<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2021.777842</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Rootstock-Mediated Genetic Variance in Cadmium Uptake by Juvenile Cacao (<italic>Theobroma cacao</italic> L.) Genotypes, and Its Effect on Growth and Physiology</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Fern&#x00E1;ndez-Paz</surname> <given-names>Jessica</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1487816/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Cort&#x00E9;s</surname> <given-names>Andr&#x00E9;s J.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/96357/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Hern&#x00E1;ndez-Varela</surname> <given-names>Camila A.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1576445/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Mej&#x00ED;a-de-Tafur</surname> <given-names>Maria Sara</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Rodriguez-Medina</surname> <given-names>Caren</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/765242/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Baligar</surname> <given-names>Virupax C.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1545273/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Corporaci&#x00F3;n Colombiana de Investigaci&#x00F3;n Agropecuaria (AGROSAVIA) &#x2013; C.I Palmira</institution>, <addr-line>Palmira</addr-line>, <country>Colombia</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Palmira</institution>, <addr-line>Palmira</addr-line>, <country>Colombia</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Corporaci&#x00F3;n Colombiana de Investigaci&#x00F3;n Agropecuaria (AGROSAVIA) &#x2013; C.I La Selva</institution>, <addr-line>Rionegro</addr-line>, <country>Colombia</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias &#x2013; Departamento de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Medell&#x00ED;n</institution>, <addr-line>Medell&#x00ED;n</addr-line>, <country>Colombia</country></aff>
<aff id="aff5"><sup>5</sup><institution>United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service-Beltsville Agricultural Research Center</institution>, <addr-line>Beltsville, MD</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Gennaro Fazio, Plant Genetic Resources Unit, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA ARS), United States</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Yanhong Lou, Shandong Agricultural University, China; Weverton Pereira Rodrigues, Universidade Estadual da Regi&#x00E3;o Tocantina do Maranh&#x00E3;o (UEMASUL), Brazil</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Caren Rodriguez-Medina, <email>cdrodriguez@agrosavia.co</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002"><p><sup>&#x2020;</sup>These authors share last authorship</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn004"><p>This article was submitted to Plant Breeding, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>23</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<elocation-id>777842</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>15</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>12</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2021 Fern&#x00E1;ndez-Paz, Cort&#x00E9;s, Hern&#x00E1;ndez-Varela, Mej&#x00ED;a-de-Tafur, Rodriguez-Medina and Baligar.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Fern&#x00E1;ndez-Paz, Cort&#x00E9;s, Hern&#x00E1;ndez-Varela, Mej&#x00ED;a-de-Tafur, Rodriguez-Medina and Baligar</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Grafting typically offers a shortcut to breed tree orchards throughout a multidimensional space of traits. Despite an overwhelming spectrum of rootstock-mediated effects on scion traits observed across several species, the exact nature and mechanisms underlying the rootstock-mediated effects on scion traits in cacao (<italic>Theobroma cacao</italic> L.) plants often remain overlooked. Therefore, we aimed to explicitly quantify rootstock-mediated genetic contributions in recombinant juvenile cacao plants across target traits, specifically cadmium (Cd) uptake, and its correlation with growth and physiological traits. Content of chloroplast pigments, fluorescence of chlorophyll <italic>a</italic>, leaf gas exchange, nutrient uptake, and plant biomass were examined across ungrafted saplings and target rootstock &#x00D7; scion combinations in soils with contrasting levels of Cd. This panel considered a total of 320 progenies from open-pollinated half-sib families and reciprocal full-sib progenies (derived from controlled crosses between the reference genotypes IMC67 and PA121). Both family types were used as rootstocks in grafts with two commercial clones (ICS95 and CCN51) commonly grown in Colombia. A pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (<italic>A</italic>-BLUP) mixed model was implemented to quantify rootstock-mediated narrow-sense heritability (<italic>h</italic><sup>2</sup>) for target traits. A Cd effect measured on rootstocks before grafting was observed in plant biomass, nutrient uptake, and content of chloroplast pigments. After grafting, damage to the Photosystem II (PSII) was also evident in some rootstock &#x00D7; scion combinations. Differences in the specific combining ability for Cd uptake were mostly detected in ungrafted rootstocks, or 2 months after grafting with the clonal CCN51 scion. Moderate rootstock effects (<italic>h</italic><sup>2</sup>&#x003E; 0.1) were detected before grafting for five growth traits, four nutrient uptake properties, and chlorophylls and carotenoids content (<italic>h</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.19, 95% CI 0.05&#x2013;0.61, <italic>r</italic> = 0.7). Such rootstock effects faded (<italic>h</italic><sup>2</sup>&#x003C; 0.1) when rootstock genotypes were examined in soils without Cd, or 4 months after grafting. These results suggest a pervasive genetic conflict between the rootstock and the scion genotypes, involving the triple rootstock &#x00D7; scion &#x00D7; soil interaction when it refers to Cd and nutrient uptake, early growth, and photosynthetic process in juvenile cacao plants. Overall, deepening on these findings will harness early breeding schemes of cacao rootstock genotypes compatible with commercial clonal scions and adapted to soils enriched with toxic levels of Cd.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>grafting combinations</kwd>
<kwd>cadmium accumulation</kwd>
<kwd>cadmium toxicity</kwd>
<kwd>rootstock mediated heritability</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Theobroma cacao</italic></kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Corporaci&#x00F3;n Colombiana de Investigaci&#x00F3;n Agropecuaria, AGROSAVIA<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/100017164</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="12"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="7"/>
<ref-count count="94"/>
<page-count count="21"/>
<word-count count="14961"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="S1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Grafting is an ancient technique used to propagate plants vegetatively by combining desirable agronomic traits of the rootstock with those of the scion. It has been used in several plant species targeting a wide spectrum of traits, for instance, resistance to pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Boughalleb et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Rivard and Louws, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">Span&#x00F2; et al., 2020</xref>); tolerance to abiotic stress factors, such as water deficit, (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Liu et al., 2016</xref>), heavy metals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Rouphael et al., 2008</xref>), and salinity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90">Yanyan et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">Su&#x00E1;rez-Hern&#x00E1;ndez et al., 2019</xref>); improved fruit quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Davis and Perkins-Veazie, 2005</xref>); higher yields (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Cardinal et al., 2007</xref>); and architectural changes in scions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Eltayb et al., 2014</xref>). However, breeding rootstocks for tree crops is slower than scion breeding for the same species. This is due to the long generation times and strong testing requirements of rootstocks, which reduce the opportunity for comprehensively testing their performance against multiple scions and environments.</p>
<p>Conventional propagation by rootstocks and grafting has routinely been used to expand cacao (<italic>Theobroma cacao</italic> L.) cultivation in tropical areas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">R&#x00ED;os, 1957</xref>). Seedling rootstocks resistant to <italic>Ceratocystis</italic> spp. and tolerant to acidic soils are typically obtained by open pollination (OP) of the IMC67, PA121, and PA46 reference genotypes in seedling orchards, and are grafted with susceptible productive clones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Palencia Calderon et al., 2007</xref>). Yet, only a few studies have evaluated the effect of the rootstock genotype on key agronomic traits such as yield and disease resistance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">Yin, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Ribeiro et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Asman et al., 2021</xref>). For instance, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">Yin (2004)</xref> detected a significant effect of the rootstock on the vigor of cacao scions, but was unable to capture an influence on yield components such as bean weight and number of beans per pod. In line with these results, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Asman et al. (2021)</xref> observed little rootstock effects on the scion&#x2019;s resistance to vascular streak dieback, caused by <italic>Ceratobasidium theobromae</italic>. On the other hand, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Ribeiro et al. (2016)</xref> observed a significant influence of the rootstock &#x00D7; scion interaction on the scion&#x2019;s resistance to witches&#x2019;s broom disease caused by <italic>Moniliophthora perniciosa</italic>, which allowed the identification of an elite rootstock genotype with a positive effect on scion disease resistance trait.</p>
<p>Despite the long time during which grafting has been used in the vegetative propagation of <italic>T. cacao</italic>, the rootstock effects on the expression of key scion&#x2019;s agronomic traits remains poorly understood, among these, cadmium (Cd) accumulation. Content of Cd in cacao products is one of the most limiting factors for cocoa sale in international markets. Cadmium, a heavy metal that causes health problems, accumulates in the seeds of <italic>T. cacao</italic>, which are the raw material to produce chocolate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Barraza et al., 2017</xref>). Considering that Cd can accumulate in the human body, starting on January 1, 2019 the European Union (EU) began to control the maximum Cd concentrations allowed in chocolate and cocoa products imported to the EU (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">European Commission, 2014</xref>). Other countries are expected to implement similar regulations to Cd concentration in cocoa products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">Vanderschueren et al., 2021</xref>), which has generated concern in countries where levels of bioavailable Cd for the plant have been detected in soil. Particularly, high Cd concentrations in cacao beans have been reported in plantations from South America (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Chavez et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Ar&#x00E9;valo-Gardini et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">Vanderschueren et al., 2019</xref>), which has been correlated with the naturally high Cd content in the young soils of this region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Arg&#x00FC;ello et al., 2019</xref>). The Cd concentration in cacao bean is related to soil properties such as total soil Cd, pH, percentage of organic carbon, and oxalate extractable manganese (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Arg&#x00FC;ello et al., 2019</xref>). Cd adversely affects growth, photosynthetic process, nutrient uptake, content of chloroplast pigments, cell structure, antioxidative metabolism, and gene expression (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Dias et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Jiao et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Borek et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Saidi et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Castro et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Farooq et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Pereira de Ara&#x00FA;jo et al., 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>Cadmium enters root cells through ion channels for Zn, Fe, Mn, and Ca (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Song et al., 2017</xref>). Transporter gene families like zinc-iron permease (ZIP), natural resistance-associated macrophage proteins (NRAMPs), and heavy metal transporting ATPases (HMAs) have been associated with uptake and translocation of Cd in plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">Vanderschueren et al., 2021</xref>). According to some studies, TcNRAMP5 may play a role in the regulation of Cd uptake in cacao plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">Ullah et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Moore et al., 2020</xref>), whereas HMA-family proteins may contribute to Cd sequestration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Moore et al., 2020</xref>). However, the information regarding the specific role of transporter genes in cacao is still limited, as well as the regulatory mechanisms of Cd translocation to the shoot. Within the roots, Cd can be transported in plants through a symplasmic pathway. Cd is later loaded from the symplasm into the xylem (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Lux et al., 2011</xref>). Movement of Cd from the roots to above-ground tissues depends on the plant mechanisms for vacuolar sequestration, xylem loading, and xylem to phloem transfer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">Vanderschueren et al., 2021</xref>). In soybean and eggplant, the effect of the root system on the accumulation of Cd in the aerial part of the plant has been demonstrated by grafting cultivars on genotypes that differ in their accumulation of Cd (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Sugiyama et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Arao et al., 2008</xref>). The feasibility of mitigating Cd uptake and accumulation through grafting of highly productive scions on top of rootstocks with low Cd uptake capability has been suggested for <italic>T. cacao</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Lewis et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Engbersen et al., 2019</xref>). However, as far as we are aware, such effect has not yet been experimentally demonstrated. Further investigation is needed to elucidate the effect of the rootstock in Cd accumulation in cacao. Rootstock genotype may produce unpredicted responses in grafted plants exposed to stressful Cd conditions compared with self-rooted plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Savvas et al., 2010</xref>).</p>
<p>Assessing the effect of rootstock genotypes or specific rootstock &#x00D7; scion combinations on the accumulation of Cd in plant tissues, and the overall plant tolerance to heavy elements, is therefore key for the establishment of new cacao plantations in regions with high levels of available Cd in soil. Therefore, the aim of this study was to quantify the inheritance of the rootstock effects on the scion&#x2019;s Cd accumulation, as well as associated growth and physiological traits of juvenile cacao plants. Both open-pollinated (OP) and reciprocal full-sib progenies (derived from controlled crosses between the reference genotypes IMC67 and PA121) were used as rootstocks in grafts with two commercial and widely adapted clones (ICS95 and CCN51) in Colombia. Content of chloroplast pigments, fluorescence of chlorophyll <italic>a</italic>, leaf gas exchange, ion leakage, protein content, nutrient uptake, and plant biomass were also examined across rootstock &#x00D7; scion combinations in soils with contrasting levels of Cd. We hypothesize that due to the complex acquisition and transportation of Cd from the root system throughout the plant, there is a potential to harness rootstock-driven genetic variance for Cd uptake as part of early selection schemes at seed orchards, nurseries, and ungrafted saplings.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="S2.SS1">
<title>Location</title>
<p>The experiment was established under greenhouse conditions at the Palmira Research Station of AGROSAVIA, located in Palmira (3&#x00B0;31&#x2032;12&#x2033;N, 76&#x00B0;19&#x2032;50&#x2033;W), province of Valle del Cauca, Colombia, at an altitude of 1,001 masl. The climatic conditions during the experiment were recorded using a weather station WatchDog 1000 series Micro Station. Average annual temperature was 26&#x00B0;C, and average relative humidity was 65%.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS2">
<title>Soil Substrate</title>
<p>Soil collected in a cacao growing region of southwest Colombia (pH 4.5) had a natural total Cd content of 0.43 mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>. The collected soil was air-dried and passed through a 2-mm mesh sieve. Cd was added to half of the sieved soil using an aqueous solution of Cd(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>. Cd-spiked soil was incubated at field capacity for 1 month in a greenhouse. During the incubation time, the soil was constantly mixed and maintained at field capacity. The other half of the sieved soil was kept untouched as control treatment.</p>
<p>Greenhouse substrate was prepared by mixing Cd-spiked soil with rice husk and sand in a ratio of 3:1:1 to reach a final content of 7.49 mg Cd kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>, as determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (Thermo Scientific ICAP 6500). Greenhouse substrate was also prepared using soil without the addition of Cd. According to soil analysis, carried out before the establishment of the experiment, the total nitrogen content in the substrate was 0.4 and 0.5% for soil without addition of Cd and soil enriched with Cd, respectively, which shows that there was no advantage in the concentration of nitrogen in the treatment with addition of Cd.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS3">
<title>Plant Material</title>
<p>Plant material was obtained from the Colombian Cacao Germplasm Bank. Full-sib progenies obtained from the crossing between IMC67 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> PA121, and its reciprocal cross, were established in Cd-spiked soil, as well as in soil without addition of Cd. Progenies were subsequently evaluated for plant growth, and physiological and nutritional parameters. Meanwhile, a total of two OP half-sib seedling families of IMC67 and PA121 were also considered. These accessions, PA121 and IMC67, corresponded to genotypes recommended as rootstocks in Colombia due to their resistance to pathogens and adaptation to soils with acidic pH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Palencia Calderon et al., 2007</xref>). The mucilage of the seed was removed by gently rubbing with sawdust. Seeds were sown in plastic conical tubes containing sand and grown under these conditions for 2 months. After this period, well-developed seedlings were transplanted into black polyethylene bags of 45 cm high and 29 cm wide, containing 10 kg greenhouse substrate with and without the addition of Cd. A commercial fertilizer containing N, P, K, and Mg was applied.</p>
<p>The experiment was established in a randomized complete block design with four replicates arranged in a 4 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> 2 factorial design and 10 plants per experimental unit. The treatments corresponded to OP families IMC67 and PA121, as well as IMC67 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> PA121 and PA121 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> IMC67 progenies from controlled crosses established in soil with and without the addition of Cd. Seedlings were grown on the Cd treatments for 5 months and then evaluated for plant growth, physiological, and nutritional parameters at the end of this period.</p>
<p>Five months after Cd treatment, budwoods of the commercial cultivars ICS95 and CCN51 were grafted onto the seedling rootstocks using the top grafting technique as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Isele et al. (2020)</xref>. Taking into consideration that each experimental unit had 10 plants, two of each were evaluated without grafting, four of the remaining plants were grafted with ICS95, and the other four with CCN51. Two and 4 months after grafting, rootstock &#x00D7; scion combinations were evaluated for plant growth, physiological, and nutritional parameters.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS4">
<title>Chlorophyll Fluorescence</title>
<p>Chlorophyll fluorescence was determined by means of a portable optical pulse fluorometer (Opti-Sciences OS30P+). The measurements were made between 7:00 and 11:00 on young, fully expanded, healthy, and photosynthetically active leaves of two plants per experimental unit, usually the third or fourth leaf from the apex of the plants. The leaf was adapted to darkness, using suitable clips, for a period of 30 min and subsequently illuminated with a saturating actinic light pulse of 3,500 &#x03BC;mol m<sup>&#x2013;2</sup> s<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> for 1 s. The following parameters were evaluated: initial fluorescence (F<sub>0</sub>), maximum fluorescence (F<sub>m</sub>), and the maximum quantum yield of PSII (F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub>), obtaining two data per plant.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS5">
<title>Leaf Gas Exchange</title>
<p>Net photosynthetic rate (P<sub>N</sub>), stomatal conductance to water vapor (g<sub>s</sub>), leaf transpiration (E), internal carbon dioxide concentration (Ci), and instantaneous water use efficiency (WUE<sub>INST</sub>) were measured on the same leaf used to determined chlorophyll fluorescence. Gas exchange measurements were performed between 7:00 and 11:00 using an open system portable gas analyzer (ADC model LCpro+), natural light intensity between 250 and 450 &#x03BC;mol m<sup>&#x2013;2</sup> s<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> and atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> of 390 &#x03BC;mol (CO<sub>2</sub>) mol<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>. The leaf area sampled was 6.25 cm<sup>2</sup>. Two data points per plant were obtained.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS6">
<title>Chloroplast Pigments</title>
<p>Chlorophyll <italic>a</italic>, chlorophyll <italic>b</italic>, their ratio, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids were quantified in the same leaves used to measure gas exchange and fluorescence emission. Pigments were extracted from three disk-shaped leaf segments per plant using cold 80% ammoniacal acetone (4&#x00B0;C), following the protocol described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Melgarejo et al. (2010)</xref> and calculated according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Lichtenthaler (1987)</xref>. The area of each disk was 0.78 cm<sup>2</sup>. The absorbance of the extracts was determined with a spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer Lambda 25) using the following wavelengths: 663, 647, and 470 nm to calculate the concentrations of chlorophyll <italic>a</italic>, chlorophyll <italic>b</italic>, and total carotenoids, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Lichtenthaler, 1987</xref>).</p>
<p>Pigment concentration was calculated from the following equations:</p>
<disp-formula id="S2.Ex1"><mml:math id="M1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>Ca</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mpadded width="+3.3pt">
<mml:mn>12.25</mml:mn>
</mml:mpadded>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi>
<mml:mmultiscripts>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi>
<mml:mprescripts/>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>663</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2.79</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:none/>
</mml:mmultiscripts>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi/>
<mml:mn>647</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="S2.Ex2"><mml:math id="M2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>Cb</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mpadded width="+3.3pt">
<mml:mn>21.5</mml:mn>
</mml:mpadded>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi>
<mml:mmultiscripts>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi>
<mml:mprescripts/>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>647</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>5.1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:none/>
