Although a trait prominently delineated by genotype, watermelon fruit weight might be influenced by environmental conditions and cultural practices, including grafting, that affect overall field performance (Alexopoulos et al., 2007; Cushman and Huan, 2008; Proietti et al., 2008; Soteriou and Kyriacou, 2014). Vigorous interspecific and L. siceraria rootstocks can improve yields significantly, which in genotypically large-fruited scions usually translates into a tendency for higher unit fruit weight, while in small-fruited cultivars it tends to increase the number of fruits per plant (Colla et al., 2006a; Alexopoulos et al., 2007; Cushman and Huan, 2008; Proietti et al., 2008; Soteriou and Kyriacou, 2014). Decrease in fruit weight against non-grafted control is usually an indicator of rootstock–scion incompatibility, while in compatible grafts maximum reported fruit weight increase approximates 55% (Yetisir and Sari, 2003; Yetisir et al., 2003; Huitrón et al., 2007; Cushman and Huan, 2008; Soteriou and Kyriacou, 2014).

Secondary morphological characteristics of watermelon fruit that may appeal to consumers’ perception of quality include shape, expressed as the ratio of longitudinal to equatorial diameter, and rind thickness. Fruit shape constitutes a trait predominantly governed by scion genotype and little affected by environmental or cultural factors; hence the effect of grafting thereupon has been circumstantial and mostly non-significant or minimal (Colla et al., 2006a; Alan et al., 2007; Rouphael et al., 2008; Soteriou and Kyriacou, 2014; Fredes et al., 2017). On the other hand, rind thickness is a morphological trait more responsive to grafting, and to cultural practice at large, as it relates to watermelon harvest maturity (Soteriou et al., 2014; Kyriacou et al., 2016). On commercial C. maxima × C. moschata and L. siceraria rootstocks, especially on landraces of the latter, thickening of watermelon rind is often observed (Yetisir et al., 2003; Alexopoulos et al., 2007; Proietti et al., 2008; Kyriacou and Soteriou, 2015). However, this has not been a ubiquitous effect across the above rootstocks, or with less common rootstocks such as C. moschata, Sicyos angulatus L., C. lanatus var. citroides (L. H. Bailey) Mansf. and C. pepo L. which were only sporadically effective in this respect (Davis and Perkins-Veazie, 2005; Alan et al., 2007; Huitrón et al., 2008; Soteriou and Kyriacou, 2014; Fredes et al., 2017). Rootstock effect on watermelon rind thickness is in general limited and studies involving multiple rootstock–scion combinations have demonstrated the predominance of the relative effect of the scion cultivar on this attribute (Kyriacou and Soteriou, 2015). Thinning of the rind is known to characterize watermelon maturation, but also its postharvest life (Corey and Schlimme, 1988); therefore, potential rootstock effect should be examined under conditions that account carefully for the effect of harvest maturity (Soteriou et al., 2014). In any case, thickening of the rind can improve the postharvest performance of watermelon fruit and may also provide a tool for increasing the source of important bioactive compounds concentrated in the rind, such as citrulline, which constitute potential by-products of the fresh-cut industry (Tarazona-Díaz et al., 2011).

Among the physical characteristics of watermelon fruit that strongly influence consumer preference, is the intensity of red coloration of the pulp. Change in the intensity of red hue, expressed as increase in colourimetric CIELAB component a^∗, marks the development of watermelon pulp color during ripening; moreover, a widening of hue angle (h°), signifying transition from red to orange–yellow is characteristic of watermelon over-ripening and senescence (Brown and Summers, 1985; López–Galarza et al., 2004; Soteriou et al., 2014). Watermelon pulp color is directly dependent upon lycopene synthesis and its accumulation in chromoplasts, while cultivar differences in pulp color correlate highly with differences in lycopene content (Perkins-Veazie and Collins, 2006; Kyriacou and Soteriou, 2015). Grafting therefore may affect pulp color to the extent it affects lycopene content (Davis and Perkins-Veazie, 2005). Watermelon scions grafted on interspecific Cucurbita hybrid rootstocks may incur delayed pulp color development, compared to non-grafted control, expressed as a delayed peak in colourimetric component a^∗ synchronous to the peak in lycopene content (Soteriou et al., 2014).

Pulp firmness constitutes one of the most important sensory traits of watermelon fruit subject to wide genotypic variation, with pronounced firmness observed usually in seedless, triploid cultivars (Leskovar et al., 2004; Soteriou and Kyriacou, 2015). Notwithstanding the genotypic effect of the scion, rootstock effects on watermelon pulp firmness can be significant hence the choice of rootstock instrumental for improving fruit quality and postharvest life (Yetisir et al., 2003; Cushman and Huan, 2008; Bruton et al., 2009; Kyriacou and Soteriou, 2015). Inter-specific Cucurbita hybrid rootstocks most consistently increase watermelon pulp firmness in both diploid and triploid scions (Bruton et al., 2009; Huitrón et al., 2009; Soteriou et al., 2014; Soteriou and Kyriacou, 2015). The effect of grafting, however, might render the pulp of certain cultivars, especially mini triploids that are genotypically inclined to outstanding firmness, undesirably hard (Soteriou and Kyriacou, 2015). Among less commonly used rootstocks, the parents of interspecific hybrids C. maxima and C. moschata, C. ficifolia Bouché, and citron melon (C. lanatus var. citroides) have been reported to elicit firmer watermelon pulp (Cushman and Huan, 2008; Bruton et al., 2009), whereas cushaw squash (C. argyrosperma C. Huber) pumpkin had the opposite effect (Davis and Perkins-Veazie, 2005). Gourd rootstocks L. siceraria usually have no effect on pulp firmness although erratic cultivar-specific effects, both positive and negative, have been reported (Yetisir et al., 2003; Cushman and Huan, 2008; Bruton et al., 2009; Özdemir et al., 2016). Morphological abnormalities scarcely associated with watermelon grafting include yellow bands in the pulp bordering the rind, hollow heart, excessively hard and discolored pith, and overall poor texture (Lee, 1994; Yamasaki et al., 1994; Davis et al., 2008b; Soteriou and Kyriacou, 2014). However, most reports on commercially available C. maxima × C. moschata and L. siceraria rootstocks do not make reference to such defects which may reflect rootstock–scion incompatibility and adverse environmental conditions or cultural practices.

The most valued singular quality trait of watermelon is undoubtedly sweetness, sensorially triggered mostly but not entirely by soluble mono- and di-saccharides, since other juice solutes including organic acids, soluble pectins and amino acids, phenolic compounds and minerals influence sweet sensation (Kader, 2008; Magwaza and Opara, 2015). The soluble solids content (SSC) – containing sugars and acids, together with small amounts of dissolved vitamins, fructans, proteins, pigments, phenolics, and minerals – is the most important quality measure used to indicate sweetness of watermelon as well as other fruits (Magwaza and Opara, 2015). It is in general not highly compromised by grafting on most commercial C. maxima × C. moschata rootstocks (Colla et al., 2006a; Proietti et al., 2008; Huitrón et al., 2009; Soteriou and Kyriacou, 2014; Kyriacou et al., 2016). Scion response to L. siceraria rootstocks appears more erratic and rootstock-specific with most graft combinations not demonstrating a significant effect on SSC but exceptions of SSC reduction, especially on landraces, or SSC increase are not infrequent (Yetisir and Sari, 2003; Alan et al., 2007; Alexopoulos et al., 2007; Cushman and Huan, 2008; Çandır et al., 2013). Effects on watermelon sweetness have occasionally been demonstrated by more marginal or experimental rootstocks, such as reduction of SSC by C. argyrosperma and C. pepo (Davis and Perkins-Veazie, 2005), and increase by C. lanatus var. citroides (Fredes et al., 2017).

