<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2017.00596</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Novel Chitinase Gene <italic>LOC_Os11g47510</italic> from Indica Rice Tetep Provides Enhanced Resistance against Sheath Blight Pathogen <italic>Rhizoctonia solani</italic> in Rice</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Richa</surname> <given-names>Kamboj</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/302732/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Tiwari</surname> <given-names>Ila M.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/317307/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Devanna</surname> <given-names>B. N.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/237192/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Botella</surname> <given-names>Jose R.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/169030/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>Vinay</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/90068/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>Tilak R.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/172048/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology</institution> <country>New Delhi, India</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Banasthali University</institution> <country>Banasthali, India</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia</institution> <country>QLD, Australia</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute</institution> <country>Mohali, India</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: <italic>Junhua Peng, China National Seed Group Corp., China</italic></p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: <italic>Guotian Li, University of California, Davis, USA; Prateek Tripathi, Scripps Research Institute, USA</italic></p></fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001"><p>&#x002A;Correspondence: <italic>Tilak R. Sharma, <email>trsharma@nrcpb.org</email>; <email>trsharma@nabi.res.in</email></italic></p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002"><p>This article was submitted to Plant Biotechnology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>25</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>8</volume>
<elocation-id>596</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>16</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2017</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>03</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2017</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2017 Richa, Tiwari, Devanna, Botella, Sharma and Sharma.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Richa, Tiwari, Devanna, Botella, Sharma and Sharma</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Sheath blight disease (ShB), caused by the fungus <italic>Rhizoctonia solani</italic> K&#x00FC;hn, is one of the most destructive diseases of rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> L.), causing substantial yield loss in rice. In the present study, a novel rice chitinase gene, <italic>LOC_Os11g47510</italic> was cloned from QTL region of <italic>R. solani</italic> tolerant rice line Tetep and used for functional validation by genetic transformation of ShB susceptible japonica rice line Taipei 309 (TP309). The transformants were characterized using molecular and functional approaches. Molecular analysis by PCR using a set of primers specific to CaMv 35S promoter, chitinase and <italic>HptII</italic> genes confirmed the presence of transgene in transgenic plants which was further validated by Southern hybridization. Further, qRT-PCR analysis of transgenic plants showed good correlation between transgene expression and the level of sheath blight resistance among transformants. Functional complementation assays confirmed the effectiveness of the chitinase mediated resistance in all the transgenic TP309 plants with varying levels of enhanced resistance against <italic>R. solani</italic>. Therefore, the novel chitinase gene cloned and characterized in the present study from the QTL region of rice will be of significant use in molecular plant breeding program for developing sheath blight resistance in rice.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>chitinase</kwd>
<kwd>rice</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Rhizoctonia solani</italic></kwd>
<kwd>sheath blight</kwd>
<kwd>QTL</kwd>
<kwd>Tetep</kwd>
<kwd>transgenic</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="0"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="49"/>
<page-count count="10"/>
<word-count count="0"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec><title>Introduction</title>
<p>Sheath blight caused by <italic>Rhizoctonia solani</italic> is a major constraint in rice cultivation. Yield losses due to sheath blight infection ranges from 8 to 50% depending on severity of the disease, stage of the crop at which it was infected by the fungus and overall environmental conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Savary et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Singh et al., 2004</xref>). To withstand these kinds of stresses, plant have evolved a battery of self-defense systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Datta et al., 2001</xref>) among the different self-defense mechanisms, those mediated by the resistance (<italic>R</italic>)-genes and other defense response (DR) genes are most significant. Upon interaction with any pathogen, plants activate their self-defense system leading to production of an array of pathogenesis related (PR) proteins like chitinases, glucanases, thaumatin-like proteins etc.</p>
<p>Till date, absolute resistance to <italic>R. solani</italic> has not been identified in any crop. Its broad host specificity and saprophytic nature renders traditional control techniques like crop-rotation inefficient. Due to lack of inherent resistance against ShB, disease control is troublesome and extensive use of chemicals remains the main strategy of disease control. However, chemical control contributes to increase health risk and financial strain on the farmer as well as being disastrous to the environment. In the absence of natural resistance, genetically modifying plants with transgenes for enhanced resistance is the most suitable alternative (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Lin et al., 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Datta et al., 2000</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Kim et al., 2003</xref>). Antifungal proteins such as chitinases and glucanases that can hydrolyse the chitin and glucan components of the fungal cell wall are the popular choices (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Okubara et al., 2014</xref>).</p>
<p>Chitinases are the members of PR-3 group of PR proteins responsible for hydrolysis of chitin, a structural polysaccharide of the cell wall of many fungi, yeast, insects, etc. Chitinases were first described by Bernard in orchid bulb as a thermosensitive and diffusible antifungal factor (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Sharma et al., 2011</xref>). Among the other sources, microbial chitinases are the major and most preferred, due to their availability and rapid multiplication. Besides microbes, chitinases are also reported in plants, animals and human beings. Chitinases purified from plants, microbes, and animals show a strong antifungal activity <italic>in vitro</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Neuhaus, 1999</xref>). Based on the amino acid sequences, plant chitinases have been classified into five different classes. Class I, II, and IV belongs to chitinases family 19 and contains globular domains whereas Class III and class V belongs to the chitinases family 18 and have 8 &#x03B1;-helices and &#x03B2;-strands each as key structures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Fukamizo et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Hamid et al., 2013</xref>). Chitinases have received a wide attention toward the biocontrol of fungal phytopathogens, due to their direct role in chitin degradation. Till-date, many chitinase genes have been identified, cloned and transformed into different plants in order to provide resistance against various plant diseases. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Sundheim et al. (1988)</xref> cloned chitinase genes from <italic>Serratia marcescens</italic> and overexpressed them in <italic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</italic>. The transconjugant <italic>P. fluorescence</italic> successfully inhibited the growth of <italic>Fusarium oxysporum</italic>, resulting in reduced infection of radish plants by same pathogen. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chernin et al. (1997)</xref> used recombinant <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> expressing chitinase gene of <italic>Enterobacter agglomerans</italic> in rhizosphere which decreases the onset of <italic>R. solani</italic> infection in cotton. Subsequently, these chitinase genes were directly deployed in plants, through transgenic approach. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Datta et al. (2001)</xref> demonstrated effectiveness of chitinases against <italic>R. solani</italic> and <italic>Magnaporthe grisea</italic> in rice. Basic PR-3-type chitinase from bean when overexpressed in transgenic tobacco and canola successfully suppressed the infection caused by <italic>R. solani</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Grover and Gowthaman, 2003</xref>). Overexpression of rice chitinases has shown resistance against <italic>Uncinula necator</italic> in grapevine, <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> in cucumber, <italic>Puccinia coronata</italic> in chrysanthemum and Italian ryegrass, <italic>Mycosphaerella fijiensis</italic> in banana and Fusarium wilt and early blight in tomato (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Tabei et al., 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Takatsu et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Yamamoto et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Kishimoto et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Takahashi et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Kov&#x00E1;cs et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Jabeen et al., 2015</xref>).</p>
