<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Phys.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-424X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1518626</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fphy.2025.1518626</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Physics</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Distance of interaction: a phenomenological analysis of elastic scattering data induced by light projectiles</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Guimar&#xe3;es et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2025.1518626">10.3389/fphy.2025.1518626</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Guimar&#xe3;es</surname>
<given-names>Valdir</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1310240/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nistal</surname>
<given-names>Pierre Camilo</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2910535/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Olorunfunmi</surname>
<given-names>Sunday D.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Linares</surname>
<given-names>Roberto</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1277439/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lubian</surname>
<given-names>Jesus</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1287353/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Instituto de F&#xed;sica</institution>, <institution>Universidade de S&#xe3;o Paulo</institution>, <addr-line>S&#xe3;o Paulo</addr-line>, <country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Department of Physics and Engineering Physics</institution>, <institution>Obafemi Awolowo University</institution>, <addr-line>Ile-Ife</addr-line>, <country>Nigeria</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Instituto de F&#xed;sica</institution>, <institution>Universidade Federal Fluminense</institution>, <addr-line>Niter&#xf3;i</addr-line>, <addr-line>Rio de Janeiro</addr-line>, <country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2310076/overview">Alan Wuosmaa</ext-link>, University of Connecticut, United States</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/533862/overview">Angela Bonaccorso</ext-link>, National Institute of Nuclear Physics of Pisa, Italy</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2237832/overview">Alberto Camaiani</ext-link>, Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Italy</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Valdir Guimar&#xe3;es, <email>valdirg@if.usp.br</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>11</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>1518626</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>28</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>07</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2025 Guimar&#xe3;es, Nistal, Olorunfunmi, Linares and Lubian.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Guimar&#xe3;es, Nistal, Olorunfunmi, Linares and Lubian</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>A phenomenological analysis, based on distances, has been performed for elastic scattering data induced by tightly bound (<sup>11</sup>B, <sup>12</sup>C, and <sup>16</sup>O), weakly bound (<sup>6</sup>Li, <sup>7</sup>Li, <sup>7</sup>Be, and <sup>9</sup>Be), and exotic (<sup>6</sup>He, <sup>8</sup>B, <sup>11</sup>Be, and <sup>15</sup>C) nuclei on light (<sup>27</sup>Al), medium (<sup>58</sup>Ni and <sup>120</sup>Sn), and heavy mass (<sup>208</sup>Pb) targets, respectively, at energies close to the Coulomb barrier.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>The cross-section data on the angular distributions have been converted as a function of the distance of the closest approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>From a fitting analysis, critical interaction and strong absorption distances were extracted from the data.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Correlation was observed with the projectile cluster configuration for the data on the target <sup>208</sup>Pb.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>nuclear reactions</kwd>
<kwd>nuclear structures</kwd>
<kwd>elastic scattering</kwd>
<kwd>critical interaction distance</kwd>
<kwd>heavy ions</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Funda&#xe7;&#xe3;o de Amparo &#xe0; Pesquisa do Estado de S&#xe3;o Paulo<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100001807</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn002">Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient&#xed;fico e Tecnol&#xf3;gico<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100003593</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn003">Instituto Nacional de Ci&#xea;ncia e Tecnologia: F&#xed;sica Nuclear e Aplica&#xe7;&#xf5;es<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100013383</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Nuclear Physics&#x200b;</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>1 Introduction</title>
<p>The complexity of nuclear structure and reactions is governed by the interplay of the strong and electroweak interactions. The need to understand how these forces act within the atomic nucleus drives experimental and theoretical efforts to explore the limits of nuclear existence. Today, 288 isotopes are known to be stable or long-lived nuclei in a vast landscape that may encompass nearly 7,800 nuclei, according to theoretical models [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]. Some of these nuclei are tightly bound in their ground state and have been well-described as spherical in shape, such as <sup>16</sup>O, <sup>58</sup>Ni, and <sup>208</sup>Pb. Other nuclei, on the other hand, are weakly bound and can exhibit clustering signatures, such as <sup>7</sup>Li <inline-formula id="inf1">
<mml:math id="m1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <sup>9</sup>Be <inline-formula id="inf2">
<mml:math id="m2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. There are also neutron- and proton-rich nuclei near the boundaries of the driplines with even more exotic configurations. Nuclei such as <sup>8</sup>B (<sup>7</sup>Be<inline-formula id="inf3">
<mml:math id="m3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) and <sup>11</sup>Be <sup>10</sup>Be<inline-formula id="inf4">
<mml:math id="m4">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) have shown an exotic configuration, in which the valence nucleon orbits a core at a large distance. Others, such as <sup>11</sup>Li (<sup>9</sup>Li<inline-formula id="inf5">
<mml:math id="m5">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>), have two valence-orbiting nucleons, forming a structure that resembles Borromean rings and are, therefore, referred to as Borromean nuclei.</p>
<p>Due to the large extended distance of nuclear matter, <sup>11</sup>Li is considered a <inline-formula id="inf6">
<mml:math id="m6">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">halo</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> nucleus, while <sup>6</sup>He is called a <inline-formula id="inf7">
<mml:math id="m7">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">skin</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> nucleus. The structure of <inline-formula id="inf8">
<mml:math id="m8">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">halo</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> in the nucleus can be considered a threshold effect, arising from the small separation energy of the one- or two-valence nucleons. In a halo structure, the valence nucleon(s) is (are) nearly decoupled from a well-defined inert core. Such a structure makes halo nuclei a suitable object to explore the behavior of open quantum systems (OQS) since the valence particle in a halo nucleus is sensitive to any interaction with continuum states and the external environment. In this case, the valence neutrons would tunnel the potential well with a slowly decaying exponential tail extending beyond the range of the potential. Thus, neutron <inline-formula id="inf9">
<mml:math id="m9">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">halo</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> can be considered one of the most exotic phenomena of the quantum tunneling effect of a loosely bound system, which can be considered to be an OQS. The boundary for defining a nucleus as <inline-formula id="inf10">
<mml:math id="m10">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">halo</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is not exactly clear, and there are some other nuclei that are also considered to have a <inline-formula id="inf11">
<mml:math id="m11">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">halo</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> structure, such as <sup>11</sup>Be and <sup>15</sup>C. For the proton-rich nuclei, the situation is even less defined since the Coulomb barrier between the core and the valence proton prevents it from having the same behavior as neutron valence. The radial density distribution deduced for elastic scattering of <sup>8</sup>B &#x2b; p exhibited a clear halo structure with the root-mean-square (rms) matter radius <inline-formula id="inf12">
<mml:math id="m12">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; 2.58 (6) fm and the rms halo radius <inline-formula id="inf13">
<mml:math id="m13">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; 4.24 (25) fm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]. This result, combined with the large breakup cross sections [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>] and the narrow longitudinal momentum distribution for the <sup>7</sup>Be core [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>], is very strong experimental evidence of a proton-halo structure in <sup>8</sup>B nuclei. Despite the lack of experimental evidence, some other proton-halo candidates are <sup>12</sup>N (<inline-formula id="inf14">
<mml:math id="m14">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; 0.601 MeV) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>] and <sup>17</sup>Ne (<inline-formula id="inf15">
<mml:math id="m15">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; 0.933 MeV) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]. In summary, several exciting phenomena have emerged from the investigations of the structures of these light nuclei, and several other phenomena remain to be investigated. In particular, whether and/or why <inline-formula id="inf16">
<mml:math id="m16">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">halo</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and cluster structures in light nuclei occur preferentially at thresholds, which is a clear characteristic of OQS, is an actual topic under investigation.</p>
<p>Nuclear reaction is one of the most commonly employed techniques for exploring the structures exhibited by nuclei across the vast nuclear landscape. To extract structure information on the colliding partners, reliable reaction models and high-quality experimental data are required. In this regard, elastic scattering is the simplest and most studied process among the possible outcomes in collisions between two nuclei. From the analysis of these elastic scattering angular distributions, we can obtain information on both the static (deformation and cluster configuration) and dynamic (couplings to nonelastic reaction channels) effects on the collision. The theoretical description of this process is often based on quantum theories with a model space of the reaction channels. Some of the ingredients in these calculations are the effective optical potential between the projectile and target nuclei, coupling constants, and the structure of the nuclei involved. The shape of the optical potential is usually linked to the overall geometry of the nuclei. By choosing specific targets, it is possible to focus on the properties of the projectile. For example, the peculiar cluster configurations in some light exotic nuclei, such as <sup>6</sup>He, <sup>8</sup>B, <sup>11</sup>Be, and <sup>15</sup>C, induce a strong coupling to the continuum states. In turn, this coupling introduces a characteristic dynamic polarization (attractive or repulsive) in the optical potential that is not present in the elastic scattering induced by strongly bound projectiles. A review investigating the elastic scattering data can be found in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]. A specific review on the elastic scattering of light radioactive projectiles can be found in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>], where the peculiar surface properties (static effects) of exotic weakly bound nuclei are highlighted. The strong coupling effect in elastic scattering has been reviewed and well-discussed in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>].</p>
<p>Although a quantum formulation for elastic scattering is well-grounded on a theoretical basis, adopting a semi-classical approach is useful for complementary phenomenological analysis. In classical mechanics, scattering is described in terms of trajectories and connects the distance of the closest approach <inline-formula id="inf17">
<mml:math id="m17">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> to the asymptotic scattering angle. Therefore, the angular distribution of normalized elastic cross sections can be converted to normalized cross sections as a function of distance <inline-formula id="inf18">
<mml:math id="m18">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. Under this transformation, it is possible to determine the strong absorption <inline-formula id="inf19">
<mml:math id="m19">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and the interaction distances <inline-formula id="inf20">
<mml:math id="m20">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> for a binary collision. The former corresponds to the distance at which the ratio of elastic scattering to Rutherford scattering (d<inline-formula id="inf21">
<mml:math id="m21">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>/d<inline-formula id="inf22">
<mml:math id="m22">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Ruth</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) drops to 0.25. The corresponding angle at which d<inline-formula id="inf23">
<mml:math id="m23">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>/d<inline-formula id="inf24">
<mml:math id="m24">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Ruth</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; 0.25 is also called the grazing angle <inline-formula id="inf25">
<mml:math id="m25">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b8;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>gr</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> or the quarter-point angle <inline-formula id="inf26">
<mml:math id="m26">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b8;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>/</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. The distance of strong absorption is closely related to the radius of the stable nucleus, as discussed in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]. However, the nuclear radius is not as easily defined for weakly bound and exotic nuclei, which can have an exotic cluster structure and/or a very diffuse density distribution at the surface region. The interaction distance represents the distance at which the nuclear potential (or a long-range Coulomb interaction) starts manifesting itself during the income trajectory in the nuclear collision and the cross-section ratio starts to deviate from unity. In the present work, the critical interaction distance is defined when the elastic cross-section ratio to Rutherford, <inline-formula id="inf27">
