<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2017.00687</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Transcriptomic Identification of Drought-Related Genes and SSR Markers in Sudan Grass Based on RNA-Seq</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Yongqun</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003"><sup>&#x02020;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Xia</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003"><sup>&#x02020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/395731/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Linkai</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Chaowen</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Xinquan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/289957/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Wenzhi</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>Jianhua</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Zhou</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>Haidong</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Fuxiang</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Xie</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/419438/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>Li</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>Dandan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Department of Grassland Science, Animal Science and Technology College, Sichuan Agricultural University</institution> <country>Chengdu, China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Soil and Fertilizer Research Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences</institution> <country>Chengdu, China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences</institution> <country>Chengdu, China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Zhulong Chan, Huazhong Agricultural University, China</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Bin Xu, Nanjing Agricultural University, China; Meiliang Zhou, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001"><p>&#x0002A;Correspondence: Xinquan Zhang <email>zhangxq&#x00040;sicau.edu.cn</email></p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002"><p>This article was submitted to Plant Abiotic Stress, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn003"><p>&#x02020;These authors have contributed equally to this work.</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>04</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>8</volume>
<elocation-id>687</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>30</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2016</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>13</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2017</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2017 Zhu, Wang, Huang, Lin, Zhang, Xu, Peng, Li, Yan, Luo, Wang, Yao and Peng.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Zhu, Wang, Huang, Lin, Zhang, Xu, Peng, Li, Yan, Luo, Wang, Yao and Peng</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Sudan grass (<italic>Sorghum sudanense</italic>) is an annual warm-season gramineous forage grass that is widely used as pasture, hay, and silage. However, drought stress severely impacts its yield, and there is limited information about the mechanisms of drought tolerance in Sudan grass. In this study, we used next-generation sequencing to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the Sudan grass variety Wulate No.1, and we developed simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers associated with drought stress. From 852,543,826 raw reads, nearly 816,854,366 clean reads were identified and used for analysis. A total of 80,686 unigenes were obtained via <italic>de novo</italic> assembly of the clean reads including 45,065 unigenes (55.9%) that were identified as coding sequences (CDSs). According to Gene Ontology analysis, 31,444 unigenes were annotated, 11,778 unigenes were identified to 25 categories in the clusters of orthologous groups of proteins (KOG) classification, and 11,223 unigenes were assigned to 280 Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways. Additionally, there were 2,329 DEGs under a short-term of 25% polyethylene glycol (PEG) treatment, while 5,101 DEGs were identified under the long-term of 25% PEG treatment. DEGs were enriched in pathways of carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms and plant hormone signal transduction which played a leading role in short-term of drought stress. However, DEGs were mainly enriched in pathway of plant hormone signal transduction that played an important role under long-term of drought stress. To increase accuracy, we excluded all the DEGs of all controls, specifically, five DEGs that were associated with high PEG concentrations were found through RNA-Seq. All five genes were up-regulated under drought stress, but the functions of the genes remain unclear. In addition, we identified 17,548 SSRs obtained from 80,686 unigenes. The newly identified drought tolerance DEGs will contribute to transgenic breeding efforts, while SSRs developed from high-throughput transcriptome data will facilitate marker-assisted selection for all traits in Sudan grass.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>Sudan grass</kwd>
<kwd>next-generation sequencing</kwd>
<kwd>differentially expressed genes</kwd>
<kwd>simple sequence repeat markers</kwd>
<kwd>PEG</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="12"/>
<table-count count="7"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="64"/>
<page-count count="16"/>
<word-count count="8592"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Global climate change has increased the incidence of drought worldwide across successive years (Shanker et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">2014</xref>), and it has had many negative effects on plant growth such as leaf rolling, growth inhibition, and death (Mutisya et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">2010</xref>), thus severely affecting agriculture. Sudan grass (<italic>Sorghum sudanense</italic>) is an annual warm-season gramineous forage grass (Smith et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">1982</xref>; Zhan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">2008</xref>). Because of its favorable yield, superior value, fast regrowth, superior disease, and pest resistance, and tolerance to abiotic stress, Sudan grass is widely grown in pastures and used as hay and silage throughout the world (Rangaswami Ayyangar and Ponnaiya, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">1939</xref>; Summer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">1965</xref>; Zamfir et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">2001</xref>; Al-Suhaibani, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">2006</xref>). It is distributed throughout China as a typical grass for livestock, aquaculture foods, and protecting fishing ponds (Wei et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">2008</xref>; Chen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">2009</xref>), especially in arid and semiarid regions (Awad et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2013</xref>). However, exposure to drought stress for long time periods can affect forage yield and quality. Bibi et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2010</xref>) showed that drought stress could decrease Sudan grass yields. Therefore, it is important to study drought tolerance mechanisms in Sudan grass.</p>
<p>Drought stress causes osmotic and oxidative stress, which decreases membrane stability, leading to cell death (Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">2003</xref>). In order to cope with drought stress, plants have developed comprehensive mechanisms such as metabolic alteration, signal transduction, and differential gene expression (Shanker et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">2014</xref>). Although various breeding approaches have been used to alleviate damage caused by drought stress in plants, genetic engineering has been more effective than other approaches. However, genetic engineering requires identifying genes with expression patterns regulated by drought stress.</p>
<p>The next-generation sequencing (NGS) technique known as RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) is a cost-efficient tool for sequencing the full transcriptomes of both model and non-model species. RNA-Seq has been successfully used in many plants such as <italic>Brachypodium sylvaticum</italic> (Fox et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2013</xref>), <italic>Sorghum sudanense</italic> (Li et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2016</xref>), sugarcane (Cardoso-Silva et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">2014</xref>), pepper (Ashrafi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2012</xref>), orchardgrass (Huang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">2015</xref>), <italic>Hemarthria</italic> (Huang X. et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2016</xref>), and annual ryegrass (Pan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">2016</xref>). Transcriptome data has been used in biological studies worldwide in order to better understand biological processes (Surget-Groba and Montoya-Burgos, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">2010</xref>), and it has especially been applied to studying the responses of gene expression to various stresses (Kreps et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">2002</xref>). Shinozaki and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">2007</xref>) reported that plants transformed with drought-inducible genes exhibited improved stress tolerance. Similarly, Ashraf (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">2010</xref>) noted that some genes are overexpressed, thereby inducing damage caused by drought stress, which are thus well utilized to improve the tolerance of plants to drought stress. However, effectively no published reports have used RNA-Seq to analyze the regulation of gene expression by the drought stress in Sudan grass.</p>
<p>Marker-assisted selection (MAS) breeding is as important as genetic engineering (Ashraf, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">2010</xref>). SSRs (simple sequence repeats), AFLPs (amplified fragment length polymorphisms), RAPDs (randomly amplified polymorphic DNAs), and RFLPs (restriction fragment length polymorphisms) have been used as efficient markers to analyze genetic diversity (Billot et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2013</xref>). Because SSRs are highly polymorphic and adaptable across species, many researchers have used them to examine genetic diversity (Smith et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">2000</xref>; Menz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2002</xref>; Geleta et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2006</xref>), construct genetic maps (Wu and Huang, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">2006</xref>), investigate the genetic relationships among populations (Ali et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2008</xref>), and identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for important agronomic traits (Sanchez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">2002</xref>; Mace and Jordan, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2011</xref>; Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">2012</xref>; Upadhyaya et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">2012</xref>). However, few SSR markers have been developed for use in Sudan grass.</p>
<p>In this study, we used RNA-Seq, a powerful NGS-based technique, to study transcription profiles of Sudan grass. The main goals of this study were (1) to develop SSR markers associated with drought-tolerance genes in the Sudan grass variety Wulate No. 1 and (2) to identify differently expressed genes (DEGs) under drought stress. This study provides more information about the molecular mechanisms of drought stress in Sudan grass, thereby contributing to future transgenic breeding efforts in addition to providing markers for MAS.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials and methods" id="s2">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Plant material and RNA isolation</title>
<p>Seeds of the Sudan grass variety Wulate No.1 (Barenbrug Co., Chengdu, China) were sown in sand-culture pots that were placed in controlled growth champers set to 25&#x000B0;C for 12-h days and 22&#x000B0;C for 12-h nights. After seeds had germinated in water, 1/2 strength Hoagland&#x00027;s solution was used to cultivate seedlings. After 20 days, seedlings were subjected to polyethylene glycol (PEG) stress as a means of inducing drought stress. The plants were divided into two treatments: (1) plants in three pots (three replicates) were subjected to 25% PEG dissolved in 1/2 strength Hoagland&#x00027;s solution (drought stress); (2) the other three pots were subjected to just 1/2 strength Hoagland&#x00027;s solution (control). The leaves were harvested at 0, 3, and 6 days and stored in a &#x02212;80&#x000B0;C freezer prior to RNA extraction. L_0_1, L_3_1, and L_6_1 were non-stressed controls that were collected at 0, 3, and 6 day, respectively. L_3_2 and L_6_2 were drought-stressed treatments that were collected at 3 and 6 day, respectively. Therefore, 5 treatments were set and each treatment had 3 replicates. A total of 15 samples were collected for RNA sequencing.</p>
<p>Total RNA was extract from leaves using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer&#x00027;s instructions and then loaded onto and electrophoresed through a 1% agarose gel to check the degradation and contamination of the RNA (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>). The quantity, concentration, and quality of the total RNA were examined using an RNA Nano 6000 kit for the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer 2100 System (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). The integrity of the RNAs is shown in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p><bold>RNA validation of Sudan grass samples by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis</bold>. M represents the marker, lanes 1&#x02013;3 correspond to the three replicates of Wulate No.1 at 0 day in 0% PEG, lanes 4&#x02013;6 correspond to the three replicates of Wulate No.1 at 3 day in 0% PEG, lanes 7&#x02013;9 correspond to the three replicates of Wulate No.1 at 3 day in 25% PEG, lanes 10&#x02013;12 correspond to the three replicates of Wulate No.1 at 6 day in 0% PEG, and lanes 13&#x02013;15 correspond to the three replicates of Wulate No.1 at 6 day in 25% PEG.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00687-g0001.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p><bold>Sudan grass RNA sample quality</bold>. The labeling scheme for each of the Wulate No.1 RNA samples is as follows: L-0d-1 through L-0d-3, the three replicates at day 0 in 0% PEG; L-3d(ck)-1 through L-3d(ck)-3, the three replicates at day 3 in 0% PEG; L-3d(T)-1 through L-3d(T)-3, the three replicates at day 3 in 25% PEG; L-6d(ck)-1 through L-6d(ck)-3, the three replicates at day 6 in 0% PEG; and L-6d(T)-1 through L-6d(T)-3, the three replicates at day 6 in 25% PEG.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00687-g0002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Preparation and sequencing of the cDNA library</title>
