It has been reported that the expression of PCaP2 in whole seedlings is significantly induced after treated by 4°C for 6 h (Kato et al., 2010a). To fully understand the expression pattern of PCaP2 under cold stress, the expression was detected in more details under 4°C treatments by analysis of qRT-PCR and GUS staining. The results showed that the expression of PCaP2 was induced in roots, cotyledons, true leaves, flowers and the whole seedlings by 4°C treatments from 1 to 12 h by qRT-PCR assay, with the peak level of the increased 16.64 ± 1.06-folds at 3 h after 4°C treatments (Figure 1A). The highest cold-induced expression of PCaP2 was detected in roots, compared with that in other tissues, (Figure 1A). To confirm the result of qRT-PCR assay, the promoter activity was detected using GUS as a reporter treated by 4°C for 3 h. The results showed that GUS activity was greatly induced in the whole seedlings, cotyledons, true leaves, hypocotyls, primary roots and lateral roots after 3 h treatment by 4°C, which is consistent with the above results from qRT-PCR (Figures 1B,C).

To analyze the function of PCaP2 in plant chilling tolerance, the phenotypes of a PCaP2-OE line (Supplementary Figure S1), a knockout of PCaP2-RNAi line (Wang X. et al., 2007; Supplementary Figure S1) and a knockdown of T-DNA insertion (pcap2) line (SALK_021652) (Kato et al., 2013; Zhu et al., 2013; Supplementary Figure S1) were investigated under normal (22°C) and 14°C conditions. Under normal conditions, the germination rates of PCaP2-OE, PCaP2-RNAi and pcap2 were slightly different than these of WT seeds from 1 to 3 days, but the germination of these seeds was identical at 4 and 5 days (Figure 2A). However, chilling significantly inhibited the germination of all these seeds, the germination rates of PCaP2-OE, PCaP2-RNAi and pcap2 were obviously different than these of WT seeds at 2 days, then the germination rates of WT and PCaP2-OE were similar, and they were higher than these of PCaP2-RNAi and pcap2 with chilling treatments at 4 and 5 days (Figure 2A). When the 4-day-old seedlings grown for 11 days in 1/2MS, the grown status had no significant difference among WT, PCaP2-OE, PCaP2-RNAi, and pcap2 lines under normal conditions, however, PCaP2-OE seedlings had longer roots, larger leaves and lateral roots than WT under 14°C, while PCaP2-RNAi and pcap2 had the opposite situation (Figures 2B,C). The similarly different growth of these seedlings was found when 7-day-old seedlings were transferred to matrix soil at 22°C for 40 days (the top of Figure 2D) or 14°C for 60 days (the bottom of Figure 2D). In the process of reproductive growth, PCaP2-OE, PCaP2-RNAi, and pcap2 were identical under normal conditions, while PCaP2-OE seedlings showed stronger, more flowers, and more siliques than WT, while PCaP2-RNAi and pcap2 had the opposite situation (Figure 2D). Compared with the chilling-inducible phenotype of pcap2, the more obvious features of PCaP2-RNAi may result from the different expression of PCaP2 between pcap2 and PCaP2-RNAi (Figure 2D). Our results suggest that PCaP2 positively regulates the chilling tolerance of Arabidopsis in seed germination, seedling and reproductive growth.

Abscisic acid is another regulatory factor in chilling stress, and the higher expression level of PCaP2 has been found in ABA treatments (Kato et al., 2010a; Trivedi et al., 2016). To investigate whether PCaP2 is also regulated by ABA signaling in chilling stress, the expression of PCaP2 was firstly examined in exogenous ABA treatments. qRT-PCR and GUS staining showed that the level of PCaP2 mRNA was markedly increased with ABA treatments from 1 to 12 h and the expression of PCaP2 was induced in the whole seedlings, cotyledons, true leaves, hypocotyls, primary roots and lateral roots after 12 h treatment by 40 μM ABA (Figures 3A–C).

