<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2021.746771</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Multi-Omics-Based Identification and Functional Characterization of <italic>Gh_A06G1257</italic> Proves Its Potential Role in Drought Stress Tolerance in <italic>Gossypium hirsutum</italic></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Mehari</surname> <given-names>Teame Gereziher</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x02020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1273592/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Yanchao</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x02020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/545286/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Umer</surname> <given-names>Muhammad Jawad</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x02020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/951463/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Shiraku</surname> <given-names>Margaret Linyerera</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1213649/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>Yuqing</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Yuhong</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Shuxun</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/354107/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Xianlong</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/366007/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Kunbo</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>Xiaoyan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Zhongli</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c002"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Fang</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c003"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/337932/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Cotton Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Anyang</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Wuhan</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>School of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou University</institution>, <addr-line>Zhengzhou</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Jinfa Zhang, New Mexico State University, United States</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Mehanathan Muthamilarasan, University of Hyderabad, India; Jian Zhao, Anhui Agricultural University, China</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x0002A;Correspondence: Xiaoyan Cai <email>caixy&#x00040;cricaas.com.cn</email></corresp>
<corresp id="c002">Zhongli Zhou <email>zhouzl&#x00040;cricaas.com.cn</email></corresp>
<corresp id="c003">Fang Liu <email>liufcri&#x00040;163.com</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn001"><p>This article was submitted to Plant Abiotic Stress, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn002"><p>&#x02020;These authors have contributed equally to this work</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>21</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<elocation-id>746771</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>24</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>31</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2021 Mehari, Xu, Umer, Shiraku, Hou, Wang, Yu, Zhang, Wang, Cai, Zhou and Liu.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Mehari, Xu, Umer, Shiraku, Hou, Wang, Yu, Zhang, Wang, Cai, Zhou and Liu</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract><p>Cotton is one of the most important fiber crops globally. Despite this, various abiotic stresses, including drought, cause yield losses. We used transcriptome profiles to investigate the co-expression patterns of gene networks associated with drought stress tolerance. We identified three gene modules containing 3,567 genes highly associated with drought stress tolerance. Within these modules, we identified 13 hub genes based on intramodular significance, for further validation. The yellow module has five hub genes (<italic>Gh_A07G0563, Gh_D05G0221, Gh_A05G3716, Gh_D12G1438</italic>, and <italic>Gh_D05G0697</italic>), the brown module contains three hub genes belonging to the aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) gene family (<italic>Gh_A06G1257, Gh_A06G1256</italic>, and <italic>Gh_D06G1578</italic>), and the pink module has five hub genes (<italic>Gh_A02G1616, Gh_D12G2599, Gh_D07G2232, Gh_A02G0527</italic>, and <italic>Gh_D07G0629</italic>). Based on RT-qPCR results, the <italic>Gh_A06G1257</italic> gene has the highest expression under drought stress in different plant tissues and it might be the true candidate gene linked to drought stress tolerance in cotton. Silencing of <italic>Gh_A06G1257</italic> in cotton leaves conferred significant sensitivity in response to drought stress treatments. Overexpression of <italic>Gh_A06G1257</italic> in Arabidopsis also confirms its role in drought stress tolerance. <sc>L</sc>-valine, Glutaric acid, <sc>L</sc>-proline, <sc>L</sc>-Glutamic acid, and <sc>L</sc>-Tryptophan were found to be the most significant metabolites playing roles in drought stress tolerance. These findings add significantly to existing knowledge of drought stress tolerance mechanisms in cotton.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>transcriptome</kwd>
<kwd>metabolome</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Gossypium hirsutum</italic></kwd>
<kwd>WGCNA</kwd>
<kwd>overexpression</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100012659</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="11"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="82"/>
<page-count count="20"/>
<word-count count="12539"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Cotton (<italic>Gossypium</italic> spp.) has been cultivated for many years by human beings (Fang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">2017</xref>). Today, <italic>G. hirsutum</italic> accounts for 95% of the yearly cotton production globally (Ullah A. et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">2017</xref>) with India, China, United States, Pakistan, and Brazil being the leading five cotton-growing countries in the world. They produce 76% of all cotton on the globe (Baytar et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">2018</xref>). China&#x00027;s cotton industry has particularly grown considerably in the last 60 years. It produces 30% of the world&#x00027;s cotton despite only having 15% of acreage for cotton at present (Dai and Dong, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2016</xref>).</p>
<p>Drought stress causes extensive crop loss and is predicted to intensify in the future. As a result, a global movement is underway to promote drought-tolerant crops (Shadakshari and Shanthakumar, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">2015</xref>). Drought tolerance occurs as a result of a chain of molecular, cellular, and physiological developments including the induction and/or repression of a variety of genes that are the basis of the buildup of numerous osmolytes, enhanced antioxidant system, decreased transpiration, repressed shoot growth, and decreased tillering (Joshi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2016</xref>). Plants have several mechanisms to conquer this abiotic stress such as drought avoidance (i.e., reduction of transpiration by closing stomata and thus bearing inner water potential), drought escape (i.e., rapid maturation), and drought tolerance (i.e., dealing with water stress without changing physiological features) (Iqbal et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2013</xref>). Plants change the transcriptional activity of stress response genes at the molecular level in response to abiotic stimuli.</p>
<p>Omics techniques have been shown to account for the majority of relevant and prospective biotechnological tools for enhancing plant abiotic stress tolerance (Bagati et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2018</xref>). Transcriptome has been broadly employed to investigate how stress factors impact the transcriptome of crops. As a result, the ability of a crop to maintain photosynthesis in the face of drought is a substantial measure of drought tolerance. However, the expressions of these genes in response to drought stress tolerance remains poorly studied (Shi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">2018</xref>). It is a decisive tool that offers a combined task of the genes along with information on gene abundance and expression levels in various plant tissues when crops are faced with numerous abiotic and biotic stress elicitors (Magwanga et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">2018</xref>).</p>
<p>In addition, metabolomics displays crucial secondary metabolites of tolerant varieties for fighting abiotic stress (Fahimirad and Ghorbanpour, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2019</xref>). Metabolites are believed to be signaling molecules because they are correlated with physiological practices and are distributed from each organelle to the cytoplasm in the form of retrograde signals. Plant responses to drought are influenced by interactions between genes, metabolites, proteins, and the drought-responsive transcriptome. As a result, by integrating transcriptome and metabolomics methods, we can better recognize the processes underlying fundamental plant resistance to drought stress. Many studies on the integration of transcriptome and metabolome have been reported in response to salt stress in <italic>Astragalus membranaceous</italic>, foxtail millets, and sesame (Jia et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">2016</xref>; Shi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">2018</xref>; Zhang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">2019</xref>), whereas some used integrated approach in <italic>Nicotiana tabacum</italic> and rice under cold stress (Ma et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">2016</xref>; Jin et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2017</xref>).</p>
<p>Progress in functional genomics of cotton will depend on enlarging high-throughput technologies and integrating multidisciplinary action toward future cotton enhancement programs (Ashraf et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2018</xref>). Moreover, Abdelrahman et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">2015</xref>) stated that for a long time, breeding and continuous cultivation for desired agronomic features has had a negative impact on the diversity of current cotton genotypes, resulting in a reduction in genetic diversity. As a result, wild accessions became valuable pools of natural genetic diversity that can be used to expand cultivar genetic bases (Kirungu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2018</xref>). Cotton production, on the other hand, is hampered by numerous biotic and abiotic stresses. Drought stress has emerged as the most serious threat to major cotton crop loss due to the global shortage of water (Ullah A. et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">2017</xref>). Understanding the biochemical and genetic bases of cotton&#x00027;s drought response and developing drought-tolerant cotton varieties, is critical.</p>
<p>Several genes from wild resources improve tolerance to abiotic stress by indirectly detoxifying cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Guo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2017</xref>). Aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) is a family of enzymes that catalyze the permanent conversion of aldehydes to acids to reduce the damage caused by abiotic stressors. Abiotic stress including drought, salinity, and high temperatures also cause a buildup of ROS which stimulates endogenous aldehyde formation via a lipid peroxidation chain reaction (Chen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2015</xref>). Aldehydes and their detoxifying roles in plants are poorly understood. As a result, it is of immense importance to distinguish the approaches underlying the detoxification of aldehydes throughout abiotic stresses and to mine endogenous resistance genes (Guo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2017</xref>). Thus, drought tolerance is complex and mutagenic. Therefore, an integrated transcriptomic, metabolomic, and functional analysis approach is required to make progress in drought tolerance (Oladosu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">2019</xref>). It is imperative to reveal this complex mechanism or to explore the relevant genes and pathways related to drought stress tolerance in cotton. Hence, understanding the molecular mechanisms and metabolic regulatory networks will help to improve the drought tolerance in cotton. Therefore, in the current study, integration of transcriptome and metabolome was performed at various time intervals in different plant parts to investigate the genetic and molecular networks and pathways underlying drought tolerance in three cotton semi-wild lines, namely, Marie-galantie85 (MG85) tolerant, Lattifolium40 (LT40) sensitive, and Upland cotton (CRI12) as a standard check. Virus induced gene silencing (VIGS) and overexpression-based functional characterization of candidate gene was also performed to validate its part in response to drought stress. The current study offers a comprehensive understanding and additional knowledge to our existing knowledge of both genetic and drought tolerance in cotton is mediated by molecular processes.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials and methods" id="s2">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Planting Material, Plant Growth, and Drought Stress Treatment</title>
<p>Two semi-wild accessions of <italic>G. hirsutum</italic>, namely, Marie-galantie85 and Lattifolium40 that were originated from Mexico and distributed in Guadeloupe and Guatemala and a released variety CRI12 for drought tolerant, sensitive, and regular checks respectively were used for transcriptome and metabolome analysis. Marie-galantie85 was specifically used for functional validation of the genes associated with the key metabolites identified in this study through gene knockout, also referred to as Virus-Induced gene silencing. A variety of CRI12 was also used for drought tolerant, sensitive, and regular checks (Xu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">2020</xref>).</p>
<p>The seeds of these lines were sterilized and aseptically kept immersed in water for one day at 30&#x000B0;C before being placed for germination in an absorbent paper under 28&#x000B0;C of day and night temperature. They were placed in 16/8 h of alternating light and dark periods (Zhang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">2017</xref>). The experiment was set up in a greenhouse with three biological replications in a completely random design. The properly germinated seeds on paper rafts were transferred to a hydroponic setup of Hoagland solution (Hoagland and Arnon, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">1950</xref>).</p>
<p>The VIGS and the wild-type seedlings were subjected to 17% PEG-6000 for PEG-induced drought at the three-leaf stage (Kirungu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">2020</xref>). PEG-6000 was used to simulate drought stress treatment in various crops. In <italic>Triticum aestivum</italic> L. (Faisal et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">2019</xref>), in soybean (Basal et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2020</xref>), in tobacco (Yang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">2017</xref>), in <italic>Stevia rebaudiana</italic> (Ahmad et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2020</xref>), in Egyptian barley cultivars (Hellal et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">2018</xref>), in peanut (Meher et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">2018</xref>) and <italic>Medicago sativa</italic> L. (Zhang and Shi, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">2018</xref>) used PEG-6000 induced treatment for drought stress.</p>
<p>The sampling parts of the materials were the roots and leaves. Sampling was done at 0, 24, and 48 h for transcriptome profiling sequence and 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, and 48 for VIGS trials in three replications. A total of 54 samples were done for RNA-sequencing. The samples were then rapidly submerged in liquid nitrogen and kept at &#x02212;80&#x000B0;C until RNA extraction was completed (Xu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">2020</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Data Collection on Phenotypic, Physiological, and Biochemical Parameters</title>
<p>Phenotypic and physiological data including excised leaf water loss (ELWL), relative leaf water content (RLWC), chlorophyll content, and cell membrane stability (CMS) were recorded from three randomly sampled plants. We took leaf tissue samples for the determination of biochemical analysis. In the biochemical analysis, the antioxidant catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>), and malondialdehyde (MDA) enzyme activities were measured. All the antioxidants and oxidant enzymes CAT, SOD, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, and MDA were evaluated using the Solarbio life sciences kit (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.solarbio.com">www.solarbio.com</ext-link>) using the instructions of the manufacturer. For physiological traits, the following formulas were used to calculate the values.</p>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item><p>ELWL = (FW &#x02013; WW/DW) (Clarke and McCaig, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">1982</xref>).</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>RLWC = (FW &#x02013; DW)/ (SW &#x02013; DW) &#x000D7; 100 (Barrs and Weatherley, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">1962</xref>).</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>CMS = [(1 &#x02013; T1/T2)/(1 &#x02013; C1/C2)] &#x000D7; 100 (Blum and Ebercon, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">1981</xref>).</p></list-item>
</list>
<p>Note, FW = Fresh weight, SW = Saturated weight, WW = Wilted weight, DW = Dry weight, T1 = Reading 1, T2 = Reading 2, C1 = Control 1, C2 = Control 2.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>cDNA Library Preparation, and RNA Sequencing</title>
