<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Pharmacol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Pharmacology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Pharmacol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1663-9812</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1213734</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fphar.2023.1213734</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Pharmacology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Clinical Trial</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Anesthetic drug concentrations and placental transfer rate in fetus between term and preterm infants, twins, and singletons</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Liu et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1213734">10.3389/fphar.2023.1213734</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Hao</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Miao</surname>
<given-names>Jing-Kun</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cai</surname>
<given-names>Meng</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gan</surname>
<given-names>Lin</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>Hui-Qing</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lei</surname>
<given-names>Xiao-Feng</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1782091/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>Jin</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1492867/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Department of Pediatrics</institution>, <institution>Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children</institution>, <institution>Women and Children&#x2019;s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University</institution>, <addr-line>Chongqing</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Department of Anesthesiology</institution>, <institution>Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children</institution>, <institution>Women and Children&#x2019;s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University</institution>, <addr-line>Chongqing</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/101557/overview">Geert W. &#x27;t Jong</ext-link>, University of Manitoba, Canada</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/905899/overview">Yinyin Qu</ext-link>, Peking University Third Hospital, China</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2370530/overview">Reiko Ohara</ext-link>, National Center for Child Health and Development (NCCHD), Japan</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Jin Yu, <email>dodoes@qq.com</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>01</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1213734</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>28</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>17</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Liu, Miao, Cai, Gan, Zhao, Lei and Yu.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Liu, Miao, Cai, Gan, Zhao, Lei and Yu</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>
<bold>Objective:</bold> This study aims to determine the drug concentration of etomidate, remifentanil, and rocuronium bromide for general anesthesia in fetus as well as the placental transport rate between term and preterm delivery, twins, and singleton.</p>
<p>
<bold>Study design:</bold> Sixty parturients with 72 fetuses undergoing cesarean section under general anesthesia were included. According to whether the fetus was a twin or premature, parturients were divided into Group I (term singleton), Group II (premature singleton), Group III (term twins), and Group IV (premature twins). The preoperative demographic characteristics and laboratory examination of parturients, hemodynamic indicators, the Apgar score of neonates at 1, 5, and 10&#xa0;min after delivery and at specific assigned values, umbilical artery blood gas analysis results, neonatal weight, and resuscitative measures were recorded. Anesthetic drug concentrations in maternal arterial (MA), umbilical arterial (UA), and umbilical venous (UV) blood were detected by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS).</p>
<p>
<bold>Result:</bold> No significant differences were observed in the concentrations of etomidate, remifentanil, and rocuronium bromide in MA, UV, and UA blood, or in the UV/MA and UA/UV ratios between term and preterm infants, twins, and singletons. Moreover, there was no variation in the anesthetic drug concentration among each pair of twins. Additionally, no correlation was found between the neonatal weight and the plasma concentrations of anesthetic drugs in UV and UA blood, except for remifentanil in UA blood.</p>
<p>
<bold>Conclusion:</bold> Preterm or twin deliveries do not affect the neonatal concentration of etomidate, remifentanil, and rocuronium bromide used in general anesthesia for cesarean sections.</p>
<p>
<bold>Clinical Trial Registration:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.chictr.org.cn">www.chictr.org.cn</ext-link>, identifier ChiCTR2100046547</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>cesarean section</kwd>
<kwd>general anesthesia</kwd>
<kwd>preterm</kwd>
<kwd>twins</kwd>
<kwd>drug concentration</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn001">cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0763</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100005230</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Obstetric and Pediatric Pharmacology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>1 Background</title>
<p>Intraspinal anesthesia remains the preferred option for cesarean sections, surpassing general anesthesia in numerous aspects. Nonetheless, in certain critical cases, general anesthesia may be more suitable or had to be the sole alternative. Recent reports indicate that general anesthesia has accounted for 5.8% of total cesarean section anesthesia and 14.6% of emergency cesarean sections due to various reasons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Juang et al., 2017</xref>). In terms of general anesthesia, etomidate, remifentanil, and rocuronium bromide are widely used in practice.</p>
<p>Remifentanil belongs to &#x3bc; opioid receptor agonists and is administered intravenously during anesthesia for cesarean section. It offers an optimal balance between reducing maternal stress response and minimizing neonatal respiratory depression (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">White et al., 2019</xref>). Remifentanil easily passes through the placental barrier due to its fat-soluble characteristics. However, it can be hydrolyzed in cord blood due to its rapid metabolism features and will rapidly be redistributed and can even enter the fetus. The distribution volume of remifentanil in newborns and infants is larger than that in adults or toddlers, and the clearance rate is faster (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Kan et al., 1998</xref>)<bold>.</bold> Our previous data demonstrate that there is no correlation between the plasma concentration of remifentanil in full-term newborns and induction to delivery (I-D) intervals time. This finding is consistent with another study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Hu et al., 2017</xref>) that reported that the mean concentrations of remifentanil in the MA, UA, and UV blood at delivery in the shorter I-D group were similar to those in the longer I-D group.</p>
<p>Etomidate has been used in cesarean sections under general anesthesia for approximately 50 years (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Downing et al., 1979</xref>). In particular, etomidate offers several advantages for parturients with previous congenital heart disease (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Clivatti et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ho et al., 2018</xref>). Remifentanil combined with etomidate and muscle relaxant (rocuronium bromide) are becoming much more popular for general anesthesia in cesarean sections; however, the concentration and placental transfer of these three drugs in twins and premature infants is poorly understood.</p>
<p>Due to advancements in assisted reproductive technology, the incidence of twin pregnancies has escalated significantly. It is noteworthy that twin pregnancies have a higher likelihood of premature birth compared to singleton pregnancies. Premature newborns and full-term newborns exhibit significant differences in many aspects of organ development, and the risk factors affecting respiratory depression also vary between them (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Condo et al., 2017</xref>). Recent research (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Louchet et al., 2021</xref>) indicates that cord concentrations of antiretroviral differed in nearly one-third of twins in the same pair, which may be due to inter-individual genetic variability of placental transporters or physiological differences between twins.</p>
