<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "archivearticle.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="methods-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2017.00725</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Methods</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Miniature Inverted Repeat Transposable Element Insertions Provide a Source of Intron Length Polymorphism Markers in the Carrot (<italic>Daucus carota</italic> L.)</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Stelmach</surname> <given-names>Katarzyna</given-names></name>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/404867/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Macko-Podg&#x000F3;rni</surname> <given-names>Alicja</given-names></name>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/387633/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Machaj</surname> <given-names>Gabriela</given-names></name>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/387998/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Grzebelus</surname> <given-names>Dariusz</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/144367/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff><institution>Faculty of Biotechnology and Horticulture, Institute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, University of Agriculture in Krakow</institution> <country>Krakow, Poland</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Fulvio Cruciani, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Christian Parisod, University of Neuch&#x000E2;tel, Switzerland; Tina T. Hu, Princeton University, USA</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001"><p>&#x0002A;Correspondence: Dariusz Grzebelus <email>d.grzebelus&#x00040;ogr.ur.krakow.pl</email></p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002"><p>This article was submitted to Evolutionary and Population Genetics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>09</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>8</volume>
<elocation-id>725</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>20</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2017</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>19</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2017</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2017 Stelmach, Macko-Podg&#x000F3;rni, Machaj and Grzebelus.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Stelmach, Macko-Podg&#x000F3;rni, Machaj and Grzebelus</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>The prevalence of non-autonomous class II transposable elements (TEs) in plant genomes may serve as a tool for relatively rapid and low-cost development of gene-associated molecular markers. Miniature inverted-repeat transposable element (MITE) copies inserted within introns can be exploited as potential intron length polymorphism (ILP) markers. ILPs can be detected by PCR with primers anchored in exon sequences flanking the target introns. Here, we designed primers for 209 <italic>DcSto</italic> (<italic>Daucus carota Stowaway</italic>-like) MITE insertion sites within introns along the carrot genome and validated them as candidate ILP markers in order to develop a set of markers for genotyping the carrot. As a proof of concept, 90 biallelic <italic>DcS</italic>-ILP markers were selected and used to assess genetic diversity of 27 accessions comprising wild <italic>Daucus carota</italic> and cultivated carrot of different root shape. The number of effective alleles was 1.56, mean polymorphism informative content was 0.27, while the average observed and expected heterozygosity was 0.24 and 0.34, respectively. Sixty-seven loci showed positive values of Wright&#x00027;s fixation index. Using Bayesian approach, two clusters comprising four wild and 23 cultivated accessions, respectively, were distinguished. Within the cultivated carrot gene pool, four subclusters representing accessions from Chantenay, Danvers, Imperator, and Paris Market types were revealed. It is the first molecular evidence for root-type associated diversity structure in western cultivated carrot. <italic>DcS</italic>-ILPs detected substantial genetic diversity among the studied accessions and, showing considerable discrimination power, may be exploited as a tool for germplasm characterization and analysis of genome relationships. The developed set of <italic>DcS</italic>-ILP markers is an easily accessible molecular marker genotyping system based on TE insertion polymorphism.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd><italic>DcSto</italic></kwd>
<kwd>genetic diversity structure</kwd>
<kwd>ILP</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Stowaway</italic>-like MITEs</kwd>
<kwd>TEs</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="4"/>
<table-count count="4"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="48"/>
<page-count count="9"/>
<word-count count="6192"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Transposable elements (TEs) are segments of DNA that can move themselves to new chromosomal location. They are prevalent in the genomes of both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, and account for a great subsection of the genetic variation in plants and animals. Some plant genomes are composed of transposable elements in more than two thirds, as the 77% of the maize genome (Meyers et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2001</xref>). Miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) are a special type of class II non-autonomous elements with a maximum of a few hundred base pairs in size (Hua-Van et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">2005</xref>). Although they were first discovered in plant genomes (Bureau and Wessler, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">1992</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">1994</xref>), they have been also identified in a wide range of animal, eubacteria and archea genomes (Br&#x000FC;gger et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">2002</xref>; Feschotte et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2002</xref>). The two largest MITE families, <italic>Stowaway</italic> and <italic>Tourist</italic>, were identified as members of the <italic>Tc1/Mariner</italic> and the <italic>PIF/Harbinger</italic> superfamilies, respectively (Jiang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2004</xref>). <italic>Stowaway</italic> MITEs were first described in the maize genome (Bureau and Wessler, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">1994</xref>) as less than 500 bp long, forming a 2 bp TA TSD upon insertion. MITEs are usually present in many thousand copies per genome. 22,000 identified <italic>Stowaway</italic> MITEs were classified into 34 families in the <italic>Oryza sativa</italic> genome (Feschotte et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">2003</xref>), whereas 18,000 MITE insertions were classified into 18 families in the <italic>Triticum</italic> spp. genome (Yaakov et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">2013</xref>).</p>
<p>The ubiquity, genome-wide distribution and high copy numbers have provided genetic markers from both class I and class II TEs (Kumar and Hirochika, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2001</xref>). The abundance of MITE copies makes them highly useful source of polymorphism. To date, MITE Transposon Display (MITE-TD) and Inter-MITE Polymorphism (IMP) techniques exploiting the TIR sequences in <italic>Oryza sativa, Zea mays, Sorghum bicolor, Hordeum vulgare</italic>, and <italic>Daucus carota</italic> MITEs, have been developed (Chang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">2001</xref>; Park et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2003</xref>; Casa et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2004</xref>; Lee et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2005</xref>; Grzebelus et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2007</xref>). Some <italic>Stowaway</italic> MITEs identified to date were described as being preferentially inserted or retained in genic regions (Casa et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2000</xref>; Jiang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2003</xref>). However, even though 54% of <italic>DcSto</italic> insertion sites in the carrot genome were located less than 2 kb away from or inside the coding sequences, random distribution of <italic>DcSto</italic> rather than preferential insertions around genes was proposed (Iorizzo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">2016</xref>).</p>
<p>Insertions within introns may provide a significant polymorphism. Intron polymorphisms, particularly intron length polymorphisms (ILPs), can be exploited as genetic markers used for gene mapping (Wydner et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">1994</xref>) and population genetic surveys (Lessa, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">1992</xref>). ILP takes advantage of the different rate of evolution of exons and introns that can result in conserved exon nucleotide sequences adjoined to more variable intron sequences. ILP can be detected by the polymerase chain reaction with a pair of primers anchored in the exons flanking the intron of interest (Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">2005</xref>). ILP markers are unique due to their gene-specifity, codominancy, conveniency, reliability and cost-efficiency. Furthermore, ILPs are characterized by high transferability among related plant species (Yang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">2007</xref>; Gupta et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2011</xref>). To date, studies on the development of ILP markers in plants have been restricted to few species (Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">2005</xref>; Huang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">2008</xref>; Chen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">2010</xref>; Gupta et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2011</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2012</xref>; Li et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2013</xref>; Muthamilarasan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">2014</xref>).</p>
