The study of fractional calculus, a subject that has garnered significant attention from mathematicians, engineers, and physicians, involves the investigation of mathematical analysis utilizing differential operators of any order. The fractional calculus has extended the usual definitions of integer order integrals and derivatives in ordinary differential calculus by transforming them into real-order operators [1–6].

Over the past 40 years, there has been a lot of focus on Theories of thermoelasticity that permit for restricted heat wave speed. These theories, known as general thermo-elasticity theories, are hyperbolic and differ from the traditional combined thermo-elasticity (C-T) theory [7], This predicts an infinite pace of heat propagation and is based on a parabolic heat equation. Lord and Shulman (L-S) [8] were the first to alter the usual Fourier law by including a unique heat conduction law, resulting in a wave type heat equation, on the other hand Green and Lindsay (G-L) [9], introduced the temperature-rate hypothesis of thermoelasticity. Green and Naghdi (G-N) [10], proposed a theory of thermo-elasticity without energy dissipation, this, unlike earlier models, does not account for thermal energy loss. Chandrasekharaia proposed two theories of dual-phase lag thermo-elasticity [11, 12] and Tzou [13]. Eringen developed the general theory of micropolar elasticity [14, 15]. In this form of solid, the vector of displacement and micro-rotation is fully defined, whereas the displacement vector alone defines motion in the case of classical elasticity [16]. The essential equations of the theory of micropolar thermoelasticity linearly get by Tauchert et al. [17] and Boschi [18]. Ciarletta [19] proposed a thermoelasticity with micropolar energy dissipation. A Lord-Shulman model of micropolar thermoelasticity dependent linear theory was proposed by Sherief et al. [20]. Othman is to blame for various issues with thermoelastic spinning media [21].

Many authors have made significant contributions to resolving the boundary value problem for thermoelasticity [22–27].

Chen and Gurtin discussed two types of temperatures: thermodynamic temperature and conductive temperature [28]. In time-independent settings, the connection between these two temperatures is linked to the heat supply. The two temperatures are similar in the absence of a heat supply and often differ in the presence of a heat supply. The two temperatures and strain are shown to have inputs in the form of a travelling wave and an instantaneous reaction that happens during the body. The waves in the two-temperature thermoelasticity theory were investigated by Warren [29], but no study in the sense of a generalised thermoelasticity theory has been carried out so far. So, along with two temperatures, the theory of two-temperature-generalized thermo-visco-elasticity will be constructed in this work.

Many authors have made significant contributions to resolving the boundary value problem for linear viscoelastic thermal materials [30–33].

The current study seeks to determine the physical quantities, such as viscosity, rotation, conformable fractional parameter, and two-temperatures, in a homogeneous, isotropic, micropolar thermo-elastic material [1, 34–40].

We put a system in a generalized micropolar thermo-viscoelastic medium under five theories, two temperatures and rotation as [41, 42]:

(i) The constitutive relations

Take a homogenous, isotropic, micropolar-viscoelastic generalised medium with rotation and two temperatures with Cartesian rectangular system of coordinates x , y , z , getting half-space surface like the plane z = 0 . Two more terminology for the displacement equation in the rotating frame: the centripetal acceleration Ω ¯ × Ω ¯ × u ¯ just because of the time change and the Coriolis acceleration 2 Ω ¯ × u ¯ ˙ because of the moving frame of reference.

Our study was restricted to x − z plane. Then u ¯ , Ω ¯ and ϕ ¯ will have the components: u ¯ = u , 0 , w , Ω ¯ = 0 , Ω , 0  and  ϕ ¯ = 0 , ϕ , 0 (7)

Combination of (3), (4) and (7) provides: ρ u ¨ + 2 Ω w ˙ − Ω 2 u = μ e 1 + α 1 ∂ ∂ t ∇ 2 u + 1 + α 1 ∂ ∂ t μ e + 1 + α 0 ∂ ∂ t λ e e , x − υ ϕ , z − γ e 1 + γ 0 ∂ ∂ t T , x , (8) ρ w ¨ − Ω 2 w − 2 Ω u ˙ = μ e 1 + α 1 ∂ ∂ t + υ ∇ 2 w + μ e 1 + α 1 ∂ ∂ t + λ e 1 + α 0 ∂ ∂ t e , z + υ ϕ , z − γ e 1 + γ 0 ∂ ∂ t T , z , (9) ε ∇ 2 ϕ + υ u , z − w , x − 2 υ ϕ = ρ j ϕ ¨ . (10)

