Front. Pharmacol. Frontiers in Pharmacology Front. Pharmacol. 1663-9812 Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fphar.2012.00173 Pharmacology Review Article Cotinine: Beyond that Expected, More than a Biomarker of Tobacco Consumption Moran Valentina Echeverria 1 2 3 * 1Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs, Bay Pines VA Healthcare System Bay Pines, FL, USA 2Tampa VA Healthcare System Tampa, FL, USA 3Department of Molecular Medicine, University of South Florida Tampa, FL, USA

Edited by: Nick Andrews, Harvard Medical School, USA

Reviewed by: Li Zhang, National Institutes of Health, USA; Mariela Fernanda Perez, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina

*Correspondence: Valentina Echeverria Moran, Laboratory of Molecular Psychiatry, Bay Pines VA Medical Center, Bay Pines Blvd, Building 22, Room 123, Bay Pines, FL 33744, USA. e-mail: valentina.echeverria@va.gov

This article was submitted to Frontiers in Neuropharmacology, a specialty of Frontiers in Pharmacology.

 10 10 2012 2012 3 173 09 07 2012 10 09 2012 Copyright © 2012 Moran. 2012

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.

A greater incidence of tobacco consumption occurs among individuals with psychiatric conditions including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), bipolar disorder, major depression, and schizophrenia, compared with the general population. Even when still controversial, it has been postulated that smoking is a form of self-medication that reduces psychiatric symptoms among individuals with these disorders. To better understand the component(s) of tobacco-inducing smoking behavior, greater attention has been directed toward nicotine. However, in recent years, new evidence has shown that cotinine, the main metabolite of nicotine, exhibits beneficial effects over psychiatric symptoms and may therefore promote smoking within this population. Some of the behavioral effects of cotinine compared to nicotine are discussed here. Cotinine, which accumulates in the body as a result of tobacco exposure, crosses the blood-brain barrier and has different pharmacological properties compared with nicotine. Cotinine has a longer plasma half-life than nicotine and showed no addictive or cardiovascular effects in humans. In addition, at the preclinical level, cotinine facilitated the extinction of fear memory and anxiety after fear conditioning, improved working memory in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and in a monkey model of schizophrenia. Altogether, the new evidence suggests that the pharmacological and behavioral effects of cotinine may play a key role in promoting tobacco smoking in individuals that suffer from psychiatric conditions and represents a new potential therapeutic agent against psychiatric conditions such as AD and PTSD.

 cotinine tobacco fear memory nicotine Introduction

The use of tobacco dates back as early as 5,000–3,000 BC, when tobacco plants were first cultivated in South America (Gately, 2003). Initially, tobacco was regarded has a medicinal plant to be used for medical purposes such as, a painkiller for earaches and toothaches (Balls, 1962). However, later studies clearly established the deleterious effects of tobacco smoking on health (Peto et al., 1996). As a result, the progressive establishment of more restrictive anti-tobacco laws has discouraged tobacco smoking worldwide. These new restrictions and public health campaigns have dramatically decreased tobacco use. However, there is a high rate of tobacco consumption among individuals that suffer from mental disorders such as, major depression disorder (MDD), schizophrenia, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD; Leonard et al., 2001; Weaver and Etzel, 2003; Thorndike et al., 2006; Buggia-Prevot et al., 2008; Aubin et al., 2012). The idea that tobacco consumption in these populations is a form of self-medication is controversial and some evidence suggests that smoking is associated with poorer mental health outcomes in some mental disorders such as, bipolar and schizoaffective disorder (Dodd et al., 2010). The desire to identify the component of tobacco that may explain this correlation has encouraged the study of the mental effect(s) of nicotine [3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl) pyridine], an alkaloid that is present in tobacco leaves, over the psychiatric symptoms. Nicotine treatment had been shown to improve cognitive function including attention, concentration, executive function, and learning and memory (Elzinga and Bremner, 2002; Horner and Hamner, 2002; Bowie and Harvey, 2005; Gray and Roth, 2007; Tapia et al., 2007; Burriss et al., 2008; Luck and Gold, 2008; Terry et al., 2008; Hinkelmann et al., 2009; Johnsen and Asbjornsen, 2009; Veltmeyer et al., 2009; Baune et al., 2010). However, nicotine’s undesirable cardiovascular and addictive side-effects have limited its therapeutic use (Karaconji, 2005). Recently, new studies have shown that the main metabolite of nicotine, an alkaloid named cotinine [(5S)-1-methyl-5-(3-pyridyl)-pyrrolidin-2-one], has beneficial therapeutic properties, while not having nicotine’s negative side-effects. In preclinical studies, cotinine has shown to improve reference and working memories, attention, and the extinction of fear memory, as well as to reduce both the startle response and anxiety in animal models of aging, Alzheimer’s disease (AD), PTSD, and schizophrenia (Figure 1). Here the psychopharmacology and the potential therapeutic use of cotinine are discussed.