<p>To isolate RNA samples from both leaf and root tissues for RNA-Seq analysis, Trizol R reagent (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) was used. Using an agarose gel electrophoresis and a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer, the quality and concentration of RNA were assessed (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) (Yu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">2017</xref>). The Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer RNA Nanochip was used to complete a more precise RNA quantification (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) (Shi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">2018</xref>). The cDNA fragments were then cleaned using a Qia Quick PCR extraction kit that was corrected at the ends with added poly(A) and ligated to Illumina sequencing adapters. Gene Denovo Biotechnology Co. used the Illumina HiSeqTM 2500 to amplify and sequence PCR products. The size of the ligation products was determined using agarose gel electrophoresis from Gene Denovo Biotechnology Co (Guangzhou, China). PCR amplified and sequenced the PCR using the Illumina HiSeqTM 2500. Tophat2 (V.2.0.13) was used to extract clean reads from raw reads, which were then associated to the reference genome of <italic>G. hirsutum</italic> (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://cottonfgd.org">http://cottonfgd.org</ext-link>) to generate mapped reads (Kim et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">2013</xref>). Cufflinks v2.2.1 was used to analyze gene expression and to calculate the differences between the treatment and control fragments per kilobase of transcript per million fragments (FPKM) values. Readings from the transcriptome were measured and adjusted to fragments per kilobase of transcript per million fragments linked to the reference genome (Trapnell et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">2014</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>DEGs Identification</title>
<p>R software (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.r-project.org/">http://www.r-project.org/</ext-link>) was used to find differentially expressed genes between samples. The false discovery rate (FDR) and log2 Fold Change thresholds for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were set at &#x0003C; .05 and &#x0003E; 1, respectively. The DEGs were then submitted to a GO function and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis. First, through the AgriGO web tool (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://systemsbiology.cau.edu.cn/agriGOv2/">http://systemsbiology.cau.edu.cn/agriGOv2/</ext-link>), all DEGs were mapped to GO (Gene and Consortium, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2000</xref>). Pathway enrichment analysis revealed considerably enhanced metabolic transduction pathways when DEGs were compared to the entire genomic background.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>WGCNA Analysis</title>
<p>To transfer genes into co-expressed modules, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was done in the R package (Zhang and Horvath, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">2005</xref>; Langfelder and Horvath, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">2008</xref>). Before generating an adjacency matrix, the FPKM values were normalized. WGCNA software was used to import the phenotypic data, and a correlation-based relationship between accessions, time points, and gene modules was done using the default settings. The WCGNA software was used to transform the adjacency matrix into TOM (topological overlap matrix). Transcripts with comparable expression patterns were clustered into one module once the network was created, and eigengenes were determined for these modules. Using Cytoscape&#x00027;s default parameters, each module&#x00027;s genes were exported.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Co-expression Network and Phylogenetic Analysis of Key Genes</title>
<p>Leaf and root tissues of the three semi-wild cotton species Marie-galantie85, Lattifolium40, and Upland cotton at 0-, 24-, and 48-h time points were used as phenotype data in the WGCNA analysis. Thirteen unique gene modules were recognized from RNA Seq data by entering WGCNA using the FPKM values. Coexpression network analysis of the three highly and positively correlated to drought modules namely brown, yellow, and pink was established by Cytoscape v.3.7.2 (Shannon et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">2003</xref>). Cotton functional genomics database website (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.cottonfgd.org/">www.cottonfgd.org/</ext-link>) was used to download the protein sequence of the candidate gene for <italic>G. hirsutum and G. arboreum</italic>, while <italic>G.raimondii, A. thaliana, Theobroma cacao, Brassica rapa, Glycine max, Medicago truncatula, Oryza sativa, Triticum aestivum, Zea mays</italic>, and <italic>Sorghum bicolor</italic> were downloaded from phytozome (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov">https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov</ext-link>). The ClustalX tool was used to align the full-length ALDH protein sequences (Larkin et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">2007</xref>) and MEGA 7 was used to create the phylogenetic tree using the neighbor-joining method with 1000 bootstrap replications (Tamura et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">2011</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Metabolite Profiling, and Data Analysis</title>
<p>The tender leaves and roots of cotton at the three-leaf seedling stage were used for metabolite profiling by the liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) approach. To detect reproducibility under the same treatment, the sample extracts were mixed to prepare a quality control sample (QC). During the LC-MS analysis, QC samples are arranged by mixing sample extracts to analyze the recurrence ability of samples under the same processing method. In the process of instrument analysis, a QC sample is usually inserted into every 10 test analysis samples to investigate the repeatability of the analysis process. Three biological replications were maintained in sampling and metabolome analysis (Zhou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">2012</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Cloning and Transformation of <italic>Gh_A06G1257</italic> in <italic>A. thaliana</italic></title>
<p>RNA sequencing of <italic>G. hirsutum</italic> yielded a substantially upregulated gene, which was then transformed into <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic> (Colombia-0). The PCR study with forward (CGGCCATTTAAATAGTGGATTCGG) and reverse (GCCACCATCTATCCTCAACGA) pair of primer sequences of <italic>Gh_A06G1257</italic> synthesized from Invitrogen, Beijing, China, verified the pWM101-35S: <italic>Gh_A06G1257</italic> build in <italic>Agrobacterium tumefaciens</italic> GV3101. The floral dip approach was used to transform wild-type <italic>A. thaliana</italic> plants.</p>
<p>The infiltration media was prepared as prescribed previously (Lu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">2019</xref>). The seedlings were moved to a growing environment with a temperature of 25&#x000B0;C and a 16 light/8 dark hours cycle from the selection medium at three-leaf stages. The little plastic pots were filled with a 1:1 mix of vermiculite and humus (Sadau et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">2021</xref>).</p>
<p>The first-generation seeds were collected after the seedlings from generation T0 had been grown to set seeds (T1). True lines were found by estimating the antibiotic-selectable marker segregation ratio of 3:1 after T1 seeds were sown in antibiotic media. Only the lines with a 100% success rate were chosen for T3 generation growth. After RT-qPCR, T3 homozygous lines were chosen from a T2 generation. Three of the six ALDH transgenic lines that were successfully transformed (OE-1, OE-9, and OE-10) were chosen from a T2 generation. The RT-qPCR prototype was <italic>Gh_A06G1257</italic> forward primer sequence and <italic>Gh_A06G1257</italic> reverse primer sequence with complete complementary DNA (cDNA). T3 homozygous generation was used to conduct the phenotypic studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Determination of Drought Tolerance in the Transgenic Lines</title>
<p>The plants were subjected to drought stress treatments after 21 days of growth. Samples from leaves were collected from transgenic lines and control. The pots were then watered with water containing 15% PEG-6000 treatment was used to alleviate drought tension. After 8 days, physiological and phenotypic traits were observed. All measurements were replicated three times biologically and three times technically (Li et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">2019</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Germination Rate and Root Elongation Determination</title>
<p>Drought simulated stress conditions were used to assess the germination percentage and root length of transgenic lines and wild form. OE-1, OE-9, OE-10, and wild-type seeds were sown in.5 MS plates complemented with 0, 100, 200, and 300 mM mannitol concentrations to simulate drought. After 10 days, the germination rate was assessed. Transgenic and wild-type seeds were seeded for 6 days in 0.5 MS media before being moved to 0.5 MS supplemented with different amounts of 0, 100, 200, and 300 mM mannitol for the root length assay. All measurements were replicated three times biologically and three times technically (Li et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">2019</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Drought Stress Treatment for VIGS in Cotton</title>
<p>The functional characterization of substantially upregulated gene expression in <italic>G. hirsutum</italic> was investigated using this approach. A gene <italic>Gh_A06G1257</italic> with 296 bp fragments was transformed by Forward (CTGTGAGTAAGGTTACCGAATTCTCTAGAGAGATGTGGAATCCCCTTGGAA) and Reverse (TCGAGACGCGTGAGCTCGGTACCGGATCCACCTTCGAACTCCCCGTGA) primer sequences into pTRV vector using enzymes XbaI and BamHI to develop a 35S promoter-driven pTRV2: <italic>ALDH7B4</italic>. The promoter cells of <italic>A. tumefaciens</italic> LBA4404 were deformed with the recombinant vector by freezing and thawing (Vel&#x000E1;squez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">2009</xref>). Wild, pTRV: 00 were used positively with Phytoene desaturase (PDS) as a negative control.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>RT-qPCR Analysis</title>
<p>To validate RNA-Seq data, DEGs were verified by RT-qPCR using (Schmittgen and Livak, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">2008</xref>) procedures. Primers were created using NCBI (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov</ext-link>) and gene sequences from <italic>G. hirsutum</italic>. Quantitative PCR was performed using an SYBR&#x000AE; Green PCR Master Mix Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and an ABI-7900 system. The 2-<sup>&#x00394;&#x00394;C</sup>T was used to determine the relative gene expression (Schmittgen and Livak, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">2008</xref>). Internally, <italic>GhActin</italic> was employed as a reference. The RT-qPCR experiment was carried out in three biological and technical replications (Chen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2015</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Statistical Analysis</title>
<p>Chenomx NMR Suite 7.7 was used to do the multivariate statistical analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), partial least squares determinant analysis (PLS-DA), and orthogonal projections to latent structures (OPLS-DA). The variance in the data matrix was presented using PCA. PLS-DA can maximize the differentiation between groups, which helps find differential metabolites. OPLS-DA data was used to examine subsequent model tests and differential metabolite screening. Fisher&#x00027;s exact test in R was used to calculate statistical significance. The Benjamini-Hochberg correction was used to adjust the false recovery rate (FDR) in the transcriptome analysis (Noble, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">2009</xref>). Coexpression network analysis was established by Cytoscape v.3.7.2 (Shannon et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">2003</xref>). The SPSS program was used to perform both t-tests and ANOVA. Significant differences were declared at the <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05 probability level (Worley and Powers, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">2015</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title>Phenotypical and Biochemical Response of Cotton Lines Under Drought Stress</title>
<p>Wilting was observed in the plants under drought stress with reduced evaporation. There were no obvious differences in the phenotype of three semi-wild cotton lines in response to drought stress (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1I</xref>). Clear and significant differences (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05) were recorded in the case of physiological and biochemical parameters (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1II</xref>). Chlorophyll and relative water contents in MG85 and CRI12 were higher as compared to LT40. A lower ion leakage with a higher excised leaf water loss was observed in LT40 as compared to CRI12 and MG85 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1III</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Cotton physiological and biochemical parameters determination. <bold>(I)</bold> A Marie-galantie85, B Upland cotton, C Lattifolium40. <bold>(II)</bold> Phenotype parameters evaluation, A Excised leaf water loss, B Relative leaf water content, C Chlorophyll content, D Cell membrane stability. <bold>(III)</bold> A Representative images of Marie-galantie85, Upland cotton, and Lattifolium40 before treatment B Representative images of (Marie-galantie85, Upland cotton, and Lattifolium40) after Drought treatment. <bold>(IV)</bold> A Catalase, B Super oxidase, C Malondehyde, D Hydrogen peroxide. SE is reflected by error bars. Using the Least Significance Difference (LSD) means on the same graph tracked by the same letter are not statistically different at the 5% probability level, Drought: supplementing with 17% PEG-6000 solution.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-746771-g0001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Higher activities of CAT and SOD were observed in MG85 and CRI12 under drought stress conditions, however lower CAT and SOD were observed in the case of LT40. Moreover, we also measured the H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and MDA activities. We found out that they were higher in LT40 as compared to MG85 and CRI12. Thus, suggesting that MG85 and CRI12 were more resistant to drought as compared to LT40 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1IV</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Transcriptome Profiling of Semi-wild Cotton Accessions</title>
<p>We selected semi-wild cotton lines, namely, Marie-galantie85, Lattifolium40, and Upland cotton for the transcriptome sequencing in response to drought treatment. After sequencing, 54 transcriptome libraries were obtained. For the accuracy of the subsequent analysis of the new data, reads with lower, linker sequences, sequences having &#x0003E;10% unknown N were deleted. After filtering the new data, we finally acquired high-quality clean reads of 2.66 Gigabytes in all the 54 libraries (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). The average length of each clean-read was 150 bp. We, therefore, acquired over 95% high-quality clean reads. The Q20 and Q30 base percentages were all above 96 and 90%, respectively, and the GC content was higher than 43% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). Bowtie2 was used for the screening of high-quality reads and then comparing them with <italic>G. hirsutum</italic> reference genome by TopHat2 software. The samples were tested for Pairwise repeatability and the correlation coefficient was all above 84%, indicating that the samples were reproducible.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>A summary of current transcriptome results.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Sample</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Raw reads</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Clean reads</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Total mapped reads</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Unique mapped reads</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>GC (%)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Q20 (%)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Q30 (%)</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TRL0-1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48,382,870</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47,225,346</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46,864,548</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38,448,228</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47.99</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93.23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TRL0-2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52,579,728</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51,266,772</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51,111,992</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43,772,867</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47.24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93.10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TRL0-3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">56,336,308</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">55,247,256</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">55,065,692</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47,160,405</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.70</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.88</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93.91</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TGL0-1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62,664,822</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61,409,970</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61,189,338</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52,802,603</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.86</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93.87</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TGL0-2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52,842,324</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51,850,414</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51,726,288</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44,713,330</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.71</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.86</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93.86</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TGL0-3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58,919,954</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57,594,852</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57,416,494</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49,525,417</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93.28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TSL0-1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58,559,786</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57,179,842</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57,016,934</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48,485,182</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.99</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.63</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93.34</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TSL0-2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59,147,410</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57,876,556</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57,665,152</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49,235,289</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47.29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.73</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93.55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TSL0-3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">56,103,088</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">55,022,828</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">54,945,274</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47,130,318</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.85</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93.88</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TRR0-1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59,661,212</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58,348,918</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58,250,544</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47,177,073</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93.41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TRR0-2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60,836,394</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59,464,474</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59,424,308</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47,696,256</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.69</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93.52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TRR0-3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60,472,180</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59,089,838</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59,049,864</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48,394,946</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93.45</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TGR0-1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53,556,182</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52,473,026</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52,431,124</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43,410,768</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93.55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TGR0-2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52,873,460</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51,652,388</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51,628,582</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41,462,144</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.64</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93.38</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TGR0-3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53,740,848</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52,592,468</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52,555,948</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43,484,717</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93.57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TSR0-1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35,554,402</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34,230,188</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34,195,512</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27,253,893</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.47</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">90.37</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TSR0-2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37,148,188</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35,631,744</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35,578,158</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27,782,277</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">90.17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TSR0-3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36,465,000</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35,138,014</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35,100,842</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28,224,201</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.49</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">90.41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TRL24-1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38,588,574</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37,466,818</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37,364,512</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31,856,229</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.86</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">91.27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TRL24-2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43,266,850</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41,820,656</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41,748,212</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35,299,949</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.70</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">90.92</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TRL24-3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37,506,180</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36,261,436</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36,195,632</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30,764,724</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43.88</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.68</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">90.89</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TGL24-1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42,139,862</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">40,793,736</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">40,723,212</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34,645,495</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43.91</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.75</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">91.05</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TGL24-2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38,490,510</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37,387,542</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37,280,882</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31,901,237</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.90</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">91.40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TGL24-3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51,608,270</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50,429,954</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50,380,624</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43,125,825</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.49</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">92.92</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TSL24-1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37,963,532</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36,924,042</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36,842,624</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31,105,640</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.94</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">91.47</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TSL24-2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">40,970,448</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">39,753,298</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">39,526,760</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">33,257,300</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.88</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">91.29</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TSL24-3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32,655,298</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31,682,966</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31,612,760</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26,842,030</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.94</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.82</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">91.11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TRR24-1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36,393,502</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35,239,978</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35,227,504</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29,516,296</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.80</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">90.96</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TRR24-2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">39,448,514</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38,355,908</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38,333,978</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32,361,413</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.91</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">91.37</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TRR24-3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44,130,164</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42,809,914</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42,760,620</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35,729,344</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.80</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">91.09</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TGR24-1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">39,080,012</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37,735,156</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37,659,594</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31,708,405</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">90.64</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TGR24-2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60,082,788</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59,164,730</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59,100,514</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50,716,629</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95.27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TGR24-3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62,648,430</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61,644,858</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61,545,300</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52,233,829</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95.25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TSR24-1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53,922,604</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53,047,176</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53,008,684</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44,163,965</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.88</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95.10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TSR24-2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59,216,670</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58,302,694</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58,251,088</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48,640,679</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95.21</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TSR24-3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61,298,808</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60,309,438</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60,271,016</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50,511,717</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98.28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95.08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TRL48-1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57,665,814</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">56,787,410</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">56,704,326</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48,914,483</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98.40</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95.40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TRL48-2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59,600,270</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58,630,866</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58,514,704</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50,438,767</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.42</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95.15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TRL48-3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62,355,000</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61,249,494</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61,063,896</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52,450,181</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.68</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">94.90</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TGL48-1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50,097,144</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49,265,584</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49,029,832</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42,334,742</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95.03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TGL48-2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51,026,702</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48,797,200</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48,707,336</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41,259,576</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.82</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">91.04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TGL48-3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49,785,362</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48,446,686</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48,357,420</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41,420,251</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">92.39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TSL48-1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44,610,152</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43,327,706</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43,165,214</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36,405,082</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.90</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">92.27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TSL48-2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45,646,602</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44,351,926</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44,240,168</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37,396,188</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">92.27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TSL48-3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45,866,752</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44,708,516</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44,645,818</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38,058,545</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">92.53</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TRR48-1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50,231,244</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48,964,774</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48,922,846</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41,803,375</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">92.50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TRR48-2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">39,102,736</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38,217,636</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38,189,310</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32,714,043</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">92.78</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TRR48-3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45,484,738</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44,342,814</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44,311,208</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37,838,745</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">92.59</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TGR48-1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51,054,758</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49,757,474</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49,700,324</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41,707,916</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43.79</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">92.59</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TGR48-2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66,423,520</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">65,320,396</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">65,236,086</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">55,097,529</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43.45</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95.22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TGR48-3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60,719,100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59,806,544</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59,777,658</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49,964,718</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43.64</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95.30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TSR48-1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51,940,624</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51,138,914</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51,064,996</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43,096,431</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95.19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TSR48-2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">54,843,004</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53,977,846</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53,945,150</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45,435,202</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95.26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TSR48-3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62,110,754</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61,093,238</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60,981,072</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52,012,735</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.66</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95.01</td>
