<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Phys.</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-424X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1780345</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fphy.2026.1780345</article-id>
<article-version article-version-type="Version of Record" vocab="NISO-RP-8-2008"/>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>LiDAR point cloud down-sampling strategy with multi-dimensional membership fusion</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Cao et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2026.1780345">10.3389/fphy.2026.1780345</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname>
<given-names>Xue</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Software" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/">Software</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Validation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname>
<given-names>Zhongqi</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal Analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x26; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Mao</surname>
<given-names>Weiwei</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2123700"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x26; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Visualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<institution>School of Intelligent Science and Information Engineering, Xi&#x2019;an Peihua University</institution>, <city>Xi&#x2019;an</city>, <country country="CN">China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
<institution>Xi&#x2019;an Institute of Applied Optics</institution>, <city>Xi&#x2019;an</city>, <country country="CN">China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<label>3</label>
<institution>School of Electro-Mechanical Engineering, Xidian University</institution>, <city>Xi&#x2019;an</city>, <country country="CN">China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<label>4</label>
<institution>Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of British Columbia</institution>, <city>Vancouver</city>, <state>BC</state>, <country country="CN">Canada</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001">
<label>&#x2a;</label>Correspondence: Weiwei Mao, <email xlink:href="mailto:weiweimao@stu.xidian.edu.cn">weiweimao@stu.xidian.edu.cn</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-02-13">
<day>13</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection">
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1780345</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>04</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>28</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>04</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2026 Cao, Feng and Mao.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Cao, Feng and Mao</copyright-holder>
<license>
<ali:license_ref start_date="2026-02-13">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)</ext-link>. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>This study devises an innovative LiDAR point cloud down-sampling strategy that capitalizes on the properties of Fuzzy C Means (FCM) clustering membership functions in each dimension. Traditional down-sampling methods frequently encounter difficulties in striking a balance between computational efficiency and feature preservation, particularly for large-scale datasets. To tackle this issue, our approach breaks down the three-dimensional simplification problem into independent one-dimensional analyses. Specifically, FCM clustering is carried out separately on the X, Y, and Z coordinates to generate dimension-wise membership functions. These functions are then intelligently integrated to calculate comprehensive importance scores for each point, facilitating adaptive sampling that eliminates redundant data while retaining critical geometric features. Experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms conventional approaches, including voxel grid, random, and farthest point sampling, in terms of geometric fidelity. The proposed method shows strong potential for real-time applications involving large-scale point clouds in fields such as autonomous driving, robotic navigation, and 3D reconstruction.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>adaptive sampling</kwd>
<kwd>FCM clustering</kwd>
<kwd>feature preservation</kwd>
<kwd>light detection</kwd>
<kwd>membership fusion</kwd>
<kwd>point cloud down-sampling</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<funding-statement>The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="6"/>
<table-count count="0"/>
<equation-count count="18"/>
<ref-count count="21"/>
<page-count count="00"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-group>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Optics and Photonics</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) point cloud data has become increasingly prevalent in various applications including autonomous vehicles, robotics, augmented reality, and digital preservation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]. These data, often acquired through LiDAR scanners or structured light systems, typically contain millions to billions of points, presenting significant challenges for storage, transmission, and processing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]. Effective point cloud down-sampling (simplification) algorithms are therefore essential for practical applications. Existing simplification methods can be broadly categorized into several types: geometry-based methods (such as Curvature-aware Sampling, CS), grid-based methods (like Voxel Grid down-sampling, VG), clustering-based approaches, and learning-based techniques [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]. While each category has its strengths, most suffer from either high computational complexity or inadequate feature preservation, particularly when dealing with complex geometric structures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>].</p>
<p>Early point cloud simplification techniques primarily focused on spatial uniformity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]. Random Sampling (RS) provides the simplest approach but often fails to preserve important geometric features [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]. VG down-sampling offers improved uniformity but tends to smooth sharp features and edges [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]. CS methods address this limitation by prioritizing areas with high geometric variation, though they require expensive normal and curvature estimations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]. Clustering methods group spatially proximate points and select representative points from each cluster. K-means and DBSCAN have been widely used, but they typically operate in the full three-dimensional space, resulting in high computational costs for large datasets [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]. Some approaches have explored hierarchical clustering to reduce complexity, but these often sacrifice feature preservation at fine scales [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>].</p>
