<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2016.01607</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Correlation between Strawberry (<italic>Fragaria ananassa</italic> Duch.) Productivity and Photosynthesis-Related Parameters under Various Growth Conditions</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Choi</surname> <given-names>Hyo G.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/353043/overview"/></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Moon</surname> <given-names>Byoung Y.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>Nam J.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Department of Horticultural Science, Kongju National University</institution> <country>Yesan, Korea</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Department of Biological Sciences, Inje University</institution> <country>Gimhae, Korea</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University</institution> <country>Jinju, Korea</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: David Bryla, Agricultural Research Service (USDA), USA</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Antonio Ferrante, University of Milan, Italy; Yuksel Tuzel, Ege University Faculty of Agriculture, Turkey</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001"><p>&#x0002A;Correspondence: Hyo G. Choi <email>hg1208&#x00040;kongju.ac.kr</email></p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002"><p>This article was submitted to Crop Science and Horticulture, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>26</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>7</volume>
<elocation-id>1607</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>02</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2016</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>12</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2016</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2016 Choi, Moon and Kang.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2016</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Choi, Moon and Kang</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract><p>In the present study, we investigated changes in chlorophyll fluorescence, photosynthetic parameters and fruit yields, as well as fruit phytochemical accumulation of strawberry (<italic>Fragaria ananassa</italic> Duch.) that had been cultivated in a greenhouse under different combinations of light intensity and temperature. In plants grown with low light (LL) photosystem II chlorophyll fluorescence was found to increase as compared with those grown under high light (HL). When strawberry plants were grown with temperature higher than 5&#x000B0;C in addition to LL, they showed decrease in non-photochemical quenching (NPQ), photochemical quenching (qP), as well as chlorophyll fluorescence decrease ratio (R<sub>Fd</sub>) when compared with other combinations of light and temperature. Moreover, fruit yield of strawberry was closely correlated with chlorophyll fluorescence-related parameters such as NPQ, qP, and R<sub>Fd</sub>, but not with the maximum efficiency of PS II (Fv/Fm). Although plant groups grown under different combinations of light and temperature showed almost comparable levels of photosynthesis rates (Pr) when irradiated with low-intensity light, they displayed clear differences when measured with higher irradiances. Plants grown under HL with temperature above 10&#x000B0;C showed the highest Pr, in contrast to the plants grown under LL with temperature above 5&#x000B0;C. When the stomatal conductance and the transpiration rate were measured, plants of each treatment showed clear differences even when analyzed with lower irradiances. We also found that fruit production during winter season was more strongly influenced by growth temperature than light intensity. We suggest that fruit productivity of strawberry is closely associated with chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis-related parameters during cultivation under different regimes of temperature and light.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>chlorophyll fluorescence</kwd>
<kwd>greenhouse</kwd>
<kwd>photosynthesis</kwd>
<kwd>phytochemicals</kwd>
<kwd>pigment</kwd>
<kwd>shading</kwd>
<kwd>strawberry</kwd>
<kwd>temperature</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="9"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="35"/>
<page-count count="13"/>
<word-count count="7734"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1"><title>Introduction</title>
<p>Unpredictable fluctuations of temperature and increased cloudy days during the cultivation seasons have been reported to negatively affect crop productions (Kucharik and Serbin, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2008</xref>; Liu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2014</xref>). In particular, environmental factors such as light (Biswal and Biswal, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">1999</xref>; Zivcak et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2014</xref>; Rapparini et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2015</xref>) and temperature (Lafta and Lorenzen, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">1995</xref>; Gupta et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">2016</xref>) have a significant impact on the growth and development of plants. Low temperature (LT) is one of the most significant abiotic stresses limiting plant photosynthesis (Ashraf and Harris, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2013</xref>) and severely retards plant growth and function (Gupta et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">2016</xref>). Light intensity is also important for the growth, morphogenesis and other physiological responses of plants (Hussey, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">1963</xref>; Keren et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">1997</xref>; Ali et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">2005</xref>; Schneider et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2006</xref>). Low light (LL), in particular lowers the rate of photosynthesis and thus limits the yield of crops (Lichtenthaler et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">1981</xref>; Dong et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2014</xref>).</p>
<p>Chlorophyll fluorescence (ChlF), photosynthesis rate (Pr) and related parameters such as stomatal conductance (Sc) and transpiration rate (Tr) have been introduced in diagnosing the physiological responses of plants under abiotic stresses such as drought, low light, or salinity (Lee et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2001</xref>; Miyashita et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2005</xref>; Barbieri et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">2012</xref>). Fv/Fm represents the maximum potential quantum efficiency of photosystem (PS II) and an Fv/Fm value in the range of 0.79 to 0.84 is optimal for many plant species, with lowered value indicating plant stress (Maxwell and Johnson, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2000</xref>). Additionally some studies explained indication of photosynthetic capacity using value of ChlF which can be represented by the rate of electron transport of PSII (Jamil et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">2007</xref>; Ashraf and Harris, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2013</xref>). Moreover, the technique of chlorophyll fluorescence imaging is being widely used as an alternative method to accurately quantify tolerance and acclimation of leaves to environmental stresses (Ehlert and Hincha, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">2008</xref>).</p>
<p>Productivity as well as accumulation of phytochemicals in the fruits of strawberry (<italic>Fragaria ananassa</italic> Duch.) are affected by various environmental conditions (Zheng et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2007</xref>; Choi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2014</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2015</xref>). In particular, phenolic compounds not only have functional roles in plant metabolism and growth but are essential for the organoleptic qualities of the fruits (Tulipani et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">2008</xref>).</p>
<p>While increasing numbers of Korean farmers tend to cultivate strawberry plants using the two-floor bench bed system in a greenhouse, they also try to reduce costs of warming the greenhouse in the winter by keeping the temperature as low as possible. Plants grown in the lower bed is usually shaded by plants growing in the upper bed because they intercept sunlight. For the optimum fruit production of strawberry, winter cultivation in the greenhouse is inevitable in Korean horticulture, but increase in the cloudy days together with capricious temperature changes during winter season tends to be an obstacle in the greenhouse agriculture. In order to address those problems, we aimed at investigating how the variations of temperature and light levels influence the greenhouse cultivation of strawberry during winter in terms of photosynthetic performances.</p>
<p>In the present study, we aimed at evaluating growth and productivity of strawberry plants in terms of chlorophyll fluorescence and related parameters of photosynthesis when they are cultivated under varying combinations of light intensity and temperature.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials and methods" id="s2"><title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec><title>Plant cultivation and materials</title>
<p>Two-floor bench bed systems consisting of upper and bottom beds (Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S1</xref>) were used for cultivating strawberry plants in the two independent greenhouses. Plants in the bottom bed were found to receive only about 40% of the sunlight intensity incident on the upper bed because they were overshadowed by the upper bed. Fluctuations in photosynthetic active radiation of ambient lights on the two-floor bench bed in a greenhouse were continuously recorded with 10-min interval by using LI-190 quantum sensors (Licor, NE, USA). Quantum sensors were installed at the height of 20 cm above the surface of each bed and the measured values were stored in the CR 1000 data-logger (Campbell Sci. Inc., UT, USA).</p>
<p>Strawberry runners were planted in the two-floor bench beds when they are at the developmental stage of the 4th leaf and were cultivated from October 15, 2014 to March 31 of the following year. They were grown in coir medium hydroponically using a drip irrigation system by providing nutrient solutions of de Kreij et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">1999</xref>) with EC between 1.0 and 1.2 dS&#x000B7;m<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> for each 2 min at a frequency of five times per day.</p>