</mml:mmultiscripts>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi/>
<mml:mn>663</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="S2.Ex3"><mml:math id="M3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mpadded width="+3.3pt">
<mml:mn>15</mml:mn>
</mml:mpadded>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi>
<mml:mmultiscripts>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi>
<mml:mprescripts/>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>663</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>18.7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:none/>
</mml:mmultiscripts>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi/>
<mml:mn>647</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="S2.Ex4"><mml:math id="M4">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>Cx</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mpadded width="+3.3pt">
<mml:mn>1000</mml:mn>
</mml:mpadded>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi>
<mml:mmultiscripts>
<mml:mi>Ca</mml:mi>
<mml:mprescripts/>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>470</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1.82</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:none/>
</mml:mmultiscripts>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>85</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mpadded width="+1.7pt">
<mml:mn>02</mml:mn>
</mml:mpadded>
<mml:mi>Cb</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">/</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>198</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>where Ca stands for chlorophyll <italic>a</italic>, Cb stands for chlorophyll <italic>b</italic>, C (a + b) stands for total chlorophyll, and Cx + c stands for carotenoids.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS7">
<title>Electrolyte Leakage</title>
<p>To determine electrolyte leakage (EL), 0.78 cm<sup>2</sup> leaf disks were taken from the same leaf used to determine the content of chloroplast pigments. Three disks were obtained from each leaf sample, washed with distilled water, and then arranged in 15 mL conical Falcon tubes containing 3 mL of deionized water. The samples were incubated at room temperature (22&#x00B0;C) on a shaker for a period of 5 h and the electrical conductivity was recorded at the end of this period (EC1). The Falcon tubes were then taken to a water bath at 80&#x00B0;C for 10 min and electrical conductivity (EC2) recorded again after cooling the bathing solution to 22&#x00B0;C. The loss of electrolytes (EL) was calculated using the following formula:</p>
<disp-formula id="S2.Ex5"><mml:math id="M5">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mpadded width="+2.8pt">
<mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
</mml:mpadded>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mpadded width="+5.6pt">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mpadded>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>EC1 corresponds to the electrical conductivity measured after 5 h in deionized water. EC2 corresponds to the electrical conductivity measured after incubation at 80&#x00B0;C.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS8">
<title>Plant Growth and Biomass</title>
<p>Once the physiological parameters were evaluated during morning hours, seedling rootstocks, and also grafting combinations, were harvested for shoot and root lengths measures. Plants were then divided into roots, stem, and leaves. Plant tissue was washed with distilled water and gently dried with absorbent towels. Fresh weight of each plant portion was then determined. To wash the excess of Cd adhered to the roots, these were immersed for 3 min in a solution containing 5 mM EDTA and 20 mM TRIS (pH 8.0) with constant agitation followed by three washes with distilled water for 3 min (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Nguyen et al., 2016</xref>). The reason why roots were washed was to prevent externally adhered Cd from being quantified as if it were inside the root system. Samples were placed in paper bags and oven-dried at 60&#x00B0;C for 72 h, and after this period dry weight was determined.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS9">
<title>Leaf Area</title>
<p>Leaf area was measured using an electronic area meter (LICOR-3000) immediately after harvesting leaf tissue.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS10">
<title>Protein Content</title>
<p>Approximately 100 mg of leaf tissue were macerated in liquid nitrogen. Phosphate buffer (0.05 M) was then added, and the samples centrifuged for 30 min at 12,000 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> <italic>g</italic> and 4&#x00B0;C. Total soluble protein content was measured by the Coomassie blue method according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Bradford (1976)</xref> using BSA as standard in a microplate spectrophotometer (BioTek EPOCH) at 595 nm.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS11">
<title>Cadmium and Mineral Nutrients Content</title>
<p>Dried plant material was ground in a mill (Thomas Wiley) and submitted to nitric&#x2013;perchloric digestion assisted by microwave (Milestone UltraWave). Mineral elements such as Cd, Ca, Mg, Fe, Zn, Cu, and Mn were determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry, P by colorimetry, and K by flame emission photometry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Isaac and Kerber, 1971</xref>). Nitrogen content was determined by the Kjeldahl method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Bradstreet, 1954</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS12">
<title>Data Analyses and Rootstock-Mediated Heritability Scores</title>
<p>Trait variation across families was explicitly compared using a mixed linear model in which family identity and Cd treatment were indexed as fixed effect and repetition as random effect. Second, rootstock-mediated additive genetic variance (i.e., narrow sense hereditability) was obtained for each trait using a best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) mixed model that relied on the pedigree information (i.e., a pedigree relationship matrix for an <italic>A</italic>-BLUP model) from the rootstocks (half-sib families for OP, and full-sib families for controlled crossing schemes, allowing for a 5% of maternal effects). The corresponding linear mixed model, following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Arenas et al. (2021)</xref>, was fitted as in:</p>
<disp-formula id="S2.Ex6"><mml:math id="M6">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mpadded width="+2.8pt">
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
</mml:mpadded>
<mml:mo rspace="5.3pt">=</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>X</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>where <italic>y</italic> is the phenotypic trait vector, <italic>a</italic> is a vector of individual random additive genetic effects with a normal distribution so that <italic>a</italic> &#x223C; N(0, <italic>A</italic>&#x03C3;<sub><italic>a</italic></sub><sup>2</sup>) with <italic>A</italic> being the pedigree relationship matrix among rootstocks and <italic>&#x03C3;<sub><italic>a</italic></sub><sup>2</sup></italic> the additive genetic variance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">M&#x00FC;ller et al., 2017</xref>), <italic>b</italic> is a vector of fixed effects (i.e., intercept or general mean, and experimental site effects), <italic>e</italic> is the vector of residual error effect, and <italic>X</italic> and <italic>Z</italic> are the corresponding incidence matrices for fixed effects and additive genetic effects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Chen et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Gutierrez et al., 2018</xref>), respectively.</p>
<p>To aid interpretability while accounting for clonal scion differences and <italic>in situ</italic> environmental (soil) variation (of major importance in Cd fixation), genetic parameters for all phenotypic traits were individually estimated for each environment and scion, rather than including the latter as explicit fixed effects within the model. All models implemented the reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) method throughout the BGLR (Bayesian Generalized Linear Regression) package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">P&#x00E9;rez-Rodr&#x00ED;guez and de los Campos, 2014</xref>) in R v.3.4.4 (R Core Team). RKHS is a semiparametric approach to infer a given function without making a strong <italic>a priori</italic> assumption about the distribution of effects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Cuevas et al., 2016</xref>). RKHS was executed using a Gibbs sampling with 10,000 iterations after discarding the 5,000 initial steps as burn-in. A thinning interval of 10 was implemented for data recording. Convergence of posterior distributions was verified using trace plots, whereas rootstock-mediated specific combining abilities, original trait correlations (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Figure 1</xref>), and <italic>A</italic> input pedigree relationship matrices (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS2">Supplementary Figure 2</xref>) were respectively checked using the R (R Core Team) functions <italic>lme</italic> (from the <italic>nlme</italic> package, treating families as fixed effects and repetitions as random effects), <italic>cor.test</italic>, and <italic>heatmap</italic>.</p>
<p>Narrow sense rootstock-mediated heritability (<italic>h</italic><sup>2</sup>) was then computed using the additive (<italic>&#x03C3;<sub><italic>a</italic></sub><sup>2</sup></italic>) and residual (<italic>&#x03C3;<sub><italic>e</italic></sub><sup>2</sup></italic>) variances, following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">de los Campos et al. (2015)</xref>, as in:</p>
<disp-formula id="S2.Ex7"><mml:math id="M7">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mpadded width="+2.8pt">
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mpadded>
<mml:mo rspace="5.3pt">=</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x03C3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">/</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x03C3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x03C3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>Variance within experimental units was captured by the residual variance term because it did not correspond to an additive variance component. Narrow sense rootstock-mediated heritability (<italic>h</italic><sup>2</sup>) estimates were summarized using the median and the 95% confidence interval from the BGLR&#x2019;s posterior distribution. Overall models&#x2019; fits were examined by computing the prediction ability (<italic>r</italic><sub>y</sub>) estimated for each trait as the Pearson&#x2019;s correlation between the observed and the predicted (i.e., breeding value deviation from the overall mean) trait values (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">M&#x00FC;ller et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B93">Zhang et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S3" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="S3.SS1">
<title>Cadmium Accumulation</title>
<p>Significant differences in the accumulation of Cd in roots before grafting were observed between the seedling rootstocks established in Cd-spiked soil. Accumulation of Cd in the roots of PA121 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> IMC67 full-sib progenies was significantly higher (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) than in IMC67 OP half-sib and IMC67 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> PA121 full-sib families (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1A</xref>). On the other hand, no significant differences were observed in the accumulation of Cd in leaves between the family rootstocks subjected to stress by Cd (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1B</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>Cadmium accumulation across four ungrafted seedling rootstocks grown in soil enriched with Cd (7.49 mg Cd kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> soil) 5 months after treatment. <bold>(A)</bold> Cadmium accumulation in roots. <bold>(B)</bold> Cadmium accumulation in leaves. Data are mean values &#x00B1; SE (<italic>n</italic> = 8).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-777842-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Cadmium accumulation in both rootstocks and scions was quantified 2 and 4 months after grafting the ICS95 and CCN51 clonal scions on the seedling rootstock families (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). At 2 months after grafting, lower accumulation of Cd in leaf tissue was observed when the ICS95 clone was grafted on the IMC67 OP half-sib progenies (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>). However, no significant differences in Cd accumulation were observed between any of the rootstock families on which ICS95 was grafted (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2C</xref>). Four months after grafting, a greater accumulation of Cd in leaf tissue of the ICS95 clonal scion grafted on PA121 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> IMC67 full-sib rootstocks was observed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>). For this case, lower accumulation of Cd in roots of the IMC67 OP half-sib and IMC67 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> PA121 full-sub families was observed when grafted with the ICS95 clonal scion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2C</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p>Cadmium accumulation in rootstock &#x00D7; scion combinations 2 and 4 months after grafting. Seedling rootstocks families were established in soil enriched with Cd (7.49 mg Cd kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> soil). Panels <bold>(A,C)</bold> depict cadmium accumulation in grafting combinations having ICS95 as scion. Panels <bold>(B,D)</bold> show Cd accumulation in grafting combinations having CCN51 as scion. Data are mean values &#x00B1; SE (<italic>n</italic> = 8).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-777842-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>On the other hand, no significant differences were observed in Cd accumulation of the CCN51 clonal scion when grafted on any of the evaluated rootstocks 2 months after grafting (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>). However, a greater accumulation of Cd was observed in PA121 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> IMC67 full-sib progenies when they were grafted with the CCN51 scion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2D</xref>). Four months after grafting, a greater accumulation of Cd was observed in CCN51 clonal scion grafted on IMC67 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> PA121 full-sib rootstocks, and its reciprocal progenies (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>). For this case, no significant differences in Cd accumulation were observed between rootstock families having CCN51 as scion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2D</xref>).</p>
<p>Cadmium accumulation in the leaf tissue of the CCN51 scion grafted on IMC67 OP half-sib rootstock progenies, 2 and 4 months after grafting, was significantly higher than for the ICS95 clonal scion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref>). No significant differences in Cd accumulation were observed between ICS95 and CCN51 when grafted onto any of the other rootstock families at 2 or 4 months after grafting (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref>). Significant differences in Cd accumulation in the roots were observed only for the PA121 &#x00D7; IMC67 full-sib rootstock family. A higher accumulation of Cd was observed when this rootstock family was grafted with the CCN51 scion 2 months after grafting. However, 4 months after grafting a higher accumulation of Cd in the roots was observed when using ICS95 as scion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption><p>Cadmium accumulation of ICS95 and CCN51 clonal scions grafted on four seedling rootstock families 2 and 4 months after grafting. Seedling rootstocks (<italic>x</italic>-axis) were grown in soil enriched with Cd (7.49 mg Cd kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> soil). <bold>(A)</bold> Cadmium accumulation in leaf tissue of the ICS95 and CCN51 clonal scions. <bold>(B)</bold> Cadmium accumulation in the roots of the four OP rootstock families when grafted with the ICS95 and CCN51 clones. Blue bars represent grafting combinations with ICS95 as scion 2 months after grafting. Green bars represent grafting combinations with CCN51 as scion 2 months after grafting. Data are mean values &#x00B1; SE (<italic>n</italic> = 8). Dashed bars show Cd accumulation 4 months after grafting.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-777842-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS2">
<title>Plant Growth</title>
<p>A significant decrease in plant biomass, shoot length, and leaf area was observed 5 months after establishment of the ungrafted seedlings in Cd-spiked soil (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figures 4A&#x2013;F</xref>). Fresh weight of the stem decreased by 13.7, 37.6, 8.3, and 13.2% for the OP half-sib families IMC67 and PA121, and for the full-sib IMC67 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> PA121 and PA121 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> IMC67 progenies, respectively, as compared with the control (without Cd addition) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4A</xref>). A greater decrease in stems&#x2019; (37.4%) and roots&#x2019; (19.5%) dry weight was also observed for PA121 OP half-sib rootstocks subjected to stress by Cd addition in the soil (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figures 4B,D</xref>). A similar response was observed for shoot length, for which a decrease of 15.8, 32, 13.6, and 2.8% was observed respectively, for OP half-sib progenies IMC67 and PA121, and full-sib IMC67 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> PA121 and PA121 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> IMC67 families (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4E</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption><p>Plant growth of four families of ungrafted seedlings under greenhouse conditions at two different concentrations of Cd in soil, 5 months after cadmium treatment. <bold>(A)</bold> Stem fresh weight, <bold>(B)</bold> stem dry weight, <bold>(C)</bold> leaf fresh weight, <bold>(D)</bold> root dry weight, <bold>(E)</bold> shoot length, and <bold>(F)</bold> leaf area. White bars represent rootstocks grown in soil without addition of Cd (0.43 mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). Gray bars represent rootstocks grown in Cd spiked soil (7.49 mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). Data are mean values &#x00B1; SE (<italic>n</italic> = 8).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-777842-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Two months after grafting, significant changes in root biomass were observed for grafting combinations having both ICS95 and CCN51 as scion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figures 5A&#x2013;D</xref>). Combinations of ICS95 as scion and PA121 half-sib progenies as rootstock showed a significant decrease in root biomass. Specifically fresh and dry root weight fell in 25.5 and 24.6%, respectively, compared with the control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figures 5A,C</xref>). Likewise, 2 months after grafting, PA121 half-sib rootstock families showed a significant decrease in root biomass in combination with the CCN51 clonal scion. For this case, fresh and dry root weight respectively, decreased by 35.13 and 36.15% compared with the control (without Cd addition) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figures 5B,D</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption><p>Root biomass of rootstock &#x00D7; scion combinations 2 months after grafting seedling rootstocks subjected to two different concentrations of Cd in soil under greenhouse conditions. Panel <bold>(A,B)</bold> depict fresh root weight of rootstock families having ICS95 and CCN51 as scions. Panel <bold>(C,D)</bold> show dry root weight of OP and full-sib rootstock progenies having ICS95 and CCN51 as scion. White bars represent rootstocks grown in soil without addition of Cd (0.43 mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). Blue bars represent rootstocks grown in Cd spiked soil (7.49 mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) grafted with the ICS95 clonal scion. Green bars represent rootstocks grown in Cd spiked soil (7.49 mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) grafted with the CCN51 clonal scion. Data are mean values &#x00B1; SE (<italic>n</italic> = 8).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-777842-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Four months after grafting, a significant decrease in root biomass was also observed in all rootstock families grafted with the ICS95 scion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figures 6A,C</xref>). On the other hand, 4 months after grafting, seedling rootstocks grafted with the CCN51 clonal scion showed significant changes not only in root growth parameters but also in the scion growth. A significant decrease in leaf area and in fresh and dry weight of leaf tissue was observed in the CCN51 scion grafted on all the rootstock families, except when it was grafted on PA121 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> IMC67 full-sib rootstocks (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figures 6B,D</xref>). A decrease in dry root weight of 23.5 and 37.2% was respectively, observed in the OP half-sib rootstock families IMC67 and PA121, both grafted with the CCN51 clonal scion (to be presented in section Rootstock-Mediated Specific Combining Abilities and Heritability Scores in Full-Sib Families).</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption><p>Plant growth of rootstock &#x00D7; scion combinations 4 months after grafting at two different concentrations of Cd in soil under greenhouse conditions. Panels <bold>(A,C)</bold> show fresh and dry root weight of seedling rootstocks grafted with the ICS95 clonal scion. Panels <bold>(B,D)</bold> depict fresh and dry leaf weight of the CCN51 clonal scion across rootstock families. White bars represent rootstocks grown in soil without addition of Cd (0.43 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>). Blue bars represent rootstock families grafted with the ICS95 clonal scion established in Cd spiked soil (7.49 mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). Green bars represent rootstock families grafted with the CCN51 clonal scion established in Cd spiked soil (7.49 mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). Data are mean values &#x00B1; SE (<italic>n</italic> = 8).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-777842-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS3">
<title>Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Leaf Gas Exchange</title>