<p>Recent advances in deep learning have led to point cloud simplification networks that learn task-specific importance metrics. While promising, these methods require extensive training data and computational resources, limiting their applicability in resource-constrained environments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>]. Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) clustering has been applied to point cloud segmentation and classification due to its ability to handle uncertainty in data membership [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>]. However, its application to point cloud simplification has been limited, primarily due to the high computational cost of three-dimensional FCM clustering on large datasets [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>].</p>
<p>This paper presents a novel down-sampling method that overcomes these limitations via a unique dimensional decomposition approach. By independently applying FCM clustering to each spatial dimension and integrating the resulting membership information, our method attains an optimal equilibrium between computational efficiency and geometric fidelity. The fundamental innovation of our proposed methodology lies in a systematic dimensional decomposition strategy that transforms the inherently complex three-dimensional point cloud simplification challenge into a series of more manageable one-dimensional analytical problems. This paradigm shift allows us to utilize the mathematical elegance and computational efficiency of single-dimensional fuzzy clustering while still capturing the essential three-dimensional geometric characteristics of point cloud data.</p>
<p>At the core of our approach lies the independent application of FCM clustering to each spatial coordinate axis. This process generates distinct membership functions for the X, Y, and Z dimensions, each representing the relationship between points and the distributional characteristics along that specific axis. These membership functions act as mathematical descriptors that quantify the extent to which each point represents the underlying statistical patterns within each dimension. The dimensionality reduction inherent in this approach provides substantial computational benefits, as the complexity of FCM clustering scales more favorably when applied to one-dimensional data than to its three-dimensional counterpart.</p>
<p>The subsequent integration of these multi-dimensional membership values forms the second crucial innovation of our method. Instead of treating the three dimensions as distinct entities, we have developed a sophisticated integration framework that combines the dimensional information into a unified importance metric. This integration process uses a product-based formulation that inherently highlights points that demonstrate high representativeness across all three dimensions simultaneously. Such points usually correspond to locations where the point cloud displays characteristic geometric features, whereas points with low multi-dimensional representativity often signify redundant or noisy data that can be safely removed without sacrificing geometric fidelity.</p>
<p>The adaptive sampling strategy driven by the derived importance scores achieves a principled balance among the competing objectives inherent in point cloud simplification. Points located at geometrically salient regions are assigned higher importance values due to their strong representativeness across multiple dimensions. Such points typically delineate surface boundaries, characterize curvature extrema, or indicate structural intersections. Conversely, points residing in homogeneous areas or arising from measurement noise exhibit weak dimensional coherence and are therefore assigned lower importance scores. This systematic importance evaluation enables the proposed algorithm to selectively retain critical geometric information while rigorously discarding redundant data. As a result, the method delivers an intelligent simplification capability that surpasses conventional uniform or randomly weighted sampling schemes. In essence, sampling is transformed from a passive selection procedure into an active, information-aware decision-making process that explicitly respects the intrinsic geometric structure of point cloud data.</p>
<p>Moreover, the dimensional independence of our analysis provides inherent robustness to anisotropic data distributions commonly encountered in practical applications. Real-world LiDAR acquisitions often exhibit varying point densities along different axes due to scanner characteristics or environmental factors. Our method naturally accommodates such variations by analyzing each dimension according to its own statistical properties, without imposing artificial symmetry constraints that might distort the simplification process. The theoretical underpinning of this approach rests on the observation that while point clouds exist in three-dimensional space, many of their essential geometric characteristics manifest distinctly along individual coordinate axes. Sharp edges, for instance, typically involve rapid changes in two dimensions while maintaining consistency in the third. Planar surfaces exhibit statistical regularity along their normal direction while showing diversity in the tangential dimensions. By capturing these dimensional signatures through independent FCM clustering and subsequently synthesizing them through intelligent fusion, our method achieves a comprehensive understanding of point cloud geometry that informs effective simplification decisions.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the dimensional independence underlying the proposed analysis confers inherent robustness to anisotropic point distributions frequently encountered in real-world scenarios. LiDAR acquisitions often exhibit nonuniform sampling densities across different axes due to sensor configurations or environmental influences. By treating each dimension according to its own statistical characteristics, the proposed approach naturally accommodates such anisotropy without enforcing artificial symmetry assumptions that could compromise geometric fidelity. This design is motivated by the observation that although point clouds are embedded in three-dimensional space, their essential geometric features often manifest distinctly along individual coordinate axes. For example, sharp edges are typically characterized by abrupt variations in two dimensions while remaining relatively stable in the third, whereas planar surfaces exhibit statistical consistency along the normal direction and greater variability within tangential directions. By capturing these dimension-specific signatures through independent FCM clustering and integrating them via a principled fusion mechanism, the proposed method attains a holistic yet nuanced representation of point cloud geometry that guides effective simplification.</p>
<p>Importantly, this dimensional decomposition and fusion framework extends beyond computational efficiency and reflects a conceptual shift in how point cloud structure is interpreted. Rather than treating simplification as the selection of representative points from a three-dimensional set, the problem is reframed as identifying points that simultaneously encode salient distributional characteristics across all coordinate axes. This perspective enables superior preservation of geometric features while maintaining scalability, thereby addressing a long-standing challenge in large-scale point cloud processing.</p>