Then we examined the seed germination rates and seedling growth of WT, PCaP2-OE, PCaP2-RNAi and pcap2 under 0 or 0.8 μM ABA treatments. The results showed that there were no significant differences observed in seed germination rates without ABA treatments (Figure 3D). However, the germination rates of WT and PCaP2-OE were similar, and they were higher than these of PCaP2-RNAi and pcap2 with exogenous ABA treatments (Figure 3D). The growth status of WT, PCaP2-OE, PCaP2-RNAi, and pcap2 were identical under control conditions (Figure 3E). However, under ABA treatments, PCaP2-OE seedlings had larger leaf area, longer primary roots, and more lateral roots than WT seedlings, while PCaP2-RNAi and pcap2 had opposite phenotypes, which is consistent with the chilling-inducible phenotypes (Figure 3F). These results suggest that PCaP2 acts as a positive factor in ABA signaling pathway and the involvement of PCaP2 in chilling might be mediated by ABA signaling pathway.

C-repeat binding Factor-signaling pathway is crucial to plants in response to cold signaling. To obtain clues as to whether PCaP2 plays a role in regulating CBFs and COR gene expression, we examined the expression of CBFs and CBF-target COR genes including CBF1, CBF2, CBF3, COR15B, KIN1, KIN2, RD29A, and HAB1 (Novillo et al., 2004) in WT, PCaP2-OE and pcap2 seedlings with 4°C treatments at 0, 6, and 12 h by qRT-PCR analysis. Previous studies have used the T-DNA mutant of PCaP2 to analyze the function of PCaP2 (Kato et al., 2013; Zhu et al., 2013). Thus, the T-DNA mutant of PCaP2 was chosen in the analysis of the gene expression in the present study. As shown in Figure 4, the expression level of all chosen genes, especially CBF2, CBF3, KIN1, RD29A, KIN2, was significantly decreased in pcap2, compared with that in WT under normal conditions. Under cold stress, the expression of all these genes, except for CBF2, was significantly inhibited in pcap2 and increased in PCaP2-OE seedlings (Figure 4A). The results demonstrate that PCaP2 affects the expression of CBF-COR pathway genes and might enhance chilling tolerance by triggering CBF1, -3 expression and inhibiting CBF2 expression.

To further dissect whether PCaP2-mediated CBF-COR pathway genes was also involved in ABA signaling pathway, we examined the expression level of the above genes in WT, PCaP2-OE and pcap2 seedlings with ABA treatments (Figure 4B). The results showed that only CBF2 expression was significantly up-regulated and other gene expression was significantly down-regulated in pcap2, which is consistent with the above results in cold stress.

SnRK2s are a center of ABA signaling pathway and regulate the expression of ABFs, ABIs and some downstream ABA-responsive genes (Fujii et al., 2007; Kulik et al., 2011). To dissert how PCaP2 regulates the molecular pathway of ABA signal, we examined the expression of the following SnRK2 genes and SnRK2-mediated ABA-responsive genes in WT, PCaP2-OE and pcap2 seedlings: SnRK2.2, SnRK2.3 and SnRK2.6 (Boudsocq et al., 2004); ABF genes (ABF2/AREB1, ABF3 and ABF4) (Choi et al., 2000; Uno et al., 2000); RD29A (Yamaguchi-Shinozaki and Shinozaki, 1994); KIN1 and KIN2 (Kurkela and Borg-Franck, 1992). In the absence of exogenous ABA, compared with WT, the expression of all these genes decreased in pcap2 seedlings. The expression of SnRK2s decreased between 2.5- and 3-fold, while ABFs decreased between 2.5 and 6.25-fold (Figure 5). In the presence of exogenous ABA, the mutation of PCaP2 still inhibited the expression of SnRK2s, ABFs, KIN1, KIN2, and RD29A (Figure 5). On basis of the above results, PCaP2 is a positive factor in ABA signaling pathway, illustrating that disruption of PCaP2 may play an inhibition role in the expression of some ABA-induced genes. Additionally, overexpression of PCaP2 induced the expression of SnRK2s, ABFs, and KIN2. Thus, we speculate that PCaP2 can regulate the expression of SnRK2s and ABFs positively to participate in ABA signaling.

To further dissect whether the above PCaP2-mediated ABA-responsive genes was also involved in low temperature stress, we examined the expression level of the above genes in WT, PCaP2-OE and pcap2 seedlings under normal and low temperature conditions. In normal conditions, the expression of all these genes was declined in pcap2 seedlings, compared with WT (Figure 6). In low temperature conditions, pcap2 still decreased the expression of SnRK2.2, -2.3, ABF2, KIN1, KIN2, and RD29A, while induced the expression of SnRK2.6, ABF1, -3, -4 (Figure 6), at the same time, PCaP2-OE showed the contrary effect on these gene expression. As shown in the above results, in response to cold stress, PCaP2 involves in chilling tolerance and ABA signaling pathway by regulating the expression of SnRK2.2, -2.3, ABF2, KIN1, KIN2, and RD29A. While these results are consistent with PCaP2 positively regulating SnRK2.2, -2.3, ABF2, KIN1, KIN2, and RD29A, the effects on ABF1, -3, -4, and SnRK2.6 are less straightforward.

