<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "archivearticle.dtd">
<article article-type="systematic-review" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Pharmacol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Pharmacology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Pharmacol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1663-9812</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1624119</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fphar.2025.1624119</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Pharmacology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Systematic Review</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Effectiveness and impact of intravenous magnesium sulfate in spinal surgery systematic review and meta-analysis</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Jin and Zhao</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1624119">10.3389/fphar.2025.1624119</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname>
<given-names>Zhaoguo</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2947508/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>Jianyong</given-names>
</name>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff>
<institution>First People&#x2019;s Hospital of Linping District</institution>, <addr-line>Hangzhou</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/8132/overview">Francisco Lopez-Munoz</ext-link>, Camilo Jos&#xe9; Cela University, Spain</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2040615/overview">Sakarie Mustafe Hidig</ext-link>, Zhejiang University, China</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3067161/overview">Alshaimaa Abdel Fattah Kamel</ext-link>, Zagazig University, Egypt</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Zhaoguo Jin, <email>linping0881@163.com</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>18</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1624119</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>07</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>28</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2025 Jin and Zhao.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Jin and Zhao</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Background</title>
<p>Effective pain management following spinal surgery is crucial for preventing complications related to delayed mobilization. Magnesium sulfate (MgSO<sub>4</sub>) has shown promise as an analgesic agent, influencing neurotransmitter modulation and autonomic nervous system regulation. However, studies evaluating its effectiveness and safety in spinal surgery remain inconsistent, necessitating a comprehensive meta-analysis to assess its role.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Objective</title>
<p>This study aimed to perform a systematic meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of magnesium sulfate against standard therapeutic options in spinal surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>The meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. We performed data extraction and analysis using Review Manager version 5.4. The study population included patients undergoing spinal surgery, with the intervention group receiving intravenous magnesium sulfate at varying dosages or in combination with other agents. The comparison group received either a placebo or alternative treatments. Primary outcomes included pain intensity, opioid consumption, and safety parameters.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>Ten randomized controlled trials involving 641 patients were included. Magnesium sulfate administration significantly reduced pain scores at 24&#xa0;h (MD &#x2212;0.18, 95% CI: &#x2212;0.34 to &#x2212;0.02) and decreased opioid consumption (SMD &#x2212;0.34, 95% CI: &#x2212;1.07 to &#x2212;0.35). Additionally, a significant reduction in muscle relaxant usage was observed (SMD &#x2212;0.91, 95% CI: &#x2212;0.66 to &#x2212;0.10). When compared with dexmedetomidine, magnesium sulfate improved verbal response (MD 1.22, 95% CI: &#x2212;0.16&#x2013;2.61) and prolonged extubation time (MD 0.91, 95% CI: &#x2212;0.98&#x2013;2.80). No significant differences in hemodynamic parameters (heart rate and blood pressure) were observed between the groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Intravenous magnesium sulfate demonstrated significant benefits in reducing postoperative pain and opioid consumption, while also improving verbal response and orientation. These findings suggest that magnesium sulfate may serve as a valuable adjunct in the perioperative management of spinal surgery patients. Further research is required to confirm these results and establish optimal dosing protocols.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>magnesium sulfate</kwd>
<kwd>spinal surgery</kwd>
<kwd>meta-analysis</kwd>
<kwd>postoperative pain</kwd>
<kwd>opioid consumption</kwd>
<kwd>systematic review</kwd>
<kwd>anesthesia</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Neuropharmacology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>1 Introduction</title>
<p>Chronic low back pain represents a significant burden on healthcare systems worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Shetty et al., 2022</xref>). The management of this condition requires a stepwise, progressive approach that prioritizes conservative treatments, including physiotherapy and lifestyle modifications. However, in severe and refractory cases, invasive interventions such as epidural steroid injections or surgical procedures may become necessary (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Ketenci and Zure, 2021</xref>). While epidural steroid injections have demonstrated Level I evidence in treating radicular pain associated with disc herniation, concerns persist regarding their safety due to rare but potentially severe neurological complications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Helm et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Within this therapeutic landscape, various interventions for low back pain have been investigated. Ozone therapy, for instance, has shown promise in pain relief, though it remains controversial due to limited long-term evaluation and unclear mechanisms of action (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">de Andrade et al., 2019</xref>). Extensive research has been conducted on adjuvant medications in spine surgery, particularly focusing on ketamine and gabapentin use in adolescents undergoing spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. These trials primarily evaluated the medications&#x2019; effectiveness in reducing postoperative pain and minimizing opioid consumption. Notably, these studies have demonstrated significant reductions in both opioid use and pain intensity during the initial 48 postoperative hours, accompanied by favorable safety profiles and low adverse event rates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Bas et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Mariscal et al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>Postoperative pain management remains a critical concern for both clinicians and patients, as delayed mobilization can lead to serious adverse outcomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Naftalovich et al., 2022</xref>). The impact of acute pain has been well-documented in numerous studies. Multiple therapeutic modalities, encompassing both pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches, have been employed to address postoperative pain, which significantly influences patient prognosis and treatment outcomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Mentes et al., 2008</xref>).</p>
<p>Magnesium, an inorganic ion, has diverse therapeutic applications, including the management of asthma exacerbations, hypokalemia, premature labor, myocardial protection following ischemia, postoperative acute pain control, and hemodynamic stabilization during intubation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Lysakowski et al., 2007</xref>). Among magnesium preparations, magnesium sulfate has gained particular attention, with its value being evaluated in numerous anesthesia-related investigations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Buvanendran et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Ferasatkish et al., 2008</xref>). The anti-nociceptive properties of magnesium (Mg) are attributed to its antagonistic effect on N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. While preoperative magnesium administration has shown limited impact on postoperative pain, several clinical trials have demonstrated that magnesium infusion during general anesthesia reduces both anesthetic requirements and postoperative analgesic consumption (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">&#xdc;nl&#xfc;gen&#xe7; et al., 2002</xref>). However, the effects of magnesium sulfate administration during regional anesthesia remain incompletely characterized.</p>
<p>Current evidence regarding magnesium sulfate use in spinal surgery is both conflicting and incomplete. While some studies have reported favorable outcomes, including improved hemostatic parameters, reduced intraoperative bleeding, and enhanced pain scores and patient satisfaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Fathy et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">James et al., 1989</xref>), others have documented adverse effects such as prolonged emergence time and delayed recovery (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Tsaousi et al., 2020</xref>). Despite these contradictory findings, no meta-analysis has specifically focused on magnesium sulfate use in spinal surgery. Previous literature reviews have noted &#x201c;low statistical power&#x201d; in existing studies, highlighting the need for a comprehensive analysis of available data to determine the effectiveness and safety profile of magnesium sulfate in spinal surgery procedures.</p>
<p>Therefore, this study aimed to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and clinical significance of magnesium sulfate administration in spinal surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s2">
<title>2 Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>2.1 Eligibility criteria</title>
<p>This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The study selection process is illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Tang, 2009</xref>). Study inclusion criteria were developed using the PICOS framework. The study population comprised adult patients who underwent spinal surgery. The intervention group received intravenous magnesium sulfate (MgSO<sub>4</sub>) treatment in varying combinations or doses, while the comparison group received either placebo or alternative treatments. Primary outcomes included efficacy metrics (pain management, medication usage, hemodynamic parameters) and safety outcomes determined through complication analysis. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were considered eligible for inclusion.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Flow chart of study selection process according to PRISMA.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphar-16-1624119-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>To minimize bias and prevent data duplication, studies with the following characteristics were excluded:<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Duplicate publications</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Non-randomized studies, due to their inherent limitations in establishing causal relationships and controlling for confounding variables</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Review articles, as they represent secondary analyses rather than primary data</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Studies with incomplete or missing data, to ensure result accuracy and consistency</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Studies that did not share variables with at least two other included studies, to enable meaningful data pooling and robust statistical analysis</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>2.2 Information sources and search strategy</title>