<p>We prepared two independent greenhouses experiencing two different regimes of temperatures. The temperature in each greenhouse was not allowed to fall below 5 or 10&#x000B0;C all day long, respectively, because the heaters called as complex environmental regulator (Woosung Hitec Co. Ltd., Yangsan, Korea) began to operate automatically every time when the room temperature drops below 5 or 10&#x000B0;C in the respective greenhouse. Every when each temperature was raised above the level of 5 or 10&#x000B0;C, heater was controlled to turn off automatically, recording the minimum temperatures of each greenhouse. The temperature sensor was set up at the height of 2.5 m above the ground in the greenhouse. In this way, four combinations of growth conditions were established, consisting of upper bed maintaining above 10&#x000B0;C (UT), bottom bed above 10&#x000B0;C (BT), upper bed above 5&#x000B0;C (UF), and finally bottom bed above 5&#x000B0;C (BF). Although light intensity and temperature inside each greenhouse varied continuously in the course of the experimental period depending on the ambient weather conditions, four different treatments named as UT, BT, UF, and BF were assumed to represent high temperature plus high light, high temperature plus low light, low temperature plus high light, and low temperature plus low light, respectively. Each group of 100 plants was subjected to four different kinds of treatment, respectively, for the subsequent analyses. The production was recorded as fruit yield harvested from December to next March. All the experiments were carried out in the greenhouses constructed in the Protected Horticulture Research Institute of Korea (latitude 35&#x000B0;19&#x02032;N and longitude 129&#x000B0;22&#x02032;E).</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Analysis of chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthetic parameters</title>
<p>Leaves of 18 to 20-day-old plants that had been excised at 7 a.m. of January 17 were sealed in the dark bottle and swiftly moved to the laboratory to minimize water stress. Chlorophyll fluorescence (ChlF) images were immediately taken using a imaging fluorometer (FluorCAM FC800, Photon Systems Instruments, Drasov, Czech) equipped with the software of quenching analysis design protocols. ChlF induction curves upon illumination of dark adapted leaves were recorded and from these induction curves, the maximum quantum use efficiency of PS II was calculated in terms of F<sub>V</sub>/F<sub>M</sub>. Other parameters of ChlF such as non-photochemical quenching (NPQ), photochemical quenching (qP), and variable chlorophyll fluorescence decline ratio (R<sub>Fd</sub>) were also measured by using the FluorCam system. From the light-induced curves of ChlF in dark-adapted leaves ChlF parameters were calculated (Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S4</xref>). Changes in Fv/Fm ratio during daytime were measured in a greenhouse on the 18th of January after supplying light pulse of 3000 &#x003BC;mol&#x000B7;m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>&#x000B7;s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> by using a portable fluorometer FluorPen FP 100 (Photon Systems Instruments, Drasov, Czech).</p>
<p>When parameters such as photosynthetic rates (Pr), stomatal conductances (Sc), and transpiration rates (Tr) were measured, intact leaves attached to plants were subjected to <italic>in situ</italic> analysis using a hand-held photosynthesis system (LI-6400, Licor, NE, USA) on the 16th of January (under increasing irradiances up to 1500 &#x003BC;mol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>), and on the 8th of February (under 1000 &#x003BC;mol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>), respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Measurement of chlorophylls and carotenoids</title>
<p>To measure the amounts of chlorophylls and carotenoids, leaves were harvested three times on the each 10th of January, February, and March on a monthly basis. After punching six leaf disks (1 g fresh weight) with a cork borer, they were macerated in 15 mL of acetone (containing 100 mg of CaCO<sub>3</sub>) with a homogenizer (PT-3100, Kinenatica AG, Switzerland). The homogenates were poured into a solvent-resistant microfuge tube, and after spinning for 5 min, the resulting supernatants were collected. The extracts were filtered, and the absorbance was measured at 661.6, 644.8, and 470 nm with a spectrophotometer (Evolution 300, Thermo Co., MA. USA) as described by Lichtenthaler (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">1987</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Preparation of fruit extracts</title>
<p>Fully matured strawberry fruits were harvested on the 10th of each month from December to March and each 1 kg fruits from 30 plants were provided for the three repetitions of measuring phytochemicals, sugar content, and organic acids. After homogenizing the fruits, the extracts were centrifuged with the speed of 16,000 g for 30 min at 4&#x000B0;C (64R Centrifuge, Beckman Coulter Inc., CA, USA). Filtered supernatants through Whatman No. 2 filter paper were immediately frozen to be stored at &#x02212;70&#x000B0;C as referred by Choi et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2015</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Analysis of sugars and organic acids</title>
<p>Before measuring the soluble solid contents of fruit extracts, frozen samples were melted and filtered through 0.45 &#x003BC;m syringe filter. After diluting the filtrates with distilled water, they were analyzed with a HPLC system (YL9100, Younglin Co., Anyang, Korea) equipped with a Sugar-Pak (4.6 mm &#x000D7; 250 mm, Supelco, PA, USA) column and RI detector according to Choi et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2015</xref>).</p>
<p>Amounts of organic acids contained in the fruit extracts were analyzed with ion chromatography system (ICS 5000, Dionex, CA, USA) equipped with Ion-Pac column (9 &#x000D7; 250 mm ICE-AS6, Dionex, NY, USA) and a suppressor (AMMS ICE300, Dionex, NY, USA) according to Choi et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2015</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Analysis of phytochemicals</title>
<p>Anthocyanin contents in the fruit extracts were measured and calculated with reference to pelargonidin-3-glucoside as the standard according to the modified procedure of Kim et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2011</xref>). Briefly, fruit extracts were pretreated with methanol and 1% hydrochloric acid and filtered solutions were subjected to spectrophotometric measurements of absorbance at 530 nm. The content of total phenolic compounds in the fruit extracts was determined according to Slinkard and Singleton (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">1977</xref>) with reference to gallic acid equivalents as the standard.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>The experimental data obtained from chlorophyll fluorescence measurements, photosynthesis parameters, photosynthetic pigments, sugar and organic acid, and phytochemical analysis were subjected to a randomized complete block design (RCBD) analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SAS (SAS Institute Inc., NC, USA). Values of <italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05 were regarded as significant.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3"><title>Results</title>
<sec><title>Changes in light and temperature experienced by plants during growth in different bed positions in the high-bench system</title>
<p>Strawberry plants were cultivated in the high-bench bed system composed of upper and bottom bed (Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S1</xref>). We recorded changes in the level of greenhouse daylight incident to plants growing in the upper or bottom bed during the cultivation period (Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S2</xref>). Since heat insulation films were covered around the greenhouse during winter for the purpose of preserving the inner temperature, they were cleared away every day from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. so that sunlight could penetrate into the greenhouse. Overshadowed by the upper bed, the light intensity of bottom bed was sharply dropped after 11 a.m. The respective monthly average of ambient daylight integral given to the upper and the bottom bed was 10.45 and 4.38 mol&#x000B7;m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>&#x000B7;d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> in December, 10.33 and 3.54 mol&#x000B7;m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>&#x000B7;d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> in January, 12.84 and 4.82 mol&#x000B7;m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>&#x000B7;d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> in February, and 19.54 and 7.35 mol&#x000B7;m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>&#x000B7;d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> in March (Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S2</xref>). In overall, the light intensity incident to the bottom bed was about only 40% of the upper bed.</p>
<p>We also recorded changes in the greenhouse temperature during the cultivation period (Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S3</xref>). The minimum temperature of each greenhouse was controlled not to decline below 5 or 10&#x000B0;C during cold season. Air ventilation of the greenhouse was carried out by opening or closing the side window of the greenhouse when the inner temperature was over or below 25&#x000B0;C, respectively. As a result, the minimum temperature of each greenhouse was kept above 5 or 10&#x000B0;C, the upper temperatures were quite variable depending on the outside weather. It was noticeable that daytime temperature of the greenhouse increased significantly following the end of February.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Chlorophyll fluorescence</title>