To investigate whether MT destabilizing activity of PCaP2 is involved in response to chilling stress, we firstly analyzed whether MT destabilization in WT benefits to plant tolerance chilling stress. Thus, we monitored the phenotype of WT in the presence of MT-destabilizing drugs (oryzalin and PPM) in normal or chilling conditions. Compared with the no drug treatments, the growth of WT seedlings treated with 50 nM oryzalin or 50 nM PPM was not different in normal conditions (Figure 7A). However, in 14°C conditions, the seedlings with oryzalin or PPM treatments were longer roots, larger leaves, more numbers of leaves and lateral roots than that without drug treatments, which is consistent with chilling-inducible phenotype of PCaP2-OE seedlings, suggesting that the low-dose MT destabilizing drug benefits to plant chilling tolerance and chilling-inducible phenotype of PCaP2-OE might be obtained from MT destabilizing effects (Figure 7B).

To confirm the above results, we secondly monitored whether the phenotypes of PCaP2-RNAi and pcap2 can be compensated by oryzalin and PPM in chilling conditions. The study found that the phenotypes of PCaP2-RNAi and pcap2 treated by oryzalin or PPM were well growth, similarly with that of WT, in 14°C, illustrating the MT destabilization can partially compensate functional disruption of PCaP2 in chilling stress (Figure 7C). These results suggest that MT destabilizing activity of PCaP2 may be involved in plant chilling tolerance.

To investigate whether MT destabilization effect on expression level of CBFs, CBF-target COR genes, SnRK2 and SnRK2-mediated ABA responsive genes. We further examined the expression change of the above cold- and ABA-responsive genes in WT, PCaP2-OE and pcap2 seedlings with oryzalin treatments under 22°C. The results showed that oryzalin treatments inhibited all these target genes expression in pcap2 and increased these genes expression in PCaP2-OE seedlings (Figure 8). Moreover, we found that the increasing expression of PCaP2-OE seedlings in oryzalin treatments was not as strong as cold and ABA treatments (Figure 8), suggesting MT destabilization might be a partial role in inducing the expression of ABA-responsive genes, CBFs and CBF-target COR genes.

We then asked whether F-actin-severing activity of PCaP2 is responsive to chilling stress. We treated m1, m2 (expressing PCaP2 mutant proteins M1 and M2 specifically lacking F-actin-severing activity, respectively, in a pcap2 background) and the m7 (expressing a PCaP2 mutant protein M7 that retained F-actin-severing activity in a pcap2 background) seedlings (the MT activity of PCaP2 isn’t effected in m1, m2, and m7) (Zhu et al., 2013), PCaP2-RNAi as a positive control, and WT with exposure to 14°C. The results showed no obvious differences among the WT, m1, m2, and m7 under normal and chilling conditions (Supplementary Figure S2), suggesting that the F-actin-severing activity of PCaP2 could not participate in response to chilling stress in seedling growth.

Previous data showed that the mRNA level of PCaP2 in the whole plant is increased with 4°C treatments and PCaP2 is mainly expressed in roots and flower tissues in normal condition (Wang X. et al., 2007; Kato et al., 2010a). The present study indicated that the expression of PCaP2 in roots, cotyledons, true leaves, lateral roots and flowers was highly induced under cold stress, especially in roots (Figure 1), indicating that PCaP2 is widely expressed in response to chilling stress, suggesting that PCaP2 might play more important or multiple roles under cold stress. Previous studies have been found that PCaP2 functions in roots, such as root hair growth and abnormal root growth (Wang X. et al., 2007; Kato et al., 2013). Our data also showed that the expression of PCaP2 was the highest in roots, compared with the other tissues, in cold and ABA treatments (Figures 1, 3B,C), suggesting that the role of PCaP2 in response to chilling and ABA might mainly result from plant root responses. Further, we found that PCaP2-OE expressed the enhanced tolerance, while PCaP2-RNAi or pcap2 were hypersensitive to chilling stress in seed germination, seedling and reproductive growth, and the difference of these phenotypes was dependent on the expression level of PCaP2 (Figure 2), demonstrating that PCaP2 is an important and positive regulator of plant chilling tolerance.