</tr>
<tr style="border-top: thin solid #000000;">
<td valign="top" align="left">Total</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2,723,819,448</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2,660,610,218</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2,655,607,474</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2,238,889,129</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>TRL-0, leaf tissue of Marie-galantie85 at 0 h; TRR-0, root tissue of Marie-galantie85 at 0 h; TGL-0, leaf tissue of Upland cotton at 0 h; TGR-0, root tissue of Upland cotton at 0 h; TSL-0, leaf tissue of Lattifolium40 at 0 h; TSR-0, root tissue of Lattifolium40 at 0 h; TRL-24, leaf tissue Marie-galantie85 at 24 h; TRR-24, root tissue Marie-galantie85 at 24 h; TGL-24, leaf tissue of Upland cotton at 24 h; TGR-24, root tissue of Upland cotton at 24 h; TSL-24, leaf samples of Lattifolium40 at 24 h; TSR-24, Lattifolium40, root samples at 24 h; TRL-48, leaf samples of Marie-galantie85 at 48 h; TRR-48, root tissue Marie-galantie85 at 48 h; TGL-48, leaf samples of Upland cotton at 48 h; TGR-48, root tissue of Upland cotton at 48 h; TSL-48: Leaf tissue of Lattifolium40 at 48 h; TSR-48, root samples of Lattifolium40 at 48 h; 1, 2, and 3 stands for three replications</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>DEGs Identification and Drought Stress Treatment</title>
<p>We found that the upregulated genes were higher in number as compared to the downregulated genes in both the leaves and roots. Specifically, TRL0 vs. TRL24 (23701 vs. 12610), TGL0 vs. TGL24 (21903 vs. 1118), and TSL0 vs. TSL48 (11618 vs. 9632) in leaves. Whereas TRR0 vs. TRR48 (19935 vs. 16030), TGR0 vs. TGR48 (19598 vs. 14874), and TSR0 vs. TSR48 (19031 vs. 13490) were highly upregulated and downregulated genes in roots (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2II</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>Distribution of DEGs and DEMs in different time points of <italic>Gossypium</italic> accessions. <bold>(I)</bold> Gene distributions among different materials, A Differential gene distribution among different comparison groups of MG85 leaves. B Differential distribution of LT40 gene among different comparison groups. C Gene distribution among different comparison groups of CRI12 leaves, D MG85 differences between different comparison groups Gene distribution, E LT40 differential gene distribution among different comparison groups, F CRI12 differential gene distribution among different comparison groups. <bold>(II)</bold> Number of DEGs identified by pairwise comparisons between cotton lines and drought treatments. Upregulated (Red) and downregulated genes were quantified. Based on |log2 (fold change) &#x0003E; 1| and <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05 were considered as significantly differential genes. <bold>(III)</bold> Principal Component Analysis Model, where MRL, Marie- galantie85 leaves; MRR, Marie-galantie85 Root; MGL, upland cotton leaf; MGR, upland cotton root; MSL, Lattifolium40 leaf; MSR, Lattifolium40 Root. <bold>(IV)</bold> Differentially Expressed Metabolites, upregulated (Red) and downregulated genes were quantified. LC-MS metabolite analyses were used to detect the metabolites from leaf and root tissues. DEGS, differentially expressed genes; DEMs, differentially expressed metabolites; LC-MS, Liquid chromatography-Mass spectrometry.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-746771-g0002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The reason for higher DGEs number in roots at different time points of drought application could be that they are the first to be in contact with PEG-6000, thus triggering the drought response. The amount of differently expressed genes in root tissues grew over time, owing to the roots&#x00027; direct interaction with PEG-6000, which resulted in more sustained drought response in the roots. Intersection and union analysis of differentially expressed genes at different time points in the same material was performed by applying Venny online software (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2I</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Analysis of Differential Gene Expression Trends</title>
<p>The expression patterns of genes change with conditions such as specific environments and time. The trend analysis of genes that were differentially expressed was performed by STEM software for the expression of leaf and root regulatory genes at different time points. The differentially expressed genes of the experimental materials were divided into 8 gene expression trends. According to the standard of (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05), the gene expression trend showed the same significant trend (trend 1, trend 6, and trend 7) with time in the three materials in both leaves and roots (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p>Trends of DEGs expressions levels in MG85, LT40, and CRI12.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="4" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Root</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="4" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Leaf</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Trend 0</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Trend 1</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Trend 6</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Trend 7</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Trend 0</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Trend 1</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Trend 6</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Trend 7</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MG85</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6,512</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8,437</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11,834</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6,109</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6,512</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9,412</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20,725</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3,723</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">LT40</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7,167</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7,678</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16,047</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4,561</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7,167</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4,993</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9,369</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2,533</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CRI12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4,817</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10,066</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14,708</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5,162</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4,817</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8,911</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18,032</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2,550</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>MG85, marie-galantie85; LT40, Lattifolium40; CRI12, upland cotton</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Analysis of Metabolites in Cotton Semi-wild Lines Under Drought Stress</title>
<p>According to the principal component analysis of the six quality control samples gathered together, the dispersion is very small, indicating that the stability of the instrument is better in the analysis of metabolites, and the results of metabolite analysis are reliable. Thirty-six samples were divided into four components by the main components PCA1 (39.9%) and PCA2 (12.8%). The main component PCA1 (39.9%) separated the leaves and root samples, indicating that under drought stress, leaves and roots respond differently (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2III</xref>). The main component PCA2 (12.8%) separates the samples at different treatment time points of the material, and the difference in the roots is small. It is indicated that the changes in leaves are more obvious at different treatment time points of drought stress. This may be due to the sensitivity of leaf tissues to stress as compared to root tissues. LC-MS analysis was helpful to identify 445 metabolites totally (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table 4</xref>). According to the analysis of the differentially expressed metabolites, the highest upregulated metabolites were recorded in the leaves at MGL0 vs. MGL48 (67 metabolites), MRL0 vs. MRL48 (61 metabolites), and MSL0 vs. MSL48 (56 metabolites), respectively, whereas the highest downregulation of metabolites was found in roots from MRR0 vs. MRR48 (54 metabolites), MSR0 vs. MRR48 (47 metabolites) and MSR0 vs. MSR48 (36 metabolites) successively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2IV</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>GO Function Enrichment Analysis</title>
<p>The identified differentially expressed genes in both the roots and leaves tissues were mainly enriched in the molecular functions, cell components, and the biological processes of functional categories (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure 1</xref>). In MG85, the leaf tissues were enriched in biological and molecular functions, whereas the root tissues were enriched only in biological processes. In CRI12, both tissues are enriched in two functions, namely, biological and molecular, and biological and cellular, respectively. Differently from the above lines LT40 enriched in all the three GO functions biological, cellular, and molecular in leaf tissues only, there is no significant enrichment in the root tissues (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure 1</xref>). In the biological process, the most important DEGs were involved in metabolic processes (GO:0008152), cellular processes (GO:0009987), biogenesis (GO:0071840), and single organism processes (GO:0044699), etc. On the other hand, in cellular components, DEGs were mainly involved in cells (GO:0005623), cell parts (GO:0044464), organelles (GO:0043226), macromolecular complex (GO:0032991), and extracellular region (GO:0005576). The molecular functions mainly included binding (GO:0005488) and catalytic activity (GO:0003824). Among them, we found that most of the DEGs were enriched in the metabolic processes in the tissues of different materials. Thus revealing that primary metabolites and secondary metabolites play an essential part in response to drought stress.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>WGCNA Analysis for the Identification of Hub Genes</title>
<p>Here we used the FPKM values of commonly expressed DEGs to perform a weighted gene coexpression network analysis for the identification of hub genes associated with drought stress tolerance. A cluster dendograms was generated to see the number of modules along with DEGs, a network heatmap was also generated from the genes located in each of the identified module (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3A,B</xref>). Using WGCNA, thirteen different modules were detected. Out of these thirteen modules, three modules (Yellow, brown, and pink) were found to be highly and positively associated with our phenotype. The yellow module contains 1,568 genes, the brown module contains 1,234 genes whereas 765 genes were present in the pink module. The yellow module has significant associations with MG85 0 h, CRI12 0 h, and LT40 0 h in root with <italic>r</italic> = 0.02 and <italic>p</italic> = 0.54, respectively. Brown modules have significant correlations with MG85 0 h, CRI12 0 h, and LT40 0 h in leaf with <italic>p</italic> = 0.02, <italic>p</italic> = 0.02 and <italic>p</italic> = 0.03 with <italic>r</italic><sup>2</sup> values of 0.55, 0.55, and 0.52, successively. Pink modules have significant associations with MG85 0 h and CRI12 0 h with <italic>r</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.42, 0.44 and <italic>p</italic> = 0.49 and 0.42, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3C</xref>). Cytoscape v.3.7.2 was used for the network visualization.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p>WGCNA revealed gene networks and major candidate genes for drought <bold>(A)</bold> Network building of three upland cotton accessions using cluster dendrograms. <bold>(B)</bold> Heatmap of the network of genes that were subjected to the coexpression module calculation. <bold>(C)</bold> Pearson correlation-based module-trait relationships. From green to red, the color key symbolizes <italic>r</italic><sup>2</sup> values ranging from &#x02212;1 to 1. Because of the highest weight inside the module, each network&#x00027;s hub genes are indicated in red and gene descriptions are coded using annotations. WGCNA, Weighted gene co-expression network analysis.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-746771-g0003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Network Visualization, RT-qPCR Validations, and Phylogenetic Analysis for Key Genes Linked to Drought Stress</title>
<p>WGCNA helped us to import the top 30 genes for each of the significant modules to build the coexpression networks. The gene lists were further used for the network visualizations. We used Cytoscape software for this purpose. To identify the hub genes, a built-in Cytoscape extension by the name of &#x0201C;cytohubba&#x0201D; was used (Shannon et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">2003</xref>). Five hub genes from the yellow module include <italic>Gh_A07G0563, Gh_D05G0221, Gh_A05G3716, Gh_D12G1438</italic>, and <italic>Gh_D05G0697</italic>, the brown module contains three hub genes (<italic>Gh_A06G1257, Gh_A06G1256</italic>, and <italic>Gh_D06G1578</italic>), and the pink module has five hub genes, namely, <italic>Gh_A02G1616, Gh_D12G2599, Gh_D07G2232, Gh_A02G0527</italic>, and <italic>Gh_D07G0629</italic>. The most interesting thing is that all the thirteen hub genes belong to the same ALDH family. Furthermore, the expression profiles of all hub genes in different plant parts under drought stress were validated via RT-qPCR. Results from RT-qPCR suggest that the <italic>Gh_A06G1257</italic> gene, having the highest expression under drought stress, might be the true candidate responsible for drought stress tolerance. We further validate this gene on a functional basis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p>Hub genes identification for drought stress tolerance and RT-qPCR analysis. <bold>(I)</bold> A Brown module, B Pink module, C Yellow module. <bold>(II)</bold> Gene expression in the cotton accessions is represented as a heat map. A Heat map of RNA Seq (FPKM) and RT-qPCR of leaf tissues in log2 fold change. B Heat map of RNA Seq (FPKM) and RT-qPCR (RT-qPCR) of root tissues in log2 fold change. C Phylogenetic tree analysis for homologous genes. FPKM, Fragments per kilobase of transcript per million fragments; RT-qPCR, Real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-746771-g0004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Two distinct clusters were formed as a result of phylogenetic analysis. The candidate gene <italic>Gh_A06G1257</italic> together with the two Gossypium species together with <italic>A. thaliana, T. cacao</italic>, and <italic>B. rapa</italic> were grouped in one cluster. <italic>G. max, M. truncatula, O. sativa, T. aestivum, Z. mays</italic>, and <italic>S. bicolo</italic>r were also grouped in the second cluster.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Overexpression of <italic>Gh_A06G1257</italic> in Arabidopsis Increases Tolerance to Drought Stress</title>
<p>We performed PCR and RT-qPCR analysis to see the expression level of six positive lines. OE-1, OE-9, and OE-10 overexpressed lines conformed with the highest expression level (<bold>Figure 8I</bold>). Seedlings of overexpressed lines were exposed to drought for studying the functions of <italic>Gh_A06G1257</italic> during drought stress. The wild-type and transgenic seedlings grew and germinated uniformly in the MS medium. On the other hand, the MS medium containing 300 mM mannitol seedlings of OE lines (OE-1, OE-9, and OE-10) showed better germination, grew faster than wild-type seedlings, and demonstrated a drought-resistant phenotype. Increased mannitol concentration resulted in a steady decrease in the rate of germination. In normal conditions, germination was calculated to be &#x0003E;90% in both wild and transgenic lines <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figures 5A,B</xref>. However, under drought stress treatments, wild-type seedlings showed a decrease in germination rate to &#x0003C;25%, while a significantly higher germination rate of 60% was observed in transgenic lines in 300 mM mannitol. Under mannitol treatment, longer roots (13 mm) were observed in the lines with over-expressed ALDH gene while in wildtype a shorter root length of 6 mm, suggesting overexpressed lines are more resistant to drought stress (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figures 5C,D</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption><p>Germination and root length determination <bold>(A)</bold> Arabidopsis has grown on MS medium with 100 mM, 200 mM, and 300 mM mannitol evaluation. <bold>(B)</bold> Root length determination after drought treatment <bold>(C)</bold> Germination assays of Arabidopsis growth in different concentrations of mannitol, <bold>(D)</bold> Root length determination of Arabidopsis growth in 0- and 300-mM concentrations of mannitol. The error bars reflect the standard error. Using the LSD, means on the same graph, with the similar letter are not significantly different at the 5% probability level. LSD, the least significant difference. OE, overexpressed; WT, wild-type; mM; millimole.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-746771-g0005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Physiological Parameters Evaluation in Arabidopsis Under Drought Stress</title>