<p>We used 3 &#x003BC;g of RNA per sample as genetic material for preparation, and mRNAs were purified from total RNA using poly-T oligo-attached magnetic beads. These fragments were used as templates in a reaction carried out by divalent cations in a NEBNext First Strand Synthesis Reaction Buffer (5&#x000D7;; New England BioLabs, Ipswitch, MA, USA). The first cDNA strand was synthesized using random hexamer primers and transcribed with RNase H<sup>&#x02212;</sup>. The second strand cDNA was synthesized using DNA polymerase I and RNase H. NEBNext Adaptor (New England BioLabs) were prepared for hybridization after blunt 3&#x02032; ends were cut via exonuclease/polymerase activities. Then, we purified cDNA with the AMPure XP system (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA USA) to select 150&#x02013;200 bp fragments. The products were generated using 3 &#x003BC;L of USER Enzyme (New England BioLabs) size-selected for adaptor-ligated cDNA at 37&#x000B0;C for 15 min followed by 5 min at 95&#x000B0;C and amplified via PCR using Universal PCR primers and index(X) primers. The PCR was performed using Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (New England BioLabs). Before PCR product sequencing, samples were index-coded for clustering under the TruSeq PE Cluster Kit v3-cBot-HS (Illumia, San Diego, CA, USA). Finally, the amplified products were purified using the AMPure XP system, and library quality was assessed on the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) to create the final cDNA libraries. Sequencing libraries were generated using NEBNext&#x000AE; Ultra&#x02122; RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina&#x000AE; (New England BioLabs) following the manufacturer&#x00027;s recommendations. In total, there were 15 cDNA libraries were constructed of Sudan grass.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Data analysis</title>
<p>The sequencing-derived image data were transformed into raw reads. To ensure high quality transcriptomic data, the raw reads were cleaned using in-house Perl scripts that remove adapter sequences, poly-N repeats, and low quality reads, whilst calculating the Q20, Q30, GC-content, and sequence duplication level of the clean data. The cleaned reads were then assembled by Trinity (Grabherr et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2011</xref>) with min_kmer_cov set to 2 as a default, and all other parameters used default settings.</p>
<p>The assembled sequences were BLASTed against NR (NCBI non-redundant protein sequences, NCBI blast 2.2.28&#x0002B;, e-value &#x0003D; 1e-5), NT (NCBI non-redundant nucleotide sequences, NCBI blast 2.2.28&#x0002B;, e-value &#x0003D; 1e-5), PFAM (Protein family, HMMER 3.0 package, hmmscan e-value &#x0003D; 0.01), KOG/COG (Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins, NCBI blast 2.2.28&#x0002B;, e-value &#x0003D; 1e-3), Swiss-Prot (a manually annotated and reviewed protein sequence database, NCBI blast 2.2.28&#x0002B;, e-value &#x0003D; 1e-5), KO (KEGG Ortholog database, KAAS [KEGG Automatic Annotation Server], e-value &#x0003D; 1e-10), and GO (Gene Ontology, Blast 2 GO v2.5, e-value &#x0003D; 1e-6; G&#x000F6;tz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2008</xref>) databases to determine gene functions of differentially expressed transcripts. Then, we predicted the coding sequences (CDSs) of the assembled unigenes in NR and Swiss-Prot. When similar unigenes were identified, the CDSs were translated into amino acid sequences later and open reading frames (ORFs) were extracted from the results; alternatively, ESTScan (3.0.3) was used to predict ORFs.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Analysis and mapping of DEG reads and differential gene expression</title>
<p>Before mapping clean reads onto the reference genome with RSEM (Li and Dewey, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">2011</xref>), the assembled Trinity transcript data was regarded as the reference sequence. The bowtie 2 mismatch parameter in RSEM was set to 0. The quantity of read counts for all genes was obtained from the mapping results and then normalized by FPKM (expected number of fragments per kilobase of transcript sequence per millions base pairs sequenced; Trapnell et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">2010</xref>). Differential expression analysis of each sample was performed using the DESeq R package (1.10.1). DESeq provides statistical routines for detecting genes exhibiting differential expression with a negative binominal distribution model (Anders and Huber, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">2010</xref>). To ensure the accuracy of the <italic>P</italic>-values, Benjamini and Hochberg&#x00027;s approach was used to control the false discovery rate (FDR), after which a <italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05 threshold was used to classify genes as differentially expressed. All DEGs were subjected to GO enrichment analysis. To adjust for gene length, a Wallenius non-central hyper-geometric distribution (Young et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">2010</xref>) was applied in the GO enrichment analysis using the GOseq R package (Young et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">2010</xref>). Next, KOBAS 2.0 (Mao et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2005</xref>) was utilized to test the statistical enrichment of DEGs in KEGG pathways, a database resource for understanding high-level functions within biological systems (Kanehisa et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2008</xref>). In KOBAS 2.0, a FDR &#x02264; 0.05 threshold was used for remarkable enrichment pathways, and the FDR parameter was set as BH in KOBAS 2.0. Finally, blastx was used to search the genome of a related species in the string database with the DEG sequences in order to obtain the protein&#x02013;protein interactions. The results were then visualized in Cytoscape (Shannon et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">2003</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>SSR detection and primer design</title>
<p>In order to identify and locate SSRs (Simple Sequence Repeats) from the unigenes, MISA 1.0 was used. It detected SSRs according to the following unit size and minimum repeat parameters: 1-10, 2-6, 3-5, 4-5, 5-5, and 6-5. SSR primers were designed using PRIMER 3 (2.3.4) with the following parameters: length range, 18&#x02013;23, with 21 as optimal; PCR product size range, 100&#x02013;300 bp; optimum annealing temperature, 55&#x000B0;C; and GC content, 40&#x02013;60%, with 50% as optimal.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Survey of SSR polymorphism</title>
<p>A total of 20 Sudan grass and sorghum accessions were used to identify SSR markers. We randomly chose 30 SSR primers to evaluate their polymorphism. DNA extractions were performed using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen) from leaves of the 20 Sudan grass and sorghum accessions. PCR amplifications were conducted in a total reaction volume of 15 &#x003BC;L containing 1.5 &#x003BC;L of DNA, 0.5 &#x003BC;L of Golden DNA Polymerase (TIANGEN Biotech, Beijing, China), 7.5 &#x003BC;L of 2&#x000D7; Reaction Mix (TIANGEN), 0.6 &#x003BC;L of each primer, and 4.4 &#x003BC;L of ddH<sub>2</sub>O. The PCR reaction cycling profile was 94&#x000B0;C for 4 min followed by 35 cycles at 94&#x000B0;C for 40 s, 55&#x02013;60&#x000B0;C for 40 s, 72&#x000B0;C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72&#x000B0;C for 10 min. PCR products were separated via gel electrophoresis on a 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gels at 350 V for 1 h alongside a 50-bp DNA marker used to assess product lengths. Then, we used 0.1% AgNO<sub>3</sub> to stain the gel. Well amplified loci were identified using Gel Doc&#x02122; XR (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec>
<title>Sequence analysis and transcript assembly</title>
<p>Replicate cDNA libraries from Sudan grass leaf samples of plants grown under drought and control treatments (Supplementary Image <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">1</xref>) were constructed and sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform. A total of 852,543,826 raw reads were generated, and they have been deposited in the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) Short Read Archive (SRA: SRP095822). A total of 816,854,366 clean reads were identified after trimming adapters and filtering out low quality reads (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). Using Trinity to further assemble the sequences, we obtained 149,395 contigs with a mean length of 1,386 bp, N50 of 2,366, and lengths of 201&#x02013;24,422 bp, amounting to a total of 207,118,332 bp (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>). The contigs were further assembled into 80,686 unigenes with a mean length of 938 bp and N50 of 1847 across a total of 75,697,479 bp (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>). There are few Sudan grass ESTs in NCBI databases; however, Li et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2010</xref>) and Lu et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2009</xref>) used ESTs from <italic>Sorghum bicolor</italic> to explore SSRs in Sudan grass. Thus, the present results will serve as valuable genomic resources that will help identify more valuable SSRs.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p><bold>Summary statistics of the Sudan grass transcriptome assemblies</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Sample</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Raw reads</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Clean reads</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">L_0_1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">168,623,898</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">165,220,518</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">L_3_1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">173,980,764</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">169,869,984</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">L_3_2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">171,496,394</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">163,559,358</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">L_6_1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">183,220,324</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">173,103,162</td>
</tr>
<tr style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;">
<td valign="top" align="left">L_6_2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">155,222,446</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">145,101,344</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">852,543,826</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">816,854,366</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>L_0_1, L_3_1, and L_6_1 were non-stressed controls that were collected at 0, 3, and 6 day, respectively. L_3_2 and L_6_2 were drought-stressed treatments that were collected at 3 and 6 day, respectively (Each treatment had three replicates). The same below</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p><bold>Transcriptome and unigene length distribution of Sudan grass</bold>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00687-g0003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Gene function annotation</title>
<p>A total of 80,686 unigenes were annotated successfully. Totals of 38,919 unigenes (48.23%) showed significant similarity to the NR database, 46,064 (57.09%) to the NT database, 11,223 (13.9%) to the KO database, 24,436 (30.28%) to the Swiss-Prot database, 26,786 (33.19%) to the PFAM database, 31,444 (38.97%) to the GO database, and 11,778 (14.58%) to the KOG database. When the sequences were compared to all databases, only 5,892 unigenes (7.3%) were annotated in all, while all 52,315 unigenes (64.83%) were annotated in at least one database according to Blastx search (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p><bold>Unigene information annotated in different databases</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Database</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Number of unigenes</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Percentage (%)</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Annotated in NR</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38,919</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48.23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Annotated in NT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46,064</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57.09</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Annotated in KO</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11,223</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Annotated in Swiss-Prot</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24,436</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Annotated in PFAM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26,786</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">33.19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Annotated in GO</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31,444</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38.97</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Annotated in KOG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11,778</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.59</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Annotated in all Databases</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5,892</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Annotated in at least one Database</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52,315</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">64.83</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total Unigenes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80,686</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>To analyze the conservation of sequences, we compared Sudan grass sequences to those from other species. The top match was <italic>Sorghum bicolor</italic> (65.7% sequence identity), followed by <italic>Zea mays</italic> (14.9%), <italic>Setaria italica</italic> (4.6%), and <italic>Oryza sativa</italic> (2.9%; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>). As expected, more than 88% of sequences among all unigenes had a top match with sequences from plants in the family Poaceae.