<p>For general anesthesia drugs, concerns are arising regarding the side effects of these anesthetic agents for neonates due to the lack of well-established dosing regimens for these drugs in the specific population. It remains unclear whether there are variations in drug concentrations or placental transport rates between term and preterm newborns as well as between twins. The primary objectives of this study were to ascertain the drug concentrations in the fetus and the placental transport rates for twin pairs and preterms versus full-term deliveries during cesarean sections performed under general anesthesia. This research has potential implications in clinics for understanding how anesthesia drug administration during cesarean sections affects fetal exposure to medications, especially in the context of multiple pregnancies and premature births.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s2">
<title>2 Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>2.1 Study subjects</title>
<p>This study was implemented in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Women and Children&#x2019;s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (Number 2021-011), and was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.chictr.org">www.chictr.org</ext-link>) (registration ID: ChiCTR2100046547). Informed consent was obtained from all participants. The inclusion criteria in this study are parturients with a preoperative history of lumbar disc herniation or lumbar surgery, thrombocytopenia or other medical conditions that contraindicated to intraspinal anesthesia. Sixty parturients with 72 fetuses undergoing cesarean section under intravenous&#x2013;inhalation combined anesthesia were included. The exclusion criteria for this study were as follows: mental illness, cognitive impairment, high risk of difficult airway assessment, or full stomach needing awake tracheal intubation. According to whether the parturient was twin or premature, enrolled parturients were divided into four groups as follows: Group I (full-term singleton), Group II (premature singleton), Group III (full-term twins), and Group IV (premature twins) (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Flow diagram of this clinical study.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphar-14-1213734-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>2.2 Anesthesia management</title>
<p>All parturients were strictly fasted for at least 8&#xa0;h and forbidden to drink for 2&#xa0;h before surgery. After entering the operating room, all parturients lay on their left side at 30&#xb0; to reduce the compression of the inferior vena cava and abdominal aorta by the uterus and to prevent the occurrence of supine hypotension syndrome. Firstly, a peripheral venous route in the forearm was established. Parturients were administered oxygen via a face mask and non-invasive arterial pressure (NIBP), heart rate (HR), and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) were monitored as normal. Anesthesia was induced with target-controlled infusion (TCI) of remifentanil at 5&#xa0;ng/mL combined with 5% sevoflurane inhalation (sevoflurane was administered for a brief duration and was discontinued if the parturients lost consciousness). In the meantime, etomidate (0.25&#xa0;mg/kg) and rocuronium (0.6&#xa0;mg/kg) were administered intravenously. Once the muscle relaxant rocuronium took effect, endotracheal intubation was inserted and connected with an anesthesia machine for mechanical ventilation. Anesthesia was maintained using remifentanil (TCI, 5&#xa0;ng/mL) and propofol (TCI, 3.5&#xa0;&#x3bc;g/mL) after umbilical cord ligation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<title>2.3 Data collection</title>
<p>The recorded data for statistical comparisons include the preoperative demographic characteristics and laboratory examination of parturients, hemodynamic indicators, the Apgar score at 1, 5, and 10&#xa0;min after delivery, umbilical artery blood gas analysis, neonatal weight, and resuscitative measures, including tactile stimulation and bag-mask ventilation or tracheal intubation of newborns. Maternal arterial (MA), umbilical arterial (UA), and umbilical venous (UV) blood samples were obtained after umbilical cord ligation for analysis of drug concentrations. The samples were centrifuged in sodium citrate&#x2013;coated anticoagulant tubes at 3,000&#xa0;rpm at 4&#xb0;C for 10&#xa0;min. The plasma was isolated and stored at &#x2212;80&#xb0;C for later analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-4">
<title>2.4 Chemicals and reagents</title>
<p>The following chemicals were used for the analysis procedure: methanol and acetonitrile were used for Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC) (Fisher Scientific, United States), remifentanil standard was purchased from Stanford Chemicals (FJTI-8736, Oregon, United States), etomidate (E933300) and rocuronium (R639500) standards were purchased from Toronto Research Chemicals (Toronto, Canada), internal standards (IS) sufentanil was purchased from Stanford Chemicals (SREP-5931, Oregon, United States), metomidate was purchased from MACKLIN (Shanghai, China), vecuronium (V102500) was purchased from Toronto Research Chemicals (Toronto, Canada), Milli-Q apparatuses (Millipore, Bedford, MA, United States) were used to purify the water during the study, and formic acid was purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Bio-Chem Technology Co., LTD. (Shanghai, China).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-5">
<title>2.5 Analyses based on liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry Apparatus and UPLC-MS/MS</title>
<p>A tandem mass spectrometer (Waters, United States) equipped with an electrospray ionization source operated in the positive mode provided the analytical platform. A reverse-phase BEH C18 column (50 &#xd7; 2.1 mm, 1.7 m, Waters Acquity) was used for separation. This was conducted at 45 &#xb0;C with a 0.4&#xa0;mL/min flow of milli-Q water containing 0.1% (v/v) formic acid (solution A) along with a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of methanol and acetonitrile containing 0.1% (v/v) formic acid (solution B). From 0 to 0.6 min, the gradient was 10% solution B; from 0.6 to 2.8 min, 10%&#x2013;90% solution B; and from 2.8 to 3.6 min, 10% solution B.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-6">
<title>2.6 Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode of mass spectrometry</title>
<p>Using the tandem mass spectrometer as an electrospray ionization source, eluted drugs were analyzed at 150&#xb0;C; capillary voltage, 3.0 kV; desolvation temperature, 500&#xb0;C; gas flow for desolvation, 800&#xa0;L/h; and gas flow for cone, 150&#xa0;L/h. An MRM event was recorded every time-scheduled minute. Data were processed and quantified using MassLynx mass spectrometry software (Waters, Massachusetts, United States). The three target drugs were identified using structurally similar drugs of protonated molecules and by comparing their retention times with those of IS. As part of the MRM mode, extracted ion chromatograms were created using the mass of the precursor ions that collided in the collision chamber to produce fragment ions. The most stable fragment ion with the highest intensity was used for quantification, from which the area under the peak was calculated.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-7">
<title>2.7 Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22.0 for Windows. Measurement data are expressed as the mean &#xb1; standard deviation (<inline-formula id="inf1">
<mml:math id="m1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xaf;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#xb1;s) and count data are expressed in actual numbers. The measurement data were compared between the groups using one-way ANOVA, and Brown-Forsythe ANOVA was used for heteroscedasticity indicators. The count data were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher&#x2019;s exact test. As for <italic>post hoc</italic> tests, Bonferroni was used for data with homogeneous variance, and Tamhane&#x2019;s was used for data with uneven variance. Correlation of the neonatal weight with the plasma concentrations of anesthetic drugs was evaluated using a Spearman rank correlation test. Values of <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>3 Results</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>3.1 Preoperative general information and laboratory examination of parturients</title>
