The chemical formula for selinexor (SXR) is [Z-3 (3-(3, 5-bis (trifluromethyl-1, 2, 4-triazol-1-yl)-N-pyrazin-2-ylprop-2-enehydrazide] (Figure 1) (Chari et al., 2019).

SXR is an anti-cancer drug that acts by inhibition of nuclear exportin-1 (Chari et al., 2019). SXR is regarded as a selective inhibitor of nuclear export known as exportin-1 (XPO1), which inhibits transport of nuclear proteins from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, leading to the induction of cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis (Chari et al., 2019). SXR is also known as chromosome region maintenance 1 protein (CRM1) and inhibits different types of tumor suppressor proteins (TSPs), including p21, p53, pRB, FOXO, and BRCA1/2, restoring the process of endogenous tumor suppression (Figure 2) (Podar et al., 2020).

SINE is a class of specific small molecules that have anti-inflammatory and antiviral properties (Widman et al., 2018). XPO1 induces accumulation of nuclear proteins within the nucleus of cancer cells with increasing expression of tumor suppressor genes (Podar et al., 2020). XPO1 mediates transport and export of leucine-rich nuclear export signals (NES) containing proteins and RNA transcripts (Widman et al., 2018). Of interest, nucleocytoplasmic transport occurs via a specific system called the nuclear pore complex, which permits passive diffusion of small molecules and active transport of large cargo proteins (Figure 3). As well, the nucleocytoplasmic transport trafficking pathway is involved in the propagation of the inflammatory process and the pathogenesis of viral infections (Widman et al., 2018). Mathew et al.'s study confirmed that XPO1 is necessary for the viral life cycle Mathew and Ghildyal (2017).

SXR was the first selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) indicated for the treatment of refractory multiple myeloma (MM) in patients who have not responded to proteasome inhibitors and immunotherapy (Chari et al., 2019). SXR is also indicated in the management of refractory and relapsing B-cell lymphoma (Kalakonda et al., 2020). Under the name of KPT-330, SXR was tested in different animal model studies in the treatment of solid tumors and chronic leukemia (Parikh et al., 2014). Moreover, different preclinical and ongoing clinical studies have shown the effectiveness of SXR and other SINEs in the treatment of various malignancies. For example, SXR in a phase II study was effective against different gynecological tumors like cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancers (Vergote et al., 2020). As well, SXR has been shown to be of interest in treating acute myeloid leukemia (Talati and sweet 2018).

SXR is given orally at a dose of 80 mg once weekly. Its absorption is not affected by food, and it has a 95% protein binding capacity with a 125-L volume of distribution. SXR has a half-life of 6–8 h and is mostly eliminated by bile after being metabolized by hepatic glucoronosyl transferase (Bader et al., 2021). SXR is associated with some adverse effects, including nausea, vomiting, leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and hyponatremia (Bader et al., 2021). SXR is associated with some adverse effects, including nausea, vomiting, leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and hyponatremia (Bader et al., 2021). In a BOSTON clinical study used to evaluate FDA-approved drugs in patients with MM following at least one prior treatment with SXR in combination with dexamethasone and bortezomib, it was revealed that the most common adverse effects were gastrointestinal disorders and cytopenia (Grosicki et al., 2020). Besides, other adverse effects have been reported in this study, like fatigue (59%), nausea (50%), thrombocytopenia (43%), lymphopenia (38%), anorexia (35%), and diarrhea (32%) (Grosicki et al., 2020). Furthermore, serious adverse effects have been reported in 46% of patients treated by SXR, including gastrointestinal toxicity, neurological toxicity, and secondary infections (Grosicki et al., 2020).

Regarding drug interactions of SXR, antifungal drugs like posaconazole, itracanazole, and isavuconazole increase the plasma concentration of SXR by inhibiting the CYP3A4 enzyme, which is involved in the metabolism of SXR (Zhou et al., 2021). Bader et al., 2021 recently found that SXR pharmacokinetics are less affected by other drugs and organ dysfunctions. (Bader et al., 2021).

It has been reported that XPO1 inhibitors have antiviral effects mainly against respiratory syncytial viruses (RSV) and influenza viruses (Jorquera et al., 2019; Uddin et al., 2020). An in vitro study illustrated that KPT-335, a SINE, prevents transport of RSV M protein from the nucleus to the cytoplasm (Jorquera et al., 2019). Watanabe et al. found that leptomycin B, a SINE, attenuates influenza virus infection through inhibition of viral ribonucleoprotein export from the nucleus to the cytoplasm (Watanabe et al., 2001). XPO1 cargo proteins are essential for the regulation of vial proliferation and maturation (Uddin et al., 2020).

Notably, coronavirus infection stimulates translocation of different cargo proteins through an XPO1-dependent pathway (Uddin et al., 2020). As well, XPO1 inhibitors attenuate replication of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) through inhibition of nuclear export of HIV intron-containing RNA (Boons et al., 2015). Indeed, nucleo-cytoplasmic transport blockers such as leptomycin B and ivermectin reduce the replication of equine herpes virus type 1 (Slonska et al., 2013).

It has been reported that verdinexor and other SINE agents were effective against in vitro replication and pathology of influenza virus infection (Perwitasari et al., 2016). Similarly, an in vivo study demonstrated that verdinexor can reduce viral burden and virus-induced lung inflammation with a subsequent decreased mortality rate even when given 4 days following influenza virus infection (Perwitasari et al., 2016). Verdinexor and SXR are closely related compounds; they have similar pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties (Perwitasari et al., 2016).

