<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2017.00816</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Development of Chloroplast and Nuclear DNA Markers for Chinese Oaks (<italic>Quercus</italic> Subgenus <italic>Quercus</italic>) and Assessment of Their Utility as DNA Barcodes</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Jia</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/408252/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>V&#x000E1;zquez</surname> <given-names>Luc&#x000ED;a</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/408673/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Xiaodan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/437782/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Huimin</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/437801/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Hao</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/437775/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Zhanlin</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/402445/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Guifang</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/335218/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Key Laboratory of Resource Biology and Biotechnology in Western China, Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Northwest University</institution> <country>Xi&#x00027;an, China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Biology Department, University of Illinois at Springfield</institution> <country>Springfield, IL, United States</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Badri Padhukasahasram, Illumina, USA</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Xue-jun Ge, South China Institute of Botany, China; Pedro Edson Moreira Guimaraes, Universidade Federal de Uberl&#x000E2;ndia, Brazil</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001"><p>&#x0002A;Correspondence: Guifang Zhao <email>gfzhao&#x00040;nwu.edu.cn</email></p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002"><p>This article was submitted to Evolutionary and Population Genetics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>19</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>8</volume>
<elocation-id>816</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>23</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2017</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>01</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2017</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2017 Yang, V&#x000E1;zquez, Chen, Li, Zhang, Liu and Zhao.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Yang, V&#x000E1;zquez, Chen, Li, Zhang, Liu and Zhao</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) is frequently used for species demography, evolution, and species discrimination of plants. However, the lack of efficient and universal markers often brings particular challenges for genetic studies across different plant groups. In this study, chloroplast genomes from two closely related species (<italic>Quercus rubra</italic> and <italic>Castanea mollissima</italic>) in Fagaceae were compared to explore universal cpDNA markers for the Chinese oak species in <italic>Quercus</italic> subgenus <italic>Quercus</italic>, a diverse species group without sufficient molecular differentiation. With the comparison, nine and 14 plastid markers were selected as barcoding and phylogeographic candidates for the Chinese oaks. Five (<italic>psb</italic>A-<italic>trn</italic>H, <italic>mat</italic>K-<italic>trn</italic>K, <italic>ycf</italic>3-<italic>trn</italic>S, <italic>mat</italic>K, and <italic>ycf</italic>1) of the nine plastid candidate barcodes, with the addition of newly designed ITS and a single-copy nuclear gene (SAP), were then tested on 35 Chinese oak species employing four different barcoding approaches (genetic distance-, BLAST-, character-, and tree-based methods). The four methods showed different species identification powers with character-based method performing the best. Of the seven barcodes tested, a barcoding gap was absent in all of them across the Chinese oaks, while ITS and <italic>psb</italic>A-<italic>trn</italic>H provided the highest species resolution (30.30%) with the character- and BLAST-based methods, respectively. The six-marker combination (<italic>psb</italic>A-<italic>trn</italic>H &#x0002B; <italic>mat</italic>K-<italic>trn</italic>K &#x0002B; <italic>mat</italic>K &#x0002B; <italic>ycf</italic>1 &#x0002B; ITS &#x0002B; SAP) showed the best species resolution (84.85%) using the character-based method for barcoding the Chinese oaks. The barcoding results provided additional implications for taxonomy of the Chinese oaks in subg. <italic>Quercus</italic>, basically identifying three major infrageneric clades of the Chinese oaks (corresponding to Groups <italic>Quercus, Cerris</italic>, and <italic>Ilex</italic>) referenced to previous phylogenetic classification of <italic>Quercus</italic>. While the morphology-based allocations proposed for the Chinese oaks in subg. <italic>Quercus</italic> were challenged. A low variation rate of the chloroplast genome, and complex speciation patterns involving incomplete lineage sorting, interspecific hybridization and introgression, possibly have negative impacts on the species assignment and phylogeny of oak species.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>plastid marker</kwd>
<kwd>nuclear gene</kwd>
<kwd>species discrimination</kwd>
<kwd>hybridization</kwd>
<kwd>phylogeny</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Quercus</italic></kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="3"/>
<table-count count="5"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="98"/>
<page-count count="17"/>
<word-count count="13665"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Chloroplast DNA (cpDNA), which is maternally inherited most angiosperm taxa, is considered a useful tool to trace demographic history, explore species divergence and identify species (Thomson et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">2010</xref>; van Velzen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">2012</xref>; Greiner et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">2014</xref>). The utility of cpDNA is highly manifested by the increasing number of phylogeographic and phylogenetic studies during recent decades (Hickerson et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2010</xref>; Qiu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">2011</xref>; Liu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">2012</xref>). For recently diverged plant species, uniparental inherited cpDNA with high levels of intraspecific genetic diversity and differentiation can provide data to infer population dynamics and phylogeographic patterns (Tzedakis et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">2013</xref>). In addition, when chloroplast gene loci have diverged from a common ancestor and have evolved independently, they are expected to possess interspecific discrepancies, namely the &#x0201C;DNA barcode,&#x0201D; which are expected to be powerful tools for species discrimination, facilitating the recognition of new species as well as biodiversity assessment thus providing useful information for the development of conservation strategies (Kress et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">2005</xref>; Hollingsworth et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2011</xref>; Krishnamurthy and Francis, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">2012</xref>; Taylor and Harris, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">2012</xref>; Li et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">2015</xref>).</p>
<p>Along with traditional morphology-based taxonomy, DNA barcoding, using one or several of the proposed DNA regions to identify species, is particularly useful for taxonomists (DeSalle et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">2005</xref>; Chase et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">2007</xref>; CBOL Plant Working Group, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">2009</xref>). In contrast to the portion of the mitochondrial Cytochrome Oxidase 1 (COI), which seems common and sufficient to fulfill almost all animal barcodes (Hebert et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">2003</xref>), suitable barcodes to distinguish plant species include some plastid regions such as <italic>rbc</italic>L, <italic>mat</italic>K, and <italic>trn</italic>H-<italic>psb</italic>A, as well as the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) (Kress and Erickson, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2007</xref>; CBOL Plant Working Group, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">2009</xref>; China Plant BOL Group, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2011</xref>; Wang X. C. et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">2015</xref>). Additionally, low (single)-copy nuclear loci related to strong reproductive isolation, which serve as the &#x0201C;speciation genes,&#x0201D; may also be potentially useful in species discrimination, albeit designing universal primers for the low (single)-copy nuclear genes are difficult (Wu, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">2001</xref>; Chase et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2005</xref>; Ran et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">2010</xref>; Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">2011</xref>). For land plants, although a number of DNA barcodes have been evaluated, special interests and challenges are still under exploration in identifying closely related or recently evolved species, especially within species-rich genera (Liu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">2011</xref>; Yan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">2015</xref>). Failures of DNA barcoding to properly discriminate recently diverged species may be due to incomplete lineage sorting or lack of a &#x0201C;barcode gap,&#x0201D; and related to large effective population size as well as low evolutionary rate of species (van Velzen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">2012</xref>). Additionally, insufficient sampling in a species-rich genus and a lack of consensus on suggested markers also cause inaccurate species identification among closely related species (Ran et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">2010</xref>). Several different DNA barcoding methodologies, such as distance-based, tree-based, similarity-based, and character-based methods have been approved for the assessment of species discrimination, yet dissimilar species identification powers exist among these analytical methods based on same datasets (Zou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B98">2011</xref>; van Velzen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">2012</xref>; Yan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">2015</xref>). In general, DNA barcoding has become a well-funded, global enterprise as a rapid technique for species identification (Taylor and Harris, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">2012</xref>). However, challenges still exist in the discrimination of closely related or recently diverged species groups (van Velzen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">2012</xref>), such as the oak lineage.</p>
<p>Oaks (<italic>Quercus</italic> L., Fagaceae) are anemophilous species with approximately 400&#x02013;500 taxa widespread throughout the Northern Hemisphere, belonging to a taxonomically complex group (Dumolin-Lapegue et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">1999</xref>; Aldrich and Cavender-Bares, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">2011</xref>). The genus <italic>Quercus</italic> has been recognized as two major clades comprising five or six infrageneric key groups as <italic>Lobatae</italic> Loudon, <italic>Protobalanus</italic> (Trelease) Camus, <italic>Quercus</italic> Linneaus, <italic>Cerris</italic> Loudon, <italic>Ilex</italic> Loudon as well as the tropical to subtropical, evergreen (subgenus) <italic>Cyclobalanopsis</italic> Oersted group in Southeast Asia (Oh and Manos, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">2008</xref>; Denk and Grimm, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2009</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2010</xref>; Denk and Tekleva, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">2014</xref>; Hubert et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2014</xref>). However, the <italic>Cyclobalanopsis</italic> group is also treated as a subgenus of <italic>Quercus</italic> by some taxonomists due to its controversial phylogenetic position (i.e., Zhou, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B96">1992</xref>; Nixon, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">1993</xref>; Manos et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">2001</xref>; Menitsky, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">2005</xref>), and we regard it as such here with focus on the Chinese oak species in subg. <italic>Quercus</italic>. Using cpDNA markers, a series of phylogenetic and phylogeographical studies have mainly been concentrated on oaks distributed in Europe and North America (Petit et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">2002</xref>; Magni et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">2005</xref>; Grivet et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2006</xref>; Cavender-Bares et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2011</xref>; Simeone et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">2016</xref>); but these markers are barely shared between the two major research areas. A set of 52 polymorphic cpDNA primers was proposed for the postglacial migration reconstruction of <italic>Quercus rubra</italic> L. (Borkowski et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">2014</xref>), yet the universality of these markers in other oaks was unknown. To date, only two barcoding prospects have been performed on Italian and Euro-Mediterranean oaks with some of the proposed DNA barcodes (<italic>rbc</italic>L, <italic>rpoC</italic>1, <italic>trn</italic>H-<italic>psb</italic>A, <italic>mat</italic>K, and ITS2; Piredda et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">2011</xref>; Simeone et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">2013</xref>). While 12 Italian oak species studied revealed extremely low discrimination success (0%), the resolution in Euro-Mediterranean oaks investigated was up to 87.8% when a combination of plastid and nuclear (ITS2) regions was used, yet they sampled large scale ranges with limited sample size (one or two individuals) for most species. The lack of unique DNA barcodes for oaks is suggested to be the result of inconsistent and limited taxonomy, low variation rates of the barcodes, frequent interspecific hybridization, incomplete lineage sorting, shared ancestral polymorphism and reticulation (Simeone et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">2013</xref>), which indicates challenges and the lack of efficient markers for barcoding the species-rich genus <italic>Quercus</italic>.</p>
<p>China harbors a high diversity of oaks in subg. <italic>Quercus</italic> with 62 species described in the <italic>Flora of China</italic> (the Chinese version), while the English revision retained 35 species, essentially removing the hybrids and morphologically similar species (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.floraofchina.org/">http://www.floraofchina.org/</ext-link>). Based on morphological and anatomical studies of pollen and leaves (Zhou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B94">1995</xref>; Pu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">2002</xref>; Peng et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">2007</xref>), the Chinese oaks (subg. <italic>Quercus</italic>) are divided into five morphology-based sections: Quercus, Aegilops, Heterobalanus, Engleriana, and Echinolepides. Of these five sections, the first two consist of deciduous oak species that are included in phylogenetic Groups <italic>Quercus</italic> and <italic>Cerris</italic>, while the remaining sections comprise evergreen oak species are hypothesized to be nested within Group <italic>Ilex</italic> (Pu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">2002</xref>; Denk and Grimm, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2009</xref>), although particular phylogenetic tests for the Chinese oaks are absent. Recent phylogeographic studies have been performed on some widespread deciduous species in Sections Quercus and Aegilops, suggesting that geological and climatic changes during the Neogene and/or Pleistocene have acted as potential triggers for intra- and inter-specific differentiation of these Chinese oaks (Zeng et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">2011</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90">2015</xref>; Chen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2012</xref>; Wang Y. H. et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">2015</xref>; Zhang X. W. et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B92">2015</xref>; Yang J. et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">2016</xref>). Additional studies have mainly focused on ecological issues of Section Heterobalanus, which contains about nine sclerophyllous alpine species and occurs mainly in the Hengduan Mountains (Yang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">2009</xref>; Feng et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2016</xref>). Other oaks, for example the species of morphology-based Sections Engleriana and Echinolepides are mainly endemics and relics with narrow and scattered distributions, and most of them are endangered due to habitat loss. However, the species discrimination and differentiation, as well as phylogeny and evolution of the entire Chinese oak species have yet to be well uncovered due ambiguous species boundaries and lack of universal molecular markers.</p>
<p>In this study, over 200 individuals of 35 Chinese oak species of subg. <italic>Quercus</italic> (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>) were collected to explore species identification using DNA barcoding analyses. Particularly, to provide sufficient barcode candidates targeting the barcoding analyses, we (1) first developed universal cpDNA markers for the Chinese oak species using a comparative method between the chloroplast genomes of <italic>Q. rubra</italic> and <italic>Castanea mollissima</italic> Blume. Designed cpDNA primers were tested on a subset of 14 deciduous oaks to obtain candidate DNA barcodes. In addition, cpDNA markers generating highly intraspecific divergence were also identified for future phylogeographic studies of the Chinese oak species. We then (2) selected five of the identified cpDNA barcode candidates in step (1) with addition of the proposed ITS and a single-copy nuclear gene (SAP) to barcode the 35 Chinese oaks. Four different DNA barcoding methods were compared to evaluate the resolution rates of species identification. Finally, based on the (tree-based) barcoding results, we discussed the potential implications for phylogenetic prospects of the Chinese oaks in subg. <italic>Quercus</italic>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p><bold>Taxon information of 35 Chinese oaks in <italic><bold>Quercus</bold></italic> subgenus <italic><bold>Quercus</bold></italic> used in this study</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Group</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Section</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Species</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Sample size</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Location (Province)</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Quercus</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus aliena</italic> Blume</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Weining (Guizhou); Shaoxing (Zhejiang); Qinhuangdao (Hebei)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus aliena</italic> Blume var. <italic>acutiserrata</italic> Maximowicz ex Wenzig</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Jiujiang (Jiangxi); Anlong (Guizhou); Emeishan (Sichuan)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus dentata</italic> Thunb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Foping (Shaanxi); Shenyang (Liaoning); Guangyuan (Sichuan)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus fabri</italic> Hance</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Weining (Guizhou); Enshi (Hubei); Dongkou (Hunan)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus serrata</italic> Murray</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Guangyuan (Sichuan); Dujiangyan (Sichuan); Bikou (Gansu)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus serrata</italic> Murray var. <italic>brevipetiolata</italic> (A. DC.) Nakai</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Shangnan (Shaanxi); Jiujiang (Jiangxi)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus liaotungensis</italic> Koidz. (or <italic>Quercus wutaishanica</italic> Blume)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mengda (Qinghai); Huayin (Shaanxi); Zhashui (Shaanxi)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus mongolica</italic> Fischer ex Ledebour</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Xiyang (Shanxi); Changchun (Jilin); Yantai (Shandong)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus griffithii</italic> Hook. f. et Thoms. ex Miquel</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lijiang (Yunnan); Tianlin (Guangxi)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus yunnanensis</italic> Franchet</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Yanyuan (Sichuan)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus stewardii</italic> Rehd.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Huoshan (Anhui)</td>