<p>In response to drought stress, we compared the physiological responses of the three transgenic lines with the wildtype. Under normal conditions, there were no significant differences between the transgenic lines and the wild type in any of the measurements, but when the plants were stressed, the transgenic lines showed greater stress tolerance than the wild type. RLWC was much higher in transgenic lines than in control lines (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6I</xref>). Wild-type plants displayed more stress-induced ion leakage when they were stressed by drought. Under regulated conditions, the ELWL did not differ statistically between wild-type and transgenic plants. However, under stress conditions, the wild-type leaves lost more water than the transgenic plant leaves <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6II</xref>. The fact that the transformed gene improved drought stress tolerance in the transgenic Arabidopsis lines was demonstrated by the increased degree of tolerance between the transgenic lines.</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption><p><bold>(I)</bold> Physiological parameters evaluation in ALDH overexpressed lines under drought stress. <bold>(II)</bold> A Transgenic lines and wild type under control and treatment. A Relative leaf water content, B excised leaf water loss, C chlorophyll content, and D Ion leakage after drought stress treatment. The error bars reflect the SE. Significant differences were observed by different letters above the graphs (ANOVA, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05). WT, wild type; overexpressed lines (OE-1, OE-9, and OE-10) after 8-day stress treatment. Three replications were maintained in the experiment. ANOVA, analysis of variance; SE, standard error.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-746771-g0006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Measurements of Oxidants and Antioxidants in Transgenic and Wild-Type Arabidopsis Plants</title>
<p>Activities of oxidants and antioxidants were measured in the transgenic and wild-type plants after applying drought treatment. Under control circumstances, there were no significant variations in SOD and CAT activity between transgenic lines and the wild type. However, when seedlings were exposed to drought stress after 8 days, the transgenic lines OE-1, OE-9, and OE-11 showed significant changes from the wild type, with increased SOD and CAT activity, lower MDA, and lower H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> levels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7A&#x02013;D</xref>). Our results suggest that <italic>Gh_A06G1257</italic> is playing a critical role in drought stress tolerance.</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption><p>Evaluation of Antioxidants and oxidants in ALDH overexpressed and WT during drought stress <bold>(A)</bold> Catalase (CAT), <bold>(B)</bold> Superoxidase (SOD), <bold>(C)</bold> Malondialdehyde (MDA), <bold>(D)</bold> Hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) in post-treatment. Bars indicate SE. Three replications were maintained in the experiment. WT, wild type; OE-1, OE-9, OE-10, overexpressed lines. CAT, catalase; SOD, superoxidase; MDA, malondialdehyde; ALDH, Aldehyde dehydrogenase.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-746771-g0007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Expression Analysis of Stress-Responsive Genes</title>
<p>We choose four abiotic responsive genes ABF4, SOS1, RAB18, and RD22 to measure the expressions by qRT-PCR in over-expressed and wild-type seedlings for a better understanding of the role <italic>Gh_A06G1257</italic> is playing when plants are exposed to abiotic stress. Results from the RT-qPCR results revealed that upon exposure of transgenic lines to drought, the expressions of ABF4, SOS1, RAB18, and RD22 were recorded higher in the transgenic lines (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8II</xref>). Thus, suggesting that <italic>Gh_A06G1257</italic> has a key role in coping with drought stress.</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>Figure 8</label>
<caption><p>Expression analysis of Gh_A06G1257 by RT-qPCR. <bold>(I)</bold> A The 771 bp CDS sequence transformation to T2 generation was checked using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), 1&#x02013;11 overexpressed lines, WT, wild type. B RT-qPCR was used to examine the transcript levels of the Gh A06G1257 (ALDH) of T2 overexpressed lines in three biological replications. <bold>(II)</bold> Expression analysis of abiotic stress-responsive genes. A APF4, B SOS1, C RAb18, D RD22 in transgenic lines (OE-1, OE-9, and OE-10) and wild type, Atactin2 gene used as an internal reference, and each experiment was done three times. CDS, coding sequence; RTqPCR, Real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-746771-g0008.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Effects on Physio-Morphological Traits Under Drought Stress Conditions</title>
<p>Significant variations in the physio-morphological traits of cotton were observed under drought conditions. The VIGS plants, positive controlled plants, and the wild types significantly (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05) differs in their response to drought stress in both morphological and physiological traits (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9</xref>). Plant height and root length showed no significant differences, while VIGS plants had a considerably lower shoot and root fresh weights than wild-type pes and positive controls. Moreover, VIGS plants have a higher excised leaf water loss, and ion leakage but significantly lower relative leaf water contents than positive control and wild-type plants under drought stress.</p>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>Figure 9</label>
<caption><p>Morphological and physiological trait evaluation. <bold>(A)</bold> Illustrative pictures of wildtype, positive control, and silenced seedlings before stress exposure. <bold>(B)</bold> Illustrative pictures of wildtype, positive control, and silenced seedlings after stress exposure. <bold>(C)</bold> Plant height and root length. <bold>(D)</bold> Shoot fresh weight and root fresh weight. <bold>(E)</bold> Excised leaf water loss. <bold>(F)</bold> Relative water content, <bold>(G)</bold> chlorophyll content in leaves, <bold>(H)</bold> cell membrane stability. The error bars reflect the standard error (SE). Using the Least Significant Difference (LSD), means on the same graph, with the same letter are not significantly different at the 5% probability level, WT, wild type, TRV2:00 Empty vector, TRV2: GhALDH7B4, the silenced seedlings. Untreated: control, supplementing with 17% PEG-6000 solution. LSD, the least significant difference.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-746771-g0009.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Measurement of Oxidants and Antioxidants in VIGS and Wild-Type Plants</title>
<p>We observed significant differences (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001) in the oxidants and antioxidants activities among VIGS and wild-type plants. Overall, lower antioxidant activities and higher oxidant activities were measured in the case of VIGS plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10II</xref>). CAT and SOD contents before treatment were almost the same, while after being treated with PEG-6000, the wild plants showed an increase over the VIGS plants. An increase in the contents of the oxidant enzymes activities showed that the VIGS plants experience higher oxidative stress than wild-type and positive controls. Activities of MDA and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> were similar in normal conditions but recorded higher under drought stress mainly in the VIGS plants. Thus, our results suggest that the knockdown of the <italic>Gh_A06G1257</italic> gene has a significant influence on coping with drought stress.</p>
<fig id="F10" position="float">
<label>Figure 10</label>
<caption><p>Enzyme assay and analysis of the variation in the expression levels of cotton using RT-qPCR. <bold>(I)</bold> Illustrative pictures of Wildtype, TRV2:00, TRV2: GhALDH7B4 and TRV2: PDS. <bold>(II)</bold> A Catalase, B super oxidase, C malondialdehyde, D hydrogen peroxide, E stress response gene profile in wildtype, positive control, and silenced seedlings under drought stress in the leaves. F Stress response gene profile in wildtype, positive control, and silenced seedlings under drought stress in root tissue. The error bars reflect the SE. Using the Least Significant Difference (LSD), means on the same graph, with the same letter are not significantly different at the 5% probability level. Untreated: Control, Drought: supplementing with 17% PEG-6000 solution. SE, standard error; LSD, least significant difference.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-746771-g0010.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Relative Expression of the Knocked Down Gene and Wild-Type Plants</title>
<p>Samples from the leaves and roots of wild-type, positive control, and VIGS plants were collected. To clarify the role of the ALDH gene (<italic>Gh_A06G1257)</italic> under drought, we collected samples from different tissues to check the expression. The expression of <italic>Gh_A06G1257</italic> in VIGS plants was lower as compared to the wild-type and the positive control plants. Thus, indicating that <italic>Gh_A06G1257</italic> is playing a critical role in coping with drought (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10II</xref>E,F).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Multi Pathway Enrichment Analysis</title>
<p>In the KEGG pathway annotation, the metabolites were enriched in metabolism, genetic information processing, and environmental processing information groups. A total of 25 genes playing key roles in different pathways have been identified from metabolome KEGG analysis (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table 1B</xref>). Within this, the ALDH genes were enriched in amino acids metabolism, carbohydrates and lipids metabolism, and the replication and repair activities. The metabolism enrichment analysis found that the major enriched pathways during drought stress were arginine and proline metabolisms, tryptophan metabolism, valine and leucine degradation, and lysine degradation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11">Figure 11</xref>). In general, higher numbers of metabolites were upregulated in the leaves than roots under drought. In arginine and proline metabolism pathway out of nine metabolites agmatine and spermidine, in tryptophan metabolism out of ten metabolites, tryptamine, N-Acetyl-5-hydroxytryptamine, and kynurenic acid, in valine and leucine degradation mainly <sc>L</sc>-valine showed upregulation in leaf tissue. On the contrary, <sc>L</sc>-ascorbic acid in glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism, glutaric acid and N6-Acetyl-<sc>L</sc>-Lysine in lysine degradation, <sc>L</sc>-valine in valine and leucine degradation, and <sc>L</sc>-proline in arginine and proline metabolism showed upregulation in root tissues during drought stress. The rest of the metabolites showed a similar trend in both tissues.</p>
<fig id="F11" position="float">
<label>Figure 11</label>
<caption><p>Heatmap of gene expression and expression patterns of metabolites enriched KEGG pathways. <bold>(A)</bold> Expression profiles of key genes involved in metabolic pathways. <bold>(B)</bold> The relative expression levels of metabolites based on log10 values using metabolome data in different pathways. KEGG, Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-746771-g0011.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Cotton, an essential industrial crop worldwide, and its production are affected by numerous stresses including both biotic and abiotic. Drought is among the key threats contributing to the significant yield losses in cotton (Hou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">2018</xref>). Several processes, i.e., molecular, cellular, and physiological contributes, in causing drought to result in the variations in the expression levels of genes involved in osmolyte production and their roles in improving antioxidant systems (Joshi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2016</xref>). Wild relatives are believed to be a source of prominent genetic assets linked to abiotic stress tolerance (Iseki et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2018</xref>). Narrow genetic diversity among crops, including wild wheat, leads the cultivated species to lose tolerance to drought (Budak et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">2013</xref>). Similarly, wild species of rice offer an extensive range of adaptive traits and can serve as potential contributors of biotic and abiotic stress tolerance (Neelam et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2018</xref>). In the current study, MG85 was used, which has a higher tolerance to drought and salt stresses than CRI12 (Xu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">2020</xref>) while LT40 is highly vulnerable to both the aforementioned stresses (Yang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">2019</xref>).</p>
<p>In total, 70,478 coding genes were present in the allotetraploid cotton <italic>G. hirsutum</italic> genome (TM-1) (Zhang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">2015</xref>). The tissues of MG85, LT40, and CRI12 were subjected to transcriptome sequencing and obtained 54 transcriptome libraries. After filtering the new data, a total of 64,617 genes were found. In a similar study, a total of 64,737 genes from 48 cDNA libraries were identified from the same test accessions under salt stress conditions (Xu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">2020</xref>). In distinct comparison groups, upregulated genes were considerably higher than downregulated genes in both leaves and roots. More DEGs in roots than in leaves showed that the roots are the most affected tissues under salt stress and, thus, have a multifaceted gene regulation to decrease the effect of salt stress (Xu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">2020</xref>). WGCNA proved to be a highly useful analysis to identify hub genes linked to drought stress tolerance in cotton.</p>
<p>In metabolite analysis, the principal component analysis separates the leaves and root samples, which meant that after drought treatment, the metabolites in leaves and roots respond to drought stress differently at different treatment time points. Differentially expressed metabolites analysis showed that the highest upregulated metabolites were recorded in leaves, whereas the highest downregulation of metabolites occurred in the roots. Kang et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2019</xref>) reported that leaves of tolerant wheat genotype changed 45 and 20 metabolites more than the roots, whereas the leaves and roots of sensitive wheat genotype changed 38 and 28 metabolites, respectively, indicating that plants dedicated more resources to the leaves of tolerant genotype. Arabidopsis plants upon grown on MS medium having supplemented mannitol, seedlings with over-expressed ALDH possess drought tolerance where wild type shows sensitivity. Our results indicate that <italic>Gh_A06G1257</italic> might play a key role in drought improvement during seed germination and root elongation. Moreover, overexpressed lines showed stable relative water contents, chlorophyll contents and, low water loss and ion damage as compared to the wild-type plants. We also employed pTRV-VIGS in cotton seedlings to study the part Gh<italic>_A06G1257</italic> is playing in drought stress. Plant height and root length showed no significant differences, while VIGS plants had a considerably lower shoot and root fresh weights than wild-type pes and positive controls. Moreover, VIGS plants have a higher excised leaf water loss, and ion leakage but significantly lower relative leaf water contents than positive control and wild-type plants under drought stress. Duan et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2015</xref>) studied the co-expression of the introduced bar and <italic>CsALDH</italic> genes in transgenic plants of Alfalfa and found that the transgenic plants retain higher relative water content levels, higher shoot biomasses, little changes in the photosystem, and reduced membrane damage.</p>
<p>Overexpressed plants have higher antioxidant enzymes activities that regulate the contents of ROS within the cell (Hasanuzzaman et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2019</xref>). Under mannitol treatment, <italic>Gh_A06G1257</italic> plants have higher antioxidants activities including CAT and Peroxidase (POD) whereas, lower activities of oxidant enzymes (MDA and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) than wild-type (WT) plants. Under stress treatment, <italic>GhMPK3</italic> overexpressed plants were shown to have higher levels of antioxidants and lower contents of oxidant enzymes than WT plants (Sadau et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">2021</xref>).</p>
<p>The activities of oxidant and antioxidant enzymes before the treatment were the same while after being treated with PEG-6000 solution, the wild and positive control plants showed variations over the VIGS plants. Under drought stress circumstances, the VIGS plants experienced more oxidative stress than the WT and positively controlled plants, as evidenced by the elevated levels of oxidant enzymes (Yang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">2019</xref>). These results were following Kirungu et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">2020</xref>), who stated that knockdown of Dehydrin gene member meaningfully effects in reduction of plant height, root length, shoot fresh weight, and root fresh weight compared to the positive control and the wild-type plants. Similarly, contents of MDA and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> were similar in normal conditions but reached high under drought stress, mainly in the VIGS plants. Plants pay well-organized detoxifying systems in response to excess-initiation of ROS under abiotic stress, containing improved activities of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, peroxidase, ascorbate peroxidase, and a controlled amount of non-enzymatic antioxidants such as glutathione and ascorbic acid (Shi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">2015</xref>; Ding et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2018</xref>). Therefore, crops must preserve the amount of ROS at a proper level under abiotic stresses.</p>