<p>Previously, using QTL mapping approach, we identified and mapped a major sheath blight resistance QTL: qSBR11-1 on chromosome 11 of resistant rice line Tetep (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Channamallikarjuna et al., 2010</xref>). Subsequently we deciphered this locus and characterized 11 novel chitinase genes present in this QTL region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Richa et al., 2016</xref>). It was found that among the 11 chitinase genes present in this particular QTL, expression of <italic>LOC_Os11g47510</italic> was much higher than rest of the genes at 36 hours post inoculation (hpi) with <italic>R. solani</italic>. Biochemical assays also confirmed antifungal activity of this particular gene against the rice sheath blight fungus <italic>R. solani</italic>. Further the field resistance of these genes against sheath blight pathogen was reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Singh et al. (2012)</xref>. They transferred QTL qSBR11-1 from Tetep into indica rice line Improved Pusa Basmati 1 and proved that qSBR11-1 imparts a significant level of field resistance against <italic>R. solani</italic>. However, there is no report on the dissection of QTL region at gene level and its validation in case of <italic>R. solani</italic>-rice system. The present study was thus designed to know the <italic>in planta</italic> expression and resistance response of highly induced gene <italic>LOC_Os11g47510</italic> from this QTL in susceptible rice cultivar Taipei 309. In the present study, we report the potential application of rice chitinase gene cloned from a tolerant rice line Tetep to enhance the resistance against sheath blight disease (ShB) in susceptible rice as well as the usefulness of the detached leaf bioassay for initial screening of the putative transformants for ShB resistance.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec><title>Plant Materials and Candidate Gene</title>
<p>Seeds of rice line Taipei 309 (TP309), susceptible to <italic>R. solani</italic> were available with the authors. <italic>Loc_Os11g47510</italic>, rice chitinase gene showing highest expression among other chitinase genes of the QTL qSBR11-1 was validated by qRT-PCR analysis after infection with <italic>R. solani</italic> and displayed antifungal activity during bioassay was previously cloned and reported by the authors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Richa et al., 2016</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Development of <italic>Loc_Os11g47510</italic> Gene Construct for Plant Transformation</title>
<p>Two different set of primers specific to <italic>Loc_Os11g47510</italic> (from Tetep and TP309) and <italic>HptII</italic> gene were designed using Primer 3 primer designing tool (Supplementary Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">1</xref>). Primers specific for <italic>LOC_Os11g47510</italic> gene had sequence of restriction sites <italic>Bam</italic>HI and <italic>Xba</italic>I in the forward and reverse primers, respectively, whereas those for <italic>HptII</italic> gene had <italic>Sac</italic>II restriction enzyme sites in both the forward and reverse primers. <italic>LOC_Os11g47510</italic> of Tetep was amplified from a clone which was already confirmed by PCR and restriction digestion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Richa et al., 2016</xref>), <italic>LOC_Os11g47510</italic> allele from TP309 was also amplified using same set of primers whereas <italic>HptII</italic> gene was PCR amplified from pCAMBIA1305.1. <italic>LOC_Os11g47510</italic> was cloned at corresponding sites in pRT100 vector and confirmed. <italic>LOC_Os11g47510</italic> allele from TP309 was cloned in pJET1.2 vector and sequence confirmed. The <italic>HptII</italic> gene was cloned into the <italic>Sac</italic>II site of the pBS(SK+) vector and clones were confirmed by PCR and restriction digestion. Subsequently, the final construct for rice transformation was developed by cloning the entire PCR amplified fragment (CaMv35S + <italic>Loc_Os11g47510</italic> + <italic>nos</italic> terminator) using primers specific to 35S promoter and <italic>nos</italic> terminator having <italic>Sma</italic>I restriction enzyme sites in both forward and reverse primers from pRT100 vector. This fragment was cloned at the corresponding restriction enzyme sites in modified pBS(SK+) vector (already having <italic>HptII</italic> gene). PCR reaction was carried out by using Finnzymes Phusion<sup>&#x00AE;</sup> High-fidelity DNA polymerase using standard protocol from manufacturer (Thermo Scientific) (Supplementary Figures <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM3">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM4">2</xref>). The <italic>LOC_Os11g47510</italic> DNA sequences from Tetep and TP309 were aligned using MULTALIN tool<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn01">1</xref></sup> (Supplementary Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM5">3</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Callus Induction in Rice Line TP309</title>
<p>Mature seeds of TP309 were dehusked manually and thoroughly washed with Teepol detergent followed by three washes with sterilized distil water. Sterilization of the seeds was performed by following method: seeds were dipped in 70% ethanol and gently stirred for 1 min followed by three washing with sterile water. Then 5% sodium hypochlorite treatment was given for 20 min and washing was given thrice with sterile distilled water. Finally 10 min sterilization with 0.2% HgCl<sub>2</sub> was done and traces of HgCl<sub>2</sub> was removed by washing with distilled water for five times. Sterile seeds were then drained free of water and blotted dried on a filter paper. The sterilized seeds were inoculated on callus induction media (CIM); Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium containing sucrose (30.0 g/l) + proline (500 mg/l) + casein hydrolysate (400 mg/l) + 2,4-<sc>D</sc> (2 mg/l) + agar (8.0 g/l) by placing 25 seeds per plate and incubated in dark at 28&#x00B0;C. Twenty-days-old embryogenic calli were excised and about 30 of them were closely arranged in a circle at the center of petriplate containing osmoticum medium (MS + 30.0 g/l sucrose + 0.2 M mannitol + 0.2 M sorbitol) supplemented with agar (8.0 g/l). The calli were ready for bombardment after 4 h of osmoticum treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Genetic Transformation of TP309</title>
<p>TP309 calli were transformed using biolistic approach (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Sanford et al., 1987</xref>). Intact plasmid constructs were bombarded using helium driven particle delivery system (PDS 1000, Bio-Rad). DNA were precipitated and coated to gold particles following the procedure recommended by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Sanford et al. (1987)</xref>. The calli were placed in the center of petridish containing osmotic medium (MS media with 8% bacteriological agar, 30 g/l mannitol and 30 g/l sorbitol). These calli were bombarded with the DNA-coated gold particles and were then maintained at 28&#x00B0;C under dark condition. The distance from the stopping screen to target was 9 cm, and the rupture disk strength was 1100 psi under a vacuum of 25 mm of Hg. After 16 h of bombardment, calli were transferred to the selection medium; CIM + Hygromycin (50 mg/l) and incubated in dark at 28&#x00B0;C. After 15 days, the proliferating calli were again transferred to the fresh selection medium for two more rounds of selection of 15 days each. After a total of 45 days of selection, healthy and proliferating calli were transferred to the regeneration media.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Plant Regeneration</title>
<p>The calli survived after three round of selection in hygromycin containing medium were transferred to the regeneration medium [MS + BAP (2.5 mg/l) + NAA (1.5 mg/l) + agar (8 g/l) + hygromycin (50 mg/l)] and incubated at 28&#x00B0;C under 1000 lux with 16 h light and 8 h dark regime. Entire process of selection and regeneration took about 2&#x2013;3 months for completion. As the plantlets reached 2 to 3 inch of height with well developed roots, they were acclimatized in solarite and finally transferred to the National Phytotron Facility (NPF), IARI, New Delhi, India and maintained under standard conditions required for rice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Molecular Analysis of the T0 and T1 Plants</title>
<p>The transgenic plants obtained from the present study were validated using molecular biology tools like PCR, qRT-PCR and Southern blot hybridization. To determine the presence of the transgene, genomic DNA was extracted from leaf tissues of transgenic plants and analyzed using PCR. For PCR validation, one set of primers specific to promoter and <italic>LOC_Os11g47510</italic> gene and another set specific for <italic>HptII</italic> gene were used. The details of different primers used and the annealing temperature used for PCR are given in Supplementary Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">1</xref>. For PCR, DNA was denatured at 94&#x00B0;C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of amplification [45 s at 94&#x00B0;C; 30 s at 58&#x00B0;C; 45 s at 72&#x00B0;C] and final incubation at 72&#x00B0;C for 10 min. For gene integration analysis, we performed southern hybridization. High quality genomic DNA was isolated by CTAB method. 10 &#x03BC;g gDNA was completely digested with <italic>Eco</italic>RI restriction enzyme. Digested DNA samples along with positive control were electrophoresed on 0.8% agarose gel in 1&#x00D7; TBE buffer. After electrophoresis, DNA samples were denatured and transferred on to the nylon membrane. 192 bp fragment of the <italic>HptII</italic> gene was labeled with &#x03B1;-dUTP and used as a probe for hybridization. After that, southern blotting was performed by using standard protocol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Sambrook et al., 1989</xref>).</p>