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p><bold>Species distribution of all the unigene sequences</bold>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00687-g0004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Among 80,686 unigenes, 45,065 (55.9%) were predicted to match CDSs with lengths ranging from 33 to 14,379 bp with an average length of 665 bp (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>). ESTScan indicated that 34,128 of unigenes (42.3%) were predicted to match CDSs ranging in length from 51 to 10,476 bp with an average length of 336 bp (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption><p><bold>The length distribution of CDSs</bold>. BLAST results are on the left, while ESTScan results are on the right.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00687-g0005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>GO is an international standardized gene functional classification system with three ontologies: biological process (BP), molecular function (MF), and cellular component (CC; Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">2010</xref>). Each ontology offers a comprehensive description of the properties of genes. A total of 31,444 unigenes were annotated according to an analysis performed with Blast 2 GO. BP was the most abundantly represented according to GO, followed by CC and MF (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref>). Within BP, cellular process (18,850 unigenes, 21.0%) and metabolic process (18,499 unigenes, 20.6%) comprised the majority. Within MF, binding (19,070 unigenes, 46.5%) and catalytic activity (15,383 unigenes, 37.5%) contained the largest numbers of genes, while within CC, cell (13,495 unigenes, 21.4%) was almost as common as cell part (13,492, 21.4%), in agreement with Li et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2016</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption><p><bold>Gene Ontology classification of assembled unigenes</bold>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00687-g0006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Within the KOG analysis, 11,778 unigenes were identified to 25 categories. The largest number of unigenes were classified as &#x0201C;General function prediction only&#x0201D; (2,463 unigenes, 20.9%), followed by &#x0201C;Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones&#x0201D; (1,535 unigenes, 13.0%), and &#x0201C;Signal transduction mechanisms&#x0201D; (1,039 unigenes, 8.8%; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref>). However, in <italic>Sorghum</italic>, the category enriched for the most unigenes was &#x0201C;General function prediction only,&#x0201D; followed by &#x0201C;Replication, recombination, and repair&#x0201D; and &#x0201C;Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones.&#x0201D; Similarly, in sugarcane, unigenes were enriched in the &#x0201C;Replication, recombination and repair&#x0201D; category followed by &#x0201C;General function prediction only&#x0201D; and &#x0201C;Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones&#x0201D; (Cardoso-Silva et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">2014</xref>). Likewise, Sudan grass grown under exposure to natural daylight, expressed genes that were enriched for &#x0201C;Replication, recombination and repair,&#x0201D; followed by &#x0201C;General function prediction only&#x0201D; and &#x0201C;Transcription&#x0201D; (Li et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2016</xref>). Thus, different species and different conditions yielded different classifications.</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption><p><bold>Histogram presentation of clusters of orthologous groups</bold>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00687-g0007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>To better understand the biological functions of and interactions among genes, 11,223 unigenes were classified into 280 KEGG pathways. The pathways included Metabolism, Genetic Information Processing, Environmental Information Processing, Cellular Processes, Organismal Systems, and Human Diseases. Metabolic pathway contained the largest number of unigenes (5,871, 46.1%), followed by Genetic Information Processing (2,190, 17.2%), and Organismal Systems (2,189, 17.2%). Overall, Carbohydrate metabolism (1,071 unigenes, 8.4%) was the most among all pathways, while signal transduction (1,028 unigenes, 8.4%) contributed to Environmental Information Processing (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">8</xref>). Carbohydrate metabolism was heavily enriched in the KEGG analysis, in accordance with the results of Huang D. L. et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2016</xref>), as well as a similar study in orchardgrass (Huang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">2015</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>Figure 8</label>
<caption><p><bold>KEGG classification results: A, Cellular Processes; B, Environmental Information Processing; C, Genetic Information Processing; D, Metabolism; and E, Organismal Systems</bold>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00687-g0008.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>DEGs under drought stress</title>
<p>There were 4,903 and 3,466 DEGs identified by comparing expression on the 3rd day to the control expression levels of days 0 and 3, respectively (i.e., L_0_1 vs. L_3_2 and L_3_1 vs. L_3_2 comparisons). Comparisons between Sudan grass exposed to the PEG treatment for 6 days with the day 0 and 6 controls, revealed 9,512 and 6,194 DEGs, respectively (i.e., L_0_1 vs. L_6_2 and L_6_1 vs. L_6_2 comparisons), which indicated that expressions changes that had occurred by the 3rd day were smaller than those occurring by the 6th day. In contrast, the comparison between expression levels on the 3rd and 6th day of the PEG treatment (i.e., L_3_2 vs. L_6_2), revealed only 130 DEGs, with 5 and 125 genes down- and up-regulated, respectively. Few of the same DEGs changed in the 3rd and 6th days, but there were changes among all control samples over time (i.e., L_0_1 vs. L_3_1, L_0_1 vs. L_6_1, and L_3_1 vs. L_6_1; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p><bold>Differentially expressed genes across two categories of Sudan grass</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Samples</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Down-regulated</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Up-regulated</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Total</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">L_0_1 vs. L_3_2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3,319</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,584</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4,903</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">L_3_1 vs. L_3_2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2,355</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,111</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3,466</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">L_0_1 vs. L_6_2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5,482</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4,030</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9,512</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">L_6_1 vs. L_6_2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3,746</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2,448</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6,194</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">L_3_2 vs. L_6_2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">125</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">130</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">L_0_1 vs. L_3_1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,962</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,009</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2,971</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">L_0_1 vs. L_6_1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">482</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">212</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">694</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">L_3_1 vs. L_6_1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">250</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">814</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,064</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>To improve the accuracy of the results, we excluded DEGs that changed in the controls, finding 2,329 DEGs between the controls (0 and 3rd day) and the treatment of 3rd (i.e., L_0_1 vs. L_3_2 vs. L_3_1 vs. L_3_2), which including 1,531 and 785 DEGs down- and up-regulated, respectively. For the 6th days of the PEG treatment compared to the controls (0 and 6th day) (i.e., L_0_1 vs. L_6_2 vs. L_6_1 vs. L_6_2), there were 3,031 and 2,084 DEGs down- and up-regulated, respectively, in total of 5,101 DEGs been founded (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>). The DEGs enriched within KEGG pathways indicated Carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms and Plant hormone signal transduction pathways play important roles in handling short-term drought stress. The next most enriched pathways were Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis, and Photosynthesis (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">9</xref>). Lenka et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2011</xref>) also demonstrated that the Carbon fixation pathways play an important role in the drought responses of rice. However, under long term drought stress, the Plant hormone signal transduction pathways was most important, followed by Starch and sucrose metabolism and Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">9</xref>). Huang et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">2014</xref>) declared that the up-regulated genes stimulated by drought stress were enriched in the signal transduction pathway, agreeing with our results.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption><p><bold>Differentially expressed genes across four categories of Sudan grass</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Samples</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Down-regulated</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Up-regulated</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Total</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">L_0_1 vs. L_3_2 vs. L_3_1 vs. L_3_2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,531</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">785</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2,329</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">L_0_1 vs. L_6_2 vs. L_6_1 vs. L_6_2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3,031</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2,084</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5,101</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>Figure 9</label>
<caption><p><bold>KEGG pathways enriched for DEGs by the 3rd and 6th days</bold>. KEGG pathways enriched for DEGs by the 3rd day are on the top, while those enriched by the 6th day are in the bottom.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00687-g0009.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>To eliminate expression changes among the all controls (0, 3rd, and 6th day), Venn diagrams were examined (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">10</xref>), which revealed no genes were down-regulated by PEG stress, while five genes were up-regulated. The corresponding genes ID were c18079_g1, c21893_g1, c33865_g2, c34306_g1, and c35500_g3.</p>
<fig id="F10" position="float">
<label>Figure 10</label>