From Eqs 1, 2, 7 the stresses can be formulated as follow: σ x x = 2 μ e 1 + α 1 ∂ ∂ t + υ u , x + λ e 1 + α 0 ∂ ∂ t e − γ e 1 + γ 0 ∂ ∂ t T , (11) σ z z = 2 μ e 1 + α 1 ∂ ∂ t + υ w , z + λ e 1 + α 0 ∂ ∂ t e − γ e 1 + γ 0 ∂ ∂ t T , (12) σ x z = μ e 1 + α 1 ∂ ∂ t + υ w , x + μ e 1 + α 1 ∂ ∂ t u , z + υ ϕ , (13) σ z x = μ e 1 + α 1 ∂ ∂ t + υ u , z + μ e 1 + α 1 ∂ ∂ t w , x − υ ϕ , (14) m x y = ε ϕ , x , (15) m z y = ε ϕ , z . (16)

For simplification, we take the non-dimensional variables: x ′ , z ′ = ϖ c o x i , z i , t ′ , τ 0 ′ , α 0 ′ , α 1 ′ , γ 0 ′ = ϖ t , τ 0 , α 0 , α 1 , γ 0 , T ′ , θ ′ = T , θ T 0 , σ i j ′ = σ i j γ e T 0 , Ω ′ = Ω c 0 2 η , u ′ , w ′ = ρ c o ϖ γ e T o u , w , m i j ′ = ϖ γ e T o c o m i j , ϕ ′ = ρ c o 2 γ e T o ϕ . (17) Where, c 0 2 = λ e + 2 μ e + υ ρ , ϖ = ρ c o 2 C E k .

With regard to the non-dimensional quantities set out in (17), Eqs 8–10, Eqs 5, 6 take the form: u ¨ − Ω 2 u + 2 Ω w ˙ = a 1 1 + α 1 ∂ ∂ t + υ 1 ∇ 2 u + a 2 1 + α o ∂ ∂ t + a 3 1 + α o ∂ ∂ t e , x − υ 1 ϕ , z − 1 + γ 0 ∂ ∂ t T , x , (18) w ¨ − Ω 2 w − 2 Ω u ˙ = a 1 1 + α 1 ∂ ∂ t + υ 1 ∇ 2 w + a 2 1 + α o ∂ ∂ t + a 3 1 + α o ∂ ∂ t e , z + υ 1 ϕ , x − 1 + γ 0 ∂ ∂ t 1 + υ 0 ∂ ∂ t T , z , (19) ∇ 2 ϕ + a 4 u , z − w , x − 2 a 4 ϕ = a 5 ϕ ¨ , (20) ∇ 2 θ = 1 + τ 0 α α ! t 1 − α ∂ ∂ t T ˙ + ε o 1 + γ 0 ∂ ∂ t 1 + τ 0 α α ! t 1 − α ∂ ∂ t e ˙ , (21) T = 1 − a * ∇ 2 θ . (22)

Also, the constitutive relations (11)–(16) reduce to σ x x = 2 a 1 1 + α 1 ∂ ∂ t + υ 1 u , x + a 2 1 + α 0 ∂ ∂ t e − 1 + γ 0 ∂ ∂ t T , (23) σ z z = 2 a 1 1 + α 1 ∂ ∂ t + υ 1 w , z + a 2 1 + α 0 ∂ ∂ t e − 1 + γ 0 ∂ ∂ t T , (24) σ x z = a 1 1 + α 1 ∂ ∂ t + υ 1 w , x + a 1 1 + α 1 ∂ ∂ t u , z + υ 1 ϕ , (25) σ z x = a 1 1 + α 1 ∂ ∂ t + υ 1 u , z + a 1 1 + α 1 ∂ ∂ t w , x − υ 1 ϕ , (26) m x y = a 6 ϕ , x , (27) m z y = a 6 ϕ , z , (28) Where, a 1 = μ e ρ c 0 2 , a 2 = λ e γ e T o , a 3 = μ e γ e T o , a 4 = υ c o 2 ε ϖ 2 , a 5 = ρ j c o 2 ε , a 6 = ε ϖ 2 ρ c o 4 , ε o = γ e ρ C E , a * = a ϖ 2 c o 2 , υ 1 = υ ρ c o 2   . (29)