<p>Real-time quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis was performed to analyze the relative expression of the integrated chitinase gene as well as <italic>hptII</italic> gene in control and transgenic TP309 plants, separately. Total RNA was isolated from the leaf samples of control and transgenic leaves using RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qaizen, USA). Quality and quantity of RNA was analyzed by agarose gel (1.0%) electrophoresis and nanodrop (Thermo Scientific), respectively. cDNA was prepared from 1 &#x03BC;g of each of total RNA sample using Protoscript first strand cDNA synthesis kit (New England Biolabs, UK). 18srRNA primer was used as internal control to normalize the data. Specific primers were designed for <italic>LOC_Os11g47510, hptII</italic> and 18srRNA gene and used for qRT-PCR (Supplementary Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">1</xref>). cDNA prepared was used as a template for expression analysis by Light cycler SYBER green I master Kit using Light Cycler<sup>&#x00AE;</sup> 480 II PCR system (Roche) using manufacturer&#x2019;s guidelines. The qRT-PCR cycling conditions were: initial denaturation 95&#x00B0;C; 5 min, 50 cycles of 95&#x00B0;C; 10 s, and annealing temperature 60&#x00B0;C; 15 s, 72&#x00B0;C; 15 s.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Functional Characterization of Transgenics in Response to <italic>Rhizoctonia solani</italic> Infection</title>
<p>Detached leaf bioassay was performed in control and transgenic plants to check phenotypic response of these plants mediated by the candidate gene against <italic>R. solani</italic>. For detached leaf assay, mycelium of <italic>R. solani</italic> was inoculated on PDA plates. Equal sized agar plugs containing mycelium of <italic>R. solani</italic> were inoculated on the surface of detached leaves (transgenic and control plant) and they were then placed on the moist filter paper in the petriplates. Petriplates were then sealed with parafilm to retain the moisture inside the plates. Phenotypic observation was recorded as degree of infection of <italic>R. solani</italic> at different hpi. Statistical analysis was performed for the three replicates of each of the transgenic plant.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Pathogenesis of <italic>R. solani</italic> on Transgenic Rice Leaves</title>
<p>Microscopic study was performed to study the growth of <italic>R. solani</italic> mycelium in transgenic as well as NT-TP309 leaves. Leaves were placed over wet filter paper in the petriplates and inoculated with agar plugs containing <italic>R. solani</italic> mycelia. At 24, 48 and 72 hpi, leaves were fixed on filter papers soaked with 1:1 (v/v) Ethanol: Acetic acid for 24 h and later transferred on to filter paper soaked in lacto glycerol [1:1:1 (v/v) ratio of lactic acid:glycerol:water). Samples were then stained with aniline blue (0.1% w/v) in 0.1 M K3PO4 and excess dye was removed using 0.1 M K3PO4. Leaves were mounted on to microscopic slides in 10% glycerol and observed under light microscope.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Quantification of Fungal Biomass</title>
<p>Standard calibration curves were established to measure the fungal biomass in the <italic>R. solani</italic> inoculated samples in T<sub>1</sub> generation. Pure <italic>R. solani</italic> fungal gDNA was used for serial dilutions to obtain 0.002, 0.02, 0.2, 2 and 20 ng/&#x03BC;l of gDNA. pUC19 plasmid DNA (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was also diluted to obtain 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 10 ng/&#x03BC;l DNA. These diluted DNA were mixed separately with a constant amount of 10 ng of genomic DNA isolated from uninfected TP309 leaves. Calibration curves were generated by plotting CT values (averaged from three technical repeats) obtained by qRT-PCR against the corresponding logarithmic <italic>R. solani</italic> and pUC19 DNA amounts. For the absolute quantification of fungal DNA in inoculated leaf samples, 20 ng/&#x03BC;l genomic DNA was used as a template. Two qPCR reactions were run separately by using the (<italic>Rhizoctonia</italic> Map Kinase gene) RPMK1_F and RPMK1_R and M13-F and M13-R pair of primers. CT values obtained were then used to calculate the absolute amount of target DNA in a given reaction. For data normalization, 0.1 ng of pUC19 DNA was mixed with all the transgenic and NT plants DNA.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec><title>Results</title>
<sec><title>Development of Plant Transformation Vector</title>
<p>Chitinase gene from rice line Tetep, present on the locus <italic>LOC_Os11g47510</italic>, which was showing higher relative expression in qRT-PCR as well as highest chitinase activity in <italic>in vitro</italic> expression study was selected for plant transformation experiments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Richa et al., 2016</xref>). The putative recombinant pBS(SK+) plasmids with <italic>LOC_Os11g47510</italic> gene cassette (CaMv 35S promoter + <italic>LOC_Os11g47510</italic> gene+ nos terminator) were screened for gene integration by PCR using primers specific to this region and also by restriction digestion using <italic>Bam</italic>HI (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref></bold>). The PCR reaction (1.6 kb promoter and gene fragment along with nos terminator) and restriction digestion confirmed (&#x223C;1.2 kb gene fragment) the presence of gene cassette and gene, respectively (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref></bold> and Supplementary Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM4">2</xref>). This particular gene cassette was cloned in a modified pBS(SK+) vector which is having <italic>hptII</italic> gene for plant selection and this modified plant transformation vector was used for genetic transformation experiments and referred to as pShB-510.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p><bold>Development of plant transformation gene cassette containing <italic>LOC_Os11g47510.</italic> (A)</bold> Schematic representation of the pShB-510 vector. <bold>(B)</bold> Restriction digestion of the putative positive clones with <italic>Bam</italic>HI restriction enzyme. Lane L1&#x2013;L4- putative positive clones; Lane L5- Empty pBS (SK+) vector containing hygromycin gene; Lane M- 1 kb DNA Ladder.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00596-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec><title>Genetic Transformation of TP309 Rice Line with the Chitinase Gene</title>
<p>Genetic transformation of rice line TP309 was performed with gene cassette containing DR gene <italic>Loc_Os11g47510</italic> using biolistic approach. For transformation, healthy calli of TP309 were selected and used for bombardment using particle gun. Sixteen hour post bombardment, the calli were transferred to the selection media containing 50 mg/l hygromycin. At the end of three selection cycles of 15 days each, out of 428 and 400 calli initially used for bombardment in two different set (batches) of experiments, 148 and 112 transformed calli, respectively, were obtained. The proliferating, healthy calli were then transferred to the regeneration medium supplemented with combination of auxin and cytokinin (NAA &#x0026; BAP) along with hygromycin for selection (Supplementary Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM6">4</xref>). Successfully regenerated plants from individual calli from each experiment were treated as an event and subjected to hardening. Finally 51 plants from nine events were transferred to the pots and grown in National Phytotron Facility (NPF, IARI, New Delhi, India) and seeds were obtained from eight out of the nine events. Regeneration efficiency was determined for different batches by calculating the percentage of regenerated calli from total number of calli subjected to regeneration after third selection cycle. The overall regeneration frequency was found to be around 55.3%, however, overall transformation efficiency achieved was 6.25% which was validated by molecular analysis (Supplementary Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">2</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Molecular Characterization and Functional Validation of Putative Transgenic Plants</title>
<p>To confirm the presence and integration of the candidate gene, <italic>LOC_Os11g47510</italic> in putative transgenic plants, PCR and Southern blot hybridization was performed using genomic DNA isolated from healthy and normal looking putative transgenic plants (<bold>Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2A,B,C</xref></bold>). PCR amplification using two primer sets: one set specific to <italic>hptII</italic> and another set specific to promoter region and transgene was performed. PCR results revealed that out of 35 plants, only 12 plants belonging to eight events were positive for both transgene and <italic>hptII</italic> gene.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p><bold>Molecular analysis of the T0 and T1 transgenic TP309 plants. (A)</bold> PCR analysis of putative T0 transgenic with CaMv 35S promoter forward primer and reverse primer from the middle of the gene. Lane 1, 1 kb plus DNA ladder; Lane 2&#x2013;13, putative transformants; Lane 14, &#x2013;ve Control; Lane 15, +ve control. <bold>(B)</bold> PCR analysis of putative transgenic with hygromycin specific primers. Lane 1, 100 bp plus DNA ladder; Lane 2, &#x2013;ve control; Lane 3&#x2013;10, putative transformants; Lane 11, +ve Control. <bold>(C)</bold> Southern Blotting of transgenics. Lane 1, &#x03BB; digested DNA with <italic>Hind</italic>III; Lane 2&#x2013;8, putative transformants; Lane 9, &#x2013;ve control; Lane 10, +ve control (192 bp Probe). <bold>(D)</bold> PCR analysis of T1 transgenic with CaMv 35S promoter forward primer and reverse primer from the middle of the gene. Lane 1, 1 kb DNA ladder; Lane 2&#x2013;10, T1 transgenics; Lane 11, &#x2013;ve control;; Lane 12, +ve control.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00596-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Further, copy number of the integrated gene <italic>LOC_Os11g47510</italic> was analyzed by Southern hybridization in all eight PCR positive putative transformed rice plants (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2C</xref></bold>). Hybridization was performed using DIG labeled <italic>HptII</italic> specific DNA probe in this study. Single and double insertions were observed in the putative transgenics and no insertion was found in the non-transgenic TP309 (NT) plant confirming the integration of the transgene in transgenics. Different positioning of the transgene in the autoradiogram confirmed that they are independent events. T1 seeds of the putative transformants were screened on hygromycin containing media and raised in the phytotron. Their transgenic nature was also confirmed by molecular analysis (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2D</xref></bold>).</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Expression Analysis of <italic>LOC_Os11g47510</italic> and <italic>hptII</italic> Gene in Transgenic Plants</title>