<caption><p><bold>Analysis of DEGs with drought stress in Sudan grass</bold>. The left one is the up-regulation of DEGs, the right one is the down-regulation of DEGs.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00687-g0010.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>To better understand the functions of these genes, we BLASTed these sequences against NR, NT, PFAM, KOG, Swiss-Prot, and GO databases. The c18079_g1 sequence is 612 bp (Appendix <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">S1</xref>), and its NR and NT descriptions indicate it is a hypothetical protein that has been annotated in <italic>Sorghum bicolor</italic>. According to Swiss-Prot, it is similar to <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic>&#x00027;s defensin-like protein. According to PFAM, it appears to belong to the Gamma-thionin family or Scorpion toxin-like domain. Lastly, GO analysis indicated it has a role in transport or defense response in BP, plasma membrane or ion channel inhibition or activity in MF, and plant-type in CC (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref>). The first response to the drought stress is reducing water deficit by closure of stomata, which is also called hydropassive closure. When the stomata are open, water evaporates from guard cells. However, stomata are opened by the reversal of ion fluxes (Jouyban, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2012</xref>); c18079_g1 may be responsible for mediating this response.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption><p><bold>Functions of DEGs according to various databases</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Gene_ID</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c18079_g1">c18079_g1</ext-link></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c21893_g1">c21893_g1</ext-link></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c33865_g2">c33865_g2</ext-link></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c34306_g1">c34306_g1</ext-link></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c35500_g3">c35500_g3</ext-link></bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Gene Length</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">612 bp</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1583 bp</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3697 bp</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2181 bp</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1110 bp</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">NR Description</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypothetical protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypothetical protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypothetical protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Phosphosulfolactate synthase-related protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypothetical protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">NT Description</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypothetical protein, mRNA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Sorghum bicolor</italic> hypothetical protein, mRNA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Sorghum bicolor</italic> hypothetical protein, mRNA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Zea mays phosphosulfolactate synthase-related protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Sorghum bicolor</italic> hypothetical protein, mRNA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Swiss-Prot Description</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Defensin-like protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Uncharacterized AAA domain-containing protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">L-ascorbate oxidase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PFAM description</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Gamma-thionin Family/Scorpion toxin-like domain</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ABC transporter/Sigma-54 interaction domain/Magnesium chelatase, subunit ChlI/AAA domain (dynein-related subfamily)/Uncharacterized P-loop hydrolase UPF0079/Parvovirus non-structural protein NS1/ATPase family associated with various cellular activities (AAA)/K-Cl Co-transporter type 1 (KCC1)/Holliday junction DNA helicase ruvB N-terminus/TIP49 C-terminus/Guanylate kinase/AAA domain (Cdc48 subfamily)/Zeta toxin/ATPase family associated with various cellular activities (AAA)/PhoH-like protein/RNA helicase/IstB-like ATP binding protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(2R)-phospho-3-sulfolactate synthase (ComA)/Small cytokines (intecrine/chemokine), interleukin-8 like</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Multicopper oxidase/Multicopper oxidase/Multicopper oxidase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BP Description</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transport/defense response</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Protein folding</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DNA repair/DNA recombination/regulation of transcription, DNA-templated/threonylcarbamoyladenosine biosynthetic process/transport/photosynthesis/chlorophyll metabolic process/viral genome replication/ion transport/chlorophyll biosynthetic process</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Signal transduction/chemotaxis/heat acclimation/coenzyme M biosynthetic process/immune response</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Oxidation-reduction process</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MF Description</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ion channel inhibitor activity</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Unfolded protein binding/heat shock protein binding</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ATP binding/transcription factor binding/nucleoside-triphosphatase activity/ATPase activity/RNA binding/magnesium chelatase activity/protein binding/four-way junction helicase activity/transporter activity/RNA helicase activity/DNA helicase activity/kinase activity</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Catalytic activity/chemokine activity</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Oxidoreductase activity/copper ion binding</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CC Description</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Plasma membrane/extracellular region/plant-type cell wall</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Replication fork/membrane/magnesium chelatase complex/transcription factor complex/Holliday junction helicase complex</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Extracellular region</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Extracellular region/plant-type cell wall</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">KOG Description</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AAA&#x0002B;-type ATPase</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Multicopper oxidases</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The second gene, c21893_g1, is 1,583 bp (Appendix <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">S1</xref>), and it also strongly resembles the <italic>Sorghum bicolor</italic> hypothetical proteins in the NR and NT databases. However, we were unable to find any description of it in the PFAM, KOG, and Swiss-Prot databases, but in the GO database, the functions of the gene were protein folding and unfolded protein binding (BP) or heat shock protein binding (MF; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref>). Buchanan et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2005</xref>) indicated that heat shock protein 17.2, heat shock protein 16.9, and HSP 70 were up-regulated by increased PEG stress in sorghum. Several studies reported that drought stress is often combined with heat shock (Wang and Huang, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">2004</xref>; Mienie and De Ronde, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">2008</xref>; Grigorova et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2011</xref>), perhaps explaining the up-regulation of this gene by drought stress in Sudan grass.</p>
<p>The third gene, c33865_g2, is the longest of all five (3,697 bp, Appendix <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">S1</xref>). It is similar to the previous genes, which are similar to hypothetical proteins in <italic>Sorghum bicolor</italic>, but in contrast, it matches genes in all of the examined databases. It matches an uncharacterized AAA domain-containing protein from <italic>Schizosaccharomyces pombe</italic> in the Swiss-Prot database, and there were many BP, MF, and CC roles in the GO database (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">6</xref>). The KOG database indicated the gene is an AAA<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>-type ATPase (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref>). As an ABC transporter-like protein in sorghum, the gene has been shown to be up-regulated under drought stress (Buchanan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2005</xref>). Deeba et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">2012</xref>) also showed that activation of the ATP generation in groundnuts can improve drought tolerance. However, the actually function of this gene is unclear.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T6">
<label>Table 6</label>
<caption><p><bold>SSR motifs</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Repeats motif</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Number</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Percentage (%)</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="3" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>MONO-NUCLEOTIDE</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">A/T</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6,166</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">C/G</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">605</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6,771</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38.59</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="3" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>DI-NUCLEOTIDE</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AC/GT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">806</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AG/CT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1,571</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT/AT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">696</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CG/CG</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">293</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3,366</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19.18</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="3" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>TRI-NUCLEOTIDE</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AAC/GTT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">140</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AAG/CTT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">356</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AAT/ATT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">124</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ACC/GGT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">506</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ACG/CGT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">741</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ACT/AGT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">142</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AGC/CTG</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1,015</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AGG/CCT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">942</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ATC/ATG</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">204</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CCG/CGG</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2,690</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6,860</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">39.09</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="3" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>TETRA-NUCLEOTIDE</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">474</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="3" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>PENTA-NUCLEOTIDE</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">49</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="3" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>HEXA-NUCLEOTIDE</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.16</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The fourth gene, c34306_g, is 2,181 bp in length (Appendix <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">S1</xref>). In the NR and NT databases, it matches the phosphosulfolactate synthase-related protein in <italic>Zea mays</italic>. The PFAM database indicated the gene is a (2R)-phospho-3-sulfolactate synthase (ComA) or Small cytokine (intecrine/chemokine), interleukin-8 like gene, whereas GO indicates it has a role in signal transduction, chemotaxis, heat acclimation, coenzyme M biosynthetic process, or immune response (BP); chemokine activity and catalytic activity (MF), and extracellular region (CC; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref>). Graham et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2002</xref>) introduced the details of the biosynthetic pathway for coenzyme M. Phosphosulfolactate synthase and ComA catalyze the first step of the coenzyme M biosynthetic process (Liu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">2006</xref>), and c34306_g may be involved in this process.</p>
<p>The last gene, c35500_g3, is 1,110 bp (Appendix <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">S1</xref>), and it is a hypothetical protein in the NR and NT databases. It matched a cucumber <sc>l</sc>-ascorbate oxidase in Swiss-Prot and a multicopper oxidase or copper ion binding protein in PFAM. In GO, c35500_g3 is characterized as having a role in the oxidation-reduction process (BP), oxidoreductase activity (MF), and extracellular region or plant-type cell wall (CC). Drought stress induces the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and therefore ROS-scavenging is stimulated by drought. Osakabe et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2014</xref>) indicated that ascorbate oxidase plays an important role in scavenging cytosolic H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref>). The function of ascorbate oxidase was to protect integrated chloroplast proteins, and massive reports have shown that the overexpression of APX2 improved drought tolerance. Increased levels of thylakoid-bound ascorbate peroxidase have been identified in sorghum under drought stress (Buchanan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2005</xref>). Dawson et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">1975</xref>) reported that every molecule of ascorbate oxidase contains 8&#x02013;10 atoms of copper, and this has been subsequently studied as an enzyme model for <sc>l</sc>-ascorbate oxidase (Ueda and Hanaki, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">1984</xref>). Thus, this gene maybe involved in the pathway for ascorbate oxidase.</p>
<p>Finally, to ensure the accuracy of the Venn diagrams, we used more comparisons to analyze DEGs (5 combinations). These alternative results coincide with the main results. We again found the same five genes up-regulated and no genes down-regulated (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11">11</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F11" position="float">
<label>Figure 11</label>
<caption><p><bold>Venn diagrams of DEGs among 5 combinations</bold>. Up-regulated DEGs are on the left, while down-regulated DEGs are on the right.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00687-g0011.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Development and validation of SSR markers</title>
<p>We identified 17,548 SSRs obtained from 80,686 sequences totaling 75,697,479 bp. A total of 13,574 sequences contained SSRs. Of these, 2,965 sequences contained more than a single SSR, and 866 exhibited compound SSR formation. Trinucleotide repeat motifs were the most abundant among the six types of motifs, totaling 6,860 (39.09%). The second most abundant were mononucleotide motifs, totaling 6,771 (38.59%), followed by 3,366 dinucleotide motifs (19.18%), 474 tetranucleotide motifs (2.7%), 49 pentanucleotide motifs (0.28%), and 28 hexanucleotide motifs (0.16%). The most abundant motifs included mononucleotide A (91%), dinucleotide AG (47%), and trinucleotide CCG repeats (39%; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">6</xref>).</p>
