<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Phys.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-424X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1120314</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fphy.2023.1120314</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Physics</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Characterization of a bimodal multi-fibre optic clinical probe for <italic>in situ</italic> tissue diagnosis based on spectrally-and temporally-resolved autofluorescence</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Sibai et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2023.1120314">10.3389/fphy.2023.1120314</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sibai</surname>
<given-names>Mira</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mehidine</surname>
<given-names>Hussein</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/587527/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Devaux</surname>
<given-names>Bertrand</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Abi Haidar</surname>
<given-names>Darine</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1717976/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Universit&#x00E9; Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab</institution>, <addr-line>Orsay</addr-line>, <country>France</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Universit&#x00E9; Paris Cit&#x00E9; &#x2013; Facult&#x00E9; de M&#x00E9;decine Paris Descartes</institution>, <addr-line>Paris</addr-line>, <country>France</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Service de Neurochirurgie, H&#x00F4;pital Lariboisi&#x00E8;re</institution>, <addr-line>Paris</addr-line>, <country>France</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
<institution>Service de Neurochirurgie, P&#x00F4;le Neurosciences, GHU-Paris</institution>, <addr-line>Paris</addr-line>, <country>France</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
<institution>Universit&#x00E9; Paris Cit&#x00E9;, IJCLab</institution>, <addr-line>Orsay</addr-line>, <country>France</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/911183/overview">Peng Gao</ext-link>, Xidian University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/567932/overview">Nirmal Mazumder</ext-link>, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/679066/overview">V. N. Du Le</ext-link>, The University of Alabama in Huntsville, United States</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Darine Abi Haidar, <email>darine.abihaidar@ijclab.in2p3.fr</email>
</corresp>
<fn fn-type="other">
<p>This article was submitted to Optics and Photonics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physics</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>01</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>11</volume>
<elocation-id>1120314</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>09</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>30</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Sibai, Mehidine, Devaux and Abi Haidar.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Sibai, Mehidine, Devaux and Abi Haidar</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>
<bold>Introduction:</bold> Fibred-based optical spectroscopy is advantageous over imaging due to its sensitivity, practicality and precision, providing point of care diagnosis. The unique advantage is that the sampled volume is well defined by the source-detector geometry and that the functionality of multiple optical techniques can be incorporated into one probe so that more information is gained without extra bulkiness or cost, while also mitigating the limitations of each.</p>
<p>
<bold>Methods:</bold> This advantage is utilized here to address the limited accuracy in delineating brain tumors, in situ, by simultaneously characterizing tissue based on the spectral and lifetime properties of five endogenous fluorophores commonly present in brain tissue. A 5-meters multi fibre-optic probe custom-built for neurosurgery guidance with a sterilizable distal end is presented in this paper. It describes its technical features such as architecture, collection efficiency, sensitivity.</p>
<p>
<bold>Results and discussion:</bold> The developed probe have a temporal resolution of 34.6 ps and a temporal impulse response function of 29 ps. The spatial resolution was around 153 &#x03BC;m while the spectral resolution is 1 nm. All of these specifications are ensured under 1 second as acquisition time. The probe is validated using fluorescent dyes and tissue phantoms. Additionally, the fluorescence spectra from fresh and frozen animal tissue and from an epileptic patient are compared to that obtained from confocal fluorescence microscopy, while the lifetime values are compared to that reported in literature. Finally, the effect of pressure applied to the probe in contact with tissue is discussed.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>autofluorescence (AF)</kwd>
<kwd>multi-fibre probe</kwd>
<kwd>fluorescence lifetime (FL)</kwd>
<kwd>tissue diagnosis</kwd>
<kwd>spectroscopy</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>1 Introduction</title>
<p>The translation of optical devices based on fibre-optic light delivery/collection into the clinical setting has gained significant momentum driven by its diagnostic/therapeutic value and its ease of use. Due to the biophysical properties of light, optical measurements uniquely sample tissue at the molecular level, and thus can probe cells, proteins, and tissue. The biological information retrieved from optical measurements depends on the light-tissue interaction taking place, from assessing the changes in the concentration of biomolecules to probing changes in their shape and orientation that manifest during pathogenesis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]. In the case of diffuse reflectance measurements, the detected signal is a result of multiple elastic scattering and absorption events. Extracting the wavelength-dependent absorption coefficient allows the determination of the concentration of macromolecules such as haemoglobin, lipids, and melanin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>], while the reduced scattering coefficient is modulated by the concentration and distribution of organelles with varying index of refraction such as at the interface of cellular membranes, collagen fibrils, lysosomes and mitochondria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]. During breast tumor surgery, for example, changes in the reduced scattering coefficient provided more useful diagnostic information compared to monitoring blood oxygenation and total haemoglobin content [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]. In addition, when fluorescence is combined with diffuse reflectance measurements, the fluorophore concentration can be extracted [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>].</p>
<p>Fibre-optical probes used in research hospitals are being evaluated for its efficacy to guide surgery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>], monitor tissue response to treatment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>], and to obtain an optical biopsy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]. The architecture of fibred probes differs according to application as well as the optical contrast that is being measured. A fibre-optic probe measuring both the steady-state diffuse reflectance and fluorescence can be configured so that both excitation light sources are guided by the same fibre, while several collection fibres are placed in the periphery or linearly at different source detector separations so that the tissue optical properties can be extracted from the diffusion Eq. 13. While previously lagging behind, probes measuring time-resolved fluorescence are slowly entering clinical studies with the advent of faster detectors and pulsed lasers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]. A promising example is the bifurcated sterilizable probe designed for <italic>in vivo</italic> intensity and time-resolved fluorescence detection to distinguish between low-grade glioma and normal white matter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]. Although point-based measurements suffer from mis-sampling errors, fibre-based optical spectroscopy still surpasses imaging in its sensitivity, acquisition speed, practicality and precision, providing point of care diagnosis. The unique advantage of using fibre-optic probes over wide-field imaging is that the sampled volume is well-defined by the source-detector geometry and that the functionality of multiple optical techniques can be incorporated into one probe so that more information about relevant physiological parameters could be extracted without extra bulkiness or cost, while also mitigating the limitations of each [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>]. Since lifetime measurements are insensitive to variations in probe to tissue distances or tissue optical properties, they are well suited for a dual modality system such as the system developed by Dochow et al [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>].</p>
<p>Translation of intraoperative multimodal fibred-based detection in to the neurosurgical suite is severely lagging due to additional constraints such as further miniaturization of the probe, a sterilizable distal end and the need for rapid acquisition and analysis. Here, we present a novel bimodal spectroscopy device, which combines spectrally- and temporally-resolved fluorescence measurements and is optimally designed for seamless surgical guidance with high temporal (35&#xa0;ps), spatial (&#x3c;0.3&#xa0;mm), and spectral resolution (1&#xa0;nm) obtained in under one second. Three main characteristics make our probe novel: 1) its ability to simultaneously detect five endogenous fluorophores under one excitation light (405&#xa0;nm); 2) its hardware is modular in the sense that the probe head used by the surgeon can be sterilized, while the proximal end of the probe (5&#xa0;m) and black box housing the remaining optical components can be placed in the non-sterile area of the operation room (OR) without affecting the quality of the measurements or intervention; 3) the custom software allows for immediate visualization of the autofluorescence spectrum and lifetime decay profile for each fluorophore with a single-click operation. Post measurement, a custom python-based program is implemented for spectral and lifetime fitting upon one click to retrieve quantitative information. Although the probe design and its development are optimized for epileptic and brain tumor surgery based on the feedback from the co-author at GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neuroscience Hospital (B.D). It is compatible and useful for any open (or minimally invasive) surgery or <italic>in situ</italic> tissue monitoring during medical intervention. The probe specifically measures the fluorescence emitted by NADH, flavins (FAD), lipopigments, porphyrin I and porphyrin II, all of which are altered in the brain with the onset of disease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>]. The quantitative metrics of interest in brain cancer or epilepsy are primarily related to the energetic metabolism as mirrored in the FAD/NADH ratio [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>], the oxidative stress, as portrayed by the Lipopigments to porphyrin ratio [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>], and the degree of vascularization as portrayed by the porphyrin to NADH ratio [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>]. Additionally, changes in the short and long fluorescence lifetime of NADH (FAD) are directly related to the conversion of free NAD &#x2b; (FAD) to bound NADH(FAD) signifying altered metabolic states as seen in hypoxic or inflamed regions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>].</p>
<p>This report starts with Monte Carlo (MC) simulations to characterize the collection efficiency and tissue volumes interrogated by the probe using a customized version of the Monte Carlo multi-layered code by Wang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>]. The spatial resolution and optimal probe to tissue distance is theoretically calculated for a non-turbid medium and then experimentally determined for a turbid medium. Moreover, fluorescent dyes and tissue-simulating phantoms are both used to validate the linearity, the stability, the sensitivity as well as the temporal impulse response of the system. <italic>Ex vivo</italic> measurements of different organs taken from a rodent model and from human brain biopsy samples are performed. The spectral shapes are compared with those obtained from a 405&#xa0;nm confocal fluorescence microscope at similar regions of interests, while the fluorescence lifetimes are compared to literature. Finally, the effect of pressure applied to tissue by the probe is experimentally tested. Ongoing <italic>ex vivo</italic> measurements of freshly excised brain tissue are being performed to delineate optical markers that can best characterize different brain tissue types, healthy and diseased, before moving the system into the OR. The end goal is to enhance needle biopsy and resection surgery by a high information content comprising relevant physiological and metabolic information <italic>in situ</italic>, unavailable by any other intraoperative technology.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s2">
<title>2 Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>2.1 Probe design</title>
