This article was submitted to Social Physics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physics
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
In the published article, there was an error regarding the affiliations for Miguel Fuentes. As well as having affiliations 2, 6 and 7, they should also have affiliation 8, ‘Instituto de Sistemas Complejos de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile’.
In addition, there were errors in some of the references. Reference 23
A correction has been made to
“Furthermore, it seems clear that any of these definitions consider the phenomenon as a “process” which, according to the discussion in [12] for example, occurs in stages: integration, disintegration, rupture and reintegration.
From sociological theory [12–22], social crises have three properties that define them as such: 1) the conjunctural desectorization of the social space, 2) structural uncertainty and, 3) the processes of deobjectivation; all selective, observable and with a given trend.”
The authors apologize for these errors and state that they do not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.