<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="review-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Phys.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-424X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1537948</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fphy.2025.1537948</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Physics</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Review</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Direct reactions for astrophysical p-capture rates with ORRUBA and GODDESS</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Pain</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2025.1537948">10.3389/fphy.2025.1537948</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Pain</surname>
<given-names>S. D.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2907071/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff>
<institution>Physics Division</institution>, <institution>Oak Ridge National Laboratory</institution>, <addr-line>Oak Ridge</addr-line>, <addr-line>TN</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2310076/overview">Alan Wuosmaa</ext-link>, University of Connecticut, United States</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1224168/overview">Mengoni Daniele</ext-link>, National Institute of Nuclear Physics of Padova, Italy</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/73414/overview">Chong Qi</ext-link>, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: S.D. Pain, <email>painsd@ornl.gov</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>26</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>1537948</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>02</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>30</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2025 Pain.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Pain</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Understanding the nucleosynthesis and energy generation in quiescent and explosive stellar burning requires a detailed understanding of reaction rates on many unstable nuclides. Such reaction rates are often governed by the properties of low-lying, isolated proton resonances. Though direct measurements of resonance strengths are ultimately desired, and are a focus of rare isotope beam facilities worldwide, such tour-de-force experiments must be guided by indirect techniques, in order to know resonance energies, <inline-formula id="inf1">
<mml:math id="m1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>J</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> assignments, and estimated widths, to inform targeted measurements. Furthermore, some important low-lying resonances may be too weak for direct measurements with radioactive beams, and indirect techniques provide the only practical constraints. Additionally, there has been growing interest in the astrophysical role of isomeric states, which can influence the reaction flow in nucleosynthetic reaction networks, and hence impact the quantitative interpretation of astronomical observables, such as <inline-formula id="inf2">
<mml:math id="m2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-ray signatures, and elemental and isotopic ratios. Properties of single-proton resonances can be obtained by exploiting the selectivity of direct reactions, such as single-nucleon transfer and charge-exchange reactions. Constraining proton-capture rates via direct reactions has been a focus of the astrophysics program at ORNL for over two decades, spurring the development of the ORRUBA and GODDESS detector systems. Herein, a review of recent developments in instrumentation and radioactive beam delivery (including isomeric beam experiments) is presented, along with some specific examples of astrophysically interesting <inline-formula id="inf3">
<mml:math id="m3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-shell nuclides, which have been a target of recent ORRUBA and GODDESS experiments.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>direct reactions</kwd>
<kwd>isomers</kwd>
<kwd>nucleosynthesis</kwd>
<kwd>novae</kwd>
<kwd>x-ray bursts</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Nuclear Physics&#x200b;</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>1 Introduction</title>
<p>Astrophysical radiative proton-capture reaction rates are often governed by the properties of low-lying discrete proton resonances. In order to constrain the astrophysical reaction rate, the location and strengths of these resonances must be known. However, as the reaction network typically involves short-lived nuclides, complete measurements of proton excitation functions over the astrophysically-important energy range on many important nuclides are not within reach. Consequently, only the most important resonances must be targeted for direct measurement of their strengths. To this end, recoil separators optimized for measuring radiative-capture reactions from isolated resonances in inverse kinematics have been developed across the globe, including the DRAGON recoil separator at TRIUMF, the Daresbury Recoil Separator at the (now closed) Holifield Radioactive Ion Beam Facility (HRIBF), the St George separator at the Nuclear Science Laboratory at Notre Dame, and most recently the SECAR recoil separator at the nascent Facility for Rare Isotope Beams (FRIB).</p>
<p>Though ultimately such direct measurements of resonance strengths are desired, indirect techniques are needed to initially locate and constrain the resonances, so that the most important resonances can be identified. Furthermore, in some cases, important low-energy resonances are too weak for direct radiative-capture reaction measurements with radioactive beams in the foreseeable future; in these cases, indirect techniques are the only way of ascertaining these resonance strengths. Various direct reactions, such as single-particle transfer and charge-exchange reactions, have long been employed for this purpose. The reaction can be chosen to selectively populate certain states (such as states of strong single-particle character, or those of low spin). Such reactions can provide resonance energies, determine the proton orbital angular momenta <inline-formula id="inf4">
<mml:math id="m4">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x2113;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <inline-formula id="inf5">
<mml:math id="m5">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> assignments (determining barrier penetrabilities) and in some cases spectroscopic factors (informing the single-particle width of the resonance) that are critical to determining the resonance strengths and hence the astrophysical reaction rate.</p>
<p>In recent years, as focus shifted toward reactions of radioactive nuclides, which dominate the reaction network in explosive nucleosynthesis, instrumentation and techniques for performing direct reactions in inverse kinematics with radioactive beams have been advanced. There have been a number of excellent reviews of recent progress [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]. Herein, some specific developments are reviewed in the context of the silicon detector array ORRUBA (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s3-1">Section 3.1</xref>), encompassing the GODDESS coupling to the large germanium detector arrays Gammasphere and GRETINA (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s3-2">Section 3.2</xref>), and utilization of new opportunities in rare isotope beam delivery enabling reaction measurements on beams in isomeric states (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s5">Section 5</xref>).</p>
<p>The manuscript is organized as follows. In <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s2">Section 2</xref>, the formalism of radiative-capture reactions though isolated resonances is outlined. In <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s3">Section 3</xref>, the ORRUBA/GODDESS instrumentation for the measurement of direct reactions is discussed. Following this, <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s4">Section 4</xref> details some methods by which direct reactions can be used to constrain resonance strengths. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s5">Section 5</xref> outlines recent efforts and opportunities aimed at constraining reactions on nuclei in isomeric states. Finally, in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s6">Section 6</xref>, a number of astrophysically-motivated cases are discussed, pertaining to proton-induced nucleosynthesis in massive stars, novae and x-ray bursts. These cases all involve odd-odd <inline-formula id="inf6">
<mml:math id="m6">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; <inline-formula id="inf7">
<mml:math id="m7">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.3333em"/>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-shell nuclides, which have been a focus of the ORRUBA and GODDESS physics program over the past two decades.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<title>2 Radiative-capture reactions through isolated resonances</title>
<p>Though direct measurements of radiative-capture reactions on radioactive nuclides are ultimately desired, the limited intensities and high cost associated with radioactive beams makes the measurement of complete excitation functions across the Gamow window unfeasible. However, at the low temperatures associated with quiescent stellar burning, and the hot CNO cycle and breakout into the rp process in novae, radiative-capture rates are often dominated by capture through isolated low-lying discrete resonances. In an astrophysical environment of temperature <inline-formula id="inf8">
<mml:math id="m8">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, the reaction rate per-particle-pair for radiative capture through an isolated resonance is given by<disp-formula id="e1">
<mml:math id="m9">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3e;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#x2009;&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3bc;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x2061;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>exp</mml:mi>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mi>&#x3c9;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(1)</label>
</disp-formula>where <inline-formula id="inf9">
<mml:math id="m10">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3bc;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is the reduced mass for the entrance channel. This reaction rate is proportional exponentially to the resonance energy <inline-formula id="inf10">
<mml:math id="m11">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, and linearly to the resonance strength <inline-formula id="inf11">
<mml:math id="m12">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c9;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, where<disp-formula id="e2">
<mml:math id="m13">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c9;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x393;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x393;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x393;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>.</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(2)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>Here, <inline-formula id="inf12">
<mml:math id="m14">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x393;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> represents the total width of the resonance for all open channels <inline-formula id="inf13">
<mml:math id="m15">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x393;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x393;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x393;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#x22ef;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, and <inline-formula id="inf14">
<mml:math id="m16">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula id="inf15">
<mml:math id="m17">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <inline-formula id="inf16">
<mml:math id="m18">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> are respectively the spins of the proton, &#x201c;target&#x201d; nucleus, and the resonance through which the reaction proceeds.</p>
<p>Rather than measure the complete excitation function over the Gamow window, it is therefore possible to target only the most important resonances, and sum their contributions as a function of temperature, to obtain the total reaction rate. Though this substantially reduces amount of experimental data needed, to just measurements of the strength of a handful of important resonances, it introduces a problem that the resonances (and hence the bombarding energies at which to measure) are not known <italic>a priori</italic>. It is therefore critical that the energies and approximate strengths of resonances in the vicinity of the Gamow window must first be identified, such that direct measurements can subsequently target only those resonances anticipated to contribute appreciably to the astrophysical reaction rate.</p>
<p>It can be seen from <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e2">Equation 2</xref> that determining the energies of resonances in the proximity of the Gamow window is the most crucial component, as this highlights which states may contribute, and constrains their contribution due to the exponential dependence on resonance energy. Having determined resonance energies, further constraints on <inline-formula id="inf17">
<mml:math id="m19">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c9;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> can stem from determining the spins of the states, or constraining the widths from scattering or branching ratio measurements. For low-energy resonances, where the barrier penetrability dominates, constraints on energies and spins can be substantially constraining on <inline-formula id="inf18">
<mml:math id="m20">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c9;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>.</p>
<p>Though there are numerous ways in which resonances can be identified and their strengths constrained, direct reactions, such as transfer and charge-exchange reactions, provide a number of benefits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>], including being able to constrain energies, spins, and ultimately strengths of multiple resonances in a single measurement. Level energies can be determined, either through two-body reaction kinematics or, often more precisely, via the detection of de-excitation <inline-formula id="inf19">
<mml:math id="m21">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> rays. <inline-formula id="inf20">
<mml:math id="m22">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> assignments can be made by measurement of the angular distributions of reaction ejectiles, which are characteristic of the angular momentum of the transferred particle. Furthermore, if a reaction can be selected which populates the states of interest via transfer of the same particle as is captured in the astrophysical reaction, cross sections from the transfer reaction can be used to constrain the resonant-capture cross section. This is usually undertaken by gaining insight into the overlap of the many-body wavefunction of the state with a pure single-particle state: i.e., the extraction of single-particle spectroscopic factors. This is discussed further in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s4-3">Section 4.3</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<title>3 Direct reaction instrumentation</title>
<p>Using direct reactions with radioactive beams to constrain astrophysical reaction rates has been a major focus of the astrophysics program at Oak Ridge National Laboratory over the last two decades. Stemming from the astrophysics program at the HRIBF, charged-particle detectors for radioactive-beam experiments have been developed in collaborations based at ORNL, including silicon detector arrays optimized for inverse-kinematics experiments (the SIDAR array of YY1 detectors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>], based on the LEDA design [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>], followed by the development of ORRUBA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]), and fast ionization chambers for the detection and identification of beam-like recoils [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]. Since the closure of the HRIBF over a decade ago, these detectors have been deployed at various facilities across the US, coupled to the large semiconductor <inline-formula id="inf21">
<mml:math id="m23">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-ray arrays (Gammasphere and GRETINA) and large recoil separators (S800, FMA, and, in future, SECAR) and the JENSA gas-jet target. Below, some basic details of these detectors are discussed.</p>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>3.1 ORRUBA</title>
<p>ORRUBA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>] is a high-solid-angle silicon detector array designed for the measurement of charged-particle reactions with radioactive beams. The position sensitivity of the array, which amounts to approximately 1<inline-formula id="inf22">
<mml:math id="m24">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xb0;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> resolution in polar angle, was designed around the requirements of inverse-kinematics experiments with radioactive beams at Coulomb-barrier energies (<inline-formula id="inf23">
<mml:math id="m25">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>5 MeV/u). The design was initially optimized for measuring (d,p) reactions on heavy fission fragment beams, which were a focus of the research program at the HRIBF at ORNL. The original array comprised two 12-fold rings of custom-designed resistive-strip X3 detectors from Micron Semiconductor, covering angles from <inline-formula id="inf24">
<mml:math id="m26">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> 45<inline-formula id="inf25">
<mml:math id="m27">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xb0;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> to 135<inline-formula id="inf26">
<mml:math id="m28">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xb0;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. In the downstream ring, detector telescopes were deployed (using 65-<inline-formula id="inf27">
<mml:math id="m29">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3bc;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>m-thick BB10 detectors) backed by 1000-<inline-formula id="inf28">
<mml:math id="m30">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3bc;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>m-thick X3 detectors) for particle identification. For the upstream barrel, which typically only detects particles lighter than the target (i.e., protons), a single layer of 1000-<inline-formula id="inf29">
<mml:math id="m31">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3bc;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>m-thick X3 detectors were deployed. Angles further upstream were subtended, when needed, by the SIDAR array of YY1 detectors, typically in a lampshade configuration.</p>
<p>In more recent years, the X3 detectors have been replaced with sX3 detectors (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>), which include 4-fold non-resistive segmentation on the Ohmic contact, for improved energy resolution. Concurrently, the YY1 lampshade was replaced by an annular QQQ5 detector endcap to the sX3 barrel [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>], resulting in a more compact array, with near seamless polar angular coverage, enabling the array to be mounted inside major <inline-formula id="inf30">
<mml:math id="m32">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-ray detector arrays (see <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s3-2">Section 3.2</xref>). The design of the QQQ5 detectors involves radial segmentation which is graded in pitch, placing increasingly finer segmentation away from the beam axis, to match the steepness of the kinematic shifts from either pickup or stripping reactions in inverse kinematics, in order to optimize resolution and channel count.</p>
<p>ORRUBA operates as a standalone detector using a fast ionization chamber as a recoil detector (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s3-3">Section 3.3</xref>), coupled to recoil separators such as the S800 at FRIB, and operates as the main particle detector for the JENSA gas-jet target [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>].</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>3.2 GODDESS</title>
<p>For many direct-reaction measurements, the detection of <inline-formula id="inf31">
<mml:math id="m33">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> rays in coincidence with charged particles is either necessary (Coulomb-excitation measurements, for instance) or highly advantageous. For measurements such as particle transfer reactions, <inline-formula id="inf32">
<mml:math id="m34">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> rays aid significantly in separating closely-spaced states populated in the reaction. In addition to the improved energy resolution of <inline-formula id="inf33">
<mml:math id="m35">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-ray detection, in many cases neighboring levels decay to different states, leading to better separation in <inline-formula id="inf34">
<mml:math id="m36">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-ray energy than the difference in excitation energy. Furthermore, <inline-formula id="inf35">
<mml:math id="m37">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> rays carry additional information on the states populated (their decay paths, angular distributions, lifetimes, etc.) and can provide information on states not populated directly in the transfer reaction, but fed by decay.</p>
<p>Motivated by these advantages, there has been much investment across the globe in couplings of high-resolution and high-efficiency charged-particle and <inline-formula id="inf36">
<mml:math id="m38">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-ray detectors, with a focus on measuring direct reactions on radioactive beams in inverse kinematics. These include TIARA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>] coupled to EXOGAM (GANIL), the SHARC array [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>] coupled to the TIGRESS (TRIUMF), TREX [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>] and more recently HI-TREX [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>] coupled to Miniball (ISOLDE), MUGAST coupled to AGATA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>] (GANIL), and the GODDESS coupling [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>] of ORRUBA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>] to Gammasphere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>] and GRETINA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>].</p>
<p>GODDESS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>] (Pain et al., forthcoming) is a coupling of an upgraded version of ORRUBA to the large semiconductor <inline-formula id="inf37">
<mml:math id="m39">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-ray detector arrays in the US: Gammasphere and GRETINA (and, in the near future, GRETA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">25</xref>]). GODDESS has been in routine operation with GRETINA since 2019 (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>), following its original deployment with Gammasphere in 2015. To date, GODDESS campaigns have been performed at ATLAS (2015, 2019, 2021, 2025), and FRIB (2024). In its default configuration, GODDESS provides near-seamless charged-particle coverage from <inline-formula id="inf38">
<mml:math id="m40">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>15</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xb0;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> to <inline-formula id="inf39">
<mml:math id="m41">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>165</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xb0;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, with <inline-formula id="inf40">
<mml:math id="m42">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xb0;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> of polar angular resolution and <inline-formula id="inf41">
<mml:math id="m43">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>80</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> azimuthal coverage throughout this range, with particle identification in the forward hemisphere. GODDESS can be operated with a compact ionization chamber (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s3-3">Section 3.3</xref>) that mounts at zero degrees, or coupled to recoil separators such as the FMA and the S800.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Photograph of ORRUBA, showing two complete rings of sX3 Si detectors, deployed at ReA (beam direction right-to-left). The Si signals are taken out of vacuum immediately to air-cooled preamplifier boxes (removed in photo), mounted from the preamplifier ring in the downstream direction.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-13-1537948-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Photograph of GODDESS, deployed with GRETINA at ATLAS at Argonne National Laboratory (beam direction left-to-right). The 720-channels of Si signals are taken out of vacuum immediately to air-cooled preamplifier boxes, in the downstream direction. The beam-right hemisphere of GRETINA is retracted for access.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-13-1537948-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In preparation for the deployment of GRETA at FRIB, at the time of writing GODDESS is being upgraded. A slightly smaller configuration, with new endcap detectors and a new vacuum chamber, will allow compatibility with the nearly full implementation of GRETA. This will provide a quasi-4<inline-formula id="inf42">
<mml:math id="m44">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> particle-<inline-formula id="inf43">
<mml:math id="m45">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> spectrometer with semiconductor resolution for FRIB.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>3.3 MAGIC</title>
<p>For inverse-kinematics experiments with radioactive beams, detection and identification of the beam-like recoil is often desirable. Firstly, RIBs are often delivered with contaminants, so event-by-event identification of the recoil is needed to associate reaction ejectiles with the beam constituent of interest. Secondly, reactions are often performed on targets with undesired elements (such as the carbon component of polyethylene and deuterated polyethylene targets). Reactions on these nuclides, such as fusion-evaporation reactions, result in substantially different recoils (both nuclide and energy), which can be readily separated by measurement of the beam-like recoil downstream of the target.</p>
