Escherichia coli TOP10 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), DH5α λpir (Ménard et al., 1993) and derivatives were cultivated in LB (lysogeny broth) medium at 37°C. A. tumefaciens GV3101(pMP90) (Koncz and Schell, 1986) and derivatives were grown at 30°C in YEB (yeast extract broth) medium, and Xcv 85-10 (Thieme et al., 2005), Xcv 85-10ΔxopQ, Xcv 85-10ΔxopC, and Xcv 85-10ΔhrcN (Lorenz and Büttner, 2009) at 30°C in nutrient yeast glycerol (Daniels et al., 1984). Plasmids were introduced into E. coli and A. tumefaciens by chemical transformation and electroporation, respectively, and into Xcv by conjugation, using pRK2013 as helper plasmid in triparental matings (Figurski and Helinski, 1979). Plasmids used in this study are listed in Table S1.

Plants were grown at day and night temperatures of 23° and 19°C, respectively, with 60/40% relative humidity and 16 h light. Plant lines used for the T3E screen are listed in Table S2. For detailed analysis of NHR of N. tabacum against Xanthomonas, the plant line Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Petit Havana was used. Generation of the Nbeds1 mutant N. benthamiana line was described previously (Ordon et al., 2016).

Two to four most expanded leaves of 5- to 9-week-old plants were used for inoculations. Xcv bacteria were hand-inoculated at an optical density (OD₆₀₀) of 0.4 in 10 mM MgCl₂ using a needleless syringe. For transient expression studies in planta, A. tumefaciens strains were resuspended in inoculation medium (10 mM MgCl₂, 5 mM MES, pH 5.3, 150 μM acetosyringone) and hand-inoculated at OD₆₀₀ = 0.8. For in planta growth curves, Xcv strains were inoculated at OD₆₀₀ = 0.0004, and bacterial growth was determined as described (Bonas et al., 1991).

For Golden Gate cloning, coding sequences of xopC, xopG, xopO, xopP, and xopQ were PCR-amplified from genomic DNA of Xcv 85-10 using oligonucleotides with BsaI restriction sites (Table S3). Fragments were cloned into pUC57 or pJET1.2/blunt (Thermo Fisher Scientific), respectively, and then by BsaI cut-ligation (Engler et al., 2008) into the expression vectors pBRM (Szczesny et al., 2010b) or pGGX1 for Xcv, and pGGA1 (Schulze et al., 2012), pGGA2 (Schreiber et al., 2015) and pGGA7, respectively, for Agrobacterium-mediated expression in planta. The binary vector pGGA7 contains the backbone of pBGWFS7 (Karimi et al., 2002), the chloramphenicol resistance-ccdB selection cassette from pGWB2 (Nakagawa et al., 2007), and allows in planta expression of genes 3′-translationally fused to 4 × c-Myc under the control of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter. The Xcv expression vector pGGX1 contains the backbone of pBBR1MCS-5 (Kovach et al., 1995), the chloramphenicol resistance-ccdB selection cassette from pGWB2 (Nakagawa et al., 2007), and allows expression of genes 3′-translationally fused to a FLAG epitope under the control of the lac promoter. Cloning details are available upon request.

A DNA-fragment corresponding to the NbEDS1a cDNA and flanked by BpiI restriction sites was synthesized as gBlocks fragment by Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT, Germany). The synthesized fragment did not contain internal BsaI or BpiI restriction sites, and codon usage was additionally altered to eliminate target sites of Cas9 nucleases used for generation of eds1 mutant plants (Ordon et al., 2016). The fragment was cloned into pAGM1287 yielding pJOG285, and subsequently assembled together with pICH51277, pICH50010, and pICH41432 in pICH47732 to yield pJOG296 (Engler et al., 2014).

