<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2017.01350</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Effects of Low Temperature Stress on Spikelet-Related Parameters during Anthesis in <italic>Indica&#x2013;Japonica</italic> Hybrid Rice</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>Yanhua</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/426372/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Yuping</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Xiang</surname> <given-names>Jing</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Uphoff</surname> <given-names>Norman T.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>Xiaohua</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Defeng</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
</contrib></contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Genetic Breeding, Jiangxi Agricultural University</institution> <country>Nanchang, China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute (CAAS)</institution> <country>Hangzhou, China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Cornell Institute for Public Affairs (CIPA), System of Rice Intensification (SRI), Cornell International Institute for Food, Agriculture and Development (CIIFAD), Cornell University, Ithaca</institution> <country>NY, United States</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: <italic>Zhenfei Guo, Nanjing Agricultural University, China</italic></p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: <italic>Raveendran Muthurajan, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India; M. Djanaguiraman, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India</italic></p></fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001"><p>&#x002A;Correspondence: <italic>Defeng Zhu, <email>cnrice@qq.com</email> Yuping Zhang, <email>cnrrizyp@163.com</email></italic></p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002"><p>This article was submitted to Plant Abiotic Stress, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>08</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>08</volume>
<elocation-id>1350</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>01</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2017</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>19</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2017</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2017 Zeng, Zhang, Xiang, Uphoff, Pan and Zhu.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Zeng, Zhang, Xiang, Uphoff, Pan and Zhu</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Poor spikelet fertility under low temperature (LT) stress during anthesis limits the possibility of high yield potential in <italic>indica&#x2013;japonica</italic> hybrid rice, leading to reduced stability of grain yield. However, the cause for it is still unclear. In this study, three <italic>indica&#x2013;japonica</italic> hybrid rice cultivars, Yongyou9, Yongyou17 (both cold sensitive), and Yongyou538, and one <italic>japonica</italic> inbred rice cultivar, Zhejing88 (cold tolerant), were grown under LT (17&#x00B0;C) and ambient temperature (AT) (25&#x00B0;C) during anthesis to test for their response with respect to spikelet fertility, pollen germination, and spikelet flowering. The results indicated that LT resulted in lower spikelet fertility in cold-sensitive cultivars than in cold-tolerant cultivars. Spikelet fertility was highly correlated with pollen germination on the stigma. The number of pollen grains and germinated pollen were higher in cold-tolerant cultivars than in cold-sensitive cultivars. Pollen fertility and pollen diameter were also higher in cold-tolerant cultivars, although the latter could achieve a high number of spikelets at anthesis in flowering patterns throughout the duration of LT stress. There were significant differences in anther width and volume between genotypes and treatments according to microscopic analyses, but no differences were observed in anther dehiscence. Moreover, variation in the number of pollen grains on stigmas and in spikelet fertility was not related to either the number of spikelets reaching anthesis or anther dehiscence. Overall, improved anther size, better pollen function, and higher spikelet fertility under LT stress were observed in cold-tolerant cultivars than in cold-sensitive cultivars. The results suggest that the increase in spikelet fertility is due to enhanced pollen germination rather than the number of spikelets reaching anthesis.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>chilling stress</kwd>
<kwd><italic>indica&#x2013;japonica</italic> hybrid rice</kwd>
<kwd>anthesis</kwd>
<kwd>pollen germination</kwd>
<kwd>spikelet fertility</kwd>
<kwd>spikelet flowering</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="7"/>
<table-count count="6"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="34"/>
<page-count count="11"/>
<word-count count="0"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec><title>Introduction</title>
<p>Rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> L.) is a staple grain crop. Six hundred million tons of rice are produced annually, and rice is widely cultivated throughout the world (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">IRRI, 2002</xref>). Low temperature (LT) is a major environmental factor causing reductions in yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Boyer, 1982</xref>). In general, the mean critical temperature for rice is +4.7&#x00B0;C, and once the ambient temperature (AT) is below 5&#x2013;10&#x00B0;C, irreversible LT-induced damage to seedling growth and development can occur (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Sanchez et al., 2014</xref>). During different developmental stages, rice shows growth responses to LT stress. The reproductive stage in rice is a critical period. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Farrell et al.</xref> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2001, 2006</xref>) reported that rice was susceptible to abundant LT-induced damage during the young microspore stage, and 12 h of exposure to LT can cause spikelet sterility. LT-induced spikelet sterility during the microsporogenesis stage is considered genotype dependent, which for cold-tolerant genotypes was a night-time air temperature of 15&#x00B0;C for 4 consecutive days and for cold-sensitive genotypes was a night-time air temperature between 17 and 19&#x00B0;C (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Satake, 1969</xref>). Hence, developing and verifying cold-tolerant cultivars will be beneficial for overcoming the influence of LT stress on rice growth and development.</p>
<p>Low temperature-induced spikelet sterility, in particular during the reproductive period, could be related to the physiological response mechanisms in the anther, pollen, and stigma. Previous studies have indicated that short anther dehiscence, poor pollen grains, and low pollen germination on stigmas were all highly correlated with spikelet sterility under LT-induced stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Matsui et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Prasad et al., 2006</xref>). Moreover, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Satake (1976)</xref> considered that the main reason for this could be attributed to LT-induced damage of male organs, such as pollen, not of female organs, such as the stigma. Hence, if pollen grains were deficient at anthesis, they could impede pollination, leading to spikelet sterility. These results might be similar to high temperature stress (HTs) in rice. A larger anther and longer stigma (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Suzuki, 1981</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">1982</xref>) were found to contribute to the increase in the basal pore length and found to improve LT tolerance during the reproductive stage, and larger anthers and longer stigmas also ultimately benefit successful pollination (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Matsui and Kagata, 2003</xref>). In addition, panicle exsertion (PE) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Rang et al., 2011</xref>) and peduncle length (PeL) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">He et al., 2009</xref>) have been reported to be responsible for enhanced spikelet sterility under water stress, as has HTs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Rang et al., 2011</xref>), but similar results have not been documented under LT stress.</p>
<p>In most rice genotypes, flowering and anthesis undergo a 5-day period with most spikelets at anthesis between 1000 and 1200 h; the similar patterns of flowering have been reported in <italic>indica</italic> and <italic>japonica</italic> subspecies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Nishiyama and Blanco, 1980</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Prasad et al., 2006</xref>). Studies have shown that flowering (containing anthesis and fertilization), as a developmental stage in rice, in particular at the booting stage (microsporogenesis), is considered most susceptible to LT (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Farrell et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Maite and Ellis, 2015</xref>). The influences on spikelet flowering in rice have been verified under HTs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Rang et al., 2011</xref>). The climatic effects on the timing of day and the duration of flowering in rice also differ (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Julia and Dingkuhn, 2012</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Jagadish et al. (2007)</xref> analyzed the flowering patterns and the time of day of spikelets reaching anthesis under HTs in <italic>indica</italic> and <italic>japonica</italic> rice. Furthermore, spikelet fertility under stress conditions could be generally measured by marking individual spikelets during anthesis, which was adopted as an effective method. <italic>Indica&#x2013;japonica</italic> hybrid cultivars (Yongyou series) have been successfully bred and have been widely used for rice production due to their exceptionally high grain yield potential. However, they are very susceptible to LT, and can succumb to spikelet sterility. Previous studies have not systematically investigated the effects of LT on spikelet flowering and spikelet fertility in <italic>indica&#x2013;japonica</italic> hybrid cultivars (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Satake, 1976</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Nishiyama, 1982</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Farrell et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Julia and Dingkuhn, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Maite and Ellis, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Zeng et al., 2015</xref>).</p>
