<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2018.00086</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title><italic>Bemisia tabaci</italic> MED Population Density as Affected by Rootstock-Modified Leaf Anatomy and Amino Acid Profiles in Hydroponically Grown Tomato</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>&#x0017D;ani&#x00107;</surname> <given-names>Katja</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Dumi&#x0010D;i&#x00107;</surname> <given-names>Gvozden</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Mandu&#x00161;i&#x00107;</surname> <given-names>Marija</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Vuletin Selak</surname> <given-names>Gabriela</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/486735/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Bo&#x0010D;ina</surname> <given-names>Ivana</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Urli&#x00107;</surname> <given-names>Branimir</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Ljubenkov</surname> <given-names>Ivica</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Bu&#x0010D;evi&#x00107; Popovi&#x00107;</surname> <given-names>Viljemka</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Goreta Ban</surname> <given-names>Smiljana</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/396885/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Department of Applied Sciences, Institute for Adriatic Crops and Karst Reclamation</institution>, <addr-line>Split</addr-line>, <country>Croatia</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Department of Plant Sciences, Institute for Adriatic Crops and Karst Reclamation</institution>, <addr-line>Split</addr-line>, <country>Croatia</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Centre of Excellence for Biodiversity and Molecular Plant Breeding (CroP-BioDiv)</institution>, <addr-line>Zagreb</addr-line>, <country>Croatia</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Split</institution>, <addr-line>Split</addr-line>, <country>Croatia</country></aff>
<aff id="aff5"><sup>5</sup><institution>Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Split</institution>, <addr-line>Split</addr-line>, <country>Croatia</country></aff>
<aff id="aff6"><sup>6</sup><institution>Department of Agriculture and Nutrition, Institute of Agriculture and Tourism</institution>, <addr-line>Pore&#x0010D;</addr-line>, <country>Croatia</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Angeles Calatayud, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Spain</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Alfonso Albacete, Centro de Edafolog&#x000ED;a y Biolog&#x000ED;a Aplicada del Segura (CSIC), Spain; Youssef Rouphael, University of Naples Federico II, Italy</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001"><p>&#x0002A;Correspondence: Gabriela Vuletin Selak <email>gabriela.vuletin.selak&#x00040;krs.hr</email></p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002"><p>This article was submitted to Crop and Product Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>05</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>9</volume>
<elocation-id>86</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>15</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2017</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>15</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2018</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2018 &#x0017D;ani&#x00107;, Dumi&#x0010D;i&#x00107;, Mandu&#x00161;i&#x00107;, Vuletin Selak, Bo&#x0010D;ina, Urli&#x00107;, Ljubenkov, Bu&#x0010D;evi&#x00107; Popovi&#x00107; and Goreta Ban.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2018</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>&#x0017D;ani&#x00107;, Dumi&#x0010D;i&#x00107;, Mandu&#x00161;i&#x00107;, Vuletin Selak, Bo&#x0010D;ina, Urli&#x00107;, Ljubenkov, Bu&#x0010D;evi&#x00107; Popovi&#x00107; and Goreta Ban</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p><italic>Bemisia tabaci</italic> is one of the most devastating pests in tomato greenhouse production. Insecticide resistance management for <italic>B. tabaci</italic> requires a novel approach that maximizes non-chemical methods for pest control. The aim of this study was to test the effects of rootstocks on <italic>B. tabaci</italic> populations in hydroponically grown tomato plants. In order to contribute to the better understanding of the mechanisms defining the attractiveness of plant to the aerial pest, the effects of rootstocks on leaf anatomy and the amino acid composition of phloem sap were assessed. A two-factorial experimental design was adopted using cultivars (rootstock cultivars and Clarabella) grown as either non-grafted or grafted with cultivar Clarabella as a scion. The rootstock cultivars included Arnold, Buffon, Emperador, and Maxifort. A reduction in <italic>B. tabaci</italic> density was observed using all rootstock cultivars. The number of adult individuals per leaf was 2.7&#x02013;5.4 times lower on rootstock cultivars than on Clarabella. The number of large nymphs per square centimeter was at least 24% higher on non&#x02013;grafted Clarabella compared with all other treatments. The leaf lamina thickness and mesophyll thickness were lower in self-grafted Clarabella than in non-grafted or in one grafted on rootstock cultivars; however, the extent of this reduction depended on the rootstock. The leaves with thinner laminae were generally less attractive to <italic>B. tabaci</italic>. Eighteen amino acids were detected in the exudates of phloem sap. In all treatments, the most abundant amino acid was &#x003B3;-aminobutyric acid (GABA), followed by proline, serine, alanine, and histidine. The scion cultivar Clarabella was the most attractive to <italic>B. tabaci</italic> and had a higher content of leucine than did rootstock cultivars, and a higher content of lysine compared to Buffon and Maxifort. The features modified by rootstock such are changes in leaf anatomy can affect the attractiveness of plants to <italic>B. tabaci</italic>. Thus, the grafting of tomato could constitute a valuable tool in an integrated management strategy against this aerial pest.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>cultivar</kwd>
<kwd>GABA</kwd>
<kwd>grafting</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Solanum lycopersicum</italic></kwd>
<kwd>spongy parenchyma</kwd>
<kwd>tobacco whitefly</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn001">3365-IP-09-2014</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Hrvatska Zaklada za Znanost<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100004488</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="6"/>
<table-count count="5"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="60"/>
<page-count count="13"/>
<word-count count="9363"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The whitefly <italic>Bemisia tabaci</italic> (<italic>Gennadius</italic>) is one of the most devastating horticultural pests throughout the world, particularly in greenhouse crop production. <italic>Bemisia tabaci</italic> exhibits high genetic diversity within the polyphagous species complex. The <italic>B. tabaci</italic> Mediterranean (MED or biotype Q) and Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1 or biotype B) species have been recognized as extremely invasive (Frohlich et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">1999</xref>; De Barro et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2000</xref>).</p>
<p>Vegetable growing in greenhouses is among the most advanced agricultural technologies. Tomato (<italic>Solanum lycopersicum</italic> L.) is an important crop in Croatia as well as throughout the world (FAO, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2014</xref>) and is among the crops most often grown in protected cultivation.</p>
<p><italic>Bemisia tabaci</italic> MED and MEAM1 are among the most serious pests of tomato (Jiao et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2012</xref>). According to &#x0017D;ani&#x00107; et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">2005</xref>), Skaljac et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">2010</xref>) and &#x0017D;ani&#x00107; et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">2017</xref>), only <italic>B. tabaci</italic> MED is widespread in the coastal areas of Croatia.</p>
<p>Applications of insecticides such as neonicotinoids and pyrethroids as well as the insect growth regulator pyriproxyfen remain an important tool for the control of <italic>B. tabaci</italic>. Nevertheless, the excessive use of these insecticides has resulted in the reduction in their efficacy against pest populations due to the development of insecticide resistance (Elbert and Nauen, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2000</xref>; Ahmad et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">2002</xref>; Roditakis et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">2005</xref>; Karunker et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2008</xref>; Horowitz and Ishaaya, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">2014</xref>; Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">2017</xref>). According to Ellsworth and Martinez-Carrillo (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2001</xref>), insecticide resistance management for <italic>B. tabaci</italic> involves maximizing each non-chemical tactic of the pest control; these maximizations can contribute to preserving the susceptibilities of these pest populations.</p>
<p>To achieve profitability and contribute to environmental protection, constant improvement of vegetable production technology involves new approaches related to pest management. Thus, vegetable grafting has received more attention in recent years as a sustainable practice for mitigation of abiotic and biotic stresses (Colla et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2010</xref>; Louws et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">2010</xref>; Savvas et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">2010</xref>; Schwarz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">2010</xref>). Grafting is a common practice in watermelon and cucumber production in Croatia (Goreta et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2008</xref>; Goreta Ban et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2014</xref>), but tomato grafting has been introduced to greenhouse production recently.</p>
<p>While the effects of grafting on soil-borne diseases and nematodes are known, insufficient information is available regarding the effects of grafting on foliar pest populations, e.g., whiteflies (&#x0017D;ani&#x00107; et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">2017</xref>). According to our previous study (&#x0017D;ani&#x00107; et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">2017</xref>), tomato grafting onto Arnold and/or He-Man rootstocks can be a useful tool in an integrated management strategy against <italic>B. tabaci</italic>. The study showed that number of <italic>B. tabaci</italic> large nymphs was affected by both nitrogen and rootstock as well as their interaction. Alam et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">1995</xref>) reported that the use of wild <italic>Solanum</italic> sp. as rootstock reduced the density of <italic>B. tabaci</italic>, leading to a reduced occurrence of the symptoms of viruses transmitted by whitefly. Alvarez-Hernandez et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">2009</xref>) and Cortez-Madrigal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">2010</xref>) found a lower occurrence of <italic>B. tabaci</italic> on tomatoes grafted onto populations of wild <italic>Solanum</italic> sp. than on tomatoes of non-grafted plants.</p>
<p>The mechanisms contributing to plant resistance to specific pests are still a matter of debate. <italic>Bemisia tabaci</italic> is a phloem feeder (van Lenteren and Noldus, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">1990</xref>; Byrne and Bellows, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">1991</xref>) and its feeding behavior is linked to stylet penetration through the leaf. Leaf lamina thickness showed a positive correlation with the number of <italic>B. tabaci</italic> adults in different eggplant varieties (Hasanuzzaman et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2016</xref>). Similar results were found in black gram, and leaf lamina thickness in that crop was positively correlated with the number of <italic>B. tabaci</italic> eggs, nymphs and adults on the infested plants (Taggar and Gill, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">2012</xref>). The role of leaf anatomy in preventing tomato plant penetration by another important whitefly <italic>Trialeurodes vaporariorum</italic> (Westwood) was proposed by Jauset et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">2000</xref>). The authors suggested the thickness of abaxial tomato epidermis and leaf laminae, in conjunction with nitrogen level and water content, could influence the survival <italic>T. vaporariorum</italic>.</p>
<p>Dietary nitrogen (N) is one of the factors influencing whitefly infestations of agricultural crops (Jauset et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">1998</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">2000</xref>; Bi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2001</xref>; Athar et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">2011</xref>; &#x0017D;ani&#x00107; et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">2011</xref>). In phloem sap, N is present mainly in the form of free amino acids, and the sap also contains soluble proteins (Ziegler, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">1975</xref>). As phloem feeders, <italic>B. tabaci</italic> ingest a diet rich in soluble carbohydrates and relatively high levels of free amino acids (Ziegler, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">1975</xref>; Buchanan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2000</xref>). The influence of amino acids composition and level on life traits of phloem feeders were studied as a consequence of N fertilization or plant age (Blackmer and Byrne, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">1999</xref>; Crafts-Brandner, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2002</xref>; Karley et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">2002</xref>; Bi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2003</xref>; Gould et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2007</xref>). However, there are no data about effect of rootstock or grafting on amino acids composition in tomato, and its relation with <italic>B. tabaci</italic>. The main amino acids translocated by tomato phloem are glutamine and glutamate, followed by aspartate, threonine, and serine (Valle et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">1998</xref>).</p>
<p>The aim of this study was to test the effects of rootstock on <italic>B. tabaci</italic> populations, leaf anatomy and the amino acid composition of phloem sap in hydroponically grown tomato plants. This aim was approached by examining four different rootstock cultivars and Clarabella, either non-grafted or grafted, using Clarabella as a scion.</p>
<p>We hypothesized that rootstock cultivars are carriers of resistance that contributes to the reduction of <italic>B. tabaci</italic> infestation and populations density in hydroponically grown tomato crop. The experiment was set-up to test the relation between <italic>B. tabaci</italic> density and rootstock-modified changes in leaf anatomy and free amino acid profile in phloem sap.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials and methods" id="s2">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Plant material</title>