For Gateway cloning, coding sequences of avrBsT, avrRxv, xopC, and xopH were PCR-amplified from genomic DNA of Xcv 85-10 or Xcv 75-3 using oligonucleotides listed in Table S3. Fragments were cloned into pENTR/D-TOPO (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and subsequently recombined into the binary vectors pGWB5 (Nakagawa et al., 2007), pGWB6 (Nakagawa et al., 2007), or pK7FWG2 (Karimi et al., 2002) using Gateway® technology (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

To generate Xcv 85-10ΔxopQ, 1-kb fragments upstream and downstream of xopQ were amplified from genomic DNA of Xcv 85-10 by PCR using oligonucleotides incorporating BsaI restriction sites (Table S3). Because xopC is flanked by IS elements, xopC was only partial deleted. A 5′ fragment (298 bp upstream of xopC and the first 452 bp of xopC) and a 3′ fragment (last 327 bp of xopC and 121 bp downstream of xopC) were PCR-amplified from genomic DNA of Xcv 85-10 using oligonucleotides incorporating BsaI restriction sites (Table S3). Corresponding 5′ and 3′ fragments were cloned into SmaI-digested pUC57 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and subsequently into the suicide vector pOGG2 (Schulze et al., 2012). The resulting plasmids pOGG2:xopC and pOGG2:xopQ were conjugated into Xcv 85-10, and mutants were selected by PCR.

For Agrobacterium-mediated expression studies, two 0.785 cm² leaf discs per inoculated strain were ground in liquid nitrogen, resuspend in 130 μl 2 × Laemmli buffer and boiled. For analysis of protein synthesis in Xcv, bacteria were resuspended in 10 mM MgCl₂ to OD₆₀₀ = 0.4, 500 μl were pelleted, resuspended in 40 μl 2 × Laemmli and boiled. Proteins were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting. Strep Tag II Antibody HRP Conjugate (Merck Chemicals GmbH), anti-c-Myc (Roche Diagnostics) anti-GFP (Thermo Fisher Scientific) primary antibodies and horseradish peroxidase-labeled α-rabbit and α-mouse antibodies (GE Healthcare) were used.

To identify T3Es that induce a macroscopic reaction in non-host plants, 21 T3Es from different Xcv strains (Table 1) were synthesized via Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression in leaves of 86 non-host Solanaceae lines, mostly Nicotiana species (Table S2). Plant reactions were scored over 8 days and categorized into six classes as exemplified in Figure 1. Protein synthesis was probed by immunoblot analysis. Plant reactions and expression data are summarized in Tables 2, 3 and Table S4. Expression of GFP did not trigger visible reactions, indicating that Agrobacterium itself was not recognized by any plant line. Upon effector expression, plants showed a range of macroscopic responses, from no reaction to chlorosis and to more or less severe cell death. AvrBs2, AvrBsT, AvrRxv, XopE1, XopG, XopL, XopM, and XopQ caused reactions, often fast cell death, on the majority of the plant lines analyzed (Tables 2, 3). XopC, XopK, AvrBs3, XopJ, and XopV triggered reactions in a few lines tested, whereas only one plant line reacted to XopH (Nnud) and XopO (Nvel), respectively. Intriguingly, XopE2, XopI, and XopP never caused any visible reactions although they were mostly well expressed. We often observed no plant reaction in the infected tissue. Even in these cases, the majority of effectors was detectable by immunoblot, indicating that a lack of phenotype is not due to transformation efficiency.

After the first survey, a subset of 18 plant accessions encompassing most phylogenetic groups was tested again in at least two additional independent experiments which generally confirmed the first results (Table S5).

Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed to identify potential commonalities between T3Es with respect to the induced plant reactions. Since we aimed at the identification of T3Es that are recognized in solanaceous non-host plants, special emphasis was laid on fast cell death, i.e., HR-like reactions, by scoring of the observed reactions on a numerical scale from 1 (no reaction) to 10 (fast cell death). Hierarchical cluster analysis of effectors and plant accessions revealed two branches of T3Es (Figure 2): T3Es, which triggered reactions on most lines of the genus Nicotiana (AvrBsT, AvrRxv, XopE1, XopG, XopM, XopQ) and T3Es, which induced reactions less frequently (all other T3Es). Only a few T3Es showed similar reaction patterns: AvrBs3, XopK, and XopV, which induced cell death in most Solanum species cluster together, as well as T3Es that triggered visible reactions in only few lines (XopC, XopE2, XopH, XopI, XopO, and XopP). All other T3Es triggered rather unique reaction patterns (Figure 2). Considering the overrepresentation of N. tabacum lines (Table S2), one line of each N. tabacum variety was randomly selected and hierarchical cluster analysis repeated (Figure S1). This led to only minor changes in T3E clustering (compare Figure 2 and Figure S1). The tested T3E set contained three members of the YopJ/AvrRxv T3E family (AvrBsT, AvrRxv, and XopJ) and two members of the HopX T3E family (XopE1 and XopE2). Interestingly, members of a given T3E family did not group together in hierarchical cluster analysis. Thus, the classification into a “family” does not allow conclusions or the predictions about a T3E's capacity to induce plant reactions or about their putative recognition via corresponding R genes/R proteins.