</tr>
<tr style="border-top: thin solid #000000;">
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Cerris</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Aegilops</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus acutissima</italic> Carr.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Funing (Yunnan); Longnan (Gansu); Qinhuangdao (Hebei)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus variabilis</italic> Blume</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Xixia (Henan); Yichang (Hubei)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus chenii</italic> Nakai</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Xinning (Hunan)</td>
</tr>
<tr style="border-top: thin solid #000000;">
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Ilex</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Heterobalanus</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus spinosa</italic> David ex Franchet</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hanzhong (Shaanxi); Jiulong (Sichuan); Shiyan (Hubei); Lijiang (Yunnan); Dali (Yunnan); Shangluo (Shaanxi); Xianju (Zhejiang); Hualien (Taiwan)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus aquifolioides</italic> Rehd. et Wils.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Maerkang (Sichuan); Mangkang (Tibet); Maoxian (Sichuan); Lijiang (Yunnan)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus rehderiana</italic> Hand. -Mazz.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Maoxian (Sichuan)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus pseudosemecarpifolia</italic> A. Camus</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Weining (Guizhou); Luding (Sichuan); Lijiang (Yunnan)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus pannosa</italic> Hand. -Mazz.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bomi (Tibet); Muli (Sichuan)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus longispica</italic> (Hand. -Mazz.) A. Camus</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Maerkang (Sichuan); Muli (Sichuan); Lijiang (Yunnan)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus monimotricha</italic> Hand. -Mazz.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Yanyuan (Sichuan); Kangding (Sichuan)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus senescens</italic> Hand. -Mazz.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chayu (Tibet); Lijiang (Yunnan); Muli (Sichuan); Huize (Yunnan); Weining (Guizhou)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus guajavifolia</italic> H. Leveille</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Maerkang (Sichuan); Deqin (Yunnan); Lijiang (Yunnan); Muli (Sichuan)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus semecarpifolia</italic> Smith</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Linzhi (Tibet)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus gilliana</italic> Rehd. et Wils.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Maoxian (Sichuan)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-top: thin solid #000000;">Engleriana</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-top: thin solid #000000;"><italic>Quercus engleriana</italic> Seem.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="border-top: thin solid #000000;">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-top: thin solid #000000;">Tongren (Guizhou)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus cocciferoides</italic> Hand. -Mazz.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Muli (Sichuan)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus phillyraeoides</italic> A. Gray</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Shaowu (Fujian); Chongqing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus franchetii</italic> Skan</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Miyi (Sichuan)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus acrodonta</italic> Seemen</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Xinning (Hunan); Shangnan (Shaanxi)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus lanata</italic> Roxb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tongmai (Tibet)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"/>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><italic>Quercus tarokoensis</italic> Hayata</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;">Taroko (Taiwan)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Echinolepides</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus dolicholepis</italic> A. Camus</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Longlin (Guangxi); Enshi (Hubei)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus oxyphylla</italic> (E. H. Wilson) Handel-Mazzetti</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lueyang (Shaanxi); Shaowu (Fujian)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Quercus baronii</italic> Skan</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Linfen (Shanxi); Xian (Shaanxi); Lushi (Henan)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials and methods" id="s2">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Taxon information, DNA isolation and PCR amplification</title>
<p>A total of 35 oak species representing the five morphology-based sections (corresponding to the phylogenetic Groups <italic>Quercus, Cerris</italic>, and <italic>Ilex</italic>, see the introduction) of the Chinese oaks (Zhou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B94">1995</xref>; Pu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">2002</xref>; Peng et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">2007</xref>) were collected following the morphological classification of the <italic>Flora of China</italic> (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). The deciduous North American species <italic>Q. rubra</italic> was used for primer development; screening of plastid primers was conducted on a subset of 14 deciduous oaks, each with three to four individuals, including 11 species of the Section Quercus and three of Aegilops. For DNA barcoding analyses below, we used all 35 oak species with increased sample size (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). Voucher specimens of the 35 Chinese oak species collected were archived in the herbarium of College of Life Sciences at Northwest University (Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM14">S1</xref>). DNA extractions and PCR protocols were the same as in Yang J. et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">2016</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Development and screening of the chloroplast primers</title>
<p>The complete chloroplast genomes of <italic>Q. rubra</italic> (NC_020152.1; Alexander and Woeste, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2014</xref>) and <italic>C. mollissima</italic> (NC_014674.1; Jansen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">2011</xref>) were aligned and compared in program Mauve (Darling et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2010</xref>) with full alignment, iterative refinement parameters and default seed weight to search potential genetic variation. The large single copy (LSC) and small single copy (SSC) regions exhibiting gaps and variations between the two genomes were extracted and divided into suitable fragments for primer design. Locations of the extracted cpDNA fragments were identified based on the chloroplast genome of <italic>Q. rubra</italic>, and conserved regions flanking variable regions were used to design primers. Additionally, repetitive structures (except the mononucleotide repeats) in the chloroplast genome, which can provide additional genetic information at low taxonomic levels, were searched in program REPuter (Kurtz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">2001</xref>) with parameters of minimal repeat size of 8 bp and maximum repeats of 50 bp. Primers were designed using the PrimerSelect program in DNAStar software (DNASTAR Inc., Wisconsin, USA) with the following characteristics: primer length &#x0003D; 18&#x02013;24 bp, melting temperature &#x0003D; 50&#x02013;65&#x000B0;C and default parameters for the rest of the conditions. Product length was restricted to 400&#x02013;1,100 bp to facilitate standard PCR amplification.</p>
<p>For each designed plastid marker, obtained sequences for 14 deciduous oak species (GenBank accession numbers: <ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="KX824782">KX824782</ext-link>-<ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="KX825832">KX825832</ext-link>) were visually checked and aligned in BioEdit 7.0.9.0 (Hall, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">1999</xref>). Ambiguous sites and poly (A and T) structures were removed, while indels were retained for potential informative characters (Jaen-Molina et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2015</xref>). To choose potential barcoding markers for species discrimination, all alignments were visually scanned, and markers displaying species-specific characters (including gaps) in individual oak species were retained as candidate barcodes. To select universal primers that generate high intraspecific diversity for future phylogeographic studies, the mean diversity (nucleotide diversity, &#x003C0;) for each species was estimated using MEGA 6.06 (Tamura et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">2013</xref>). Two criteria were used to filter the designed cpDNA markers: (1) primers could be successfully amplified among most of the 14 deciduous oaks; and (2) the estimated mean diversity of the 14 oak species (&#x003C0;) &#x0003E; 0.0005; this threshold value was chosen based on the average estimation of cpDNA nucleotide diversity documented in previous phylogeographic researches on anemophilous tree species such as <italic>Populus balsamifera</italic> (Breen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2012</xref>), <italic>Pteroceltis tatarinowii</italic> (Li et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">2012</xref>), and <italic>Quercus variabilis</italic> (Chen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2012</xref>). Sequences having repetitive structures were evaluated with the deletion-insertion polymorphism (DIP) analysis using the Multiallelic option in DnaSP 5.0 (Rozas et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">2003</xref>), but were only performed on two widespread species <italic>Quercus aliena</italic> and <italic>Quercus acutissima</italic>, which have sample sizes of nine individuals for each species.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>DNA barcoding analyses</title>
<p>Five cpDNA candidate barcodes were selected for barcoding the Chinese oak species, as a combination of them showed the maximum species identification potential among 14 Chinese deciduous oaks (see the results). Additionally, two nuclear genes with newly designed primers, the ITS region flanking ITS1-5.8S rDNA-ITS2 (Forward: GTTCGGGCGACGGGACAC; Reverse: CCTGCGGGCGGGGACCTC) and a predicted zinc finger A20 and AN1 domain-containing stress-associated protein 8-like gene (SAP) (Vij and Tyagi, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">2006</xref>) (Forward: ATGGAGCATGATGAGACGGG; Reverse: GCCTTAACAACAGGGTTGGC) which was confirmed as a single-copy gene using a BLAST search based on a comparative transcriptome work (unpublished data) and against the <italic>Quercus</italic> EST database in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), were joined to test their discriminatory power in subg. <italic>Quercus</italic> of China. All obtained DNA sequences for each candidate region (GenBank accession numbers: <ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="KX836866">KX836866</ext-link>-<ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="KX838287">KX838287</ext-link>) were checked visually and aligned with BioEdit 7.0.9.0. Ambiguous sites and poly (A and T) structures were removed, while informative insertion-deletion events (gaps) showing species-specific characters were coded as nucleotide substitutions following Simmons and Ochoterena (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">2000</xref>). Potential pseudogenes of the ITS region (Manos et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">2001</xref>; Ma and Zhou, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">2006</xref>; Denk and Grimm, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2010</xref>) were checked and filtered using multiple examinations (i.e., G&#x0002B;C content, secondary structure and conserved domains of ITS2, and conserved motifs in 5.8S rDNA; see Note <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM22">S1</xref>); only functional ITS orthologues were retained for the barcoding analysis. Sequencing peaks of nucleotide sites having an overlap greater than 80% in the nuclear sequences were treated as heterozygous, and ambiguity was coded according to the IUPAC (International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry). Individual barcodes and all possible combinations of the seven candidates (five plastid and two nuclear regions) were evaluated using four different barcoding methods as follows:</p>
<p>Method-1 Genetic distance-based: DNA barcoding gaps of the Chinese oak species were evaluated by comparing the distributions of ranked pairwise differences (p-distance) with the maximum intraspecific genetic divergence calculated in MEGA 6.06 with 1,000 bootstraps for each candidate barcode. A barcode gap would exhibit a sudden increase in the vicinity of the maximum intraspecific divergence. For each barcode candidate and all possible combinations, the obtained genetic distance matrices were then used as input to explore potential species groups using the Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery (ABGD) tool with estimated maximum intraspecific distance as threshold and 100 simulation steps (Puillandre et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">2012</xref>). A species group was considered as successfully delimited if conspecific individuals were partitioned into the same group without sequences from other species. Differentiations between the intra- and interspecific divergences for each candidate and infrageneric partition (i.e., the five morphology-based sections of the Chinese oaks and traditional phylogenetic classification of <italic>Quercus</italic>) were also compared using the Student&#x00027;s <italic>t</italic>-test and Wilcoxon rank sum test in R 3.2.3 (R Development Core Team, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">2011</xref>).</p>
<p>Method-2 BLAST-based: Sequences of the seven candidate barcodes were concatenated as a local reference database. Individual sequences from a specified barcode were then used to query the reference database with the local NCBI-blast-2.2.28&#x0002B; program in C environment (Camacho et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2009</xref>). Query parameters were compiled as: &#x02013;query BLAST_sequence &#x02013;db reference_database &#x02013;out BLAST_results &#x02013;outfmt 7 &#x02013;max_target_seqs 10. Species discrimination was considered successful when all individuals of a species had a top hit to conspecific individuals (the query sequence itself was excluded from the blast results).</p>
<p>Method-3 Character-based: The character-based DNA barcode method in BLOG (Barcoding with LOGic) 2.0 was used for species identification under a machine learning approach which selects a small set of suitable positions from the reference sequences to classify species (Weitschek et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">2013</xref>). Raw sequences of each candidate barcode and combinations were used as the reference database and were tested with 100% slicing for training, 50 POSCOST and 800 NEGPOST for the logic formulas against itself to verify the identification power of each database. For each reference, the total percentage of correct species classification rates was recorded.</p>
<p>Method-4 Tree-based: Unrooted neighbor-joining (NJ) trees were constructed in MEGA 6.06 based on pairwise deletion and the p-distance model with 1,000 bootstrap replicates according to Yan et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">2015</xref>) for species-level discrimination of closely related groups. Only species with multiple individuals forming a monophyletic clade in the NJ tree were considered to be successfully identified.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title>Comparison of the two chloroplast genomes</title>
<p>The total consensus chloroplast genome length of <italic>Q. rubra</italic> was 161,304 and 160,799 bp for <italic>C. mollisima</italic> (Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S1</xref>). Both species had similar GC contents but differed in the total number of genes with <italic>Q. rubra</italic> having 11 more genes than <italic>C. mollisima</italic>. The LSC and SSC regions of <italic>Q. rubra</italic> were larger (91,121 and 20,150 bp) than those of <italic>C. mollissima</italic> (90,432 and 18,995 bp). In contrast, the inverted repeat (IR) of <italic>Q. rubra</italic> was shorter than in <italic>C. mollissima</italic>. Searching for repetitive structures within the chloroplast genome revealed 12 repeats in <italic>Q. rubra</italic>, while <italic>C. mollissima</italic> had eight (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). When the IR regions were removed, comparison of the chloroplast genome of <italic>Q. rubra</italic> with <italic>C. mollissima</italic> as reference yielded 701 plastid SNP sites and 221 gaps for primer design.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p><bold>Comparison of major features of the two chloroplast genomes <italic><bold>Quercus rubra</bold></italic> and <italic><bold>Castaena mollissima</bold></italic></bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>Quercus rubra</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>Castanea mollissima</italic></bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total length (bp)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">161,304</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">160,799</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">LSC length (bp)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">91,121</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">90,432</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SSC length (bp)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20,150</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18,995</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">IR length (bp)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25,051</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25,686</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">GC content (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36.79</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36.80</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Number of gene</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">138</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">127</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Number of repetitive structure</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Information of designed primers for the Chinese oaks</title>
<p>Thirty-nine pairs of plastid primers were designed based on detected variations and gaps in the LSC and SSC regions of the chloroplast genome of <italic>Q. rubra</italic>. Total expected PCR product length of the 39 primers was 28,555 bp, covering 17.7% of the <italic>Q. rubra</italic> chloroplast genome. In addition, the repetitive structures in the chloroplast genome of <italic>Q. rubra</italic> yielded eight primer pairs. The average length of PCR products for these 47 primers was 710 bp. Primer screening on 14 deciduous oak species resulted in successful amplification of 30 primer pairs with an average success rate of 62% among the 47 designed markers (Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM15">S2</xref>); most primers showed high universality across the 14 Chinese deciduous oaks.</p>