<p>For plants grown under four different conditions of light and temperature consisting of UT, BT, UF, and BF, chlorophyll fluorescence image was visualized from leaves of each plant (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>). BT and BF leaves of the bottom bed under low light showed higher ChlF of Fo, Fm, Fp, and Fv/Fm than UT and UF leaves of the upper bed under high light. ChlF was most strongly emitted at leaf base close to the petiole and extended to the margin of leaves. Leaves exposed to different temperatures of 5 and 10&#x000B0;C showed little differences in the emission of ChlF.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p><bold>Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging in strawberry leaves cultivated under different combinations of light and temperature regimes</bold>. Leaves were harvested at 7:00 a.m. on January 17, 2015 and subjected to chlorophyll fluorescence induction after dark adaptation of the leaves for 20 min. BF, plants of the bottom bed under heating start temperature at 5&#x000B0;C; BT, plants of the bottom bed under heating start temperature at 10&#x000B0;C; UF, plants of the upper bed under heating start temperature at 5&#x000B0;C; UT, plants of the upper bed under heating start temperature at 10&#x000B0;C.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-07-01607-g0001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref> shows time-dependent changes in several parameters of ChlF induction from leaves of strawberry when irradiated by actinic light at an intensity of 700 &#x003BC;mol&#x000B7;m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>&#x000B7;s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>. NPQ, qP, and R<sub>Fd</sub> values obtained from BF plants were significantly lower than those values from the other plant groups except for Fv/Fm. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref> shows local-time dependent changes in Fv/Fm from morning till night from leaves of plants that had been cultivated under different regimes of light and temperature. All the plants showed the highest Fv/Fm toward the sunrise, while they recorded the lowest valued around 11 a.m. when the ambient light of the greenhouse was brightest, ranging from 0.79 to 0.80 (Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S2A</xref>; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>). Generally speaking, Fv/Fm ratios measured from plants that had been cultivated under different regimes of light and temperature ranged from 0.79 to 0.84. Plants of BF showed higher Fv/Fm ratios than those of UT. When each Fv/Fm ratio was compared in terms of growth temperature, plants under low temperature (UF and BF) showed higher values between 0.81 and 0.83 than those grown under high temperature (UT and BT) with values between 0.80 and 0.82.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p><bold>Actinic light-dependent changes in chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of strawberry leaves during cultivation under different regimes of light and temperature</bold>. For the induction of chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics, actinic light was provided at an intensity of 700 &#x003BC;mol&#x000B7;m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>&#x000B7;s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>. From each group of plants 5 sheets of leaves were harvested at 7:00 a.m. on January 17, 2015 and subjected to chlorophyll fluorescence analysis after dark adaptation for 20 min. Deviation bars indicate &#x000B1; S.D. of the means. Other remarks are as shown in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-07-01607-g0002.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p><bold>Changes in Fv/Fm of strawberry plants over time during the day when grown under different regimes of light and temperature in a greenhouse</bold>. For each measurement leaves from 20 individual plants were harvested on January 18, 2015 and subjected to chlorophyll fluorescence induction after dark adaptation for 20 min. Deviation bars indicate &#x000B1; S.D. of the means. Other remarks are as shown in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-07-01607-g0003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec><title>Photosynthetic rate and related parameters</title>
<p>Light-intensity dependent changes in photosynthetic rate (Pr) as well as related parameters such as stomatal conductance (Sc) and transpiration rate (Tr) were investigated with leaves of strawberry plants each under UT, BT, UF, and BF conditions (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>). Each parameter of UT plants showed the highest level followed in turn by those of BT, UF, and BF plants. Differences in Pr between UT and other plants became clearly seen starting from the light intensity of 200 &#x003BC;mol&#x000B7;m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>&#x000B7;s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> that had been irradiated for the induction of photosynthesis. When the actinic light of 800 &#x003BC;mol&#x000B7;m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>&#x000B7;s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> was irradiated, UT plants showed the highest Pr value of 14.06 &#x003BC;mol CO<sub>2</sub>&#x000B7;m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>&#x000B7;s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> as compared with 12.53 of BT, 11.77 of UF and 7.62 of BF plants, amounting to the increase of 11.2, 19.5, and 84.5%, respectively. Furthermore, BF plants recorded the lowest value of Sc and Tr, each showing 0.069 and 0.89 mmol H<sub>2</sub>O&#x000B7;m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>&#x000B7;s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> as compared with other groups of plants. Changes in Pr, Sc, and Tr were investigated with the progress of local time during the daytime and the results were shown in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>. At noon when the light intensity was at the peak, UT plants showed the highest value of Pr while their Sc and Tr were at the lowest level. In contrast to this, BF plants recorded the lowest levels in these parameters during the measurement, showing the least values at 3:00 pm (Figures <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S2</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S3</xref>; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p><bold>Light-intensity dependent changes in photosynthetic rate and related parameters rates of strawberry plants during cultivation under different regimes of light and temperature in a greenhouse</bold>. Leaves were harvested at around noon of January 16, 2015 and each supplied with increasing irradiances (PPFD) up to 1500 &#x003BC;mol&#x000B7;m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>&#x000B7;s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> each for 21 min for each measurement. Each datum point represents the mean of the results obtained from each 10 individual plants. Deviation bars indicate &#x000B1; S.D. of the means. Pr, photosynthetic rate; Sc, stomatal conductance; Tr, transpiration rate. Other remarks are as shown in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-07-01607-g0004.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption><p><bold>Changes in photosynthetic rate and related parameters of strawberry plants over time during the day when plants are cultivated under different regimes of light and temperature</bold>. For each measurement, 10 sheets of strawberry leaf were harvested on February 8, 2015 and each supplied with light at an intensity of 1000 &#x003BC;mol&#x000B7;m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>&#x000B7;s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>. Deviation bars indicate &#x000B1; S.D. of the means. Other remarks are as shown in this figure.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-07-01607-g0005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec><title>Photosynthetic pigments</title>
<p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref> shows the amount of photosynthetic pigments in the leaves of UT, BT, UF, and BF plants that had been measured on a monthly basis from January to March of 2015. Amounts of chlorophyll <italic>a, b</italic>, and carotenoids were the highest, each showing 35.6, 9.7, and 18 g&#x000B7;kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, in leaves of BF plants that had been grown under lower light and temperature. While Chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> was shown to continuously decrease from the start of January, contents of chlorophyll <italic>b</italic> and carotenoids were maintained at the initial level till the start of February and thereafter began to decline. In March when the strength of sunlight enhances, it was noticed that pigments in leaves of each plant groups were markedly reduced. For example in BT plants, levels of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoids decreased by 15.9, 42.6, and 21.6%, respectively. Despite such outcomes, it was evident that plant groups under higher light condition (UT and UF) accumulated less amounts of photosynthetic pigments compared with those plant groups exposed to lower light (BT and BF; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref>). On the contrary, the ratio of chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> and <italic>b</italic> recorded a remarkable increase from February till March, with UT plants showing the highest value of 6.7 while BF plants the lowest of 5.0 during March.</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption><p><bold>Changes in photosynthetic pigments of strawberry plants monthly monitored during growth in a greenhouse under different regimes of light and temperature</bold>. Measurements were done in three replicates with each replicate analyzing 100 g fresh weight of leaves collected from twenty plants. Deviation bars indicate &#x000B1; S.D. of the means. Other remarks are as shown in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-07-01607-g0006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec><title>Fruit yield</title>
<p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref> shows the monthly production as well as the cumulative production of strawberry fruits measured until March from December of the previous year. The respective plants of each group showed a steady increase in the fruit yield with the progress of cultivation days from December to March of the following year, with UT plants showing the highest while BF plants the lowest yield. Although January had seen a sharp increase in the fruit production of BT and UF plants compared with December, there were no differences between January and February. In contrast to this, plants of UT and BF showed almost a linear increase in the fruit production with the passage of months during the growth period. Total cumulative productions of fruits from December to March were calculated for each plant group (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7D</xref>). UT plants showed the highest fruit production of 425 g per plant, followed by 350 g for UF plants, 328 g for BT plants, and 244 g for BF plants, corresponding to 82, 77, and 57% of UT plants.</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption><p><bold>Changes in fruit yield on a plant basis that had been monthly harvested during cultivation of strawberry plants in a greenhouse under different regimes of light and temperature</bold>. <bold>(A)</bold> Monthly yield from December 2014 to March 2015; <bold>(B)</bold> the cumulative yield up to January 2015; <bold>(C)</bold> the cumulative yield up to February 2015; <bold>(D)</bold> the total cumulative yield up to March 2015. Each value represents the mean of 100 plants. Deviation bars indicate &#x000B1; S.D. of the means. Letters above the bars indicate mean separation by Duncan&#x00027;s multiple range test at <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05. Other remarks are as shown in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-07-01607-g0007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec><title>Soluble sugars and organic acids</title>