<p>Carrot is the most widely grown member of Apiaceae family. Its progenitor, wild <italic>Daucus carota</italic> L., is a plant commonly occurring in the temperate climatic zones. To date, a range molecular tools facilitating genome analysis in context of evolutionary history of wild and cultivated carrot have been developed, i.e., DArT, SSR, and SNP markers (Cavagnaro et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2011</xref>; Iorizzo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2013</xref>; Grzebelus et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2014</xref>) and a set of ca. 30 resequenced genomes (Iorizzo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">2016</xref>). The analyses showed clear evidence for the carrot germplasm separation into three distinct groups of wild, western cultivated (European and American germplasm) and eastern cultivated (Asian germplasm) carrot. The majority of modern cultivars belong to the western group. Several varietal types were distinguished within western carrots, based primarily on the storage root shape and size (Prohens and Nuez, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">2008</xref>). Despite apparent phenotypic differences, previous studies have indicated absence of any apparent population structure in western carrots, suggesting no significant genetic separation among these varietal types (Bradeen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">2002</xref>; Iorizzo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2013</xref>).</p>
<p>In this study, we performed (1) a genome-wide search for <italic>DcSto</italic> (<italic>Daucus carota Stowaway</italic>-like) MITE insertion-based intron length polymorphism markers, and (2) validation of candidate ILP markers in order to develop a panel for genotyping the carrot by means of applying a simple, cost- and time-efficient polymerase chain reaction.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials and methods" id="s2">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Plant materials</title>
<p>Twenty eight carrot accessions comprising four wild carrots of different origin, 23 western type carrot cultivars representing four types of root shape and a DH1 plant (Iorizzo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">2016</xref>) as the reference, were used for ILP validation (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). Total genomic DNA was isolated from fresh young leaves using commercial DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen) and used as the template for PCR amplification.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p><bold>Description of plant material used in the present study</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Number</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Accession</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Species</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Cultivar name</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Root type</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Origin</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2"><bold>Source</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="RS33">RS33</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>sativus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chantenay Royal</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chantenay</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">FRA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HRIGRU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8860</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="RS34">RS34</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>sativus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chantenay Red Cored</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chantenay</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GBR</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HRIGRU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8847</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="RS35">RS35</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>sativus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Royal Chantenay</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chantenay</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">USA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HRIGRU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3882</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="RS37">RS37</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>sativus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Gold King</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chantenay</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">USA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HRIGRU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5127</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="RS39">RS39</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>sativus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chantenay Long Type</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chantenay</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">USA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HRIGRU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5090</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="RS41">RS41</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>sativus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chantenay Rex RS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chantenay</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">NLD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HRIGRU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5589</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="RS43">RS43</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>sativus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Danvers 126</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Danvers</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GBR</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HRIGRU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6487</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="RS44">RS44</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>sativus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Danvers Danro RS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Danvers</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">NLD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HRIGRU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5595</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="RS45">RS45</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>sativus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Danvers Red Cored</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Danvers</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">USA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HRIGRU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5128</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="RS49">RS49</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>sativus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Danvers</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Danvers</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">NLD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HRIGRU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11144</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="RS50">RS50</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>sativus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Danvers Pride</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Danvers</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">USA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HRIGRU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8098</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">12</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="RS51">RS51</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>sativus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Danvers Half Long</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Danvers</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">USA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HRIGRU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8109</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">13</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="RS56">RS56</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>sativus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Paris Market</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Paris Market</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">NLD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HRIGRU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5596</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">14</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="RS57">RS57</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>sativus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Paris Forcing</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Paris Market</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GBR</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HRIGRU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3966</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">15</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="RS59">RS59</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>sativus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">French Forcing Horn</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Paris Market</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GBR</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HRIGRU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6489</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">16</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="RS60">RS60</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>sativus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Parijse Market</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Paris Market</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02014;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HRIGRU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9294</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">17</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="RS62">RS62</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>sativus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Parijse Market (Rubin)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Paris