<mml:math id="m27">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Ruth</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, is equal to 0.98. This value corresponds to the S-matrix&#x2019;s absolute value of 0.99, and it is the distance where the flux from elastic scattering starts to be absorbed.</p>
<p>In this work, we present a semiclassical phenomenological analysis based on distances to investigate static and dynamic effects on the elastic scattering of light nuclei, at energies close to the Coulomb barrier. We present new results for the analysis of elastic scattering data on the targets <sup>27</sup>Al and <sup>120</sup>Sn, which can be considered a sequel of the previous analysis on the targets <sup>58</sup>Ni [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>] and <sup>208</sup>Pb [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>]. On account of this, this analysis was inspired by the initial work of Pakou and Rusek, which is presented in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>]. Systematic analysis, in which several data sets can be compared on the same grounds, has been shown to be a powerful tool for investigating general behavior and highlighting the particular properties of some of the nuclei involved.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<title>2 Critical distance of interaction</title>
<p>The cross sections of the angular distributions, listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Tables 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>, were converted from the angular dependence to the distance of the closest approach on a Rutherford trajectory and then to reduced distances. In classical scattering, the distance at the closest approach is related to the incident energy and scattering angle in the center of mass (c.m.) frame as follows:<disp-formula id="e1">
<mml:math id="m28">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mfenced open="[" close="]">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>.</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>.</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mfenced open="[" close="]">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>sin</mml:mi>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b8;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(1)</label>
</disp-formula>with <inline-formula id="inf28">
<mml:math id="m29">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1.44</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> MeV.fm. <inline-formula id="inf29">
<mml:math id="m30">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <inline-formula id="inf30">
<mml:math id="m31">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> correspond to the atomic number and mass of the nuclei of the projectile <inline-formula id="inf31">
<mml:math id="m32">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and the target <inline-formula id="inf32">
<mml:math id="m33">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, respectively. For a better comparison of the different data sets, involving different projectiles, we consider the reduced distance at the closest approach <inline-formula id="inf33">
<mml:math id="m34">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> defined as follows:<disp-formula id="e2">
<mml:math id="m35">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>.</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(2)</label>
</disp-formula>By plotting the data as a function of <inline-formula id="inf34">
<mml:math id="m36">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, we can combine several data sets corresponding to the angular distribution <inline-formula id="inf35">
<mml:math id="m37">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Ruth</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mspace width="0.3333em"/>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.3333em"/>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b8;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>c.m.</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> measured in different energies into one data set <inline-formula id="inf36">
<mml:math id="m38">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Ruth</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mspace width="0.3333em"/>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.3333em"/>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. This is very convenient for elastic angular distributions with radioactive projectiles, where cross sections are usually obtained at fewer angles for each energy but at several different energies.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>List of selected energies of the angular distributions with the <sup>27</sup>Al target considered in this work.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">Projectile</th>
<th align="center">Energies (MeV)</th>
<th align="center">Ref.</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>6</sup>He</td>
<td align="center">9.5, 11.0, 12.0, and 13.4</td>
<td align="center">[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>6</sup>Li</td>
<td align="center">7.0, 8.0, and 10.0</td>
<td align="center">[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>7</sup>Li</td>
<td align="center">7.0, 8.0, 9.0, and 10.0</td>
<td align="center">[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>7</sup>Be</td>
<td align="center">15.2 and 15.4</td>
<td align="center">[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>9</sup>Be</td>
<td align="center">12.0 and 14.0</td>
<td align="center">[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>8</sup>B</td>
<td align="center">15.3 and 21.7</td>
<td align="center">[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>11</sup>B</td>
<td align="center">24.0, 36.0, and 48.0</td>
<td align="center">[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>12</sup>C</td>
<td align="center">21.0</td>
<td align="center">[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>14</sup>N</td>
<td align="center">52.3</td>
<td align="center">[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>16</sup>O</td>
<td align="center">28.0</td>
<td align="center">[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>]</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>After converting all the angular distributions to the reduced distance dependence, we observed a common behavior among them. The d<inline-formula id="inf37">
<mml:math id="m39">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>/d<inline-formula id="inf38">
<mml:math id="m40">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Ruth</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> ratio for all systems is very close to unity for large distances and begins to decrease rapidly at short distances. The cross sections are dropped because of strong absorption of the elastic flux into nonelastic channels, mostly fusion for very small distances. In the intermediate region, the static (cluster structure) and dynamic (couplings) effects play a relevant role for the tightly, weakly bound, and exotic configuration projectile, which can be related to the reduced distance of strong absorption <inline-formula id="inf39">
<mml:math id="m41">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and the reduced distance of critical interaction <inline-formula id="inf40">
<mml:math id="m42">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. As mentioned above, the reduced critical interaction distance is defined as the distance for which the ratio <inline-formula id="inf41">
<mml:math id="m43">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Ruth</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> drops to 0.98, while the reduced strong absorption distance (also associated with the grazing angle or with <inline-formula id="inf42">
<mml:math id="m44">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b8;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) is defined for when <inline-formula id="inf43">
<mml:math id="m45">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Ruth</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is 0.25. We can extract these distances from the plots of the angular distributions as a function of the reduced distance of the closest approach. The procedure of the present work is also performed in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>], which defines a phenomenological expression that could describe the region where the cross sections fall. The adopted expression is based on a Boltzmann exponential function and is defined as follows:<disp-formula id="e3">
<mml:math id="m46">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="[" close="]">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(3)</label>
</disp-formula>where <inline-formula id="inf44">
<mml:math id="m47">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2261;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Ruth</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. The parameters <inline-formula id="inf45">
<mml:math id="m48">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula id="inf46">
<mml:math id="m49">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, and <inline-formula id="inf47">
<mml:math id="m50">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> are free to vary during the data fitting process. The expression itself has no physical meaning and can only be used in the restricted region of the cross-section ratio between 1 and 0.1. The parameter <inline-formula id="inf48">
<mml:math id="m51">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is related to the asymptotic value of <inline-formula id="inf49">
<mml:math id="m52">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> for a large distance <inline-formula id="inf50">
<mml:math id="m53">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, and thus, it is associated with the normalization of the data. When its value is very close to unity, it indicates a suitable normalization of the data. The whole procedure is very reliable in obtaining the values of the reduced critical interaction and strong absorption distances, in particular for the data at energies close to the Coulomb barrier with no strong Fresnel peak. The errors in the values of the parameters were also obtained and are related to the quality of the cross-section data. This work mainly aims to obtain a reduced critical interaction and strong absorption distances for different projectile types such as exotic, weakly and strongly bound, stable, and radioactive light nuclei on light, medium, and heavy mass targets. Furthermore, the idea is to verify the correlation between these distances and, for instance, the projectile cluster configuration or the separation energies for the given cluster configuration. To perform a systematic and comparative analysis, we consider the reduced distances, where the size and geometric effect of the projectiles associated with mass dependence are somehow disregarded. The remaining geometric effect is associated only with the projectile deformation, cluster, and halo configurations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<title>3 Data analysis</title>
<p>We have surveyed the literature for a series of measured angular distributions of elastic scattering involving tightly bound (<sup>10</sup>B, <sup>11</sup>B, <sup>12</sup>C, <sup>13</sup>C, and <sup>14</sup>N), weakly bound (<sup>6</sup>Li, <sup>7</sup>Li, <sup>7</sup>Be, and <sup>9</sup>Be), and exotic (<sup>6</sup>He, <sup>8</sup>B, <sup>11</sup>Be, and <sup>15</sup>C) nuclei projectiles on <sup>27</sup>Al, <sup>58</sup>Ni, <sup>120</sup>Sn, and <sup>208</sup>Pb targets, at energies close to the Coulomb barrier. In addition to the new analysis of elastic scattering on <sup>27</sup>Al and <sup>120</sup>Sn targets, we included, in the present work, part of the results of the previous analysis on <sup>58</sup>Ni and <sup>208</sup>Pb targets [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>] and the new analysis of data recently published for <sup>8</sup>B [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>], <sup>10</sup>C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>], <sup>13</sup>C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>], and <sup>15</sup>C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>] projectiles on <sup>208</sup>Pb target, which is not present in the previous work. The targets considered here are among the most common ones used in elastic scattering measurements, mainly because they are tightly bound and not very deformed, and even double magic as in the case of <sup>208</sup>Pb target, for which we expected to have very low collectivity or influence of other channels in the elastic (except for the <sup>27</sup>Al target, which may have some collective effect). Thus, the dynamic and static effects on the elastic process can mostly rely on the projectile&#x2019;s properties. The data used in the present analysis are compiled in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Tables 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>. We have only selected elastic scattering data for light projectiles on <sup>27</sup>Al, <sup>58</sup>Ni, <sup>120</sup>Sn, and <sup>208</sup>Pb targets, at energies around the Coulomb barrier. This allows us to explore the collisions mediated by a nuclear interaction, with the <sup>27</sup>Al target, all the way through the Coulomb-dominated interaction, with <sup>208</sup>Pb and the (possible) nuclear Coulomb interferences with the <sup>58</sup>Ni and <sup>120</sup>Sn targets. For some systems, the angular distributions have also been measured at several other energies well above the Coulomb barrier. Still, we selected the angular distributions measured close to the Coulomb barrier, where the Fresnel peak is absent or very small.</p>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>3.1 Distances for light mass target A &#x3d; 27</title>
<p>The selected angular distributions and their corresponding energies and references used in the analysis of elastic scattering on the light <sup>27</sup>Al target are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>, which includes data induced by tightly bound (<sup>11</sup>B, <sup>12</sup>C, <sup>14</sup>N, and <sup>16</sup>O), weakly bound (<sup>6</sup>Li, <sup>7</sup>Li, <sup>7</sup>Be, and <sup>9</sup>Be), and exotic (Borromean <sup>6</sup>He and proton-halo <sup>8</sup>B) projectiles. The data for the elastic scattering were, actually, extracted from the EXFOR database (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www-nds.iaea.org/exfor/">https://www-nds.iaea.org/exfor/</ext-link>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>] and converted to a function of the reduced distance of the closest approach, according to <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e1">Equations 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e2">2</xref>. The plots of the cross sections <inline-formula id="inf51">
<mml:math id="m54">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> distances for <sup>6</sup>Li, <sup>6</sup>He, <sup>9</sup>Be, <sup>6</sup>Li, <sup>7</sup>Li, <sup>7</sup>Be, <sup>8</sup>B, <sup>11</sup>B, <sup>12</sup>C, and <sup>14</sup>N are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figures 1</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>. The results of the fitting using <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e3">Equation 3</xref> and the corresponding parameters obtained are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>. It is worth highlighting the good quality of the data for elastic scattering induced by <sup>7</sup>Li, <sup>9</sup>Be, and <sup>12</sup>C projectiles. However, some angular distributions have a clear normalization issue. For the present analysis, correct normalization of the angular distributions is important since the critical interaction distance is defined on the basis of it. For example, the cross-section ratios for the angular distribution for <sup>11</sup>B &#x2b; <sup>27</sup>Al at <inline-formula id="inf52">