<p>There was no statistically significant difference among the four groups in preoperative general information, except for gestational weeks. For preoperative laboratory examination of parturients, the D-dimer of Group IV was nearly twice as high as that of Group I (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). These differences were related to the grouping criteria. <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref> shows the comparison of preoperative general information and laboratory examination of parturients among the four groups. The hemodynamic indicators, including HR, NIBP, and SpO<sub>2</sub>, are shown in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Table S1</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>General information and laboratory examination of parturients.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">Parameters</th>
<th align="left">Group I (n &#x3d; 38)</th>
<th align="left">Group II (n &#x3d; 10)</th>
<th align="left">Group III (n &#x3d; 5)</th>
<th align="left">Group IV (n &#x3d; 7)</th>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">
<italic>p</italic>-Value</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left">Full-term singleton</th>
<th align="left">Premature singleton</th>
<th align="left">Term twins</th>
<th align="left">Premature twins</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>General information</bold>
</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Age, years</td>
<td align="left">32.24 &#xb1; 3.87</td>
<td align="left">28.50 &#xb1; 2.99</td>
<td align="left">32.00 &#xb1; 3.39</td>
<td align="left">30.86 &#xb1; 5.49</td>
<td align="left">0.071</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Body weight, kg</td>
<td align="left">72.07 &#xb1; 11.19</td>
<td align="left">65.76 &#xb1; 10.08</td>
<td align="left">74.40 &#xb1; 6.58</td>
<td align="left">67.73 &#xb1; 8.88</td>
<td align="left">0.270</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Height, cm</td>
<td align="left">158.11 &#xb1; 5.09</td>
<td align="left">158.00 &#xb1; 5.42</td>
<td align="left">157.00 &#xb1; 4.36</td>
<td align="left">155.71 &#xb1; 6.75</td>
<td align="left">0.724</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">BMI</td>
<td align="left">28.77 &#xb1; 3.92</td>
<td align="left">26.42 &#xb1; 4.47</td>
<td align="left">30.25 &#xb1; 3.39</td>
<td align="left">28.02 &#xb1; 4.42</td>
<td align="left">0.289</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Gestation, weeks</td>
<td align="left">38.82 &#xb1; 0.86</td>
<td align="left">34.60 &#xb1; 2.03<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">37.11 &#xb1; 0.25<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">34.29 &#xb1; 1.89<sup>ac</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">0.000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Gestational hypertension (Yes/No)</td>
<td align="left">0/38</td>
<td align="left">1/9</td>
<td align="left">0/5</td>
<td align="left">1/6</td>
<td align="left">0.141</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Gestational diabetes mellitus (Yes/No)</td>
<td align="left">7/31</td>
<td align="left">1/9</td>
<td align="left">1/4</td>
<td align="left">3/4</td>
<td align="left">0.396</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Scar uterus (previous CS) (Yes/No)</td>
<td align="left">15/23</td>
<td align="left">2/8</td>
<td align="left">1/4</td>
<td align="left">1/6</td>
<td align="left">0.393</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>Laboratory examination</bold>
</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Hb<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>, g/L</td>
<td align="left">125.63 &#xb1; 9.88</td>
<td align="left">125.10 &#xb1; 13.15</td>
<td align="left">117.40 &#xb1; 21.84</td>
<td align="left">121.43 &#xb1; 14.18</td>
<td align="left">0.482</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Hct<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>, %</td>
<td align="left">36.23 &#xb1; 4.19</td>
<td align="left">36.59 &#xb1; 3.55</td>
<td align="left">34.18 &#xb1; 5.29</td>
<td align="left">35.19 &#xb1; 3.58</td>
<td align="left">0.668</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Leukocyte, 10<sup>9</sup>/L</td>
<td align="left">8.07 &#xb1; 1.97</td>
<td align="left">8.90 &#xb1; 1.30</td>
<td align="left">7.38 &#xb1; 1.44</td>
<td align="left">7.97 &#xb1; 2.50</td>
<td align="left">0.486</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">PLT<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>, 10<sup>9</sup>/L</td>
<td align="left">140.26 &#xb1; 57.92</td>
<td align="left">163.90 &#xb1; 58.85</td>
<td align="left">148.40 &#xb1; 66.44</td>
<td align="left">150.53 &#xb1; 66.72</td>
<td align="left">0.731</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">PT<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>, s</td>
<td align="left">10.37 &#xb1; 1.36</td>
<td align="left">10.20 &#xb1; 0.79</td>
<td align="left">10.20 &#xb1; 0.45</td>
<td align="left">10.29 &#xb1; 0.76</td>
<td align="left">0.974</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">APTT<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>, s</td>
<td align="left">26.09 &#xb1; 1.99</td>
<td align="left">26.01 &#xb1; 1.30</td>
<td align="left">28.60 &#xb1; 3.09</td>
<td align="left">26.74 &#xb1; 0.75</td>
<td align="left">0.050</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">FIB<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>, g/L</td>
<td align="left">4.60 &#xb1; 0.72</td>
<td align="left">4.55 &#xb1; 0.90</td>
<td align="left">4.82 &#xb1; 0.72</td>
<td align="left">4.17 &#xb1; 1.44</td>
<td align="left">0.577</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">TT<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>, s</td>
<td align="left">17.47 &#xb1; 0.76</td>
<td align="left">17.20 &#xb1; 0.92</td>
<td align="left">17.80 &#xb1; 0.84</td>
<td align="left">19.43 &#xb1; 2.64</td>
<td align="left">0.070</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">D-Dimer, mg/L</td>
<td align="left">2.43 &#xb1; 1.29</td>
<td align="left">2.46 &#xb1; 1.86</td>
<td align="left">4.11 &#xb1; 2.44</td>
<td align="left">4.40 &#xb1; 2.32<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>I-S</bold>
<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>, (min)</td>
<td align="left">2.62 &#xb1; 0.48</td>
<td align="left">2.76 &#xb1; 0.68</td>
<td align="left">2.29 &#xb1; 0.59</td>
<td align="left">2.26 &#xb1; 0.54</td>
<td align="left">0.164</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>U-D</bold>
<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>, (second)</td>
<td align="left">60.21 &#xb1; 25.10</td>
<td align="left">55.30 &#xb1; 36.79</td>
<td align="left">66.20 &#xb1; 15.01</td>
<td align="left">46.86 &#xb1; 7.58</td>
<td align="left">0.532</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>I-D</bold>
<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>, (min)</td>
<td align="left">6.13 &#xb1; 2.00</td>
<td align="left">7.13 &#xb1; 4.74</td>
<td align="left">4.95 &#xb1; 0.75</td>
<td align="left">5.19 &#xb1; 1.72</td>
<td align="left">0.461</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="Tfn1">
<label>
<sup>a</sup>
</label>
<p>Hb, Hemoglobin, Hct:Hematocrit, PLT:platelet, PT, plasma prothrombin time, APTT, activated partial thrombin time, FIB, plasma fibrinogen, TT, thrombin time, I-S, induction to skin incision time (min), U-D, uterine incision to delivery time (second), I-D, anesthesia induction to delivery intervals (min).</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>a: Compared with Group I, <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05; b: Compared with Group II, <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05; c: Compared with Group III, <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>3.2 Neonatal-related indicators</title>
<p>A total of 60 parturients and 72 newborns were included in this analysis. The weight of singleton premature newborns and twin newborns was significantly lower than that of the singleton term group (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). The incidence of neonatal asphyxia in Group IV (35.71%) was significantly higher than that in full-term delivery groups (I, III) (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). Although there was no statistically significant difference in 1-5-10&#xa0;min Apgar scores among the groups, when the sub-items of the score were compared, the reflex and color scores of the 1-min Apgar scores in Group IV were worse than those in other groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). Additionally, the color scores of the 5-min Apgar scores in Groups II and IV were also worse than those in Group I (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). The proportion of bag-mask ventilation usage for newborns and the send to NICU rate in premature newborns (Groups II and IV) were higher than those in term newborns (Groups I and III). The proportion of tracheal intubation in Group IV was significantly higher than that in Group I (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). The results of the blood gas analysis were consistent with the neonatal condition; the umbilical artery blood pH of Group IV was significantly lower than that of Group I (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05) (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Neonatal related indicators of four groups.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">Parameters</th>
