Ononis natrix subsp. hispanica was collected from Antalya-Turkey during of flowering season (June 2015). Taxonomic identification of the plant material was confirmed by the senior taxonomist Dr. Murad Aydin Sanda, from the Department of Biology, Selcuk University. The voucher specimen has been deposited at the Herbarium of the Department of Biology, Selcuk University, Konya-Turkey.

To obtain ethyl acetate and methanol extracts, the air-dried aerial parts (10 g) were macerated with 200 mL of these solvents at room temperature (25° ± 1°C) for 24 h. The extracts were concentrated under vacuum at 40°C by using a rotary evaporator. To obtain water extract, the powdered samples were boiled with 250 mL of distilled water for 30 min. The aqueous extract was filtered, lyophilized (−80°C, 48 h), and all extracts stored at + 4°C in the dark until use.

The total phenolics content was determined by Folin-Ciocalteu method (Slinkard and Singleton, 1977) with slight modification and expressed as gallic acid equivalents (GAE/g extract), while total flavonoids content was determined using AlCl₃ method (Zengin et al., 2014) with slight modification and expressed as rutin equivalents (RE/g extract).

Phenolic compounds were evaluated by RP-HPLC (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Tokyo, Japan). Detection and quantification were carried out with a LC-10ADvp pump, a Diode Array Detector, a CTO-10Avp column heater, SCL-10Avp system controller, DGU-14A degasser and SIL-10ADvp auto sampler (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Columbia, MD). Separations were conducted at 30°C on Agilent® Eclipse XDB C-18 reversed-phase column (250 × 4.6 mm length, 5 μm particle size). Phenolic compositions of the extracts were determined by a modified method of Zengin et al. (2014). Gallic acid, protocatechuic acid, (+)-catechin, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, (−)-epicatechin, syringic acid, vanillin, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, sinapic acid, benzoic acid, o-coumaric acid, rutin, hesperidin, rosmarinic acid, eriodictyol, trans-cinnamic acid, quercetin, luteolin, kaempferol, and apigenin were used as standards. Identification and quantitative analysis were done by comparison with standards. The amount of each phenolic compound was expressed as microgram per gram of extract using external calibration curves, which were obtained for each phenolic standard.

Antioxidant [DPPH, ABTS radical scavenging, reducing power (CUPRAC and FRAP), phosphomolybdenum and metal chelating (ferrozine method) and enzyme inhibitory assays (cholinesterase (Elmann's method), tyrosinase (dopachrome method), α-amylase (iodine/potassium iodide method) and α-glucosidase (chromogenic PNPG method)] were performed according to our previous researches (Zengin et al., 2014; Zengin, 2016). Antioxidant capacities were expressed as equivalents of trolox and EDTA (for metal chelating). In addition, the enzyme inhibitory activities of the extracts were evaluated as equivalents of standard inhibitors per gram of the plant extract (galantamine for AChE and BChE, kojic acid for tyrosinase, and acarbose for α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibition assays).

Dockings of the representative substances have been performed for each selected enzyme employed for the in vitro enzymatic inhibition tests in this work. Glide embedded in the maestro suite 10.2 has been employed for the docking calculations by using the “eXtra Precision” scoring function for all the enzymes and the mm-GBSA binding energy has been calculated by the use of Prime embedded in maestro 10.2 (Table 1; Jones et al., 1997). In all cases, the binding pocket was determined automatically by centering the grid on the crystallographic inhibitor, extended in a radius of 10 Angstroms from the center. The best pose for each compound docked to the selected enzymes was the best ranked among the 10,000 generated.

DNA protection activity of the studied extracts was analyzed using pUC19 plasmid DNA (pDNA). Plasmid isolation was performed by Thermo Scientific Genejet Plasmid Miniprep Kit. The reaction mixture contained 5 μL of Fenton's reagent (30 mM H₂O₂, 50 mM ascorbic acid, and 80 mM FeCI₃), 5 μL of these extracts at two different concentrations (5 and 10 mg/mL) and 3 μL of pDNA (300 μg/μL). Final volume of reaction mixture was brought up to 20 μL using double-distilled water. Positive control was composed of 12 μL of distilled water, 5 μL of Fenton's reagent and 3 μL of pDNA. Negative control involved only 17 μL of distilled water and 3 μL of pDNA. Samples were incubated for 30 min at 37°C and 4 μL loading dye (Thermo Scientific, USA) was added to the all mixtures. The DNA mixtures were run on 0.8% agarose gel and then visualized under ultraviolet light cabin. Biological replication of test was carried out at three times and band density was determined by the gel image analysis software (Quantum, Vision-Capt., Vilber Lourmat SAS, France) (Ozkan et al., 2015).

