Front. Phys.
Frontiers in Physics
Front. Phys.
2296-424X
Frontiers Media S.A.
874424
10.3389/fphy.2022.874424
Physics
Correction
Corrigendum: Correspondences Between Parameters in a Reaction-Diffusion Model and Connexin Function During Zebrafish Stripe Formation
Nakamasu
Corrigendum: PDF Model for Fish Pigmentation
Nakamasu
Akiko M.
*
International Research Organization for Advanced Science and Technologies, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
Edited by: Istvan Lagzi, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary
Reviewed by: Daishin Ueyama, Musashino University, Japan
István Szalai, Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary
*Correspondence: Akiko M. Nakamasu, nakamasu@kumamoto-u.ac.jp
This article was submitted to Physical Chemistry and Chemical Physics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physics
23
03
2022
2022
10
874424
12
02
2022
28
02
2022
Copyright © 2022 Nakamasu.
2022
Nakamasu
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
A corrigendum on Correspondences Between Parameters in a Reaction-Diffusion Model and Connexin Function During Zebrafish Stripe Formation by Nakamasu A. M. (2022). Front. Phys. 9:805659. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2021.805659
pattern formation
turing pattern
mathematical model
reaction -diffusion system
pigmentation pattern
connexin
In the original article, there are errors. Interpretation of the parameter corresponding to the connexin defect in this model was incomplete.
A correction has been made on page 6 to the section 3 RESULTS, “3.3 Correspondence Between the Mathematical Model and Connexin Defects in Zebrafish Estimated from Molecular Function”:
“
w
has peaks with the peaks of producer
U
, and gates on cells assume passive effects on
W
movements. Defects of gate on a
U
cell will enclose
W
into the cell, then the production of
W
from
U
, i.e.,
p
w
u
, other than
d
u
will also be affected. If
p
w
u
is decreased, v cells will be affected to decrease. However, the supply of w from other than u cells to the system will absorb the negative effects on v, even though the sw
in Table 1 is 0.0. Then the increase in
d
u
itself has the effect to decrease the concentration of
W
.”
Then parameters in Table 1, Figures 5A–D is as follows, 0.01, 1, 0.5, 0.5, 0.1, 1, 0.1, 1, 0.2, 1, 1, 0.5, 0.0.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.