<p>Though recoil separators provide numerous benefits for recoil detection, they are not always available, or necessary. Furthermore, their use is complicated in many cases by the energy, angle and charge-state distributions of beam-like recoils after the reaction target. Alternatively, for beam intensities below <inline-formula id="inf44">
<mml:math id="m46">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>6</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> ions/second, a zero-degree detector that sees the entire beam flux can often be used. Ionization chambers can be very effective as such detectors. They can be segmented along the stopping axis, and easily tuned in pressure to match the required stopping power to the energy and charge of the incoming ion, to optimize particle identification via <inline-formula id="inf45">
<mml:math id="m47">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x394;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>E-E. They are radiation hard, and can deliver good (typically a few percent) resolution at reasonable count rates (<inline-formula id="inf46">
<mml:math id="m48">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>6</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, depending on design).</p>
<p>Conventional transverse-field gridded ionization chambers have been used as zero-degree detectors (e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">26</xref>]), but they are rate limited to <inline-formula id="inf47">
<mml:math id="m49">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> ions/second, due to the long drift times. More recently, a number of axial-field ionization chambers have been developed with increased count-rate capability. The TEGIC detector [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">27</xref>], was designed for high-energy ions (<inline-formula id="inf48">
<mml:math id="m50">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>100 MeV/u), using a series of aluminized Mylar foils, stacked along the beam axis, to form parallel transmission electrodes, alternately biased to form a series of anodes and cathodes. In this manner, the electron and ion drift distance can be substantially reduced (typically to 1&#x2013;2 cm) compared to a more conventional transverse-field gridded ionization chamber (where drifts are typically 5&#x2013;10 cm). The TEGIC electrodes are tilted from the beam axis at 30<inline-formula id="inf49">
<mml:math id="m51">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xb0;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, to help reduce recombination. The reduced drift distance results in substantially increased counting rate capacity, enabling this detector to operate at up to <inline-formula id="inf50">
<mml:math id="m52">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>6</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> ions/second.</p>
<p>Because the foils provide too much dead material for this design to be used for low-energy ions (such as in the 5&#x2013;10 MeV/u direct-reaction experiments discussed herein), an axial-field ionization chamber was built in support of the ORRUBA program. This detector was based upon the concept of the TEGIC detector, but replaced the foils with a series of high-transmission wire grids (using <inline-formula id="inf51">
<mml:math id="m53">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>18 <inline-formula id="inf52">
<mml:math id="m54">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3bc;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>m diameter wires, spaced by 2 mm, giving <inline-formula id="inf53">
<mml:math id="m55">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3e;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>99</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> transmission per grid) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>], so that the ions do not traverse dead material between electrodes (instead, a few percent of the ions stop prematurely, by hitting a wire as they traverse the detector). In this detector, groups of anodes were electrically connected together and read out via charge-sensitive preamplifiers to provide <inline-formula id="inf54">
<mml:math id="m56">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x394;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>E and residual energy signals, while the cathodes were grounded. This provided particle identification at rates up to <inline-formula id="inf55">
<mml:math id="m57">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>6</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> ions/second [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>].</p>
<p>Subsequently, a number of other axial-field ionization chamber detectors have been built upon the wire-grid design, incorporating various improvements. A more compact tilted-grid ionization chamber was built, to operate in the much more confined space of GODDESS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>]. An ionization chamber for ANASEN [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">28</xref>] simplified the design by removing the tilt from the grids, and along with it broadening due to tilted windows and asymmetric dead gas lengths, with minimal impact on resolution or count rate capacity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">29</xref>]. This larger detector also introduced individual wire readout on the entrance anodes, with the rotation of the grids oriented for XY measurement of position of the ion as it enters the detector, with 3 mm resolution. The TRIFIC detector [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">30</xref>] was developed at TRIUMF, using the tilted-grid approach, but biasing the anodes and cathodes symmetrically (rather than grounding the cathodes) for reduced fringe-field effects and enabling operation at higher electric fields.</p>
<p>The most recent detector in this series, MAGIC (Multi Axial-field Gridded Ionization Chamber), is purposefully built for GODDESS (Pain et al., forthcoming). In order to operate in the small space available, while maintaining maximum acceptance and easy reconfiguration, the perpendicular grids are self-supporting and stacked using electric headers (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>), which provide both mechanical support, and electrical connections from each of the grids to the back flange, where signals are brought out of vacuum. This design makes the detector easily adjustable and serviceable. In this detector, the front two anodes use individual wire readout, for XY position measurement, with 2 mm resolution. The remaining anode signals are brought out of vacuum individually, and can easily be recombined (via a custom preamplifier motherboard) to optimize the anode groupings for particle identification. Furthermore, this is the first detector that provides readout of the cathode signal in addition to the anodes, which facilitates gain matching and improved sensitivity (Pain et al., forthcoming).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Photograph of the self-supporting grids of the MAGIC detector (see text). The wires (2 mm pitch) of the first two anodes are read out individually, for XY position measurement of incident ions.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-13-1537948-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4">
<title>4 Using transfer reactions to constrain resonance strengths</title>
<p>This section highlights some manners in which direct reactions can be utilized to constrain resonance strengths, illustrated by some specific examples from ORRUBA/GODDESS experiments.</p>
<sec id="s4-1">
<title>4.1 Constraining resonance strengths by determination of resonance energies</title>
<p>To constrain the reaction rate from a single isolated low-lying resonance, three things are needed: the resonance energy <inline-formula id="inf56">
<mml:math id="m58">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, the <inline-formula id="inf57">
<mml:math id="m59">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> of the resonance, and its resonance strength <inline-formula id="inf58">
<mml:math id="m60">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c9;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. Determination of the energy of the resonance is most critical; for a given resonance strength, it impacts the reaction rate exponentially (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e1">Equation 1</xref>). It also impacts the resonance strength itself (along with the <inline-formula id="inf59">
<mml:math id="m61">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> of the resonance, which constrains the orbital angular momentum of the captured particle) by impacting barrier penetrabilities; at low energies, the barrier penetrabilities, and hence resonance strength, also exhibit an exponential dependence on resonance energy.</p>
<p>The combination of high resolution charged-particle and <inline-formula id="inf60">
<mml:math id="m62">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-ray detection can enable the use of transfer reactions as a mechanism to populate states of astrophysical interest, using high-resolution <inline-formula id="inf61">
<mml:math id="m63">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-ray spectroscopy to obtain precise energies of the states populated. In such measurements, the detection, identification and energy measurement of the outgoing ejectile can give unambiguous determination of the nucleus populated, and the approximate formation energy. By detecting angle of the outgoing proton not only helps with the kinematic reconstruction of the two-body reaction, but also enables determination of the momentum vector of the recoiling nucleus, which can be used for a more-precise Doppler correction to the <inline-formula id="inf62">
<mml:math id="m64">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> rays, and can provide angular distributions that can be used for <inline-formula id="inf63">
<mml:math id="m65">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> assignments.</p>
<p>In this approach, it is not important whether the reaction proceeds via the component of the wavefunction important for the capture reaction; that is, the resonance strength is not constrained from the cross sections, only by the energy and <inline-formula id="inf64">
<mml:math id="m66">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> assignments derived from the analysis. This can often reduce uncertainties on resonance strength from experiments with relatively simple analyses, without the concerns pertaining to efficiencies, acceptances, deadtime and normalization that must be addressed in order to extract reaction cross sections for spectroscopic factors (as discussed in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s4-2">Section 4.2</xref>). To this end, a series of (<sup>3</sup>He,t) experiments have been performed with GODDESS; examples of such experiments are given in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s6-1">Sections 6.1</xref> and <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s6-6">6.6</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-2">
<title>4.2 Constraining resonance strengths by measuring spectroscopic factors</title>
<p>For low-lying resonances, <inline-formula id="inf65">
<mml:math id="m67">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x393;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is a particularly important parameter for determining <inline-formula id="inf66">
<mml:math id="m68">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c9;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. Indeed, in very low-lying resonances (below <inline-formula id="inf67">
<mml:math id="m69">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>500 keV), <inline-formula id="inf68">
<mml:math id="m70">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x393;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is generally much smaller than <inline-formula id="inf69">
<mml:math id="m71">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x393;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. In this case, the resonance strength can be approximated as:<disp-formula id="e3">
<mml:math id="m72">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c9;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x393;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>where <inline-formula id="inf70">
<mml:math id="m73">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x393;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> depends critically on <inline-formula id="inf71">
<mml:math id="m74">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <inline-formula id="inf72">
<mml:math id="m75">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> of the resonance.</p>
<p>In the absence of further information, the maximum strength of a pure single-particle resonance at <inline-formula id="inf73">
<mml:math id="m76">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and with <inline-formula id="inf74">
<mml:math id="m77">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> can be calculated. At such low energies, the value of this width, <inline-formula id="inf75">
<mml:math id="m78">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x393;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, is dominated by the penetrability of the Coulomb and angular-momentum barriers, so is strongly dependent on <inline-formula id="inf76">
<mml:math id="m79">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <inline-formula id="inf77">
<mml:math id="m80">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (or, more strictly, the orbital angular momentum of the proton, <inline-formula id="inf78">
<mml:math id="m81">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x2113;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>). The single-proton width can be determined by calculating single-particle wavefunctions corresponding to the elastic scattering of a proton by a realistic diffuse potential, such as a Woods-Saxon well [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">31</xref>], at the resonance energy of interest [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">32</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">33</xref>]. Tuned by adjusting the potential depth, the width of the pure single-proton resonance is determined by the energy dependence of the phase shift <inline-formula id="inf79">
<mml:math id="m82">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b4;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, and can be calculated by codes such as DWUCK and WSPOT [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">34</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">35</xref>].</p>
<p>The proton width of a given resonance is further dependent on the overlap between the many-body nuclear wavefunction of the resonance and the pure single-proton wavefunction - i.e., the proton spectroscopic factor, <inline-formula id="inf80">
<mml:math id="m83">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>:<disp-formula id="e4">
<mml:math id="m84">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x393;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext> </mml:mtext>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x393;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>.</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(3)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>The many-body wavefunction is, <italic>a priori</italic>, unknown for a given resonance. However, it can be constrained by a nuclear structure model, such as shell-model calculations, or ideally by experimental data, such as from a transfer reaction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>].</p>
<p>The proportionality between cross sections (i.e., spectroscopic factors) from proton-transfer reactions and radiative proton direct-capture [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">36</xref>] and resonant capture reactions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">33</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">37</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">38</xref>] is documented. It is important to note that in the extraction of resonance strengths from transfer reactions, the same potential should be used for the calculation of the transfer-reaction cross sections as for the calculation of the single-particle proton widths, as was suggested by the late John Schiffer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">32</xref>]. Particularly, a strong dependency between the geometry of the single-particle binding potential and reaction cross sections is well known; providing a consistent potential is employed between the two reactions, much of the uncertainty associated with this potential choice cancels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">32</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">39</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">41</xref>].</p>
<p>The use of transfer reactions to obtain resonance strengths has a number of advantages. Firstly, it can be used to study multiple resonances in a single measurement. Secondly, because the transfer reactions are measured at energies above the Coulomb barrier (typically, several MeV/u upward), the cross sections are not hindered by barrier penetrability. This allows transfer reactions to be used to study very low-lying resonances that are out of reach for direct measurements in the foreseeable future.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-3">
<title>4.3 Benchmarking resonance strengths from (d,p) against direct (p,<inline-formula id="inf81">
<mml:math id="m85">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) measurements</title>
<p>Though proton-transfer reactions, such as (<sup>3</sup>He,d) and (d,n), are the reactions of choice for extracting proton spectroscopic factors, the application of these reactions to experiments in inverse kinematics with radioactive beams remains a challenge. Both (<sup>3</sup>He,d) and (d,n) reactions are experimentally complicated, by target requirements and the complexities of spectroscopic neutron detection, respectively. Recently, the technique of measuring angle-integrated cross sections by &#x3b3;-ray tagging the final state, such as a number of recent measurements using GRETINA and the S800 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">42</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">43</xref>], has been employed. Though this approach can be effective, it relies on knowledge of proton-<inline-formula id="inf83">
<mml:math id="m87">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> branching ratios, corrections for feeding, and on the spins of the final states being known in order to infer <inline-formula id="inf84">
<mml:math id="m88">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x2113;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. Furthermore, for transfer onto states with non-zero spins, even knowledge of <inline-formula id="inf85">
<mml:math id="m89">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> assignments of final states is insufficient for a conclusive interpretation, as the total angle-integrated cross section for a given final <inline-formula id="inf86">
<mml:math id="m90">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> can be composed of a sum of multiple proton orbital angular momentum couplings. Without a method to deconvolve these components, it is impossible to assign more than limits on spectroscopic factors for the individual orbital angular components, which inherently have vastly different contributions to the astrophysical reaction rate, due to barrier penetrabilities. Combining these experiments with neutron detection helps address this issue, at the cost of efficiency and the complexity of neutron detection.</p>
<p>However, the isospin independence of the nuclear force can be exploited to constrain proton spectroscopic factors from their neutron counterparts, by using the mirrored reaction (for example, the (d,p) reaction) to extract neutron spectroscopic factors for the equivalent state in the mirror system. There are several experimental advantages to using this technique of measuring (d,p) on proton-rich nuclei, including simple targets, high particle-detection efficiency that is well understood, a compact setup that can be fielded with large germanium detector arrays, and positive Q values which reduce kinematic compression in inverse-kinematic stripping reactions. This approach has been benchmarked for a number of astrophysically-interesting cases in the <inline-formula id="inf87">
<mml:math id="m91">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> shell, finding general systematic agreement between proton and neutron spectroscopic factors (extracted from (<sup>3</sup>He,d) and (d,p) reactions, respectively), and associated direct measurements of proton resonance strengths, to within about 30<inline-formula id="inf88">
<mml:math id="m92">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">37</xref>]. The (d,p) reaction has recently exploited using isobaric analog states in neighboring isobars, at the NSCL using the <sup>26</sup>Si(d,p<inline-formula id="inf89">
<mml:math id="m93">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>27</sup>Si to constrain the <sup>26m</sup>Al(p,<inline-formula id="inf90">
<mml:math id="m94">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>27</sup>Si reaction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">44</xref>], and at TRIUMF using the <sup>23</sup>Ne(d,p<inline-formula id="inf91">
<mml:math id="m95">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>24</sup>Ne reaction to constrain the <sup>23</sup>Al(p,<inline-formula id="inf92">
<mml:math id="m96">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>24</sup>Ne reaction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">45</xref>].</p>
<p>Furthermore, a number of astrophysically-interesting nuclides for proton capture lie on or close to the <inline-formula id="inf93">
<mml:math id="m97">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; <inline-formula id="inf94">
<mml:math id="m98">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> line (See <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s6">Section 6</xref>). The technique described above is further simplified in the case of the <inline-formula id="inf95">
<mml:math id="m99">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; <inline-formula id="inf96">
<mml:math id="m100">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> nuclides, as the &#x2018;target&#x2019; nucleus is self-conjugate, and hence identical for the two mirror systems. <sup>26</sup>Al represents an important testing ground for this approach, as it is a radioactive <inline-formula id="inf97">
<mml:math id="m101">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; <inline-formula id="inf98">
<mml:math id="m102">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> nuclide with strong astrophysical interest [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">46</xref>], yet the ground state (<sup>26g</sup>Al) has a long enough lifetime that it can be fabricated into target. Consequently, numerous resonances in the <sup>26g</sup>Al(p,<inline-formula id="inf99">
<mml:math id="m103">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) reaction have been well studied in both normal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">47</xref>] and inverse [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">48</xref>] kinematics, as well as with indirect techniques such as <sup>26g</sup>Al (<sup>3</sup>He,d) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">47</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">49</xref>] using an <sup>26g</sup>Al target, and inverse kinematics (d,p) measurements using beams of <sup>26</sup>Al [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">50</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">52</xref>]. The lowest resonance for which there have been direct measurements of the resonance strength via <sup>26g</sup>Al(p,<inline-formula id="inf100">
<mml:math id="m104">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) is the 189-keV resonance. This has been measured [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">47</xref>] using an <sup>26g</sup>Al target to be 0.055 (9) meV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">47</xref>] and, via inverse kinematics using a <inline-formula id="inf101">
<mml:math id="m105">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>9</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> ions/s radioactive beam at TRIUMF using the DRAGON recoil separator to be 0.035 (7) meV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">48</xref>]. An indirect measurement of the <sup>26g</sup>Al(<sup>3</sup>He,d)<sup>27</sup>Si reaction using an <sup>26g</sup>Al target and a Q3D spectrograph yielded a resonance strength of 0.064 for an <inline-formula id="inf102">
<mml:math id="m106">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x2113;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> transfer, with unreported uncertainty (statistical errors on the differential cross section amount to <inline-formula id="inf103">
<mml:math id="m107">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>20</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>. This experiment was unable to probe lower-energy resonances due to the strong backgrounds from the <sup>27</sup>Al component of the target.</p>
<p>More recently (d,p) experiments using radioactive <sup>26</sup>Al beams have been used to determine the strengths of resonances out of current reach of direct (p,<inline-formula id="inf104">
<mml:math id="m108">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) measurements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">50</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">51</xref>], which are unconstrained by target impurities that limited the <sup>26g</sup>Al(<sup>3</sup>He,d)<sup>27</sup>Si experiment. These experiments are described in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s6-3">Section 6.3</xref>. Concurrently, as a benchmarking of the (d,p) technique, spectroscopic factors for the mirrors to high-lying resonances were extracted, and resonance strengths determined and compared to direct measurements using (p,<inline-formula id="inf105">
<mml:math id="m109">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) reactions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">50</xref>].</p>
<p>When constraining resonance strengths via mirror symmetry, it is important to note that the mirror states in the two systems lie at different energies with respect to the separation energy. For example, the low-lying resonances in the <sup>26</sup>Al &#x2b; p system lie hundreds of keV above <inline-formula id="inf106">
<mml:math id="m110">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> in <sup>27</sup>Si, whereas the mirror states in the <sup>26</sup>Al &#x2b; n system lie 2&#x2013;3 MeV below <inline-formula id="inf107">
<mml:math id="m111">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> in <sup>27</sup>Al. Though the wavefunctions of the mirror states are of a highly similar structure, there are differences due to the effects of different couplings to the continuum. In some studies (e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">51</xref>]), the spectroscopic factors are assumed to be equal in the two systems to about <inline-formula id="inf108">