Antimicrobial activity test was performed by disc diffusion method. Nutrient agar medium was used for test microorganisms and microorganisms were refreshed in 100 mm sterile petri dishes. Single colony of bacterial strain was inoculated in 20 ml nutrient broth medium for 24 h at 37°C incubator. After bacteria concentration was made visible in %9 sterile NaCI and its turbidity was standardized to 0.5 McFarland by adding bacterial suspension. Bacterial suspension seeded to 100 mm petri dishes. After the tested extracts were dissolved in DMSO and saturated on discs, they were incubated at room temperature for drying. They were placed on the inoculated petri plates with microorganisms for 24 h at 37°C incubator. Test was replicated at least three times and results were analyzed by measuring inhibition zone. Microorganisms were illustrated on Table 2.

All the assays were carried out in triplicate. The results were expressed as mean value and standard deviation (mean ± SD). Statistical differences between the extracts were analyzed by using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's honestly significant difference post-hoc test (α = 0.05). All the analysis was carried out using SPSS v22.0 software.

In the last decades, many studies highlighted biological activities of phenolic compounds, such as antioxidant, anticancer, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory. Flavonoids are the most abundant group of phenolics and considered as natural bioactive agents for designing novel functional products. In this sense, the amounts of total phenolics and flavonoids contents in O. natrix extracts were determined by Folin-Ciocalteu and AlCl₃ methods. The greatest content of total phenolics was noticed in the ethyl acetate extract (60.19 mgGAE/g extract), followed by methanol (59.22 mgGAE/g extract) and water (35.12 mgGAE/g extract) extracts. Similar results were observed for flavonoid as well (Table 3). These findings were confirmed by several researchers who reported the higher concentration of total phenolics in ethyl acetate and methanol extracts (Do et al., 2014; Murugan and Parimelazhagan, 2014). In a previous study (Mhamdi et al., 2015), the total phenolic content of O. natrix in Tunisia was reported as 51 mgGAE/g, which was lower than that found in the present study. Moreover, some researchers were found to be different levels of total phenolics in several Ononis species, such as O. spinosa (3.09 mgGAE/g extract) (Orhan et al., 2012), O. pubescens (17.23 mgGAE/g extract), and O. ornithopodioides (20.96 mgGAE/g extract) (Sarikürkcü et al., 2016).

Individual phenolic constituents in the tested extracts were analyzed by HPLC-DAD and the results are given in Table 4. A total of 23 standard phenolics were used and 21 of them were identified in these extracts. Two compounds (rutin and hesperidin) were not detected in the extracts. Apigenin was quantified as the dominant phenolic in the ethyl acetate and methanol extracts. Other dominant phenolics were luteolin, epicatechin, and rosmarinic acid in these extracts. However, the most abundant phenolics in the water extract were benzoic acid and quercetin. In recent studies, the detected phenolics in O. natrix extracts possess a broad range of biological activities including antioxidant, anticancer, antimicrobial and enzyme inhibitory (López-Lázaro, 2009; Amoah et al., 2016; David et al., 2016). In this framework, the observed biological activities for O. natrix extracts might be explained with the presence of these phenolic components. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first report which indicates comprehensive analysis of phenolic constituents of O. natrix. In this sense, the present findings could be opened new horizons for the genus Ononis and it' usages.

In order to evaluate antioxidant ability of O. natrix extracts, several methods were performed: free radical scavenging (DPPH and ABTS), reducing power (CUPRAC and FRAP), phosphomolybdenum and metal chelating assays. DPPH and ABTS assays are widely utilized to examine radical scavenging activities of plant extracts or synthetics. These assays are based on the reduction of ABTS⁺ and DPPH^· in the presence of antioxidants and the changes (from blue to white in ABTS; from purple to yellow in DPPH) can spectrophotometrically be recorded. In addition, the assays reflect to hydrogen donating abilities of antioxidants. As shown in Table 3, the methanol and water extracts had similar DPPH scavenging abilities whereas the lowest ability was observed in the ethyl acetate extract. However, ABTS radical scavenging abilities can be ranked as ethyl acetate> methanol>water. The apparent differences can be attributed to nature of these radicals (ABTS assay is considered as both hydrophilic and lipophilic antioxidant systems, while DPPH is only hydrophobic systems). Our findings are consistent with previous results, which were reported different results for DPPH and ABTS (Kim et al., 2002; Zengin et al., 2015, 2017; Bouhlali et al., 2017).

