<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2016.01036</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Partial Activation of SA- and JA-Defensive Pathways in Strawberry upon <italic>Colletotrichum acutatum</italic> Interaction</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Amil-Ruiz</surname> <given-names>Francisco</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/345095/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Garrido-Gala</surname> <given-names>Jos&#x000E9;</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/354066/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Gadea</surname> <given-names>Jos&#x000E9;</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/359909/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Blanco-Portales</surname> <given-names>Rosario</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/359848/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Mu&#x000F1;oz-M&#x000E9;rida</surname> <given-names>Antonio</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Trelles</surname> <given-names>Oswaldo</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>de los Santos</surname> <given-names>Berta</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/359897/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Arroyo</surname> <given-names>Francisco T.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/149291/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Aguado-Puig</surname> <given-names>Ana</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Romero</surname> <given-names>Fernando</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Mercado</surname> <given-names>Jos&#x000E9;-&#x000C1;ngel</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/359927/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Pliego-Alfaro</surname> <given-names>Fernando</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/359984/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Mu&#x000F1;oz-Blanco</surname> <given-names>Juan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/320750/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Caballero</surname> <given-names>Jos&#x000E9; L.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/354059/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Departamento de Bioqu&#x000ED;mica y Biolog&#x000ED;a Molecular e Instituto Andaluz de Biotecnolog&#x000ED;a, Edificio Severo Ochoa (C6), Universidad de C&#x000F3;rdoba</institution> <country>C&#x000F3;rdoba, Spain</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Instituto de Biolog&#x000ED;a Molecular y Celular de Plantas, Universidad Polit&#x000E9;cnica de Valencia&#x02013;Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cient&#x000ED;ficas</institution> <country>Valencia, Spain</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Departamento de Arquitectura de Computaci&#x000F3;n, Universidad de M&#x000E1;laga, Campus de Teatinos</institution> <country>M&#x000E1;laga, Spain</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Centro Andalusian Institute of Agricultural and Fishering Research and Training (IFAPA) Las Torres-Tomejil, CAPMA&#x02013;Junta de Andaluc&#x000ED;a</institution> <country>Sevilla, Spain</country></aff>
<aff id="aff5"><sup>5</sup><institution>Departamento de Biolog&#x000ED;a Vegetal, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de M&#x000E1;laga, Campus de Teatinos</institution> <country>M&#x000E1;laga, Spain</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Abdul Latif Khan, University of Nizwa, Oman</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Lei Zhang, North Carolina State University, USA; Marcos Egea-Cortines, Universidad Polit&#x000E9;cnica Cartagena, Spain</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001"><p>&#x0002A;Correspondence: Jos&#x000E9; L. Caballero <email>bb1carej&#x00040;uco.es</email></p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002"><p>This article was submitted to Plant Biotic Interactions, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>15</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>7</volume>
<elocation-id>1036</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>26</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2016</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>01</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2016</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2016 Amil-Ruiz, Garrido-Gala, Gadea, Blanco-Portales, Mu&#x000F1;oz-M&#x000E9;rida, Trelles, de los Santos, Arroyo, Aguado-Puig, Romero, Mercado, Pliego-Alfaro, Mu&#x000F1;oz-Blanco and Caballero.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2016</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Amil-Ruiz, Garrido-Gala, Gadea, Blanco-Portales, Mu&#x000F1;oz-M&#x000E9;rida, Trelles, de los Santos, Arroyo, Aguado-Puig, Romero, Mercado, Pliego-Alfaro, Mu&#x000F1;oz-Blanco and Caballero</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract><p>Understanding the nature of pathogen host interaction may help improve strawberry (<italic>Fragaria</italic> &#x000D7; <italic>ananassa</italic>) cultivars. Plant resistance to pathogenic agents usually operates through a complex network of defense mechanisms mediated by a diverse array of signaling molecules. In strawberry, resistance to a variety of pathogens has been reported to be mostly polygenic and quantitatively inherited, making it difficult to associate molecular markers with disease resistance genes. <italic>Colletotrichum acutatum</italic> spp. is a major strawberry pathogen, and completely resistant cultivars have not been reported. Moreover, strawberry defense network components and mechanisms remain largely unknown and poorly understood. Assessment of the strawberry response to <italic>C. acutatum</italic> included a global transcript analysis, and acidic hormones SA and JA measurements were analyzed after challenge with the pathogen. Induction of transcripts corresponding to the SA and JA signaling pathways and key genes controlling major steps within these defense pathways was detected. Accordingly, SA and JA accumulated in strawberry after infection. Contrastingly, induction of several important SA, JA, and oxidative stress-responsive defense genes, including <italic>FaPR1-1, FaLOX2, FaJAR1, FaPDF1</italic>, and <italic>FaGST1</italic>, was not detected, which suggests that specific branches in these defense pathways (those leading to <italic>FaPR1-2, FaPR2-1, FaPR2-2, FaAOS, FaPR5</italic>, and <italic>FaPR10)</italic> were activated. Our results reveal that specific aspects in SA and JA dependent signaling pathways are activated in strawberry upon interaction with <italic>C. acutatum</italic>. Certain described defense-associated transcripts related to these two known signaling pathways do not increase in abundance following infection. This finding suggests new insight into a specific putative molecular strategy for defense against this pathogen.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group><kwd><italic>Colletotrichum acutatum</italic></kwd>
<kwd><italic>Fragaria</italic> &#x000D7; <italic>ananassa</italic></kwd>
<kwd>quantification of gene expression</kwd>
<kwd>salicylic and jasmonic acid</kwd>
<kwd>strawberry defense response</kwd></kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn001">P07-AGR-02482</contract-num>
<contract-num rid="cn001">P12-AGR-2174</contract-num>
<contract-num rid="cn001">Grupo-BIO278</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Consejer&#x000ED;a de Econom&#x000ED;a, Innovaci&#x000F3;n, Ciencia y Empleo, Junta de Andaluc&#x000ED;a<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100002878</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="8"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="89"/>
<page-count count="23"/>
<word-count count="13611"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Strawberry fruit (<italic>Fragaria</italic> &#x000D7; <italic>ananassa</italic> Duch.) is of great importance throughout the world due to its flavor and nutritious qualities [FAOSTAT (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://faostat.fao.org/">http://faostat.fao.org/</ext-link>)] (Freeman et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2001</xref>). However, strawberry exhibits wide diversity in its susceptibility to a large variety of phytopathogenic organisms, including <italic>Colletotrichum</italic> spp., which are major pathogens of this crop (Simpson, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">1991</xref>; Maas, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">1998</xref>), requiring excessive use of chemical agents for disease control. Breeding for resistance by crossing in natural resistance mechanisms found in related genotypes lead to more sustainable farming with fewer chemical inputs. However, resistance to a variety of pathogens is generally polygenic and quantitatively inherited (Amil-Ruiz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">2011</xref>), making it difficult to associate single molecular markers with disease resistance genes.</p>
<p>Understanding the molecular interplay between plant and microbes has led to identification of candidate genes that have been used in developing transgenic strategies and breeding efforts to increase resistance against specific pathogens in many plants (Tohidfar and Khosravi, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">2015</xref>). Plant resistance to pathogenic agents usually operates through a complex defense mechanism network. Compounds such as salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), and ethylene (ET) regulate plant defense pathways to trigger appropriate responses to different pathogens (Robert-Seilaniantz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">2011</xref>). Whereas the SA signaling pathway is mainly activated against biotrophic pathogens, the JA/ET signaling pathway is activated against necrotrophic pathogens. Interplay and antagonism between these signaling pathways has also been described (Robert-Seilaniantz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">2011</xref>). Pathogens have evolved to overcome plant immunity mechanisms by disrupting the fine crosstalk between these defense pathways (El Oirdi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2011</xref>; Rahman et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">2012</xref>; Chung et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2013</xref>).</p>
<p>In Arabidopsis, genetic markers have been identified to denote activation of canonical SA- and JA defense pathways. Both <italic>PAD4</italic> and <italic>EDS1</italic> activate SA biosynthesis, and both are also SA induced (Rust&#x000E9;rucci et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">2001</xref>; Venugopal et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">2009</xref>). <italic>PR1</italic> and <italic>PR2</italic> are known pathogen- and SA-responsive genes, which are well-established markers for the <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> defense responses against <italic>P. syringae</italic> (Uknes et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">1992</xref>). <italic>WRKY70</italic> encodes a transcription factor and is an important regulator in the interplay of SA- and JA-related plant defense responses (Li et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">2004</xref>). <italic>AOS</italic> encodes an allene oxide synthase, which is responsible for JA synthesis, and its expression is also regulated by this hormone (Turner et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">2002</xref>). <italic>PDF1.2</italic> and <italic>JAR1</italic> are genes that are commonly used to monitor JA responses (Staswick and Tiryaki, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">2004</xref>; Pieterse et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">2009</xref>), whereas <italic>LOX2</italic>, which is involved in JA biosynthesis, is activated by a positive feedback loop (Sasaki et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">2001</xref>). <italic>GST1</italic> is part of the array of defense-related genes induced in response to oxidative burst produced after pathogen infection (Bhattacharjee, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2012</xref>). This gene encodes a glutathione S-transferase that is known to play a key role in reactive oxygen species (ROS) detoxification and reduction.</p>
<p>In strawberry, isolation of individual genes related to plant defense has been previously reported (Amil-Ruiz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">2011</xref>). Furthermore, Casado-D&#x000ED;az et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2006</xref>) first reported isolation of a large set of genes with altered expression during strawberry and <italic>C. acutatum</italic> interaction. Over the last decade, microarrays have proved to be a valuable tool to analyze the expression of thousands of genes on a simultaneous basis, contributing to elucidate the underlying networks of gene regulation that lead to a wide variety of defense responses. Thus, Maleck et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">2000</xref>) have provided a comprehensive description of the SAR genes from <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic>. Wang et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">2005</xref>) reported that SAR requires protein secretory pathway induction. Further, microarrays have led to numerous findings of key regulatory genes for defense signaling as well as valuable end-point genes whose products display direct action against pest and diseases (Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">2006</xref>; Sarowar et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">2011</xref>). In addition, microarray analysis has demonstrated a substantial crosstalk among different defense signaling pathways (Schenk et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">2003</xref>) and ultimately among genes and their products, and the entire pathways are not always tuned by signaling (Lodha and Basak, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">2012</xref>). In strawberry, microarrays have also been used to analyze gene expression differences between white and red fruit after 24 h interaction with <italic>C. acutatum</italic> and provision of certain data from factors associated with pathogen quiescence during fruit immature stages (Guidarelli et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2011</xref>). However, strawberry defense network components remain largely unknown or poorly understood, and accurate mechanisms remain elusive.</p>
<p>In this report, a transcriptomic approach has been used to identify pathogen-responsive genes in <italic>F</italic> &#x000D7; <italic>ananassa</italic> strawberry crown and petiole, key sites of <italic>C. acutatum</italic> infection. Transcript accumulation was also monitored in response to SA and JA treatments. Synthesis of SA and JA signaling molecules was also analyzed. These trials reveal changes in the transcriptomic profile of plants challenged with <italic>C. acutatum</italic> and present a hypothesis about a strategy potentially used by this pathogen to overcome strawberry defense. These data deepen our understanding of the complex genetic and molecular mechanisms of strawberry defense.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials and methods" id="s2">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Plant materials, pathogen inoculation, and hormonal treatments</title>
<p>Plant culture (<italic>Fragaria</italic> &#x000D7; <italic>ananassa</italic> cultivar Camarosa) and growth conditions, <italic>C. acutatum</italic> (isolate CECT 20240) inoculation, and treatments with chemicals have been previously described (Encinas-Villarejo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2009</xref>). In breaf, 8-week-old strawberry plantlets were placed in 20 cm diameter plastic pots containing sterilized peat and grown for a minimum of 6 additional weeks prior to mock or pathogen inoculation by spraying a spore suspension of 10<sup>4</sup> conidia&#x000B7;ml<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>. Crown was collected 5 days after treatment (spray-infected and mock-treated) for microarray studies. At this time, under our experimental conditions, plants still looked healthy, and no visible disease symptoms were easily detected, even in petioles, crowns or leaves. For RTqPCR analysis, crowns and petioles were collected 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 days after treatment, as previously described in Casado-D&#x000ED;az et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2006</xref>). For treatment and hormonal content analysis, axenic <italic>in-vitro</italic> plantlets were used and aseptically sprayed with either MeJa (2 mM) or SA (5 mM) solutions, or inoculated with <italic>C. acutatum</italic> conidia suspension (10<sup>4</sup> conidia&#x000B7;ml<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>), respectively. All collected plants were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at &#x02212;80&#x000B0;C until use. For transmission electron microscopy, pathogen was spot inoculated in crown by applying 50-&#x003BC;L droplets of conidia suspension (10<sup>6</sup> conidia&#x000B7;ml<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) (Arroyo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2005</xref>). Control plants were similarly inoculated with 50 &#x003BC;L of sterile distilled water. The position of each infection site was marked for reference. Inoculated plants were enclosed in plastic bags for 48 h to maintain high relative humidity and incubated in similar conditions as described above. Hence, disease is forced to progress quicker than by spraying.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Light microscopic fungal development observation</title>
<p>Light microscopy analyses of <italic>C. acutatum</italic> development were performed on strawberry leaf discs (10 mm diameter) randomly excised from infected leaflet at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 dpi, using a method modified from Debode et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2009</xref>). In breaf, leaf discs were cleared in 0.15% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) in a 3:1 (v/v) mixture of ethanol and chloroform for 48 h, with at least three changes of the bleaching solution, rinsed briefly in lactoglycerol and incubated at room temperature for 1 h in lactophenol blue (Sigma), and washed 3 times in lactoglycerol. For ROS detection, leaf discs were infiltrated in a 10 mg/ml DAB (3,3&#x02032; -diaminobenzidine, Sigma) solution for 10 min and subsequently incubated overnight at room temperature in dark, and cleared for 24 h in 3:1 (v/v) ethanol: glacial acetic acid with three changes. Treated leaf disc was mounted in 50% fresh glycerol on glass slides and examined using a Leica DM5000B microscope. Images were captured with a Leica DC500 digital camera. Three leaftlets were sampled from each plant, and 3 plants were observed at each time point. The overall number of conidia (germinated and non-germinated) and appresoria were counted per leaf disc taken up to 9 dpi.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)</title>
<p>Strips of tissue &#x0007E;1 mm thick and 1&#x02013;2 mm long were removed from beneath the inoculation droplets and fixed in 4% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in 0.1 mol&#x000B7;L &#x02013;1cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) for 3 h at 4&#x000B0;C. Upon rinsing in the same buffer, tissues were post-fixed in 1% (w/v) osmium tetroxide for 2 h at 4&#x000B0;C and subsequently dehydrated in a graded acetone series and embedded in EMBED-812 (Polysciences, Warrington, Penn.) according to manufacturer&#x00027;s instructions. Slides with semithin sections (0.5 &#x003BC;m) were placed on a hotplate at 50&#x000B0;C, stained for 1 min with 0.1% aqueous toluidine blue O and examined using a light microscope (Leitz Aristoplan). Ultrathin 60&#x02013;80 nm sections were made with a Reichert-Jung Ultracut E ultramicrotome and a diamond knife, and collected on 300-mesh copper grids (Dashek and Mayfield 2000). Grids were stained with 7% aqueous uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Sections were observed and images were collected using a Philips CM-10 transmission electron microscope (TEM).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Total RNA extraction and real-time qPCR</title>
<p>Total RNA from strawberry tissues was isolated as described previously (Casado-D&#x000ED;az et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2006</xref>), treated with DnaseI (Invitrogen) for residual DNA removal, and further purified with the RNeasy MinElute Cleanup Kit (QIAGEN). Purified RNA was quantified by NanoDrop 1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo scientific). RNA integrity was checked using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Deutschland). First-strand cDNA synthesis was carried out using 1 &#x003BC;g of purified total RNA as template for a 20 &#x003BC;L reaction [iScript cDNA Synthesis kit (Bio-Rad)]. RT reactions were diluted 5-fold with nuclease-free water prior to qPCR.</p>
<p>Specific primer pairs set were designed using Oligo Primer Analysis software version 6.65, tested by dissociation curve analysis, and verified for absence of non-specific amplification (Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S1</xref>). FaGAPDH2 gene was used for normalization (Khan and Shih, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2004</xref>; Amil-Ruiz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2013</xref>). RTqPCR runs were performed using two technical replicates in the same run and three biological replicates in different runs, as described previously (Encinas-Villarejo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2009</xref>), using SsoAdvanced&#x02122; SYBR&#x000AE; Green supermix, and MyIQ v1.004 and iCycler v3.1 real-time PCR systems (Bio-Rad).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Microarray analysis and strawberry gene annotation</title>
<p>For microarray analysis, strawberry samples were collected 5 days after treatment (spray-infected and mock-treated). Crowns were used to make biological replicates, and overall RNA was isolated from three independent biological replicates for hybridization against a proprietary microarray representing approximately 2529 predicted unigenes from <italic>F. vesca</italic> (Shulaev et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">2011</xref>), previously identified from strawberry libraries (Casado-D&#x000ED;az et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2006</xref>; and JL Caballero unpublished). Microarray data with accession <ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="GSE56296">GSE56296</ext-link> were deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. Quality control, labeling, hybridization, and scanning were carried out by the SCAI, University of C&#x000F3;rdoba (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.uco.es/servicios/scai/index.html">http://www.uco.es/servicios/scai/index.html</ext-link>), following the Genomic Unit guidelines. Microarray images were analyzed using GenePix 6.0 software (Molecular Devices). Data were transformed using an intensity-based Lowess function (Yang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">2002</xref>) with Acuity 4.0 software (Axon Instruments). Genes were considered as differentially expressed if they fulfilled both a FDR &#x0003C; 0.05 after a SAM test analysis (Tusher et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">2001</xref>), and the fold-change (up or down) was above 1.75-fold.</p>
<p>To assign a putative biological function to every detected differentially expressed gene, their respective orthologous genes from the wild species <italic>F. vesca</italic>, which genome has been recently released (Shulaev et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">2011</xref>), were identified by blasting the EST sequence associated with each singular spot within the array to the overall collection of <italic>F. vesca</italic> predicted genes (Altschul et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">1990</xref>; Shulaev et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">2011</xref>; <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.rosaceae.org/">http://www.rosaceae.org/</ext-link>). In order to enrich this process, <italic>A. thaliana</italic> putative orthologs were also identified for every <italic>F</italic> &#x000D7; <italic>ananassa</italic> gene as vast functional information is available for the former species (TAIR10: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.arabidopsis.org/">http://www.arabidopsis.org/</ext-link>). FunCat and GO terms assignments were first used to perform an automated functional categorization of differentially expressed genes (Ashburner et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2000</xref>; Ruepp et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">2004</xref>). FatiGO tool (a web tool to find significant associations of Gene Ontology terms with gene groups; Ashburner et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2000</xref>; Ruepp et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">2004</xref>) was used to perform a comprehensive Singular Enrichment Analysis (SEA) to extract relevant GO terms associated with up-regulated genes. Briefly stated, it takes two lists of genes (ideally a group of interest and the remaining genes in the experiment, while any two groups, formed in any way, can be tested against each other) and converts them into two lists of GO annotations using the corresponding gene or protein&#x02014;term annotation table. A Fisher&#x00027;s exact test for 2 &#x000D7; 2 contingency tables is subsequently used to check for significant over-representation of GO annotations in one of the sets with respect to the other. Multiple test correction to account for the multiple hypotheses tested (one for each functional term) is applied. The terms are considered to be relevant by the application of statistical tests, as described in Al-Shahrour et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2004</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Hormone determination in strawberry tissues</title>