<p>According to our results, <italic>Gh_A06G1257</italic> was found to be a candidate gene responsible for tolerance to drought stress. Results from VIGS in cotton and overexpression in Arabidopsis also confirm the role this gene is playing to cope with drought. An over-expression research in <italic>A. thaliana</italic> of the <italic>VvALDH2B4</italic> gene boosted protection against high salt and pathogenic bacteria and bring about lower MDA levels (Wen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">2012</xref>). When <italic>ScALDH21</italic> was introduced into tobacco plants, it resulted in greater germination ratios, root lengths, proline concentrations, antioxidant enzyme actions, and decreased MDA levels (Yang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">2015</xref>). <italic>CaALDH1</italic> gene silencing in pepper disturbed phenolic compound buildup, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> production, protection response gene expression, and cell death, while in transgenic <italic>A. thaliana</italic>, overexpressing <italic>CaALDH1</italic> revealed improved defense response to infection (Kim and Hwang, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">2015</xref>).</p>
<p><italic>BrALDH7B2</italic> has the potential to cope in both abiotic stress and hormonal treatments in <italic>Brassica rapa</italic>. Over-expressing <italic>BrALDH7B2</italic> in <italic>E. coli</italic> and yeast cells resulted in a substantial tolerance to abiotic stress. Hence, <italic>BrALDH</italic> genes need to be explored more as they play a key role to cope with abiotic stress in <italic>B. rapa</italic> (Gautam et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2019</xref>). Drought stress in soybean leaves strongly supported the functions of <italic>GmALDH</italic> genes, including <italic>GmALDH3H2, GmALDH12A2</italic>, and <italic>GmALDH18B3</italic> (Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">2017</xref>). The expression of &#x0201C;<italic>ALDH3I1&#x0201D;</italic> and &#x0201C;<italic>ALDH7B4&#x0201D;</italic> genes was adequate to boost tolerance against drought, salinity, and oxidative stress in crops (Kotchoni et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">2010</xref>). Plant <italic>ALDH7B</italic> expression has been found to be responsive to a wide range of stressors in studies, and expression is assumed to be a part of general stress-response pathways. UV exposure, dehydration, high salinity, low temperature, heat shock, and applied behavior analysis (ABA) therapy are just some of the stressors that cause <italic>ALDH7B</italic> overexpression (Brocker et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2013</xref>).</p>
<p>In the KEGG pathway annotation, ALDH genes play key roles in different pathways that have been identified as the home of metabolites during drought stress. <sc>L</sc>-ascorbic acid, agmatine, spermidine, myoinositol, ectoine, tryptamine, N-Acetyl-5-hydroxytryptamine, and kynurenic acid in leaf tissue, glutaric acid, <sc>L</sc>-ascorbic acid, N6-Acetyl-<sc>L</sc>-Lysine, <sc>L</sc>-tryptophan, and <sc>L</sc>-proline in root tissues showed upregulation. The ALDH gene family, which is involved in many pathway regulations and enzymes, appears to play a primary role in abiotic stress-response pathways. These metabolites could be an important target for increasing plant resistance to stressful conditions like elevated soil salinity or dehydration, which is especially important when developing stress-tolerant crops (Brocker et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2013</xref>). Metabolites like proline, <sc>L</sc>-arginine, <sc>L</sc>-histidine, <sc>L</sc>-isoleucine, and tryptophan exhibited increased after drought stress, which was likely the sign of acclimation in response to drought stress in chickpeas (Khan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2019</xref>). Similarly, in maize research, an increased amount of proline was observed under drought stress and tryptophan addition increased Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and Gibberellic acid (GA) production, and further increased Abscisic acid (ABA) production in water shortage areas, demonstrating that tryptophan addition may help enhance drought tolerance (Yasmin et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">2017</xref>).</p>
<p>Plants produce large amounts of ROS under drought stress. Most of these substances are antioxidants that can increase the drought resistance of plants under drought stress. Excessive amounts of these ROS can cause damage to plant cells and can lead to plant death (Suzuki et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">2012</xref>; Baxter et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2014</xref>; Nakabayashi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">2014</xref>; An et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">2015</xref>). Plants, sensing the osmotic stress through their receptor, will induce the regulation and expression of genes in the body and generate a large amount of metabolism through various amino acids, lipids, carbohydrates, and secondary metabolism. Antioxidant substances such as glutathione, lysine, proline, ascorbic acid, terpenoids, and flavonoids respond to drought stress (Nakabayashi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">2014</xref>; Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">2016</xref>). Similarly, a prominent group of metabolites affected by drought stress is amino acids, organic acids, sugars, sugar alcohol, and fatty alcohol. Tolerant genotypes distributed more resources to leaves than roots, whereas sensitive genotypes allocated resources to roots and leaves in a similar way (Kang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2019</xref>). Tryptophan is an osmolyte that regulates ion transport, modulates stomatal opening, and maintains water balance (Rahman et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">2017</xref>). Proline has been positively correlated with stress tolerance, serves as a compatible solute, and helps plants to avoid oxidative stress by keeping reduced levels of ROS (Hayat et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2012</xref>). Raised tryptophan and proline was crucial in drought stress condition (Kang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2019</xref>). Similarly, an increase in lysine concentration encourages the transcriptional upregulation of genes enhancing lysine-to-a-aminoadipate metabolic instability and using glutamate to yield proline to respond to abiotic and biotic stress (Arruda and Barreto, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">2020</xref>). In the RNA-Seq and RT-qPCR analysis, most genes were upregulated thus, demonstrating that these genes could be playing a significant role in enhancing drought stress tolerance in cotton. Similarly, <italic>Gh_A06G1257</italic> was found to be upregulated in all species and time points according to RNA-Sequencing as well as RT-qPCR analysis, which revealed that this is a true potential candidate for drought stress tolerance in cotton. Cai et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2019</xref>) stated that RT-qPCR results were significantly correlated to the RNA-Seq data both at 6 and 12 h points under cold stress (<italic>r</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.88 and 0.95) in <italic>G. thurberi</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="s5">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In the current research work, an integrated transcriptome and metabolome approach to investigate gene/s to cope with drought in cotton was utilized. Thirteen hub genes were initially identified by WGCNA. Further expression analysis in both leaves and root tissues revealed that <italic>Gh_A06G1257</italic> (<italic>GhALDH7B4</italic>) belonging to the ALDH family might be the candidate gene. We opted for VIGS and overexpression approaches for functionally validating the candidate gene and current results suggest that <italic>Gh_A06G1257</italic> is involved in drought stress tolerance in cotton. <sc>L</sc>-valine, Glutaric acid, <sc>L</sc>-proline, <sc>L</sc>-Glutamic acid, and <sc>L</sc>-Tryptophan were found to be the upregulated metabolites in the pathway annotation. This gene is newly identified. No previous reports regarding its role or functions in cotton are available. The results of this study may add to a profound understanding of the highly multifaceted genes and regulatory mechanisms that function in plants during drought stress.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s6">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: NCBI (accession: <ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="PRJNA663204">PRJNA663204</ext-link>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>TM: conceptualization, methodology, and writing original draft. YX: conceptualization and methodology. MU: writing&#x02014;review and editing. MS: formal analysis and investigation. YH, YW, SY, and XZ: investigation and resources. KW, XC, and ZZ: software and validation. FL: supervision. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="s8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31621005 and 32072023), Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="conf1">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s9">
<title>Publisher&#x00027;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s10">
<title>Supplementary Material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.746771/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.746771/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.zip" id="SM1" mimetype="application/zip" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abdelrahman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sawada</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nakabayashi</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sato</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hirakawa</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>El-Sayed</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Integrating transcriptome and target metabolome variability in doubled haploids of <italic>Allium cepa</italic> for abiotic stress protection</article-title>. <source>Mol. Breed.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>11</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0181784</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28800607</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ahmad</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Javed</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adeel</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rizwan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>PEG 6000-stimulated drought stress improves the attributes of <italic>in vitro</italic> growth, steviol glycosides production, and antioxidant activities in <italic>Stevia rebaudiana</italic> Bertoni</article-title>. <source>Plants (Basel)</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>1552</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants9111552</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33198205</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>An</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Transcriptome profiling and identification of transcription factors in ramie (<italic>Boehmeria nivea</italic> L. Gaud) in response to PEG treatment, using illumina paired-end sequencing technology</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>3493</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3511</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms16023493</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25658800</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arruda</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barreto</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Lysine catabolism through the saccharopine pathway: enzymes and intermediates involved in plant responses to abiotic and biotic stress</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>587</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2020.00587</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32508857</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ashraf</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zuo</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Malik</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abid</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Recent insights into cotton functional genomics: progress and future perspectives</article-title>. <source>Plant Biotechnol. J.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>699</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>713</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/pbi.12856</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29087016</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bagati</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mahajan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nazir</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmed</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zargar</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>&#x0201C;Omics&#x0201D;: A Gateway Towards Abiotic Stress Tolerance</article-title>, in <source>Abiotic Stress-Mediated Sensing and Signaling in Plants: An Omics Perspective</source> (<publisher-loc>Berlin</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>45</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-981-10-7479-0_1</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barrs</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weatherley</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1962</year>). <article-title>A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves by H. D. Barrs<sup>&#x0002A;</sup> and P. E. Weatherleyt</article-title>. <source>Aust. J. Biol. Sci.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>413</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>428</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Basal</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Szab,&#x000F3;</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Veres</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>PEG-induced drought stress effects on soybean germination parameters</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Nutr.</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>1768</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1779</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01904167.2020.1750638</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baxter</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mittler</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suzuki</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>ROS as key players in plant stress signalling</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>65</volume>, <fpage>1229</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1240</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/ert375</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24253197</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baytar</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peynircioglu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sezener</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Basal</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frary</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frary</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Genome-wide association mapping of yield components and drought tolerance-related traits in cotton</article-title>. <source>Mol. Breed.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>74</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11032-018-0831-0</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Blum</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ebercon</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1981</year>). <article-title>Cell membrane stability as a measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>43</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>47</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100010013x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brocker</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vasiliou</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carpenter</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carpenter</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) superfamily in plants: gene nomenclature and comparative genomics</article-title>. <source>Planta</source> <volume>237</volume>, <fpage>189</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>210</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00425-012-1749-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23007552</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Budak</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kantar</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yucebilgili</surname> <given-names>K. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Drought tolerance in modern and wild wheat</article-title>. <source>Sci. World J.</source> <volume>2013</volume>:<fpage>548246</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2013/548246</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23766697</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Magwanga</surname> <given-names>R. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Comparative transcriptome, physiological and biochemical analyses reveal response mechanism mediated by CBF4 and ICE2 in enhancing cold stress tolerance in <italic>Gossypium thurberi</italic></article-title>. <source>AoB Plants</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>plz045</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aobpla/plz045</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31777648</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhong</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>TraeALDH7B1-5A, encoding aldehyde dehydrogenase 7 in wheat, confers improved drought tolerance in Arabidopsis</article-title>. <source>Planta</source> <volume>242</volume>, <fpage>137</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>151</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00425-015-2290-8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25893867</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Clarke</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McCaig</surname> <given-names>T. N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1982</year>). <article-title>Excised-leaf water retention capability as an indicator of drought resistance of triticum genotypes</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>571</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>578</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4141/cjps82-086</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Farming and cultivation technologies of cotton in China</article-title>. <source>Cotton Res.