<p>The architecture of fibre-optic probes differs according to application and the corresponding requirements. Each design directly impacts light delivery and propagation into tissue, collection efficiency as well as the origin of the collected light [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>]. The probe that is presented in this work is custom designed based on a multifibre bifurcated architecture. The architecture and probe geometry was optimized by Monte Carlo simulations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>]. This included selecting the diameter of the illumination and collection fibres, the separation distance, the angle between the two fibres [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>]. Eight multimode fibres are housed in a stainless-steel casing with a sapphire window (diameter of 8&#xa0;mm) at the distal end that can be disinfected with isopropyl alcohol during surgery. A ring of seven detection fibres surrounds one central illumination fibre. Of the seven, two contralateral fibres collect time-resolved fluorescence at five spectral bandwidths, while the remaining five fibres collect spectrally-resolved fluorescence. All fibres are made of UV-grade silica/silica with a nominal NA of 0.22. The core of the illumination fibre is 200&#xa0;&#xb5;m while that of the source-to-detector separation is 600&#xa0;&#x3bc;m, from centre to centre. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref> shows images of the whole system (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1B</xref>), the black box housing all optical components (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figures 1A, B</xref>), the probe head (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1C</xref>) and the sample holder used for <italic>ex vivo</italic> measurements (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1C</xref>). The probe is coupled to the laser and detectors in the black box <italic>via</italic> SMA connectors (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1A</xref>). The black box contains the 40&#xa0;MHz pulsed 405&#xa0;nm collimated excitation source (LDH-P-C-405B, Picoquant, Germany) coupled into the illumination fibre. The box also houses the photomultiplier tube and TCSCP acquisition card (PMA 182 and Time Harp 200, Picoquant, Germany) for fluorescence lifetime detection (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1B</xref>). A filter wheel (FW102C, Thorlabs, Newton, United States) is placed in front of the detector with five bandpass filters: 450 &#xb1; 10&#xa0;nm, 520 &#xb1; 10&#xa0;nm, 550 &#xb1; 30&#xa0;nm, 620 &#xb1; 10&#xa0;nm and 680 &#xb1; 10&#xa0;nm. A filter wheel is also placed in front of the spectrometer (QE Pro OceanOptics, Florida, United States), where the choice of a 450&#xa0;nm high pass filter or the bandpass filters appropriate for the five fluorophores is available.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Instrumental setup of our spectroscopic probe stationed in the neurosurgical suite at GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neuroscience Hospital. <bold>(A)</bold> Side view of one side of the black box with three optical leads exiting the box that are grouped into the bifurcated probe. <bold>(B)</bold> Photo of the whole system: The black box containing the optical components, the fibre-optic probe fixed vertically over a motorized sample stage, the accompanying computer for direct acquisition and analysis; <bold>(C)</bold> a close-up photograph of the probe with a biopsy sample positioned for measurements with showing the multi fibres architecture.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-11-1120314-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>2.2 Acquisition and analysis</title>
<p>The probe is fixed above a 2D precision translation stage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1C</xref>), where the sample is placed. The probe can be translated vertically in steps of 1&#xa0;mm, while the sample stage can be translated in the xy plane in steps of 0.1&#xa0;mm at a speed of 0.3&#xa0;mm/s. Measurements are carried out at 40.106 pulses per second with energy output of approximately 1&#xa0;&#x3bc;J/pulse. For <italic>in vivo</italic> measurements, the probe head is free to move as dictated by the surgeon. The 5-meter cable connecting the black box to the distal end of the probe is long and flexible enough to be utilized safely in the OR, while the black box containing the illumination source and detection system can be placed in the non-sterilized area. A homemade LabView acquisition interface (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1B</xref>) allows for real-time visualization of the spectral and lifetime decay signal as well as control of the acquisition time (separate for each mode), the choice of applied filters (separate for each mode), dark count correction, and the frequency of signal averaging. Post-measurement, a python-based GUI allows for fast spectral and temporal analysis. The fluorescence lifetime decay signal under a given detection band is fit to a mono (Porphyrins I and II, lipopigments) or bi-exponential decay function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>] (NADH and FAD). The fluorescence spectra for all five fluorophores were modeled as Gaussians with known ranges for peak wavelengths and Gaussian widths based on previous <italic>in vivo</italic> spectral measurements as described elsewhere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>].</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<title>2.3 Monte Carlo modelling of the light propagation though the fibre and tissue</title>
<p>To estimate the cross section of interaction at the tissue interface, a modified MCML code with fluorescence modeling was used where the model was customized based on the probe geometry, refractive index mismatches, and brain tissue optical properties at the excitation and emission wavelengths, determined from <italic>in vivo</italic> and <italic>ex vivo</italic> brain tissue [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>]. The model was previously compared and validated against traditional MC and MCML programs for layered tissue phantoms at different illumination-collection geometries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>]. Modifications to the MCML program included modelling the excitation light as a Gaussian beam exciting a fibre with a core diameter of 200&#xa0;&#xb5;m and an NA of 0.22. The absorption (&#x3bc;<sub>ax</sub>) and scattering coefficients (&#x3bc;<sub>sx</sub>) at the excitation wavelengths ranges from to 3&#x2013;20&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> and 150&#x2013;400&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, respectively; the anisotropy factor is set to 0.87. The fluorophore is uniformly distributed in the tissue model with an absorption coefficient of 0.1 cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> similar to that of FAD measured <italic>in vivo</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>]. Additionally, the fluorescence quantum yield, the wavelength-dependent extinction coefficient of FAD, and the wavelength-dependent tissue optical properties (&#x3bc;<sub>am</sub>, &#x3bc;<sub>sm</sub>, and g) across the spectral range 475&#x2013;600&#xa0;nm are all inputs to the model.</p>
<p>For simulating photon excitation, 10<sup>7</sup> photons are launched in a 3D Cartesian grid with 50&#xa0;&#xb5;m resolution. Absorption matrixes recorded from the individual voxels were created for the tissue background and the fluorophore separately. Consequently, the fluorophore excitation weight is then assembled and each voxel becomes an individual source with optical properties at the randomized emission wavelength. For simulating the fluorescence emission, the separation distance between the excitation and collection fibres (600&#xa0;&#xb5;m center to center) is set at an angle of 11&#xb0; with a detection solid angle of 12.75&#xb0;. Flow charts depicting the added parameters in the modified MCML for both the absorption and fluorescence emission maps are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>. Furthermore, the most efficient probe to sample distance was obtained experimentally as well as through Monte Carlo simulations. Through MC modelling, the fluorescence intensity was simulated for varying probes to sample distances from 0 to 4&#xa0;mm in steps of 0.2&#xa0;mm for the same range of optical properties mentioned above and for the specific probe geometry. Experimentally, a fixed brain tissue sample (see methods; <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s5">Section 5</xref>) was positioned on the translation stage and the autofluorescence spectrum was acquired at different probe to tissue vertical displacements in steps of 0.5&#xa0;mm. The integrated fluorescence within the FAD fluorescence emission band was used to compare the predicted fluorescence by MCML.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(A)</bold> Flow chart diagram of the MCML code presented by wang et al (ref 26). <bold>(B)</bold> Flow chart diagram of the customized version of the MCML code used in this study, modifications and added parts are the one marked in orange.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-11-1120314-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-4">
<title>2.4 Experimental characterization of the probe</title>
<p>The output power at the distal end of the probe was measured periodically to test the stability of the laser source exiting the probe. Then, the radiant exposure was calculated based on the measured mean power, the beam diameter and repetition pulse rate. This was compared to the maximum allowable exposure limit as defined by ICNIRP(32). The spatial and temporal response dictates the spatial and temporal resolution achieved by our probe in a non-turbid medium. A 1951 USAF resolution target (R3L3S1P - Positive 1951 USAF Test Target, Thorlabs, Newton-New jersey, United States) was used to characterize the spatial resolution of the probe by linearly scanning across group -2 and element 3. A homemade script was developed to deconvolve the spatial impulse response function from the measured intensity data and retrieve the full width at half maximum (FWHM). The temporal instrument response function (IRF) was found by measuring the fluorescence lifetime of the laser source exiting the distal end of the probe and being reflected by a mirror. The decay profile was fitted to a Lorentzian function. The linearity and reproducibility of our probe were tested using dilutions of standard fluorescent dyes and liquid tissue simulating phantoms. First, the linearity of the spectral and temporal response as a function of either exposure time or fluorophore concentration simulating tissue simulating phantoms, where the minimum detection limit could be determined. The tissue phantom comprised of a mixture of Intralipid (I141-100ML, Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, United States), China ink, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, United States), and FAD solution (F6224, Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, United States). The concentrations of Intralipid and ink yielded reduced scattering and absorption coefficients of 2&#xa0;mm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> and 1&#xa0;mm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> at the excitation wavelength, respectively. For the first test, the acquisition time varied from 10&#xa0;ms to 1,000&#xa0;ms and 1&#xa0;mM of FAD was added to the phantom. Then the fluorescence intensity was detected across the 500&#x2013;600&#xa0;nm spectral band for the tissue phantom of varying [FAD], where [FAD] ranged from 0 to 30&#xa0;&#xb5;M. These concentrations are within the ranges expected <italic>in vivo</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>]. The fluorescence decay across the same spectral band was fitted to a bi-exponential decay function to extract the short and long lifetimes of FAD as a function of acquisition time and fluorophore concentration. Secondly, the fluorescence lifetime of several fluorescent dyes as a function of concentration and pH was determined and compared to literature. FAD, NADH, fluorescein, and Rhodamine B (RhdB) were diluted in PBS to obtain different concentrations. Drops of NaOH or HCl solutions were added to change the alkalinity/acidity of the dye solution. The effect of temperature was not studied as the system is stationed in the OR at fixed room temperature.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-5">
<title>2.5 <italic>Ex vivo</italic> animal study. Comparison with confocal fluorescence spectral microscopy</title>
<p>After a mouse was euthanized, its liver, lung, and brain were extracted and washed in PBS. All methods are reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines of reporting animal research [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>]; All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and according to the CEE directives for animal experimentation (decree No 2001&#x2013;131; JO 06/02/01). The experimental protocols were approved by CNRS-UMR9012 IJCLab laboratory and have already been applied in another published study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>]. Each organ was placed on a microscope slide and positioned on the translation stage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1C</xref>), experiments were performed on the hole organ without any preliminary cut. The probe was fixed at 1.5&#xa0;mm away from the sample and measurements were acquired in a raster scan manner at 0.4&#xa0;mm intervals. Following the probe measurements, the fresh samples were imaged on a confocal-multiphoton fluorescence microscope (Leica TCS SP8 MP, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). The confocal fluorescence imaging mode was selected with 405&#xa0;nm excitation. The microscope is equipped with highly sensitive hybrid non-descanned detectors and a dedicated Leica software. The spectral acquisition mode was selected to capture spectrally-resolved fluorescence images from 380 to 750&#xa0;nm at 10&#xa0;nm intervals. Using the acquisition software (Leica LAS X) the mean fluorescence spectra from a z-stack at different regions of the sample were obtained. The probe and confocal microscope measurements were also performed after fixing the samples with Formalin. Temporally-resolved fluorescence were acquired by our probe on both fresh and fixed <italic>ex vivo</italic> samples. A bi-exponential decay function was used to fit the fluorescence decay profiles of NADH and FAD, while a mono-exponential decay function was used to fit the lipopigments and porphyrins fluorescence decay curves. In the former case, the amplitude weighted lifetime were determined so that one lifetime is reported for all fluorophores.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-6">
<title>2.6 The effect of Formalin fixation of human brain tissue samples on the spectral and lifetime fluorescence measurements</title>
<p>The cortical brain tissue sample was collected from the Neurosurgery and Neuropathology department at GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neuroscience Hospital upon the approval of the GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neuroscience Hospital&#x2014;University Paris Descartes Review Board (CPP Ile de France 3, S.C.3227). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations of this approval and informed consents were obtained from all patients prior to sample collection. Although only one cortical brain tissue sample from an epileptic patient is collected for this study, the <italic>ex vivo</italic> clinical study approved by the GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neuroscience Hospital&#x2014;University Paris Descartes Review Board allows the measurement of freshly extracted tissue from patients diagnosed with a wide range of brain diseases as long as the patient consents. The biopsy specimen was placed in saline solution prior to the probe and microscope measurements, it has an approximately size of 15&#xa0;mm length, 10&#xa0;mm width and 4&#xa0;mm thickness. Afterwards, the sample was fixed and the same measurements were repeated.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-7">
<title>2.7 The effect of applied pressure on the fluorescence and lifetime measurements</title>