<p>Expression study of the gene <italic>LOC_Os11g47510</italic> in transgenic plants was performed using qRT-PCR technique. All four Southern blot positive transgenic plants along with control (NT) TP309 plant were screened with the primers specific to <italic>Loc_Os11g47510</italic> transcribed region. 18S rRNA gene specific primers were used as an internal control in the present experiment for data normalization. The results obtained indicated varying level of transgene expression, ranging from 3.7- to 9.5-folds in different transgenic events (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref></bold>). The expression of <italic>hptII</italic> in NT and transgenic plants revealed no amplification in NT-TP309, but varying levels of expression of four transgenic lines (Supplementary Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM7">5</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption><p><bold>Differential expression analysis of <italic>LOC_Os11g47510</italic> gene in transgenic vs. control TP309 plants.</bold> Leaf samples of southern positive transgenic plants and non-transgenic plant were subjected to qRT-PCR for expression study of gene under CaMv 35S promoter. qRT-PCR analysis indicates that <italic>LOC_Os11g47510</italic> gene is expressing constitutively and showing different expression levels in different transgenic events. NT, Non-transgenic plant, TPc1&#x2013;Tpc4, Transgenic events.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00596-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec><title>Functional Analysis of Transgenic Plants by Detached Leaf Bioassay</title>
<p>Detached leaf bioassay experiments using transgenic and NT-TP309 plants confirmed the transgene mediated resistance response in transgenic plants in comparison to NT plants (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref></bold> and Supplementary Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM8">6</xref>). At 36 hpi, size of the lesions developed on transgenics was comparatively smaller than control NT-TP309 plants. After 72 hpi, almost whole leaf of NT-plant was infected with sheath blight pathogen <italic>R. solani</italic>, whereas the infection on the transgenics was restricted to small lesions.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption><p><bold>Detached leaf Bioassay of control TP309 vs. transgenics plants. (A)</bold> Detached leaves of transgenic and non-transgenic plants were placed on the wet filter paper. Agar plug containing the mycelium of <italic>R. solani</italic> were placed on the surface of the leaves. Petriplates were sealed with parafilm and incubated at 28&#x00B0;C for 3 days. <bold>(B)</bold> Statistical analysis of lesion covered leaf area (after 72 h) was performed by calculating the standard error of mean of the three replicates for each of the plant. NT, Non-transgenic plant, TPc1&#x2013;TPc4, Transgenic events.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00596-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec><title>Microscopic Study of Transgenic Rice Leaves for Fungal Growth Analysis</title>
<p>Observations of <italic>R. solani</italic> infected leaves revealed that lesion development begins at 24 hpi in NT-TP309 leaves whereas no lesion was observed in transgenic TP309 leaves. Mycelia of <italic>R. solani</italic> grew and colonized surface of the leaves in both transgenic and NT plants. After colonization, hyphal branches were seen and they either penetrated rice cells directly or formed lobate appressorium and invaded leaf tissue via epidermal intercellular spaces as well as through stomata and trichomes (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5A</xref></bold>). Usually, <italic>R. solani</italic> hyphae tends to grow in bunch and ultimately form infection cushions. Similarly we observed penetration peg or infection cushion in NT leaves at 24 hpi, and after 24 hpi number of infection cushions increased with increase in time (at 48 and 72 hpi), whereas in case of transgenic rice leaves infection cushion was observed only at 72 hpi (Supplementary Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM8">6</xref>). The size of the hyphal mat at the site of colonization and also lesion size was comparatively less in the transgenic lines. We also recorded the number of infection cushions per microscopic field in both transgenic and NT leaves at each time interval. At 72 hpi, the number of infection cushions per microscopic field in transgenic plant leaves was only 2 as compared to 8.3 in NT plant leaves (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5B</xref></bold>).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption><p><bold>Microscopic study of fungal mycelium inside the rice leaves. (A)</bold> Microscopic observations of lesions in infected transgenic and NT rice leaves at 24, 48, and 72 hpi. Mycelia of <italic>R. solani</italic> grew and colonized surface of the leaves. Post colonization, branching of fungal hyphae was observed which either directly penetrate the host cells or form a lobate appressorium and invaded leaf tissue via epidermal intercellular spaces. The number of infection cushion observed in non-transgenic leaves at 24, 48, and 72 hpi was higher in NT-TP309 plants than transgenic lines. <bold>(B)</bold> Number of infection cushion per microscopic field observed under the microscope in NT and transgenic plants at different time intervals. <bold>(C)</bold> Fungal biomass quantification. qPCR analysis using DNA from detached leaf samples of transgenic as well as non-transgenic plants inoculated with <italic>R. solani</italic>. Amount of fungal DNA increases with increase time interval after inoculation in both transgenic as well as non-transgenic leaves but rate of increase was much higher in NT rice leaves as compare to the transgenic leaf samples. Statistical analysis for each experiment was performed by calculating the standard error of mean of three replicates. DP, Direct penetration, LA, Lobate appressorium, IC, Infection cushion.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00596-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec><title>Quantification of Fungal Biomass in the Infected Tissues</title>
<p>Absolute quantification of the fungal biomass in case of transgenic as well as NT rice leaves inoculated with <italic>R. solani</italic> was analyzed by using qPCR. The results obtained revealed that with progress in time interval, the amount of the fungal DNA has increased in both NT as well as in transgenic leaves; however, the amount of fungal DNA found in the case of NT leaves was much higher than the amount in transgenic plants (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5C</xref></bold> and Supplementary Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM9">7</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec><title>Discussion</title>
<p>Rice ShB is one of the most destructive diseases causing severe yield losses all over the world (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Lee and Rush, 1983</xref>). Management of rice sheath blight is difficult as <italic>R. solani</italic>; the causal agent of the disease is having a broad host range (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Taheri et al., 2007</xref>). Further, breeding for sheath blight resistance is very tedious task and time consuming, largely due to quantitative nature of the resistance response. However, now-a-days, cloning of the genes responsible for resistance into the susceptible rice varieties is gaining popularity over other approaches. The developments in the field of identification and mapping of resistance genes and the knowledge of signal transduction components involved in hypersensitive response and systemic acquired resistance pathway had increased the available sources for developing disease resistant plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Piquerez et al., 2014</xref>). Previous studies have proved that the constitutive expression of PR genes has increased resistance against plant pathogens in transgenic plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Xiong and Yang, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Sayari et al., 2014</xref>).</p>
<p>Till date many genes had been cloned and transformed into the susceptible varieties against the fungal diseases. Among the cloning of disease resistance genes, overexpression of gene from the same plant species instead of foreign transgene is advantageous in consideration to public acceptance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Datta et al., 1999</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Alexander et al. (1993)</xref> demonstrated the overexpression of PR-1a gene in tobacco has increased the tolerance against <italic>Peronospora tabacina</italic> and <italic>Phytophthora parasitica</italic> var. <italic>nicotianae</italic>. Thaumatin like PR-5 overexpressed in transgenic rice and orange has increased resistance against <italic>R. solani</italic> and <italic>P. citrophthora</italic>, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Datta et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Fagoaga et al., 2001</xref>). PR-3 specific &#x03B2;-1,3-glucanases from alfalfa, barley, tobacco and soybean have been shown to suppress fungal diseases in tobacco (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bucher et al., 2001</xref>). Overexpression of glucanases from soybean has improved tolerance of potato and kiwi to <italic>P. infestans</italic> and <italic>B. cinerea</italic> infection, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Grover and Gowthaman, 2003</xref>), whereas a glucanase of potato was reported to increase resistance in flax against <italic>Fusarium oxysporum</italic> and <italic>F. culmorum</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Wrobel-Kwiatkowska et al., 2004</xref>).</p>
<p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Huynh et al. (1992)</xref> demonstrated the <italic>in vitro</italic> antifungal activity of 28 kDa chitinases (<italic>chiA</italic> and <italic>chiB</italic>) isolated from maize seeds against the growth of <italic>Trichoderma reesei, Alternaria solani</italic> and <italic>Fusarium oxysporum.</italic> An antifungal chitinase of 64 kDa from <italic>Enterobacter</italic> sp. NRG4 against <italic>R. solani</italic> was reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Dahiya et al. (2005)</xref>.</p>