<mml:math id="m112">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>30</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, which is often a reasonable approximation, compared to other uncertainties in the experiments, and certainly to the potential orders of magnitude uncertainty in resonance strengths prior to experimental constraint. However, a rigorous approach is to explicitly account for the systematic difference in spectroscopic factors in the two systems due to coupling to the continuum. In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">50</xref>], spectroscopic factors were calculated for bound <sup>27</sup>Al states and unbound <sup>27</sup>Si in the Shell Model Embedded in the Continuum (SMEC) formalism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">53</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">54</xref>], using the USDb interaction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">55</xref>]. The ratio of spectroscopic factors between the two mirror systems was then used to scale the experimentally-determined spectroscopic factors between <sup>27</sup>Al and <sup>27</sup>Si. This scaling, which is dependent on the energies of the states with respect to their separation energies, and the orbital angular momentum, is typically of the order 10&#x2013;40<inline-formula id="inf109">
<mml:math id="m113">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5">
<title>5 Opportunities with isomeric beams</title>
<p>There is a growing understanding of the importance that isomers play in astrophysical reaction networks (astromers) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">46</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">56</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">62</xref>], impacting reaction flow and effective lifetimes, in scenarios ranging from massive stars, to novae, supernovae, and r-process nucleosythesis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">44</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">46</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">63</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">64</xref>]. For example, many odd-odd <inline-formula id="inf110">
<mml:math id="m114">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; <inline-formula id="inf111">
<mml:math id="m115">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> nuclides in the <italic>sd</italic> and <italic>fp</italic> shells are of substantial astrophysical interest (see <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s6">Section 6</xref>), affecting reaction flow, and impacting astronomical observables such as isotopic ratios and prompt <inline-formula id="inf112">
<mml:math id="m116">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-ray signatures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">46</xref>]). Many also have low-lying spin isomers which must be incorporated into the reaction network (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Properties of the ground and isomeric states in odd-odd nuclides in the <inline-formula id="inf113">
<mml:math id="m117">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> shell and lower <inline-formula id="inf114">
<mml:math id="m118">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> shell. In most cases, either the ground state or isomer has a lifetime of comparable duration to the possible range of holdup times (10s of ms to seconds) in the ReA system, potentially enabling the employment of the hold-up technique (see text) to manipulate the GS:IS content of the beam.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">Nuclide</th>
<th align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf115">
<mml:math id="m119">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (GS)</th>
<th align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf116">
<mml:math id="m120">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (IS)</th>
<th align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf117">
<mml:math id="m121">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (GS)</th>
<th align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf118">
<mml:math id="m122">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (IS)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>22</sup>Na</td>
<td align="center">3<sup>&#x2b;</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">1<sup>&#x2b;</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">2.6 years</td>
<td align="center">240 ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>24</sup>Al</td>
<td align="center">4<sup>&#x2b;</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">1<sup>&#x2b;</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">2 s</td>
<td align="center">130 ms</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>26</sup>Al</td>
<td align="center">5<sup>&#x2b;</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">0<sup>&#x2b;</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">0.7 My</td>
<td align="center">6.3 s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>30</sup>P</td>
<td align="center">1<sup>&#x2b;</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">0<sup>&#x2b;</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">2.5 min</td>
<td align="center">96 fs</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>34</sup>Cl</td>
<td align="center">0<sup>&#x2b;</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">3<sup>&#x2b;</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">1.5 s</td>
<td align="center">32 min</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>38</sup>K</td>
<td align="center">3<sup>&#x2b;</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">0<sup>&#x2b;</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">6.7 min</td>
<td align="center">0.9 s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>42</sup>Sc</td>
<td align="center">0<sup>&#x2b;</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">7<sup>&#x2b;</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">0.7 s</td>
<td align="center">1 min</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Simplified reaction network for nova nucleosythesis, omitting <inline-formula id="inf119">
<mml:math id="m123">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b2;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> decays and photodissociation reactions for clarity. The odd-odd <inline-formula id="inf120">
<mml:math id="m124">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; <inline-formula id="inf121">
<mml:math id="m125">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> nuclides, which are all of particular astrophysical interest (see text), are highlighted, along with nuclides with isomeric states (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>) on which capture cross sections are needed.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-13-1537948-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The lack of information on reaction cross sections on isomers in radioactive nuclides presents a particular challenge. Beam production techniques typically populate both the ground state (GS) and isomeric state (IS) of such nuclides. However, in general, the ratio is difficult to predict or control without undesired impacts on other beam properties.</p>
<sec id="s5-1">
<title>5.1 Production and control of mixed GS:IS beams at FRIB</title>
<p>Recent developments at the ReA facility at FRIB are enabling the delivery of beams containing isomeric states in which the GS:IS composition can be controlled without impact on the other properties of the reaccelerated beam [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">65</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">66</xref>]. This is achieved by completely stopping the fragmentation beam, and reaccelerating it to energies appropriate for either direct measurements at astrophysical energies, or to Coulomb-barrier energies that are appropriate for indirect techniques for constraining astrophysical reaction rates, such as direct reactions. The GS:IS ratio of the reaccelerated beam can be controlled by two mechanisms. Firstly, the tuning of the fragment separator can be employed to change the GS:IS content of the fragmentation beam before stopping and reacceleration. Secondly, if the lifetimes of the two states are conducive, the adjustable hold-up times in the reacceleration system can be used to further modify the GS:IS composition of the reaccelerated beam. Crucially, because of the stopping and reacceleration, the final beam properties (energy, emittance, etc.) are largely isolated from these adjustments to the GS:IS ratio. These two mechanisms are discussed in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s5-1-1">Section 5.1.</xref>1 and <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s5-1-2">Section 5.1.2.</xref>
</p>
<sec id="s5-1-1">
<title>5.1.1 Selection by fragment momentum</title>
<p>In general, projectile fragmentation populates nuclei in an ensemble of excited states, which subsequently <inline-formula id="inf122">
<mml:math id="m126">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> decay in-flight; in nuclides with isomers, this can result in feeding of the isomer as well as the ground state. If that isomer has a comparable lifetime to the flight-time of the beam, a beam can be delivered with a mixed GS:IS composition. Due to the differences in spin between the GS and IS, some control over GS:IS ratio can be achieved by selectively tuning the fragment separator to transmit a subset of the fragmentation momentum distribution. In two studies, performed at the NSCL prior to FRIB operations, the production of mixed GS:IS beams of <sup>38</sup>K [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">65</xref>] and <sup>34</sup>Cl [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">66</xref>] were investigated. In both cases, the beams were produced via the 1p-1n removal channel of the fragmentation of a primary beam (<sup>40</sup>Ca and <sup>36</sup>Ar, respectively), incident at similar energies (140 and 150 MeV/u) on a beryllium production target. It is noteworthy that both nuclides have the same GS and IS spins (though reversed ordering), and comparable lifetimes (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). In both studies, the GS and IS were populated in the fragmentation reaction with approximately equal proportions. Tuning the fragment separator to transmit the low-momentum tail of the fragmentation distribution (which stems from smaller-impact-parameter fragmentation events with on-average larger momentum transfer) was found to enhance the fractional population of the higher-spin state (the 3<sup>&#x2b;</sup> GS in <sup>38</sup>K, and the <inline-formula id="inf123">
<mml:math id="m127">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> IS in <sup>34</sup>Cl) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">65</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">66</xref>], albeit at the cost of total production yields.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5-1-2">
<title>5.1.2 Selection by lifetime</title>
<p>In addition to the spin selectivity obtainable by the tuning of the fragment separator, the content of the reaccelerated beam is subject to the holdup times inherent to the ReA system. If one or both of the lifetimes of GS or IS is comparable to the range of available hold-up times, the content of the reaccelerated beam can be manipulated by adjusting the hold-up time. The reacceleration process involves stopping the fragmentation beam in a gas stopper, preparing the ions in a cooler-buncher trap, and charge-breeding the ions in an electron-beam ion trap (EBIT), before reacceleration in the ReA linac. In this process, the ions spend an equal amount of time in the cooler-buncher and EBIT; this time is adjustable, in the range of 10s of ms to seconds. By setting this holdup time based on the lifetime of the ground and/or isomeric states involved, the composition of the beam can be adjusted by controlling how much of each species is allowed to <inline-formula id="inf124">
<mml:math id="m128">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b2;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> decay before reacceleration. The advantages of this approach are several-fold:<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Beams at ReA can be delivered at energies spanning direct astrophysics measurements (100s of keV/u to a few MeV/u) to transfer-reactions (5&#x2013;15 MeV/u).</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; The high-quality reaccelerated beam emittance (<inline-formula id="inf125">
<mml:math id="m129">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> energy spread, <inline-formula id="inf126">
<mml:math id="m130">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>2-mm beam spot size) is critical to recoil-separator acceptance for radiative-capture measurements, and to resolution in kinematic reconstruction in direct reactions, such as transfer reactions or inelastic scattering.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Data can be acquired with two different GS:IS beam compositions without affecting other properties of the reaccelerated beam. This enables a straightforward deconvolution of the GS and IS yields, without having to account for additional changes to the experimental response.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5-1-3">
<title>5.1.3 Production of pure isomeric beams</title>
<p>In addition, it is possible to produce certain beams almost entirely in one either of isomeric state or ground state, by taking advantage of the selectivity of <inline-formula id="inf127">
<mml:math id="m131">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b2;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> decay, which often very preferentially populates just one of the of two states in a nuclide, and the lifetimes of the nuclides involved. For example, the <inline-formula id="inf128">
<mml:math id="m132">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b2;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> decay of <sup>26</sup>Si results almost entirely in population of the isomeric state of <sup>26</sup>Al<inline-formula id="inf129">
<mml:math id="m133">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3e;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>99.9</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. So, rather than tuning the fragment separator for <sup>26</sup>Al in the method described above, which would produce a beam of <sup>26</sup>Al in both the ground and isomeric states, the fragment separator can instead be tuned for the <inline-formula id="inf130">
<mml:math id="m134">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b2;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-decay parent, <sup>26</sup>Si. The <sup>26</sup>Si can then be held up in the ReA system for long enough that a substantial fraction <inline-formula id="inf131">
<mml:math id="m135">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b2;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> decays to <sup>26</sup>Al, exclusively in the IS, which can then be reaccelerated. The resultant beam is then a mix of <sup>26</sup>Si and <sup>26</sup>Al, with the <sup>26</sup>Al component exclusively in the IS. Though the beam is not isobarically pure, the contaminant is a different element, rather than a different state in the same nuclide, which is much easier to handle in experiments due the <italic>Z</italic> difference, either by identification of recoils in a zero degree detector (such as an ionization chamber, discussed in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s3-3">Section 3.3</xref>) or a recoil separator. The first experiment using this approach has been approved for beam time at FRIB [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">67</xref>]. This experiment will measure the <sup>26m</sup>Al(<inline-formula id="inf132">
<mml:math id="m136">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>,p) reaction using the JENSA gas-jet target and ORRUBA, and is currently awaiting scheduling.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s6">
<title>6 The odd-odd N &#x3d; Z <italic>sd</italic>-shell nuclides</title>
<p>This section highlights the usage of the techniques and instrumentation described above to determine astrophysical reaction rates due to isolated proton resonances, on nuclides in ground and isomeric states. These examples are located within a region of the nuclear chart (the odd-odd <inline-formula id="inf133">
<mml:math id="m137">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; <inline-formula id="inf134">
<mml:math id="m138">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> nuclides in the <inline-formula id="inf135">
<mml:math id="m139">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> shell) which has been a focus of the ORRUBA/GODDESS program, highlighting some experiments which have been performed, and some which are planned for the near future.</p>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref> shows a simplified reaction network for nova nucleosynthesis, including the hot CNO cycle and breakout reactions into the rp process. The odd-odd <inline-formula id="inf136">
<mml:math id="m140">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; <inline-formula id="inf137">
<mml:math id="m141">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> nuclides are highlighted, as these are of elevated astrophysical interest. The <sup>18</sup>F(p,<inline-formula id="inf138">
<mml:math id="m142">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>18</sup>Ne reaction competes with the <sup>18</sup>F(p,<inline-formula id="inf139">
<mml:math id="m143">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) reaction, governing breakout from the hot CNO cycle and the synthesis of heavier elements. The radioisotope <sup>22</sup>Na is anticipated to be produced in sufficient quantities that the 1.275-MeV <inline-formula id="inf140">
<mml:math id="m144">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-ray from its decay may be a prompt observable from nova explosions, yet its abundance is subject to uncertainties on the astrophysical rate of the <sup>22</sup>Na(p,<inline-formula id="inf141">
<mml:math id="m145">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>22</sup>Na destruction reaction. <sup>26</sup>Al is the most-studied radionuclide, with the 1.8 MeV <inline-formula id="inf142">
<mml:math id="m146">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-ray line associated with its <inline-formula id="inf143">
<mml:math id="m147">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b2;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> decay being the subject of years of data collected with the HEAO [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">68</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">69</xref>], the COMPTEL and INTEGRAL satellite <inline-formula id="inf144">
<mml:math id="m148">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-ray telescopes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">70</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">73</xref>], and is used to map regions of star formation and to trace stellar ejecta in the interstellar medium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">74</xref>]. However, the destruction reaction <sup>26</sup>Al(p,<inline-formula id="inf145">
<mml:math id="m149">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>27</sup>Si impacts the quantitative interpretation of this signal. The rate of the <sup>30</sup>P(p,<inline-formula id="inf146">
<mml:math id="m150">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>31</sup>S reaction is crucial for classical nova nucleosynthesis, bottle-necking the reaction flow into the A &#x3d; 30&#x2013;40 mass range. The <sup>34</sup>S/<sup>32</sup>S isotopic ratio in pre-solar grains, which is believed to be a strong indicator of nova origin, is impacted by the <sup>34</sup>Cl(p,<inline-formula id="inf147">
<mml:math id="m151">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>35</sup>Ar reaction rate, which governs the reaction flow due to the unbound nature of <sup>34</sup>K. The <sup>38</sup>K(p,<inline-formula id="inf148">
<mml:math id="m152">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>39</sup>Ca reaction likewise bottlenecks the reaction flow to higher masses due to the unbound nature of <sup>39</sup>Sc.</p>
<p>The situation is further complicated because many of these <inline-formula id="inf149">
<mml:math id="m153">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; <inline-formula id="inf150">
<mml:math id="m154">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> nuclides have low-lying isomers with sufficiently long lifetimes that they can contribute to the reaction network. At low temperatures, the ground and isomeric states can be independently populated and destroyed by capture reactions and <inline-formula id="inf151">
<mml:math id="m155">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b2;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> decay, so are typically treated as independent species in reaction networks. However, at elevated temperatures they can be connected, via thermal excitations to higher levels. In the limit of high-enough temperature, the two states are in thermal equilibrium, and can be treated as a single effective species. At intermediate temperatures, there is a transition between these two scenarios, resulting in strongly temperature-dependent effective properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">57</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">75</xref>]. For the reaction network, proton-capture cross sections are required on both ground state and isomer. With new techniques of isomeric beam production (such as those outlined in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s5">Section 5</xref>), indirect techniques are being used to unambiguously study resonances that are sensitive to the overlap in the many-body wavefunction to single-particle resonances on both ground states and isomers. Examples of such experiments are described in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s6-3">Sections 6.3</xref>, <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s6-5">6.5</xref>, and <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s6-6">6.6</xref>.</p>
<sec id="s6-1">
<title>6.1 The <sup>18</sup>F(p,<inline-formula id="inf152">
<mml:math id="m156">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>19</sup>Ne reaction</title>
<p>Understanding the reaction flow breaking out of the hot CNO cycle, and the abundance of <sup>18</sup>F produced in novae (a major source of 511-keV radiation, and hence a potential prompt <inline-formula id="inf153">
<mml:math id="m157">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-ray observable), is influenced by the strengths of resonances in <sup>19</sup>Ne, which impact the <sup>18</sup>F(p,<inline-formula id="inf154">
<mml:math id="m158">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>15</sup>O and <sup>18</sup>F(p,<inline-formula id="inf155">
<mml:math id="m159">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>19</sup>Ne reactions. An experiment was performed to measure the <sup>18</sup>F(d,p)<sup>19</sup>F reaction to determine spectroscopic factors in the mirror system, to constrain the proton widths in <sup>19</sup>Ne [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">76</xref>]. An isotopically-pure <sup>18</sup>F beam was from the HRIBF was impinged at 6 MeV/u upon a 160 <inline-formula id="inf156">
<mml:math id="m160">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3bc;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>g/cm<sup>2</sup> deuterated polyethylene target. In this pioneering experiment using a (d,p) reaction in inverse-kinematics with a radioactive beam, and an application of the mirror-symmetry approach, proton ejectiles were detected at backward angles in the SIDAR array. In coincidence, the very forward-focused <sup>19</sup>Ne recoils were detected in coincidence at the focal plane of the Daresbury Recoil Separator, while the <sup>15</sup>N recoils from the <inline-formula id="inf157">
<mml:math id="m161">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> emission channel were detected in an annular silicon detector at forward angles. Angular distributions for the protons were measured, and spectroscopic factors extracted from a DWBA analysis, from which proton widths were determined using mirror symmetry. These were used to calculate the astrophysical rate of the <sup>18</sup>F(p,<inline-formula id="inf158">
<mml:math id="m162">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>15</sup>O reaction, which was found to be reduced by approaching an order of magnitude over the temperature range of classical novae [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">76</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">77</xref>]. However, systematic uncertainties remained pertaining to the precise mirror assignments between <sup>19</sup>Ne and <sup>19</sup>F.</p>
<p>More recently, uncertainties in this reaction rate stemming from uncertainties in the energies of low-lying resonances <sup>19</sup>Ne have been addressed, using the <sup>19</sup>F(<sup>3</sup>He,<inline-formula id="inf159">
<mml:math id="m163">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>19</sup>Ne reaction, measured using GODDESS at ATLAS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">78</xref>]. The experiment used a 30-MeV <sup>3</sup>He beam incident on a <inline-formula id="inf160">
<mml:math id="m164">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>1 mg/cm<sup>2</sup> <inline-formula id="inf161">
<mml:math id="m165">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>CaF</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> target, and outgoing tritons were detected and identified in the ORRUBA silicon detectors. De-excitation <inline-formula id="inf162">
<mml:math id="m166">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> rays were measured in coincidence in the Gammasphere array of Compton-suppressed HPGe detectors. Over forty decays from 21 energy levels were identified. In particular, the positions of two 3/2<sup>&#x2b;</sup> states near the proton threshold were determined, and the location of an 11/2<sup>&#x2b;</sup> state, previously thought to be unbound, was found to be sub-threshold. This reduced the upper limit to the <sup>18</sup>F(p,<inline-formula id="inf163">
<mml:math id="m167">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>15</sup>O reaction rate by a factor of 1.5&#x2013;17 across the nova temperature range, reducing the nova detection probability uncertainty by a factor of two [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">78</xref>].</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6-2">
<title>6.2 The <sup>22</sup>Na(p,<inline-formula id="inf164">
<mml:math id="m168">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>23</sup>Na reaction</title>
<p>The radioisotope <sup>22</sup>Na is one of the most promising targets of discrete <inline-formula id="inf165">
<mml:math id="m169">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-ray astronomy, producing a 1.275 MeV <inline-formula id="inf166">