A schematic comparison of the behavioral effects of nicotine and cotinine.

 Discussion Cotinine pharmacokinetic

Cotinine is an alkaloid found in tobacco leaves and the main metabolite of nicotine. The active form of cotinine, the isomer S(-)-cotinine accumulates in the body after tobacco consumption. The pharmacokinetic profiles of cotinine administered orally or intravenously have been investigated in humans. These reports show that cotinine is well-absorbed orally (De Schepper et al., 1987), has a long plasma half-life (19–24 h; Benowitz et al., 1983; Benowitz and Sharp, 1989) and crosses the blood-brain barrier (Riah et al., 1998). Approximately 80–85% of nicotine is metabolized in the liver and converted into cotinine by enzymes such as cytochrome P450 2A6 (CYP2A6; Lewis et al., 1999) and cytochrome P4502A5 (CYP2A5) in human and mouse, respectively (Donato et al., 2000; Visoni et al., 2008).

In humans, cotinine is excreted in the urine, mainly as trans-3′-hydroxycotinine (90% of cotinine) and glucuronide (Caldwell et al., 1992; Ghosheh and Hawes, 2002; Kuehl and Murphy, 2003).

The expression of different variants of the CYP2A6 gene, coding for enzymes with different catalytic activities, influences the level of cotinine achieved in the body after nicotine consumption and, seems to influence nicotine addiction (Malaiyandi et al., 2006; Strasser et al., 2007). For example, individuals that express a catalytically deficient form of CYP2A6 (i.e., CYP2A6*4) showed a lower rate of cigarette consumption compared with individuals that express the normal allele (Yamanaka et al., 2004). The alleles that express the polymorphic forms of the CYP2A6 gene, with low or high enzymatic activity, are distinctly represented in diverse ethnic groups (Bramer and Kallungal, 2003; Nakajima et al., 2006). The distinct expression of the different forms of CYP2A6 may explain the varying metabolism of cotinine observed in individuals of diverse ethnic backgrounds (Nakajima et al., 2006). Therefore cotinine metabolism and, consequently, smoking behavior can be influenced by ethnicity. Furthermore, other factors such as the consumption of a specific food can also affect cotinine metabolism (Nakajima et al., 2006). For example, some components of grapefruit juice inhibit the activity of CYP2A6 and, consequently, cotinine synthesis (Tassaneeyakul et al., 2000; Hukkanen et al., 2006).