<p>The overall objectives in the present study were therefore to evaluate spikelet fertility of <italic>indica&#x2013;japonica</italic> hybrid rice under LT stress and study the main traits of anthesis and pollen related to spikelet sterility. The experiments were conducted under AT (25&#x00B0;C) and LT (17&#x00B0;C) and involved the following: (1) recording the effect of LT on peduncle length (PeL) and PE in rice; (2) studying the influences on spikelet fertility, anther dehiscence, pollen grains, and pollen germination on stigmas under LT during anthesis; and (3) examining the relationship between spikelet flowering and spikelet fertility across cultivars.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec><title>Experimental Design and Crop Husbandry</title>
<p>Pot experiments were conducted during the period from June to November in 2013 and in 2014 at the China National Rice Research Institute (CNRRI), Fuyang district (longitude: 119&#x00B0;55&#x2032;48&#x2032;&#x2032; E; latitude: 30&#x00B0;2&#x2032;24&#x2032;&#x2032; N), Zhejiang Province, China. A split-plot design was used for the experiments. Temperature treatments (i.e., LT and AT) were used for the main plots, and cultivars were the subplots with three replications. Half of the plants were established under the AT treatment, and the other half were established under the LT treatment. Each section comprised 40 plants of each cultivar in 20 pots (2 hills per pot, 2 seedlings per hill) under each temperature regime, and each pot was considered a sample. The height and diameter of each rice pot was 33 and 23 cm, respectively. Eight kilograms of paddy soil common to rice planting in the area was placed into each pot. Four rice cultivars were used with different LT sensitivities during anthesis. The growth characteristics of cultivars are described in <bold>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref></bold>, including sowing date, growth duration, and flowering dates. The cold-tolerant cultivar Yongyou538, which has a shorter growth duration, was sown 1 week later than the other cultivars to maintain the synchronous time of anthesis.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Information on four rice cultivars selected for the study.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Cultivar<sup>a</sup></th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Ecotype</th>
<th valign="top" align="left" colspan="2">Gene frequencies<hr/></th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Stress tolerance<sup>b</sup></th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Sowing date</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Booting<sup>d</sup></th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Anthesis</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Grain-filling stage</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>Indica</italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>Japonica</italic></th>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Yongyou9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Subspecies <italic>Indica</italic> &#x00D7;<italic>Japonica</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.458</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.542</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chilling sensitive</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">June 14</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">September 8&#x2013;10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">September 11&#x2013;13</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">October 1&#x2013;3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Yongyou17</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Subspecies <italic>Indica</italic> &#x00D7;<italic>Japonica</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.477</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.524</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">June 14</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">September 9&#x2013;10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">September 12&#x2013;13</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">October 2&#x2013;3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Yongyou538</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Subspecies <italic>Indica</italic> &#x00D7;<italic>Japonica</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.459</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.541</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chilling tolerant</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">June 21<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">September 1&#x2013;3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">September 4&#x2013;6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">September 24&#x2013;26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Zhejing88</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>O. japonica</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.900</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">June 14</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">September 2&#x2013;5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">September 5&#x2013;8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">September 25&#x2013;28</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<attrib><sup>a</sup><italic>Cultivars are from the China National Rice Research Institute (CNRRI), China. <sup>b</sup>The results are derived from those of the study of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Zeng et al. (2015)</xref>. <sup>c</sup>Yongyou538, which has a shorter growth duration, was sown 1 week later than other cultivars to maintain a synchronous time of flowering. <sup>d</sup>The booting stage, anthesis, and grain filling were recorded in both 2013 and 2014</italic>.</attrib>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Pre-germinated seeds were sown in seed trays covered with a matrix containing vermiculite, charcoal, soil, and slow-release fertilizer. After 20 days, the seedlings were transplanted into the pots. The pots were established in an open space under natural environmental conditions except for temperature treatments. Alternate wetting and drying irrigation was conducted throughout the cropping season. Two grams (g) of calcium superphosphate (P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>) and 4.0 g of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium (NPK) compound fertilizer (15-15-15) were applied to each pot for 1 day before transplanting. One gram of potassium chloride was applied identically at tillering and panicle initiation, and 4.0 g of urea was supplied at planting (50%), at tillering (20%), and at panicle initiation (30%). Pest-, disease-, and weed-related problems were intensively controlled. Other management practices for high grain yield cultivation were in accordance with local recommendations. At the end of productive tiller stage, redundant tillers were removed, leaving approximately 12 large tillers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Stress Treatments</title>
<p>On the day of spikelet flowering (i.e., anthers appearing or spikelets expanding), the plants of each cultivar were transferred to growth chambers (PGV-36, Conviron Corporation, Winnipeg, MB, Canada) with automatically controlled temperatures using sensing elements. The temperature threshold of the rice plants during the reproductive growth stage (booting stage and heading) is often described as 17&#x00B0;C (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Satake, 1969</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Farrell et al., 2006</xref>). Therefore, in this study, LT was set at 17&#x00B0;C, and the growth chamber was held at an average LT of 17&#x00B0;C (20/14&#x00B0;C max/min; actual: 16.7&#x00B0;C [<italic>SD</italic> = 1.16]). The plants of the AT treatment were maintained at an elevated average temperature of 25&#x00B0;C (28/22&#x00B0;C max/min; actual: 23.7&#x00B0;C [<italic>SD</italic> = 0.64]) for five consecutive flowering days, such that the AT was nearly equal to the natural environmental temperature during the past 10 years during flowering days, as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Zeng et al. (2015)</xref>. The time window of the temperature treatment day was divided into four time frames on five consecutive flowering days (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref></bold>), and the relative humidity (RH) was 75% (actual: 81.7% [<italic>SD</italic> = 1.10]). Plants were spaced at a distance of approximately 15&#x2013;20 cm (0.15&#x2013;0.20 m) to reduce crowding and shading effects. Five days after the temperature treatment, the plants were placed under natural environmental conditions. Temperature and RH were both monitored independently through recordings by a micrometeorological station (HOBO, H08-002-21, Onset Computer Corporation, Barnstable, MA, United States) with different sensors/loggers every 10 s and averaged for each 30 min. Temperatures surrounding the plants were controlled and maintained consistently within the set points of 0.5&#x00B0;C for temperature and 5% for RH in order to reduce any chamber effects on the observations recorded of plants. In addition, the level of photosynthetic photon flux density for each temperature treatment was maintained at 640 &#x03BC;mol m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>. Natural environmental conditions were adopted for plant growth and development, and no unusual HT or LT was observed.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>Temperature treatments, AT, ambient temperature; LT, low temperature.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-01350-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec><title>Measurements and Data Collection</title>
<p>In the study, five pots (10 plants) were used for testing PeL, PE, and wrap-around panicle length (WPL) under both LT and AT treatments; another five pots were used to determine spikelet fertility and spikelet flowering, while the remaining 10 pots in the set were used for the collection of spikelets for microscopic analyses.</p>
<sec><title>PeL, PE, and WPL</title>
<p>PeL and PE were determined using a ruler according to the methods of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Rang et al. (2011)</xref>. The elongation of panicle exsertion (EPE) was calculated as the ratio of PeL to the duration of exposure to LT. EPE was to express the degree of LT stress on peduncle exsertion. PeL, panicle length (PaL), and WPL were measured in 2013.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Microscopic Analysis of Spikelets</title>