<mml:math id="m55">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Lab</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; 24.0 MeV and <sup>12</sup>C &#x2b; <sup>27</sup>Al at <inline-formula id="inf53">
<mml:math id="m56">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Lab</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; 21.0 MeV were re-normalized by a factor of 0.95 and 0.98, respectively, so at large distances, the ratios become, on average, equal to 1.0. For the <sup>8</sup>B and <sup>7</sup>Be &#x2b; <sup>27</sup>Al systems, the error bars for the first two points were artificially reduced to 1<inline-formula id="inf54">
<mml:math id="m57">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> to ensure that the parameters <inline-formula id="inf55">
<mml:math id="m58">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> were obtained close to unity. For the <sup>14</sup>N &#x2b; <sup>27</sup>Al system, the Fresnel points, indicated as open symbols in the plot, were removed from the fitting. <inline-formula id="inf56">
<mml:math id="m59">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c7;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">red</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> obtained for the fit is also listed in the <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>. As can be seen, <inline-formula id="inf57">
<mml:math id="m60">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c7;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">red</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> obtained for the <sup>7</sup>Be &#x2b; <sup>27</sup>Al system is very small due to the large error bars in the cross sections, while for <sup>12</sup>C &#x2b; <sup>27</sup>Al, it is small due to the small fluctuation of the data compared to the error bars.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>
<inline-formula id="inf58">
<mml:math id="m61">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Ruth</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> as a function of the reduced distance for <sup>6</sup>Li, <sup>6</sup>He, and <sup>9</sup>Be &#x2b; <sup>27</sup>Al systems at the indicated energies. The cross-section data are from references indicated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-13-1518626-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>
<inline-formula id="inf59">
<mml:math id="m62">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Ruth</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> as a function of the reduced distance for <sup>7</sup>Li, <sup>7</sup>Be, and <sup>8</sup>B&#x2b; <sup>27</sup>Al systems at the indicated energies. The cross-section data are from references indicated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-13-1518626-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>
<inline-formula id="inf60">
<mml:math id="m63">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Ruth</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> as a function of the reduced distance for <sup>11</sup>B, <sup>12</sup>C, and <sup>14</sup>N &#x2b; <sup>27</sup>Al systems at the indicated energies. The cross-section data are from references indicated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-13-1518626-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Distances of interaction for <sup>27</sup>Al determined from <inline-formula id="inf61">
<mml:math id="m64">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Ruth</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> as a function of the reduced distance. <inline-formula id="inf62">
<mml:math id="m65">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> corresponds to the separation energy of the nucleus for the given cluster structure.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">Projectile</th>
<th align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf63">
<mml:math id="m66">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (MeV)</th>
<th align="center">config</th>
<th align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf64">
<mml:math id="m67">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (fm)</th>
<th align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf65">
<mml:math id="m68">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (fm)</th>
<th align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf66">
<mml:math id="m69">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</th>
<th align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf67">
<mml:math id="m70">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (<inline-formula id="inf68">
<mml:math id="m71">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>fm</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)</th>
<th align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf69">
<mml:math id="m72">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (fm)</th>
<th align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf70">
<mml:math id="m73">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c7;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">red</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>6</sup>He</td>
<td align="center">0.973</td>
<td align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf71">
<mml:math id="m74">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf72">
<mml:math id="m75">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center">3.17 (23)</td>
<td align="center">1.410 (22)</td>
<td align="center">1.021 (93)</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.45 (35)</td>
<td align="center">1.870 (97)</td>
<td align="center">1.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>6</sup>Li</td>
<td align="center">1.474</td>
<td align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf73">
<mml:math id="m76">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf74">
<mml:math id="m77">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center">2.67 (8)</td>
<td align="center">1.614 (12)</td>
<td align="center">1.013 (1)</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;4.23 (3)</td>
<td align="center">1.878 (2)</td>
<td align="center">4.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>7</sup>Li</td>
<td align="center">2.467</td>
<td align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf75">
<mml:math id="m78">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf76">
<mml:math id="m79">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center">2.53 (8)</td>
<td align="center">1.604 (12)</td>
<td align="center">1.007 (1)</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;5.14 (4)</td>
<td align="center">1.820 (2)</td>
<td align="center">3.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>7</sup>Be</td>
<td align="center">1.587</td>
<td align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf77">
<mml:math id="m80">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>&#x2b;<sup>3</sup>He</td>
<td align="center">2.82 (7)</td>
<td align="center">1.683 (14)</td>
<td align="center">1.018 ()</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;3.83 (10)</td>
<td align="center">1.972 (51)</td>
<td align="center">0.06</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>8</sup>B</td>
<td align="center">0.137</td>
<td align="center">
<sup>7</sup>Be&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf78">
<mml:math id="m81">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center">2.60 (11)</td>
<td align="center">1.736 (10)</td>
<td align="center">0.998 (20)</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;5.9 (16)</td>
<td align="center">1.923 (53)</td>
<td align="center">0.48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>9</sup>Be</td>
<td align="center">1.665</td>
<td align="center">
<sup>8</sup>Be&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf79">
<mml:math id="m82">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center">2.53 (18)</td>
<td align="center">1.660 (9)</td>
<td align="center">0.992 (5)</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;6.71 (11)</td>
<td align="center">1.832 (7)</td>
<td align="center">0.57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>11</sup>B</td>
<td align="center">8.689</td>
<td align="center">
<sup>7</sup>Li&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf80">
<mml:math id="m83">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center">2.41 (7)</td>
<td align="center">1.529 (10)</td>
<td align="center">1.011 (25)</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;5.10 (12)</td>
<td align="center">1.746 (18)</td>
<td align="center">5.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>12</sup>C</td>
<td align="center">7.366</td>
<td align="center">
<sup>8</sup>Be&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf81">
<mml:math id="m84">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center">2.16 (5)</td>
<td align="center">1.520 (8)</td>
<td align="center">1.009 (18)</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;7.31 (42)</td>
<td align="center">1.674 (7)</td>
<td align="center">0.09</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>14</sup>N</td>
<td align="center">7.551</td>
<td align="center">
<sup>13</sup>C&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf82">
<mml:math id="m85">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center">2.37 (8)</td>
<td align="center">1.523 (9)</td>
<td align="center">1.003 (41)</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;5.72 (29)</td>
<td align="center">1.715 (21)</td>
<td align="center">1.05</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>As the results of the fit, the reduced critical interaction distance, <inline-formula id="inf83">
<mml:math id="m86">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, and the reduced strong absorption distance, <inline-formula id="inf84">
<mml:math id="m87">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, could be extracted and are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>. The uncertainties in the reduced critical interaction and strong absorption distances were obtained, considering the difference in the distance for the cross-section ratios 0.97&#x2013;0.99 and 0.24&#x2013;0.26, respectively. The quality and fluctuation of the data are indirectly included in these uncertainties by the fitting curve. Inspecting the reduced distances listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>, we can conclude that the average reduced strong absorption distances for the system with exotic and weakly bound projectiles are <inline-formula id="inf85">
<mml:math id="m88">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1.62</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>8</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> fm, a little larger than for the tightly bound projectile, <inline-formula id="inf86">
<mml:math id="m89">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1.526</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> fm. For the reduced critical interaction distance, the values are <inline-formula id="inf87">
<mml:math id="m90">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2.72</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>18</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> fm and <inline-formula id="inf88">
<mml:math id="m91">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2.31</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>10</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> fm for the two groups, respectively. Although the difference is not large, it is not negligible. The highest value is obtained for the <sup>6</sup>He &#x2b; <sup>27</sup>Al system, due to the exotic configuration of the <sup>6</sup>He projectile. The small fluctuation among the values of the critical interaction distances might be due to the fact that the long-range Coulomb interaction, which can be quite different for different projectile types, is weak for this light target.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>3.2 Distances for medium-mass target A &#x3d; 58</title>
<p>The phenomenological distance analysis has already been performed for the elastic scattering data induced by some light nuclei as <sup>6</sup>He, <sup>6,7,8</sup>Li, <sup>7,9,10,11</sup>Be, <sup>8,10,11,12</sup>B, <sup>9,11</sup>Li, <sup>12</sup>C, and <sup>16</sup>O, on the medium-mass targets <sup>58</sup>Ni and <sup>64</sup>Zn, reported in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>]. Since this analysis has already been published, we are just resuming the import results. The values of the reduced interaction distance can be divided into three groups. The average value for systems with weakly bound projectiles <sup>6,7,8</sup>Li and <sup>7,9</sup>Be is <inline-formula id="inf89">
<mml:math id="m92">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2.18</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>49</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> fm; for the tightly bound system, the average value is <inline-formula id="inf90">
<mml:math id="m93">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1.87</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> fm, while for the exotic projectiles, <sup>6</sup>He, <sup>8</sup>B, and <sup>11</sup>Be, the reduced critical distances are much larger, being in the range of <inline-formula id="inf91">
<mml:math id="m94">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> 2.5 to 3.0 fm. The differences in the values between these three groups are more pronounced than for light <sup>27</sup>Al, indicating stronger dynamic effects since static effects are related to the projectile itself. The extended matter density (static effect) and the lower breakup threshold (dynamic effect) of the exotic projectiles induce the nuclear forces to be felt beyond the classical range, resulting in a strong absorption and early deviation of the d<inline-formula id="inf92">
<mml:math id="m95">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>/d<inline-formula id="inf93">
<mml:math id="m96">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Ruth</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> ratio from unity. In particular, the extension of the direct interaction region for the <sup>6</sup>He and <sup>11</sup>Be projectiles is closely related to the importance of long-range Coulomb and/or nuclear interaction for these exotic projectiles. This effect also provokes a strong damping of the Fresnel diffraction peak observed in the corresponding angular distributions compared to those for the tightly bound isotopes of the same elements (<sup>4</sup>He and <sup>10</sup>Be).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>3.3 Distances for the medium-mass target A &#x3d; 120</title>
<p>The selected data used in the analysis of elastic scattering on the medium-mass <sup>120</sup>Sn target are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>. For this target, we also analyzed the elastic scattering data for systems including tightly bound (<sup>11</sup>B, <sup>12</sup>C, and <sup>16</sup>O), weakly bound (<sup>6</sup>Li, <sup>7</sup>Li, and <sup>9</sup>Be), and exotic (Borromean <sup>6</sup>He, proton-halo <sup>8</sup>B, and neutron-halo <sup>11</sup>Be) projectiles. Furthermore, for this target, the elastic scattering cross-section data were extracted from the EXFOR database (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www-nds.iaea.org/exfor/">https://www-nds.iaea.org/exfor/</ext-link>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>] for most of the system and converted to a function of the reduced distance of the closest approach. The corresponding plots of the cross-section ratios <inline-formula id="inf94">