The observed T3E-induced plant reactions in different species might rely on the presence of corresponding R genes. Among our set of plant lines, in particular the Nicotiana phylogeny has been extensively studied. Based on phylogenetic studies, e.g., sequence analyses of plastid- and nuclear-encoded genes and genomic in situ hybridization experiments (Chase et al., 2003; Clarkson et al., 2010; Kelly et al., 2013), the genus Nicotiana has been divided into 13 sections (Knapp et al., 2004). To study conservation of putative R genes in this genus in more detail, representative lines of all sections were tested. No T3E triggered a reaction in all tested Nicotiana lines (Table 2 and Table S2). We furthermore included six species of section Suaveolentes and four species of section Alatae to test for conservation of putative R genes within a given section. Since none of the tested T3Es triggered reactions in all representatives of the two sections (Table 2), putative corresponding R genes within Suaveolentes and Alatae appear not to be conserved.

Finally, 46 members of the species N. tabacum (sect. Nicotiana) were analyzed. AvrBsT, AvrRxv, XopE1, XopG, XopL, XopM, and XopQ triggered consistent reactions in all or most lines of the species N. tabacum (at least 43 out of 46 lines), suggesting a high conservation of putative corresponding R genes (Table 3). Four T3Es triggered consistent reactions in 21–34 N. tabacum lines tested: AvrBs1 (21/46), AvrBs2 (34/46), XopB (21/46), and XopS (34/46). Putative R genes recognizing these T3Es appear less conserved, but retain a high persistence among N. tabacum lines.

Taken together, some putative R genes are conserved within the species N. tabacum, whereas no conservation was observed within the superordinate phylogenetic units section and genus.

Strikingly, XopQ expression induced necrotic or chlorotic reactions exclusively in Nicotiana species (Figure 2, Table 2), suggesting the presence of a XopQ-specific R gene (R_xopQ) in most members of this genus. We speculated that XopQ is also recognized during infection of Nicotiana spp. with Xcv and therefore contributes to Xcv-induced NHR. To test the influence of XopQ on NHR, all 86 Solanaceae lines were infected with the wild-type strain Xcv 85-10, the Xcv 85-10ΔxopQ deletion mutant and an Xcv 85-10ΔxopQ strain ectopically expressing xopQ. Xcv 85-10ΔxopQ caused weaker or no reactions compared to the wild-type strain on approximately two-thirds of the accessions tested (Figure 3). The plant phenotypes after Xcv infection correlated well with reactions observed after Agrobacterium-mediated XopQ expression: If T-DNA delivery of xopQ induced a cell death or chlorosis, Xcv-induced reactions also were xopQ-dependent (Figure 3). Intriguingly, two plant lines, N. benthamiana (Nbent) and N. paniculata (Npan), showed water-soaked lesions after infection with Xcv 85-10ΔxopQ, whereas infection with the wild-type and the complemented ΔxopQ mutant triggered chlorotic or cell death reactions (Figures 3, 4A).

Similarly to the transient expression via Agrobacterium, a subset of 18 plant accessions encompassing most phylogenetic groups was analyzed in at least two additional independent experiments. Results largely confirmed the reactions shown in Figure 3 (Table S5). Inoculation of Xcv 85-10ΔhrcN (Lorenz and Büttner, 2009), a T3SS-deficient and non-pathogenic mutant, never resulted in visible reactions (Table S5). Thus, macroscopic NHR reactions depend on T3E translocation, whereas T3SS-independent recognition of Xcv, i.e., during PTI, failed to induce visible NHR reactions.