<p>The experiment was conducted in an unheated greenhouse at the Institute for Adriatic Crops at Split (43&#x000B0;30&#x02032;17.17&#x02033;N, 16&#x000B0;29&#x02032;49.71&#x02033;E) in the Mediterranean area of Croatia. A two-factorial experimental design was adopted in which cultivars (rootstock cultivars and Clarabella) were grown as non-grafted or grafted with cultivar Clarabella as a scion (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>). The rootstock cultivars included Arnold, Buffon (Syngenta Seeds Basel, Switzerland), Emperador (Rijk Zwan, The Netherlands), and Maxifort (De Ruiter, The Netherlands), while the scion cultivar Clarabella (Rijk Zwan, The Netherlands) was grown as a non-grafted or self-grafted scion (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>). This experiment was conducted on young plants in accordance with the goal of the study and did not include harvest.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Scheme description of the plant material used in the study including: non-grafted rootstock cultivars Arnold (A), Buffon (B), Emperador (EM), and Maxifort (M) or grafted with scion cultivar Clarabella (C); and non-grafted and self-grafted scion cultivar.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-09-00086-g0001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title><italic>Bemisia tabaci</italic> culture</title>
<p><italic>Bemisia tabaci</italic> MED adult insects were collected from the insectary of the institute, where they had been maintained on cotton seedlings (<italic>Gossypium hirsutum</italic> L. cv. Acala) in a growth chamber under a 14:10 h light/dark photocycle at 26&#x000B0;C and 60% relative humidity (RH). This population was used to infest peppermint plants (<italic>Mentha piperita</italic> L.) as a host plant favored by <italic>B. tabaci</italic>. Whitefly-infested peppermint plants were kept in a low tunnel covered by non-woven, polypropylene material (Novagryl P30; Fiberweb France, A Berry Plastics Company, France) inside the greenhouse under conditions that were favorable for pest development (&#x0017D;ani&#x00107; et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">2011</xref>). Uniformly infested peppermint plants were further used for the infestation of tomatoes.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Plant treatments and cultivation</title>
<p>The seeds of tomato rootstocks and scion were sown in an organic substrate (Brill Type 4; Gebr. Brill Substrate GmbH &#x00026; Co. KG, Germany). Splice grafting was performed 1 month after sowing (21 September; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>) at the lower epicotyl as recommended for solanaceous crops and according to Lee et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2010</xref>). The seedlings of rootstock and scion were cut completely across and diagonally. Their end surfaces were overlapped in a way the cambiums are in contact, and secured using a silicone grafting clip, sized for stem diameters of 2.0 mm (Bato Plastics B.V., The Netherlands). Grafted seedlings were cultivated under reduced light conditions (10% of daily light intensity) at a relative humidity higher than 95% and a temperature from 22 to 25&#x000B0;C for 7 days until callus formed. The grafted and non-grafted seedlings that had two fully developed leaves were planted into rockwool cubes (7.5 &#x000D7; 7.5 &#x000D7; 6.5 cm<sup>3</sup>; KRANIZOL s.r.o., Czech Republic) 10 days after grafting and fertigated with a nutrient solution prepared in accordance with the methods of Sonneveld and Straver (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">1994</xref>); the solution had an electrical conductivity of 3 dS/m and a pH of 5.5.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Days after sowing (DAS) and dates at which plant cultivation measures and sampling measurements were conducted.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="10" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Activities</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="4" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Plant cultivation</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="6" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Sampling and measurements</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Description</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Sowing</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Grafting</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Planting into rockwool cubes</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Transplanting into rockwool slabs</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Infestation</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Counting of adults</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Counting of eggs</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Phloem sampling and anatomy measurements</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Counting of nymphs</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>The end of the experiment</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">DAS</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0-3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">40</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61&#x02013;67</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">69</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">79</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Date</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22&#x02013;24 Aug.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21 Sept.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1 Oct.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19 Oct.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20 Oct.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22&#x02013;29 Oct.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30 Oct.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11 Nov.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24 Nov.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28 Nov.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The experiment was arranged in a randomized block design and consisted of four replications. Grafted and non-grafted young plants with five fully expanded leaves of approximately 22&#x02013;35 cm in height were transplanted into rockwool slabs (7.5 &#x000D7; 20 &#x000D7; 100 cm<sup>3</sup>) on 19 October 2015 (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). There were four transplants per slab. Each treatment comprised 16 plants and was replicated four times with four plants each. The plants were fertigated with nutrient solution (Sonneveld and Straver, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">1994</xref>) containing 205 mg/L N and composed of 1.25 mM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 12.71 mM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 1.25 mM H<sub>2</sub><inline-formula><mml:math id="M3"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>PO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 8.75 mM K<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>, 2 mM Mg<sup>2&#x0002B;</sup>, 4.25 Ca<sup>2&#x0002B;</sup>, 1.75 mM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 15 &#x003BC;M Fe<sup>2&#x0002B;</sup>, 10 &#x003BC;M Mn<sup>2&#x0002B;</sup>, 5 &#x003BC;M Zn<sup>2&#x0002B;</sup>, 0.5 &#x003BC;M Mo<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>, 0.75 &#x003BC;M Cu<sup>2&#x0002B;</sup>, and 30 &#x003BC;M B<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>. The nutrient solution was applied using a drip irrigation system during a 40-day period. The temperature in the glasshouse recorded at 2 p.m. ranged from 12.5&#x000B0; to 30&#x000B0;C.</p>
<p>The plants were exposed to adults of <italic>B. tabaci</italic> via infested peppermint plants on 20 October 2015 (the plants had 5&#x02013;7 leaves; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). One highly infested peppermint plant was used per rockwool slab, and this infestation source was removed after 2 days.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Pest sampling</title>
<p>Sampling of whitefly instars was performed according to the methods of &#x0017D;ani&#x00107; et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">2011</xref>). The seven oldest leaves of the selected plants were used for pest density assessments.</p>
<p>Assessments of adult numbers were conducted early in the morning (7 a.m.) at 2, 5, and 8 days after infestation (DAI) using the leaf-turn method (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). Adult numbers were assessed on all (5&#x02013;7) the fully developed leaves of 8 selected young plants in each treatment.</p>
<p>To record the densities of eggs at 10 DAI (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>), all leaves were collected from 8 plants per treatment and examined in the laboratory. The total number of eggs per leaf was recorded using a stereo microscope (Stemi 2000, Zeiss, Germany). The leaf area was determined using a leaf area meter LI-3050A (LI-COR, Nebraska, USA), and these data were also expressed as the number of eggs per 100 cm<sup>2</sup>.</p>
<p>The density of the large nymphs (fourth instar to pupae stages) was assessed on 4th, 5th, and 6th leaves of two sampled plants per plot at 35 DAI (24 November; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). The assessment was conducted on the date approximately coinciding with the completion of the pest life cycle. In accordance with the procedure described by Liu (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2004</xref>), large nymphs were counted on 4 leaf disks (radius &#x0003D; 1 cm), 2 from each side of the middle vein of each leaflet. The total number of individuals on each 3.14-cm<sup>2</sup> disc was recorded using a stereomicroscope and expressed as the number of nymphs per square centimeter.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Leaf anatomy measurements</title>
<p>One leaflet of the fifth leaf from the top of each of four plants in each treatment was removed on 11 November (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). Two samples (5 mm<sup>2</sup>) of each leaflet (one from each side of the midrib) were fixed in 3.5% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution (PBS; pH 7.3) for 24 h at 4&#x000B0;C and then in 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.2) for 2. The tissue was then postfixed in 2% osmium tetroxide for 1 h and then dehydrated in an ascending series of acetone. After dehydration, the tissue samples were embedded in the Durcupan resin (Fluka AG Buchs, Switzerland) and cut transversally (Sheehan and Hrapchak, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">1980</xref>). At least four semithin 0.5-&#x003BC;m sections per sample were stained with 1% toluidine blue and then examined under a light microscope (Axioskop 2 plus, Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) using 400X magnification and Axiovision SE64 software (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). In each section (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2A,B</xref>), measurements of different leaf anatomy characteristics were made (the thickness of the lamina, the thickness of the abaxial (lower) and adaxial (upper) layers, and the thickness of the mesophyll). The distance from the underleaf surface to the center of the nearest minor vascular bundle was also measured. The minor vascular bundles were defined according to the methods of Cohen et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">1996</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>Cross-section of a leaf lamina of tomato (<italic>Solanum lycopersicum</italic> L.) observed under a light microscope (<bold>A</bold>; in addition, detail <bold>B</bold>) showing the epidermis on the adaxial (upper; UE) and abaxial (lower; LE) sides of the leaf, palisade (PM), and spongy mesophyll (SM), trichomes (T) that occur on the epidermis <bold>(A)</bold> and vascular bundles (VB) scattered within spongy parenchyma. Scale bar &#x0003D; 50 &#x003BC;m.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-09-00086-g0002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Amino acid extractions from phloem sap</title>
<p>Phloem sap was extracted from plant treatments according to the methods of King and Zeevaart (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">1974</xref>) and Gould et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2007</xref>) on 11 November (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). The terminal leaflet was excised from a compound leaf that was midway along the shoot axis, after which the excised leaflet was inserted immediately into a 1.5-ml solution of 20 mM ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA; pH 7.0) for 2 h in the dark at 25&#x000B0;C. The leaflet samples were then transferred to 1.5-ml vials that contained deionized water for 12 h of sap collection in the dark. The phloem sap samples exuded in diH<sub>2</sub>O for 12 h were used for chemical analysis. The petioles were removed from the vials, and the phloem sap fraction was frozen at &#x02212;20&#x000B0;C until analysis. The amino acids in the phloem exudates were separated by reverse-phase HPLC (Jones et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">1981</xref>) using a Perkin Elmer Series 200 LC system in conjunction with Waters AccQ&#x02022;Tag&#x02122; derivatization chemistry, columns and fluorescence detection.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>The data were tested for normality of distribution and homogeneity of variance and transformed when necessary, after which they were subjected to two-way analysis of variance using proc glm of SAS software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, New Carolina). When <italic>F</italic>-tests were significant, the means of the main factors and interactions were compared using the least significant difference test at <italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title>Adult density and oviposition</title>
<p>The effects of rootstock cultivar on density of <italic>B. tabaci</italic> adults were found at 2, 5, and 8 DAI (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>), while the effects of grafting were recorded at 2 DAI. The interaction between rootstock cultivar and grafting was not significant. The number of adult individuals per leaf was 2.7&#x02013;5.4 times lower on rootstock cultivars than on Clarabella, while the difference among rootstock cultivars was not found. The initial assessment at 2 DAI showed that grafted treatments were 36% more attractive to the pests than non-grafted treatments.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p>Effects of rootstock cultivar and grafting with Clarabella as a scion on <italic>Bemisia tabaci</italic> adult density and oviposition.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Treatment</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Number of adults per leaf</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2"><bold>An oviposition 10 DAI</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Leaf area (cm<sup>2</sup>/plant)</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>2 DAI<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>5 DAI</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>8 DAI</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Number of eggs per plant</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Number of eggs per cm<sup>2</sup></bold></th>
