<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2018.00792</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Zucchini Yellow Mosaic Virus Infection Limits Establishment and Severity of Powdery Mildew in Wild Populations of <italic>Cucurbita pepo</italic></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Harth</surname> <given-names>Jacquelyn E.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/485003/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Ferrari</surname> <given-names>Matthew J.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Helms</surname> <given-names>Anjel M.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/646500/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Tooker</surname> <given-names>John F.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Stephenson</surname> <given-names>Andrew G.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/495510/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Department of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University</institution>, <addr-line>University Park, PA</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, The Pennsylvania State University</institution>, <addr-line>University Park, PA</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Department of Entomology, The Pennsylvania State University</institution>, <addr-line>University Park, PA</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Essaid Ait Barka, Universit&#x00E9; de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, France</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Miguel A. Aranda, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cient&#x00ED;ficas, Spain; Laurence Veronique Bindschedler, Royal Holloway, University of London, United Kingdom</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Andrew G. Stephenson, <email>as4@psu.edu</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002"><p>This article was submitted to Plant Microbe Interactions, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>13</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>09</volume>
<elocation-id>792</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>15</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2017</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>24</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2018</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2018 Harth, Ferrari, Helms, Tooker and Stephenson.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2018</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Harth, Ferrari, Helms, Tooker and Stephenson</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Few studies have examined the combined effect of multiple parasites on host fitness. Previous work in the <italic>Cucurbita pepo</italic> pathosystem indicates that infection with Zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV) reduces exposure to a second insect-vectored parasite (<italic>Erwinia tracheiphila</italic>). In this study, we performed two large-scale field experiments employing wild gourds (<italic>Cucurbita pepo</italic> ssp. <italic>texana</italic>), including plants with a highly introgressed transgene conferring resistance to ZYMV, to examine the interaction of ZYMV and powdery mildew, a common fungal disease. We found that ZYMV-infected plants are more resistant to powdery mildew (i.e., less likely to experience powdery mildew infection and when infected with powdery mildew, have reduced severity of powdery mildew symptoms). As a consequence, during widespread viral epidemics, proportionally more transgenic plants get powdery mildew than non-transgenic plants, potentially mitigating the benefits of the transgene. A greenhouse study using ZYMV-inoculated and non-inoculated controls (non-transgenic plants) revealed that ZYMV-infected plants were more resistant to powdery mildew than controls, suggesting that the transgene itself had no direct effect on the powdery mildew resistance in our field study. Additionally, we found evidence of elevated levels of salicylic acid, a phytohormone that mediates anti-pathogen defenses, in ZYMV-infected plants, suggesting that viral infection induces a plant immune response (systemic acquired resistance), thereby reducing plant susceptibility to powdery mildew infection.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd><italic>Cucurbita pepo</italic></kwd>
<kwd>multi-parasite interactions</kwd>
<kwd>powdery mildew</kwd>
<kwd>systemic acquired resistance</kwd>
<kwd>ZYMV</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn001">2009-33120-20093</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">National Institute of Food and Agriculture<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/100005825</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="4"/>
<table-count count="0"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="68"/>
<page-count count="11"/>
<word-count count="0"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec><title>Introduction</title>
<p>Many studies have examined the costs of parasite infection for host fitness. In both plant and animal systems, parasites can increase mortality, reduce reproductive output, reduce growth, and induce defense systems that are costly in terms of energy and nutrients (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Anderson and May, 1978</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Burdon and Leather, 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Ryals et al., 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Hawkins et al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Maskell et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Moore, 2002a</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">b</xref>). The presence of multiple parasites in a host, which is common in nature, can change the expected dynamics of these systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Petney and Andrews, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Cox, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Lello et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Hatcher et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Lively et al., 2014</xref>). Despite the complex nature of most natural communities, relatively few empirical studies have examined the combined effect of multiple parasites on host fitness especially under field conditions (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Mitchell and Power, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Pedersen and Fenton, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Sasu et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Alexander, 2010</xref>).</p>
<p>Direct interactions, such as interference competition between parasites, have been well documented (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Dobson and Barnes, 1995</xref>). However, the importance of indirect effects as drivers of parasite community structure are gaining attention (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Strauss, 1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Pedersen and Fenton, 2006</xref>). Indirect interactions among parasites can influence parasite fitness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Stewart et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Ishii et al., 2002</xref>), host fitness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Donoghue et al., 2005</xref>), and have important implications for the spread of parasites within communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Mitchell and Power, 2006</xref>). These indirect interactions fall into two broad categories: pre-infection interactions (i.e., interactions that affect host exposure to a second parasite) and post-infection interactions (i.e., infection with one parasite changing host resource quality or the host immune response to a second parasite).</p>
<p>Pre-infection interactions among competing parasites have been documented in a few study systems. &#x201C;Ecological interference&#x201D; has been proposed as a mechanism of interaction in directly transmitted childhood infections, whereby illness due to a primary infection reduces contact rates and therefore exposure to a secondary infection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Rohani et al., 1998</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">2003</xref>). Vector behavior, in response to an infected host, can also influence exposure rates to a vectored parasite. Changes in host-plant chemistry after infection can alter volatile cues that then influence vector-feeding preferences (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Mauck et al., 2010</xref>). These changes in vector behavior can result in either increased (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Wang et al., 2014</xref>) or reduced exposure of the host to a secondary parasite (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Shapiro et al., 2012</xref>).</p>
<p>After infection, a co-infecting parasite enters an environment in which host resources may already be consumed by an initial parasite, or in which host defenses are upregulated in response to the primary infection. In plant cells, infection can trigger signaling cascades of the innate immune system that provide broad spectrum immunity against subsequent parasite attack (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Jones and Dangl, 2006</xref>). These signaling cascades function via the signaling molecules, jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA), which are key mediators of plant defense responses. Specifically, SA is considered the primary phytohormone mediating induced resistance against biotrophic pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">An and Mou, 2011</xref>), while JA is primarily responsible for regulating defenses against necrotrophic pathogens and herbivores (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Wasternack, 2007</xref>). In particular, SA is essential to the plant immune system, facilitating broad spectrum protection provided by systemic acquired resistance (SAR), cell-wall fortification, and the accumulation of pathogenesis related (PR) proteins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Dean and Kuc, 1987</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Vlot et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">An and Mou, 2011</xref>). A SAR response triggered by the presence of one parasite has been shown to increase defenses against subsequent parasite attack in a few systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Kuc, 1982</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Mucharromah and Kuc, 1991</xref>). Additionally, antagonistic &#x201C;cross-talk&#x201D; between the SA and JA pathways can also influence the interaction among multiple parasites in the same host (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Kunkel and Brooks, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chung et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
<p>We have extensively studied the interactions among pathogens and herbivores in populations of <italic>Cucurbita pepo</italic> ssp. <italic>texana</italic> (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Hayes et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Stephenson et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Ferrari et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Du et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Sasu et al., 2009</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">2010a</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Simmons et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Shapiro et al., 2012</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Harth et al., 2016</xref>) under laboratory, greenhouse and field conditions. <italic>Cucurbita pepo</italic> ssp. <italic>texana</italic> (wild gourd) is an annual monoecious vine that is cross compatible with cultivated squash and several annual species of wild <italic>Cucurbita</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Decker-Walters et al., 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Arriaga et al., 2006</xref>). The primary herbivores of wild gourds include a variety of generalist aphids and several species of cucumber beetles. The aphids also vector the four most common viral diseases of cucurbits [Cucumber mosaic (CMV), Papaya ringspot, Watermelon mosaic (WMV), and Zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV)]. ZYMV and WMV are the two most common viral diseases of cucurbits at our field sites in Central Pennsylvania (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Sasu et al., 2009</xref>). Both viruses are in the family Potyviridae and are transmitted via aphids in a non-persistent manner. These viruses depress reproductive output but they do not typically kill the plants (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Stephenson et al., 2004</xref>). Cucumber beetles are the only known vector of <italic>Erwinia tracheiphila</italic>, the causative agent of bacterial wilt disease. Transmission occurs when fecal pellets containing <italic>Erwinia</italic> fall either onto open wounds created during feeding or onto the floral nectaries when beetles aggregate in the flowers to mate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Fleischer et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Sasu et al., 2010b</xref>). Wilting symptoms develop 10&#x2013;15 days after infection and the disease is fatal once symptoms appear (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Ferrari et al., 2007</xref>).</p>