<p>To select suitable cpDNA markers for future phylogeographic studies, estimation of the mean genetic diversity (&#x003C0;) suggested that 12 primer pairs could reveal high intraspecific diversity in most of the 14 deciduous oak species based on our criteria (&#x003C0; &#x0003E; 0.0005; Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">S2</xref>; Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref> and Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM16">S3</xref>); moreover, these primers had high amplification success. Of these 12 cpDNA markers, two primers (B13 and B36) revealed the highest mean intraspecific diversity (&#x003C0;) with the values of 0.0056 and 0.0051 across the 14 deciduous oaks. For the eight plastid regions having repetitive structures, two markers (R1 and R7) showed high DIPs with the mean values of 0.4290 and 0.5000, respectively (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p><bold>Information of plastid primers selected for phylogeography and species identification based on 14 deciduous oak species</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Primer ID</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Amplification region</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Forward (5&#x02032;-3&#x02032;)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Reverse (5&#x02032;-3&#x02032;)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Tm (&#x000B0;C)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Aligned length (bp)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Amplification success (%)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Mean diversity (&#x003C0;)</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">B1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>psb</italic>A-<italic>trn</italic>K<sup>UUU</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GACGGTTTTCAGTGCTGGTTATCC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TTTTCATCAATGGTCTGTCC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">514</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0016</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">B2<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>&#x00023;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>mat</italic>K-<italic>trn</italic>K<sup>UUU</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TCTTACGATTTCTGCCCCTTCT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TTCTTAGCGGATCGGTTCAAAA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">755</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0008</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">B3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>&#x00023;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>rps</italic>16</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TTGGGATAGATGTAGATGAATAA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TCGGGGGTTGGGATGTAAATAGT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">612</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0012</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">B4<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>&#x00023;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>mat</italic>K</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ACCCAGTCCATCTGGAAATCTTGGTTC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CGTACAGTACTTTTGTGTTTACGAG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">698</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">B9<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>atp</italic>I-<italic>rps</italic>2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ATAATGGCTGAACCTAATAAGATA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TCCCAGCAAATGATGACG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">56</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">379</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">86</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0006</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">B13<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>trn</italic>D<sup>GUC</sup>-<italic>trn</italic>E<sup>UUC</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CTTGACAGGGCGGTGCTCT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TAATGGGGACGGACTGTAAAT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">491</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0056</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">B14<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>psb</italic>C-<italic>lhb</italic>A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ATTGATCGCGATTTTGAACCT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CCACGAATCTATTAATGCTGTATG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">435</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0018</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">B17<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>&#x00023;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>ycf</italic>3-<italic>trn</italic>S<sup>GGA</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AAATCGCACCATCTCTGTAATAGG</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CAAAACCGGGTGAATAGTGAGTC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">884</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">B29<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>rps</italic>11-<italic>rps</italic>8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TATTCTACGCGCACTCTTACG</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AACGGGTTTCTATTCTCACTCTC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">661</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0022</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">B30<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>rps</italic>3-<italic>rps</italic>19</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TGCAAACCAAAGAGAATGATGAC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TCCGAGGACACGCAAAAA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">618</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0012</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">B31<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>&#x00023;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>ndh</italic>F</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TTCGGCCAATGCTCTTAT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TCCACCCCTTGCCTGTTTT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">781</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0007</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">B36<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>&#x00023;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>rps</italic>15-<italic>ycf</italic>1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ATCCCCTGTTTTCTTCTTTTTC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CAATAATGGTAGTCGTTTCAGTCT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">493</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0051</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">B37<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>&#x00023;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>ycf</italic>1<sup>(5&#x02032;)</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CGCGATAGGGTCCGTTCA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CTATTTAGGCAGAGTACCGTCACC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">757</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0008</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">B38<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>&#x00023;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>ycf</italic>1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ATTCTGATGGTCCGGAAGGG</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CCTTATCAGACTGAAACGACTAC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">440</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0006</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">B39<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>&#x00023;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>trn</italic>H<sup>GUG</sup>-<italic>psb</italic>A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GTTATGCATGAACGTAATGCTC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CGCGCATGGTGGATTCACAATCC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">332</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">R1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>rps</italic>12-<italic>trn</italic>V<sup>GAC</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CCAAATTGACGGGTTAGTGTGA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TTACCTCCGCGGAAAAGATGAT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">415</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.429<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">R7<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>rps</italic>16-<italic>trn</italic>Q<sup>UUG</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AAAGAAAATGATGGATGTAAGAAT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TAATGTAATGATAGTGAAATAGGA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">483</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TN1">
<label>&#x0002A;</label>
<p><italic>Primers selected for phylogeographic analysis;</italic></p></fn>
<fn id="TN2">
<label>&#x00023;</label>
<p><italic>Primers selected for species identification;</italic></p></fn>
<fn id="TN3">
<label>a</label>
<p><italic>Values of Deletion-Insertion polymorphism (DIP)</italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>For selection of candidate DNA barcodes, screening on amplicons revealed that nine primer pairs generated species-specific characters, which might show discriminating potential among the 14 deciduous oak species (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>). Overall, the selected cpDNA markers for phylogeographic and barcoding studies amplified 17 chloroplast regions, 12 were located in intergenic spacers, while four and one markers were anchored in codon and intron regions (Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM3">S3</xref>), respectively. In order to select powerful barcoding markers for all the Chinese oak species, the ABGD method was initially applied to sequences obtained from 14 deciduous oaks after PCR amplification of these nine primer candidates and all possible combinations. The ABGD results showed that most primer pair candidates demarcated one species groups and only primer pair B38 (<italic>ycf</italic>1) delineated three species groups, while ranges of intra- and interspecific genetic distances in each candidate barcode were overlapped based on the 14 deciduous oak species (Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM17">S4</xref>). Despite this, five cpDNA markers (<italic>psb</italic>A-<italic>trn</italic>H, <italic>mat</italic>K-<italic>trn</italic>K, <italic>ycf</italic>3-<italic>trn</italic>S, <italic>mat</italic>K, and <italic>ycf</italic>1; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>) were chosen for our barcoding analyses because their combination revealed the highest species identification level among the 14 deciduous oaks tested.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption><p><bold>Estimation of genetic information of seven barcode candidates in DNA barcoding analysis based on the 35 Chinese oak species</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Barcode ID</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>No. amplicons</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Aligned length (bp)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>No. variable sites</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>No. informative sites</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>No. indels</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>No. diagnostic indels</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Maximum intraspecific distance (SE)</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>mat</italic>K-<italic>trn</italic>K</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">205</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">694</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0130 (0.0043)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>ycf</italic>3-<italic>trn</italic>S</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">207</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">607</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0099 (0.0038)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>psb</italic>A-<italic>trn</italic>H</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">211</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">502</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0139 (0.0052)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>mat</italic>K</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">209</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">729</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0123 (0.0038)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>ycf</italic>1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">216</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">448</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0117 (0.0048)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ITS</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">201</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">411</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">86</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0389 (0.0095)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SAP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">173</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">355</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">39</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0169 (0.0064)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Barcode universality and sequence characteristics</title>
<p>The five plastid candidate barcodes and two nuclear genes showed high amplification success rates (100%) at the species level for the 35 Chinese oak species. At the individual level, these five cpDNA candidates as well as the ITS region had medium to high success rates (87&#x02013;100%), while the SAP gene showed the lowest amplification rates in species from morphology-based Sections Quercus, Heterobalanus, Engleriana, and Echinolepides (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption><p><bold>Information of amplification success for the seven candidate barcodes used in this study</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Barcode ID</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold><italic>Quercus</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold><italic>Cerris</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><italic><bold>Ilex</bold></italic></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Quercus (%)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Aegilops (%)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Heterobalanus (%)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Engleriana (%)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Echinolepides (%)</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Species level</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>mat</italic>K-<italic>trn</italic>K</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>ycf</italic>3-<italic>trn</italic>S</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>psb</italic>A-<italic>trn</italic>H</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>mat</italic>K</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>ycf</italic>1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">ITS</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">SAP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Overall</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
</tr>
<tr style="border-top: thin solid #000000;">
<td valign="top" align="left">Individual level</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>mat</italic>K-<italic>trn</italic>K</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">94</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>ycf</italic>3-<italic>trn</italic>S</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">99</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">89</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>psb</italic>A-<italic>trn</italic>H</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">94</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>mat</italic>K</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">99</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>ycf</italic>1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">99</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">ITS</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">94</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">87</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">SAP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">76</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">89</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">81</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Overall</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">99</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">90</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">94</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>A total of 1422 sequences of the 35 Chinese oak species were available for the DNA barcoding analyses. The aligned lengths of the seven barcodes ranged from 355 bp for the SAP gene to 729 bp of the <italic>mat</italic>K region. Among the seven barcodes, the aligned ITS region showed the highest number of variable sites, while the <italic>ycf</italic>3-<italic>trn</italic>S alignment had the lowest variable sites. The two nuclear genes exhibited more variable sites than the five plastid candidates. Of the seven tested barcodes, the <italic>psb</italic>A-<italic>trn</italic>H region had the highest number of indels (11) with five of them being diagnostic for some Chinese oak species. The <italic>mat</italic>K-<italic>trn</italic>K and <italic>ycf</italic>3-<italic>trn</italic>S sequences as well as the ITS region showed two indels in each alignment, but only one gap was species-specific for the <italic>mat</italic>K-<italic>trn</italic>K and ITS regions. No indels were found in the <italic>mat</italic>K, <italic>ycf</italic>1 and SAP alignments (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>DNA barcoding gap assessment</title>
<p>Among the seven barcodes, the ITS region revealed the highest variation in the maximum intraspecific genetic distance, while <italic>ycf</italic>3-<italic>trn</italic>S showed the lowest maximum intraspecific variation (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>). No sudden increase was found around the vicinity of the maximum intraspecific distance for the ranked genetic distances, indicating no DNA barcoding gap among the 35 Chinese oak species for each barcode candidate (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>). The differentiation tests between the minimum inter- and maximum intra-specific genetic distances revealed significantly higher values of the intraspecific variation than genetic variation at the interspecific level for <italic>ycf</italic>3-<italic>trn</italic>S, <italic>mat</italic>K, <italic>ycf</italic>1 and the two nuclear genes, while no differences between the intra- and inter-specific genetic distances were shown in <italic>mat</italic>K-<italic>trn</italic>K and <italic>psb</italic>A-<italic>trn</italic>H. Among species of each morphology-based section, the differentiation tests also showed significantly higher intraspecific variations than interspecific differentiation for Sections Quercus (corresponding to the phylogenetic Group <italic>Quercus</italic>), Aegilops (phylogenetic Group <italic>Cerris</italic>), Heterobalanus and Echinolepides, with the exception of Engleriana, for which the maximum intraspecific genetic distances were significantly lower than the minimum interspecific divergence (Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM18">S5</xref>). However, when the differentiation tests were performed on the phylogenetic Group <italic>Ilex</italic> (including species of Sections Heterobalanus, Engleriana, and Echinolepides), both tests showed significantly higher intraspecific variations than interspecific differentiation among these evergreen oaks (<italic>t</italic> &#x0003D; 3.811, <italic>P</italic> &#x0003C;0.001; <italic>W</italic> &#x0003D; 32563.5, <italic>P</italic> &#x0003C;0.001).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p><bold>Ranked values of genetic distances (p-distance) for the seven DNA barcode candidates among 35 Chinese oaks in <italic><bold>Quercus</bold></italic> subgenus <italic><bold>Quercus</bold></italic>, and an example (Puillandre et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">2012</xref>) indicating a clear barcoding gap</bold>. X-axes represent the numbers of ranked genetic distances, Y-axes indicate the values of genetic distance. Black solid lines with gray areas show the estimated genetic distances with standard errors for each candidate. Dashed lines correspond to values of the maximum intraspecific divergence revealed for each candidate barcode.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00816-g0001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Comparison of species discrimination</title>