<th/>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="7" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>CULTIVAR</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Arnold</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.86 &#x000B1; 0.48 b<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.00 &#x000B1; 0.87 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.37 &#x000B1; 0.78 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">709.5 &#x000B1; 156.6 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">157.9 &#x000B1; 45.9 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">535.5 &#x000B1; 95.9 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Buffon</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.79 &#x000B1; 0.27 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.46 &#x000B1; 0.85 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.80 &#x000B1; 0.58 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">651.1 &#x000B1; 254.4 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">129.7 &#x000B1; 53.8 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">573.8 &#x000B1; 110.9 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Clarabella</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.74 &#x000B1; 1.28 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.29 &#x000B1; 2.67 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.74 &#x000B1; 1.97 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2111.0 &#x000B1; 501.5 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">509.8 &#x000B1; 149.6 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">477.4 &#x000B1; 45.3 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Emperador</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.38 &#x000B1; 0.40 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.10 &#x000B1; 0.99 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.26 &#x000B1; 0.68 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">896.4 &#x000B1; 158.5 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">155.7 &#x000B1; 25.2 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">584.6 &#x000B1; 63.1a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Maxifort</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.59 &#x000B1; 0.61 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.54 &#x000B1; 0.67 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.36 &#x000B1; 0.53 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">512.4 &#x000B1; 127.0 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">115.6 &#x000B1; 24.3 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">436.3 &#x000B1; 47.4 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>F</italic>(<italic>df</italic> &#x0003D; 4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21.086</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21.794</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29.361</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.233</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.781</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.69</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>P</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003C;0001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003C;0001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003C;0001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0026</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0042</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.6054</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="7" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>GRAFTING</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">No</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.45 &#x000B1; 0.48 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.02 &#x000B1; 1.03 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.88 &#x000B1; 0.75 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1085.3 &#x000B1; 246.4 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">263.56 &#x000B1; 67.12 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">438.02 &#x000B1; 36.3 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Yes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.70 &#x000B1; 0.49 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.94 &#x000B1; 0.88 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.14 &#x000B1; 0.71 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">866.9 &#x000B1; 172.7 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">163.97 &#x000B1; 42.22 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">605.03 &#x000B1; 51.7 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>F</italic>(<italic>df</italic> &#x0003D; 1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.932</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.522</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.773</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.740</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.139</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.83</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>P</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.048</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4703</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1836</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.3965</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1540</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0145</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="7" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>C</bold> &#x000D7; <bold>G</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>F</italic>(<italic>df</italic> &#x0003D; 4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.137</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.653</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.048</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.615</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.603</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>P</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.3385</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.6252</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.3818</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.655</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.6637</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1109</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TN1">
<label>a</label>
<p><italic>Days after infestation</italic>.</p></fn>
<fn id="TN2">
<label>b</label>
<p><italic>Results are expressed as the mean &#x000B1; SE. For each main effect, different lowercase letters in a column indicate a significant difference by the least significant difference test at P &#x0003C; 0.05</italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The oviposition of <italic>B. tabaci</italic> was influenced by cultivar (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). The effects of grafting as well as cultivar &#x000D7; grafting interactions were not recorded. The number of eggs oviposited on the leaves of cultivar Clarabella was 2.4&#x02013;4.1 times higher than on leaves of rootstock cultivars at 10 DAI. Consequently, egg density was 3.2&#x02013;4.4 times higher on Clarabella than on the rootstock cultivars. The leaf area of measured plants was not affected by cultivar but grafted plants had a larger leaf area than non-grafted plants.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Density of <italic>B. tabaci</italic> large nymphs</title>
<p>The effects of rootstock cultivar and grafting on the density of <italic>B. tabaci</italic> large nymphs were observed at 35 DAI by stereomicroscopic examination of the 4th, 5th, and 6th leaves (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>). The number of large nymphs per square centimeter was 2.2&#x02013;7.9 times lower on rootstock cultivars than on Clarabella at three leaf positions. The density of large nymphs was 30&#x02013;46% higher on grafted treatments than on non-grafted treatments.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p>Effects of rootstock cultivar and grafting with Clarabella as a scion on <italic>B. tabaci</italic> large nymphs density at 35 days after infestation (DAI).</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Treatment</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>No. of large nymphs/cm</bold><sup><bold>2</bold></sup></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>4th leaf</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>5th leaf</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>6th leaf</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="4" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>CULTIVAR</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Arnold</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.03 &#x000B1; 0.16 c<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.49 &#x000B1; 0.20 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.13 &#x000B1; 0.18 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Buffon</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.14 &#x000B1; 0.28 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.21 &#x000B1; 0.18 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.20 &#x000B1; 0.09 d</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Clarabella</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.86 &#x000B1; 0.49 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.94 &#x000B1; 0.73 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.59 &#x000B1; 0.34 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Emperador</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.38 &#x000B1; 0.10 c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.03 &#x000B1; 0.15 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.29 &#x000B1; 0.12 cd</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Maxifort</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.87 &#x000B1; 0.14 c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.99 &#x000B1; 0.26 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.80 &#x000B1; 0.13 bc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>F</italic> (<italic>df</italic> &#x0003D; 4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">163.53</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">142.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">71.81</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>P</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003C;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003C;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003C;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="4" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>GRAFTING</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">No</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.35 &#x000B1; 0.25 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.52 &#x000B1; 0.27 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.82 &#x000B1; 0.15 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Yes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.36 &#x000B1; 0.24 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.14 &#x000B1; 0.32 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.59 &#x000B1; 0.12 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>F</italic>(<italic>df</italic> &#x0003D; 1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.84</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>P</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0125</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003C;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003C;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="4" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>C</bold> &#x000D7; <bold>G</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>F</italic>(<italic>df</italic> &#x0003D; 4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.83</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.65</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>P</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003C;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2901</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003C;0.001</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TN3">
<label>a</label>
<p><italic>Results are expressed as the mean &#x000B1; SE. For each main effect, different lowercase letters in a column indicate a significant difference by the least significant difference test at P &#x0003C; 0.05 if the interaction was not significant</italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The large nymphs density on 4th and 6th leaf was affected by cultivar &#x000D7; grafting interaction (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>, Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>). On the 4th leaf, non-grafted Clarabella had 24% higher number of large nymphs per square centimeter compared with other treatments (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3A</xref>). The number of large nymphs on the 4th leaf of rootstock cultivars Arnold, Emperador, and Maxifort, were similar to observation on non-grafted plants and those grafted using Clarabella as a scion. On the 6th leaf, more than 36% higher density of large nymphs was recorded on non-grafted Clarabella compared with other treatments (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3B</xref>). When Buffon, Emperador, and Maxifort were used as rootstock cultivars, the large nymph density was not significantly different between non-grafted plants and those grafted using Clarabella as a scion.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p><italic>Bemisia tabaci</italic> large nymph density at 35 days after infestation (DAI) assessed on non-grafted rootstock cultivars or grafted cultivars that used Clarabella as a scion at the 4th leaf position (<bold>A</bold> scale 0&#x02013;14) and the 6th leaf position (<bold>B</bold> scale 0&#x02013;7). The results are expressed as the means &#x000B1; SE. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences according to the least significant difference test at <italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-09-00086-g0003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Leaf anatomy characteristics</title>