Next, we determined whether XopQ contributes to bacterial multiplication in leaves of N. benthamiana (Nbent), N. tabacum (Ntab), N. paniculata (Npan), N. clevelandii (Ncle), and N. rustica (Nrus). In these lines, xopQ differentially determines the Xcv-induced NHR reaction: Xcv 85-10 induces a xopQ-dependent chlorotic reaction in Nbent, Ntab, and Npan and a HR-like reaction in Ncle (Figure 4A). Xcv 85-10ΔxopQ triggered water soaking on Nbent and Npan and nearly no visible reactions on Ntab and Ncle. Nrus was the only plant line in which Xcv 85-10ΔxopQ triggered cell death, whereas Xcv 85-10 caused no visible reactions (Figures 3, 4A). As shown in Figures 4B,C, Xcv 85-10 moderately multiplied in all plant lines, whereas Xcv 85-10ΔxopQ grew significantly better. We also analyzed in planta growth of the T3S-deficient strain Xcv 85-10ΔhrcN in Ntab and Nbent. Interestingly, Xcv 85-10ΔhrcN multiplied significantly better in Nbent than Xcv 85-10 (Figure 4B) indicating a strong impact of ETI on NHR of Nbent. Taken together, in all Nicotiana species analyzed, XopQ displays an avirulence activity triggering plant defenses and restricting the growth of Xcv in the leaf tissue.

As described above, XopQ affected Xcv-mediated NHR reactions in all Nicotiana plant lines in which Agrobacterium-mediated expression of XopQ triggered a reaction. We wondered if this is also true for other T3Es. In contrast to XopQ, transient expression of XopC exclusively induced plant reactions in lines of the genus Solanum (Table 2). We speculated that XopC contributes to Xcv-induced reactions in these plant lines and generated a xopC deletion mutant. As shown in Figure 5, Xcv 85-10ΔxopC induced weaker reactions than Xcv 85-10 in S. americanum (Same 1), which could be complemented by ectopic expression of xopC. Deletion of xopC did not affect visible reactions in N. benthamiana and N. tabacum to infection with Xcv (data not shown). Thus, similarly to recognition of XopQ, also XopC contributes to Xcv-induced phenotypes in certain non-host plants.

In most cases, T3E recognition takes place within the plant cell via corresponding NLR-type R proteins (Khan et al., 2016). TIR domain-containing TNLs represent one large NLR subgroup, and TNL-mediated immunity required the lipase-like protein EDS1 in N. benthamiana (Peart et al., 2002), tomato (Hu et al., 2005) and Arabidopsis thaliana (Aarts et al., 1998; Wirthmueller et al., 2007). We employed a recently reported Nbeds1a-1 line to test EDS1 dependency of T3E-induced plant reactions in N. benthamiana, which encodes two EDS1 orthologs, NbEDS1a and NbEDS1b (Ordon et al., 2016). Nbeds1a-1 was reported to contain a 97-bp deletion in exon 2 of NbEDS1a, which was generated using Cas9-based nucleases. Since employed guide RNAs also targeted NbEDS1b, this locus was sequence-verified. Indeed, the Nbeds1a-1 line additionally contained both a point mutation and a large deletion at the NbEDS1b locus (Figure 6A). However, this line will be further referred to as Nbeds1a-1, since NbEDS1b is most likely a pseudogene (Figure S2). When T3Es were transiently expressed in Nbeds1a-1 leaf tissues, plant reactions induced by AvrBsT, AvrRxv, XopE1, XopJ, XopL, and XopM were unaltered, indicating EDS1-independent recognition of these effectors (Figure 6B). In contrast, XopQ-induced chlorosis was abolished on eds1 mutant plants, suggesting activation of an EDS1-dependent resistance pathway (Figure 6B). A transient complementation assay was used to unequivocally show EDS1-dependent recognition of XopQ in N. benthamiana. XopQ or GFP were transiently co-expressed with NbEDS1a in wild-type or eds1 mutant leaf tissues (Figure 6C). XopQ expression induced chlorosis on wild type, but not eds1 plants, and chlorosis was restored upon co-expression of NbEDS1b (Figure 6C). Thus, the putative R_xopQ for recognition of XopQ most likely encodes a TIR-type NLR protein.

To analyze the role of EDS1 in the NHR of N. benthamiana against Xcv, we inoculated Xcv 85-10 and Xcv 85-10ΔxopQ into N. benthamiana wild-type (EDS1) and Nbeds1a-1 (eds1) plants. Xcv 85-10 triggered no disease symptoms and showed a moderate growth, whereas Xcv 85-10ΔxopQ multiplied significantly better and caused disease symptoms in wild-type N. benthamiana (Figures 6D,E). In eds1 plants, both Xcv strains caused disease and multiplied equally well (Figures 6D,E). Thus, EDS1 is essential for the NHR of N. benthamiana against Xcv 85-10, most likely due to its essential role in XopQ recognition via a corresponding TIR-type NLR.