Sweetness depends mostly on the total concentration of soluble carbohydrates, which in most fruits constitutes the largest fraction of the SSC, but also on the relative proportions of the three main sugars, glucose, fructose, and sucrose, which contribute differentially to sweetness and combine to yield what is termed sweetness index (Elmstrom and Davis, 1981; Brown and Summers, 1985; Kader, 2008). Among cucurbit genotypes, variation in sugar content and sweetness index has been associated mostly with their ability to accumulate sucrose at the expense of fructose and glucose during ripening, owing to the activity of sucrose phosphate synthase and sucrose synthase and the decline in activity of soluble acid invertase (Stepansky et al., 1999; Yativ et al., 2010). In watermelon, fructose and glucose are the main sugars supplying the demands of the ovary during initial fruit development, due to the high activities of neutral and acid invertases (Lanchun et al., 2010). Sucrose is the main soluble carbohydrate accumulating in watermelon fruit during ripening at the expense of reducing sugars (Brown and Summers, 1985; Chisholm and Picha, 1986; López–Galarza et al., 2004; Soteriou et al., 2014), although less common genotypes accumulating reducing-sugars throughout ripening have been reported (Yativ et al., 2010). Lower accumulation of hexoses at the onset of fruit development and reduced sucrose accumulation during ripening have been implicated in moderate reduction of watermelon total sugar content in response to the use of C. maxima × C. moschata and L. siceraria rootstocks (Miguel et al., 2004; Liu et al., 2006; Kyriacou and Soteriou, 2015; Fredes et al., 2017). However, other studies involving the same rootstock types have revealed no significant effects on glucose, fructose, sucrose, or total sugars content (Colla et al., 2006a; Proietti et al., 2008; Soteriou et al., 2014). Disparity of results regarding the effect of grafting on non-structural carbohydrates in many cases reflects differential ripening events, notwithstanding the possible effects of cultural practice and climatic conditions particularly on flowering and fruit setting. Grafting may affect the earliness of flowering and thereby affect the time to commercial maturity (Satoh, 1996; Sakata et al., 2007), however, the delay in maturation relates mainly to retarded post-anthesis ripening events as a result of increased crop load on grafted plants (Soteriou et al., 2014; Kyriacou and Soteriou, 2015; Soteriou and Kyriacou, 2015).

Acidity balances sweetness in the taste profile of most fruits, although effectively the ratio between SSC and titratable acidity (TA) is considered crucial in terms of consumer acceptability mostly for sour fruits. Acidity in watermelon fruit is very low, with a pH range of 5.5–5.8 and acid concentration in its juice 0.7–1.2 g/l predominantly in malate form (Kyriacou and Soteriou, 2012; Çandır et al., 2013; Soteriou et al., 2014; Fredes et al., 2017). Grafting on C. maxima × C. moschata has been found to increase the TA and reduce the pH of the pulp (Colla et al., 2006a; Proietti et al., 2008; Soteriou et al., 2014). Increase in watermelon acidity has been elicited by grafting not only on hybrid rootstocks but also on C. lanatus var. citroides and on certain L. siceraria rootstocks, expressed mostly in higher malic acid levels in the juice (Çandır et al., 2013; Fredes et al., 2017). The TA of watermelon pulp declines linearly with ripening; grafting, however, sustains higher TA throughout the ripening period in comparison to non-grafted plants, which verifies that this is less mediated by maturity than the effect of grafting on sugars (Soteriou et al., 2014), moreover it predisposes the fruit for improved postharvest performance (Kyriacou and Soteriou, 2015).

Alcohol and aldehyde characteristics of the Cucurbitaceae family constitute the main aroma volatiles in watermelon fruit, with the former usually in higher concentrations (Beaulieu and Lea, 2006; Saftner et al., 2007). The most abundant alcohols identified in the aroma profile of mini watermelons include (Z)-3-Nonen-1-ol (fresh melon), (Z,Z)-3,6-Nonadien-1-ol (pumpkin, cucumber), hexanol (flower, green), nonanol (herbaceous) and (Z)-6-Nonen-1-ol (pumpkin-like, green melon) (Yajima et al., 1985; Dima et al., 2014). Among identified aldehydes most abundant were (Z)-2-nonenal (honeydew melon, fruity), hexanal (green), (E,Z)-2,6-nonadienal (cucumber, green), nonanal (melon, orange peel), (Z)-6-nonenal (honeydew melon, fruity), 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one (flower) and (E)-6-nonenal (earthy) (Dima et al., 2014). Although significant rootstock-specific effects on watermelon volatile profile have been identified, the effect of grafting on watermelon aroma profile remains at large a scarcely charted territory (Petropoulos et al., 2014; Fredes et al., 2017). Grafting midi-watermelon cultivars (≈6 kg) on C. maxima × C. moschata and L. siceraria rootstocks was found to increase fruit content in several aroma volatiles, including (E)-2-nonenal (fat, cucumber) and (Z,Z)-3,6-nonadien-1-ol (green, cucumber) (Petropoulos et al., 2014). Fredes et al. (2017) identified differential effects among C. maxima × C. moschata rootstocks in the levels of (Z)-6-nonenal and (E,Z)-2,6-nonadienal, associated with melon-like and cucumber-like aromas, respectively. A critical and consistent finding across C. maxima × C. moschata rootstocks, but not on C. lanatus var. citroides, is the increased level of (Z)-6-nonen-1-ol, which confers undesirable pumpkin-like odor in fruits from grafted plants. However, the identification of higher levels of lycopene degradation products, such as 6-methy-5-heten-2-one and geranylacetone in the volatile profile of fruit from non-grafted plants, characterized by earlier peak in lycopene content (Soteriou et al., 2014), suggests differential harvest maturity between treatments may be implicated in these findings (Lewinsohn et al., 2005). Available work is far from providing conclusive evidence on the effect of grafting on watermelon aroma profile. Future work needs to take carefully into consideration the evolution of aroma profile during ripening so that the potential effects of grafting are discerned from those of harvest maturity. Analysis of volatiles performed using a GC–MS-olfactory approach combined with extensively trained sensory panels would provide a more resilient basis for further investigation into rootstock-mediated effects on watermelon aroma profile (Saftner et al., 2007).

Notwithstanding wide genotypic variation, watermelon is a lycopene-rich food source with higher lycopene concentration in its pulp than that of tomato (Perkins-Veazie et al., 2001; Fish and Davis, 2003; Soteriou et al., 2014). Grafting, particularly on C. maxima × C. moschata rootstocks, has been reported to raise lycopene levels significantly in watermelon fruit (Perkins-Veazie et al., 2007; Proietti et al., 2008; Soteriou et al., 2014; Kyriacou and Soteriou, 2015). Increase was also reported on selected L. siceraria genotypes (Çandır et al., 2013) and on C. argyrosperma and C. pepo but limited to seedless scions (Davis and Perkins-Veazie, 2005). Decrease in lycopene levels associated with certain rootstock–scion combinations involving L. siceraria and C. argyrosperma (Davis and Perkins-Veazie, 2005; Çandır et al., 2013), or absence of effect (Bruton et al., 2009; Soteriou and Kyriacou, 2014) have been more infrequently reported. Conflicting reports may be explained in the light of recent work demonstrating that lycopene content is affected more by maturity and less by grafting, as the peak in lycopene content appears about 1 week earlier in fruit from non-grafted than from grafted plants (Soteriou et al., 2014). Ripening-dependent accumulation of lycopene may derive from the inhibition of β-carotene synthesis or from an alternative ripening-specific pathway, such as the 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate (DOXP) pathway (Bramley, 2002; Schofield et al., 2008). It is also not known whether the progressive transition in pulp color from red to orange–yellow, which signifies over-ripening, derives from the conversion of accumulated lycopene to β-carotene, or from a senescence-related degradation of lycopene (Ronen et al., 2000; Schofield et al., 2008). The implications of grafting for both of the above processes remain uninvestigated. In addition, lycopene synthesis events are carried over to the postharvest period where they appear temperature-controlled and linked to changes in pulp color (Perkins-Veazie and Collins, 2006). Lycopene content peaked 7 days postharvest at 25°C and was further increased by grafting on C. maxima × C. moschata rootstocks (Kyriacou and Soteriou, 2015). Depending upon maturity at the time of harvest, postharvest lycopene synthesis may appear as a continuation of the ripening-dependent pattern observed preharvest.

A non-essential amino acid found in abundance in watermelon and other cucurbits is citrulline (Rimando and Perkins-Veazie, 2005). It is a metabolic intermediate in the nitric oxide cycle, active in biological functions such as vasodilation and muscle relaxation which derive from the dissipation of NO during conversion of citrulline to arginine (Nissinen et al., 2003). Earlier indications that grafting could increase amino acid content of watermelon fruit, particularly citrulline (Davis et al., 2008c) have been confirmed by more recent work. Grafting onto C. maxima × C. moschata rootstock resulted in higher citrulline content in the pulp throughout fruit ripening (Soteriou et al., 2014). Grafting improves the performance of watermelon under deficit irrigation (Proietti et al., 2008), while the accumulation of citrulline in watermelon vegetative tissues under drought conditions has been proposed to contribute to oxidative stress tolerance based on its novel hydroxyl radical scavenging activity (Akashi et al., 2001). Citrulline accumulation in watermelon rind and pulp, possibly relates to an osmotic role during cell expansion as it constitutes a potentially significant fraction of the non-carbohydrate soluble solids in the fruit (Curis et al., 2005; Davis et al., 2011; Tarazona-Díaz et al., 2011; Soteriou et al., 2014).

