Front. Physiol. Frontiers in Physiology Front. Physiol. 1664-042X Frontiers Media S.A. 1219583 10.3389/fphys.2023.1219583 Physiology Correction Corrigendum: A compact multi-functional model of the rabbit atrioventricular node with dual pathways Ryzhii and Ryzhii 10.3389/fphys.2023.1219583 Ryzhii Maxim 1 * Ryzhii Elena 2 1 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Aizu, Aizu-Wakamatsu, Japan 2 Department of Anatomy and Histology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan

Edited and reviewed by Elena Tolkacheva, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, United States

 *Correspondence: Maxim Ryzhii, m-ryzhii@u-aizu.ac.jp 02 06 2023 2023 14 1219583 09 05 2023 23 05 2023 Copyright © 2023 Ryzhii and Ryzhii. 2023 Ryzhii and Ryzhii

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 A Corrigendum on A compact multi-functional model of the rabbit atrioventricular node with dual pathways by Ryzhii M and Ryzhii E (2023). Front. Physiol. 14:1126648. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1126648 atrioventricular node rabbit heart model aliev-panfilov model dual pathway conduction curve coupling asymmetry retrograde conduction laddergram section-at-acceptance Cardiac Electrophysiology

In the published article, there was an error in Figure 9 as published. The position of tick bars on some axes in the figure was incorrect, there was a mistake in the x-axis titles in panels A, and the legends in panels B were wrong. The corrected Figure 9 and its caption “Comparison of experimental (Reid et al., 2003) (left panels) and simulated (right panels) anterograde and retrograde recovery curves in the control case and after FP and SP ablations. (A) Experimental recovery curves in the control case and after FP ablation and simulated recovery curves. (B) Experimental recovery curves in the control case and after SP ablation and simulated recovery curves. Dashed lines correspond to the simulated retrograde conduction in the control case without coupling asymmetry” appear below.

Comparison of experimental (Reid et al., 2003) (left panels) and simulated (right panels) anterograde and retrograde recovery curves in the control case and after FP and SP ablations. (A) Experimental recovery curves in the control case and after FP ablation and simulated recovery curves. (B) Experimental recovery curves in the control case and after SP ablation and simulated recovery curves. Dashed lines correspond to the simulated retrograde conduction in the control case without coupling asymmetry.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.