<p>At our field sites in Central Pennsylvania, the <italic>C. pepo</italic> pathosystem also consists of powdery mildew (<italic>Podosphaera</italic> sp.), a wind-dispersed fungal pathogen of squash, cucumbers and melons. The fungus overwinters as chasmothecia (sexual spores) which serve as the source of initial infection each year. However, conidia (asexual spores) are the primary means of dispersal. Symptoms first appear on older leaves as small reddish-brown spots that quickly turn white as hyphae are produced. As the disease progresses, leaves become covered in the powdery, white mycelia before shriveling and dying. In central Pennsylvania, first symptoms typically occur in early August and by September the disease will spread to the entire population.</p>
<p>We have previously documented that primary infection with ZYMV limits exposure to <italic>Erwinia tracheiphila</italic>, i.e., a pre-infection interaction, by changing the foraging behavior of the beetle vector (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Sasu et al., 2009</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">2010a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Shapiro et al., 2012</xref>). These studies were greatly aided by the fact that in 1996, the USDA deregulated a transgenic yellow crookneck squash (Asgrow, CZW-3) with coat protein-based resistance to WMV, ZYMV, and CMV (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">USDA, 1996</xref>). In short, the transgene consists of a constitutively expressed promoter that drives the expression of portions of the coat protein of each of the three viruses which act as interference RNA to prevent encapsulation during viral replication (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Fuchs and Gonsalves, 2007</xref>). By introgressing the transgene into wild gourd, we were able to create plants that were susceptible only to bacterial wilt disease and plants that were susceptible to ZYMV and bacterial wilt. In the study presented below, we show using large scale field and greenhouse experiments that a primary infection with ZYMV increases SA production and has post-infection effects on the incidence and severity of powdery mildew in populations of <italic>C. pepo</italic> ssp. <italic>texana</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec><title>Introgression of the Virus Resistant Transgene and Field Experimental Design</title>
<p>To examine the effects of ZYMV infection on subsequent powdery mildew infection and establishment in wild gourds, under field conditions, we used transgenic wild gourds that were resistant to ZYMV but susceptible to powdery mildew and wild gourds that were susceptible to both ZYMV and powdery mildew. The Liberator III crookneck squash cultivar is one of many commercially available transgenic squash with coat protein based resistance to WMV, ZYMV, and CMV. In this cultivar, the virus resistance transgene (hereafter called the transgene) is hemizygous and, importantly, the <italic>NPTII</italic> marker gene has not been deactivated and is still tightly linked to the coat protein genes of the three viruses. Consequently, we have been able to introgress the transgene (coat protein genes and <italic>NPTII</italic>) into 20 families of the wild gourd (using the wild gourd as the recurrent parent) because the presence of the NPTII protein in hybrid progeny can be detected serologically. Previous studies have shown that the introgressed transgene effectively deters the target viruses under field conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Sasu et al., 2009</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">2010a</xref>). For the study reported here, we used non-transgenic (ntBC9) and transgenic plants (tBC9) from the backcross nine generation (BC9) as well as wild type wild gourds. The BC9 plants are expected, on average, to possess less than 0.1% of the nuclear DNA of the Liberator III cultivar and no organelle DNA from the cultivar. It was not possible for us to distinguish among the three types of plants (wild gourds, ntBC9, tBC9) based upon appearance or growth habit. Moreover, because we screened progeny from multiple tBC8 X wild gourd crosses to produce the tBC9 and ntBC9 plants used in this study, we know that the segregation of the transgene did not differ significantly from 50 to 50 (see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Sasu et al., 2009</xref> for similar results from previous generations).</p>
<p>We germinated seeds in a greenhouse in early May 2013 and 2014 and, in late May of each year, we transplanted 18 wild gourds (wild type ssp. <italic>texana</italic>) plants, 9 tBC9, and 9 ntBC9 from each of five families (180 total plants per field, 25% were transgenic) into each of four 0.4 ha fields at the Pennsylvania State University Agriculture Experiment Station at Rock Springs, PA. In two of the four fields (located 25 m apart) we inoculated eight wild gourd and four ntBC9 from each of the five families prior to transplanting. Inoculum was prepared by grinding 2&#x2013;3 ZYMV infected symptomatic leaves in 100 ml of a phosphate buffer. Plants were then inoculated by brushing the adaxial leaf surface with 320 grit carborundum and then dipping a small pestle into the inoculum and gently rubbing the leaf surface in a circular motion. This inoculation design resulted in 60 inoculated plants, 75 non-inoculated wild gourds and ntBC9 (virus susceptible) plants, and 45 tBC9 plants per field (<bold>Supplementary Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S1</xref></bold>). Symptoms first appeared 7&#x2013;10 days after inoculation. The other two fields had no inoculated plants and were located approximately 1 km from the fields with the inoculated plants. The non-inoculated fields were also separated by 25 m and they were permitted to become naturally infected with mosaic viruses. In all four fields, the plants were the progeny from the same five randomly selected families (by family we mean the wild gourd, ntBC9, and tBC9 progeny shared the same maternal parent). Moreover, the tBC9 and ntBC9 from each family were full siblings (i.e., sired by the pollen from one hemizygous tBC8 plant from one of five different families) as were all of the wild gourd plants from a given maternal parent. In all four fields, plants were allowed to become infected with powdery mildew naturally.</p>
<p>The plants in each of the four fields were monitored once weekly throughout the growing season (beginning in early June) for symptoms of viral diseases. Our field diagnoses based upon visual symptoms were confirmed in both early July and early August by taking leaf samples from up to 20 symptomatic and 20 asymptotic plants per field and testing the leaves using ZYMV ImmunoStrips<sup>&#x00AE;</sup> (purchased from Agdia Inc., Elkhart, IN, United States. No inoculated plants were tested and no symptomatic plants were tested in both July and August. In the two control fields (no inoculations of ZYMV) it was not possible to find 20 symptomatic plants in early July. In no case did our field diagnosis differ from the immunological test results. However, it should be noted that the ELISA based ImmunoStrips are not as sensitive as RT-PCR screening. Consequently, it possible that some asymptomatic plants had low titers of ZYMV (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Prendeville et al., 2012</xref>) and were pre-symptomatic. During our weekly screening for ZYMV symptoms we also screened for symptoms of powdery mildew. In mid-August of each year, we collected a sample of infected leaves from 15 visually infected plants in each field and our field diagnosis was confirmed by the Plant Disease Clinic, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States, as <italic>Podosphaera</italic> sp. (most likely <italic>Podosphaera xanthii</italic>). We assessed powdery mildew symptom severity on a 0&#x2013;3 scale where 0 indicates a plant showing no powdery mildew symptoms, 1 indicates a plant with &#x003C;33% of leaves showing >50% spread of powdery mildew symptoms on the leaf surface, 2 indicates a plant with 33&#x2013;67% of leaves showing >50% spread of powdery mildew symptoms on the leaf surface, and 3 indicates a plant with >67% leaves showing >50% spread of powdery mildew symptoms on the leaf surface. We assessed reproductive output by counting staminate (male) and pistillate (female) flowers weekly (an unbiased estimate of total flower production because the flowers last for only one morning) until the beginning of September.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Greenhouse Experimental Design</title>
<p>To confirm that the interaction between ZYMV and powdery mildew was not a direct result of transgene presence, we grew 320 wild gourd plants (wild type, no transgenic plants) in a greenhouse in September 2014. Additionally, the greenhouse environment allowed for a controlled environment where the only difference between plants prior to powdery mildew introduction was presence or absence of ZYMV. We inoculated 160 plants (16 plants from each of 10 families) with ZYMV at the second true leaf stage using the procedure described above (ZYMV infection confirmed by ELISA based ImmunoStrips; Agdia Inc., Elkhart, IN, United States). We mock-inoculated 80 (8 plants from each of 10 families) plants using just the inoculation buffer and left 80 plants as untreated controls (8 plants from each of 10 families). Plants were arranged in a randomized block design. Plants were treated with an insecticide to prevent leaf herbivory and ZYMV spread. Fourteen days after all inoculated plants first showed ZYMV symptoms, 12 additional plants with established powdery mildew infections were moved into the greenhouse and uniformly distributed. Fans were used to circulate the spores and ensure all plants were rapidly exposed to the powdery mildew inoculum. Plants were scored for powdery mildew symptoms every 2 days for 3 weeks.</p>
<p>To examine the effects of ZYMV infection on SA concentration in leaves, we grew an additional 12 plants for each treatment (mock, ZYMV-infected, and control) to use for phytohormone analysis. Leaf samples weighing 0.1 g were collected from these plants 10 days post-inoculation (prior to the introduction of powdery mildew) and were taken from new leaves that were systemically infected. Samples were immediately flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. After harvesting, the tissue samples received 100 ng of internal, isotopic standards and 400 &#x03BC;L of an aqueous, weakly acidic buffer solution while on ice. After grinding and mixing, each sample then received 1 mL of dichloromethane and was mixed and centrifuged for 2 min at 12,000 &#x00D7; <italic>g</italic>. The dichloromethane layer, now containing the compounds of interest and the internal standards, was removed to a glass vial and dried under house air. Briefly, after solvent extractions of leaf tissue we derivatized SA to its methyl ester, which we isolated using vapor-phase extraction and analyzed by coupled gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with isobutane chemical ionization using selected-ion monitoring. We quantified amounts of total free SA using 100 ng of [<sup>2</sup>H<sub>6</sub>]SA (CDN Isotopes, Pointe-Claire, Montreal, QC, Canada) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Schmelz et al., 2003</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Shapiro et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec><title>Results</title>