<p>The organization of this paper is as follows: <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s2">Section 2</xref> introduces the proposed algorithm and its theoretical foundations. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s3">Section 3</xref> details the experimental setup and a comparative analysis of results. Finally, <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s4">Section 4</xref> concludes the paper with a summary of findings and future research directions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Point cloud simplification method based on multi-dimensional membership functions</title>
<p>In this section, we develop point cloud simplification method based on Multi-dimensional FCM (MFCM) membership functions. The proposed algorithm consists of four main stages: single-dimensional FCM clustering, multi-dimensional membership fusion, adaptive sampling strategy and parameter selection.</p>
<sec id="s2-1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Single-dimensional FCM clustering</title>
<p>Given a LiDAR point cloud dataset <inline-formula id="inf1">
<mml:math id="m1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">P</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> with <inline-formula id="inf2">
<mml:math id="m2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> points, we first separate it into three independent one-dimensional vectors:<disp-formula id="e1">
<mml:math id="m3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">P</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>:</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">P</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>:</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>z</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">P</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>:</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(1)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>For each dimension data, we apply FCM clustering with <inline-formula id="inf3">
<mml:math id="m4">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> clusters. The objective function to minimize is:<disp-formula id="e2">
<mml:math id="m5">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">U</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">V</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(2)</label>
</disp-formula>where <inline-formula id="inf4">
<mml:math id="m6">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> represents the distance between data point <italic>i</italic> and cluster center <italic>j</italic>, <inline-formula id="inf5">
<mml:math id="m7">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3e;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is the fuzziness parameter controlling cluster overlap, and <inline-formula id="inf6">
<mml:math id="m8">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> denotes the membership degree of point <italic>i</italic> and cluster center <italic>j</italic>, satisfying<disp-formula id="e3">
<mml:math id="m9">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2264;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2264;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(3)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>The membership update equation derived through Lagrange optimization is:<disp-formula id="e4">
<mml:math id="m10">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(4)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>The cluster center update equation is:<disp-formula id="e5">
<mml:math id="m11">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mo>&#xb7;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(5)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Multi-dimensional membership fusion</title>
<p>For each point <inline-formula id="inf7">
<mml:math id="m12">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>z</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, we obtain three membership matrices:<disp-formula id="e6">
<mml:math id="m13">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">U</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="[" close="]" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">U</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="[" close="]" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">U</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>z</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="[" close="]" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>z</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(6)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>We define the dimensional representativeness of each point as its maximum membership value in each dimension:<disp-formula id="e7">
<mml:math id="m14">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>max</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:munderover accent="true">
<mml:mi>max</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>z</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:munderover accent="true">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>max</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>z</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(7)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>Then, we develop some fusion strategies to combine these representativeness measures:<disp-formula id="e8">
<mml:math id="m15">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>prod</mml:mtext>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#xb7;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#xb7;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>z</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(8)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>This method emphasizes points that exhibit high representativeness across all dimensions simultaneously. The weighted sum fusion is:<disp-formula id="e9">
<mml:math id="m16">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>sum</mml:mtext>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>z</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>z</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(9)</label>
</disp-formula>where <inline-formula id="inf8">
<mml:math id="m17">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>z</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. This allows adjustable emphasis on different dimensions based on application requirements. Minimum Fusion:<disp-formula id="e10">
<mml:math id="m18">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>min</mml:mi>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>min</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="{" close="}" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>z</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(10)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>This conservative approach ensures basic representativeness in all dimensions. Based on information theory, we compute the entropy of membership distributions:<disp-formula id="e11">
<mml:math id="m19">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2061;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>log</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2061;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(11)</label>
</disp-formula>and define importance as:<disp-formula id="e12">
<mml:math id="m20">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>entropy</mml:mtext>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>z</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#x3f5;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(12)</label>