<p>Effects of different light and temperature on the accumulation of soluble sugars and organic acids in the strawberry fruits are shown in Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>. Total sugars of the fruits harvested in March declined by 29, 51, 47, and 64% lower than those in January for the plants of UT, BT, UF, and BF, respectively. On the contrary, organic acids of fruits harvested in March were elevated by 36, 36, 16, and 23% higher than those in January for the plants of UT, BT, UF, and BF, respectively. The decreased extent of fruit sugars was found to be much larger than the increased extent of organic acids in the fruits as the cultivation continues. In particular, fruits of UT and UF had higher capacity to build total soluble sugar and organic acids than those of BT and BF.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p><bold>Contents of soluble sugars in the fruits of strawberry that had been cultivated under different environmental conditions</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Treatment</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Fructose (g&#x000B7;100 g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, FW)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Glucose (g 100 g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, FW)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Sucrose (g 100 g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, FW)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Total sugars (g 100 g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, FW)</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Jan. 10</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Feb. 10</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Mar. 10</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Jan. 10</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Feb. 10</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Mar. 10</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Jan. 10</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Feb. 10</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Mar. 10</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Jan. 10</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Feb. 10</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Mar. 10</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">UT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.99 &#x000B1; 0.12a<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>z</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.77 &#x000B1; 0.16a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.42 &#x000B1; 0.28a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.84 &#x000B1; 0.18a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.54 &#x000B1; 0.08a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.29 &#x000B1; 0.24a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.48 &#x000B1; 0.35a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.84 &#x000B1; 0.18a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.88 &#x000B1; 0.92a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.31 &#x000B1; 0.58a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.15 &#x000B1; 0.18a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.61 &#x000B1; 1.42a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.03 &#x000B1; 0.11a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.77 &#x000B1; 0.09a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.79 &#x000B1; 0.06b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.91 &#x000B1; 0.12a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.62 &#x000B1; 0.25a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.64 &#x000B1; 0.06b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.14 &#x000B1; 0.30b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.75 &#x000B1; 0.05a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.53 &#x000B1; 0.49b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.08 &#x000B1; 0.53a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.14 &#x000B1; 0.29a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.96 &#x000B1; 0.50b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">UF</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.08 &#x000B1; 0.17a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.68 &#x000B1; 0.04a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.78 &#x000B1; 0.12b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.03 &#x000B1; 0.19a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.58 &#x000B1; 0.16a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.68 &#x000B1; 0.10b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.18 &#x000B1; 0.50ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.55 &#x000B1; 0.20a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.98 &#x000B1; 0.46b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.31 &#x000B1; 0.86a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.87 &#x000B1; 0.28a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.02 &#x000B1; 0.42b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BF</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.13 &#x000B1; 0.10a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.69 &#x000B1; 0.06a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.71 &#x000B1; 0.05b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.03 &#x000B1; 0.13a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.55 &#x000B1; 0.20a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.58 &#x000B1; 0.03b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.73 &#x000B1; 1.0ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.63 &#x000B1; 0.20a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.56 &#x000B1; 0.45b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.91 &#x000B1; 0.83a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.82 &#x000B1; 0.26a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.28 &#x000B1; 0.44b</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TN1">
<label>z</label>
<p><italic>Average values and standard deviation of 3 replicates were presented, each repeat being tested with 1 kg of fruits collected from 30 individual plants. Different letters indicate statistical differences within columns by Duncan&#x00027;s multiple range test at p &#x0003C; 0.05</italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p><bold>Contents of organic acids in the fruits of strawberry that had been cultivated under different environmental conditions</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Treatment</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Citric acid (mg 100 g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, FW)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Malic acid (mg 100 g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, FW)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Acetic acid (mg &#x000B7;100 g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, FW)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Total acids (mg 100 g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, FW)</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Jan. 10</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Feb. 10</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Mar. 10</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Jan. 10</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Feb. 10</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Mar. 10</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Jan. 10</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Feb. 10</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Mar. 10</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Jan. 10</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Feb. 10</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Mar. 10</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">UT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">426 &#x000B1; 16a<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>z</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">529 &#x000B1; 13a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">584 &#x000B1; 2a3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">207 &#x000B1; 12a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">191 &#x000B1; 25ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">263 &#x000B1; 30a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.2 &#x000B1; 1.4b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.9 &#x000B1; 5.6b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.0 &#x000B1; 2.3a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">643 &#x000B1; 24ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">737 &#x000B1; 29a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">863 &#x000B1; 29a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">369 &#x000B1; 22b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">461 &#x000B1; 53ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">487 &#x000B1; 11b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">205 &#x000B1; 12a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">214 &#x000B1; 10a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">291 &#x000B1; 10a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.5 &#x000B1; 0.7b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48.2 &#x000B1; 1.3a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.0 &#x000B1; 3.6a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">581 &#x000B1; 36b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">723 &#x000B1; 48a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">792 &#x000B1; 16b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">UF</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">451 &#x000B1; 15a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">483 &#x000B1; 64ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">493 &#x000B1; 21b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">239 &#x000B1; 36a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">196 &#x000B1; 27ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">287 &#x000B1; 22a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.3 &#x000B1; 0.4a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.3 &#x000B1; 4.9b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.8 &#x000B1; 0.8a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">679 &#x000B1; 29a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">690 &#x000B1; 21ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">791 &#x000B1; 41b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BF</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">390 &#x000B1; 45ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">422 &#x000B1; 18b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">468 &#x000B1; 26b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">218 &#x000B1; 28a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">174 &#x000B1; 10b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">281 &#x000B1; 10a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.3 &#x000B1; 4.7a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">40.3 &#x000B1; 2.6ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.7 &#x000B1; 4.9a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">618 &#x000B1; 78ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">636 &#x000B1; 28b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">763 &#x000B1; 36b</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TN2">