<p>The adaxial and abaxial epidermal cells were in one layer, and the adaxial cells had a larger volume regardless of treatment (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4A&#x02013;F</xref>). In non-grafted Clarabella, the mesophyll was mostly composed of spongy parenchyma and had large intercellular spaces (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4A</xref>). A smaller size of spongy parenchyma was observed for self-grafted Clarabella or Clarabella scion grafted on rootstocks particularly Buffon and Maxifort (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4E,F</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p>Cross-sections of the leaf laminae of non-grafted Clarabella plants <bold>(A)</bold>; self-grafted Clarabella plants <bold>(B)</bold>; and plants grafted with the cultivar Clarabella as a scion in conjunction with rootstock cultivars Arnold <bold>(C)</bold>, Emperador <bold>(D)</bold>, Buffon <bold>(E)</bold>, and Maxifort <bold>(F)</bold>, observed under a light microscope. Scale bar &#x0003D; 50 &#x003BC;m <bold>(A&#x02013;F)</bold>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-09-00086-g0004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The observed leaf anatomy characteristics important for <italic>B. tabaci</italic> oviposition and feeding ranged as follows: leaf lamina thickness from 101.45 to 171.43 &#x003BC;m, abaxial epidermis thickness from 8.46 to 12.31 &#x003BC;m, and mesophyll thickness from 80.95 to 145.20 &#x003BC;m. All observed leaf anatomy characteristics were significantly affected by cultivar, grafting, and their interaction (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption><p>Two-way analysis of variance of the effect of cultivar (Arnold, Buffon, Clarabella, Emperador, and Maxifort) and grafting on tomato leaf anatomy characteristics (Thickness) and Distance from the underleaf surface to the center of the vascular bundles (Distance).</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Variable</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Cultivar (C)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Grafting (G)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>C</bold> &#x000D7; <bold>G</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>df</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>F</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>P</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>df</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>F</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>P</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>df</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>F</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>P</italic></bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="10" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>THICKNESS</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lamina</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">235.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003C;0.0001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">50.79</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003C;0.0001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">52.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003C;0.0001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mesophyll</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">201.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003C;0.0001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">21.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003C;0.0001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">58.52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003C;0.0001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Abaxial epidermis</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">12.29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003C;0.0001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">6.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0113</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">5.82</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Adaxial epidermis</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">22.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003C;0.0001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">6.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0140</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">17.28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003C;0.0001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Distance</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">31.24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003C;0.0001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">10.68</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0014</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">10.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003C;0.0001</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The effect of interaction between cultivar and grafting is shown in Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5A&#x02013;D</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref>. The thickness of leaf laminae was the highest in non-grafted Clarabella, followed by Arnold grafted using Clarabella as a scion and self-grafted Clarabella (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5A</xref>). The thickest mesophyll was found in non-grafted Clarabella, followed by Arnold grafted using Clarabella as a scion and self-grafted Clarabella (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5B</xref>). The plants of non-grafted Maxifort rootstock and those grafted using Clarabella as a scion had the thinnest mesophyll. The abaxial epidermis was thickest in Emperador rootstock grafted using Clarabella as a scion as well as in non-grafted Clarabella, followed by self-grafted Clarabella (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5C</xref>). The adaxial epidermis was thicker in non-grafted and self-grafted Clarabella plants, non-grafted Buffon plants or those grafted using Clarabella as a scion, and Emperador and Maxifort plants grafted using Clarabella as a scion than in plants of the other treatments (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5D</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption><p>Leaf anatomy characteristics (<bold>A</bold>, lamina thickness; <bold>B</bold>, mesophyll thickness; <bold>C</bold>, abaxial epidermis thickness; and <bold>D</bold>, adaxial epidermis thickness) of non-grafted rootstock cultivars or cultivars grafted using Clarabella as a scion. The results are expressed as the means &#x000B1; SE. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences according to the least significant difference test at <italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-09-00086-g0005.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption><p>Distance from the underleaf surface to the center of the vascular bundles of non-grafted rootstock cultivars or cultivars grafted using Clarabella as a scion. The results are expressed as the means &#x000B1; SE. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences according to the least significant difference test at <italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-09-00086-g0006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The distance from the underleaf surface to the center of the nearest minor vascular bundle was affected by cultivar, grafting, and their interaction (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>). An interaction cultivar &#x000D7; grafting is presented in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref>. This distance ranged from 32.45 to 62.71 &#x003BC;m; the longest value was recorded in leaves of Clarabella scion grafted onto Arnold rootstock, followed by self-grafted and non-grafted Clarabella plants. In the treatment most preferred by <italic>B. tabaci</italic>, i.e., non-grafted Clarabella, the distance from the underleaf surface to the center of the nearest minor vascular bundle was 52.54 &#x003BC;m.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Free amino acids in the phloem sap</title>
<p>The amino acid composition of the tomato leaf phloem sap of plants infested with <italic>B. tabaci</italic> is presented in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref>. Eighteen amino acids were detected in the phloem sap exudates. In all treatments, the most abundant amino acid was &#x003B3;-aminobutyric acid (GABA), followed by proline, serine, alanine, and histidine. Differences among cultivars were found for GABA, cysteine, lysine, and leucine percentage in the phloem sap, and grafting reduced only the serine percentage in the phloem sap. Interactions between cultivar and grafting were not detected (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref>). The GABA percentage in the phloem sap was 10&#x02013;13% lower in Maxifort than in Arnold, Clarabella and Emperador, while the percentage of cysteine was 45.5 and 54.5% lower in Arnold and Buffon than in Emperador, respectively. Compared with other cultivars, the pest-favored cultivar Clarabella had the highest percentage of leucine and 19&#x02013;28% higher percentage of lysine than did the rootstock cultivars Buffon and Maxifort, respectively.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption><p>Effects of rootstock cultivar and grafting with Clarabella as a scion on the free amino acid composition (%) in the phloem sap of tomato plants at 21 days after infestation.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Amino acid</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="5" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Rootstock (R)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Grafting (G)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Significance</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Arnold</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Buffon</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Clarabella</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Emperador</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Maxifort</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>No</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Yes</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>R</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>G</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>R &#x000D7; G</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ASP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.386 &#x000B1; 0.107</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.720 &#x000B1; 0.205</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.323 &#x000B1; 0.491</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.096 &#x000B1; 0.197</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.093 &#x000B1; 0.271</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.136 &#x000B1; 0.218</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.711 &#x000B1; 0.137</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.162</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.174</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SER</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.448 &#x000B1; 0.645</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.117 &#x000B1; 0.558</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.791 &#x000B1; 0.846</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.961 &#x000B1; 1.072</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.469 &#x000B1; 1.238</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.398 &#x000B1; 0.723</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.116 &#x000B1; 0.528</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.801</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.005</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.152</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">GLU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.789 &#x000B1; 0.091</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.146 &#x000B1; 0.088</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.176 &#x000B1; 0.210</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.910 &#x000B1; 0.086</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.255 &#x000B1; 0.247</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.111 &#x000B1; 0.113</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.999 &#x000B1; 0.094</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.231</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.447</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.203</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">GLY</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.819 &#x000B1; 0.073</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.899 &#x000B1; 0.130</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.925 &#x000B1; 0.075</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.949 &#x000B1; 0.131</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.930 &#x000B1; 0.092</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.829 &#x000B1; 0.037</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.980 &#x000B1; 0.080</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.850</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.063</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">HIS</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.138 &#x000B1; 0.779</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.166 &#x000B1; 1.272</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.531 &#x000B1; 0.286</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.832 &#x000B1; 0.312</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.493 &#x000B1; 0.829</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.269 &#x000B1; 0.248</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.395 &#x000B1; 0.674</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.051</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.128</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.807</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ARG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.032 &#x000B1; 0.055</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.071 &#x000B1; 0.076</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.282 &#x000B1; 0.055</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.109 &#x000B1; 0.054</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.048 &#x000B1; 0.075</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.112 &#x000B1; 0.039</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.105 &#x000B1; 0.046</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.078</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.892</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.683</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">THR</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.609 &#x000B1; 0.079</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.650 &#x000B1; 0.037</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.794 &#x000B1; 0.116</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.833 &#x000B1; 0.064</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.904 &#x000B1; 0.087</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.763 &#x000B1; 0.054</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.752 &#x000B1; 0.054</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.104</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.887</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.944</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ALA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.346 &#x000B1; 0.918</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.678 &#x000B1; 1.284</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.060 &#x000B1; 1.125</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.875 &#x000B1; 0.736</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.502 &#x000B1; 1.048</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.077 &#x000B1; 0.687</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.908 &#x000B1; 0.689</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.075</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.347</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.150</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PRO</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.137 &#x000B1; 0.860</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.693 &#x000B1; 1.040</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.180 &#x000B1; 0.382</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.724 &#x000B1; 0.916</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.127 &#x000B1; 0.709</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.512 &#x000B1; 