<p>It is well known that the pressure applied to the probe when in contact with tissue <italic>in vivo</italic> directly affects the tissue remission spectra due to changes in vascularity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>]. To test this effect, the probe was first placed barely touching the brain tissue sample (referred to as &#x201c;light&#x201d; in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10</xref>) and a spectrum was acquired. Then the probe was translated vertically downward in steps of 0.2&#xa0;mm until the probe was visibly pushing the tissue surface (referred to as &#x201c;heavy&#x201d;).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>3 Results</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>3.1 Theoretical characterization of the probe</title>
<sec id="s3-1-1">
<title>3.1.1 Spatial distribution of the excited and emitted photons</title>
<p>The distributions of the absorbed and emitted fluorescent photons at the tissue surface are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3A, B</xref>, respectively for &#x3bc;<sub>ax</sub> &#x3d; 10&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> and &#x3bc;<sub>sx</sub> &#x3d; 400&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) was estimated to be 200&#xa0;&#xb5;m for the excited beam at the tissue surface and did not vary when &#x3bc;<sub>ax</sub> varied from 3 to 20&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> and when &#x3bc;<sub>sx</sub> varied from 150 to 400&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. This indicates that the illumination source acts as a point source and is only modestly affected by changes in tissue optical properties at the excitation wavelength. On the other hand, the FWHM of the emitted fluorescence was estimated to vary between 400 and 500&#xa0;&#xb5;m depending on the optical properties at the emission wavelengths. The simulated axial distribution of the fluorescence emission, F(<italic>x</italic> &#x3d; <italic>y</italic> &#x3d; 50&#xa0;mm, <italic>z</italic>), for four pairs of tissue optical properties are plotted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4B</xref>. The fluorescence intensity peaks shown correspond to the intensity at that center <italic>x</italic> &#x3d; <italic>y</italic> &#x3d; 50&#xa0;mm of the 3D Cartesian array. Since the fluorescence photons for the higher absorption coefficients at constant scattering coefficient are more concentrated at the center, the recorded fluorescence photons are higher. On the other hand, the more diffuse the medium, the larger the FWHM and the fewer photons that are detected at the center. The scattering coefficient dictates the depths at which most of the photons originated from (maximum sensitivity). At higher scattering values, the probe is sensitive to superficial layers, while the probe samples a more homogeneous volume at lower scattering coefficients. Both optical properties affect the maximum penetration depth, defined here as the depth at which 80% of the fluorescence originate from. A summary of both parameters is provided in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>. The maximum penetration depth varies from 0.93 to 0.35&#xa0;mm as the total attenuation increases. Therefore, the detected volume varies from 0.59 to 0.24&#xa0;mm<sup>3</sup>, assuming radial symmetry. To test whether the fluorescence emission varied from one collection fibre to another, the emission matrix was rotated by 52.4&#xb0; about the <italic>z</italic>-axis and the emission profiles were compared to that at 0&#xb0;. The fluorescence intensity reaching the detector did not vary with angle.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(A)</bold> Distribution of the excitation photons absorbed specifically by the fluorophore at the tissue surface (lateral dimensions are in mm), <bold>(B)</bold> distribution of the emitted fluorescence photons reaching the detector. The emission map is similar for all five detectors.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-11-1120314-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(A)</bold> The fluorescence intensity as a function of probe to sample distance based on <italic>ex vivo</italic> tissue measurements (blue curve) as well as on MC predictions (black curve). In each case, the fluorescence is normalized to its maximum intensity, which occurs at 1.5&#xa0;mm. <bold>(B)</bold> Simulated Axial distribution (F(z)) of the fluorescent photons for different sets of optical properties (&#x3bc;<sub>ax</sub>, &#x3bc;<sub>sx</sub>).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-11-1120314-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>The depth at which the most number of fluorescent photons originate (mm) and the maximum penetration depth (mm) for different pairs of optical properties.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">&#x3bc;<sub>ax</sub> (cm<sup>-1</sup>) and &#x3bc;<sub>sx</sub> (cm<sup>-</sup>1)</th>
<th align="center">Depth of maximum sensitivity (&#xb5;m)</th>
<th align="center">80% fluorescence collection depth (&#xb5;m)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="center">20 and 400</td>
<td align="center">50</td>
<td align="center">350</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">10 and 400</td>
<td align="center">50</td>
<td align="center">470</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">20 and 200</td>
<td align="center">100</td>
<td align="center">530</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">10 and 200</td>
<td align="center">100</td>
<td align="center">630</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">3 and 100</td>
<td align="center">200</td>
<td align="center">930</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">3 and 200</td>
<td align="center">150</td>
<td align="center">870</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-1-2">
<title>3.1.2 Optimal probe to sample distance based on Monte Carlo predictions and <italic>ex vivo</italic> measurements</title>
<p>The MC code systematically predicts fewer detected photons at distances shorter than 1.5&#xa0;mm, while the opposite trend is seen beyond 1.5&#xa0;mm. Nevertheless, based on both methods, the optimal probe to sample distance is 1.5&#xa0;mm, which corresponds to the distance at which there is maximum overlap between the illumination and collection cones. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref> a show the variation of the detected fluorescence intensity as function of probe to sample distance (measured and simulated). Longer distances result in loss of photons due to the quasi-exponential decay law. Liquid phantom measurements with FAD solutions also resulted in similar conclusions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>3.2 Experimental characterization of the probe</title>
<sec id="s3-2-1">
<title>3.2.1 Stability of the laser source</title>
<p>Since point-to-point measurements of a typical surgical cavity of 3&#xa0;cm by 3&#xa0;cm will take less than 15&#xa0;minutes, the power of the laser source exiting the probe for the duration of 1&#xa0;hour was measured in 10-minute intervals. The laser source has 405&#xa0;nm as emission wavelength and the average laser power was 0.8 &#xb1; 0.0076&#xa0;mW (50% of the power exiting the proximal end of the probe). For the duration of 1&#xa0;hour, the power varied by only 0.9%. The radiant exposure (J/m<sup>2</sup>) emitted by the laser source at the distal end was calculated as 59.2&#xa0;J/m<sup>2</sup> for a one second measurement and for a repetition frequency of 40&#xa0;MHz. This exposure is three orders of magnitude lower than the maximum allowable radiant exposure emitted by a pulsed laser on skin for one second (11&#xa0;J/m<sup>2</sup> x 10<sup>3</sup>&#xa0;J/m<sup>2</sup>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>].</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2-2">
<title>3.2.2 Spatial and temporal impulse response</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5A</xref> shows the beam profile obtained after linearly scanning the probe across group -2 and element 3 of the USAF resolution target, while <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5B</xref> shows the recovered impulse response. The spatial resolution in a non-turbid medium was found to be 153.06&#xa0;&#xb5;m. The temporal impulse Response Function (IRF) of the probe system, which corresponds to the time that separate the sending of a laser pulse by the laser source and its detection back by the detector, was measured. For that, a mirror was placed under the probe and the fluorescence lifetime decay profile of the reflected laser beam was recorded fitted to a Lorentzian function. This yielded the IRF and the temporal resolution of 29 and 34.6&#xa0;ps, respectively. The IRF and temporal resolution also matches the manufacturer&#x2019;s laser evaluations at the end of the laser without propagating through the fibre-optic probe, hence the probe itself did not cause temporal broadening.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(A)</bold> Reflected signal detected by raster scanning group -2 and element 3 of the USAF target (orange curve) considered as the image of the target (yellow curve) and the fitted curve of the reflected signal (Blue curve). <bold>(B)</bold> Spatial impulse response of the light exiting from our probe as obtained by raster scanning group -2 and element 3 (bar width of 1.58&#xa0;mm). The deconvolution program retrieves a spatial resolution of 153 &#xb1; 65&#xa0;&#xb5;m.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-11-1120314-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2-3">
<title>3.2.3 Spectral and temporal response as a function of exposure time and fluorophore concentration</title>
<p>The fluorescence intensity increases linearly with acquisition time and fluorophore concentration, as expected (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figures 6A, C</xref>). The linearity is best when measurements are acquired for more than 40&#xa0;ms and when the concentration of the standard FAD solution, used in this experiment, is at least 4&#xa0;&#xb5;M. FAD is the main source of fluorescence in the spectral range of 500&#x2013;600&#xa0;nm for the tissue simulating phantoms, however, Intralipid is also a contributor, with a fluorescence peak at 500&#xa0;nm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>]. Intralipid fluorescence is therefore the reason for the non-zero signal at [FAD] &#x3d; 0 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6C</xref>). In fact, the fluorescence lifetime of the tissue phantom with no FAD shows a significantly lower long lifetime value (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05) than those phantoms with FAD, as we can notice in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6D</xref> which represents the variation of FAD fluorescence lifetime with its concentration ([FAD]). In any case, the fluorescence lifetime measurements indicate that indeed they are independent of the fluorophore concentrations commonly present in tissue [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>], and also independent of acquisition time as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6B</xref> which represent the variation of the FAD fluorescence lifetime with the acquisition time. As for testing the accuracy of our probe to reproduce the lifetime characteristics of common fluorescent dyes, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Tables 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref> summarize the mean lifetime values obtained with direct comparison to the values published in literature (in parenthesis).</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(A)</bold> Raw fluorescence intensity as a function of acquisition time from a tissue phantom with FAD added as the fluorophore, <bold>(B)</bold> the fluorescence lifetime of FAD as a function of acquisition time, <bold>(C)</bold> the raw fluorescence intensity as a function of fluorophore concentration in the tissue phantom, and <bold>(D)</bold> FAD fluorescence lifetime as a function of [FAD].</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-11-1120314-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Fluorescence lifetime values as a function of fluorophore concentrations.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">
<bold>Concentration (M)</bold>
</th>
<th align="center">
<bold>10<sup>&#x2212;3</sup>
</bold>
</th>
<th align="center">
<bold>10<sup>&#x2212;4</sup>
</bold>
</th>
<th align="center">
<bold>10<sup>&#x2212;5</sup>
</bold>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Rhd B (ns)</td>
<td align="center">1.61 &#xb1; 0.03 (1.49 &#xb1; 0.04)</td>
<td align="center">1.84 &#xb1; 0.10 (1.72 &#xb1; 0.04)</td>
<td align="center">1.78 &#xb1; 0.08 (1.79 &#xb1; 0.2)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Fluorescein (ns)</td>
<td align="center">3.75 &#xb1; 0.04 (3.6 &#xb1; 0.1)</td>
<td align="center">3.75 &#xb1; 0.09 (3.6 &#xb1; 0.1)</td>
<td align="center">3.70 &#xb1; 0.02 (3.6 &#xb1; 0.1)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>Concentration (M)</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>10</bold>
<sup>
<bold>&#x2212;</bold>
</sup>
<bold>
<sup>4</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>10</bold>
<sup>
<bold>&#x2212;</bold>
</sup>
<bold>
<sup>5</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>10</bold>
<sup>
<bold>&#x2212;</bold>
</sup>
<bold>
<sup>6</sup>
</bold>
</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">FAD (ns)<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="center">4.83 &#xb1; 0.3</td>
<td align="center">3.24 &#xb1; 0.2</td>
<td align="center">3.22 &#xb1; 0.3</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>Concentration (M)</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>2.5 &#xd7; 10</bold>
<sup>
<bold>&#x2212;4</bold>
</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>1.25 &#xd7; 10</bold>
<sup>
<bold>&#x2212;4</bold>
</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>0.25 &#xd7; 10</bold>
<sup>
<bold>&#x2212;4</bold>
</sup>
</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">NADH (ns)<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn2">
<sup>b</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="center">0.51 &#xb1; 0.03 (0.58)</td>
<td align="center">0.54 &#xb1; 0.08 (0.58)</td>
<td align="center">0.52 &#xb1; 0.06 (0.58)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Literature values and corresponding errors are in parentheses.</p>
</fn>
<fn id="Tfn1">
<label>
<sup>a</sup>
</label>
<p>Literature values with below concentrations of FAD dissolved in PBS were not found.</p>
</fn>
<fn id="Tfn2">
<label>
<sup>b</sup>
</label>
<p>No standard error was reported in(39) for the reported free NADH lifetime.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Fluorescence lifetime values as a function of pH.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">pH</th>
<th align="center">5&#x2013;6</th>
<th align="center">8</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Rhd B (ns) (Lit)</td>
<td align="center">1.85 (1.8)</td>
<td align="center">1.86 (1.7)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Fluorescein (ns)</td>
<td align="center">3.75 (3.6)</td>