Market</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02014;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HRIGRU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9296</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">18</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="RS71">RS71</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>sativus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Gold Pak</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Imperator</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">USA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HRIGRU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3885</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">19</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="RS72">RS72</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>sativus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Imperator 408</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Imperator</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">USA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HRIGRU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3907</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">20</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="RS73">RS73</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>sativus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Imperator</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Imperator</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">NLD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HRIGRU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11145</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">21</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="RS74">RS74</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>sativus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Imperator 407</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Imperator</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">USA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HRIGRU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3891</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">22</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="RS75">RS75</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>sativus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Long Imperator 58</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Imperator</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">USA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HRIGRU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3917</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">23</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="RS76">RS76</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>sativus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Imperator 58</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Imperator</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">USA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HRIGRU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3892</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">24</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="CDS15">CDS15</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>azoricus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ESP</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HRIGRU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6667</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">25</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="CDS39">CDS39</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>carota</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CHE</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HRIGRU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9226</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">26</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="CDS93">CDS93</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>carota</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">USA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">USDA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">27</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="CDS40">CDS40</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>carota</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">POL</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HRIGRU</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9270</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Development of ILP markers</title>
<p>Coordinates of 4028 <italic>DcSto</italic> insertions belonging to 14 families were compared to coordinates of ca. 32 thousand genes annotated in the carrot reference DH1 genome assembly (Iorizzo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">2016</xref>; NCBI accession <ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="LNRQ01000000">LNRQ01000000</ext-link>). 609 gene-associated <italic>DcSto</italic> insertion sites localized in introns were identified, of which 209 were manually selected for development of ILP markers. The criteria for initial selection were as followed: insertion sites were (1) free from any other annotated repetitive sequences, (2) present in introns not longer than 3.7 Kb, and (3) evenly distributed over each chromosome. Primer3 (Untergasser et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">2012</xref>) and Primer-BLAST (Ye et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">2012</xref>) were used to design PCR primer pairs anchored in exons flanking introns harboring the selected <italic>DcSto</italic> insertions. Primer pairs were designed to amplify fragments in a 400&#x02013;3,700-bp range. The optimal annealing temperature was set to 58&#x000B0;C; and the size and GC content ranged from 18 to 23 bases and 40 to 60%, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Validation and evaluation of <italic>DcS</italic>-ILP markers</title>
<p>Candidate ILP markers were selected for experimental evaluation. Amplification was carried out in a 10 &#x003BC;L total volume containing 20 ng of genomic DNA, 0.5 &#x003BC;M each of forward and reverse primer, 0.25 mM of each dNTP (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 0.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 1x Taq buffer. The PCR amplifications were performed in an Eppendorf MasterCycler Gradient using the following thermal profile: 94&#x000B0;C (120 s), 30 cycles of 94&#x000B0;C (30 s), 56&#x000B0;C (30 s), 68&#x000B0;C (120 s) and final step of 68&#x000B0;C (600 s). For primers generating ambiguous profiles, the annealing temperature was adjusted to 58, 59, or 60&#x000B0;C. PCR products were separated in 1% agarose gels run in 1x Tris-borate-EDTA buffer (pH 8.0) at a constant current of 5V/cm for about 2 h, stained with Midori Green (Nippon Genetics) and analyzed using GelDoc-It imaging system (UVP). GeneRuler 1 kb and 100 bp<sup>&#x0002B;</sup> DNA Ladders (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used to determine product sizes for each locus. The amplicons representing additional local rearrangements within introns were excised, purified using GenJET&#x02122; Gel Extraction Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), cloned into T/A cloning vector (Promega Corporation) and transformed into <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>, strain DH10B. Up to five recombinant colonies were selected and cultured overnight at 37&#x000B0;C in culture tubes containing 5 mL of Luria&#x02013;Bertani medium and ampicillin (100 mg/L). Plasmids were purified using Wizard SV Minipreps KIT (Promega Corporation). Sequencing reactions were set up with universal primers sp6 and T7 using Big Dye terminator chemistry (Applied Biosystems), as recommended by manufacturer. Sequencing was carried out on ABI 3700 capillary sequencer (Applied Biosystems).The sequences were manually edited using BioEdit (Hall, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">1999</xref>) and aligned to the sequences of predicted genes for which ILP primers were designed.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Recording of electrophoretic bands and statistical data analysis</title>
<p>The ILP marker profiles were scored manually. Each allele was scored as: 1 (empty insertion site), 2 (occupied insertion site) or 0 (lack of amplification).The codominant marker matrix with diploid individuals was created (Supplementary Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">1</xref>) and used in GenAlEx 6.5 (Peakall and Smouse, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2006</xref>) for creating genetic distance matrix and analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA). Expected and observed heterozygosity (H<sub><italic>e</italic></sub> and H<sub><italic>o</italic></sub>), and fixation index (F<sub><italic>IS</italic></sub>) were computed using POPGENE 1.32 (Yeh et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">2000</xref>). Polymorphism informative content (PIC) of <italic>n</italic>-allele locus, an indicator of a genetic marker&#x00027;s usefulness introduced by Botstein et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">1980</xref>), was calculated as: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mstyle displaystyle='true'><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle='true'><mml:munderover><mml:mo>&#x02211;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle><mml:mtext>&#x0200B;</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mstyle displaystyle='true'><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle='true'><mml:munderover><mml:mo>&#x02211;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x000A0;</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x000A0;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle='true'><mml:munderover><mml:mo>&#x02211;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x000A0;</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x000A0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle><mml:mtext>&#x0200B;</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <italic>p</italic><sub><italic>i</italic></sub> and <italic>p</italic><sub><italic>j</italic></sub> are the population frequency of the <italic>i</italic>th and <italic>j</italic>th allele. Genetic structure was inferred using Bayesian model-based software STRUCTURE 2.2.3 (Pritchard et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2008</xref>) without information on the accession origin. Ten independent iterations with an admixture and correlated allele frequencies model were performed. The length of the burn-in period and the number of Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) replications after the burn-in were assigned at 10<sup>5</sup> for each number of clusters (K) set from 1 to 27 and 1 to 23 for further subclustering. The estimation of K was provided by joining the log probability of data [LnP(D)] from STRUCTURE output and an <italic>ad hoc</italic> statistics &#x00394;K (Evanno et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2005</xref>) based on the second rate of change of the log probability of data with respect to the number of clusters. In addition, CLUMPAK software (Kopelman et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2015</xref>) was used to confirm the selection of the best K. Based on the chosen K, each carrot accession was assigned to a subpopulation for which its membership value (Q) was higher than 0.6. AMOVA was performed using GenAlEx 6.5 to evaluate differentiation among the subpopulations. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was conducted to visualize genetic diversity of the studied accessions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title>Development and validation of the candidate ILP markers</title>