<mml:math id="m170">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-ray line with a lifetime (<inline-formula id="inf167">
<mml:math id="m171">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; 2.6 years) that is sufficiently short to maintain spatial correlation with localized sources, yet long enough to last beyond the opaque conditions at the peak of a nova explosion. <sup>22</sup>Na is predicted to be produced in sufficient quantity in novae to be detectable, and therefore <sup>22</sup>Na is a leading candidate for a prompt <inline-formula id="inf168">
<mml:math id="m172">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-ray signature for nova nucleosynthesis in our galaxy. Current and previous instruments may be close in sensitivity to detecting the <sup>22</sup>Na line [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">79</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">82</xref>], and planning has begun for future missions with greater sensitivity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">83</xref>]. Understanding the quantity of <sup>22</sup>Na produced in a typical nova explosion is crucial to informing such missions, by predicting the number of novae that are within detectable distance, and enabling a quantitative interpretation of this potential signature, should it be detected. This requires reliable models of nova nucleosynthesis, including reaction rates which affect the <sup>22</sup>Na abundance ejected.</p>
<p>The <sup>22</sup>Na(p,<inline-formula id="inf169">
<mml:math id="m173">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>23</sup>Mg reaction is one of the main destruction mechanisms affecting <sup>22</sup>Na yields in nova models. Despite decades of direct and indirect study of the proton resonances important for <sup>22</sup>Na(p,<inline-formula id="inf170">
<mml:math id="m174">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>), there is no consensus on the resonance strengths for this important reaction. The resonance believed to be most important at nova temperatures is the 205 keV (7/2)<sup>&#x2b;</sup> resonance. There have been two absolute determinations of the strength of this resonance through direct measurements of the (p,<inline-formula id="inf171">
<mml:math id="m175">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) reaction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">84</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">86</xref>], performed in 1990 and 2010.<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref> These experiments differ in resonance strength by about a factor of about 2.5, resulting in a discrepancy in <sup>22</sup>Na yields from novae, and hence the possibility of prompt <inline-formula id="inf172">
<mml:math id="m176">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> detection, of a factor of 1.4&#x2013;2.0. It should be noted that all of these challenging direct (p,<inline-formula id="inf173">
<mml:math id="m177">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) measurements utilized <sup>22</sup>Na-implanted targets. Such measurements are subject to possible systematic uncertainties associated with beam/target overlap due to non-uniformities of implanted <sup>22</sup>Na ions (in both depth and transverse profiles) and the beam profile, and uncertainties in the stopping power of the target. This is further complicated by target degradation from irradiation with intense proton beams (typically tens of <inline-formula id="inf174">
<mml:math id="m178">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3bc;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>A), and backgrounds from the mCi-activity of the targets.</p>
<p>Because of this, and its astrophysical importance, the 205-keV (7/2)<sup>&#x2b;</sup> resonance has also been the subject of a number of indirect studies, based on measurements of branching ratios of this state, fed by <inline-formula id="inf175">
<mml:math id="m179">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b2;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> decay. However, rather than resolving the situation, these indirect studies yield resonance strengths with even greater disagreement, spanning over an order of magnitude, and typically with lower strengths than the direct measurements. A recent result yields the lowest number yet [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90">88</xref>]. This stems from an experiment using the new gas-filled detector GADGET [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">89</xref>], which is designed to substantially suppress <inline-formula id="inf176">
<mml:math id="m180">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b2;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> backgrounds compared to silicon-based setups, to aid in measuring low-energy <inline-formula id="inf177">
<mml:math id="m181">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b2;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-delayed protons. This experiment yielded a substantially smaller proton branching ratio for the 205-keV resonance, despite being in agreement with previous results for the 275-keV and 583-keV resonances [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B92">90</xref>]. Nominally, the result from the GADGET measurement suggests a resonance strength that is a factor of 7 and 22 below the two direct measurements.</p>
<p>However, in all the <inline-formula id="inf178">
<mml:math id="m182">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b2;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-delayed proton experiments, the branching ratios obtained must be combined with the absolute lifetime of the state in order to determine a resonance strength, and it has been suggested that the lifetime of the state be revisited [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B93">91</xref>]. The universally-adopted value for the lifetime of the 205-keV (7/2)<sup>&#x2b;</sup> resonance is 10 (3) fs, stemming from a fusion-evaporation measurement using Gammasphere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B94">92</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B95">93</xref>], in which the lifetime was determined from the fractional Doppler-shift technique. A more recent measurement at TRIUMF has placed a 3<inline-formula id="inf179">
<mml:math id="m183">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> upper limit on the lifetime of 12 fs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B96">94</xref>] using the Doppler-shift Attenuation Method. However, shell-model calculations suggest a shorter lifetime (0.6&#x2013;1.7 fs) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B93">91</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B97">95</xref>], which would systematically raise all the resonance strengths from indirect measurements by about an order of magnitude.</p>
<p>A detailed systematic study of the spectroscopic strengths of single-proton states in <sup>23</sup>Mg would considerably enlighten the situation, as the large variations in resonance strengths correspond to equally large variations in proton spectroscopic factors for these states, as in <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e3">Equation 3</xref>. Though some proton spectroscopic factors have been determined using the <sup>22</sup>Na(<sup>3</sup>He,d)<sup>23</sup>Mg reaction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B98">96</xref>] in an experiment using an implanted <sup>22</sup>Na target and a Q3D spectrometer, only upper limits were obtained for most of the resonances in the astrophysically interesting region. Despite the excellent resolution afforded by the spectrometer, the experiment was hampered by strong background lines and less distinct angular distribution shapes from (<sup>3</sup>He,d), and the need for substantial shielding to cope with the activity of the <sup>22</sup>Na target.</p>
<p>To address this, the GODDESS collaboration undertook a measurement of the <sup>22</sup>Na(d,p)<sup>23</sup>Na reaction in inverse kinematics, to determine single-particle spectroscopic factors of the neutron mirror states, and thereby inform the resonance strengths in <sup>23</sup>Mg independently of the systematics of the previous measurements. Spectroscopic strengths in <inline-formula id="inf180">
<mml:math id="m184">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; <inline-formula id="inf181">
<mml:math id="m185">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> mirror systems are typically preserved to <inline-formula id="inf182">
<mml:math id="m186">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>20%&#x2013;30% level, a considerably smaller uncertainty than the discrepancies in the resonance strengths, and the differences in mirror systems can further be addressed by SMEC calculations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">50</xref>] (see <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s4-3">Section 4.3</xref>). The measurement utilized a 10-MeV/A<sup>22</sup>Na beam produced by the <sup>21</sup>Ne(d,p)<sup>22</sup>Na reaction at 10 MeV/A using the RAISOR facility at ATLAS at Argonne National Laboratory. The beamline was tuned for <sup>22</sup>Na(<inline-formula id="inf183">
<mml:math id="m187">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>q</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>11</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>), providing suppression of Ne (fully stripped Ne ions have <inline-formula id="inf184">
<mml:math id="m188">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>q</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>10</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>), with further suppression of scattered beam by the RF sweeper. This energy is well-suited to the population of the astrophysically-important low-angular-momentum states, and produces distinctive angular distributions. Such measurements in inverse kinematics involve substantially smaller quantities of <sup>22</sup>Na, thereby avoiding the radiological complications of experiments with <sup>22</sup>Na targets. As with a many <inline-formula id="inf185">
<mml:math id="m189">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-shell <inline-formula id="inf186">
<mml:math id="m190">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; <inline-formula id="inf187">
<mml:math id="m191">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> nuclei, <sup>22</sup>Na has a 1<sup>&#x2b;</sup> isomer a few hundred keV above the ground state. Though the <sup>21</sup>Ne(d,n)<sup>22</sup>Na reaction populates both the ground state and isomer, the <sup>22</sup>Na isomer <inline-formula id="inf188">
<mml:math id="m192">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> decays with a 243 ns half life to the <sup>22</sup>Na ground state. The flight path between the production target and the experimental target is <inline-formula id="inf189">
<mml:math id="m193">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>150 feet - which is equivalent to <inline-formula id="inf190">
<mml:math id="m194">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>5 half lives. Therefore, 97% of the isomeric component of the beam decayed to the ground state by the time the ions reached the experimental target.</p>
<p>The GODDESS position-sensitive fast ionization chamber provided real-time beam diagnostics, including beam composition, rates by particle type, and mm-precision spatial feedback, to aid in tuning of the beamline and optimization of the RF sweeper phase. Protons emitted in the <sup>22</sup>Na(d,p<inline-formula id="inf191">
<mml:math id="m195">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>23</sup>Na reaction were detected in the ORRUBA silicon detectors, and de-excitation <inline-formula id="inf192">
<mml:math id="m196">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> rays in GRETINA. The data from this experiment are currently under analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6-3">
<title>6.3 The <sup>26</sup>Al(p,<inline-formula id="inf193">
<mml:math id="m197">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>27</sup>Si reaction</title>
<p>The 1.8 MeV <inline-formula id="inf194">
<mml:math id="m198">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-ray line from the decay of <sup>26</sup>Al is a major target of <inline-formula id="inf195">
<mml:math id="m199">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-ray astronomy. Its distribution in galactic coordinates has been extensively mapped, and its Doppler shift studied, indicating that it is co-rotating with, and hence pervasive across, the galaxy. Though it is likely that multiple sites contribute to the 1.8-MeV signature, clues to possible sources can be garnered from its correlation with other signatures that have also been directionally-mapped [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B99">97</xref>]. Notably, the 1.8-MeV <inline-formula id="inf196">
<mml:math id="m200">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> ray shows strong correlation with 53 GHz free-free microwave emission, which is an indicator of ionized dust clouds, and hence regions of massive star formation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B100">98</xref>]. It is likely that massive stars contribute substantially to the <sup>26</sup>Al signature, and the rate <sup>26g</sup>Al(p,<inline-formula id="inf197">
<mml:math id="m201">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>27</sup>Si reaction at stellar temperatures impacts the net production of <sup>26</sup>Al. Although many direct measurements constraining <sup>26g</sup>Al (p,<inline-formula id="inf198">
<mml:math id="m202">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) resonance strengths have been performed, at such low temperatures (<inline-formula id="inf199">
<mml:math id="m203">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3c;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> 0.1 GK) the main resonances within the Gamow window for massive stars are out of reach. As discussed in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s4-3">Section 4.3</xref>, the lowest energy for which a direct (p,<inline-formula id="inf200">
<mml:math id="m204">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) measurement has been possible is the 189-keV resonance, studied in both normal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">47</xref>] and inverse kinematics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">48</xref>].</p>
<p>A 9/2<sup>&#x2b;</sup> resonance at 127 keV is likely to dominate in massive stars, which can be populated via <inline-formula id="inf201">
<mml:math id="m205">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x2113;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> proton capture on the 5<sup>&#x2b; 26g</sup>Al. However, due to the lower energy, this resonance is several orders of magnitude weaker than the 189-keV resonance, and hence out of reach for direct measurements. An indirect measurement of the <sup>26g</sup>Al(<sup>3</sup>He,d)<sup>27</sup>Si reaction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">49</xref>] using an <sup>26g</sup>Al target and a Q3D spectrograph was unable to provide more than an upper limit on this resonance, due to the strong backgrounds from reactions on the <sup>27</sup>Al component of the target. More recently, (d,p) experiments using radioactive <sup>26</sup>Al beams have been used to determine the strengths of resonances out of current reach of direct (p,<inline-formula id="inf202">
<mml:math id="m206">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) measurements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">50</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">51</xref>], which are unconstrained by target impurities that limited the <sup>26g</sup>Al(<sup>3</sup>He,d)<sup>27</sup>Si experiment. These experiments, performed at the HRIBF with ORRUBA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">50</xref>] and at TRIUMF [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">51</xref>], are in remarkable agreement, constraining the strength of the 127-keV resonance (<inline-formula id="inf203">
<mml:math id="m207">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c9;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; <inline-formula id="inf204">
<mml:math id="m208">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2.6</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0.9</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0.7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mspace width="0.3333em"/>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> meV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">50</xref>] and 2.5 (5) <inline-formula id="inf205">
<mml:math id="m209">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> meV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">51</xref>]). The resonance strength was found to be 4 times higher than the previously adopted upper limit, and to dominate the reaction rate at temperatures between 0.04 GK and 0.1 GK [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">50</xref>]. The experiments also placed upper limits on the strength of the even lower-lying 68 keV resonance (<inline-formula id="inf206">
<mml:math id="m210">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c9;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.3333em"/>
<mml:mo>&#x2264;</mml:mo>
<mml:mspace width="0.3333em"/>
<mml:mn>3.0</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>12</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> meV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">50</xref>] and 8 <inline-formula id="inf207">
<mml:math id="m211">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>13</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> meV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">51</xref>]).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6-4">
<title>6.4 The <sup>30</sup>P(p,<inline-formula id="inf208">
<mml:math id="m212">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>31</sup>S reaction</title>
<p>
<sup>30</sup>P is of particular interest for understanding classical nova nucleosynthesis on ONe white dwarfs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B101">99</xref>], due in part to the long lifetime of <sup>30</sup>P (<inline-formula id="inf209">
<mml:math id="m213">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>2.5 min) with respect to the timescale of a nova outburst. The <sup>30</sup>P(p,<inline-formula id="inf210">
<mml:math id="m214">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>31</sup>S reaction is a potential bottleneck, affecting the reaction flow into the A &#x3d; 30&#x2013;40 mass range during the nova [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B102">100</xref>]. As a consequence, the rate affects the abundances of isotopes of phosphorus, sulphur and silicon - critical elements for observational constraints on novae. The <sup>30</sup>P(p,<inline-formula id="inf211">
<mml:math id="m215">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>31</sup>S reaction rate directly affects the isotopic ratio of <sup>30</sup>Si/<sup>28</sup>Si, which is an important nova identifier in the analysis of pre-solar grains [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B103">101</xref>]. Furthermore, the O/S, S/Al, O/P and P/Al elemental ratios have recently been shown to be particularly sensitive probes of nova peak temperatures, with final abundance ratios varying by 2&#x2013;3 orders of magnitude due to peak temperature changes between <inline-formula id="inf212">
<mml:math id="m216">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>230 and <inline-formula id="inf213">
<mml:math id="m217">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>310 MK. In this detailed study, in which these ratios were found to be one-to-two orders of magnitude more sensitive than ratios solely of elements lighter than phosphorus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B104">102</xref>], the impact of various reaction rates on the ratios was examined. The uncertainty in the <sup>30</sup>P(p,<inline-formula id="inf214">
<mml:math id="m218">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>31</sup>S rate was highlighted as the major nuclear physics uncertainty in interpreting these ratios, currently hampering the use of these ratios to constrain the energetics of novae.</p>
<p>The rate of this reaction depends critically on the spectroscopic strengths of levels between 6 and 7 MeV excitation in <sup>31</sup>S. The <sup>30</sup>P(d,p<inline-formula id="inf215">
<mml:math id="m219">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>31</sup>P reaction was measured with GODDESS in inverse kinematics, using mirror symmetry to inform state in <sup>31</sup>S. An 8 MeV/u beam of <sup>30</sup>P (<inline-formula id="inf216">
<mml:math id="m220">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>80</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> pure) was produced via the <sup>29</sup>Si(d,p)<sup>30</sup>P reaction, using the RAISOR facility at ATLAS, and delivered to the GODDESS particle-<inline-formula id="inf217">
<mml:math id="m221">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> spectrometer.</p>
<p>The protons emitted from the <sup>30</sup>P (d,p)<sup>31</sup>S reaction on a <inline-formula id="inf218">
<mml:math id="m222">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>600 <inline-formula id="inf219">
<mml:math id="m223">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3bc;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>g/cm<sup>2</sup> <inline-formula id="inf220">
<mml:math id="m224">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>D</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> target were measured in the ORRUBA detectors. The GODDESS position-sensitive ionization chamber was used to identify P recoils, and aid in the kinematic reconstruction using the recoil position to help account for the large in-flight beam spot. Using coincident <inline-formula id="inf221">
<mml:math id="m225">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> rays to aid in resolution, angular distributions were measured and spectroscopic factors determined. As in the case of <sup>26</sup>Al, states of a particular <inline-formula id="inf222">
<mml:math id="m226">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>J</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> can be populated via multiple <inline-formula id="inf223">
<mml:math id="m227">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x2113;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> transfers, due to the 1<sup>&#x2b;</sup> ground-state spin. A manuscript on these results is currently in preparation (Ghimire et al., forthcoming).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6-5">
<title>6.5 The <sup>34</sup>Cl(p,<inline-formula id="inf224">
<mml:math id="m228">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>35</sup>Ar reaction</title>
<p>The elemental and isotopic composition of dust grains formed during the cooling of nova outflows can provide a signature of the nova origin of these grains, and furthermore provide metrics against which nova models can be tested. Such pre-solar grains can be found in primitive meteorites within the solar system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B106">103</xref>]. However, the majority of grains originate from supernovae and massive stars and, although a number of isotopic ratios (including C, N and Si isotopes) are indicators of nova origins, none provide an unambiguous nova signature. A promising candidate for pre-solar grain classification is the <sup>34</sup>S/<sup>32</sup>S ratio, which recent studies have suggested is constrained to a narrow range in nova grains [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B103">101</xref>], limit its usefulness. The <sup>34</sup>Cl(p,<inline-formula id="inf225">
<mml:math id="m229">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) reaction impacts the nucleosynthetic flow in the sulfur region; if the rate proceeds fast enough with respect to <sup>34</sup>Cl <inline-formula id="inf226">
<mml:math id="m230">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b2;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> decay, the reaction flow bypasses <sup>34</sup>S. However, the <sup>34</sup>Cl(p,<inline-formula id="inf227">
<mml:math id="m231">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) reaction rate is subject to substantial uncertainties. In nova sensitivity studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B102">100</xref>], a statistical Hauser-Feshbach calculation is adopted for the <sup>34</sup>Cl(p,<inline-formula id="inf228">
<mml:math id="m232">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) reaction rate, and assigned factor of 100 uncertainty due to the lack of experimental constraint, resulting in <inline-formula id="inf229">
<mml:math id="m233">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> variations of final <sup>34</sup>S abundance. However, in addition to the 0<sup>&#x2b; 34</sup>Cl ground state (<inline-formula id="inf230">
<mml:math id="m234">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; 1.53 s), the uncertainties are compounded by a low-lying long-lived <inline-formula id="inf231">
<mml:math id="m235">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> isomer at 146 keV (<inline-formula id="inf232">
<mml:math id="m236">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; 32 min), which can both be produced directly via the nucleosynthesis network, and by thermal population at nova temperatures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">57</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">75</xref>]. Notably, the reaction network in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B102">100</xref>] did not treat the isomer explicitly. It is necessary to assess the reaction rate on both <sup>34g</sup>Cl and <sup>34m</sup>Cl, and include both explicitly in network calculations.</p>
<p>A recent spectrograph measurement [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B107">104</xref>] located levels in <sup>35</sup>Ar but was unable to constrain the <inline-formula id="inf233">
<mml:math id="m237">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> or widths relevant to the <sup>34</sup>Cl(p,<inline-formula id="inf234">
<mml:math id="m238">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>35</sup>Ar reaction rate. A theoretical study of rp-process nuclei with low-lying isomers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B108">105</xref>] used shell-model calculations of spectroscopic factors and <inline-formula id="inf235">
<mml:math id="m239">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> widths to estimate stellar enhancement factors for radiative capture rates on the isomeric states due to thermal population. For <sup>34</sup>Cl(p,<inline-formula id="inf236">
<mml:math id="m240">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>), an enhancement factor of <inline-formula id="inf237">
<mml:math id="m241">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> was found, peaked at 0.2 GK. As calculations were performed using the USD interaction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B109">106</xref>], only positive-parity states were included. However, in other mid <inline-formula id="inf238">