<label>z</label>
<p><italic>Average values and standard deviation of 3 replicates were presented, each repeat being tested with 1 kg of fruits collected from 30 individual plants. Different letters indicate statistical differences within columns by Duncan&#x00027;s multiple range test at p &#x0003C; 0.05</italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec><title>Phenolic compounds and anthocyanins</title>
<p>Effects of different regimes of light and temperature on the formation of phenolic compounds and anthocyanins in the strawberry fruits are shown in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">8</xref>. Fruits of UT and UF were found to accumulate much higher amounts of phenolic compounds and anthocyanins than those of BT and BF. When changes in the amounts of the compounds were investigated on a monthly basis from January to March, it was noted that phenolic compounds in the fruits decreased from January to February followed by a sharp increase from February to March. On the contrary, anthocyanin contents were found to be significantly elevated from January to February, followed by an equivalent decrease from February to March.</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>Figure 8</label>
<caption><p><bold>Changes in the amounts of phytochemicals contained in the strawberry fruits that had been harvested on a monthly basis during cultivation in a greenhouse under different regimes of light and temperature</bold>. Each value represents the mean of three replicates, with each replicate analyzing 1 kg fresh weight of fruits collected from thirty plants. Deviation bars indicate &#x000B1; S.D. of the means. Other remarks are as shown in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-07-01607-g0008.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec><title>The correlation between fruit yield and photosynthesis-related parameters</title>
<p>The correlation analysis was carried out between fruit production and a variety of photosynthesis-related parameters, by calculating Pearson Product Moment Correlation (Pearson, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">1895</xref>). As shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>, we found that fruit productions were closely correlated with Pr (<italic>r</italic> &#x0003D; 0.962, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01) and R<sub>fd</sub> (<italic>r</italic> &#x0003D; 0.952, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01), showing a little less correlation with Sc (<italic>r</italic> &#x0003D; 0.874, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01), Tr (<italic>r</italic> &#x0003D; 0.837, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001) and NPQ (<italic>r</italic> &#x0003D; 0.700, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001). In contrast, they were negatively correlated with Fv/Fm (<italic>r</italic> &#x0003D; &#x02212;0.735, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p><bold>Combined correlation coefficients between fruit yield and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters as well as photosynthetic parameters of strawberry plants</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Index</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Fruit yield</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Rfd</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>qP</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>NPQ</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Fv/Fm</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Pr</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Sc</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Tr</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fruit yield</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.000</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Rfd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.952<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.000</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">qP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.605<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.531<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.000</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">NPQ</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.700<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.830<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.053</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.000</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fv/Fm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.735<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.673<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.412</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.417</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.000</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pr</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.962<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.902<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.599<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.644<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.650<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.000</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.874<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.794<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.736<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.451</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.536<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.929<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.000</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tr</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.837<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.779<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.740<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.423</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.491</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.868<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.962<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.000</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TN3">
<label>&#x0002A;,&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</label>
<p><italic>Significant correlations at 5% and at 1% level (n &#x0003D; 16), respectively, by using Pearson correlation coefficients</italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>When correlation coefficients were calculated between photosynthesis rate (Pr) and related parameters, Pr showed a significant positive correlation with Sc (<italic>r</italic> &#x0003D; 0.929, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01) and R<sub>fd</sub> (<italic>r</italic> &#x0003D; 0.902, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01), with little lower correlation with Tr (<italic>r</italic> &#x0003D; 0.869, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01) and NPQ (<italic>r</italic> &#x0003D; 0.644, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01). In contrast, Pr was negatively correlated with Fv/Fm (<italic>r</italic> &#x0003D; &#x02212;0.650, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01). R<sub>fd</sub> was also positively correlated with NPQ, Sc, and Tr showing the respective correlation coefficient of 0.830 (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01), 0.794 (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01), and 0.779 (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01). Correlation coefficient between Sc and Tr was 0.962(<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01) and those between qP and Sc as well as Tr were 0.736 (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01) and 0.740 (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01), respectively. The results indicated that fruit yield of strawberry was strongly dependent on photosynthesis and other related parameters.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4"><title>Discussion</title>