We define e x , z , t and ψ x , z , t as the displacement potentials recount to u and w e = u , x + w , z , ψ = u , z − w , x . (30)

In terms of normal modes, the solution of the considered variables can be written as: u , w , e , ψ , T , θ , ϕ , m i j , σ i j x , z , t = u ¯ , w ¯ , e ¯ , ψ ¯ , T ¯ , θ ¯ , ϕ ¯ , m ¯ i j , σ ¯ i j z exp ω t + i b x . (31) Where, u ¯ , w ¯ , e ¯ , ψ ¯ , T ¯ , θ ¯ , ϕ ¯ , m ¯ i j , σ ¯ i j z are the amplitudes of the variables, ω is the complex angular frequency, b is the wave number in the z -direction and = − 1 .

From Eqs 18, 19 we get e ¨ − Ω 2 e − 2 Ω ψ ˙ = a 1 1 + α 1 ∂ ∂ t + a 2 1 + α o ∂ ∂ t + a 3 1 + α o ∂ ∂ t + υ 1 ∇ 2 e − 1 + γ 0 ∂ ∂ t ∇ 2 T , (32) ψ ¨ − Ω 2 ψ + 2 Ω e ˙ = a 1 1 + α 1 ∂ ∂ t + υ 1 ∇ 2 ψ − υ 1 ∇ 2 ϕ . (33)

Using Eqs 22, 30, 31, Eqs 20, 21, 31 and 32 lead to b 1 D 2 − b 2 − b 2 θ ¯ = b 3 e ¯ , (34) b 4 − b 5 D 2 − b 2 e ¯ − b 6 ψ ¯ = − b 7 D 2 − b 2 1 − a * D 2 − b 2 θ ¯ , (35) b 4 − b 8 D 2 − b 2 ψ ¯ = − b 6 e ¯ − υ 1 D 2 − b 2 ϕ ¯ , (36) D 2 − b 2 ϕ ¯ + a 4 ψ ¯ − 2 a 4 ϕ ¯ = ω 2 a 5 ϕ ¯ . (37)

Also, the constitutive relations (18)–(21) become σ ¯ x x = 2 a 1 1 + α 1 ω + υ 1 i b u ¯ + a 2 1 + α o ω e ¯ − 1 + γ o ω T ¯ , (38) σ ¯ z z = 2 a 1 1 + α 1 ω + υ 1 D w ¯ + a 2 1 + α o ω e ¯ − 1 + γ o ω T ¯ , (39) σ ¯ x z = a 1 1 + α 1 ω + υ 1 i b w ¯ + a 1 1 + α o ω D u ¯ + υ 1 ϕ ¯ , (40) σ ¯ z x = a 1 1 + α 1 ω + υ 1 D u ¯ + a 1 1 + α o ω i b w ¯ − υ 1 ϕ ¯ , (41) m ¯ x y = i b a 6 ϕ ¯ , (42) m ¯ z y = a 6 D ϕ ¯ . (43)

Where, D = d d z , b 1 = a * ω 1 + τ 0 α α ! t 1 − α ω , b 2 = ε o ω 1 + γ 0 ω 1 + τ 0 α α ! t 1 − α ω , b 3 = ε o ω 1 + γ 0 ω 1 + τ 0 α α ! t 1 − α ω , b 4 = ω 2 − Ω 2 , b 5 = 1 + α 1 ω a 1 + 1 + α 0 ω a 2 + 1 + α 1 ω a 3 + υ 1 , b 6 = 2 Ω ω , b 7 = 1 + γ o ω , b 8 = υ 1 + a 1 1 + α 1 ω , b 9 = ω 2 a 5 + 2 a 4 .