<sec><title>Effect of ZYMV on Powdery Mildew Spread and Establishment &#x2013; Field Experiments</title>
<p>Our initial analyses revealed that the wild type gourds and the ntBC9 plants did not differ statistically in their incidence or severity of powdery mildew infection, nor in their flower production. Therefore, we combined these two plant types into a single &#x201C;susceptible&#x2019; class for the analyses presented below. Plants that died before the first incidence of powdery mildew in our fields (from transplant stress and bacterial wilt disease) were not included in these analyses.</p>
<p>In 2013, flowering began in late June and peak flower and fruit production occurred in August. Powdery mildew first appeared in mid-August and spread rapidly in all fields. Natural ZYMV spread in the inoculated fields began in mid-June, with peak spread occurring before first powdery mildew incidence (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1A</xref></bold>). In the non-inoculated fields, first ZYMV incidence occurred in late July. The transgene was effective against ZYMV infection, though a few transgenic plants did express mild symptoms ZYMV infection in August (<bold>Supplementary Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM6">S1</xref></bold>).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>Cumulative total of ZYMV infected plants and plants with powdery mildew symptoms over the course of both field seasons in <bold>(A)</bold> the ZYMV inoculated fields and <bold>(B)</bold> the not inoculated fields.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-09-00792-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In 2013, there were significant differences in the incidence of powdery mildew between the two plant types (susceptible and transgenic) in both the inoculated fields (<italic>X</italic><sup>2</sup> = 23.173, <italic>df</italic> = 1, <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.001) and the non-inoculated fields (<italic>X</italic><sup>2</sup> = 6.876, <italic>df</italic> = 1, <italic>P</italic> = 0.009) in mid-August, with the same trend continuing in late August. We used a mixed-effects analysis of variance (ANOVA) to assess the effect of plant type (susceptible or transgenic), family (random), treatment (virus inoculated fields or no inoculation fields), and a plant type by treatment interaction on powdery mildew symptom severity. We found that transgenic plants not only had a higher incidence of powdery mildew infection, they also experienced significantly more severe powdery mildew symptoms than virus susceptible plants at each time point during the 2013 field season (mid-August: <italic>F</italic><sub>1,564</sub> = 34.10, <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.001; late August: <italic>F</italic><sub>1,564</sub> = 29.30, <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.001) (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2A</xref></bold>). A mixed-effects model ANOVA showed there was not a significant plant-type by treatment interaction (<italic>F</italic><sub>1,564</sub> = 2.23, <italic>P</italic> = 0.078) for the final powdery mildew scoring date (late August). However, inoculation treatment was not a significant factor indicating that ZYMV spread in the non-inoculated fields had reached a point where there were no longer treatment (field inoculation) differences. Additionally, there were significant family differences for powdery mildew severity at both time points (mid-August: <italic>F</italic><sub>4,564</sub> = 3.94, <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.01; late August: <italic>F</italic><sub>4,564</sub> = 6.07, <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.001), with one family showing the most severe symptoms (<bold>Supplementary Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">S2A</xref></bold>).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p>Powdery mildew symptom severity for each sampling date comparing transgenic and susceptible plants in <bold>(A)</bold> the 2013 field season and <bold>(B)</bold> the 2014 field season. Transgenic plants had significantly more severe symptoms at each time point (<sup>&#x2217;</sup><italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-09-00792-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In 2014, flowering began in late June and peak flower production occurred in August. Powdery mildew first appeared in mid-August and spread rapidly in all fields. In the inoculated fields, natural ZYMV spread began in late June and peaked in late July, with most susceptible plants (wild gourd and ntBC9) infected before first incidence of powdery mildew. In the non-inoculated fields, first incidence of ZYMV was in mid-August, occurring simultaneously with powdery mildew infection and spreading rapidly (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1B</xref></bold>). The transgene was effective against ZYMV infection, though a few transgenic plants did express mild symptoms of virus in August.</p>
<p>In mid-August 2014, the incidence of powdery mildew was significantly higher on transgenic plants in the virus inoculated fields (<italic>X</italic><sup>2</sup> = 21.368, <italic>df</italic> = 1, <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.001) than on the susceptible plants. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of powdery mildew on transgenic and susceptible plants in the non-inoculated fields (<italic>X</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.068, <italic>df</italic> = 1, <italic>P</italic> = 0.794) indicating that the transgene <italic>per se</italic> does not alter the resistance of plants to powdery mildew. However, by early September, after virus had spread through the non-inoculated fields, there were significant differences in the proportion of transgenic and susceptible plants that contracted powdery mildew (<italic>X</italic><sup>2</sup> = 4.982, <italic>df</italic> = 1, <italic>P</italic> = 0.026).</p>
<p>We found that transgenic plants not only had a higher incidence of powdery mildew infection, they also experienced significantly more severe powdery mildew symptoms than non-transgenic plants at each time point during the 2014 field season (mid-August: <italic>F</italic><sub>1,522</sub> = 7.06, <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.01; late August: <italic>F</italic><sub>1,522</sub> = 6.65, <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05; early September: <italic>F</italic><sub>1,522</sub> = 16.92, <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.001) (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2B</xref></bold>). The ANOVA also revealed a significant positive plant-type by treatment (inoculated vs. non-inoculated fields) interaction term indicating that transgenic plants have more severe powdery mildew symptoms in the ZYMV-inoculated fields (mid-August: <italic>F</italic><sub>1,522</sub> = 9.27, <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.01; late August: <italic>F</italic><sub>1,522</sub> = 4.13, <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05; early September: <italic>F</italic><sub>1,522</sub> = 4.35, <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05). Additionally, there were significant family differences for powdery mildew severity (mid-August: <italic>F</italic><sub>4,522</sub> = 2.80, <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05; late August: <italic>F</italic><sub>4,522</sub> = 2.76, <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05; early September: <italic>F</italic><sub>4,522</sub> = 2.65, <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05), with one family showing the most severe symptoms (<bold>Supplementary Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">S2B</xref></bold>).</p>
<p>Among susceptible plants in our fields, the proportion of plants that contracted powdery mildew during the initial outbreak decreased with the number of weeks they were infected with ZYMV (0&#x2013;10 weeks) (<bold>Supplementary Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM3">S3</xref></bold>). Moreover, transgenic and susceptible plants that were not virus infected had a similar incidence of powdery mildew during the initial stages of the powdery mildew outbreak (<bold>Supplementary Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM3">S3</xref></bold>). We used a logistic regression model to assess the effect of plant type (transgenic or susceptible), family (random), treatment (inoculated or non-inoculated fields), and &#x2018;weeks with virus symptoms,&#x2019; on the likelihood of infection with powdery mildew. This analysis showed that weeks with virus is a significant predictor of powdery mildew incidence and for each week a plant has been infected with virus, ZYMV-infected plants are 0.84 times less likely to contract powdery mildew. A reduced model that did not include weeks with virus showed that when powdery mildew first enters our fields, the odds of a transgenic plant contracting powdery mildew are 2.4 times that of susceptible plants (most of which are infected with ZYMV at this time in the season). However, the full model is a better fit (AIC full model = 1459.6; AIC reduced model = 1497.5) and &#x2018;when weeks with virus&#x2019; is included in the model, plant type is no longer a significant predictor. This suggests that differences between transgenic and susceptible plants are a result of viral infection and not the transgene <italic>per se</italic>. The logistic regression model also revealed a significant family effect. In particular, one maternal family showed higher odds of contracting powdery mildew relative to the other four families suggesting that there was heritable (in the broad sense) variation for resistance to powdery mildew among families.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Effect of ZYMV on Powdery Mildew Spread and Establishment &#x2013; Greenhouse Experiment</title>
<p>The results of the 2013 and 2014 field experiments suggested that healthy (not virus infected) plants were more susceptible to powdery mildew and that the transgene had no direct effect on susceptibility to powdery mildew. To explicitly test these findings, we conducted a greenhouse experiment that consisted of three treatments (mock-inoculated, virus-inoculated, and untreated controls) and used only wild gourds (no transgenic plants). A repeated measures ANOVA showed that treatment was a significant factor for predicting susceptibility to powdery mildew (<italic>F</italic><sub>2,287</sub> = 207.71, <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.001). We found that virus-infected plants showed significantly less severe powdery mildew symptoms than the other two treatments (mock-inoculated and control) and that mock-inoculated plants showed significantly more severe symptoms than the other two treatments (virus-infected and control) (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref></bold>). There were significant family differences in powdery mildew severity as well (<italic>F</italic><sub>9,287</sub> = 118.56, <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.001) (<bold>Supplementary Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM4">S4</xref></bold>), indicating broad sense heritable variation for powdery mildew resistance among the 10 families used in this study. A significantly smaller proportion of virus-infected plants were infected with powdery mildew relative to the mock-inoculated and control treatments at the early (<italic>X</italic><sup>2</sup> = 27.533, <italic>df</italic> = 2, <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.001) and middle (<italic>X</italic><sup>2</sup> = 6.582, <italic>df</italic> = 2, <italic>P</italic> = 0.037) time points (<bold>Supplementary Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM7">S2</xref></bold>). However, at the conclusion of the experiment, all plants were infected with powdery mildew.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption><p>Severity of powdery mildew symptoms for each treatment type for the greenhouse experiment. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups at the <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05 level.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-09-00792-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec><title>Phytohormone Analysis</title>
