Front. Physiol. Frontiers in Physiology Front. Physiol. 1664-042X Frontiers Media S.A. 1105285 10.3389/fphys.2022.1105285 Physiology Correction Corrigendum: Cerebrovascular reactivity measurement using magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review Sleight et al. 10.3389/fphys.2022.1105285 Sleight Emilie 1 2 Stringer Michael S. 1 2 * Marshall Ian 1 2 Wardlaw Joanna M. 1 2 Thrippleton Michael J. 1 2 1 Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom 2 UK Dementia Research Institute, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Edited and reviewed by: Nicholas P. Blockley, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom

 *Correspondence: Michael S. Stringer, m.stringer@ed.ac.uk

This article was submitted to Vascular Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology

 09 12 2022 2022 13 1105285 22 11 2022 29 11 2022 Copyright © 2022 Sleight, Stringer, Marshall, Wardlaw and Thrippleton. 2022 Sleight, Stringer, Marshall, Wardlaw and Thrippleton

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 A Corrigendum on Cerebrovascular reactivity measurement using magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review by Sleight E, Stringer MS, Marshall I, Wardlaw JM and Thrippleton MJ (2021). Front. Physiol. 12:643468. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.643468 cerebrovascular reactivity magnetic resonance imaging blood oxygen-level dependent arterial spin labelling MRI hypercapnia (CO(2)) inhalation systematic review

In the published article, there was an error in Figure 5 as published: the wrong Figure 5A was inserted. The corrected Figure 5 and its caption appear below.

Distribution of the (A) CVR processing and (B) delay computation methods with the associated year of publication of the paper. The category “Others” in (B) includes deconvolution to find the HRF between the EtCO2 and the MRI signal, and GLM with two (“fast” and “slow”) regressors. STD, standard deviation of MRI signal; HRF, haemodynamic response function; GLM, general linear model.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.