<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2017.00423</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Climate Influences the Content and Chemical Composition of Foliar Tannins in Green and Senesced Tissues of <italic>Quercus rubra</italic></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Top</surname> <given-names>Sara M.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/405011/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Preston</surname> <given-names>Caroline M.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/397227/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Dukes</surname> <given-names>Jeffrey S.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/54763/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Tharayil</surname> <given-names>Nishanth</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/97095/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University</institution> <country>Clemson, SC, USA</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Natural Resources Canada, Pacific Forestry Centre</institution> <country>Victoria, BC, Canada</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University</institution> <country>West Lafayette, IN, USA</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University</institution> <country>West Lafayette, IN, USA</country></aff>
<aff id="aff5"><sup>5</sup><institution>Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts Boston</institution> <country>Boston, MA, USA</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Raquel Esteban, University of the Basque Country, Spain</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Zhenzhu Xu, State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany (CAS), China; Gerald Moser, University of Giessen, Germany</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001"><p>&#x0002A;Correspondence: Sara M. Top <email>saramarietop&#x00040;gmail.com</email></p></fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn002"><p>Nishanth Tharayil <email>ntharay&#x00040;clemson.edu</email></p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn003"><p>This article was submitted to Functional Plant Ecology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>16</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>8</volume>
<elocation-id>423</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>03</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2016</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>13</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2017</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2017 Top, Preston, Dukes and Tharayil.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Top, Preston, Dukes and Tharayil</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract><p>Environmental stresses not only influence production of plant metabolites but could also modify their resorption during leaf senescence. The production-resorption dynamics of polyphenolic tannins, a class of defense compound whose ecological role extends beyond tissue senescence, could amplify the influence of climate on ecosystem processes. We studied the quantity, chemical composition, and tissue-association of tannins in green and freshly-senesced leaves of <italic>Quercus rubra</italic> exposed to different temperature (<italic>Warming</italic> and <italic>No Warming</italic>) and precipitation treatments (<italic>Dry, Ambient, Wet</italic>) at the Boston-Area Climate Experiment (BACE) in Massachusetts, USA. Climate influenced not only the quantity of tannins, but also their molecular composition and cell-wall associations. Irrespective of climatic treatments, tannin composition in <italic>Q. rubra</italic> was dominated by condensed tannins (CTs, proanthocyanidins). When exposed to <italic>Dry</italic> and <italic>Ambient</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>Warm</italic> conditions, <italic>Q. rubra</italic> produced higher quantities of tannins that were less polymerized. In contrast, under favorable conditions (<italic>Wet</italic>), tannins were produced in lower quantities, but the CTs were more polymerized. Further, even as the overall tissue tannin content declined, the content of hydrolysable tannins (HTs) increased under <italic>Wet</italic> treatments. The molecular composition of tannins influenced their content in senesced litter. Compared to the green leaves, the content of HTs decreased in senesced leaves across treatments, whereas the CT content was similar between green and senesced leaves in <italic>Wet</italic> treatments that produced more polymerized tannins. The content of total tannins in senesced leaves was higher in <italic>Warming</italic> treatments under both <italic>dry</italic> and <italic>ambient</italic> precipitation treatments. Our results suggest that, though climate directly influenced the production of tannins in green tissues (and similar patterns were observed in the senesced tissue), the influence of climate on tannin content of senesced tissue was partly mediated by the effect on the chemical composition of tannins. These different climatic impacts on leaves over the course of a growing season may alter forest dynamics, not only in decomposition and nutrient cycling dynamics, but also in herbivory dynamics.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>hydrolysable tannins</kwd>
<kwd>condensed tannins</kwd>
<kwd>drought</kwd>
<kwd>warming</kwd>
<kwd>Proanthocyanidins</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Quercus rubra</italic></kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn001">DEB-1145993</contract-num>
<contract-num rid="cn001">DEB-0546670</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">National Science Foundation<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/100000001</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="4"/>
<table-count count="5"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="74"/>
<page-count count="12"/>
<word-count count="9639"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Global changes, through their widespread influence on all biological processes, can significantly impact plant life cycles and functions (Norby and Luo, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">2004</xref>). Elevated levels of CO<sub>2</sub> and ozone, increased temperatures, as well as higher drought frequency, all alter the content and composition of plant metabolites by disrupting the physiological stoichiometry in plants (Kuokkanen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2001</xref>; Xu and Zhou, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">2006</xref>; Prior et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">2011</xref>; Xu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">2014</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">2015</xref>), thus influencing plant survival and distribution. Furthermore, by influencing the chemical composition of senesced litter that fuels the metabolism of soil heterotrophs, the climate-induced physiological alterations in plants could also influence soil nutrient cycling and ecosystem productivity. For example, climate-induced changes in the composition of senescing leaves (Top and Filley, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">2014</xref>; Suseela et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">2015</xref>) could affect the subsequent detritivory (Currano et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2008</xref>; Couture et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2012</xref>) that regulates the cycling of soil carbon and mineral nutrients (Aerts, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">1997</xref>; Liu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2009</xref>; Suseela et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">2013</xref>), which in turn could influence ecosystem productivity. These protracted influences of environmental stress on ecosystem performance could be mediated in part by climatic regulation of defense compounds that retain their biological-inhibitory properties even after tissue senescence.</p>
<p>Polyphenols, specifically tannins, are ecologically relevant, multifaceted carbon-based secondary metabolites that are common in most plant species (Kraus et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2003a</xref>). These compounds perform multiple protective functions and facilitate the interactions of plants with their biotic and abiotic environments during the active growth of tissues and after tissue senescence. In green tissues, as protective compounds, tannins play a critical role in plant&#x02014;herbivore and plant-to-plant interactions (Salminen and Lempa, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">2002</xref>; Kraus et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2003a</xref>; Barbehenn and Constabel, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2011</xref>), and also serve as a photo-protectant (Close and Mcarthur, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2002</xref>). Tannins in senescent leaves can account for up to 25% leaf dry weight (Kraus et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2003b</xref>) and thus can be a major form of carbon reaching the belowground ecosystems. Tannins in senescent tissues also retain their ability to complex with proteins (Hagerman et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">1998</xref>) and inactivate soil enzymes (Triebwasser et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">2012</xref>), which could hinder soil N mineralization (H&#x000E4;ttenschwiler and Vitousek, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2000</xref>; Kraus et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2003a</xref>; Adamczyk et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">2013</xref>; Tharayil et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">2013</xref>). Thus, environmental conditions that exist during plant growth, by regulating the production of tannins in green tissues, can influence carbon and nitrogen cycling in soils.</p>
<p>Tannins can be broadly classified into condensed tannins (CTs) and hydrolysable tannins (HTs; Kraus et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2003a</xref>), with gymnosperms and monocots producing primarily CTs, and dicots able to produce either HTs or CTs alone or as mixtures (Bate-Smith, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">1977</xref>; Haslam, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">1988</xref>; Kraus et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2003a</xref>; Triebwasser et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">2012</xref>). Condensed tannins, also known as proanthocyanidins, are polymers of flavan-3-ols such as catechin and gallocatechin (Xie and Dixon, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">2005</xref>). Hydrolysable tannins are composed of gallic acid units linked via an ester linkage to a glucose functional group, and they can be further classified as gallotannins and ellagitannis by the respective presence or absence of C&#x02013;C linked galloyl groups (Hartzfeld et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2002</xref>). In plants, tannin production is genetically (Scioneaux et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">2011</xref>), as well as environmentally, controlled (Tharayil et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">2011</xref>). Environmental conditions that affect the production of tannins include photoperiod, soil pH, moisture and nutrient availability, herbivory, and atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> (Herms and Mattson, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">1992</xref>; Bussotti et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">1998</xref>; Kraus et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2003a</xref>; Cohen and Kennedy, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2010</xref>; Jaakola and Hohtola, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2010</xref>; Lindroth, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">2010</xref>; Malisch et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">2016</xref>). Along with their total quantity, the biological reactivity of tannins is closely regulated by the chemistry of the polymer, <italic>viz</italic>. identity of monomers, substitution pattern of the phenolic ring, and the degree of polymerization (Kraus et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2003b</xref>). Although tannin quantities have been shown to respond to environmental changes, little is known about the influence of climate on the chemical composition of tannins. Further, less is known about the changes in the composition of tannins between green and senesced tissues, which are primarily influenced by the overall resorption metabolism during tissue senescence.</p>
<p>We investigated the influence of warming and altered precipitation on tannin production in <italic>Quercus rubra</italic>, an important species in many forested ecosystems of eastern North America (Prasad et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2007-ongoing</xref>). Specifically, we sought to determine the interactive effects of temperature and precipitation on (1) the content and molecular composition of tannins, (2) the association of tannins within different tissue fractions (operationally defined as extractable and non-extractable tannins) and (3) whether climatic effects on content and chemical composition of tannins differ between green and senescent leaves. We hypothesized that the climate stresses we imposed (drought, increased temperature) would induce the production of tannins that are quantitatively and compositionally different, and that the climate-induced changes in composition of tannins in green leaves would also influence the content of tannins that are retained in the senescent leaves.</p></sec>
<sec id="s2">
<title>Methods and materials</title>
<sec>
<title>Site description</title>