Whereas compatible C. melo and Cucurbita hybrid rootstocks generally tend to have no effect on melon fruit weight, there is also widespread rootstock–scion interaction in the responses of different melon types to grafting. For instance, the fruit weight of muskmelon (cv. Proteo) was not influenced by either C. melo (cvs. Energia and Sting) or Cucurbita hybrid rootstocks (cvs. Polifemo, AS10, RS841, P360, and Elsi) (Condurso et al., 2012). However, the same scion (cv. Proteo) grown hydroponically on other C. melo (cvs. Dinero and Jador) and hybrid rootstocks (cvs. P360 and PS1313), incurred a limited mean increase of 6.8% in fruit weight (Colla et al., 2010a). In the case of inodorus honeydew melon (cv. Incas), fruit weight was not influenced by grafting onto C. melo (cvs. Belimo, Energia, Griffin, Sting, and ES liscio) and Cucurbita hybrid rootstocks (cvs. AS10, P360, ES99-13, and Elsi), although it was increased moderately when grafted onto hybrids ‘RS841’ and ‘Polifemo’ (Crinò et al., 2007; Verzera et al., 2014). Commercial hybrid rootstocks ‘TZ148,’ ‘N101,’ ‘Carnivor,’ and ‘30900’ also had no effect on the fruit weight of an Ananas type (cv. Raymond) and two Galia type (cvs. Elario and Polynica) melons (Soteriou et al., 2016), as was also the case with cantaloupe (cv. Athena) grafted on interspecific hybrids ‘Strong Tosa’ and ‘Tetsukabuto’ (Zhao et al., 2011). By contrast, Schultheis et al. (2015) identified a general trend for reduction of fruit weight as a result of grafting in field trials of muskmelon, honeydew and specialty melons, tested, however, only on hybrid rootstock cv. Carnivor. Traka-Mavrona et al. (2000) found grafting had no effect on fruit weight of three inodorous melons (cvs. Thraki, Peplo, and Lefko Amynteou), and a cantaloupe (cv. Kokkini Banana) using two hybrids (‘TZ-148’ and ‘Mamouth’) and one pumpkin (C. maxima) landrace (‘Kalkabaki’) as rootstocks under protected and open field cultivation. Similarly, grafting galia (cv. Arava) and honeydew (cv. Honey Yellow) melons onto nematode-resistant C. metuliferus had no effect on fruit weight under organic or conventional production systems (Guan et al., 2014). Exceptional increase (29%) in fruit weight was reported for cantaloupe (cv. Cyrano) when grafted on hybrid ‘P360’ and grown under greenhouse salinity treatments (Colla et al., 2006b). Decrease in fruit weight of muskmelon cv. Proteo resulted from grafting onto B. hispida, whereas C. metuliferus, C. zeyheri Sond., C. moschata, C. maxima, and C. maxima × C. moschata hybrids had no such effect on muskmelon cultivars Proteo and Supermarket (Trionfetti-Nisini et al., 2002). Finally, Park et al. (2013) examined four C. melo accessions and a Shintoza hybrid as rootstocks and found that none of these had an effect on the fruit weight of muskmelon (‘Earl’s elite’) and honeydew (‘Homerunstar’) except a C. melo accession (‘K134069’) which produced fruits of greater weight and size than the non-grafted control.

Other morphological traits of relevance to melon quality include fruit shape, exocarp and pulp thickness. Reports on melon grafting do not present significant rootstock effects on these variables which rather seem strongly delineated by the scion genotype. In the case of honeydew, muskmelon, cantaloupe and Piel de Sapo melons these traits were not affected by grafting on Cucurbita hybrid, C. melo, C. maxima and C. melo subsp. agrestis rootstocks (Traka-Mavrona et al., 2000; Fita et al., 2007; Colla et al., 2010a; Verzera et al., 2014). Similar results on fruit shape were obtained with Ananas and Galia type melons (Soteriou et al., 2016), and with cantaloupe grafted on hybrid rootstocks (Colla et al., 2006b), notwithstanding a limited increase in rind thickness.

Fruit texture is an essential characteristic for the organoleptic assessment of melon fruit and one often reported to deteriorate as a result of grafting (Rouphael et al., 2010). Grafting honeydew melon onto Cucurbita hybrids and C. melo rootstocks had no effect on fruit dry matter content and pulp firmness (Crinò et al., 2007). On the contrary, Colla et al. (2006b) found that pulp firmness values recorded for cantaloupe grafted on hybrid rootstock were significantly higher (19–32%) than those observed for non-grafted plants, and the same effect was observed with muskmelon grafted either on C. melo or Cucurbita hybrid rootstocks (Colla et al., 2010a), despite that grafting resulted in lower pulp dry matter content in both these studies. By contrast, flesh firmness of Galia melon was consistently reduced by grafting on four different hybrid rootstocks and a similar tendency was evidenced with Ananas melon; however, these results were obtained from graft combinations that demonstrated incompatibility problems, variably causing plant decline, with loss of pulp firmness being one of the quality indices proposed for prognostication of incompatibility (Soteriou et al., 2016). Galia melon grafted onto interspecific hybrid rootstocks and onto C. metuliferus incurred reduced overall sensory rating but not reduced flesh firmness compared to non-grafted controls (Guan et al., 2015), although the same scion grafted on C. metuliferus and grown organically in nematode infested soil incurred a reduction in pulp firmness (Guan et al., 2014).

Grafting interacted with scion cultivar in respect to firmness but a general trend for loss of firmness was identified in two annual field trials involving numerous cultivars of muskmelon, honeydew and specialty melon scions, although assessment of firmness across the various melon types was hampered by the difficulty of harvesting melons of the same maturity (Schultheis et al., 2015). Grafting cantaloupe on two interspecific hybrid rootstocks reduced flesh firmness compared to non-grafted and self-grafted control, with differences minimized after prolonged postharvest storage (Zhao et al., 2011). Finally, no effect on flesh firmness was reported when Piel de Sapo-type melon was grafted on either Monosporascus-resistant C. melo subsp. agrestis or the widely used but less compatible interspecific hybrid RS841 (Fita et al., 2007). From the findings above it is evident that, unlike the case of grafted watermelon (Kyriacou and Soteriou, 2015; Kyriacou et al., 2016), melon grafting, whether on same or different species rootstocks, unequivocally does not increase flesh firmness; it either has no effect or it results in loss of textural quality, depending largely on rootstock–scion compatibility and to a lesser extent on cultural conditions.

Fruit sweetness is a major sensory feature of melon quality (Yamaguchi et al., 1977; Liu et al., 2010), which stems mainly from soluble carbohydrates but is commonly quantitated on the basis of the SSC derived from the temperature-compensated refractive index of the fruit juice. Understanding rootstock-mediated effects on melon sweetness is critical for safeguarding sensorial acceptability of melon fruit produced on grafted plants. Available reports describing these effects manifest widespread rootstock–scion interaction attesting the importance of selecting appropriate graft combinations. For instance, grafting cantaloupe (cv. Cyrano) on hybrid ‘P360’ under greenhouse conditions reduced the fruit SSC by an absolute 1.6% when compared to the non-grafted control; however, the SSC (10.9%) remained highly acceptable (Colla et al., 2006b). Similar findings were reported for muskmelon (cv. Proteo) grafted on hybrid rootstock (‘P360’) in open field cultivation, though both grafted (8.3%) and non-grafted (7.5%) plants exhibited quite low fruit SSC (Colla et al., 2010b). However, evaluating the same scion (‘Proteo’) on hybrid rootstocks ‘P360’ and ‘PGM96-05,’ revealed no effect on SSC though grafting both ‘Proteo’ and ‘Supermarket’ muskmelons on B. hispida and C. metuliferus did reduce their SSC (Trionfetti-Nisini et al., 2002). Crinò et al. (2007) found no effect on the SSC of honeydew melon (cv. Incas) by grafting on four hybrids and four C. melo rootstocks, as also verified by Verzera et al. (2014) using the same scion on three hybrids and two C. melo rootstocks, but not with hybrid rootstock ‘AS10’ which increased the SSC from 15.5 to 16.3%. Galia melon ‘Arava’ grafted onto hybrids ‘Strong Tosa’ and ‘Carnivor’ incurred reduced overall acceptability, flavor rating and SSC compared to non-grafted controls, but not when grafted onto C. metuliferus (Guan et al., 2014, 2015). Moreover, honeydew scion (‘Honey Yellow’) on the same rootstocks did not differ in sensory properties and SSC in comparison with either non-grafted or self-grafted controls (Guan et al., 2014, 2015). The SSC of Piel de Sapo melon was slightly reduced when grafted on Monosporascus-resistant rootstock C. melo subsp. agrestis (‘Pat 81’) and also on hybrid ‘RS 841,’ but not to an extent that might significantly affect marketability (Fita et al., 2007). Although decrease in the SSC is not an infrequent response to grafting, with potential implications on, the increment of decrease in none of the reported studies seemed decisive for overall quality and marketability.