<p>Eight to 10 uniform panicles of each pot were marked for exposure to temperature treatment during anthesis. Twenty to 25 spikelets, positioned on the three primary branches on the top rachis in each panicle (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Matsui and Kagata, 2003</xref>), were collected simultaneously between 1030 and 1200 h and between 1300 and 1400 h for different treatments and cultivars every day. Therefore, spikelets that approximately opened (i.e., with an observable anther) on the main tiller and on some primary tillers were both marked using black acrylic paint. Then, marked spikelets were collected in brown glass vials filled with formalin&#x2013;acetic acid&#x2013;alcohol (FAA) fixative (including 90 mL of 70% ethanol, 5 mL of acetic acid, and 38% formaldehyde) after flowering and pollination, following the methods of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Jagadish et al. (2010)</xref>. The spikelets collected from the tillers were used for microscopic analyses (i.e., anther dehiscence, total pollen grain number on stigmas, and pollen germination), excluding spikelet fertility estimations.</p>
<p>The spikelets were dissected under a stereoscopic microscope (Olympus SZX7, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Then, using a digital camera (DP70) affixed to an Axioplane 2 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) at 100&#x00D7; (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref></bold>), images were taken following the methods of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Jagadish et al. (2010)</xref>. The anthers were isolated from the fixed spikelets to score the numbers of dehisced anthers, which were described as full anther dehiscence (FAD) if both apical and basal pores were present, partial anther dehiscence (PAD) if only one pore was present, and anther indehiscence (AID) if no pore was present. The ratio of the number of dehiscent anthers to the total number of anthers (containing both dehiscent and indehiscent anthers) was calculated and described as anther dehiscence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Rang et al., 2011</xref>). Anther length and width were also determined, and anther volume was calculated using the following equation: <italic>V</italic> = 0.34 <italic>LW</italic><sup>2</sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Nishiyama, 1982</xref>). Anthers were separated on a glass slide and colored with 1% I<sub>2</sub>&#x2013;KI with the aid of a stereoscopic microscope (Olympus SZX7, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), and the number of pollen grains and pollen diameter were recorded. Stigmas separated from spikelets with minimum disturbance were cleared using 8 N NaOH for 3&#x2013;5 h at room temperature, after which they were stained with 0.05% aniline blue dissolved in a solution of 0.1 M dipotassium phosphate for 5&#x2013;10 min. The pollen grains and germination on the stigma were recorded using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus BX43, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The amount of germinated pollen on the stigma was scored according to the procedures of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Jagadish et al. (2010)</xref>, and the per cent pollen germination (PPG) was calculated as the percentage of germinated pollen of the total amount of pollen (germinated + non-germinated). All the above measurements were performed using calibrated Image Pro-Plus 6.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Bethesda, MD, United States).</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Spikelet Fertility and Spikelet Flowering</title>
<p>The main-tiller panicles on the day before the heading stage were selected and tagged for each cultivar in the treatments, and then the panicles were harvested at physiological maturity. PaL and the number of filled (i.e., completely or partially filled with grain) and unfilled grains per panicle were both determined, and spikelet fertility (seed set) was recorded for 2 years following the methods of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Mohammed and Tarpley (2009)</xref>. Each grain was evaluated for whether it was filled or not by pressing the grain between the forefinger and the thumb. Since the grain filling of the spikelets on different positions of the panicle was not synchronous, spikelet fertility ultimately differed between the upper part and the lower part. Panicles were separated into the upper (i.e., superior grains), middle, and lower (i.e., inferior grains) parts described as spikelet positions in accordance with the protocol of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Yang et al. (2006)</xref> to test the effects on spikelet fertility in each part. Spikelet fertility was evaluated by dividing the number of filled grains by the total number of grains (i.e., florets) and was described as the per cent. In addition, in 2014, the effect of temperature on spikelet opening, marked by different tinctorial acrylic paints, was also examined on five consecutive flowering days in accordance with the methods of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Jagadish et al.</xref> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2007, 2008</xref>). The effect of flowering patterns was also identified using blue paint to distinguish spikelets undergoing anthesis at different time periods between 0830 and 1630 h Beijing Summer time (BST), and spikelets were counted every 2 h on the third flowering day. Spikelet flowering in this study was described as the per cent of the numbers of spikelets at anthesis of the total number of spikelets in the panicle (anthesis + non-anthesis) per 2 h period on the third day of anthesis in the four cultivars among the treatments. Spikelet fertility of the marked panicles was also ultimately recorded.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec><title>Statistical Analysis</title>
<p>All data of several traits were analyzed as a spilt-plot design, in which the main plot consisted of temperature treatments (low temperature and ambient temperature) with three replications and the subplots consisted of cultivars, using PROC Generalized Linear Mixed Models in the SAS 9.1 (Cary, NC, United States). The data regarding morphology at anthesis, anther dehiscence, pollen germination traits, spikelet flowering and spikelet fertility were used to test the analysis of variance (ANOVA) of temperature treatments, cultivars and their interaction. Linear regressions among pollen traits, anther dehiscence, spikelet fertility, and spikelet flowering were also conducted using GLM procedures. The values in this study were expressed as the means and errors. The means were examined by Tukey&#x2019;s least significant difference (LSD) test to compare the differences at the probability level of 0.05.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec><title>Results</title>
<sec><title>PeL, PE, and WPL</title>
<p>Elongation of panicle exsertion significantly decreased (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) among cultivars subjected to LT stress compared with AT (<bold>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref></bold>). The interaction between cultivars and treatments was also significantly different. Across treatments, the EPE of cold-sensitive cultivars, Yongyou9 and Yongyou17, was higher than that of cold-tolerant cultivars, Yongyou538 and Zhejing88. Similarly, the PE of all cultivars also significantly (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) decreased by 44.3% under LT (<bold>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref></bold>); Yongyou9 had the highest PE, ranging from 32.0 to 58.0%. PeL among the cultivars was consistently maintained in response to LT stress and was 68.1% longer in cold-sensitive cultivars than in cold-tolerant cultivars. Across all the cultivars, PeL was reduced by 6.81 cm under LT, compared with AT. Furthermore, the WPL of Yongyou17 was significantly longer by 114.1% under LT than under AT, but there was no difference (<italic>P</italic> > 0.05) in Yongyou9. Compared with AT, the percent of spikelets trapped inside panicle was enhanced by 3.65% in all the cultivars under LT.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p>Effects of LT and AT on morphological traits of the panicles in four cultivars.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Trait</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Treatments</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Yongyou9</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Yongyou17</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Yongyou538</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Zhejing88</th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3">ANOVA<hr/></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>G</italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>T</italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>G</italic> &#x00D7;<italic>T</italic></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Elongation of panicle exsertion (cm&#x22C5;d<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">LT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.39 &#x00B1; 0.18<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.65 &#x00B1; 0.22<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.60 &#x00B1; 0.04<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.72 &#x00B1; 0.12<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.61 &#x00B1; 0.28<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.04 &#x00B1; 0.30<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.70 &#x00B1; 0.17<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.11 &#x00B1; 0.15<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Wrap-around panicle Length (cm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">LT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.13 &#x00B1; 0.32<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.79 &#x00B1; 0.26<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.69 &#x00B1; 0.36<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.47 &#x00B1; 0.59<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.99 &#x00B1; 0.44<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.77 &#x00B1; 0.33<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.10 &#x00B1; 0.36<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.90 &#x00B1; 0.25<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Peduncle length (cm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">LT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.58 &#x00B1; 0.97<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.95 &#x00B1; 0.94<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.67 &#x00B1; 0.38<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.11 &#x00B1; 0.57<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x2217;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.39 &#x00B1; 0.93<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.38 &#x00B1; 1.01<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.49 &#x00B1; 0.83<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.30 &#x00B1; 0.63<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Panicle exsertion (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">LT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">68.59 &#x00B1; 3.97<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43.41 &#x00B1; 3.69<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35.37 &#x00B1; 2.36<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51.98 &#x00B1; 2.21<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">89.47 &#x00B1; 1.83<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95.65 &#x00B1; 2.64<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">87.54 &#x00B1; 1.82<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">85.16 &#x00B1; 2.89<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<attrib><italic>Data indicate the means &#x00B1; standard errors, <italic>n</italic> = 60. Means within a column followed by a different lowercase letter differ significantly at a level of 0.05. G: genotypes; T: treatments. <sup>&#x2217;</sup><italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05, <sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup><italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.01, ns, not significant</italic>.</attrib>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec><title>Anther Dehiscence and Anther Characteristics</title>