<p>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases without language or publication date restrictions. The final search was performed in October 2023, encompassing PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library. The search strategy employed the Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms &#x201c;Magnesium&#x201d; and &#x201c;spine&#x201d; (detailed search strategy provided in Supplementary Material 1). Additionally, reference lists of included articles were manually screened to identify additional relevant studies.</p>
<p>Study selection was performed independently by two reviewers with Level V expertise (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Tang, 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Chandler et al., 2019</xref>). In cases of disagreement, a third reviewer was consulted to reach consensus. The detailed study selection process is presented in the PRISMA flow diagram (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<title>2.3 Data extraction and data items</title>
<p>Data extraction was conducted independently by two reviewers with Level V expertise, with discrepancies resolved through consultation with a third reviewer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Tang, 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Chandler et al., 2019</xref>). The following data were extracted from each included study:<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Study characteristics (author, location, study duration).</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Patient demographics (mean age, gender distribution).</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Clinical indicators (etiology, spinal drug dosage).</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Primary outcome measures:</p>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>
<monospace>o</monospace> Pain assessment using Visual Analog Scale (VAS).</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>
<monospace>o</monospace> Medication usage (opioids, muscle relaxants, remifentanil).</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>
<monospace>o</monospace> Hemodynamic parameters (heart rate [HR], mean arterial pressure [MAP]).</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>
<monospace>o</monospace> Recovery indicators (extubation time, verbal command response, orientation time).</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</list-item>
</list>
</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-4">
<title>2.4 Risk of bias assessment</title>
<p>The risk of bias in included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration&#x2019;s risk of bias tool and analyzed using Review Manager software (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). Assessment domains included:<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Random sequence generation.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Allocation concealment.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Blinding of participants and personnel.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Blinding of outcome assessments.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Incomplete outcome data.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Selective reporting.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Risk of Bias graph.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphar-16-1624119-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-5">
<title>2.5 Publication bias</title>
<p>Review Manager was used to assess publication bias through funnel plot analysis. Funnel plots provide a visual method for examining publication bias by plotting study precision (measured by sample size or standard error) against effect sizes. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>, the asymmetrical distribution suggests the presence of publication bias, potentially due to the exclusion of smaller studies with non-significant results from the analysis. Additional subgroup analyses were performed to account for multiple time points of outcome measurement, enabling more comprehensive data interpretation.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Risk of bias summary.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphar-16-1624119-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-6">
<title>2.6 Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Data analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 software. For continuous outcomes, mean differences were calculated, while odds ratios were computed for dichotomous outcomes. All results were presented with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was assessed using I<sup>2</sup> and Chi<sup>2</sup> tests, with I<sup>2</sup> values &#x3e; 25%, &#x3e;50%, and &#x3e;75% indicating low, moderate, and high heterogeneity, respectively. A fixed-effects model was employed in the absence of significant heterogeneity, while a random-effects model was used when heterogeneity was detected.</p>
<p>Data from figures were extracted using Web Plot Digitizer version 4.5. Missing data were handled according to Cochrane Handbook guidelines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Guyatt et al., 2013</xref>). Publication bias was assessed using Review Manager-generated funnel plots, with asymmetrical distribution indicating potential publication bias. Subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate outcomes at different time points, enabling more detailed data analysis.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>3 Results</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>3.1 Study selection</title>
<p>The systematic literature search initially identified 415 potentially relevant studies. After applying the clinical trial filter, 381 studies were excluded, leaving 34 studies for further evaluation. Following title and abstract screening, 21 studies were excluded based on predefined criteria: they were either study protocols, non-human studies, pharmacokinetic studies, or studies not focused on spinal surgery.</p>
<p>Of the remaining 13 studies that underwent full-text review, three were subsequently excluded due to:<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Non-shared outcome variables</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Duplicate publications</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Non-intravenous magnesium sulfate administration routes</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Significant heterogeneity in inclusion criteria</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</p>
<p>Manual screening of reference lists from included studies did not yield any additional eligible articles. Therefore, ten randomized controlled trials were ultimately included in the meta-analysis, as illustrated in the PRISMA flow diagram (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>3.2 Study characteristics</title>
<p>The primary characteristics of the included studies are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>. The meta-analysis comprised ten studies with a total of 641 participants: 295 in the magnesium sulfate (MS) group, 163 in the placebo group, 103 in the dexamethasone group, and 80 in the dexmedetomidine group. The mean age of participants ranged from 32.2 to 55.9 years, with 301 participants (46.9%) being female. <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref> presents the detailed MS dosage regimens and surgical indications for each study. The risk of bias assessment for the included studies is presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>The main characteristics of included studies.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Study</th>
<th align="left">Region</th>
<th align="left">Dose MgSo4</th>
<th align="left">Surgery site</th>
<th align="left">No. of patients treatment/Placebo</th>
<th align="left">No. of females (MS/PL)</th>
<th align="left">Age</th>
<th align="left">Period</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Altan et al. (2005)</xref>
</td>
<td align="left">Turkey</td>
<td align="left">30&#xa0;mg/kg 1 over a 15-min period before induction of anesthesia and 10&#xa0;mg/kg 1&#xa0;h</td>
<td align="left">Spine surgery</td>
<td align="left">60 (30/30)</td>
<td align="left">7/7</td>
<td align="left">42.3/44.9</td>
<td align="left">NR</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">G&#xf6;ral et al. (2011)</xref>
</td>
<td align="left">Turkey</td>
<td align="left">50&#xa0;mg/kg in 100&#xa0;mL saline by slow infusion over 10&#xa0;min, followed by a continuous infusion of 20&#xa0;mg/kg/h</td>
<td align="left">Single-level microscopic lumbar discectomy</td>
<td align="left">40 (20/20)</td>
<td align="left">10/11</td>
<td align="left">48/49</td>
<td align="left">NR</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Kumar et al. (2023)</xref>
</td>
<td align="left">India</td>
<td align="left">15&#xa0;mL of 0.75% ropivacaine &#x2b;500&#xa0;mg equivalent to 1&#xa0;mL &#x2b; 4.0&#xa0;mL normal saline. The total volume of the solution infiltrated was 20&#xa0;mL in both groups</td>
<td align="left">Single-level lumbar laminectomy</td>
<td align="left">60 (30/30)</td>
<td align="left">8/5</td>
<td align="left">35.2/38.2</td>
<td align="left">NR</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Levaux et al. (2003)</xref>
</td>
<td align="left">Belgium</td>
<td align="left">50&#xa0;mg/kg in 250&#xa0;mL of normal saline over 30&#xa0;min immediately before induction of anesthesia</td>
<td align="left">Lumbar arthrodesis</td>
<td align="left">24 (12/12)</td>
<td align="left">8/5</td>
<td align="left">55/46</td>
<td align="left">NR</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Oguzhan et al. (2008)</xref>
</td>
<td align="left">Turkey</td>
<td align="left">30&#xa0;mg/kg (over 10&#xa0;min) starting immediately after induction of anesthesia and completed before intubation; the infusion was then continued at 10&#xa0;mg/kg/h throughout surgery</td>
<td align="left">Lumbar disc surgery</td>
<td align="left">50 (25/25)</td>
<td align="left">12/11</td>
<td align="left">44/42</td>
<td align="left">2005 to 2006</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Park et al. (2015)</xref>
</td>
<td align="left">Korea</td>