Besides the case of hybrid ‘AS10’ above, few are the cases of rootstocks reported of causing increase in melon SSC. One such is the absolute increase of 1.2% obtained in the mean SSC (10.4%) of greenhouse grown Galia melon grafted onto hybrid rootstocks ‘TZ148,’ ‘N101,’ ‘Carnivor,’ and ‘30900’ (Soteriou et al., 2016). Most often, grafting on compatible rootstocks has no effect on the fruit SSC. Out of four hybrid rootstocks onto which Ananas melon was grafted only one (‘30900’) had an effect on the SSC causing an absolute reduction by 1.12% relative to the non-grafted control (Soteriou et al., 2016). Field trials of muskmelon, honeydew and specialty melon types (Persian, Tuscan, Canary, Galia, Piel de Sapo) grafted on hybrid rootstock ‘Carnivor’ vs. self-grafted and non-grafted controls generally showed no effect on the SSC although limited grafting × scion interaction was evident (Schultheis et al., 2015). Traka-Mavrona et al. (2000) also found grafting had no effect on the fruit SSC of three inodorous melon and one cantaloupe cultivars tested on two hybrids and one pumpkin landrace rootstocks under protected and open field cultivation. Finally, in a study closely observing fruit harvest maturity based on the date of fruit setting, Park et al. (2013) reported that grafting both muskmelon (‘Earl’s elite’) and honeydew melon (‘Homerunstar’) onto four C. melo accessions and one Shintoza type Cucurbita hybrid had no effect on the scions’ fruit SSC, and they repudiated categorically claims of reduced fruit quality as a result of grafting, provided compatible rootstocks.

Further to the effect of grafting on SSC, the concentrations of soluble sugars are also critical as they dictate their relative contribution to the sweetness index (SI) of fruits (Elmstrom and Davis, 1981). According to Liu et al. (2010), accumulation patterns for hexoses, sucrose and oligosaccharides were similar during muskmelon ripening from non-grafted and grafted plants, despite differences in sugar levels between rootstocks. Moreover, during the period of fast sugar accumulation (32–48 days after anthesis) muskmelons from grafted plants maintained higher starch content than the non-grafted control, and the starch fraction was higher in the lower sugar content rootstock and lower in the non-grafted control. It was further postulated that the marked increase in mesocarp starch content may derive from competition by the vigorous rootstocks for the soluble sugars translocated to sink fruit which the rate of sucrose decomposition was unable to satisfy. Differential rootstock-mediated patterns of soluble sugars’ accumulation were depicted in a recent study by Soteriou et al. (2016), wherein total soluble sugars in the pulp of both Galia and Ananas melons were not differentiated between four hybrid rootstocks and the non-grafted control; however, grafting Galia generally increased fruit sucrose levels at the expense of fructose and glucose whereas the opposite was observed with Ananas melon (Soteriou et al., 2016).

Like most cucurbits, melon is a fruit of very low acidity, usually below 0.2% in citrate equivalents, which nevertheless affects the sweet-to-sour balance in sensory perception (Crinò et al., 2007; Colla et al., 2010b; Verzera et al., 2014; Guan et al., 2015). Grafting honeydew melon and cantaloupe on hybrid rootstocks had a minimal effect on fruit TA which was inconsequential to fruit sensory quality (Colla et al., 2006b; Verzera et al., 2014). Similarly, no effect was found on the TA of muskmelon and Galia melon by grafting on either Cucurbita hybrid or C. melo rootstock (Crinò et al., 2007; Colla et al., 2010b; Zhao et al., 2011; Guan et al., 2015).

The production of volatile compounds in melon is associated with ethylene-dependent pathways (Obando-Ulloa et al., 2008; Pech et al., 2008) and with textural changes related to cell wall matrix solubilization events (Dos-Santos et al., 2013). Hence, the climacteric (cantalupensis and reticulates) and the non-climacteric (inodorus) types demonstrate distinct volatile profiles, with C9 aliphatic aldehydes being the key aroma and flavor descriptors for inodorous honeydew melons (Verzera et al., 2014), as opposed to the mainly ester-based (ethyl butanoate, methyl 2-methylbutanoate and ethyl 2-methylpropanoate) descriptors for fruity and sweet aroma notes of cantalupensis and reticulates muskmelon cultivars (Kourkoutas et al., 2006; Beaulieu and Lea, 2007). Grafting seems to affect the aroma profile of both muskmelon and honeydew type melons. Grafting muskmelon on interspecific Cucurbita hybrids and on C. melo rootstocks generally elicited higher levels of non-key alcohol and aldehyde volatile compounds responsible for green and fresh notes, such as flower-green (1-hexanol), fruity (2-methyl-1-butanol), fatty-green (1-octanol), ethereal (ethanol), green [(E)-2-butenal], and fresh-lemon-green (octanal) aromas (Condurso et al., 2012). Ester-based aromas characteristic of muskmelon were generally higher in non-grafted control, such as cantaloupe-like, green fruity, melon (ethyl 2-methylbutanoate) and sweet-fruit (ethyl butanoate) aromas (Chuan-qiang et al., 2011; Condurso et al., 2012). However, significant exceptions to this motif were found among both Cucurbita spp. and C. melo rootstocks, rendering screening for optimum rootstock–scion combinations essential. In fact, some commercial Cucurbita hybrids (e.g., ‘RS-841’) and C. melo (e.g., ‘Energia’) rootstocks can be successfully used for controlling soilborne pathogens without any significant effect on the fruit aroma (Condurso et al., 2012). Similarly, Verzera et al. (2014) examined the effect of four inter-specific hybrids and two melon genotypes on the fruit aroma and sensory quality of honeydew melon cv. Incas (C. melo L. subsp. melo var. inodorus H. Jacq.). Prevalent volatiles in both grafted and non-grafted inodorus melon were mainly aldehydes and alcohols such as nonanal (melon, orange peel), (Z)-6-nonenal and (E)-2-nonenal (honeydew melon fruity), (E,Z)-2,6-nonadienal, 1-nonanol (herbaceous), (Z)-3-nonen-1-ol (melon, green, floral) and (Z,Z)-3,6-nonadien-1-ol (pumpkin, cucumber). Fruits from plants grafted on three of the interspecific hybrids (cvs. RS-841, P-360, Polifemo) and one C. melo rootstock (‘Energia’) had similar aroma profiles to the control, however, particular rootstocks from either type (e.g., ‘AS10’ and ‘Sting’) were found to decrease the amounts of key aroma compounds. Grafting was generally found to reduce the intensity of honeydew melon and herbaceous aroma descriptors and increase those related to fruity aroma and flavor. It is important to emphasize that selection is possible of resistant interspecific hybrid rootstocks (e.g., ‘RS-841’) that increase yield and fruit weight of both honeydew cv. Incas and muskmelon cv. Proteo scions, without having a detrimental effect on sensory characteristics, including the aroma profile (Condurso et al., 2012; Verzera et al., 2014).

Melon is a rich source of α-, ζ-, and especially β-carotene but also of lutein, cryptoxanthin, phytoene, and the violaxanthin cycle carotenoids, however, little is known on the effect of grafting on these components (Laur and Tian, 2011). The fruit carotenoid profile of odorous melon, was either non-differentiated, or highly improved particularly with regards to the α- and β-carotene components in response to grafting on C. maxima × C. moschata hybrid rootstocks vis-à-vis the non-grafted control; whereas grafting on C. melo rootstocks resulted in significantly reduced β-carotene levels, which inadvertently emphasized ζ-carotene content, while lutein was increased with grafting on both types of rootstocks (Condurso et al., 2012). Carotenoid content is largely responsible for melon pulp color; hence the effects of grafting on these traits are expectedly associated. Colla et al. (2006b) reported that grafting cantaloupe (cv. Cyrano) on hybrid rootstock ‘P360’ influenced pulp colourimetric values positively, resulting in brighter (higher L^∗) and more intense orange hue (higher a^∗/b^∗ ratio), probably reflecting higher α- and β-carotene concentrations in the pulp (Condurso et al., 2012). Intriguingly, increased levels of both chlorophylls and β-carotene were obtained in the leaves of Galia type cvs. Arava and Resisto grafted on interspecific rootstocks ‘Shintoza,’ ‘Kamel,’ and particularly on ‘RS841’ (Romero et al., 1997).