Different viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, require nuclear XPO1 to carry their proteins. For example, envelop and nucleoproteins need XPO1 for proper action (Zhou et al., 2020). Jorquera et al. found that inhibition of XPO1 by leptomycin B and other natural products results in apoptosis of SARS-CoV infected cells Jorquera et al. (2019). SXR has the ability to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication by inhibiting the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and activating the release of anti-inflammatory cytokines (de Lemos et al., 2003).

SXR, on the other hand, has potent anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting nuclear factor B (NF-B), resulting in the inhibition of IL-1, IL-6, and interferon gamma (INF-γ) release (Kashyap et al., 2016). Besides, SXR has an antioxidant effect by inducing the release of nuclear erythroid factor 2 (Nrf2) (Tajiri et al., 2016). Also, SXR has anti-inflammatory and cytoprotective effects by activating peroxisome proliferator activator receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) (Umemoto and Fujiki, 2012). Wu et al. revealed that SXR had the ability to attenuate lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced peritoneal sepsis in mice Wu et al. (2018).

These observations suggest that SXR has antiviral and anti-inflammatory effects, thereby enabling it to mitigate different viral infections and associated inflammatory disorders.

SXR covalently binds the cysteine 528 residue of XPO1’s cargo binding pocket, inhibiting nuclear protein transport, including SARS-CoV-2 viral protein, nucleocapsid proteins, and ORF3b/ORF9b, which block host immune response (Kashyap et al., 2021). Uddin et al. confirmed the dose-dependent manner of SXR in the inhibition of the SARS-CoV-2 proliferation (Uddin et al., 2020).

Definitely, XPO1 inhibitors can limit the interaction between the SARS-CoV-2 viral protein and host cell receptors (Gordon et al., 2020). At present, ACE2 is regarded as a cargo protein transported by XPO1 to express on the cell membrane (Kashyap et al., 2021). Therefore, inhibition of nuclear XPO1 by SXR may limit expression of ACE2 and its interaction with SARS-CoV-2 (Kashyap et al., 2021). However, this effect was transient and not completely blocked by SXR therapy.

Moreover, a recent study confirmed that neuropilin-1 (NRP-1) may act as a receptor and facilitate entry of SARS-CoV-2 into the host cell via the interaction between its B1 domain and the S1 subunit of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Thus, NRP-1 could be a potential target for SARS-CoV-2 infection. It has been shown by in vivo and in vitro testing that SXR has the ability to block the NRP-1 receptor (Charoute et al., 2022). Therefore, SXR can reduce the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infection independent of the ACE2 pathway. However, the effect of SXR on other proposed SARS-CoV-2 receptors has been suggested but not documented (Charoute et al., 2022).

Of note, XPO1 inhibitors block the replication of SARS-CoV by inhibiting the export of viral nuclear proteins ORF3, N, 9B, and S proteins (Agree, 2020). Lee and others revealed that SARS-CoV-2 ORF6, which uses XPO1, is the most cytotoxic protein in human 293-T cells, and use of SXR may attenuate this in vitro toxicity (Lee et al., 2021). Therefore, SXR could be the potential therapy to prevent the SARS-CoV-2-induced cytopathic effect. SARS-CoV ORF proteins, in particular, have been linked to significant cytotoxicity (Khan et al., 2006). To evade host immune response and suppress immune response to the invading virus, SARS-CoV-2 ORF6 antagonizes INF signaling and interacts with the nuclear pore protein NUP98-RAE1 (Miorin et al., 2020). Therefore, prevention of the entrance of SARS-CoV-2 via importin inhibitors like ivermectin or using XPO1 inhibitors like SXR could be effective against SARS-CoV-2 infection (Al-Kuraishy et al., 2020 d).

Moreover, SXR has the ability to prevent the development of a cytokine storm in COVID-19 by inhibiting the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines since SINE had the ability to inhibit the release of inflammatory cytokines in different experimental studies (Perwitasari et al., 2016; Jorquera et al., 2019). Kashyap et al. experimental study demonstrated that SXR can inhibit SARS-CoV-2 proliferation and attenuate associated inflammation by inhibiting pro-inflammatory cytokine release and augmenting anti-inflammatory cytokine release Kashyap et al. (202).

Regarding the role of nuclear proteins in SARS-CoV-2 infection, it has been shown that p53 inhibits expression of ACE2 and interaction with SARS-CoV-2 (Zhang et al., 2021). ACE2 seems to be protective rather than harmful by attenuating inflammatory and coagulation disorders in COVID-19 by metabolizing vasoconstrictor angiotensin II (AngII) to anti-inflammatory Ang1-7 (Al-Kuraishy et al., 2020 e). Subhash et al. revealed that SXR and other SINE can inhibit transport of p53 in gastric carcinoma, resulting in nuclear accumulation of p53 with induction of apoptosis and cell-cycle arrest Subhash et al. 2(2018). SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses induce cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis through the induction of p53 (Hemmat et al., 2021). Therefore, inhibition of the p53 pathway by SXR may decrease SARS-CoV-2-induced apoptosis in COVID-19.

Notably, SXR can reduce oxidative and inflammatory disorders in COVID-19 by activating Nrf2 and PPAR-γ (Umemoto and Fujiki, 2012; Tajiri et al., 2016). Several studies (Filgueira et al., 2021; Pivonello et al., 2021) found that high inflammatory and oxidative burdens in SARS-CoV-2 infection were associated with COVID-19 severity.

Taken together, SXR could be a potential candidate in the management of COVID-19 because of its anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anti-SARS-CoV-2 effects (Figure 4).

The present review has several limitations, including a paucity of clinical studies and long-term adverse effects of SXR were not evaluated. Despite these limitations, this review highlighted the potential role of SXR in the management of COVID-19 and could be a preliminary report evoking researchers for large-scale prospective studies.