<p>Extraction and purification procedures and chromatographic analysis have been previously described (Durgbanshi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2005</xref>). In short, 3 grams of frozen green tissue were lyophilized and immediately homogenized in 5 mL of ultrapure water. After centrifugation (5000 g, 10 min), supernatant pH was adjusted to 2.8 with 15% (v/v) CH3COOH, and the supernatant was partitioned twice against an equal volume of diethyl ether. The aqueous phase was discarded and the organic fraction was vacuum evaporated at room temperature. The solid residue was resuspended in 1 mL of a 90:10 (v/v) water/methanol solution and subsequently filtered through a cellulose acetate filter (0.22 &#x003BC;m). A 20 &#x003BC;L aliquot of this solution was then injected into the high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system from Waters, Milford MA (Alliance 2690 system). Aliquots were injected on a Nucleosil ODS reversed-phase column. Phytohormones were eluted with a gradient of methanol and 0.01% CH3COOH in water that started from 10:90 (v/v) and linearly reached 60:40 (v/v) in 10 min. In the following 4 min, the gradient was increased to 80:20 (v/v). Isocratic conditions of 80:20 (v/v) were then retained during the last 2 min of the run. Initial conditions were restored and allowed to equilibrate for 5 min, for a total time of 21 min per sample. The solvent flow rate was 0.3 mL/min, with working pressures at around 70&#x02013;100 bar.</p>
<p>Quoted plant hormone endogenous contents are mean values from 2 measurements of each of all 3 biological replicates. The One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with a Bonferroni Multiple Comparisons Test was performed using GraphPad InStat3 for Windows (GraphPad Software, La Jolla California USA, <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.graphpad.com">www.graphpad.com</ext-link>) to calculate the significant differences between control and inoculated plants.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title>Monitoring <italic>C. acutatum</italic> development in plant tissue</title>
<p>The histopathology of the interaction strawberry-<italic>C. acutatum</italic> has been previously reported (Curry et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2002</xref>), and the transition to the necrotrophic phase was established after 4 dpi (Horowitz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">2002</xref>). However, fungal colonization in plant may vary with infection conditions. Thus, we monitored the infection progress of <italic>C. acutatum</italic> on strawberry plant after artificial inoculation (spraying) using microscopic analysis.</p>
<p>To identify the initial infection stages, conidial development was monitored. The number of ungerminated conidia, germinated conidia without forming appresoria, and germinated conidia with fully developed appressoria, was monitored 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 dpi (days post-inoculation; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>). No visual disease symptoms were detected in the plant during this period of time. At 5 dpi 44.76% of conidia registered fully developed appresoria (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1A</xref>). Other conidia did not germinate (34.98%); others, while they did, they did not produce appresoria (20.24%). Early mycelium formation was observed microscopically at 5 dpi (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1D</xref>), whereas more extended and abundant mycelium was detected at 7 and 9 dpi, respectively (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1E,F</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p><bold><italic>Colletotrichum acutatum</italic> development in strawberry tissue. (A)</bold> Progression of <italic>C. acutatum</italic> isolate CECT 20240 conidial germination. <bold>(B&#x02013;F)</bold> Photomicrographs of <italic>C. acutatum</italic> structures formed during infection of strawberry leaves over a 9-days period. <bold>(B)</bold> Non germinated conidia at 1 dpi; <bold>(C)</bold> Germinated conidia after 3 dpi; <bold>(D,E)</bold> Appressorium and mycelium development at 5 and 7 dpi, respectively; <bold>(F)</bold> Abundant mycelium at 9 dpi. All bars 25 &#x003BC;m.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-07-01036-g0001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>As pathogen development in crown it is difficult to monitor by optical microscopy in the same way as aerial tissues, the progress of pathogen development in crown was monitored using TEM with the inoculation methods presented in Arroyo et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2005</xref>) (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>). Such higher concentration of inoculum expedited infection development. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2A</xref> shows penetration peg formation through the host cuticle and a small infection vesicle, 36 h post-inoculation (hpi), which reflects the establishment of the biotrophic stage of <italic>C. acutatum</italic>. No morphological signs of cuticular component degradation were observed during this penetration phase. Necrotic signals appeared as early as 4 dpi (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2B</xref>), and pathogen development clearly expanded throughout vascular tissue at 7 dpi (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2C</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p><bold>Transmission Electronic Microscopy (TEM) in strawberry crown. (A)</bold> Penetration of cuticle and biotrophic stage of <italic>C. acutatum</italic> by subcuticular hyphae on wall epidermal cell 36 h post-inoculation. <bold>(B)</bold> Necrotrophic signals of development of <italic>C. acutatum</italic> by intercellular hypha 4 days post-inoculation. <bold>(C)</bold> Necrotrophic development of <italic>C. acutatum</italic> by intracellular hyphae in xylem tissues at 7 dpi. A, appresorium; C, plant cuticle; IV, infection vesicle; W, wall plant cell; IM, intramural o intercellular hypha; FW, fungal cell wall; CD, cell debris; IC, intracellular hyphae; X, xylem. Bar &#x0003D; 1 &#x003BC;m.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-07-01036-g0002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Oxidative stress analyses</title>
<p>ROS production was monitored by diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining throughout the plant infection time-course. No clear accumulation of DAB (reddish-brown color visible to the naked-eye) was evident at any stage of the infection analyzed here (data not shown). Furthermore, under light microscopy, DAB staining beneath fungal appressoria and surrounding the penetration pegs was very rarely observed and only after 7 dpi (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3A&#x02013;C</xref>). FaGST1 transcripts (the strawberry AtGST1 orthologous gene) did not increase across the time points examined, neither in crown (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3D</xref>) nor in leaves (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3E</xref>). A slight increase in the expression of this gene was detected in petiole tissue 3&#x02013;5 dpi (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3F</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p><bold>Light microscopic analysis of DAB stained preparations of <italic>C. acutatum</italic> infected strawberry tissue at 7 dpi, and relative expression values by RTqPCR analysis of FaGST1 (At1g02930 ortholog) gene at different time points of infection. (A)</bold> Tissue sample showing no DAB reaction, <bold>(B,C)</bold> very rarely detected reduction of DAB beneath fungal appressoria, and surrounding the penetration pegs, at upper and lower focal planes, respectively. All bars 25 &#x003BC;m. <bold>(D&#x02013;F)</bold> Relative FaGST1 expression values. At each time point, every inoculated sample was compared with its corresponding mock treated sample. In the graphics, standard value 1 at T0 was added to better illustrate changes.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-07-01036-g0003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Based on these results, and the observation that spray inoculation with 10<sup>4</sup> conidia&#x000B7;ml<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> more closely mimics natural infection conditions, the 5 dpi time point was chosen for transcriptome analysis. The assumption was that most of the changes in transcript accumulation in response to early <italic>C. acutatum</italic> infection would be detected around this time point, including those in response to early stages of switching to necrotrophic growth. In addition, analysis of known defense-related transcripts was performed at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 dpi to assess plant response to a wider range of fungal developmental stages and disease progression.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Expression profiling of <italic>C. acutatum</italic>-infected strawberry</title>
<p>Transcript abundance was measured in crown tissue 5 days after <italic>C. acutatum</italic> infection and in mock-treated plants. Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1A</xref>,<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">B</xref> and Tables <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S1</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">S2</xref> show a summary of identified transcripts with the highest induction or repression levels after crown infection. A total of 147 transcripts varied in accumulation more than 1.75-fold following criteria described under Material and Methods. Of these, 118 genes were induced, and 29 genes were repressed. Verification of gene expression changes by real-time RTqPCR was performed on eleven up-regulated genes and two down-regulated genes, representing different categories shown in Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1A</xref>,<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">B</xref> (marked with &#x00023;). The expression pattern of analyzed genes after <italic>C. acutatum</italic> inoculation was consistent with that obtained by microarray analysis.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1A</label>
<caption><p><bold>Up-regulated genes by <italic>Colletotrichum acutatum</italic> in crown tissue of <italic>Fragaria x ananassa</italic>, cultivar Camarosa</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold><italic>Fxananassa</italic> gene ID</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold><italic>F. vesca</italic> ortholog</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold><italic>A. thaliana</italic> ortholog</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Gene description</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Relation with defense/biological function</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>CC vs. CI</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th/>
<th/>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Fold change (<italic>RTqPCR</italic>)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>FDR <italic>q</italic>-value</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="7" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>INVASION SENSING</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M13C5<sup>&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene07245</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G13160</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Serine/threonine-protein kinase PBS1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Receptor kinase, R protein-guard model</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M19F7<sup>&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene15497</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT4G33210</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">SLOMO (SLOw MOtion) F-box/LRR-repeat protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fbox/LRR protein, plant receptor, Proteasome complex</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M2F10<sup>&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene19270<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x02020;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT4G00340</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Receptor-like protein kinase 4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Receptor kinase, Signal transduction regulation</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M14D5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene13911</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G30240</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Proline-, glutamic acid- and leucine-rich protein 1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">LRR protein, plant receptor</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M6C2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene01890</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G42090</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lung seven transmembrane receptor family protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Plant receptor</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ELRR-39&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene25524</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G21090</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CPR30 Leucine-rich repeat (LRR) family protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">LRR protein, plant receptor</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.14 (2.82 &#x000B1; 0.54)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M29F3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene16731</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G14460</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">LRR and NB-ARC domains-containing disease resistance protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CC-NBS-LRR class of R proteins, plant receptor</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M18E3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene20858</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G14460</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Proline-, glutamic acid- and leucine-rich protein 1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CC-NBS-LRR class of R proteins, plant receptor</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.84</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="7" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M23A9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene14522</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT4G35790</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Phospholipase D delta</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Phospholipase D, Transduction of stress responses</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M27D3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene18784</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G01160</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RING/U-box E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">E3 ligase, Proteasome complex</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M16B7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene00744</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G69960</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase PP2A catalytic subunit</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ser/Thr protein phosphatase 2A catalytic subunit</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M19D11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene10418<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x02020;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G03940</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Casein Serine/threonine-protein kinase</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Calcium binding kinase</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.59</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M13C5<sup>&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene07245</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G13160</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Serine/threonine-protein kinase PBS1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Receptor kinase, R protein-guard model</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">EDS1-936<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene09503</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G48090</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">EDS1-specific diacylglycerol lipase alpha</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lipase, SA pathway regulator</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.82 (4.4 &#x000B1; 1.13)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M23A6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene32391</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT4G11740</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ubiquitin-like superfamily protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ubiquitin, Proteasome complex</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.49</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.60E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M27C10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene30942<sub>.3utr</sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G25510</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Serine/threonine protein phosphatase 2A regulatory B subunit</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ser/Thr protein phosphatase 2A catalytic subunit</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M8G2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene10067</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT4G30960</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CIPK-Serine/threonine-protein kinase 6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Calcium binding kinase SOS2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M4F10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene21532</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G65430</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase ARI8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">E3 ligase, Proteasome complex</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M8G7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene24036</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT4G36990</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TBF1 Heat shock factor protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Major molecular switch for plant growth-to-defense transition</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.06</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M24D7<sup>&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene28350</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G40150</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Peroxidase superfamily protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Class III peroxidase</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.76</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M10E2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene02575</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G27460</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">NPGR1-No pollen germination related 1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Calmoduling binding protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.73</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M3D5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene23778</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G05180</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">NEDD8-activating enzyme E1 regulatory subunit / AXR1 (Auxin resistant 1) NAD(P)-binding Rossmann-fold superfamily protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fbox, JA signaling, Proteasome complex</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.73</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M19F7<sup>&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene15497</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT4G33210</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">SLOMO (SLOw MOtion) F-box/LRR-repeat protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fbox/LRR protein, plant receptor, Proteasome complex</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M25E7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene01516</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G15780</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bromodomain-containing protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Interact with calcium binding protein kinase</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.47</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M8D11<sup>&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene06214</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G60490</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Protein kinase, Protein trafficking, Secretory Pathway</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.46</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M13H9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene12681</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G57020</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Myristoyl-CoA:protein N-myristoyltransferase</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Co-traslational addition of myristic acid</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.45</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M2F10<sup>&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene19270<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x02020;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT4G00340</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Receptor-like protein kinase 4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Receptor kinase, Signal transduction regulation</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M7G11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene04753</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G69640</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sphingoid base hydroxylase 1 (SBH1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Synthesis of membrane components</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.42</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M4E10<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene16110</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G52430</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Phytoalexin deficient 4, Lipase</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lipase, Chemical defenses, SA pathway regulator</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.33 (2.67 &#x000B1; 0.64)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M4C3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene15015</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G10930</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CIPK-Serine/threonine-protein kinase 5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Calcium binding kinase</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M14H1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene07894</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G51860</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Vacuolar cation/proton exchanger 3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Proton/Calcium antiporter</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M7B6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene05859</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G80210</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">BRCC36A - homologous recombination</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Homologous recombination, deubiquitinating activity, Proteasome complex</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M21H5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene01441</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G56180</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Actin-related protein 8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fbox/Actin/helicase domain, proteasome complex, XXXRNAmetabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M4E6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene12959</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT4G33240</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1-phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Protein kinase, protein trafficking, endomembrane homeostasis</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M28C8<sup>&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene12445</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G05260</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Peroxidase superfamily protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Class III peroxidase</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.98</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M17E3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene06367<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x02020;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT4G24830</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Argininosuccinate synthase</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">NO synthesis, signal transduction</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.98</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M3E6<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene27591</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G71695</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Peroxidase superfamily protein (Prx12)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Class III peroxidase</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.92 (5.5 &#x000B1; 0.7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M10B6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene01594</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G13460</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">YTH