 Cotinine pharmacodynamic effects

Early studies of cotinine effects in humans showed that cotinine has a good safety profile (Borzelleca et al., 1962; Bowman and Mc, 1962). One of these seminal studies demonstrated that daily doses of cotinine of up to 1,800 mg for a period of 4 days did not induce deleterious side-effects in humans (Bowman and Mc, 1962). Another clinical study investigating the psychogenic effects of cotinine showed that when administered intravenously to abstinent smokers, this compound reduced the self-reported irritability and tobacco cravings experienced by the participants (Benowitz et al., 1983). A follow-up phase II clinical study investigated the effects of cotinine on smoking cessation in an inpatient, 10-day study in abstinent cigarette smokers (Hatsukami et al., 1997). This study showed that oral cotinine treatment of up to 160 mg/day had no addictive, cardiovascular (e.g., heart rate and blood pressure), or behavioral effects in individuals between 21 and 42 years of age (Hatsukami et al., 1997). A follow-up study from the same research group also found that cotinine at the doses studied did not help with tobacco cessation and antagonized the reduction of the withdrawal symptoms induced by a nicotine patch (Hatsukami et al., 1998). These results confirmed that orally administered cotinine exhibits behavioral effects in humans, likely by modulating the nAChR sensitivity to agonists; however, this concept requires further experimental validation.

Cotinine is a cognitive enhancer in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s Disease

Cotinine has been shown to prevent working and reference memory loss in a mouse model of AD (Echeverria et al., 2011). In this study, the ability of cotinine to prevent plaque development and memory loss in the Tg6799 mice (Ohno et al., 2006) was investigated. Two-month-old Tg and same age non-Tg (NT) mice were orally treated with vehicle (PBS) or 2.5 mg/kg of cotinine for 4.5 months via gavage and tested for working memory using the circular platform, the Radial Arm Water maze (RAWM), and cognitive interference tests. These behavioral study showed that cotinine prevented memory loss in Tg6799 mice and significantly decreased plaques burden in the cortex of the Tg6799 mice. Cotinine treatment also reduced the number and size of the amyloid plaques. The decrease in plaque load also correlated with a decrease in the levels of insoluble Aβ in the cortex of the cotinine-treated Tg mice when compared with the vehicle-treated Tg mice (Echeverria et al., 2011). This evidence suggest that cotinine may be a new therapeutic agent against this devastating condition (Echeverria and Zeitlin, 2012).

 Cotinine reduced anxiety and fear in a mouse model of PTSD – like symptoms

Post-traumatic stress disorder is an anxiety disorder that appears after exposure to life-threatening events (Martenyi et al., 2007). PTSD is characterized by symptoms such as anxiety, fear, working memory impairment, hyperarousal, emotional numbing, and sleep disorders. These symptoms have been associated with a permanent alteration of the physiological response to stress induced by over-activation of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis (Yehuda et al., 1991). These changes are generally accompanied by dysregulation of several neurotransmitter systems including the serotoninergic, dopaminergic, noradrenergic, and cholinergic systems. The hyperarousal and aggressive behavior observed in patients with PTSD are caused, at least in part, by a decrease in serotonin neurotransmission (Nutt, 2000). Consistent with this idea, serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) such as paroxetine and sertraline are currently used in the treatment of PTSD (Brady et al., 2000; Davidson et al., 2001; Brady and Clary, 2003; Corchs et al., 2009; Stein et al., 2009). Because serotonin promotes acetylcholine release, and acetylcholine signaling positively affects attention and memory, an increase of serotonin levels in the brain, may simultaneously improve mood, reduce aggressiveness (Buhot et al., 2000), and positively affect cognitive abilities. Although SSRIs are useful in the treatment of PTSD (Cohen et al., 2000), they are effective only in a small percentage of patients (approximately 30%; Veltmeyer et al., 2009).

Post-traumatic stress disorder patients are commonly heavy smokers, and an association between tobacco dependence and PTSD has previously been established (Hapke et al., 2005). In the search of new drugs that could diminish fear and anxiety and enhance the extinction of fear memories, rodent models of fear conditioning (FC) has been extensively used. These animal models have permitted to characterize the effect of drugs, including cotinine, over anxiety, fear, and contextual memory in anxiety disorders. FC is a broadly used model of associative memory that involves the pairing of neutral conditioning stimuli (CS; sound and context) with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US; electric shock). After conditioning, the presentation of the CS alone elicits both a conditioned fear response (freezing behavior) and anxiety in the animal. Experimentally, the extinction of contextual fear (FE) after FC is expressed as a progressive decrease in fear responses attained after repetitive exposures to the CS (context) in the absence of the pairing with an aversive US (Steckler and Risbrough, 2012).