<th align="left">Group I (n &#x3d; 38)</th>
<th align="left">Group II (n &#x3d; 10)</th>
<th align="left">Group III (n &#x3d; 10)</th>
<th align="left">Group IV (n &#x3d; 14)</th>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">
<italic>p</italic>-Value</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left">Full-term singleton</th>
<th align="left">Premature singleton</th>
<th align="left">Term twins</th>
<th align="left">Premature twins</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Weight, g</td>
<td align="left">3397 &#xb1; 452</td>
<td align="left">2359 &#xb1; 536<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">2544 &#xb1; 260<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">2102 &#xb1; 357 <sup>ac</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">0.000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Neonatal asphyxia</td>
<td align="left">2 (5.25%)</td>
<td align="left">3 (30%)</td>
<td align="left">0 (0%)</td>
<td align="left">5 (35.71%) <sup>ac</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">0.008</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>1&#xa0;min Apgar scores</bold>
</td>
<td align="left">9.53 &#xb1; 1.03</td>
<td align="left">8.40 &#xb1; 1.84</td>
<td align="left">9.80 &#xb1; 0.42</td>
<td align="left">8.07 &#xb1; 2.62</td>
<td align="left">0.007</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Muscle tone (0/1/2)</td>
<td align="left">0/5/33</td>
<td align="left">0/4/6</td>
<td align="left">0/1/9</td>
<td align="left">1/4/9</td>
<td align="left">0.117</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Heart rate (0/1/2)</td>
<td align="left">0/1/37</td>
<td align="left">0/1/9</td>
<td align="left">0/0/10</td>
<td align="left">0/2/12</td>
<td align="left">0.276</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Reflex (0/1/2)</td>
<td align="left">0/0/38</td>
<td align="left">0/1/9</td>
<td align="left">0/0/10</td>
<td align="left">0/3/11<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">0.016</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Color (0/1/2)</td>
<td align="left">0/5/33</td>
<td align="left">0/4/6</td>
<td align="left">0/1/9</td>
<td align="left">0/7/7<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">0.014</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Respiration (0/1/2)</td>
<td align="left">1/5/32</td>
<td align="left">1/4/5</td>
<td align="left">0/0/10</td>
<td align="left">2/3/9</td>
<td align="left">0.056</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>5&#xa0;min Apgar scores</bold>
</td>
<td align="left">9.92 &#xb1; 0.36</td>
<td align="left">9.50 &#xb1; 1.08</td>
<td align="left">10.00 &#xb1; 0.00</td>
<td align="left">9.27 &#xb1; 1.49</td>
<td align="left">0.049</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Muscle tone (0/1/2)</td>
<td align="left">0/2/36</td>
<td align="left">0/2/8</td>
<td align="left">0/0/10</td>
<td align="left">0/2/12</td>
<td align="left">0.218</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Heart rate (0/1/2)</td>
<td align="left">0/0/38</td>
<td align="left">0/0/10</td>
<td align="left">0/0/10</td>
<td align="left">0/0/14</td>
<td align="left">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Reflex (0/1/2)</td>
<td align="left">0/0/38</td>
<td align="left">0/0/10</td>
<td align="left">0/0/10</td>
<td align="left">0/1/13</td>
<td align="left">0.472</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Color (0/1/2)</td>
<td align="left">0/0/38</td>
<td align="left">0/2/8<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">0/0/10</td>
<td align="left">0/4/10<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">0.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Respiration (0/1/2)</td>
<td align="left">0/1/37</td>
<td align="left">0/1/9</td>
<td align="left">0/0/10</td>
<td align="left">1/1/12</td>
<td align="left">0.328</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>10&#xa0;min Apgar scores</bold>
</td>
<td align="left">9.97 &#xb1; 0.16</td>
<td align="left">9.80 &#xb1; 0.42</td>
<td align="left">10.00 &#xb1; 0.00</td>
<td align="left">9.71 &#xb1; 0.83</td>
<td align="left">0.163</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Muscle tone (0/1/2)</td>
<td align="left">0/1/37</td>
<td align="left">0/2/8</td>
<td align="left">0/0/10</td>
<td align="left">0/1/13</td>
<td align="left">0.147</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Heart rate (0/1/2)</td>
<td align="left">0/0/38</td>
<td align="left">0/0/10</td>
<td align="left">0/0/10</td>
<td align="left">0/0/14</td>
<td align="left">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Reflex (0/1/2)</td>
<td align="left">0/0/38</td>
<td align="left">0/0/10</td>
<td align="left">0/0/10</td>
<td align="left">0/0/14</td>
<td align="left">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Color (0/1/2)</td>
<td align="left">0/0/38</td>
<td align="left">0/0/10</td>
<td align="left">0/0/10</td>
<td align="left">0/0/14</td>
<td align="left">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Respiration (0/1/2)</td>
<td align="left">0/0/38</td>
<td align="left">0/0/10</td>
<td align="left">0/0/10</td>
<td align="left">1/1/12</td>
<td align="left">0.219</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Tactile stimulation</td>
<td align="left">38</td>
<td align="left">10</td>
<td align="left">10</td>
<td align="left">14</td>
<td align="left">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Bag-mask ventilation</td>
<td align="left">4</td>
<td align="left">6<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">0<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">6 <sup>ac</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Tracheal intubation</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">3<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">0.019</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NICU (Yes/No)</td>
<td align="left">5/33</td>
<td align="left">9/1<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">1/9<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">12/2<sup>ac</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">0.000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UA blood pH</td>
<td align="left">7.28 &#xb1; 0.05</td>
<td align="left">7.26 &#xb1; 0.05</td>
<td align="left">7.27 &#xb1; 0.05</td>
<td align="left">7.23 &#xb1; 0.04<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">0.037</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UA blood PaO<sub>2</sub> (mmHg)</td>
<td align="left">31.69 &#xb1; 13.03</td>
<td align="left">29.70 &#xb1; 13.37</td>
<td align="left">31.38 &#xb1; 8.50</td>
<td align="left">28.79 &#xb1; 12.51</td>
<td align="left">0.898</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UA blood PaCO<sub>2</sub>, (mmHg)</td>
<td align="left">55.17 &#xb1; 7.55</td>
<td align="left">57.79 &#xb1; 9.08</td>
<td align="left">49.00 &#xb1; 7.03</td>
<td align="left">56.14 &#xb1; 8.46</td>
<td align="left">0.125</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UA blood Base excess (mmol/L)</td>
<td align="left">&#x2212;2.04 &#xb1; 1.89</td>
<td align="left">&#x2212;2.46 &#xb1; 2.51</td>
<td align="left">&#x2212;4.86 &#xb1; 1.55<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">&#x2212;4.75 &#xb1; 2.96<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">0.001</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>NICU, neonatal intensive care unit, UA, umbilical artery.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>a: Compared with Group I, <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05; b: Compared with Group II, <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05; c: Compared with Group III, <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>3.3 Plasma concentrations of general anesthetics</title>
<p>Twin birth and premature delivery had no effect on the concentrations of general anesthetics at delivery. There was no significant difference in the plasma concentrations of the anesthetic drugs etomidate, remifentanil, and rocuronium bromide in MA, UV, and UA blood as well as the UV/MA ratio and UA/UV ratio among the four groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3e; 0.05) (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Tables 3</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref>). Among the 12 twin parturients, only 2 of them were monochorionic diamniotic, while the remaining 10 were dichorionic diamniotic. As shown in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Table S2</xref>, there were no statistically significant differences between monochorionic diamniotic and dichorionic diamniotic at the three anesthetics concentrations in MA, UV, and UA blood.</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Blood concentration of etomidate (ng/mL).</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">Parameters</th>