</source> <volume>77</volume>:<fpage>97</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5772/64485</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Exogenous melatonin mitigates methyl viologen-triggered oxidative stress in poplar leaf</article-title>. <source>Molecules</source> <volume>23</volume>:<fpage>2852</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/molecules23112852</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30400163</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Duan</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Di</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Co-transforming bar and CsALDH genes enhanced resistance to herbicide and drought and salt stress in transgenic alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>1115</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2015.01115</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26734025</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fahimirad</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ghorbanpour</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Omics approaches in developing abiotic stress tolerance in rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> L.)</article-title>, in <source>Advances in Rice Research for Abiotic Stress Tolerance</source> (<publisher-loc>Amsterdam</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>), <fpage>767</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>779</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-12-814332-2.00038-1</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Faisal</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mujtaba</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Asma Mahboob</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Polyethylene glycol mediated osmotic stress impacts on growth and biochemical aspects of wheat (<italic>Triticum aestivum</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>213</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>223</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12892-018-0166-0</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Genomic insights into divergence and dual domestication of cultivated allotetraploid cottons</article-title>. <source>Genome Biol.</source> <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>33</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13059-017-1167-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28219438</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gautam</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmed</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shukla</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meena</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kirti</surname> <given-names>P. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Genome-wide characterization of ALDH Superfamily in Brassica rapa and enhancement of stress tolerance in heterologous hosts by BrALDH7B2 expression</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>13</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-019-43332-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31065035</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gene</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Consortium</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Gene ontology: tool for the unification of bio</article-title>. <source>Gene Expr.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>25</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>29</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/75556</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10802651</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Genome-wide characterization and expression analysis of the aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) gene superfamily under abiotic stresses in cotton</article-title>. <source>Gene</source> <volume>628</volume>, <fpage>230</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>245</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gene.2017.07.034</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28711668</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hasanuzzaman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bhuyan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anee</surname> <given-names>T. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Parvin</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nahar</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mahmud</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Regulation of ascorbate-glutathione pathway in mitigating oxidative damage in plants under abiotic stress</article-title>. <source>Antioxidants (Basel)</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>384</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/antiox8090384</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31505852</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hayat</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hayat</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alyemeni</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wani</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pichtel</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmad</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Role of proline under changing environments: a review</article-title>. <source>Plant Signal. Behav.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>37</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>41</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4161/psb.21949</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22951402</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hellal</surname> <given-names>F. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>El-Shabrawi</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abd El-Hady</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khatab</surname> <given-names>I. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>El-Sayed</surname> <given-names>S. A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abdelly</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Influence of PEG induced drought stress on molecular and biochemical constituents and seedling growth of Egyptian barley cultivars</article-title>. <source>J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>203</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>212</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jgeb.2017.10.009</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30647723</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hoagland</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arnon</surname> <given-names>D. I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1950</year>). <article-title>The water-culture method for growing plants without soil</article-title>. <source>Circ. California Agric. Exp. Station</source> <volume>347</volume>:<fpage>32</fpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Niu</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Genome-wide association studies reveal genetic variation and candidate genes of drought stress related traits in cotton (<italic>Gossypium hirsutum</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>1276</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2018.01276</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30233620</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Iqbal</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Naeem</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aziz</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Afzal</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Latif</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Inducing drought tolerance in upland cotton (<italic>Gossypium hirsutum</italic> L.), accomplishments and future prospects</article-title>. <source>World Appl. Sci. J.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>1062</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1069</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.21.7.222</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Iseki</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Takahashi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Muto</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Naito</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tomooka</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Diversity of drought tolerance in the genus Vigna</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>729</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2018.00729</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29963062</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zuo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Integrating transcriptomics and metabolomics to characterise the response of <italic>Astragalus membranaceus</italic> Bge. var. mongolicus (Bge.) to progressive drought stress</article-title>. <source>BMC Genomics</source> <volume>17</volume>:<fpage>188</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12864-016-2554-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26944555</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Integrated transcriptomics and metabolomics analysis to characterize cold stress responses in <italic>Nicotiana tabacum</italic></article-title>. <source>BMC Genomics</source> <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>496</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12864-017-3871-7</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28662642</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Joshi</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wani</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bohra</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dar</surname> <given-names>Z. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lone</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Transcription factors and plants response to drought stress: current understanding and future directions</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>1029</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2016.01029</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27471513</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Babar</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Islam</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Comparative metabolomic profiling in the roots and leaves in contrasting genotypes reveals complex mechanisms involved in post-anthesis drought tolerance in wheat</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>e0213502</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0213502</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30856235</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bano</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rahman</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rathinasabapathi</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Babar</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>UPLC-HRMS-based untargeted metabolic profiling reveals changes in chickpea (<italic>Cicer arietinum</italic>) metabolome following long-term drought stress</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>115</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>132</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/pce.13195</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29532945</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pertea</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trapnell</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pimentel</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kelley</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salzberg</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions</article-title>. <source>Genome Biol.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>13</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23618408</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hwang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Pepper aldehyde dehydrogenase CaALDH1 interacts with Xanthomonas effector AvrBsT and promotes effectortriggered cell death and defence responses</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>3367</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3380</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erv147</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25873668</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kirungu</surname> <given-names>J. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Magwanga</surname> <given-names>R. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Simple sequence repeat (SSR) genetic linkage map of d genome diploid cotton derived from an interspecific cross between <italic>Gossypium davidsonii</italic> and <italic>Gossypium klotzschianum</italic></article-title>. <source>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</source> <volume>19</volume>:<fpage>204</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms19010204</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29324636</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kirungu</surname> <given-names>J. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Magwanga</surname> <given-names>R. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Knockdown of Gh_A05G1554 (GhDHN_03) and Gh_D05G1729 (GhDHN_04) dehydrin genes, reveals their potential role in enhancing osmotic and salt tolerance in cotton</article-title>. <source>Genomics</source> <volume>112</volume>, <fpage>1902</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1915</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ygeno.2019.11.003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31733270</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kotchoni</surname> <given-names>S. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jimenez-Lopez</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Edwards</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gachomo</surname> <given-names>E. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Margam</surname> <given-names>V. M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Modeling-dependent protein characterization of the rice aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) superfamily reveals distinct functional and structural features</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>e11516</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0011516</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20634950</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Langfelder</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Horvath</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis</article-title>. <source>BMC Bioinformatics</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>559</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2105-9-559.</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19114008</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Larkin</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blackshields</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>N. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chenna</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McGettigan</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McWilliam</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>2947</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2948</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17846036</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Din</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>GhWRKY6 acts as a negative regulator in both transgenic arabidopsis and cotton during drought and salt stress</article-title>. <source>Front. Genet.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>392</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fgene.2019.00392</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31080461</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Magwanga</surname> <given-names>R. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kirungu</surname> <given-names>J. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Overexpression of cotton a DTX/MATE gene enhances drought, salt, and cold stress tolerance in transgenic arabidopsis</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>299</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2019.00299</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30930923</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Transcriptomic and metabolomic studies disclose key metabolism pathways contributing to well-maintained photosynthesis under the drought and the consequent drought-tolerance in rice</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>1886</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2016.01886</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28066455</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Magwanga</surname> <given-names>R. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kirungu</surname> <given-names>J. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Whole genome analysis of cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) gene family in cotton and functional evaluation of the role of CDKF4 gene in drought and salt stress tolerance in plants</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</source> <volume>19</volume>:<fpage>2625</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms19092625</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30189594</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Meher</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>hivakrishna</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ashok Reddy</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manohar Rao</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effect of PEG-6000 imposed drought stress on RNA content, relative water content (RWC), and chlorophyll content in peanut leaves and roots</article-title>. <source>Saudi J. Biol. Sci.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>285</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>289</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.04.008</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29472779</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nakabayashi</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yonekura-Sakakibara</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Urano</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suzuki</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yamada</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nishizawa</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Enhancement of oxidative and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis by overaccumulation of antioxidant flavonoids</article-title>. <source>Plant J.