Previous studies have proved that an elevated cytoplasmic Ca²⁺ level by environment signaling may trigger the interaction of CaM with PCaP2, resulting in PtdInsP2s becoming free and interacting with the target membrane proteins, demonstrating that PCaP2 is involved in intracellular signal transduction (Kato et al., 2010a,b, 2013). Our results showed that PCaP2 can regulate the expression of many ABA responsive-genes and cold inducible-genes, including some upstream genes such as CBFs, SnRK2.2, -2.3 (Figures 4–6), suggesting that PCaP2 might mainly function as a Ca²⁺-binding protein to participate in intracellular signaling transduction under chilling stress.

Considering that both PCaP1 and PCaP2 also function in regulating MT destabilizing and F-actin severing (Wang X. et al., 2007; Zhu et al., 2013), the question is raised whether these functions of PCaP2 are also involved in plant chilling tolerance. Our results suggested that the F-actin-severing activity of PCaP2 wasn’t involved in response to chilling stress in seedling growth (Supplementary Figure S2), however, PCaP2 may be responsive to chilling stress partially by the dynamic organization of MTs (Figure 1). Although there are reports that a plant with increased chilling tolerance along with an elevated cold stability of MTs (Jian et al., 1989; Nick, 2013), our results indicated that it is possibility that PCaP2 functions as a MT destabilizing protein and enhances the ability of plant chilling tolerance and triggers cold- and ABA- responsive gene expression, suggesting MT destabilization also confers plant chilling tolerance, which is a novel phenomenon in MT-mediated plant cold responses. It has been proved that the high dynamics and reorganization of MT respond to environment signals and the early MT destabilization may improve the later MT stability in some environment conditions, such as cold acclimation (Wang and Nick, 2001; Abdrakhamanova et al., 2003), salt stress (Wang C. et al., 2007), thus we speculate that the MT destabilization in chilling stress might play a similar role. In addition, it is well-known that MTs can regulate the plant growth (Mathur, 2004; Wang X. et al., 2007), supporting that PCaP2 as MT-associated protein could be involved in the regulation of plant growth in chilling stress. However, it is hardly to control the steady environment conditions of low temperature in observing the dynamics of MTs in live-cells. Thus, we can’t obtain the results about the dynamics of MTs under cold stress.

Transcriptional cascades, mediated by CBF regulators, are the central regulatory framework in a cold signaling pathway (Zarka et al., 2003; Cook et al., 2004; Gilmour et al., 2004). Our results proved that PCaP2 can trigger CBF-COR pathway in plant chilling tolerance due to the evidences that the mutant of PCaP2 obviously inhibited the expression of CBF1, -3 and CBF-target COR genes, while increased the expression of CBF2 in cold stress (Figure 4).

To this day, although no phenotypes of the single mutants of CBF1, -2, -3 are reported in Arabidopsis chilling tolerance possibly due to the redundant function of CBFs in cold stress (Park et al., 2015), Arabidopsis CBF1 overexpression seedlings and Arabidopsis CBF3 overexpressing cassava seedlings obviously improve chilling tolerance by genetics analysis (Yang et al., 2010; An et al., 2016), indicating that CBF1 and CBF3 act as positive regulators of chilling tolerance. Previous studies demonstrate that CBF2 is a negative regulator of freezing and negatively mediates the CBF1 and CBF3 expression in cold stress (Novillo et al., 2004), suggesting the involvement of CBF2 in plant cold tolerance is the contrary pathway of CBF1, -3. In addition, two reports showed the different chilling-inducible phenotypes of the triple mutants of CBF1, -2, -3 in Arabidopsis. One is no obvious phenotype with 4°C treatments from 45 to 90 days (Zhao et al., 2016); the other is chilling tolerance treated with 4°C from 35 to 50 days (Jia et al., 2016). On basis of the previous results, a possible explanation is the opposite pathways of CBF1, CBF2, and CBF3 resulting in the triple mutants inhibiting the expression of CBF1, -3 to decrease chilling tolerance and inhibiting the expression of CBF2 to increase chilling tolerance at the same time, thus the triple mutants might be hard to show a steady phenotype in different cultivation environments, although all treated with 4°C (Jia et al., 2016). Our studies further support the possibility that PCaP2 may regulate CBF1/3 and CBF2 through different pathway in response to chilling stress (Figure 4). Interestingly, our results showed that PCaP2 significantly inhibited the expression of CBF2, -3 and slightly inhibited the CBF1 expression in normal condition (Figure 4), suggesting PCaP2 might directly regulate the expression of CBF2, -3 under normal condition, while CBF1 is specially regulated by PCaP2 in chilling stress.