<th align="left">Group I (n &#x3d; 38)</th>
<th align="left">Group II (n &#x3d; 10)</th>
<th align="left">Group III (n &#x3d; 10)</th>
<th align="left">Group IV (n &#x3d; 14)</th>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">
<italic>p</italic>-Value</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left">Full-term singleton</th>
<th align="left">Premature singleton</th>
<th align="left">Term twins</th>
<th align="left">Premature twins</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">MA, ng/mL</td>
<td align="left">432.57 &#xb1; 143.28</td>
<td align="left">411.92 &#xb1; 196.94</td>
<td align="left">508.16 &#xb1; 43.82</td>
<td align="left">573.98 &#xb1; 221.59</td>
<td align="left">0.126</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UV, ng/mL</td>
<td align="left">307.99 &#xb1; 12.42</td>
<td align="left">290.48 &#xb1; 156.47</td>
<td align="left">372.61 &#xb1; 119.60</td>
<td align="left">315.08 &#xb1; 130.32</td>
<td align="left">0.491</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UA, ng/mL</td>
<td align="left">181.28 &#xb1; 71.07</td>
<td align="left">177.42 &#xb1; 123.30</td>
<td align="left">201.98 &#xb1; 80.99</td>
<td align="left">165.51 &#xb1; 42.12</td>
<td align="left">0.725</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UV/MA ratio</td>
<td align="left">0.73 &#xb1; 0.19</td>
<td align="left">0.69 &#xb1; 0.14</td>
<td align="left">0.72 &#xb1; 0.19</td>
<td align="left">0.60 &#xb1; 0.25</td>
<td align="left">0.219</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UA/UV ratio</td>
<td align="left">0.62 &#xb1; 0.18</td>
<td align="left">0.66 &#xb1; 0.24</td>
<td align="left">0.57 &#xb1; 0.21</td>
<td align="left">0.60 &#xb1; 0.26</td>
<td align="left">0.831</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>MA, maternal arterial, UA, umbilical arterial, UV, umbilical venous.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Blood concentration of remifentanil (ng/mL).</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">Parameters</th>
<th align="left">Group I (n &#x3d; 38)</th>
<th align="left">Group II (n &#x3d; 10)</th>
<th align="left">Group III (n &#x3d; 10)</th>
<th align="left">Group IV (n &#x3d; 14)</th>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">
<italic>p</italic>-Value</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left">Full-term singleton</th>
<th align="left">Premature singleton</th>
<th align="left">Term twins</th>
<th align="left">Premature twins</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">MA, ng/mL</td>
<td align="left">4.00 &#xb1; 1.53</td>
<td align="left">4.34 &#xb1; 1.20</td>
<td align="left">3.95 &#xb1; 0.91</td>
<td align="left">3.31 &#xb1; 1.12</td>
<td align="left">0.524</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UV, ng/mL</td>
<td align="left">2.05 &#xb1; 0.94</td>
<td align="left">1.72 &#xb1; 0.78</td>
<td align="left">1.61 &#xb1; 0.93</td>
<td align="left">1.60 &#xb1; 0.43</td>
<td align="left">0.195</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UA, ng/mL</td>
<td align="left">1.09 &#xb1; 0.74</td>
<td align="left">0.87 &#xb1; 0.68</td>
<td align="left">0.91 &#xb1; 1.01</td>
<td align="left">0.50 &#xb1; 0.41</td>
<td align="left">0.090</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UV/MA ratio</td>
<td align="left">0.51 &#xb1; 0.15</td>
<td align="left">0.41 &#xb1; 0.17</td>
<td align="left">0.40 &#xb1; 0.17</td>
<td align="left">0.51 &#xb1; 0.21</td>
<td align="left">0.111</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UA/UV ratio</td>
<td align="left">0.50 &#xb1; 0.24</td>
<td align="left">0.48 &#xb1; 0.24</td>
<td align="left">0.46 &#xb1; 0.34</td>
<td align="left">0.36 &#xb1; 0.30</td>
<td align="left">0.394</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>MA, maternal arterial, UA, umbilical arterial, UV, umbilical venous.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T5" position="float">
<label>TABLE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Blood concentration of rocuronium bromide (&#x3bc;g/mL).</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">Parameters</th>
<th align="left">Group I (n &#x3d; 38)</th>
<th align="left">Group II (n &#x3d; 10)</th>
<th align="left">Group III (n &#x3d; 10)</th>
<th align="left">Group IV (n &#x3d; 14)</th>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">
<italic>p</italic>-Value</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left">Full-term singleton</th>
<th align="left">Premature singleton</th>
<th align="left">Term twins</th>
<th align="left">Premature twins</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">MA, ug/mL</td>
<td align="left">5.59 &#xb1; 1.91</td>
<td align="left">6.41 &#xb1; 3.41</td>
<td align="left">5.50 &#xb1; 1.21</td>
<td align="left">7.12 &#xb1; 3.74</td>
<td align="left">0.407</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UV, ug/mL</td>
<td align="left">0.84 &#xb1; 0.55</td>
<td align="left">0.65 &#xb1; 0.25</td>
<td align="left">0.98 &#xb1; 0.70</td>
<td align="left">0.67 &#xb1; 0.43</td>
<td align="left">0.387</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UA, ug/mL</td>
<td align="left">0.50 &#xb1; 0.34</td>
<td align="left">0.42 &#xb1; 0.16</td>
<td align="left">0.50 &#xb1; 0.35</td>
<td align="left">0.35 &#xb1; 0.18</td>
<td align="left">0.370</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UV/MA ratio</td>
<td align="left">0.16 &#xb1; 0.09</td>
<td align="left">0.14 &#xb1; 0.09</td>
<td align="left">0.17 &#xb1; 0.09</td>
<td align="left">0.13 &#xb1; 0.13</td>
<td align="left">0.640</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UA/UV ratio</td>
<td align="left">0.60 &#xb1; 0.22</td>
<td align="left">0.66 &#xb1; 0.17</td>
<td align="left">0.53 &#xb1; 0.10</td>
<td align="left">0.58 &#xb1; 0.17</td>
<td align="left">0.483</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>MA, maternal arterial, UA, umbilical arterial, UV, umbilical venous.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4">
<title>3.4 Comparison of plasma concentration between twins</title>
<p>During a cesarean section of a twin pregnancy, the birth order has no impact on the blood concentration of anesthetic drugs (etomidate, remifentanil, and rocuronium bromide) in UV or UA blood and UV/MA ratio and UA/UV ratio (<italic>p</italic> &#x3e; 0.05) (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">Table 6</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T6" position="float">
<label>TABLE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Comparison of plasma concentration between twins.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Parameters</th>
<th align="left">The first of the twins in Group III (n &#x3d; 5)</th>
<th align="left">The second of the twins in Group III (n &#x3d; 5)</th>
<th align="left">The first of the twins in Group IV (n &#x3d; 7)</th>
<th align="left">The second of the twins in Group IV (n &#x3d; 7)</th>
<th align="left">
<italic>p</italic>-Value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>Etomidate</bold>
</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UV, ng/mL</td>
<td align="center">400.23 &#xb1; 90.87</td>
<td align="center">345.00 &#xb1; 148.39</td>
<td align="center">346.30 &#xb1; 138.41</td>
<td align="center">283.85 &#xb1; 123.95</td>
<td align="left">0.939</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UA, ng/mL</td>
<td align="center">239.16 &#xb1; 93.26</td>
<td align="center">164.80 &#xb1; 51.04</td>
<td align="center">167.32 &#xb1; 46.32</td>
<td align="center">163.69 &#xb1; 41.12</td>
<td align="left">0.599</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UV/MA ratio</td>
<td align="center">0.78 &#xb1; 0.13</td>
<td align="center">0.66 &#xb1; 0.23</td>
<td align="center">0.67 &#xb1; 0.29</td>
<td align="center">0.53 &#xb1; 0.21</td>
<td align="left">0.533</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UA/UV ratio</td>
<td align="center">0.60 &#xb1; 0.18</td>
<td align="center">0.54 &#xb1; 0.26</td>
<td align="center">0.55 &#xb1; 0.28</td>
<td align="center">0.65 &#xb1; 0.26</td>
<td align="left">0.897</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>Remifentanil</bold>
</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UV, ng/mL</td>
<td align="center">1.74 &#xb1; 1.06</td>
<td align="center">1.47 &#xb1; 0.88</td>
<td align="center">1.60 &#xb1; 0.50</td>
<td align="center">1.53 &#xb1; 0.39</td>
<td align="left">0.496</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UA, ng/mL</td>
<td align="center">1.00 &#xb1; 1.08</td>
<td align="center">0.82 &#xb1; 1.05</td>
<td align="center">0.51 &#xb1; 0.41</td>
<td align="center">0.48 &#xb1; 0.44</td>
<td align="left">0.131</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UV/MA ratio</td>
<td align="center">0.42 &#xb1; 0.18</td>
<td align="center">0.37 &#xb1; 0.17</td>
<td align="center">0.52 &#xb1; 0.23</td>
<td align="center">0.50 &#xb1; 0.21</td>