<p>A decrease in the net photosynthetic rate (<italic>P</italic><sub>N</sub>) and in instantaneous water use efficiency (WUE<sub>INST</sub>) was observed in response to Cd toxicity before grafting (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref>). A significant decrease (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) in the carbon assimilation rate equivalent to 40.09%, compared with the control, was observed when using PA121 OP half-sib seedling rootstocks (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7A</xref>). Water use efficiency respectively, decreased by 30.46 and 40.6% when using IMC67 and PA121 OP half-sib seedling rootstock families, compared with control plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7B</xref>). There was no effect of Cd on leaf gas exchange variables when using ICS95 and CCN51 as clonal scions, neither at 2 nor at 4 months after grafting.</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption><p>Leaf gas exchange in four seedling rootstock families subjected to two different concentrations of Cd in soil under greenhouse conditions 5 months after cadmium treatment. <bold>(A)</bold> Photosynthetic rate (P<sub>N</sub>), and <bold>(B)</bold> instantaneous water use efficiency (WUE<sub>INST</sub>). White bars represent rootstock families grown in soil without addition of Cd (0.43 mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). Gray bars represent rootstock families grown in Cd spiked soil (7.49 mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). Data are mean values &#x00B1; SE (<italic>n</italic> = 8).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-777842-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Variables of chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> fluorescence emission did not show significant differences (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) between seedling rootstock families established in soil with and without the addition of Cd before grafting (to be presented in section Rootstock-Mediated Specific Combining Abilities and Heritability Scores in Full-Sib Families). However, 2 months after grafting, a significant decrease in F<sub>m</sub> was observed in ICS95 clonal scion grafted on all the rootstock families. A greater decrease of 19.4% in F<sub>m</sub> was observed in this clonal scion grafted on IMC67 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> PA121 full-sib rootstock progenies (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8A</xref>). An effect of Cd on F<sub>m</sub> resulted in a change in F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> ratio scores. A significant decrease in F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> was observed in the ICS95 clonal scion grafted on PA121 OP half-sib and IMC67 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> PA121 full-sib rootstock families 2 months after grafting (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8B</xref>). On the other hand, an increase in F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> ratio was observed in the same clone when grafted on the reciprocal PA121 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> IMC67 full-sib progenies 2 and 4 months after grafting (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figures 8B,C</xref>), which suggests for a maternal effect. There was no significant difference when the clonal scion CCN51 was grafted with the different seedling rootstock families for the variables of chlorophyll fluorescence at 2 or at 4 months after grafting (to be presented in section Rootstock-Mediated Specific Combining Abilities and Heritability Scores in Full-Sib Families).</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption><p>Chlorophyll fluorescence in the ICS95 clonal scion when grafted with 4 different rootstock families at two different concentrations of Cd in soil under greenhouse conditions. <bold>(A)</bold> F<sub>m</sub> 2 months after grafting. <bold>(B)</bold> F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> 2 months after grafting. <bold>(C)</bold> F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> 4 months after grafting. White bars represent rootstock families grown in soil without addition of Cd (0.43 mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). Blue bars represent rootstock families grown in Cd spiked soil (7.49 mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). Dashed bars show Cd accumulation 4 months after grafting. Data are mean values &#x00B1; SE (<italic>n</italic> = 8).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-777842-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS4">
<title>Chloroplast Pigments</title>
<p>Significant changes in the content of chloroplast pigments were observed in the ungrafted seedlings 5 months after establishment in Cd-spiked soil (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9</xref>). A different effect of Cd was observed depending on the rootstock. A significant increase in chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> equivalent to 41.6 and 21.8% was respectively, observed in IMC67 OP half-sib and PA121 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> IMC67 full-sib progenies, compared with the control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9A</xref>). IMC67 OP half-sib and PA121 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> IMC67 full-sib families also showed a significant increase in chlorophyll <italic>b</italic> content respectively, equivalent to 32 and 29% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9B</xref>). Changes in chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> and <italic>b</italic> resulted in changes in total chlorophyll, accordingly. A significant increase of total chlorophyll was observed in IMC67 OP half-sib and PA121 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> IMC67 full-sib families (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9C</xref>). The carotenoid content also increased by 17% in IMC67 OP half-sib progenies 5 months after Cd addition. The content of carotenoids in the remaining families decreased (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9D</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 9</label>
<caption><p>Content of chloroplast pigments of ungrafted seedling families subjected to two different concentrations of Cd in soil under greenhouse conditions 5 months after cadmium addition. <bold>(A)</bold> Content of chlorophyll <italic>a</italic>. <bold>(B)</bold> Content of Chlorophyll <italic>b</italic>. <bold>(C)</bold> Content of total Chlorophyll. <bold>(D)</bold> Content of carotenoids. White bars represent seedling families grown in soil without addition of Cd (0.43 mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). Gray bars represent seedling progenies grown in Cd spiked soil (7.49 mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). Data are mean values &#x00B1; SE (<italic>n</italic> = 8).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-777842-g009.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Two months after grafting, a significant decrease in all chloroplast pigments was observed across seedling rootstock families grafted with both ICS95 and CCN51 clonal scions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F10" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 10</label>
<caption><p>Content of chloroplast pigments in ICS95 and CCN51 clonal scions 2 months after grafting on four different seedling rootstock families subjected to two different concentrations of Cd in soil under greenhouse conditions. Panels <bold>(A,B)</bold> show content of Chlorophyll a of ICS95 and CCN51 clonal scions. Panels <bold>(C,D)</bold> depict content of Chlorophyll b of ICS95 and CCN51 clonal scions. Panels <bold>(E,F)</bold> exhibit content of total Chlorophyll of ICS95 and CCN51. Panels <bold>(G,H)</bold> show content of carotenoids of ICS95 and CCN51 clonal scions. White bars represent rootstocks &#x00D7; scion combinations grown in soil without addition of cadmium (0.43 mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). Blue bars show seedling rootstock families grafted with the ICS95 clonal scion grown in Cd spiked soil (7.49 mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). Green bars depict seedling rootstock families grafted with the CCN51 clonal scion grown in Cd spiked soil (7.49 mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). Data are mean values &#x00B1; SE (<italic>n</italic> = 8).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-777842-g010.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS5">
<title>Electrolyte Leakage</title>
<p>A significant increase of 24.7 and 30.6% in electrolyte leakage was observed in ungrafted IMC67 and PA121 OP half-sib families established in Cd-spiked soil, suggesting cell membrane damage in these rootstocks (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11">Figure 11</xref>). No significant difference was observed in electrolyte leakage after grafting with the ICS95 and CCN51 clonal scions in Cd-spiked soil (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS5">Supplementary Table 5</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F11" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 11</label>
<caption><p>Electrolyte leakage in four ungrafted seedling families subjected to two different concentrations of Cd in soil under greenhouse conditions 5 months after Cd addition. White bars represent ungrafted seedling families grown in soil without the addition of Cd (0.43 mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). Gray bars represent ungrafted seedling families grown in Cd-spiked soil (7.49 mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). Data are mean values &#x00B1; SE (<italic>n</italic> = 8).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-777842-g011.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS6">
<title>Protein Content</title>
<p>A decrease of 22.2% in total soluble protein content was observed in PA121 OP half-sib seedlings before grafting (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12">Figure 12A</xref>). Two months after grafting, a significant decrease in total soluble protein content of 39.5 and 38.5% was observed respectively in the ICS95 clonal scion grafted on the IMC67 OP half-sib, and IMC67 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> PA121 full-sib families, compared to the control plants without Cd addition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12">Figure 12B</xref>). A significant decrease in protein content in leaf tissue of the CCN51 clonal scion grafted on IMC67 OP half-sib progenies, equivalent to 31% compared with the control, was also observed 2 months after grafting (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12">Figure 12C</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F12" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 12</label>
<caption><p>Protein content in leaf tissue of rootstocks and grafting combinations subjected to two different concentrations of Cd in soil under greenhouse conditions. <bold>(A)</bold> Protein content in leaf tissue of ungrafted seedling families 5 months after Cd addition. <bold>(B)</bold> Protein content in leaf tissue of the ICS95 clonal scion 2 months after grafting with four different rootstock families. <bold>(C)</bold> Protein content in leaf tissue of the CCN51 clonal scion 2 months after grafting with four different rootstock families. White bars represent families grown in soil without addition of Cd (0.43 mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). Gray bars represent ungrafted seedling families grown in Cd-spiked soil (7.49 mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). Blue bars represent seedling rootstock families grafted with the ICS95 clonal scions in Cd-spiked soil (7.49 mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). Green bars represent seedling rootstock families grafted with the CCN51 clonal scion in Cd-spiked soil (7.49 mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). Data are mean values &#x00B1; SE (n = 8).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-777842-g012.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS7">
<title>Mineral Nutrients Content in Leaf Tissue</title>
<p>Cadmium absorption resulted in changes in the accumulation of mineral elements in leaf tissue of ungrafted seedling (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS1">Supplementary Table 1</xref>). Significant increases of 14 and 17.3% in K content were observed in PA121 OP half-sib and PA121 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> IMC67 full-sib families compared with the control. N content decreased in all seedling families, while Mg content increased. However, these changes were significant only in IMC67 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> PA121 full-sib progenies, compared with the control (without Cd addition). A significant increase in P content in leaf tissue was observed only in IMC67 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> PA121 full-sib family established in Cd-spiked soil. In relation to micronutrients, changes in Fe content in leaf tissue were significant only in IMC67 OP half-sib progenies, for which there was a reduction of 16.3% in relation to the control. Zn and Mn content decreased in all seedling families subjected to stress by Cd. A significantly higher decrease in the Zn content of 25.8% was observed in PA121 OP half-sib progenies, compared with the control. Mn content respectively decreased by 10.9, 24.4, 11.5, and 21.5% for PA121 and IMC67 OP half-sib, and PA121 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> IMC67 and IMC67 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> PA121 full-sib families, in relation to the control.</p>
<p>Mineral elements concentration in leaf tissue of clonal scions across seedling rootstock families is shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS2">Supplementary Table 2</xref>. Two months after grafting, significant changes were observed in the concentrations of macro- and microelements in both CCN51 and ICS95.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS8">
<title>Rootstock-Mediated Specific Combining Abilities and Heritability Scores in Full-Sib Families</title>
<p>In ungrafted full-sib progenies obtained from the crossing between IMC67 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> PA121 and its reciprocal cross, specific combining abilities were only significantly different for the Cd treatment (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS3">Supplementary Table 3</xref>). Specifically, they differed significantly in 23 of the 38 examined traits, including Cd content in roots, eight nutrient uptake traits, six biomass traits, three cationic interchange traits, and five pigments&#x2019; content traits (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). Meanwhile, only two traits exhibited heritability (<italic>h</italic><sup>2</sup>) scores above 0.1 under the non-Cd-added treatment, as compared with seven from the Cd-added treatment (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS4">Supplementary Table 4</xref>). Of the latter, all matched with significantly different specific combining abilities (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>), which speaks for a predominant role of additive genetic effects for ungrafted progenies.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption><p>Specific combining abilities and narrow-sense heritability (<italic>h</italic><sup>2</sup>) in cacao seedlings from controlled crosses before grafting.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify" colspan="2">Trait<hr/></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="6">MLM<hr/></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="4"><italic>h</italic><sup>2</sup><hr/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" colspan="2"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">F</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>p</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">IMC67</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">PA121</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">IMC67 &#x00D7; PA121</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">PA121 &#x00D7; IMC67</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Median</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.5%</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.5%</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>r</italic></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cadmium</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Cd (mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.80</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.174</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">85.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;6.71</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.048</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.016</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.183</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.163</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Cd in root (mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.035</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>40.36</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>11.59</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;0.39</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>19.48</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.054</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.017</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.231</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.287</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Nutrients</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">K (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.56</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.005</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>1.57</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.15</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;0.09</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;0.01</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.068</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.022</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.316</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.410</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Mg (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.006</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.48</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;0.08</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;0.04</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;0.08</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.084</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.023</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.351</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.472</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Fe (mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.000</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>175.50</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;40.75</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;3.63</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>7.00</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.169</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.034</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.660</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.651</underline></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Mn (mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.006</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>489.13</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>79.75</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>70.75</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>136.25</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.067</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.021</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.274</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.398</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Cu (mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.016</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>10.31</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>1.37</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;0.90</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;0.26</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.057</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.017</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.233</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.308</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Zn (mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.64</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.004</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>68.01</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;15.61</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;8.98</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;3.56</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.090</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.024</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.350</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.504</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">B (mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.018</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>67.78</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;19.04</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;10.90</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;14.35</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.088</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.023</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.327</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.505</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Na (mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.001</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>177.63</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;30.00</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;26.88</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;10.50</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.074</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.022</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.303</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.439</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Biomass</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Leaf fresh weight (g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.53</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.001</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>46.55</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>1.55</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>11.01</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>4.78</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.050</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.017</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.332</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.543</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Stem fresh weight (g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.53</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.000</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>34.95</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;11.38</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.68</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;0.61</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.225</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.046</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.816</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.705</underline></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Aerial length (cm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.89</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.021</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>56.40</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;7.15</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;0.05</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>4.31</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.066</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.018</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.285</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.361</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Leaf area (cm<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.000</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>3217.31</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;47.31</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>1018.14</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>488.41</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.057</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.016</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.377</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.601</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Dry stem weight (g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.000</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>9.26</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;3.04</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.54</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;0.09</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.201</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.035</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.695</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.675</underline></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Dry root weight (g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.06</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.018</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>11.81</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;3.68</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.81</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;0.07</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.071</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.021</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.336</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.441</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Leaf gas exchange</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">P<sub>N</sub> (&#x03BC;mol CO2 m<sup>&#x2013;2</sup> s<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.034</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>5.21</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;0.04</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>1.61</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>3.01</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.049</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.016</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.190</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.310</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">WUE<sub>INST</sub> (&#x03BC;mol CO<sub>2</sub> mmol