C-repeat binding factor-mediated pathway has been considered in a cross talk with ABA signaling pathway (Shi and Yang, 2014). Genetic studies also indicate that ABA biosynthesis and signaling components are important for the expression of COR genes, such as RD29A, RD22, KIN1, KIN2, COR15A, COR15B, and HAB1 (Xiong et al., 2001, 2002). A report show that CBF-COR pathway can be triggered by ABA signals in cold stress and be mediated by MYB96-HHP module (Lee and Seo, 2015), however, the function of MYB96-HHP by genetics analysis remains unknown in chilling, freezing or ABA treatments. Thus, the crosstalk mechanism between CBF-COR pathway and ABA pathway is largely unknown in chilling stress.

Compared with the previous studies, our results provided the more details. ABA upregulated the expression of PCaP2 in roots, cotyledons, true leaves, and lateral roots (Figures 3B,C), and PCaP2-OE seedlings were less sensitive, while PCaP2-RNAi or pcap2 seedlings were hypersensitive to exogenous ABA treatments, which was consistent with the phenotypes treated by chilling stress (Figures 3E,F). In addition, pcap2 inhibited the expression of CBF1, -3, RD29A, KIN1, KIN2, COR15A, and HAB1, but increased the CBF2 expression, in exogenous ABA treatments, which was similar expression change treated by cold (Figure 4). These results suggest that PCaP2 is a positive regulator of ABA signaling pathway and may activate the CBF-mediated transcriptional network by ABA signal in cold stress.

SnRK2s are a center of ABA signaling pathway (Kulik et al., 2011). Others have demonstrated that the transcription level of SnRK2s is upregulated in response to cold stress in some species. For example, the transcription level of TaSnRK2.4, TaSnRK2.7, TaSnRK2.8 (in wheat), ZmSnRK2.3, and ZmSnRK2.7 (in maize) (Zou et al., 2006; Huai et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2010, 2011). However, the few investigations of Arabidopsis, SnRK2s have been conducted in cold stress. In Arabidopsis, SnRK2.2, -2.3, -2.6 are crucial in response to abiotic stress (Fujii and Zhu, 2009). Our results firstly proved the involvement of SnRK2.2, -2.3, -2.6 in cold stress by the analysis of the cold inducible expression of SnRK2.2, -2.3, -2.6 and SnRK2-mediated genes (Figure 6). It has been proved the functional segregation of between SnRK2.6 and SnRK2.2, -2.3 in drought stress (Fujii et al., 2007; Kulik et al., 2011). Interestingly, our further studies showed that PCaP2 positively influenced both ABA-induced and cold-induced the expression of SnRK2.2, -2.3, but not SnRK2.6 (Figure 6), demonstrating that PCaP2 triggers the expression of SnRK2.2, -2.3 and the separately function of SnRK2.6 and SnRK2.2, -2.3 might be also involved in cold stress.

In ABA signaling pathway, SnRK2s play a key role in stimulating the expression of ABA-dependent transcription factors, such as ABIs and ABFs, which mediate the expression of many downstream ABA responsive genes (Fujii and Zhu, 2009). In Arabidopsis, four AREB/ABF transcription factors and five ABIs can be mediated by SnRK2s (Shi and Yang, 2014; Trivedi et al., 2016). Our results showed that PCaP2 regulated the expression of ABF2, KIN1, KIN2, and RD29A in ABA and cold treatments (Figures 5, 6), illustrating that PCaP2 also increase the SnRK2-mediated gene expression in cold stress and ABA treatments, further supporting that PCaP2 activates the SnRK2-mediated transcriptional network in response to ABA and cold signals.