<td align="left">0.338</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UA/UV ratio</td>
<td align="center">0.47 &#xb1; 0.29</td>
<td align="center">0.45 &#xb1; 0.41</td>
<td align="center">0.37 &#xb1; 0.29</td>
<td align="center">0.35 &#xb1; 0.33</td>
<td align="left">0.867</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>Rocuronium bromide</bold>
</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UV, ng/mL</td>
<td align="center">1.13 &#xb1; 0.78</td>
<td align="center">0.83 &#xb1; 0.68</td>
<td align="center">0.73 &#xb1; 0.56</td>
<td align="center">0.60 &#xb1; 0.29</td>
<td align="left">0.482</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UA, ng/mL</td>
<td align="center">058 &#xb1; 0.36</td>
<td align="center">0.43 &#xb1; 0.36</td>
<td align="center">0.35 &#xb1; 0.23</td>
<td align="center">0.34 &#xb1; 0.13</td>
<td align="left">0.453</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UV/MA ratio</td>
<td align="center">0.20 &#xb1; 0.10</td>
<td align="center">0.14 &#xb1; 0.09</td>
<td align="center">0.16 &#xb1; 0.18</td>
<td align="center">0.10 &#xb1; 0.06</td>
<td align="left">0.550</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">UA/UV ratio</td>
<td align="center">0.54 &#xb1; 0.14</td>
<td align="center">0.52 &#xb1; 0.06</td>
<td align="center">0.55 &#xb1; 0.17</td>
<td align="center">0.60 &#xb1; 0.18</td>
<td align="left">0.774</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>MA, maternal arterial, UA, umbilical arterial, UV, umbilical venous.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-5">
<title>3.5 Correlation between drug concentration and neonatal weight</title>
<p>Except for remifentanil in UA blood, neonatal weight showed no significant correlation with the plasma concentration of anesthetic drugs in UV or UA blood (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures 2</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>). A positive correlation was found between remifentanil plasma concentrations and neonatal weight in UA blood (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05) (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="T7">Table 7</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlations of neonatal remifentanil concentrations and neonatal weight. Ther is no correlation between neonatal weight and neonatal remifentanil plasma concentration in UV blood. There is a positive correlation between neonatal weight and remifentanil plasma concentrations in UA blood (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphar-14-1213734-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlations of neonatal etomidate concentrations and neonatal weight. There is no correlation between neonatal weight and etomidate plasma concentration in UV and UA blood (<italic>p</italic> &#x3e; 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphar-14-1213734-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlations of neonatal rocuronium bromide concentrations and neonatal weight. There is no correlation between neonatal weight and rocuronium bromide plasma concentration in UV and UA blood (<italic>p</italic> &#x3e; 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphar-14-1213734-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T7" position="float">
<label>TABLE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlation coefficient of neonatal blood concentrations of etomidate, remifentanil, rocuronium bromide with neonatal weight.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">Drugs</th>
<th align="left">UV (r, <italic>p</italic>-value)</th>
<th align="left">UA (r, <italic>p</italic>-value)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Etomidate</td>
<td align="left">0.155, <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.193</td>
<td align="left">0.123, <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.305</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Remifentanil</td>
<td align="left">0.138, <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.249</td>
<td align="left">0.244, <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.039</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Rocuronium bromide</td>
<td align="left">0.006, <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.958</td>
<td align="left">0.135, <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.256</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>4 Discussion</title>
<p>The utilization of opioid induction for CS remains a controversial topic, with numerous theorized risks and benefits. The rising incidence of caesarean deliveries for premature babies under general anesthesia raises concerns about the assumption that neonate exposure to anesthetics will lead to respiratory depression after birth. Cord blood concentrations reflect the drug transfer across the placenta and pharmacokinetics in the fetus, both of which may differ within a twin pair or between preterm and term infants. In this study, the blood concentrations of various anesthetic drugs (etomidate, remifentanil, and rocuronium bromide) in MA, UV, and UA blood at delivery undergoing caesarean section between term and preterm infants, twins, and singletons were analyzed by UPLC-MS/MS. No differences were found for these anesthetic drugs concentrations in MA, UV, and UA blood or UV/MA and UA/UV ratios between term and preterm infants, twins, and singletons. Moreover, there was no variation in the anesthetic drug concentration among each pair of twins. Additionally, no correlation was found between the neonatal weight and the plasma concentrations of anesthetic drugs in UV and UA blood, except for remifentanil in UA blood.</p>
<p>Our data reveals that the incidence of neonatal asphyxia in twin premature delivery was up to 35.71% for caesarean section under general anesthesia. Immediately after birth, we observed that the reflex and color of newborns were predominantly affected, while respiration seemed less impacted. This suggests that the adverse effects on preterm twin infants due to general anesthesia may not be directly attributed to respiratory depression caused by the anesthesia drugs. In addition, the proportion of tracheal intubation in the premature twin group was significantly higher than that in the full-term singleton group, suggesting extra attention should be paid to the issue of asphyxia in newborns born through cesarean section under general anesthesia.</p>
<p>No significant differences were observed in etomidate, remifentanil, and rocuronium bromide concentrations between term and preterm infants; twins and singletons are the main findings of this study. Etomidate has been used in cesarean sections under general anesthesia for many years. A previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Gregory and Davidson, 1991</xref>) demonstrated that the umbilical/maternal vein ratio of etomidate was 0.5 (SD 0.18), with no relation to time in the range encountered, and that the uterine artery/uterine vein ratio of etomidate was 0.86 (SD 0.33), suggesting that etomidate uptake into the fetus is effectively complete. Another study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Esener et al., 1992</xref>) in 40 patients undergoing cesarean deliveries found that the mean plasma etomidate concentration decreased rapidly (1,242.0&#xa0;ng/mL at 5&#xa0;min to undetectable 2&#xa0;h after injection) and that the umbilical:maternal vein ratio was 1:24. And etomidate levels in colostrum were 79.3&#xa0;ng/mL after 30 min, which reduced to undetectable after 4 h, indicating that a single injection of etomidate is safe for parturients and lactation.</p>
<p>Remifentanil is a &#x3bc;-opioid receptor agonist with weak affinity to &#x3b4;- and &#x3ba;-receptors. Blood-brain balance is rapidly reached in the human body in approximately 1&#xa0;min and the drug is rapidly hydrolyzed in tissue and blood, resulting in a fast onset and short maintenance time, which is obviously different from other fentanyl analogues. Remifentanil is mainly metabolized by non-specific esterase hydrolysis in plasma and tissues. Approximately 95% of remifentanil is metabolized and excreted in urine, with the main metabolite activity being only 1/4,600. There is no change in metabolic rate and no accumulation in the body after long-term infusion or repeated injection, and the incidence of delayed respiratory depression is very low (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Kan et al., 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Sridharan and Sivaramakrishnan, 2019</xref>). A previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Welzing et al., 2011</xref>) demonstrated that very preterm infants exhibited a high nonspecific esterase activity in umbilical cord blood compared with term infants, which contributed to the rapid drug metabolization in preterm infants. This rapid metabolic feature also explains the results in our study, wherein the plasma concentrations of remifentanil and etomidate are not different between the groups. As for the positive correlation found between remifentanil plasma concentrations and neonatal weight in UA blood, it is inferred that preterm infants exhibit a high nonspecific esterase activity in umbilical cord blood compared with term infants, affecting the metabolism and distribution of remifentanil in newborns.</p>