H<sub>2</sub>O)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.015</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.90</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.02</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.40</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.51</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.048</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.015</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.201</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.428</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Electrolyte leakage</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Electrolyte leakage (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.045</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>23.93</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>4.17</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;1.00</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;3.89</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.056</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.018</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.245</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.298</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chloroplast pigments</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Chlorophyll <italic>A</italic> (mg/g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.53</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.000</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>4.49</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;1.62</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;1.66</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;0.97</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.172</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.041</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.648</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.647</underline></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Chlorophyll <italic>B</italic> (mg/g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.42</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.000</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>1.65</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;0.60</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;0.59</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;0.27</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.151</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.030</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.531</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.631</underline></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Total chlorophyll (<italic>a</italic> + <italic>b</italic>) (mg/g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.000</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>6.14</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;2.22</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;2.25</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;1.23</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.162</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.037</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.568</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.644</underline></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Carotenoids (mg/g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.000</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>1.37</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;0.48</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;0.36</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;0.36</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.252</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.064</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.686</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.740</underline></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total soluble protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Protein (mg/g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.85</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.004</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.57</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>&#x2013;0.07</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.17</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><underline>0.35</underline></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.052</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.016</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.231</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.326</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p><italic>Estimates were gathered in two OP half-sib families (IMC67 and PA121), and two full-sib progenies obtained from the crossing between IMC67 &#x00D7; PA121 and its reciprocal cross. Only significant (bold and underlined) specific combining abilities under the Cd-added treatment are retained, and only h<sup>2</sup> estimates above 0.1 are highlighted, except for the Cd content in leaves that is kept for reference purposes. For the full compilation refer to <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS3">Supplementary Tables 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS4">4</xref> for the specific combining abilities and the narrow-sense heritability, respectively. Specific combining abilities are indexed to a general mean (intercept under the first column after the p-value), and the corresponding positive or negative contributions (three last columns). Heritability (h<sup>2</sup>) and model fits (R software, R Core Team) estimates were computed using an A pedigree relatedness matrix (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS2">Supplementary Figure 2A</xref>) inputted in a &#x201C;genetic prediction&#x201D; additive mixed linear model, according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">de los Campos et al. (2009)</xref>.</italic></p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Concerning cacao full-sib seedlings from controlled crosses between IMC67 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> PA121 (and reciprocal) 2-months after grafting with the ICS95 and CCN51 scions, specific combining abilities were mostly different under the Cd-added treatment (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS5">Supplementary Table 5</xref>). Specifically, these differences concerned 27 traits from the overall 35 examined traits (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). Mismatches due to the scion origin were overserved in 14 cases (including Cd content in leaves and roots). Similarly, when examining the very same cacao seedlings from these controlled crosses 4 months after grafting, specific combining abilities differed for nine of the 17 studied traits (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS6">Supplementary Table 6</xref>). Specifically, these differences only overlapped between the ICS95 and CCN51 clonal scions for Cd content in leaves and dry root weight (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption><p>Specific combining abilities in cacao seedling rootstocks from controlled crosses 2 and 4 months after grafting with the ICS95 and CCN51 scions.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sampling</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">Trait<hr/></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="6">ICS95<hr/></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="6">CCN51<hr/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" colspan="2"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>F</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>p</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">IMC67</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">PA121</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">IMC67 &#x00D7; PA121</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">PA121 &#x00D7; IMC67</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>F</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>p</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">IMC67</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">PA121</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">IMC67 &#x00D7; PA121</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">PA121 &#x00D7; IMC67</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Two months after grafting</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Cadmium</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Cd in leaf tissue<break/> (mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.006</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>81.39</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>14.29</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>19.40</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>29.58</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.653</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">121.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;17.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;5.95</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;3.44</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Cd in roots (mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.856</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">33.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.76</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;1.54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.016</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>37.37</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;3.42</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>1.33</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>11.54</underline></bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Nutrients</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">N (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.006</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>1.54</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.05</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.04</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.27</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.002</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>1.67</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.06</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.15</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.24</underline></bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">K (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.69</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.004</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>1.76</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.31</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.08</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.02</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.002</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>1.72</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.19</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.25</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.14</underline></bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Mg (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.042</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.71</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.11</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.01</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.09</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.59</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.002</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.75</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.13</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.01</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.17</underline></bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Cu (mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.048</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>8.12</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>3.73</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>1.11</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>2.33</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.87</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.002</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>9.98</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>3.19</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;1.61</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>2.40</underline></bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Zn (mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.024</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>63.73</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;14.80</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>4.51</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>8.70</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.130</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66.45</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;13.83</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;0.30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Na (mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.041</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>113.10</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>12.53</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>21.28</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;5.64</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.66</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.070</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">107.49</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;5.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.49</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Biomass</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Root fresh weight (g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.000</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>39.68</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;12.74</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>1.51</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>1.33</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.006</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>36.39</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;10.38</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>2.60</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.59</underline></bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Dry root weight (g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.000</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>16.65</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;5.88</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>1.16</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.16</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.71</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.010</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>15.53</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;4.58</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>1.05</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.84</underline></bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Chlorophyll fluorescence</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Fm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.048</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>377.56</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;7.56</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;33.63</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>22.75</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.238</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">370.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;4.81</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;12.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29.88</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Fv/Fm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.012</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.77</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.02</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.02</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.01</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.185</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.76</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Fv/Fo</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.93</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.008</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>3.41</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.32</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.26</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.20</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.284</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;0.28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;0.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Chloroplast pigment</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Chlorophyll <italic>A</italic> (mg/g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.019</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>1.53</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.03</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.35</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.25</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.80</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.004</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>1.44</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.11</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.44</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.09</underline></bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Chlorophyll <italic>B</italic> (mg/g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.012</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.59</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.10</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.11</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.12</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.000</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.64</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.58</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.04</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.04</underline></bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Total chlorophyll (<italic>a</italic> + <italic>b</italic>) (mg/g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.017</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>2.12</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.12</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.46</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.37</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.001</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>2.08</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.69</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.48</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.05</underline></bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Carotenoids (mg/g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.006</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.64</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.04</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.14</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.10</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.013</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.63</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.11</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.13</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.03</underline></bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Total soluble protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Protein (mg/g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.87</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.000</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.46</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.45</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.13</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.22</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.001</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.52</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.26</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.20</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.37</underline></bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Four months after grafting</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Cadmium</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Cd in leaf tissue<break/> (mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.96</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.021</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>66.97</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>6.70</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>16.73</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>40.48</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.94</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.009</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>84.10</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;5.19</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>33.07</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>35.24</underline></bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Cd in roots (mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.002</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>35.45</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>21.24</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;4.21</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>21.30</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.803</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;5.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;8.64</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;7.79</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Biomass</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Leaf fresh weight (g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.76</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.183</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">69.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;7.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;3.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.45</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.001</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>61.61</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;2.03</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;8.83</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>11.96</underline></bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Root weight (g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.98</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.020</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>41.34</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;4.64</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>8.91</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>7.70</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.102</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;7.96</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Leaf area (cm<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.286</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4022.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;324.64</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;74.60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">293.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.030</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>3925.93</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;100.12</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;121.21</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>843.41</underline></bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Dry leaf weight (g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.097</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.85</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;2.95</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.001</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>18.22</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.28</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;1.66</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>5.19</underline></bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Dry root weight (g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.005</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>14.68</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;2.00</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>4.89</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>3.51</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.93</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.008</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>16.61</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;2.56</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>6.30</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.60</underline></bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Chlorophyll fluorescence</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Fv/Fm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.038</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.78</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.01</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.02</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.01</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.06</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.383</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.77</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;0.