<p>Samples were collected from the Boston-Area Climate Experiment (BACE), located in Waltham, Massachusetts, USA. The experiment is located in an old-field ecosystem, and the soil is a Mesic Typic Dystrudept (Haven series) with loamy topsoil (0&#x02013;30 cm; sand:silt:clay ratios of 45:46:9) over a gravelly sandy loam subsoil. The BACE has four temperature treatments and three precipitation treatments and is divided into three replicate blocks with 12 plots (2 &#x000D7; 2 m, with 1 m spacing between plots) within each block. Lateral movement of water is prevented by lining each plot with polyethylene sheets to a depth of 0.6 m. Each block has ambient (i.e., control, unmanipulated), wet (150% of ambient rainfall during the growing season) and dry (50% of ambient rainfall year-round) precipitation zones, which are administered through a passive removal and active redistribution system mounted above the plots on otherwise open greenhouse frames. <italic>Dry</italic> plots are located under portions of the greenhouse frames that are covered in evenly spaced, clear, six-inch polycarbonate slats (15 cm slats arranged 15 cm apart) that exclude 50% of incoming precipitation. Frames over the <italic>Ambient</italic> and <italic>Wet</italic> treatments are covered in deer netting that provides similar shading, reducing photosynthetically active radiation by &#x0007E;6% but letting all precipitation in. The precipitation collected from the dry plots was immediately reapplied to the <italic>Wet</italic> plots via electric pumps and an overhead sprinkler system (Hoeppner and Dukes, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">2012</xref>). Within each precipitation zone are plots designated for one of four levels of warming: no warming, low (&#x0002B;c. 1.0&#x000B0;C), medium (&#x0002B;c. 2.7&#x000B0;C) and high (&#x0002B;c. 4.0&#x000B0;C) (Tharayil et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">2011</xref>; Hoeppner and Dukes, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">2012</xref>; Suseela and Dukes, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">2013</xref>). The warming treatments were applied, starting in 2008, with infrared heaters that were mounted 1 m above each corner of the plot. Temperature at the middle of the plots was measured every 10 s. The difference in temperature between the plant canopies of the warmest and ambient plots within each group of four plots was used to achieve feedback control (Hoeppner and Dukes, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">2012</xref>). Three bare-root plants (30&#x02013;45 cm) of different tree species such as <italic>Q. rubra, Betula lenta, Ulmus americanus</italic>, and <italic>Betula populifolia</italic> were planted along the margins of each plot during April 2012. For this study, mature, non-shaded, leaves were collected from three <italic>Q. rubra</italic> trees per plot in 2013 during the first week of September (green leaves) and in the second week of October (freshly senesced leaves). Leaves of similar size were collected from 2 to 3 apical whorls per tree during each harvest, resulting in at least 12 leaves per plot per harvest. Leaves from trees within a plot were pooled together to obtain a composite sample. Leaves were flash frozen between slabs of dry ice immediately after harvest, and the samples were maintained below &#x02212;20&#x000B0;C during all analyses. The <italic>Q. rubra</italic> leaves used for this study were collected from the unwarmed (<italic>No Warm</italic>) and high temperature (<italic>Warm</italic>) treatments exposed to <italic>Dry, Ambient</italic>, and <italic>Wet</italic> precipitation treatments. Three treatment replicates were maintained for each treatment in all analyses.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Extraction of tissues</title>
<p>Leaf petioles were removed, and frozen leaf samples were finely ground in dry ice using mortar and pestle. Approximately 100 mg of the ground tissue was extracted twice with 10 ml of 100% MeOH. The methanol extracted tissues were further extracted with 10 ml of 75% acetone, three more times. During each extraction step the tissues were sonicated for 2 min, and then shaken for 2 h. The supernatant from the five extractions was pooled to obtain a composite extractable-fraction. The extracts were stored at &#x02212;20&#x000B0;C and the residual litter (non-extractable) was washed with 2 ml of 80% methanol and dried overnight at 40&#x000B0;C.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Condensed tannin quantity</title>
<p>The total content of condensed tannins (CTs) in the pooled extracts and in the litter residue was quantified using the acid-butanol assay modified from Porter et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">1986</xref>). For the extractable tannins, subsamples (2 ml) of the pooled extract were dried down under N<sub>2</sub> gas at 40&#x000B0;C before adding 6 ml of the butanol:HCl (95:5) reagent. For the analysis of the non-extractable tannins, approximately 20 mg of the residual litter was weighed into glass tubes and combined with 6 ml of the butanol:HCl reagent. Samples were then placed in a water bath at 90&#x02013;95&#x000B0;C for an hour and then cooled on ice. The amount of depolymerized anthocyanidin in the samples was quantified spectrophotometrically by measuring the absorbance at 550 nm (Jasco V-550 UV/VIS spectrophotometer, Jasco, Analytical Instruments, Easton, MD, USA) with the amount of tannins quantified from a standard curve derived from purified tannins of <italic>Q. rubra</italic> collected from the same experimental plot as described in Tharayil et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">2011</xref>). Since <italic>Quercus</italic> tannins are a mixture of CT and HTs, the weight percent of CTs in the purified tannins were determined during the depolymerizing of the purified tannins in the presence of excess phloroglucinol as described below. The CT concentration in the standard curve was adjusted accordingly to avoid the potential overestimation of tannins.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Mean degree of polymerization and monomer identity of condensed tannin</title>
<p>Mass spectrometric analysis of intact polymeric tannins is challenging, especially when using electrospray as the ionization interface. This is because as the degree of polymerization increases the ionization efficiency of proanthocyanidins decreases (Karonen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2006</xref>; Mouls et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">2011</xref>). Also, stability of deprotonated proanthocyanidins and their fragments decreases with the increase in degree of polymerization of the molecule (Gu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">2003</xref>). Combined, this would result in an under sampling of the polymers with a higher chain-length, thus underestimating the degree of polymerization of proanthocyanidins in a sample. In order to further elucidate CT chemistry, subunit composition and mean degree of polymerization were determined by depolymerizing CTs in the presence of excess phloroglucinol (Kennedy and Jones, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2001</xref>; Karonen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2006</xref>). Phloroglucinol reagent was prepared by dissolving 2.5 g phloroglucinol in 55 ml methanol containing 400 &#x003BC;l of concentrated HCl. The reagent was sparged with argon for &#x0007E;30 min until the methanol volume was reduced to 50 ml. Two milliliters of the reagent were added to glass tubes containing &#x0007E;150 mg of finely ground leaf tissues that were not subjected to prior solvent extraction. Samples in the tubes were then sparged with argon for another 2 min, immediately closed with Teflon-lined caps and incubated on a heating block at 50&#x000B0;C for 130 min. The tubes were then cooled on ice, centrifuged (1,000 <italic>g</italic>, 5 min), and 1.5 ml supernatant was transferred to centrifuge tubes. Saturated MgSO<sub>4</sub> solution (&#x0007E;45 g in 100 ml water) was added to the supernatant and samples were cooled on ice again to facilitate the subsequent phase separation. For liquid-liquid extraction, 1.5 ml of ethyl ether was added and the tubes were shaken end to end on a rotatory shaker for 5 min. The tubes were centrifuged (1000 <italic>g</italic>, 5 min) and 40 &#x003BC;l of the top ethyl ether fraction was transferred to 100 &#x003BC;l glass inserts and completely dried under N<sub>2</sub> gas. The samples were reconstituted in 50% methanol and analyzed using a liquid chromatograph coupled to a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. Detailed chromatography and mass spectrometry parameters are given in supporting information.</p>
<p>Peak identities were determined based on authentic standards of catechin and gallocatechin as well as literature values reported for phloroglucinol adducts and procyanidin fragments (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). Mass spectral patterns relative to un-adducted parent monomers were also compared. Concentrations of extractable catechin monomers were subtracted from the result of the phloroglucinol depolymerization assay. Relative mass responses (Kennedy and Jones, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2001</xref>) were used to normalize the difference in the ESI responses among the terminal units and phloroglucinol adducts. Procyanidin content was determined using the catechin and epicatechin monomers as well as fragments. Prodelphinidin content was defined as the gallocatechin/epi-gallocatechin pair (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). Mean degree of polymerization of proanthocyanidins, was determined by dividing the sum of the normalized peak areas of extender units (phloroglucinol adducts of catechin, gallocatechin) by the sum of the peak areas of the terminal units (catechin and gallocatechin).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p><bold>Identification and categorization of condensed tannin monomers</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Condensed Tannin Monomers</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Categorization</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>[M&#x02013;H]<sup>&#x02212;</sup></bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">(&#x0002B;)-Catechin</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Procyanidin</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">289</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">(&#x02212;)-Epicatechin</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Procyanidin</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">289</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">(&#x02212;)-Epigallocatechin</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Procyanidin</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">305</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">(&#x0002B;)-Catechin with phloroglucinol adduct</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Procyanidin</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">413</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">(&#x02212;)-Epi-catechin with phloroglucinol adduct</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Procyanidin</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">413</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Epi-gallocatechin with phloroglucinol adduct</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Prodelphinidin</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">429</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>[M-H]<sup>&#x02212;</sup>: deprotonated molecular mass</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Hydrolysable tannin analysis</title>
<p>For the quantification of hydrolysable tannins (HTs), methanolysis was carried out with a subsample of the methanol extract or 40 mg of methanol-extracted residual litter in methanolic H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> at 85&#x000B0;C as described by Hartzfeld et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2002</xref>). The concentrations of methyl gallate were then quantified using high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC; see supporting information). Ellagic acid (ellagitannins), and methyl gallate (gallotannins), were identified and quantified in samples using authentic standards. Efficiency of methylation was monitored by measuring percent methylation of gallic acid standard under similar conditions as described above.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Calculations and statistical analysis</title>
<p>The total concentration of tannins in the leaf tissue was calculated by summing CT and HT concentrations. A subsample of leaves collected at the same time was used for determining specific leaf area, which was similar between the green and freshly-senesced for all treatments meaning that trends observed on a mass basis would be similar if based on area (See Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S1</xref> in Suseela et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">2015</xref>).</p>
<p>To test the main and interactive effects of warming and altered precipitation on CTs and HTs, a mixed model restricted maximum likelihood estimation (REML) with time of sampling (green or senesced) as repeated measures was used in SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA). Degrees of freedom were calculated using the Kenward-Rogers method. Warming and precipitation treatments were fixed effects and blocks were treated as the random effects. Tukey&#x00027;s HSD multiple comparison test was used to identify differences among treatments. Significance was set at &#x003B1; &#x0003D; 0.05.</p></sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title>Type of tannins</title>
<p>The total tannin concentration in green leaves varied with temperature and precipitation treatments (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1A,B</xref>; Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S1</xref>). The green leaves formed in the <italic>Dry</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>Warm</italic> and <italic>Ambient</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>Warm</italic> treatment had the highest concentrations of total tannins (121.2 and 128.8 mg g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> tissue, respectively; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1A</xref>), while the <italic>Ambient</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>No Warm</italic> treatment had the lowest total tannin concentration (73.5 mg g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> tissue; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1A</xref>). Only the <italic>Ambient</italic> treatment exhibited an increase in green leaf tannin concentrations with an increase in temperature (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001). This pattern was also observed in senesced tissues, where the tannin concentration of senesced leaves also increased with higher temperature in both <italic>Dry</italic> (34% increase; <italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.005) and <italic>Ambient</italic> (53% increase; <italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.004) treatments (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1B</xref>, Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S1</xref>). Within the <italic>Warm</italic> treatment, the senesced leaves in the drier treatments had more tannins (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1B</xref>). <italic>Dry</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>Warm</italic> had the highest concentration (110.5 mg g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> tissue) and <italic>Wet</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>Warm</italic> had the lowest concentration (62.1 mg g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> tissue) of total tannins (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1B</xref>). The same trend was evident for senesced leaves exposed to <italic>Dry, Ambient</italic>, and <italic>Wet</italic> conditions in the <italic>NoWarm</italic> treatments. Decreases between the green and senesced tissue were observed in total tannins for the <italic>Wet</italic> treatments (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05) and the <italic>Ambient</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>No Warm</italic> treatment (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p><bold>Total average (&#x000B1;SE) tannin content for green (A)</bold> and senesced <bold>(B)</bold> leaf tissue. Asterisks (<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>) above a set of columns indicate significant (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05) differences between <italic>No Warm</italic> and <italic>Warm</italic> treatments within each precipitation treatment. Uppercase letters indicate significant differences (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05) between precipitation treatments within the <italic>No Warm</italic> temperature regime. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05) between precipitation treatments within the <italic>Warm</italic> temperature regime.