domain family protein 2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Calcium transport to nucleus, regulate gene expression</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.86</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M13F3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene28416</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G27925</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Protease DegP1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Protease</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.79</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M1H8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene12874<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x02020;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G53360</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">E3 Ubiquitin protein ligase SINAT3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">E3 ligase, proteasome complex</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.75</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9.42E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="7" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>NEW PROTEIN SYNTHESIS AND SECRETION</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M21B3&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene01340</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G13080</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">WRKY DNA-binding protein 75</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcription factor</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.79 (19.47 &#x000B1; 5.2)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M8H8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene10702</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT4G17960</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ATP-dependent RNA helicase DBP10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RNA metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M26G7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene31909</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT2G25970</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RNA binding KH domain-containing protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RNA metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M22D9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene22758</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G51980</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Armadillo repeat superfamily protein-Hsp70 nucleotide exchange factor fes1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Protein folding</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.80</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">J_4-9&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene07210</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G13080</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">WRKY DNA-binding protein 75</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcription factor</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.89 (56.68 &#x000B1; 7.93)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M11C6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene03828</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G69620</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">60S Ribosomal protein L34</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Protein synthesis</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.79</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M6G7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene32154</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G48030</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypoxia-responsive Zinc finger (C3HC4-type RING finger) family protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcription factor</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.75</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M10C12</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene08531</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G75780</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tubulin beta-1 chain</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Citosqueleton</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M9F6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene29752</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G28420</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Homeobox protein orthopedia</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcription factor</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M1A2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene24354</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G62020</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Coatomer subunit alpha</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Protein transport</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M23C4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene02623</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT4G37750</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AINTEGUMENTA gene - AP2 like transcription factor</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcription factor</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.60E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M18A9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene30367</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G46190</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RNA-binding KH domain-containing protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RNA metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.85</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M7G4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene23202</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G52250</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Duplicated homeodomain-like superfamily protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RNA metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.75</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M23C7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene25539<sub>.3utr</sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT4G33865</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">40S ribosomal protein S29</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Protein synthesis</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M17H1<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene13547</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G56400</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">WRKY DNA-binding protein 70</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcription factor, SA-JA crosstalk</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.53 (4.99 &#x000B1; 0.54)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M18F1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene09051</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G47490</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RNA-binding protein 47C</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RNA metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.49</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M8D11<sup>&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene06214</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G60490</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Protein kinase, Protein trafficking, Secretory Pathway</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.46</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M11H4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene22626</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G12110</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Actin 11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Citosqueleton</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.42</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M8H3<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene13803</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT2G38470</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">WRKY DNA-binding protein 33</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcription factor, JA pathway</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.41 (3.58 &#x000B1; 1.52)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M14B5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene29081</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G59740</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Peptide transporter PTR</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Protein secretion</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.39</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M5B8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene24582</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G22950</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 24</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Protein secretion</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M12E12<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene21365</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G56400</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">WRKY DNA-binding protein 70</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcription factor, SA-JA crosstalk</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.19 (2.96 &#x000B1; 0.54)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M3A1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene30880</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G16060</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Kinesin-related protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Citosqueleton</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M19E4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene05323</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT2G44710</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RNA-binding (RRM/RBD/RNP motifs) family protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RNA metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M18C5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene04135</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G66140</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Zinc finger protein 4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcription factor</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M3E11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene25805</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G18650</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Plasmodesmata callose-binding endo-1,3-beta-glucosidase protein 3 (PdCB3)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cell-to-cell trafficking</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M12B6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">no hit found<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x02020;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G25940</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DNA-directed RNA polymerase TFIIB zinc-binding protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RNA metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M7D1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene10625</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G05590</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">60S ribosomal protein L18-2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Protein synthesis</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M20A3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene21473</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G16715</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Valyl-tRNA synthetase</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Protein synthesis</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.98</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M8A6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene00998</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G77030</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DEAD-box ATP-dependent RNA helicase 29</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RNA metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.93</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M9E2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene15731</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G80070</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pre-mRNA-processing-splicing factor SUS2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RNA metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.92</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M28B7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene16235<sub>.5utr</sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT2G22430</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Homeobox-leucine zipper protein ATHB-6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcription factor</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.89</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M1C12<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene28174</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT2G38470</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">WRKY DNA-binding protein 33</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcription factor, JA pathway</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.86 (9.10 &#x000B1; 1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M6A9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene00185</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G67300</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcription factor MYB44</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcription factor</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.83</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9.42E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M4C6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene20572</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G62310</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RNA helicase family protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RNA metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.79</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9.42E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="7" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>DIRECT DEFENSES</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M24B7&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene14817</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT4G16260</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Glycosyl hydrolase superfamily protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cell wall degradation, PR protein family</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47.54 (30.54 &#x000B1; 16.25)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M16D12&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene02717</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G54420</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chitinase class IV</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PR protein family</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.93 (116.84 &#x000B1; 22.54)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">EPR5-77&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene32423</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT4G11650</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pathogenesis-related 5 family protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PR protein family</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.52 (59.11 &#x000B1; 10.05)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M5B6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene24296<sub>.3utr</sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G09360</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Laccase</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lignin biosynthesis</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.48</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M23A10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene07086</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G24020</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pathogenesis-related 10 family protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PR protein family</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M12C12&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene31975</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G14180</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Triacylglycerol lipase 2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lipase, Chemical defenses</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.60 (19.59 &#x000B1; 2.7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M6G11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene26351</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT4G34135</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Flavonol 7-O-glucosyltransferase</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Secondary metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M6B9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene05185</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G24020</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pathogenesis-related 10 family protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PR protein family</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.89</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">EPR5-284&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene32422</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT4G11650</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pathogenesis-related 5 family protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PR protein family</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.88 (5.63 &#x000B1; 1.93)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M1F10&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene09812</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G20030</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pathogenesis-related 5 family protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PR protein family</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.69 (17.58 &#x000B1; 5.7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M22A10&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene07085</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G24020</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pathogenesis-related 10 family protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PR protein family</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.20 (8.87 &#x000B1; 2.38)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M24D7<sup>&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene28350</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G40150</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Peroxidase superfamily protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Class III peroxidase</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.76</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M5G8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene07082</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G24020</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pathogenesis-related 10 family protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PR protein family</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M10C5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene00687</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G24020</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pathogenesis-related 10 family protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PR protein family</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.66</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M26E5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene32023</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G17000</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Zinc-binding dehydrogenase family protein / oxidoreductase</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Redox protection</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M4F3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene27555</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G22750</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">D-serine/D-alanine/glycine transporter</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Secondary metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M25D10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene07087</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G24020</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pathogenesis-related 10 family protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PR protein family</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M5C8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene11632</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT4G32320</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">L-ascorbate peroxidase 6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Antioxidant defenses</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M4E10<sup>&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene16110</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G52430</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Phytoalexin deficient 4, Lipase</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lipase, Chemical defenses, SA pathway regulator</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.33 (2.67 &#x000B1; 0.64)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M23D11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene20700</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT4G37990</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lignin biosynthesis</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M29A9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene21697</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G54420</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Endochitinase PR4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PR protein family</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M25D11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene17437</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G07320</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">O-Glycosyl hydrolases family 17, (1-&#x0003E;3)-beta-glucanase</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cell wall degradation, PR protein family</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.98</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M28C8<sup>&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene12445</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G05260</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Peroxidase superfamily protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Class III peroxidase</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.98</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M3E6<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene27591</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G71695</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Peroxidase superfamily protein (Prx12)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Class III peroxidase</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.92 (5.5 &#x000B1; 0.7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M10D7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene07065</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G24020</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fra a 2 allergen</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PR protein family</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.86</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M26G2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene31048</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT2G30370</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CHAL secreted protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Inhibite stomatal production</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.79</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M21G5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene04724</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G69530</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Expansin-A1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Stomatal movement</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.76</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9.42E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="7" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>HORMONE-DEPENDENT PATHWAYS</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">EDS1-936<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene09503</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G48090</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">EDS1-specific diacylglycerol lipase alpha</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lipase, SA pathway regulator</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.82 (4.4 &#x000B1; 1.13)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M12E4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene32179</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G27500</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR)-like superfamily protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tetratricopeptide repeat</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M22A6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene05545</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G80360</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pyridoxal phosphate (PLP)-dependent transferases superfamily protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pyridoxal-phosphate, oxidative stress