<td align="left">30&#xa0;mg/kg in a total of 100&#xa0;mL normal saline was given for 10&#xa0;min before the induction of anesthesia, followed by continuous infusion of at 10&#xa0;mg/kg/h until the end of operation</td>
<td align="left">Lumbar spine surgery</td>
<td align="left">146 (73/73)</td>
<td align="left">32/31</td>
<td align="left">51/51</td>
<td align="left">2013 to 2014</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Srivastava et al. (2016)</xref>
</td>
<td align="left">India</td>
<td align="left">Loading dose 50&#xa0;mg/kg before induction over a period of 15&#xa0;min and maintenance 15&#xa0;mg/kg/h throughout the surgery</td>
<td align="left">Elective spine surgery</td>
<td align="left">90 (45/45)</td>
<td align="left">19/20</td>
<td align="left">48.3/46.6</td>
<td align="left">NR</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Tsaousi et al. (2020)</xref>
</td>
<td align="left">Greece</td>
<td align="left">20&#xa0;mg/kg diluted in isotonic saline to a volume of 100&#xa0;mL was infused as an intravenous (i.v.) bolus dose over 15&#xa0;min before anesthesia induction and thereafter 20&#xa0;mg/kg/h was continuously infused until surgery completion</td>
<td align="left">Lumbar laminectomy</td>
<td align="left">71 (35/36)</td>
<td align="left">22/21</td>
<td align="left">55.9/49</td>
<td align="left">2020</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Hwang et al. (2010)</xref>
</td>
<td align="left">Korea</td>
<td align="left">magnesium sulphate 50&#xa0;mg/kg for 15&#xa0;min and then 15&#xa0;mg/kg per hour by continuous i.v</td>
<td align="left">spinal surgery</td>
<td align="left">40 (20/20)</td>
<td align="left">11/7</td>
<td align="left">47/49.9</td>
<td align="left">NR</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Dabbagh et al. (2009)</xref>
</td>
<td align="left">Iran</td>
<td align="left">magnesium sulphate dose of 8&#xa0;mg/kg/h of body weight</td>
<td align="left">Lower limb orthopedic surgery</td>
<td align="left">60 (30/30)</td>
<td align="left">21/24</td>
<td align="left">33.7/35.1</td>
<td align="left">NR</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Notes: NR: no data reported.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>A comparative analysis of different treatment approaches and anesthesia techniques in spinal surgery pain management is provided in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>. This analysis includes various interventions such as esketamine combined with pregabalin, dexmedetomidine, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and acupuncture, highlighting their respective outcomes and clinical significance in spinal surgery patients.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>A comparative of different treatments and anesthesia TechniquesSpinal in surgery pain management and outcomes.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Author, year</th>
<th align="left">Patient population</th>
<th align="left">Treatment</th>
<th align="left">Operation type</th>
<th align="left">Conclusion</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Zhou, (2024)</xref>
</td>
<td align="left">Spinal cord surgery patients between the ages of 18 and 65</td>
<td align="left">Patients were randomized to receive esketamine (injection dose 0.5&#xa0;mg&#xb7; kg-1, infusion dose 0.12&#xa0;mg&#xb7; kg-1 &#xb7; h-1, 48&#xa0;h after surgery) combined with oral pregabalin (75&#x2013;150&#xa0;mg/day, beginning 2&#xa0;h before surgery and ending 2 weeks after surgery) or equivalent saline and placebo capsules</td>
<td align="left">Moderate-to-severe acute postsurgical pain</td>
<td align="left">Esketamine combined with pregabalin is effective in alleviating APSP after spinal surgery, but analgesic strategies may increase the risk of mild dissociation symptoms</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Hwang, (2015)</xref>
</td>
<td align="left">40 patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) under general anesthesia</td>
<td align="left">A total of 40 patients underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) under general anesthesia. Anesthesia was maintained at 3&#x2013;12&#xa0;mg/kg/h with propofol, 0.01&#x2013;0.2&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/kg/min in remifentanil group and 0.01&#x2013;0.02&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/kg/min in dexmedetomidine group, and the bispectral index was maintained between 40 and 60</td>
<td align="left">Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA)</td>
<td align="left">Dexmedetomidine showed superior efficacy in pain relief and pain management 48&#xa0;h after PLIF.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Chen, (2022)</xref>
</td>
<td align="left">Records of successive patients who underwent surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar disease in our hospital from 2013 to 2014</td>
<td align="left">Patients were grouped according to pain control methods, including routine analgesia, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and acupuncture. The routine analgesia group took acetaminophen/NSaids and piperidine orally as needed for immediate pain control. The PCA group received a base dose of morphine and a subsequent user-required dose. In the acupuncture group, acupuncture was performed every other day</td>
<td align="left">The procedure included open laminectomy, discectomy, and posterolateral fusion with transpedicle screw internal fixation</td>
<td align="left">For adjunctive pain control after surgery for degenerative lumbar disease, acupuncture may be as effective as traditional analgesia and PCA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Rahimzadeh, (2018)</xref>
</td>
<td align="left">60 patients aged 15&#x2013;65 years who were undergoing posterior spinal fusion</td>
<td align="left">A double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted in 60 patients aged 15&#x2013;65 years who were to undergo posterior spinal fusion by random sampling. Intraoperative anesthesia was induced and 1% isoflurane was used in both groups. One group was injected with remifentanil by pumping. The experimental group was given dexmedetomidine</td>
<td align="left">Spinal fusion patients</td>
<td align="left">Dexmedetomidine reduced postoperative pain scores and intraoperative bleeding in patients undergoing spinal surgery. The hemodynamic effect of dexmedetomidine group was significantly improved</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Umakoshi, (2021)</xref>
</td>
<td align="left">A total of 156 non-PD patients treated for spinal degenerative diseases and PD patients after spinal surgery from 2013 to 2017</td>
<td align="left">The Hoehn and Yahr scores of D were 8 cases in stage 1, 2 cases in stage 2, 8 cases in stage 3, 10 cases in stage 4, and 0 cases in stage 5. The median daily equivalent dose of levodopa before surgery was 410&#xa0;mg. Thirteen patients (46%) received subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS.</td>
<td align="left">Parkinson&#x2019;s disease</td>
<td align="left">Postoperative pain and functional improvement in PD patients lasted for 2 years, and the complication rate was higher than that in non-PD patients. PD patients with STN DBS maintained good lumbar lordosis 2 years after spinal surgery. STN DBS significantly maintained spinal alignment 2 years after surgery, with pain and improved function</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Lee, (2018)</xref>
</td>
<td align="left">Patients were recruited from a medical center in central Taiwan. Ninety patients participated in the study</td>
<td align="left">Patients who underwent lumbar surgery (n &#x3d; 86) were randomly assigned to the intervention group (educational intervention; n &#x3d; 43) or control group (n &#x3d; 43); Four patients voluntarily withdrew after surgery (1 case in the intervention group; Control group (3 cases)</td>
<td align="left">spinal surgery</td>
<td align="left">Preoperative educational interventions are effective in informing patients undergoing spinal surgery of reduced postoperative pain, anxiety, and fear</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The global VAS (MD 0.56, 95% CI &#x2212;1.47 to 0.36; participants &#x3d; 1,232; studies &#x3d; 15; I2 &#x3d; 99%) showed no discernible differences (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). Comparably, at 6&#xa0;h (MD &#x2212;0.38, 95% CI &#x2212;2.59 to 1.83; participants &#x3d; 536; studies &#x3d; 6; I2 &#x3d; 99%) and 12&#xa0;h (MD &#x2212;1.40, 95% CI &#x2212;2.64 to 0.34; participants &#x3d; 160; studies &#x3d; 3; I2 &#x3d; 96%), no significant differences were discovered. After a full day, however, the magnesium group displayed noticeably less discomfort than the control group (MD&#x2212;0.18, 95% CI&#x2212;0.34, &#x2212;0.02; participants, 536; studies, 6; I2 &#x3d; 0%). When comparing MS with a placebo, MS showed a much higher global VAS reduction. There were no discernible changes between MS and dexmedetomidine. Likewise, no noteworthy distinctions were noted when contrasting MS with dexamethasone. The subgroup test is 1.20 and the overall effect test is 2.16.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Forest plot displaying pain measured using Visual Analog Scale (VAS).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphar-16-1624119-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<sec id="s3-2-1">
<title>3.2.1 Drug consumption</title>
<p>In relation to opioid consumption, no significant differences were observed at 6&#xa0;h (SMD&#x2212;0.35, 95%CI&#x2212;0.82 to 0.13; participants &#x3d; 244; studies &#x3d; 3; I2 &#x3d; 63%) or 24&#xa0;h (SMD&#x2212;0.36, 95% CI&#x2212;1.07 to 0.35; participants &#x3d; 243; studies &#x3d; 3; I2 &#x3d; 83%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). When magnesium was compared to a placebo, it was found to significantly reduce opioid consumption (SMD&#x2212;0.66, 95%CI &#x2212;0.95 to &#x2212;0.38; participants &#x3d; 196; studies &#x3d; 6; I2 &#x3d; 0%), both at 6 and 24&#xa0;h (SMD&#x2212;0.71, 95% CI &#x2212;1.12 to &#x2212;0.30; participants &#x3d; 98; studies &#x3d; 3; I2 &#x3d; 0%). In terms of overall or at six or 24&#xa0;h, there were no significant differences between MS and dexamethasone (SMD 0.10, 95% CI&#x2212;0.13 to 0.33; participants &#x3d; 292; studies &#x3d; 6; I2 &#x3d; 0%). Test results for the subgroup are 1.82 and the overall impact are 1.00.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Forest plot of muscle relaxant consumption.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphar-16-1624119-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The MS group&#x2019;s use of muscle relaxants was significantly lower among participants (252) and studies (3) (SMD &#x2212;0.91, 95% CI&#x2212;1.93 to &#x2212;0.10; I2 &#x3d; 92%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>) MS had a significantly decreased consumption of muscle relaxants when compared to a placebo. The total impact test is 1.77 and the chi2 value is 0.73.</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Forest plot of remifentanil consumption.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphar-16-1624119-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Vasoactive agent use did not differ significantly (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.46; participants &#x3d; 315; studies &#x3d; 4; I2 &#x3d; 0%) from (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref>). Not at all in contrast to a placebo. The chi2 value is 1.72 and the overall impact test is 1.99.</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Forest plot of vasopressor consumption.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphar-16-1624119-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2-2">