It is well established that vigorous Cucurbita interspecific hybrids can improve cucumber yields significantly (Davis et al., 2008b). More frequently, the effect on yield is related to the variation in fruit size, as grafted plants are characterized by a vigorous root system (high root length and density) able to enhance photosynthetic rate as well as water and nutrient uptake efficiency (particularly N, P, Ca, and Mg) and, consequently, crop productivity (Rouphael et al., 2010). Several authors have demonstrated a significant increase in fruit weight when cucumber plants were grafted onto Cucurbita interspecific hybrids (‘RS841,’ ‘Strong Tosa,’ ‘PS1313,’ and ‘P360’) and Cucumis pustulatus Naudin ex Hook.f. compared to non-grafted control (Colla et al., 2012, 2013; Goreta Ban et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2015). However, in some cases increased cucumber yield has been attained mainly by an increase in the number of fruits per plant rather than an increase in mean fruit size (Huang et al., 2009).

Other morphological traits that constitute primary criteria for making purchasing decisions are the fruit shape index and the colouration of the skin (Rouphael et al., 2010). Reports on cucumber grafting demonstrated that the effect of rootstocks on fruit shape has been mostly non-significant or minimal (Lee et al., 1999; Colla et al., 2013). Regarding color, Colla et al. (2012) reported that lightest colouration, expressed as an increase in colourimetric CIELAB component L^∗, was observed on the skin of cucumber cv. Akito grafted onto the commercial rootstock ‘PS1313’ (C. maxima × C. moschata) compared to fruit from plants grown on their own roots.

Fruit firmness constitutes also an important physical property influencing consumer acceptability (Rouphael et al., 2010). Hwang et al. (1992) demonstrated that cucumber from plants grafted onto S. angulatus ‘Andong’ rootstock tended to be firmer than those grafted onto figleaf gourd (C. ficifolia ‘Heukjong’). On the contrary, Morishita (2001) reported that ‘Kema’ and ‘Kifujin New Type’ cucumber plants grafted onto the bloomless rootstock ‘Big Ben Kitora’ carried fruits of softer flesh than those grown on their own roots. Nevertheless, more popular rootstocks such as C. moschata or C. maxima × C. moschata had no effect on fruit firmness when compared to non-grafted plants (Sakata et al., 2007; Colla et al., 2013). The variation in fruit firmness induced by rootstocks may be attributed to several mechanisms such as the uptake and translocation of calcium, modulated water relations and nutritional status, increased synthesis of endogenous hormones as well as variation in cell morphology and turgor (Rouphael et al., 2010).

It has been reported that changes in grafted vegetable aroma and taste appear to be not only scion but also rootstock-dependent attesting the importance of selecting appropriate graft combinations (Rouphael et al., 2010). For instance, grafting cucumber onto ‘Heukjong’ figleaf gourd (C. ficifolia) reduced the fruit SSC and fructose concentration when compared to the non-grafted control; whereas the SSC remained high when ‘Andong’ (S. angulatus) was used as rootstock (Lee et al., 1999). Moreover, Huang et al. (2009) observed a lower accumulation of SSC in plants grafted onto figleaf gourd and grown under unstressed conditions compared to self-grafted control. However, under saline conditions of 60 mM NaCl the SSC and TA incurred significant increase in both grafted and self-grafted plants. Similarly, the SSC of ‘Akito’ cucumber increased when grafted onto the interspecific hybrid ‘PS1313,’ whereas an opposite trend was recorded for the TA (Colla et al., 2013).

Besides taste, the effect of grafting on aroma was also quantitated in cucumber. In a recent study, Guler et al. (2013) demonstrated that grafting affected the aroma profile of both the peel and flesh of cucumber cv. Cengelköy in response to the use of a bottle gourd rootstock. Thus, grafting caused a substantial increase in the alcohol content [(Z)-6-Nonenol, (E,Z)-2,6-nonadienol, 1-nonanol, and (Z,Z)-3,6-nonadienol], a decrease in the aldehyde content [(E,Z)-2,6-nonadienal] with no significant influence on ketones, terpenes and hydrocarbons in both cucumber peel and flesh tissues. The authors concluded that the bottle gourd ‘33-41’ could be considered a promising rootstock for improving major volatile components identified in cucumber.

Grafting tomato often results in significant increase in fruit weight and consequently in fruit diameter and size compared with non- or self-grafted plants (Passam et al., 2005; Moncada et al., 2013; Riga, 2015). This was reported for many different rootstock–scion combinations resulting in total yield increase. However, yield gain may be also attributed to an increase in the number of fruits rather than an increase in mean fruit weight (Savvas et al., 2011). The effect of grafting on fruit weight and size depends on grafting combinations (Khah et al., 2006; Leonardi and Giuffrida, 2006; Schwarz et al., 2013). Larger fruit size seems to be attained when vigorous rootstocks are used, such as ‘Maxifort’ (Krumbein and Schwarz, 2013; Schwarz et al., 2013), ‘Beaufort’ (Romano et al., 2000; Pogonyi et al., 2005; Turhan et al., 2011), ‘Heman’ (S. habrochaites), ‘Joint,’ ‘P1614,’ and ‘RS1427’ (Romano et al., 2000), or ‘Star Fighter’ (Theodoropoulou et al., 2007). This phenomenon is particularly recognized when scions have smaller fruit sizes, e.g., cherry tomato with less than 40 g (Schwarz et al., 2013). In some cases, grafting may reduce fruit size when less vigorous rootstocks are used, such as ‘Brigeor’ (Schwarz et al., 2013), ‘Energy,’ ‘Firefly,’ ‘Linea9243,’ ‘Nico’ (Romano et al., 2000). Based on the same reasons, fruit size of two different scion cultivars was significantly reduced when a salt tolerant goji berry (Lycium chinense Mill.) served as rootstock (Huang et al., 2015).

Fruit shape has seldom been assessed in grafted tomato despite indications of its differentiation once the fruit size is affected (Schwarz et al., 2013). Increase in shape index, measured as the ratio of fruit diameter to maximal height, was reported as corresponding to increase in fruit size (Turhan et al., 2011). However, rootstock ‘Beaufort’ raised the fruit shape index, compared to non-grafted tomato, irrespective of the scion cultivar (‘Yeni Talya,’ ‘Swanson,’ ‘Beril’), while rootstock ‘Arnold’ only increased it in combination with the scion ‘Yeni Talya.’ This indicates a similar dependence of fruit shape to rootstock vigor as already mentioned for the fruit size.

Fruit color was in certain cases affected by grafting (Di Gioia et al., 2010; Brajović et al., 2012) but in others not (Krumbein and Schwarz, 2013; Schwarz et al., 2013). As in the case of watermelon (see chapter ‘Watermelon’), changes pertained particularly to color component a^∗ (redness) which is associated with lycopene content. Thus, also for tomato, an effect of grafting on color seems to be significant if a rootstock influences the fruit lycopene content (Miskovic et al., 2016). However, color as well as texture assessment, are often presented with the difficulty of obtaining sufficient and uniform fruit samples in terms of development and harvest maturity to constitute a representative sample. Failure to control sampling procedures effectively may lead to misleading or inconsistent results (see also chapter ‘Methodological approaches’).