<p>Low temperature have an influence on anther dehiscence (including FAD, PAD, and AID), and there were obvious differences among cultivars (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref></bold>). All cultivars showed less FAD under LT than under AT, and a significant difference (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) was observed in the majority of the cultivars. However, the cultivars had higher PAD under LT than under AT, and Yongyou17 was significantly affected (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05). Overall, LT increased anther indehiscence in cold-sensitive cultivars.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p>Effects of LT and AT on anther dehiscence of rice plants (<italic>n</italic> > 60 anthers). The three parameters were analyzed separately for each anther dehiscence. Bars with different lowercase letters denote a particular anther dehiscence across cultivars, which differ at a significance level of 0.05. Bars indicate standard error. FAD, full anther dehiscence; PAD, partial anther dehiscence; AID, anther indehiscence; YY9, Yongyou9; YY17, Yongyou17; YY538, Yongyou538; ZJ88, Zhejing88; AT, ambient temperature; LT, low temperature.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-01350-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Anther size (anther length, width, and volume) varied among temperature treatments and cultivars (<bold>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref></bold>), and the effects on the cultivars were significantly different (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05). Anther width and volume indicated the same decreasing trends under LT compared with those under AT; however, a significant difference was observed in cold-sensitive cultivars regarding anther volume. There were no significant differences among cold-tolerant cultivars.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p>Effects of LT on the anther size of rice plants (<italic>n</italic> = 60) during the flowering period.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Trait</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Treatments</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Yongyou9</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Yongyou17</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Yongyou538</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Zhejing88</th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3">ANOVA<hr/></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>G</italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>T</italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>G</italic> &#x00D7;<italic>T</italic></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Anther length (mm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">LT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.44 &#x00B1; 0.03<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.28 &#x00B1; 0.04<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.11 &#x00B1; 0.04<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.00 &#x00B1; 0.07<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.47 &#x00B1; 0.03<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.30 &#x00B1; 0.01<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.04 &#x00B1; 0.01<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.01 &#x00B1; 0.04<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Anther width (mm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">LT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.64 &#x00B1; 0.03<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.58 &#x00B1; 0.04<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.67 &#x00B1; 0.04<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.57 &#x00B1; 0.04<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.70 &#x00B1; 0.02<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.63 &#x00B1; 0.02<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.70 &#x00B1; 0.02<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.62 &#x00B1; 0.02<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Anther volume (mm<sup>3</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">LT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.34 &#x00B1; 0.04<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.26 &#x00B1; 0.04<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.32 &#x00B1; 0.04<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.22 &#x00B1; 0.04<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.41 &#x00B1; 0.03<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.31 &#x00B1; 0.02<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.34 &#x00B1; 0.02<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.26 &#x00B1; 0.02<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<attrib><italic>Data indicate the means &#x00B1; standard errors. Means within a column followed by a different lowercase letter differ significantly at a level of 0.05 for a particular parameter. G: genotypes; T: treatments. <sup>&#x2217;</sup><italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05, <sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup><italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.01, ns, not significant</italic>.</attrib>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec><title>Spikelet Fertility and Pollen Grain on the Stigma</title>
<p>There were significant (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.01) differences among cultivars and temperature treatments on spikelet positions regarding spikelet fertility (<bold>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref></bold>). Spikelet fertility significantly (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) decreased in Yongyou9 (9.5%) and Yongyou17 (12.5%) under LT (<bold>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref></bold>), whereas no significant differences were observed in Yongyou538 and Zhejing88. Based on spikelet position, LT also significantly reduced spikelet fertility in the upper, middle, and lower parts of the panicle, with a significant impact on cold-sensitive cultivars, particularly in the upper part of the panicle.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption><p>Effects of LT and spikelet position on the spikelet fertility of rice plants (%).</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Spikelet position</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Treatments</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Yongyou9</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Yongyou17</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Yongyou538</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Zhejing88</th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3">ANOVA<hr/></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>G</italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>T</italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>G</italic> &#x00D7;<italic>T</italic></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Whole</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">LT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">84.4 &#x00B1; 1.4<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">83.3 &#x00B1; 1.4<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">89.1 &#x00B1; 0.3<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95.5 &#x00B1; 0.7<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93.2 &#x00B1; 0.9<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95.2 &#x00B1; 0.6<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">92.5 &#x00B1; 1.4<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.5 &#x00B1; 0.6<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Upper</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">LT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">83.3 &#x00B1; 2.0<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">77.7 &#x00B1; 1.9<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">91.9 &#x00B1; 0.5<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.2 &#x00B1; 0.9<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.1 &#x00B1; 0.8<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.3 &#x00B1; 0.4<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95.7 &#x00B1; 0.8<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98.0 &#x00B1; 0.3<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Middle</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">LT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">84.3 &#x00B1; 1.8<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">85.5 &#x00B1; 1.9<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">86.7 &#x00B1; 1.7<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.0 &#x00B1; 0.7<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x2217;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">92.9 &#x00B1; 0.9<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95.2 &#x00B1; 0.7<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">91.9 &#x00B1; 1.6<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.5 &#x00B1; 0.6<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lower</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">LT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">88.8 &#x00B1; 1.2<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">86.8 &#x00B1; 1.2<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">81.9 &#x00B1; 2.7<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">94.7 &#x00B1; 1.2<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">91.6 &#x00B1; 1.4<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">94.0 &#x00B1; 1.2<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">90.6 &#x00B1; 1.9<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95.7 &#x00B1; 1.2<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<attrib><italic>Data indicate the means &#x00B1; standard errors, <italic>n</italic> = 25. Means within a column followed by a different lowercase letter differ significantly at a level of 0.05. G: genotypes; T: treatments. <sup>&#x2217;</sup><italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05, <sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup><italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.01, ns, not significant</italic>.