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;0.02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Fv/Fo</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.043</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>3.59</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.14</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>&#x2013;0.35</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><underline>0.29</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.275</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.46</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;0.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;0.31</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p><italic>Estimates were gathered in two OP half-sib families (IMC67 and PA121), and two full-sib progenies obtained from the crossing between IMC67 &#x00D7; PA121 and its reciprocal cross, grafted with the ICS95 and CCN51 clonal scions. Only significant (bold and underlined) specific combining abilities under the Cd-added treatment are retained. For the full compilation refer to <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS5">Supplementary Tables 5</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS6">6</xref> for specific combining abilities 2 and 4 months after grafting, respectively. Specific combining abilities are indexed to a general mean (intercept under the first column after the p-value), and the corresponding positive or negative contributions (three last columns).</italic></p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Most of these specific combining abilities from the full-sib rootstock families fell when looking at the narrow-sense rootstock-mediated heritability (<italic>h</italic><sup>2</sup>) scores 2 months after grafting (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS7">Supplementary Table 7</xref>), and completely vanished after 4 months (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS8">Supplementary Table 8</xref>). When grafting the clonal scion ICS95, heritability scores above 0.1 were only observed 2 months after grafting for root weight, dry root weight, and protein content, whereas for the CCN51 scion this only applied for chlorophyll <italic>b</italic> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). Four-months after grafting, none <italic>h</italic><sup>2</sup> estimate was above 0.1.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption><p>Narrow-sense rootstock-mediated heritability (<italic>h</italic><sup>2</sup>) in cacao seedling rootstocks from controlled crosses 2 months after grafting with the ICS95 and CCN51 scions.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="2">Trait<hr/></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="4">ICS95<hr/></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="4">CCN51<hr/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" colspan="2"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Median</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.5%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">97.5%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>r</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Median</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.5%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">97.5%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>r</italic></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cadmium</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cd in leaf tissue (mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.056</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.018</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.232</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.289</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.052</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.017</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.209</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cd in roots (mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.049</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.015</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.196</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.058</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.052</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.017</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.236</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.231</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Biomass</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Root fresh weight (g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold><underline>0.125</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold><underline>0.028</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold><underline>0.580</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold><underline>0.584</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.079</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.020</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.325</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.446</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dry root weight (g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold><underline>0.146</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold><underline>0.033</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold><underline>0.660</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold><underline>0.612</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.068</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.019</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.289</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.406</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chloroplast pigment</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chlorophyll B (mg/g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.054</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.018</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.237</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.267</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold><underline>0.149</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold><underline>0.032</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold><underline>0.706</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold><underline>0.631</underline></bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total soluble protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Protein (mg/g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold><underline>0.274</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold><underline>0.077</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold><underline>0.660</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold><underline>0.760</underline></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.079</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.022</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.362</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.475</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p><italic>Estimates were gathered in two OP half-sib families (IMC67 and PA121), and two full-sib progenies obtained from the crossing between IMC67 &#x00D7; PA121 and its reciprocal cross, grafted with the ICS95 and CCN51 clonal scions. Only h<sup>2</sup> estimates above 0.1 (highlighted) under the Cd-added treatment are retained, except for the Cd content in leaves and roots that is kept for reference purposes (for the full compilation refer to <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS7">Supplementary Tables 7</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS8">8</xref> for 4-months after grafting). Heritability (h<sup>2</sup>) and model fits (r) estimates were computed using an A pedigree relatedness matrix (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS2">Supplementary Figure 2B</xref>) inputted in a &#x201C;genetic prediction&#x201D; additive mixed linear model according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">de los Campos et al. (2009)</xref>.</italic></p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="S4.SS1">
<title>Cadmium Toxicity Affects a Wide Spectrum of Growth and Physiological Traits Before and After Grafting</title>
<p>In this study, an inhibition in plant growth and biomass was observed as result of Cd toxicity. Cd showed a greater toxic effect on the growth of PA121 OP seedlings than in the other families used as rootstocks. Also, a significant decrease in root biomass of PA121 OP rootstocks was observed both in combinations with clones ICS95 and CCN51 as scions. An effect of toxic levels of Cd on decreasing plant growth and biomass accumulation has been reported for other plant species such as cotton (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Farooq et al., 2016</xref>), mustard (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ahmad et al., 2011</xref>), peanut (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Lu et al., 2013</xref>), lettuce (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Dias et al., 2012</xref>), lupin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B94">Zornoza et al., 2002</xref>), and <italic>Rorippa globose</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">Wei et al., 2012</xref>), but this is the first explicit quantification in cacao scion &#x00D7; rootstocks combinations. Two months after grafting, changes were observed in growth parameters, although these were significant only for root biomass. Interestingly, 4 months after grafting, rootstock families having ICS95 as scion continued exhibiting significant changes only for root biomass, whereas the rootstock families having CCN51 as scion already started presenting significant changes also for growth parameters measured on the aerial part such as leaf area and leaf biomass. Decreased leaf area may be the result of reduction in cells size or alternatively more condense intercellular spaces (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Barcel&#x00F3; et al., 1988</xref>). Such effect of Cd on plant growth may result from alterations in cell division (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Liu et al., 2003</xref>).</p>
<p>Meanwhile, a reduced Cd translocation from root to shoot could be explained by a differential loading of Cd into the xylem (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Arao et al., 2010</xref>). Differences in Cd uptake by a symplastic pathway could also be related to differences between genotypes in Cd translocation to the stem of rootstocks and to scion&#x2019;s tissues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Arao et al., 2010</xref>). The latter would explain a lower accumulation of Cd in ICS95, grafted on IMC67, compared with CCN51 grafted on the same rootstock. Expression of specific transporter proteins could also explain differences in Cd uptake and accumulation in different cacao genotypes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Moore et al., 2020</xref>). Still, further studies are needed to evaluate Cd translocation in the xylem of rootstocks &#x00D7; scion combinations to increase knowledge of Cd distribution in plant organs.</p>
<p>Cadmium has an effect on different photosynthetic processes such as decrease in chlorophyll content, inhibition of chlorophyll formation, inhibition of Rubisco activity, inhibition of both photosynthesis reaction centers, PSI and PSII, and an increase in lipoxygenase activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Rai et al., 2016</xref>). The inhibition of the growth of plants subjected to Cd stress could further be due to a toxic effect of the heavy metal on physiological processes, such as reduction of the maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Ge et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Pereira de Ara&#x00FA;jo et al., 2017</xref>), in addition to an imbalance in the uptake of essential mineral elements (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B94">Zornoza et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">H&#x00E9;diji et al., 2015</xref>) and to an inhibition in the production of sugars due to the decrease in the carbon assimilation rate, P<sub>N</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Dias et al., 2012</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ahmad et al. (2011)</xref> correlated the toxic effect of Cd on mustard plant growth with a Cd-induced decrease in P<sub>N</sub> and WUE. Similarly, a greater decreasing effect of Cd concentration in P<sub>N</sub> and WUE<sub>INST</sub> was observed in our study for PA121 that, as indicated above, was the rootstock that presented a greater effect of Cd toxicity on plant growth. A decrease in WUE suggests alterations in water balance, which could be due to changes in water uptake and transport as a result of the toxic effect of Cd (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Singh and Tewari, 2003</xref>).</p>
<p>Cadmium binds to several sites in PSII, affecting both the donor and the acceptor side. Cd also inhibits oxygen evolution in a high affinity site by competition with Ca on the donor side (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Sigfridsson et al., 2004</xref>). Concerning underlying physiological processes, efficiency of PSII, measured as the fluorescence F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> ratio, did not appear to be affected in Cd-stressed rootstocks. However, significant changes in F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> ratio of scion ICS95 were observed at 2 and 4 months after grafting on IMC67 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> PA121 full-sib family rootstocks established in Cd-spiked soil compared with the control. Interestingly, no significant differences were observed in the maximum efficiency of the reaction centers of the PSII of scion CCN51 grafted on any of the rootstocks subjected to Cd stress in soil. This result suggested that grafting combinations having CCN51 as scion had a more stable photosynthetic performance than those having ICS95 clone as scion. A similar effect of Cd on photosynthetic performance has also been reported in poplar (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Ge et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Jiao et al., 2015</xref>), pea (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Sandalio et al., 2001</xref>), and lettuce (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Dias et al., 2012</xref>). One of the factors that could result in an effect on photosynthetic performance is the decrease in chlorophyll content as a result of Cd toxicity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Sandalio et al., 2001</xref>). However, for the case of ungrafted rootstocks, an increase in the content of chloroplast pigments at IMC67 OP seedlings is observed and does not result in significant changes in the F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> ratio. On the other hand, changes in the photosynthetic performance of scion ICS95 2 months after grafting effectively coincided with a decrease in chlorophyll content. In the case of scion CCN51, although a decrease in chlorophyll content is observed under Cd stress, the photosynthetic performance remains unchanged.</p>
<p>Similarly, a significant decrease in the concentration of chloroplast pigments has been reported for other species such as cotton (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Farooq et al., 2016</xref>), beans (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Saidi et al., 2013</xref>), <italic>Phragmites australis</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Pietrini et al., 2003</xref>), poplar (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Jiao et al., 2015</xref>), maize (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Ekmek&#x00E7;i et al., 2008</xref>), pea (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Sandalio et al., 2001</xref>), and cucumber plants exposed to Cd (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B92">Zhang et al., 2002</xref>). In this regard, carotenoids play a role as antioxidants, and increases in carotenoid content in some species have been explained as an attempt to protect chlorophyll from the photooxidative damage caused by Cd stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Mishra et al., 2006</xref>). Therefore, the decrease in carotenoid content observed in grafting combinations having ICS95 as scion may have jeopardized the detoxification of radicals formed in response to Cd stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Ekmek&#x00E7;i et al., 2008</xref>).</p>
<p>Cadmium absorption by plants can also result in changes in the accumulation of essential mineral elements in plant tissues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Castro et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Pereira de Ara&#x00FA;jo et al., 2017</xref>). Cd may affect the transport of mineral elements by disturbing the radial movement of transporters in the root, loading into the xylem vessels or into the leaves, thereby promoting morphological changes of the xylem tissue, changes in H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase activity, and alterations in IRT1 transporter selectivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Sandalio et al., 2001</xref>). Changes in nutritional elements may indicate alterations in ionic homeostasis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Saidi et al., 2013</xref>). In our work, changes in mineral elements were observed in rootstock families before grafting, and in both ICS95 and CCN51 leaf tissue 2 months after grafting. Cd translocation in the plant is carried out using the same transporters than some nutritional elements such as Ca, Mn, and Zn (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Rahman et al., 2016</xref>). Competition for these same transporters may explain the decrease in the content of Zn and Mn in ungrafted rootstocks under Cd stress.</p>
<p>On the other hand, according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">K&#x00FC;pper et al. (1998)</xref>, Cd could replace Mg in chlorophylls, which may decrease chlorophyll content in plants under Cd stress. A direct proportional relationship between toxicity of heavy metals and Mg substitution in chlorophylls has been reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">K&#x00FC;pper et al., 1996</xref>). In our study, a significant increase in Mg concentration in leaf tissue was observed 2 months after grafting in Cd-spiked soil. These results are in agreement with the observation made by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Cie&#x0107;ko et al. (2005)</xref>, in which the content of Mg in oat increased when it was grown in Cd-contaminated soil. An effect of Cd on electron transport on the reducing side of photosystem I was observed on isolated chloroplasts of maize plants grown in nutrient solution containing the heavy metal. A reduction in electron transport was associated with a decrease in ferredoxin content, which was then correlated with a low Fe concentration, suggesting that Cd induced Fe deficiency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Siedlecka and Baszy&#x0144;ski, 1993</xref>). In our work, significant changes in Fe content in leaf tissue of ungrafted rootstocks were observed only for IMC67 seedlings. Accordingly, a decrease in F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> ratio scores was observed in IMC67 seedlings before grafting. A significant decrease in Fe content has also been observed in bean plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Saidi et al., 2013</xref>). On the other hand, a significant increase in Fe content for cacao in grafting combinations having full-sib IMC67 <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> PA121 progenies as rootstocks was observed too. Despite this, a significant decrease in F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> was observed in the ICS95 clone when grafted on this rootstock family, whereas no significant changes were observed in this parameter when using CCN51 as scion.</p>
<p>A decrease in the content of total soluble protein was observed in PA121 seedlings before grafting. Significant decreases were also observed in both CCN51 and ICS95 scions 2 months after grafting on the IMC67 OP rootstock family. An effect in total soluble protein content could be explained by Cd-induced protein degradation and an increase in proteolytic activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Mishra et al., 2006</xref>). In some cases, a slight boost in total soluble protein was observed, but it was not significant compared with the control. Slight increases in protein content may be explained by the induction of stress proteins as part of the plant defense system to Cd toxicity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Di Toppi and Gabbrielli, 1999</xref>).</p>
<p>Finally, a significant increase in electrolytes leakage was observed in IMC67 and PA121 established in Cd-spiked soil, suggesting a Cd effect on cell membrane integrity. An increase in electrolyte loss has been observed in cucumber (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Gon&#x00E7;alves et al., 2007</xref>), maize (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Ekmek&#x00E7;i et al., 2008</xref>), and <italic>Bacopa monnieri</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Mishra et al., 2006</xref>). Heavy metals induce an alteration in the lipid composition of thylakoid membranes. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) induced by Cd results in lipid peroxidation, which implies the degradation of polyunsaturated fatty acids of membrane lipids. The later causes distortion of the lipid bilayer and alters membrane ion channels, resulting in leakage of ions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Mishra et al., 2006</xref>). The apparent lack of cell membrane damages in the CCN51 and ICS95 scions, 2 months after grafting, may be due to an insufficient exposure time to Cd as to cause a perceptible effect.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4.SS2">
<title>Rootstock Versus Scion Genetic Conflict</title>
<p>This work has enlightened some major trends regarding the complexity at the rootstock&#x2013;scion interface. First, phenotypic differences due to rootstock effects are more notorious early after grafting (i.e., 2-months), in concert with expectations observed at the ungrafted seedlings. Such differences tend to vanish at older grafted seedlings (i.e., 4 months after grafting). The tendencies observed when computing specific combining abilities across rootstock families are aligned with this conclusion, in the sense that significantly different specific combining abilities among rootstock families were more common at 2 months after grafting than at 4 months. Second, heritability estimates also speak for the dilution of the rootstock effects through genotypes and time. Several of the heritabilities that were calculated in ungrafted families were not significant in the grafted portion of the experiment, which may speak for a genuine physiological communication gap at the graft interface. Alternatively, it could reflect an intrinsic limitation in degrees of freedom due to the complexity of the rootstock &#x00D7; scion factorial design. Still, rootstock-mediated heritability scores above 0.1 were more commonly observed at 2 months after grafting than at 4 months, regardless of the specific rootstock <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> scion combination. Such instability ultimately suggests an underlying and unavoidable conflict between the two genomes that shape the chimeric grafted organism (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">Warschefsky et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Gautier et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>Genetic conflict is known to be pervasive at multiple nested evolutionary scales, for example, among genes, among chromosomes, between chromosomes and cytoplasmic organelles, and between sexes in dioicous species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">&#x00C5;gren and Clark, 2018</xref>). These multiple scenarios are evidenced by the recurrent segregation distortion due to gene drives, transposons, and unconventional sex determination systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Renner and M&#x00FC;ller, 2021</xref>). However, our study is the first in suggesting an analogous mechanism at the rootstock <bold>&#x00D7;</bold> scion interface, typically regarded as leading to emergent heterotic properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Reyes-Herrera et al., 2020</xref>). This conflict may be due to underlying additive and combined physiological drivers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Loupit and Cookson, 2020</xref>), such as water and nutrients uptake and transport, hormone production and transport, and large-scale movement of molecules during grafting and through time (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Rasool et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4.SS3">