Although physiological disorders related to grafted plants have not received much attention in the literature, they are not uncommon. Blossom end-rot (BER), the most typical tomato disorder (Ho and White, 2005), was invariably reduced in tomato grafted on rootstocks ‘Brigeor,’ ‘Maxifort,’ and LA1777 (S. habrochaites), and under different environmental conditions shaped by factors such as salinity, potassium nutrition, sub-optimal temperature, and light conditions (Fan et al., 2011; Krumbein and Schwarz, 2013; Schwarz et al., 2013; Ntatsi et al., 2014). Moreover, reduction in BER incidence with grafting was pronounced under stress conditions in comparison to both non- and self-grafted scions. Decrease in BER was mainly related to the rootstock genotype; e.g., the BER incidence in ‘Classy,’ a medium round type tomato of ∼70 g, was more diminished when grafted on the rootstock ‘Brigeor’ compared to ‘Maxifort’ or self-grafted plants. The BER reduction was also influenced by rootstock–scion interaction; e.g., it was decreased to a greater extent when cherry tomato ‘Piccolino’ was used as a scion. Under certain conditions, the use of a rootstock may raise the BER incidence. This was the case in an experiment where two cultivation systems were compared during summer: hydroponics vs. soil (Takasu et al., 1996); the improved nutrient and water uptake facilitated by grafting did not cope sufficiently with the very fast fruit growth under high radiation conditions. Also, BER increased in trials involving rootstock ‘Edkawi,’ or eggplant rootstocks (e.g., ‘EG203,’ ‘VFR Takii’) (Oda et al., 1996; Poudel and Lee, 2009; Fan et al., 2011). Here possible reasons are justified by the characteristics of the rootstocks selected. Rootstock ‘Edkawi,’ although known as salinity-tolerant, as well as eggplant rootstocks, lower the uptake and transport of Ca-ions into the fruits compared with self-grafted tomato. Results indicate that the incidence of BER is reduced by grafting when Ca uptake and transport into the fruits is improved (Fan et al., 2011; Savvas et al., 2017). Increased fruit Ca concentration may lead to strengthening of cell walls and cellular integrity and improvement of fruit firmness (Dorais, 2007; Schwarz et al., 2013).

Attributes of texture are seldom considered in grafted tomato. Cultivar Jack grown under Mediterranean conditions as a scion grafted onto nine rootstocks typified rootstock effects: e.g., ‘Alligator’ tended to reduce, ‘Maxifort’ did not affect and ‘King Kong’ enhanced firmness (Riga, 2015). Other reports corroborate these findings although loss of firmness seems as the predominant effect. Thus, fruits of the cultivars ‘Classy’ and ‘ASVEG10’ obtained from plants grafted onto ‘Brigeor’ or ‘Maxifort’ and grown under potassium deficiency but also fruits from plants grafted on eggplant rootstock were less firm and scored higher maximum deformation than fruits from self-grafted tomato (Poudel and Lee, 2009; Schwarz et al., 2013). The reasons are not clear but K⁺/Ca²⁺ interaction was not implicated in the differences in fruit firmness. Independently, it could be clearly demonstrated that fruit Ca content was increased by grafting (Khah et al., 2006; Fan et al., 2011; Savvas et al., 2017). However, as in the case of Khah et al. (2006) it did not affect fruit firmness. While Riga (2015) did not find differences in fruit firmness between non- and self-grafted ‘Jack’ tomato, Rahmatian et al. (2014) found significantly lower firmness in fruits from self-grafted compared to non-grafted ‘Synda’ tomato. However, the use of a rootstock (cv. King Kong) independently of simple or double grafting did not affect firmness.

Results concerning the variation in taste of grafted tomato fruit, comprising sugars (glucose, fructose), SSC as a non-specific sweetness parameter, and TA are also very contradictory and seem to be affected by the same parameters as mentioned above. In several experiments, the use of a rootstock did not change fruit taste attributes (Matsuzoe et al., 1996; Khah et al., 2006; Savvas et al., 2011; Barrett et al., 2012). However, decrease and increase in the main components of taste were also observed, as explained below, and based on these findings grafting appears not to constitute a reliable tool for improving tomato fruit taste. This conclusion was confirmed by the results of one of the rare consumer sensory tests performed during a 2-year cultivation of the heirloom tomato ‘Brandywine’ as non-, self-grafted and grafted onto ‘Survivor’ and ‘Multifort.’ While in the first year the rootstock ‘Survivor’ scored significantly lower than the non-grafted ‘Brandywine’ in appearance, acceptability, and flavor, no differences were observed between these treatments in the second year (Barrett et al., 2012).

The main sugars in mature tomato are glucose and fructose in equal shares and the total sugar concentration ranges from about 20 to 100 g⋅kg^-1 fresh mass, depending on cultivar and growing conditions. Improvement of fruit sweetness related to grafting is rather seldomly reported. Such cases described were with tomato grafted onto ‘Fanny,’ ‘King Kong,’ ‘LA1777’ (S. habrochaites), or onto scarlet eggplant rootstocks (e.g., ‘EG 203’), whereby the enhanced SSC content was associated with the effect of water deficiency which lowered plant growth and yield and decreased fruit water content (Oda et al., 1996; Fernández-García et al., 2004a,b; Poudel and Lee, 2009; Ntatsi et al., 2014; Rahmatian et al., 2014). The same association occurred when grafted plants grew under saline or drought conditions or when using a drought tolerant cultivar as a rootstock (Flores et al., 2010; Sánchez-Rodríguez et al., 2012a) or when grafting onto a medicinal plant (L. chinense; Huang et al., 2015). However, in many grafting combinations, rootstocks reportedly decreased SSC and sugar concentration in the scion fruits (Pogonyi et al., 2005; Qaryouti et al., 2007; Turhan et al., 2011; Barrett et al., 2012; Nicoletto et al., 2013a,b; Schwarz et al., 2013; Gajc-Wolska et al., 2015; Kumar et al., 2015; Riga, 2015). Nevertheless, the decline caused by grafting is very low compared to the potential increase procured by employing a selected scion that might at least double the fruit sugar concentration. The decline in sugars incurred with grafting is reported to account for approximately not more than 16% (Riga, 2015), which does not exceed the range of maximum decline proposed for consumer acceptability (Kader, 1999; Maynard et al., 2002). The reasons for a lower carbohydrate content in grafted tomato may stem indirectly through rootstock effect on scion vigor, timing of flowering, fruit load, yield and, ultimately, fruit maturation, as fruit sugar concentration is highly dependent on fruit maturity at harvest (Rouphael et al., 2010; Soteriou and Kyriacou, 2015). In this respect, grafting may be considered a high-input production method, with a prevalent tendency for increasing crop load and potentially suppressing fruit sugar content (Davis et al., 2008b; Soteriou and Kyriacou, 2015). Moreover, vigorous rootstocks may act as additional sinks for assimilates and thus, reduce assimilate flow to the fruits (Xu et al., 2006; Martínez-Ballesta et al., 2010). Alternatively, water uptake-efficient rootstocks may increase fruit water content even if sufficient assimilates are available, thus, leading to a reduced fruit sugar concentration (Turhan et al., 2011; Krumbein and Schwarz, 2013). Fruits of grafted scions are often larger than fruits of the same non- or self-grafted scion, and though the fruit sugar/acid ratio might remain unaffected, a decline in soluble carbohydrates may be incurred as a dilution effect (Tieman et al., 2017).

While sugars may decrease in grafted tomato, acid content expressed as TA is on the contrary enhanced (Turhan et al., 2011; Sánchez-Rodríguez et al., 2012a; Nicoletto et al., 2013a,b; Schwarz et al., 2013; Krumbein and Schwarz, 2013; Huang et al., 2015; Kumar et al., 2015; Riga et al., 2016). Total organic acids in tomato fruit are usually in the range of 0.2 to 1.7 g⋅kg^-1 fresh mass, with citric and malic acid being the main components of sourness. Grafting accounts for an increase in TA up to 15% reported under a range of different environmental conditions which indicates a direct rootstock effect. Comparing fruits from ‘Classy’ and ‘Piccolino’ self-grafted or grafted onto ‘Maxifort’ and ‘Brigeor’ resulted under different experimental conditions almost always in the highest TA produced by ‘Maxifort’ followed by ‘Brigeor’ and self-grafted. Independent of the presence or absence of water stress, tomato fruits from the drought sensitive cultivar Josefina grafted onto the drought tolerant cv. Zarina had always higher TA contents, particularly citric acid, compared with non-, self-grafted or the reciprocal grafting combination (Sánchez-Rodríguez et al., 2012a).

The mechanisms involved in grafting-elicited increase of fruit TA have not been thoroughly investigated; however, organic acids constitute a direct substrate for respiratory demands and their increased de novo synthesis in developing fruits might be a plausible mechanism for coping with the sugar deficit incurred on the heavy crop load supported by vigorous rootstocks. Moreover, the capability of a vigorous root system to enhance the uptake of nutrients, such as K, could be another reason (Ruiz and Romero, 1999; Leonardi and Giuffrida, 2006; Albacete et al., 2009). Potassium is positively related to the acid concentration in tomato fruits, and plays a role in maintaining electroneutrality of acids in the fruit. However, K transport depends not only on the rootstock but also on growing conditions, such as the current K concentration in the root zone, and on climatic factors (Albacete et al., 2009). Interestingly, differences in K concentration were found not to be significant between fruits of self-grafted and grafted plants, but increase in fruit TA was significant (Schwarz et al., 2013). To complicate matters further, an exceptional report demonstrated that when cv. Lemance was grafted onto ‘Beaufort,’ fruit organic acid concentration was lower compared with fruits from non-grafted plants (Pogonyi et al., 2005). Therefore, the enhanced TA in fruits of grafted tomato warrants further investigation (Leonardi and Giuffrida, 2006).