<p>The repeat counts ranged from 5 to 23. SSRs with 5&#x02013;8 repeats were being most abundant, followed by those with 9&#x02013;12 repeats (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12">12</xref>). In sugarcane, trinucleotide motifs are perhaps most common among SSRs, which is consist with our results. Cardoso-Silva et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">2014</xref>) reported that trinucleotide SSR motifs strongly impact the rate of frameshift mutations.</p>
<fig id="F12" position="float">
<label>Figure 12</label>
<caption><p><bold>The distribution of SSR motifs in Sudan grass</bold>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00687-g0012.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>We randomly selected 30 primer pairs for amplification. Of these, 23 primer pairs (76.7%) successfully amplified products from genomic DNA from Sudan grass and <italic>Sorghum</italic> (though the remaining 7 primer pairs failed to generate PCR products). The failure of the primer pairs to amplify may have been caused by the location of primers across splice sites, introns, mutations, or indels.</p>
<p>In total, 124 amplified bands were detected from the PCR products of 23 primer pairs. The products of the primer pairs ranged from 134 to 280 bp. Among the 23 primers, the unigene c24737_g1 amplified by primer pair 23 showed the highest average polymorphism information content (PIC &#x0003D; 0.8304), followed by c25684_g1, which was amplified by primer pair 1 (PIC &#x0003D; 0.7608). However, according to Shannon&#x00027;s information index (<italic>I</italic>), c25493_g1 (amplified by primer pair 9) was the most diverse, (<italic>I</italic> &#x0003D; 0.6851), followed by c24737_g1 (amplified by primer pair 23). According to Nei&#x00027;s gene diversity (<italic>H</italic>), c10226_g1 (amplified by primer pair 7) exhibited the most variation (<italic>H</italic> &#x0003D; 0.5281), followed by c33403_g4 (amplified by primer pair 14; <italic>H</italic> &#x0003D; 0.5169). Among these 23 unigenes, the average PIC was 0.5327, <italic>I</italic> was 0.552, <italic>H</italic> was 0.439, and PPB was 78.18%. Therefore, these 23 unigenes showed high levels of diversity (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T7">7</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T7">
<label>Table 7</label>
<caption><p><bold>Characterization of 23 novel microsatellite loci for Sudan grass</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Gene ID</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Primer no</bold>.</th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Forward primer(5&#x02032;&#x02013;3&#x02032;)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Reverse primer (5&#x02032;&#x02013;3&#x02032;)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Tm</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Product size(bp)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Repeats</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>PIC</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>I</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>H</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>PPB%</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c25684_g1">c25684_g1</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GGTAGGAGACGGAGGTGAGT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GTCCTCCGATCTGCTAAGCC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">140</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(GCG)6</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.7608333</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.4577</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.3537</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">100.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c24947_g1">c24947_g1</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GTTTGCTTGTCCGCTAAGGC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TTGTCGTCGTCCGTTGTAGG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">197</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(ACC)6</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.6325</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.6567</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.4902</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">100.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c32362_g4">c32362_g4</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GCAACGGCAAGCAGAGTATG</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TTTGCATGCCACAGACTTGC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">255</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(GCA)7</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.4908333</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.5555</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.4925</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">66.67</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c18739_g1">c18739_g1</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ACAGCTAGTTTGGGTGTCCG</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CATGGCCGAGGTCAACTCTT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">140</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(GCT)6</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.6357143</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.5622</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.4607</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">100.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c30194_g1">c30194_g1</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TCACGCACTGCAGGGTTAAT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ACACGCGTATCAGTGTTCGT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">134</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(A)10</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.7336364</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.6645</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.1948</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">100.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c23844_g2">c23844_g2</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CCGCCAAAGAAGACAAAGGC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GTCCAGCTCCATCCTGAACC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">218</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(CGA)6</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.7140625</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.4848</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.4030</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">100.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c10226_g1">c10226_g1</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GTGACACGGATCTCACGGAG</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GGTGTGGTGAAGAGGTCTGG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">192</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(TTG)5</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.3033333</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.6109</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.5281</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">33.33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c29788_g1">c29788_g1</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GCGGGTGTTGATGATGCTTG</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GCCAAAGCAAGAACGACAGG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">104</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(GCC)5</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.3442857</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.5156</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.5132</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">57.14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c25493_g1">c25493_g1</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TGCTGAAACTTTGGAATGGCA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CCCCTTGCATGTTCAAGTGC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">154</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(T)11</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.5883333</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.6851</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.4850</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">83.33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c35250_g7">c35250_g7</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CAATTTTGCCCTCCTTGCCC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CTTCCTCATCTCCTCCGCAC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">242</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(T)11</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.39075</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.5207</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.5045</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">50.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c28737_g2">c28737_g2</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AAGATCAAGAAGCCCCTGCC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ATCTGGTGGTACCTCGGGAA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">143</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(GCC)5</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.7382143</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.5887</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.3875</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">85.71</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c22092_g1">c22092_g1</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TGTGACTTTGAGCTCCGTCA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TGCTACCTGAACTCCCCCTT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">229</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(T)11</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.3525</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.5943</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.4448</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">66.67</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c39996_g1">c39996_g1</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TCCGAAATCCTTGTCCCTCT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TCGCCATCGATCAACTCTCG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">121</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(CAC)5</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.453</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.6227</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.5120</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">80.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c33403_g4">c33403_g4</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GAGCAGAGGAACCATGGCTT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TCGTCACGCAACAACTGTTC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">200</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(A)10</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.41875</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.5554</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.5169</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">50.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c31134_g1">c31134_g1</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AGGTCAGACGCCAAACTGTC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ATCAGCACGTACTTGGTCGG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">234</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(TTC)5</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.1642857</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.4127</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.4668</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">28.57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c32157_g1">c32157_g1</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CCACATCCGTTCACCCTTCA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GGGTTTGGTTGCTCCGTTTC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">206</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(CT)6</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.5004</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.4693</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">100.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c32633_g2">c32633_g2</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CTCTCTCCCACTCTCTGCCT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AGGGAAGTGCATGCAAGCTA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">163</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(TCG)5</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.715</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.3902</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.3791</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">100.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c30552_g1">c30552_g1</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TCCTATGCGCACCACCAATT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GTGACATGATCCCTGGCCC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">248</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(GC)6</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.6275</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.5088</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.4187</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">66.67</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c40055_g1">c40055_g1</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GAGCATCGAGGAGCGTCTC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CTTCTGCGCTCGAAATGGAG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">183</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(C)11</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.23625</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.3183</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.4424</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">100.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c23435_g1">c23435_g1</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GGGGCAAAACTGCTGTTGTT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CCCACTTCCTGCTCAACCAG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">157</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(CTG)5</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.66375</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.6276</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.3963</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">75.