response</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.84</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M14G2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene31738</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT4G39820</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR)-like superfamily protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tetratricopeptide repeat</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.69</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M8H2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene09899</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G64250</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2-nitropropane dioxygenase</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">JA pathway</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M26D3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene18908</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT4G01100</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Adenine nucleotide transporter 1 (ADNT1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Purine transporter, Signaling</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.56</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M17H1<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene13547</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G56400</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">WRKY DNA-binding protein 70</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcription factor, SA-JA crosstalk</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.53 (4.99 &#x000B1; 0.54)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M25B1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene23034</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G13790</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cell wall Invertase 1 (AtcwINV1): Glycosyl hydrolases family 32 protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cell wall invertase, signaling</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.48</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M9E10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene03078</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G44750</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Purine permease 11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Purine transporter, Signaling</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M8H3<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene13803</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT2G38470</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">WRKY DNA-binding protein 33</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcription factor, JA pathway</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.41 (3.58 &#x000B1; 1.52)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M4E10<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene16110</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G52430</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Phytoalexin deficient 4, Lipase</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lipase, Chemical defenses, SA pathway regulator</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.33 (2.67 &#x000B1; 0.64)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M12E12<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene21365</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G56400</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">WRKY DNA-binding protein 70</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcription factor, SA-JA crosstalk</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.19 (2.96 &#x000B1; 0.54)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M23C11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene08617</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G76180</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dehydrin cold-regulated 47</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ABA responsive</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M16H1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene14094<sub>.3utr</sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">no hit found</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Auxin response factor</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Auxin responsive</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M9D5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene29393</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT4G37150</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Methyl salicylate (MeSA) esterase 9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">SA release from MeSA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M30F8&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene29769<sub>.3utr</sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G28480</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Glutaredoxin GRX480</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">SA pathway, REDOX signaling</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.92 (4.52 &#x000B1; 0.82)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M1C12<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene28174</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT2G38470</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">WRKY DNA-binding protein 33</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcription factor, JA pathway</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.86 (9.10 &#x000B1; 1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M28A2&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene15063</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G42650</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Allene oxide synthase</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">JA synthesis</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.75 (1.5 &#x000B1; 0.64)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9.42E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="7" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>NO OBVIOUSLY RELATED TO DEFENSE RESPONSE</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M22B1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene01044</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT2G25660</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Embryo defective 2410</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M18E11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene27435</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G34550</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Embryo defective 2756</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M21E9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene24023</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT2G24960</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">MRG family protein, chromatin binding</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M7B12</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene07388</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT2G21170</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Triosephosphate isomerase</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.96</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.60E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M24C11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene32086</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G64385</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Unknown protein, endomembrane system</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.88</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.60E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M13A4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene23331</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G13520</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Aminopeptidase M1 family protein / Leukotriene A-4 hydrolase</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.39</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M27A2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene13677<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x02020;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G32060</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Phosphoribulokinase</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M4E4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene05017<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>&#x02020;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G49930</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Embryo defective 1441</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M25G5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene06563<sub>.3utr</sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT4G13930</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Serine hydroxymethyltransferase 4</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M3F5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene13777</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G08890</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Protein of unknown function</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.97</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M22G7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene09933<sub>.3utr</sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G41835</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">non-LTR retrotransposon family</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.93</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.64E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M4F8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene15022<sub>.3utr</sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT2G25140</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Casein lytic proteinase B4/heat shock protein</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.91</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.93E-03</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>Genes were considered as differentially expressed if they fulfilled a FDR &#x0003C; 0.05 after a SAM test analysis and the fold-change was higher that 1.75-fold between the compared conditions. Fold change values represent the ratio of cv. Camarosa mock (CC) vs. infected (CI). (&#x00023;) indicates genes further analyzed by real time RTqPCR to validate microarray result. Their relative expression value at 5dpi is shown as (media &#x000B1; SD) in the &#x0201C;Fold Change&#x0201D; column. (</italic></p>
<fn id="TN1">
<label>&#x02020;</label>
<p><italic>) marks no obvious detection of F. vesca ortolog gene due to putative fails by automated gene prediction (see also Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM3">S3</xref>). 3utr, and 5utr, indicate F x ananassa sequences matching untranslated regions of the corresponding F. vesca gene (see also Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM3">S3</xref>). Regulated genes are grouped in sections accordingly to their role in different steps of the defense response against C. acutatum (see Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM4">S4</xref> for associated references). Asterisk marks genes which take part in more than one unique functional group</italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 1B</label>
<caption><p><bold>Down-regulated genes by <italic>Colletotrichum acutatum</italic> in crown tissue of <italic>Fragaria x ananassa</italic>, cultivar Camarosa</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold><italic>Fxananassa</italic> gene ID</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold><italic>F. vesca</italic> ortholog</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold><italic>A. thaliana</italic> ortholog</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Gene Description</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Relation with defense/biological function</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>CC vs. CI</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th/>
<th/>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Fold Change</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>FDR <italic>q</italic>-value</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="7" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>INVASION SENSING</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M6F8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene29223</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G57680</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G-Protein coupled receptor 1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G-protein coupled receptor</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.99</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M20C3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene24345</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT2G32240</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Leucine-rich repeat-containing protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">LRR protein, plant receptor</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.93</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="7" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M18F3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene21849</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G43010</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Regulatory particle AAA-ATPase 4A/Proteasome complex</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Regulatory ATPase, Proteasome complex</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;2.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M29G3&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene25430</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT2G22990</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Serine carboxypeptidase</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Peptidase, Glucosinolate and phenylpropanoid pathway</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.88 (&#x02212;5.1 &#x000B1; 2.2)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M5E3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene12921</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G74960</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Beta-ketoacyl-ACP synthase</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fatty acid biosynthesis</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.80</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M26F4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene09121</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G67090</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Subtilisin-like serine endopeptidase</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Peptidase</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.78</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M22F5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene18417</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G02310</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Protein ubiquitination component of the N-end rule</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ubiquitin ligase, Proteasome complex</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.76</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="7" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>NEW PROTEIN SYNTHESIS AND SECRETION</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M10H10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene17514</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT2G32700</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">LEUNIG_homolog transcriptional correpresor</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcription represor</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;2.39</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M28F7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene25662<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>&#x02020;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G02960</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">40S Ribosomal protein S12/S23</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Protein synthesis</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;2.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M22E3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene12861</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G53430</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Histone methyltransferase</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Indirect transcription regulation</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.86</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M22E11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene15974<sub>.3utr</sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G15750</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TOPLESS transcriptional correpresor</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcription represor</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.85</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M22D5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene31183<sub>.3utr</sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G22910</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RNA-binding (RRM/RBD/RNP motifs) family protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RNA metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.78</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M21G2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene29663</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G29170</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">SCAR family member</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Citoesqueleton</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.75</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="7" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>DIRECT DEFENSES</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M29H6&#x00023;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene32347</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT4G22880</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase (LDOX)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Secondary metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.91 (&#x02212;4.3 &#x000B1; 2.11)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M21F3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene11045</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G36370</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Serine hydroxymetyltransferase</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">REDOX production</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.90</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M29C12</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene21346</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G05270</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chalcone-flavanone isomerase</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Secondary metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.89</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M19C6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene26641</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G15870</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Glycosyl hydrolase family 81 protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cell wall degradation, PR protein family</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.76</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="7" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>HORMONE-DEPENDENT PATHWAYS</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M18H1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene14092</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G07590</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR)-like superfamily protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tetratricopeptide repeat</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.82</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M15G5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene02397</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT4G03550</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Glucan / Callose synthase</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Negative regulator SA dependent defenses</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.80</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="7" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>NO OBVIOUSLY RELATED TO DEFENSE RESPONSE</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M8D2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene14995</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G17920</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Methionine synthase</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;2.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M9F8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene16275</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT4G39970</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Haloacid dehalogenase-like hydrolase</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;2.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M7B2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene10408</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G03890</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Flavin mononucleotide binding</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.94</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M14A10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene29476</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G52820</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">WD-40 repeat CUL4 RING ubiquitin ligase complex</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.94</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M5B7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene09169</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G48380</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DNA binding protein ROOT HAIRLESS 1, component of the topoisomerase VI complex</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.92</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M18D12</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene20804</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT2G22530</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Alkaline-phosphatase-like family protein</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.83</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M18A11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene08921</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G47470</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Nodulin transporter family protein</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.83</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M28A7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene15006</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT5G10840</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Endomembrane protein 70 protein family</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.81</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M26H5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene18624</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT1G01090</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pyruvate dehydrogenase alpha</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.78</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M11B2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">gene07537</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AT3G13990</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Kinase-related protein</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.76</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95E-02</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>Genes were considered as differentially expressed if they fulfilled a FDR &#x0003C; 0.05 after a SAM test analysis and the fold-change was higher that 1.75-fold between the compared conditions. Fold change values represent the ratio of cv. Camarosa mock (CC) vs. infected (CI), transformed by: -1/fold-change for better understanding of values. (&#x00023;) indicates genes further analyzed by real time RTqPCR to validate microarray result. Their relative expression value at 5dpi is shown as (media &#x000B1; SD) in the &#x0201C;Fold Change&#x0201D; column. (</italic></p>
<fn id="TN2">
<label>&#x02020;</label>
<p><italic>) marks no obvious detection of F. vesca ortolog gene due to putative fails by automated gene prediction (see also Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM3">S3</xref>). 3utr, and 5utr, indicate F &#x000D7; ananassa sequences matching untranslated regions of the corresponding F. vesca gene (see also Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM3">S3</xref>). Regulated genes are grouped in sections accordingly to their role in different steps of the defense response against C. acutatum (see Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM4">S4</xref> for associated references)</italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Automated functional analysis by FunCat and GO terms assignments showed that many of these up- and down-regulated genes described in Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1A</xref>,<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">B</xref> belong to plant defense and stress response-related categories (Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM7">S1</xref> and Tables <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM3">S3</xref>&#x02013;<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM5">S5</xref>). However, when no obvious functional role was annotated within the corresponding <italic>F. vesca</italic> ortholog genes, a thorough search through the references available in the database from many plant species was performed (see Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM3">S3</xref>). A wider range of the strawberry transcripts matched defense and biotic stress annotations with the number of up- and down-regulated genes changing 89.93 and 65.51%, respectively.</p>