<p>An ANOVA revealed significant differences in SA production among the treatments (mock-inoculated, virus-inoculated, and untreated controls) in our greenhouse study (<italic>F</italic><sub>2,33</sub> = 9.99, <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.001). A Tukey&#x2019;s HSD test showed that leaves of ZYMV-infected plants contained significantly higher levels of SA compared to mock-inoculated and control plants (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref></bold>).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption><p>Mean salicylic acid levels with standard error for each treatment type (ZYMV-infected, control, and mock-inoculated) in the greenhouse experiment (<italic>N</italic> = 12 in each treatment). ZYMV-infected plants had significantly higher levels of salicylic acid (<sup>&#x2217;</sup><italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-09-00792-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec><title>Effect of Powdery Mildew on Plant Fitness</title>
<p>A regression analysis revealed that there is a slight (but significant) negative impact on plant fitness as a result of powdery mildew infection in 2014 (<bold>Supplementary Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM5">S5</xref></bold>). We did not conduct a regression analysis on the 2013 field data as there were only two powdery mildew scoring dates in 2013. However, an LS-means showed that susceptible plants produced 0.638 (<italic>SE</italic> = 0.012) of their total flower production and transgenic plants produced 0.628 (<italic>SE</italic> = 0.024) of their total flower production post first incidence of powdery mildew in our fields. We also used an analysis of covariance to assess the effects of weeks with powdery mildew (covariate), plant type (transgenic or susceptible), family (random), and treatment (inoculated or non-inoculated fields) on the proportion of both the total staminate and the total pistillate flowers produced by each plant after powdery mildew infection in both years. This analysis revealed that there was no difference in the proportion of flowers produced by transgenic and susceptible plants after powdery mildew infection in 2013 (Staminate: <italic>F</italic><sub>1,560</sub> = 0.03, <italic>P</italic> = 0.854, Pistillate: <italic>F</italic><sub>1,501</sub> = 0.53, <italic>P</italic> = 0.466). In contrast, our findings revealed that in 2014, transgenic plants produced a greater proportion of both staminate and pistillate flowers after powdery mildew infection relative to susceptible plants (Staminate: <italic>F</italic><sub>1,551</sub> = 10.29, <italic>P</italic> = 0.001; Pistillate: <italic>F</italic><sub>1,520</sub> = 6.97, <italic>P</italic> = 0.009). Moreover, even when weeks with virus is included as a second covariate in the model, transgenic plants still produce a significantly greater proportion of flowers than susceptible plants after powdery mildew infection (Staminate: <italic>F</italic><sub>1,551</sub> = 4.64, <italic>P</italic> = 0.032; Pistillate: <italic>F</italic><sub>1,520</sub> = 8.42, <italic>P</italic> = 0.004). This suggests that although powdery mildew infection has a negative impact on fitness, due to the timing of the diseases in our fields, the impact of powdery mildew was not as great as the impact of virus infection on plant fitness.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec><title>Discussion</title>
<p>In multi-parasite systems, interactions among multiple diseases can lead to unexpected dynamics. In this study, we show that (1) plants infected with ZYMV are less likely to become infected with powdery mildew, (2) that when infected with powdery mildew, ZYMV-infected plants show reduced powdery mildew symptom severity, and (3) that infection with powdery mildew adversely affects the production of staminate and pistillate flowers. By August, when powdery mildew entered our ZYMV-inoculated fields, most non-virus-infected plants in our inoculated fields were transgenic individuals, however, our data show that the transgene has no direct effect on powdery-mildew infection (i.e., transgenic and susceptible plants were equally impacted by powdery mildew in the absence of ZYMV). Additionally, the greenhouse experiment (which did not use any transgenic plants) also showed that virus infected plants are more resistant to powdery mildew than their non-infected siblings, further indicating that the interaction between ZYMV and powdery mildew is not a direct result of transgene presence <italic>per se</italic>.</p>
<p>We also show that plants infected with ZYMV have elevated levels of SA post-infection (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref></bold>), similar to previous work (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Shapiro et al., 2013</xref>). These data, in combination with the field and greenhouse experiments in this study, suggest that a SAR response triggered by SA accumulation post-ZYMV infection increases the pathogen defenses of virus-infected plants compared to non-infected plants, thereby increasing their resistance to subsequent powdery-mildew infection. Other studies have shown that exposure to a pathogen can induce a SAR response that rarely results in complete resistance to a subsequent pathogen infection, but typically reduces lesion number and symptom severity (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Kuc, 1982</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Walters et al., 2005</xref>).</p>
<p>The mock-inoculated plants in our greenhouse study showed significantly more severe powdery mildew symptoms than both the control and virus-inoculated plants (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref></bold>). While we expected that mock-inoculated plants would have more severe symptoms than the virus-inoculated plants, the fact that they had more severe symptoms than the control plants was surprising. The leaf damage caused by the inoculation/mock-inoculation procedure (abrasion) may have provided an easier avenue for the fungus to invade our plants. Additionally, the leaf damage may have upregulated the JA defense pathway, as commonly occurs with mechanical wounding, thereby suppressing levels of SA and facilitating powdery mildew infection as a result of antagonistic SA/JA cross-talk (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Kunkel and Brooks, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chung et al., 2013</xref>). Regardless of the mechanism, the virus-inoculated plants received the same leaf abrasion as the mock inoculated plants, and still showed significantly less severe powdery mildew symptoms (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref></bold>).</p>
<p>Previously, our lab documented an ecological, pre-infection interaction affecting exposure rates between two parasites in experimental populations of wild gourd. We found that in the absence of viral pathogens, virus-resistant transgenic and susceptible plants appear similarly affected by the deadly bacterial pathogen, <italic>Erwinia tracheiphila</italic>&#x2014;the causative agent of bacterial wilt disease (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Sasu et al., 2009</xref>). The disproportionate exposure of transgenic plants to wilt disease, due to avoidance of virus infected plants by vectors, mitigates the fitness advantage of the virus-resistant transgene when ZYMV is also epidemic in the population (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Sasu et al., 2009</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">2010a</xref>). Here, we present evidence of a second, post-infection interaction (a likely immunological interaction between ZYMV and powdery mildew) that further mitigates the benefit of the virus-resistant transgene. Our data reveal that powdery mildew adversely affects reproductive output and that ZYMV-infected plants are more resistant to powdery mildew than non-infected plants. During a viral outbreak, a high proportion of the non-infected plants possessed a virus-resistant transgene and suffered a greater incidence and severity of powdery mildew. Due to the influence of these pathogens on host-plant fitness, our findings have important implications for the spread of the transgene in natural populations of wild gourds.</p>
<p>Transgenic cultivars are often grown near wild populations and because gene flow between cultivated squash and wild gourds (<italic>Cucurbita pepo</italic> ssp. <italic>texana</italic>) is common and well documented (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Kirkpatrick and Wilson, 1988</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Decker-Walters et al., 2002</xref>), it is likely that the virus-resistant transgene has been introduced into wild populations. Unlike most traits of cultivated species which negatively influence fitness in wild populations, there are concerns that the presence of a virus-resistant transgene in wild populations could lead to increased fitness and weediness of wild species and/or have indirect impacts on non-target species and community composition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Fuchs and Gonsalves, 2007</xref>). Studies examining the transgene in both wild gourds and cultivated squash have shown that transgenic plants have a significant fitness advantage in the presence of the target pathogen and that there are no direct costs of transgene presence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Fuchs et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Laughlin et al., 2009</xref>). In populations consisting of wild gourds and transgenic introgressives (as would happen if pollen flowed from transgenic cultivars into wild populations), the transgenic plants would suffer disproportionately from the adverse effects of powdery mildew if viral diseases are also present in the population. If all three diseases (ZYMV, bacterial wilt, and powdery mildew) are present in the same population, which seems likely, then fitness benefits of the transgene predicted by virus only studies would be greatly reduced. The pre-infection and post-infection interactions that would result from the presence of multiple pathogens in the same population are expected to slow, and under some conditions stop, the spread of the transgene in wild populations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Harth et al., 2012</xref>).</p>
<p>In addition to the implications for management of transgenic introgressives in wild populations, these data have implications for applied agriculture. Powdery mildew is a major economic pest of cultivated squashes and pumpkins worldwide by decreasing yield by as much as 50% and shortening the growing season (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Perez-Garcia et al., 2009</xref>). Moreover, it is becoming increasingly difficult to control as some strains are resistant to the available fungicides (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">McGrath, 2001</xref>). Our data reveal heritable genetic variation for resistance to powdery mildew in wild <italic>C. pepo</italic> that could be bred into cultivated <italic>C. pepo</italic>. Moreover, recent studies have revealed that vertical transmission rates of ZYMV are 1.6% and that infected plants are virtually asymptomatic (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Simmons et al., 2011</xref>). If vertically infected <italic>C. pepo</italic> show the same immune response to powdery mildew infection that horizontally infected ZYMV plants show in our studies, it could serve as a low pesticide alternative to extend the growing season. Similar cross-protection strategies in which a mild strain of one virus protects against a more virulent strain of that virus or another pathogen, have been effectively used in other crops (see reviews in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Fulton, 1986</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Lecoq and Raccah, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Ziebell and Carr, 2010</xref>). For example, infection with the mild strain ZYMV-WK proved to be effective against infection with more severe ZYMV strains (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Lecoq et al., 1991</xref>). Additionally, mild-strain cross protection using Citrus tristeza virus has successfully protected against more severe strains that cause citrus stem pitting (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Folimonova, 2013</xref>) and has been important in maintaining profitability of the citrus market (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Moreno et al., 2008</xref>). As in our study, it is likely that the mild pathogen induces defense pathways that in turn provide a degree of resistance to the more virulent pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Lee and Keremane, 2013</xref>).</p>