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c32482_g1">c32482_g1</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CGTAATTTGGGCCGCCAATC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CGAACGAATCGCTGAGGTTT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">275</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(A)10</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.626875</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.6272</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.4561</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">75.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c17048_g1">c17048_g1</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CATAGTGCCGTAGCCCGTAG</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CGGACGACTCTTGGACCAAA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">280</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(GGC)5</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.2615</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.5579</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.4745</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">80.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="c24737_g1">c24737_g1</ext-link></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GCAAGATGATATATGGAGTACGGC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TCCCCTTCCTAGAGCTGCTT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">140</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(A)10</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.8304167</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.6704</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.3114</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">100.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>Tm, optimal annealing temperature (&#x000B0;C); PIC, average polymorphism information content; I, Shannon&#x00027;s information index of diversity; H, Nei&#x00027;s gene diversity; and PPB, percentage of polymorphic bands</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>SSR makers are extremely useful molecular makers that can be used for genetic linkage mapping, comparative mapping, and many other genotyping applications (Tang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2009</xref>). These makers have many advantages including reliable reproducibility, co-dominance, and a high degree of operational transferability to other related species (Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">2002</xref>; Kaur et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2011</xref>). SSRs have been widely used in sorghum (Sanchez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">2002</xref>; Mace and Jordan, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2011</xref>; Upadhyaya et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">2012</xref>; Hussein et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2014</xref>), but Li et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2016</xref>) reported important differences between sorghum and Sudan grass in indel markers. Few studies have tried to use ESTs from sorghum to design SSR markers in Sudan grass. Further genetic analyses of Sudan grass require the development of more SSR makers for the species. Our study has identified 17,548 SSRs that may be used to enhance the molecular breeding of Sudan grass.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="s4">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In this study, we used NGS data to analyze the Sudan grass transcriptome under drought stress. We found 2,329 DEGs and 5,101 DEGs under a short- and long-term of 25% PEG treatment, respectively. And we also found five genes related to the drought stress strictly. Notably, those genes were up-regulated in Sudan grass under drought stress. This discovery may facilitate the development of transgenic breeding for drought resistance. We also developed a substantial number of new genetic markers, including SSRs, which can be broadly applied to understanding the genetics of Sudan grass.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>XZ, YZ, and XiaW conceived the project and designed the experiments; YZ, XiaW, and LH performed the experiments; YZ, XiaW, CL, WX, JP, ZL, and HY analyzed the data; YZ, XiaW, FL, XieW, LY, and DP finalized the manuscript; all authors discussed the results and reviewed the manuscript.</p>
<sec>
<title>Conflict of interest statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p></sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack><p>This research work was funded by the Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System (CARS-35-36, CARS-35-05), project 948 of the Agricultural Department of Sichuan Province (2014-Z53), the Fiscal Genetic Engineering Project in Sichuan province (2016TSCY-005), and the Funding of Outstanding Papers Promotion Project for Financial Innovation in Sichuan province (2014LWJJ-006).</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s6">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2017.00687/full#supplementary-material">http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2017.00687/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image1.JPEG" id="SM1" mimetype="image/jpeg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Image 1</label>
<caption><p><bold>Sudan grass exposed to 0% PEG (control; top) and 25% PEG (experimental treatment; bottom) at 6th day, with three replicates each</bold>.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet1.DOCX" id="SM2" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Appendix S1</label>
<caption><p><bold>Five unigenes are differentially expressed among all controls and treatments of &#x0201C;Wulate No.1&#x0201D;</bold>. The c18079_g1, c21893_g1, c33865_g2, c34306_g1, and c35500_g3 indicate the name of unigenes; the bases below the name are the sequences of these five unigenes.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Al-Suhaibani</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Effect of irrigation intervals and nitrogen fertilizer rates on fresh forage yield of Sudangrass [<italic>Sorghum sudanense</italic> (Piper) Stapf.]</article-title>. <source>Food Sci. Agric. Res.Center King Saud Univ.</source> <volume>142</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>14</lpage>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/7970">http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/7970</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ali</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rajewski</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baenziger</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gill</surname> <given-names>K. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eskridge</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dweikat</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Assessment of genetic diversity and relationship among a collection of US sweet sorghum germplasm by SSR markers</article-title>. <source>Mol. Breed.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>497</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>509</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11032-007-9149-z</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anders</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huber</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Differential expression analysis for sequence count data</article-title>. <source>Genome Biol.</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>R106</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20979621</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ashraf</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Inducing drought tolerance in plants: recent advances</article-title>. <source>Biotechnol. Adv.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>169</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>183</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.11.005</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19914371</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ashrafi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hill</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stoffel</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kozik</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chin-Wo</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title><italic>De novo</italic> assembly of the pepper transcriptome (<italic>Capsicum annuum</italic>): a benchmark for <italic>in silico</italic> discovery of SNPs, SSRs and candidate genes</article-title>. <source>BMC Genomics</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>571</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2164-13-571</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23110314</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Awad</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hafiz</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hammada</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>El-Nouby</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>El-Hendawy</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Grain yield production of Sudan grass (<italic>Sorghum sudanense</italic> (Piper) Stapf.) as influenced by cutting numbers, potassium rates, and intrarow spacing in a semiarid environment</article-title>. <source>Turk. J. Agric. Forestry</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>657</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>664</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3906/tar-1208-53</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bibi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sadaqat</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Akram</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Usman</surname> <given-names>B. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Physiological and agronomic responses of sudangrass to water stress</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Res.</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>369</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>380</lpage>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281541636">https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281541636</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Billot</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramu</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bouchet</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chantereau</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gardes</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Massive sorghum collection genotyped with SSR markers to enhance use of global genetic resources</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>e59714</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0059714</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23565161</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Buchanan</surname> <given-names>C. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lim</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salzman</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kagiampakis</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morishige</surname> <given-names>D. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weers</surname> <given-names>B. D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2005</year>). <article-title><italic>Sorghum bicolor&#x00027;s</italic> transcriptome response to dehydration, high salinity and ABA</article-title>. <source>Plant Mol. Biol.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>699</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>720</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11103-005-7876-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16158244</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cardoso-Silva</surname> <given-names>C. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Costa</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mancini</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Balsalobre</surname> <given-names>T. W. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Canesin</surname> <given-names>L. E. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pinto</surname> <given-names>L. R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title><italic>De novo</italic> assembly and transcriptome analysis of contrasting sugarcane varieties</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>e88462</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0088462</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24523899</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>Z. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>L. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kong</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Optimization of DNA extraction from seeds of <italic>Sorghum sudanense</italic> (Piper) Stapf</article-title>. <source>Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>256</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15835/nbha3713132</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dawson</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Strothkamp</surname> <given-names>K. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Krul</surname> <given-names>K. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1975</year>). <article-title>Ascorbate oxidase and related copper proteins</article-title>. <source>Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.</source> <volume>258</volume>, <fpage>209</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>220</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1749-6632.1975.tb29281.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">812408</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Deeba</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pandey</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ranjan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mishra</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>Y. K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Physiological and proteomic responses of cotton (<italic>Gossypium herbaceum</italic>, L.) to drought stress</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol. Biochem.