Eliminating ψ ¯ z , θ ¯ z and ϕ ¯ z between Eqs 34–37, we get the following eighth order ordinary differential equation satisfied with e ¯ z D 8 − A   D 6 + B   D 4 − C D 2 + E e ¯ z = 0 . (44) Where, A = b 1 b 5 + a * b 3 b 7 a 4 υ 1 − b 4 − b 8 b 9 − 2 b 2 b 8 − b 8 b 1 b 4 + 2 b 2 b 1 b 5 + b 2 b 5 + b 3 b 7 + 2 a * b 2 b 3 b 7 − b 1 b 5 b 8 − a * b 3 b 7 b 8 , B = − b 1 b 5 − a * b 3 b 7 b 4 b 9 + b 2 b 4 + b 2 b 8 b 9 + b 4 b 8 − b 2 a 4 υ 1 − b 8 b 2 b 1 b 4 + b 4 b 1 b 5 + b 2 b 4 + b 2 b 2 b 5 + a 4 υ 1 − b 4 − b 8 b 9 − 2 b 2 b 8 b 1 b 4 + 2 b 2 b 1 b 5 + b 2 b 5 + b 3 b 7 + 2 a * b 2 b 3 b 7 − a * b 4 b 3 b 7 b 8 − b 2 b 3 b 7 b 8 − b 1 b 6 2 − b 1 b 5 b 8 − a * b 3 b 7 b 8 , C = − b 4 b 9 + b 2 b 4 + b 2 b 8 b 9 + b 4 b 8 − b 2 a 4 υ 1 b 1 b 4 + 2 b 2 b 1 b 5 + b 2 b 5 + b 3 b 7 + 2 a * b 2 b 3 b 7 + a 4 υ 1 − b 4 − b 8 b 9 − 2 b 2 b 8 a * b 4 b 3 b 7 + b 2 b 3 b 7 + b 2 b 1 b 4 + b 4 b 1 b 5 + b 2 b 4 + b 2 b 2 b 5 − b 6 2 b 1 b 9 + 2 b 2 b 1 + b 2 − b 1 b 5 b 8 − a * b 3 b 7 b 8 , E = − b 4 b 9 + b 2 b 4 + b 2 b 8 b 9 + b 4 b 8 − b 2 a 4 υ 1 a * b 4 b 3 b 7 + b 2 b 3 b 7 + b 2 b 1 b 4 + b 4 b 1 b 5 + b 2 b 4 + b 2 b 2 b 5 − b 6 2 b 2 b 1 b 9 + b 4 b 1 + b 2 b 9 + b 2 b 2 − b 1 b 5 b 8 − a * b 3 b 7 b 8 .

By rewriting Eq. 44, we get D 2 − k 1 2 D 2 − k 2 2 D 2 − k 3 2 D 2 − k 4 2 e ¯ z = 0 . (45) Where, the roots of the characteristic Eq. 44 k n 2   n = 1,2,3,4 .

The solution of Eq. 44, which bounded as x → ∞ , is given by e ¯ z = ∑ n = 1 4 M n e − k n z . (46)

In a similar manner, θ ¯ x = ∑ n = 1 4 H 1 n M n e − k n z , (47) ψ ¯ z = ∑ n = 1 4 H 3 n M n e − k n z . (48)

Substituting from Eqs 46 to Eq. 48 and (31) in Eqs 30, 22 and Eqs 38–43, the thermodynamic temperature, micro-rotation, the displacement, force stresses and the couple stresses components take the form T ¯ z = ∑ n = 1 4 H 2 n M n e − k n z , (49) ϕ ¯ z = ∑ n = 1 4 H 4 n M n e − k n z , (50) w ¯ z = ∑ n = 1 4 H 5 n M n e − k n z , (51) u ¯ z = ∑ n = 1 4 H 6 n M n e − k n z , (52) σ ¯ x x z = ∑ n = 1 4 H 7 n M n e − k n z , (53) σ ¯ z z z = ∑ n = 1 4 H 8 n M n e − k n z , (54) σ ¯ x z z = ∑ n = 1 4 H 9 n M n e − k n z , (55) σ ¯ z x z = ∑ n = 1 4 G 1 n M n e − k n z , (56) m ¯ x y z = ∑ n = 1 4 G 2 n M n e − k n z , (57) m ¯ z y x = ∑ n = 1 4 G 3 n M n e − k n z . (58)

Where, H 1 n = b 3 b 1 k n 2 − b 2 − b 2 , H 2 n = 1 − a * k n 2 − b 2 H 1 n , H 3 n = b 4 − b 5 k n 2 − b 2 + H 2 n b 7 k n 2 − b 2 b 6 , H 4 n = a 4 H 3 n b 9 − k n 2 − b 2 , H 5 n = − k n − i b H 3 n k n 2 − b 2 , H 6 n = − i 1 + k n H 5 n b , H 7 n = i b H 6 n 2 a 1 1 + α 1 ω + υ 1 + a 2 1 + α o ω − H 2 n 1 + γ o ω H 8 n = − k n H 5 n 2 a 1 1 + α 1 ω + υ 1 + a 2 1 + α o ω − H 2 n 1 + γ o ω , H 9 n = i b H 5 n a 1 1 + α 1 ω + υ 1 + υ 1 H 4 n − a 1 k n H 6 n 1 + α 1 ω , G 1 n = − k n H 6 n a 1 1 + α 1 ω + υ 1 + i b a 1 H 5 n 1 + α 1 ω − υ 1 H 4 n , G 2 n = i b a 6 H 4 n , G 3 n = − a 6 k n H 4 n . M n n = 1,2,3,4 , some coefficients can be calculated based on the boundary conditions