</attrib>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Spikelet fertility on five consecutive flowering days decreased significantly due to being subjected to LT for both Yongyou9 and Yongyou17. Zhejing88 and Yongyou538, however, exhibited much higher spikelet fertility under LT than did Yongyou9 and Yongyou17 (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref></bold>). Spikelet fertility under AT was not significantly different among cultivars. There was less spikelet fertility reduction in Yongyou9 (-29.4%) and Yongyou17 (-25.5%) under LT than in Yongyou538 (-9.8%) and Zhejing88 (2.1%).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption><p>Spikelet fertility during five consecutive days of anthesis of four rice varieties under LT and AT. On different days, individual spikelet fertility was marked with different colored acrylic paints (<italic>n</italic> = 10), and the fertility of spikelets undergoing anthesis was scored separately. Bars with different lowercase letters denote spikelet fertility, which differ at a significance level of 0.05. Smaller bars indicate standard error. AT, ambient temperature; LT, low temperature.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-01350-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Variational differences in the numbers of pollen grains, germinated pollen grains, and PPG between treatments followed the same trends in all cultivars (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref></bold>). These traits significantly decreased under LT in Yongyou9 and Yongyou17 compared with those under AT but not in Yongyou538 and Zhejing88. The results are shown as pictorial illustrations of pollen count and pollen germination (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref></bold>). There were significant differences between the cultivars and treatments and their interaction for pollen fertility and diameter (<bold>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref></bold>). Moreover, under LT stress, pollen fertility and diameter significantly decreased in cold-sensitive cultivars compared with those under AT, but no differences in cold-tolerant cultivars were observed (<italic>P</italic> > 0.05). Pollen fertility and diameter were both positively related to the number of germinated pollen grains (<italic>r</italic> = 0.77 and <italic>r</italic> = 0.79, respectively; <italic>n</italic> = 15).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption><p>Effects of LT and AT on the number of pollen grains on stigmas (<bold>A</bold>, <italic>n</italic> > 60 spikelets) and per cent pollen germination <bold>(B)</bold> of four rice cultivars. Smaller bars with different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at the level of 0.05. Smaller bars indicate standard error. PRS, pollen reception on the stigma; GPS, number of germinated pollen grains on stigmas; AT, ambient temperature; LT, low temperature.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-01350-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption><p>Pictorial illustration of LT and AT affecting the number of pollen grains and pollen germination of four rice genotypes. The luminous circle symbol indicates pollen, and the threadlike light line represents the pollen tube. Pollen was recorded as germinated when the length of pollen tube was at least equivalent to the pollen diameter. AT, ambient temperature; LT, low temperature.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-01350-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption><p>Effects of LT on pollen fertility and pollen diameter (<italic>n</italic> = 60) during the flowering period.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Trait</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Treatments</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Yongyou9</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Yongyou17</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Yongyou538</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Zhejing88</th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3">ANOVA<hr/></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>G</italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>T</italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>G</italic> &#x00D7;<italic>T</italic></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pollen fertility (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">LT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">74.96 &#x00B1; 1.29<sup>a,b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">72.26 &#x00B1; 3.63<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">85.13 &#x00B1; 1.22<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">87.13 &#x00B1; 0.63<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x2217;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">86.01 &#x00B1; 1.11<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80.94 &#x00B1; 2.72<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">87.32 &#x00B1; 1.55<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">88.88 &#x00B1; 0.95<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pollen diameter (&#x03BC;m)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">LT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42.57 &#x00B1; 0.46<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41.40 &#x00B1; 0.10<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.26 &#x00B1; 0.52<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.66 &#x00B1; 0.21<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x2217;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.07 &#x00B1; 0.43<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43.90 &#x00B1; 0.59<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.90 &#x00B1; 0.28<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.94 &#x00B1; 0.31<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<attrib><italic>Data indicate the means &#x00B1; standard errors. Means within a column followed by a different lowercase letter differ significantly at a level of 0.05. G: genotypes; T: treatments. <sup>&#x2217;</sup><italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05, <sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup><italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.01, ns, not significant</italic>.</attrib>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec><title>Spikelet Flowering at Anthesis</title>
<p>The time of day of spikelets undergoing anthesis for 5 days under AT showed similar trends among cultivars, and flowering peaked on the third (or fourth) day (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref></bold>). On average, LT significantly reduced the total number of spikelets at anthesis in all cultivars. However, spikelet flowering under LT was higher in Yongyou9 and Yongyou17 than in Yongyou538 and almost decreased to 0% during the 5-day flowering period for Zhejing88.</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption><p>Spikelet flowering per day during five consecutive days of anthesis in <italic>indica&#x2013;japonica</italic> hybrid rice Yongyou9 <bold>(A)</bold>, Yongyou17 <bold>(B)</bold> and Yongyou538 <bold>(C)</bold> and in <italic>japonica</italic> rice Zhejing88 <bold>(D)</bold> under LT and AT. Individual spikelet flowering per panicle was marked with different colored acrylic paints on different days (<italic>n</italic> = 10), and spikelet fertility was scored separately. Smaller bars indicate standard error. AT, ambient temperature; LT, low temperature.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-01350-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The pattern of flowering under AT showed similar trends among cultivars of increasing but then decreasing on the third flowering day, peaking at 1230 or 1030 h (Yongyou9) (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref></bold>). However, LT significantly reduced spikelet flowering between 1030 and 1230 h. Under LT, spikelet flowering decreased on the third flowering day and was higher on average in Yongyou9 (2.14%) and Yongyou17 (1.82%) compared to that of Yongyou538 (0.63%) and Zhejing88 (0.01%).</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption><p>Spikelet flowering every 2 h on the third day of anthesis in four rice genotypes under LT and AT. Individual spikelets flowering per panicle at different times of day during anthesis were marked with different colored acrylic paints (<italic>n</italic> = 10), and spikelet fertility was scored separately. Smaller bars indicate standard error. BST, Beijing Summer time; AT, ambient temperature; LT, low temperature.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-01350-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Spikelet fertility was positively correlated with the number of pollen grains, germinated pollen grains, and PPG but not with anther dehiscence or spikelet flowering (<bold>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">6</xref></bold>). Moreover, anther dehiscence was not correlated with spikelet flowering (<italic>P</italic> > 0.05).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T6">
<label>Table 6</label>
<caption><p>Relationship among pollen count on the stigma, pollen germination, anther dehiscence, spikelet fertility, and spikelet flowering (<italic>n</italic> = 15).</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Trait</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Anther dehiscence (%)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Spikelet fertility (%)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Spikelet flowering (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Number of pollen grains on the stigma</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.081<sup>ns</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.679<sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.372<sup>ns</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Number of germinated pollen grains on the stigma</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.042<sup>ns</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.779<sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.344<sup>ns</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pollen germination (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.410<sup>ns</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.759<sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.116<sup>ns</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Anther dehiscence (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.311<sup>ns</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Spikelet flowering (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.350<sup>ns</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.390<sup>ns</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2014;</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<attrib><sup>&#x2217;</sup><italic>P &#x003C; 0.05, <sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup><italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.01, ns, not significant</italic>.</attrib>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec><title>Discussion</title>