</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>6</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>18</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.01.002</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22285410</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fox</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Preece</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kimbrel</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marchini</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sage</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Youens-Clark</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Sequencing and <italic>de novo</italic> transcriptome assembly of <italic>Brachypodium sylvaticum</italic> (Poaceae)</article-title>. <source>Appl. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>1</volume>:<fpage>1200011</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3732/apps.1200011</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25202520</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Geleta</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Labuschagne</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Viljoen</surname> <given-names>C. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Genetic diversity analysis in sorghum germplasm as estimated by AFLP, SSR and morpho-agronomical markers</article-title>. <source>Biodivers. Conserv.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>3251</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3265</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10531-005-0313-7</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>G&#x000F6;tz</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garc&#x000ED;a-G&#x000F3;mez</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Terol</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nagaraj</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nueda</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>High-throughput functional annotation and data mining with the Blast2GO suite</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>3420</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3435</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkn176</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18445632</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grabherr</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haas</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yassour</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Levin</surname> <given-names>J. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thompson</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Amit</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome</article-title>. <source>Nat. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>644</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>652</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nbt.1883</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21572440</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Graham</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>White</surname> <given-names>R. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Identification of coenzyme m biosynthetic 8 phosphosulfolactate synthase: a new family of sulfonate-biosynthesizing enzymes</article-title>. <source>J. Biol. Chem.</source> <volume>277</volume>, <fpage>13421</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>13429</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M201011200</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grigorova</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vaseva</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Demirevska</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feller</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Combined drought and heat stress in wheat: changes in some heat shock proteins</article-title>. <source>Biol. Plant.</source> <volume>55</volume>, <fpage>105</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>111</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10535-011-0014-x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gui</surname> <given-names>Y. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Z. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>C. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Transcriptome of High-sucrose sugarcane variety GT35</article-title>. <source>Sugar Tech</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>520</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12355-015-0420-z</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>L. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>H. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>X. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frazier</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Identifying differentially expressed genes under heat stress and developing molecular markers in orchardgrass (<italic>Dactylis glomerata</italic> L.) through transcriptome analysis</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol. Resour.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>1497</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1509</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1755-0998.12418</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25894804</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>L. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Y. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>B. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Comparative transcriptome sequencing of tolerant rice introgression line and its parents in response to drought stress</article-title>. <source>BMC Genomics</source> <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>1026</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2164-15-1026</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25428615</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>H. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frazier</surname> <given-names>T. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title><italic>De novo</italic> transcriptome analysis and molecular marker development of two Hemarthria species</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>496</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2016.00496</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27148320</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hussein</surname> <given-names>A. A. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Siddig</surname> <given-names>M. A. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abdalla</surname> <given-names>A. W. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dweikat</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baenziger</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Ssr and srap markers-based genetic diversity in sorghum (sorghum bicolor (L.) moench) accessions of sudan</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Plant Breed. Genet.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>89</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>99</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3923/ijpbg.2014.89.99</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jouyban</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Study of effects of drought stress in plants</article-title>. <source>Tech. J. Eng. Appl. Sci.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>172</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>176</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kanehisa</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Araki</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goto</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hattori</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hirakawa</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Itoh</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>36</volume> <fpage>D480</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>D484</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkm882</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18077471</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kaur</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cogan</surname> <given-names>N. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pembleton</surname> <given-names>L. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shinozuka</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Savin</surname> <given-names>K. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Materne</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Transcriptome sequencing of lentil based on second-generation technology permits large-scale unigene assembly and SSR marker discovery</article-title>. <source>BMC Genomics</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>265</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2164-12-265</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21609489</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kreps</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harper</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Transcriptome changes for Arabidopsis in response to salt, osmotic, and cold stress</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>130</volume>, <fpage>2129</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2141</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.008532</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12481097</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lenka</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Katiyar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chinnusamy</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bansal</surname> <given-names>K. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Comparative analysis of drought-responsive transcriptome in Indica rice genotypes with contrasting drought tolerance</article-title>. <source>Plant Biotechnol. J.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>315</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>327</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00560.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20809928</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dewey</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome</article-title>. <source>BMC Bioinformatics</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>323</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2105-12-323</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhan</surname> <given-names>Q. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Establishment of sorghum EST-SSR marker and its preliminary application to sudangrass</article-title>. <source>Pratacultural Sci.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>112</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>117</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhan</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Transcriptome characterization and functional marker development in <italic>Sorghum sudanense</italic></article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>e0154947</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0154947</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27152648</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>N. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hsieh</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Charng</surname> <given-names>Y. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Hsa32, a phosphosulfolactate synthase-related heat-shock protein, is not involved in sulfolipid biosynthesis in arabidopsis</article-title>. <source>Bot. Stud.</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>389</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>394</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhan</surname> <given-names>Q. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Development of EST-SSR marker in sorghum and sudangrass</article-title>. <source>Acta Laser Biol. Sin.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>389</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>394</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mace</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jordan</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Integrating sorghum whole genome sequence information with a compendium of sorghum QTL studies reveals uneven distribution of QTL and of gene-rich regions with significant implications for crop improvement</article-title>. <source>Theor. Appl. Genet.</source> <volume>123</volume>, <fpage>169</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>191</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00122-011-1575-y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21484332</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mao</surname> <given-names>X. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olyarchuk</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>L. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Automated genome annotation and pathway identification using the KEGG Orthology (KO) as a controlled vocabulary</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>3787</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3793</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/bti430</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15817693</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Menz</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klein</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mullet</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Obert</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Unruh</surname> <given-names>N. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klein</surname> <given-names>P. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>A high-density genetic map of <italic>Sorghum bicolor</italic> (L.) moench based on 2926 AFLP&#x000AE;, RFLP and SSR markers</article-title>. <source>Plant Mol. Biol.</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>483</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>499</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1014831302392</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mienie</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Ronde</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>A comparison of drought stress and heat stress in the leaves and tubers of 12 potato cultivars: research letter</article-title>. <source>S. Afr. J. Sci</source>. <volume>104</volume>, <fpage>156</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>159</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mutisya</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sitieney</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gichuki</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Phenotypic and physiological aspects related to drought tolerance in sorghum</article-title>. <source>Afr. Crop Sci. J.