</disp-formula>where &#x3f5; is a small constant for numerical stability. Lower entropy (more concentrated membership) corresponds to higher importance.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Adaptive sampling strategy and parameter selection</title>
<p>Given a target simplification ratio <inline-formula id="inf10">
<mml:math id="m22">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and corresponding target point count, we define sampling probabilities:<disp-formula id="e13">
<mml:math id="m23">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(13)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>The cumulative distribution function is constructed as:<disp-formula id="e14">
<mml:math id="m24">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(14)</label>
</disp-formula>where <inline-formula id="inf11">
<mml:math id="m25">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> represents indices sorted in descending order of importance. The sampling process proceeds as follows:<list list-type="alpha-lower">
<list-item>
<p>Generate <inline-formula id="inf12">
<mml:math id="m26">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> independent random numbers <inline-formula id="inf13">
<mml:math id="m27">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula id="inf14">
<mml:math id="m28">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula id="inf15">
<mml:math id="m29">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2026;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula id="inf16">
<mml:math id="m30">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>U</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>For each <inline-formula id="inf17">
<mml:math id="m31">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, find the smallest index <inline-formula id="inf18">
<mml:math id="m32">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> satisfying <inline-formula id="inf19">
<mml:math id="m33">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2265;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Include point <inline-formula id="inf20">
<mml:math id="m34">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> in the simplified point cloud</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</p>
<p>Then, we develop an adaptive method for determining the optimal number of clusters <inline-formula id="inf21">
<mml:math id="m35">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> for each dimension:<disp-formula id="e15">
<mml:math id="m36">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#x2308;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>log</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>IQR</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold">d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3f5;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2309;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(15)</label>
</disp-formula>where <inline-formula id="inf22">
<mml:math id="m37">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>IQR</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold">d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is the interquartile range of the data, and <inline-formula id="inf23">
<mml:math id="m38">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>&#x3f5;</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> represents the estimated noise level. The fuzziness parameter <inline-formula id="inf24">
<mml:math id="m39">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is adaptively set based on data characteristics:<disp-formula id="e16">
<mml:math id="m40">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>log</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>&#xb7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>skewness</mml:mtext>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold">d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>kurtosis</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold">d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(16)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>The use of membership functions provides inherent sensitivity to data distribution characteristics. Points located near cluster centers (with high membership values) represent typical features of the data distribution, while points with low membership values across dimensions represent outliers or noise. By preferentially selecting points with high importance scores, our algorithm naturally preserves characteristic features while removing redundant or noisy data.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<label>3</label>
<title>Experimental studies</title>
<p>In this study, we compare the proposed MFCM algorithm with four state-of-the-art point cloud simplification methods: Voxel Grid Down-sampling (VG), a widely adopted uniform approach that partitions space into regular voxels and retains centroid points; Random Sampling (RS), a baseline technique that randomly selects points according to a predefined ratio; Farthest Point Sampling (FPS), an iterative method that maximizes spatial coverage by sequentially selecting points farthest from existing samples; and Curvature-based Sampling (CS), a geometry-aware strategy that prioritizes high-curvature regions to preserve salient geometric features. The experiments utilized six point cloud datasets from Stanford University (Horse, Skull, Bunny, Cactus, Elephant, and Chair), evaluating performance through two widely adopted quantitative metrics:</p>
<p>Chamfer Distance (CD): Measures the average bidirectional distance between point sets. Lower values indicate better overall shape preservation.<disp-formula id="e17">
<mml:math id="m41">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="|" close="|" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:munder>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2208;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:munder>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:munder>
<mml:mi>min</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2208;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:munder>
<mml:mo>&#x2225;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x2225;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="|" close="|" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:munder>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2208;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:munder>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:munder>
<mml:mi>min</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2208;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:munder>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="&#x2016;" close="&#x2016;" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(17)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>Hausdorff Distance (HD): Captures the worst-case maximum deviation. Lower values ensure no significant local distortions.<disp-formula id="e18">
<mml:math id="m42">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>max</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="{" close="}" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:munder>
<mml:mi>sup</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2208;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:munder>
<mml:munder>
<mml:mi>inf</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2208;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:munder>