<td align="center">3.86 (4.2)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Literature values are in parentheses.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The recovered lifetime values are similar to the published values [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>]. The error associated to each lifetime obtained experimentally corresponds to the standard deviation in the lifetime value from three measurements at different time points. The errors in parentheses are the errors reported in literature except for (free) NADH, which was not reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>]. Lifetime values of FAD dissolved in PBS at the given concentrations were not found in literature so that a comparison was not possible, although an average value of 2.99&#xa0;ns was reported by Nakabayashi et al. for [FAD] &#x3d; 10<sup>&#x2212;4</sup>&#xa0;M in a mixture of alcohol and water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>]. The fluorescence lifetime of fluorescein is invariant to fluorophore concentration and pH (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Tables 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>), while RhdB and FAD dyes produced two different values. At low concentrations (&#x2264;10<sup>&#x2212;4</sup>), RhdB resulted in higher lifetime values compared to when the dye solution was further concentrated (&#x2265;10<sup>&#x2212;5</sup>), while the opposite behavior is found in FAD solutions. Similar to fluorescein, the acidity/alkalinity of RhdB solution did not affect the recovered fluorescence lifetime.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>3.3 <italic>Ex vivo</italic> animal study</title>
<p>The fluorescence spectra from fresh rodent organs acquired by our probe and shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7A, B</xref> reproduce the spectral characteristics of the endogenous fluorophores pertaining to both the liver and brain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>]. Both in the liver and brain, NADH, FAD, phospholipids/lipopigments and porphyrins are the main endogenous fluorophores. The confocal fluorescence spectra fail to reproduce the lipopigments and porphyrins peak due to the 650&#xa0;nm long pass filter added to separate the excitation from the emission signal in the case of two-photon excitation. Additionally, the 405&#xa0;nm peak in all the spectra acquired from the confocal microscope benchtop system as well as the heightened fluorescence intensity in the 405&#x2013;450&#xa0;nm range is a result of the excitation light bleed-through. On the other hand, the fluorescence spectra from fixed tissue, shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7C, D</xref>, show better correspondence between the two techniques as tissue fixation significantly attenuates the contribution of lipopigments and porphyrins, while almost preserving NADH and FAD fluorescence. The fluorescence intensities were scaled for optimal comparison between the two modalities. In all cases, our probe significantly detects more photons than the confocal microscope in 1/10 of the time. A direct comparison between the normalized autofluorescence spectra from fresh and fixed tissue as measured by our probe under the same integration time is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figures 8A, B</xref>. In all cases, the overall fluorescence intensity is enhanced after tissue fixation. In the fresh <italic>ex vivo</italic> cohort, the fluorescence spectra are distinct for each organ, including slight differences in the location of the fluorescent peaks, while in the fixed tissue study, all three organs show similar emission profiles. <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref> summarize the fluorescence lifetime values for the five endogenous fluorophores from fresh and fixed animal tissue respectively. Overall, the lifetime values for each fluorophore from the fixed samples were significantly longer (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05), except for porphyrin I in the lung sample (<italic>p</italic> &#x3e; 0.05).</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Autofluorescence spectra from fresh <bold>(A)</bold> Mouse liver and <bold>(B)</bold> Brain tissue obtained with our probe and the confocal microscope benchtop system. The corresponding autofluorescence spectra from fixed <bold>(C)</bold> Liver and <bold>(D)</bold> Brain tissue. The fluorescence intensities are scaled for better visualization.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-11-1120314-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Autofluorescence spectra obtained by our probe from fresh <bold>(A)</bold> and fixed <bold>(B)</bold> mouse tissue.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-11-1120314-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Average amplitude weighted fluorescence lifetimes (ns) from fresh and fixed brain, liver and lung mouse tissue.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left"/>
<th align="center">NADH</th>
<th align="center">FAD</th>
<th align="center">Lipofuscin/Lipopigments</th>
<th align="center">PI</th>
<th align="center">PII</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Fresh Brain</td>
<td align="center">1.69 &#xb1; 0.62</td>
<td align="center">2.07 &#xb1; 0.73</td>
<td align="center">2.31 &#xb1; 0.20</td>
<td align="center">2.23 &#xb1; 0.45</td>
<td align="center">1.72 &#xb1; 0.33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Fresh Liver</td>
<td align="center">1.95 &#xb1; 0.48</td>
<td align="center">1.74 &#xb1; 0.16</td>
<td align="center">2.19 &#xb1; 0.21</td>
<td align="center">2.22 &#xb1; 0.22</td>
<td align="center">2.32 &#xb1; 0.08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Fresh Lung</td>
<td align="center">1.27 &#xb1; 0.18</td>
<td align="center">2.69 &#xb1; 0.26</td>
<td align="center">2.94 &#xb1; 0.46</td>
<td align="center">3.01 &#xb1; 0.32</td>
<td align="center">2.70 &#xb1; 0.11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#xa0;</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Fixed Brain</td>
<td align="center">2.94 &#xb1; 0.13</td>
<td align="center">3.19 &#xb1; 0.16</td>
<td align="center">3.21 &#xb1; 0.067</td>
<td align="center">3.04 &#xb1; 0.13</td>
<td align="center">2.81 &#xb1; 0.53</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Fixed Liver</td>
<td align="center">2.89 &#xb1; 0.22</td>
<td align="center">3.11 &#xb1; 0.17</td>
<td align="center">3.12 &#xb1; 0.12</td>
<td align="center">2.90 &#xb1; 0.21</td>
<td align="center">3.08 &#xb1; 0.22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Fixed Lung</td>
<td align="center">2.18 &#xb1; 0.39</td>
<td align="center">2.70 &#xb1; 0.17</td>
<td align="center">3.07 &#xb1; 0.063</td>
<td align="center">2.70 &#xb1; 0.19</td>
<td align="center">1.96 &#xb1; 0.092</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>PI, Porphyrin I; PII, Porphyrin II.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4">
<title>3.4 <italic>Ex vivo</italic> human cortical tissue</title>
<p>As deduced from the mouse data, the fibred-optic probe is spectrally sensitive and specific enough to characterize the fluorescence peaks of the five endogenous fluorophores. This is not possible with the spectral detection of the confocal microscope (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9A</xref>). Following tissue fixation, the autofluorescence spectrum obtained by our probe degenerates to have a similar spectral shape detected by the confocal microscope platform (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9B</xref>). There is a systemic decrease in the relative contributions of porphyrins after tissue fixation. Although the spectra in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9A</xref> infer that the signals detected by confocal microscope are higher, this is not the case. Rather the spectra are only scaled as such for better visualization. Also similar to the <italic>ex vivo</italic> mouse results, fixation does enhance the overall autofluorescence signal. There is no significant difference in the recovered mean lifetime values of NADH, FAD and lipopigments between the fresh and fixed brain tissue samples as the values shows in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Table 5</xref>, while porphyrin II in the fixed samples had significantly higher values than their fresh counterparts (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05), mirroring the enhanced quenching under its fluorescence peak seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9B</xref>.</p>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 9</label>
<caption>
<p>Autofluorescence spectra obtained with the optical probe and the confocal fluorescence microscope from fresh <bold>(A)</bold> and fixed <bold>(B)</bold> human cortical tissue.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-11-1120314-g009.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T5" position="float">
<label>TABLE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>The amplitude weighted fluorescence lifetime (ns) extracted from fresh and fixed human cortical tissue.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left"/>
<th align="center">NADH</th>
<th align="center">FAD</th>
<th align="center">Lipopigments</th>
<th align="center">PI</th>
<th align="center">PII</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Fresh cortical tissue</td>
<td align="center">2.45 &#xb1; 0.53</td>
<td align="center">2.18 &#xb1; 0.21</td>
<td align="center">2.57 &#xb1; 0.33</td>
<td align="center">2.25 &#xb1; 0.29</td>
<td align="center">1.78 &#xb1; 0.49</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Fixed cortical tissue</td>
<td align="center">2.50 &#xb1; 0.20</td>
<td align="center">2.64 &#xb1; 0.13</td>
<td align="center">2.73 &#xb1; 0.075</td>
<td align="center">2.69 &#xb1; 0.056</td>
<td align="center">2.46 &#xb1; 0.13</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>PI, Porphyrin I; PII, Porphyrin II.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-5">
<title>3.5 The effect of pressure applied to the probe on the autofluorescence spectrum</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10A</xref> illustrates how applying pressure to the probe when in contact with tissue can readily affect the fluorescence spectrum. Heavy and medium-heavy exerted pressures resulted in higher autofluorescence signals as a result of squeezing out blood from the measured site. After spectral fitting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>], the integrated area under each fluorophore was determined for each pressure condition. The relative standard deviations in the calculated areas for the four pressure conditions are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">Table 6</xref>. The integrated fluorescence under both porphyrins I and II and NADH are the most sensitive to pressure changes (22%&#x2013;29%), while the integrated fluorescence under the lipopigments (7.8%) changed the least. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10B</xref> is the result of normalizing each fluorescence spectrum to the 520&#xa0;nm peak. All four fluorescence become nearly identical. This is also true after normalizing to the 440 and 580&#xa0;nm peaks, which coincide with oxy- and deoxy-haemoglobin&#x2019;s isosbestic peaks. The difference in the integrated areas under each emission curve after applying the normalization scheme reduces the standard deviations to less than 12% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">Table 6</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F10" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 10</label>
<caption>
<p>Autofluorescence spectra obtained by our probe from <bold>(A)</bold> Fresh and <bold>(B)</bold> Fixed mouse tissue with different power of applied pressure from the probe on the sample.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphy-11-1120314-g010.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T6" position="float">
<label>TABLE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>The relative standard deviation (%) of the integrated area under the Gaussian curve for each fluorophore retrieved at the four pressure condFitions with and without normalizing each spectrum to its intensity at 520&#xa0;nm.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left"/>
<th align="center">NADH</th>
<th align="center">FAD</th>
<th align="center">Lipopigments</th>
<th align="center">PI</th>
<th align="center">PII</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">With Normalization (%)</td>
<td align="center">26</td>
<td align="center">19</td>
<td align="center">7.84</td>
<td align="center">29</td>
<td align="center">22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Without Normalization (%)</td>
<td align="center">9.3</td>
<td align="center">0.69</td>
<td align="center">12.3</td>
<td align="center">5.5</td>
<td align="center">2.0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>PI, Porphyrin I; PII, Porphyrin II.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>4 Discussion</title>