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00423-g0001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>When separating total tannins into CTs and HTs, CTs made up between 29 and 89% of the green leaf tissue and 53&#x02013;88% of the senesced leaf tissue. In the green tissue of the <italic>Wet</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>No Warm</italic> treatment, HTs made up the larger percentage of total tannins (&#x0007E;69%) (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). In green leaf tissue, warming did not alter HT concentrations in the <italic>Dry, Ambient</italic> (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003D; 0.06), or the <italic>Wet</italic> (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003D; 0.12) treatments (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). The <italic>Wet</italic> precipitation treatment had the highest percentages of HTs in green leaf tissue for both the <italic>No Warm</italic> (69.1%) and the <italic>Warm</italic> (50.0%) treatments (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). In senesced leaf tissue, warming increased (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001) the percent of HTs in the <italic>Ambient</italic> treatment, but decreased HTs (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001) in the <italic>Wet</italic> treatment (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). In unwarmed plots, leaves in the <italic>Ambient</italic> treatment had the lowest percentage of HTs and those in the <italic>Wet</italic> treatment had the highest percentage (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). Senesced leaf tissue had lower (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05) in HT percentages than green tissue in the all the <italic>Wet</italic> treatments and the <italic>Ambient</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>Warm</italic> treatment.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p><bold>Percentages of hydrolysable tannins calculated from total tannins (&#x000B1;SE) for both green and senesced leaf tissue</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Treatments</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Green</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Senesced</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Precipitation</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Temperature</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>% HT</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>% HT</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dry</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">No warm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.7 &#x000B1; 4.0<sup>A</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21.2 &#x000B1; 0.4<sup>A</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dry</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Warm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.4 &#x000B1; 1.3<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.6 &#x000B1; 0.9<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ambient</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">No warm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.5 &#x000B1; 1.4<sup>A</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.7 &#x000B1; 0.6<sup>&#x0002A;B</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ambient</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Warm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36.1 &#x000B1; 0.9<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26.0 &#x000B1; 1.2<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Wet</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">No warm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">69.1 &#x000B1; 0.9<sup>B</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42.2 &#x000B1; 2.2<sup>&#x0002A;C</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Wet</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Warm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50.0 &#x000B1; 2.0<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26.3 &#x000B1; 1.2<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>Upper- and lower-case letters indicate significant (P &#x0003C; 0.05, Tukey&#x00027;s HSD) differences between precipitation treatments within the No Warm and Warm temperatures, respectively</italic>.</p>
<p><italic>Asterisk (<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>) indicates difference between No Warm and Warm within a specific precipitation treatment</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The responses of CT to climate treatments were similar to those of total tannins (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2A,B</xref>). <italic>Warm</italic> treatments did not increase the total CTs in the green leaves in any of the precipitation treatments <italic>Dry</italic> (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003D; 0.41), <italic>Ambient</italic> (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003D; 0.14), or <italic>Wet</italic> (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003D; 0.42; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2A</xref>). <italic>Warm</italic> treatments increased the total CTs in the senesced leaves for the <italic>Dry</italic> (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.02), but not for the <italic>Ambient</italic> (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003D; 0.15) or the <italic>Wet</italic> (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003D; 0.082; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2B</xref>). While total content of CTs did not change between the green and senesced leaf tissue, the content that CTs represented of the total proportion of tannins significantly (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05) increased for the <italic>Wet</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>No Warm</italic> and the <italic>Ambient</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>Warm</italic> and <italic>Wet</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>Warm</italic>.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p><bold>Total average (&#x000B1;SE) condensed (A,B)</bold> and hydrolysable <bold>(C,D)</bold> tannin content for the extractable and non-extractable portions of both green <bold>(A,C)</bold> and senesced <bold>(B,D)</bold> leaf tissue. Upper asterisks (<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>) indicate significant differences (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05) between the <italic>No Warm</italic> and <italic>Warm</italic> treatments within each precipitation treatment for extractable condensed tannins and lower asterisks indicate significant effects of warming within each precipitation treatment for non-extractable condensed tannins. Different upper case letters indicate significant differences (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05) between precipitation treatments within the <italic>No Warm</italic> temperature regime. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between precipitation treatments within the <italic>Warm</italic> treatment.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00423-g0002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Climatic treatments influenced the chemistry of CTs in leaf tissues (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>). The <italic>Wet</italic> treatment had CTs with longer subunit chains than in the <italic>Dry</italic> and <italic>Ambient</italic> treatments (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>). The proportion of epi/catechin to epi/gallocatechin or procyanidin (PC) to prodelphinidin (PD) differed only by precipitation treatment; warming did not change the percentage of CT monomers that were PD or PC. The <italic>Ambient</italic> treatment had the highest percentage of PDs (&#x0007E;27%) and <italic>Wet</italic> had the lowest, at &#x0003C;6.8%, with the <italic>Dry</italic> treatment intermediate (&#x0007E;10&#x02013;14%; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p><bold>Percentage (&#x000B1;SE) of type of condensed tannins and average (&#x000B1;SE) chain length of condensed tannin polymers</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Treatments</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>PD %</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Chain length (mean degree of polymerization)</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Precipitation</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Temperature</bold></th>
<th/>
<th/>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dry</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">No warm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.8 &#x000B1; 1.5<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.2 &#x000B1; 0.5<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dry</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Warm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.2 &#x000B1; 1.7<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.4 &#x000B1; 0.6<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ambient</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">No warm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.7 &#x000B1; 1.9<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.1 &#x000B1; 1.5<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ambient</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Warm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.7 &#x000B1; 1.3<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.9 &#x000B1; 0.5<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Wet</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">No warm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.2 &#x000B1; 0.3<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.9 &#x000B1; 0.8<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Wet</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Warm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.8 &#x000B1; 0.5<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.6 &#x000B1; 1.4<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>Different letters indicate significant (P &#x0003C; 0.05, Tukey&#x00027;s HSD) differences between treatments</italic>.</p>
<p><italic>PD refers to prodelphinidin, see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref></italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The total content of HTs in green tissues increased with warming under <italic>Ambient</italic> (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01) precipitation, but decreased with warming in the <italic>Wet</italic> treatment (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.02; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2C</xref>). In senesced tissue, HTs generally made up a lower percentage of the total tannin concentration than they did in green tissue (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2D</xref>). Similar trends between <italic>Warm</italic> and <italic>No Warm</italic> treatments also appeared in the senesced tissue, except in the senesced leaf tissue the differences between <italic>Warm</italic> and <italic>No Warm</italic> were significant for all the precipitation treatments. Warming increased HTs in the <italic>Dry</italic> (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01) and the <italic>Ambient</italic> (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001) treatments, but decreased them in the <italic>Wet</italic> treatment (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.005; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2C</xref>). Total HT content significantly decreased from green to senesced leaf tissue in the <italic>Wet</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>No Warm</italic> treatment and all the <italic>Warm</italic> treatments.</p>
<p>The HTs can be further differentiated into two HT structural compounds in the <italic>Q. rubra</italic> leaves: ellagitannins and gallotannins (Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>). Both green and senesced tissues generally had higher proportions of ellagitannins, although total contents were higher in the green tissue compared to the senesced tissue (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>). In the green tissue both gallotannins and ellagitannins displayed the same relationship, where the <italic>Ambient</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>No Warm</italic> treatment had the least (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>). A similar relationship also existed in the senesced leaf tissue (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>). Over the course of the growing season, ellagitannin content decreased in green to senesced leaf tissue, but only in the <italic>Wet</italic> treatments (<italic>No Warm, P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05; <italic>Warm, P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001). Total gallotannin content also decreased (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05) between green and senesced leaf tissue in all the treatments except the <italic>Ambient</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>No Warm</italic> control.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption><p><bold>Average concentrations, mg g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> tissue, (&#x000B1;SE) of structural types of hydrolysable tannins for both green and senesced leaf tissue</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Treatments</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Green</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Senesced</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Precipitation</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Temperature</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Gallotannins</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Ellagitannins</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Gallotannins</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Ellagitannins</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dry</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">No warm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.4 &#x000B1; 2.0<sup>A</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.4 &#x000B1; 4.8<sup>A</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.7 &#x000B1; 0.5<sup>A</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.7 &#x000B1; 0.1<sup>&#x0002A;A</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dry</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Warm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.6 &#x000B1; 0.6<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.8 &#x000B1; 1.3<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.0 &#x000B1; 0.7<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.6 &#x000B1; 0.04<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ambient</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">No warm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.3 &#x000B1; 0.2<sup>&#x0002A;B</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.8 &#x000B1; 1.8<sup>&#x0002A;B</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.6 &#x000B1; 0.2<sup>&#x0002A;B</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.3 &#x000B1; 0.6<sup>&#x0002A;B</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ambient</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Warm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.3 &#x000B1; 1.4<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26.2 &#x000B1; 4.1<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.9 &#x000B1; 0.4<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.8 &#x000B1; 0.9<sup>ab</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Wet</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">No warm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.8 &#x000B1; 2.2<sup>&#x0002A;A</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37.9 &#x000B1; 3.6<sup>A</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.9 &#x000B1; 0.1<sup>A</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.3 &#x000B1; 0.2<sup>A</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Wet</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Warm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.2 &#x000B1; 0.5<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.4 &#x000B1; 0.3<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.3 &#x000B1; 0.2<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.0 &#x000B1; 0.2<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>Upper- and lower-case letters indicate significant (P &#x0003C; 0.05, Tukey&#x00027;s HSD) differences between precipitation treatments within the No Warm and Warm temperatures, respectively</italic>.</p>