<mml:math id="m242">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-shell nuclei, substantial spectroscopic strength is expected for <inline-formula id="inf239">
<mml:math id="m243">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x2113;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> resonances, as the lowest states from the <inline-formula id="inf240">
<mml:math id="m244">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-shell are typically located close to the proton separation energy in these nuclei [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">50</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">52</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B110">107</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B112">109</xref>]. A more recent (2020) study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B110">107</xref>] in <inline-formula id="inf241">
<mml:math id="m245">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext> </mml:mtext>
<mml:mi>&#x210f;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>&#x3c9;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> space using the <inline-formula id="inf242">
<mml:math id="m246">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-<inline-formula id="inf243">
<mml:math id="m247">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> interaction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B113">110</xref>] predicted negative parity states in the astrophysically interesting energy range. However, with no experimental constraint on these levels, 200-keV uncertainties were assumed on excitation energies, and factor 2 uncertainties on spectroscopic factors (partial widths), leading to large uncertainties in the reaction rate. As the authors note: &#x2018;In a study by Fry et al., 17 <sup>35</sup>Ar levels have been detected in the energy region Ex &#x3d; 5.9&#x2013;6.7 MeV and their excitation energies have been determined, but not spins, parities, widths, or branching ratios. Because of the paucity of such information, it is not yet possible to derive meaningful experimental <sup>34g,m</sup>Cl(p,<inline-formula id="inf244">
<mml:math id="m248">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>35</sup>Ar reaction rates&#x2019; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B110">107</xref>].</p>
<p>A systematic experimental determination of the distribution of single-proton spectroscopic strengths as a function of excitation energy in <sup>35</sup>Ar, for both <sup>34g</sup>Cl and <sup>34m</sup>Cl, would considerably enlighten the situation. A<sup>34g,m</sup>Cl(d,p)<sup>35</sup>Cl experiment has been approved by the FRIB PAC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B114">111</xref>], using the techniques outlined in Sections 5 and 6.6, and is awaiting scheduling at the time of writing.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6-6">
<title>6.6 The <sup>38</sup>K(p,<inline-formula id="inf245">
<mml:math id="m249">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>39</sup>Ca reaction</title>
<p>The <sup>38</sup>K(p,<inline-formula id="inf246">
<mml:math id="m250">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>39</sup>Ca reaction is an important bottleneck to the end-point of the rp-process chain. The reaction rate has been estimated to be uncertain by a factor of <inline-formula id="inf247">
<mml:math id="m251">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>10</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B102">100</xref>], leading to large uncertainties in abundances from novae [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B102">100</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B115">112</xref>]. Further, in Type I x-ray bursts on neutron stars, the rp process branches and proceeds either via <sup>36</sup>K (<inline-formula id="inf248">
<mml:math id="m252">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b2;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula id="inf249">
<mml:math id="m253">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; 0.342 s)<sup>36</sup>Ar(p,<inline-formula id="inf250">
<mml:math id="m254">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>37</sup>K(p,<inline-formula id="inf251">
<mml:math id="m255">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>38</sup>Ca or <sup>36</sup>K(p,<inline-formula id="inf252">
<mml:math id="m256">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>37</sup>Ca(<inline-formula id="inf253">
<mml:math id="m257">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b2;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula id="inf254">
<mml:math id="m258">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; 0.175 s)<sup>37</sup>K(p,<inline-formula id="inf255">
<mml:math id="m259">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>38</sup>Ca. Since <sup>39</sup>Sc is almost proton unbound, the rp flow must wait for <sup>38</sup>Ca(<inline-formula id="inf256">
<mml:math id="m260">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b2;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula id="inf257">
<mml:math id="m261">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; 0.440 s)<sup>38</sup>K(p,<inline-formula id="inf258">
<mml:math id="m262">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>39</sup>Ca [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B116">113</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B117">114</xref>]. The <sup>38</sup>K(p,<inline-formula id="inf259">
<mml:math id="m263">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>39</sup>Ca reaction is thus an important path to the formation of heavier elements. However, there is limited experimental constraint; the current rate widely used for nucleosynthesis calculations (JINA REACLIB v2.0) is a theoretical rate based on a Hauser-Feshbach statistical model calculation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B118">115</xref>]. Furthermore, the relatively short-lived (<inline-formula id="inf260">
<mml:math id="m264">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; 924.3 ms) <sup>38</sup>K isomer is important, as it is the endpoint of 76.5<inline-formula id="inf261">
<mml:math id="m265">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> of the <sup>38</sup>Ca decays [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B119">116</xref>] and the rise times of x-ray bursts typically fall in the range of 1&#x2013;10 s. As such, capture on both ground (<sup>
<italic>38g</italic>
</sup>K, <inline-formula id="inf262">
<mml:math id="m266">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>J</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; <inline-formula id="inf263">
<mml:math id="m267">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) and isomeric (<sup>
<italic>38m</italic>
</sup>K, <inline-formula id="inf264">
<mml:math id="m268">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>J</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; <inline-formula id="inf265">
<mml:math id="m269">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) states plays an important role in the astrophysical network, and needs experimental constraint.</p>
<p>Though a direct measurement of the <sup>38g</sup>K(p,<inline-formula id="inf266">
<mml:math id="m270">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>39</sup>Ca reaction has been reported in recent papers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B115">112</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B120">117</xref>], many significant questions remain open. This experiment targeted three known <inline-formula id="inf267">
<mml:math id="m271">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> states (at 386<inline-formula id="inf268">
<mml:math id="m272">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xb1;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>10 keV, 515<inline-formula id="inf269">
<mml:math id="m273">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xb1;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>10 keV, and 689<inline-formula id="inf270">
<mml:math id="m274">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xb1;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>10 keV) in <sup>39</sup>Ca, assumed to be populated by <inline-formula id="inf271">
<mml:math id="m275">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x2113;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; 0 protons coupled to the 3<sup>&#x2b; 38</sup>K ground state. Only upper limits were set for the lower two resonances. A strength for the 689-keV resonance was extracted, but its energy was found to lie 10 keV lower than the adopted energy, at 679 keV. This reaction rate has been addressed by two recent ORRUBA/GODDESS experiments, as detailed in Sections 6.6.1 and 6.6.2.</p>
<sec id="s6-6-1">
<title>6.6.1 Constraining <sup>38</sup>K(p,<inline-formula id="inf272">
<mml:math id="m276">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>39</sup>Ca reaction via the <sup>40</sup>Ca(<sup>3</sup>He,<inline-formula id="inf273">
<mml:math id="m277">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>39</sup>Ca reaction</title>
<p>GODDESS was deployed at ATLAS to search for resonances in <sup>39</sup>Ca, utilizing the <sup>40</sup>Ca(<sup>3</sup>He,<inline-formula id="inf274">
<mml:math id="m278">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>39</sup>Ca reaction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B121">118</xref>], and in particular to better constrain the energies of these three 5/2<sup>&#x2b;</sup> states. The (<sup>3</sup>He,<inline-formula id="inf275">
<mml:math id="m279">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) reaction channel was cleanly selected by particle-identification and two-body reaction kinematics of outgoing <inline-formula id="inf276">
<mml:math id="m280">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> particles in ORRUBA. The coincident de-excitation <inline-formula id="inf277">
<mml:math id="m281">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> rays were used to determine 23 new transitions, corresponding to three 5/2<sup>&#x2b;</sup> states in <sup>39</sup>Ca. The <inline-formula id="inf278">
<mml:math id="m282">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> decay of the 386-keV 5/2<sup>&#x2b;</sup> resonance was observe via a direct ground-state transition of 6156.7 (16) keV. This level had previously been measured via the same <sup>40</sup>Ca(<sup>3</sup>He,<inline-formula id="inf279">
<mml:math id="m283">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>39</sup>Ca reaction, detecting the alphas in a split-pole spectrograph, as 6154 (5) keV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B122">119</xref>]. Reducing the uncertainty on this resonance energy alone reduced the uncertainty on this resonance contribution from a factor of <inline-formula id="inf280">
<mml:math id="m284">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>3 to <inline-formula id="inf281">
<mml:math id="m285">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>1.6.</p>
<p>The second of these resonances was first reported in 1993 to be at 6286 (10) keV by a spectrograph measurement of the <sup>40</sup>Ca(p,d)<sup>39</sup>Ca reaction at 65 MeV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B123">120</xref>], giving a resonance energy of 515 (13) keV. This state was not been confirmed in subsequent measurements, such as the <sup>40</sup>Ca(<sup>3</sup>He,<inline-formula id="inf282">
<mml:math id="m286">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>39</sup>Ca measurement of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B122">119</xref>], and was non-observed (i.e., an upper limit reported) in the direct <sup>38g</sup>K(p,<inline-formula id="inf283">
<mml:math id="m287">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>39</sup>Ca [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B115">112</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B120">117</xref>]. In the GODDESS experiment, a direct to ground-state transition of 6268.8 (22) keV was observed, giving a resonance energy of 498 (2) keV - barely over 1<inline-formula id="inf284">
<mml:math id="m288">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> away from the energy of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B123">120</xref>]. If this is the same state, not only does this energy difference impact the reaction rate, it also impacts the interpretation of the direct <sup>38g</sup>K(p,<inline-formula id="inf285">
<mml:math id="m289">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>39</sup>Ca experiment of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B115">112</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B120">117</xref>], in which the gas target covered resonance energies of 515<inline-formula id="inf286">
<mml:math id="m290">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xb1;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>13 keV; a 498 (2) keV would not have been located in the gas target.</p>
<p>The third resonance, placed at 679 (2) keV in the <sup>38g</sup>K(p,<inline-formula id="inf287">
<mml:math id="m291">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>39</sup>Ca, likely corresponds to previous observations at 6450 (30) keV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B124">121</xref>] and 6467 (10) keV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B123">120</xref>]. However, the <sup>40</sup>Ca(<sup>3</sup>He,<inline-formula id="inf288">
<mml:math id="m292">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>39</sup>Ca experiment of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B122">119</xref>] placed this state at 6472.2 (24) keV. The GODDESS experiment measured a ground-state transition of 6470.8 (19) keV, in agreement with [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B122">119</xref>]. This would place this resonance even higher in energy, at 701 (2) keV, which would have been located at the entrance (rather than the center) of the target, which covered 689<inline-formula id="inf289">
<mml:math id="m293">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xb1;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>13 keV. This leads to questions as the absolute normalization of the yields from this experiment if these are the same resonance. It is noteworthy that capture at this beam energy on the <inline-formula id="inf290">
<mml:math id="m294">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> isomer (which comprised <inline-formula id="inf291">
<mml:math id="m295">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> of the beam composition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B115">112</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B120">117</xref>]), corresponds exactly to a known state at 6580 keV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B123">120</xref>].</p>
<p>In total, from this experiment, by locating the energies of states more precisely, the upper limit on the <sup>38</sup>K(p,<inline-formula id="inf292">
<mml:math id="m296">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>39</sup>Ca was reduced over the temperature range of novae [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B121">118</xref>]. Furthermore, such experiments highlight the importance of high-resolution experiments, such as <inline-formula id="inf293">
<mml:math id="m297">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-ray spectroscopy, for precise determination of resonance energies, which are crucial to guiding the planning and interpretation of direct (p,<inline-formula id="inf294">
<mml:math id="m298">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) measurements with radioactive beams.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6-6-2">
<title>6.6.2 Constraining <sup>38</sup>K(p,<inline-formula id="inf295">
<mml:math id="m299">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>39</sup>Ca reaction via the <sup>38</sup>K (d,p)<sup>39</sup>K reaction</title>
<p>Despite substantial progress, many open questions remain pertaining to the <sup>38</sup>K(p,<inline-formula id="inf296">
<mml:math id="m300">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>39</sup>Ca reaction rate. Firstly, these direct measurements provided no explicit constraint on proton capture on <sup>38m</sup>K. Furthermore, in addition to the <inline-formula id="inf297">
<mml:math id="m301">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x2113;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> resonances that have been the subject of much focus, important <inline-formula id="inf298">
<mml:math id="m302">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x2113;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> resonances are anticipated in this region, as the <inline-formula id="inf299">
<mml:math id="m303">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> orbitals are mostly vacant in <sup>38</sup>K, the <inline-formula id="inf300">
<mml:math id="m304">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> orbital is full, and the <inline-formula id="inf301">
<mml:math id="m305">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> orbital lies much higher in energy. No information constraining the precise location and strength of these resonances currently exists. Proton capture through higher-<inline-formula id="inf302">
<mml:math id="m306">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x2113;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> orbitals is suppressed due to the larger barrier (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s4-3">Section 4.3</xref>).</p>
<p>Indeed, there are two known <inline-formula id="inf303">
<mml:math id="m307">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> states in <sup>39</sup>Ca that are just above the <sup>38</sup>K &#x2b; p threshold at 5.771 MeV, and there are several levels in <sup>39</sup>K in the same region that are potential mirrors to these <sup>39</sup>Ca states [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B125">122</xref>]. One or both of these states might be formed with a 2<inline-formula id="inf304">
<mml:math id="m308">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> proton coupled to either the 3<sup>&#x2b; 38g</sup>K or the 0<sup>&#x2b; 38m</sup>K(130.4 keV), but those structures have not been studied. Determining the location, spins and strengths of these resonances is crucial for an accurate and robust description of the <sup>38</sup>K(p,<inline-formula id="inf305">
<mml:math id="m309">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) rate, and to identify the most important resonances to be targeted with direct measurements.</p>
<p>To inform the properties of the relevant proton resonances near the <sup>38</sup>K &#x2b; p threshold, a proton transfer reaction, such as <sup>38</sup>K(<sup>3</sup>He,d)<sup>39</sup>Ca or <sup>38</sup>K(d,n)<sup>39</sup>Ca, would ideally be performed on both ground and isomeric states of <sup>38</sup>K. However, as <sup>39</sup>K and <sup>39</sup>Ca are mirror nuclei, the technique of measuring the mirror <sup>38</sup>K(d,p)<sup>39</sup>K reaction can be applied. Furthermore, due to the advances in delivering beams of nuclides in their ground and isomeric states, and controlling their ratio (as described in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s5">Section 5</xref>), a simultaneous measurement of <sup>38g,m</sup>K (d,p)<sup>39</sup>K was undertaken at the ReA facility.</p>
<p>The 4.57 MeV/u beam, at a total intensity of <inline-formula id="inf306">
<mml:math id="m310">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>50k ions/second, comprised a 60:40 composition of <sup>38</sup>K and <sup>38</sup>Ar. The beam was delivered to a 420 <inline-formula id="inf307">
<mml:math id="m311">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3bc;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>g/cm<sup>2</sup> <inline-formula id="inf308">
<mml:math id="m312">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>D</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> target. Proton ejectiles following the (d,p) reaction were measured between <inline-formula id="inf309">
<mml:math id="m313">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> 45<inline-formula id="inf310">
<mml:math id="m314">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xb0;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <inline-formula id="inf311">
<mml:math id="m315">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> 175<inline-formula id="inf312">
<mml:math id="m316">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xb0;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> using ORRUBA. The GODDESS position-sensitive fast ionization chamber MAGIC (Pain et al., forthcoming) was used to identify events corresponding to K or Ar induced reactions. Two charge-breeding settings were employed for the experiment to manipulate the <sup>38</sup>K GS:IS content of the beam. A short setting of 150 ms charge-breeding time (corresponding to a total hold-up time of <inline-formula id="inf313">
<mml:math id="m317">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> 300 ms) produced a<sup>38</sup>K GS:IS composition of <inline-formula id="inf314">
<mml:math id="m318">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>5:4. A long setting, allowing most of the IS to decay, resulted in a GS:IS composition of <inline-formula id="inf315">
<mml:math id="m319">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>9:1.</p>
<p>The reactions on the GS and isomer are deconvolved by scaling the data with the long holdup time to the short-holdup-time data by the number of incident GS ions. The difference between the two spectra therefore results entirely from reactions on the isomer. This deconvolution is straightforward, as the beam, target and detector properties, and hence experimental response, are identical for the two data sets. These data are currently under analysis to extract angular distributions, <inline-formula id="inf316">
<mml:math id="m320">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> assignments and spectroscopic factors for states built on both <sup>38g</sup>K and <sup>38m</sup>K.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>7 Conclusion and outlook</title>
<p>Recent years have seen substantial investments in radioactive beam production, in the US (with the nascent US flagship facility, FRIB, and nuCARIBU at ATLAS at Argonne National Laboratory), and globally. With these investments come opportunities for constraining radiative-capture cross sections via direct measurements of resonance strengths, consequently spurring the development of new instrumentation, such as recoil separators such as SECAR at FRIB, and the JENSA gas-jet target.</p>
<p>However, to make use of these advances, indirect techniques, including various direct reactions (such as (d,p), (<sup>3</sup>He,t) and (<sup>3</sup>He,<inline-formula id="inf317">
<mml:math id="m321">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) reactions highlighted herein) using stable and radioactive beams, are crucial in guiding the direct measurements. Techniques for constraining astrophysically-important proton-capture reactions via direct reactions has been a major focus of the ORRUBA program for approaching two decades. To this end, new developments in instrumentation have been undertaken, such as the GODDESS coupling to the flagship HPGe arrays (Gammasphere, GRETINA and GRETA), and improved recoil detectors, to improve the sensitivity and resolution of direct reaction measurements.</p>
<p>With the increased complexity of RIB facilities, and competition for beam time, such indirect measurements will be increasingly critical for guiding direct measurements of radiative capture reactions, and in some cases remain the only way of constraining lower-lying resonances that are too weak for direct measurements with radioactive beams in the foreseeable future.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="s8">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>SP: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review and editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="s9">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 (ORNL).</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>Thanks are owed to the members of the ORRUBA and GODDESS collaborations, and the operations staff at the HRIBF, ATLAS and ReA (NSCL/FRIB). The mentorship, friendship, collaboration, and pioneering contributions of the late Ray Kozub to the (d,p) experimental program discussed herein, stemming from the <sup>18</sup>F(d,p) experiment, are remembered with fondness and gratitude.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s10">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="s11">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s12">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<fn-group>
<fn id="fn1">
<label>1</label>
<p>Note that in this experiment, the statistics in differential cross sections (see Figure 6 of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">49</xref>]) were insufficient to constrain <inline-formula id="inf318">
<mml:math id="m322">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x2113;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, and for many years this state was assigned positive parity. Recent (d,p) data (see below) indicate an <inline-formula id="inf319">
<mml:math id="m323">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x2113;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> transfer to the mirror of this state.</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fn2">
<label>2</label>
<p>A third study of direct <sup>22</sup>Na(p,<inline-formula id="inf320">
<mml:math id="m324">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)<sup>23</sup>Mg measurement [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">87</xref>], performed at Bochum, extended measurements to lower energy resonances, but measured relative yields only, using the 274-keV and 583-keV resonances to normalize the their data to the M&#xfc;nster experiment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">84</xref>], so provide no independent constraint on the absolute value of the strength of the 205-keV resonance</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bardayan</surname>
<given-names>DW</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Transfer reactions in nuclear astrophysics</article-title>. <source>J.Phys.(London)</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>G43</volume>:<fpage>043001</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/0954-3899/43/4/043001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Brune</surname>
<given-names>CR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davids</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Radiative capture reactions in astrophysics</article-title>. <source>Annu Rev Nucl Part Sci</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>65</volume>:<fpage>87</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>112</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-nucl-102014-022027</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hammache</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de S&#xe9;r&#xe9;ville</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Transfer reactions as a tool in nuclear astrophysics</article-title>. <source>Front Phys</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>8</volume>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fphy.2020.602920</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4.</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Catford</surname>