<mml:mo>&#x2225;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2225;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:munder>
<mml:mi>sup</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2208;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:munder>
<mml:munder>
<mml:mi>inf</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2208;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:munder>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="&#x2016;" close="&#x2016;" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(18)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>Both metrics were computed using efficient kd-tree implementations for nearest neighbor searches, and values were scaled by 1,000 for readability.</p>
<p>The comprehensive experimental evaluation reveals several important insights regarding the performance characteristics of different point cloud simplification algorithms across diverse datasets, which are plotted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figures 1</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref>. The consistent superiority of both MFCM and FPS algorithms across all datasets warrants particular attention. While FPS demonstrates exceptional performance in spatial coverage maximization through its iterative selection of farthest points, MFCM achieves even better results by incorporating multi-dimensional distribution characteristics.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Downsampling results for the Horse.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-14-1780345-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Six 3D point cloud renderings of a horse model show the original with 48,485 points and subsampled results using MFCM, VG, RS, FPS, and CS methods, each with around 4,849 points. Two bar charts display Chamfer Distance and Hausdorff Distance comparisons for subsampling methods.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Downsampling results for the Skull.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-14-1780345-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Six 3D scatter plots display a colored point cloud of a human skull, representing the original dataset and five subsampling methods (MFCM, VG, RS, FPS, CS), each with about two thousand points. Two adjacent bar charts compare methods by Chamfer Distance and Hausdorff Distance, showing CS with the highest error values.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Downsampling results for the Bunny.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-14-1780345-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Six colored 3D point cloud visualizations show an original point cloud and five methods for downsampling to around three thousand five hundred points, each retaining about ninety percent of the shape. Two bar charts compare Chamfer Distance and Hausdorff Distance, with MFCM having the lowest and CS the highest values.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Downsampling results for the Cactus.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-14-1780345-g004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Grid of six 3D point cloud visualizations shows a cactus shape: original point cloud with three thousand two hundred eighty points, and sampled versions using MFCM, VG, RS, FPS, and CS, each with around three hundred twenty-eight points representing ninety percent of the original. Two bar charts compare Chamfer Distance and Hausdorff Distance metrics for all sampling methods, with MFCM showing the lowest values and CS the highest.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Downsampling results for the Elephant.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-14-1780345-g005.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Six colored 3D point cloud visualizations of a rabbit-shaped object compare the original point set to five sampled point sets labeled MFCM, VG, RS, FPS, and CS, with each sampling method showing a reduced point count around two thousand five hundred. Two bar charts display Chamfer and Hausdorff distance metrics for each method, with MFCM showing the lowest distance values and CS the highest.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Downsampling results for the Chair.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-14-1780345-g006.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Six 3D point cloud visualizations compare original and sampled data via different methods labeled MFCM, VG, RS, FPS, and CS, each with roughly 10 percent of points retained. Two bar charts display Chamfer and Hausdorff distance values for each method, showing MFCM with the lowest and CS with the highest errors.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The performance difference can be attributed to several fundamental factors: First, FPS operates purely on spatial distances without considering the underlying data distribution patterns. While effective for ensuring even spatial coverage, this approach may oversample homogeneous regions while potentially down-sampling areas with complex geometric features. In contrast, MFCM analyzes the statistical distribution of points along each dimension independently, enabling it to identify points that are representative not just spatially but also in terms of their distributional characteristics. Second, the dimensional decomposition strategy of MFCM provides a more nuanced understanding of point importance. By examining how points contribute to the overall distribution along each coordinate axis, MFCM can better preserve structural characteristics that might be overlooked in purely distance-based approaches. This is particularly evident in datasets with anisotropic features or directional dependencies, where MFCM demonstrates significant advantages over FPS. Third, the fuzzy membership framework of MFCM introduces a degree of tolerance to noise and outliers that enhances robustness in real-world datasets. While FPS can be sensitive to outlier points that artificially extend the spatial bounds, MFCM&#x2019;s membership-based approach naturally weights points according to their representativeness within clusters, providing inherent robustness.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the experimental results also highlight the scalability of these algorithms with respect to dataset size. For smaller datasets, both FPS and MFCM exhibit comparable performance in terms of simplification accuracy and computational efficiency. However, as the dataset size increases, MFCM demonstrates superior scalability due to its dimensional decomposition strategy, which allows for parallel processing along each dimension. This parallel processing capability significantly reduces the overall computational time, making MFCM more suitable for large-scale point cloud simplification tasks.</p>
<p>In addition to scalability, the experiments also investigate the impact of different parameter settings on the performance of both algorithms. For FPS, the number of iterations and the initial point selection strategy are found to have a significant impact on the final simplification result. In contrast, the performance of the developed MFCM is more stable across different parameter settings, thanks to its adaptive membership assignment mechanism. This mechanism automatically adjusts the importance of each point based on its distributional characteristics, reducing the need for extensive parameter tuning.</p>