A devastating symptom in PTSD is the failure to extinguish traumatic memories that force the patient to continue re-experiencing the trauma (Izquierdo et al., 2004). Thus, the identification of drugs that would enable the extinction of fear memories would be an essential therapeutic goal.

One recent study investigated the effect of pre- and post-treatment with cotinine over the stability of contextual fear memory after repetitive or single re-exposure to the CS (Zeitlin et al., 2012). Male adult mice were pre-treated or post-treated with cotinine before or after FC, respectively, and tested for fear responses and anxiety after being exposed to the CS (context). These studies showed that cotinine accelerated the extinction and reduced the stability of the contextual fear memory. FE is considered a “new learning” process that involves the acquisition of inhibitory memories that compete with the original fear memory consolidation. For this reason, it has been proposed that cognitive enhancers may have a positive effect over the extinction of fear memories. Thus the improvement of cognitive abilities induced by cotinine may be relevant for its effects on FE. Thus, cotinine may promote the extinction of contextual fear memory by stimulating the acquisition of new inhibitory memories.

In addition, because cotinine reduces anxiety and helps to extinguish fear memory, it is feasible that cotinine may also be useful, alone or in a combined treatment, with psychotherapy to reduce both non-cognitive and cognitive symptoms of PTSD. However, these ideas need to be tested in placebo-controlled clinical trials.

 Cell signaling changes associated with fear extinction triggered by cotinine

This enhancement of contextual FE in mice subjected to FC described above, correlated with an increase in the extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK)1/2 (ERKs) activity in the hippocampus (Chen et al., 2005; Fischer et al., 2007). This increase has been regarded as a key molecular event during the fear extinction process because this brain region is involved in contextual FE (Bouton et al., 2006; Quirk and Mueller, 2008) and also because that ERK1/2 inhibition immediately after memory retrieval prevented the extinction of contextual memory (Chen et al., 2005). Consistent with these findings, the enhancement of FE induced by cotinine treatment in the C57BL/6, mice positively correlated with an increase in the levels of the active form of ERK1/2 (phospho-ERKs) in the hippocampus.

In addition this study showed that cotinine also reduced anxiety in the conditioned mice. Since it has been demonstrated that cotinine inhibited serotonin reuptake and increased its spontaneous release in rat brains (Fuxe et al., 1979), an increase in serotonin in the brain induced by cotinine may explain the reduction in anxiety after FC in the cotinine-treated mice. A similar effect may also explain the common perception of a “calming effect” experienced by tobacco smokers.

 Cotinine, is a memory enhancer in animal models of schizophrenia-like symptoms Effect of smoking on psychiatric symptoms in schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a mental disorder characterized by cognitive deficits and both positive and negative symptoms (Van Snellenberg, 2009). The positive symptoms include delusions, hallucinations, and difficulty in thought organization and oral expression. The negative symptoms include deficits in attention and motivation, social withdrawal, and emotional numbness (Van Snellenberg, 2009). Although the causes of schizophrenia are not well understood, abnormalities in the activity of several neurotransmitters such as, dopamine, acetylcholine, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and glutamate have been proposed (Lang et al., 2007). Since the development of clozapine, current drugs used to treat schizophrenia are mostly antagonists of the serotoninergic/dopaminergic signaling systems. These drugs have been effective in the management of positive psychotic symptoms; however, they do not effectively target the negative symptoms and cognitive deficits observed in schizophrenic patients. Thus, the identification of new drugs are needed to adequately treat these symptoms (Biedermann and Fleischhacker, 2011; Karam et al., 2012).