To obtain the coefficients M n n = 1,2,3,4 , we use the surface’s boundary conditions on the surface z = 0 as T x , 0 , t = f x , 0 , t = f * ⁡ exp ω t + i b x , (59) σ z z x , 0 , t = 0 , (60) σ z x x , 0 , t = 0 , (61) m z y x , 0 , t = 0 . (62)

Where, f x , t is an arbitrary function of x , t and f * is the magnitude of the constant temperature applied to the boundary.

Using Eqs 59–62, the following equations satisfied by the coefficient M n n = 1,2,3,4 can be obtained ∑ n = 1 4 H 2 n M n = f * , (63) ∑ n = 1 4 H 8 n M n = 0 , (64) ∑ n = 1 4 G 1 n M n = 0 , (65) ∑ n = 1 4 G 3 n M n = 0 . (66)

We complete the solution of the problem by solving the system of Eqs 63–66.

To perform numerical calculations [45] the magnesium crystal value of the related parameters is taken at T o = 23   C o λ e = 9.4 × 10 10 k g   m − 1   s − 2 , ε = 0.779 × 10 − 9 k g   m   s − 2 , , k = 2.510 w . m − 1 . k − 1 , α t = 2.36 × 10 − 5 k − 1 , ρ = 1.74 × 10 3 k g . m − 3 , C E = 9.623 J . k g − 1 . k − 1 , υ = 10 10 k g   m − 1 s − 2 , μ e = 4 × 10 10 k g   m − 1 s − 2 , j = 0.2 × 10 − 19 m 2 .

The comparison was performed for x = 0.01 , f * = 1 , ω = ω 0 + i ξ , ω 0 = − 2 , ξ = 1 , b = 0.5 , τ 0 = 0.08 , α = 0.1 a = 0.5 , Ω = 0.1 , α 0 = 0.6 , α 1 = 0.9 .

The numerical data given above were used to determine the real part distribution of the displacement component, force stress components, conductive temperature, thermo-dynamic temperature, micro-rotation, and couple stress components in relation to the problem under consideration. Figures 1–25 show the results.

From an implementation standpoint, we divided the schematics into four components.

(i) For different values of rotation, the micropolar thermo-visco-elasticity theory with conformable fractional order theory and two-temperatures is concerned. Figures 1–7 i.e.., Ω = 0.1,0.01 .

Figures 1, 2 depict the distribution of θ and T with distance x with two-temperatures for varying rotational values. It is noticed that curves of θ and T begin from a positive value. Then, it then reduces to zero indefinitely.

Figure 3 shows the variations of u with distance x with two-temperatures for different values of rotation. The rotation has a decreasing influence.

Figures 4, 5 represent the profile of force stress components σ z x , σ z z based for various values of rotation with two-temperature. They start with a zero value that is completely compatible with the limits. The value of σ z x , σ z z for Ω = 0.1 is less as compared to Ω = 0.01 , the values of σ z x , σ z z tending to zero.

Figure 6 displays the disparity of the couple stress component m z y with distance x for two-temperatures for varying rotational values. It begins with a zero value entirely consistent with the limit conditions. We notice that the value of m z y for Ω = 0.1 is less as compared to Ω = 0.01 , the values of m z y tending to zero.

Figure 7 shows the variation of the micro-rotation ϕ with distance x , with two-temperatures for different values of rotation. The rotation has a decreasing influence.

(ii) Effect of two temperatures

Figure 8 illuminates the supply of the thermodynamic temperature T with distance x for different a = 0 , a = 0.1 . values under the influence of rotation. It begins with T = 1 that fully complies with the limit conditions, subsequently decreases continually to zero value. We noticed that the parameter a has an increasing effect

Figure 9 shows the conductive temperature θ with distance x with the effect of rotation. We noticed that the curve of θ begins from a positive value. It then, reduces constantly to zero. We notice that the parameter a has an increasing effect.