<p>Insertion sites of 209 <italic>DcSto</italic> MITEs within introns of annotated genes were chosen to develop <italic>Daucus carota Stowaway</italic>-like Intron Length Polymorphism (<italic>DcS</italic>-ILP) markers evenly distributed throughout the genome (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>). The number of <italic>DcSto</italic> insertion sites evaluated per chromosome varied from 18 (chromosome 9) to 32 (chromosome 2), with an average of 23.22. Their density ranged from 1.37 (chromosome 2) to 2.57 per Mb (chromosome 1), with an average of 1.76.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p><bold>Physical genomic distribution of the 209 developed <italic><bold>DcS</bold></italic>-ILP markers on nine chromosomes of the carrot genome</bold>. The vertical bars correspond to the position of introns harboring <italic>DcSto</italic> insertions, selected for a development of ILP markers. Positively validated markers are marked by asterisk.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00725-g0001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Upon PCR amplification, 100 of the 209 sites showed the expected <italic>DcSto</italic> insertion-based polymorphism, however, in case of 10 sites at least one additional amplicon was present in at least one accession (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>). Sequencing of those amplicons revealed that none of the additional variants was related to the activity of the <italic>DcSto</italic> copy present in the reference genome (data not shown). Of the remaining 109 sites, six did not amplify efficiently; 32 were monomorphic for all tested plants; 13 showed a complex pattern resulting from nonspecific amplification, whereas 58 yielded polymorphic products not associated with <italic>DcSto</italic> insertions (i.e., sizes of PCR products did not correspond to the expected sizes of empty or occupied variants) (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p><bold>Amplification of <italic><bold>DcS</bold></italic>-ILP612 and <italic><bold>DcS</bold></italic>-ILP608 markers in 23 carrot cultivars and the reference genome</bold>. Carrot accessions from 1 to 24 are listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>. <italic>DcS</italic>-ILP612&#x02014;amplification of two alleles corresponding to empty <bold>(A)</bold> and occupied <bold>(B)</bold> <italic>DcSto</italic> insertion site and heterozygote <bold>(C)</bold>; <italic>DcS</italic>-ILP608&#x02014;amplification of an additional allele <bold>(D)</bold> resulting from an unclassified rearrangement within the intron. M, 1 kb DNA Ladder.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00725-g0002.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p><bold>Results of the experimental validation of developed candidate <italic><bold>DcS</bold></italic>-ILP markers</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left" colspan="2"/>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="6" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Validated insertion sites</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Chromosome</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Number of insertion sites</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Polymorphic with two allelic variants resulting from <italic>DcSto</italic> insertion</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Polymorphic with two allelic variants resulting from <italic>DcSto</italic> insertion and an additional variant</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Polymorphic with many allelic variants not associated with <italic>DcSto</italic> insertion</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Complex amplification pattern</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Monomorphic</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>No amplification</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr style="border-top: thin solid #000000;">
<td valign="top" align="left">Total</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">209</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">90</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The length of introns harboring the selected <italic>DcSto</italic> insertions varied from 449 to 3,637 bp. Based on the length of amplified introns, the developed markers were divided into six classes; I to V with intron size ranging from 400 to 3,400 bp, each at 600-bp interval, and class VI comprising introns longer than 3,400 bp (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>). Introns belonging to classes I to IV comprised 97.6% of all the developed markers. Class I and II markers were the most numerous, whereas class III markers showed the highest (55.6%) successful amplification rate indicating the most suitable length of introns considered for ILP markers. DcS-ILP markers of class V and VI were characterized by ambiguous amplification patterns, therefore not considered for further analyses.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p><bold>The intron length-based classification of candidate <italic><bold>DcS</bold></italic>-ILP markers</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Marker class</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>The range of intron lengths [bp]</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Number of candidate <italic>DcS</italic>-ILP markers</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Number of positively validated <italic>DcS</italic>-ILP markers</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">I</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">400&#x02013;1,000</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">II</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,001&#x02013;1,600</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">III</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,601&#x02013;2,200</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">IV</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2,201&#x02013;2,800</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">V</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2,801&#x02013;3,400</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">VI</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003E;3,401</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Finally, 90 <italic>DcS</italic>-ILP (Supplementary Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">2</xref>) markers showing biallelic <italic>DcSto</italic> insertion polymorphism (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>) were chosen for development of a panel for genotyping the carrot.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Assessment of genetic diversity</title>
<p>The utility of 90 biallelic <italic>DcS</italic>-ILP markers was verified by estimating the genetic diversity of the collection of 27 <italic>D. carota</italic> accessions comprising 23 cultivated and 4 wild populations. In total, 180 alleles were identified with an average of 2.0 per locus. 2.78% of the alleles were rare (frequency &#x0003C;0.05) and the mean effective number of alleles was 1.56. The observed heterozygosity for individual loci ranged from 0.04 to 0.56, with an average of 0.24, whereas the expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.04 to 0.51, with an average of 0.34. Shannon&#x00027;s index was from 0.09 to 0.69, with an average of 0.50. Among all the loci analyzed with the Wright&#x00027;s fixation index, 67 were positive. The PIC values ranged from 0.04 to 0.37, with an average of 0.27 (Supplementary Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">1</xref>).</p>