<title>3.2.2 Hemodynamics</title>
<p>Regarding global heart rate (MD 2.37, 95% CI &#x2212;0.66 to 5.10; participants &#x3d; 797; studies &#x3d; 17; I2 &#x3d; 24%), there were no significant changes between the groups or in any of the follow-up time-based subgroups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8</xref>). The MS group displayed a considerably greater heart rate in comparison to the placebo. When MS was compared with clonidine, no discernible differences were found. Test results for subgroup difference are 0.40 and total effect are 0.55.</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Forest plot results express heart rate at 30&#xa0;min, 60&#xa0;min, 120&#xa0;min, and after extubating.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphar-16-1624119-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9</xref> indicates that there were no significant variations in mean arterial pressure (MAP) across the groups (MD 1.81, 95% CI&#x2212;2.55 to 6.17; 950 participants, 20 studies, and 57% I2). Notably, there were no variations when compared to the placebo group. MS displayed a considerably decreased MAP in contrast to clonidine. Regarding dexmedetomidine, there were no notable variations. The subgroup test is 0.55 while the overall effect test is 0.45.</p>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 9</label>
<caption>
<p>Forest plot express mean arterial pressure at 30&#xa0;min, 60&#xa0;min, 120&#xa0;min, and after extubating.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphar-16-1624119-g009.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2-3">
<title>3.2.3 Extubating time, response to verbal commands and orientation time</title>
<p>There was no statistically significant difference in extubating time between the groups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10</xref>; participants &#x3d; 364, studies &#x3d; 5, I2 &#x3d; 94%; MD 0.91, 95% CI -0.98&#x2013;2.80). With respect to the placebo group, there were no appreciable variations. The MS group had a considerably longer extubation time in comparison to dexmedetomidine. The overall effect test result is 0.94, and chi2 is 71.91.</p>
<fig id="F10" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 10</label>
<caption>
<p>Forest plot of extubation time.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphar-16-1624119-g010.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11">Figure 11</xref> shows that the MS group&#x2019;s responsiveness to verbal orders was considerably higher (MD 1.22, 95% CI -0.166 to 2.61; participants &#x3d; 291; studies &#x3d; 4; I2 &#x3d; 76%). With respect to the placebo group, there were no appreciable variations. In contrast to the clonidine group, the MS group displayed a noticeably slower response time to spoken instructions. Chi2 is 12.27 and the test for the total effect is 1.73.</p>
<fig id="F11" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 11</label>
<caption>
<p>Forest plot of verbal commands.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphar-16-1624119-g011.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Additionally, the orientation time was substantially longer in the MS group compared to the placebo group (MD: 2.07, 95% CI 0.82 to 3.32; participants &#x3d; 146; studies &#x3d; 3; I2 &#x3d; 59%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12">Figure 12</xref>). The test effect was 3.25 overall, and the chi2 was 4.91.</p>
<fig id="F12" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 12</label>
<caption>
<p>Forest plot of orientation time.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphar-16-1624119-g012.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2-4">
<title>3.2.4 Publication bias</title>
<p>Visual inspection of funnel plots revealed significant publication bias across most variables, as evidenced by notable asymmetry in the distribution of studies. Detailed analysis of these asymmetries and their implications is presented in the supplementary materials.</p>
<p>The therapeutic benefits of magnesium in postoperative pain management likely stem from its multifaceted neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory mechanisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Hassan et al., 2020</xref>). Through the promotion of neuroplasticity, magnesium provides protection against neuronal deterioration and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Hassan et al., 2020</xref>). Its antioxidant properties are demonstrated through the neutralization of reactive oxygen species (ROS), specifically via hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) elimination and hydrogen (H2) liberation, contributing significantly to its anti-inflammatory effects in treating intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Hassan et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Zhang et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>The neuroprotective profile of magnesium extends to its modulation of S100B protein levels, a recognized biomarker of oxidative stress and amyloid precursor (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Zhang et al., 2023</xref>). Clinical investigations have revealed that magnesium&#x2019;s efficacy in managing postoperative sore throat is comparable to corticosteroids, potentially contributing to enhanced patient satisfaction. This finding is particularly noteworthy given that patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were primarily limited to Visual Analog Scale (VAS) assessments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Park et al., 2015</xref>). The comparison with corticosteroids merits special attention, considering their adverse metabolic effects, particularly on glucose homeostasis. The therapeutic benefit appears to be mediated through magnesium&#x2019;s anti-inflammatory properties, resulting in reduced postoperative nausea, vomiting, and subsequent throat discomfort (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Lu et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Mori et al., 2010</xref>).</p>
<p>A significant limitation across studies was the absence of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) assessments, highlighting a crucial area for future investigation. The marked reduction in opioid consumption observed with magnesium administration, compared to placebo, can be mechanistically explained by its non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonism. This mechanism results in decreased glutamate release and inhibition of excessive calcium influx into neurons, thereby providing neuroprotection and maintaining cellular integrity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Newcomer and Krystal, 2001</xref>). Similar opioid-sparing effects have been documented with other NMDA receptor antagonists, including gabapentin and ketamine (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Newcomer and Krystal, 2001</xref>).</p>
<p>The neuroprotective properties of magnesium sulfate have broader clinical applications, as evidenced by its recommended use in reducing cerebral palsy incidence among preterm infants, particularly those at risk of delivery before 32 weeks gestation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Jameson and Bernstein, 2019</xref>). Through dual mechanisms of neuronal process stabilization and vasodilation, intracerebral magnesium sulfate reduces the incidence of cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia. Complementary intravenous hydrogen therapy may enhance these effects through additional antioxidant benefits, potentially improving clinical outcomes and reducing cerebral oxidative stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Takeuchi et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2-5">
<title>3.2.5 Hemodynamic and cardiovascular effects</title>
<p>Our analysis revealed lower mean arterial pressure in the magnesium group compared to the corticosteroid group, attributable to magnesium&#x2019;s vasodilatory properties. Magnesium exerts its hypotensive effect through multiple mechanisms: direct relaxation of blood vessels, calcium channel antagonism, and competition with sodium in vascular smooth muscle cells. Furthermore, magnesium enhances endothelial function and vascular wall integrity, promoting vasodilation and reducing inflammation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Houston, 2011</xref>). The observed increase in heart rate in our meta-analysis likely represents a compensatory response to this vasodilation, while the higher mean arterial pressure in the corticosteroid group can be attributed to adrenergic system activation.</p>
<p>The hypotensive properties of magnesium contribute to reduced perioperative bleeding (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Rayssiguier et al., 2010</xref>). Additionally, magnesium modulates sympathetic nervous system activity through catecholamine blockade (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">G&#xf6;ral et al., 2011</xref>). While the magnesium group demonstrated prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time, other coagulation parameters remained comparable between groups (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Wang et al., 2024</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2-6">
<title>3.2.6 Neuromuscular effects and safety considerations</title>
<p>Magnesium&#x2019;s ability to reduce muscle relaxant requirements is attributed to its inhibition of acetylcholine receptor responses in muscle cells. This synergistic effect potentially allows for dose reduction of muscle relaxants during surgical procedures. However, careful dose titration of both vecuronium and magnesium sulfate is essential to prevent adverse effects and excessive muscle relaxation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Aal-Hamad et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2-7">
<title>3.2.7 Risk of hypermagnesemia</title>
<p>Careful monitoring of magnesium levels is crucial, as concentrations exceeding 4&#x2013;5&#xa0;mmol/L (9.7&#x2013;12.2&#xa0;mg/dL) are considered hazardous. Hypermagnesemia can manifest as weakness, nausea, dizziness, and confusion, with increased mortality risk in hospitalized patients. The prevalence ranges from 3.0% to 5.7%&#x2013;9.3% in the general population, with higher rates in hospital settings. Patients with renal insufficiency require particularly vigilant monitoring and management to prevent serious complications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Srivastava et al., 2016</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2-8">
<title>3.2.8 Recovery period considerations</title>
<p>The prolonged recovery period observed in the magnesium group, characterized by delayed orientation time and verbal response, likely results from the combination of its hypotensive and muscle-relaxant effects. The vasodilatory properties may lead to reduced cerebral perfusion and oxygenation, contributing to extended recovery times and temporary cognitive effects. The muscle-relaxant properties may further impair patient responses during the recovery phase, affecting both verbal communication and orientation capabilities.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2-9">