Figure 10 displays the variations of u with distance z under the influence of rotation for different values of a = 0 , a = 0.5 . The parameter a is seen to have an increasing impact.

Figures 11, 12 denote the outline of the force stress component σ z x , σ z z under the effect of rotation for changed values of a = 0 , a = 0.5 . It begins with a zero value that is fully consistent with the limits. In this figure, we can see that the values of σ z x , σ z z for a = 0 is greater than that at = 0.5 .

Figure 13 shows the profile of the couple stress component m z y under the influence of rotation for the values of a = 0 , a = 0.5 . This begins with a zero value that is totally compatible with the limits. In this figure, we can see that the value of m z y for a = 0.5 is greater than that at as a = 0 It is observed that the influence is rising in parameter.

Figure 14 represents the variation of the micro-rotation with distance under the influence of rotation for different values of = 0 , a = 0.5 . In the figure the value of ϕ for a = 0.5 is greater than that at a = 0 . The a parameter is seen to have a growing effect.

(iii) Effect of viscosity

Figures 15, 16 depict θ and T in two-temperature under the influence of rotation with and without of viscosity. It has been observed that the curves of θ and T begin from a positive value, Then it decreases constantly to zero.

Figure 17 shows the deviation of the horizontal displacement distribution u with distance x under the influence of rotation and two-temperatures with and without viscosity. It can be seen that TE > TVE

Figures 18, 19 represent the profile of stress components σ z x , σ z z under the influence of rotation and two-temperature for TE and TVE .They begin with a zero value that is fully in line with the limit conditions. The value of σ z x for TVE is greater than that for TE . the value of σ z z for TE is greater than that for TVE.

Figure 20 depicts the disparity of the couple stress m z y with distance x under the influence of rotation and two-temperatures for TE and TVE .We observe that the value of m z y for TVE is greater than that for TE .

Figure 21 depicts the variation of the micro-rotation ϕ with distance x under the influence of rotation and two-temperature for TE and TVE . We observe that the value of ϕ for TVE is greater than that for TE .

(v) Effect of Conformable fractional parameter

The figures [22–24] clarified four curves predicted by the different theories of thermo-elasticity, such that

• α = 1 , indicates the generalized thermoelastic theory with one relaxation time [10].

Figures 22, 23 depict the distribution of the thermo-dynamic temperature T and conductive temperature θ with distance x , under the influence of rotation and two-temperature for various values of α and for t = 0 . It is observed that the variation of θ starts from a positive value, then decreases continually to zero. It is also visible that for α = 1 , the result coincides with all results of applications that are taken in the context of the generalized thermoelasticity with one relaxation time, for t = 0 , the result coincides with all results of applications that are taken in the case of the coupled theory, for α = 0.1 and α = 0.5 gives new results for the generalized conformable fractional order theory of thermoelasticity From this figure it is spotted that as fractional parameter α increase the measure of the temperature θ rise.

Figure 24 shows the variations of u via distance x under the influence of rotation and two-temperature for various values of α and t = 0 . For α = 1 , the result to agree with all results of applications that are taken in the context of the generalized thermoelasticity with one relaxation time, for t = 0 , the result agree with all results of applications that are taken in the context of the coupled theory, for α = 1 and α = 0.5 gives new results for the generalized conformable fractional order theory of thermoelasticity.

Figure 25 explains the variations of stress components σ z x with distance x under the influence of rotation and two-temperature for various values of α and for t = 0 . It can be visible that they beginning with zero value that fully agrees with the boundary conditions.

Normal mode analysis was employed to investigate the behavior of the conductive temperature, the thermodynamic temperature, the component of horizontal displacement, the component of force stress, the couple stresses, and the micro-rotation under the effect of rotation, conformable fractional order theory, viscosity, and two-temperatures in a homogeneous, isotropic, generalized micropolar thermo-viscoelastic medium. We aim to study the effect of conformable fractional derivative, effect of rotation, and the two-temperature coefficients. The above analysis leads us to the following conclusions:

• Variations in various fields are clearly constrained to a certain zone in all of the data, and the values vanish outside of the region, which is consistent with the perspective of generalized micropolar thermo-visco- elasticity theory.

The given model will be valuable for scientists working on micropolar thermoelasticity in understanding the viscoelastic characteristics of human soft tissue and may lead to enhanced diagnostic applications. The findings may be used to both theoretical and empirical wave propagation.

• The fractional parameter α highly influences all variables.