<p>STRUCTURE analysis based on 90 loci representing <italic>DcSto</italic> insertion-derived polymorphisms was performed to evaluate genetic structure of the 27 accessions. The value of &#x00394;K statistics was the highest when two clusters were assumed [&#x00394;<italic>K</italic><sub>(2)</sub> &#x0003D; 297.64]. The increase in the number of assumed clusters resulted in low &#x00394;<italic>K</italic> value [&#x00394;<italic>K</italic><sub>(&#x0003E;2)</sub> &#x0003D; 0.01&#x02013;52.35]. Twenty three cultivated accessions were assigned to cluster 1 (C1) with membership coefficients (Q) ranging between 0.831 and 0.997, whereas cluster 2 (C2) comprised exclusively wild accessions with the <italic>Q</italic> value of 0.965&#x02013;0.998 (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3A</xref>). The level of genetic diversity within C1 (0.31) was slightly higher than within C2 (0.29).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p><bold>The genetic structure of the studied 27 accessions based on a Bayesian approach assuming two clusters comprising cultivated (cluster 1) and wild (cluster 2) accessions, exclusively (A)</bold>. The analysis of the genetic structure within first cluster resulted in forming four subclusters, generally comprising accessions representing each of described storage root shapes: C, Chantenay; D, Danvers; I, Imperator; P, Paris Market <bold>(B)</bold>. Assumed four gene pools reflect their breeding history as proposed by Banga (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1963</xref>) <bold>(C)</bold>. The numbers of accessions correspond to those listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00725-g0003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>To evaluate the genetic structure of the 23 cultivated accessions further subclustering was performed on the accessions assigned to C1. The highest &#x00394;K was observed for <italic>K</italic> &#x0003D; 21 [&#x00394;<italic>K</italic><sub>(21)</sub> &#x0003D; 22.77], <italic>K</italic> &#x0003D; 2 [&#x00394;<italic>K</italic><sub>(2)</sub> &#x0003D; 17.33] and <italic>K</italic> &#x0003D; 4 [&#x00394;<italic>K</italic><sub>(4)</sub> &#x0003D; 14.55]. &#x00394;<italic>K</italic> values for <italic>K</italic> &#x0003D; 3, <italic>K</italic> &#x0003D; 5&#x02013;20 and <italic>K</italic> &#x0003D; 22&#x02013;23 were not significant (&#x00394;<italic>K</italic> &#x0003D; 0.164&#x02013;4.16). The mean value of log probability of the data was higher for <italic>K</italic> &#x0003D; 4 than for <italic>K</italic> &#x0003D; 21, and <italic>K</italic> &#x0003D; 2 [LnP(D)<sub><italic>K</italic> &#x0003D; 4</sub> &#x0003D; &#x02212;1891.7, LnP(D)<sub><italic>K</italic> &#x0003D; 2</sub> &#x0003D; &#x02212;1922.5, LnP(D)<sub><italic>K</italic> &#x0003D; 21</sub> &#x0003D; &#x02212;2703.2], therefore four subclusters were chosen as the most probable genetic structure of the studied cultivated accessions. With <italic>K</italic> &#x0003D; 4, three accessions were assigned to subcluster SC1 with Q ranging between 0.928 and 0.962, six to subcluster SC2 with Q between 0.746 and 0.908, five to subcluster SC3 with Q between 0.825 and 0.954 and five to subcluster SC4 with Q between 0.782 and 0.922 (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3B</xref>). Four accessions, namely Chantenay Red Cored, Chentenay Rex RS, Danvers 126, and Danvers could not be assigned to any of the subclusters due to high level of admixture (<italic>Q</italic> &#x0003C; 0.6). The overall Q proportion of each of the four types clearly distinguished (<italic>Q</italic> &#x0003E; 0.6) the membership of Chantenay root type in SC1 (<italic>Q</italic> &#x0003D; 0.605), Danvers root type in SC2 (<italic>Q</italic> &#x0003D; 0.626), Imperator root type in SC3 (<italic>Q</italic> &#x0003D; 0.785), and Paris Market root type in SC4 (<italic>Q</italic> &#x0003D; 0.884) (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption><p><bold>The proportion of membership coefficients (Q) of each population defined by the type of root in each of the four subclusters</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Population name</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="4" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Q proportion for four assumed subclusters</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Number of accessions assigned to defined population</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>SC1</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>SC2</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>SC3</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>SC4</bold></th>
<th/>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chantenay</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.605</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.253</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.031</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.111</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Danvers</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.082</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.626</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.136</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.155</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Imperator</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.014</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.175</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.786</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.024</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Paris market</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.043</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.034</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.039</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.884</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>AMOVA attributed 19% (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003D; 0.001) of the total genetic diversity to variation among the root types. The diversity of the 23 cultivated accessions was revealed by PCoA (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>). Using the first three axes 31.7% of the total variation could be explained, with the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd axes explaining 12.1, 10.4, and 9.2%, respectively.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p><bold>PCoA of 23 carrot accessions based on 90 <italic><bold>DcS</bold></italic>-ILP markers</bold>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00725-g0004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The above results suggested four separate groups in the collection of 23 cultivated carrots and the grouping generally corresponded with a postulated breeding history of western carrot types presented by Banga (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1963</xref>), indicating that Chantenay and Danvers types originated from the Late Half Long Horn group, while Paris Market type descended from the Early Short Horn group. Both historical groups differ in terms of their storage root shape and earliness. In turn, the origin Imperator type was traced back to a cross between Chantenay and Nantes (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3C</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>In the present study, we took advantage of intron length polymorphisms resulting from retained <italic>DcSto</italic> insertions in order to develop a set of ILP markers in the carrot. The <italic>DcSto</italic> elements used in the study comprised mostly two families, <italic>DcSto6</italic> and <italic>DcSto1</italic>, the most numerous in the carrot genome and showing high percentage of insertions within coding regions (20 and 12%, respectively) (Iorizzo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">2016</xref>). The ubiquity of <italic>DcSto</italic> elements facilitated the selection of evenly distributed insertion sites for analysis, as well as equal coverage of the genome with the developed markers. 62.7% of the candidate markers were successfully amplified and 47.8% of them identified <italic>DcSto</italic> insertion polymorphisms. The success of amplification rate was lower in comparison with ILP markers in other plants, such as <italic>Vigna unguiculata</italic> (89%; Gupta et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2012</xref>), <italic>Glycine max</italic> (88.2%; Shu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2010</xref>), <italic>Solanum lycopersicum</italic> (71%; Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">2010</xref>), probably as a result of high percentage of ambiguous amplification of introns longer than 2,200 bp. The length of intron is considered the main cause of PCR failure and generally, the successful amplification rate decreases with greater length of intron (Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">2010</xref>; Gupta et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2012</xref>). Polymorphism information content (PIC) has become the most widely used formula to measure the information content of molecular markers (Nagy et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2012</xref>). The mean PIC value of <italic>DcS</italic>-ILPs obtained for the studied <italic>Daucus carota</italic> accessions was higher compared to many of the developed ILP markers, e.g., <italic>Setaria italica</italic> (Gupta et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2011</xref>) and <italic>Hevea brasiliensis</italic> (Li et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2013</xref>), and comparable to study of Gupta et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2012</xref>) where 16 CILP loci were analyzed in 10 <italic>Vigna unguiculata</italic> accessions, with an average of 2.0 alleles per locus, and PIC value of 0.34. Differences in PIC values might be attributed to the various numbers of markers and accessions exploited in these studies. The average PIC value obtained in study of Huang et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2010</xref>), where 103 ILP loci were analyzed in 36 <italic>Oryza sativa</italic> accessions, was considerably higher (0.44) due to the higher number of alleles identified by rice ILPs (2.29 alleles per locus). As expected, the mean PIC value of the codominant <italic>DcS</italic>-ILPs was lower than the one obtained for the genomic SSR markers developed for the carrot (Rong et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">2010</xref>; Cavagnaro et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2011</xref>). Similar results were reported for the comparative analysis of genetic diversity in <italic>Oryza sativa</italic> using ILP and genomic SSR markers (Huang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2010</xref>). The developed <italic>DcS</italic>-ILPs showed discriminatory power comparable to that of dominant markers, e.g., DArT (Grzebelus et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2014</xref>). The values of Wright&#x00027;s fixation index which were significantly higher than zero, as well as the lower mean value of observed heterozygosity, indicated an excess of homozygous allelic states expected in advanced cultivars. <italic>DcS</italic>-ILP-based analysis of genetic structure of the studied accessions showed clear differentiation of wild and cultivated carrot, supporting earlier observations based on DArT, SSR and SNP genotyping (Cavagnaro et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2011</xref>; Iorizzo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2013</xref>; Grzebelus et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2014</xref>). Bayesian clustering, on both accession and pre-defined population levels, revealed the presence of four gene pools that generally could be attributed to the shape of the storage root, namely: (1) Chantenay, (2) Danvers, (3) Imperator, and (4) Paris Market, and corresponding to their breeding history, as proposed by Banga (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1963</xref>) (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3B,C</xref>). Having said that, a substantial level of admixture was apparent for few investigated cultivars, possibly resulting from inter-type crosses aiming to derive an intermediate root morphology, e.g., longer or shorter roots. On the other hand, clear separation between the Paris Market type cultivars and the remaining three types confirms the postulated origin of the former from the Early Short Horn gene pool, opposed to Danvers and Chantenay types originating from the Late Half Long Horn gene pool. It is the first molecular evidence for a possible root-type associated structure of genetic diversity in western cultivated carrot. Nonetheless, a more extensive study ought to be conducted in order to substantiate this hypothesis. The results of PCoA were mostly consistent with Bayesian clustering indicating the presence of the above-mentioned genetic structure.