Patients with schizophrenia may often die prematurely due to health risk factors commonly associated with this condition including obesity and smoking behavior (Sagud et al., 2009; van Os and Kapur, 2009; von Hausswolff-Juhlin et al., 2009; Kelly et al., 2011).

A percentage of patients report, that smoking helps in decreasing psychiatric symptoms (Glynn and Sussman, 1990) which, become worse during tobacco withdrawal (Dalack and Meador-Woodruff, 1996). There are few and incomplete clinical data supporting the therapeutic effects of cotinine in psychiatric conditions, however, in one clinical study it was found that smoking high-nicotine cigarettes, compared to smoking de-nicotinized cigarettes, reduced negative symptoms without affecting positive symptoms (Smith et al., 2002). This effect is considered to be the result of the increase of dopamine levels in the nucleus accumbens and prefrontal cortex induced by nicotine (Corrigall and Coen, 1991). This increase in dopamine may stimulate active coping, improve attention, environmental engagement, and emotional responding, that are commonly absent in schizophrenic patients with prominent negative symptoms.

Cognitive impairment is one of the main challenges experienced by these patients. Growing evidence suggests that a deficit in cholinergic neurotransmission plays an important role in mediating cognitive deficits (Araki et al., 2002; Levin, 2002; Money et al., 2012). This evidence suggests that activation of the nicotinic receptors can be useful in treating some symptoms of schizophrenia particularly the cognitive deficits (Taly et al., 2009; Toyohara and Hashimoto, 2010).

 The nicotinic receptors as targets of cotinine effects in schizophrenia

The nicotinic receptors are involved in mediating attention, sensory gating, and learning and memory (AhnAllen, 2012; Yakel, 2012). The most broadly expressed nicotinic receptor (90%) is formed by α4 and β2 subunits and binds nicotine with high affinity while, not binding α-bungarotoxin (McGehee and Role, 1995); this receptor is highly represented in the striatum and substantia nigra and, poorly expressed in the neocortex and hippocampus (Rubboli et al., 1994b).

No less relevant, although less expressed, is the α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α7 nAChR), a low affinity receptor for nicotine that is highly expressed in the midbrain, neocortex, thalamus, and hippocampus, with lower levels in the striatum (Sugaya et al., 1990; Freedman et al., 1993; Rubboli et al., 1994a,b). This receptor that has high affinity for α-bungarotoxin (McGehee and Role, 1995) and, plays a key role mediating several cognitive functions including attention, memory, executive function, and sensory gating (Woodruff-Pak and Gould, 2002; Leiser et al., 2009; AhnAllen, 2012).

A cholinergic deficit has been proposed as a factor leading to cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Numerous studies have shown that expression of the α7 nAChR is decreased in the brains of patients with schizophrenia when compared to healthy controls (Breese et al., 2000; Leonard et al., 2000). This idea is supported by clinical evidence showing that the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, galantamine, which increases the synaptic levels of acetylcholine, improved the cognitive abilities in patients with schizophrenia (Ago, 2010; Ago et al., 2011).

The high rate of smoking in individuals with schizophrenia, although not a evidence of causation, has permitted speculation of the beneficial effect of a tobacco-derivative, but not smoking itself (Dalack and Meador-Woodruff, 1999) on some schizophrenia symptoms such as working memory impairment (Leonard et al., 1998, 2001). For example, evidence has been reported suggesting that α7 nAChR expression is significantly lower in schizophrenic non-smokers than in control non-smokers (Mexal et al., 2010).

In a rat model of Schizophrenia-like symptoms, the administration of nicotine attenuated the working memory deficits induced by the dopamine antagonist dizocilpine (Levin et al., 1998; Ciamei et al., 2001). In patients with schizophrenia, nicotine administration via a nasal spray has shown to ameliorate deficits in working memory, attention, and anxiety (Smith et al., 2006; Buckley et al., 2007). In addition, other clinical studies have shown that chronic treatment with nicotine improved the cognitive abilities in schizophrenic patients treated with antipsychotics (McEvoy et al., 1999; Freedman et al., 2008).

