TI bipolarons are formed at a temperature T ∗ which is much higher than that of an SC transition T c (Refs. [4–7]). For T c < T < T ∗ and in the absence of a Fermi surface with a sharp boundary, an ensemble of TI bipolarons would be an ideal gas whose particles would have a spectrum s = { ν k 2 ( P → ) } , determined by the dispersion equation (Refs. [4–7]): 1 = 2 3 ∑ k k 2 | f k | 2 ω k s − ω k 2 , ω k = ω 0 ( k → , P → ) − k →   P → M + k 2 2 M − k → M ∑ k ' k → | f k ' | 2 , (1) f k = f k ( k → , P → ) are parameters determining the ground state energy E b p ( P → ) of a TI-bipolaron, P → is the total momentum of a TI bipolaron, M = 2 m , where m   is the mass of a band electron (hole), and ω 0 ( k → , P → ) is the phonon frequency in an electron gas around TI bipolarons.

In describing the Kohn anomaly, one usually proceeds from Frӧhlich Hamiltonian of the following form [11]: H = ∑ p ε ( p → ) c p → + c p → + ∑ p → ħ ω ˜ ( k ) b k → + b k → + ∑ p → k → g ( k → ) c p → + k → + c p → ( b − k → + + b k → ) , (2) where the first term corresponds to a free electron gas; c p + ,   c p are the operators of the birth and annihilation of an electron with energy ε ( p → ) , respectively. The second term corresponds to Hamiltonian of the lattice; b k → + , b k → are operators of the birth and annihilation of lattice oscillations with energy ω ˜ ( k ) , respectively. The third term describes interactions of electrons with the lattice; g ( k ) is the matrix element of the interaction.

Renormalization of phonon frequencies corresponding to (2) is determined by the expression [11]: ω 2 ( k → ) = ω ˜ ( k → ) 2 + 2 ω ˜ ( k → ) | g ( k → ) | 2 R e [ χ ( k → ) ] , (3) where ω ( k → ) are phonons renormalized by an interaction with an electron gas whose polarizability is determined by χ ( k → ) .

The Kohn anomaly describes vanishing of renormalized phonon modes ω ( k ) for k = P C D W .

In the TI-bipolaron theory of SC [4–7], bipolarons are believed to be immersed into an electron gas. The properties of such bipolarons are also described by Fröhlich Hamiltonian of the form (2), but with a field of already renormalized phonons with energies ω ( k ) and, accordingly, a matrix element of the interaction V ( k → ) instead of g ( k → ) .

It should be noted that spectral equation 1 is independent of the form of V ( k → ) .

The experimental evidence of the occurrence of renormalized phonons with zero energy in layered HTSC cuprates is the absence of a gap in the nodal direction in these materials which, by definition, is the phonon frequency in the TI bipolaron theory of SC.

The wave function of a TI-bipolaron with the wave vector P → will have the following form: | Ψ ( P → ) 〉 b p = e i P → R → | Ψ ( 0 ) 〉 b p , (4) where R → comprises coordinates of the bipolaron mass center. The explicit form of the wave function | Ψ ( 0 ) 〉 b p   with zero momentum is well established [12]. An expression for P → can be derived by calculating the mathematical expectation of the operator of the total momentum P ^ : P → = 〈 Ψ ( P → ) | P ^ | Ψ ( P → ) 〉 = M u → + ∑ k k → | f k | 2 , (5) where u → is the velocity of a TI bipolaron. Assuming that P → = M b p u → , where M b p is the bipolaron mass, we can rewrite (5) and express M b p as follows: M b p = M 1 − η   ,     η = P → P 2 ∑ k k → | f k | 2 . (6) With the use of (6) expression for ω k from (1) can be rewritten as follows: ω k = ω 0 ( k → , P → ) + k 2 2 M − k →   P → M b p . (7)

It follows from (6) that in the case of a weak and intermediate coupling (when TI-bipolaron states are metastable for P → = 0 ), the exact form of f k ( k , → P → ) is known [13], and in the case of bipolaron, it is equal to f k ( k , → P → ) = − V k ω 0 ( k → , P → ) − k → P → 2 M ( 1 − η ) + k 2 2 M , where V k is the electron–phonon matrix element, and the expression for the TI-bipolaron effective mass will have the simple form: M b p = M ( 1 + α / 6 ) , where α is a constant of the electron–phonon interaction; that is, mass M b p is equal to the sum of masses of individual polarons. For a large α, good approximations for f k are available only for P → = 0 . For this reason, the calculation of the effective mass of a TI bipolaron is rather difficult.