Our work is the first larger study on reactions caused by Xanthomonas T3Es in non-host plants. Plant phenotypes upon T3E expression reached from fast, HR-like cell death over chlorotic reactions to no visible reaction. T3E-induced cell death reactions are a hallmark of ETI (Henry et al., 2013) and, therefore, suggest the presence of one or several corresponding R genes/R proteins. Chlorotic reactions might also result from ETI, as shown for recognition of the Pseudomonas syringae T3E AvrB by the TNL TAO1 in A. thaliana (Eitas et al., 2008). In some cases, however, the observed phenotypes might result from a virulence-associated activity of the respective strongly expressed effector and occur independently of an R gene/R protein. Transient expression of T3Es in different Solanaceae species led to diverse reaction patterns (Tables 2, 3), suggesting variable sets of putative R genes among Solanaceae or different sensitivities of plant lines to virulence activities of T3Es. A genetic variation of R genes has often been described, whereas a genetic variation of plant susceptibility against T3Es virulence activities is rarely reported. Therefore, we basically interpret our data according to the presence or absence of putative R genes. However, this simplification requires further analysis, i.e., the isolation of corresponding R genes. The number of plant R genes varies strongly in different Solanaceae species, e.g., 2042 NLRs were annotated in pepper (Chiltepin), whereas tomato (Heinz1706) only encodes 478 NLRs (Wei et al., 2016). Furthermore, a high evolution rate of R genes and R gene clusters was shown, e.g., in various Solanaceae plants (Jupe et al., 2012; Quirin et al., 2012; Andolfo et al., 2013), Fabaceae (Zheng et al., 2016), Arabidopsis lyrata (Buckley et al., 2016) and grasses (Yang et al., 2008, 2013; Luo et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2014). We observed variable plant responses between members of the section Nicotiana and even between closely related members of the species N. tabacum, indicating dynamic acquisition and loss of R genes.

N. tabacum is an allotetraploid species which originated approximately 200,000 years ago from an interspecific cross of N. sylvestris (2n = 24, maternal progenitor) with N. tomentosiformis (2n = 24, paternal progenitor) (Leitch et al., 2008; Sierro et al., 2013, 2014). Interestingly, two sets of T3Es triggered consistent reactions in N. tomentosiformis (AvrBsT, AvrRxv, XopB, XopE1, XopL, XopM, and XopQ) and N. sylvestris (AvrBs1, AvrRxv, XopG, XopM, and XopS), respectively, with AvrRxv and XopM being recognized in both species. Taken together, one can speculate that R genes recognizing these 10 T3Es were combined upon genome fusion in N. tabacum (Figure 7). Indeed, putative R genes recognizing seven of the 10 T3Es (AvrBsT, AvrRxv, XopE1, XopG, XopL, XopM, and XopQ) appear to be conserved in N. tabacum until today. By contrast, putative R genes recognizing the T3Es AvrBs1, XopB and XopS got (functionally) lost in a number of cultivated N. tabacum lines, e.g., Ntab 8, 36, 39 (no AvrBs1-mediated reaction) and Ntab 5, 16 (no XopB-mediated reaction). Interestingly, AvrBs2 also triggered reactions in most N. tabacum lines, but not in lines of the progenitor species N. tomentosiformis or N. sylvestris tested here, suggesting loss of the putative corresponding R genes in N. tomentosiformis and N. sylvestris or gain in N. tabacum in the course of evolution (Table 3, Figure 7). The T3E AvrBs2 is recognized in pepper ECW-20R plants (Minsavage et al., 1990) and is a virulence factor across xanthomonads (Kearney and Staskawicz, 1990).

Out of the 46 tested N. tabacum lines, only Ntab 9, Ntab 12 and Ntab 26 showed consistent reactions to XopJ (Table 3). A plausible explanation could be that these lines acquired XopJ-specific R genes only recently. The same might be true for N. velutina (Nvel) and N. nudicaulis (Nnud), which were the only lines recognizing XopH and XopO, respectively (Table 2). As mentioned above, the observed reaction patterns might also rely on a genetically determined variation of plant susceptibility against the virulence activity of a given T3E.