<given-names>WN</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <source>What can we learn from transfer, and how is best to do it?</source> <publisher-loc>Berlin, Heidelberg</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher-name> (<year>2014</year>). <fpage>67</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>122</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-642-45141-6_3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bardayan</surname>
<given-names>DW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blackmon</surname>
<given-names>JC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brune</surname>
<given-names>CR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Champagne</surname>
<given-names>AE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>AA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cox</surname>
<given-names>JM</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Observation of the astrophysically important 3<sup>&#x2b;</sup> state in<sup>18</sup>
<italic>ne</italic> via elastic scattering of a radioactive<sup>17</sup>
<italic>f</italic> beam from<sup>1</sup>
<italic>h</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev Lett</source> (<year>1999</year>) <volume>83</volume>:<fpage>45</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.45</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Davinson</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bradfield-Smith</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cherubini</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>DiPietro</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Galster</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Laird</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Louvain&#x2013;edinburgh detector array (leda): a silicon detector array for use with radioactive nuclear beams</article-title>. <source>Nucl Instr Methods Phys Res Section A: Acc Spectrometers, Detectors Associated Equipment</source> (<year>2000</year>) <volume>454</volume>:<fpage>350</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0168-9002(00)00479-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pain</surname>
<given-names>SD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cizewski</surname>
<given-names>JA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hatarik</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname>
<given-names>KL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thomas</surname>
<given-names>JS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bardayan</surname>
<given-names>DW</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Development of a high solid-angle silicon detector array for measurement of transfer reactions in inverse kinematics</article-title>. <source>Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms</source> (<year>2007</year>). <volume>261</volume>:<fpage>1122</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1125</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nimb.2007.04.289</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pain</surname>
<given-names>SD</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Advances in instrumentation for nuclear astrophysics</article-title>. <source>AIP Adv</source> (<year>2014</year>) <volume>4</volume>:<fpage>041015</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.4874116</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chae</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ahn</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bardayan</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chipps</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manning</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pain</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Construction of a fast ionization chamber for high-rate particle identification</article-title>. <source>Nucl Instr Methods Phys Res Section A: Acc Spectrometers, Detectors Associated Equipment</source> (<year>2014</year>) <volume>751</volume>:<fpage>6</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nima.2014.03.016</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hall</surname>
<given-names>MR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bardayan</surname>
<given-names>DW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baugher</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lepailleur</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pain</surname>
<given-names>SD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ratkiewicz</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>
<sup>19</sup>Ne level structure for explosive nucleosynthesis</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>102</volume>:<fpage>045802</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.102.045802</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chipps</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Greife</surname>
<given-names>U</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bardayan</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blackmon</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kontos</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Linhardt</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>The jet experiments in nuclear structure and astrophysics (jensa) gas jet target</article-title>. <source>Nucl Instr Methods Phys Res Section A: Acc Spectrometers, Detectors Associated Equipment</source> (<year>2014</year>) <volume>763</volume>:<fpage>553</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>64</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nima.2014.06.042</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schmidt</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chipps</surname>
<given-names>KA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ahn</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bardayan</surname>
<given-names>DW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Browne</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Greife</surname>
<given-names>U</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>
<article-title>Status of the JENSA gas-jet target for experiments with rare isotope beams</article-title>. <source>Nucl Inst.s Meth.in Phys Res A</source> (<year>2018</year>). <volume>911</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nima.2018.09.052</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Labiche</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Catford</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lemmon</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Timis</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chapman</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Orr</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Tiara: a large solid angle silicon array for direct reaction studies with radioactive beams</article-title>. <source>Nucl Instr Methods Phys Res Section A: Acc Spectrometers, Detectors Associated Equipment</source> (<year>2010</year>) <volume>614</volume>:<fpage>439</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>48</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nima.2010.01.009</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Diget</surname>
<given-names>CA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fox</surname>
<given-names>SP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Williams</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Porter-Peden</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Achouri</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>SHARC: silicon highly-segmented array for reactions and coulex used in conjunction with the tigress <italic>&#x3b3;</italic>-ray spectrometer</article-title>. <source>J Instrumentation</source> (<year>2011</year>) <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>P02005</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1748-0221/6/02/p02005</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bildstein</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gernhauser</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kroll</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Krucken</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wimmer</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Van Duppen</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>T-rex a new setup for transfer experiments at rex-isolde</article-title>. <source>Eur.Phys.J.</source> (<year>2012</year>) <volume>48</volume>:<fpage>85</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1140/epja/i2012-12085-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Berner</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Werner</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gernh&#xe4;user</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kr&#xf6;ll</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Hi-trex&#x2014;a highly integrated transfer setup at rex-(hie)isolde</article-title>. <source>Nucl Instr Methods Phys Res Section A: Acc Spectrometers, Detectors Associated Equipment</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>987</volume>:<fpage>164827</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nima.2020.164827</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Assi&#xe9;</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cl&#xe9;ment</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lemasson</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ramos</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Raggio</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zanon</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>The mugast-agata-vamos campaign: set-up and performances</article-title>. <source>Nucl Instr Methods Phys Res Section A: Acc Spectrometers, Detectors Associated Equipment</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>1014</volume>:<fpage>165743</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nima.2021.165743</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pain</surname>
<given-names>SD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ratkiewicz</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baugher</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Febbraro</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lepailleur</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ayangeakaa</surname>
<given-names>AD</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Direct reaction measurements using GODDESS</article-title>. <source>Phys Proc</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>90</volume>:<fpage>455</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.phpro.2017.09.051</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>IY</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The gammasphere</article-title>. <source>Nucl Struct Nineties</source> <volume>520</volume> (<year>1990</year>) <fpage>c641</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>55</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0375-9474(90)91181-P</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vetter</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuhn</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Clark</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cromaz</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deleplanque</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Performance of the greta prototype detectors</article-title>. <source>Nucl Instr Methods Phys Res Section A: Acc Spectrometers, Detectors Associated Equipment</source> (<year>2000</year>) <volume>452</volume>:<fpage>105</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0168-9002(00)00431-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Descovich</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cromaz</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Clark</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deleplanque</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Diamond</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>GRETINA status and recent progress: The effect of neutron damage on energy and position resolution of the GRETINA detector</article-title>. <source>Nucl Instr Methods Phys Res Section B: Beam Interactions Mater Atoms</source> (<year>2005</year>) <volume>241</volume>:<fpage>931</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nimb.2005.07.150</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Paschalis</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Macchiavelli</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Campbell</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cromaz</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gros</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>The performance of the gamma-ray energy tracking in-beam nuclear array GRETINA</article-title>. <source>Nucl Instr Methods Phys Res Section A: Acc Spectrometers, Detectors Associated Equipment</source> (<year>2013</year>) <volume>709</volume>:<fpage>44</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>55</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nima.2013.01.009</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fallon</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gade</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>IY</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>GRETINA and its early science</article-title>. <source>Annu Rev Nucl Part Sci</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>66</volume>:<fpage>321</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>39</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-nucl-102115-044834</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Weisshaar</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bazin</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bender</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Campbell</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Recchia</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bader</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>The performance of the <italic>&#x3b3;</italic> -ray tracking array GRETINA for <italic>&#x3b3;</italic> -ray spectroscopy with fast beams of rare isotopes</article-title>. <source>Nucl Instr Methods Phys Res Section A: Acc Spectrometers, Detectors Associated Equipment</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>847</volume>:<fpage>187</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>98</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nima.2016.12.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>25.</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<source>GRETA final design report</source>. <publisher-name>Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory</publisher-name> (<year>2020</year>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>26.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Thomas</surname>
<given-names>JS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bardayan</surname>
<given-names>DW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blackmon</surname>
<given-names>JC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cizewski</surname>
<given-names>JA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Greife</surname>
<given-names>U</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gross</surname>
<given-names>CJ</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>First study of the level structure of the r-process nucleus <sup>83</sup>Ge</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2005</year>) <volume>71</volume>:<fpage>021302</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.71.021302</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>27.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kimura</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Izumikawa</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koyama</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ohnishi</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ohtsubo</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ozawa</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>High-rate particle identification of high-energy heavy ions using a tilted electrode gas ionization chamber</article-title>. <source>Nucl Instr Methods Phys Res Section A: Acc Spectrometers, Detectors Associated Equipment</source> (<year>2005</year>) <volume>538</volume>:<fpage>608</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nima.2004.08.100</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>28.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Koshchiy</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blackmon</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rogachev</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wiedenh&#xf6;ver</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baby</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barber</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Anasen: the array for nuclear astrophysics and structure with exotic nuclei</article-title>. <source>Nucl Instr Methods Phys Res Section A: Acc Spectrometers, Detectors Associated Equipment</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>870</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nima.2017.07.030</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>29.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lai</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Afanasieva</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blackmon</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deibel</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gardiner</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lauer</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Position-sensitive, fast ionization chambers</article-title>. <source>Nucl Instr Methods Phys Res Section A: Acc Spectrometers, Detectors Associated Equipment</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>890</volume>:<fpage>119</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>125</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nima.2018.01.010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>30.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chester</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smallcombe</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Henderson</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berean-Dutcher</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bernier</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bhattacharjee</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Trific: the triumf fast ion counter</article-title>. <source>Nucl Instr Methods Phys Res Section A: Acc Spectrometers, Detectors Associated Equipment</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>930</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nima.2019.03.075</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<label>31.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Woods</surname>
<given-names>RD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saxon</surname>
<given-names>DS</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Diffuse surface optical model for nucleon-nuclei scattering</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev</source> (<year>1954</year>) <volume>95</volume>:<fpage>577</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>578</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRev.95.577</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<label>32.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schiffer</surname>
<given-names>JP</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Proton widths in a diffuse well</article-title>. <source>Nucl Phys</source> (<year>1963</year>) <volume>46</volume>:<fpage>246</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>250</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0029-5582(63)90586-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<label>33.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Iliadis</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Proton single-particle reduced widths for unbound states</article-title>. <source>Nucl Phys A</source> (<year>1997</year>) <volume>618</volume>:<fpage>166</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0375-9474(97)00065-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<label>34.</label>
<citation citation-type="web">
<collab>Author anonymous</collab> (<year>2024</year>). <comment>Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://orruba.org/software">https://orruba.org/software</ext-link> (Accessed December 2024).</comment>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<label>35.</label>
<citation citation-type="web">
<collab>Author anonymous</collab> (<year>2024</year>). <comment>Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://people.frib.msu.edu/brown/reaction-codes">https://people.frib.msu.edu/brown/reaction-codes</ext-link> (Accessed December 2024).</comment>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<label>36.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Iliadis</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wiescher</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Spectroscopic factors from direct proton capture</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2004</year>) <volume>69</volume>:<fpage>064305</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.69.064305</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<label>37.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Iliadis</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Endt</surname>
<given-names>PM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prantzos</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thompson</surname>
<given-names>WJ</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Explosive hydrogen burning of 27si, 31s, 35ar, and 39ca in novae and x-ray bursts</article-title>. <source>Astrophysical J</source> (<year>1999</year>) <volume>524</volume>:<fpage>434</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>53</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/307778</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<label>38.</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Iliadis</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <source>Nuclear Physics of Stars</source>. <publisher-name>Wiley-VCH</publisher-name> (<year>2007</year>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<label>39.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kozub</surname>
<given-names>RL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Youngblood</surname>
<given-names>DH</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Single-particle strengths for quasibound levels in <sup>33</sup>Cl</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>1972</year>) <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>413</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.5.413</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<label>40.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hale</surname>
<given-names>SE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Champagne</surname>
<given-names>AE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Iliadis</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hansper</surname>
<given-names>VY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Powell</surname>
<given-names>DC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blackmon</surname>
<given-names>JC</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Investigation of the <sup>22</sup>Ne(<italic>p,&#x3b3;</italic>)<sup>23</sup>Na reaction via (<sup>3</sup>He, <italic>d</italic>) spectroscopy</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2001</year>) <volume>65</volume>:<fpage>015801</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.65.015801</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<label>41.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Harrouz</surname>
<given-names>DS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de S&#xe9;r&#xe9;ville</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Adsley</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hammache</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Longland</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bastin</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Experimental study of the <sup>30</sup>Si(<sup>3</sup>He, <italic>d</italic>)<sup>31</sup>P reaction and thermonuclear reaction rate of <sup>30</sup>Si(<italic>p,&#x3b3;</italic>)<sup>31</sup>P</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>105</volume>:<fpage>015805</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.105.015805</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<label>42.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kankainen</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Woods</surname>
<given-names>PJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nunes</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Langer</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schatz</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bader</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Angle-integrated measurements of the <sup>26</sup>Al (d, n)<sup>27</sup>Si reaction cross section: a probe of spectroscopic factors and astrophysical resonance strengths</article-title>. <source>Eur Phys J</source> (<year>2016</year>). <volume>52</volume>:<fpage>6</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1140/epja/i2016-16006-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<label>43.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kankainen</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Woods</surname>
<given-names>PJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schatz</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Poxon-Pearson</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Doherty</surname>
<given-names>DT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bader</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Measurement of key resonance states for the <sup>30</sup>p(p,<italic>&#x3b3;</italic>)<sup>31</sup>s reaction rate, and the production of intermediate-mass elements in nova explosions</article-title>. <source>Phys Lett B</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>769</volume>:<fpage>549</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.physletb.2017.01.084</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<label>44.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hallam</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lotay</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gade</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Doherty</surname>
<given-names>DT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Belarge</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bender</surname>