<p>The four analysis methods afforded different rates of species discrimination for the 35 Chinese oak species in subg. <italic>Quercus</italic>. Overall, among the four different DNA barcoding methods, the character-based method showed the highest species discrimination rates with values from 30.30 to 84.85% for individual candidates to seven barcode combination. For a single barcode, the BLAST- and character-based methods provided the highest level of species identification (30.30%). The genetic distance-based method showed the lowest discrimination rates for the Chinese oak species for single barcodes and all their combinations, ranging from 0 to 17.14% (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>; Tables <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM19">S6</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM20">S7</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p><bold>Comparison of species resolution for four different barcoding methods (genetic distance-, BLAST-, character-, and tree-based methods) with single to seven barcode combinations based on the 35 Chinese oak species in <italic><bold>Quercus</bold></italic> subgenus <italic><bold>Quercus</bold></italic></bold>. Box with error bars indicates 95% confidence intervals, and solid lines in the box show the mean values of species resolution. Black dots indicate outliers for specified barcode combination.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00816-g0002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>When comparing the discriminating potentials of each of the seven candidate loci and all of their combinations (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>), ITS and the <italic>psb</italic>A-<italic>trn</italic>H region showed the highest species discrimination rate (both 30.30%) when the character-based method and the BLAST-based method were used, respectively. However, the ITS region identified no species group with the genetic distance-based method. For the character-based method, combinations with increasing numbers of barcoding markers tended to provide increasing rates of the species discrimination and showed the highest species discrimination potentials (84.85%) with the combination of <italic>psb</italic>A-<italic>trn</italic>H &#x0002B; <italic>mat</italic>K-<italic>trn</italic>K &#x0002B; <italic>mat</italic>K &#x0002B; <italic>ycf</italic>1 &#x0002B; ITS &#x0002B; SAP, as well as with all the seven barcode candidates. In contrast, for the three remaining methods, the species identification rates did not significantly increase when the barcode combinations included a larger number of candidate barcodes (Tables <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM19">S6</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM20">S7</xref>). No species group was found for the combination of the seven barcoding markers when the genetic distance-based method was performed (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>). The highest species identification rates of the genetic distance-, BLAST- and tree-based methods were 17.14% with a three-marker combination (<italic>mat</italic>K-<italic>trn</italic>K &#x0002B; <italic>ycf</italic>3-<italic>trn</italic>S &#x0002B; ITS), 45.45% using the combination of <italic>mat</italic>K &#x0002B; <italic>ycf</italic>1 &#x0002B; SAP, and 30.30% with six combined candidates of <italic>psb</italic>A-<italic>trn</italic>H &#x0002B; <italic>mat</italic>K-<italic>trn</italic>K &#x0002B; <italic>ycf</italic>3-<italic>trn</italic>S &#x0002B; <italic>ycf</italic>1 &#x0002B; ITS &#x0002B; SAP, respectively.</p>
<p>Along with the DNA barcoding aspects, the NJ trees generated were also used to test the five morphology-based sections Quercus, Aegilops, Heterobalanus, Engleriana, and Echinolepides, and the phylogenetic hypothesis of Groups <italic>Quercus, Cerris</italic> and <italic>Ilex</italic> for the Chinese oaks of subg. <italic>Quercus</italic>. The NJ tree with the highest species discrimination was shown in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>. Ten of 33 Chinese oak species (<italic>Quercus monimotricha</italic> and <italic>Quercus senescens</italic> were not counted due only one sample of each in the analyses) were identified: two species in morphology-based Section Aegilops, two in Heterobalanus, five species in Engleriana, and one in Echinolepides. No monophyletic species clade was found in Section Quercus. At the infrageneric level, the five morphology-based sections were not well resolved in the NJ tree: all the white oaks of Section Quercus formed a distinct group; the three deciduous oak species from Aegilops also clustered together as a monophyletic group, and showed close relationship with the remaining evergreen oaks; while oaks of Sections Heterobalanus, Engleriana, and Echinolepides were mixed and formed multiple clades without clear section boundaries. In contrast, a previous phylogenetic classification for subg. <italic>Quercus</italic> was highly confirmed that individuals of the 35 Chinese oak species basically formed three major clades, corresponding to the phylogenetic Groups <italic>Quercus, Cerris</italic>, and <italic>Ilex</italic>. The NJ trees generated from four single barcodes (<italic>psb</italic>A-<italic>trn</italic>H, <italic>mat</italic>K-<italic>trn</italic>K, ITS, and SAP), the combinations of the five cpDNA barcodes and of two nuclear genes, as well as the combination of seven candidate loci showed similar phylogenetic patterns to the best species identification tree based on six barcodes (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>), while for the NJ trees of the <italic>ycf</italic>3-<italic>trn</italic>S, <italic>mat</italic>K, and <italic>ycf</italic>1 regions, species of the three major groups were mixed without distinct boundaries except that the Group <italic>Cerris</italic> was identified by the <italic>ycf</italic>1 region (Figures <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM4">S4</xref>&#x02013;<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM13">S13</xref>). The morphology-based Section Heterobalanus was only supported by a NJ tree using the combination of ITS and SAP (Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM12">S12</xref>), however, support for this monophyletic clade was low (Bootstrap probability &#x0003D; 58).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p><bold>NJ tree of the highest species identification rate with the combination of <italic><bold>psb</bold></italic>A-<italic><bold>trn</bold></italic>H &#x0002B; <italic><bold>mat</bold></italic>K-<italic><bold>trn</bold></italic>K &#x0002B; <italic><bold>ycf</bold></italic>3-<italic><bold>trn</bold></italic>S &#x0002B; <italic><bold>ycf</bold></italic>1 &#x0002B; ITS &#x0002B; SAP shows the phylogenetic implications for the Chinese oak species of <italic><bold>Quercus</bold></italic> subgenus <italic><bold>Quercus</bold></italic></bold>. Gray dots highlight the individuals of identified oak species.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00816-g0003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec>
<title>Development of universal cpDNA markers for the Chinese oak species</title>
<p>The Chinese oak species in subg. <italic>Quercus</italic> show complex distribution patterns from the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau to south and north China (Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">1985</xref>; Zhou, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B97">1993</xref>), possibly reflecting complex population dynamics among species, as the past climatic and geographical impacts in different regions of China are considered heterogeneous (Harrison et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2001</xref>; Qiu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">2011</xref>). However, relatively few phylogeographic and phylogenetic studies have been performed for the Chinese oak species, probably due to the ambiguous species boundaries and low universality and genetic variation of current molecular markers. To overcome these limitations, the chloroplast genomes of <italic>Q. rubra</italic> and <italic>C. mollissima</italic> were compared to develop universal cpDNA markers. Two reasons were considered for this comparison: (1) among the complete and available Fagaceae genomes, these two species are closely related taxa. Further, previous comparative genomic analysis, as well as phylogenetic investigations, have shown that oaks are more closely related to chestnuts than to other taxa in Fagaceae (Manos and Steele, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">1997</xref>; Kremer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">2012</xref>); (2) our recent comparative work on the chloroplast genomes of five Chinese oak species indicates highly conserved identity of sequences across these oak genomes, suggesting limited genetic variation at low taxonomic levels (Yang Y. C. et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">2016</xref>). The universal plastid markers developed in this study are envisioned to provide useful tools for phylogenetic, biodiversity and population studies of oak species, as well as for other genera in the Fagaceae.</p>
<p>In this study, 14 deciduous oak species with multiple samples per species were used to test the designed cpDNA markers rather than screening them with pairs of species (Shaw et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">2007</xref>). Most of the designed cpDNA markers can be amplified across the 14 oaks, suggesting superior universality of these primer pairs for the Chinese oaks (Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref> and Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM15">S2</xref>). After screening on the 14 deciduous oaks, we suggested 12 plastid regions generating high intraspecific diversity that could be useful for phylogeographic and population genetic studies. As expected, most of the 12 chloroplast markers amplify intergenic spacers (Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM3">S3</xref>), supporting the intergenic regions accumulate more intraspecific polymorphism than the codon regions in chloroplast genome (Shaw et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">2007</xref>; Yang Y. C. et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">2016</xref>). Additionally, two pairs of primers (R1 and R7) exhibiting high DIPs by introducing indels in individual sequences may provide additional genetic information for evolutionary processes of oak species having slow evolutionary rates (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>). For selection of candidate cpDNA barcodes, nine primer pairs having discriminatory potentials were chosen based on the results of the 14 deciduous oak species examined. Despite the limited species identification of each candidate (Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM17">S4</xref>), five of them (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>) were chosen for testing DNA barcoding in 35 Chinese oak species. Evaluation of the five plastid candidates and two additional nuclear genes tested on the 35 Chinese oak species are discussed below.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Evaluation of candidate DNA barcodes for the Chinese oaks</title>
<p>An efficient DNA barcode is expected to have highly universal primer pair as well as high interspecific variation, and to provide steady species-specific characters that allow species identity (Erickson et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2008</xref>; Hollingsworth et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2011</xref>; Naciri et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">2012</xref>). The five candidate cpDNA barcodes selected in this study, as well as the two newly designed nuclear genes (ITS and SAP), showed relatively high universal coverage of the 35 Chinese oak species at the species and individual levels (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref>), while their identification powers were variable across the Chinese oaks under different barcoding methods (Tables <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM19">S6</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM20">S7</xref>).</p>
<p>Of the seven candidate barcodes, ITS and <italic>psb</italic>A-<italic>trn</italic>H provided the highest species resolution (both 30.30%) using the character- and the BLAST-based method, respectively. The ITS region was proposed as one of the core and powerful barcodes for seed plants (China Plant BOL Group, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2011</xref>), and its utility has also been supported in several barcoding studies (Liu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">2011</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">2014</xref>; Muellner et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">2011</xref>; Pang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">2011</xref>; Zhang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">2012</xref>; Chen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2014</xref>; Zhang J. Q. et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B93">2015</xref>). In a barcoding study of Euro-Mediterranean oaks, ITS2 increased the species resolution when combined with two plastid barcoding loci (Simeone et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">2013</xref>); however, by itself, the ITS region showed no species identification when the genetic distance method was applied. Similarly, a barcoding study of <italic>Rhododendron</italic>, using ITS, showed low species resolution; this aspect could be attributed to recent radiative speciation, hybridization and introgression (Yan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">2015</xref>). The contrast performance of ITS in species identification of the 35 Chinese oaks between the character- and genetic distance-based analyses can be induced by technical difference of methods between these two barcoding approaches, as the rapid evolution rate of ITS could accumulate high intra- and inter-specific mutations, concealing interspecific genetic divergence among species; conversely, the character-based method synthesizes a set of diagnostic positions to distinguish species but ignores uninformative sites in the sequences (Bertolazzi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">2009</xref>), which may reduce the impact of intraspecific genetic variations. Obviously, with the character-based method, species identification rates of the Chinese oaks were increased when the ITS region was combined with other candidate barcodes (Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM20">S7</xref>), supporting the utility of this region as an efficient barcode in plants.</p>
<p>As a single-copy gene, the SAP region was used to test the potential of low-copy nuclear loci as suitable barcodes for <italic>Quercus</italic>. Although there were amplification failures on some samples, the SAP gene showed 100% amplification success at the species level (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref>). However, the SAP gene showed relatively low rate of species identification among the seven candidate barcodes (i.e., 2.86% in the genetic distance-based method and 18.18% using the BLAST-based method). Most combinations between the SAP gene and the remaining candidates provided inconspicuous promotions on the species discrimination rate except when the ITS region was joined (Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM20">S7</xref>). The limited nucleotide variation and parsimonious informative sites of the functional SAP gene (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>), which yield low interspecific differentiations among closely related oak species, account for its poor species identification rate. Interestingly, despite the frustrating rate of species identification for the SAP gene, individuals of a widespread deciduous oak, <italic>Q. acutissima</italic>, seem to be well differentiated from two closely related species (<italic>Q. variabilis</italic> &#x0002B; <italic>Quercus chenii</italic>) (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>, Figures <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM10">S10</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM12">S12</xref>). One stable transition (in <italic>Q. acutissima</italic>) was found between <italic>Q. acutissima</italic> and <italic>Q. variabilis</italic> &#x0002B; <italic>Q. chenii</italic> in the alignment of SAP, which may induce potential differentiation of the stress-associated protein function encoded by this gene (Vij and Tyagi, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">2006</xref>), and foster ecological differentiation among sympatric oaks (Cavender-Bares et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">2015</xref>), particularly between the two widespread species <italic>Q. acutissima</italic> and <italic>Q. variabilis</italic>. However, given that only a few samples of the three closely related oaks were included in this study, the assumption that the SAP gene is likely a &#x0201C;speciation gene&#x0201D; (Wu, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">2001</xref>) bears further verification with the study of a larger number of individuals and a functional proteomics approach.</p>
<p>Of the five plastid candidate barcodes, the <italic>psb</italic>A-<italic>trn</italic>H region showed the highest species resolution (30.30%) using the BLAST-based method. Due to its high level of sequence divergence and species identification rate, the non-coding <italic>psb</italic>A-<italic>trn</italic>H region has been suggested as a robust DNA barcode for plants (Kress et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">2005</xref>; Hollingsworth et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2011</xref>; Taylor and Harris, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">2012</xref>), and has been supported in several studies (Liu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">2014</xref>; Yan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">2015</xref>; Zhang J. Q. et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B93">2015</xref>). In this study, the <italic>psb</italic>A-<italic>trn</italic>H region showed the highest number of informative sites, as well as diagnostic indels compared to the rest of plastid barcode candidates (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>). Additionally, the proposed problematic ambiguous inversions within <italic>psb</italic>A-<italic>trn</italic>H region encountered in some Euro-Mediterranean oaks (Simeone et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">2013</xref>) was not found among the Chinese oak species, suggesting this region as a suitable core DNA barcode for <italic>Quercus</italic>. The <italic>ycf</italic>1 region is functional and exists in all Chinese oak species tested in this study, and showed the highest species resolution (14.29%) when the tree-based method was considered. This cpDNA region also provided considerable species discrimination rates compared to the <italic>psb</italic>A-<italic>trn</italic>H region using the other three methods, supporting that this locus should be included as a marker for barcoding analyses at low taxonomic levels (Neubig et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">2009</xref>; Dong et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2012</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2015</xref>). However, given the high variation of the <italic>ycf</italic>1 gene that was verified in some angiosperm taxa (Dong et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2015</xref>), universality of the newly designed <italic>ycf</italic>1 region in this study bears further verification in other seed plants. The <italic>mat</italic>K-<italic>trn</italic>K region showed higher species resolution rates than <italic>mat</italic>K among most of the four barcoding methods, probably due to higher sequence variation in the intergenic region of <italic>mat</italic>K-<italic>trn</italic>K compared to the coding region of <italic>mat</italic>K. Thus, although these two regions are adjacent to each other (Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM3">S3</xref>), it seems better to use the <italic>mat</italic>K-<italic>trn</italic>K region for barcoding <italic>Quercus</italic> than <italic>mat</italic>K. The <italic>ycf</italic>3-<italic>trn</italic>S had the lowest sequence variation (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>) and showed relatively low species differentiation among the five plastid candidates. Combinations of the <italic>ycf</italic>3-<italic>trn</italic>S region with other candidate barcodes provided very little or no improvement of species resolution for the Chinese oak species, suggesting that this region could be omitted from barcoding studies in <italic>Quercus</italic>.</p>
<p>Overall, the seven barcode candidates show low rates of species identification among the 35 Chinese oaks when analyzed individually. Nevertheless, the combinations of DNA barcodes improved species discrimination, and provided varying species resolution with different barcoding methods (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>; Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM19">S6</xref>). The highest species discrimination rate (84.85%) was found using the combination of <italic>psb</italic>A-<italic>trn</italic>H &#x0002B; <italic>mat</italic>K-<italic>trn</italic>K &#x0002B; <italic>mat</italic>K &#x0002B; <italic>ycf</italic>1 &#x0002B; ITS &#x0002B; SAP with the character-based method, which is the same as the result obtained with the combination of all seven candidates (Tables <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM19">S6</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM20">S7</xref>), and possibly acts as the best choice for barcoding the Chinese oaks. However, given the different performances among the four barcoding methods tested, choosing a suitable barcoding method is also crucial for barcoding analyses (Yan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">2015</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Comparison of different analytical methods for barcoding the Chinese oaks</title>