<mml:math id="m97">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> distances for <sup>6</sup>Li, <sup>6</sup>He, <sup>9</sup>Be, <sup>10</sup>B, <sup>11</sup>B, <sup>11</sup>Be, and <sup>8</sup>B are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figures 4</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref>. The parameters and corresponding values of <inline-formula id="inf95">
<mml:math id="m98">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c7;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">red</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, obtained as the result of the fitting using <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e3">Equation 3</xref>, are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref>. The data for this target are of much better quality than those for the aluminum target. In particular, we can highlight the good quality of the data for <sup>9</sup>Be, <sup>10</sup>B, and <sup>11</sup>B, obtained in recent years at the Tandar Laboratory in Argentina [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>]. By removing data points at the Fresnel peak for the <sup>11</sup>B &#x2b; <sup>120</sup>Sn system, the values for the distances did not change, but <inline-formula id="inf96">
<mml:math id="m99">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c7;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">red</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> drops from 7.87 to 3.00. The good quality for the <sup>9</sup>Be &#x2b; <sup>120</sup>Sn system is also reflected in the small <inline-formula id="inf97">
<mml:math id="m100">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c7;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">red</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; 0.80. For the <sup>12</sup>C &#x2b; <sup>120</sup>Sn data, the obtained large <inline-formula id="inf98">
<mml:math id="m101">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c7;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">red</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> value is due to the too small error bars reported in EXFOR.</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>List of selected energies of the angular distributions with the <sup>120</sup>Sn target considered in this work.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">Projectile</th>
<th align="center">Energies (MeV)</th>
<th align="right">Reference.</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="center">
<sup>6</sup>He</td>
<td align="center">17.4, 18.05, 19.8, and 20.5</td>
<td align="right">[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">22.2</td>
<td align="right">[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="center">
<sup>6</sup>Li</td>
<td align="center">44.0</td>
<td align="right">[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">22.8</td>
<td align="right">[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>7</sup>Li</td>
<td align="center">20, 22, 24, and 26</td>
<td align="right">[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>8</sup>B</td>
<td align="center">38.7 and 46.1</td>
<td align="right">[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>9</sup>Be</td>
<td align="center">26.0, 27.0, and 28.0</td>
<td align="right">[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="center">
<sup>10</sup>B</td>
<td align="center">31.5, 33.5, and 35.0</td>
<td align="right">[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">37.5</td>
<td align="right">[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>11</sup>Be</td>
<td align="center">32.0</td>
<td align="right">[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>11</sup>B</td>
<td align="center">32.6, 34.7, and 37.2</td>
<td align="right">[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>12</sup>C</td>
<td align="center">60.0</td>
<td align="right">[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">46</xref>]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="center">
<sup>16</sup>O</td>
<td align="center">53.0, 54.0, and 55.0</td>
<td align="right">[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">47</xref>]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">55.0 and 65.75</td>
<td align="right">[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">48</xref>]</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>
<inline-formula id="inf99">
<mml:math id="m102">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Ruth</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> as a function of the reduced distance for <sup>6</sup>Li, <sup>6</sup>He, and <sup>9</sup>Be &#x2b; <sup>120</sup>Sn systems at the indicated energies. The cross-section data are from references indicated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-13-1518626-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>
<inline-formula id="inf100">
<mml:math id="m103">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Ruth</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> as a function of the reduced distance for <sup>10</sup>B, <sup>11</sup>B, and <sup>11</sup>Be &#x2b; <sup>120</sup>Sn systems at the indicated energies. The cross-section data are from references indicated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-13-1518626-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>
<inline-formula id="inf101">
<mml:math id="m104">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Ruth</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> as a function of the reduced distance for <sup>8</sup>B &#x2b; <sup>120</sup>Sn and <sup>8</sup>B &#x2b; <sup>208</sup>Pb systems at the indicated energies. The cross-section data are from references indicated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-13-1518626-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Distances of interactions for <sup>120</sup>Sn determined from <inline-formula id="inf102">
<mml:math id="m105">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Ruth</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> as a function of the reduced distance. <inline-formula id="inf103">
<mml:math id="m106">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> corresponds to the separation energy of the nucleus for the given cluster configuration.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">Projectile</th>
<th align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf104">
<mml:math id="m107">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>(MeV)</th>
<th align="center">config</th>
<th align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf105">
<mml:math id="m108">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (fm)</th>
<th align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf106">
<mml:math id="m109">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (fm)</th>
<th align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf107">
<mml:math id="m110">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</th>
<th align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf108">
<mml:math id="m111">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (<inline-formula id="inf109">
<mml:math id="m112">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>fm</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)</th>
<th align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf110">
<mml:math id="m113">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (fm)</th>
<th align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf111">
<mml:math id="m114">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c7;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">red</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>6</sup>He</td>
<td align="center">0.973</td>
<td align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf112">
<mml:math id="m115">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf113">
<mml:math id="m116">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center">2.49 (10)</td>
<td align="center">1.579 (10)</td>
<td align="center">0.999 (5)</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;5.51 (39)</td>
<td align="center">1.778 (13)</td>
<td align="center">1.12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>6</sup>Li</td>
<td align="center">1.474</td>
<td align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf114">
<mml:math id="m117">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf115">
<mml:math id="m118">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center">2.14 (6)</td>
<td align="center">1.461 (8)</td>
<td align="center">1.005 (8)</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;7.03 (6)</td>
<td align="center">1.618 (3)</td>
<td align="center">4.41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>7</sup>Li</td>
<td align="center">2.467</td>
<td align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf116">
<mml:math id="m119">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf117">
<mml:math id="m120">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center">1.95 (3)</td>
<td align="center">1.566 (6)</td>
<td align="center">1.007 (1)</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;12.16 (8)</td>
<td align="center">1.657 (1)</td>
<td align="center">4.20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>8</sup>B</td>
<td align="center">0.137</td>
<td align="center">
<sup>7</sup>Be&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf118">
<mml:math id="m121">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center">2.10 (6)</td>
<td align="center">1.656 (4)</td>
<td align="center">0.996 (1)</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;11.76 (14)</td>
<td align="center">1.749 (2)</td>
<td align="center">9.79</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>9</sup>Be</td>
<td align="center">1.665</td>
<td align="center">
<sup>8</sup>Be&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf119">
<mml:math id="m122">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center">1.95 (3)</td>
<td align="center">1.582 (5)</td>
<td align="center">1.014 (4)</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;12.23 (26)</td>
<td align="center">1.674 (1)</td>
<td align="center">0.80</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>10</sup>B</td>
<td align="center">4.461</td>
<td align="center">
<sup>6</sup>Li&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf120">
<mml:math id="m123">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center">1.83 (3)</td>
<td align="center">1.538 (5)</td>
<td align="center">1.004 (1)</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;16.65 (8)</td>
<td align="center">1.604 (1)</td>
<td align="center">4.55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>11</sup>B</td>
<td align="center">8.664</td>
<td align="center">
<sup>7</sup>Li&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf121">
<mml:math id="m124">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center">1.79 (2)</td>
<td align="center">1.547 (2)</td>
<td align="center">1.007 (1)</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;19.35 (10)</td>
<td align="center">1.605 (1)</td>
<td align="center">7.87</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>11</sup>Be</td>
<td align="center">0.502</td>
<td align="center">
<sup>10</sup>Be&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf122">
<mml:math id="m125">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center">4.45 (10)</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;-</td>
<td align="center">1.055 (4)</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;7.68 (3)</td>
<td align="center">1.06 (53)</td>
<td align="center">1.26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>12</sup>C</td>
<td align="center">7.366</td>
<td align="center">
<sup>8</sup>Be&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf123">
<mml:math id="m126">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center">1.82 (2)</td>
<td align="center">1.536 (4)</td>
<td align="center">1.017 (35)</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;14.38 (6)</td>
<td align="center">1.612 (6)</td>
<td align="center">162</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>16</sup>O</td>
<td align="center">7.162</td>
<td align="center">
<sup>12</sup>C&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf124">
<mml:math id="m127">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center">1.72 (2)</td>
<td align="center">1.528 (3)</td>
<td align="center">1.000 (1)</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;27.00 (15)</td>
<td align="center">1.568 (3)</td>
<td align="center">19.0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>For this target, the average reduced strong absorption distance for the tightly bound projectiles is <inline-formula id="inf125">
<mml:math id="m128">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1.537</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>6</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> fm, which is consistent with the value obtained for the <sup>27</sup>Al target. For exotic and weakly bound projectiles, the distance is <inline-formula id="inf126">
<mml:math id="m129">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1.57</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> fm, which is again just a little larger than that for tightly bound projectiles. For the reduced critical interaction distance, the averaged values are <inline-formula id="inf127">
<mml:math id="m130">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1.80</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> fm for tightly bound projectiles and <inline-formula id="inf128">
<mml:math id="m131">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2.13</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> fm for exotic and weakly bound projectiles. The distance obtained for <sup>11</sup>Be was not included in the previous averaging. The <sup>11</sup>Be projectile is a neutron-rich isotope that forms a halo configuration with the <sup>10</sup>Be core and a weakly bound neutron (<inline-formula id="inf129">
<mml:math id="m132">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>504</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>6</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> keV). The quite large value for the critical interaction distance, <inline-formula id="inf130">
<mml:math id="m133">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>4.41</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> fm, for the <sup>11</sup>Be &#x2b; <sup>120</sup>Sn system is clear experimental evidence of the strong effect of the <sup>11</sup>Be neutron halo structure on elastic scattering, at energies close to the Coulomb barrier. This large absorption effect has already been observed for the elastic scattering of <sup>11</sup>Be on the <sup>64</sup>Zn target [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>] close to the barrier energy and also on the <sup>208</sup>Pb target at higher energies (three times the Coulomb barrier) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>]. The strong absorption in elastic scattering induced by this projectile is due to the strong influence of the break-up channel, related to its loosely bound structure. By comparison, this effect is not as drastic for the proton-rich halo nucleus <sup>8</sup>B, with proton separation energy <inline-formula id="inf131">