<title>3.2.9 Comparative analysis with dexmedetomidine</title>
<p>Dexmedetomidine served as a key comparator in our meta-analysis, providing important insights into alternative therapeutic approaches. As an &#x3b1;2-adrenoceptor agonist, dexmedetomidine demonstrates significant efficacy in reducing surgical stress responses. Our analysis revealed that dexmedetomidine was more effective than magnesium in reducing both fentanyl and propofol consumption. Srivastav et al.&#x27;s findings demonstrated superior hemodynamic stability with dexmedetomidine compared to other interventions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Srivastava et al., 2016</xref>). This enhanced hemodynamic profile and greater efficacy in reducing opioid and propofol consumption can be attributed to dexmedetomidine&#x2019;s high affinity and selectivity for &#x3b1;2-adrenergic receptors. However, these benefits are accompanied by an increased risk of bradycardia and hypotension compared to magnesium therapy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Srivastava et al., 2016</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2-10">
<title>3.2.10 Pain management and recovery characteristics</title>
<p>While Kumar&#x2019;s study reported superior pain control with dexmedetomidine compared to magnesium plus ropivacaine combination, our meta-analysis found no significant differences in pain outcomes between the interventions. Notably, we observed increased muscle relaxant consumption in the dexmedetomidine group. In comparison with placebo, dexmedetomidine demonstrated advantages in orientation time and verbal response parameters. The prolongation of local anesthetic effects observed with dexmedetomidine can be attributed to its vasoconstrictive properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Yoshitomi et al., 2008</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2-11">
<title>3.2.11 Safety profile and administration considerations</title>
<p>Recent meta-analyses have highlighted specific safety concerns with dexmedetomidine administration during spinal surgery. The risk of bradycardia and intraoperative hypotension is particularly pronounced when administered as a loading dose in combination with total intravenous anesthesia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Wang et al., 2024</xref>). These risks were notably elevated in patients receiving inhalation anesthesia. While the inhalation anesthesia subgroup demonstrated reduced blood loss, this effect was not observed consistently across all administration methods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Wang et al., 2024</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2-12">
<title>3.2.12 Multimodal applications and synergistic effects</title>
<p>Magnesium demonstrates significant potential for synergistic effects when combined with other analgesic modalities. The modest effects observed in comparisons between magnesium sulfate and corticosteroids may be attributed to limited sample sizes and short follow-up periods (typically 24&#xa0;h). Evidence suggests enhanced patient outcomes when magnesium is combined with various analgesic interventions, including opioids, local anesthetics, and regional anesthesia techniques (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Fairley et al., 2017</xref>). This multimodal approach may provide more comprehensive pain management strategies, though longer-term monitoring beyond the immediate postoperative phase is needed to fully evaluate these benefits.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2-13">
<title>3.2.13 Administration protocols and dosing strategies</title>
<p>Considerable variation exists in magnesium administration protocols (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Tsaousi et al., 2020</xref>). Our meta-analysis evaluated various approaches, including:<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Loading doses: 30&#x2013;50&#xa0;mg/kg in saline, administered over 10&#x2013;30&#xa0;min pre-anesthesia.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Maintenance infusions: 10&#x2013;20&#xa0;mg/kg/h throughout surgery.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Alternative approaches: One study evaluated ropivacaine infiltration with 500&#xa0;mg magnesium supplementation.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</p>
<p>While visual analysis of forest plots did not reveal clear associations between administration protocols and outcomes, this observation requires cautious interpretation given the lack of formal statistical analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2-14">
<title>3.2.14 Broader clinical applications</title>
<p>Magnesium&#x2019;s therapeutic benefits extend beyond spinal surgery. Evidence demonstrates its efficacy in.<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Reducing postoperative atrial fibrillation in cardiac surgery (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Fairley et al., 2017</xref>).</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Decreasing ventricular arrhythmias without additional adverse effects.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Improving postoperative pain control in arthroscopic procedures when administered intra-articularly.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Providing cartilage and chondrocyte protection, as supported by experimental studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Zeng et al., 2016</xref>).</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</p>
<p>Meta-analyses have documented significant reductions in:<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; 24-h morphine consumption.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Time to first analgesic requirement.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Postoperative shivering without increasing adverse effects such as bradycardia, nausea, or vomiting (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Ng et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2-15">
<title>3.2.15 Surgical outcome analysis</title>
<p>Our study expanded upon previous meta-analyses by incorporating additional outcome measures, including remifentanil and muscle relaxant consumption. Key findings include.<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Peak pain reduction occurred at varying timepoints (6&#x2013;12&#xa0;h) across studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Tsaousi et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Kumar et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Tsaousi et al. uniquely reported decreased extubation time with corresponding reductions in opioid and remifentanil use (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Tsaousi et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Variable outcomes in specific surgical subgroups:</p>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>
<monospace>o</monospace> Microscopic surgery (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">G&#xf6;ral et al. (2011)</xref>): Limited comparable outcomes.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>
<monospace>o</monospace> Lumbar disc replacement: Significant improvements in pain control and reduced muscle relaxant requirements (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Kumar et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>
<monospace>o</monospace> Broader surgical categories (&#x201c;lumbar arthrodesis,&#x201d; &#x201c;spine surgery&#x201d;): Limited comparative analysis due to heterogeneity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Morrison et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</list-item>
</list>
</p>
<p>Unlike previous meta-analyses focusing on total anesthesia duration, our study specifically examined orientation and verbal response times, though findings aligned with established observations regarding prolonged anesthetic effects.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4">
<title>4 Limitations</title>
<p>There are several restrictions on this study. The restricted number of included studies hindered the ability to do sensitivity and consistent subgroup analysis, as well as to assess the impact of varying doses and surgical indications. To give more detailed advice, future research should describe findings according to the precise kind of surgery that was done. Additionally, rather than using formal procedures, publication bias was evaluated visually, and in several instances, there were just a few publications available for the control groups. Even though the established Cochrane guidelines were adhered to, challenges pertaining to missing data were also observed. Furthermore, several intriguing factors, including improved hemostatic parameters, decreased intraoperative bleeding, and patient satisfaction, were only reported in one trial and could not be compared via meta-analysis. Data on these characteristics should be used in future research. These restrictions should be considered when interpreting the findings, and they highlight the need for more study to address these restrictions in order to gain a more thorough understanding of the application of magnesium in the treatment of postoperative pain.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s5">
<title>5 Conclusion</title>
<p>In conclusion, our meta-analysis showed that magnesium sulphate delivery following spinal surgery significantly reduced pain at 24&#xa0;h and minimized the use of opioids and muscle relaxants when compared to placebo and other analgesics. Magnesium sulphate also extended orientation and reactions to spoken instructions. The groups&#x2019; heart rates and blood pressure did not differ significantly from one another. Without causing greater side effects, this multimodal strategy using magnesium sulphate seemed to reduce postoperative pain more well. These results imply that magnesium sulphate may improve recovery regimens optimised after spine surgery and solve current problems associated with opioid use. It is yet unknown how clinical improvements will translate to patient outcomes and what effect they will have on hospital stays, patient satisfaction, and care quality.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s6">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s12">Supplementary Material</xref>, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="s7">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>ZJ: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Conceptualization, Writing &#x2013; review and editing, Formal Analysis, Supervision. JZ: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Investigation, Conceptualization, Writing &#x2013; review and editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="s8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>Thanks to all those who helped with the study but were not listed as co-authors due to insufficient contributions.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s9">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="s10">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s11">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s12">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2025.1624119/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2025.1624119/full&#x23;supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Supplementaryfile1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/docx" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Aal-Hamad</surname>