<p>In previous study we cloned and characterized 6 out of 11chitinase genes present in the QTL qSBR11-1 from rice line Tetep and performed expression analysis of those 11 chitinase genes present in this particular QTL using qRT-PCR technique in both tetep and HP2216 rice lines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Richa et al., 2016</xref>). It was found that out of the 11 genes, the gene present on the locus LOC_Os11g47510 was highly expressed after 36 hpi with <italic>R. solani</italic> in rice line tetep as compared to the HP2216. <italic>In vitro</italic> assays confirmed chitinase activity of LOC_Os11g47510 protein as it showed antifungal activity against <italic>R. solani</italic>. Therefore, <italic>LOC_Os11g47510</italic> gene was selected as a candidate gene for cloning and genetic transformation into the sheath blight susceptible rice lineTP309.</p>
<p>In the present investigation, chitinase gene <italic>LOC_Os11g47510</italic> was cloned and transferred into the susceptible rice variety Taipei 309. Putative transgenic plants were characterized at molecular level using PCR and Southern blot tools for gene integration and copy number analysis, whereas qRT-PCR was performed to study the expression of integrated gene in transgenic TP309 rice plants. Among the transgenic TP309 plants subjected to expression analysis, expression of the <italic>LOC_Os11g47510</italic> transcript varied from 3.7- to 9.5-folds higher as compared to the control NT plants. This variation in transgene expression, though under the control of constitutive 35S promoter can be attributed to the site of transgene integration in different events. Effect of site of transgene integration into a euchromatin region on the expression level of the corresponding gene has been reviewed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Kohli et al. (2006)</xref>. Antifungal bioassay by using detached leaves of transgenic and NT rice plants showed that infection process culminating in lesion development takes place much earlier in NT-control plants as compared to the transgenic plants. Further into the infection process, characteristic necrotic browning feature around the site of lesion was observed in both the transgenic and NT plants after 48&#x2013;72 hpi, however, the area covered by necrotic regions was more in NT-control plants as compared to the transgenic plants. Formation of infection cushions during early stages of infection has been reported by various researchers. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Singh et al. (2003)</xref> reported early formation of infection cushion in rice leaf lamina as compared to the leaf sheath. We analyzed the inhibition of fungal mycelia inside the leaf tissue in both, the transgenic as well as NT rice plants inoculated with <italic>R. solani</italic> using light microscope. At 24 hpi, we observed branching of <italic>R. solani</italic> hyphae and colonization along with formation of infection cushion in NT plant, whereas in transgenic plant, very less growth of fungal hyphae was recorded. At 48 hpi, infection was observed in both NT as well as transgenic plant but the number of infection cushions was more in NT plant. Similarly, at 72 hpi the number of infection cushions was much more in NT plant than transgenic plants. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Armentrout and Downer (1987)</xref> reported the formation of infection cushion at 21 hpi in cotton seedlings and in excised hypocotyls. Infection cushion plays an important role in disease development and its severity as it helps in enzymatic degradation and hyphal penetration inside the leaf tissue (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Anderson, 1982</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Ghosh et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Zhang et al., 2016</xref>).</p>
<p>Once inside the plant tissues, the total fungal biomass is also an indicator of the response of the plants against invading fungus. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Weihmann et al. (2016)</xref> demonstrated the quantification of fungal biomass in maize plants inoculated with <italic>Colletotrichum graminicola</italic>. In the present study, fungal biomass was quantified in the transgenic and NT leaves challenged with <italic>R. solani.</italic> We observed an increased amount of fungal DNA over different time intervals, i.e., 0, 24, 48, and 72 hpi, both in NT and transgenic plants; however, the fungal DNA was much higher in NT plant as compare to the transgenic plant. Therefore, these molecular, phenotypic and microscopic observations can be directly attributed to the transgene overexpression, as validated through qRT-PCR analysis in transgenic TP309 plants. Resistance attributed to overexpression of chitinase gene was also supported by other researchers. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Yuan et al. (2004)</xref> overexpressed rice chitinase gene (RC24) in rice and reported that the number of lesions was more in non-transgenic rice line as compared to the transgenic line; however, both transformed as well as non-transformed lines could show characteristic necrotic browning features after 2 days of inoculation. In another report, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Nandakumar et al. (2007)</xref> also observed fewer lesions, i.e., 0&#x2013;3 in transgenic rice lines as compare to the NT ones, i.e., 4&#x2013;5, registering more resistance as compare to the NT ones. Further correlating the relation between chitinase expression and lesion length in rice, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Shrestha et al. (2008)</xref> found a negative correlation between percentage of relative lesion length and chitinase activity in rice. <italic>alit</italic> has also been reported that there was a negative correlation between the mycelial growth of <italic>R. solani</italic> and chitinase activity in the antifungal assay conducted with recombinant LOC_Os11g47510, chitinase protein (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Richa et al., 2016</xref>). Very recently, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Rajesh et al. (2016)</xref> analyzed the sheath blight resistance in transgenic ASD16 rice lines expressing a rice <italic>chi11</italic> gene encoding chitinase and found that transgenic line ASD16-4-1-1 gave a better protection against the sheath blight pathogen than the other two lines.</p>
<p>In the present study, the detached leaf assay and real-time qRT-PCR study revealed negative correlation between chitinase expression and number of lesions formed and lesion length caused by <italic>R. solani</italic> and further the chitinase gene overexpression in transgenic plants correlate directly with sheath blight resistance in otherwise susceptible rice line TP309. Usefulness of the detached leaf bioassay for initial screening of the putative transformants for ShB resistance was also supported by qRT-PCR results. It was observed that transgenic events which were showing less disease progression during leaf assay showed high expression of transgene during expression analysis studies. We found that for initial screening of large number of putative transformants, detached leaf assay is a better approach and transformants exhibiting better resistance at initial level needs to be assessed further by expression studies. Therefore, the findings of the present investigation demonstrated that the overexpression of novel chitinase gene from indica rice line can effectively enhance resistance response against <italic>R. solani</italic> infection by inhibiting the growth and branching of hyphae in transgenic plants. Our results are also helpful in enhancing the knowledge and resources available for effective management of rice ShB and the candidate gene validated here can be used for resistance breeding of elite rice lines using molecular breeding or transgenic approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>Conceived and designed the experiments: TS. Performed the experiments: KR and IT. Analyzed the data: KR and IT. Wrote the paper: TS, KR, BD, IT, VS, and JB.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Conflict of Interest Statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<p>TS is thankful to the Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India for financial assistance (BT/Indo-Qld/ 01/09/2010) and DST for JC Bose Fellowship.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="supplementary material">
<title>Supplementary Material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2017.00596/full#supplementary-material">http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2017.00596/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.DOC" id="SM1" mimetype="application/msword" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_2.DOC" id="SM2" mimetype="application/msword" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_1.TIF" id="SM3" mimetype="image/tif" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_2.TIF" id="SM4" mimetype="image/tif" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_3.TIF" id="SM5" mimetype="image/tif" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_4.TIF" id="SM6" mimetype="image/tif" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_5.TIF" id="SM7" mimetype="image/tif" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_6.TIF" id="SM8" mimetype="image/tif" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_7.TIF" id="SM9" mimetype="image/tif" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alexander</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goodman</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gut-Rella</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Glascock</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weyman</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Friedrich</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Increased tolerance to two oomycete pathogens in transgenic tobacco expressing pathogenesis-related protein 1a.</article-title> <source><italic>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</italic></source> <volume>90</volume> <fpage>7327</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7331</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.90.15.7327</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1982</year>). <article-title>The genetics and pathology of <italic>Rhizoctonia solani</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.