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>175</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>182</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4314/acsj.v18i4.68645</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Osakabe</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Osakabe</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shinozaki</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tran</surname> <given-names>L. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Response of plants to water stress</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>86</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2014.00086</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24659993</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>L. K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Transcriptional profiles of drought-related genes in modulating metabolic processes and antioxidant defenses in <italic>Lolium multiflorum</italic></article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>519</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2016.00519</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27200005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rangaswami Ayyangar</surname> <given-names>G. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ponnaiya</surname> <given-names>B. W. X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1939</year>). <article-title>Studies in <italic>Sorghum sudanense</italic>, Stapf-The Sudan grass</article-title>. <source>Proc. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>237</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>254</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sanchez</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Subudhi</surname> <given-names>P. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosenow</surname> <given-names>D. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>H. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Mapping QTLs associated with drought resistance in sorghum (<italic>Sorghum bicolor</italic> L. <italic>moench</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Plant Mol. Biol.</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>713</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>726</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1014894130270</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11999845</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shanker</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maheswari</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Desai</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bhanu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Attal</surname> <given-names>N. B.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Drought stress responses in crops</article-title>. <source>Funct. Integr. Genomics</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>11</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>22</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10142-013-0356-x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24408129</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shannon</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Markiel</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ozier</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baliga</surname> <given-names>N. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramaga</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks</article-title>. <source>Genome Res.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>2498</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2504</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gr.1239303</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14597658</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shinozaki</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yamaguchi-Shinozaki</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>221</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>227</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erl164</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17075077</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>J. S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kresovich</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hopkins</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mitchell</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dean</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Woodman</surname> <given-names>W. L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Genetic diversity among elite sorghum inbred lines assessed with simple sequence repeats</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>226</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>232</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci2000.401226x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dillow</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Young</surname> <given-names>L. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1982</year>). <article-title>Disposition of fertilizer nitrate applied to sorghum-sudangrass in the Southern Plains</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Qual.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>341</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>344</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/jeq1982.00472425001100030002x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Summer</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>W. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Etchegaray</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1965</year>). <article-title>Dry matter and protein yields and nitrate content of Piper sudangrass (<italic>Sorghum sudanense</italic> (Piper) Stapf.) in response to nitrogen fertilization</article-title>. <source>Agron. J.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>351</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>354</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronj1965.00021962005700040012x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Surget-Groba</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Montoya-Burgos</surname> <given-names>J. I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Optimization of <italic>de novo</italic> transcriptome assembly from next-generation sequencing data</article-title>. <source>Genome Res.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>1432</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1440</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gr.103846.109</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20693479</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Okashah</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cordonnier-Pratt</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pratt</surname> <given-names>L. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>V. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>EST and EST-SSR marker resources for Iris</article-title>. <source>BMC Plant Biol.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>72</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2229-9-72</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19515254</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Trapnell</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pertea</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mortazavi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kwan</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baren</surname> <given-names>M. J. V.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation</article-title>. <source>Nat. Biotech.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>511</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>515</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nbt.1621</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20436464</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ueda</surname> <given-names>J. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hanaki</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>Copper (II)-poly(L-histidine) as an enzyme model for L-ascorbate oxidase</article-title>. <source>Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>3511</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3516</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1246/bcsj.57.3511</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Upadhyaya</surname> <given-names>H. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hasenstein</surname> <given-names>K. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>SSR markers linked to kernel weight and tiller number in sorghum identified by association mapping</article-title>. <source>Euphytica</source> <volume>187</volume>, <fpage>401</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>410</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10681-012-0726-9</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vinocur</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Altman</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance</article-title>. <source>Planta</source> <volume>218</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>14</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00425-003-1105-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14513379</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Georgi</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhebentyayeva</surname> <given-names>T. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reighard</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scorza</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abbott</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>High-throughput targeted SSR marker development in peach (<italic>Prunus persica</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Genome</source> <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>319</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>328</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/g01-153</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11962629</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bible</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Loganantharaj</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Upadhyaya</surname> <given-names>H. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Identification of SSR markers associated with height using pool-based genome-wide association mapping in sorghum</article-title>. <source>Mol. Breed.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>281</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>292</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11032-011-9617-3</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Physiological recovery of kentucky bluegrass from simultaneous drought and heat stress</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>1729</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1736</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci2004.1729</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>B. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Z. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>L. F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title><italic>De novo</italic> assembly and characterization of root transcriptome using Illumina paired-end sequencing and development of cSSR markers in sweetpotato (<italic>Ipomoea batatas</italic>)</article-title>. <source>BMC Genomics</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>726</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2164-11-726</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Copper accumulation and tolerance in <italic>Chrysanthemum coronarium</italic> L. and <italic>Sorghum sudanense</italic> L</article-title>. <source>Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.</source> <volume>55</volume>, <fpage>238</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>246</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00244-007-9114-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18183449</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>An SSR genetic map of <italic>Sorghum bicolor</italic> (L.) Moench and its comparison to a published genetic map</article-title>. <source>Genome</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>84</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>89</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/g06-133</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17546074</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Young</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wakefield</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smyth</surname> <given-names>G. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oshlack</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias</article-title>. <source>Genome Biol.</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>R14</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r14</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20132535</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zamfir</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schitea</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zamfir</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>The variability study of some quantitative traits in Sudan grass [<italic>Sorghum sudanense</italic> Piper(Staph.)]</article-title>. <source>Rom. Agric. Res.</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>23</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>30</lpage>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242626066">https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242626066</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhan</surname> <given-names>Q. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>T. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>B. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J. Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Diversity comparison and phylogenetic relationships of <italic>S. bicolor</italic> and <italic>S. sudanense</italic> as revealed by SSR markers</article-title>. <source>Plant Sci.</source> <volume>174</volume>, <fpage>9</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>16</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plantsci.2007.09.007</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