Reducing power is an important way in the antioxidant mechanisms and it reflects electron-donating abilities of antioxidants. From this point, CUPRAC and FRAP assays were performed to detect reducing abilities of O. natrix extracts (Table 5). By using CUPRAC assay (from Cu²⁺ to Cu), the ethyl acetate extract showed the strongest reducing ability, followed by methanol and water extracts. These results are in line with the total phenolic and flavonoid contents. Nevertheless, the FRAP (from Fe³⁺ to Fe²⁺) abilities decreased in that order water (106.12 mgTE/g extract)>ethyl acetate (90.71 mgTE/g extract)>methanol (79.73 mgTE/g extract). This finding for water extract in FRAP assay might be related to complex interactions of phytochemical (antagonistic etc.) described as Peña-Cerda et al. (2017) and (Hmid et al., 2017).

Phosphomolybdenum assays is proposed by Prieto et al. (1999), which is based on the reduction of Mo (VI) to Mo (V) by the antioxidants and then a green phosphate/Mo (V) complex occurs at the acidic pH. The assay is also considered as one of total antioxidant capacity assays. Within O. natrix extracts, the methanol extract (1.53 mmolTE/g extract) exerted the strongest ability in phosphomolybdenum assay, followed by ethyl acetate (1.27 mmolTE/g extract) and water (1.13 mmolTE/g extract) extracts (Table 4). In the literature, several researchers reported different approaches for a correlation between total phenolic and the reduction of Mo (VI) to Mo (V) (Albayrak et al., 2010; Kocak et al., 2016; Amessis-Ouchemoukh et al., 2017). At this point, this activity for the methanol extract may be related to the presence of other antioxidants as well as phenolics.

Transition metal ions, such as iron and copper are involved in the production of hydroxyl radical via Fenton and Haber-Weiss reactions. In this sense, the metal chelating ability is considered as an important way in the antioxidant mechanisms. Contrary to expectations, the metal chelating ability significantly differs from other antioxidant assays and the strongest activity was observed in water extract with 14.49 mgEDTAE/g, while the ethyl acetate extract had the lowest ability (Table 5). These findings are consistent with previous studies, which reported no correlation between total phenolic and metal chelating ability (Silva et al., 2011; Hatami et al., 2014; Khorasani Esmaeili et al., 2015). In fact, the metal chelating abilities of phenolics were described as a minor way in theirs antioxidant properties by Rice-Evans et al. (1996).

Alzheimer's diseases (AD) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are considered as major public health problems and their incidence tends to increase at an alarming rate (more than 35.6 million AD patients in worldwide and is expected to be more than 100 million AD patients by 2050). The development of new therapeutic approaches (also in terms of non-pharmacological therapy supplement) for these diseases has become a pressing issue. Among the therapeutic approaches, the inhibition of key enzymes is considered as one of most effective strategy (Wimo and Prince, 2010). Cholinesterase inhibitors are currently used as a drug for the treatment of AD. The inhibitors increase brain acetylcholine (ACh) levels by preventing the breakdown of ACh and this case is very important to cognitive function (Menichini et al., 2014). Again, α-amylase and α-glucosidase release glucose from larger carbohydrates (especially starch) and are key enzymes in DM glucose level control (Kubinova et al., 2014). In this direction, both α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitors are promising drugs in the treatment of DM. In addition, tyrosinase is a main enzyme in the synthesis of melanin and thus tyrosinase inhibitors are useful for controlling hyperpigmentation problems. Within the framework of these information's, many enzyme inhibitors are synthetically produced. However, most of them show limited effectiveness especially related to side effects, such as gastrointestinal disturbances, and toxic properties (Kumar et al., 2011). Therefore, many scientists have focused on naturally occurring compounds from plants as potential sources of either new or safe effective inhibitors.