</italic></source> <volume>20</volume> <fpage>29</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>47</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.py.20.090182.001553</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Armentrout</surname> <given-names>V. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Downer</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>Infection cushion development by <italic>Rhizoctonia solani</italic> on cotton.</article-title> <source><italic>Phytopathology</italic></source> <volume>77</volume> <fpage>619</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>623</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/Phyto-77-619</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bucher</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tarina</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heinlein</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Serio</surname> <given-names>F. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meins</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names> <suffix>Jr.</suffix></name> <name><surname>Iglesias</surname> <given-names>V. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Local expression of <italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-1,3-glucanase enhances symptoms of TMV infection in tobacco.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant J.</italic></source> <volume>28</volume> <fpage>361</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>369</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-313X.2001.01181.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Channamallikarjuna</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sonah</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prasad</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rao</surname> <given-names>G. J. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chand</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Uperti</surname> <given-names>H. C.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Identification of major quantitative trait loci qSBR11-1 for sheath blight resistance in rice.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Breed.</italic></source> <volume>25</volume> <fpage>55</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>166</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11032-009-9316-5</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chernin</surname> <given-names>L. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De-la-Fuente</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sobolev</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haran</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vorgias</surname> <given-names>C. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oppenheim</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Molecular cloning, structural analysis and expression in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> of a chitinase gene from <italic>Enterobacter agglomerans</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>63</volume> <fpage>834</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>839</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dahiya</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tewari</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tiwari</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hoondal</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Production of an antifungal chitinase from <italic>Enterobacter</italic> sp. NRG4 and its application in protoplast production.</article-title> <source><italic>World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</italic></source> <volume>21</volume> <fpage>1611</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1616</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11274-005-8343-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Datta</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koukolikova</surname> <given-names>N. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baisakh</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oliva</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Datta</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title><italic>Agrobacterium</italic>-mediated engineering for sheath blight resistance of indica rice cultivars from different ecosystems.</article-title> <source><italic>Theor. Appl. Genet.</italic></source> <volume>100</volume> <fpage>832</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>839</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s001220051359</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Datta</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oliva</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ona</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Velazhahan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mew</surname> <given-names>T. W.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Enhanced resistance to sheath blight by constitutive expression of infection-related rice chitinase in transgenic elite indica rice cultivars.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>160</volume> <fpage>405</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>414</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0168-9452(00)00413-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Datta</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Velazhahan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oliva</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ona</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mew</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khush</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Over-expression of the cloned rice thaumatin-like protein (PR-5) gene in transgenic rice plants enhances environmental friendly resistance to <italic>Rhizoctonia solani</italic> causing sheath blight disease.</article-title> <source><italic>Theor. Appl. Genet.</italic></source> <volume>98</volume> <fpage>1138</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1145</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s001220051178</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fagoaga</surname> <given-names>C. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rodrigo</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Conejero</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hinarejos</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tuset</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arnau</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Increased tolerance to <italic>Phytophthora citrophthora</italic> in transgenic orange plants constitutively expressing a tomato pathogenesis related protein PR-5.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Breed.</italic></source> <volume>7</volume> <fpage>175</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>185</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1011358005054</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fukamizo</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sakai</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tamoi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Plant Chitinases: structure-function relationships and their physiology.</article-title> <source><italic>Foods Food Ingredients J. Jpn.</italic></source> <volume>208</volume> <fpage>631</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>632</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ghosh</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chakraborty</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Das</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Monitoring the efficacy of mutated <italic>Allium sativum</italic> leaf lectin in transgenic rice against <italic>Rhizoctonia solani</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>BMC Biotechnol.</italic></source> <volume>16</volume>:<issue>24</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12896-016-0246-0</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grover</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gowthaman</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Strategies for development of fungus-resistant transgenic plants.</article-title> <source><italic>Curr. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>84</volume> <fpage>330</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>340</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hamid</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmad</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmad</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abdin</surname> <given-names>M. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Musarrat</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Chitinases: an update.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci.</italic></source> <volume>5</volume> <issue>21-29</issue>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huynh</surname> <given-names>Q. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hironaka</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Levine</surname> <given-names>E. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>C. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Borgmeyer</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shah</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Antifungal proteins from plants. Purification, molecular cloning, and antifungal properties of chitinases from maize seed.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Biol. Chem.</italic></source> <volume>267</volume> <fpage>6635</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6640</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jabeen</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chaudhary</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gulfraz</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rashid</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mirza</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Expression of rice chitinase gene in genetically engineered tomato confers enhanced resistance to fusarium wilt and early blight.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Pathol. J.</italic></source> <volume>31</volume> <fpage>252</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>258</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5423/PPJ.OA.03.2015.0026</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jang</surname> <given-names>I. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zuo</surname> <given-names>W. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boston</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>Y. H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Co-expression of a modified maize ribosome-inactivating protein and a rice basic chitinase gene in transgenic rice plants confers enhanced resistance to sheath blight.</article-title> <source><italic>Transgenic Res.</italic></source> <volume>12</volume> <fpage>475</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>484</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1024276127001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kishimoto</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nishizawa</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tabei</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ibi</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nakajima</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Akutsu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Detailed analysis of rice chitinase gene expression in transgenic cucumber plants showing different levels of disease resistance to gray mold (<italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic>).</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>162</volume> <fpage>655</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>662</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0168-9452(01)00602-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kohli</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Melendi</surname> <given-names>P. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abranches</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Capell</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Christou</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>The quest to understand the basis and mechanisms that control expression of introduced transgenes in crop plants.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Signal. Behav.</italic></source> <volume>1</volume> <fpage>185</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>195</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4161/psb.1.4.3195</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kov&#x00E1;cs</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>S&#x00E1;gi</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jacon</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arinaitwe</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Busogoro</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thiry</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Expression of a rice chitinase gene in transgenic banana (&#x2019;Gros Michel&#x2019;, AAA genome group) confers resistance to black leaf streak disease.</article-title> <source><italic>Transgenic Res.</italic></source> <volume>22</volume> <fpage>117</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>130</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11248-012-9631-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>F. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rush</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1983</year>). <article-title>Rice sheath blight: a major rice disease.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Dis.</italic></source> <volume>67</volume> <fpage>829</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>832</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PD-67-829</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anuratha</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Datta</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Potrykus</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Muthukrishnan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Datta</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Genetic engineering of rice for resistance to sheath blight.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Biotechnol.</italic></source> <volume>13</volume> <fpage>686</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>691</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nbt0795-686</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nandakumar</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Babu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kalpana</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raguchander</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Balasubramanian</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Samiyappan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title><italic>Agrobacterium</italic>-mediated transformation of indica rice with chitinase gene for enhanced sheath blight resistance.</article-title> <source><italic>Biol. Plant.</italic></source> <volume>51</volume> <fpage>142</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>148</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10535-007-0027-7</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Neuhaus</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>&#x201C;Plant chitinases (PR-3 PR-4 PR-8 PR-11),&#x201D; in</article-title> <source><italic>Pathogenesis-Related Proteins in Plants</italic></source> <role>eds</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Datta</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Muthukrishnan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Boca Raton, FL</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CRC Press</publisher-name>) <fpage>77</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>105</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Okubara</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dickman</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blechl</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Molecular and genetic aspects of controlling the soil borne necrotrophic pathogens <italic>Rhizoctonia</italic> and <italic>Pythium</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>228</volume> <fpage>61</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>70</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.02.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Piquerez</surname> <given-names>S. J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harvey</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beynon</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ntoukakis</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Improving crop disease resistance: lessons from research on <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> and tomato.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>5</volume>:<issue>671</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2014.00671</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rajesh</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maruthasalam</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kalpana</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Poovannan</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>K. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kokiladevi</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Stability of sheath blight resistance in transgenic ASD16 rice lines expressing a rice <italic>chi11</italic> gene encoding chitinase.</article-title> <source><italic>Biol. Plant.</italic></source> <volume>60</volume> <fpage>749</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>756</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10535-016-0594-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Richa</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tiwari</surname> <given-names>I. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumari</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Devanna</surname> <given-names>B. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sonah</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumari</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Functional characterization of novel chitinase genes present in the sheath blight resistance QTL: qSBR11-1 in rice line tetep.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>7</volume>:<issue>244</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2016.00244</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sambrook</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fritsch</surname> <given-names>E. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maniatis</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <source><italic>Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Cold Spring Harbor, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sanford</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klein</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wolf</surname> <given-names>E. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Allen</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>Delivery of substances into cells and tissues using a particle bombardment process.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Particulate Sci. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>5</volume> <fpage>27</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>37</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/02726358708904533</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Savary</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Willocquet</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elazegui</surname> <given-names>F. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Castilla</surname> <given-names>N. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Teng</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Rice pest constraints in tropical Asia: quantification of yield losses due to rice pests in a range of production situations.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Dis.</italic></source> <volume>84</volume> <fpage>357</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>369</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.3.357</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sayari</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Babaeizad</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ghanbari</surname> <given-names>M. A. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rahimian</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Expression of the pathogenesis related proteins, NH-1, PAL, and lipoxygenase in the iranian Tarom and Khazar rice cultivars, in reaction to <italic>Rhizoctonia solani</italic>&#x2013; the causal agent of rice sheath blight.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Plant Prot. Res.