Subject to availability of a Fermi surface with a sharp boundary, the TI-bipolaron gas under consideration will have some peculiarities. Thus, if there are rather large fragments on this surface which can be superimposed by transferring one of them onto vector P → , then if the size of these fragments is rather large, the coupling between them will be rather strong, which will lead to the Peierls deformation of the lattice in the direction of this nesting. A loss of energy associated with the lattice deformation will be compensated by a gain in the energy of a bipolaron gas which forms a charge density wave with the wave vector P → = P → C D W . The fact of a gain in the energy of a TI bipolaron follows from Equation 1, whose solution leads to the spectrum of a TI-bipolaron E k ( P → ) , where E k ( P → ) = { E b p ( P → ) ,       k = 0 E b p ( P → ) + ω 0 ( P → , k → ) + k 2 2 M − k → P → M b p ,         k ≠ 0 , (8) that is, E k = E b p + ω k ,   and  v k = ω k     f o r   k ≠ 0 .

The gain in the energy is caused by the above considered Kohn anomaly [14] which implies that for P = P C D W (in 1D–metal P C D W = 2 k F ,     ω 0 ( 2 k F ) = 0 , where k F is a Fermi momentum), the phonon frequency ω 0 ( P C D W , k ) = ω C D W softens, and, as a consequence, the energy E b p greatly decreases due to a sharp increase in the constant of the electron–phonon interaction α ∼ 1 / ω C D W 1 / 2 . For ω C D W → 0 ,   α C D W → ∞ , accordingly M b p → ∞ and CDWs appears to be practically immobile.

The general expression for E b p ( P → ) is complicated, and even in the case of P → = 0 , there are only variational estimates for it [12]. It can be assumed that the general form of the E b p dependence on P will be δ-shaped, in which the δ-shaped minimum will correspond to P = P C D W   (Figure 1).

For this spectrum, TI bipolarons will pass on to the state with the energy minimum E b p ( P C D W ) to form a single charge density wave consisting of paired states and determined by expression (4).

Hence, for T C D W ,     T b p > T C , where T C D W   = | E b p ( P C D W ) − E b p ( 0 ) | ,     T b p = | E b p ( 0 ) − 2 E p ( 0 ) | ,     E p ( 0 ) is the polaron ground state energy, the pseudogap precedes the SC. If in this case the condition T C D W   > T b p is fulfilled, then the pseudogap is a coherent pseudophase, and for T b p > T C D W , a coherent pseudophase is preceded by a non-coherent phase of free pairs. If the inequality T C D W ,   T b p > T C is not fulfilled, then the smallest quantity ( T C D W or T b p ) becomes equal to T C . In any case, the superconducting phase coexists with the pseudogap one which disappears for T = 0 , when all the pairs are in a Bose condensate and the CDW amplitude vanishes.

Energetical advantageousness of а condensate phase follows from expressions (7), (8), which suggest that a homogeneous Bose condensate has a lower energy on condition: P < M b p 2 ω 0 ( P , k ) / M . (9)

It should be noted that the scenario considered is close in many respects to the Fröhlich superconductivity model [15]. In the Frӧhlich model, it was assumed that two electrons with opposite momenta (as in BCS) on the Fermi surface are connected by a phonon with the wave vector P C D W ( 2 k F in 1D case), thereby forming a charged phonon. Being bosons, such phonons, in a macroscopic number, can be in the same state with the wave vector P C D W to form a CDW (Fröhlich charge wave). Such a wave, however, will not be superconducting, since pinning which always takes place in real crystals or its scattering by normal carriers will hinder such a wave. The main difference between the TI-bipolaron description and Fröhlich approach is in the formation of a Bose condensate of TI bipolarons (which form a wave of Fröhlich charged phonons), which is just responsible for superconductivity.