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="s5">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In this study, we showed that the abundance of class II transposable elements may serve as a tool for relatively rapid and low-cost development of gene-derived molecular markers for effective use in carrot genotyping studies. <italic>DcSto</italic> insertion-derived ILP markers detect substantial variation among carrot plants of different origin and can be exploited in germplasm characterization and analysis of genome relationships. In addition, <italic>DcS</italic>-ILP markers directly reflect the variation within the genes and could be potentially useful in gene tagging and genetic map construction. ILP markers share many advantages of SSR markers, i.e., codominant nature, locus specificity and high reproducibility, but provide more convenient and rapid detection. To our knowledge, the <italic>DcS</italic>-ILP markers developed in this study are a novel set of publicly available transposon-based markers in the carrot.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>AM, DG, and KS designed the study; KS, AM, and GM developed <italic>DcS</italic>-ILP markers; KS performed the validation of candidate <italic>DcS</italic>-ILP markers and the assessment of genetic diversity; KS, DG, AM, and GM drafted sections of the manuscript; KS and DG prepared the final version of the paper. All authors read, reviewed and approved the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The research was financed from funds for basic research on crop improvement granted by the Polish Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development in the years 2014&#x02013;2016.</p>
<sec>
<title>Conflict of interest statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s8">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2017.00725/full#supplementary-material">http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2017.00725/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table1.xlsx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table2.XLSX" id="SM2" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Banga</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1963</year>). <source>Main Types of the Western Carotene Carrot and Their Origin</source>. <publisher-loc>Zwolle</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>N.V. Uitgevers-Maatschappij W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Botstein</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>White</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Skolnick</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Davis</surname> <given-names>R. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1980</year>). <article-title>Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Hum. Genet.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>314</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>331</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">6247908</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bradeen</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bach</surname> <given-names>I. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Briard</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>le Clerc</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grzebelus</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Senalik</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Molecular diversity analysis of cultivated carrot (<italic>Daucus carota</italic> L.) and wild <italic>Daucus</italic> populations reveals a genetically nonstructured composition</article-title>. <source>J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.</source> <volume>127</volume>, <fpage>383</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>391</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Br&#x000FC;gger</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Redder</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>She</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Confalonieri</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zivanovic</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garrett</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Mobile elements in archaeal genomes</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol. Lett.</source> <volume>206</volume>, <fpage>131</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>141</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0378-1097(01)00504-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11814653</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bureau</surname> <given-names>T. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wessler</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title><italic>Tourist</italic>: a large family of small inverted repeat elements frequently associated with maize genes</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>1283</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1294</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/tpc.4.10.1283</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1332797</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bureau</surname> <given-names>T. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wessler</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title><italic>Stowaway</italic>: a new family of inverted repeat elements associated with the genes of both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Online</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>907</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>916</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/tpc.6.6.907</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8061524</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Casa</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brouwer</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nagel</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kresovich</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>The MITE family <italic>Heartbreaker</italic> (<italic>Hbr</italic>): molecular markers in maize</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>97</volume>, <fpage>10083</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>10089</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.97.18.10083</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10963671</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Casa</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nagel</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wessler</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>MITE display</article-title>. <source>Methods Mol. Biol.</source> <volume>260</volume>, <fpage>175</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>188</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1385/1-59259-755-6:175</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15020809</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cavagnaro</surname> <given-names>P. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chung</surname> <given-names>S.-M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manin</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yildiz</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ali</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alessandro</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Microsatellite isolation and marker development in carrot - genomic distribution, linkage mapping, genetic diversity analysis and marker transferability across Apiaceae</article-title>. <source>BMC Genomics</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>386</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2164-12-386</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21806822</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>R.-Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>O&#x00027;Donoughue</surname> <given-names>L. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bureau</surname> <given-names>T. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Inter-MITE polymorphisms (IMP): a high throughput transposon-based genome mapping and fingerprinting approach</article-title>. <source>TAG Theor. Appl. Genet.</source> <volume>102</volume>, <fpage>773</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>781</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s001220051709</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Investigation and utilization of intron length polymorphisms in conifers</article-title>. <source>New For.