<p>Among the four analytical methods, the character-based method provided the highest species resolution when individual barcode candidate and all of their combinations were used. Conversely, the genetic distance-based method showed the lowest rates of species identification, particularly with the combination of all the seven candidates, which assigned no species groups to the 35 Chinese oaks. The BLAST-based method exhibited higher species discrimination than the tree-based method, but was lower than the character-based approach (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>; Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM19">S6</xref>). The different performances of the four methods used in this study possibly reflect the variant analytical theories of the approaches implemented: the character-based method identifies potential distinctive nucleotide positions from DNA barcode sequences (the reference database) and assigns species using logic formulas based on the species-specific (diagnostic) codes (Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM21">S8</xref>), which is suggested to be efficient and precise (van Velzen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">2012</xref>; Weitschek et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">2013</xref>). Our results strongly support the highly discriminate capacity (84.85%) of this method, even when tested in <italic>Quercus</italic>, which is widely known as a taxonomically problematic group (Dumolin-Lapegue et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">1999</xref>; Aldrich and Cavender-Bares, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">2011</xref>). In addition, the highest species identification rate obtained with this approach is comparable to the average rate of successful species discrimination (70%) found in land plants (Ran et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">2010</xref>; Hollingsworth et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2011</xref>), and also shows considerable ability of species identification compared with some previous researches in species-rich and recently divergent plant lineages using multiple DNA barcodes (Ran et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">2010</xref>; Zhang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">2012</xref>; Simeone et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">2013</xref>; Liu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">2014</xref>; Zhang J. Q. et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B93">2015</xref>). However, caution should be taken as it is hard to provide a reliable/idealistic DNA barcoding reference containing specimens with <italic>a priori</italic> known species when not all the individuals of a species are tested against the putative barcode. Besides, the evolutionary processes of a species, such as local adaptation and hybridization, may obscure species identification by introducing negative mutations to the diagnostic sites in short DNA barcodes. Therefore, rather than indicating the species identification rate among the Chinese oaks, the character-based method may suggest possibilities of the barcode candidates that act as DNA barcodes to the oak species with those samples involved in this study, and bear further verification with additional individuals from unsampled areas. The BLAST-based method calculates the similarity of sequences with the assumption that conspecific individuals will be more similar to each other than to any other species (van Velzen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">2012</xref>). This method also yields higher identification rates than the distance- and tree-based methods as documented in several barcoding studies (Hassel et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2013</xref>; Chen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2014</xref>; Yan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">2015</xref>). The tree-based approach is a bottom-up clustering algorithm that forms a single tree based on genetic distance matrix; however, the result could be affected by the distance algorithm used for tree construction (Yan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">2015</xref>), and by the incomplete lineage sorting effects among recently diverged species (Simeone et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">2013</xref>). The (genetic distance-based) ABGD analysis has been proposed as a method sensitive to the presence of recent speciation events; in this method, species delimitation is based on the partition of intra- and inter-specific genetic distances of species datasets (Puillandre et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">2012</xref>). However, in our study, application of this method seems impractical for barcoding the Chinese oak species given that the intra- and inter-specific genetic distances of the seven barcode candidates largely overlap (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>; Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM18">S5</xref>). Moreover, as it was concluded in a DNA barcoding test on Euro-Mediterranean oaks by Simeone et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">2013</xref>), an increased sampling may lead to a continuum of overlapping genetic distances among closely related species, thus discouraging the successful species identification based on the genetic distance approach. The lack of a barcode gap among congeners was also observed for the Italian oak species, a probable consequence of low variation rate, frequent interspecific hybridization, and the complex incidence of biogeography of some sympatric species (Piredda et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">2011</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Phylogenetic implications for the Chinese oak species</title>
<p>Despite the overall poor performance of DNA barcoding for the Chinese oak species, the (NJ) tree-based results provided considerable insights into phylogenetic relationships of the Chinese oaks in subg. <italic>Quercus</italic>. The NJ tree with the highest species discrimination (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>) largely confirms the traditionally recognized <italic>Quercus</italic> infrageneric Groups <italic>Quercus, Cerris</italic>, and <italic>Ilex</italic> (Denk and Grimm, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2009</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2010</xref>; Denk and Tekleva, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">2014</xref>; Hubert et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2014</xref>). This infrageneric framework is also supported by the NJ trees generated with two cpDNA barcode candidates (<italic>psb</italic>A-<italic>trn</italic>H and <italic>mat</italic>K-<italic>trn</italic>K) (Figures <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM4">S4</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM5">S5</xref>) and two nuclear genes (ITS and SAP) (Figures <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM9">S9</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM10">S10</xref>) respectively. While for the three remaining cpDNA barcodes, the NJ trees indicated unclear boundaries among the three major groups of subg. <italic>Quercus</italic> (Figures <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM6">S6</xref>&#x02013;<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM8">S8</xref>), probably due to a lower mutation rate and less genetic information of these cpDNA markers obtained among the Chinese oaks when compared with that of the intergenic <italic>psb</italic>A-<italic>trn</italic>H and <italic>mat</italic>K-<italic>trn</italic>K regions and the two nuclear genes (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>). In contrast, the five morphology-based sections (Zhou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B94">1995</xref>; Pu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">2002</xref>; Peng et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">2007</xref>) are controversial. Oak species of the Group <italic>Quercus</italic> (morphology-based Section Quercus) are clearly distinct from the clade comprising oaks of Groups <italic>Cerris</italic> and <italic>Ilex</italic>, strongly supporting a scenario of two possible originations (the New World and Old World Oaks) of <italic>Quercus</italic> that was previously identified with phylogenetic classification (Oh and Manos, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">2008</xref>; Denk and Grimm, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2009</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2010</xref>; Denk and Tekleva, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">2014</xref>; Hubert et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2014</xref>). In China, the three deciduous East Asian species of Group <italic>Cerris</italic> (morphology-based Section Aegilops) are strongly supported forming a monophyletic clade in contrast to the shared &#x0201C;<italic>Cerris</italic>-<italic>Ilex</italic>&#x0201D; haplotype scenario found in some Eurasian oaks (Denk and Grimm, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2010</xref>; Hubert et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2014</xref>; Simeone et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">2016</xref>). Pollen morphology of the three cerriod oaks in East Asia (<italic>Q. acutissima, Q. variabilis</italic>, and <italic>Q. chenii</italic>) is different from the evergreen oaks of Group <italic>Ilex</italic> in China (Cao and Zhou, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2002</xref>), thus suggesting possible reproductive isolation between the cerriod and ilicoid oaks in China. However, although the hybrid formations are considered to be highly frequent among closely related species within a section/group, hybridization and gene flow between oak species from Groups <italic>Cerris</italic> and <italic>Ilex</italic> were found in Europe, such as hybridization between <italic>Quercus suber</italic> and <italic>Q. ilex</italic>, which may reflect enigmatic species evolutionary history of the two major Old World clades (Groups <italic>Cerris</italic> and <italic>Ilex</italic>) linked with complex incidence of geographical effects during different periods in Europe (Aldrich and Cavender-Bares, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">2011</xref>; Hubert et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2014</xref>; Simeone et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">2016</xref>). Within Group <italic>Ilex</italic>, species of the morphological Sections Heterbalanus, Engleriana, and Echinolepides are mixed and form multiple clades without clear boundaries in the NJ trees (i.e., Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref> and Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM13">S13</xref>), albeit the oaks among the three morphology-based sections show distinct morphological differences in foliage and acorn cupule patterns (Pu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">2002</xref>; Peng et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">2007</xref>). Previous phylogenetic studies on Eurasian oaks involving a fraction of these evergreen Asian species indicated similar patterns, highlighting the incongruence between morphology and phylogenetic relationships in <italic>Quercus</italic> (Denk and Grimm, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2010</xref>; Simeone et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">2016</xref>). Prior morphological and phylogenetic studies have provided evidences that Section Heterobalanus is an expanded/natural group within Group <italic>Ilex</italic> (Zhou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B94">1995</xref>; Manos et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">2001</xref>; Deng et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2017</xref>); however, a morphologically distinct species (<italic>Quercus engleriana</italic>) was found to be paraphyletic within the Heterobalanus clade in that phylogeny (Manos et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">2001</xref>), and our phylogenetic implications of NJ trees also rejected the monophyly of Section Heterobalanus (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref> and Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM13">S13</xref>) except for a NJ tree using the combination of ITS and SAP (Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM12">S12</xref>), which slightly supported the Heterobalanus subclade (BP &#x0003D; 58) within Group <italic>Ilex</italic>. The sclerophyllous alpine oaks in Section Heterobalanus are largely sympatric and mainly concentrated in the Hengduan Mountains and adjacent alpine regions in east of the Himalayas, where they chiefly occur above 2000 m (Yang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">2009</xref>). Specific morphological characteristics of the alpine oak species in Section Heterobalanus, such as dense hairs, thick cuticles and lignified epidermal cell walls, are believed to be initiated by the cold and dry conditions of the Hengduan Mountains since the Miocene to Pliocene (Zhou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B95">2003</xref>), suggesting potential ecological niche shift of these alpine oaks to the intense orographic and climatic turbulence around the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. The hypothesis of the subclade Heterobalanus within Group <italic>Ilex</italic> based on two combined nuclear genes in this study also indicates that nuclear genes may provide more efficient phylogenetic signals than chloroplast genes having low mutation rate in recently divergent lineages. However, given the limited molecular markers and phylogenetic methodology used in the DNA barcoding test, the monophyly of Section Heterobalanus in Group <italic>Ilex</italic> still needs further verification with more functional nuclear genes. In summary, the lack of clear boundaries of the three evergreen morphological sections in Group <italic>Ilex</italic> can be explained by incomplete lineage sorting and/or gene introgression between closely related species (Manos et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">2001</xref>; Denk and Grimm, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2010</xref>), as well as by limited genetic information revealed in current phylogeny, which requires further phylogenetic evidences using more comprehensive genomic coverage.</p>
<p>At the species level, the NJ tree with the highest discrimination rate identified 10 Chinese oak species in subg. <italic>Quercus</italic>, most of which are evergreen oaks in the <italic>Ilex</italic> group, while no species resolution was found among Chinese white oaks (Group <italic>Quercus</italic>) (Figures <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM3">3</xref> and Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM13">S13</xref>). The identified evergreen species, for example <italic>Quercus franchetii, Quercus acrodonta, Quercus cocciferoides</italic> and <italic>Q. engleriana</italic>, are highly diverse in morphology and karyotype (Cao and Zhou, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2000</xref>), and evolved early according to fossil data (Zhou, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B97">1993</xref>). Additionally, these oaks are endemic and allopatric, suggesting long-time isolation due geographical barriers among these species, which may have enhanced genetic and morphological differentiation during species evolution. This aspect is also found among the European oak species of Group <italic>Ilex</italic>, which showed conspicuous plastid diversity, reflecting complex geographical history and growing geographic isolation among members of this clade (Simeone et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">2016</xref>). In contrast, some white oak species of Group <italic>Quercus</italic>, such as <italic>Q. aliena, Quercus fabri</italic>, and <italic>Quercus dentata</italic>, are widespread tree species across south China (Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">1985</xref>). Adaptive divergence to different ecological niches due extensive distribution could explain the species identification failure for this group. Additionally, fossil evidences and previous researches suggested recently radiative diversification of the closely related species involved in Group <italic>Quercus</italic> (Zhou, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B96">1992</xref>; Hubert et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2014</xref>; Yang J. et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">2016</xref>), which possibly indicates incomplete lineage sorting and shared ancestral polymorphism among these deciduous oak species. Moreover, according to the <italic>flora of China</italic>, flowering time of these white oaks highly overlaps from March to May, suggesting that frequent interspecific hybridization may occur among recently diverged species, thus eroding species coherence in this group. The latter explanation, as well as introgression, incomplete lineage sorting and reticulation (Simeone et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">2013</xref>), have also been suggested as potential processes that complicate species identification of the morphology-based Section Heterobalanus (if it exists), which comprises 8&#x02013;11 alpine sclerophyllous oaks that mainly happen in the Hengduan Mountains (Yang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">2009</xref>) and show identical florescence covering May and June.</p>
<p>Overall, the NJ results of the DNA barcoding analyses in this study highlighted the phylogenetic relationship and evolutionary significance of the Chinese oak species in subg. <italic>Quercus</italic>, and provided additional taxonomic patterns for the diverse oak lineage. However, considering the few DNA barcode candidates and a simple genetic distance method (p-distance) used for constructing NJ trees in our DNA barcoding analyses without regarding any evolutionary model and compatibility among these barcode candidates, the phylogenetic implications obtained from the NJ results in this study may be insufficient compared with that of a specific phylogenetic research, which warrant particular investigations using comprehensive samplings and analytical methods, as well as with more efficient genetic information covering the genomic level (Zhang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">2012</xref>; Simeone et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">2013</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="s5">
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>In this study, a comparative analysis on two chloroplast genomes (<italic>Q. rubra</italic> and <italic>C. mollissima</italic>) in Fagaceae was adopted to explore potential universal cpDNA markers for <italic>Quercus</italic>. After laborious screening on a subset of 14 deciduous Chinese oaks, 14 primer pairs revealing high intraspecific genetic diversity in most of the species dataset were selected for phylogeographic studies, while nine plastid regions exhibiting species discriminate potentials were retained for barcoding <italic>Quercus</italic>. Five of the nine plastid candidate barcodes, with additions of the proposed ITS region and a single-copy nuclear gene (SAP) were then used to test their discriminatory power employing four different barcoding methods for 35 Chinese oak species. Among the seven barcode candidates, the ITS and <italic>psb</italic>A-<italic>trn</italic>H regions provided the highest species resolution (30.30%) using the character- and BLAST-based method, respectively, and were recommended as core DNA barcodes for <italic>Quercus</italic>. The highest species discrimination rate (84.85%) was found using the combination of <italic>psb</italic>A-<italic>trn</italic>H &#x0002B; <italic>mat</italic>K-<italic>trn</italic>K &#x0002B; <italic>mat</italic>K &#x0002B; <italic>ycf</italic>1 &#x0002B; ITS &#x0002B; SAP with the character-based method, which seems to be the best choice for barcoding the Chinese oaks. The character-based method showed the best potential for species identification among the four barcoding methods, which is supported as an efficient tool for barcoding lineages having recently diverged species. The DNA barcoding results also provided phylogenetic implications for the framework of the Chinese oak species which has yet been assessed, supporting the phylogenetic classification of three major groups <italic>Quercus, Cerris</italic> and <italic>Ilex</italic>; however, the previously recognized five morphology-based sections proposed for the Chinese oaks are not well recovered. Some factors, such as low evolutionary rate of the plastid genome, interspecific hybridization and introgression, and incomplete lineage sorting, are likely to affect the phylogenetic signal in Chinese oaks and lead to intractable species identification based on different barcoding methods.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>JY and GZ designed the research. JY, XC and HL performed the experiments. JY, XC, HL, and HZ contributed materials and data analysis. JY and LV wrote the paper. LV, ZL and GZ revised the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
<sec>
<title>Conflict of interest statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack><p>We thank the two reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions for improving the manuscript. We are grateful to all collectors listed in Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM14">S1</xref> for their assistance on sample collections. This work was financially supported by the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (No. IRT1174).</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s7">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2017.00816/full#supplementary-material">http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2017.00816/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image1.PDF" id="SM1" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Figure S1</label>