<title>Foreseeing the Complexity of the Rootstock &#x00D7; Scion Interaction</title>
<p>The novelty of this work lays on the explicit comparison of rootstock families in terms of Cd uptake. However, after quantifying an additive component such as the inheritance of rootstock effects (i.e., rootstock-mediated genetic variance) across recombinant cacao saplings, a next step is to consider more thoroughly the complexity of the rootstock &#x00D7; scion interaction. After all, rootstock metabolites transcend the root system and could reach the grafted scion, i.e., rootstock&#x2019;s additive contribution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Loupit and Cookson, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Rasool et al., 2020</xref>), which in turn may have contrasting consequences on rootstock traits, i.e., scion&#x2019;s additive contribution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Shu et al., 2017</xref>). These concurrent effects would ultimately feedback an emergent rootstock &#x00D7; scion interaction, a statistical interaction in the strict sense.</p>
<p>To be able to accurately estimate the rootstock &#x00D7; scion component, it will be necessary to further validate the rootstock-mediated pedigree-estimated heritability scores <italic>via</italic> controlled experiments across an expanded panel of clonal scion genotypes grafted on rootstocks with a more continuous gradient of pairwise relatedness values (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Reyes-Herrera et al., 2020</xref>). Specifically, future experimental assessments might rely on factorial designs of diverse clonal scions grafted on clonal rootstocks. This would allow to reduce recombination uncertainty and optimize statistical power to estimate the interaction term.</p>
<p>From an analytical point of view, the <italic>A</italic>-BLUP model implemented here would be capable to condition pedigree-based rootstock-mediated heritability scores as a function of the scion&#x2019;s pedigree. Alternatively, the rootstock &#x00D7; scion interaction may also be quantified <italic>via</italic> indirect genetic effect (IGE) models (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Bijma, 2010</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Fisher and Mcadam, 2019</xref>) at relatively low phenotyping costs. It would also be desirable to extend IGE monitoring through time as a way to validate whether some of the significant rootstock &#x00D7; scion effects may persist in adult trees, even several years after grafting.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4.SS4">
<title>Perspectives</title>
<p>A recurrent caveat of pedigree-based heritability estimates concerns the potential fortuitous unbalanced between each phenotypic vector and the <italic>A</italic> pedigree-based relatedness matrix within the &#x201C;genetic prediction&#x201D; model. However, we did not detect this trend for any of the significantly rootstock-inherited traits. On the contrary, after examining for 2 years, as part of a parallel experiment, eight traits in full-sib families obtained by cross pollination of clonal accessions from the Cacao Germplasm at greenhouse conditions and two water regimes, we have been able to identify three candidate families for further testing. We recommend using this promissory dataset as reference (i.e., training) population to calibrate explicit eco-physiological mechanistic models (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Lo&#x00EC;pez-Hern&#x00E1;ndez and Cort&#x00E9;s, 2019</xref>) and last-generation machine learning algorithms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Cort&#x00E9;s and L&#x00F3;pez-Hern&#x00E1;ndez, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Montesinos-Lo&#x00EC;pez et al., 2021</xref>) as innovative alternatives beyond <italic>A</italic>-BLUP models (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Guevara-Escudero et al., 2021</xref>). As part of this task, we envision the following pipeline: (1) developing explicit eco-physiological indices for cacao targeting neo-tropical localities, (2) calibrating last-generation predictive breeding models aiming to forecast such indices based on extensive genealogical information, (3) extending the previous models to account for the complexity of the rootstock-scion interaction (i.e., G &#x00D7; S &#x00D7; E term, as expanded in the previous section), and (4) validating the corresponding predictions across seed orchards and cacao saplings at local nurseries to leverage natural variation for early selection (i.e., before grafting) of low Cd uptake. Ultimately, this combined strategy promises speeding up breeding of polygenic trait variation in a perennial tree crop, while accounting for the interaction of multiple genotypes at the rootstock&#x2013;scion interface. In parallel, high throughput genotyping of the rootstock families will enable a more accurate description of the underlying genetic architecture.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S5" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Material</xref>, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S6">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>CR-M conceived the original sampling and experiment and compiled the datasets. JF-P, CH-V, and CR-M collected phenotypic data at the greenhouses. JF-P and CH-V carried out lab work procedures. CH-V, JF-P, and AC prepared input datasets for statistical softwares and carried out data analyses. CR-M and AC drafted a first version of this manuscript and edited by the other co-authors. CH-V, JF-P, AC, MM-D-T, CR-M, and VB interpreted results, contributed to the manuscript, and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10">
<title>Author Disclaimer</title>
<p>The findings and conclusion in this publication are those of the authors and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or United States Government determination or policy.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="conf1" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="pudiscl1" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="S7" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This research was funded by USAID/USDA Cacao for Peace initiative (Collaboration agreement No. 1939, project 1001136). JF-P received financial support to carry out her master&#x2019;s studies from AGROSAVIA, which is financed with public resources from the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development from Colombia (MADR). AGROSAVIA also financed this publication.</p>
</sec>
<ack><p>We would like to thank the National Germplasm Banks (SBGNAA) for supplying plant material of the cacao genotypes included in this study. We also would like to acknowledge technical support from Diego Fernando Morales Villegas AGROSAVIA, Palmira. We extend our thank to Marshall Elson for commenting an early version of this manuscript, as well as to the reviewers and the editor for their insightful recommendations.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="S9" sec-type="supplementary-material"><title>Supplementary Material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.777842/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.777842/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_1.pdf" id="FS1" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Pearson correlations coefficients among examined traits from half-sib and full-sib seedling rootstocks <bold>(A)</bold> before grafting, <bold>(B)</bold> two, and <bold>(C)</bold> four months after grafting. Estimates were gathered in two OP half-sib families (IMC67 and PA121), and two full-sib rootstock progenies obtained from the crossing between IMC67 &#x00D7; PA12 and its reciprocal cross, grafted with the ICS95 and CCN51 clonal scions under two Cd treatments. Correlation estimates are presented above the diagonal and below diagonal circles are sized and coloured accordingly.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_2.pdf" id="FS2" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>Heat plots of A pedigree relatedness matrices from two OP half-sib families (IMC67 and PA121), and two full-sib rootstock families derived from controlled crosses between IMC67 &#x00D7; PA121 and its reciprocal cross, inputed in a &#x201C;genetic prediction&#x201D; additive mixed linear model, according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">de los Campos et al. (2009)</xref>. Heat plots are depicted for verification purposes <bold>(A)</bold> before grafting, and <bold>(B)</bold> two and <bold>(C)</bold> four months after grafting with the ICS95 and CCN51 clonal scions under two Cd treatments.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_sheet_1.xlsx" id="TS1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Concentration of mineral nutrients in leaf tissue of ungrafted rootstocks five months after cadmium treatment. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in mineral elements concentration between ungrafted seedling families at the same Cd concentration in soil. Different capital letters indicate significant differences in mineral elements concentration of the same ungrafted seedling at different Cd concentrations in soil. Results are according to Duncan test (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05). Data are mean values &#x00B1; SE (<italic>n</italic> = 8).</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_sheet_1.xlsx" id="TS2" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 2</label>
<caption><p>Concentration of mineral nutrients in leaf tissue of scions ICS95 and CCN51 two months after grafting onto rootstocks. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in mineral elements concentration in leaf tissue of the ICS95 or CCN5 clonal scions grafted on four different seedling rootstock families at the same Cd concentration in soil. Different capital letters indicate significant differences in mineral elements concentration in leaf tissue of ICS95 or CCN51 clonal scions grafted on the same seedling rootstock family at different Cd concentrations in soil. Results are according to Duncan test (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05). Data are mean values &#x00B1; SE (<italic>n</italic> = 8).</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_sheet_1.xlsx" id="TS3" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 3</label>
<caption><p>Specific combining abilities in cacao seedlings from controlled crosses before grafting. Estimates were gathered in two OP half-sib families (IMC67 and PA121), and two full-sib progenies obtained from the crossing between IMC67 &#x00D7; PA121 and its reciprocal cross, under two Cd treatments. Specific combining abilities are indexed to a general mean (intercept under the first column after the <italic>p</italic>-value), and the corresponding positive or negative contributions (three last columns). Significantly different specific combining abilities are highlighted.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_sheet_1.xlsx" id="TS4" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 4</label>
<caption><p>Narrow-sense heritability (h2) in cacao seedlings from controlled crosses before grafting. Estimates were gathered in two OP half-sib families (IMC67 and PA121), and two full-sib progenies obtained from the crossing between IMC67 &#x00D7; PA121 and its reciprocal cross, grafted with the ICS95 and CCN51 clonal scions under two Cd treatments. Heritability (<italic>h</italic><sup>2</sup>) and model fits (<italic>r</italic>) estimates were computed using an <italic>A</italic> pedigree relatedness matrix (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S9">Supplementary Figure 2A</xref>) inputted in a &#x201C;genetic prediction&#x201D; additive mixed linear model, according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">de los Campos et al. (2009)</xref>. Heritability (<italic>h</italic><sup>2</sup>) scores above 0.1 are highlighted.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_sheet_1.xlsx" id="TS5" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 5</label>
<caption><p>Specific combining abilities in cacao seedling rootstocks from controlled crosses two-months after grafting. Estimates were gathered in full-sib rootstock progenies obtained from the crossing between IMC67 &#x00D7; PA121, and its reciprocal cross, grafted with the ICS95 and CCN51 clonal scions under two Cd treatments. Specific combining abilities are indexed to a general mean (intercept under the first column after the <italic>p</italic>-value), and the corresponding positive or negative contributions (three last columns). Significantly different specific combining abilities are highlighted.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_sheet_1.xlsx" id="TS6" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 6</label>
<caption><p>Specific combining abilities in cacao seedling rootstocks from controlled crosses four-months after grafting. Estimates were gathered in two OP half-sib families (IMC67 and PA121), and two full-sib progenies obtained from the crossing between IMC67 &#x00D7; PA121 and its reciprocal cross, grafted with the ICS95 and CCN51 clonal scions under two Cd treatments. Specific combining abilities are indexed to a general mean (intercept under the first column after the <italic>p</italic>-value), and the corresponding positive or negative contributions (three last columns). Significantly different specific combining abilities are highlighted.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_sheet_1.xlsx" id="TS7" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 7</label>
<caption><p>Narrow-sense rootstock-mediated heritability (h2) in cacao seedling rootstocks from controlled-crosses two-months after grafting. Estimates were gathered in two OP half-sib families (IMC67 and PA121), and two full-sib progenies obtained from the crossing between IMC67 &#x00D7; PA121 and its reciprocal cross, grafted with the ICS95 and CCN51 clonal scions under two Cd treatments. Heritability (<italic>h</italic><sup>2</sup>) and model fits (<italic>r</italic>) estimates were computed using an <italic>A</italic> pedigree relatedness matrix (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S9">Supplementary Figure 2B</xref>) inputted in a &#x201C;genetic prediction&#x201D; additive mixed linear model, according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">de los Campos et al. (2009)</xref>. Heritability (<italic>h</italic><sup>2</sup>) scores above 0.1 are highlighted.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_sheet_1.xlsx" id="TS8" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 8</label>
<caption><p>Narrow-sense rootstock-mediated heritability (h2) in cacao seedling rootstocks from controlled-crosses four-months after grafting. Estimates were gathered in two OP half-sib families (IMC67 and PA121), and two full-sib progenies obtained from the crossing between IMC67 &#x00D7; PA121 and its reciprocal cross, grafted with the ICS95 and CCN51 clonal scions under two Cd treatments. Heritability (<italic>h</italic><sup>2</sup>) and model fits (<italic>r</italic>) estimates were computed using an <italic>A</italic> pedigree relatedness matrix (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S9">Supplementary Figure 2C</xref>) inputted in a &#x201C;genetic prediction&#x201D; additive mixed linear model, according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">de los Campos et al. (2009)</xref>. None <italic>h</italic><sup>2</sup> estimate was above 0.1.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>&#x00C5;gren</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clark</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Selfish genetic elements.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS Genet.</italic></source> <volume>14</volume>:<issue>e1007700</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pgen.1007700</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30439939</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ahmad</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nabi</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ashraf</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Cadmium-induced oxidative damage in mustard [<italic>Brassica juncea</italic> (L.) Czern. &#x0026; Coss.] plants can be alleviated by salicylic acid.</article-title> <source><italic>South Afr. J. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>77</volume> <fpage>36</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>44</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.sajb.2010.05.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arao</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ishikawa</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Murakami</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abe</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maejima</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Makino</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Heavy metal contamination of agricultural soil and counter measures in Japan</article-title>. <source><italic>Paddy and water Environ.</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>247</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>257</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10333-010-0205-7</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arao</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Takeda</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nishihara</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Reduction of cadmium translocation from roots to shoots in eggplant (<italic>Solanum melongena</italic>) by grafting onto <italic>Solanum torvum</italic> rootstock.</article-title> <source><italic>Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.</italic></source> <volume>54</volume> <fpage>555</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>559</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1747-0765.2008.00269.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arenas</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cort&#x00E9;s</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mastretta</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jaramillo</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Evaluating the accuracy of genomic prediction for the management and conservation of relictual natural tree populations.</article-title> <source><italic>Tree Genet. Genomes</italic></source> <volume>17</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>19</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11295-020-01489-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ar&#x00E9;valo-Gardini</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ar&#x00E9;valo-Hern&#x00E1;ndez</surname> <given-names>C. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baligar</surname> <given-names>V. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>Z. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Heavy metal accumulation in leaves and beans of cacao (<italic>Theobroma cacao</italic> L.) in major cacao growing regions in Peru.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Total Environ.</italic></source> <volume>605</volume> <fpage>792</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>800</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.122</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28683423</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arg&#x00FC;ello</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chavez</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lauryssen</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vanderschueren</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smolders</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Montalvo</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Soil properties and agronomic factors affecting cadmium concentrations in cacao beans: a nationwide survey in Ecuador.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Total Environ.</italic></source> <volume>649</volume> <fpage>120</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>127</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.292</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30173024</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Asman</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>bin Purung</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lambert</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Amiruddin</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosmana</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effect of rootstock and scion on resistance of cocoa clones to vascular streak dieback caused by <italic>Ceratobasidium theobromae</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Ann. Agricult. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>66</volume> <fpage>25</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>30</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aoas.2021.02.005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barcel&#x00F3;</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>V&#x00E1;zquez</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Poschenrieder</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Structural and ultrastructural disorders in cadmium-treated bush bean plants (<italic>Phaseolus vulgaris</italic> L.).</article-title> <source><italic>New Phytol.</italic></source> <volume>108</volume> <fpage>37</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>49</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-81371988.tb00202.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barraza</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schreck</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>L&#x00E9;v&#x00EA;que</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Uzu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>L&#x00F3;pez</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ruales</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Cadmium bioaccumulation and gastric bioaccessibility in cacao: a field study in areas impacted by oil activities in Ecuador.</article-title> <source><italic>Environ. Pollut.</italic></source> <volume>229</volume> <fpage>950</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>963</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.080</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28781181</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bijma</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Estimating indirect genetic effects: precision of estimates and optimum designs.</article-title> <source><italic>Genetics</italic></source> <volume>186</volume> <fpage>1013</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1028</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1534/genetics.110.120493</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20713688</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bijma</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>The quantitative genetics of indirect genetic effects: a selective review of modelling issues.</article-title> <source><italic>Heredity</italic></source> <volume>112</volume> <fpage>61</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>69</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/hdy.2013.15</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23512010</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Borek</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ba&#x0327;czek-Kwinta</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rapacz</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging of cadmium-treated white cabbage plants</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source><italic>Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Heavy Metals in the Environment E3S Web of Conferences</italic></source>, <volume>Vol. 1</volume> (<publisher-loc>Les Ulis</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>EDP Sciences</publisher-name>), <fpage>39004</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Boughalleb</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tarchoun</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>El-Mbarki</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>El-Mahjoub</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Resistance evaluation of nine cucurbit rootstocks and grafted watermelon (<italic>Citrullus lanatus</italic> L.) varieties against <italic>Fusarium</italic> wilt and <italic>Fusarium</italic> crown and root rot.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>2</volume> <fpage>102</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>107</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3923/jps.2007.102.107</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bradford</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1976</year>). <article-title>A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.</article-title> <source><italic>Anal. Biochem.</italic></source> <volume>72</volume> <fpage>248</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>254</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/abio.1976.9999</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">942051</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bradstreet</surname> <given-names>R. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1954</year>). <article-title>Kjeldahl method for organic nitrogen.</article-title> <source><italic>Anal. Chem.</italic></source> <volume>26</volume> <fpage>185</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>187</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cardinal</surname> <given-names>A. B. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gon&#x00E7;alves</surname> <given-names>P. D. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martins</surname> <given-names>A. L. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Stock-scion interactions on growth and rubber yield of <italic>Hevea brasiliensis</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Agric.</italic></source> <volume>64</volume> <fpage>235</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>240</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S0103-90162007000300004</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Castro</surname> <given-names>A. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Almeida</surname> <given-names>A. A. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pirovani</surname> <given-names>C. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reis</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Almeida</surname> <given-names>N. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mangabeira</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Morphological, biochemical, molecular and ultrastructural changes induced by Cd toxicity in seedlings of <italic>Theobroma cacao</italic> L.</article-title> <source><italic>Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety</italic></source> <volume>115</volume> <fpage>174</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>186</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.02.003</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25700096</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chavez</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>Z. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stoffella</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mylavarapu</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moyano</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Concentration of cadmium in cacao beans and its relationship with soil cadmium in southern Ecuador.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Total Environ.</italic></source> <volume>533</volume> <fpage>205</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>214</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.106</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26172587</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Z. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baison</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karlsson</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andersson</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Westin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Accuracy of genomic selection for growth and wood quality traits in two control-pollinated progeny trials using exome capture as the genotyping platform in Norway spruce.</article-title> <source><italic>BMC Genomics</italic></source> <volume>19</volume>:<issue>946</issue>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cie&#x0107;ko</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kalembasa</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wyszkowski</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rolka</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>The magnesium content in plants in soil contaminated with cadmium.</article-title> <source><italic>Polish J. Environ. Stud.</italic></source> <volume>14</volume> <fpage>365</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>370</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cort&#x00E9;s</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>L&#x00F3;pez-Hern&#x00E1;ndez</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Harnessing crop wild diversity for climate adaptation.</article-title> <source><italic>Genes</italic></source> <volume>12</volume>:<issue>783</issue>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cuevas</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crossa</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soberanis</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pe&#x00EC;rez-Elizalde</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pe&#x00EC;rez-Rodri&#x00EC;guez</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de los Campos</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Genomic prediction with genotype x environment interaction kernel regres- sion models.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Genome</italic></source> <volume>9</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>20</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Davis</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Perkins-Veazie</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Rootstock effects on plant vigour and watermelon fruit quality.</article-title> <source><italic>Cucurbit Genet. Coop. Rep.</italic></source> <volume>28</volume> <fpage>39</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>42</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>de los Campos</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Naya</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gianola</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crossa</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Legarra</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manfredi</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree</article-title>. <source><italic>Genetics</italic></source> <volume>182</volume>, <fpage>375</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>385</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1534/genetics.109.101501</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19293140</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>de los Campos</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sorensen</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gianola</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Genomic heritability: what is it?</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS Genet.</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>:<issue>e1005048</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pgen.1005048</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25942577</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Di Toppi</surname> <given-names>L. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gabbrielli</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Response to cadmium in higher plants.</article-title> <source><italic>Environ. Exp. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>41</volume> <fpage>105</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>130</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0098-8472(98)00058-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dias</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Monteiro</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moutinho-Pereira</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Correia</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gon&#x00E7;alves</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Santos</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Cadmium toxicity affects photosynthesis and plant growth at different levels.</article-title> <source><italic>Acta Physiol. Plant.</italic></source> <volume>35</volume> <fpage>1281</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1289</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11738-012-1167-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ekmek&#x00E7;i</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tanyolac</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ayhan</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Effects of cadmium on antioxidant enzyme and photosynthetic activities in leaves of two maize cultivars.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Plant Physiol.</italic></source> <volume>165</volume> <fpage>600</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>611</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jplph.2007.01.017</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17728009</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Eltayb</surname> <given-names>M. T. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Magid</surname> <given-names>T. D. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ibrahim</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dirar</surname> <given-names>A. M. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Effect of grafting (rootstock) on morphological changes of scions in some Acacia species</article-title>. <source><italic>J. Forest Prod. Ind. Corpus.</italic></source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>27</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>36</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Engbersen</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gramlich</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lopez</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schwarz</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hattendorf</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gutierrez</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Cadmium accumulation and allocation in different cacao cultivars.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Total Environ.</italic></source> <volume>678</volume> <fpage>660</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>670</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.001</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31078857</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>European Commission</collab> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Commission Regulation (EC) No 488/2014 of 12 May 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 as regards maximum levels of cadmium in foodstuffs.</article-title> <source><italic>Official J. Eur. Union</italic></source> <volume>138</volume>:<issue>75</issue>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Farooq</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ali</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hameed</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bharwana</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rizwan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ishaque</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Cadmium stress in cotton seedlings: physiological, photosynthesis and oxidative damages alleviated by glycinebetaine.</article-title> <source><italic>South Afr. J. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>104</volume> <fpage>61</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>68</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.sajb.2015.11.006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fisher</surname> <given-names>D. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mcadam</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Indirect genetic e ects clarify how traits can evolve even when fitness does not.</article-title> <source><italic>Evol. Lett.</italic></source> <volume>3</volume> <fpage>4</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/evl3.98</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gautier</surname> <given-names>A. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chambaud</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brocard</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ollat</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gambetta</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Delrot</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Merging genotypes: graft union formation and scion-rootstock interactions.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Exp. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>70</volume> <fpage>747</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>755</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/ery422</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30481315</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ge</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Ultrastructural and photosynthetic response of populus 107 leaves to cadmium stress.</article-title> <source><italic>Polish J. Environ. Stud.</italic></source> <volume>24</volume> <fpage>519</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>527</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15244/pjoes/27814</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guevara-Escudero</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Osorio</surname> <given-names>A. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cort&#x00E9;s</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Integrative breeding for biotic resistance in forest trees.</article-title> <source><italic>Plants</italic></source> <volume>10</volume>:<issue>2022</issue>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gon&#x00E7;alves</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Becker</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cargnelutti</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tabaldi</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pereira</surname> <given-names>L. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Battisti</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Cadmium toxicity causes oxidative stress and induces response of the antioxidant system in cucumber seedlings.</article-title> <source><italic>Braz. J. Plant Physiol.</italic></source> <volume>19</volume> <fpage>223</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>232</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S1677-04202007000300006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gutierrez</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matika</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bean</surname> <given-names>T. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Houston</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Genomic selec- tion for growth traits in Pacific oyster (<italic>Crassostrea gigas</italic>): potential of low-density marker panels for breeding value prediction.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Genet.</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<issue>391</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fgene.2018.00391</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30283494</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>H&#x00E9;diji</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Djebali</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Belkadhi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cabasson</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moing</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rolin</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Impact of long-term cadmium exposure on mineral content of <italic>Solanum lycopersicum</italic> plants: consequences on fruit production.</article-title> <source><italic>South Afr. J. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>97</volume> <fpage>176</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>181</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.sajb.2015.01.010</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Isaac</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kerber</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1971</year>). <article-title>&#x201C;Atomic absorption and flame photometry: techniques and uses in soil, plant, and water analysis,&#x201D; in</article-title> <source><italic>Instrumental Methods for Analysis of Soils and Plant Tissue</italic></source>, <role>ed</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Walsh</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name></person-group> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/1971.instrumentalmethods.c2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Isele</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Breen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Galanti</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <source><italic>Grafting Cacao. College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources (CTAHR).</italic></source></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jiao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ge</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Influence of cadmium stress on growth, ultrastructure and antioxidative enzymes in Populus 2025</article-title>. <source><italic>Fresenius Environ. Bull.</italic></source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>1375</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1384</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jiao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ge</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Physiological and ultrastructural effects of cadmium on Poplar (Populus x euramericana) leaves.</article-title> <source><italic>Baltic Forestry</italic></source> <volume>21</volume> <fpage>106</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>113</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>K&#x00FC;pper</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kupper</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Spiller</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Environmental relevance of heavy metal-substituted chlorophylls using the example of water plants.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Exp. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>47</volume> <fpage>259</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>266</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/47.2.259</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>K&#x00FC;pper</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>K&#x00FC;pper</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Spiller</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>In situ detection of heavy metal substituted chlorophylls in water plants.</article-title> <source><italic>Photosynth. Res.</italic></source> <volume>58</volume> <fpage>123</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>133</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lewis</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lennon</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eudoxie</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Umaharan</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Genetic variation in bioaccumulation and partitioning of cadmium in <italic>Theobroma cacao</italic> L.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Total Environ.</italic></source> <volume>640</volume> <fpage>696</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>703</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.365</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29870946</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lichtenthaler</surname> <given-names>H. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes.</article-title> <source><italic>Methods Enzymol.</italic></source> <volume>148</volume> <fpage>350</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>382</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Effects of cadmium on root growth, cell division and nucleoli in root tip cells of garlic.</article-title> <source><italic>Biol. Plant.</italic></source> <volume>47</volume> <fpage>79</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>83</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1027384932338</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahammed</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Grafting cucumber onto luffa improves drought tolerance by increasing ABA biosynthesis and sensitivity.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Rep.</italic></source> <volume>6</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep20212</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26832070</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lo&#x00EC;pez-Hern&#x00E1;ndez</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cort&#x00E9;s</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Last-generation genome&#x2013;environment associations reveal the genetic basis of heat tolerance in common bean (<italic>Phaseolus vulgaris</italic> L.).</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Genet.</italic></source> <volume>10</volume>:<issue>954</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fgene.2019.00954</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31824551</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Loupit</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cookson</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Identifying molecular markers of successful graft union formation and compatibility.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>:<issue>352</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2020.610352</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33343610</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Su</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Cultivar variation in morphological response of peanut roots to cadmium stress and its relation to cadmium accumulation.</article-title> <source><italic>Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety</italic></source> <volume>91</volume> <fpage>147</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>155</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.01.017</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23410837</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lux</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martinka</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vacul&#x00ED;k</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>White</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Root responses to cadmium in the rhizosphere: a review.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Exp. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>62</volume> <fpage>21</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>37</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erq281</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20855455</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B55"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Melgarejo</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Romero</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hern&#x00E1;ndez</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jaime</surname> <given-names>S. M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Su&#x00E1;rez</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>P&#x00E9;rez</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <source><italic>Experimentos en Fisiolog&#x00ED;a Vegetal Lab F&#x00ED;siol Bioqu&#x00ED;mica Veg.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Bogot&#x00E1;</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Universidad Nacional de Colombia</publisher-name>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.uv.mx/personal/tcarmona/files/2019/02/Melgarejo-2010.pdf">https://www.uv.mx/personal/tcarmona/files/2019/02/Melgarejo-2010.pdf</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="B56"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mishra</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Srivastava</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tripathi</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Govindarajan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuriakose</surname> <given-names>S. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prasad</surname> <given-names>M. N. V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Phytochelatin synthesis and response of antioxidants during cadmium stress in <italic>Bacopa monnieri</italic> L?.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Physiol. Biochem.</italic></source> <volume>44</volume> <fpage>25</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>37</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plaphy.2006.01.007</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16545573</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Montesinos-Lo&#x00EC;pez</surname> <given-names>O. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Montesinos-Lo&#x00EC;pez</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pe&#x00EC;rez-Rodri&#x00EC;guez</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barro&#x00EC;n-Lo&#x00EC;pez</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martini</surname> <given-names>J. W. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fajardo-Flores</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>A review of deep learning applications for genomic selection.</article-title> <source><italic>BMC Genomics</italic></source> <volume>22</volume>:<issue>19</issue>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moore</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ullah</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Oliveira</surname> <given-names>V. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hammond</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Strekopytov</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tibbett</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Cadmium isotope fractionation reveals genetic variation in Cd uptake and translocation by <italic>Theobroma cacao</italic> and role of natural resistance-associated macrophage protein 5 and heavy metal ATPase-family transporters.</article-title> <source><italic>Horticult. Res.</italic></source> <volume>7</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41438-020-0292-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B59"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>M&#x00FC;ller</surname> <given-names>B. S. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neves</surname> <given-names>L. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Almeida Filho</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Resende</surname> <given-names>M. F. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mun&#x03F8;oz</surname> <given-names>P. R.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Genomic prediction in contrast to a genome-wide association study in explaining heritable variation of complex growth traits in breeding populations of Eucalyptus.</article-title> <source><italic>BMC Genomics</italic></source> <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12864-017-3920-2</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28693539</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B60"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>N. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McInturf</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mendoza-C&#x00F3;zatl</surname> <given-names>D. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Hydroponics: a versatile system to study nutrient allocation and plant responses to nutrient availability and exposure to toxic elements.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Visual. Exp. JoVE</italic></source> <volume>113</volume>:<issue>54317</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3791/54317</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27500800</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B61"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Palencia Calderon</surname> <given-names>G. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>G&#x00F3;mez Santos</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mejia</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <source><italic>Patrones Para Cacao: Cartilla (No. Doc. 22050) CO-BAC, Bogot&#x00E1;).</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Bucaramanga</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Editorial AGROSAVIA.</publisher-name></citation></ref>