<p>Transcripts representing five subsets of putative molecular function were identified. These include plant receptors, signal transduction mechanisms under hormonal control (protein modification and degradation), transcriptional changes (transcription factors), new protein synthesis, and secretion of active defense components (PR proteins, degradative enzymes or chemical defenses).</p>
<sec>
<title>Singular enrichment analysis (SEA) shows key components of SA-mediated signaling pathway are up-regulated</title>
<p>A comprehensive Singular Enrichment Analysis (SEA) using FatiGO (Al-Shahrour et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2004</xref>) identified key processes altered in strawberry after <italic>C. acutatum</italic> infection (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>, and Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM6">S6</xref>). Transcripts increasing in abundance include (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.005) those associated with Systemic Acquired Resistance and SA-mediated signaling pathways, responding to bacterium and fungus, and activating the immune response. Strawberry genes within these enriched categories are genes FaEDS1 (EDS1-936<sup>EST</sup>, AtEDS1-like) and FaPAD4 (M4E10<sup>EST</sup>, AtPAD4-like), which are known to be involved in PRR- and R-mediated pathogen-induced SA accumulation in other plants; genes FaWRKY70-1 and FaWRKY70-2 (M17H1<sup>EST</sup>, and M12E12<sup>EST</sup>, respectively, two AtWRKY70-like genes); gene FaMeSA1 (M9D5<sup>EST</sup>, a methyl salicylate esterase); gene FaPBS1 (M13C5<sup>EST</sup>, a SA-dependent Ser/Thr kinase); and gene FaGRX1 (M30F8<sup>EST</sup>, similar to a member of the glutaredoxin family that regulates the protein redox state), which are major downstream components of the SA signal transduction pathway, and known to be activators of SA-dependent defense in many plants.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p><bold>Singular Enrichment Analysis (SEA) on strawberry up-regulated genes</bold>. FatiGO was used to extract relevant GO terms for biological processes (BP) at <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.005. The terms are considered to be relevant by the application of statistical tests as described in Al-Shahrour et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2004</xref>). Data are presented as a heat map, as prompts color intensity correlates with adj. <italic>p</italic>-value, the highest intensity, the lowest adj. <italic>p</italic>-value. See Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S1</xref> for a detailed list of further genes belonging to overrepresented functions.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-07-01036-g0004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>RTqPCR analysis indicates that components of jasmonic acid defense signaling pathway are also induced in strawberry after C. acutatum infection</title>
<p>Analysis of a representative set of up-regulated genes, including those used for microarray validation (see Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1A</xref>,<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">B</xref>), was carried out by RTqPCR after crown infection (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>). All genes tested showed clear upregulation after infection (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5A</xref>). Similar results were also found on petiole tissue analysis after infection (Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM8">S2A</xref>). In addition, two main expression patterns were detected. Transcripts corresponding to FaWRKY1 (J_4-9<sup>EST</sup>), FaLIP-1 (M12C12<sup>EST</sup>), FaCHI4-2 (M16D12<sup>EST</sup>), FaPR5-2 (EPR5-77<sup>EST</sup>), and FaPR10-4 (M22A10<sup>EST</sup>) reached a maximum level at 5 dpi, while transcripts corresponding to FaWRKY2 (M21B3<sup>EST</sup>), FaLRR1 (ELRR-39<sup>EST</sup>), FaGLN-2 (M24B7<sup>EST</sup>), and FaPR5-1 (EPR5-284<sup>EST</sup>) reached their maximum expression level at later times. Transcripts representing FaWRKY1 (J_4-9<sup>EST</sup>) and FaWRKY2 (M21B3<sup>EST</sup>), which belong to the same family of transcription factors (orthologs to Arabidopsis AtWRKY75), registered a different timing in their response. Other variations in timing were also detected for the three members of the PR5 family (FaPR5-1, FaPR5-2, FaPR5-3).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption><p><bold>Relative expression values by RTqPCR analysis of upregulated strawberry genes during <italic>C. acutatum</italic> infection. (A)</bold> Relevant strawberry genes in this study, <bold>(B)</bold> JA-responsive marker genes, and <bold>(C)</bold> SA-responsive marker genes. Strawberry crowns were harvested at different days post-treatment (dpi) either with mock or <italic>C. acutatum</italic> spore suspension. At each time point, every inoculated sample was compared with its corresponding mock treated sample. In the graphics, standard value 1 at T0 was added to better illustrate changes. Asterisk marks genes not present in the Array dataset. Arabidopsis orthologous genes are <italic>AT5G13080</italic> (<italic>AtWRKY75</italic>), <italic>AT5G42650</italic> (<italic>AtAOS</italic>), <italic>AT2G38470</italic> (<italic>AtWRKY33</italic>), <italic>AT3G45140</italic> (<italic>AtLOX2</italic>), <italic>AT2G46370</italic> (<italic>AtJAR1</italic>), <italic>AT5G44420</italic> (<italic>AtPDF1.2</italic>), <italic>AT3G48090</italic> (<italic>AtEDS1</italic>), <italic>AT3G52430</italic> (<italic>AtPAD4</italic>), <italic>AT1G28480</italic> (<italic>AtGRX480</italic>), <italic>AT3G56400</italic> (<italic>AtWRKY70</italic>), <italic>AT2G14610</italic> (<italic>AtPR1</italic>), <italic>AT3G57260</italic> (<italic>AtPR2</italic>).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-07-01036-g0005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>An additional experiment was performed using <italic>in-vitro</italic> plantlets to describe networks associated with SA or JA treatment. Plantlets were used because they show enhanced sensitivity and a faster response to hormone treatment against mature plants (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref>). Almost all <italic>C. acutatum</italic> induced transcripts also showed significant induction after MeJA, but not so after SA treatment (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6A</xref>). Transcripts corresponding to PR genes such as FaGLN-2 (M24B7<sup>EST</sup>), FaCHI4-2 (M16D12<sup>EST</sup>), FaPR5-2 (EPR5-77<sup>EST</sup>), FaPR5-1 (EPR5-284<sup>EST</sup>), FaPR5-3 (M1F10<sup>EST</sup>), and FaPR10-4 (M22A10<sup>EST</sup>), as well as the WRKY75-like transcription factors [genes FaWRKY1 (J_4-9<sup>EST</sup>) and FaWRKY2 (M21B3<sup>EST</sup>)] increased in abundance in response to JA.</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption><p><bold>Relative expression values by RTqPCR analysis of upregulated strawberry genes by hormone treatment. (A)</bold> Relevant strawberry genes in this study, <bold>(B)</bold> JA-responsive marker genes, and <bold>(C)</bold> SA-responsive marker genes. Strawberry plantlets were treated with mock, SA (5 mM) and MeJA (2 mM) elicitors, and harvested at different hours post-treatment (htp). At each time point, every elicited sample was compared against its corresponding mock treated sample. Left and right legends represent relative expression values for SA and JA treatments, respectively. In the graphics, standard value 1 at T0 was added to better illustrate changes. Asterisk marks genes not present in the Array dataset. Arabidopsis orthologous are <italic>AT5G13080</italic> (<italic>AtWRKY75</italic>), <italic>AT5G42650</italic> (<italic>AtAOS</italic>), <italic>AT2G38470</italic> (<italic>AtWRKY33</italic>), <italic>AT3G45140</italic> (<italic>AtLOX2</italic>), <italic>AT2G46370</italic> (<italic>AtJAR1</italic>), <italic>AT5G44420</italic> (<italic>AtPDF1.2</italic>), <italic>AT3G48090</italic> (<italic>AtEDS1</italic>), <italic>AT3G52430</italic> (<italic>AtPAD4</italic>), <italic>AT1G28480</italic> (<italic>AtGRX480</italic>), <italic>AT3G56400</italic> (<italic>AtWRKY70</italic>), <italic>AT2G14610</italic> (<italic>AtPR1</italic>), <italic>AT3G57260</italic> (<italic>AtPR2</italic>).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-07-01036-g0006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Incomplete activation of SA and JA pathways occurs during <italic>C. acutatum</italic> infection</title>
<p>To further investigate how SA- and JA- hormone-dependent pathways are responding to <italic>C. acutatum</italic> infection, transcript levels of their described signaling pathways were measured by RTqPCR. Transcripts corresponding to JA-associated genes FaWRKY33-1 (M8H3<sup>EST</sup>) and FaWRKY33-2 (M1C12<sup>EST</sup>) (two orthologs to AtWRKY33), FaAOS-1 (M28A2<sup>EST</sup>, AtAOS ortholog), FaLOX2-1 (AtLOX2 ortholog), FaJAR1 (AtJAR1 ortholog), and FaPDF1 (AtPDF1.2 ortholog), and SA-associated transcripts such as FaEDS1 (EDS1-936<sup>EST</sup>, AtEDS1 ortholog), FaPAD4 (M4E10<sup>EST</sup>, AtPAD4 ortholog), FaGRX1 (M30F8<sup>EST</sup>, AtGRX480 ortholog), FaWRKY70-1 and FaWRKY70-2 (M17H1<sup>EST</sup>, and M12E12<sup>EST</sup>, respectively), FaPR1-1 and FaPR1-2 (AtPR1 ortholog), FaPR2-1 and FaPR2-2 (AtPR2 ortholog), were analyzed in crown tissue in response to <italic>C. acutatum</italic> inoculation (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5B,C</xref>), and after MeJA or SA exogenous applications (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6B,C</xref>).</p>
<p>None of known JA inducible pathways, except for gene regulators FaWRKY33-1, FaWRKY33-2, and FaAOS-1 (whose induction was also detected by microarray, see Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1A</xref>,<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">B</xref>) were infection induced (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5B</xref>). Similar results were also obtained on petiole tissue analysis after infection (Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM8">S2B</xref>). On the contrary, all transcripts were induced (FaAOS-1, FaWRKY33-1, FaWRKY33-2, FaLOX2-1, FaJAR1, and FaPDF1) in response to MeJA treatment (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6B</xref>).</p>
<p>On the other hand all SA-pathway associated orthologs were induced in crown after <italic>C. acutatum</italic> infection (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5C</xref>) except for FaPR1-1, a well-known SA-pathway-associated gene. The same result was found in petiole (Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM8">S2C</xref>). Nearly all strawberry SA-associated transcripts including FaPR1-1, increased in abundance in response to SA treatment. Two classical SA-associated PR orthologous genes, FaPR1-2 and FaPR2-2, are shown to be mainly JA-dependent in strawberry (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6C</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Level of SA and JA during the strawberry/<italic>C. acutatum</italic> interaction</title>
<p>Salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) content in strawberry plantlets cv. Camarosa was measured at 3 and 5 days after inoculation with <italic>C. acutatum</italic>. A significant 272% increase in free SA concentration was detected in aerial tissues only at 3 dpi (202.21 ng/g dw, in infected plantlets vs. 74.42 ng/g dw, in mock-treated plantlets; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7A</xref>). In addition, free SA in infected plantlets increased up to 678% at 5 dpi compared with that of mock treatment (354.77 ng/g dw vs. 52.33 ng/g dw, respectively). A significant 241% increase in free JA concentration was detected in infected plantlets at 3 dpi compared with that of mock treatment (771.39 ng/g dw, vs. 320.42 ng/g dw, respectively; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7B</xref>). This increase was even higher after 5 dpi (425%), compared with that of mock treatment (1707.03 ng/g dw vs. 401.93 ng/g dw, respectively).</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption><p><bold>Quantification of (A) SA and (B) JA [ng g-1 (dry weigh)] in aerial tissues of <italic>in-vitro</italic> strawberry plantlets at 3 and 5 days after mock (white bars) and pathogen inoculation (black bars)</bold>. Data are the mean of three biological replicates, and error bars represent the SD. Numbers inside arrows indicate percentage of increase of infected samples vs. mock. Asterisks indicate confidence of ANOVA-Bonferroni Multiple Comparisons Test (<sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup><italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001; <sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup><italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-07-01036-g0007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec>
<title>Disease progress</title>
<p>This report characterizes the molecular events related to strawberry response to <italic>C. acutatum</italic> infection largely prior to plant disease symptom occurrence. In other pathosystems, main changes in gene expression are known to occur before significant lesion development (Windram et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">2012</xref>). Previous research indicates that <italic>C. acutatum</italic> may persist and grow extensively on strawberry tissues without causing visible symptoms (Freeman et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">1998</xref>; Leandro et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">2001</xref>; Debode et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2009</xref>). Under inoculation conditions (10<sup>4</sup> conidia&#x000B7;ml<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) used herein, no symptoms were visible during the time course of the experiment. Conditions mirror those used in previously published work (Casado-D&#x000ED;az et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2006</xref>; Encinas-Villarejo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2009</xref>; Amil-Ruiz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2012</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2013</xref>). Transmission electron microscopy results (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>) are roughly consistent with the timing of pathogen development observed after spray inoculation, taking into account that spot inoculation with a higher spore concentration (10<sup>6</sup> conidia&#x000B7;ml<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) is forcing a much quicker infection process. Indeed, this inoculum concentration is also used by Horowitz et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">2002</xref>) to study the developmental stages of this pathogen in strawberry, and necrotrophic transition was first identified after 4 dpi, which is consistent with our TEM observations. In addition, the penetration phase of <italic>C. acutatum</italic> on strawberry tissues is not a synchronous process, as previously described for this pathogen and other <italic>Colletotrichum</italic> spp. on other hosts (Makowski and Mortensen, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">1998</xref>; Arroyo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2005</xref>). Furthermore, at 5 days after inoculation, less than fifty percent of the conidia showed fully formed appresoria, and limited primary hyphae formation was observed (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>). To strengthen the transcriptomic analysis, a more detailed gene expression study (RTqPCR) was performed throughout the <italic>C. acutatum</italic> infection stages from 1 to 9 days after inoculation, which certainly should reflect changes in host in response to most pathogen development stages. A similar time-window for gene expression has been monitored in other pathosystems (Doehlemann et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">2008</xref>; Marcel et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">2010</xref>; Vargas et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">2012</xref>). Previous studies on <italic>C. acutatum</italic>-strawberry interaction have also shown that main transcript changes occur in host along the period of time herein analyzed (Casado-D&#x000ED;az et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2006</xref>; Encinas-Villarejo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2009</xref>). All in all, these observations informed about the appropriate time points for transcriptomic analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Molecular components of the strawberry response to <italic>C. acutatum</italic> identified in this study</title>
<p>Following <italic>C. acutatum</italic> infection, the transcriptomic analysis shows a wide range of responses to this pathogen. Many of the identified transcripts encode proteins with demonstrated roles in resistance and defense functions. Other transcript classes identified include members of plant pathogen perception and sensing apparatus, signal transduction machinery, transcriptional factors and regulatory genes, and protein synthesis and secretion mechanisms. For the purposes of this report, only components belonging to known SA and JA signaling pathways are discussed.</p>
<sec>
<title>Signaling transduction pathways: Downstream responses against C. acutatum</title>
<p>In model plants, one of the big gaps in plant immunity understanding lies in the signaling pathways operating immediately downstream of PRR and R protein activation. However, partially understood pathways have been established (Dodds and Rathjen, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">2010</xref>). We have found that members of kinase, phosphatase, ubiquitin and calcium-associated gene families related to signal transduction pathways were induced upon interaction with <italic>C. acutatum</italic> (Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1A</xref>,<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">B</xref> and Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM3">S3</xref>). Known components of both SA- and JA-dependent defense signaling pathways were also up-regulated. No induction was observed of important components of MAP Kinases pathway, which seems to play a role in the interplay between SA and JA-defense signaling pathways (Rodriguez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">2010</xref>; Caarls et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2015</xref>). The reasons behind this are unclear, but it is possible that the pathogen could be manipulating part of this pathway.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>SA-signaling pathway</title>
<p>Enrichment of transcripts corresponding to specific SA-pathway members was detected. Thus, the expression of genes FaEDS1 (EDS1-936<sup>EST</sup>) and FaPAD4 (M4E10<sup>EST</sup>) is induced by <italic>C. acutatum</italic>. The lipase-like protein EDS1 is an important node acting upstream of SA in PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI) after PRRs stimulation and is also required for signaling of all TIR-NB-LRRs tested to date (Wiermer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">2005</xref>; Heidrich et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2011</xref>). These findings suggest that specific effector-triggered immunity (ETI) through TIR domain signaling might also be acting in strawberry against this pathogen. EDS1 is known to physically interact with two other positive regulators, PAD4 and SAG101, both of which are putative lipases, although hydrolase activity has not been demonstrated for either protein (Wiermer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">2005</xref>). Interestingly, the expression of Arabidopsis EDS1 is positively regulated by WRKY70 transcription factors (Li et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">2004</xref>), and enrichment in WRKY70 orthologs has also been detected in strawberry (see further below). Moreover, a strawberry PAD4 ortholog (FaPAD4) was indeed upregulated. PAD4 affect SA accumulation (Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">2011</xref>). Thus, the dissociated forms of EDS1 and PAD4 are fully competent in signaling receptor triggered localized cell death at infection locations (Rust&#x000E9;rucci et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">2001</xref>; Aviv et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2002</xref>) but, by contrast, an EDS1&#x02013;PAD4 complex is necessary for basal resistance involving transcriptional up-regulation of PAD4 itself and mobilization of salicylic acid defenses (Rietz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">2011</xref>).</p>
<p>Local SA production has been shown to trigger defenses in the surrounding cells downstream of EDS1 and PAD4 activity. This SAR is activated thorough a systemic signal that primes distal tissues against similar invaders. The SA derivative methyl salicylate (MeSA) is believed to serve as a long-distance phloem-mobile SAR signal in plants (Liu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">2011</xref>; Dempsey and Klessig, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2012</xref>). Once in the distal, uninfected tissue, MeSA must be converted into biologically active SA by esterase activity (Dempsey and Klessig, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2012</xref>). Interestingly, induction of the strawberry gene M9D5<sup>EST</sup> encoding a methyl salicylate (MeSA) esterase similar to the Arabidopsis AtMES9 was detected (Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1A</xref>,<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">B</xref>), which suggests that this signaling mechanism might also be activated in strawberry during <italic>C. acutatum</italic> interaction. Curiously, the Arabidopsis AtMES9 presents <italic>in-vitro</italic> activity with MeSA, MeJA and MeIAA (Yang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">2008</xref>) but it showed preference for MeSA as a substrate (Vlot et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">2008</xref>; Dempsey and Klessig, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2012</xref>).</p>
<p>Induction of other transcripts acting downstream of SA was detected. Two WRKY70-like genes, FaWRKY70-1 (M17H1<sup>EST)</sup> and FaWRKY70-2 (M12E12<sup>EST</sup>), and a glutaredoxin GRX480-like gene, FaGRX1 (M30F8<sup>EST</sup>), which have been described as essential components for SA-dependent defense activation, were detected in strawberry after infection. In addition, transcript accumulation of strawberry orthologs to classical SA associated genes such as PRs FaPR1-2, FaPR2-1, and FaPR2-2 was highly induced in crown or petiole (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5C</xref> and Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM8">S2C</xref>). Recently the FaPR2-2 transcript has been reported as a reliable indicator of SA-dependent defenses in strawberry, as it was induced by <italic>C. acutatum, C. fragariae</italic>, and SA (Zamora et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">2012</xref>). However, although FaPR1-2, FaPR2-1 and FaPR2-2 were detected in this study after SA treatment, both FaPR1-2 and FaPR2-2 turned out to be also induced after JA treatment (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6C</xref>). Therefore, we propose that these two later genes should not be considered as SA-specific transcripts in strawberry.</p>
<p><italic>C. acutatum</italic> infection also increased M8G7<sup>EST</sup> transcript, encoding a protein that resembles the HSF-like transcription factor TBF1, a member of an extensive family of heat responsive proteins (Baniwal et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">2004</xref>; Ikeda and Ohme-Takagi, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2009</xref>). These proteins are associated with diverse functions, including heat stress response (Charng et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2007</xref>; Ikeda et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2011</xref>), and plant development (Pernas et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">2010</xref>; ten Hove et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">2010</xref>). Interestingly, the TBF1 protein has recently been shown to be a major molecular switch for plant growth-to-defense transition in Arabidopsis (Pajerowska-Mukhtar et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2012</xref>). This transcription factor is a positive regulator of immune responses induced by salicylic acid and PAMPs, and it binds to the TL1 (GAAGAAGAA) <italic>cis</italic> element of NPR1-dependent ER-resident genes required for antimicrobial protein secretion.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>JA-signaling pathway</title>
<p>Transcripts related to the JA-mediated signaling pathway were also induced in strawberry after <italic>C. acutatum</italic> infection, including FaAOS-1 (M28A2<sup>EST</sup>), FaWRKY33-1 (M8H3<sup>EST</sup>), and FaWRKY33-2 (M1C12<sup>EST</sup>). FaAOS-1 encodes an allene oxide synthase, a member of the cytochrome p450 CYP74 gene family (Song et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">1993</xref>) that functions as a key enzyme in the initial steps of the JA biosynthetic pathway (Pe&#x000F1;a-Cort&#x000E9;s et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">2004</xref>; Leon-Reyes et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2010</xref>), thus generating signaling molecules that are essential for host immunity and plant development (Acosta and Farmer, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">2010</xref>; Gfeller et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2010</xref>; Bak et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">2011</xref>). Interestingly, while only a single copy of AOS gene exists in Arabidopsis (Kubigsteltig et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">1999</xref>), a small AOS gene family with five members can be detected in <italic>F. vesca</italic> genome (unpublished), and three AOS members have been detected in tomato (L&#x000F3;pez-R&#x000E1;ez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">2010</xref>), suggesting a more complex regulation of this pathway in fruiting plants. In addition, FaWRKY33-1 and FaWRKY33-2 are duplicated in <italic>Fragaria</italic> and can be paralogous, and both are similar to the well-known WRKY33 transcription factor from Arabidopsis. This important transcription factor acts downstream of JA and regulates expression of classical JA-dependent defense genes, such as those encoding glucanases, chitinases, and thaumatin-like proteins, which have been extensively described as JA-associated genes in other plants. Accordingly, many strawberry orthologs to these JA-induced proteins, such as FaGLN-2, FaCHI4-2, FaPR10-4, FaPR5-1, FaPR5-2, and FaPR5-3, were strongly induced by <italic>C. acutatum</italic> (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5A</xref>).</p>