<given-names>A. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Al-Alawi</surname>
<given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kashoub</surname>
<given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Falhammar</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Hypermagnesemia in clinical practice</article-title>. <source>Medicina</source> <volume>59</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>1190</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/medicina59071190</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Altan</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Turgut</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yildiz</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Balci</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ozyurek</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Turhan</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Effects of magnesium sulphate and clonidine on propofol consumption, haemodynamics and postoperative recovery</article-title>. <source>British Journal of Anaesthesia</source>, <volume>94</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>438</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>441</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bja/aei070</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bas</surname>
<given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bas</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bonilla</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mariscal</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>P&#xe9;rez</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bovea-Marco</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Efficacy of perioperative gabapentin use in patients with idiopathic scoliosis undergoing fusion surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Eur. Spine J.</source> <volume>32</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>2521</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2532</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00586-023-07764-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Buvanendran</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McCarthy</surname>
<given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kroin</surname>
<given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leong</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Perry</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tuman</surname>
<given-names>K. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Intrathecal magnesium prolongs fentanyl analgesia: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial</article-title>. <source>Anesth. and Analgesia</source> <volume>95</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>661</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>666</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00000539-200209000-00031</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chandler</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cumpston</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Page</surname>
<given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Welch</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <source>Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions</source>. <publisher-loc>Hoboken</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Wiley</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mao</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>A retrospective comparison of analgesic efficacy between acupuncture, patient-controlled analgesia, and conventional analgesia for postoperative pain management in spinal fusion surgery</article-title>. <source>Pain Research and Management</source>, 2022, <fpage>8494206</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2022/8494206</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dabbagh</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Elyasi</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Razavi</surname>
<given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fathi</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rajaei</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Intravenous magnesium sulfate for post-operative pain in patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery</article-title>. <source>Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica</source>, <volume>53</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>1088</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1091</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02025.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>de Andrade</surname>
<given-names>R. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Oliveira-Neto</surname>
<given-names>O. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barbosa</surname>
<given-names>L. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Santos</surname>
<given-names>I. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Sousa-Rodrigues</surname>
<given-names>C. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barbosa</surname>
<given-names>F. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Efetividade da ozonioterapia comparada a outras terapias para dor lombar: revis&#xe3;o sistem&#xe1;tica com metan&#xe1;lise de ensaios cl&#xed;nicos randomizados</article-title>. <source>Rev. Bras. Anestesiol.</source> <volume>69</volume>, <fpage>493</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>501</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bjan.2019.06.007</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fairley</surname>
<given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Glassford</surname>
<given-names>N. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bellomo</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Magnesium status and magnesium therapy in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on arrhythmia prevention</article-title>. <source>J. Crit. care</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>69</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>77</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.05.038</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fathy</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hussein</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ibrahim</surname>
<given-names>R. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abdel-Aziz</surname>
<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Adel</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Soliman</surname>
<given-names>S. H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Comparative effect of transforaminal injection of Magnesium sulphate versus Ozone on oxidative stress biomarkers in lumbar disc related radicular pain</article-title>. <source>BMC Anesthesiol.</source> <volume>22</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>254</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12871-022-01789-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ferasatkish</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dabbagh</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alavi</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mollasadeghi</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hydarpur</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moghadam</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Effect of magnesium sulfate on extubation time and acute pain in coronary artery bypass surgery</article-title>. <source>Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand.</source> <volume>52</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>1348</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1352</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01783.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>G&#xf6;ral</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ergil</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alptekin</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>&#xd6;zkan</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>G&#xfc;rer</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dolgun</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Effect of magnesium sulphate on bleeding during lumbar discectomy</article-title>. <source>Anaesthesia</source> <volume>66</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>1140</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1145</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06898.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guyatt</surname>
<given-names>G. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thorlund</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oxman</surname>
<given-names>A. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walter</surname>
<given-names>S. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Patrick</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Furukawa</surname>
<given-names>T. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing summary of findings tables and evidence profiles&#x2014;continuous outcomes</article-title>. <source>J. Clin. Epidemiol.</source> <volume>66</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>173</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>183</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.08.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hassan</surname>
<given-names>W. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tawfik</surname>
<given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nabil</surname>
<given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abd Elkareem</surname>
<given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Could intraoperative magnesium sulphate protect against postoperative cognitive dysfunction?</article-title> <source>Minerva Anestesiol.</source> <volume>86</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>808</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>815</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14012-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Helm</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Harmon</surname>
<given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Noe</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Calodney</surname>
<given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abd-Elsayed</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Knezevic</surname>