<p>Plants under stressful conditions can be diagnosed by analyzing chlorophyll fluorescence imaging (Lichtenthaler and Mieh&#x000E9;, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">1997</xref>). ChlF imaging was successfully utilized to determine freezing tolerance of Arabidopsis leaves in which freezing-induced inactivation of photosynthesis were closely monitored (Ehlert and Hincha, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">2008</xref>). In the present study, when ChlF emission images from plants of UT, BT, UF, and BF were compared, it was noted that leaves of BT and BF plants showed higher PS II fluorescence than those of UT and UF plants. The results indicated that plants grown in the bottom beds were less able to carry out photosynthesis probably because they received less light by overshadowing of the upper bed. Moreover, plants of UF showed a slightly higher ChlF than those of UT (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>), suggesting that lower temperature had depressed photosynthesis slightly. Fv/Fm is a normalized ratio created by dividing variable ChlF by maximum ChlF and represents the maximal efficiency of PSII to photochemistry (Baker, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">2008</xref>). While Fv/Fm values in the range of 0.79&#x02013;0.84 are regarded optimal for many plant species, decreased values are frequently observed when plants are exposed to various stress conditions such as high light, chilling, and salinity (Jamil et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">2007</xref>; Na et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2014</xref>; Rapparini et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2015</xref>). In this study, it was noted that strawberry plants grown under BF condition of low light and low temperature showed higher Fv/Fm ratios than those plants grown under UT, UF, and BT conditions (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>). The results suggested that BF plants were in a less photoinhibited state even under low temperature probably because they were subjected to low light intensity. On the other hand, UT plants recorded higher values of NPQ, qP, and R<sub>Fd</sub> than UF, BT, and BF plants (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>), indicating that they had higher potential of performing photosynthesis. ChlF kinetic parameters of NPQ, qP, and R<sub>Fd</sub> are also useful in measuring plant stresses under adverse environmental conditions (Lichtenthaler and Mieh&#x000E9;, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">1997</xref>; Lichtenthaler and Burkart, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">1999</xref>; Zivcak et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2014</xref>). In consistent with the observation that R<sub>Fd</sub> is an indicator correlating with the photosynthetic activity of whole leaves (Lichtenthaler et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">2005</xref>). When the obtained data values of chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis as well as of related parameters were plotted on the basis of four different growth conditions (UT, BT, UF, and BF), trends of change in Pr and cumulative fruit yield showed close association qP and R<sub>Fd</sub> (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">9</xref>). We also calculated Pearson correlation coefficients between those parameters and clarified that there were significant positive correlation between fruit yield and parameters of chlorophyll fluorescence as well as of related parameters (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>). These results suggested that those parameters could be applied to predict strawberry productivity under a variety of environmental conditions. It was noted that parameters of Pr and R<sub>Fd</sub>, in particular, showed the highest correlation with fruit production, emerging themselves as promising indicators of plant productivity.</p>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>Figure 9</label>
<caption><p><bold>The relationship of the graph pattern between strawberry yield and each parameter</bold>. When UT value was represented as 1 in various parameters, BT, UF, and BF were indicated by proportion in comparison with UT. Yield value was calculated from Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7B</xref>; R<sub>Fd</sub>, qP, and NPQ values were calculated from the value measured 92 s actinic light time of Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>; Pr, Sc, and Tr values were calculated from the 800 &#x003BC;mol&#x000B7;m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>&#x000B7;s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> of Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-07-01607-g0009.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>It was previously demonstrated that the increase of growth temperature from 5 to 10&#x000B0;C resulted in the promotion of rubisco activity and CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation of several plant species (Sage and Sharkey, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">1987</xref>). The present study showed that strawberry leaves grown under BF or UF condition had lower CO<sub>2</sub> fixation than those grown under BT or UT conditions. In January when the intensity of ambient light becomes weaker, a rise in the growth temperature rather than light played a pivotal role in the promotion of photosynthetic rate (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>). When CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation of whole leaves was examined, plants of BT and BF showed a rapid decline around 3:00 p.m. probably due to shortage of light rather than changes in stomatal conductance or transpiration rate (Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S2</xref>; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>). In January or February when the ambient light gets weaker, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate were found to be significantly dependent on the changes in the growth temperature.</p>
<p>Amounts of photosynthetic pigments markedly declined during the course of cultivation (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref>). Chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> content showed almost a linear decline from January to March, while chlorophyll <italic>b</italic> and carotenoid content began to decrease from February. When compared between plants grown under different conditions, plants of BT and BF grown under lower light showed a higher content of these pigments relatively to those of UT and UF grown under higher light (Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S2</xref>; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref>), indicating that light intensity is more important than the growth temperature in the production of photosynthetic pigments. An earlier work done by Lichtenthaler and Burkart (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">1999</xref>) showed that plants grown under high light had lower amount of chlorophylls per chloroplast, high chlorophyll a/b ratio, and high CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation rate. They also reported that the production of chloroplast starch was greatly increased in the plants grown under sunlight as compared with those grown under shading.</p>
<p>When the fruit production of strawberry was compared between plants grown under different environmental conditions, the highest yield at the end of cultivation was observed in the plants of UT, sequentially followed by those of UF, BT, and BF (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref>). In other words, plants grown under higher light conditions showed greater fruit production than those grown under lowered light. The results indicate that the light intensity serves a crucial role in the production of fruits, probably resulting from the higher photosynthetic performances displayed by plants grown under higher light.</p>
<p>During January and February when ambient light intensity is lowered, there was a temporary elevation of fruit production in plants of BT under lower light as compared with those of UF under higher light (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7B,C</xref>). In those periods when light intensity remains weaker and the average of ambient daylight integral was less than 13 mol&#x000B7;m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>&#x000B7;d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> up to February, the growth temperature was found to have exerted a small but clear influence on the fruit production. Entering into March when the daylight integral was rapidly increased over 19 mol&#x000B7;m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>&#x000B7;d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, light intensity began to exercise a stronger influence on the fruit production (Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S2</xref>; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref>). When fruit production was compared between plants of BT and BF, both grown under lower light, BT plants showed a much more production than BF plants. The results suggested that in the presence of the same light intensity a rise in the growth temperature could promote the fruit production.</p>
<p>When the contents of soluble sugars as well as organic acids were examined in the fruits harvested at the end of the cultivation, UT and UF plants showed a higher amount than BT and BF plants. Here again, light intensity was more important than the growth temperature in the accumulation of these metabolites (Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). Contents of phytochemicals in the fruits were also significantly dependent on the changes in the ambient light intensity of the greenhouse.</p>
<p>When the photosynthetic rates and related parameters measured from strawberry plants were plotted against different combinations of light and temperature during cultivation, it became evident that fruit productivity was correlated with qP, R<sub>Fd</sub>, NPQ, Pr, Sc, and Tr. On the other hand, Fv/Fm ratio was found to have negative correlation with fruit yield (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">9</xref>). Moreover, we came to realize that even during winter season when the ambient light grows weaker and the average daylight integral falls below 13 mol&#x000B7;m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>&#x000B7;d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, increasing the growth temperature resulted in the promotion of photosynthetic performances followed by further improvement of fruit production. Those findings are expected to possibly give a new insight regarding the operation of strawberry industry during winter season.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5"><title>Author contributions</title>
<p>HC planned the study, conducted the experiment, analyzed the data, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. BM revised the analysis of the data and edited the manuscript. NK involved within statistics section and modified the manuscript.</p>