<mml:math id="m134">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0.138</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> MeV for the <sup>7</sup>Be&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf132">
<mml:math id="m135">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> configuration, indicated by the not-so-large reduced critical distance of interaction for this nucleus, <inline-formula id="inf133">
<mml:math id="m136">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2.10</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>6</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> fm, shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>. The other large critical interaction distance is obtained for the <sup>6</sup>He projectile, <inline-formula id="inf134">
<mml:math id="m137">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2.49</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> fm. Both <sup>6</sup>He (<inline-formula id="inf135">
<mml:math id="m138">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf136">
<mml:math id="m139">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf137">
<mml:math id="m140">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) and <sup>9</sup>Be (<inline-formula id="inf138">
<mml:math id="m141">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf139">
<mml:math id="m142">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf140">
<mml:math id="m143">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) nuclei are considered to have a Borromean configuration, where by removing one of the elements, the other two also dissociate, resembling the Borromean ring. However, <sup>6</sup>He is radioactive and weakly bound (<inline-formula id="inf141">
<mml:math id="m144">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0.973</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> MeV), while <sup>9</sup>Be is a stable bound nucleus with <inline-formula id="inf142">
<mml:math id="m145">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; 1.665 MeV. The difference in their critical interaction distances can be attributed to static and dynamic effects related to the extended matter distribution and the lower breakup threshold, respectively. The extended critical interaction distance for neutron-rich <sup>6</sup>He and <sup>11</sup>Be projectiles is again clear experimental evidence of the importance of a long-range Coulomb and/or nuclear interaction for these exotic projectiles. Consequently, these give rise to a combination of effects of a large value of Coulomb dipole polarizability and large transfer breakup probabilities already observed experimentally.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4">
<title>3.4 Distances for heavy-mass target A &#x3d; 208</title>
<p>The present phenomenological distance analysis has already been performed for the elastic scattering data induced by some light nuclei such as <sup>6</sup>He, <sup>6</sup>Li, <sup>7</sup>Li, <sup>7</sup>Be, <sup>8</sup>He, <sup>8</sup>Li, <sup>8</sup>B <sup>9</sup>Li, <sup>9</sup>Be, <sup>10</sup>Be, <sup>11</sup>Li, <sup>12</sup>C, <sup>16</sup>O, <sup>17</sup>F, and <sup>19</sup>F on the <sup>208</sup>Pb target, reported in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>]. The analysis of the heavy spherical target yielded interesting results related to the dependence of the cluster configuration throughout the separation energy and the critical distance of interaction. By choosing heavy targets with a stronger Coulomb field, all absorption effects can be related to the projectile configuration. We are now expanding the analysis with data recently published on <sup>8</sup>B, <sup>10</sup>C, <sup>13</sup>C, and <sup>15</sup>C. The plots for the cross-section ratio as a function of the reduced distances for these nuclei are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figures 6</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref>. In particular, we emphasize the importance of the new data for proton-rich nuclei that were not included in the previous analysis. The low binding energy for <sup>8</sup>B projectile (<inline-formula id="inf143">
<mml:math id="m146">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0.138</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> MeV) and the nuclear proton-halo configuration (<sup>7</sup>Be&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf144">
<mml:math id="m147">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) contribute to the opening of several elastic absorption channels, observed as a large total reaction cross section [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>]. In addition, because of the low binding energy, the projectile can easily break up near the target Coulomb and nuclear fields, enhancing the breakup channel, mainly at energies close to the Coulomb barrier. However, since the proton is in the <inline-formula id="inf145">
<mml:math id="m148">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> orbital, the matter density is not as extended far from the core due to the centrifugal barrier. The critical interaction distance obtained for this projectile is <inline-formula id="inf146">
<mml:math id="m149">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2.78</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> fm, which is the second largest in the table, just below that for <sup>11</sup>Li. The large distance of interaction is not due to the extended matter density (static effect) but due to the lower breakup threshold and stronger coupling to the continuum. The other proton-rich nucleus is <sup>10</sup>C. It has a <inline-formula id="inf147">
<mml:math id="m150">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf148">
<mml:math id="m151">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf149">
<mml:math id="m152">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf150">
<mml:math id="m153">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> configuration, and it is called the Brunnian or super Borromean nucleus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>]. This configuration is similar to that for <sup>10</sup>Be (<inline-formula id="inf151">
<mml:math id="m154">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf152">
<mml:math id="m155">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf153">
<mml:math id="m156">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf154">
<mml:math id="m157">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>). However, the presence of the neutrons makes <sup>10</sup>Be a quite tightly bound nucleus. As noted in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>], the exotic cluster configuration for <sup>10</sup>C induces strong absorption, making the critical interaction distance for this nucleus similar to the weakly bound nuclei.</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>
<inline-formula id="inf155">
<mml:math id="m158">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Ruth</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> as a function of the reduced distance for <sup>10</sup>C, <sup>13</sup>C, and <sup>15</sup>C &#x2b; <sup>208</sup>Pb systems at the indicated energies. The cross-section data are from references indicated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-13-1518626-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The critical distance of interaction obtained for the new data on <sup>8</sup>B, <sup>10</sup>C, <sup>13</sup>C, and <sup>15</sup>C projectiles were included in the systematic as a function of the separation energy, as performed in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>]. The extended and upgraded plot can be seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8</xref>. The values used in this plot are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Table 5</xref> in the column for <sup>208</sup>Pb. The proton halo <sup>8</sup>B has the second-largest critical distance of interaction. The neutron halo <sup>15</sup>C also has a considerable critical interaction distance. On the other hand, <sup>10</sup>C and <sup>13</sup>C follow the trend of the weakly and tightly bound nuclei; the weaker the projectile, the more significant the critical interaction distance.</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Reduced critical distance of interaction as a function of the separation energy for the nuclei indicated. The dashed curve corresponds to the trend of the data for the weakly and tightly bound nuclei in red. The plot is an upgrade of this figure in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>].</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-13-1518626-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T5" position="float">
<label>TABLE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Distance of critical interaction for <sup>27</sup>Al, <sup>58</sup>Ni, <sup>120</sup>Sn, and <sup>208</sup>Pb.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">Projectile</th>
<th align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf156">
<mml:math id="m159">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>(MeV)</th>
<th align="center">
<sup>27</sup>Al</th>
<th align="center">
<sup>58</sup>Ni</th>
<th align="center">
<sup>120</sup>Sn</th>
<th align="center">
<sup>208</sup>Pb</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>6</sup>He</td>
<td align="center">0.973</td>
<td align="center">3.17 (23)</td>
<td align="center">2.93 (13)</td>
<td align="center">2.49 (10)</td>
<td align="center">2.20 (5)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>6</sup>Li</td>
<td align="center">1.474</td>
<td align="center">2.67 (8)</td>
<td align="center">2.22 (6)</td>
<td align="center">2.14 (6)</td>
<td align="center">1.95 (4)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>7</sup>Li</td>
<td align="center">2.467</td>
<td align="center">2.53 (8)</td>
<td align="center">2.19 (5)</td>
<td align="center">1.95 (3)</td>
<td align="center">1.74 (2)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>7</sup>Be</td>
<td align="center">1.587</td>
<td align="center">2.82 (7)</td>
<td align="center">2.17 (6)</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center">1.86 (5)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>8</sup>He</td>
<td align="center">2.140</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center">2.24 (7)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>8</sup>Li</td>
<td align="center">2.140</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center">2.23 (3)</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center">2.30 (7)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>8</sup>B</td>
<td align="center">0.138</td>
<td align="center">2.60 (11)</td>
<td align="center">2.50 (10)</td>
<td align="center">2.10 (6)</td>
<td align="center">2.78 (12)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>9</sup>Li</td>
<td align="center">4.064</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center">1.84 (2)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>9</sup>Be</td>
<td align="center">1.665</td>
<td align="center">2.53 (18)</td>
<td align="center">2.12 (6)</td>
<td align="center">1.95 (3)</td>
<td align="center">1.86 (2)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>10</sup>Be</td>
<td align="center">6.812</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center">1.73 (2)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>1</sup>&#xb0;C</td>
<td align="center">3.821</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center">2.56 (16)</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center">1.98 (5)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>11</sup>Li</td>
<td align="center">0.369</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center">5.16 (44)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>11</sup>B</td>
<td align="center">8.664</td>
<td align="center">2.41 (7)</td>
<td align="center">1.88 (3)</td>
<td align="center">1.79 (2)</td>
<td align="center">1.75 (2)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>12</sup>C</td>
<td align="center">7.366</td>
<td align="center">2.16 (50)</td>
<td align="center">1.83 (3)</td>
<td align="center">1.84 (2)</td>
<td align="center">1.66 (2)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>13</sup>C</td>
<td align="center">4.946</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center">1.65 (1)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>15</sup>C</td>
<td align="center">1.218</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center">2.32 (10)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>16</sup>O</td>
<td align="center">7.162</td>
<td align="center">2.13 (5)</td>
<td align="center">1.80 (2)</td>
<td align="center">1.72 (2)</td>
<td align="center">1.64 (1)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf157">
<mml:math id="m160">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2.56</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>23</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3e;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf158">
<mml:math id="m161">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2.22</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>25</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3e;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf159">
<mml:math id="m162">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2.00</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>18</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3e;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf160">
<mml:math id="m163">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1.96</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>25</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3e;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4">
<title>4 Comparative analysis</title>
<p>A comparative analysis was also performed by combining all the distances obtained for exotic, weakly bound, and tightly bound projectiles on light (<sup>27</sup>Al), medium (<sup>58</sup>Ni and <sup>120</sup>Sn), and heavy (<sup>208</sup>Pb) targets together. The values for all obtained strong absorption and critical interaction distances are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Tables 5</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">6</xref>. A more complete set of data was obtained for <sup>208</sup>Pb since several elastic scattering experiments have been performed on this target, including the most recent for <sup>8</sup>B, <sup>10</sup>C, <sup>13</sup>C, and <sup>15</sup>C. This makes the comparative analysis more reliable for this target, as shown in the previous section. We can observe in these tables that, although there are some fluctuations in the values for some projectiles, the average value for a reduced strong absorption distance is about the same for all targets analyzed here. As mentioned above, this distance is related somehow to the geometry (radius) of the nucleus. However, we should emphasize that what is obtained are the reduction distances, where a factor 1/(<inline-formula id="inf161">
<mml:math id="m164">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>A</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>&#x2b;<inline-formula id="inf162">
<mml:math id="m165">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) has been applied. Therefore, the strong absorption distance (not the reduced one) should be larger for a larger mass target. This can be confirmed just by multiplying each of the average values, only by the target contribution of the reduction factor (<inline-formula id="inf163">
<mml:math id="m166">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>A</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>). In this case, the average values turn out to be <inline-formula id="inf164">