Several modulators of nAChRs have been tested against schizophrenia. For example, a partial agonist of the α7 nAChR, DMXB-A (GTS-21) was investigated in a phase 2 clinical study investigating the therapeutic effects of this drug over the symptoms of schizophrenia. Although GTS-21 improved some negative symptoms, it did not ameliorate the cognitive deficits observed in schizophrenic patients (Olincy and Stevens, 2007; Freedman et al., 2008).

Despite cotinine acting as a weak agonist (100 times less potent than nicotine) of the nAChRs, in rats it reversed the cognitive deficits induced by antagonism of the glutamate receptor, N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR), with ketamine. In this rodent model cotinine improved sustained attention and attenuated behavioral alterations induced by ketamine (Terry et al., 2012).

This pro-cognitive effect is not limited to rodent models of this disorder as cotinine, at similar doses, also improved performance accuracy on the delayed matching to sample (DMTS) task in aged rhesus monkeys. The DMTS task assesses recognition memory for novel non-verbal patterns, and tests short-term visual memory. This test has 19 outcome measures, including latency to response, the number of correct choices selected, and the probability of an error after a correct or incorrect response. In this task, cotinine-treated monkeys performed significantly better than vehicle-treated controls (Terry et al., 2005), indicating that cotinine improved visual short-term memory. These results also suggest that cotinine is a general cognitive enhancer that is useful in different species and types of cognitive abilities.

But the positive effects of cotinine are not limited to cognitive abilities. A recent study tested the effect of acute subcutaneous (0.03–10 mg/kg) and chronic oral administration of cotinine on sustained attention and behavioral alterations in rats induced by the glutamate (NMDA) antagonist MK-801 (Terry et al., 2012). The effects of cotinine were assessed in a five-choice serial reaction timed task (5CSRTT), a test broadly used to measure visual attention and impulsivity in rats. The 5CSRTT is implemented in a specially designed operant chamber with multiple response locations (“nine-hole box”) using food reinforcers to maintain performance on baseline sessions (about 100 trials). The test gives the rat a brief 0.5 s visual stimulus, measuring the time, and accuracy of the animal’s reactions, as well as the errors made by the rat. The 5CSRTT is used for measuring various aspects of attentional control over performance with its main measures of accuracy, premature responding, correct response latencies, and latency to collect earned food pellets (Robbins, 2002; Robinson et al., 2009).

The results showed that acute treatment with cotinine diminished MK-801-induced impairments in accuracy and elevations in timeout responses while increasing the number of completed trials. Furthermore, chronic treatment with cotinine induced similar beneficial effects even when the difficulties of the task were increased. The authors concluded that cotinine was useful in improving sustained attention and, in decreasing the impulsive and compulsive behaviors that were related to the postulated glutamate receptor signaling dysfunction in schizophrenia (Terry et al., 2012).

 Effect of cotinine on sensory gating in animal models of schizophrenia

A deficit in sensory gating is also a characteristic of schizophrenic patients as well as patients with other psychiatric conditions such as PTSD, borderline personality disorder, and bipolar disorder (Braff et al., 1992; Swerdlow et al., 2006). Individuals with this deficit cannot filter out irrelevant stimuli, as their brains are unable to inhibit its responsiveness to similar and repeated stimuli. The activation of cholinergic nicotinic receptors in the hippocampus is one of the main molecular mechanisms that control this inhibitory gating. Because the α7 nAChR is required for supporting sensory gating abilities (Freedman et al., 1994), a cognitive ability that is reduced in the patients with schizophrenia, this receptor is considered a potential therapeutic target for diminishing sensory gating deficit in this disorder (Olincy and Stevens, 2007).