<caption><p><bold>Annotation of the complete chloroplast genome of <italic>Quercus rubra</italic></bold>. Inner circle indicates inferred structures of a complete chloroplast genome. Black boxes on the outer circle represent the selected regions for primer design.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image2.PDF" id="SM2" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Figure S2</label>
<caption><p><bold>Estimation of mean intraspecific diversity (&#x003C0;) for 12 selected cpDNA markers (in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>) based on a subset of 14 Chinese oak species from morphology-based Sections Quercus and Aegilops</bold>. Box plots represent 95% confidence intervals and solid lines in the box plots indicate mean diversity values. Black dots indicate outlying values.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image3.PDF" id="SM3" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Figure S3</label>
<caption><p><bold>Priming sites of the 17 selected cpDNA markers (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>) in chloroplast genome of <italic>Quercus rubra</italic></bold>. White boxes indicate relative coding positions of chloroplast genes for primer design and gene names are displayed above. Black and gray lines indicate intergenic spacer and intron region, respectively. Numbers above the lines show the intergenic spacer and intron length (bp). Marker IDs are displayed in bold.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image4.PDF" id="SM4" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Figure S4</label>
<caption><p><bold>NJ tree of the single barcode candidate <italic>psb</italic>A-<italic>trn</italic>H region for the Chinese oak species in <italic>Quercus</italic> subgenus <italic>Quercus</italic></bold>.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image5.PDF" id="SM5" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Figure S5</label>
<caption><p><bold>NJ tree of the single barcode candidate <italic>mat</italic>K-<italic>trn</italic>K region for the Chinese oak species in <italic>Quercus</italic> subgenus <italic>Quercus</italic></bold>.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image6.PDF" id="SM6" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Figure S6</label>
<caption><p><bold>NJ tree of the single barcode candidate <italic>ycf</italic>3-<italic>trn</italic>S region for the Chinese oak species in <italic>Quercus</italic> subgenus <italic>Quercus</italic></bold>.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image7.PDF" id="SM7" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Figure S7</label>
<caption><p><bold>NJ tree of the single barcode candidate <italic>mat</italic>K region for the Chinese oak species in <italic>Quercus</italic> subgenus <italic>Quercus</italic></bold>.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image8.PDF" id="SM8" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Figure S8</label>
<caption><p><bold>NJ tree of the single barcode candidate <italic>ycf</italic>1 region for the Chinese oak species in <italic>Quercus</italic> subgenus <italic>Quercus</italic></bold>.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image9.PDF" id="SM9" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Figure S9</label>
<caption><p><bold>NJ tree of the single barcode ITS region for the Chinese oak species in <italic>Quercus</italic> subgenus <italic>Quercus</italic></bold>.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image10.PDF" id="SM10" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Figure S10</label>
<caption><p><bold>NJ tree of the single-copy nuclear gene (SAP) for the Chinese oak species in <italic>Quercus</italic> subgenus <italic>Quercus</italic> highlights the species discrimination of <italic>Quercus acutissima</italic> from <italic>Quercus variabilis</italic> &#x0002B; <italic>Quercus chenii</italic> in Group <italic>Cerris</italic></bold>.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image11.PDF" id="SM11" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Figure S11</label>
<caption><p><bold>NJ tree based on the combination of five cpDNA barcode candidates for the Chinese oak species in <italic>Quercus</italic> subgenus <italic>Quercus</italic></bold>.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image12.PDF" id="SM12" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Figure S12</label>
<caption><p><bold>NJ tree based on the combination of two nuclear genes for the Chinese oak species in <italic>Quercus</italic> subgenus <italic>Quercus</italic> highlights the species discrimination of <italic>Quercus acutissima</italic> from <italic>Quercus variabilis</italic> &#x0002B; <italic>Quercus chenii</italic> in Group <italic>Cerris</italic> and shows the monophyletic subclade of Section Heterobalanus in Group <italic>Ilex</italic></bold>.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image13.PDF" id="SM13" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Figure S13</label>
<caption><p><bold>NJ tree of the combination with all seven candidate barcodes shows the phylogenetic implications for the Chinese oak species in <italic>Quercus</italic> subgenus <italic>Quercus</italic></bold>. Gray dots highlight the individuals of identified oak species.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table1.DOCX" id="SM14" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Table S1</label>
<caption><p><bold>Information of voucher specimens of the 35 Chinese oak species in <italic>Quercus</italic> subgenus <italic>Quercus</italic></bold>.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table2.DOCX" id="SM15" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Table S2</label>
<caption><p><bold>Information of 49 designed cpDNA markers based on the comparison of two chloroplast genomes of <italic>Quercus rubra</italic> and <italic>Castanea mollissima</italic></bold>.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table3.DOCX" id="SM16" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Table S3</label>
<caption><p><bold>Estimation of intraspecific genetic diversity (&#x003C0;) for 14 deciduous oak species of morphology-based Sections Quercus and Aegilops based on the designed cpDNA markers</bold>.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table4.DOCX" id="SM17" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Table S4</label>
<caption><p><bold>Estimation of genetic information and Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery (ABGD) results for nine candidate barcodes based on 14 Chinese oak species</bold>.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table5.DOCX" id="SM18" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Table S5</label>
<caption><p><bold>Differentiation tests between the minimum interspecific and maximum intraspecific genetic distance (p-distance) for each barcode candidate and section</bold>.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table6.DOCX" id="SM19" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Table S6</label>
<caption><p><bold>Estimation of the highest species discrimination rates for four barcoding methods based on single and all possible barcode combinations</bold>.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table7.DOCX" id="SM20" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Table S7</label>
<caption><p><bold>Species resolution of seven single barcodes and all their possible combinations for the Chinese oaks based on four barcoding methods</bold>.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table8.XLSX" id="SM21" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Table S8</label>
<caption><p><bold>The minimum cost logic formula (diagnostic nucleotide) of the highest species identification using six barcode candidates (psbA-trnH &#x0002B; matK-trnK &#x0002B; matK &#x0002B; ycf1 &#x0002B; ITS &#x0002B; SAP) for the Chinese oaks</bold>.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet1.DOCX" id="SM22" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Note S1</label>
<caption><p><bold>Detailed methods for data filtering of the ITS sequence</bold>.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aldrich</surname> <given-names>P. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cavender-Bares</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Chapter 6 Quercus</article-title>, in <source>Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources, Forest Trees</source>, ed <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Kole</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Clemson</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>89</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>129</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alexander</surname> <given-names>L. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Woeste</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Pyrosequencing of the northern red oak (<italic>Quercus rubra</italic> L.) chloroplast genome reveals high quality polymorphisms for population management</article-title>. <source>Tree Genet. Genomes</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>803</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>812</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11295-013-0681-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bertolazzi</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Felici</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weitschek</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Learning to classify species with barcodes</article-title>. <source>BMC Bioinformatics</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>S7</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2105-10-S14-S7</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19900303</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Borkowski</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McCleary</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McAllister</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Severson</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Primers for 52 polymorphic regions in the <italic>Quercus rubra</italic> chloroplast, 47 of which amplify across 11 tracheophyte clades</article-title>. <source>Tree Genet. Genomes</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>885</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>893</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11295-014-0729-x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Breen</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Murray</surname> <given-names>D. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olson</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Genetic consequences of glacial survival: the late Quaternary history of balsam poplar (<italic>Populus balsamifera</italic> L.) in North America</article-title>. <source>J. Biogeogr.</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>918</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>928</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02657.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Camacho</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coulouris</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Avagyan</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Papadopoulos</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>BLAST&#x0002B;: architecture and applications</article-title>. <source>BMC Bioinformatics</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>421</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2105-10-421</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20003500</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>A karyotype analysis of 9 species of the <italic>Quercus</italic> from China</article-title>. <source>Guihaia</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>341</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>345</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3969/j.issn.1000-3142.2000.04.012</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Pollen morphology and its systematic significance of the <italic>Quercus</italic> from China</article-title>. <source>Guihaia</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>14</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>18</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0161762</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cavender-Bares</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gonzalez-Rodriguez</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pahlich</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koehler</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deacon</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Phylogeography and climatic niche evolution in live oaks (<italic>Quercus</italic> series <italic>Virentes</italic>) from the tropics to the temperate zone</article-title>. <source>J. Biogeogr.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>962</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>981</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02451.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cavender-Bares</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gonzalez-Rodriguez</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eaton</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hipp</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beulke</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manos</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Phylogeny and biogeography of the American live oaks (<italic>Quercus</italic> subsection <italic>Virentes</italic>): a genomic and population genetics approach</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>3668</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3687</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/mec.13269</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26095958</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>CBOL Plant Working Group</collab></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>A DNA barcode for land plants</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>106</volume>, <fpage>12794</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>12797</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0905845106</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19666622</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chase</surname> <given-names>M. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salamin</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wilkinson</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dunwell</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kesanakurthi</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haidar</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Land plants and DNA barcodes: short-term and long-term goals</article-title>. <source>Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.</source> <volume>360</volume>, <fpage>1889</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1895</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rstb.2005.1720</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16214746</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chase</surname> <given-names>M. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cowan</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holllingsworth</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van den Berg</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Madrinan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petersen</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>A proposal for a standardised protocol to barcode all land plants</article-title>. <source>Taxon</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>295</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>299</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>H. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Phylogeography of <italic>Quercus variabilis</italic> based on chloroplast DNA sequence in East Asia: multiple glacial refugia and Mainland-migrated island populations</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>e47268</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0047268</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23115642</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Erickson</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kress</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Testing DNA barcodes in closely related species of <italic>Curcuma</italic> (Zingiberaceae) from Myanmar and China</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol. Resour.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>337</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>348</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1755-0998.12319</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25158042</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>China Plant BOL Group</collab></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Comparative analysis of a large dataset indicates that internal transcribed spacer (ITS) should be incorporated into the core barcode for seed plants</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>108</volume>, <fpage>19641</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>19646</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1104551108</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22100737</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Darling</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mau</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Perna</surname> <given-names>N. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>e11147</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0011147</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20593022</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Y. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coombes</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>Y. S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Leaf epidermal features of <italic>Quercus</italic> Group Ilex (Fagaceae) and their application to species identification</article-title>. <source>Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol.</source> <volume>237</volume>, <fpage>10</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>36</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.revpalbo.2016.11.006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Denk</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grimm</surname> <given-names>G. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Significance of pollen characteristics for infrageneric classification and phylogeny in <italic>Quercus</italic> (Fagaceae)</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>170</volume>, <fpage>926</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>940</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/600134</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Denk</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grimm</surname> <given-names>G. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>The oaks of western Eurasia: traditional classifications and evidence from two nuclear markers</article-title>. <source>Taxon</source> <volume>59</volume>, <fpage>351</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>366</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Denk</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tekleva</surname> <given-names>M. V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Pollen morphology and ultrastructure of <italic>Quercus</italic> with focus on Group Ilex (&#x0003D; <italic>Quercus</italic> subgenus Heterobalanus (Oerst.) Menitsky): impliations for oak systematics and evolution</article-title>. <source>Grana</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>255</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>282</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00173134.2014.918647</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>DeSalle</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Egan</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Siddall</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>The unholy trinity: taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding</article-title>. <source>Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.</source> <volume>360</volume>, <fpage>1905</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1916</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rstb.2005.1722</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16214748</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>W. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Highly variable chloroplast markers for evaluating plant phylogeny at low taxonomic levels and for DNA barcoding</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>e35071</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0035071</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22511980</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>W. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zuo</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title><italic>ycf</italic> 1, the most promising plastid DNA barcode of land plants</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>8348</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep08348</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25672218</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dumolin-Lapegue</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kremer</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petit</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Are chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA variation species independent in oaks?