0.498</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.433 &#x000B1; 0.546</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.224</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.264</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.806</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">GABA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41.459 &#x000B1; 0.862 a<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN4"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37.442 &#x000B1; 1.791 bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">40.536 &#x000B1; 1.681 ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41.644 &#x000B1; 0.860 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36.808 &#x000B1; 1.286 c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">40.177 &#x000B1; 0.954</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38.978 &#x000B1; 0.863</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.012</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.305</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.852</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CYS</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.044 &#x000B1; 0.002 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.048 &#x000B1; 0.003 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.053 &#x000B1; 0.002 ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.092 &#x000B1; 0.024 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.049 &#x000B1; 0.006 ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.053 &#x000B1; 0.003</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.061 &#x000B1; 0.010</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.026</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.435</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.125</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TYR</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.065 &#x000B1; 0.065</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.926 &#x000B1; 0.052</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.100 &#x000B1; 0.079</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.183 &#x000B1; 0.071</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.066 &#x000B1; 0.071</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.057 &#x000B1; 0.042</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.080 &#x000B1; 0.047</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.109</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.703</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.563</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">VAL</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.135 &#x000B1; 0.066</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.079 &#x000B1; 0.152</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.558 &#x000B1; 0.137</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.407 &#x000B1; 0.086</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.355 &#x000B1; 0.178</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.323 &#x000B1; 0.085</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.290 &#x000B1; 0.089</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.124</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.795</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.920</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MET</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.513 &#x000B1; 0.033</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.476 &#x000B1; 0.034</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.566 &#x000B1; 0.042</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.556 &#x000B1; 0.033</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.527 &#x000B1; 0.046</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0519 &#x000B1; 0.025</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.536 &#x000B1; 0.023</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.480</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.609</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.130</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">LYS</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.453 &#x000B1; 0.178 abc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.121 &#x000B1; 0.215 c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.005 &#x000B1; 0.228 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.753 &#x000B1; 0.194 ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.377 &#x000B1; 0.163 bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.583 &#x000B1; 0.116</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.501 &#x000B1; 0.150</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.024</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.601</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.721</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ILEU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.412 &#x000B1; 0.058</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.360 &#x000B1; 0.085</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.677 &#x000B1; 0.098</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.613 &#x000B1; 0.098</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.504 &#x000B1; 0.076</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.517 &#x000B1; 0.046</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.510 &#x000B1; 0.066</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.060</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.893</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.947</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">LEU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.187 &#x000B1; 0.094 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.490 &#x000B1; 0.250 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.306 &#x000B1; 0.275 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.401 &#x000B1; 0.178 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.421 &#x000B1; 0.166 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.510 &#x000B1; 0.115</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.612 &#x000B1; 0.168</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.601</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.449</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PHE</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.027 &#x000B1; 0.040</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.918 &#x000B1; 0.096</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.136 &#x000B1; 0.053</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.064 &#x000B1; 0.091</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.074 &#x000B1; 0.123</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.056 &#x000B1; 0.031</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.032 &#x000B1; 0.071</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.409</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.678</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.615</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TN4">
<label>a</label>
<p><italic>Results are expressed as the mean &#x000B1; SE. For each main effect, different lowercase letters in a row indicate a significant difference by the least significant difference test at P &#x0003C; 0.05</italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>In general, the effects of rootstocks on the populations of aerial pests have been poorly studied. The first report on the influence of commercial rootstocks on the population density of the aerial pest <italic>B. tabaci</italic> in a hydroponic tomato crop was reported by &#x0017D;ani&#x00107; et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">2017</xref>). In the current study, an alternation of <italic>B. tabaci</italic> density was identified as a main effect of the rootstock cultivars (Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>). The density of large nymphs and adults was higher on grafted treatments than on non-grafted (Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>) as a result of lower attractiveness of non-grafted commercial rootstocks to <italic>B. tabaci</italic>. However, a significant interaction of cultivar x grafting confirmed the importance of rootstock and scion for large nymphs density (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>). Thus, Clarabella grafted onto Arnold, Buffon, Emperador, or Maxifort reduced the incidence of <italic>B. tabaci</italic> large nymphs (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>) compared with non-grafted and self-grafted Clarabella. The effects of grafting tomatoes onto wild <italic>Solanum</italic> spp. on the reduction of the incidence of <italic>B. tabaci</italic> adults was also reported by Alam et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">1995</xref>), Alvarez-Hernandez et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">2009</xref>), and Cortez-Madrigal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">2010</xref>). Similarly, &#x0017D;ani&#x00107; et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">2017</xref>) found that tomato grafting onto Arnold and/or He-Man rootstocks could be valuable tool in an integrated management strategy against <italic>B. tabaci</italic>. The effects of grafting on other aerial pests have been investigated in several studies. Alvarez-Hernandez et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">2009</xref>) and Cortez-Madrigal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">2010</xref>) recorded that tomatoes grafted onto their wild relatives showed resistance to tomato psyllid <italic>Bactericera</italic> (&#x0003D; <italic>Paratrioza</italic>) <italic>cockerelli</italic> (Sulc) and aphids (Aphididae), in addition to the effect on <italic>B. tabaci</italic>. However, in a study on grafted potatoes, rootstocks did not affect the phloem-feeding potato aphid <italic>Macrosiphum euphorbiae</italic> Thomas but did reduce the development of the Colorado potato beetle (<italic>Leptinotarsa decemlineata</italic> Say) on potato scions (Pelletier and Clark, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">2004</xref>). Furthermore, Lagenaria rootstock provided resistance to the mite <italic>Tetranychus cinnabarinus</italic> (Boisduval) in susceptible Cucurbita scions (Edelstein et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2000</xref>).</p>
<p>Although it has been suggested that grafting may improve resistance to aerial pests, these plant defense mechanisms have yet to be explored. According to Edelstein et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2000</xref>), resistance to <italic>T. cinnabarinus</italic> can be transferred by grafting from Lagenaria rootstocks to Cucurbita scions but not in the opposite direction. The authors suggested that the resistant rootstock produced a resistance-promoting substance that was transferred through the graft to the Cucurbita foliage. Cortez-Madrigal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">2010</xref>) and Edelstein et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2000</xref>) suggested that both antixenosis and antibiosis mechanisms constitute possible types of resistance to foliar pests. Muigai et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">2002</xref>) suggested the necessity of multifactorial approaches to explain resistance mechanisms among <italic>Solanum</italic> germplasm. To contribute to understanding of the mechanisms defining the attractiveness of plant to aerial pests, the leaf anatomy and the composition of amino acids of phloem sap were observed in our study.</p>
<p>In our experiment, the leaf anatomy characteristics of the tested rootstock cultivars and scion grafted onto rootstock varied significantly. Our results (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5A,B</xref>) showed that grafting <italic>per se</italic> reduces leaf lamina and mesophyll thickness, as the thickness of both was lower in self-grafted Clarabella than in non-grafted Clarabella. However, the changes in leaf anatomy characteristics of Clarabella scion also depended on the rootstock cultivar. The leaf lamina and mesophyll thickness of Clarabella scion grafted onto Buffon and Maxifort was substantially less than that of non-grafted and self-grafted Clarabella; these thicknesses were reduced because of characteristics of the laminae and mesophyll of non-grafted Buffon and Maxifort rootstocks. The reduction in leaf lamina and mesophyll thickness was not so evident after grafting Clarabella onto Arnold and Emperador rootstocks, and the laminae were thicker than those of non-grafted Arnold and Emperador rootstocks. Buffon and Maxifort, both of whose vigor is less than that of Arnold and Emperador (personal observation), transferred their leaf properties to the scion, and the leaves remained as thin as those of non-grafted plants. The changes in leaf anatomy enhanced by grafting or by rootstock cultivar substantially influenced the attractiveness of the leaves to <italic>B. tabaci</italic> infestation and increased the population density of this insect. Non-grafted Clarabella plants were the most attractive for <italic>B. tabaci</italic> and in these plants, the leaf lamina thickness was 171.43 &#x003BC;m, the abaxial epidermis thickness was 12.09 &#x003BC;m, and the adaxial epidermis thickness was 17.37 &#x003BC;m, while the mesophyll thickness was 145.20 &#x003BC;m (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>).</p>
<p>There is a lack of data on the effects of grafting on leaf anatomy with respect to defense mechanisms against whiteflies in vegetable crops. However, the leaf anatomy characteristics in plants preferred by whiteflies (vegetables or cotton) have been linked to pest densities. The leaf lamina thickness of eggplant varieties was positively correlated with the number of <italic>B. tabaci</italic> adults but not eggs (Hasanuzzaman et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2016</xref>). Eggplant leaves with thinner laminae were less succulent and less preferred for feeding and oviposition purposes by the whiteflies than were the leaves with thicker laminae. According to the study of Taggar and Gill (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">2012</xref>), the leaf laminae of black gram genotypes were positively correlated with the numbers of <italic>B. tabaci</italic> eggs, nymphs and adults. The genotypes with the thickest laminae had the largest nymphal populations. Venugopalrao et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">1990</xref>) suggested a role of leaf lamina thickness in preventing the penetration of cotton plants by <italic>B. tabaci</italic> females because the plants the most susceptible to <italic>B. tabaci</italic> were those with the thinnest leaf laminae. On the other hand, Firdaus et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">2011</xref>) indicated that pepper cuticle thickness was negatively correlated with <italic>B. tabaci</italic> adult survival and oviposition rates. Jauset et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">1998</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">2000</xref>) showed that the thickness of abaxial tomato cuticle, in combination with nitrogen level and water content, could also influence the survival of <italic>T. vaporariorum</italic>. In our study, the adaxial epidermis of Clarabella scion grafted onto Buffon, Emperador and Maxifort was similar to that of some non-grafted and self-grafted plants; only in Arnold the adaxial epidermis thickness was significantly reduced (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5C,D</xref>). However, regarding the abaxial epidermis, only Clarabella grafted onto Emperador had a similar thickness as that of non-grafted and self-grafted Clarabella. The rootstock effect on Clarabella scion seems less clear for the thickness of abaxial and adaxial epidermis than for lamina and mesophyll thickness, and epidermis is not as clearly associated with <italic>B. tabaci</italic> infestation.</p>