Among ABFs and ABIs, the expression of ABF1 is significantly induced by cold (Choi et al., 2000; Uno et al., 2000) and ectopic expression ABI3 confers ability to express COR genes and enhances cold tolerance in Arabidopsis (Tamminen et al., 2001), illustrating that ABF1 and ABI3 is involved in cold stress. One study illustrates that ABF/AREB family transcription factors physically interact with DREB/CBF family members, and ABF2 interacts with CBF3 in vitro (Lee et al., 2010), suggesting that ABF2 could function by associating with CBF-pathway. Our results showed that only ABF2 expression was positively mediated by PCaP2 in ABA and cold treatments (Figures 5, 6), suggesting that the involvement of PCaP2 in chilling stress might be a same pathway with ABF2.

Arabidopsis ecotype Col-0 was the background for all transgenic and mutant plants in this study. The seeds of pcap2, PCaP2-RNAi and PCaP2-OE, m1, m2, m7 and pPCaP2 promoter::GUS were provided by professor Ming Yuan and professor Ying Fu, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China. All these seeds were used in the previous studies (Wang X. et al., 2007; Kato et al., 2013; Zhu et al., 2013).

Arabidopsis seeds were surface-sterilized and sowed on MS/G plates consisting of 1/2 MS (Murashige and Skoog) medium with vitamins (PlantMedia¹), 0.6% w/v phytoagar (PlantMedia), and 1% w/v sucrose, pH adjusted to 5.8–6.0 with 1 M NaOH. The plates were cold-treated at 4°C in darkness for 3 days, and then moved to a growth chamber at 22°C, with a 16 h/8 h (light/dark) photoperiod at approximately 120 μmol m^-2 s^-1. For chilling tolerance assay, 4-day-old seedlings were transferred to new 1/2 MS medium and then placed in a growth chamber set at 14°C while the control group set at 22°C for 11 days (Figures 2B,C), additionally, 7-day-old seedlings which grown at normal condition were transferred to matrix soil at 22°C for 40 days (the top of Figure 2D) or 14°C for 60 days (the bottom of Figure 2D), respectively. For ABA treatment, 4-day-old seedlings were transferred to 1/2 MS medium without or with ABA (0.5 μM). The growth phenotypes including leaf numbers, leaf area, primary root length, and lateral root numbers of chilling stress and ABA treatments were investigated and photographed. At least 20 seedlings in each experiment were observed and the experiments were repeated at least three times.

Wild type and PCaP2-OE seedlings grown for 14-day-old at 22°C were harvested. Total RNA was isolated using an RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen), and treated with RNase-Free DNase (Qiagen) to remove DNA contamination by the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was synthesized using 1 μg total RNA by oligo- (dT) 20-primed reverse transcription using the Omniscript RT Kit (Qiagen). The total reaction volume was 20 and 1 μL of the reaction mixture was subjected to the quantitative real time PCR reaction. 18S rRNA was used as an internal control, the expression levels of PCaP2 were analyzed. Three biological replicates and two to three technical replicates (for each biological replicate) were used for each treatment. The average and standard deviation were calculated from the biological replicates.

To assay the expression of PCaP2 under chilling stress, 14-day-old or 4-week-old WT seedlings grown at normal condition were incubated at 4°C for 0, 1, 3, 6 and 12 h. The 14-day-old seedlings were used for detecting the expression level of PCaP2 in various issues while 4-week-old seedlings were used for flower tissues. WT, pcap2 and PCaP2-OE seedlings grown for 14-day-old at normal condition were incubated at 4°C for 0 or 12 h used for analyzing the expression of chilling response genes. To assay the expression levels of PCaP2 after ABA treatment, qRT–PCR analysis was performed with RNA samples isolated from 14-day-old WT seedlings harvested at 0, 1, 3, 6, and 12 h after treatment with 40 μM ABA. To assay the expression of ABA response genes in WT and mutant lines by ABA treatment, WT and mutant seedlings grown at normal condition for 14-day-old were harvested and treated with 40 μM ABA for 0 and 12 h. Total RNA extraction and reverse transcription were performed as described above. All the primers used for qRT-PCR examination are listed in Supplementary Table S1. Three replicates were performed for each representative experiment.

Fourteen-day-old pPCaP2 promoter::GUS seedlings were collected and incubated at 4°C for 6 h or 40 μM ABA for 3 h, then used for observing the changes of GUS activity under chilling stress and ABA treatment in various tissues. The GUS staining procedure was performed by the method from Wang X. et al. (2007). Samples were examined on an Olympus microscope equipped with a color CCD camera (Sutter Instrument; LAMBDA 10-2) or by an Epson scanner.