</source> <volume>77</volume>, <fpage>367</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>379</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/tpj.12388</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24274116</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Neelam</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sahi</surname> <given-names>G. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Identification of drought stress tolerance in wild species germplasm of rice based on leaf and root morphology</article-title>. <source>Plant Genetic Resourc.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>289</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>295</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S1479262117000284</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Noble</surname> <given-names>W. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>How does multiple testing correction work?</article-title> <source>Nat. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>1135</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1137</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nbt1209-1135</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20010596</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oladosu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rafii</surname> <given-names>M. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Samuel</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fatai</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Magaji</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kareem</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Drought resistance in rice from conventional to molecular breeding: a review</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</source> <volume>20</volume>:<fpage>3519</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms20143519</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31323764</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rahman</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Akond</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Babar</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beecher</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Erickson</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thomason</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>LC-HRMS based non-targeted metabolomic profiling of wheat (<italic>Triticum aestivum</italic> L.) under post-anthesis drought stress</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>08</volume>, <fpage>3024</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3061</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2017.812205</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sadau</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmad</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tajo</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ibrahim</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kazeem</surname> <given-names>B. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Overexpression of GhMPK3 from cotton enhances cold, drought, and salt stress in arabidopsis</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>1049</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy11061049</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30930923</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schmittgen</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Livak</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method</article-title>. <source>Nat. Protoc.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>1101</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1108</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nprot.2008.73</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18546601</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shadakshari</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shanthakumar</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of maize inbred lines for drought tolerance under contrasting soil moisture regimes</article-title>. <source>Karnataka J. Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>142</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>146</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shannon</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Markiel</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ozier</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baliga</surname> <given-names>N. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramage</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Cytoscape: A software Environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks</article-title>. <source>Genome Res.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>2498</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2504</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gr.1239303</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14597658</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>D. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reiter</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Comparative physiological, metabolomic, and transcriptomic analyses reveal mechanisms of improved abiotic stress resistance in bermudagrass [<italic>Cynodon dactylon</italic> (L). Pers.] by exogenous melatonin</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>681</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>694</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/eru373</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25225478</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Transcriptomic studies reveal a key metabolic pathway contributing to a well-maintained photosynthetic system under drought stress in foxtail millet (<italic>Setaria italica</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>PeerJ</source> <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>e4752</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7287/peerj.preprints.26860v1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29761061</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Suzuki</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koussevitzky</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mittler</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>ROS and redox signalling in the response of plants to abiotic stress</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>259</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>270</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02336.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21486305</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tamura</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peterson</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peterson</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stecher</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nei</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods</article-title>. <source>Mol. Biol. Evol.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>2731</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2739</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/molbev/msr121</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21546353</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Trapnell</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roberts</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goff</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pertea</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kelley</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Erratum: Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks [Nature Protocols (2012) 7 (562&#x02013;578)]</article-title>. <source>Nat. Protoc.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>2513</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2513</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nprot.2012.016</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22383036</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ullah</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Drought coping strategies in cotton: increased crop per drop</article-title>. <source>Plant Biotechnol. J.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>271</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>284</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/pbi.12688</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28055133</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ullah</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Y&#x000FC;ce</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neslihan</surname> <given-names>&#x000D6;. G. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Budak</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Comparative metabolite profiling of drought stress in roots and leaves of seven Triticeae species</article-title>. <source>BMC Genomics</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>969</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12864-017-4321-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29246190</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vel&#x000E1;squez</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chakravarthy</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>G. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) in Nicotiana benthamiana and tomato</article-title>. <source>J. Vis. Exp.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>3</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>5</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3791/1292</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19516240</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B67">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gai</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Genome-wide characterization of the aldehyde dehydrogenase gene superfamily in soybean and its potential role in drought stress response</article-title>. <source>BMC Genomics</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>17</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12864-017-3908-y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28687067</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B68">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xin</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaleri</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Transcriptomic analysis reveals the molecular mechanisms of drought-stress-induced decreases in <italic>Camellia sinensis</italic> leaf quality</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>385</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2016.00385</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27066035</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B69">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Ectopic expression of VpALDH2B4, a novel aldehyde dehydrogenase gene from Chinese wild grapevine (<italic>Vitis pseudoreticulata</italic>), enhances resistance to mildew pathogens and salt stress in Arabidopsis</article-title>. <source>Planta</source> <volume>236</volume>, <fpage>525</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>539</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00425-012-1624-z</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22437646</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B70">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Worley</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Powers</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Generalized adaptive intelligent binning of multiway data</article-title>. <source>Chem. Intell. Lab. Syst.</source> <volume>146</volume>, <fpage>42</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>46</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.05.005</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26052171</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B71">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Magwanga</surname> <given-names>R. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Genetic regulatory networks for salt-alkali stress in <italic>Gossypium hirsutum</italic> with differing morphological characteristics</article-title>. <source>BMC Genomics</source> <volume>21</volume>:<fpage>15</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12864-019-6375-9</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31906862</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B72">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bozorov</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abdullaev</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wood</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Ectopic overexpression of the aldehyde dehydrogenase ALDH21 from <italic>Syntrichia caninervis</italic> in tobacco confers salt and drought stress tolerance</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol. Biochem.</source> <volume>95</volume>, <fpage>83</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>91</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.07.001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26202169</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B73">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Biochemical and transcriptomic analyses of drought stress responses of LY1306 tobacco strain</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>17442</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-017-17045-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29234072</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B74">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kirungu</surname> <given-names>J. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Magwanga</surname> <given-names>R. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Knockdown of GhIQD31 and GhIQD32 increases drought and salt stress sensitivity in <italic>Gossypium hirsutum</italic></article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol. Biochem.</source> <volume>144</volume>, <fpage>166</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>177</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.09.027</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31568959</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B75">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yasmin</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nosheen</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Naz</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bano</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Keyani</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>L-tryptophan-assisted pgpr-mediated induction of drought tolerance in maize (<italic>Zea mays</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Interact.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>567</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>578</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/17429145.2017.1402212</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B76">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>The factors affecting the reproducibility of micro-volume DNA mass quantification in Nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer</article-title>. <source>Optik</source> <volume>145</volume>, <fpage>555</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>560</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.08.031</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B77">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Horvath</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>A general framework for weighted gene co-expression network analysis</article-title>. <source>Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol</source> <volume>4</volume>:<fpage>17</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2202/1544-6115.1128</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16646834</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B78">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Physiological and proteomic responses of contrasting alfalfa (<italic>Medicago sativa</italic> L.) varieties to PEG-induced osmotic stress</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>242</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2018.00242</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29541085</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B79">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ruan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Integrated transcriptome and metabolic analyses reveals novel insights into free amino acid metabolism in Huangjinya tea cultivar</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>291</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2017.00291</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28321230</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B80">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Sequencing of allotetraploid cotton (<italic>Gossypium hirsutum</italic> L. acc. TM-1) provides a resource for fiber improvement</article-title>. <source>Nature Biotechnology</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>531</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>537</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nbt.3207</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25893781</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B81">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dossa</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Transcriptome and metabolome analyses of two contrasting sesame genotypes reveal the crucial biological pathways involved in rapid adaptive response to salt stress</article-title>. <source>BMC Plant Biol.</source> <volume>19</volume>:<fpage>66</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12870-019-1665-6</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30744558</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B82">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tuli</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ressom</surname> <given-names>H. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>LC-MS-based metabolomics</article-title>. <source>Mol. Biosyst.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>470</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>481</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1039/c1mb05350g</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22041788</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>