<p>With changing global climate, extreme cold conditions will be more frequent in the future, which make rice subject to adverse abiotic stresses. Improving the temperature stress tolerance in rice at anthesis during the susceptible reproductive stage is beneficial for adapting to highly dynamic climatic conditions in the future (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Horie et al., 1996</xref>). In addition, increasing the absolute stress tolerance of rice could facilitate important physiological processes (e.g., anther dehiscence, pollen germination, pollination, and fertilization) being carried out with high spikelet fertility under stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Jagadish et al., 2008</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Rang et al., 2011</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Rang et al. (2011)</xref> considered that spikelet fertility might be largely determined by morphological conditions at anthesis under different abiotic stresses. PE, which was primarily affected by PeL, could be described as affecting rice spikelet fertility when exposed to LT. However, in the present study, the panicles were partially exserted under LT; some spikelets within the panicles were still stuck in the leaf sheath of the four cultivars regardless of the degree of cold tolerance and EPE (<bold>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref></bold>). Interestingly, we found that PeL decreased significantly (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) under LT in all cultivars apart from Yongyou9. These results were similar to the previous findings under HTs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Rang et al., 2011</xref>).</p>
<p>Although spikelets stuck in the leaf sheath could be reflective of spikelet fertility through altered anthesis and fertilization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">O&#x2019;Toole and Namuco, 1983</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Cruz and O&#x2019;Toole, 1984</xref>), the physiological process of spikelet fertility under LT did not invariably coincide with phenology. In general, anther dehiscence can affect the number of pollen grains on the stigma (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Rang et al., 2011</xref>). In the present study, anther indehiscence under LT was higher in cold-sensitive cultivars than in cold-sensitive cultivars (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref></bold>). It was mainly due to a sharply reduced FAD, resulting in decreased pollen grains on the stigma. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Liu et al. (2006)</xref> reported that the rupturing of the septa, the expansion of locule walls, the swelling of pollen grains, and then the rupturing of the stomium were all highly related to anther dehiscence. However, in the present study, this phenomenon was not observed (<bold>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">6</xref></bold>). The reason was that anthers still dehisced under stress due to spikelet flowering; pollen grains could not swell, and they lost viability and did not shed, resulting in unfertilized pollen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Farrell et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Liu et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Jagadish et al., 2010</xref>). There was no relationship between greater anther dehiscence and more pollen grains on the stigma, as was described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Jagadish et al. (2010)</xref>. However, spikelet fertility under cool temperature conditions was strongly correlated with large anthers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Suzuki, 1981</xref>), and anther length, width and area benefit increasingly large pollen grains with respect to fertilization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Farrell et al., 2006</xref>). Our findings also showed that anther volume, which was significantly affected in cold-sensitive cultivars, was more closely related to anther width (<italic>r</italic> = 0.96, <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.01; <italic>n</italic> = 17, data not shown) than anther length (<italic>r</italic> = 0.69, <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.01) under LT. In addition, spikelets scored for high fertility had at least 10 or more than 20 germinated pollen grains, which could be identified as the threshold number (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Jagadish et al., 2010</xref>). It was therefore thought that cold-tolerant cultivars obtained more germinated pollen on the stigma (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4A</xref></bold>), and increased seed set compared with that of cold-sensitive cultivars under LT was ultimately confirmed (<bold>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref></bold>). It has been reported that pollen germination alters spikelet fertility, ultimately affecting rice productivity under high night-time temperatures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Mohammed and Tarpley, 2009</xref>) as well as under LT. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Liu et al. (2006)</xref> reported that improved pollen stickiness, which could restrict pollen grains from shedding whether the anther pores dehisced or not, might affect pollen count on the stigma. Our results suggest that a small pollen count and germinated pollen grains under LT were observed in cold-sensitive cultivars (<bold>Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref></bold>, <bold><xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref></bold>), mainly due to poor pollen fertility and shortened pollen diameters (<bold>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref></bold>). Moreover, there was strong positive relationship between spikelet fertility and pollen germination (<bold>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">6</xref></bold>). However, the mechanism controlling high pollen germination with low anther dehiscence in spikelets under LT stress is not clear.</p>
<p>Although a uniform level of PE, PeL, and WPL between treatments was observed among the cultivars, rice plants exposed to LT did have lower spikelet fertility across cold-sensitive cultivars (<bold>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref></bold>). This was caused by different spikelet positions within the panicle (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05); the upper parts of the panicle under LT stress and LT alone could especially aggravate poor spikelet fertility. However, under stress conditions, the grains at the upper parts of the panicle are usually filled primarily (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Stansel, 1975</xref>). The upper parts are also exposed to LT first, which can enhance the extent of cold-induced damage and lead to spikelet sterility, even when the panicles are exserted. However, the lower and middle parts of the panicle were correspondingly subjected to less damage due to the site of PE. Similar results on the grain characteristics of rice under high night-time temperatures and spikelet position can be obtained from the report of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Mohammed and Tarpley (2010)</xref>. Furthermore, the effect of spikelet position within the panicle on spikelet fertility across cultivars was also related to the exsertion of the panicle.</p>
<p>The cumulative negative influence of extended LT stress on consecutive flowering days was examined in terms of spikelet fertility (seed set) using the individual spikelets marked. In the study, we observed a significant reduction in spikelet fertility with the duration of flowering in cold-sensitive cultivars but not in cold-tolerant cultivars (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref></bold>). This result was in accordance with that in the studies of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Jagadish et al. (2007)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Rang et al. (2011)</xref> on the effects of HTs. Flowering under AT peaked within a 5-day period earlier in <italic>indica&#x2013;japonica</italic> hybrid cultivars than in <italic>japonica</italic> rice (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref></bold>). The former cultivars contain the <italic>indica</italic> gene besides the <italic>japonica</italic> gene (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Prasad et al., 2006</xref>), resulting in early flowering, even though the pattern of flowering, which reached peaked between 1030 and 1230 h, on the third day was similar among cultivars (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref></bold>). Compared with cold-sensitive cultivars, cold-tolerant cultivars still had fewer numbers of flowering spikelets under LT (<bold>Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref></bold>, <bold><xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref></bold>), allowing floral organs to avoid damage from LT. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Jagadish et al. (2007)</xref> proposed that more spikelet anthesis is correlated with a higher spikelet fertility under HTs. However, this phenomenon was not verified in our study, because spikelet flowering did not significantly affect spikelet fertility (<bold>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">6</xref></bold>). Hence, our results stated that spikelet fertility was not the consequence of spikelet flowering. It had been understood that the normal action of dehisced pollen sacs in anthers and pollen vitality might be affected by LT stress as well as by HTs a day ahead flowering (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Matsui and Omasa, 2002</xref>). It is possible that in cold-susceptible cultivars such as Yongyou9 and Yongyou17, other processes that occur before fertilization were affected, such as pollen shrinkage and anther volume reduction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Farrell et al., 2006</xref>) as well as effects on pollen tube growth rate and pollen germination (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Kakani et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Coast et al., 2015</xref>). This could confirm that high pollen germination was observed in Yongyou538 and Zhejing88. Nonetheless, it is unlikely that ovary development was unaffected after fertilization, although spikelets subjected to LT after opening were fertile in both cold-sensitive cultivars and cold-tolerant cultivars. This phenomenon could also result in spikelet sterility.</p>