<p>You may typeset. The probe that is presented in this work is a multi-fibred optic probe specifically designed to be utilized for brain tissue classification during neurosurgery for a wide range of diagnosis including epilepsy, meningioma, and glioma. Two main biophysical properties are measured that are expected to vary with tissue type and pathology, the fluorescence spectra from five endogenous molecules as well as their fluorescence lifetime [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>]. Since the geometry and physical properties of the collection and illumination fibres directly impacts the extent of tissue being optically sampled and the collection efficiency [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>], it is imperative to fully characterize the fibred-optic probe, which is intendent for <italic>in vivo</italic> diagnosis. This was accomplished by MC simulations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>) and by experiments with tissue simulating phantoms (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Tables 1</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>). The modelled behavior of fluorophore absorption and fluorescence emission area at the tissue surface (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>) is similar to the absorption and emission maps obtained for fibres of similar geometry, fibre diameter size, and illumination-collection fibre separation distance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>]. The diameter of the collection fibre in our probe is modestly larger than those typically reported (360&#xa0;&#xb5;m vs. 200&#xa0;&#xb5;m) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>], which results in higher collection efficiency and mean path lengths, but does not significantly increase the probing depth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>]. The asymmetric intensity profile as a function of probe to sample distance (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4A</xref>) was also described in the bifurcated probes designed by Papaioannou et al and by Pfefer et al [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>]. The optimal probe to sample distance was found at larger distances for larger source-collection separation distances so that maximum overlap between the illumination and collection cones is achieved. This was found to be 1.5&#xa0;mm for our probe. The deviations observed between the simulated intensity profile and the measured intensities (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4A</xref>) depend on the probe to sample distance. At distances shorter than 1.5&#xa0;mm, the simulated data are underestimated due to the low probability in fluorescence detection, where only laterally scattered light reaches the detector. At distances beyond 1.5&#xa0;mm, the overlap between the illumination and collection cones decreases more rapidly than predicted by MC as the model does not account for the direction at which the fibres are beveled. Based on the above observation, one can deduce that the fibres are beveled away from each other so that the intersection between the illumination and detection areas decreases faster than if the fibres were beveled toward each other at the same angle (11&#xb0;). At a fixed probe to sample distance (1.5&#xa0;mm), tissue optical properties affect the depth at which fluorescent photons originate from, where the fluorescence signal is more surface weighted for higher &#x3bc;<sub>a</sub> and &#x3bc;<sub>s</sub> values as determined here. The higher scattering values used explains the shorter depths than those reported in similar studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>]. Nevertheless, the 600&#xa0;&#xb5;m separation distance between the source and collection fibre ensures relatively homogenous sampling with depth. The range of optical properties selected for MC and tissue phantom measurements aimed at modelling a wide range of optical properties as observed <italic>in vivo</italic> in brain tissue [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>]. The angular orientation of the detection fibre does not affect the sample volume as shown by rotating the emission matrices, therefore adding the emission maps from all five detectors does not affect the optically interrogated volume. This is because the illumination angle is maintained perpendicular to the sample and the separation distance and angle between the source and collection fibres is fixed and therefore the final emission is the summation of the photons collected by the five detectors.</p>
<p>The spatial and temporal impulse response of the probe in a non-turbid medium defines the spatial and temporal resolution. These were found to be 150&#xa0;&#xb5;m and 35&#xa0;ps, respectively. It is important to note that the fluorescence lifetime of the five endogenous molecules of interest have their lifetimes in the nanosecond range and thus the temporal resolution is more than sufficient for <italic>in vivo</italic> measurements. Additionally, the nanosecond lifetimes ensure that the temporally-resolved fluorescence measurements interrogate the same tissue volumes as the steady-state intensity measurements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>], which is the main confounding factor in imaging devices with multimodal abilities. A recent study showed that reconstructing an optical coherence tomography (OCT) based image from a three dimensional image to a two dimensional &#x201c;<italic>en face</italic>&#x201d; OCT map, enables one to extract structural contrast within the same tissue area interrogated by a scanning fibre-optic probe acquiring the autofluorescence spectrum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>]. The steady-state MC simulations predicted the spatial extent of the incoming beam at the tissue surface to be &#x223c;200&#xa0;&#x3bc;m, close to the measured spatial impulse response of 150&#xa0;&#xb5;m. 200&#xa0;&#xb5;m corresponds to the size of the illumination fibre indicating minimal diffusion induced divergence of the excitation light, since the excitation photons are readily absorbed. The MC simulations were limited to modelling one fluorophore that was homogenously distributed throughout a semi-infinite turbid medium with homogenous optical properties at the excitation wavelength. For the fluorescence emission simulations, wavelength-dependent &#xb5;<sub>am</sub>, &#xb5;<sub>sm</sub>, and the extinction coefficient of FAD were included. A recent tetrahedral mesh-based MC program developed by Lilge et al. can incorporate different optical properties and tissue geometries to model white and grey matter as well as tumor inclusions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">46</xref>]. Since the purpose of the MC simulations was to calculate the interrogated tissue volume, the optimal probe to sample distance, and the depths of maximum sensitivity, the assumptions in the modified mcml code were sufficient. Detailed validation of the modified code with multi-layered fluorescence inclusion measurements as well as comparison to the conventional MCML code has been studied previously [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>].</p>
<p>The minimum detection limit of 4&#xa0;&#xb5;M is only a magnitude lower than the [FAD] concentrations expected <italic>in vivo</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>], however this limit was obtained for an acquisition time of 40&#xa0;ms (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>). Increasing the acquisition time to 400&#xa0;ms is possible without causing practical delays or photobleaching. The detection limits at the other emission bands were not characterized here as their concentrations found in brain tissue are not reported in the literature, although the [NADH] is expected to be in the mM range [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>]. For <italic>ex vivo</italic> measurements of biopsied brain tissue, an acquisition time of 500&#xa0;ms is typically used to ensure high signal to noise ratios in both the spectral and temporal measurements. The accuracy of recovering the fluorescence lifetime of several fluorescent dyes was tested as a function of fluorophore concentration (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>) and pH (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). The lifetime values for each dye is consistent with those found in literature for the given concentrations and dilution solutions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">47</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">49</xref>]. The reproducibility can be estimated based on the standard deviations obtained after repeating the measurement three times. This varied between 2% and 6%. The dichotomic behaviour of RhdB as a function of concentration has also been observed elsewhere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">48</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">49</xref>]. At RhdB dye concentrations lower than 10<sup>&#x2212;4</sup>&#xa0;M, its fluorescence lifetime was longer (1.98&#x2013;2.24&#xa0;ns) that its value at higher dye concentrations (1.56&#x2013;1.68&#xa0;ns) due to static quenching [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">48</xref>]. The opposite trend is observed for FAD, where higher FAD concentrations (&#x2265;10<sup>&#x2212;4</sup>) resulted in longer lifetime values due to the dynamic intramolecular electron transfer between the photoexcited isoalloxazine moiety and the adenine moiety of FAD, which in turn depends on the dielectricity and viscosity of the surrounding environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>]. The longer lifetime at the high concentration is closer to the lifetime of flavin mononucleotide (467&#xa0;ns) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">50</xref>], while lifetime values for FAD for the lower concentrations are not found in literature even though they are closer to the concentrations observed <italic>in vivo</italic>. Moreover, the probe measurements also recapitulated the independence of the fluorescence lifetimes on pH for fluorescein and RhdB, as also observed in other studies, indicating that these dyes are not sensitive markers of pH [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">47</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">49</xref>].</p>
<p>In the <italic>ex vivo</italic> rodent and human study, steady-state and lifetime measurements were conducted on fresh and fixed tissue samples to understand the changes in the biophysical properties that occur due to tissue fixation. This is critical so that optical measurements performed on fixed tissue can at least be correctly extrapolated to what is expected <italic>in vivo</italic> when needed. Fixed tissue analysis is more practical and is more useful when correlating or comparing to findings from histopathology. An interesting finding here was that keeping the sample &#x201c;fresh&#x201d; is not necessary for conventional confocal fluorescence microscopy as the spectral specificity is inherently lost by the limited spectral resolution of the microscope itself. In fact, tissue fixation is preferred as the fluorescence is enhanced (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figures 5D</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6B</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7B</xref>), particularly that from NADH and FAD. The relative contribution of porphyrins I and II are significantly reduced. Another explanation of the difference in the spectral shape obtained by our probe and the confocal microscope is that in the latter case, the excited and emitted light is minimally distorted by tissue optical properties as scattered photons are not detected and hence do not modulate the fluorescence spectral shapes. After tissue fixation, the spectral shapes acquired from our probe and microscopy are similar. Since Formalin fixation reduces haemoglobin absorption [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">51</xref>], the fluorescence intensities under the oxy- and deoxy-haemoglobin peaks (440, 555, and 580&#xa0;nm) are enhanced. These correspond to NADH, FAD and lipopigments. Another result due to haemoglobin changes is that the concentration and distribution of porphyrins are altered [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">51</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">52</xref>], hence their relative contributions to the overall spectra are different from those found in fresh samples. Quenching of the fluorescence of porphyrins following Formalin fixation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figures 6B</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7B</xref>) could have also resulted in such changes. Interestingly, although the spectral shapes for each fresh tissue type (brain, liver, and lung) are unique, the lifetime values in the rodent study for each fluorophore is relatively constant as they are independent of tissue optical properties and fluorophore concentration. In all three tissue types, although less for the lung sample, the fluorescence lifetime is systemically longer for each fluorophore upon tissue fixation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref>), which was also found recently with FLIM of brain tissue samples [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">53</xref>]. The interaction of each fluorophore with Formalin changes its protein-binding affinity, directly affecting the average lifetime. On the other hand, the amplitude weighted mean lifetimes of all five fluorophores, except porphyrin II, recovered from fresh human cortical tissue did not differ significantly after tissue fixation (<italic>p</italic> &#x3e; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Table 5</xref>). However, when comparing the free and bound lifetime values of FAD and NADH, it was found that the lifetime values of free NADH (&#x3c4;1) and bound FAD (&#x3c4;1) were higher upon tissue fixation. Similar findings were reported by Wang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>], when cultured Hela cells were Formalin fixed. The authors also found that changes in the fluorescence lifetime of NADH and FAD depended on the time of measurement post-fixation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>]. Specifically, the lifetime of NADH increased sharply (33%) following fixation and remained constant for 14&#xa0;days. FAD increased steadily right after tissue fixation, but then jumped after day 11. Lifetime measurements were not conducted after day 14. In the present study, the fixed human brain samples were measured one-month post-fixation, while the animal tissue samples were measured 6&#xa0;days post-fixation. Therefore, the time of measurement after fixation may explain the differences observed. Nevertheless, the lifetime values obtained <italic>ex vivo</italic> do mirror the values reported <italic>in vivo</italic> for FAD and NADH, which varies from 2.3 to 2.9&#xa0;ns for free FAD and 2&#x2013;2.3&#xa0;ns for bound NADH [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>]. Additionally the lifetime values reported <italic>ex vivo</italic> on fresh cortical brain tissue for all five fluorophores are within the ranges reported previously by our group using a dual fibre-based fluorescence setup that was stationed adjacent to the OR [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>]. With that setup as well, fixed tissue samples had generally longer lifetime values [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">53</xref>]. These comparisons further demonstrate the accuracy of the lifetime measurements acquired by our probe on the one hand, and the different fluorescence response as a function of tissue type and tissue status on the other.</p>