<sec><title>Conflict of interest statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack><p>This study received financial assistance from the Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea (Project No. PJ011264) and the Technology Development Program for Agriculture and Forestry, Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Republic of Korea (Project No. 315004-5). We thank Khoshimkhujaev Bekhzod for technical support.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s6"><title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2016.01607/full#supplementary-material">http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2016.01607/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ali</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hahn</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paek</surname> <given-names>K. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Effects of light intensities on antioxidant enzymes and malondialdehyde content during short-term acclimatization on micropropagated <italic>Phalaenopsis</italic> plantlet</article-title>. <source>Environ. Exper. Bot.</source> <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>109</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>120</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.06.005</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ashraf</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harris</surname> <given-names>P. J. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Photosynthesis under stressful environments: an overview</article-title>. <source>Photosynthetica</source> <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>163</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>190</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11099-013-0021-6</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baker</surname> <given-names>N. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosynthesis <italic>in vivo</italic></article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>59</volume>, <fpage>89</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>113</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092759</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18444897</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barbieri</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vallone</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Orsini</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paradiso</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Pascale</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zakharov</surname> <given-names>F. N.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Stomatal density and metabolic determinants mediate salt stress adaptation and water use efficiency in basil (<italic>Ocimum basilicum</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Physiol</source>. <volume>169</volume>, <fpage>1737</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1746</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jplph.2012.07.001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22840325</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Biswal</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Biswal</surname> <given-names>U. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Photosynthesis under stress: stress signals and adaptive response of chloroplasts,</article-title> in <source>Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress</source>, ed <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Pessarakli</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Marcel Dekker, Inc.</publisher-name>), <fpage>315</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>336</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Choi</surname> <given-names>H. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moon</surname> <given-names>B. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>N. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Effects of LED light on the production of strawberry during cultivation in a plastic greenhouse and in a growth chamber</article-title>. <source>Sci. Hort</source>. <volume>189</volume>, <fpage>22</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>31</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2015.03.022</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Choi</surname> <given-names>H. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moon</surname> <given-names>B. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>N. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kwon</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bekhzod</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>K. S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Yield loss and quality degradation of strawberry fruits cultivated under the deficient insolation conditions by shading</article-title>. <source>Hort. Environ. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>55</volume>, <fpage>263</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>270</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13580-014-0039-0</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>de Kreij</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Voogt</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baas</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <source>Nutrient Solution and Water Quality for Soilless Cultures</source>. Brochure 196. Research Station for Floriculture and glasshouse vegetables (PBG) Naaldwijk.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Low light intensity effects on the growth, photosynthetic characteristics, antioxidant capacity, yield and quality of wheat (<italic>Triticum aestivum</italic> L.) at different growth stages in BLSS</article-title>. <source>Adv. Space Res</source>. <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>1557</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1566</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.asr.2014.02.004</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ehlert</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hincha</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging accurately quantifies freezing damage and cold acclimation responses in Arabidopsis leaves</article-title>. <source>Plant Methods</source> <volume>4</volume>:<fpage>12</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1746-4811-4-12</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18505561</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Agarwal</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dev</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prakash</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arya</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Assessment of photosynthetic potential of indoor plants under cold stress</article-title>. <source>Photosynthetica</source> <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>138</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>142</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11099-015-0173-7</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hussey</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1963</year>). <article-title>Growth and development in the young tomato: I. The effect of temperature and light intensity on growth of the shoot apex and leaf primordia. <italic>J. Exp</italic></article-title>. <source>Bot.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>316</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>325</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jamil</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rehman</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rha</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Salinity reduced growth PS2 photochemistry and chlorophyll content in radish</article-title>. <source>Sci. Agr</source>. <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>111</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>118</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S0103-90162007000200002</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Keren</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berg</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Kan</surname> <given-names>P. J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Levanon</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ohad</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Mechanism of photosystem II photoinactivation and DI protein degradation at low light: the role of back electron flow</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>94</volume>, <fpage>1579</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1584</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11038602</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bae</surname> <given-names>R. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chun</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Changes in bioactive compounds contents of &#x02018;Maehyang&#x02019; and &#x02018;Seolhyang&#x02019; strawberry fruits by UV light illumination</article-title>. <source>Kor. J. Hortic. Sci. Technol</source>. <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>172</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>180</lpage>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Article/NODE01649835">http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Article/NODE01649835</ext-link></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kucharik</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Serbin</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Impacts of recent climate change on Wisconsin corn and soybean yield trends</article-title>. <source>Environ. Res. Lett.</source> <volume>3</volume>:<fpage>034003</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1748-9326/3/3/034003</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lafta</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lorenzen</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Effect of high temperature on plant growth and carbohydrate metabolism in potato</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol</source>. <volume>109</volume>, <fpage>637</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>643</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12228617</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hong</surname> <given-names>Y. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chow</surname> <given-names>W. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Photoinactivation of photosystem II complexes and photoprotection by non-functional neighbours in <italic>Capsicum annuum</italic> L. leaves</article-title>. <source>Planta</source> <volume>212</volume>, <fpage>332</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>342</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s004250000398</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11289597</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lichtenthaler</surname> <given-names>H. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes</article-title>. <source>Methods Enzymol.</source> <volume>148</volume>, <fpage>351</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>382</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lichtenthaler</surname> <given-names>H. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Burkart</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Photosynthesis and high light stress</article-title>. <source>Bulg. J. Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>3</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>16</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5539/jas.v7n6p69</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lichtenthaler</surname> <given-names>H. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buschmann</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>D&#x000F6;ll</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fietz</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bach</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kozel</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>1981</year>). <article-title>Photosynthetic activity, chloroplast ultrastructure, and leaf characteristics of high-light and low-light plants and of sun and shade leaves</article-title>. <source>Photosynth. Res.