Thus, we tested enzyme inhibitory effects of Ononis extracts against to cholinesterases, tyrosinase, amylase and glucosidase. The results are represented in Table 6. The ethyl acetate extract exhibited the strongest cholinesterase inhibitory effect on both AChE (1.46 mgGALAE/g extract) and BChE (0.93 mgGALAE/g extract). However, the water extract was not active on BChE. The observed activity for ethyl acetate extract may be linked to higher level of phenolics in the extracts. Our findings were confirmed by several researchers (Kennedy and Wightman, 2011; Roseiro et al., 2012; Mazlan et al., 2013; Hlila et al., 2015), who reported a linear correlation between phenolic content and anti-cholinesterase abilities. Interestingly, the ethyl acetate extract did not have any inhibitory effect on tyrosinase and the water extract had remarkable anti-tyrosinase effect with 52.81 mgKAE/g extract. As for amylase and glucosidase inhibition, the ethyl acetate (0.74 mmolACAE/g and 17.52 mmolACAE/g) and methanol extracts (0.59 mmolACAE/g and 19.94 mmolACAE/g) had the greatest abilities compared to water extract. The higher concentrations of phenolics in these extracts may be responsible for their anti-diabetic effects. In accordance with our findings, some phenolic components were reported as anti-diabetic agents (Tundis et al., 2010; Etxeberria et al., 2012; Ríos et al., 2015). From this point, molecular approaches could be valuable to understand interactions of enzymes and phenolics. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first report on Ononis natrix subsp. hispanica. Taken together, this study could provide a starting point on this species and could open new perspectives for designing novel functional products.

Evidence from the literature supports the inhibitory action of apigenin on AChE and BChE (Katalinić et al., 2010; Xie et al., 2014). Apigenin was also reported to induce moderate inhibitory effect on α-amylase (Li et al., 2014; Wulan et al., 2014) and on α-glucosidase. On the other hand, we have found that the water extract possesses good inhibition activity toward tyrosinase. This may be attributed to the presence of luteolin and quercetin. In light of the observed inhibitory activity, in silico molecular docking simulation was used to investigate the interactions between apigenin to AChE, BChE, amylase and glucosidase, whereas luteolin and quercetin have been selected as principal inhibitors of tyrosinase. The most representative enzyme-ligand complexes were reported in Figures 2–4.

Apigenin has been previously reported to inhibit both AChE and BChE by IC50 of 7.72 micro/Mol (Balkis et al., 2015) and 37.4 micro/Mol (Katalinić et al., 2010), respectively. The best docked pose interacts with AChE in the binding pocked by establishing two hydrogen bonds to Glu199 and Ser122 and two pi-pi stacks to Phe330 and Trp 84 with a docking score of −9.607 and a binding energy of −60.64 Kcal/Mol. Apigenin also interacts with several residues present in the binding pocket of BChE forming two hydrogen bonds to Thr120 and Glu197 with a docking score of −9.459 and a binding energy of −52.54 kcal/Mol. Also, considering the abundance in the ethyl acetate and methanol extracts, apigenin could be also responsible for the amylase and glucosidase inhibiting activity. Indeed, it has been previously reported that apigenin was an efficacious inhibitor of α-glucosidase with a IC50 of and a moderate α-amylase inhibitor with a IC50 of 10.5 μ/Mol (Zeng et al., 2016).

Apigenin interacts with α-glucosidase by forming two hydrogen bonds to Asp215 and Gln353 and with the enzymatic cavity of α-amylase by forming three hydrogen bonds to Gln63, His299, and Glu233. The aqueous extract has shown a strong activity toward tyrosinase. The most abundant substances present in the extracts are benzoic acid, luteolin and quercetin. All of these substances have been demonstrated to have an tyrosinase inhibitory activity in in vitro experiments (IC50 = quercetin 0.13 mM) (Chen and Kubo, 2002). However, benzoic acid reported a scarce docking score (−5.1) and a positive binding energy (+41.7 Kcal/Mol) which indicate none or very little affinity for the binding pocket of the enzyme, whereas the luteolin and quercetin have obtained the best binding energy. (−28 Kcal/Mol and −29.31 Kcal/Mol, respectively).

However, it is noteworthy to highlight that the plant extracts contain several phenolic compounds which in less extent are able to inhibit the tested enzymes all with non-competitive mechanism as demonstrated in our previous paper (Picot et al., 2017). Inhibitory action of the plant extracts on AChE, BChE, tyrosinase, α-amylase, and α-glucosidase might be due to the concerted action of several phenolic compounds rather than a single molecule.