<p><italic>Asterisk (<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>) indicates difference between No Warm and Warm within a specific precipitation treatment</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap></sec>
<sec>
<title>Tannin fractions</title>
<p>Total tannins, when separated into extractable and non-extractable fractions, showed similar patterns in both the green and senesced leaf tissue (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref>). For the extractable fractions, the lowest concentration of tannins was in the <italic>Wet</italic> precipitation treatment, with no warming effect (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref>). Warming increased the non-extractable fraction in green leaf tissue (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05) in the <italic>Ambient</italic> treatment (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref>), and did not affect the non-extractable fraction in senesced tissue. In both the green and senesced leaf tissues, the lowest non-extractable tannin concentration existed in the <italic>Ambient</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>No Warm</italic> treatment (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref>). Between seasons (green and senesced) there was a decrease (5.2%) in the <italic>Ambient</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>No Warm</italic> control and an increase (13.2%) in the <italic>Wet</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>Warm</italic> treatment in the percentage of tannins that were extractable.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption><p><bold>Average concentrations, mg g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> tissue, (&#x000B1;SE) of total extractable and non-extractable tannins for both green and senesced leaf tissue</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Treatments</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Green</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Senesced</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Precipitation</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Temperature</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Extractable</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Non-extractable</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Extractable</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Non-extractable</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dry</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">No warm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">71.6 &#x000B1; 2.1<sup>A</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43.3 &#x000B1; 7.6<sup>A</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57.8 &#x000B1; 4.7<sup>A</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.4 &#x000B1; 1.0<sup>A</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dry</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Warm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">81.2 &#x000B1; 5.1<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">40.0 &#x000B1; 3.6<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">68.9 &#x000B1; 5.8<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41.5 &#x000B1; 1.6<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ambient</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">No warm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57.2 &#x000B1; 4.5<sup>A</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.4 &#x000B1; 1.6<sup>&#x0002A;B</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">39.5 &#x000B1; 3.2<sup>AB</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.0 &#x000B1; 1.5<sup>B</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ambient</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Warm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">78.1 &#x000B1; 4.0<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50.6 &#x000B1; 3.0<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51.8 &#x000B1; 3.2<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31.9 &#x000B1; 1.1<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Wet</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">No warm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29.2 &#x000B1; 3.3<sup>A</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61.8 &#x000B1; 6.6<sup>A</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.0 &#x000B1; 2.4<sup>B</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.7 &#x000B1; 0.4<sup>AB</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Wet</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Warm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37.8 &#x000B1; 1.6<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43.6 &#x000B1; 1.4<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37.1 &#x000B1; 3.0<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.0 &#x000B1; 0.1<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>Upper- and lower-case letters indicate significant (P &#x0003C; 0.05, Tukey&#x00027;s HSD) differences between precipitation treatments within the No Warm and Warm temperatures, respectively</italic>.</p>
<p><italic>Asterisk (<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>) indicates difference between No Warm and Warm within a specific precipitation treatment</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The majority of CTs were located in the extractable fraction (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2A,B</xref>). Warming did not affect the total content of CTs in each fraction in the green leaf tissue (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>). The percentage of non-extractable CTs in the green tissue was higher in the <italic>Wet</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>No Warm</italic> (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.005), but not the <italic>Wet</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>Warm</italic> (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003D; 0.09; <bold>Figure 4A</bold>). The <italic>Ambient</italic> treatments had the lowest percentage of non-extractable CTs (<italic>No Warm</italic> &#x0003D; 12.2%, <italic>Warm</italic> &#x0003D; 11.7%; <bold>Figure 4A</bold>). In the senesced tissue, warming had an effect only in the <italic>Dry</italic> treatment, where it increased (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001) the content of CTs in the non-extractable fraction (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2B</xref>). The percentage of non-extractable CTs tended to increase with warming only in the <italic>Dry</italic> treatment, and then only marginally (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.1; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3B</xref>). Within the <italic>No Warm</italic> temperature treatment, the <italic>Wet</italic> had the highest percentage (28.4%) of non-extractable CTs (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3B</xref>). The percentage of non-extractable CTs significantly increased (by 8.5, 11.4, and 9.3%) from green leaves to senesced leaves for the <italic>Wet</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>No Warm, Dry</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>Warm</italic>, and <italic>Ambient</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>Warm</italic>, respectively.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p><bold>Average (&#x000B1;SE) percent of non-extractable condensed tannins for green (A)</bold> and senesced <bold>(B)</bold> leaf tissue. Asterisks (<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>) above a set of columns indicate significant (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05) differences between the <italic>No Warm</italic> and <italic>Warm</italic> treatments within each precipitation treatment. Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between precipitation treatments within the <italic>No Warm</italic> temperature regime. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between precipitation treatments within the <italic>Warm</italic> temperature regime.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00423-g0003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The relative majority of HTs were located in the non-extractable fraction (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2C,D</xref>) for both the green and senesced tissue. In green leaf tissue, warming increased the proportions of HTs in both the extractable (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.03) and non-extractable (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.005) fractions of the <italic>Ambient</italic> treatment (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2C</xref>). Warming also decreased (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.03) HTs in the non-extractable fraction in the <italic>Wet</italic> treatment (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2C</xref>). Similar patterns occurred in the senesced tissue as well (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2D</xref>), where HTs also increased with warming in the <italic>Dry</italic> treatment (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2D</xref>).</p>
<p>For individual HTs, the percent of gallotannins increased the most in the <italic>Ambient</italic> treatment, with <italic>Ambient</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>No Warm</italic> having the lowest percentages of gallotannins (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>). In the <italic>Ambient</italic> treatment, warming increased gallotannins in the extractable fraction in both the green and senesced leaf tissue (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4B,D</xref>). In senesced tissue, warming in the <italic>Ambient</italic> treatment also increased the gallotannin percentage of the non-extractable fraction (this pattern did not occur in the green leaf tissue; <italic>P</italic> &#x0003D; 0.09, Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4A,C</xref>). In the <italic>Wet</italic> treatment, senesced leaves had more gallotannins (11.8%, <italic>No Warm</italic>; 7.7% <italic>Warm</italic>) in the non-extractable fraction than green leaf tissue.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p><bold>Average (&#x000B1;SE) percent gallotannins in non-extractable and extractable hydrolysable tannins for both green (A,B)</bold> and senesced <bold>(C,D)</bold> leaf tissue. Asterisks (<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>) above a set of columns indicate significant (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05) differences between <italic>No Warm</italic> and <italic>Warm</italic> treatments within each precipitation treatment. Uppercase letters indicate significant differences between precipitation treatments within the <italic>No Warm</italic> temperature regime. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences between precipitation treatments within the W<italic>arm</italic> temperature regime.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-08-00423-g0004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Climatic stresses that disrupt cellular functioning in plants initiate readjustments in metabolic pathways, which in turn facilitate the acclimation of plants to their new environment. The resulting reprogramming of important metabolic pathways, including the phenylpropanoid pathway, citric acid cycle, glycolysis, and urea cycle, results in the upregulation of several metabolite classes such as amino acids, phenolic acids, sugars, organic acids, sugar alcohols, polyamines, and polyols (Bohnert et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">1995</xref>; Pe&#x000F1;uelas et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">2013</xref>; Suseela et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">2015</xref>). Drought and warmer temperatures have been shown to influence many different morphological (yield, growth) and physiological (rate of photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, leaf pigmentation, water potential, protein concentrations, etc.) responses in plants (Benjamin and Nielsen, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">2006</xref>; Rennenberg et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">2006</xref>; Praba et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">2009</xref>; Anjum et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">2011</xref>). However, the influence of environmental stressors on the content and composition of polymeric defense compounds across green and senesced plant tissues is less well-known.</p>
<p>In this study, climate-induced changes in leaf tannin composition influenced not only the quantity of tannins, but also the proportion of HTs to CTs, monomer composition and mean degree of polymerization of CTs, composition of HTs, the association of tannins within the cells (extractable and non-extractable), and the composition of the tannins remaining in the senescent leaves. In general, plants growing in favorable conditions (<italic>Ambient</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>No Warm, Wet</italic>) produced less tannins per unit leaf mass than those growing in more stressful conditions (<italic>Dry, Ambient</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>Warm</italic>). Increase in tissue content of tannins with increasing environmental stress has been frequently reported (Bussotti et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">1998</xref>; Cohen and Kennedy, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2010</xref>). Reallocation of nutrients in plants based on the favorability of growth and nutrient conditions is expected under two major hypotheses: the carbon/nutrient balance and the growth/differentiation balance (Herms and Mattson, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">1992</xref>). The increase in tannin production under <italic>Dry</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>Warm</italic> conditions could be a defense strategy in plants to protect the resources that they have already acquired (Herms and Mattson, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">1992</xref>; Wright et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">2010</xref>; Massad et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">2014</xref>). At the same time, in the <italic>Wet</italic> treatments, because growth conditions were presumably closer to optimal, the decrease in tannin production could be a result of the plant preferentially allocating C for growth instead of defense (Bryant et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">1983</xref>; Tuomi, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">1992</xref>). Also, a greater concentration of tannins binding with cellulose and lignin matrices (Zucker, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">1983</xref>; Bussotti et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">1998</xref>) could potentially create a physical impedance to cell expansion. A similar allocation pattern of photosynthates for growth, rather than for defense compounds, has been previously reported in other tree species (Donaldson et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2006</xref>), where the plant growth was negatively correlated with phenolics and CTs. In a previous study conducted at BACE, the tannin content in senesced leaves of <italic>Acer rubrum</italic> was greater in <italic>Dry</italic> than in <italic>Ambient</italic> treatments, while the senesced leaves from <italic>Wet</italic> and the <italic>Ambient</italic> treatments had similar tannin contents (Tharayil et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">2011</xref>). This contrasting pattern could be attributed to a difference in the physiological responses of the two species to stress, and also to differences in precipitation patterns between the two growing seasons. In the 2009 growing season (April to October; Tharayil et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">2011</xref>), 720 mm of rain fell, as opposed to 606 mm during the 2013 growing season. Further, only half as much rain fell in the last 4 months of the 2013 growing season (July to October) as fell during that period in 2009 (210 mm and 428 mm, respectively). The larger amount of precipitation received by <italic>A. rubrum</italic> during the 2009 growing season would have led to a similar physiological water status between <italic>Ambient</italic> and <italic>Wet</italic> treatments, which could have resulted in similar tannin content between these two precipitation treatments (Tharayil et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">2011</xref>). In the present study, the scarcer and less evenly distributed precipitation of 2013 likely exposed <italic>Q. rubra</italic> in <italic>Ambient</italic> to a greater physiological water stress, which could explain the observed similarity in tannin content between <italic>Ambient</italic> and <italic>Dry</italic> treatments.</p>