</article-title> <source>Evolution</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>1406</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1413</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/2640887</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Erickson</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Spouge</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Resch</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weigt</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kress</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>DNA barcoding in land plants: developing standards to quantify and maximize success</article-title>. <source>Taxon</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>1304</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1316</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19779570</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Q. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qian</surname> <given-names>Z. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Genetic structure and evolutionary history of three Alpine Sclerophyllous oaks in East Himalaya-Hengduan Mountains and adjacent regions</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>1688</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2016.01688</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27891142</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Greiner</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sobanski</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bock</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Why are most organelle genomes transmitted maternally?</article-title> <source>Bioessays</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>80</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>94</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/bies.201400110</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25302405</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grivet</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deguilloux</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petit</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sork</surname> <given-names>V. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Contrasting patterns of historical colonization in white oaks (<italic>Quercus</italic> spp.) in California and Europe</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>4085</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>4093</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03083.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17054504</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hall</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT</article-title>. <source>Nucleic. Acids Symp. Ser.</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>95</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>98</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11557970</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Harrison</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Takahara</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prentice</surname> <given-names>I. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Palaeovegetation. Diversity of temperate plants in east Asia</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>413</volume>, <fpage>129</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>130</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/35093166</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11557970</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hassel</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Segreto</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ekrem</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Restricted variation in plant barcoding markers limits identification in closely related bryophyte species</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol. Resour.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>1047</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1057</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1755-0998.12074</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23368628</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hebert</surname> <given-names>P. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ratnasingham</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Waard</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species</article-title>. <source>Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.</source> <volume>270</volume>, <fpage>s96</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>s99</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rsbl.2003.0025</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12952648</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hickerson</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carstens</surname> <given-names>B. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cavender-Bares</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crandall</surname> <given-names>K. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Graham</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Phylogeography&#x00027;s past, present, and future: 10 years after Avise, (2000)</article-title>. <source>Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.</source> <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>291</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>301</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ympev.2009.09.016</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19755165</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hollingsworth</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Graham</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Little</surname> <given-names>D. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Choosing and using a plant DNA barcode</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>e19254</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0019254</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21637336</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hubert</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grimm</surname> <given-names>G. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jousselin</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berry</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Franc</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kremer</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Multiple nuclear genes stabilize the phylogenetic backbone of the genus <italic>Quercus</italic></article-title>. <source>Syst. Biodivers.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>405</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>423</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/14772000.2014.941037</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jaen-Molina</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marrero-rodriguez</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reyes-Betancort</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Santos-Guerra</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Naranjo-Suarez</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Caujape-Castells</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Molecular taxonomic identification in the absence of a &#x02018;barcoding gap&#x02019;: a test with the endemic flora of the Canarian oceanic hotspot</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol. Resour.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>42</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>56</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1755-0998.12292</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24919404</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jansen</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saski</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hansen</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Daniell</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Complete plastid genome sequences of three Rosids (<italic>Castanea, Prunus, Theobroma</italic>): evidence for at least two independent transfers of <italic>rpl</italic>22 to the nucleus</article-title>. <source>Mol. Biol. Evol.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>835</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>847</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/molbev/msq261</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20935065</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kremer</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abbott</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carlson</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manos</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Plomion</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sisco</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Genomics of Fagaceae</article-title>. <source>Tree Genet. Genomes</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>583</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>610</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11295-012-0498-3</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kress</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Erickson</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding <italic>rbc</italic>L gene complements the non-coding <italic>trn</italic>H-<italic>psb</italic>A spacer region</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>2</volume>:<fpage>e508</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0000508</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17551588</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kress</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wurdack</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zimmer</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weigt</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Janzen</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>102</volume>, <fpage>8369</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>8374</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0503123102</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15928076</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Krishnamurthy</surname> <given-names>P. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Francis</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>A critical review on the utility of DNA barcoding in biodiversity conservation</article-title>. <source>Biodivers. Conserv.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>1901</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1919</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10531-012-0306-2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kurtz</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choudhuri</surname> <given-names>J. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ohlebusch</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schleiermacher</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stoye</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Giegerich</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>REPuter: the manifold applications of repeat analysis on a genomic scale</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>4633</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>4642</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/29.22.4633</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11713313</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>Y. X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Chloroplast phylogeography of a temperate tree <italic>Pteroceltis tatarinowii</italic> (Ulmaceae) in China</article-title>. <source>J. Syst. Evol.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>325</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>333</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1759-6831.2012.00203.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Henry</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rossetto</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Plant DNA barcoding: from gene to genome</article-title>. <source>Biol. Rev.</source> <volume>90</volume>, <fpage>157</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>166</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/brv.12104</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24666563</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moller</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>D. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>D. Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>DNA barcoding for the discrimination of Eurasian yews (<italic>Taxus</italic>, L., Taxaceae) and the discovery of cryptic species</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol. Resour.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>89</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>100</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02907.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21429104</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Y. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ge</surname> <given-names>X. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>Y. X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Phylogeographic studies of plants in China, Advances in the past and directions in the future</article-title>. <source>J. Syst. Evol.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>267</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>275</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1759-6831.2012.00214.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Identification of species in the angiosperm family Apiaceae using DNA barcodes</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol. Resour.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>1231</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1238</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1755-0998.12262</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24739357</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Effect of ITS pseudogene on the phylogenetic study of <italic>Quercus</italic> (Fagaceae) and its revelation on the plant molecular phylogenetics</article-title>. <source>Acta Bot. Yunnanica</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>127</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>132</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3969/j.issn.2095-0845.2006.02.007</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Magni</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ducousso</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Caron</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petit</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kremer</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Chloroplast DNA variation of <italic>Quercus rubra</italic> L. in North America and comparison with other Fagaceae</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>513</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>524</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02400.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15660942</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Manos</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Steele</surname> <given-names>K. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Phylogenetic analyses of &#x0201C;higher&#x0201D; hamamelididae based on plastid sequence data</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Bot.</source> <volume>84</volume>, <fpage>1407</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1419</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/2446139</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21708548</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Manos</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cannon</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Systematics of Fagaceae: phylogenetic tests of reprodective trait evolution</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>162</volume>, <fpage>1361</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1379</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/322949</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Menitsky</surname> <given-names>Y. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <source>Oaks of Asia</source>. <publisher-loc>Enfield, NH</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Science Publishers</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Muellner</surname> <given-names>A. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schaefer</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lahaye</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of candidate DNA barcoding loci for economically important timber species of the mahogany family (Meliaceae)</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol. Resour.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>450</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>460</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.02984.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21481203</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Naciri</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Caetano</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salamin</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Plant DNA barcodes and the influence of gene flow</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol. Resour.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>575</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>580</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03130.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22394382</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Neubig</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Whitten</surname> <given-names>W. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carlsward</surname> <given-names>B. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blanco</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Endara</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>N. H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Phylogenetic utility of <italic>ycf</italic> 1 in orchids: a plastid gene more variable than <italic>mat</italic>K</article-title>. <source>Plant Syst. Evol.</source> <volume>277</volume>, <fpage>75</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>84</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00606-008-0105-0</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nixon</surname> <given-names>K. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Infrageneric classification of Quercus (Fagaceae) and typification of sectional names</article-title>. <source>Ann. Sci. For.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>25s</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>34s</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1051/forest:19930701</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oh</surname> <given-names>S.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manos</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Molecular phylogenetics and cupule evolution in fagaceae as inferred from nuclear CRABS CLAW sequences</article-title>. <source>Taxon</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>434</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>451</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pang</surname> <given-names>X. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>H. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>L. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Applying plant DNA barcodes for Rosaceae species identification</article-title>. <source>Cladistics</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>165</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>170</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1096-0031.2010.00328.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>Y. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J. Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Study on numerical taxonomy of <italic>Quercus</italic>, L. (Fagaceae) in China</article-title>. <source>J. Wuhan Bot. Res.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>149</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>157</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3969/j.issn.2095-0837.2007.02.008</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Petit</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Csaikl</surname> <given-names>U. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bordacs</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Burg</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coart</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cottrell</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Chloroplast DNA variation in European white oaks: phylogeography and patterns of diversity based on data from over 2600 populations</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>156</volume>, <fpage>5</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>26</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0378-1127(01)00645-4</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Piredda</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Simeone</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Attimonelli</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bellarosa</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schirone</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Prospects of barcoding the Italian wild dendroflora: oaks reveal severe limitations to tracking species identity</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol. Resour.