Various stress factors, such as oxidative stress, acid, alkaline, UV, and heavy metals can damage DNA. ROS formed by hydroxyl radicals cause DNA strand breakage that is brought about carcinogenesis, mutagenesis and cytotoxicity (Golla and Bhimathati, 2014). Here, we targeted to measure the DNA damage by Fenton reaction-mediated oxidative stress. Fenton's reagent (Fe²⁺ + H₂O₂ → Fe³⁺ + OH⁻ + ⋅OH) produces the highly deleterious hydroxyl radicals that damage the cellular components, such as DNA, lipid and proteins. The scavenging effect of extract was tested in plasmid nicking assay. Figure 5 illustrates the DNA protection activity of the Ononis extracts with two different concentrations (5 and 10 mg/ml). Ononis extracted in water (10 mg/ml) had the most effective on protection of DNA with 78%, followed by water (5 mg/ml) (70%) and methanol extract with 5 mg/ml (53%). Except for the ethyl acetate extract (5 and 10 mg/ml), water and methanol extracts protected supercoiled form of pDNA and indicated DNA protection activity.

In the present study, the water extract had the most protection activity on DNA. This can be arisen from availability of different metabolites in water extract. Quercetin and sinapic acid are only metabolites which found in this extract. So, it can be concluded that these chemicals may be responsible for protection of DNA from Fenton reagent. Like water extract, the methanol extract also contained specific metabolite, such as rosmarinic acid. In this sense, the observed DNA protection ability for the methanol extract can be arisen from presence of higher amount of rosmarinic acid. Therefore, it seems that different ingredients of the extracts may cause formation of DNA protection property for the tested extracts. According to DNA protection assay results, water extract of Ononis natrix showed the most protective activity for DNA. This result may be explained by determination of phenolic components in the extracts using HPLC analysis. As indicated in Table 4, rosmarinic acid and quercetin were the most dissolved components in methanol and water extracts of Ononis natrix, respectively. So, it can be concluded that rosmarinic acid and quercetin can be considered as potential chemicals for protection of DNA from free radicals, hydroxyl radicals and mutagens. Quercetin is a well-investigated antioxidant known as promising molecule for pharmacological studies. In a comprehensive research for DNA protection ability of quercetin, its supplementation indicated protection of nuclear DNA from oxidative damage and significant genoprotective activity on mitochondrial DNA (Potenza et al., 2008). In a different study, three polyphenolic compounds including luteolin, quercetin and rosmarinic acid, were investigated for their protective effects against oxidative DNA damage (Silva et al., 2008). They found that all of these phenolics were protection agents against oxidative stress-induced DNA damage. In another search, protective activity of pure rosmarinic acid and elagic acid were evaluated. It has been found that they have equal effect on declining AAPH-induced oxidative DNA damage (Vattem et al., 2006). These results are in accord with our study indicating that methanol and water extracts of Ononis natrix can be considered as valuable DNA protectors because of presence of rosmarinic acid and quercetin.

The cytotoxic effects of Ononis natrix on the survival of HeLa and PC3 cells were determined by MTT cell viability assay. HeLa cervical cancer cell line and PC3 prostate cancer cell line were treated with these extracts with different concentrations for 24 h. Cells morphology was observed under inverted microscope and illustrated in Figure 6. According to morphological appearance, there was no significant apoptotic effect on Ononis natrix extracts for HeLa cell line. However, the water and methanol extracts caused initiation of apoptosis for PC3 cell line. To indicate effect of three extracts on cancer cell lines, cell viability assay (MTT) was also conducted. Although there was a cytotoxic activity for HeLa cells after application of the water extract, no significant decline was observed in cancer cell numbers compared to control (Figure 7). On the other hand, 2.5 mg water extract, 1 mg methanol extract and 0.1 μg ethyl acetate extract caused a significant cell number reduction on PC3 cancer line (Figure 7). Ethyl acetate extract indicated cytotoxic activity with the smallest concertation (0.1 μg) among all extracts. 2.5 mg of the water extract showed dose-independent cytotoxic effect on PC3 cell line since there was no effect for 5 mg and 10 mg water extracts. It has been considered that concentration of water extract more than 2.5 mg may be toxic against healthy or normal viable cells. Thus, it can be concluded that 2.5 mg is a moderate concentration for cytotoxicity on PC3 cancer cell line. It was also monitored that other treatments had cytotoxic effect whereas, they were not significantly different from control sample anymore.