<given-names>N. N.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Transforaminal epidural steroid injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety</article-title>. <source>Pain Physician</source> <volume>24</volume> (<issue>S1</issue>), <fpage>S209</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>S232</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Houston</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>The role of magnesium in hypertension and cardiovascular disease</article-title>. <source>J. Clin. Hypertens.</source> <volume>13</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>843</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>847</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00538.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hwang</surname>
<given-names>J. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Na</surname>
<given-names>H. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jeon</surname>
<given-names>Y. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ro</surname>
<given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Do</surname>
<given-names>S. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>I.V. infusion of magnesium sulphate during spinal anaesthesia improves postoperative analgesia</article-title>. <source>British Journal of Anaesthesia</source>, <volume>104</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>89</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>93</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bja/aep334</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hwang</surname>
<given-names>S. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Park</surname>
<given-names>I. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kang</surname>
<given-names>D. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Park</surname>
<given-names>H. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil in postoperative pain control after spinal surgery: a randomized controlled trial</article-title>. <source>Medicine</source>, <volume>94</volume> (<issue>29</issue>), <fpage>e1161</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/MD.0000000000001161</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>James</surname>
<given-names>M. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beer</surname>
<given-names>R. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Esser</surname>
<given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>Intravenous magnesium sulfate inhibits catecholamine release associated with tracheal intubation</article-title>. <source>Anesth. and Analgesia</source> <volume>68</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>772</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>776</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1213/00000539-198906000-00015</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jameson</surname>
<given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bernstein</surname>
<given-names>H. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Magnesium sulfate and novel therapies to promote neuroprotection</article-title>. <source>Clin. perinatology</source> <volume>46</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>187</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>201</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.clp.2019.02.008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ketenci</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zure</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment approaches to chronic lumbar back pain</article-title>. <source>Turkish J. Phys. Med. rehabilitation</source> <volume>67</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5606/tftrd.2021.8216</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>R. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vikal</surname>
<given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yadav</surname>
<given-names>J. B. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Comparison of ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine plus magnesium sulfate infiltration for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgeries</article-title>. <source>Cureus</source> <volume>15</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>e36295</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7759/cureus.36295</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>T. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname>
<given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>Y. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Y. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effects of preoperative pain education on postoperative pain control and anxiety in patients undergoing spinal surgery: A randomized controlled trial</article-title>. <source>Asian Spine Journal</source>, <volume>12</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>65</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>74</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4184/asj.2018.12.1.65</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Levaux</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bonhomme</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dewandre</surname>
<given-names>P. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brichant</surname>
<given-names>J. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hans</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Effect of intra-operative magnesium sulphate on pain relief and patient comfort after major lumbar orthopaedic surgery</article-title>. <source>Anaesthesia</source>, <volume>58</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>131</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>135</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.02999.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname>
<given-names>K.-z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>M.-g.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname>
<given-names>G.-p.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Ondansetron does not attenuate the analgesic efficacy of nefopam</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Med. Sci.</source> <volume>10</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>1790</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1794</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7150/ijms.5386</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lysakowski</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dumont</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Czarnetzki</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tram&#xe8;r</surname>
<given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Magnesium as an adjuvant to postoperative analgesia: a systematic review of randomized trials</article-title>. <source>Anesth. and Analgesia</source> <volume>104</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1532</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1539</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1213/01.ane.0000261250.59984.cd</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mariscal</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morales</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>P&#xe9;rez</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rubio-Belmar</surname>
<given-names>P. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bovea-Marco</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bas</surname>
<given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Meta-analysis of the efficacy of ketamine in postoperative pain control in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing spinal fusion</article-title>. <source>Eur. Spine J.</source> <volume>31</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>3492</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3499</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00586-022-07422-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mentes</surname>
<given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Harlak</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yigit</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Balkan</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Balkan</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cosar</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Effect of intraoperative magnesium sulphate infusion on pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy</article-title>. <source>Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand.</source> <volume>52</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>1353</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1359</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01816.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mori</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koyama</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arendash</surname>
<given-names>G. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Horikoshi&#x2010;Sakuraba</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tan</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Town</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Overexpression of human S100B exacerbates cerebral amyloidosis and gliosis in the Tg2576 mouse model of Alzheimer&#x27;s disease</article-title>. <source>Glia</source> <volume>58</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>300</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>314</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/glia.20924</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Morrison</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hunter</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Halpern</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Banerjee</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Effect of intrathecal magnesium in the presence or absence of local anaesthetic with and without lipophilic opioids: a systematic review and meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Br. J. Anaesth.</source> <volume>110</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>702</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>712</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bja/aet064</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Naftalovich</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singal</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Iskander</surname>
<given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols for spine surgery&#x2013;review of literature</article-title>. <source>Anaesthesiol. Intensive Ther.</source> <volume>54</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>71</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>79</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5114/ait.2022.113961</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Newcomer</surname>
<given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Krystal</surname>
<given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>NMDA receptor regulation of memory and behavior in humans</article-title>. <source>Hippocampus</source> <volume>11</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>529</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>542</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/hipo.1069</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ng</surname>
<given-names>K. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yap</surname>
<given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Izham</surname>
<given-names>I. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Teoh</surname>