<p>In general, <italic>indica</italic> species are more tolerant to HTs; conversely, <italic>japonica</italic> species are more tolerant to LT stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Farrell et al., 2006</xref>). Moreover, <italic>indica&#x2013;japonica</italic> hybrid rice, which simultaneously contains <italic>indica</italic> and <italic>japonica</italic> genes, was sensitive to temperature fluctuations, resulting in spikelet sterility under LT, despite the neutral alleles at the two loci being used to solve pollen sterility in <italic>indica&#x2013;japonica</italic> hybrid rice (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Lu et al., 2000</xref>). In this study, <italic>indica&#x2013;japonica</italic> hybrid rice cultivars, which were tested for the gene frequencies of <italic>indica</italic> and <italic>japonica</italic> using SSR molecular markers (data not shown), indeed had different responses to LT. Our study may provide evidence of <italic>indica&#x2013;japonica</italic> hybrid rice adapting to extreme climatic changes for breeding purposes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Our study has shown that LT induces spikelet sterility by shrinking anther size and decreasing pollen function (the number of pollen grains, pollen fertility, and pollen germination on stigmas) in cold-sensitive cultivars during anthesis. We found that spikelet fertility was strongly correlated with pollen germination rather than spikelet flowering across cultivars and treatments. Spikelet fertility was not attributed to the patterns of flowering and the number of spikelets reaching anthesis. Therefore, this aspect should be considered for breeding <italic>indica&#x2013;japonica</italic> hybrid rice varieties to tolerance during flowering.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>DZ conceived and designed the experiments. YPZ, JX, NU, and XP provided experimental opinions and assistance. YPZ and YHZ performed the experiments. YHZ analyzed the data and wrote the paper.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Conflict of Interest Statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<p>We thank the staff of the State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute. This work was supported by grants from the Zhejiang Province Natural Science Foundation of China (Y13C130013), the Special Fund for Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (2012RG004&#x2013;2), the Earmarked Fund for Modern Agro-Industry Technology Research System of China (CARS-01-09B) and the Jiangxi Province Natural Science Foundation of China (20161BAB214171).</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Boyer</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1982</year>). <article-title>Plant productivity and environment.</article-title> <source><italic>Science</italic></source> <volume>218</volume> <fpage>443</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>448</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.218.4571.443</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Coast</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Murdoch</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ellis</surname> <given-names>R. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hay</surname> <given-names>F. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jagadish</surname> <given-names>K. S. V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Resilience of rice (<italic>Oryza</italic> spp.) pollen germination and tube growth to temperature stress.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Cell Environ.</italic></source> <volume>39</volume> <fpage>26</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>37</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/pce.12475</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cruz</surname> <given-names>R. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>O&#x2019;Toole</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>Dryland rice response to an irrigation gradient at flowering stage.</article-title> <source><italic>Agron. J.</italic></source> <volume>76</volume> <fpage>178</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>183</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronj1984.00021962007600020003x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Farrell</surname> <given-names>T. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fox</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fukai</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Genotypic variation for cold tolerance during reproductive development in rice: screening with cold air and cold water.</article-title> <source><italic>Field Crops Res.</italic></source> <volume>98</volume> <fpage>178</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>194</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2006.01.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Farrell</surname> <given-names>T. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fukai</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>The cost of low temperature to the NSW rice industry</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source><italic>Proceeding of the 10th Australian Agronomy Conference</italic></source> (<publisher-loc>Hobart, TAS</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Australian Society of Agronomy</publisher-name>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Serraj</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Changes in OsXTH gene expression, ABA content, and peduncle elongation in rice subjected to drought at the reproductive stage.</article-title> <source><italic>Acta Physiol. Plant.</italic></source> <volume>31</volume> <fpage>749</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>756</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aob/mct292</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Horie</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matsui</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nakagawa</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Omasa</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Effect of elevated CO2 and global climate change on rice yield in Japan</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source><italic>Climate Change and Plants in East Asia</italic></source>, <role>eds</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Omasa</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kai</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taoda</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Uchijima</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yoshino</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Tokyo</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer-Verlag</publisher-name>), <fpage>39</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>56</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-4-431-66899-2_4</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>IRRI</collab> (<year>2002</year>). <source><italic>Rice Almanac: Source Book for the Most Important Economic Activity on Earth</italic></source>, <edition>3rd Edn</edition>. <publisher-loc>Wallingford</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CABI Publishing</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jagadish</surname> <given-names>S. V. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Craufurd</surname> <given-names>P. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wheeler</surname> <given-names>T. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>High temperature stress and spikelet fertility in rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> L.).</article-title> <source><italic>J. Exp. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>58</volume> <fpage>1627</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1635</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erm003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jagadish</surname> <given-names>S. V. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Craufurd</surname> <given-names>P. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wheeler</surname> <given-names>T. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Phenotyping parents of mapping populations of rice for heat tolerance during anthesis.</article-title> <source><italic>Crop Sci.</italic></source> <volume>48</volume> <fpage>1140</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1146</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci2007.10.0559</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jagadish</surname> <given-names>S. V. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Muthurajan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oane</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wheeler</surname> <given-names>T. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heuer</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bennett</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Physiological and Proteomic approaches to address heat tolerance during anthesis in rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> L.).</article-title> <source><italic>J. Exp. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>61</volume> <fpage>143</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>156</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erp289</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Julia</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dingkuhn</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Variation in time of day of anthesis in rice in different climatic environments.</article-title> <source><italic>Eur. J. Agron.</italic></source> <volume>43</volume> <fpage>166</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>174</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eja.2012.06.007</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kakani</surname> <given-names>V. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prasad</surname> <given-names>P. V. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Craufurd</surname> <given-names>P. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wheeler</surname> <given-names>T. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Response of in vitro pollen germination and pollen tube growth of groundnut (<italic>Arachis hypogaea</italic> L.) genotypes to temperature.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Cell Environ.</italic></source> <volume>25</volume> <fpage>1651</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1661</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00943.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>D. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oane</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Estenor</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z. C.