<p>Plants in agricultural and especially natural populations are part of complex pathosystems consisting of a community of interacting organisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Sasu et al., 2009</xref>) that have both direct and indirect effects on their host plants. Pairwise studies of hosts and their pathogens reveal only the direct effects of these pathogens; the direction and magnitude of indirect effects are far more difficult to predict. Studies of the <italic>Cucurbita pepo</italic> pathosystem reveal that a virus resistance transgene would spread rapidly through natural populations of wild gourd when only viral disease is present in the population. However, when multiple pathogens are present in the population, we see both pre-infection interactions and post-infection interactions among pathogens that would limit the spread of the transgene. The parallels between these mechanisms and those in animal systems suggest that these tractable plant systems might provide a test-bed for general tests of pathogen&#x2013;pathogen&#x2013;host interactions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Data Accessibility</title>
<p>The data supporting this manuscript are available via Penn State&#x2019;s ScholarSphere and can be found at the following URL: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scholarsphere.psu.edu/collections/4f16c298n">https://scholarsphere.psu.edu/collections/4f16c298n</ext-link>.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>JH, AS, and MF conceived and designed the experiments. JH performed the experiments. AH assisted with phytohormone experiments. JH, AS, AH, and MF analyzed the data. AS and JT contributed reagents, materials, and analysis tools. JH, AS, JT, and MF wrote the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Conflict of Interest Statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="financial-disclosure">
<p><bold>Funding.</bold> This work was supported by the Biotechnology Risk Assessment Program competitive grant number 2009-33120-20093 (National Institute of Food and Agriculture).</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
<ack>
<p>We thank Bob Oberheim and his staff at the Penn State Agricultural Experiment Station for field assistance and use of the land; Scott DiLorreto for greenhouse assistance; and Danelle Weakland, Kayla Nowak, and Chad Nihranz for field and greenhouse assistance.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="supplementary material">
<title>Supplementary Material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2018.00792/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2018.00792/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_1.PDF" id="SM1" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>FIGURE S1</label>
<caption><p>Schematic Representation of a 2013 Inoculated Field consisting of 15 rows and 12 columns of plants spaced evenly over a 0.4 ha plot, 180 total plants. Each box lists the type of plant (Wild type = X, non-transgenic backcross 9 = BC, transgenic backcross 9 = BCT) and the family to which it belongs (I2, J5, OZ, D2, or J3). Boxes shaded in red indicate ZYMV inoculated ntBC9 plants and boxes shaded in yellow indicate ZYMV inoculated wild type plants. The 2014 inoculated fields had the same layout.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_2.JPEG" id="SM2" mimetype="image/jpeg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>FIGURE S2</label>
<caption><p>Severity of powdery mildew on plants from each maternal family for each scoring date during the <bold>(A)</bold> 2013 and <bold>(B)</bold> 2014 field seasons. Different letters indicate significant differences between families at the <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05 level.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_3.jpg" id="SM3" mimetype="image/jpeg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>FIGURE S3</label>
<caption><p>Proportion of susceptible plants infected with powdery mildew in mid-August declines as the number of weeks for increasing weeks with zucchini yellow mosaic virus increases. Point size scales with number of plants that were virus infected for a given number of weeks.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_4.JPEG" id="SM4" mimetype="image/jpeg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>FIGURE S4</label>
<caption><p>Severity of powdery mildew symptoms for each maternal family included in the greenhouse experiment. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups at the <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05 level.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_5.JPEG" id="SM5" mimetype="image/jpeg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>FIGURE S5</label>
<caption><p>Regression analysis for the impact of weeks infected with powdery mildew on the proportion of staminate (&#x03B2; = -0.0245, SE &#x03B2; = 0.0078, <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> = 1.72%, <italic>P</italic> = 0.002) and pistillate flowers (&#x03B2; = -0.07, SE &#x03B2; = 0.0121, <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> = 5.96%, <italic>P</italic> = 0.000) produced after first incidence of powdery mildew for 2014 field season. Dotted lines represent 95% confidence intervals.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.DOCX" id="SM6" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>TABLE S1</label>
<caption><p>Percent of susceptible and transgenic plants infected with Zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV) and the percent of non-inoculated susceptible and transgenic plants infected with Powdery Mildew in both the ZYMV inoculated and not inoculated fields at each time point during the <bold>(A)</bold> 2013 field season and <bold>(B)</bold> 2014 field season.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_2.DOCX" id="SM7" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>TABLE S2</label>
<caption><p>Percent of plants for each treatment type that showed powdery mildew at early and mid-time points during the greenhouse experiment.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alexander</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Disease in natural plant populations, communities, and ecosystems: insights into ecological and evolutionary processes.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Dis.</italic></source> <volume>94</volume> <fpage>492</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>503</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-94-5-0492</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>An</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mou</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Salicylic acid and its function in plant immunity.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Integr. Plant Biol.</italic></source> <volume>53</volume> <fpage>412</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>428</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1744-7909.2011.01043.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21535470</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>May</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1978</year>). <article-title>Regulation and stability of host-parasite population interactions: I. Regulatory processes.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Anim. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>47</volume> <fpage>219</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>247</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/3933</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arriaga</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huerta</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lira-Saade</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moreno</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alarcon</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Assessing the risk of releasing transgenic <italic>Cucurbita</italic> ssp. in Mexico.</article-title> <source><italic>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</italic></source> <volume>112</volume> <fpage>291</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>299</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2005.07.007</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Burdon</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leather</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <source><italic>Pests, Pathogens and Plant Communities.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Blackwell Scientific Publications</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chung</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosa</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scully</surname> <given-names>E. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peiffer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tooker</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hoover</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Herbivore exploits orally secreted bacteria to suppress plant defenses.</article-title> <source><italic>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</italic></source> <volume>110</volume> <fpage>15728</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15733</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1308867110</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24019469</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cox</surname> <given-names>F. E. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Concomitant infections, parasites and immune responses.</article-title> <source><italic>Parasitology</italic></source> <volume>122</volume> <fpage>S23</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>S38</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S003118200001698X</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dean</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuc</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>Rapid lignification in response to wounding and infection as a mechanism for induced systemic protection in cucumber.</article-title> <source><italic>Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol.</italic></source> <volume>31</volume> <fpage>69</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>81</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0885-5765(87)90007-5</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Decker-Walters</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Straub</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chung</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nakata</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Quemada</surname> <given-names>H. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Diversity in free-living populations of <italic>Cucurbita pepo</italic> (Cucurbitaceae) as assessed by random amplified polymorphic DNA.</article-title> <source><italic>Syst. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>27</volume> <fpage>19</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>28</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Decker-Walters</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Walters</surname> <given-names>T. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cowan</surname> <given-names>C. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>B. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Isozymic characterization of wild populations of <italic>Cucurbita pepo</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Ethnobiol.</italic></source> <volume>13</volume> <fpage>55</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>72</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dobson</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barnes</surname> <given-names>E. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Interaction between <italic>Ostertagia circumcincta</italic> and <italic>Haemonchus contortus</italic> infection in young lambs.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Parasitol.</italic></source> <volume>25</volume> <fpage>495</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>501</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0020-7519(94)00157-J</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7635626</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Donoghue</surname> <given-names>H. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marcsik</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matheson</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vernon</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nuorala</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Molto</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Co&#x2013;infection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and <italic>Mycobacterium leprae</italic> in human archaeological samples: a possible explanation for the historical decline of leprosy.</article-title> <source><italic>Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>272</volume> <fpage>389</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>394</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rspb.2004.2966</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15734693</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Winsor</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>DeNicco</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stephenson</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Resistance and tolerance to herbivory changes with inbreeding and ontogeny in a wild gourd (Cucurbitaceae).</article-title> <source><italic>Am. J. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>95</volume> <fpage>84</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>92</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3732/ajb.95.1.84</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21632318</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ferrari</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Winsor</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stephenson</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Inbreeding alters host plant quality and incidence of an insect borne pathogen in <italic>Cucurbita pepo</italic> ssp. <italic>texana</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>168</volume> <fpage>603</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>610</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/513487</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fleischer</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Mackiewicz</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gildow</surname> <given-names>F. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lukezic</surname> <given-names>F. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Serological estimates of the seasonal dynamics of <italic>Erwinia tracheiphila</italic> in <italic>Acalymma vittata</italic> (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae).</article-title> <source><italic>Environ. Entomol.</italic></source> <volume>28</volume> <fpage>470</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>476</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/ee/28.3.470</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Folimonova</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Developing an understanding of cross-protection by <italic>Citrus tristeza virus</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>4</volume>:<issue>76</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2013.00076</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23577008</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fuchs</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chirco</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McFerson</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gonsalves</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Comparative fitness of a wild squash species and three generations of hybrids between wild X virus-resistant transgenic squash.</article-title> <source><italic>Enivron. Biosaf. Res.</italic></source> <volume>3</volume> <fpage>17</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>28</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1051/ebr:2004004</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15612352</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fuchs</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gonsalves</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Safety of virus-resistant transgenic plants two decades after their introduction: lessons from realistic field risk assessment studies.</article-title> <source><italic>Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.</italic></source> <volume>45</volume> <fpage>173</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>202</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.phyto.45.062806.094434</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17408355</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fulton</surname> <given-names>R. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1986</year>). <article-title>Practices and precautions in the use of cross protection for plant virus disease control.</article-title> <source><italic>Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.</italic></source> <volume>24</volume> <fpage>67</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>81</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.py.24.090186.000435</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Harth</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deveny</surname> <given-names>T. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Winsor</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferrari</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stephenson</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>&#x201C;Background and development of a model to predict the fate of an escaped virus resistant transgene from <italic>Cucurbita pepo</italic>,&#x201D; in</article-title> <source><italic>Proceedings of the 10th EUCARPIA Meeting on Genetics and Breeding of Cucurbitaceae 2012</italic></source>, <role>eds</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Sari</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Solmaz</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aras</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Antalya</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>University of Cukurova</publisher-name>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Harth</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Winsor</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weakland</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nowak</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferrari</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stephenson</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Effects of virus infection on pollen production and pollen performance: implications for the spread of resistance alleles.</article-title> <source><italic>Am. J. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>103</volume> <fpage>577</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>583</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3732/ajb.1500165</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26905087</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hatcher</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dick</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dunn</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>How parasites affect interactions between competitors and predators.</article-title> <source><italic>Ecol. Lett.</italic></source> <volume>9</volume> <fpage>1253</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1271</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00964.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17040328</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hawkins</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cornell</surname> <given-names>H. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hochberg</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Predators, parasitoids, and pathogens as mortality agents in phytophagous insect populations.</article-title> <source><italic>Ecology</italic></source> <volume>78</volume> <fpage>2145</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2152</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[2145:PPAPAM]2.0.CO;2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hayes</surname> <given-names>C. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Winsor</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stephenson</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Inbreeding influences herbivory in <italic>Cucurbita pepo</italic> ssp. <italic>texana</italic> (Cucurbitaceae).</article-title> <source><italic>Oecologia</italic></source> <volume>140</volume> <fpage>601</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>608</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00442-004-1623-2</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15252728</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ishii</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Takatsuka</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nakai</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kunimi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Growth characteristics and competitive abilities of a nucleopolyhedrovirus and an entomopoxvirus in larvae of the smaller tea tortrix, <italic>Adoxophyes honmai</italic> (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae).</article-title> <source><italic>Biol. Control</italic></source> <volume>23</volume> <fpage>96</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>105</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/bcon.2001.0988</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dangl</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>The plant immune system.</article-title> <source><italic>Nature</italic></source> <volume>444</volume> <fpage>323</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>329</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature05286</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17108957</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kirkpatrick</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wilson</surname> <given-names>H. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Interspecific gene flow in <italic>Cucurbita</italic>: <italic>C. texana</italic> vs. <italic>C. pepo</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Am. J. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>75</volume> <fpage>519</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>527</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/j.1537-2197.1988.tb13470.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kuc</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1982</year>). <article-title>Induced immunity to plant disease.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioscience</italic></source> <volume>32</volume> <fpage>854</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>860</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/1309008</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kunkel</surname> <given-names>B. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brooks</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Cross talk between signaling pathways in pathogen defense.</article-title> <source><italic>Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.</italic></source> <volume>5</volume> <fpage>325</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>331</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00275-3</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Laughlin</surname> <given-names>K. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Power</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Snow</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Spencer</surname> <given-names>L. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Risk Assesment of genetically engineered crops: fitness effects of virus-resistance transgenes in wild <italic>Cucurbita pepo</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Ecol. Appl.