<mml:math id="m167">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>4.77</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x3e;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula id="inf165">
<mml:math id="m168">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>5.85</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x3e;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula id="inf166">
<mml:math id="m169">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>7.64</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x3e;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, and <inline-formula id="inf167">
<mml:math id="m170">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>9.02</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x3e;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> fm, for <sup>27</sup>Al, <sup>58</sup>Ni, <sup>120</sup>Sn, and <sup>208</sup>Pb targets, respectively. As expected, larger values are obtained for the larger-mass target. The reduced critical interaction distances should be larger than the corresponding reduced strong absorption distances. This is expected since not only static but also dynamic effects play a role in the elastic scattering process at distances larger than the strong absorption distance. However, as observed in the tables, the reduced critical interaction distances are smaller for heavier targets. The average values (taking the anomalous value for <sup>11</sup> Li) decrease for heavier targets. Again, this is the effect of the reduction factor (mass influences). The projectiles begin to feel the interaction at shorter distances for the lighter target. The average values after recovering the contribution of the target mass factor become <inline-formula id="inf168">
<mml:math id="m171">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>7.68</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x3e;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula id="inf169">
<mml:math id="m172">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>8.44</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x3e;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula id="inf170">
<mml:math id="m173">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>9.80</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x3e;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, and <inline-formula id="inf171">
<mml:math id="m174">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>11.56</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x3e;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> fm, for the targets <sup>27</sup>Al, <sup>58</sup>Ni, <sup>120</sup>Sn, and <sup>208</sup>Pb, respectively. We can conclude that more relevant information is obtained when a comparison is performed for different projectile types but on the same target.</p>
<table-wrap id="T6" position="float">
<label>TABLE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Distance of strong absorption for <sup>27</sup>Al, <sup>58</sup>Ni, <sup>120</sup>Sn, and <sup>208</sup>Pb.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">Projectile</th>
<th align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf172">
<mml:math id="m175">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>(MeV)</th>
<th align="center">
<sup>27</sup>Al</th>
<th align="center">
<sup>58</sup>Ni</th>
<th align="center">
<sup>120</sup>Sn</th>
<th align="center">
<sup>208</sup>Pb</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>6</sup>He</td>
<td align="center">0.973</td>
<td align="center">1.410 (22)</td>
<td align="center">1.522 (15)</td>
<td align="center">1.579 (10)</td>
<td align="center">1.589 (7)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>6</sup>Li</td>
<td align="center">1.474</td>
<td align="center">1.614 (12)</td>
<td align="center">1.600 (07)</td>
<td align="center">1.461 (08)</td>
<td align="center">1.521 (5)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>7</sup>Li</td>
<td align="center">2.467</td>
<td align="center">1.604 (10)</td>
<td align="center">1.582 (07)</td>
<td align="center">1.566 (06)</td>
<td align="center">1.491 (3)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>7</sup>Be</td>
<td align="center">1.587</td>
<td align="center">1.683 (14)</td>
<td align="center">1.603 (06)</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center">1.509 (4)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>8</sup>He</td>
<td align="center">2.140</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center">1.718 (6)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>8</sup>Li</td>
<td align="center">2.140</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center">1.433 (10)</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center">1.521 (5)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>8</sup>B</td>
<td align="center">0.137</td>
<td align="center">1.736 (10)</td>
<td align="center">1.625 (10)</td>
<td align="center">1.656 (04)</td>
<td align="center">1.456 (15)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>9</sup>Be</td>
<td align="center">1.665</td>
<td align="center">1.660 (09)</td>
<td align="center">1.480 (07)</td>
<td align="center">1.582 (05)</td>
<td align="center">1.540 (4)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>10</sup>Be</td>
<td align="center">6.812</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center">1.521 (2)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>1</sup>&#xb0;C</td>
<td align="center">3.821</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center">1.412 (12)</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center">1.491 (6)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>11</sup>Li</td>
<td align="center">0.369</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center">1.59 (4)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>11</sup>B</td>
<td align="center">8.644</td>
<td align="center">1,529 (10)</td>
<td align="center">1.587 (04)</td>
<td align="center">1.547 (02)</td>
<td align="center">1.478 (3)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>12</sup>C</td>
<td align="center">7.366</td>
<td align="center">1.520 (08)</td>
<td align="center">1.570 (03)</td>
<td align="center">1.535 (04)</td>
<td align="center">1.491 (2)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>13</sup>C</td>
<td align="center">4.946</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center">1.502 (2)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>15</sup>C</td>
<td align="center">1.218</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center">1.576 (8)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<sup>16</sup>O</td>
<td align="center">7.162</td>
<td align="center">1.582 (15)</td>
<td align="center">1.572 (02)</td>
<td align="center">1.528 (03)</td>
<td align="center">1.498 (2)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf173">
<mml:math id="m176">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1.59</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3e;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf174">
<mml:math id="m177">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1.54</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>6</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3e;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf175">
<mml:math id="m178">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1.56</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3e;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf176">
<mml:math id="m179">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1.53</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3e;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s5">
<title>5 Summary</title>
<p>A semiclassical approach, by plotting the ratio of elastic cross section to the Rutherford value as a function of the distance of the closest approach on a Rutherford trajectory, was performed for some light projectiles on light (<sup>27</sup>Al), medium (<sup>58</sup>Ni and <sup>120</sup>Sn), and heavy (<sup>208</sup>Pb) targets. This analysis is of special advantage for investigating angular distributions induced by low-statistics radioactive nuclei because several angular distributions can be grouped in one data set. In this sense, the present analysis is a good approach to check the quality of the data. The reduced critical and strong absorption distances obtained were compared, and the influence of static and dynamic effects on the elastic scattering process was discussed. Although these distances can be somehow related to the size of the nuclei, they are also influenced by the reaction mechanisms. In particular, the critical interaction distance has some correlation with the separation energy of the valence particles or a particular cluster configuration, which may affect the strength of the couplings and the importance of a particular channel. The significantly higher value obtained for exotic nuclei such as <sup>11</sup>Li, <sup>6</sup>He, <sup>8</sup>B, and <sup>15</sup>C can be understood as a result of the influence of the large Coulomb dipole polarizability of these projectiles, which induces a higher breakup probability. For a neutron-halo projectile, the Coulomb breakup originates only from the recoil of its core. However, for a proton-halo projectile, the valence proton also feels the effect of the direct Coulomb interaction with the Coulomb field of the target. Therefore, for a proton-halo projectile, the breakup will originate from a combination of three forces: the nuclear interaction with the target, the effective force due to the recoil of the core, and the direct proton&#x2013;target Coulomb repulsion. The interplay between these three interaction modes is important in describing the angular distribution of the elastic scattering with proton-halo projectiles. These forces act coherently, and their final effects are due to strong interferences at the scattering angles, where the three forces have comparable values. An interesting discussion on the different behavior of the proton and neutron halo projectile in a reaction is presented in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">49</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">50</xref>]. In the present analysis, only the overall effects are observed as a large distance of interaction and, as also observed, are strongly related to the target mass. For the <sup>208</sup>Pb target, the extended and upgraded plot of the critical distance of interaction versus the separation energy for the given cluster configuration indicates a clear correlation.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s6">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. These data can be found here: the original data are in the published paper already referred.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="s7">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>VG: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, software, supervision, validation, visualization, writing&#x2013;original draft, and writing&#x2013;review and editing. PN: formal analysis, investigation, and writing&#x2013;review and editing. SO: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, and writing&#x2013;review and editing. RL: formal analysis, investigation, validation, visualization, writing&#x2013;original draft, and writing&#x2013;review and editing. JL: investigation, validation, visualization, and writing&#x2013;review and editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="s8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The authors acknowledge financial support from the Brazilian Funding Agencies: CNPq (Grant 303769/2021-1), FAPESP (Grants 2016/17612-7, 2022/14052-1 and 2024/02463-2), and INCT-FNA (Instituto Nacional de Ci&#xea;ncia e Tecnologia-F&#xed;sica Nuclear e Aplica&#xe7;&#xf5;es) Proc. No. 464898/2014-5 and FAPERJ Proc. No. 210805/2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s9">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
<p>The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="s10">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s11">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Erler</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Birge</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kortelainen</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nazarewicz</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Olsen</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Perhac</surname>
<given-names>AM</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>The limits of the nuclear landscape</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> (<year>2012</year>) <volume>486</volume>:<fpage>509</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature11188</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Neufcourt</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Giuliani</surname>
<given-names>SA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nazarewicz</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Olsen</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tarasov</surname>
<given-names>OB</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Quantified limits of the nuclear landscape</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>101</volume>:<fpage>044307</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.101.044307</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Korolev</surname>
<given-names>GA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dobrovolsky</surname>
<given-names>AV</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Inglessi</surname>
<given-names>AG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alkhazov</surname>
<given-names>GD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Egelhof</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Estrad&#xe9;</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Halo structure of <sup>8</sup>B determined from intermediate energy proton elastic scattering in inverse kinematics</article-title>. <source>Phys Lett B</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>780</volume>:<fpage>200</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.physletb.2018.03.013</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yamaguchi</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moro</surname>
<given-names>AM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>NR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>DX</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Breakup of the proton halo nucleus 8b near barrier energies</article-title>. <source>Nat Commun</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>7193</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-022-34767-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kelley</surname>
<given-names>JH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Austin</surname>
<given-names>SM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Azhari</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bazin</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname>
<given-names>JA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Esbensen</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Study of the breakup reaction <sup>8</sup>B&#x2192;7Be&#x2b;p; Absorption effects and E2 strength</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev Lett</source> (<year>1996</year>) <volume>77</volume>:<fpage>5020</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/physrevlett.77.5020</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Magro</surname>