<p>Upregulation of genetic components needed for SA and JA synthesis in strawberry is accompanied by a concomitant increase in concentration of such phytohormones in response to inoculation by <italic>C. acutatum</italic> (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref>). Therefore, taken together, these results clearly demonstrate that both SA and JA defense signaling pathways are activated in strawberry during <italic>C. acutatum</italic> infection.</p>
<p>In addition, main transcript accumulation was observed between 3 and 5 dpi for genes <italic>FaWRKY1, FaCHI4-2, FaPR10-4, FaPR5-2, FaPR5-3, FaLIP1, FaPR2-1</italic>, and <italic>FaPR2-2</italic>, coding for known PR defense proteins (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>). This increase roughly coincides with the break time observed during conidial germination and appressoria formation of <italic>C. acutatum</italic> (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>), and it may reflect an early attempt of strawberry plant to halt pathogen development. After 5 dpi, expression of these genes decreases gradually while a progressive increase in the percentage of germinated conidia with fully developed appressoria occurs (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>). The latter may reflect the process whereby pathogen hijacks plant defenses to its own benefit.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Evidence of <italic>C. acutatum</italic> influence on SA- and JA-dependent defense pathways to promote pathogen development in strawberry</title>
<p>The SA and JA signaling pathways are activated in strawberry challenged with <italic>C. acutatum</italic>. However, results indicate that expression of well-known components of both SA- and JA-dependent defense pathways are not activated during this interaction. FaPR1-1 has been described as SA inducible in strawberry in cv. P&#x000E1;jaro, challenged with the avirulent strain M23 of <italic>C. fragariae</italic> but not after infection with virulent strain M11 of <italic>C. acutatum</italic> (Grellet-Bournonville et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">2012</xref>). Infection with the avirulent strain M23 induced temporary SA accumulation (nearly 2-fold) in strawberry plants that was accompanied by induction of FaPR1-1 transcripts and protection against a subsequent infection with <italic>C. acutatum</italic>.</p>
<p>Here the infection of cv. Camarosa with <italic>C. acutatum</italic> induced the SA accumulation to a higher level (nearly 3-fold), but no significant accumulation of FaPR1-1 transcript above basal levels in crown and petiole was observed (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5C</xref> and Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM8">S2C</xref>). In contrast, many other SA-responsive PRs (FaPR1-2, FaPR2-1, and FaPR2-1) were upregulated. The FaPR1-1 transcript did increase in abundance after SA treatment in &#x0201C;Camarosa,&#x0201D; which means that strawberry cv. Camarosa has the ability to induce this gene (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6C</xref>).</p>
<p>No significant increase in FaGST1 expression (the strawberry AtGST1 heterolog, a well-known oxidative stress inducible transcript) was observed in crown and leaf tissue (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3D,E</xref>) at any time after pathogen inoculation. Only a slight increase was observed in petioles after 5 dpi. These results suggest that little, if any, ROS production occurs during pathogen development. No significant DAB staining was evident in strawberry tissue during this time course, which is consistent with the results. It is known that ROS is generated in response to abiotic stress, particularly H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, which is an active signaling molecule triggering a variety of defense responses, with GST induction being the most significant (Bhattacharjee, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2012</xref>).</p>
<p>Production of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and activation of gene PR-1 gene occur simultaneously, and it has been suggested that H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> acts downstream from SA in the pathogenesis-related (PR-1) gene induction [73]. Intriguingly, no ROS production and no significant <italic>FaGST</italic> and <italic>FaPR1.1</italic> transcript induction were detected in strawberry after pathogen inoculation, even though SA increased. Our results strongly correlate with those of Grellet-Bournonville et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">2012</xref>), who also reported that virulent <italic>C. acutatum</italic> strain M11 showed no ROS accumulation and no <italic>FaPR1.1</italic> gene induction after strawberry infection.</p>
<p>On the other hand, expression of strawberry orthologs to JA-associated defense related genes, such as FaPDF1, FaLOX2-1, and FaJAR1, also remained unchanged after infection with <italic>C. acutatum</italic>, despite the fact that many other components of the JA-mediated signaling pathway were induced (FaAOS-1, FaWRKY33-1, FaWRKY33-2; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5B</xref> and Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM8">S2B</xref>).</p>
<p>Our results indicate that a number of known components of both SA- and JA-dependent defense pathways are not activated in strawberry during interaction with <italic>C. acutatum</italic>. Furthermore, our results support a hypothesis that <italic>C. acutatum</italic> might be interfering with certain branches of both SA- and JA-dependent defense pathways in strawberry. Absence of a significant plant defense response would allow successful colonization of host tissue by this pathogen. In this sense, recent results reported on the tomato-<italic>Botrytis</italic> system have shown that the exopolysaccharide production by this pathogen [EPS, known as b-(1,3)(1,6)-D-glucan] acted as elicitor of the tomato SA biosynthesis pathway and that inappropriate induction of SA by this pathogen impaired tomato JA-dependent defenses by interrupting the JA signaling pathway downstream of JA production (El Oirdi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2011</xref>; Rahman et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">2012</xref>). Consequently, the fungus could gradually spread through tomato plant tissues.</p>
<p>It is tempting to speculate that <italic>C. acutatum</italic> may be able to interact with strawberry defense response. Based on our results, and considering the canonical SA JA crosstalk model proposed in Arabidopsis (Spoel et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">2007</xref>; Spoel and Dong, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">2012</xref>), an integrated model has been devised (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">8</xref>). In this model, in which activation of both SA and JA pathways and increased amount of SA and JA signal molecules occurs after <italic>C. acutatum</italic> infection, negative crosstalk between these two pathways should somehow be expected. Spoel et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">2007</xref>) showed that simultaneous <italic>A. thaliana</italic> inoculation with a biotrophic and a necrotrophic pathogen resulted in impaired resistance to the necrotrophic pathogen, and demonstrated that the SA pathway that was activated by the biotrophus suppressed the level of JA-dependent resistance against the necrotroph. Indeed, SA-mediated suppression of JA-responsive gene expression has been reported to be targeted downstream of JA biosynthesis (Leon-Reyes et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2010</xref>). Thus, GRX480 is an NPR1 dependent-SA-inducible class III glutaredoxin (Rouhier et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">2006</xref>; Krinke et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2007</xref>) specific to land plants (Ziemann et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">2009</xref>), which interacts with TGA factors and suppresses JA-responsive PDF1.2 transcription (Ndamukong et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">2007</xref>; Zander et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">2011</xref>). In addition, NPR1 and WRKY70 also acts downstream of the SA molecule as a node of convergence for JA-mediated and SA-mediated signals (Dong, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2004</xref>; Li et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">2004</xref>; Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">2006</xref>; Ren et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">2008</xref>), balancing the JA- and SA-dependent responses (Li et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">2006</xref>). Interestingly, strawberry orthologs FaGRX1, FaWRKY70-1 and FaWRKY70-2 were specifically induced during interaction with <italic>C. acutatum</italic>, but no induction on FaPDF1 and other major components of JA-dependent signaling pathway, such as genes FaLOX2-1 and FaJAR1, was detected. Moreover, an increase in JA synthesis and upregulation of FaAOS-1, the strawberry ortholog to Arabidopsis AtAOS, a well-known JA-associated marker gene encoding a key enzyme for JA synthesis, was also reported after <italic>C. acutatum</italic> infection, supporting the idea that in strawberry repression of some JA-responsive genes is targeted downstream of the JA biosynthesis. Indeed, AtAOS has been described as a MeJA-inducible gene but not suppressed by WRKY70 (Li et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">2006</xref>). Very interestingly, the expression of a second group of known JA-responsive genes, such as FaGLN-2, FaCHI4-2, FaPR10-4, FaPR5-1, FaPR5-2, FaPR5-3, increased after being challenged with this pathogen, suggesting the presence in strawberry of a second GRX480/WRKY70-independent JA-dependent defense branch.</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>Figure 8</label>
<caption><p><bold>Hypothetical model of SA- and JA-dependent defense pathways activated in strawberry in response to <italic>C. acutatum</italic></bold>. This model is based on the canonical pathways described in model plant. Upon interaction with <italic>C. acutatum</italic>, the strawberry plant activates upstream components of SA and JA defense pathways. Thus, synthesis of these signal molecules increases and main downstream key components for SA (FaNPR1, FaWRKY70, FaGRX) and JA (FaWRKY33) are activated. Unlike Arabidopsis WRKY33, FaWRKY33 does not act as a negative regulator of the entire SA-dependent defense signaling pathway, either by a direct or an indirect effect of fungal activity, but only for some components (FaGST1, FaPR1.1). That allows FaGRX, together with FaNPR1 and FaWRKY70, to act as negative regulators of JA responsive genes similarly to their Arabidopsis orthologs. As a result, important JA-responsive defense marker genes, such as FaLOX2, FaJAR1, and FaPDF1, are not induced. These impaired mechanisms might provide some advantage for fungal spreading.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-07-01036-g0008.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Importantly, two other JA-associated AtWRKY33-like genes, FaWRKY33-1 and FaWRKY33-2, were also upregulated in strawberry by <italic>C. acutatum</italic>. The JA-associated component AtWRKY33 has recently been reported as a key transcriptional regulator of defense responses to necrotrophus (Birkenbihl et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">2012</xref>). Indeed, AtWRKY33 acts as a negative regulator of the SA-defense pathway upon pathogen infection and negatively controls expression of many important genes, including those responsible for SA biosynthesis and accumulation, positive regulatory proteins EDS1 and PAD4, and SA responsive genes PR1, PR2, and PR3. Interestingly, in strawberry, expression of the SA-dependent orthologous genes FaGST and FaPR1-1 remained unaltered but very intriguingly, the synthesis of SA and the expression of orthologs to components of SA-mediated signaling pathway acting upstream (FaEDS1 and FaPAD4), and downstream of SA (FaGRX1, FaWRKY70-1, FaWRKY70-2, FaPR1-2, FaPR2-1, and FaPR2-2), was remarkably induced during the infection with <italic>C. acutatum</italic>, despite the fact that FaWRKY33-1 and FaWRKY33-2 were clearly upregulated. Unlike what has been previously described for AtWRKY33 (Birkenbihl et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">2012</xref>), these results suggest that repressive control of many known components of the SA-pathway through these FaWRKY33 transcription factors does not work in strawberry during interaction with <italic>C. acutatum</italic> (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">8</xref>).</p>
<p>In conclusion, our results demonstrate both that SA and JA increase in strawberry upon <italic>C. acutatum</italic> infection, and that known plant defenses through SA and JA dependent signaling pathways are partially promoted during such interaction. Indeed, major plant defense marker genes are not up-regulated in strawberry after infection with this pathogen, which might evidence a putative molecular strategy used by this pathogen to overcome strawberry plant defense. This is in line with the new emerging paradigm that a key pathogen virulence strategy involves modulation of plant hormone signaling (El Oirdi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2011</xref>; Chung et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2013</xref>).</p>
<p>Results from our research are of great use to further our understanding of the strawberry immune system to enable future disease control through biotechnological and breeding strategies.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>FAR and supervisors JC and JMB conceived and designed the experiments. FAR, JC, and JMB contributed to reagents/materials and analysis tools. FAR, JGG, JG, RB, AM, OT, BD, FR, JAM, FP carried out experiments, analyzed and interpreted the data. FAR, JC contributed to drafting the manuscript. AA, FA, JGG, FAR, JC performed the light and TEM microscopic observations. JC, JMB, JG revising the article critically. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.</p>
<sec>
<title>Conflict of interest statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p></sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<p>Authors are grateful to Dr. JM Lopez-Aranda (IFAPA-Centro de Churriana) for providing micropropagated strawberry plants and to Nicol&#x000E1;s Garc&#x000ED;a-Caparr&#x000F3;s for technical assistance. Authors also want to thank Kevin M. Folta for his insightful comments on the paper. This work was supported by Junta de Andaluc&#x000ED;a, Spain [Proyectos de Excelencia P07-AGR-02482/P12-AGR-2174, and grants to Grupo-BIO278].</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s6">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2016.01036">http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2016.01036</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table1.XLS" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.ms-excel" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table2.PDF" id="SM2" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table3.PDF" id="SM3" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table4.XLS" id="SM4" mimetype="application/vnd.ms-excel" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table5.XLS" id="SM5" mimetype="application/vnd.ms-excel" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table6.XLS" id="SM6" mimetype="application/vnd.ms-excel" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image1.PDF" id="SM7" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image2.PDF" id="SM8" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Acosta</surname> <given-names>I. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Farmer</surname> <given-names>E. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Jasmonates</article-title>. <source>Arabidopsis Book</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>e0129</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1199/tab.0129</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26054241</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Al-Shahrour</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>D&#x000ED;az-Uriarte</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dopazo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>FatiGO: a web tool for finding significant associations of Gene Ontology terms with groups of genes</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>578</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>580</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btg455</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14990455</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Altschul</surname> <given-names>S. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gish</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Myers</surname> <given-names>E. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lipman</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Basic local alignment search tool</article-title>. <source>J. Mol. Biol.</source> <volume>215</volume>, <fpage>403</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>410</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2231712</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Amil-Ruiz</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blanco-Portales</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mu&#x000F1;oz-Blanco</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Caballero</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>The strawberry plant defence mechanism: a molecular review</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Physiol.</source> <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>1873</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1903</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/pcp/pcr136</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Amil-Ruiz</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Encinas-Villarejo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de los Santos</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mu&#x000F1;oz-M&#x000E9;rida</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mercado</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trelles</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Distinctive transcriptome response of two strawberry (<italic>Fragaria</italic> x <italic>ananassa</italic>) cultivars to <italic>Colletotrichum acutatum</italic> infection</article-title>, in <source>XXVIII International Horticultural Congress on Science and Horticulture for People (IHC2010): International Symposium on Genomics and Genetic Transformation of Horticultural Crops</source>, eds <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Litz</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Folta</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Talon</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pliego Alfaro</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Lisbon</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>ISHS</publisher-name>), <fpage>47</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>50</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Amil-Ruiz</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garrido-Gala</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blanco-Portales</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Folta</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mu&#x000F1;oz-Blanco</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Caballero</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Identification and validation of reference genes for transcript normalization in strawberry (<italic>Fragaria</italic> &#x000D7; <italic>ananassa</italic>) defense responses</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>e70603</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0070603</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23940602</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arroyo</surname> <given-names>F. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moreno</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garc&#x000ED;a-Herdugo</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de los Santos</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barrau</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Porras</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Ultrastructure of the early stages of <italic>Colletotrichum acutatum</italic> infection of strawberry tissues</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Bot.</source> <volume>83</volume>, <fpage>491</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>500</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/b05-022</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ashburner</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ball</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blake</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Botstein</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Butler</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cherry</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology</article-title>. <source>Nat. Genet.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>25</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>29</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/75556</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10802651</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aviv</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rust&#x000E9;rucci</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Iii</surname> <given-names>B. F. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dietrich</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Parker</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dangl</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Runaway cell death, but not basal disease resistance, in lsd1 is SA- and NIM1/NPR1-dependent</article-title>. <source>Plant J.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>381</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>391</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.0960-7412.2001.01225.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bak</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beisson</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bishop</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hamberger</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>H&#x000F6;fer</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paquette</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Cytochromes P450</article-title>. <source>Arabidopsis Book</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>e0144</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1199/tab.0144</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23738914</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baniwal</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bharti</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chan</surname> <given-names>K. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fauth</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ganguli</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kotak</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Heat stress response in plants: a complex game with chaperones and more than twenty heat stress transcription factors</article-title>. <source>J. Biosci.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>471</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>487</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02712120</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15625403</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bhattacharjee</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>The language of reactive oxygen species signaling in plants</article-title>. <source>J. Bot.</source> <volume>2012</volume>, <fpage>22</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2012/985298</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Birkenbihl</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Diezel</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Somssich</surname> <given-names>I. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Arabidopsis WRKY33 Is a key transcriptional regulator of hormonal and metabolic responses toward botrytis cinerea infection</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>159</volume>, <fpage>266</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>285</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.111.192641</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22392279</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Caarls</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pieterse</surname> <given-names>C. M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Wees</surname> <given-names>S. C. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>How salicylic acid takes transcriptional control over jasmonic acid signaling</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>6</volume>:<issue>170</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2015.00170</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25859250</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Casado-D&#x000ED;az</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Encinas-Villarejo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de los Santos</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schilir&#x000F2;</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yubero-Serrano</surname> <given-names>E.-M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Amil-Ruiz</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Analysis of strawberry genes differentially expressed in response to <italic>Colletotrichum</italic> infection</article-title>. <source>Physiol. Plant.</source> <volume>128</volume>, <fpage>633</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>650</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00798.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Charng</surname> <given-names>Y. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>N. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chi</surname> <given-names>W. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>A heat-inducible transcription factor, HsfA2, is required for extension of acquired thermotolerance in Arabidopsis</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>143</volume>, <fpage>251</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>262</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.106.091322</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17085506</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chung</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosa</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scully</surname> <given-names>E. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peiffer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tooker</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hoover</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Herbivore exploits orally secreted bacteria to suppress plant defenses</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>110</volume>, <fpage>15728</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>15733</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1308867110</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24019469</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Curry</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abril</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Avant</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Strawberry anthracnose: histopathology of <italic>Colletotrichum acutatum</italic> and <italic>C. fragariae</italic></article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>92</volume>, <fpage>1055</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1063</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.10.1055</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18944215</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Debode</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Hemelrijck</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baeyen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Creemers</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heungens</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maes</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Quantitative detection and monitoring of <italic>Colletotrichum acutatum</italic> in strawberry leaves using real-time PCR</article-title>. <source>Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>504</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>514</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3059.2008.01987.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dempsey</surname> <given-names>D. M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klessig</surname> <given-names>D. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>SOS &#x02013; too many signals for systemic acquired resistance?</article-title> <source>Trends Plant Sci.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>538</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>545</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tplants.2012.05.011</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22749315</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dodds</surname> <given-names>P. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rathjen</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Plant immunity: towards an integrated view of plant&#x02013;pathogen interactions</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Genet.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>539</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>548</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrg2812</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20585331</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Doehlemann</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wahl</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Horst</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Voll</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Usadel</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Poree</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Reprogramming a maize plant: transcriptional and metabolic changes induced by the fungal biotroph Ustilago maydis</article-title>. <source>Plant J.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>181</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>195</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03590.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18564380</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>NPR1, all things considered</article-title>. <source>Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>547</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>552</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pbi.2004.07.005</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15337097</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Durgbanshi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arbona</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pozo</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miersch</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sancho</surname> <given-names>J. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gomez-Cadenas</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Simultaneous determination of multiple phytohormones in plant extracts by liquid chromatography&#x02212;electrospray tandem mass spectrometry</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Food Chem.</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>8437</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>8442</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jf050884b</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16248534</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>El Oirdi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>El Rahman</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rigano</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>El Hadrami</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rodriguez</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Daayf</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Botrytis cinerea manipulates the antagonistic effects between immune pathways to promote disease development in tomato</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Online</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>2405</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2421</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/tpc.111.083394</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21665999</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Encinas-Villarejo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maldonado</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Amil-Ruiz</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de los Santos</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Romero</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pliego-Alfaro</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Evidence for a positive regulatory role of strawberry (<italic>Fragaria x ananassa</italic>) Fa WRKY1 and Arabidopsis At WRKY75 proteins in resistance</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>60</volume>, <fpage>3043</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3065</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erp152</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19470657</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Freeman</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Horowitz</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharon</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Pathogenic and nonpathogenic lifestyles in <italic>Colletotrichum acutatum</italic> from strawberry and other plants</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>91</volume>, <fpage>986</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>992</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO.2001.91.10.986</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18944126</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Freeman</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Katan</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shabi</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Characterization of Colletotrichum species responsible for anthracnose diseases of various fruits</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>82</volume>, <fpage>596</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>605</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.6.596</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gfeller</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dubugnon</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liechti</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Farmer</surname> <given-names>E. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Jasmonate biochemical pathway</article-title>. <source>Sci. Signal.</source> <volume>3</volume>:<fpage>cm3</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/scisignal.3109cm3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20159849</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grellet-Bournonville</surname> <given-names>C. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martinez-Zamora</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Castagnaro</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>D&#x000ED;az-Ricci</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Temporal accumulation of salicylic acid activates the defense response against Colletotrichum in strawberry</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol. Biochem.</source> <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>10</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>16</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.01.019</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22366637</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guidarelli</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carbone</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mourgues</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Perrotta</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosati</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bertolini</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title><italic>Colletotrichum acutatum</italic> interactions with unripe and ripe strawberry fruits and differential responses at histological and transcriptional levels</article-title>. <source>Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>60</volume>, <fpage>685</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>697</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02423.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Heidrich</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wirthmueller</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tasset</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pouzet</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deslandes</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Parker</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Arabidopsis EDS1 connects pathogen effector recognition to cell compartment&#x02013;specific immune responses</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>334</volume>, <fpage>1401</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1404</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1211641</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22158818</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Horowitz</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Freeman</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharon</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Use of green fluorescent protein-transgenic strains to study pathogenic and nonpathogenic lifestyles in <italic>Colletotrichum acutatum</italic></article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>92</volume>, <fpage>743</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>749</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.7.743</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18943270</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ikeda</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mitsuda</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ohme-Takagi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Arabidopsis HsfB1 and HsfB2b act as repressors of the expression of heat-inducible hsfs but positively regulate the acquired thermotolerance</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>157</volume>, <fpage>1243</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1254</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.111.179036</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21908690</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ikeda</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ohme-Takagi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>A novel group of transcriptional repressors in Arabidopsis</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Physiol.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>970</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>975</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/pcp/pcp048</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19324928</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shih</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Molecular cloning, characterization, and expression analysis of two class II chitinase genes from the strawberry plant</article-title>. <source>Plant Sci.</source> <volume>166</volume>, <fpage>753</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>762</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.11.015</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Krinke</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ruelland</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Valentov&#x000E1;</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vergnolle</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Renou</surname> <given-names>J.-P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taconnat</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Phosphatidylinositol 4-Kinase activation is an early response to salicylic acid in Arabidopsis suspension cells</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>144</volume>, <fpage>1347</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1359</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.107.100842</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17496105</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kubigsteltig</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Laudert</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weiler</surname> <given-names>E. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Structure and regulation of the <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic> allene oxide synthase gene</article-title>. <source>Planta</source> <volume>208</volume>, <fpage>463</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>471</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s004250050583</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10420644</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leandro</surname> <given-names>L. F. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gleason</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nutter</surname> <given-names>F. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wegulo</surname> <given-names>S. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dixon</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Germination and sporulation of <italic>Colletotrichum acutatum</italic> on symptomless strawberry leaves</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>91</volume>, <fpage>659</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>664</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO.2001.91.7.659</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18942995</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leon-Reyes</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van der Does</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Lange</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Delker</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wasternack</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Wees</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Salicylate-mediated suppression of jasmonate-responsive gene expression in Arabidopsis is targeted downstream of the jasmonate biosynthesis pathway</article-title>. <source>Planta</source> <volume>232</volume>, <fpage>1423</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1432</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00425-010-1265-z</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20839007</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brader</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kariola</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tapio Palva</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>WRKY70 modulates the selection of signaling pathways in plant defense</article-title>. <source>Plant J.</source> <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>477</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>491</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02712.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16623907</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brader</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Palva</surname> <given-names>E. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>The WRKY70 transcription factor: a node of convergence for Jasmonate-mediated and Salicylate-mediated signals in plant defense</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>319</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>331</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/tpc.016980</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14742872</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>P.-P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>von Dahl</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>S.-W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klessig</surname> <given-names>D. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Interconnection between methyl salicylate and lipid-based long-distance signaling during the development of systemic acquired resistance in Arabidopsis and tobacco</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>155</volume>, <fpage>1762</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1768</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.110.171694</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21311035</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lodha</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Basak</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Plant&#x02013;pathogen interactions: what microarray tells about it?</article-title> <source>Mol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>87</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>97</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12033-011-9418-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21618071</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>L&#x000F3;pez-R&#x000E1;ez</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Verhage</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fern&#x000E1;ndez</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garc&#x000ED;a</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Azc&#x000F3;n-Aguilar</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Flors</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Hormonal and transcriptional profiles highlight common and differential host responses to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and the regulation of the oxylipin pathway</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>61</volume>, <fpage>2589</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2601</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erq089</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20378666</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maas</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <source>Compendium of Strawberry Diseases</source>. <publisher-loc>St Paul, MN</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>American Phytopathological Society</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Makowski</surname> <given-names>R. M. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mortensen</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Latent infections and penetration of the bioherbicide agent Colletotrichum gloeosporioides f. sp. malvae in non-target field crops under controlled environmental conditions</article-title>. <source>Mycological Res.</source> <volume>102</volume>, <fpage>1545</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1552</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0953756298006960</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maleck</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Levine</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eulgem</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morgan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schmid</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lawton</surname> <given-names>K. A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>The transcriptome of <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic> during systemic acquired resistance</article-title>. <source>Nat. Genet.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>403</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>410</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/82521</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11101835</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Marcel</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sawers</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oakeley</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Angliker</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paszkowski</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Tissue-adapted invasion strategies of the rice blast fungus <italic>Magnaporthe oryzae</italic></article-title>. <source>Plant Cell</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>3177</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3187</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/tpc.110.078048</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20858844</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ndamukong</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abdallat</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thurow</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fode</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zander</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weigel</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>SA-inducible Arabidopsis glutaredoxin interacts with TGA factors and suppresses JA-responsive PDF1.2 transcription</article-title>. <source>Plant J.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>128</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>139</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03039.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17397508</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pajerowska-Mukhtar</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tada</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oka</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tucker</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fonseca</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>The HSF-like transcription factor TBF1 is a major molecular switch for plant growth-to-defense transition</article-title>. <source>Curr. Biol.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>103</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>112</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cub.2011.12.015</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22244999</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pe&#x000F1;a-Cort&#x000E9;s</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barrios</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dorta</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Polanco</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>S&#x000E1;nchez</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>S&#x000E1;nchez</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Involvement of jasmonic acid and derivatives in plant response to pathogen and insects and in fruit ripening</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Growth Regul.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>246</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>260</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00344-004-0035-1</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pernas</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ryan</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dolan</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>SCHIZORIZA controls tissue system complexity in plants</article-title>. <source>Curr. Biol.