<p>Finally, the pressure study highlighted the importance of maintaining a relatively constant pressure applied to the probe when in contact to tissue. Although the autofluorescence spectra did not vary significantly between light pressure and medium pressure or between the two heavier ones (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10A</xref>), as also seen in other studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>], the pressure threshold to cause a difference in the intensity was not quantified. In any case, when comparing with other reported studies, it is evident that the effect of probe pressure is tissue site and probe specific. The diffuse reflectance acquired <italic>in vivo</italic> by a single fibre diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, showed that increased pressure reduces &#xb5;<sub>a</sub> and increases &#xb5;&#x27;<sub>s</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>]. The reduced absorption is a result of reduced total haemoglobin content, vessel diameter and oxygenation level as pressure expels blood cells within the interrogated area and constrains the supply of incoming oxygen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>]. Another study involved testing the effect pressure applied on a clinical probe in contact with the cervix for cervical cancer screening [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>]. The authors concluded that the autofluorescence spectral shapes remained unchanged with applied pressure. To correct for intensities differences, each spectrum was normalized to its peak intensity (&#x223c;380&#xa0;nm). Pressure-induced signal changes did not affect the accuracy in identifying the different pathologies investigated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>]. A similar finding to Nath et al., was demonstrated here (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figures 10A, B</xref>). Light and medium contact did not significantly alter the fluorescence signals, however there is a significant difference between strong and light contact, which is systemic across the spectral range of interest. This observation motivated the choice of normalizing each spectrum by the 520&#xa0;nm peak. This peak is one of haemoglobin&#x2019;s isobestic wavelengths, where oxy- and deoxy-haemoglobin is equally affected and hence the normalization step accounts for total haemoglobin concentration changes. This decrease as well as an increase in the scattering parameters result in higher fluorescence signals. However, since applying pressure causes more oxygenated blood to become de-oxygenated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>], the total absorption coefficient is lower in magnitude at wavelengths beyond 600&#xa0;nm. This explains the slightly higher porphyrin I fluorescence peak obtained from the heavy pressure measurement despite the normalization scheme (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10B</xref>). The slight increase in the standard deviations pertaining to Lipopigments after normalization indicates that the normalization scheme overcorrects the fluorescence intensities since the fluorescence was least altered as lipopigments are not involved in cell respiration or blood flow. One additional important factor affecting probe pressure studies was found to be the duration of measurement, i.e. the duration the probe is in contact with tissue [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>]. Minimal effects on the optically-derived physiological parameters, including [NADH], [haemoglobin], and oxygenation saturation levels, are seen for acquisition times shorter than 2&#xa0;seconds, while significant changes were found for longer contact times [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>]. The probe measurements do not take more than 1&#xa0;s per site. These results show that the probe measurements can be conducted for <italic>in situ</italic> tissue diagnosis without being concerned about the interfering factor of pressure variation.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s5">
<title>5 Conclusion</title>
<p>Overall, this paper aims to characterize a bimodal label-free fibred probe targeted for tissue characterization during brain tumor surgery. The complementary information extracted by spectrally- and temporally-resolved fluorescence has been utilized by other groups [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">54</xref>], but the unique advantage of our custom-made optical probe is its practicality and ability to extract several physiologically relevant quantitative markers in near real-time. As a pilot validation study, our probe is now stationed adjacent to the OR so that the <italic>ex vivo</italic> measurements closely mimic the <italic>in vivo</italic> scenario.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s6">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because of patient confidentiality as part of these data were acquired from human patient samples following the approval of the GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neuroscience Hospital&#x2014;University Paris Descartes Review Board (CPP Ile de France 3, S.C.3227). Requests to access the datasets should be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the approval of the GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neuroscience Hospital&#x2014;University Paris Descartes Review Board (CPP Ile de France 3, S.C.3227). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. The animal study was reviewed and approved by the CNRS-UMR9012 IJCLab according to the CEE directives for animal experimentation (decree No 2001-131; JO 06/02/01).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>MS collected, analysed the data and worked on the writing of the manuscript. HM participate to the manuscript writing. BD directed the clinical study at GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neuroscience Hospital, his former affiliation, provided samples and participated in the manuscript writing. DAH designed the research project, the protocols for experiments, designed the probe and developed it, supervised the work and participated in the manuscript writing. Equally important, DAH performed measurements. All authors reviewed the manuscript and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work is financially supported by ITMO Cancer AVIESAN (Alliance Nationale pour les Sciences de la Vie et de la Sant&#xe9;, National Alliance for Life Sciences and Health) within the framework of the Cancer Plan for MEVO and IMOP projects, by CNRS with &#x201c;D&#xe9;fi instrumental&#x201d; grant, by ligue nationale contre le cancer (LNCC), by CNRS innovation, by the P2IO LabEx and the Institut National de Physique Nucl&#xe9;aire et de Physique des Particules (IN2P3). Part of this work was done at the PIMPA Platform (The confocal-mutlitphoton fluorescence microscope platform) partly funded by the French program &#x201c;Investissement d&#x2019;Avenir&#x201d; run by the &#x201c;Agence Nationale pour la Recherche&#x201d; (grant &#x201c;Infrastructure d&#x2019;avenir en Biologie Sant&#xe9;&#x2014;ANR&#x2014;11-INBS-0006&#x201d;).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s10">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s11">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tuchin</surname>
<given-names>VV</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Tissue optics and Photonics: Biological tissue structures</article-title>. <source>J Biomed Photon Eng</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>1</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>3</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>21</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18287/jbpe-2015-1-1-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Laughney</surname>
<given-names>AM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Krishnaswamy</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rizzo</surname>
<given-names>EJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schwab</surname>
<given-names>MC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barth</surname>
<given-names>RJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pogue</surname>
<given-names>BW</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Scatter spectroscopic imaging distinguishes between breast pathologies in tissues relevant to surgical margin assessment</article-title>. <source>Clin Cancer Res</source> (<year>2012</year>) <volume>18</volume>(<issue>22</issue>):<fpage>6315</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>25</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-12-0136</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khurana</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moriyama</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilson</surname>
<given-names>BC</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Quantification of <italic>in vivo</italic> fluorescence decoupled from the effects of tissue optical properties using fiber-optic spectroscopy measurements</article-title>. <source>J Biomed Opt</source> (<year>2010</year>) <volume>15</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<fpage>067006</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1117/1.3523616</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Valdes P</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leblond F</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jacobs</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paulsen K</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roberts</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>
<italic>In vivo</italic> fluorescence detection in surgery: A review of principles, methods, and clinical applications</article-title>. <source>Curr Med Imaging Rev</source> (<year>2012</year>) <volume>8</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>211</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>32</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jermyn</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Desroches</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aubertin</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>St-Arnaud</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Madore</surname>
<given-names>WJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>De Montigny</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>A review of Raman spectroscopy advances with an emphasis on clinical translation challenges in oncology</article-title>. <source>Phys Med Biol</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>61</volume>(<issue>23</issue>):<fpage>R370</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>400</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/0031-9155/61/23/r370</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6.</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Anand</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cicchi</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Giordano</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Conti</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buccoliero</surname>
<given-names>AM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guerrini</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Fiber-probe optical spectroscopy discriminates normal brain from focal cortical dysplasia in pediatric subjects</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Madsen</surname>
<given-names>SJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>VXD</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, editors. <source>Proceedings of the SPIE</source>. <publisher-loc>San Francisco, California, United States</publisher-loc> (<year>2017</year>). p. <fpage>1005005</fpage>. <comment>[cited 2022 Nov 2]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1117/12.2250265</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Butte</surname>
<given-names>PV</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mamelak</surname>
<given-names>AN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nuno</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bannykh</surname>
<given-names>SI</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Black</surname>
<given-names>KL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marcu</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Fluorescence lifetime spectroscopy for guided therapy of brain tumors</article-title>. <source>NeuroImage</source> (<year>2011</year>) <volume>54</volume>:<fpage>S125</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>35</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Saager</surname>
<given-names>RB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rowland</surname>
<given-names>RA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baldado</surname>
<given-names>ML</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kennedy</surname>
<given-names>GT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bernal</surname>
<given-names>NP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ponticorvo</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Impact of hemoglobin breakdown products in the spectral analysis of burn wounds using spatial frequency domain spectroscopy</article-title>. <source>J Biomed Opt</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>24</volume>(<issue>02</issue>):<fpage>1</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1117/1.jbo.24.2.020501</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pomerleau-Dalcourt</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lilge</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Development and characterization of multi-sensory fluence rate probes</article-title>. <source>Phys Med Biol</source> (<year>2006</year>) <volume>51</volume>(<issue>7</issue>):<fpage>1929</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>40</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/0031-9155/51/7/021</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nazeer</surname>
<given-names>SS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saraswathy</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shenoy</surname>
<given-names>SJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jayasree</surname>
<given-names>RS</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Fluorescence spectroscopy as an efficient tool for staging the degree of liver fibrosis: An <italic>in vivo</italic> comparison with MRI</article-title>. <source>Scientific Rep</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>8</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>10967</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-018-29370-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rath</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tontini</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vieth</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>N&#xe4;gel</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Neurath</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Neumann</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>
<italic>In vivo</italic> real-time assessment of colorectal polyp histology using an optical biopsy forceps system based on laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopy</article-title>. <source>Endoscopy</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>48</volume>(<issue>06</issue>):<fpage>557</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>62</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1055/s-0042-102251</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Spliethoff</surname>
<given-names>JW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prevoo</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meier</surname>
<given-names>MAJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Jong</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klomp</surname>
<given-names>HM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Evers</surname>
<given-names>DJ</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Real-time <italic>in vivo</italic> tissue characterization with diffuse reflectance spectroscopy during transthoracic lung biopsy: A clinical feasibility study</article-title>. <source>Clin Cancer Res</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>22</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>357</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>65</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-0807</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Marcu</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Fluorescence lifetime techniques in medical applications</article-title>. <source>Ann Biomed Eng</source> (<year>2012</year>) <volume>40</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>304</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>31</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10439-011-0495-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Butte</surname>