<p>Along with the total quantity of tannins, climate influenced both the monomer composition and mean degree of polymerization of tannins, the two parameters that are seldom investigated despite their regulatory influence on the potential biological reactivity of tannins (Zucker, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">1983</xref>; Kraus et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2003b</xref>; Tharayil et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">2011</xref>; Triebwasser et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">2012</xref>). Reactivity of CT is a function of the hydroxylation pattern of the B-ring, and tannins with trihydroxy B-rings (PD) are more reactive than those with dihydroxy B-ring (PC). Both <italic>Wet</italic> and <italic>Dry</italic> treatments, despite their contrasting influences on total content of CTs, reduced the relative proportion of PD units. Compared to PCs, the PD units are formed only during later parts of cell development (Stafford et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">1989</xref>). Thus, the lower accumulation of the PDs in wet climates could indicate a metabolic modification in CT biosynthesis. Under the metabolic stress in <italic>Dry</italic> conditions the triphenolic vicinal hydroxyls predispose PDs to oxidation and polymerization reactions (Close and Mcarthur, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2002</xref>; Aron and Kennedy, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2008</xref>) resulting in a lower proportion of PDs. This could partly explain the lower proportion of PDs in <italic>Dry</italic> treatments despite a higher production of CTs. Compared to <italic>Ambient</italic> and <italic>Dry</italic> treatments, the proportion of PD units and the mean degree of polymerization were higher under <italic>Wet</italic> treatments. The biological reactivity of tannins is a function of their degree of polymerization, where tannins with greater chain length have a higher capacity to complex with and precipitate proteins. Thus, though the leaves that were formed under ambient growing conditions and <italic>Wet</italic> treatments had a lower tannin quantity, these tannins would have a greater capacity to defend herbivory due to their higher biological reactivity contributed by a greater polymerization and higher proportion of PD units. Environmental conditions have been shown to influence the degree of polymerization of tannins (Cohen and Kennedy, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2010</xref>). A lower polymerization of tannins exposed to non-optimal growing conditions has been reported before (Tharayil et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">2011</xref>) in senesced leaves of <italic>Acer rubrum</italic> from the same site. In <italic>Vitis vinifera</italic>, environmental stressors, especially moisture deficit, have been reported to increase the mean degree of polymerization of tannins (Kennedy et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">2002</xref>; Cohen and Kennedy, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2010</xref>). In <italic>Onobrychis viciifolia</italic> the influence of drought on the mean degree of polymerization of CTs was dependent on otogeny of the plant (Malisch et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">2016</xref>). These results indicate that the influence of environment on molecular composition of tannins could be regulated by the physiological stress perceived by the plant (as opposed to the magnitude of the treatment applied), the identity of the species, as well as their growth stage.</p>
<p>Distributions of tannins within leaves are highly species-specific (Kraus et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2003a</xref>), and within a species the cellular localization of tannins, herein operationally defined as solvent extractable and non-extractable tannins, can change based on environmental conditions (Gagn&#x000E9; et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2006</xref>). In green leaves, CTs are usually stored in the cell vacuoles (Stafford, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">1988</xref>; Bussotti et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">1998</xref>; Marles et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">2003</xref>), and thus are sequestered away from potential interactions with the structural matrix and plant metabolic compounds. During leaf maturation the tannins penetrate the cell walls (Bussotti et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">1998</xref>), which may result in an increase in the fiber-bound proportion of tannins. These complexes can protect the cell wall or organelle against microbial attack, and can also delay the decomposition after senescence of the tissue (Zucker, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">1983</xref>). Irrespective of the warming treatment, the leaves from the <italic>Wet</italic> treatment had a greater proportion of total CT that was non-extractable during the sequential solvent extraction. While we cannot be certain of the exact complexation of the tannins, some of them may be in association with cellulose and pectin (Le Bourvellec et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2009</xref>; Padayachee et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">2012a</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">b</xref>; Jakobek, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">2015</xref>) in the cell walls and middle lamellae. A high affinity of PCs binding to pectin has been observed (Le Bourvellec et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2009</xref>; Watrelot et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">2013</xref>; Jakobek, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">2015</xref>), meaning that tannins in the <italic>Wet</italic> treatment with the highest percentage of PCs and greater chain-length could have a greater complexation capacity with cell wall components. Alternatively, the greater chain-length and higher proportion of PC units would have resulted in lower extractability of tannins from the leaf tissues, resulting in the observed lower content of tannins in <italic>Wet</italic> treatments. Also, the <italic>Wet</italic> treatments, despite a lower content of CTs, have a higher percentage of HTs, which have a higher enzyme inhibition capacity compared to CTs (Triebwasser et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">2012</xref>). Thus, overall, the leaves formed under <italic>Wet</italic> treatments would have a similar herbivore deterrence contributed by tannins, despite a lower content of CTs in the tissue.</p>
<p>Climate influenced the proportion of HTs and CTs. Across most treatments, the dominant type of tannin in <italic>Q. rubra</italic> was CT, with lower content of HTs. A similar, lower proportion of HT in red oak species has been reported before (Barbehenn et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2005</xref>). Compared to the <italic>Ambient</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>NoWarm</italic> control, all climate treatments had higher percentages of HTs, which may reflect the ease of maintenance, mobility, and greater responsiveness of HTs relative to CTs (Zucker, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">1983</xref>; Shure et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">1998</xref>). Because HTs are less associated with the structural matrix of the plants than CTs, they offer less resistance to normal cell growth and expansion, making them a preferable type of defense compound over CTs in environments that favor active plant growth (Zucker, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">1983</xref>), as evidenced by the higher percentages of HTs in the <italic>Wet</italic> treatments. HTs are also thought to be metabolically cheaper; the metabolic cost for the formation of proanthocyanidin (monomers of CT) is 0.395 ATP equivalent g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, where as that of HTs is 0.27 equivalent g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (Lewis and Yamamoto, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">1989</xref>).</p>
<p>Both gallotannins and ellagitannins also exhibit antioxidant properties (Barbehenn et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2006</xref>), and thus may play a role in the inhibition of higher radical formation in leaves, especially under climatic stress. Ellagitannins can also be highly variable in structure (Zucker, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">1983</xref>). This could have specific relevance inhibiting digestive enzymes in herbivore digestive tracts (Zucker, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">1983</xref>), which would be an effective defense mechanism against herbivory for the plant. In most climates in this study, the green leaves exhibited higher content of ellagitannins, however, the <italic>Ambient</italic><sup>&#x0002A;</sup><italic>No Warm</italic> control had the highest percentage of ellagitannins compared to all other treatments, suggesting that the alteration of climate in any way can significantly alter the proportion of certain types of tannins present, either by production rates or utilization of certain hydrolysable tannin structural components, such as the glucose molecule (Zucker, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">1983</xref>).</p>
<p>During tissue senescence, following the disruption of membrane-bound vesicles, CTs can form insoluble complexes with proteins and cell wall carbohydrates (Kraus et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2003a</xref>; Marles et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">2003</xref>), which could contribute to an increase in the percent of non-extractable CTs in the senesced tissue. Differences in the content of tannins in green leaves compared to senesced leaves observed in this study may be the result of different overall resorption strategies of the plants. Considering their protein complexation capacity, polymeric nature, and the C-C linkages, the CT would less amenable to enzyme mediated catalysis and subsequent resorption. Due to their lower complexity and the presence of more labile ester bonds, the gallotannins would be more amenable to resorption during tissue senescence than CTs. Compared to the green tissues, the greater mobilization of HTs during senescence is reflected in the lower proportion of HTs in the senesced tissues across the treatments. The CT content of the <italic>Wet</italic> treatments were similar in both green and senesced tissues, which could be primarily attributed to the greater degree of polymerization and a greater PC content of tannins produced in this treatment, which would have resulted in a greater association of these tannins with the cell wall.</p>
<p>Tannins can complex with carbohydrates and proteins and this complexation can persist after the leaf senesces, potentially delaying decomposition. With the increase in CTs and non-extractable CTs for some of the treatments, this might mean that those leaves would break down more slowly, lose less material to leaching, and possibly provide more sustained nutrient input into the soil. The higher tannin content of foliage observed under less favorable growing conditions could be partly countered by the changes in allocation patterns at the tree level, since trees exposed to climatic stress often produce less leaf biomass. However, the reduced carbon input through litterfall in such ecosystems, coupled with higher content of phenolic compounds in these tissues, might impose a greater constraint on nutrient cycling in these soils. Extractable phenolics and tannins are lost rapidly from the leaves, suggesting that leaching is a primary route for loss of tannins from leaves (Benner et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">1988</xref>; Schofield et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">1998</xref>; Hernes et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2001</xref>), and lower molecular weight tannins are lost more rapidly than higher molecular weight tannins (Schofield et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">1998</xref>). Thus, the <italic>Wet</italic> treatments with their higher length CTs could better retain some of the tannin-related defense capabilities which could interfere with decomposition processes. However, the overall herbivory and decomposition processes are influenced not only by the content of anti-nutrients in the tissues, but also by their overall nutrient content (Suseela et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">2013</xref>; Almuzini et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">2017</xref>), which in turn is also regulated by environmental stressors.</p>
<p>Overall, our study elucidates multiple factors that regulate the production and seasonal change of tannins in <italic>Q. rubra</italic>. In agreement with the nutrient-balance hypothesis, the tannin concentrations in tissues formed under favorable climates were lower, but the tannins produced were more complex and potentially more protective due to higher chain lengths of CTs and greater proportions of HTs. When exposed to climatic stress, <italic>Q. rubra</italic> responded by producing a greater quantity of tannins that were of shorter chain length. The differential influence of the environment on the production dynamics of plant metabolites is important in the context of global changes and carbon and nitrogen cycle feedbacks. Although over longer time scales climate modifies ecosystem processes through shifts in species composition, over shorter time scales the physiological adaptations of plants to changing climate could influence soil C and nutrient cycling through changes in chemical composition of biomass. These changes in tannin content and composition may alter forest dynamics, not only by influencing decomposition and nutrient cycling dynamics, but also by regulating herbivore dynamics.</p></sec>