</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>379</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>388</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11056-010-9229-5</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Evanno</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Regnaut</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goudet</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>2611</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2620</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15969739</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Feschotte</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Swamy</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wessler</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Genome-wide analysis of mariner-like transposable elements in rice reveals complex relationships with <italic>Stowaway</italic> miniature inverted repeat transposable elements (MITEs)</article-title>. <source>Genetics</source> <volume>163</volume>, <fpage>747</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>758</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12618411</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Feschotte</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wessler</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Minature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) and their relationship with established DNA transposons</article-title>, in <source>Mobile DNA II</source>, eds <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Craig</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Craigie</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gellert</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lambowitz</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Washington, DC</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>American Society for Microbiology Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>1147</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1158</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grzebelus</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Iorizzo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Senalik</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ellison</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cavagnaro</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Macko-Podgorni</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Diversity, genetic mapping, and signatures of domestication in the carrot (<italic>Daucus carota</italic> L.) genome, as revealed by Diversity Arrays Technology (DArT) markers</article-title>. <source>Mol. Breed.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>625</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>637</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11032-013-9979-9</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24532979</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grzebelus</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jagosz</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Simon</surname> <given-names>P. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>The <italic>DcMaster</italic> transposon display maps polymorphic insertion sites in the carrot (<italic>Daucus carota</italic> L.) genome</article-title>. <source>Gene</source> <volume>390</volume>, <fpage>67</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>74</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gene.2006.07.041</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17011731</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bansal</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gopalakrishna</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Development of intron length polymorphism markers in cowpea [<italic>Vigna unguiculata</italic> (L.) Walp.] and their transferability to other <italic>Vigna</italic> species</article-title>. <source>Mol. Breed.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>1363</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1370</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11032-012-9722-y</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumari</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Das</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lata</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Puranik</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prasad</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Development and utilization of novel intron length polymorphic markers in foxtail millet (<italic>Setaria italica</italic> (L.) P. Beauv.)</article-title>. <source>Genome</source> <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>586</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>602</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/g11-020</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21751869</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hall</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT</article-title>. <source>Nucleid Acids Symp. Ser.</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>95</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>98</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jojee</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Madonna</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Comparative analysis of genetic diversity and structure in rice using ILP and SSR markers</article-title>. <source>Rice Sci.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>257</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>268</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1672-6308(09)60025-1</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Genome-wide analysis of transposon insertion polymorphisms reveals intraspecific variation in cultivated rice</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>148</volume>, <fpage>25</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>40</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.108.121491</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18650402</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Iorizzo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ellison</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Senalik</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Satapoomin</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>A high-quality carrot genome assembly provides new insights into carotenoid accumulation and asterid genome evolution</article-title>. <source>Nat. Genet.</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>657</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>666</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ng.3565</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27158781</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Iorizzo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Senalik</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ellison</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grzebelus</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cavagnaro</surname> <given-names>P. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Allender</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Genetic structure and domestication of carrot (<italic>Daucus carota</italic> subsp. <italic>sativus</italic>) (Apiaceae)</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Bot.</source> <volume>100</volume>, <fpage>930</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>938</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3732/ajb.1300055</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23594914</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hirochika</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eddy</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McCouch</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>An active DNA transposon family in rice</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>421</volume>, <fpage>163</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>167</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature01214</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12520302</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feschotte</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wessler</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Using rice to understand the origin and amplification of miniature inverted repeat transposable elements (MITEs)</article-title>. <source>Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>115</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>119</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pbi.2004.01.004</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kopelman</surname> <given-names>N. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mayzel</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jakobsson</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosenberg</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mayrose</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Clumpak: a program for identifying clustering modes and packaging population structure inferences across K</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol. Resour.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>1179</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1191</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1755-0998.12387</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25684545</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hirochika</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Applications of retrotransposons as genetic tools in plant biology</article-title>. <source>Trends Plant Sci.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>127</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>134</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01860-4</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hua-Van</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Le Rouzic</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maisonhaute</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Capy</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Abundance, distribution and dynamics of retrotransposable elements and transposons: similarities and differences</article-title>. <source>Cytogenet. Genome Res.</source> <volume>110</volume>, <fpage>426</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>440</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1159/000084975</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16093695</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kwon</surname> <given-names>S.-J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>K.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>N.-S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Isaac-CACTA transposons: new genetic markers in maize and sorghum</article-title>. <source>Genome</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>455</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>460</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/g05-013</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16121242</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lessa</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Rapid surveying of DNA sequence variation in natural populations</article-title>. <source>Mol. Biol. Evol.