</italic></source> <volume>19</volume> <fpage>1091</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1101</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/08-0105.1</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19688918</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lecoq</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lemaire</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wipf-Scheibel</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Control of zucchini yellow mosaic virus in squash by cross protection.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Dis.</italic></source> <volume>75</volume> <fpage>208</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>211</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PD-75-0208</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lecoq</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raccah</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>&#x201C;Cross-protection: interactions between strains exploited to control plant virus diseases,&#x201D; in</article-title> <source><italic>Biotic Interactions in Plant-Pathogen Associations</italic></source>, <role>eds</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Jegger</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Spence</surname> <given-names>N. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Wallingford</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CAB International</publisher-name>), <volume>177</volume>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1079/9780851995120.0177</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>R. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Keremane</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Mild strain cross protection of tristeza: a review of research to protect against decline on sour orange in Florida.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> 4:<fpage>39</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>49</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2013.00259</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lello</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boag</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fenton</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stevenson</surname> <given-names>I. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hudson</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Competition and mutualism among the gut helminths of a mammalian host.</article-title> <source><italic>Nature</italic></source> <volume>428</volume> <fpage>840</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>844</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature02490</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15103373</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lively</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Roode</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duffy</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Graham</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koskella</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Interesting open questions in disease ecology and evolution.</article-title> <source><italic>Am. Nat.</italic></source> <volume>184</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/677032</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25061674</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maskell</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raybould</surname> <given-names>A. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cooper</surname> <given-names>J. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Edwards</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gray</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Effects of turnip mosaic virus and turnip yellow mosaic virus on the survival, growth and reproduction of wild cabbage (Brassica oleracea).</article-title> <source><italic>Ann. Appl. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>135</volume> <fpage>401</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>407</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1744-7348.1999.tb00867.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mauck</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Moraes</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mescher</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Deceptive chemical signals induced by a plant virus attract insect vectors to inferior hosts.</article-title> <source><italic>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</italic></source> <volume>107</volume> <fpage>3600</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3605</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0907191107</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20133719</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McGrath</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Fungicide resistance in cucurbit powdery mildew: experiences and challenges.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Dis.</italic></source> <volume>85</volume> <fpage>236</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>245</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS.2001.85.3.236</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mitchell</surname> <given-names>C. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Power</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>&#x201C;Disease dynamics in plant communities,&#x201D; in</article-title> <source><italic>Disease Ecology: Community Structure and Pathogen Dynamics</italic></source>, <role>eds</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Collinge</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ray</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moore</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002a</year>). <source><italic>Parasites and the Behavior of Animals.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moore</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002b</year>). <article-title>Host behavioral manipulation.</article-title> <source><italic>Trends Parasitol.</italic></source> <volume>18</volume>:<issue>10</issue>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moreno</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ambros</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Albiach-Marti</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guerri</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pena</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title><italic>Citrus tristeza virus</italic>: a pathogen that changed the course of the citrus industry.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Plant Pathol.</italic></source> <volume>9</volume> <fpage>251</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>268</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1364-3703.2007.00455.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18705856</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mucharromah</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuc</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Oxalate and phosphates induce systemic resistance against diseases caused by fungi, bacteria and viruses in cucumber.</article-title> <source><italic>Crop Prot.</italic></source> <volume>10</volume> <fpage>265</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>270</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0261-2194(91)90004-B</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pedersen</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fenton</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Emphasizing the ecology in parasite community ecology.</article-title> <source><italic>Trends Ecol. Evol.</italic></source> <volume>22</volume> <fpage>133</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>139</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tree.2006.11.005</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17137676</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Perez-Garcia</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Romero</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fernandez-Ortuno</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lopez-Ruiz</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Vicente</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tores</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>The powdery mildew fungus <italic>Podosphaera fusca</italic> (synonym <italic>Podosphaera xanthii</italic>), a constant threat to cucurbits.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Plant Pathol.</italic></source> <fpage>153</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>160</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1364-3703.2008.00527.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19236565</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Petney</surname> <given-names>T. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andrews</surname> <given-names>R. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Multiparasite communities in animals and humans: frequency, structure and pathogenic significance.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Parasitol.</italic></source> <volume>28</volume> <fpage>377</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>393</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0020-7519(97)00189-6</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9559357</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Prendeville</surname> <given-names>H. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morris</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pilson</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Virus infections in wild plant populations are both frequent and often unapparent.</article-title> <source><italic>Am. J. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>99</volume> <fpage>1033</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1042</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3732/ajb.1100509</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22645099</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rohani</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Earn</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Finkenstadt</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grenfell</surname> <given-names>B. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Population dynamic interference among childhood diseases.</article-title> <source><italic>Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B</italic></source> <volume>265</volume> <fpage>2033</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2041</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rspb.1998.0537</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9842732</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rohani</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Green</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mantilla-Beniers</surname> <given-names>N. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grenfell</surname> <given-names>B. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Ecological interference between fatal diseases.</article-title> <source><italic>Nature</italic></source> <volume>422</volume> <fpage>885</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>888</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature01542</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12712203</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ryals</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neuenschwander</surname> <given-names>U. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Willits</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Molina</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Steiner</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hunt</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Systemic acquired resistance.