<given-names>PC</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Exploiting isospin symmetry to study the role of isomers in stellar environments</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev Lett </source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>126</volume>:<fpage>042701</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/physrevlett.126.042701</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<label>45.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lotay</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Henderson</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Catford</surname>
<given-names>WN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ali</surname>
<given-names>FA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berean</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bernier</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Single neutron transfer on <sup>23</sup>ne and its relevance for the pathway of nucleosynthesis in astrophysical x-ray bursts</article-title>. <source>Phys Lett B</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>833</volume>:<fpage>137361</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137361</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<label>46.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Laird</surname>
<given-names>AM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lugaro</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kankainen</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Adsley</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bardayan</surname>
<given-names>DW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brinkman</surname>
<given-names>HE</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Progress on nuclear reaction rates affecting the stellar production of <sup>26</sup>al</article-title>. <source>J.Phys.(London)</source> (<year>2023</year>). <volume>G50</volume>:<fpage>033002</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1361-6471/ac9cf8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<label>47.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vogelaar</surname>
<given-names>RB</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The <sup>26</sup>Al(p,&#x3b3;) <sup>27</sup>Si reaction: stellar origins of galactic <sup>26</sup>Al</article-title>. <publisher-loc>Pasadena, CA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>California insitute of Technology</publisher-name>. <comment>Ph.D Thesis</comment> (<year>1989</year>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<label>48.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ruiz</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parikh</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jos&#xe9;</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buchmann</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Caggiano</surname>
<given-names>JA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>AA</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Measurement of the Ec.m. &#x3d; 184 keV resonance strength in the 26gAl (p, gamma)27 Si reaction</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev Lett</source> (<year>2006</year>) <volume>96</volume>:<fpage>252501</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.252501</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<label>49.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vogelaar</surname>
<given-names>RB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mitchell</surname>
<given-names>LW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kavanagh</surname>
<given-names>RW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Champagne</surname>
<given-names>AE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Magnus</surname>
<given-names>PV</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname>
<given-names>MS</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>1996</year>). <volume>53</volume>:<fpage>1945</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.53.1945</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<label>50.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pain</surname>
<given-names>SD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bardayan</surname>
<given-names>DW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blackmon</surname>
<given-names>JC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname>
<given-names>SM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chae</surname>
<given-names>KY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chipps</surname>
<given-names>KA</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Constraint of the astrophysical <sup>26g</sup>Al(p,&#x3b3;)<sup>27</sup> Si destruction rate at stellar temperatures</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev Lett</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>114</volume>:<fpage>212501</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.212501</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<label>51.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Margerin</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lotay</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Woods</surname>
<given-names>PJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aliotta</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Christian</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davids</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Inverse kinematic study of the (26g)Al(d,p)(27)Al reaction and implications for destruction of (26)Al in wolf-rayet and asymptotic giant branch stars</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev Lett</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>115</volume>:<fpage>062701</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.062701</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<label>52.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lotay</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Woods</surname>
<given-names>PJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moukaddam</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aliotta</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Christian</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davids</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>High-resolution radioactive beam study of the <sup>26</sup>al(d, p) reaction and measurements of single-particle spectroscopic factors</article-title>. <source>Eur Phys J</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>A 56</volume>:<fpage>3</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1140/epja/s10050-019-00008-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<label>53.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Oko&#x142;owicz</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>P&#x142;oszajczak</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rotter</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Dynamics of quantum systems embedded in a continuum</article-title>. <source>Phys Rep</source> (<year>2003</year>) <volume>374</volume>:<fpage>271</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>383</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00366-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<label>54.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Oko&#x142;owicz</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Michel</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nazarewicz</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>P&#x142;oszajczak</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Asymptotic normalization coefficients and continuum coupling in mirror nuclei</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2012</year>) <volume>85</volume>:<fpage>064320</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.85.064320</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<label>55.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname>
<given-names>BA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Richter</surname>
<given-names>WA</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>New usd Hamiltonians for the sd shell</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2006</year>) <volume>74</volume>:<fpage>034315</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/physrevc.74.034315</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<label>56.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ward</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fowler</surname>
<given-names>WA</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Thermalization of long-lived nuclear isomeric states under stellar conditions</article-title>. <source>Astrophys J</source> (<year>1980</year>) <volume>238</volume>:<fpage>266</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>86</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/157983</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<label>57.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Coc</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Porquet</surname>
<given-names>MG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nowacki</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> <article-title>Lifetimes of <sup>26</sup>Al and <sup>34</sup>Cl in an astrophysical plasma</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>1999</year>) <volume>61</volume>:<fpage>015801</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.61.015801</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<label>58.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gupta</surname>
<given-names>SS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meyer</surname>
<given-names>BS</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Internal equilibration of a nucleus with metastable states: <sup>26</sup>Al as an example</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2001</year>) <volume>64</volume>:<fpage>025805</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.64.025805</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<label>59.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Misch</surname>
<given-names>GW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ghorui</surname>
<given-names>SK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Banerjee</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mumpower</surname>
<given-names>MR</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Astromers: nuclear isomers in astrophysics<sup>&#x2a;</sup>
</article-title>. <source>Astrophysical J Suppl Ser</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>252</volume>:<fpage>2</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3847/1538-4365/abc41d</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<label>60.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Misch</surname>
<given-names>GW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sprouse</surname>
<given-names>TM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mumpower</surname>
<given-names>MR</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Astromers in the radioactive decay of r-process nuclei</article-title>. <source>Astrophysical J Lett</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>913</volume>:<fpage>L2</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3847/2041-8213/abfb74</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<label>61.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Misch</surname>
<given-names>GW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sprouse</surname>
<given-names>TM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mumpower</surname>
<given-names>MR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Couture</surname>
<given-names>AJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fryer</surname>
<given-names>CL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meyer</surname>
<given-names>BS</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Sensitivity of neutron-rich nuclear isomer behavior to uncertainties in direct transitions</article-title>. <source>Symmetry</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>1831</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/sym13101831</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<label>62.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Misch</surname>
<given-names>GW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mumpower</surname>
<given-names>MR</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> <article-title>Astromers: status and prospects</article-title>. <source>Eur Phys J Spec Top</source> (<year>2024</year>) <volume>233</volume>:<fpage>1075</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>99</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1140/epjs/s11734-024-01136-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<label>63.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lotay</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Radiative Capture on Nuclear Isomers: Direct Measurement of the <sup>26m</sup>Al(p, &#x3b3;) <sup>27</sup>Si Reaction</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev Lett </source> (<year>2022</year>). <volume>128</volume>:<fpage>042701</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.042701</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<label>64.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Almaraz-Calderon</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rehm</surname>
<given-names>KE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gerken</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Avila</surname>
<given-names>ML</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kay</surname>
<given-names>BP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Talwar</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Study of the <sup>26</sup>Al<sup>m(d,p)</sup>
<sub>27AI</sub> reaction and the influence of the <sup>26</sup>Al 0<sup>&#x2b;</sup> isomer on the destruction of <sup>26</sup>Al in the galaxy</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev Lett</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>119</volume>:<fpage>072701</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.072701</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<label>65.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chipps</surname>
<given-names>KA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kozub</surname>
<given-names>RL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sumithrarachchi</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ginter</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baumann</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lund</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> <article-title>K 38 isomer production via fast fragmentation</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev Accel Beams</source> (<year>2018</year>). <volume>21</volume>:<fpage>121301</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.21.121301</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<label>66.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shehu</surname>
<given-names>OA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Crider</surname>
<given-names>BP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ginter</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hoffman</surname>
<given-names>CR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ogunbeku</surname>
<given-names>TH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Experimental study of the <sup>34m</sup>Cl beam production at intermediate energies</article-title>. <source>Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment</source> (<year>2022</year>). <volume>1035</volume>:<fpage>166789</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nima.2022.166789</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B69">
<label>67.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pain</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>FRIB Proposal 23079 Approved; awaiting scheduling</article-title> (<year>2023</year>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<label>68.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mahoney</surname>
<given-names>WA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ling</surname>
<given-names>JC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jacobson</surname>
<given-names>AS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lingenfelter</surname>
<given-names>RE</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Diffuse galactic gamma-ray line emission from nucleosynthetic Fe-60, Al-26, and Na-22 - preliminary limits from HEAO 3</article-title>. <source>Astrophys J</source> (<year>1982</year>) <volume>262</volume>:<fpage>742</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/160469</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B71">
<label>69.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Share</surname>
<given-names>GH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kinzer</surname>
<given-names>RL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kurfess</surname>
<given-names>JD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Forrest</surname>
<given-names>DJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chupp</surname>
<given-names>EL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rieger</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Detection of galactic Al-26 gamma radiation by the SMM spectrometer</article-title>. <source>Astrophys J</source> (<year>1985</year>) <volume>292</volume>:<fpage>L61</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>L65</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/184473</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B72">
<label>70.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schoenfelder</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aarts</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bennett</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Boer</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Clear</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Collmar</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Instrument description and performance of the imaging gamma-ray telescope COMPTEL aboard the Compton gamma-ray observatory</article-title>. <source>Astrophys J Supp Ser</source> (<year>1993</year>) <volume>86</volume>:<fpage>657</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>92</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/191794</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B73">
<label>71.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Diehl</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dupraz</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bennett</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bloemen</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Boer</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hermsen</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <source>COMPTEL observations of the 1.809 MeV gamma-ray line from galactic Al</source> (<year>1994</year>). <volume>26</volume>:<fpage>429</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>32</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/191990</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B74">
<label>72.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Diehl</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Halloin</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kretschmer</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lichti</surname>
<given-names>GG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sch&#xf6;nfelder</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Strong</surname>
<given-names>AW</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Radioactive <sup>26</sup>Al from massive stars in the Galaxy</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> (<year>2006</year>) <volume>439</volume>:<fpage>45</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature04364</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B75">
<label>73.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Diehl</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lang</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kretschmer</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>
<sup>26</sup>Al emission throughout the galaxy</article-title>. <source>New Astron Rev</source> <volume>52</volume> (<year>2008</year>). <fpage>440</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.newar.2008.06.024</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B76">
<label>74.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Voss</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Diehl</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hartmann</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kretschmer</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Population synthesis models for 26al production in starforming regions</article-title>. <source>New Astron Rev</source> (<year>2008</year>) <volume>52</volume>:<fpage>436</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.newar.2008.06.022</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B77">
<label>75.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Banerjee</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Misch</surname>
<given-names>GW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ghorui</surname>
<given-names>SK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> <article-title>Effective stellar &#x3b2;-decay rates of nuclei with long-lived isomers: <sup>26</sup>Al and <sup>34</sup>Cl</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>97</volume>:<fpage>065807</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.97.065807</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B78">
<label>76.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kozub</surname>
<given-names>RL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bardayan</surname>
<given-names>DW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Batchelder</surname>
<given-names>JC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blackmon</surname>
<given-names>JC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brune</surname>
<given-names>CR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Champagne</surname>
<given-names>AE</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>New constraints on the<sup>18</sup>F(<italic>p,&#x3b1;</italic>)<sup>15</sup>O rate in novae from the (<italic>d, p</italic>) reaction</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2005</year>) <volume>71</volume>:<fpage>032801</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.71.032801</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B79">
<label>77.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kozub</surname>
<given-names>RL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bardayan</surname>
<given-names>DW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Batchelder</surname>
<given-names>JC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blackmon</surname>
<given-names>JC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brune</surname>
<given-names>CR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Champagne</surname>
<given-names>AE</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Neutron single particle strengths from the reaction on <sup>18</sup>F</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> <volume>73</volume> (<year>2006</year>) <fpage>044307</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.73.044307</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B80">
<label>78.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hall</surname>
<given-names>MR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bardayan</surname>
<given-names>DW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baugher</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lepailleur</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pain</surname>
<given-names>SD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ratkiewicz</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Key<sup>19</sup>Ne states identified affecting <italic>&#x3b3;</italic>-ray emission from<sup>18</sup>F in novae</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev Lett</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>122</volume>:<fpage>052701</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.052701</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B81">
<label>79.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Iyudin</surname>
<given-names>AF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bennett</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bloemen</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Diehl</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hermsen</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lichti</surname>
<given-names>GG</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>COMPTEL search for 2&#x302;2N&#x302;a line emission from recent novae</article-title>. <source>Astron Astrophys</source> (<year>1995</year>) <volume>300</volume>:<fpage>422</fpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B82">
<label>80.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jean</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hernanz</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gomez-Gomar</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jose</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Galactic 1.275-MeV emission from ONe novae and its detectability by INTEGRAL/SPI</article-title>. <source>Mon Not R Astron Soc</source> (<year>2000</year>) <volume>319</volume>:<fpage>350</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>64</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03587.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B83">
<label>81.</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Siegert</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coc</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Delgado</surname>
<given-names>LG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Diehl</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Greiner</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hernanz</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <source>Gamma-ray observations of nova sgr 2015 no. 2 with integral</source>, <volume>292</volume> (<year>2018</year>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B84">
<label>82.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Siegert</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coc</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Delgado</surname>
<given-names>LG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Diehl</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Greiner</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hernanz</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Gamma-ray observations of nova sgr 2015 no. 2 with integral</article-title>. <source>Astron Astrophys</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>615</volume>:<fpage>A107</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1051/0004-6361/201732514</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B85">
<label>83.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fryer</surname>
<given-names>CL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Timmes</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hungerford</surname>