Up to now it was largely unknown whether Xcv translocates T3Es into non-host plants and whether ETI is induced during NHR. We identified XopQ as avirulence determinant within several non-host plant lines and found that XopC contributes to Xcv-induced plant reactions during infection of S. americanum. These results indicate that Xcv translocates T3Es into the plant cells of non-host species. In contrast to Xcv 85-10, the T3SS-deficient strain Xcv 85-10ΔhrcN did not induce phenotypic reactions on non-host plants (Table S5). We, therefore, assume that ETI significantly contributes to NHR against Xcv. Similarly, ETI also contributes to the NHR of diverse plant lines during interaction with Pseudomonas syringae (Lindeberg et al., 2009, 2012; Senthil-Kumar and Mysore, 2013).

Since Xcv 85-10ΔhrcN multiplied significantly better than Xcv 85-10 in N. benthamiana (Figure 4B), PTI appears to restrict Xcv growth in N. benthamiana less efficiently than the combination of PTI and ETI. This is reminiscent of a recent model by Cui et al. (2015) which describes PTI as a balance of positive and negative immunity signals to prevent plants from overreactions to harmless microbes. Initiation of ETI, signaling the presence of a serious pathogen threat, dampens negative regulation of PTI, resulting in an efficient plant immunity to halt the infection (Cui et al., 2015). This, however, cannot be generalized as in N. tabacum the hrcN deletion strain affected NHR phenotypes but not in planta growth of Xcv. Future studies on the interaction of Xcv with N. benthamiana and N. tabacum might help to understand quantitative differences in plant immunity responses.

Here, we identified XopQ as a key host range factor in Xcv for the interaction with Nicotiana species. A recent study performed at the same time as ours also identified XopQ as a host range factor in N. benthamiana and proposed a XopQ-specific R protein, R_XopQ (Schwartz et al., 2015). In most cases, Xcv 85-10ΔxopQ induced weaker NHR reactions on Nicotiana spp. compared to Xcv 85-10 and only caused disease on N. benthamiana and N. paniculata. This might be due to the recognition of at least one additional T3E or due to the inability to modulate virulence targets in most non-host plants.

The finding that N. benthamiana EDS1 is essential for the XopQ-mediated NHR suggests that R_xopQ encodes a TIR-type NLR. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the role of EDS1 in NHR against a bacterial pathogen in N. benthamiana. It is worth to note that several Xcv T3Es (Figure 6B) can induce HR-like reactions when expressed in N. benthamiana, but the deletion of xopQ in Xcv 85-10 is sufficient to abolish NHR, and allows full plant colonization and disease symptom formation (Figure 6E; Schwartz et al., 2015). Thus, remaining T3Es are either translocated at low levels, below a threshold for avirulence activity, or avirulence activities might be suppressed by simultaneously translocated other T3Es. XopQ was identified as the only effector recognized in an EDS1-dependent manner, and Xcv 85-10 and Xcv 85-10ΔxopQ strains grew equally well on eds1 mutant plants. These observations suggest that XopQ is most likely the only Xcv T3E recognized in an EDS1-dependent manner in N. benthamiana, and resistance defects in eds1 mutant lines do not extend beyond abolished TNL signaling.

Interestingly, there are several parallels between recognition of XopQ from Xcv and recognition of the XopQ homolog from Pseudomonas syringae, HopQ1. As XopQ, HopQ1 from P. syringae DC3000 induces chlorosis in N. benthamiana (Wroblewski et al., 2009) and a fast cell death in N. tabacum (Li et al., 2013a) after transient expression. Additionally, HopQ1 restricts host range of P. syringae strains in N. benthamiana dependent on SGT1, indicating the presence of a HopQ1-specific R protein (Wei et al., 2007; Ferrante et al., 2009). In case of HopQ1, its virulence activity can be clearly separated from its avirulence activity because the nucleoside hydrolase-like domain of HopQ1 and the interaction of HopQ1 with host 14-3-3 proteins contribute to virulence but are dispensable for recognition in N. tabacum (Li et al., 2013a,b). It could very well be that recognition of XopQ and HopQ1 is mediated by a single TIR-type NLR. Identification of the representative R gene might represent a promising avenue for generation of more resistant crop plants.

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.