<ref id="B62"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pereira de Ara&#x00FA;jo</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Furtado, de Almeida</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pereira</surname> <given-names>L. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mangabeira</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Souza</surname> <given-names>J. O.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Photosynthetic, antioxidative, molecular and ultrastructural responses of young cacao plants to Cd toxicity in the soil.</article-title> <source><italic>Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety</italic></source> <volume>144</volume> <fpage>148</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>157</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.06.006</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28614756</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B63"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>P&#x00E9;rez-Rodr&#x00ED;guez</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de los Campos</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Genome-wide regression and prediction with the Bglr statistical package.</article-title> <source><italic>Genetics</italic></source> <volume>198</volume> <fpage>483</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>495</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1534/genetics</pub-id> 114.164442</citation></ref>
<ref id="B64"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pietrini</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Iannelli</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pasqualini</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Massacci</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Interaction of cadmium with glutathione and photosynthesis in developing leaves and chloroplasts of <italic>Phragmites australis</italic> (Cav.) Trin. ex Steudel.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Physiol.</italic></source> <volume>133</volume> <fpage>829</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>837</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.103.026518</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14526113</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B65"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rahman</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mostofa</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nahar</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hasanuzzaman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fujita</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Exogenous calcium alleviates cadmium-induced oxidative stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings by regulating the antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems.</article-title> <source><italic>Braz. J. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>39</volume> <fpage>393</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>407</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.crvi.2016.08.002</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27662772</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B66"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rai</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Agrawal</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Agrawal</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Impact of heavy metals on physiological processes of plants: with special reference to photosynthetic system</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source><italic>Plant Responses to Xenobiotics</italic></source>, (<publisher-loc>Singapore</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>), <fpage>127</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>140</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-981-10-2860-1_6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B67"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rasool</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mansoor</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bhat</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hassan</surname> <given-names>G. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baba</surname> <given-names>T. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alyemeni</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Mechanisms underlying graft union formation and rootstock scion interaction in horticultural plants.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>:<issue>590847</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2020.590847</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33362818</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B68"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Renner</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>M&#x00FC;ller</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Plant sex chromosomes defy evolutionary models of expanding.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Plants</italic></source> <volume>7</volume> <fpage>392</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>402</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41477-021-00884-3</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33782581</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B69"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Reyes-Herrera</surname> <given-names>P. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mu&#x00F1;oz-Baena</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vel&#x00E1;squez-Zapata</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pati&#x00F1;o</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Delgado-Paz</surname> <given-names>O. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>D&#x00ED;az-Diez</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Inheritance of rootstock effects in avocado (<italic>Persea americana</italic> Mill.) cv.</article-title> <source><italic>Hass. Front. Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>:<issue>555071</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2020.555071</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33424874</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B70"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ribeiro</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Almeida</surname> <given-names>A. A. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alves</surname> <given-names>T. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gramacho</surname> <given-names>K. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pirovani</surname> <given-names>C. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Valle</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Rootstock&#x00D7; scion interactions on <italic>Theobroma cacao</italic> resistance to witches&#x2019; broom: photosynthetic, nutritional and antioxidant metabolism responses.</article-title> <source><italic>Acta Physiol. Plant.</italic></source> <volume>38</volume>:<issue>73</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11738-016-2095-9</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B71"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>R&#x00ED;os</surname> <given-names>A. V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1957</year>). <article-title>La relaci&#x00F3;n patr&#x00F3;n-injerto en la propagaci&#x00F3;n vegetativa del cacao (<italic>Theobroma cacao</italic> L.).</article-title> <source><italic>Acta Agron.</italic></source> <volume>7</volume> <fpage>223</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>232</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B72"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rivard</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Louws</surname> <given-names>F. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Grafting to manage soilborne diseases in heirloom tomato production.</article-title> <source><italic>HortScience</italic></source> <volume>43</volume> <fpage>2104</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2111</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21273/HORTSCI.43.7.2104</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B73"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rouphael</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cardarelli</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rea</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Colla</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Grafting of cucumber as a means to minimize copper toxicity.</article-title> <source><italic>Environ. Exp. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>63</volume> <fpage>49</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>58</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.10.015</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B74"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Saidi</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ayouni</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dhieb</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chtourou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cha&#x00EF;bi</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Djebali</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Oxidative damages induced by short-term exposure to cadmium in bean plants: protective role of salicylic acid.</article-title> <source><italic>South Afr. J. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>85</volume> <fpage>32</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>38</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.sajb.2012.12.002</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B75"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sandalio</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dalurzo</surname> <given-names>H. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gomez</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Romero-Puertas</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Del Rio</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Cadmium-induced changes in the growth and oxidative metabolism of pea plants.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Exp. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>52</volume> <fpage>2115</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2126</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jexbot/52.364.2115</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11604450</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B76"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Savvas</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Colla</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rouphael</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schwarz</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Amelioration of heavy metal and nutrient stress in fruit vegetables by grafting.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Horticult.</italic></source> <volume>127</volume> <fpage>156</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>161</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2010.09.011</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B77"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jue</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Effects of avocado (<italic>Persea americana</italic> Mill.) scion on arbuscular mycorrhizal and root hair development in rootstock.</article-title> <source><italic>Arch. Agron. Soil Sci.</italic></source> <volume>63</volume> <fpage>1951</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1962</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B78"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Siedlecka</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baszy&#x0144;ski</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Inhibition of electron flow around photosystem I in chloroplasts of Cd-treated maize plants is due to Cd-induced iron deficiency.</article-title> <source><italic>Physiol. Plant.</italic></source> <volume>87</volume> <fpage>199</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>202</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B79"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sigfridsson</surname> <given-names>K. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bern&#x00E1;t</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mamedov</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Styring</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Molecular interference of Cd2+ with Photosystem II.</article-title> <source><italic>Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Bioenergetics</italic></source> <volume>1659</volume> <fpage>19</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>31</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bbabio.2004.07.003</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15511524</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B80"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>P. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tewari</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Cadmium toxicity induced changes in plant water relations and oxidative metabolism of <italic>Brassica juncea</italic> L. plants.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Environ. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>1</volume> <fpage>107</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>112</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B81"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Cadmium absorption and transportation pathways in plants.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Phytoremed.</italic></source> <volume>19</volume> <fpage>133</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>141</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/15226514.2016.1207598</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27409403</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B82"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Span&#x00F2;</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferrara</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gallitelli</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mascia</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>The role of grafting in the resistance of tomato to viruses.</article-title> <source><italic>Plants</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<issue>1042</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants9081042</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32824316</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B83"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Su&#x00E1;rez-Hern&#x00E1;ndez</surname> <given-names>&#x00C1;M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>V&#x00E1;zquez-Angulo</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grimaldo-Ju&#x00E1;rez</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duran</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gonz&#x00E1;lez-Mendoza</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bazante-Gonz&#x00E1;lez</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Production and quality of grafted watermelon in saline soil.</article-title> <source><italic>Horticult. Brasil.</italic></source> <volume>37</volume> <fpage>215</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>220</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S0102-053620190213</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B84"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sugiyama</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ae</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arao</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Role of roots in differences in seed cadmium concentration among soybean cultivars&#x2014;proof by grafting experiment.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Soil</italic></source> <volume>295</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-007-9252-2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B85"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ullah</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eide</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dunwell</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Evolution, and functional analysis of natural resistance-associated macrophage proteins (NRAMPs) from <italic>Theobroma cacao</italic> and their role in cadmium accumulation.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Rep.</italic></source> <volume>8</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-018-32819-y</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30258092</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B86"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vanderschueren</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Montalvo</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Ketelaere</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Delcour</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smolders</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The elemental composition of chocolates is related to cacao content and origin: a multi-element fingerprinting analysis of single origin chocolates.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Food Composition Anal.</italic></source> <volume>83</volume>:<issue>103277</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jfca.2019.103277</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B87"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vanderschueren</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arg&#x00FC;ello</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blommaert</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Montalvo</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barraza</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maurice</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Mitigating the level of cadmium in cacao products: reviewing the transfer of cadmium from soil to chocolate bar.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Total Environ.</italic></source> <volume>146779</volume>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146779</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B88"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Warschefsky</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klein</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frank</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chitwood</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Londo</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Von Wettberg</surname> <given-names>E. J. B.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Rootstocks: diversity, domestication, and impacts on shoot phenotypes.</article-title> <source><italic>Trends Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>21</volume> <fpage>418</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>437</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tplants.2015.11.008</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26698413</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B89"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Tolerant mechanisms of <italic>Rorippa globosa</italic> (Turcz.) Thell. hyperaccumulating Cd explored from root morphology.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioresource Technol.</italic></source> <volume>118</volume> <fpage>455</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>459</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.049</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22717563</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B90"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yanyan</surname> <given-names>Y. A. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shuoshuo</surname> <given-names>W. A. N. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Min</surname> <given-names>W. E. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Biao</surname> <given-names>G. O. N. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qinghua</surname> <given-names>S. H. I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effect of different rootstocks on the salt stress tolerance in watermelon seedlings.</article-title> <source><italic>Horticult. Plant J.</italic></source> <volume>4</volume> <fpage>239</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>249</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.hpj.2018.08.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B91"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>J. P. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Rootstock effects on cocoa in Sabah, Malaysia.</article-title> <source><italic>Exp. Agricult.</italic></source> <volume>40</volume> <fpage>445</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>452</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0014479704002108</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B92"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Response of antioxidative enzymes in cucumber chloroplasts to cadmium toxicity.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Plant Nutr.</italic></source> <volume>26</volume> <fpage>1779</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1788</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1081/PLN-120023282</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B93"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Factors affecting the accuracy of genomic selection for agricultural economic traits in maize, cattle, and pig populations.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Genet.</italic></source> <volume>10</volume>:<issue>189</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fgene.2019.00189</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30923535</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B94"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zornoza</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>V&#x00E1;zquez</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Esteban</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fern&#x00E1;ndez-Pascual</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carpena</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Cadmium-stress in nodulated white lupin: strategies to avoid toxicity.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Physiol. Biochem.</italic></source> <volume>40</volume> <fpage>1003</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1009</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0981-9428(02)01464-X</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>