<p>Rocuronium provides the shortest onset of action of non-depolarizing blocking agents, with few adverse reactions. It is highly water-soluble and difficult to pass through the placental barrier. As early as 1994, it was used for general anesthesia in cesarean section (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abouleish et al., 1994</xref>). Due to its characteristic large molecular weight, most studies related to rocuronium (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Abu-Halaweh et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Blaha et al., 2020</xref>) focused on the onset time and muscle relaxant effects, while the exact placental transfer rate was absent. Our results show that the placental transfer rate of rocuronium in combination with etomidate and remifentanil was 16% in single term neonates.</p>
<p>Apgar scores are commonly used as surrogate measures to predict subsequent adverse neonatal outcomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Cnattingius et al., 2020</xref>). Due to the grouping conditions, the Apgar scores between groups were different for neonates, with those from twin premature delivery being inferior in most indicators (e.g., weight, the reflex and color scores of 1 min and 5&#xa0;min Apgar scores, the proportion of using bag-mask ventilation and tracheal intubation, and umbilical artery blood pH). In addition, D-dimer was different (higher in twins) between groups due to the grouping conditions, which is consistent with the changing model results of D-dimer in twins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bar et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Morikawa et al., 2011</xref>).</p>
<p>This study is the first to describe the concentrations and placental transfer rates of intravenous drugs in twins and premature infants born by cesarean section under general anesthesia. However, the study has several limitations. Firstly, the sample size of the study is small, resulting in a large data standard deviation and some differences (such as the positive correlation between remifentanil concentration in UA and neonatal weight) that cannot be clearly explained. It is necessary to collect a larger sample size to clarify this confusion. Secondly, cord blood concentrations were determined only at birth, which does not reflect dynamic changes in the features of neonates after birth. In addition, monochorionic and dichorionic diamniotic twins were pooled for analysis, since obtaining a sufficient number of cases for twins under general anesthesia is challenging.</p>
<p>In conclusion, preterm or twin deliveries do not affect the neonatal concentrations of etomidate, remifentanil, and rocuronium bromide used in general anesthesia for cesarean sections.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s5">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Material</xref>, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The studies involving humans were approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children (reference number: 2021-011). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>HL laboratory tests, data curation, writing-original draft. J-KM methodology, supervision, investigation, writing&#x2013;original draft. MC, LG, and H-QZ investigation, data curation, formal analysis. X-FL writing&#x2013;review, resource, supervision. JY conceptualization, investigation, formal analysis, writing&#x2013;review and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This study was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing of China (No. cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0763), Institutional Research Grants of Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children (No. 2021YJMS03) and National Key Clinical Specialty Construction Project (Obstetrics and Gynecology).</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>We are grateful to Prof. Yongchun Su at Chongqing Youyoubaobei Women and Children&#x2019;s Hospital for his manuscript preparation assistance. We thank all the participating families and the research assistants involved in this study.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s9">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s10">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2023.1213734/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2023.1213734/full&#x23;supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/docx" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table2.docx" id="SM2" mimetype="application/docx" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Abouleish</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abboud</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lechevalier</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chalian</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alford</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Rocuronium (Org 9426) for caesarean section</article-title>. <source>Br. J. Anaesth.</source> <volume>73</volume>, <fpage>336</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>341</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bja/73.3.336</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Abu-Halaweh</surname>
<given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Massad</surname>
<given-names>I. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abu-Ali</surname>
<given-names>H. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Badran</surname>
<given-names>I. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barazangi</surname>
<given-names>B. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ramsay</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Rapid sequence induction and intubation with 1 mg/kg rocuronium bromide in cesarean section, comparison with suxamethonium</article-title>. <source>Saudi Med. J.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>1393</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1396</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bar</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blickstein</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hod</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bar-Hava</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ben-Rafael</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rahmany-Babai</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Increased D-dimer levels in twin gestation</article-title>. <source>Thromb. Res.</source> <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>485</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>489</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0049-3848(00)00187-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Blaha</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Noskova</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hlinecka</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Krakovska</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fundova</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bartosova</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Surgical conditions with rocuronium versus suxamethonium in cesarean section: A randomized trial</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Obstet. Anesth.</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>14</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>21</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.08.005</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Clivatti</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname>
<given-names>R. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sermer</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Silversides</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carvalho</surname>
<given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Cardiac output monitoring during Cesarean delivery in a patient with palliated tetralogy of Fallot</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Anaesth.</source> <volume>59</volume>, <fpage>1119</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1124</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12630-012-9793-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cnattingius</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johansson</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Razaz</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Apgar score and risk of neonatal death among preterm infants</article-title>. <source>N. Engl. J. Med.</source> <volume>383</volume>, <fpage>49</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>57</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1056/NEJMoa1915075</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Condo</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cipriani</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Colnaghi</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bellu</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zanini</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bulfoni</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: are risk factors the same in preterm and term infants?</article-title> <source>J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>1267</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1272</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/14767058.2016.1210597</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Downing</surname>