<sec id="s5">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>ST and NT contributed to the conceptualization of the project and design of the experiment, JD provided the experimental framework, ST collected and analyzed the data, CP and NT guided the analyses, ST drafted the article, all authors contributed to the critical revision of the article.</p>
<sec>
<title>Conflict of interest statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p></sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack><p>We thank Vidya Suseela two reviewers for their critiques and thoughtful remarks on earlier drafts of this manuscript. We also thank Carol Goranson for maintaining the BACE field site, and Vidya Suseela for reoptimizing the tannin extraction protocols for this experiment. This research was supported by the National Science Foundation Grant (DEB-1145993) to NT and JD. The BACE infrastructure was supported by grants to JSD from NSF (grant DEB-0546670) and the U.S. Department of Energy&#x00027;s Office of Science (BER), through the Northeastern Regional Center of the National Institute for Climatic Change Research and the Terrestrial Ecosystem Sciences program. This is Technical Contribution No. 6549 of the Clemson University Experiment Station and is Purdue Climate Change Research Center Publication number 1709. This material is based upon work supported by NIFA/USDA, under project number SC-1700538.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s6">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2017.00423/full#supplementary-material">http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2017.00423/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet1.pdf" id="SM1" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Adamczyk</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kitunen</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smolander</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Response of soil C and N transformations to condensed tannins and different organic N-condensed tannin complexes</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>163</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>170</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.12.003</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aerts</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Climate, leaf litter chemistry, and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship</article-title>. <source>Oikos</source> <volume>79</volume>, <fpage>439</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>449</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Almuzini</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Decker</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gerard</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tharayil</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Nutrient supply and simulated herbivory differentially alter the metabolite pools and the efficacy of the glucosinolate-based defense system in Brassica Species</article-title>. <source>J. Chem. Ecol.</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>129</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>142</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10886-016-0811-y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28050732</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anjum</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress</article-title>. <source>Afr. J. Agric. Res.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>2026</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2032</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5897/AJAR10.027</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aron</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kennedy</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Flavan-3-ols: nature, occurrence and biological activity</article-title>. <source>Mol. Nutr. Food Res.</source> <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>79</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>104</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/mnfr.200700137</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18081206</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barbehenn</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheek</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gasperut</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lister</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maben</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Phenolic compounds in red oak and sugar maple leaves have prooxidant activities in the midgut fluids of <italic>Malacosoma disstria</italic> and <italic>Orgyia leucostigma</italic> caterpillars</article-title>. <source>J. Chem. Ecol.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>969</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>988</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10886-005-4242-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16124227</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barbehenn</surname> <given-names>R. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Constabel</surname> <given-names>C. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Tannins in plant &#x02013; herbivore interactions</article-title>. <source>Phytochemistry</source> <volume>72</volume>, <fpage>1551</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1565</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.01.040</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21354580</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barbehenn</surname> <given-names>R. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>C. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hagerman</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karonen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salminen</surname> <given-names>J.-P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Ellagitannins have greater oxidative activities than condensed tannins and galloyl glucoses at high pH: potential impact on caterpillars</article-title>. <source>J. Chem. Ecol.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>2253</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2267</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10886-006-9143-7</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17019621</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bate-Smith</surname> <given-names>E. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1977</year>). <article-title>Astringent tannins of <italic>Acer</italic> species</article-title>. <source>Phytochemistry</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>1421</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1426</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0031-9422(00)88795-6</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Benjamin</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nielsen</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Water deficit effects on root distribution of soybean, field pea and chickpea</article-title>. <source>Field. Crop. Res.</source> <volume>97</volume>, <fpage>248</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>253</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2005.10.005</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Benner</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kirchmann</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hodson</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Bacterial abundance and production on mangrove leaves during initial stages of leaching and biodegradation</article-title>. <source>Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>19</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>26</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bohnert</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nelson</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jensen</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Adaptations to environmental stresses</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>1099</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1111</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/tpc.7.7.1099</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12242400</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bryant</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chapin</surname> <given-names>F. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klein</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1983</year>). <article-title>Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory</article-title>. <source>Oikos</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>357</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>368</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bussotti</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gravano</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grossoni</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tani</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Occurrence of tannins in leaves of beech trees (<italic>Fagus sylvatica</italic>) along an ecological gradient, detected by histochemical and ultrastructural analyses</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>138</volume>, <fpage>469</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>479</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00121.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Close</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mcarthur</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Rethinking the role of many plant phenolics: protection from photodamage not herbivores?</article-title> <source>Oikos</source> <volume>99</volume>, <fpage>166</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>172</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.990117.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cohen</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kennedy</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Plant metabolism and the environment: implications for managing phenolics</article-title>. <source>Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>620</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>643</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10408390802603441</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20694925</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Couture</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meehan</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lindroth</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Atmospheric change alters foliar quality of host trees and performance of two outbreak insect species</article-title>. <source>Oecologia</source> <volume>168</volume>, <fpage>863</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>876</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00442-011-2139-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21971584</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Currano</surname> <given-names>E. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wilf</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wing</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Labandeira</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lovelock</surname> <given-names>E. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Royer</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Sharply increased insect herbivory during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>1960</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1964</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0708646105</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18268338</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Donaldson</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kruger</surname> <given-names>E. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lindroth</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Competition- and resource-mediated tradeoffs between growth and defensive chemistry in trembling aspen (<italic>Populus tremuloides</italic>)</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>169</volume>, <fpage>561</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>570</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01613.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16411958</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gagn&#x000E9;</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saucier</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>G&#x000E9;ny</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Composition and cellular localization of tannins in <italic>Cabernet Sauvignon</italic> skins during growth</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Food Chem.</source> <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>9465</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>9471</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jf061946g</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17147434</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kelm</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hammerstone</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beecher</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holden</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Liquid chromatographic/electrospray ionization mass spectrometric studies of proanthocyanidins in foods</article-title>. <source>J. Mass Spectrom.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>1272</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1280</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jms.541</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14696209</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hagerman</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Riedl</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sovik</surname> <given-names>K. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ritchard</surname> <given-names>N. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hartzfeld</surname> <given-names>P. W.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>High molecular weight plant polyphenolics (tannins) as biological antioxidants</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Food Chem.</source> <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>1887</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1892</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hartzfeld</surname> <given-names>P. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Forkner</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hunter</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hagerman</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Determination of hydrolyzable tannins (gallotannins and ellagitannins) after reaction with potassium iodate</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Food Chem.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>1785</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1790</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jf0111155</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11902913</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Haslam</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Plant polyphenols (syn. vegetable tannins) and chemical defense-A reappraisal</article-title>. <source>J. Chem. Ecol.