Odor-active volatiles contribute to tomato flavor (Krumbein and Auerswald, 1998) but their influence on sensory properties awaits further treatise. Six major volatiles which contribute to tomato flavor were evaluated by a consumer panel in Florida (USA): 2-butylacetate, cis-3-hexen-1-ol, 3-methyl-1-butenol, 2-methylbutanal, 1-octen-3-one, trans,trans-2,4-decadienal (Tieman et al., 2012; Zhang B. et al., 2016). Krumbein and Schwarz (2013) found that for two different scion cultivars, ‘Piccolino’ – a cherry, and ‘Classy’ – a round type, grafting on rootstocks ‘Brigeor’ and ‘Maxifort’ induced a general enhancement of three aroma volatiles: methyl salicylate, guaiacol and eugenol, with oily, sweet and spicy odors, respectively; but the concentrations of three other aroma volatiles with almondy odor (benzaldehyde), violet-like odor (β-ionone) and tomato-like flavor (geranylacetone) were decreased by grafting. The variation of the carotenoid content in tomato (see below) affects the carotenoid-derived volatiles responsible for tomato flavor, such as the violet-like odor (β-ionone) and the tomato-like flavor (geranylacetone) (Krumbein and Schwarz, 2013). However, the actual sensory contribution of these volatiles to changes in tomato flavor was not assessed, which remains critical particularly under the light of the findings of Tieman et al. (2012).

Carotenoid content of tomato fruit, mainly lycopene and β-carotene, can be influenced by grafting, but it is subject to significant rootstock–scion interaction which indicates that graft combination plays an important role. Moreover, as Riga et al. (2016) demonstrated, the comparison of the grafting combination to either the non-grafted or self-grafted scion is very important. According to several authors, lycopene concentration in tomato fruits tends to decrease with grafting (Helyes et al., 2009; Brajović et al., 2012; Nicoletto et al., 2013b); e.g., most out of 15 rootstocks investigated, including ‘Maxifort,’ ‘Beaufort,’ and ‘King Kong,’ decreased the fruit lycopene concentration of tomato scion ‘Jeremy’ and ‘Jack’ (Miskovic et al., 2009; Riga et al., 2016). Similar results have been reported for tomato scion ‘Cecilia’ grafted onto ‘Beaufort’ and ‘Heman’ (Mohammed et al., 2009), for scion ‘Macarena’ grafted onto ‘Maxifort’ (Gajc-Wolska et al., 2010), as well as for ‘Classy’ grafted onto ‘Brigeor’ (Krumbein and Schwarz, 2013; Schwarz et al., 2013). Though in the latter experiments total carotenoids were diminished due to lycopene decrease, under specific conditions of grafting the lycopene/carotenoid content may increase. When eggplant rootstock ‘Madonna’ was used, tomato lycopene concentration increased (Miskovic et al., 2016). In another experiment, nutritional stress caused by low potassium in the nutrient solution was applied to ‘Classy’ grafted onto ‘Maxifort’ resulting in enhanced β-carotene (Schwarz et al., 2013), as well as in another grafting combination (‘Amati’ grafted onto ‘Robusta’ or ‘Body’) under non-stressed conditions (Brajović et al., 2012). The mechanisms for these opposite responses remain unclear. In other studies, authors did not find any grafting effect on carotenoids (Khah et al., 2006; Vinkovic-Vrcek et al., 2011) of ‘Big Red’ tomato grafted onto ‘Heman’ and ‘Primavera’ (S. lycopersicum) under open-field and greenhouse conditions and of ‘Tamaris’ grafted onto ‘Heman,’ ‘Efiato,’ and ‘Maxifort’ always comparing with fruits from non-grafted cultivars.

Tomato fruit contains significant amounts of ascorbic acid, and several studies showed that fruit content strongly reduced by grafting both in greenhouse and field studies (Fernández-García et al., 2004a,b; Arvanitoyannis et al., 2005; Di Gioia et al., 2010; Vinkovic-Vrcek et al., 2011; Djidonou et al., 2016; Riga et al., 2016). Fruit vitamin C content was reduced in soil cultivation of different tomato scions grafted onto ‘Heman,’ ‘Spirit,’ ‘Arnold,’ ‘Beaufort’ (Qaryouti et al., 2007; Turhan et al., 2011) and in hydroponics using ‘Maxifort,’ ‘Interpro,’ or ‘King Kong’ rootstocks (Riga et al., 2016). The lower ascorbic acid content could be explained by the higher plant/shoot biomass in grafted plants compared with non-grafted ones or by the fact that grafted plants were initially subjected to stress following the grafting operation. Ascorbic acid is known to control cell differentiation (Arrigoni, 1994) and to promote callus division and growth (Tabata et al., 2001). The decreased total vitamin C content of the fruits from grafted plants could therefore be a resultant of redistribution or accumulation of vitamin C in other parts of grafted plants (Wadano et al., 1999). Alternatively, changes in ascorbic acid content can be influenced by the choice of rootstock, as shown for tomato grafted onto ‘King Kong,’ ‘Beaufort,’ or ‘Maxifort’ rootstocks, which exhibited higher ascorbic acid content compared to the same plants self-grafted or grafted onto ‘Arnold’ and ‘Brigeor’ rootstock, respectively (Turhan et al., 2011; Schwarz et al., 2013; Rahmatian et al., 2014). A similar increase in Vitamin C was analyzed when tomato were grafted on L. chinense (Huang et al., 2015).

Abundant flavonoids in tomato fruits are the hydroxycinnamic acids and their derivatives (Gómez-Romero et al., 2010; Sánchez-Rodríguez et al., 2012b; Riga et al., 2016), as well as naringenin, chalcone and rutin (quercetin-3-O-rutinoside) (Slimestad et al., 2008; Sánchez-Rodríguez et al., 2012b), which are natural antioxidants. The choice of cultivar (Steward et al., 2000) as well as abiotic and agronomic factors are major contributing factors to the total content of phenolics in tomato (Tomas-Barberan and Espin, 2001). Under water stress the combination with a drought tolerant rootstock (cv. Zarina) resulted in the highest value in total flavonoids, hydroxycinnamic acids and rutin compared with not or self-grafted ‘Zarina.’ Nicoletto et al. (2013b) found also a higher phenolic acid content for another grafting combination with ‘Profitto’ grafted onto ‘Beaufort’ compared with non-grafted plants, but this was not observed with rootstock ‘Big Power.’ However, Vinkovic-Vrcek et al. (2011) reported that grafting significantly reduced the total phenolic content of tomato cv. Tamaris grafted onto ‘Heman,’ ‘Efiato,’ and ‘Maxifort,’ while no significant differences were found among these rootstocks. Comparing nine different mainly commercial rootstocks, Riga et al. (2016) confirmed that the reduction or increase in flavonoids clearly depends on the selection of the rootstock when the same scion cultivar was used. Thus, relative to tomato from non-grafted ‘Jack,’ soluble and total phenolics were reduced when grafted onto ‘King Kong’ but increased when grafted onto ‘Brigeor.’ The trigger for the rootstock to affect flavonoid concentration remains unclear. Although as indicated by the drought experiment, rootstocks better adapted to stress conditions responsible for higher flavonoid production may improve total flavonoids in the whole plant (Sánchez-Rodríguez et al., 2012b).

Among other functional compounds, serotonin concentration in fruits was found lower after grafting ‘Jack’ onto different commercial rootstocks independent of the cultivars selected (Riga et al., 2016).

Based on recent studies, the effect of grafting on eggplant mean fruit weight tends to be non-significant, compared to non- and self-grafted plants. For instance, when cultivar Black Beauty was cultivated non-grafted, self-grafted or grafted onto S. torvum, S. incanum × S. melongena and S. melongena × S. aethiopicum similar mean fruit weights were observed (Gisbert et al., 2011b). Similar findings were also recorded when S. melongena landraces ‘Bianca,’ ‘Sciacca,’ ‘Marsala,’ and ‘Sicilia’ were grafted onto S. torvum under open field conditions (Sabatino et al., 2016). Khah (2011) also confirmed these results when eggplant cv. Rima was cultivated non-grafted, self-grafted, or grafted onto two hybrid tomato rootstocks, ‘Heman’ and ‘Primavera’ under both greenhouse and open-field conditions. Exceptional increase (29%) in fruit weight was reported for eggplant ‘Black Bell’ when grafted onto S. torvum and grown in a soilless system (Cassaniti et al., 2011).