<given-names>PV</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fang</surname>
<given-names>Q</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jo</surname>
<given-names>JA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yong</surname>
<given-names>WH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pikul</surname>
<given-names>BK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Black</surname>
<given-names>KL</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Intraoperative delineation of primary brain tumors using time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy</article-title>. <source>J Biomed Opt</source> (<year>2010</year>) <volume>15</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>027008</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1117/1.3374049</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marple</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reichenberg</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tunnell</surname>
<given-names>JW</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Design and characterization of a novel multimodal fiber-optic probe and spectroscopy system for skin cancer applications</article-title>. <source>Rev Scientific Instr</source> (<year>2014</year>) <volume>85</volume>(<issue>8</issue>):<fpage>083101</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.4890199</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dochow</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Latka</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bocklitz</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hartl</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bec</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Combined fiber probe for fluorescence lifetime and Raman spectroscopy</article-title>. <source>Anal Bioanal Chem</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>407</volume>(<issue>27</issue>):<fpage>8291</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>301</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00216-015-8800-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fang</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Quantitative assessment of microenvironment characteristics and metabolic activity in glioma via multiphoton microscopy</article-title>. <source>J Biophotonics</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>e201900136</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jbio.201900136</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>LZ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>HN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ranji</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nioka</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chance</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Mitochondrial redox imaging for cancer diagnostic and therapeutic studies</article-title>. <source>J Innovative Opt Health Sci</source> (<year>2009</year>) <volume>02</volume>(<issue>04</issue>):<fpage>325</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>41</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1142/s1793545809000735</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mehidine</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chalumeau</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Poulon</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jamme</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Varlet</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Devaux</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Optical signatures derived from deep UV to NIR excitation discriminates healthy samples from low and high grades glioma</article-title>. <source>Scientific Rep</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>9</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>8786</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-019-45181-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mehidine</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Refregiers</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jamme</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Varlet</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Juchaux</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Devaux</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Molecular changes tracking through multiscale fluorescence microscopy differentiate Meningioma grades and non-tumoral brain tissues</article-title>. <source>Sci Rep</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>11</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>3816</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-020-78678-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Palmer</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Litvinova</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dunaev</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yubo</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McGloin</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nabi</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Optical redox ratio and endogenous porphyrins in the detection of urinary bladder cancer: A patient biopsy analysis</article-title>. <source>J Biophotonics</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>10</volume>(<issue>8</issue>):<fpage>1062</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>73</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jbio.201600162</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Skala</surname>
<given-names>MC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Riching</surname>
<given-names>KM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gendron-Fitzpatrick</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eickhoff</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eliceiri</surname>
<given-names>KW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>White</surname>
<given-names>JG</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>
<italic>In vivo</italic> multiphoton microscopy of NADH and FAD redox states, fluorescence lifetimes, and cellular morphology in precancerous epithelia</article-title>. <source>Proc Natl Acad Sci</source> (<year>2007</year>) <volume>104</volume>(<issue>49</issue>):<fpage>19494</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0708425104</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jacques</surname>
<given-names>SL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>MCML&#x2014;Monte Carlo modeling of light transport in multi-layered tissues</article-title>. <source>Comp Methods Programs Biomed</source> (<year>1995</year>) <volume>47</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>131</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>46</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0169-2607(95)01640-f</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Utzinger</surname>
<given-names>U</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Richards-Kortum</surname>
<given-names>RR</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Fiber optic probes for biomedical optical spectroscopy</article-title>. <source>J Biomed Opt</source> (<year>2003</year>) <volume>8</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>121</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1117/1.1528207</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25.</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vu Thi</surname>
<given-names>MH</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <source>D&#xe9;veloppement d&#x2019;une sonde per-op&#xe9;ratoire bas&#xe9;e sur la detection d&#x2019;autofluorescence pour l&#x2019;assistance au traitement chirurgical des tumeurs c&#xe9;r&#xe9;brales</source> (<year>2008</year>). <comment>[Internet] [PhD Thesis]. Available from: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.theses.fr/2008PA112358">http://www.theses.fr/2008PA112358</ext-link>
</comment>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26.</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Leh</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <source>Caract&#x00E9;risation par autofluorescence de tissus c&#x00E9;r&#x00E9;braux tumoraux: mesures sur fant&#x00F4;mes et mod&#x00E8;le animal</source> (<year>2011</year>). <comment>[Internet] [PhD Thesis]. Available from: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.theses.fr/2011PA112166/document">http://www.theses.fr/2011PA112166/document</ext-link>
</comment>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Haidar</surname>
<given-names>DA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leh</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zanello</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Siebert</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Spectral and lifetime domain measurements of rat brain tumors</article-title>. <source>Biomed Opt Express</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>6</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>1219</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1364/boe.6.001219</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vald&#xe9;s</surname>
<given-names>PA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leblond</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Conde</surname>
<given-names>OM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Harris</surname>
<given-names>BT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paulsen</surname>
<given-names>KD</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Combined fluorescence and reflectance spectroscopy for <italic>in vivo</italic> quantification of cancer biomarkers in low- and high-grade glioma surgery</article-title>. <source>J Biomed Opt</source> (<year>2011</year>) <volume>16</volume>(<issue>11</issue>):<fpage>116007</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1117/1.3646916</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zanello</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Poulon</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pallud</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Varlet</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hamzeh</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abi Lahoud</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Multimodal optical analysis discriminates freshly extracted human sample of gliomas, metastases and meningiomas from their appropriate controls</article-title>. <source>Scientific Rep</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>41724</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep41724</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Poulon</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mehidine</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Juchaux</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Varlet</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Devaux</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pallud</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Optical properties, spectral, and lifetime measurements of central nervous system tumors in humans</article-title>. <source>Sci Rep</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>7</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>13995</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-017-14381-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Q</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grant</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Compact point-detection fluorescence spectroscopy system for quantifying intrinsic fluorescence redox ratio in brain cancer diagnostics</article-title>. <source>J Biomed Opt</source> (<year>2011</year>) <volume>16</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>037004</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1117/1.3558840</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<label>32.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Percie du Sert</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hurst</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ahluwalia</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alam</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Avey</surname>
<given-names>MT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baker</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research</article-title>. <source>PLOS Biol</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>18</volume>(<issue>7</issue>):<fpage>e3000410</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<label>33.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lim</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nichols</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rajaram</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tunnell</surname>
<given-names>JW</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Probe pressure effects on human skin diffuse reflectance and fluorescence spectroscopy measurements</article-title>. <source>J Biomed Opt</source> (<year>2011</year>) <volume>16</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>011012</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1117/1.3525288</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<label>34.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Delgado Atencio</surname>
<given-names>JA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Orozco Guill&#xe9;n</surname>
<given-names>EE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>V&#xe1;zquez</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Montiel</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cunill Rodr&#xed;guez</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Castro Ramos</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Influence of probe pressure on human skin diffuse reflectance spectroscopy measurements</article-title>. <source>Opt Mem Neural Networks</source> (<year>2009</year>) <volume>18</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>6</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3103/s1060992x09010020</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<label>35.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hariri Tabrizi</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shakibaei</surname>
<given-names>AA</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The effect of probe pressure on <italic>in vivo</italic> single fiber reflectance spectroscopy</article-title>. <source>J Lasers Med Sci</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>7</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>233</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15171/jlms.2016.41</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<label>36.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nath</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rivoire</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cox</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Atkinson</surname>