<given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buley</surname>
<given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brock-Utne</surname>
<given-names>J. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Houlton</surname>
<given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1979</year>). <article-title>Etomidate for induction of anaesthesia at caesarean section: comparison with thiopentone</article-title>. <source>Br. J. Anaesth.</source> <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>135</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>140</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bja/51.2.135</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Esener</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sarihasan</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guven</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ustun</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Thiopentone and etomidate concentrations in maternal and umbilical plasma, and in colostrum</article-title>. <source>Br. J. Anaesth.</source> <volume>69</volume>, <fpage>586</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>588</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bja/69.6.586</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gregory</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davidson</surname>
<given-names>D. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Plasma etomidate levels in mother and fetus</article-title>. <source>Anaesthesia</source> <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>716</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>718</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2044.1991.tb09762.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ho</surname>
<given-names>Y. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boey</surname>
<given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Varughese Mathews</surname>
<given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>See</surname>
<given-names>H. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hwang</surname>
<given-names>N. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>An unusual case of a parturient with uncorrected pentalogy of fallot presenting for elective cesarean section delivery of twins</article-title>. <source>Anesth. Essays Res.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>267</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>270</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4103/aer.AER_126_17</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shu</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Propofol in combination with remifentanil for cesarean section: placental transfer and effect on mothers and newborns at different induction to delivery intervals</article-title>. <source>Taiwan J. Obstet. Gynecol.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>521</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>526</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tjog.2016.09.010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Juang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gabriel</surname>
<given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dutton</surname>
<given-names>R. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Palanisamy</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Urman</surname>
<given-names>R. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Choice of anesthesia for cesarean delivery: an analysis of the national anesthesia clinical outcomes Registry</article-title>. <source>Anesth. analgesia</source> <volume>124</volume>, <fpage>1914</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1917</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1213/ANE.0000000000001677</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kan</surname>
<given-names>R. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hughes</surname>
<given-names>S. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rosen</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kessin</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Preston</surname>
<given-names>P. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lobo</surname>
<given-names>E. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Intravenous remifentanil: placental transfer, maternal and neonatal effects</article-title>. <source>Anesthesiology</source> <volume>88</volume>, <fpage>1467</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1474</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00000542-199806000-00008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Louchet</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peytavin</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Didelot</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Le</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bourgeois-Moine</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carbillon</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Frequency of differential placental transfer to twins of maternal antiretroviral medications</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.</source> <volume>256</volume>, <fpage>405</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>411</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.11.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Morikawa</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yamada</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yamada</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Akaishi</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koyama</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Minakami</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Changes in D-dimer levels after cesarean section in women with singleton and twin pregnancies</article-title>. <source>Thromb. Res.</source> <volume>128</volume>, <fpage>e33</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e38</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.thromres.2011.05.011</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sridharan</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sivaramakrishnan</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Comparison of fentanyl, remifentanil, sufentanil and alfentanil in combination with propofol for general anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</article-title>. <source>Curr. Clin. Pharmacol.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>116</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>124</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2174/1567201816666190313160438</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Welzing</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ebenfeld</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dlugay</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wiesen</surname>
<given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roth</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mueller</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Remifentanil degradation in umbilical cord blood of preterm infants</article-title>. <source>Anesthesiology</source> <volume>114</volume>, <fpage>570</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>577</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/ALN.0b013e318204e043</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>White</surname>
<given-names>L. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hodsdon</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>An</surname>
<given-names>G. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thang</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Melhuish</surname>
<given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vlok</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Induction opioids for caesarean section under general anaesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Obstet. Anesth.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>4</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.04.007</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>