Eggplant fruit shape is highly heritable and subject to strong genetic control (Gisbert et al., 2011b). Several studies revealed that the effect of grafting on shape index has been circumstantial and mostly non-significant or minimal (4%) when the following rootstocks were used: S. incanum, S. incanum × S. melongena and S. torvum (Cassaniti et al., 2011; Gisbert et al., 2011a,b). Information on fruit physical properties of grafted eggplants, such as peel color, is conflicting but generally considered as having a negative effect (Moncada et al., 2013). For instance, the calyx of ‘Brigah’ fruits from non-grafted plants exhibited higher values of lightness (L^∗) and more vivid color saturation (chroma) in comparison to those from plants grafted onto S. torvum; however, in other similar works such differences between fruits of grafted and non-grafted plants were not observed (Cassaniti et al., 2011; Gisbert et al., 2011b). The most likely source of this disparity could be the difficulty of standardizing sampling practices based on optimal harvest maturity for eggplant.

Negative effects on eggplant fruit textural properties amounting to loss of firmness were reported when the S. melongena cultivars Black Bell and Tsakoniki were grafted onto S. torvum and S. sisymbriifolium rootstocks, respectively (Arvanitoyannis et al., 2005; Cassaniti et al., 2011). The greater fruit external and pulp internal firmness of non-grafted plants observed by Arvanitoyannis et al. (2005) could be attributed to the fact that the pest and disease pressures were more pronounced in this treatment. Therefore, it is likely that restriction of water uptake efficiency in non-grafted plants resulted fruits with lower water content and tougher texture.

Information on taste compounds of eggplant fruits in relation to grafting remains conflicting and conclusive trends may be difficult to deduce currently, however, the reporting of positive effects is the one mostly absent. For example, according to Lee et al. (2010) S. torvum rootstock had no effect on eggplant fruit sugar content. Moreover, only non-significant differences in the SSC, in TA, and in juice pH were recorded among fruits from non-grafted, self-grafted and plants grafted onto S. habrochaites and S. lycopersicum rootstocks (Khah, 2011). In line with the previous work, Arvanitoyannis et al. (2005) observed that grafted plants yielded less sweet fruits with lower ratings of sensory acceptability than non-grafted plants. The reduced fruit sugar concentration in the fruits of grafted plants may be attributed to several mechanisms, including (i) the reduction of assimilate flow to the reproductive organs since vigorous rootstocks may act as additional sinks for assimilates, and (ii) the increased water uptake by rootstocks which could reduce fruit dry matter content and consequently sugar content (Martínez-Ballesta et al., 2010; Rouphael et al., 2010).

Eggplant is among the most important vegetables in terms of oxygen radicals scavenging capacity, which is a quality trait associated with its high content of phenolic antioxidants (Cao et al., 1996). Gisbert et al. (2011b) observed a higher total phenolic content only in fruits of eggplant ‘Cristal’ grafted onto S. macrocarpon rootstock. Furthermore, Sabatino et al. (2016) showed that grafting eggplant onto S. torvum increased total polyphenol fruit content in three out of four Sicilian landraces grown under open-field conditions, whereas an opposite trend was observed by Moncada et al. (2013), wherein the total phenolic content was greater in the non-grafted plants. Moreover, changes in fruit phenolic contents and other important flavonoids, notably anthocyanins, can be highly influenced by the rootstock–scion combination which is often subject to significant interaction (Marsic et al., 2014). However, the latter study also highlighted the importance of environmental parameters such as solar radiation in the same respect, as fruits from the same landrace/rootstock combination behaved differently in two growing seasons, with the first season being characterized by lower solar radiation compared to second. The higher vigor of grafted plants may have a negative effect on the concentration of anthocyanins, therefore grafted plants should be properly pruned under low solar conditions to improve light interception since the accumulation of anthocyanins in eggplant fruit epidermis is strongly dependent on light exposure (Awad et al., 2001).

Several reports in the scientific literature indicated strong rootstock specificity in the responses of pepper to grafting (Rouphael et al., 2010). For instance, Doñas-Uclés et al. (2014) demonstrated an increase in fruit weight when cv. Palermo was grafted onto the C. annuum rootstock ‘Tesor,’ whereas the use of rootstocks ‘Oscos’ and ‘AR40’ incurred a minimal increase in fruit weight. Similarly, Leal-Fernández et al. (2013) showed that the mean fruit weight was higher when sweet pepper ‘Triple star’ was grafted onto chili pepper rootstock ‘AR96029,’ in comparison to non-grafted plants. In the case of F1 hybrids ‘Edo’ and ‘Lux,’ fruit weight was not influenced by grafting onto C. annuum rootstocks of the cultivars Snooker, Tresor, RX360, DRO8801, and 97.9001 (Colla et al., 2008). By contrast Gisbert et al. (2010) identified a general trend for reduction of fruit weight in greenhouse trials of grafted pepper (cvs. Almuden and Coyote), based, however, only on two hybrid rootstocks, ‘Charlot’ and ‘Foc.’ Decrease in fruit weight against non-grafted control is usually an indicator of rootstock–scion incompatibility.

Moreover, absence of defects in particular blossom end rot (BER) is another important quality consideration for peppers. This physiological disorder of the pepper fruit could be ascribed to a local shortage of Ca and is manifested as a leathery brown patch at the blossom-end of the fruit. However, to date there is no information in the international literature on whether the incidence of BER is reduced by grafting. The incidence of BER in grafted pepper plants could be influenced positively by rootstocks able to improve uptake and translocation of Ca to the fruits, thus strengthening cell walls and cellular integrity, or could be exacerbated by vigorous rootstocks of high nitrogen-uptake efficiency that may encourage fast growth whose demands in calcium might be difficult to meet. Therefore, research in this field is currently a prime necessity.

The SSC and TA of pepper fruit is in general not highly compromised by grafting on most commercial C. annuum rootstocks (Colla et al., 2008; López-Marín et al., 2013). In the former, two studies neither SSC nor TA were affected when pepper plants, cultivated under greenhouse conditions, were grafted onto the following Capsicum rootstocks: ‘Snooker,’ ‘Tresor,’ ‘RX360,’ ‘DRO8801,’ ‘97.90001,’ ‘Atlante,’ ‘Creonte,’ and ‘Terrano’ (Colla et al., 2008; López-Marín et al., 2013). Contrarily, positive effects were observed in the TA and SSC of ‘Herminio’ grafted onto ‘Atalante’ under both full and deficit irrigation conditions (López-Marín et al., 2017). The contradictory results pertaining to these taste compounds could relate to differential environments and cultural practices, as well as to possible rootstock–scion interaction.

Pepper fruit carotenoid content, in particular lycopene and β-carotene which is a precursor of vitamin A, can be affected by grafting and is strongly dependent on the choice of rootstock. For instance, red cultivar Fascinato and yellow cultivar Jeanette when grafted onto the rootstock ‘Terrano’ incurred increase in fruit antioxidant capacity and β-carotene content, but not in lycopene content (Chávez-Mendoza et al., 2013). Polyphenols, which constitute a large family of secondary metabolites that act as major antioxidants in the neutralization of free radicals, are abundant in pepper (Colla et al., 2013). Two studies conducted by Spanish researchers showed that grafting effects on the levels of total phenolics in pepper were non-significant (Chávez-Mendoza et al., 2013; López-Marín et al., 2013; Sánchez-Torres et al., 2016).

Pepper fruit contains significant important amounts of ascorbic acid, however, currently available studies have presented conflicting results concerning the variation in vitamin C content in response to grafting (Gisbert et al., 2010; Chávez-Mendoza et al., 2013; López-Marín et al., 2013; Sánchez-Torres et al., 2016). For example, Chávez-Mendoza et al. (2013) observed a significant enhancement of ascorbic acid in grafted pepper plants; but the same effect was not confirmed by López-Marín et al. (2013). The former authors concluded that variation in vitamin C depends on both scion–rootstock combinations and growing conditions, such as plant shading. Nevertheless, other authors reported that grafting had no effect on pepper content in ascorbic acid, such as Gisbert et al. (2010) and Sánchez-Torres et al. (2016) who found no differences when two commercial pepper hybrid cultivars (Almuden and Coyote) were grafted onto two rootstocks (‘Foc’ and Charlot’). In light of the above studies, it might be inferred that high genotypic dependence of this quality trait in pepper scions likely confounds more limited rootstock effects.