<given-names>W. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kwok</surname>
<given-names>P. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koh</surname>
<given-names>W. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>The effect of intravenous magnesium on postoperative morphine consumption in noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Anaesthesiology&#x7c; EJA</source> <volume>37</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>212</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>223</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/EJA.0000000000001164</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Oguzhan</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gunday</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Turan</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Effect of magnesium sulfate infusion on sevoflurane consumption, hemodynamics, and perioperative opioid consumption in lumbar disc surgery</article-title>. <source>Journal of Opioid Management</source>, <volume>4</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>105</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>110</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5055/jom.2008.0015</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Park</surname>
<given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shim</surname>
<given-names>J.-K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname>
<given-names>J.-W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kwak</surname>
<given-names>Y.-L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>A randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial of magnesium sulphate versus dexamethasone for prevention of postoperative sore throat after lumbar spinal surgery in the prone position</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Med. Sci.</source> <volume>12</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>797</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>804</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7150/ijms.12831</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rahimzadeh</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Faiz</surname>
<given-names>S. H. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Imani</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Derakhshan</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Amniati</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Comparative addition of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl to intrathecal bupivacaine in orthopedic procedure in lower limbs</article-title>. <source>BMC Anesthesiol.</source> <volume>18</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>62</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12871-018-0531-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rayssiguier</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Libako</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nowacki</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rock</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Magnesium deficiency and metabolic syndrome: stress and inflammation may reflect calcium activation</article-title>. <source>Magnesium Res.</source> <volume>23</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>73</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>80</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1684/mrh.2010.0208</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shetty</surname>
<given-names>G. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jain</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thakur</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khanna</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Prevalence of low back pain in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Work</source> <volume>73</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>429</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>452</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3233/WOR-205300</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Srivastava</surname>
<given-names>V. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mishra</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Agrawal</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Comparative evaluation of dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulphate on propofol consumption, haemodynamics and postoperative recovery in spine surgery: a prospective, randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind study</article-title>. <source>Adv. Pharm. Bull.</source> <volume>6</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>75</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>81</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15171/apb.2016.012</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Takeuchi</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumagai</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Toyooka</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Otani</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wada</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mori</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Intravenous hydrogen therapy with intracisternal magnesium sulfate infusion in severe aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage</article-title>. <source>Stroke</source> <volume>52</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>20</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>27</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031260</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname>
<given-names>J. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Re: levels of experience of surgeons in clinical studies</article-title>. <source>J. Hand Surg. Eur. Volume</source> <volume>34</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>137</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>138</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/17531934097321</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tsaousi</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nikopoulou</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pezikoglou</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Birba</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grosomanidis</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Implementation of magnesium sulphate as an adjunct to multimodal analgesic approach for perioperative pain control in lumbar laminectomy surgery: a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial</article-title>. <source>Clin. Neurology Neurosurg.</source> <volume>197</volume>, <fpage>106091</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106091</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Umakoshi</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shimizu</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miyamoto</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kinoshita</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Takao</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matsushita</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Spinal surgery in patients with Parkinson&#x2019;s disease: Experiences with the challenges and outcomes</article-title>. <source>European Spine Journal</source>, <volume>30</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>452</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>461</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00586-020-06656-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>&#xdc;nl&#xfc;gen&#xe7;</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>G&#xfc;nd&#xfc;z</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>&#xd6;zalevli</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Akman</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>A comparative study on the analgesic effect of tramadol, tramadol plus magnesium, and tramadol plus ketamine for postoperative pain management after major abdominal surgery</article-title>. <source>Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand.</source> <volume>46</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>1025</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1030</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460817.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Che</surname>
<given-names>J.-X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname>
<given-names>T.-T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qu</surname>
<given-names>J.-T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Effect of dexmedetomidine on intraoperative hemodynamics and blood loss in patients undergoing spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Chin. Med. Sci. J.</source> <volume>39</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>54</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>68</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24920/004294</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yoshitomi</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kohjitani</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maeda</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Higuchi</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shimada</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miyawaki</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Dexmedetomidine enhances the local anesthetic action of lidocaine via an &#x3b1;-2A adrenoceptor</article-title>. <source>Anesth. and Analgesia</source> <volume>107</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>96</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>101</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1213/ane.0b013e318176be73</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zeng</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Y.-s.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname>
<given-names>D.-x.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>L.-j.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Analgesic effect and safety of single-dose intra-articular magnesium after arthroscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>6</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>38024</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep38024</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xin</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>ROS-responsive magnesium-containing microspheres for antioxidative treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration</article-title>. <source>Acta Biomater.</source> <volume>158</volume>, <fpage>475</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>492</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.actbio.2023.01.020</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Esketamine combined with pregabalin for acute postsurgical pain after spinal surgery: a randomized controlled trial</article-title>. <source>European Journal of Pain</source>, <volume>28</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>127</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>139</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ejp.2168</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>