<given-names>PLD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guimaraes</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Linares</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Elastic scattering in the <sup>12</sup>N&#x2b;<sup>197</sup>Au system at elab &#x3d; 70 MeV</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2025</year>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lehr</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wamers</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aksouh</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>&#xc1;lvarez-Pol</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Atar</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Unveiling the two-proton halo character of <sup>17</sup>Ne: exclusive measurement of quasi-free proton-knockout reactions</article-title>. <source>Phys Lett B</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>136957</volume>:<fpage>136957</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.physletb.2022.136957</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kanungo</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chiba</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Adhiraki</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Possibility of a two-proton halo in <sup>17</sup>Ne</article-title>. <source>Phys Lett</source> (<year>2003</year>) <volume>21</volume>:<fpage>571</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.physletb.2003.07.050</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Canto</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guimar&#xe3;es</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lubi&#xe1;n</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hussein</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The total reaction cross section of heavy-ion reactions induced by stable and unstable exotic beams: the low-energy regime</article-title>. <source>Eur Phys J A</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>281</volume>:<fpage>281</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00277-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Canto</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gomes</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Donangelo</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lubian</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hussein</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Recent developments in fusion and direct reactions with weakly bound nuclei</article-title>. <source>Phys Rep</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>596</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>86</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.physrep.2015.08.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kolata</surname>
<given-names>VJJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guimar&#xe3;es</surname>
<given-names>AEF</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Elastic scattering, fusion, and breakup of light exotic nuclei</article-title>. <source>Eur Phys J A</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>123</volume>:<fpage>123</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1140/epja/i2016-16123-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Keeley</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alamanos</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kemper</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rusek</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Elastic scattering and reactions of light exotic beams</article-title>. <source>Prog Part Nucl Phys</source> (<year>2009</year>) <volume>63</volume>:<fpage>396</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>447</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ppnp.2009.05.003</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>WH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>JS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mukherjee</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Q</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Patel</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>YY</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Correlation between quarter-point angle and nuclear radius</article-title>. <source>Chin Phys C</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>044103</volume>:<fpage>044103</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1674-1137/41/4/044103</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wen</surname>
<given-names>PW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>CJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname>
<given-names>HM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>NR</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Systematic extraction of the strong absorption distance and coulomb barrier from elastic scattering</article-title>. <source>Chin Phys C</source> (<year>2023</year>) <volume>124104</volume>:<fpage>47</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1674-1137/acf7b8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guimar&#xe3;es</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cardozo</surname>
<given-names>CEN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lubian</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Assun&#xe7;&#xe3;o</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pires</surname>
<given-names>KCC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Canto</surname>
<given-names>LF</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Role of cluster configurations in the elastic scattering of light projectiles on Ni and Zn targets: a phenomenological analysis</article-title>. <source>Eur Phys J A</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>90</volume>:<fpage>55</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00403-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guimar&#xe3;es</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lubian</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kolata</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aguilera</surname>
<given-names>EF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Assun&#xe7;&#xe3;o</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morcelle</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Phenomenological critical interaction distance from elastic scattering measurements on a <sup>208</sup>Pb target</article-title>. <source>Eur Phys J A</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>223</volume>:<fpage>54</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1140/epja/i2018-12662-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pakou</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rusek</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Interaction distances for weakly bound nuclei at near barrier energies</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2004</year>) <volume>057602</volume>:<fpage>057602</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.69.057602</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Benjamim</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>L&#xe9;pine-Szily</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mendes Junior</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lichtenth&#xe4;ler</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guimar&#xe3;es</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gomes</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Elastic scattering and total reaction cross section for the 6he &#x2b; 27al system</article-title>. <source>Phys Lett B</source> (<year>2007</year>) <volume>647</volume>:<fpage>30</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.physletb.2007.01.048</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Figueira</surname>
<given-names>J. M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Niello</surname>
<given-names>J. O. F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abriola</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arazi</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Capurro</surname>
<given-names>O. A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barbar&#xe1;</surname>
<given-names>E. d</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Breakup threshold anomaly in the elastic scattering <sup>6</sup>Li on <sup>27</sup>Al</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2007</year>) <volume>017602</volume>:<fpage>75</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.75.017602</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Figueira</surname>
<given-names>J. M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abriola</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Niello</surname>
<given-names>J. O. F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arazi</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Capurro</surname>
<given-names>O. A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barbar&#xe1;</surname>
<given-names>E. D</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Absence of the threshold anomaly in the elastic scattering of the weakly bound <sup>7</sup>Li on <sup>27</sup>Al</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2006</year>) <volume>054603</volume>:<fpage>73</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.73.054603</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Morcelle</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lichtenth&#xe4;ler</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Linares</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morais</surname>
<given-names>MC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guimar&#xe3;es</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>L&#xe9;pine-Szily</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Elastic scattering and total reaction cross section for <sup>7</sup>B &#x2b; <sup>27</sup> Al system at near-barrier energies</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2014</year>) <volume>044611</volume>:<fpage>89</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.89.044611</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Anjos</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Muri</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lubian</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gomes</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Padron</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alves</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>No evidence of break-up effects on the fusion of 9be with medium-light nuclei</article-title>. <source>Phys Lett B</source> (<year>2002</year>) <volume>534</volume>:<fpage>45</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>51</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0370-2693(02)01554-X</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Morcelle</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lichtenth&#xe4;ler</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>L&#xe9;pine-Szily</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guimar&#xe3;es</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pires</surname>
<given-names>KCC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lubian</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>
<sup>8</sup>B &#x2b; <sup>27</sup> Al scattering at low energies</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>014615</volume>:<fpage>95</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.95.014615</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guimar&#xe3;es</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Fusion cross study from section of 11B &#x2b; 27Al system (Master degree dissertation - University of Sao Paulo - Brazil)</article-title>. <source>Instituto de F&#xed;sica</source> (<year>1988</year>). <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11606/D.43.1988.tde-17062015-061743</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hamada</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burtebayev</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gridnev</surname>
<given-names>KA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Amangeldi</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Further investigation of the elastic scattering of 16o, 14n and 12c on the nucleus of 27al at low energies</article-title>. <source>Physica Scripta</source> (<year>2011</year>) <volume>045201</volume>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mateja</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stanley</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Theisen</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frawley</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pepmiller</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Medsker</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>A woods-saxon and double-folding optical-model description of 14n elastic and inelastic scattering from 24mg, 27al and 28si</article-title>. <source>Nucl Phys A</source> (<year>1981</year>) <volume>351</volume>:<fpage>509</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0375-9474(81)90185-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>de Faria</surname>
<given-names>PN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lichtenth&#xe4;ler</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pires</surname>
<given-names>KCC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moro</surname>
<given-names>AM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>L&#xe9;pine-Szily</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guimar&#xe3;es</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Elastic scattering and total reaction cross section of <sup>6</sup>He &#x2b; <sup>120</sup>Sn</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2010</year>) <volume>044605</volume>:<fpage>81</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.81.044605</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Appannababu</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lichtenth&#xe4;ler</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alvarez</surname>
<given-names>MAG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rodr&#xed;guez-Gallardo</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>L&#xe9;pine-Szily</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pires</surname>
<given-names>KCC</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Two-neutron transfer in the <sup>6</sup>He &#x2b; <sup>120</sup>Sn reaction</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>014601</volume>:<fpage>99</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.99.014601</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Becker</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blatt</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>J&#xe4;nsch</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Korsch</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leucker</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luck</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Polarized 6li scattering from 120sn at 44 mev</article-title>. <source>Nucl Phys A</source> (<year>1991</year>) <volume>535</volume>:<fpage>189</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>202</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0375-9474(91)90522-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chuev</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Glukhov</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manko</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Novatskii</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ogloblin</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sakuta</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>On the interference between coulomb and nuclear excitation in the inelastic scattering of 6li ions</article-title>. <source>Phys Lett B</source> (<year>1972</year>) <volume>42</volume>:<fpage>63</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0370-2693(72)90717-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zagatto</surname>