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>72</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>83</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02900.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21429102</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pu</surname> <given-names>C. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>A cladistic analysis of <italic>Quercus</italic> (Fagaceae) in China based on leaf epidermis and architecture</article-title>. <source>Acta Bot. Yunnanica</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>689</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>698</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3969/j.issn.2095-0845.2002.06.002</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Puillandre</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lambert</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brouillet</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Achaz</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>ABGD, automatic barcode gap discovery for primary species delimitation</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>1864</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1877</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05239.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21883587</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>Y. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>C. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Comes</surname> <given-names>H. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Plant molecular phylogeography in China and adjacent regions: tracing the genetic imprints of Quaternary climate and environmental change in the world&#x00027;s most diverse temperate flora</article-title>. <source>Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.</source> <volume>59</volume>, <fpage>225</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>244</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ympev.2011.01.012</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21292014</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>R Development Core Team</collab></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <source>R: A Language And Environment For Statistical Computing</source>. <publisher-loc>Vienna</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>R Foundation for Statistical Computing</publisher-name>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21292014</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B67">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ran</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>P. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>A test of seven candidate barcode regions from the plastome in <italic>Picea</italic> (Pinaceae)</article-title>. <source>J. Integr. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>1109</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1126</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.00995.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21106009</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B68">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rozas</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sanchez-Delbarrio</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Messeguer</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rozas</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>2496</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2497</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btg359</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14668244</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B69">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shaw</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lickey</surname> <given-names>E. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schilling</surname> <given-names>E. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Small</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Comparison of whole chloroplast genome sequences to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in Angiosperms: the tortoise and the hare III</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Bot.</source> <volume>94</volume>, <fpage>275</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>288</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3732/ajb.94.3.275</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21636401</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B70">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Simeone</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Piredda</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Papini</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vessella</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schirone</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Application of plastid and nuclear markers to DNA barcoding of Euro-Mediterranean oaks (<italic>Quercus</italic>, Fagaceae): problems, prospects and phylogenetic implications</article-title>. <source>Bot. J. Linn. Soc.</source> <volume>172</volume>, <fpage>478</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>499</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/boj.12059</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B71">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Simeone</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grimm</surname> <given-names>G. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Papini</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vessella</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cardoni</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tordoni</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Plastome data reveal multiple geographic origins of <italic>Quercus</italic> Group Ilex</article-title>. <source>PeerJ</source> <volume>4</volume>:<fpage>e1897</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7717/peerj.1897</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27123376</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B72">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Simmons</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ochoterena</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analysis</article-title>. <source>Syst. Biol.</source> <volume>49</volume>, <fpage>369</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>381</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/sysbio/49.2.369</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12118412</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B73">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tamura</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stecher</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petersen</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0</article-title>. <source>Mol. Biol. Evol.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>2725</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2729</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/molbev/mst197</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24132122</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B74">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>H. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harris</surname> <given-names>W. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>An emergent science on the brink of irrelevance: a review of the past 8 years of DNA barcoding</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol. Resour.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>377</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>388</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03119.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22356472</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B75">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thomson</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>I. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Genome-enabled development of DNA markers for ecology, evolution and conservation</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>2184</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2195</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04650.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20465588</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B76">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tzedakis</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Emerson</surname> <given-names>B. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hewitt</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Cryptic or mystic? Glacial tree refugia in northern Europe</article-title>. <source>Trends Ecol. Evol.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>696</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>704</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tree.2013.09.001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24091207</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B77">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>van Velzen</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weltschek</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fellci</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bakker</surname> <given-names>F. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>DNA barcoding of recently diverged species: relative performance of matching methods</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>e30490</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0030490</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22272356</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B78">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vij</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tyagi</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Genome-wide analysis of the stress associated protein (SAP) gene family containing A20/AN1 zinc-finger(s) in rice and their phylogenetic relationship with Arabidopsis</article-title>. <source>Mol. Genet. Genomics</source> <volume>276</volume>, <fpage>565</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>575</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00438-006-0165-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17033811</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B79">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>X. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y. Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>Geographic distribution of deciduous oaks in China</article-title>. <source>J. Beijing Forestry Coll.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>57</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>69</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B80">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Q. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J. Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Are nuclear loci ideal for barcoding plants? A case study of genetic delimitation of two sister species using multiple loci and multiple intraspecific individuals</article-title>. <source>J. Syst. Evol.</source> <volume>49</volume>, <fpage>182</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>188</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1759-6831.2011.00135.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B81">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bengtsson-Palme</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>ITS1: a DNA barcode better than ITS2 in eukaryotes?</article-title> <source>Mol. Ecol. Resour.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>573</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>586</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1755-0998.12325</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25187125</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B82">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>G. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Genetic diversity and population structure of <italic>Quercus serrata</italic> var. <italic>breviptiolata</italic> revealed by nSSR markers</article-title>. <source>Scientia Silvae Sinicae</source> <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>121</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>131</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11707/j.1001-7488.20151215</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B83">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Weitschek</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Velzen</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Felici</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bertolazzi</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>BLOG 2.0: a software system for character-based species classification with DNA Barcode sequences. What it does, how to use it</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol. Resour.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>1043</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1046</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1755-0998.12073</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23350601</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B84">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>C. I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>The genic view of the process of speciation</article-title>. <source>J. Ecol. Biol.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>851</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>865</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00335.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B85">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>L. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moller</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>D. Z.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>DNA barcoding of <italic>Rhododendron</italic> (Ericaceae), the largest Chinese plant genus in biodiversity hotspots of the Himalaya-Hengduan Mountains</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol. Resour.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>932</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>944</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1755-0998.12353</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25469426</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B86">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Q. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Climatic envelope of evergreen sclerophyllous oaks and their present distribution in the eastern Himalaya and Hengduan Mountains</article-title>. <source>J. Syst. Evol.</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>183</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>190</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1759-6831.2009.00020.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B87">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Di</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>G. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Phylogeography and evolution of two closely related oak species (<italic>Quercus</italic>) from north and northeast China</article-title>. <source>Tree Genet. Genomes</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>89</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11295-016-1044-5</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B88">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duan</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>G. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Comparative analysis of the complete chloroplast genomes of five <italic>Quercus</italic> species</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>959</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2016.00959</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27446185</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B89">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>Y. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petit</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>D. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Geographic variation in the structure of oak hybrid zones provides insights into the dynamics of speciation</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>4995</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>5011</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05354.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22059561</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B90">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>Y. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>D. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Multiple glacial refugia for cool-temperate deciduous trees in northern East Asia: the Mongolian oak as a case study</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>5676</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>5691</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/mec.13408</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26439083</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B91">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>H. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ge</surname> <given-names>X. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Testing DNA barcoding in closely related groups of <italic>Lysimachia</italic>, L. (Myrsinaceae)</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol. Resour.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>98</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>108</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03076.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21967641</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B92">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>Y. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Phylogeography of the temperate tree species <italic>Quercus acutissima</italic> in China: Inferences from chloroplast DNA variations</article-title>. <source>Biochem. Syst. Ecol.</source> <volume>63</volume>, <fpage>190</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>197</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bse.2015.10.010</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B93">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rao</surname> <given-names>G. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>DNA barcoding of <italic>Rhodiola</italic> (Crassulaceae): a case study on a group of recently diversified medicinal plants from the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>e0119921</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0119921</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25774915</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B94">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wilkinson</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Z. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Taxonomical and evolutionary of the leaf anatomy and architecture of <italic>Quercus</italic> L. subgenus <italic>Quercus</italic> from China</article-title>. <source>Cathaya</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>34</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B95">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pu</surname> <given-names>C. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Relationships between the distributions of <italic>Quercus</italic> Sect. Heterobalanus (Fagaceae) and uplift of Himalayas</article-title>. <source>Adv. Earth Sci.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>884</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>890</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2003.06.0884</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B96">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Origin, phylogeny and dispersal of <italic>Quercus</italic> from China</article-title>. <source>Acta Bot. Yunnanica</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>227</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>236</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B97">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Geographical distribution of <italic>Quercus</italic> from China</article-title>. <source>J. Grad. Sch. Acad. Sin.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>95</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>108</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B98">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kong</surname> <given-names>L. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>X. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Comparing the usefulness of distance, monophyly and character-based DNA barcoding methods in species identification: a case study of Neogastropoda</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>e26619</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0026619</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22039517</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>