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>818</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>823</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cub.2010.02.062</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20417101</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pieterse</surname> <given-names>C. M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leon-Reyes</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van der Ent</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Wees</surname> <given-names>S. C. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Networking by small-molecule hormones in plant immunity</article-title>. <source>Nat. Chem. Biol.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>308</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>316</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nchembio.164</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19377457</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rahman</surname> <given-names>T. A. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oirdi</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gonzalez-Lamothe</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bouarab</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Necrotrophic pathogens use the salicylic acid signaling pathway to promote disease development in tomato</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>1584</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1593</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/MPMI-07-12-0187-R</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22950753</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>C.-M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>B.-D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ke</surname> <given-names>S.-Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>W.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>D.-X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Transcription factor WRKY70 displays important but no indispensable roles in jasmonate and salicylic acid signaling</article-title>. <source>J. Integr. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>630</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>637</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1744-7909.2008.00653.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18713432</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rietz</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stamm</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Malonek</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wagner</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Becker</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Medina-Escobar</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Different roles of Enhanced Disease Susceptibility1 (EDS1) bound to and dissociated from Phytoalexin Deficient4 (PAD4) in Arabidopsis immunity</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>191</volume>, <fpage>107</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>119</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03675.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21434927</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Robert-Seilaniantz</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grant</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>J. D. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Hormone crosstalk in plant disease and defense: more than just JASMONATE-SALICYLATE antagonism</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.</source> <volume>49</volume>, <fpage>317</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>343</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-114447</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21663438</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rodriguez</surname> <given-names>M. C. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petersen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mundy</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling in plants</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>61</volume>, <fpage>621</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>649</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112252</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20441529</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rouhier</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Couturier</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jacquot</surname> <given-names>J.-P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Genome-wide analysis of plant glutaredoxin systems</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>1685</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1696</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erl001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16720602</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ruepp</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zollner</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maier</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Albermann</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hani</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mokrejs</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>The FunCat, a functional annotation scheme for systematic classification of proteins from whole genomes</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>5539</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>5545</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkh894</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15486203</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rust&#x000E9;rucci</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aviv</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holt</surname> <given-names>B. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dangl</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Parker</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>The disease resistance signaling components eds1 and pad4 are essential regulators of the cell death pathway controlled by LSD1 in Arabidopsis</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Online</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>2211</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2224</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/tpc.13.10.2211</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11595797</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sarowar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soria-Guerra</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ali</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Expression profiles of differentially regulated genes during the early stages of apple flower infection with Erwinia amylovora</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>4851</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>4861</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/err147</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21725032</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sasaki</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Asamizu</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shibata</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nakamura</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaneko</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Awai</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Monitoring of methyl jasmonate-responsive Genes in Arabidopsis by cDNA macroarray: Self-activation of jasmonic acid biosynthesis and crosstalk with other phytohormone signaling pathways</article-title>. <source>DNA Res.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>153</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>161</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/dnares/8.4.153</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11572481</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schenk</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kazan</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manners</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Simpson</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wilson</surname> <given-names>I. W.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Systemic gene expression in Arabidopsis during an Incompatible Interaction with Alternaria brassicicola</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>132</volume>, <fpage>999</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1010</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.103.021683</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12805628</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Simpson</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Resistance to <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> in pistillate genotypes of the cultivated strawberry <italic>Fragaria ananassa</italic></article-title>. <source>J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>719</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>724</lpage></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shulaev</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sargent</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crowhurst</surname> <given-names>R. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mockler</surname> <given-names>T. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Folkerts</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Delcher</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>The genome of woodland strawberry (<italic>Fragaria vesca</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Nat. Genet.</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>109</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>116</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ng.740</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21186353</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>W. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Funk</surname> <given-names>C. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brash</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Molecular cloning of an allene oxide synthase: a cytochrome P450 specialized for the metabolism of fatty acid hydroperoxides</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>90</volume>, <fpage>8519</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>8523</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.90.18.8519</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8378325</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B69">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Spoel</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>How do plants achieve immunity? Defence without specialized immune cells</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Immunol.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>89</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>100</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nri3141</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22273771</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Spoel</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Regulation of tradeoffs between plant defenses against pathogens with different lifestyles</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>104</volume>, <fpage>18842</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>18847</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0708139104</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17998535</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B71">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Staswick</surname> <given-names>P. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tiryaki</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>The oxylipin signal jasmonic acid is activated by an enzyme that conjugates it to isoleucine in Arabidopsis</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Online</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>2117</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2127</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/tpc.104.023549</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15258265</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B72">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>ten Hove</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Willemsen</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Vries</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Dijken</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scheres</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heidstra</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>SCHIZORIZA encodes a nuclear factor regulating asymmetry of stem cell divisions in the Arabidopsis root</article-title>. <source>Curr. Biol.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>452</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>457</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cub.2010.01.018</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20171102</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B73">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tohidfar</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khosravi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Transgenic crops with an improved resistance to biotic stresses. A review</article-title>. <source>Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>62</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>70</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B74">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ellis</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Devoto</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>The jasmonate signal pathway</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Online</source> <volume>14</volume>(<supplement>suppl. 1</supplement>), <fpage>S153</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>S164</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/tpc.000679</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25729969</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B75">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tusher</surname> <given-names>V. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tibshirani</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>5116</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>5121</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.091062498</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11309499</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B76">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Uknes</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mauch-Mani</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moyer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Potter</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dincher</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Acquired resistance in Arabidopsis</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Online</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>645</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>656</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/tpc.4.6.645</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23847635</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B77">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vargas</surname> <given-names>W. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mart&#x000ED;n</surname> <given-names>J. M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rech</surname> <given-names>G. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rivera</surname> <given-names>L. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Benito</surname> <given-names>E. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>D&#x000ED;az-M&#x000ED;nguez</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Plant defense mechanisms are activated during biotrophic and necrotrophic development of colletotricum graminicola in maize</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>158</volume>, <fpage>1342</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1358</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.111.190397</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22247271</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B78">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Venugopal</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jeong</surname> <given-names>R.-D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mandal</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chandra-Shekara</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Enhanced disease susceptibility 1 and salicylic acid act redundantly to regulate resistance gene-mediated signaling</article-title>. <source>PLoS Genet.</source> <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>e1000545</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pgen.1000545</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19578402</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B79">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vlot</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>P.-P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cameron</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>S.-W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Identification of likely orthologs of tobacco salicylic acid-binding protein 2 and their role in systemic acquired resistance in <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic></article-title>. <source>Plant J.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>445</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>456</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03618.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18643994</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B80">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Amornsiripanitch</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>A genomic approach to identify regulatory nodes in the transcriptional network of systemic acquired resistance in plants</article-title>. <source>PLoS Pathog.</source> <volume>2</volume>:<fpage>e123</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.ppat.0020123</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17096590</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B81">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weaver</surname> <given-names>N. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kesarwani</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Induction of protein secretory pathway is required for systemic acquired resistance</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>308</volume>, <fpage>1036</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1040</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1108791</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15890886</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B82">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>G.-F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Seabolt</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hamdoun</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ng</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Multiple Roles of WIN3 in regulating disease resistance, cell death, and flowering time in Arabidopsis</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>156</volume>, <fpage>1508</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1519</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.111.176776</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21543726</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B83">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wiermer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feys</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Parker</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Plant immunity: the EDS1 regulatory node</article-title>. <source>Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>383</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>389</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pbi.2005.05.010</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15939664</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B84">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Windram</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Madhou</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McHattie</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hill</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hickman</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cooke</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Arabidopsis defense against botrytis cinerea: chronology and regulation deciphered by high-resolution temporal transcriptomic analysis</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Online</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>3530</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3557</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/tpc.112.102046</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23023172</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B85">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dudoit</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luu</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ngai</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>30</volume>:<fpage>e15</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/30.4.e15</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11842121</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B86">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vlot</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klessig</surname> <given-names>D. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pichersky</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Inactive methyl Indole-3-Acetic acid ester can be hydrolyzed and activated by several esterases belonging to the AtMES esterase family of Arabidopsis</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>147</volume>, <fpage>1034</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1045</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.108.118224</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18467465</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B87">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zamora</surname> <given-names>M. G. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bournonville</surname> <given-names>C. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Castagnaro</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ricci</surname> <given-names>J. C. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Identification and characterisation of a novel class I endo-&#x003B2;-1,3-glucanase regulated by salicylic acid, ethylene and fungal pathogens in strawberry</article-title>. <source>Funct. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>412</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>420</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/FP11275</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B88">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zander</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Imkampe</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thurow</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gatz</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Repression of the <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic> jasmonic acid/ethylene-induced defense pathway by TGA-Interacting Glutaredoxins depends on their C-Terminal ALWL Motif</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>831</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>840</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/mp/ssr113</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22207719</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B89">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ziemann</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bhave</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zachgo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Origin and Diversification of Land Plant CC-Type Glutaredoxins</article-title>. <source>Genome Biol. Evol.</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>265</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>277</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/gbe/evp025</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20333196</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<glossary>
<def-list>
<title>Abbreviations</title>
<def-item><term>EPS</term>
<def><p>exopolysaccharide</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>ER-resident</term>
<def><p>endoplasmic reticulum-resident</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>ET</term>
<def><p>ethylene</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>ETI</term>
<def><p>effector-triggered immunity</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>FDR</term>
<def><p>false discovery rate</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>JA</term>
<def><p>jasmonic acid</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>PAMP</term>
<def><p>pathogen-associated molecular pattern</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>PR proteins</term>
<def><p>pathogenesis related proteins</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>PRR</term>
<def><p>pattern recognition receptor</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>PTI</term>
<def><p>PAMP-triggered immunity</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>qPCR</term>
<def><p>quantitative PCR</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>R protein</term>
<def><p>resistance protein</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>SA</term>
<def><p>salicylic acid</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>SEA</term>
<def><p>singular enrichment analysis</p></def></def-item>
</def-list>
</glossary>
</back>
</article>