<p><italic>Bemisia tabaci</italic> adult and nymphal feeding behavior occurs via stylet penetration through the leaf laminae. Although several authors list <italic>B. tabaci</italic> (B biotype) as a phloem feeder (van Lenteren and Noldus, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">1990</xref>; Byrne and Bellows, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">1991</xref>), there is a report of possible alternative feeding methods (Cohen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">1996</xref>). It seems that <italic>B. tabaci</italic> may feed incidentally on non-vascular tissue, but at some point in their feeding the insects are obliged to tap into a vascular bundle (Cohen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">1996</xref>). In the study involving cotton plants (Cohen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">1996</xref>), the mean distance of the nymphs of <italic>B. tabaci</italic> from the point of labial contact with the leaf surface to the nearest edge of a vascular bundle was 40.9 &#x003BC;m. In the same plant species, the distance from the underleaf surface to the center of the nearest minor vascular bundle was significantly correlated with leaf thickness but negatively correlated with <italic>B. tabaci</italic> adult, egg and nymphal densities (Chu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">1999</xref>). In our study, the distance from the underleaf surface to the center of the nearest minor vascular bundle in non-grafted Clarabella plants, which were preferred the most by <italic>B. tabaci</italic>, was 52.54 &#x003BC;m (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref>). The longest distance was found for Arnold grafted using Clarabella as a scion, followed by self-grafted Clarabella and non-grafted Clarabella, and this distance coincided with lamina thickness. We consider that the distance of 52.54 &#x003BC;m from the underleaf surface to the center of the nearest minor vascular bundle in non-grafted Clarabella enables successful feeding of B. tabaci because of the highest pest density in this treatment.</p>
<p>In addition to changes in leaf anatomy, we expected that the tomato rootstocks or grafting could induce changes in plant metabolism by influencing the amino acid composition and thus affect feeding behavior and population density of <italic>B. tabaci</italic>. Eighteen amino acids were detected in the phloem sap exudate of Clarabella scion in our study, and the most abundant amino acid was GABA, followed by proline, serine, alanine, and histidine. In contrast to the results of a study by Valle et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">1998</xref>), we detected a relatively small content of glutamic acid but more serine and alanine, as well as, the presence of proline and histidine. It has been proposed that GABA accumulation may be an artifact of the EDTA phloem exudation technique (Girousse et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">1991</xref>) or may be caused by the wound response to the leaf cutting methodology used during EDTA-enhanced exudate collection (Valle et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">1998</xref>). On the basis of experiments with <italic>Choristoneura rosaceana</italic> Harris larvae, Ramputh and Bown (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">1996</xref>) proposed that rapid GABA accumulation may represent one of many chemical defense systems that immobile plants deploy against phytophagous invertebrates. In soybean, the accumulation of GABA and reductions in glutamate are triggered by the mechanical damage of leaves, temperature changes, and darkness (Wallace et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">1984</xref>). A high GABA content and low glutamic acid content were also observed in our study, probably because all treatments were infested by <italic>B. tabaci</italic> albeit to different extents. The GABA percentage in phloem sap exudates was dependent on rootstock and Buffon and Maxifort had lower contents of GABA than Arnold and Emperador but they were no less infested with <italic>B. tabaci</italic>. The scion cultivar Clarabella was the most attractive to <italic>B. tabaci</italic> and had a higher content of leucine than did rootstock cultivars, and a higher content of lysine compared to Buffon and Maxifort (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref>). Increased levels of histidine, isoleucine, leucine, tyrosine and valine were found in tomato plants as result of interaction between mite <italic>Tetranychus evansi</italic> Baker &#x00026; Pritchard infestation and drought (Xim&#x000E9;nez-Emb&#x000FA;n et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">2016</xref>), although the effect of drought was more pronounced.</p>
<p>In <italic>Cucumis melo</italic> L., quantitative and qualitative changes in amino acids did not cause variability in oviposition of <italic>B. tabaci</italic> biotype B, but higher adult (male and female) weight and developmental time are associated with higher concentrations of essential amino acids (Blackmer and Byrne, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">1999</xref>). Grafting effects on the amino acid profile were observed only for lower contents of serine in grafted plants than in non-grafted plants. In a study by Bi et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2003</xref>), the levels of free amino acids in cotton petioles and the numbers of whiteflies (adults or immatures) were not correlated. However, the performance of the aphids <italic>Myzus persicae</italic> (Sulzer) and <italic>Macrosiphum euphorbiae</italic> (Thomas) could be linked to changes in the amino acid composition of the phloem; these changes included a developmental shift from high glutamine levels in pre-tuber-filling plants to low glutamine levels in tuber-filling plants (Karley et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">2002</xref>). We did not find a simple relationship between free amino acid profiles in the phloem sap of tomato and <italic>B. tabaci</italic> density; however, the percentages of GABA, cysteine, lysine and leucine in the phloem sap depended on the rootstock, and serine was reduced by grafting. In plants infested by mites (Acarina, Tetranychidae) a composition of amino acids was related to host plant and cultivar (Dabrowski and Bielak, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">1978</xref>). Herbivore arthropods are able to adopt on alternation in plant nutritional status and stress metabolites induced as a plant defense mechanism by changing enzyme system activity of the digestion system (Ortego, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2012</xref>; Zhu-Salzman and Zeng, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">2015</xref>).</p>
<p>Our data reveal the <italic>B. tabaci</italic> density is affected by rootstock cultivar and grafting, as well as their interaction in the case of large nymphs. From a horticultural point of view, tomato grafting onto Arnold, Buffon, Emperador and Maxifort rootstocks can be a useful part of an integrated management strategy against this aerial pest. The underlying mechanism could be at least partly explained by changes in leaf anatomy, in which reductions in spongy parenchyma were observed after self-grafting or grafting onto rootstocks. Leaves with thinner laminae were generally less attractive to <italic>B. tabaci</italic>. The amino acid profiles shifted largely to the accumulation of GABA in all treatments and this may be due to the infestation of <italic>B. tabaci</italic> in all treatments. The scion cultivar Clarabella was the most attractive to <italic>B. tabaci</italic> and had a higher content of leucine than did rootstock cultivars, and a higher content of lysine compared to Buffon and Maxifort. However, a specific shift in free amino acids accumulation due to rootstock or grafting and its relation to <italic>B. tabaci</italic> density was not observed in this study. To distinguish the role of rootstocks in the amino acid profiles of scion, non-infested plants should be used as controls, as no simple response was observed in our study under biotic stress conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>The author contributions were as follows: K&#x0017D;, GD, and SG conceived and designed the study; GD, MM, BU, GV, and K&#x0017D; conducted the experiments; K&#x0017D; and MM managed and evaluated the insect populations; IL, VB, GD, and SG measured the amino acid profiles; IB, GV, and BU performed the histology experiments; GD and SG analyzed the data; and K&#x0017D; drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
<sec>
<title>Conflict of interest statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ahmad</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arif</surname> <given-names>M. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmad</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Denholm</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Cotton whitefly (<italic>Bemisia tabaci</italic>) resistance to organophosphate and pyrethroid insecticides in Pakistan</article-title>. <source>Pest Manag. Sci</source>. <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>203</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>208</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.440</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11852647</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alam</surname> <given-names>M. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hossa</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choudhury</surname> <given-names>D. A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Uddin</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haque</surname> <given-names>N. M. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Effect of grafting technology on suppression of whitefly (<italic>Bemisia tabaci</italic> Gennadius) disseminating virus diseases in tomato</article-title>. <source>Ann. Bangladesh Agric</source>. <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>91</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>98</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alvarez-Hernandez</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cortez-Madrigal</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garcia-Ruiz</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ceja-Torres</surname> <given-names>L. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petrez-Dominguez</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Incidence of pests in grafts of tomato (<italic>Solanum lycopersicum</italic>) on wild relatives</article-title>. <source>Rev. Col. Entomol</source>. <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>150</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>155</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Athar</surname> <given-names>H. U. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bhatti</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bashi</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zafar</surname> <given-names>Z. U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abida Faroo</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Modulating infestation rate of whitefly (<italic>Bemisia tabaci</italic>) on okra (<italic>Hibiscus esculentus</italic> L.) by nitrogen application</article-title>. <source>Acta Physiol. Plant</source>. <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>843</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>850</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11738-010-0609-4</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bi</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ballmer</surname> <given-names>G. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hendrix</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Henneberry</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Toscano</surname> <given-names>N. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Effect of cotton nitrogen fertilization on <italic>Bemisia argentifolii</italic> densities and honeydew production</article-title>. <source>Entomol. Exp. Appl</source>. <volume>99</volume>, <fpage>25</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>36</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1570-7458.2001.00798.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bi</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Toscano</surname> <given-names>N. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Madore</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Effect of urea fertilizer application on soluble protein and free amino acid content of cotton petioles in relation to silverleaf whitefly (<italic>Bemisia argentifolii</italic>) populations</article-title>. <source>J. Chem. Ecol</source>. <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>747</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>761</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1022880905834</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12757331</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Blackmer</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Byrne</surname> <given-names>D. N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Changes in amino acids in <italic>Cucumis melo</italic> in relation to life-history traits and flight propensity of <italic>Bemisia tabaci</italic></article-title>. <source>Entomol. Exp. Appl</source>. <volume>93</volume>, <fpage>29</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>40</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1570-7458.1999.00559.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Buchanan</surname> <given-names>B. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gruissem</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <source>Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants</source>. <publisher-loc>Rockville, MD</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>American Society of Plant Physiologists</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Byrne</surname> <given-names>D. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bellows</surname> <given-names>T. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Whitefly biology</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Entomol</source>. <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>431</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>457</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.en.36.010191.002243</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cohen</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Natwick</surname> <given-names>E. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Simmons</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Henneberry</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) biotype B colonisation and leaf morphology relationships in upland cotton cultivars</article-title>. <source>Aust. J. Entomol</source>. <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>127</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>131</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1440-6055.1999.00091.