<given-names>VAB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lubian</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gasques</surname>
<given-names>LR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alvarez</surname>
<given-names>MAG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chamon</surname>
<given-names>LC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oliveira</surname>
<given-names>JRB</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Elastic scattering, inelastic excitation, and neutron transfer for <sup>7</sup>Li &#x2b; <sup>120</sup>Sn at energies around the coulomb barrier</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>064614</volume>:<fpage>95</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.95.064614</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<label>32.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Arazi</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Casal</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rodr&#xed;guez-Gallardo</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arias</surname>
<given-names>JM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lichtenth&#xe4;ler Filho</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abriola</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>
<sup>9</sup>Be &#x2b; <sup>120</sup>Snscattering at near-barrier energies within a four-body model</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>044609</volume>:<fpage>97</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.97.044609</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<label>33.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Alvarez</surname>
<given-names>MAG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rodr&#xed;guez-Gallardo</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gasques</surname>
<given-names>LR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chamon</surname>
<given-names>LC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oliveira</surname>
<given-names>JRB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scarduelli</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Elastic scattering, inelastic excitation, and 1n pick-up transfer cross sections for <sup>10</sup>B &#x2b; <sup>120</sup>Sn at energies near the coulomb barrier</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>024621</volume>:<fpage>98</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.98.024621</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<label>34.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gasques</surname>
<given-names>LR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Freitas</surname>
<given-names>AS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chamon</surname>
<given-names>LC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oliveira</surname>
<given-names>JRB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Medina</surname>
<given-names>NH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scarduelli</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Elastic, inelastic, and 1n transfer cross sections for <sup>10</sup>B &#x2b; <sup>120</sup> Sn reaction</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>034629</volume>:<fpage>97</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.97.034629</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<label>35.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Acosta</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>&#xc1;lvarez</surname>
<given-names>MAG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Andr&#xe9;s</surname>
<given-names>MV</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Borge</surname>
<given-names>MJG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cort&#xe9;s</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Espino</surname>
<given-names>JM</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Signature of a strong coupling with the continuum in <sup>11</sup>Be&#x2b;<sup>120</sup>Sn scattering at the coulomb barrier</article-title>. <source>Eur Phys J A</source> (<year>2009</year>) <volume>42</volume>:<fpage>461</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1140/epja/i2009-10822-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<label>36.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Scarduelli</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gasques</surname>
<given-names>LR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chamon</surname>
<given-names>LC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zagatto</surname>
<given-names>VAB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alvarez</surname>
<given-names>MAG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>L&#xe9;pine-Szily</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Consistent analysis of <sup>11</sup>B &#x2b; <sup>120</sup> Sn reaction channels</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>044606</volume>:<fpage>106</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.106.044606</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<label>37.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kundu</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Santra</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pal</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chattopadhyay</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nag</surname>
<given-names>TN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gandhi</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Reaffirmation of probe dependence of the mass deformation length for low-lying excitations <sup>112,116,118,120,122,124</sup> Sn isotopes</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>024614</volume>:<fpage>100</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.100.024614</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<label>38.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Silva</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alvarez</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chamon</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pereira</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rao</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rossi</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
<suffix>Jr</suffix>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>The heavy-ion nuclear potential: determination of a systematic behavior at the region of surface interaction distances</article-title>. <source>Nucl Phys A</source> (<year>2001</year>) <volume>679</volume>:<fpage>287</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>303</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0375-9474(00)00347-X</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<label>39.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Robertson</surname>
<given-names>BC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sample</surname>
<given-names>JT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Goosman</surname>
<given-names>DR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nagatani</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname>
<given-names>KW</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Elastic scattering of <sup>16,18</sup> O by <sup>116,120</sup> Sn at energies near the coulomb barrier</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>1971</year>) <volume>4</volume>:<fpage>2176</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>80</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.4.2176</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<label>40.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mazzocco</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Keeley</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boiano</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boiano</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>La Commara</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manea</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Elastic scattering for the <sup>8</sup>B and <sup>7</sup>Be &#x2b; <sup>208</sup> Pb systems at near-coulomb barrier energies</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>024602</volume>:<fpage>100</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.100.024602</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<label>41.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Linares</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sinha</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cardozo</surname>
<given-names>EN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guimar&#xe3;es</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rogachev</surname>
<given-names>GV</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hooker</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Elastic scattering measurements for the <sup>10</sup>C &#x2b; <sup>208</sup> Pb system at E<sub>lab</sub> &#x3d; 66 mev</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>044613</volume>:<fpage>103</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.103.044613</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<label>42.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Magro</surname>
<given-names>PLD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guimar&#xe3;es</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Assun&#xe7;&#xe3;o</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Elastic and inelastic scattering measurements for the 13c&#x2b;208pb system at close to the coulomb barrier energies</article-title>. <source>Eur Phys J A</source> (<year>2024</year>) <volume>122</volume>:<fpage>60</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01342-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<label>43.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>T&#xe1;vora</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ovejas</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martel</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Keeley</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Acosta</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Borge</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Strong coupling effects on near-barrier <sup>15</sup>C&#x2b;<sup>208</sup>Pb elastic scattering</article-title>. <source>Phys Lett B</source> (<year>2024</year>) <volume>855</volume>:<fpage>138770</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138770</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<label>44.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zerkin</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pritychenko</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The experimental nuclear reaction data (exfor): extended computer database and web retrieval system</article-title>. <source>Nucl Instr Methods Phys Res Section A: Acc Spectrometers, Detectors Associated Equipment</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>888</volume>:<fpage>31</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>43</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nima.2018.01.045</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<label>45.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Di Pietro</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Randisi</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scuderi</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Acosta</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Amorini</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Borge</surname>
<given-names>MJG</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Elastic scattering and reaction mechanisms of the halo nucleus <sup>11</sup>Be around the coulomb barrier</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev Lett</source> (<year>2010</year>) <volume>022701</volume>:<fpage>105</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.022701</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<label>46.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Duan</surname>
<given-names>FF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>YY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lei</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>ZY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pang</surname>
<given-names>DY</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Elastic scattering and breakup reactions of neutron-rich <sup>11</sup>Be on <sup>208</sup> Pb at 210 mev</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>034602</volume>:<fpage>105</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.105.034602</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<label>47.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Curtis</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Achouri</surname>
<given-names>NL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ashwood</surname>
<given-names>NI</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bohlen</surname>
<given-names>HG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Catford</surname>
<given-names>WN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Clarke</surname>
<given-names>NM</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Breakup reaction study of the brunnian nucleus <sup>10</sup>C</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2008</year>) <volume>021301</volume>:<fpage>77</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/0031-8949/84/04/045201</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<label>48.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guimar&#xe3;es</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cardozo</surname>
<given-names>EN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scarduelli</surname>
<given-names>VB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lubian</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kolata</surname>
<given-names>JJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>O&#x2019;Malley</surname>
<given-names>PD</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Strong coupling effect in the elastic scattering of <sup>10</sup>C &#x2b; <sup>58</sup> N<sub>i</sub> system near barrier</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>034603</volume>:<fpage>100</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.100.034603</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<label>49.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bonaccorso</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Brink DM, Bertulani CA. Proton vs neutron halo breakup</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2004</year>) <volume>024615</volume>:<fpage>69</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.69.024615</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<label>50.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rangel</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lubian</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Canto</surname>
<given-names>LF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gomes</surname>
<given-names>PRS</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Effect of Coulomb breakup on the elastic cross section of the <sup>8</sup>B proton-halo projectile on a heavy, <sup>208</sup>Pb target</article-title>. <source>Phys Rev C</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>054610</volume>:<fpage>93</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevC.93.054610</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>