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>323</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>330</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1560767</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Development, characterization, genetic diversity and cross-species/genera transferability of ILP markers in rubber tree (<italic>Hevea brasiliensis</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Genes Genomics</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>719</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>731</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13258-013-0122-4</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Meyers</surname> <given-names>B. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tingey</surname> <given-names>S. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morgante</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Abundance, distribution, and transcriptional activity of repetitive elements in the maize genome</article-title>. <source>Genome Res.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>1660</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1676</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gr.188201</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11591643</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Muthamilarasan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Venkata Suresh</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pandey</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumari</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Parida</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prasad</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Development of 5123 intron-length polymorphic markers for large-scale genotyping applications in foxtail millet</article-title>. <source>DNA Res.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>41</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>52</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/dnares/dst039</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24086082</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nagy</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Poczai</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cern&#x000E1;k</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gorji</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heged&#x00171;s</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taller</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>PICcalc: an online program to calculate polymorphic information content for molecular genetic studies</article-title>. <source>Biochem. Genet.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>670</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>672</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10528-012-9509-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22573137</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>K.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>N.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shin</surname> <given-names>Y.-B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>J.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>N.-S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Genetic variation in <italic>Oryza</italic> species detected by MITE-AFLP</article-title>. <source>Genes Genet. Syst.</source> <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>235</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>243</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1266/ggs.78.235</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12893965</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Peakall</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smouse</surname> <given-names>P. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol. Notes</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>288</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>295</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pritchard</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Falush</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <source>Structure software: version 2.2.3</source>. <publisher-loc>Chicago, IL</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Univ</publisher-name>. Chicago.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Prohens</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nuez</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <source>Vegetables: Fabaceae, Liliaceae, Solanaceae, and Umbelliferae</source>. <publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer New York</publisher-name>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-0-387-30443-4</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rong</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Janson</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Umehara</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ono</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vrieling</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Historical and contemporary gene dispersal in wild carrot (<italic>Daucus carota</italic> ssp. <italic>carota</italic>) populations</article-title>. <source>Ann. Bot.</source> <volume>106</volume>, <fpage>285</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>296</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aob/mcq108</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Genome-wide identification of intron fragment insertion mutations and their potential use as SCAR molecular markers in the soybean</article-title>. <source>Theor. Appl. Genet.</source> <volume>121</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>8</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00122-010-1285-x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20162255</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Untergasser</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cutcutache</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koressaar</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Faircloth</surname> <given-names>B. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Remm</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Primer3&#x02013;new capabilities and interfaces</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>40</volume>:<fpage>e115</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gks596</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22730293</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Genome-wide investigation of intron length polymorphisms and their potential as molecular markers in rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>DNA Res.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>417</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>427</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/dnares/dsi019</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16769698</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Francis</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Discovery of intron polymorphisms in cultivated tomato using both tomato and <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> genomic information</article-title>. <source>Theor. Appl. Genet.</source> <volume>121</volume>, <fpage>1199</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1207</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00122-010-1381-y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20552324</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wydner</surname> <given-names>K. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sechler</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boyd</surname> <given-names>C. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Passmore</surname> <given-names>H. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Use of an intron length polymorphism to localize the tropoelastin gene to mouse Chromosome 5 in a region of linkage conservation with human chromosome 7</article-title>. <source>Genomics</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>125</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>131</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/geno.1994.1467</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7829060</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yaakov</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ben-David</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kashkush</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Genome-wide analysis of <italic>Stowaway</italic>-like MITEs in wheat reveals high sequence conservation, gene association, and genomic diversification</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>161</volume>, <fpage>486</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>496</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.112.204404</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23104862</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>PIP: a database of potential intron polymorphism markers</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>2174</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2177</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btm296</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17545179</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coulouris</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zaretskaya</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cutcutache</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rozen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Madden</surname> <given-names>T. L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Primer-BLAST: a tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction</article-title>. <source>BMC Bioinformatics</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>134</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2105-13-134</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22708584</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yeh</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rongcal</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boyle</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <source>POPGENE-1.32: A Free Program for the Analysis of Genetic Variation Among and Within Populations Using Co-dominant and Dominant Markers</source>. <publisher-loc>Edmonton</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Department of Renewable Resources at the University of Alberta</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>