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cohen</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Henneberry</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Geometric relationships between whitefly feeding behavior and vascular bundle arrangements</article-title>. <source>Entomol. Exp. Appl</source>. <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>135</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>142</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1570-7458.1996.tb00774.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Colla</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rouphael</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leonardi</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bie</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Role of grafting in vegetable crops grown under saline conditions</article-title>. <source>Sci. Hortic.</source> <volume>127</volume>, <fpage>147</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>155</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2010.08.004</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cortez-Madrigal</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Resistencia a insectos de tomate injertado en parientes silvestres, con &#x000E9;nfasis en <italic>Bactericera cockerelli</italic> Sulc. (Hemiptera: Psyllidae)</article-title>. <source>Bioagro</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>11</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>16</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Crafts-Brandner</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Plant nitrogen status rapidly alters amino acid metabolism and excretion in <italic>Bemisia tabaci</italic></article-title>. <source>J. Insect. Physiol</source>. <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>33</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>41</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0022-1910(01)00140-8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12770130</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dabrowski</surname> <given-names>Z. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bielak</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1978</year>). <article-title>Effect of some plant chemical compounds on the behaviour and reproduction of spider mites (Acarina: Tetranychidae)</article-title>. <source>Entomol. Exp. Appl</source>. <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>317</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>326</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1570-7458.1978.tb02788.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>De Barro</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Driver</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trueman</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Curran</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Phylogenetic relationships of world populations of <italic>Bemisia tabaci</italic> (Gennadius) using ribosomal ITS1</article-title>. <source>Mol. Phylogenet. Evol</source>. <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>29</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>36</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/mpev.1999.0768</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10877937</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Edelstein</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tadmor</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abo-Moch</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karchi</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mansour</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>The potential of Lagenaria rootstock to confer resistance to the carmine spider mite, <italic>Tetranychus cinnabarinus</italic> (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Cucurbitaceae</article-title>. <source>B. Entomol. Res</source>. <volume>90</volume>, <fpage>113</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>117</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0007485300000213</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10948370</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Elbert</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nauen</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Resistance of Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) to insecticides in southern Spain with special reference to neonicotinoids</article-title>. <source>Pest Manag. Sci</source>. <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>60</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>64</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/(SICI)1526-4998(200001)56:1&#x0003C;60::AID-PS88&#x0003E;3.0.CO;2-K</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ellsworth</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martinez-Carrillo</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>IPM for <italic>Bemisia tabaci</italic>: a case study from North America</article-title>. <source>Crop Prot</source>. <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>853</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>869</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0261-2194(01)00116-8</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>FAO</collab></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <source>Food and Agricultural Organization</source>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC">www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC</ext-link> (Accessed June 19, 2017).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Firdaus</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Heusden</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harpenas</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Supena</surname> <given-names>E. D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Visser</surname> <given-names>R. G. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vosman</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Identification of silverleaf whitefly resistance in pepper</article-title>. <source>Plant Breed</source>. <volume>130</volume>, <fpage>708</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>714</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1439-0523.2011.01894.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Frohlich</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Torres-Jere</surname> <given-names>I. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bedford</surname> <given-names>I. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Markham</surname> <given-names>P. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>A phylogeographical analysis of the <italic>Bemisia tabaci</italic> species complex based on mitochondrial DNA markers</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol</source>. <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>1683</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1691</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00754.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10583831</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Girousse</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bonnemain</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Delrot</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bournoville</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Sugar and amino-acid-composition of phloem sap of Medicago-sativa: a comparative-study of 2 collecting methods. <italic>Plant Physiol</italic></article-title>. <source>Bioch</source>. <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>41</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>48</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Goreta</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bu&#x0010D;evi&#x00107;-Popovi&#x00107;</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vuletin Selak</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pavela-Vran&#x0010D;i&#x00107;</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Perica</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Vegetative growth, superoxide dismutase activity and ion concentration of salt-stressed watermelon as influenced by rootstock</article-title>. <source>J. Agr. Sci. Cambr.</source> <volume>146</volume>, <fpage>695</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>704</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0021859608007855</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Goreta Ban</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>&#x0017D;ani&#x00107;</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dumi&#x0010D;i&#x00107;</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raspudi&#x00107;</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vuletin Selak</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ban</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Growth and yield of grafted cucumbers in soil infested with root-knot nematodes</article-title>. <source>Chil. J. Agr. Res</source>. <volume>74</volume>, <fpage>29</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>34</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4067/S0718-58392014000100005</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gould</surname> <given-names>G. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>C. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rifleman</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Perez</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coleman</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Variation in eastern cottonwood (<italic>Populus deltoides</italic> Bartr.) phloem sap content caused by leaf development may affect feeding site selection behavior of the aphid, <italic>Chaitophorous populicola</italic> Thomas (Homoptera: Aphididae)</article-title>. <source>Environ. Entomol.</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>1212</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1225</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1603/0046-225X(2007)36[1212:VIECPD]2.0.CO;2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18284747</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hasanuzzaman</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Islam</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>T. X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Leaf morphological characters can be a factor for intra-varietal preference of whitefly <italic>Bemisia tabaci</italic> (Hemiptera:Aleyrodidae) among eggplant varieties</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>e0153880</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0153880</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27081849</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Horowitz</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ishaaya</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Dynamics of biotypes B and Q of the whitefly <italic>Bemisia tabaci</italic> and its impact on insecticide resistance</article-title>. <source>Pest Manag. Sci</source>. <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>1568</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1572</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.3752</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24488629</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jauset</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saras&#x000FA;a</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Avilla</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Albajes</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>The impact of nitrogen fertilization of tomato on feeding site selection and oviposition by <italic>Trialeurodes vaporariorum</italic></article-title>. <source>Entomol. Exp. Appl</source>. <volume>86</volume>, <fpage>175</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>182</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1570-7458.1998.00278.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jauset</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saras&#x000FA;a</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Avilla</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Albajes</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Effect of nitrogen fertilization level applied to tomato on the greenhouse whitefly</article-title>. <source>Crop Prot</source>. <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>255</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>261</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0261-2194(00)00016-8</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jiao</surname> <given-names>X. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Q. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>H. P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Host preference and nymph performance of B and Q putative species of Bemisia tabaci on three host plants</article-title>. <source>J. Pest Sci</source>. <volume>85</volume>, <fpage>423</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>430</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10340-012-0441-2</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>B. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>P&#x000E4;&#x000E4;bo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stein</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1981</year>). <article-title>Amino-acid-analysis and enzymatic sequence determination of peptides by an improved ortho-phthaldialdehyde pre-column labelling procedure</article-title>. <source>J. Liq. Chrom</source>. <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>565</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>586</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01483918108059956</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Karley</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Douglas</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Parker</surname> <given-names>W. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Amino acid composition and nutritional quality of potato leaf phloem sap for Aphids</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Biol</source>. <volume>205</volume>, <fpage>3090</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3018</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12200404</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Karunker</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Benting</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lueke</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ponge</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nauen</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roditakis</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Over-expression of cytochrome P450 CYP6CM1 is associated with high resistance to imidacloprid in the B and Q biotypes of <italic>Bemisia tabaci</italic> (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)</article-title>. <source>Insect Biochem. Molec.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>634</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>644</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ibmb.2008.03.008</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18510975</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>King</surname> <given-names>R. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeevaart</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1974</year>). <article-title>Enhancement of phloem exudation from cut petioles by chelating agents</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol</source>. <volume>53</volume>:<fpage>96</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>103</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.53.1.96</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16658661</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kubota</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tsao</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bied</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hoyosechevarria</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morra</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Current status of vegetable grafting: diffusion, grafting techniques, automation</article-title>. <source>Sci. Hortic</source>. <volume>127</volume>, <fpage>93</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>105</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2010.08.003</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>T.-X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Toxicity and efficacy of spiromesifen, a tetronic acid insecticide, against sweetpotato whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) on melons and collards</article-title>. <source>Crop Prot</source>. <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>505</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>513</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2003.10.006</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Louws</surname> <given-names>F. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rivard</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kubota</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Grafting fruiting vegetables to manage soilborne pathogens, foliar pathogens, arthropods and weeds</article-title>. <source>Sci. Hortic.</source> <volume>127</volume>, <fpage>127</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>146</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2010.09.023</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Muigai</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schuster</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Snyder</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scott</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bassett</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McAuslane</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Mechanisms of resistance in Lycopersicon germplasm to the whitefly <italic>Bemisia argentifolii</italic></article-title>. <source>Phytoparasitica</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>347</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>360</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02979682</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ortego</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Physiological adaptations of the insect gut to herbivory</article-title>, in <source>Arthropod-Plant Interactions - Novel Insights and Approaches for IPM</source>, eds <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Smagghe</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Diaz</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Dordrecht</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>), <fpage>75</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>88</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pelletier</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clark</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Use of reciprocal grafts to elucidate mode of resistance to Colorado potato beetle (<italic>Leptinotarsa decemlineata</italic> (Say)) and potato aphid (<italic>Macrosiphum euphorbiae</italic> (Thomas)) in six wild <italic>Solanum</italic> species</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Potato Res</source>. <volume>81</volume>, <fpage>341</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>346</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02870180</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ramputh</surname> <given-names>A. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bown</surname> <given-names>A. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Rapid gamma-aminobutyric acid synthesis and the inhibition of the growth and development of oblique-banded leaf-roller larvae</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol</source>. <volume>111</volume>, <fpage>349</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1352</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.111.4.1349</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12226367</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roditakis</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roditakis</surname> <given-names>N. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tsagkarakou</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Insecticide resistance in Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) populations from Crete</article-title>. <source>Pest Manag. Sci</source>. <volume>61</volume>, <fpage>577</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>582</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.1029</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15712366</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Savvas</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Colla</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rouphael</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schwarz</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Amelioration of heavy metal and nutrient stress in fruit vegetables by grafting</article-title>. <source>Sci. Hortic</source>. <volume>127</volume>, <fpage>156</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>161</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2010.09.011</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schwarz</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rouphael</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Colla</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Venema</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Grafting as a tool to improve tolerance of vegetables to abiotic stresses: thermal stress, water stress and organic pollutants</article-title>. <source>Sci. Hortic.</source> <volume>127</volume>, <fpage>162</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>171</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2010.09.016</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Skaljac</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zanic</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ban</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kontsedalov</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ghanim</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Co-infection and localization of secondary symbionts in two whitefly species</article-title>. <source>BMC Microbiol.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>142</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2180-10-142</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20462452</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sheehan</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hrapchak</surname> <given-names>B. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1980</year>). <source>Theory and Practice of Histotechnology, 2nd Edn</source>. <publisher-loc>Columbus, OH</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Battellle Press</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sonneveld</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Straver</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <source>Nutrient Solutions for Vegetables and Flowers Grown in Water or Substrates, 10th Edn.</source> <publisher-loc>Series</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Voedingsoplossingen Glastuinbouw</publisher-name>. <publisher-loc>Aalsmeer</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>PBG Naaldwijik</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Taggar</surname> <given-names>G. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gill</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Preference of whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, towards black gram genotypes: role of morphological leaf characteristics</article-title>. <source>Phytoparasitica</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>461</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>474</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12600-012-0247-z</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Valle</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boggio</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heldt</surname> <given-names>H. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Free amino acid composition of phloem sap and growing fruit of Lycopersicon esculentum</article-title>. <source>Plant Cel. Physiol</source>. <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>458</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>461</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029391</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>van Lenteren</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Noldus</surname> <given-names>L. P. J. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Whitefly-plant relationships: behavioural and ecological aspects</article-title>, in <source>Whiteflies: Their Bionomics, Pest Status and Management</source>, ed <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Gerling</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Andover</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Intercept</publisher-name>), <fpage>47</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>89</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Venugopalrao</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reddy</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ankaiah</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rao</surname> <given-names>Y. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khasim</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Incidence of whitefly (<italic>Bemisia tabaci</italic>) in relation to leaf characters of upland cotton (<italic>Gossypun hirsutum</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Ind. J. Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>60</volume>, <fpage>619</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>624</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wallace</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Secor</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schrader</surname> <given-names>L. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>Rapid accumulation of aminobutyric acid and alanine in soybean leaves in response to an abrupt transfer to lower temperature, darkness, or mechanical manipulation</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol</source>. <volume>75</volume>, <fpage>170</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>175</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.75.1.170</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Che</surname> <given-names>W. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>F. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Desneux</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Lethal and sublethal effects of cyantraniliprole, a new anthranilic diamide insecticide, on <italic>Bemisia tabaci</italic> (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) MED</article-title>. <source>Crop Protect</source>. <volume>91</volume>, <fpage>108</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>113</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2016.10.001</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xim&#x000E9;nez-Emb&#x000FA;n</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ortego</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Casta&#x000F1;era</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Drought-stressed tomato plants trigger bottom-up effects on the invasive <italic>Tetranychus evansi</italic></article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>e0145275</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0145275</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26735490</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>&#x0017D;ani&#x00107;</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cenis</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ka&#x0010D;i&#x00107;</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Katalini&#x00107;</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Current status of Bemisia tabaci in coastal Croatia</article-title>. <source>Phytoparasitica</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>60</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>64</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02980926</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>&#x0017D;ani&#x00107;</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dumi&#x0010D;i&#x00107;</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Urli&#x00107;</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vuletin Selak</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goreta Ban</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title><italic>Bemisia tabaci</italic> (Gennadius) population density and pupal size are dependent on rootstock and nitrogen in hydroponic tomato crop</article-title>. <source>Agric. For. Entomol</source>. <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>42</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>51</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/afe.12179</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>&#x0017D;ani&#x00107;</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dumi&#x0010D;i&#x00107;</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>&#x00160;kaljac</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goreta Ban</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Urli&#x00107;</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>The effects of nitrogen rate and the ratio of NO<sup>3&#x02212;</sup>:NH<sup>4&#x0002B;</sup> on <italic>Bemisia tabaci</italic> populations in hydroponic tomato crops</article-title>. <source>Crop Prot</source>. <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>228</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>233</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2010.11.004</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhu-Salzman</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Insect response to plant defensive protease inhibitors</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Entomol</source>. <volume>60</volume>, <fpage>233</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>252</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-020816</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25341101</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ziegler</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1975</year>). <article-title>The nature of transported substances</article-title>, in <source>Transport in Plants</source>, eds <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Zimmermann</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Milburn</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Berlin</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer-Verlag</publisher-name>), <fpage>59</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>136</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="financial-disclosure"><p><bold>Funding.</bold> This study was supported by the Hrvatska Zaklada za Znanost (Croatian Science Foundation; Grant 3365-IP-09-2014).</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>