<given-names>EN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Follen</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Effect of probe pressure on cervical fluorescence spectroscopy measurements</article-title>. <source>J Biomed Opt</source> (<year>2004</year>) <volume>9</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>523</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1117/1.1695562</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<label>37.,</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title>ICNIRP guidelines on limits of exposure to laser radiation of wavelengths between 180 nm and 1,000 &#x3bc;m</article-title>. <source>Health Phys</source>. <year>2013</year>;<volume>105</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>271</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>95</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/HP.0b013e3182983fd4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<label>38.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Du Le</surname>
<given-names>VN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nie</surname>
<given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hayward</surname>
<given-names>JE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Farrell</surname>
<given-names>TJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fang</surname>
<given-names>Q</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Measurements of extrinsic fluorescence in Intralipid and polystyrene microspheres</article-title>. <source>Biomed Opt Express</source> (<year>2014</year>) <volume>5</volume>(<issue>8</issue>):<fpage>2726</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1364/boe.5.002726</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<label>39.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fei</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Effect of fixation and mounting on fluorescence lifetime of cellular autofluorescence</article-title>. <source>IEEE J Selected Top Quan Elect</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>25</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/jstqe.2018.2889429</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<label>40.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nakabayashi</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Islam</surname>
<given-names>MS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ohta</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Fluorescence decay dynamics of flavin adenine dinucleotide in a mixture of alcohol and water in the femtosecond and nanosecond time range</article-title>. <source>The J Phys Chem B</source> (<year>2010</year>) <volume>114</volume>(<issue>46</issue>):<fpage>15254</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>60</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jp1063066</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<label>41.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bachmann</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zezell</surname>
<given-names>DM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ribeiro</surname>
<given-names>Ada C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gomes</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ito</surname>
<given-names>AS</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Fluorescence spectroscopy of biological tissues&#x2014;a review</article-title>. <source>Appl Spectrosc Rev</source> (<year>2006</year>) <volume>41</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<fpage>575</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>90</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/05704920600929498</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<label>42.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Berezin</surname>
<given-names>MY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Achilefu</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Fluorescence lifetime measurements and biological imaging</article-title>. <source>Chem Rev</source> (<year>2010</year>) <volume>110</volume>(<issue>5</issue>):<fpage>2641</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>84</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/cr900343z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<label>43.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pfefer</surname>
<given-names>TJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schomacker</surname>
<given-names>KT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ediger</surname>
<given-names>MN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nishioka</surname>
<given-names>NS</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Multiple-fiber probe design for fluorescence spectroscopy in tissue</article-title>. <source>Appl Opt</source> (<year>2002</year>) <volume>41</volume>(<issue>22</issue>):<fpage>4712</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1364/ao.41.004712</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<label>44.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Papaioannou</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Preyer</surname>
<given-names>NW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fang</surname>
<given-names>Q</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brightwell</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carnohan</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cottone</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Effects of fiber-optic probe design and probe-to-target distance on diffuse reflectance measurements of turbid media: An experimental and computational study at 337 nm</article-title>. <source>Appl Opt</source> (<year>2004</year>) <volume>43</volume>(<issue>14</issue>):<fpage>2846</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1364/ao.43.002846</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<label>45.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jing</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Dual-modality optical diagnosis for precise <italic>in vivo</italic> identification of tumors in neurosurgery</article-title>. <source>Theranostics</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>9</volume>(<issue>10</issue>):<fpage>2827</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>42</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7150/thno.33823</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<label>46.</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lilge</surname>
<given-names>LD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cassidy</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yassine</surname>
<given-names>AA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kingsford</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilson</surname>
<given-names>BC</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Monte Carlo based light propagation models to improve efficacy of biophotonics based therapeutics of hollow organs and solid tumours including photodynamic therapy and photobiomodulation (Conference Presentation)</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Popp</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tuchin</surname>
<given-names>VV</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pavone</surname>
<given-names>FS</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, editors. <source>Biophotonics: Photonic solutions for better Health care VI [internet]</source>. <publisher-loc>Strasbourg, France</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>SPIE</publisher-name> (<year>2018</year>). p. <fpage>2</fpage>. <comment>[cited 2022 Nov 2]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1117/12.2306150</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<label>47.</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ryder</surname>
<given-names>AG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Power</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Glynn</surname>
<given-names>TJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morrison</surname>
<given-names>JJ</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Time-domain measurement of fluorescence lifetime variation with pH</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Bearman</surname>
<given-names>GH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bornhop</surname>
<given-names>DJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Levenson</surname>
<given-names>RM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bornhop</surname>
<given-names>DJ</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, editors. <source>Biomarkers and biological spectral imaging [Internet]</source>. <publisher-name>SPIE</publisher-name> (<year>2001</year>). p. <fpage>102</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1117/12.432487</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<label>48.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kristoffersen</surname>
<given-names>AS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Erga</surname>
<given-names>SR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hamre</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frette</surname>
<given-names>&#xd8;</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Testing fluorescence lifetime standards using two-photon excitation and time-domain instrumentation: Rhodamine B, coumarin 6 and lucifer yellow</article-title>. <source>J Fluorescence</source> (<year>2014</year>) <volume>24</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>1015</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>24</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10895-014-1368-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<label>49.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ibrahim</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Poulon</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Melouki</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zanello</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Varlet</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Habert</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Spectral and fluorescence lifetime endoscopic system using a double-clad photonic crystal fiber</article-title>. <source>Opt Lett</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>41</volume>(<issue>22</issue>):<fpage>5214</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1364/ol.41.005214</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<label>50.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Grajek</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gryczynski</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bojarski</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gryczynski</surname>
<given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bharill</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ku&#x142;ak</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Flavin mononucleotide fluorescence intensity decay in concentrated aqueous solutions</article-title>. <source>Chem Phys Lett</source> (<year>2007</year>) <volume>439</volume>(<issue>1&#x2013;3</issue>):<fpage>151</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cplett.2007.03.042</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<label>51.</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vladimirov</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Borisova</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Avramov</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Delta-ALA-mediated fluorescence spectroscopy of gastrointestinal tumors: Comparison of <italic>in vivo</italic> and <italic>in vitro</italic> results</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Tikhomirov</surname>
<given-names>SA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Udem</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yudin</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pshenichnikov</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sarkisov</surname>
<given-names>OM</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, editors. <source>Proceedings of SPIE</source>. <publisher-loc>Minsk, Belarus</publisher-loc> (<year>2007</year>). p. <fpage>67271X</fpage>. <comment>[cited 2022 Nov 2]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1117/12.752411</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<label>52.</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Anand</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cicchi</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martelli</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Giordano</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buccoliero</surname>
<given-names>AM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guerrini</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Effects of formalin fixation on tissue optical properties of <italic>in-vitro</italic> brain samples</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Jansen</surname>
<given-names>ED</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, editor. <source>Proceedings of SPIE BiOS</source>. <publisher-loc>San Francisco, California, United States</publisher-loc> (<year>2015</year>). p. <fpage>93210Z</fpage>. <comment>[cited 2022 Nov 2]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1117/12.2076961</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<label>53.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mehidine</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sibai</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Poulon</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pallud</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Varlet</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zanello</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Multimodal imaging to explore endogenous fluorescence of fresh and fixed human healthy and tumor brain tissues</article-title>. <source>J Biophotonics</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>e201800178</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jbio.201800178</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<label>54.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kantelhardt</surname>
<given-names>SR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kalasauskas</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>K&#xf6;nig</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weinigel</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Uchugonova</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>
<italic>In vivo</italic> multiphoton tomography and fluorescence lifetime imaging of human brain tumor tissue</article-title>. <source>J Neuro-Oncology</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>127</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>473</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>82</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11060-016-2062-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>