<p>In summary, the experimental results not only validate the effectiveness of the proposed MFCM algorithm but also contribute to a deeper understanding of the relative strengths and limitations of different simplification paradigms. The consistent superiority of MFCM across diverse datasets and evaluation metrics suggests that its multi-dimensional, distribution-aware approach represents a significant advancement in point cloud simplification methodology.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s4">
<label>4</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This paper has presented a novel multi-dimensional FCM-based approach for LiDAR point cloud simplification that effectively addresses the critical trade-off between computational efficiency and geometric fidelity preservation. By decomposing the complex three-dimensional simplification problem into independent one-dimensional analyses, our method achieves significant advantages over conventional techniques.</p>
<p>The central innovation of the proposed approach lies in its dimensional decomposition strategy, which enables the efficient application of FCM clustering to individual coordinate axes. This design facilitates the extraction of informative membership functions that explicitly characterize the statistical distribution of point cloud data along each spatial dimension. By subsequently fusing these dimension-wise membership values using an optimized product-based strategy, a unified importance metric is constructed that effectively identifies points most representative of the underlying geometric structure.</p>
<p>Extensive experiments conducted on a diverse set of datasets, including benchmark three-dimensional models, real-world LiDAR scans, and architectural point clouds, demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed MFCM algorithm. In comparisons with four representative state of the art simplification methods, MFCM consistently achieves the lowest Chamfer Distance and Hausdorff Distance at identical simplification ratios. These quantitative advantages are further supported by qualitative visual evaluations, confirming that the proposed method preserves both global shape integrity and fine-scale geometric details more effectively than existing approaches.</p>
<p>Several promising avenues for future research naturally arise from this work. First, the computational efficiency of MFCM can be further enhanced through parallel implementations, as the dimensional independence of the framework is inherently well suited to parallel processing. Second, the proposed formulation may be extended to incorporate additional point attributes beyond spatial coordinates, such as intensity, color, or temporal information in dynamic point clouds. Third, the integration of deep learning techniques offers the potential to automate parameter selection and to learn application specific fusion strategies. Finally, a hierarchical extension of the framework would allow the algorithm to scale efficiently to ultra large point clouds containing billions of points.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the multi-dimensional FCM approach represents a significant advancement in point cloud simplification methodology. By fundamentally rethinking the problem through dimensional decomposition and fuzzy membership analysis, we have developed an algorithm that not only outperforms existing methods but also provides a flexible framework for future extensions and applications. As LiDAR technology continues to advance and generate increasingly large and complex point cloud datasets, methods like MFCM will play an increasingly important role in enabling efficient processing while preserving the rich geometric information essential for accurate perception and analysis.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s5">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="s6">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>XC: Data curation, Investigation, Software, Validation, Writing &#x2013; original draft. ZF: Formal Analysis, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review and editing. WM: Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review and editing, Methodology, Visualization.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s8">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="s9">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s10">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="custom" custom-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/977347/overview">Huadan Zheng</ext-link>, Jinan University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="custom" custom-type="reviewed-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1565806/overview">Yinghua Shen</ext-link>, Chongqing University, China</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2963195/overview">Bo Sun</ext-link>, Taiyuan University of Technology, China</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Suchde</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jacquemin</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davydov</surname>
<given-names>O</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Point cloud generation for meshfree methods: an overview</article-title>. <source>Arch Comput Methods Eng</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>30</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>889</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>915</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11831-022-09820-w</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wiesmann</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Milioto</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stachniss</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Behley</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Deep compression for dense point cloud maps</article-title>. <source>IEEE Robotics Automation Lett</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>6</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>2060</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/lra.2021.3059633</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>A point cloud simplification method based on modified fuzzy C-means clustering algorithm with feature information reserved</article-title>. <source>Math Probl Eng</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>2020</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2020/5713137</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ge</surname>