<given-names>AL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Couture</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Adams</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aoki</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Catching element formation in the act</article-title> (<year>2019</year>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B86">
<label>84.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Seuthe</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rolfs</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schroder</surname>
<given-names>U</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schulte</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Somorjai</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trautvetter</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Resonances in the 22Na(p,<italic>&#x3b3;</italic>)23mg reaction</article-title>. <source>Nucl Phys A</source> (<year>1990</year>) <volume>514</volume>:<fpage>471</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>502</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0375-9474(90)90153-D</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B87">
<label>85.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sallaska</surname>
<given-names>AL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wrede</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garc&#xed;a</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Storm</surname>
<given-names>DW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname>
<given-names>TAD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruiz</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Direct measurements of <sup>22</sup>Na(<italic>p,&#x3b3;</italic>) <sup>23</sup>Mg resonances and consequences for <sup>22</sup>Na production in classical novae</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev Lett</source> (<year>2010</year>) <volume>105</volume>:<fpage>152501</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.152501</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B88">
<label>86.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sallaska</surname>
<given-names>AL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wrede</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garc&#xed;a</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Storm</surname>
<given-names>DW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname>
<given-names>TAD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruiz</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Absolute determination of the<sup>22</sup>Na(<italic>p, &#x3b3;</italic>)<sup>23</sup>Mg reaction rate in novae</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2011</year>) <volume>83</volume>:<fpage>034611</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.83.034611</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B89">
<label>87.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stegm&#xfc;ller</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rolfs</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schmidt</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schulte</surname>
<given-names>WH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trautvetter</surname>
<given-names>HP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kavanagh</surname>
<given-names>RW</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>
<sup>22</sup>Na(p,<italic>&#x3b3;</italic>) <sup>23</sup>Mg resonant reaction at low energies</article-title>. <source>Nucl Phys A</source> (<year>1996</year>) <volume>601</volume>:<fpage>168</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>80</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0375-9474(96)00084-X</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B90">
<label>88.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Friedman</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Budner</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>P&#xe9;rez-Loureiro</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pollacco</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wrede</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jos&#xe9;</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Low-energy <sup>23</sup>-delayed proton decay and <sup>22</sup>Na destruction in novae</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> <volume>101</volume> (<year>2020</year>) <fpage>052802</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.101.052802</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B91">
<label>89.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Friedman</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Perez-Loureiro</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Budner</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pollacco</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wrede</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cortesi</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Gadget: a gaseous detector with germanium tagging</article-title>. <source>Nucl Instr Methods Phys Res Section A: Acc Spectrometers, Detectors Associated Equipment</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>940</volume>:<fpage>93</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>102</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nima.2019.05.100</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B92">
<label>90.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Saastamoinen</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trache</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Banu</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bentley</surname>
<given-names>MA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davinson</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hardy</surname>
<given-names>JC</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Experimental study of <italic>&#x3b2;</italic>-delayed proton decay of <sup>23</sup>Al for nucleosynthesis in novae</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2011</year>) <volume>83</volume>:<fpage>045808</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.83.045808</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B93">
<label>91.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Friedman</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Budner</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Perez-Loureiro</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pollacco</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wrede</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jose</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Low-energy <sup>23</sup>Al <italic>&#x3b2;</italic>-delayed proton decay and <sup>22</sup>Na destruction in novae</article-title>. <source>arXiv</source> (<year>2019</year>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B94">
<label>92.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jenkins</surname>
<given-names>DG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lister</surname>
<given-names>CJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Janssens</surname>
<given-names>RVF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khoo</surname>
<given-names>TL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moore</surname>
<given-names>EF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rehm</surname>
<given-names>KE</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Reevaluation of the <sup>22</sup>Na(<italic>p, &#x3b3;</italic>) reaction rate: implications for the detection of <sup>22</sup>Na gamma rays from novae</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev Lett</source> (<year>2004</year>) <volume>92</volume>:<fpage>031101</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.031101</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B95">
<label>93.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jenkins</surname>
<given-names>DG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bouhelal</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Courtin</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Freer</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fulton</surname>
<given-names>BR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haas</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>
<italic>&#x3b3;</italic>-ray spectroscopy of the <italic>a</italic> &#x3d; 23, <italic>t</italic> &#x3d; 1/2 nuclei <sup>23</sup>Na and <sup>23</sup>Mg: high-spin states, mirror symmetry, and applications to nuclear astrophysical reaction rates</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2013</year>) <volume>87</volume>:<fpage>064301</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.87.064301</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B96">
<label>94.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kirsebom</surname>
<given-names>OS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bender</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheeseman</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Christian</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Churchman</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cross</surname>
<given-names>DS</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Measurement of lifetimes in <sup>23</sup>Mg</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>93</volume>:<fpage>025802</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.93.025802</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B97">
<label>95.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname>
<given-names>SJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>YB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Su</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname>
<given-names>SQ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>YJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Resonant scattering of <sup>22</sup>na &#x2b; <italic>p</italic> studied by the thick-target inverse-kinematic method</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2013</year>) <volume>88</volume>:<fpage>035801</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.88.035801</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B98">
<label>96.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schmidt</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rolfs</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schulte</surname>
<given-names>WH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trautvetter</surname>
<given-names>HP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kavanagh</surname>
<given-names>RW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hategan</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>
<sup>22</sup>Na(<sup>3</sup>He,d)<sup>23</sup>Mg reaction studies of states near the proton threshold and hydrogen burning of <sup>22</sup>Na</article-title>. <source>Nucl Phys A</source> (<year>1995</year>). <volume>591</volume>:<fpage>227</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0375-9474(95)00164-V</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B99">
<label>97.</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kn&#xf6;dlseder</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bennett</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bloemen</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Diehl</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hermsen</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oberlack</surname>
<given-names>U</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <source>A multiwavelength comparison of COMPTEL 1.8 MeV {(26)} line data</source>, <volume>344</volume> (<year>1999</year>). <fpage>68</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>82</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B100">
<label>98.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kn&#xf6;dlseder</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>On the origin of galactic <sup>26</sup>AL</article-title>. <source>Astrophys Lett Comm</source> (<year>1999</year>) <volume>38</volume>:<fpage>379</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9902281</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B101">
<label>99.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wrede</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The <sup>30</sup>P(p,<italic>&#x3b3;</italic>)<sup>31</sup>S reaction in classical novae: progress and prospects</article-title>. <source>A.I.P Adv</source> (<year>2014</year>) <volume>4</volume>:<fpage>041004</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.4864193</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B102">
<label>100.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Iliadis</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Champagne</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jos&#xe9;</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Starrfield</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tupper</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <source>Ap J Suppl Ser</source> (<year>2002</year>) <volume>142</volume>:<fpage>105</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/341400</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B103">
<label>101.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jos&#xe9;</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hernanz</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Amari</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lodders</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zinner</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The Imprint of Nova Nucleosynthesis in Presolar Grains</article-title>. <source>Astrophys J</source> (<year>2004</year>) <volume>612</volume>:<fpage>414</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/422569</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B104">
<label>102.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Downen</surname>
<given-names>LN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Iliadis</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jos&#xe8;</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Starrfield</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Nuclear Thermometers for Classical Novae</article-title>. <source>Astrophys J</source> (<year>2013</year>) <volume>762</volume>:<fpage>105</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/105</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B106">
<label>103.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hynes</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gyngard</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The presolar grain database</article-title>. <source>Lunar Planet Sci</source> (<year>2009</year>) <volume>40</volume>:<fpage>1198</fpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B107">
<label>104.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fry</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wrede</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bishop</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname>
<given-names>BA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>AA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Faestermann</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Discovery of <sup>34g,m</sup>Cl(<italic>p,&#x3b3;</italic>)<sup>35</sup>Ar resonances activated at classical nova temperatures</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>91</volume>:<fpage>015803</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.91.015803</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B108">
<label>105.</label>
<citation citation-type="other">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Grineviciute</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname>
<given-names>BA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schatz</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The role of excited states in rp-process for sd shell nuclei</article-title>. <source>arXiv [Preprint]. arXiv:1404.7268</source> (<year>2014</year>). <comment>Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.7268">https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.7268</ext-link>
</comment> (<comment>Accessed April 29, 2025</comment>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B109">
<label>106.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname>
<given-names>BA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wildenthal</surname>
<given-names>WDM</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Status of the nuclear shell model</article-title>. <source>Ann Rev Nucl Part Sci</source> (<year>1988</year>) <volume>38</volume>:<fpage>29</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>66</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.ns.38.120188.000333</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B110">
<label>107.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Richter</surname>
<given-names>WA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname>
<given-names>BA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Longland</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wrede</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Denissenkov</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fry</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Shell-model studies of the astrophysical <italic>rp</italic>-process reactions <sup>34</sup>S(<italic>p,&#x3b3;</italic>)<sup>35</sup>Cl and <sup>34g,m</sup>Cl(<italic>p,&#x3b3;</italic>)<sup>35</sup>Ar</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>102</volume>:<fpage>025801</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.102.025801</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B111">
<label>108.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname>
<given-names>BA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Richter</surname>
<given-names>WA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wrede</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Shell-model studies of the astrophysical rapid-proton-capture reaction <sup>30</sup>P(<italic>p,&#x3b3;</italic>)<sup>31</sup>S</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2014</year>) <volume>89</volume>:<fpage>062801R</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/physrevc.89.062801</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B112">
<label>109.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pain</surname>
<given-names>SD</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Proposal to the NSCL PAC</article-title>, <fpage>e18037</fpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B113">
<label>110.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Utsuno</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Otsuka</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname>
<given-names>BA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Honma</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mizusaki</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shimizu</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Shape transitions in exotic si and s isotopes and tensor-force-driven jahn-teller effect</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2012</year>) <volume>86</volume>:<fpage>051301</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.86.051301</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B114">
<label>111.</label>
<citation citation-type="other">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pain</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>FRIB Proposal 21067 (2021). Approved; awaiting scheduling</article-title>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B115">
<label>112.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lotay</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Christian</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruiz</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Akers</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burke</surname>
<given-names>DS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Catford</surname>
<given-names>WN</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Direct measurement of the astrophysical <sup>38</sup>K(<italic>p,&#x3b3;</italic>)<sup>39</sup>Ca reaction and its influence on the production of nuclides toward the end point of nova nucleosynthesis</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev Lett</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>116</volume>:<fpage>132701</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.132701</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B116">
<label>113.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fisker</surname>
<given-names>JL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname>
<given-names>EF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liebend&#xF6;rfer</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thielemann</surname>
<given-names>FK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wiescher</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>The reactions and ashes of thermonuclear explosions on neutron stars</article-title>. <source>Nucl.Phys.</source> (<year>2005</year>). <volume>A752</volume>:<fpage>604c</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.02.063</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B117">
<label>114.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fisker</surname>
<given-names>JL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schatz</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thielemann</surname>
<given-names>FK</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Explosive hydrogen burning during type I X&#x2010;ray bursts</article-title>. <source>Astrophys J Supp Ser</source> (<year>2008</year>) <volume>174</volume>:<fpage>261</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>76</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/521104</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B118">
<label>115.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cyburt</surname>
<given-names>RH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Amthor</surname>
<given-names>AM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ferguson</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meisel</surname>
<given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Warren</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>The jina reaclib database: its recent updates and impact on type-i x-ray bursts</article-title>. <source>Astrophysical J Suppl Ser</source> (<year>2010</year>) <volume>189</volume>:<fpage>240</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>52</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/0067-0049/189/1/240</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B119">
<label>116.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cameron</surname>
<given-names>JA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Nuclear data sheets for a &#x3d; 38</article-title>. <source>Nucl Data Sheets</source> (<year>2008</year>) <volume>109</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>170</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nds.2007.12.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B120">
<label>117.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Christian</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lotay</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruiz</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Akers</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burke</surname>
<given-names>DS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Catford</surname>
<given-names>WN</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Direct measurement of astrophysically important resonances in <sup>38</sup>K(<italic>p,&#x3b3;</italic>)<sup>39</sup>Ca</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>97</volume>:<fpage>025802</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.97.025802</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B121">
<label>118.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hall</surname>
<given-names>MR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bardayan</surname>
<given-names>DW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baugher</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lepailleur</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pain</surname>
<given-names>SD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ratkiewicz</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>
<italic>&#x3b3;</italic>-ray spectroscopy of astrophysically important states in <sup>39</sup>Ca</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>101</volume>:<fpage>015804</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.101.015804</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B122">
<label>119.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Setoodehnia</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marshall</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kelley</surname>
<given-names>JH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Portillo Chaves</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Longland</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Excited states of <sup>39</sup>Ca and their significance in nova nucleosynthesis</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>98</volume>:<fpage>055804</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.98.055804</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B123">
<label>120.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Matoba</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Iwamoto</surname>
<given-names>O</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Uozumi</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sakae</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koori</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fujiki</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>
<sup>40</sup>Ca(p,d)<sup>39</sup>ca reaction at 65 mev</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>1993</year>) <volume>48</volume>:<fpage>95</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>104</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.48.95</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B124">
<label>121.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Doll</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wagner</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kn&#xf6;pfle</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mairle</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The quasihole aspect of hole strength distributions in odd potassium and calcium isotopes</article-title>. <source>Nucl Phys A</source> (<year>1976</year>) <volume>263</volume>:<fpage>210</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>36</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0375-9474(76)90169-X</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B125">
<label>122.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cameron</surname>
<given-names>JA</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Nuclear data sheets for a &#x3d; 39</article-title>. <source>Nucl Data Sheets</source> (<year>2006</year>) <volume>107</volume>:<fpage>225</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>354</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nds.2006.01.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>