</italic></source> <volume>54</volume> <fpage>36</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>43</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2478/jppr-2014-0006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>K. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gaur</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>V. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Role of chitinase in plant defense.</article-title> <source><italic>Asian J. Biochem.</italic></source> <volume>6</volume> <fpage>29</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>37</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3923/ajb.2011.29.37</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shrestha</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ona</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Muthukrishnan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mew</surname> <given-names>T. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Chitinase levels in rice cultivars correlate with resistance to the sheath blight pathogen <italic>Rhizoctonia solani</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Eur. J. Plant Pathol.</italic></source> <volume>120</volume> <fpage>69</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>77</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-007-9199-4</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rohila</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Savary</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Willocquet</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>U. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Infection process in sheath blight of rice caused by <italic>Rhizoctonia solani</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Indian Phytopathol.</italic></source> <volume>56</volume> <fpage>434</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>438</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>V. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pandian</surname> <given-names>T. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ellur</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Molecular breeding for the development of multiple disease resistance in Basmati rice.</article-title> <source><italic>AoB Plants</italic></source> <volume>2012</volume>:<issue>ls029</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aobpla/pls029</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shukla</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sinha</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Current status and impact of sheath blight in rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> L.) &#x2013; a review.</article-title> <source><italic>Agric. Rev.</italic></source> <volume>25</volume> <fpage>289</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>297</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sundheim</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Poplawsky</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hlingboe</surname> <given-names>A. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Molecular cloning of two chitinase genes from <italic>Serratia marcescens</italic> and their expression in <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> species.</article-title> <source><italic>Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol.</italic></source> <volume>33</volume> <fpage>483</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>491</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0885-5765(88)90013-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tabei</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kitade</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nishizawa</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kikuchi</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kayano</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hibi</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Transgenic cucumber plants harboring a rice chitinase gene exhibit enhanced resistance to gray mold (<italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic>).</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Cell Rep.</italic></source> <volume>17</volume> <fpage>159</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>164</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s002990050371</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Taheri</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gnanamanickam</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>H&#x00F6;fte</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Characterization, genetic structure, and pathogenicity of <italic>Rhizoctonia</italic> spp. associated with rice sheath diseases in India.</article-title> <source><italic>Phytopathology</italic></source> <volume>97</volume> <fpage>373</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>383</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-97-3-0373</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Takahashi</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Masahiro</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miura</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Komatsu</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nishizawa</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hibi</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Increased resistance to crown rust disease in transgenic Italian ryegrass (<italic>Lolium multiflorum</italic> Lam.) expressing the rice chitinase gene.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Cell Rep.</italic></source> <volume>23</volume> <fpage>811</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>818</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00299-004-0900-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Takatsu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nishizawa</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hibi</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Akutsu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Transgenic chrysanthemum (<italic>Dendranthema grandiflorum</italic> (Ramat.) Kitamura) expressing a rice chitinase gene shows enhanced resistance to gray mold (<italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic>).</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Hortic.</italic></source> <volume>82</volume> <fpage>113</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>123</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0304-4238(99)00034-5</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Weihmann</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eisermann</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Becher</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Krijger</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hubner</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deising</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Correspondence between symptom development of <italic>Colletotrichum graminicola</italic> and fungal biomass, quantified by a newly developed qPCR assay, depends on the maize variety.</article-title> <source><italic>BMC Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>16</volume>:<issue>94</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12866-016-0709-4</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wrobel-Kwiatkowska</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lorenc-Kukula</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Starzycki</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oszmianski</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kepczynska</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Szopa</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Expression of &#x03B2;-1,3-glucanase in flax causes increased resistance to fungi.</article-title> <source><italic>Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol.</italic></source> <volume>65</volume> <fpage>245</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>256</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pmpp.2005.02.008</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Disease resistance and abiotic stress tolerance in rice are inversely modulated by an abscisic acid-inducible mitogen activated protein kinase.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Cell</italic></source> <volume>15</volume> <fpage>745</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>759</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/tpc.008714</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yamamoto</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Iketani</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leki</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nishizawa</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Notsuka</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hibi</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Transgenic grapevine plants expressing a rice chitinase with enhanced resistance to fungal pathogens.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Cell Rep.</italic></source> <volume>19</volume> <fpage>639</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>646</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s002999900174</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>H. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>X. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Characteristics of resistance to rice sheath blight of zhongda 2, a transgenic rice line as modified by gene &#x201C;RC24&#x201D;.</article-title> <source><italic>Rice Sci.</italic></source> <volume>11</volume> <fpage>177</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>180</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huo</surname> <given-names>H. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xi</surname> <given-names>X. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Histological observation of potato in response to <italic>Rhizoctonia solani</italic> infection.</article-title> <source><italic>Eur. J. Plant Pathol.</italic></source> <volume>145</volume>:<issue>289</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-015-0842-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn id="fn01"><label>1</label><p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://multalin.toulouse.inra.fr/multalin/">multalin.toulouse.inra.fr/multalin/</ext-link></p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>