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Genetic variation in the sensitivity of anther dehiscence to drought stress in rice.</article-title> <source><italic>Field Crops Res.</italic></source> <volume>97</volume> <fpage>87</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>100</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2005.08.019</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>C. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Takabatake</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ikehashi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Identification of segregation- distortion-neutral alleles to improve pollen fertility of <italic>indica-japonica</italic> hybrids in rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> L.).</article-title> <source><italic>Euphytica</italic></source> <volume>113</volume> <fpage>101</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>107</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1003929312252</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maite</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ellis</surname> <given-names>R. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Temporal sensitivities of rice seed development from spikelet fertility to viable mature seed to extreme-temperature.</article-title> <source><italic>Crop Sci.</italic></source> <volume>55</volume> <fpage>354</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>364</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci2014.01.0042</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Matsui</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kagata</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Characteristics of floral organs related to reliable self pollination in rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> L.).</article-title> <source><italic>Ann. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>91</volume> <fpage>473</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>477</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aob/mcg045</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Matsui</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Omasa</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> L.) cultivars tolerant to high temperature at flowering: anther characteristics.</article-title> <source><italic>Ann. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>89</volume> <fpage>687</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>688</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aob/mcf112</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Matsui</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Omasa</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Horie</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>The difference in sterility due to high temperatures during the flowering period among <italic>japonica</italic> rice varieties.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Prod. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>4</volume> <fpage>90</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>93</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1626/pps.4.90</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mohammed</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tarpley</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>High nighttime temperatures affect rice productivity through altered pollen germination and spikelet fertility.</article-title> <source><italic>Agric. For. Meteorol.</italic></source> <volume>149</volume> <fpage>999</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1008</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.12.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mohammed</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tarpley</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Effects of high night temperature and spikelet position on yield-related parameters of rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> L.) plants.</article-title> <source><italic>Eur. J. Agron.</italic></source> <volume>33</volume> <fpage>117</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>123</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eja.2009.11.006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nishiyama</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1982</year>). <article-title>Male sterility caused by cooling treatment at the young microspore stage in rice plants XXI. Estimations of microspore and anther volumes at and after the critical stage.</article-title> <source><italic>Jpn. J. Crop Sci.</italic></source> <volume>51</volume> <fpage>172</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>177</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1626/jcs.51.172</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nishiyama</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blanco</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1980</year>). <article-title>Avoidance of high temperature sterility by flower opening in the early morning.</article-title> <source><italic>Jpn. Agric. Res. Q.</italic></source> <volume>14</volume> <fpage>116</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>117</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>O&#x2019;Toole</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Namuco</surname> <given-names>O. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1983</year>). <article-title>Role of panicle exertion in water-stress induced sterility.</article-title> <source><italic>Crop Sci.</italic></source> <volume>23</volume> <fpage>1093</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1097</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci1983.0011183X002300060017x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Prasad</surname> <given-names>P. V. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boote</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Allen</surname> <given-names>L. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sheehy</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thomas</surname> <given-names>J. M. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Species, ecotype and cultivar differences in spikelet fertility and harvest index of rice in response to high temperature stress.</article-title> <source><italic>Field Crops Res.</italic></source> <volume>95</volume> <fpage>398</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>411</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2005.04.008</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rang</surname> <given-names>Z. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jagadish</surname> <given-names>S. V. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Q. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Craufurd</surname> <given-names>P. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heuer</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Effect of high temperature and water stress on pollen germination and spikelet fertility in rice.</article-title> <source><italic>Environ. Exp. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>70</volume> <fpage>58</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>65</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.08.009</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sanchez</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rasmussen</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Porter</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Temperatures and the growth and development of maize and rice: a review.</article-title> <source><italic>Global Change Biol.</italic></source> <volume>20</volume> <fpage>408</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>417</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.12389</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Satake</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1969</year>). <article-title>Research on cold injury of paddy rice plants in Japan.</article-title> <source><italic>Jpn. Agric. Res. Q.</italic></source> <volume>4</volume> <fpage>5</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Satake</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1976</year>). <article-title>Determination of the most sensitive stage to sterile-type cool injury in rice plants.</article-title> <source><italic>Res. Bull. Hokkaido Natl. Agric. Exp. Stn.</italic></source> <volume>113</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>44</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stansel</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1975</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>The rice plant &#x2013; its development and yield</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source><italic>Six Decades of Rice Research in Texas</italic></source> <volume>Vol. 4</volume> <role>ed.</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>College Station, TX</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Texas Agricultural Experiment Station</publisher-name>), <fpage>9</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>21</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Suzuki</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1981</year>). <article-title>Cold tolerance in rice plants with special reference to the floral characters. I. Varietal differences in anther and stigma lengths and effects of planting densities on these characters.</article-title> <source><italic>Jpn. J. Breed.</italic></source> <volume>31</volume> <fpage>57</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>64</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1270/jsbbs1951.31.57</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Suzuki</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1982</year>). <article-title>Cold tolerance with rice plants with special reference to the floral characters. II. Relations between floral characters and the degree of cold tolerance in segregating generations.</article-title> <source><italic>Jpn. J. Breed.</italic></source> <volume>32</volume> <fpage>9</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1270/jsbbs1951.32.9</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>L. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Abscisic acid and ethylene interact in wheat grains in response to soil drying during grain filling.</article-title> <source><italic>New Phytol.</italic></source> <volume>171</volume> <fpage>293</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>303</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01753.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>Y. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>D. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of chilling resistance in Yongyou series of hybrid rice at flowering stage.</article-title> <source><italic>Chin. J. Rice Sci.</italic></source> <volume>29</volume> <fpage>291</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>298</lpage>.</citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>