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Cell</italic></source> <volume>8</volume> <fpage>1809</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1819</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/tpc.8.10.1809</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12239363</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sasu</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferrari</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Winsor</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stephenson</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Indirect costs of a non-target pathogen mitigate the direct benefits of a virus-resistant transgene in wild <italic>Cucurbita</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</italic></source> <volume>106</volume> <fpage>19067</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>19071</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0905106106</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19858473</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sasu</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferrari</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stephenson</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010a</year>). <article-title>Interrelationships among a virus-resistant transgene, herbivory, and a bacterial disease in wild <italic>Cucurbita</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>171</volume> <fpage>1048</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1058</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sasu</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Seidl-Adams</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wall</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Winsor</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stephenson</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010b</year>). <article-title>Floral transmission of <italic>Erwinia tracheiphila</italic> by cucumber beetles in a wild <italic>Cucurbita pepo</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Environ. Entomol.</italic></source> <volume>39</volume> <fpage>140</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>148</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1603/EN09190</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20146850</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schmelz</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Engelberth</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alborn</surname> <given-names>H. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>O&#x2019;Donnell</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sammons</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Toshima</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Simultaneous analysis of phytohormones, phytotoxins, and volatile organic compounds in plants.</article-title> <source><italic>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</italic></source> <volume>100</volume> <fpage>10552</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10557</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1633615100</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12874387</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B55"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schmelz</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Engelberth</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tumlinson</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Block</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alborn</surname> <given-names>H. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>The use of vapor phase extraction in metabolic profiling of phytohormones and other metabolites.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant J.</italic></source> <volume>39</volume> <fpage>790</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>808</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02168.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15315639</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B56"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shapiro</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moraes</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stephenson</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mescher</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Pathogen effects on vegetative and floral odours mediate vector attraction and host exposure in a complex pathosystem.</article-title> <source><italic>Ecol. Lett.</italic></source> <volume>15</volume> <fpage>1430</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1438</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ele.12001</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22988893</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shapiro</surname> <given-names>L. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salvaudon</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mauck</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pulido</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Moraes</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stephenson</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Disease interactions in a shared host plant: effects of pre-existing viral infection on cucurbit plant defense responses and resistance to bacterial wilt disease.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS One</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>:<issue>e77393</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0077393</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24155951</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shapiro</surname> <given-names>L. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Seidl-Adams</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Moraes</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stephenson</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mescher</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Dynamics of short-and long-term association between a bacterial plant pathogen and its arthropod vector.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Rep.</italic></source> <volume>4</volume>:<issue>4155</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep04155</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24561664</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B59"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Simmons</surname> <given-names>H. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holmes</surname> <given-names>E. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gildow</surname> <given-names>F. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bothe-Goralcyzk</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stephenson</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Experimental verification of seed transmission of <italic>Zucchini yellow mosaic virus</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Dis.</italic></source> <volume>95</volume> <fpage>751</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>754</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-11-10-0843</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B60"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stephenson</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leyson</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Travers</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hayes</surname> <given-names>C. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Winsor</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Interrelationships among inbreeding, herbivory, and disease on reproduction in a wild gourd.</article-title> <source><italic>Ecology</italic></source> <volume>85</volume> <fpage>3023</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3034</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/04-0005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B61"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stewart</surname> <given-names>G. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boussinesq</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coulson</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elson</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nutman</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bradley</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Onchocerciasis modulates the immune response to mycobacterial antigens.</article-title> <source><italic>Clin. Exp. Immunol.</italic></source> <volume>117</volume> <fpage>517</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>523</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2249.1999.01015.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10469056</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B62"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Strauss</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Indirect effects in community ecology: their definition, study and importance.</article-title> <source><italic>Trends Ecol. Evol.</italic></source> <volume>6</volume> <fpage>206</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>210</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0169-5347(91)90023-Q</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B63"><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>USDA</collab> (<year>1996</year>). <source><italic>Environmental Assessment for Upjohn Company/Asgrow Seed Company Petition for Determination of Non-Regulated Status for CZW-3 Squash.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Washington, DC</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>US Department of Agriculture</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B64"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vlot</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dempsey</surname> <given-names>D. M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klessig</surname> <given-names>D. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Salicylic acid, a multifaceted hormone to combat disease.</article-title> <source><italic>Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.</italic></source> <volume>47</volume> <fpage>177</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>206</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.phyto.050908.135202</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B65"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Walters</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Walsh</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Newton</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lyon</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Induced resistance for plant disease control: maximizing the efficacy of resistance elicitors.</article-title> <source><italic>Phytopathology</italic></source> <volume>95</volume> <fpage>1368</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1373</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-95-1368</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18943546</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B66"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus alters insect vectors&#x2019; host orientation preferences to enhance spread and increase rice ragged stunt virus co-infection.</article-title> <source><italic>Phytopathology</italic></source> <volume>104</volume> <fpage>196</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>201</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-08-13-0227-R</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24047253</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B67"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wasternack</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Jasmonates: an update on biosynthesis, signal transduction and action in plant stress response, growth and development.</article-title> <source><italic>Ann. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>100</volume> <fpage>681</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>697</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aob/mcm079</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17513307</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B68"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ziebell</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carr</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Cross-protection: a century of mystery.</article-title> <source><italic>Adv. Virus Res.</italic></source> <volume>76</volume> <fpage>211</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>264</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0065-3527(10)76006-1</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20965075</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>