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>115</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>141</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00028752</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24470202</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lichtenthaler</surname> <given-names>H. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buschmann</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knapp</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>How to correctly determine the different chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and the chlorophyll fluorescence decrease ratio R<sub>Fd</sub> of leaves with the PAM fluorometer</article-title>. <source>Photosynthetica</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>379</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>393</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11099-005-0062-6</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lichtenthaler</surname> <given-names>H. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mieh&#x000E9;</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Fluorescence imaging as a diagnostic tool for plant stress</article-title>. <source>Trends Plant Sci</source>. <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>316</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>320</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1360-1385(97)89954-2</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>B. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>J. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Effects of low light on agronomic and physiological characteristics of rice including grain yield and quality</article-title>. <source>Rice Sci.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>243</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>251</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1672-6308(13)60192-4</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maxwell</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>G. N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Chlorophyll fluorescence-a practical guide</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>659</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>668</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/51.345.659</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10938857</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miyashita</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tanakamaru</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maitani</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kimura</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Recovery responses of photosynthesis, transpiration, and stomatal conductance in kidney bean following drought stress</article-title>. <source>Environ. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>205</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>214</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.03.015</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Na</surname> <given-names>Y. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jeong</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choi</surname> <given-names>H. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rho</surname> <given-names>I. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Chlorophyll fluorescence as a diagnostic tool for abiotic stress tolerance in wild and cultivated strawberry species</article-title>. <source>Hort. Environ. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>55</volume>, <fpage>280</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>286</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13580-014-0006-9</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pearson</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1895</year>). <article-title>Notes on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents</article-title>. <source>Proc. R. Soc. Lond.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>240</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>242</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rapparini</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neri</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mihailova</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petkova</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Georgieva</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Growth irradiance affects the photoprotective mechanisms of the resurrection angiosperm <italic>Haberlea rhodopensis</italic> Friv. in response to desiccation and rehydration at morphological, physiological and biochemical levels</article-title>. <source>Environ. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>113</volume>, <fpage>67</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>79</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.01.007</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sage</surname> <given-names>R. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharkey</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>The effect of temperature on the occurrence of O<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> insensitive photosynthesis in field grown plants</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol</source>. <volume>84</volume>, <fpage>658</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>664</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16665498</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schneider</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ziegler</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Melzer</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Growth towards light as an adaptation to high light conditions in <italic>Chara</italic> branches</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>172</volume>, <fpage>83</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>91</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01812.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16945091</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Slinkard</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singleton</surname> <given-names>V. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1977</year>). <article-title>Total phenol analysis; automation and comparison with manual methods. <italic>Am. J. Enol</italic></article-title>. <source>Viticult.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>49</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>55</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tulipani</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mezzetti</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Capocasa</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bompadre</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beekwilder</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ric-devos</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Antioxidants, phenolic compounds, and nutritional quality of different strawberry genotypes</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Food Chem.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>696</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>704</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jf0719959</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18211027</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Changes in strawberry phenolics, anthocyanins, and antioxidant capacity in response to high oxygen treatments</article-title>. <source>LWT Food Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>49</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>57</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.lwt.2005.08.013</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zivcak</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brestic</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kalaji</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Govindjee</surname></name></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Photosynthetic responses of sun- and shade-grown barley leaves to high light: is the lower PSII connectivity in shade leaves associated with protection against excess of light</article-title>. <source>Photosynth. Res.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>339</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>354</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11120-014-9969-8</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<glossary>
<def-list>
<title>Abbreviations</title>
<def-item><term>BF</term>
<def><p>bottom bed of the greenhouse kept at temperatures not lower than 5&#x000B0;C</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>BT</term>
<def><p>bottom bed of the greenhouse kept at temperatures not lower than 10&#x000B0;C</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>ChlF</term>
<def><p>chlorophyll fluorescence</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>dS m<sup>&#x02212;1</sup></term>
<def><p>deci Siemens per meter</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>EC</term>
<def><p>electrical conductivity</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>Fv/Fm</term>
<def><p>ratio of variable fluorescence to maximal fluorescence indicating maximum quantum yield of photosystem II photochemistry in the dark-adapted state</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>HL</term>
<def><p>high light</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>HT</term>
<def><p>high temperature</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>LL</term>
<def><p>low light</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>LT</term>
<def><p>low temperature</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>Pr</term>
<def><p>photosynthetic rate</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>PS II</term>
<def><p>photosystem II</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>R<sub>Fd</sub></term>
<def><p>variable chlorophyll fluorescence decrease ratio</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>Sc</term>
<def><p>stomatal conductance</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>Tr</term>
<def><p>transpiration rate</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>UF</term>
<def><p>upper bed of the greenhouse kept at temperatures not lower than 5&#x000B0;C</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>UT</term>
<def><p>upper bed of the greenhouse kept at temperatures not lower than 10&#x000B0;C.</p></def></def-item>
</def-list>
</glossary> 
</back>
</article>