According to reports, about 60% of anticancer drugs are isolated from plant-derived natural compounds. These medicinal plants highly contain polyphenolic compounds which are actually inhibitors for cancer development (Sukumaran et al., 2016). Cytotoxic and apoptotic effects of the studied extracts on HeLa and PC3 cell lines were investigated. Although there was no significant variation on HeLa cells, 2.5 mg of water and 1 mg methanol extracts leaded to cytotoxic activity compared to control in PC3. Some of phenolic compounds show anti-proliferative effect which depends on polarity of compounds. Cytotoxic effect of methanol extract can be explained with the presence of rosmarinic acid, apigenin, and epicatechin. Effect of anti-carcinogenic and scavenging of reactive oxygen radicals of rosmaniric acid were particularly searched in Perilla frutescens (Osakabe et al., 2004). The body's response to cancer showed parallel effects with the inflammatory response. Since, inflammatory cytokine networks may affect survival, growth, mutation, proliferation, differentiation and relocation of tumor and stromal cells (David, 1988; Balkwill and Mantovani, 2001; Osakabe et al., 2004). Rosmaniric acid is a water-soluble polyphenolic compound and has function on inhibition of angiogenesis (Huang and Zheng, 2006). There was a potential evidence that ROS acts as initiating angiogenesis and onset of cancer mechanism. It was proved that hydrogen peroxide stimulated angiogenesis in vitro condition (Shono et al., 1996; Yasuda et al., 1999; Huang and Zheng, 2006). Rosmaniric acid reduced ROS expression, hydrogen peroxide level and VEGF (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor) level that are important on cancer development (Huang and Zheng, 2006). Furthermore, the previous report which indicated effect of methanolic extract of plant species on antioxidant activity and examination of level of rosmaniric acid (Tepe, 2008). In addition, in our previous study, three extracts (ethyl acetate, methanol and water) of two Potentilla species (Potentilla reptans and P. speciosa) showed cytotoxic activity against A549 andMCF-7 due to some phenolic compounds (Uysal et al., 2017). The findings of this analysis suggest that one or more than one phenolic compounds and their interaction may cause initiation of apoptosis in cancer cell lines. However, further investigation should be performed in in vivo test to arrive at a definite judgment for inhibition of cancer development.

Antimicrobial activity of the extracts from O. natrix subsp. hispanica were searched against to 13 bacteria and 1 fungus by the disk diffusion method. The extracts were loaded the disks at the concentration of 10, 50, and 100 mg. According to results, 50 and 100 mg of methanol and ethyl acetate extracts showed the best antibacterial effect against to Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 and Staphylococcus epidermidis strains (Figure 8). In addition, 100 mg water extracts had a small effect on Salmonella kentucky. It was realized that extracts possessed more protective effect against to gram positive bacteria strains. In addition, concentration-dependent effect was also observed. For example, S. epidermis stain was more sensitive against to 100 mg of methanol and ethyl acetate extracts than 50 mg ones. Methanol and ethyl acetate extracts of O. natrix subsp. hispanica were more effective than water extract for antimicrobial analysis. The results of this analysis support the idea that because of higher total phenolic and flavonoid contents of methanol and ethyl acetate extracts, they indicated more antimicrobial activity than water one.

Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) is a gram positive bacterium and causes several human infections and leads to sanitary problems. S. aureus also shows resistance to some antibiotics and drugs particularly to methicillin (Hannan et al., 2008). Resistance problems induced to researchers to tend for seeking novel therapy. S. epidermidis together with S. aureus lead to severe infectious diseases (Otto, 2009). S. epidermidis is more being tend to cause infectious diseases due to developing persistent infection on human skin (Otto, 2009). Researchers are seeking the mechanisms by which S. epidermidis promotes diseases (Otto, 2009). In a study of Sayari et al. (2016) Ononis natrix leaves extracts were tested against to 9 bacterial strains (5 gram-negative and 4 gram-positive). Consistently with our study, S. aureus were the most susceptible against to Ononis natrix leaves extracts. In another study, S. aureus (ATCC 25923), and E. coli (ATCC 25922) were found to have more sensitivity against the Ononis natrix essential oils with inhibition zone as 27 and 25, respectively (Elamrani and Benaissa, 2010).

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.