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>1789</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1805</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF01013477</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24277094</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>H&#x000E4;ttenschwiler</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vitousek</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>The role of polyphenols in terrestrial ecosystem nutrient cycling</article-title>. <source>Trends Ecol. Evol.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>238</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>243</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01861-9</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10802549</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Herms</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mattson</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>The dilemma of plants: Grow or defend hypothesis</article-title>. <source>Q. Rev. Biol.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>283</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>335</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hernes</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Benner</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cowie</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Go&#x000F1;i</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bergamaschi</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hedges</surname> <given-names>J. I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Tannin diagenesis in mangrove leaves from a tropical estuary: a novel molecular approach</article-title>. <source>Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta</source> <volume>65</volume>, <fpage>3109</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3122</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0016-7037(01)00641-X</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hoeppner</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dukes</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Interactive responses of old-field plant growth and composition to warming and precipitation</article-title>. <source>Glob. Chang. Biol.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>1754</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1768</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02626.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jaakola</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hohtola</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Effect of latitude on flavonoid biosynthesis in plants</article-title>. <source>Plant. Cell Environ.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>1239</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1247</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02154.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20374534</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jakobek</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Interactions of polyphenols with carbohydrates, lipids and proteins</article-title>. <source>Food Chem.</source> <volume>175</volume>, <fpage>556</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>567</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.12.013</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25577120</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Karonen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ossipov</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sinkkonen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Loponen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haukioja</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pihlaja</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Quantitative analysis of polymeric proanthocyanidins in birch leaves with normal-phase HPLC</article-title>. <source>Phytochem. Anal.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>149</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>156</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/pca.898</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16749421</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kennedy</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>G. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Analysis of proanthocyanidin cleavage products following acid-catalysis in the presence of excess phloroglucinol</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Food Chem.</source> <volume>49</volume>, <fpage>1740</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1746</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jf001030o</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11308320</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kennedy</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matthews</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Waterhouse</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Effect of maturity and vine water status on grape skin and wine flavonoids</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Enol. Vitic.</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>268</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>274</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kraus</surname> <given-names>T. E. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dahlgren</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zasoski</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003a</year>). <article-title>Tannins in nutrient dynamics of forest ecosystems - a review</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>256</volume>, <fpage>41</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>66</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1026206511084</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kraus</surname> <given-names>T. E. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Preston</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dahlgren</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zasoski</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003b</year>). <article-title>Linking chemical reactivity and protein precipitation to structural characteristics of foliar tannins</article-title>. <source>J. Chem. Ecol.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>703</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>730</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1022876804925</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12757329</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kuokkanen</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Julkunen-Tiitto</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kein&#x000E4;nen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Niemel&#x000E4;</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tahvanainen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>The effect of elevated CO<sub>2</sub> and temperature on the secondary chemistry of <italic>Betula pendula</italic> seedlings</article-title>. <source>Trees</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>378</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>384</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s004680100108</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Le Bourvellec</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guyot</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Renard</surname> <given-names>C. M. G. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Interactions between apple (<italic>Malus x domestica</italic> Borkh.) polyphenols and cell walls modulate the extractability of polysaccharides</article-title>. <source>Carbohydr. Polym.</source> <volume>75</volume>, <fpage>251</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>261</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.07.010</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lewis</surname> <given-names>N. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yamamoto</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>Tannins&#x02014;their place in plant metabolism</article-title>, in <source>Chemistry and Significance of Condensed Tannins</source>, eds <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Hemingway</surname> <given-names>R. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karchesy</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name></person-group>(<publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Plenum Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>23</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>46</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lindroth</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Impacts of elevated atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> on forests: phytochemistry, trophic interactions, and ecosystem dynamics</article-title>. <source>J. Chem. Ecol.</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>2</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>21</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10886-009-9731-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20054619</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>King</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Giardina</surname> <given-names>C. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Booker</surname> <given-names>F. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>The influence of chemistry, production and community composition on leaf litter decomposition under elevated atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and tropospheric O<sub>3</sub> in a northern hardwood ecosystem</article-title>. <source>Ecosystems</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>401</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>416</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10021-009-9231-y</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Malisch</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salminen</surname> <given-names>J.-P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>K&#x000F6;lliker</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Engstr&#x000F6;m</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suter</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Studer</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Drought effects on proanthocyanidins in sainfoin (<italic>Onobrychis viciifolia</italic> Scop.) are dependent on the plant&#x00027;s ontogenetic stage</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Food Chem.</source> <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>9307</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>9316</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.jafc.6b02342</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27960281</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Marles</surname> <given-names>M. A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ray</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gruber</surname> <given-names>M. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>New perspectives on proanthocyanidin biochemistry and molecular regulation</article-title>. <source>Phytochemistry</source> <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>367</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>383</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0031-9422(03)00377-7</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12943753</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Massad</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trumbore</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ganbat</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reichelt</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Unsicker</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boeckler</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>An optimal defense strategy for phenolic glycoside production in <italic>Populus trichocarpa</italic>- isotope labeling demonstrates secondary metabolite production in growing leaves</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>203</volume>, <fpage>607</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>619</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.12811</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24739022</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mouls</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mazauric</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sommerer</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fulcrand</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mazerolles</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Comprehensive study of condensed tannins by ESI mass spectrometry: average degree of polymerisation and polymer distribution determination from mass spectra</article-title>. <source>Anal. Bioanal. Chem.</source> <volume>400</volume>, <fpage>613</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>623</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00216-011-4751-7</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21359577</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Norby</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Evaluating ecosystem responses to rising atmospheric CO2 and global warming in a multi-factor world</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>162</volume>, <fpage>281</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>293</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01047.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Padayachee</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Netzel</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Netzel</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Day</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zabaras</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mikkelsen</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012a</year>). <article-title>Binding of polyphenols to plant cell wall analogues - Part 1: anthocyanins</article-title>. <source>Food Chem.</source> <volume>134</volume>, <fpage>155</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>161</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.02.082</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Padayachee</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Netzel</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Netzel</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Day</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zabaras</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mikkelsen</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012b</year>). <article-title>Binding of polyphenols to plant cell wall analogues - Part 2: phenolic acids</article-title>. <source>Food Chem.</source> <volume>135</volume>, <fpage>2287</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2292</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.07.004</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22980803</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pe&#x000F1;uelas</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sardans</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Estiarte</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ogaya</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carnicer</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coll</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Evidence of current impact of climate change on life: a walk from genes to the biosphere</article-title>. <source>Glob. Change Biol.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>2303</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2338</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.12143</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23505157</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Porter</surname> <given-names>L. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hrstich</surname> <given-names>L. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chan</surname> <given-names>B. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1986</year>). <article-title>The conversion of procyanidins and prodelphinidins to cyanidin and dephinidin</article-title>. <source>Phytochemistry</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>223</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>230</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Praba</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cairns</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Babu</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lafitte</surname> <given-names>H. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Identification of physiological traits underlying cultivar differences in drought tolerance in rice and wheat</article-title>. <source>J. Agron. Crop Sci.</source> <volume>195</volume>, <fpage>30</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>46</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00341.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Prasad</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Iverson</surname> <given-names>L. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matthews</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peters</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007-ongoing</year>). <source>A Climate Change Atlas for 134 Forest Tree Species of the Eastern United States [database].</source> <publisher-loc>Delaware, OH</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service</publisher-name>. Avialble online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/atlas/tree">https://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/atlas/tree</ext-link></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Prior</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Runion</surname> <given-names>G. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marble</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rogers</surname> <given-names>H. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gilliam</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Torbert</surname> <given-names>H. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>A review of elevated atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> effects on plant growth and water relations: Implications for horticulture</article-title>. <source>HortScience</source> <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>158</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>162</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rennenberg</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Loreto</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Polle</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brilli</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fares</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beniwal</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Physiological responses of forest trees to heat and drought</article-title>. <source>Plant Biol.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>556</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>571</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1055/s-2006-924084</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16773557</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Salminen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lempa</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Effects of hydrolysable tannins on a herbivorous insect: fate of individual tannins in insect digestive tract</article-title>. <source>Chemoecology</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>203</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>211</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/PL00012670</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schofield</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hagerman</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harold</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Loss of tannins and other phenolics from willow leaf litter</article-title>. <source>J. Chem. Ecol.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>1409</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1421</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1021287018787</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scioneaux</surname> <given-names>A. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schmidt</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moore</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lindroth</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wooley</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hagerman</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Qualitative variation in proanthocyanidin composition of <italic>Populus</italic> species and hybrids: genetics is the key</article-title>. <source>J. Chem. Ecol.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>57</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>70</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10886-010-9887-y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21116841</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shure</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mooreside</surname> <given-names>P. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ogle</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Rainfall effects on plant-herbivore processes in an upland oak forest</article-title>. <source>Ecology</source> <volume>79</volume>, <fpage>604</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/176957</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stafford</surname> <given-names>H. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Proanthocyanidins&#x02014;and the lignin connection</article-title>. <source>Phytochemistry</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>5</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stafford</surname> <given-names>H. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>E. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weider</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>The development of proanthocyanidins (condensed tannins) and other phenolics in bark of <italic>Pseudotsuga mensiesii</italic></article-title>. <source>Can. J. Bot.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>1111</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1118</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Suseela</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dukes</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>The responses of soil and rhizosphere respiration to simulated climatic changes vary by season</article-title>. <source>Ecology</source> <volume>94</volume>, <fpage>403</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>413</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/12-0150.1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23691659</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Suseela</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tharayil</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xing</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dukes</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Labile compounds in plant litter reduce the sensitivity of decomposition to warming and altered precipitation</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>200</volume>, <fpage>122</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>133</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.12376</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23822593</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Suseela</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tharayil</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xing</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dukes</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Warming and drought differentially influence the production and resorption of elemental and metabolic nitrogen pools in <italic>Quercus rubra</italic></article-title>. <source>Glob. Chang. Biol.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>4177</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>4195</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.13033</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26179236</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tharayil</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alpert</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bhowmik</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gerard</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Phenolic inputs by invasive species could impart seasonal variations in nitrogen pools in the introduced soils: a case study with Polygonum cuspidatum</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>858</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>867</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.09.016</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tharayil</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suseela</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Triebwasser</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Preston</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gerard</surname> <given-names>P. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dukes</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Changes in the structural composition and reactivity of Acer rubrum leaf litter tannins exposed to warming and altered precipitation: climatic stress-induced tannins are more reactive</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>191</volume>, <fpage>132</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>145</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03667.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21371041</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Top</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Filley</surname> <given-names>T. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Effects of elevated CO<sub>2</sub> on the extractable amino acids of leaf litter and fine roots</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>202</volume>, <fpage>1257</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1266</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.12762</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24635834</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Triebwasser</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tharayil</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Preston</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gerard</surname> <given-names>P. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>The susceptibility of soil enzymes to inhibition by leaf litter tannins is dependent on the tannin chemistry, enzyme class and vegetation history</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>196</volume>, <fpage>1122</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1132</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04346.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23025512</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tuomi</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Toward integration of plant defense theories</article-title>. <source>Trends Ecol. Evol.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>365</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>367</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0169-5347(92)90005-V</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21236069</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Watrelot</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Le Bourvellec</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Imberty</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Renard</surname> <given-names>C. M. G. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Interactions between pectic compounds and procyanidins are influenced by methylation degree and chain length</article-title>. <source>Biomacromolecules</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>709</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>718</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/bm301796y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23327557</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B69">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wright</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kitajima</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kraft</surname> <given-names>N. J. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reich</surname> <given-names>P. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ian</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bunker</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Functional traits and the growth &#x02014; mortality trade-off in tropical trees</article-title>. <source>Ecology</source> <volume>91</volume>, <fpage>3664</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3674</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/09-2335.1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21302837</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>D.-Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dixon</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Proanthocyanidin biosynthesis&#x02013;still more questions than answers?</article-title> <source>Phytochemistry</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>2127</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2144</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.01.008</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16153412</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B71">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Response and adaptation of photosynthesis, respiration, and antioxidant systems to elevated CO<sub>2</sub> with environmental stress in plants</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>701</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2015.00701</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26442017</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B72">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shimizu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ito</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yagasaki</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Effects of elevated CO<sub>2</sub> warming and precipitation change on plant growth, photosynthesis and peroxidation in dominant species from North China grassland</article-title>. <source>Planta</source> <volume>239</volume>, <fpage>421</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>435</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00425-013-1987-9</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24463932</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B73">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Combined effects of water stress and high temperature on photosynthesis, nitrogen metabolism and lipid peroxidation of a perennial grass <italic>Leymus chinensis</italic></article-title>. <source>Planta</source> <volume>224</volume>, <fpage>1080</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1090</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00425-006-0281-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16685524</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B74">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zucker</surname> <given-names>W. V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1983</year>). <article-title>Tannins: does structure determine function? An ecological perspective</article-title>. <source>Am. Nat.</source> <volume>121</volume>, <fpage>335</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>365</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>