<given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Uniformization and density adaptation for point cloud data <italic>via</italic> graph laplacian</article-title>. <source>Comput Graph Forum</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>37</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>325</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>37</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/cgf.13293</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wen</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tao</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Learnable skeleton-aware 3D point cloud sampling</article-title>. In: <source>Proc. 2023 IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR)</source> (<year>2023</year>). p. <fpage>17671</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>81</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zeng</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheung</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ng</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pang</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>3D point cloud denoising using graph Laplacian regularization of a low dimensional manifold model</article-title>. <source>IEEE Trans Image Process</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>29</volume>:<fpage>3474</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>89</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/TIP.2019.2961429</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31899426</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Qi</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Feature preserving and uniformity-controllable point cloud simplification on graph</article-title>. In: <source>Proc. IEEE int. conf. multimedia expo (ICME)</source> (<year>2019</year>). p. <fpage>284</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>A framework of point cloud simplification based on voxel grid and its applications</article-title>. <source>IEEE Sensors J</source> (<year>2024</year>) <volume>24</volume>(<issue>5</issue>):<fpage>6349</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>57</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/jsen.2023.3320671</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Quan</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Structure-aware subsampling of tree point clouds</article-title>. <source>IEEE Geosci Remote Sensing Lett</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>19</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/lgrs.2021.3124139</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname>
<given-names>XC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>LS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>HW</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Feature preserving point cloud simplification</article-title>. <source>Opt Precision Eng</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>23</volume>(<issue>9</issue>):<fpage>2666</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>76</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3788/ope.20152309.2666</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lv</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Approximate intrinsic voxel structure for point cloud simplification</article-title>. <source>IEEE Trans Image Process</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>30</volume>:<fpage>7241</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>55</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/TIP.2021.3104174</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34403339</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huo</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xing</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Novel feature preserving method for simplifying the surface point cloud of underground space tunnel</article-title>. <source>IEEE Trans Instrumentation Meas</source> (<year>2024</year>) <volume>73</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/tim.2024.3420354</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mao</surname>
<given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hamzaoui</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hou</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>CS-Net: contribution-based sampling network for point cloud simplification</article-title>. <source>IEEE Trans Visualization Comput Graphics</source> (<year>2025</year>) <volume>31</volume>(<issue>10</issue>):<fpage>9154</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>65</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/tvcg.2025.3591189</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40694462</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pedrycz</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xing</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>LiDAR point cloud simplification algorithm with fuzzy encoding-decoding mechanism</article-title>. <source>Appl Soft Comput</source> (<year>2024</year>) <volume>162</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111852</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>An</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Learning-based sampling method for point cloud segmentation</article-title>. <source>IEEE Sensors J</source> (<year>2024</year>) <volume>24</volume>(<issue>15</issue>):<fpage>24140</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>51</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/jsen.2024.3410373</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname>
<given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>LiDAR point cloud simplification strategy utilizing probabilistic membership</article-title>. <source>Front Phys</source> (<year>2024</year>) <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>1471077</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fphy.2024.1471077</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Efficient roof vertex clustering for wireframe simplification based on the extended multiclass twin support vector machine</article-title>. <source>IEEE Geosci Remote Sensing Lett</source> (<year>2024</year>) <volume>21</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/lgrs.2024.3422842</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sambon</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>De Saint Moulin</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thiran</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oestges</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vandendorpe</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Electromagnetic modeling of extended targets in a distributed antenna system</article-title>. <source>IEEE Trans Radar Syst</source> (<year>2025</year>) <volume>3</volume>:<fpage>1257</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>68</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/trs.2025.3605951</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiong</surname>
<given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zou</surname>
<given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Optimizing temporal data forecasting for stiffness-modulated MEMS reservoir computing</article-title>. <source>IEEE Sensors J</source> (<year>2024</year>) <volume>24</volume>(<issue>22</issue>):<fpage>38092</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>101</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/jsen.2024.3446672</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname>
<given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>A tractable analysis model of information freshness for Mobile edge computing assisted IoT system with layer-coded HARQ</article-title>. <source>IEEE Trans Mobile Comput</source> (<year>2025</year>) <volume>24</volume>(<issue>7</issue>):<fpage>5779</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>92</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/tmc.2025.3539662</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Time-slotted task offloading and resource allocation for cloud-edge-end cooperative computing networks</article-title>. <source>IEEE Trans Mobile Comput</source> (<year>2024</year>) <volume>23</volume>(<issue>8</issue>):<fpage>8225</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>41</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/tmc.2024.3349551</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>