The NMDAR antagonist, dizocilpine, or the dopamine agonist, apomorphine are used in rodents to induce memory and sensory gating deficits resembling those observed in persons with schizophrenia (Seillier and Giuffrida, 2009). For example, apomorphine is used to induce in rodents the deficit in prepulse inhibition (PPI) observed in schizophrenia. PPI is the decrease in the startle response to an auditory stimulus after repetitive exposure to the stimulus and a measure of sensory gating. The sensory gating deficit is expressed as an increase in the startle response (Geyer, 2006). To assess the effect of drugs on PPI animals are treated with vehicle, or the study drug, and are exposed to a weak acoustic stimulus (the prepulse); then, changes in the reflexive flinching response (startle) displayed as a result of a second stimulus of higher intensity (the pulse) is measured. Effective antipsychotic agents prevent the inhibition of PPI induced by psychogenic compounds such as apomorphine and dizolcipine. Previous studies have shown that nicotine blocks the apomorphine-induced disruption of the PPI of the acoustic startle in rats (Suemaru et al., 2004).

In fact, several studies have reported a positive effect of smoking on sensory gating and cognitive function in schizophrenia. In one study, the relationship between sensory gating and smoking levels was assessed by investigating the correlation between PPI and smoking behavior in schizophrenic and control patients (Rabin et al., 2009). The authors found that schizophrenic non-smokers have poorer PPI performances than schizophrenic smokers, whose levels did not differ from non-schizophrenic controls.

In addition to the observed effects of nicotine on sensory gating, other studies have demonstrated that nicotine also improved other schizophrenic symptoms (Lyon, 1999). These results support the view that smoking is a form of self-medication to alleviate psychotic symptoms and the unpleasant side-effects of antipsychotics (Matthews et al., 2011). Interestingly, cotinine, the long-lived metabolite of nicotine, also ameliorated the apomorphine-induced deficits in PPI of the acoustic startle response in rats (Risner et al., 1985; Terry et al., 2005). This result suggested that cotinine may have antipsychotic effects and underlie the beneficial effects of nicotine on attention and sensory gating, in addition to its predicted positive effect over working memory. In addition, as mentioned before, cotinine facilitates fear extinction a measure of executive function which has been found also impaired in people suffering from schizophrenia (Holt et al., 2009). Unfortunately, no clinical studies have been performed to investigate the effect of cotinine over these symptoms in schizophrenia.

 Molecular mechanisms potentially mediating the beneficial effects of cotinine on cognition

Thus far, the molecular mechanisms of cotinine action have been elusive. A previous report suggested that cotinine binds to an unknown type of receptor (Riah et al., 2000). Unfortunately, no follow-up studies pursued the characterization of this “cotinine receptor”. Other study based in the fact that cotinine increased serotonin levels in the rat brain, investigated whether granisetron, a 5HT(3) receptor antagonist, could enhance the efficacy of the nicotine patch. The results indicated that 5HT(3) antagonism was an unlikely mechanism of cotinine’s actions (Hatsukami et al., 2003). On the other hand, pharmacological evidence using 125I-labeled α-bungarotoxin and [3H] nicotine to differentiate subtypes of nAChRs affinities show that cotinine is a weak agonist of the α7 nAChRs and nicotine has more than 100 times higher affinity than cotinine for agonist binding sites of both subtypes of receptors. In addition the toxicological analysis using acute intraperitoneal injections of drugs in saline, showed that cotinine has in comparison to nicotine less than 1.5% toxicity (Table 1; Riah et al., 1999).

Potencies and affinities of cotinine and nicotine to different subtypes of nAChRs in the rat brain and values of acute toxicity in mice.

*I/IC50 [3H] nicotine I/IC50 125I-labeled α-bungarotoxin Male
 Female
LD50 LD90 LD50 LD90
Nicotine 100/(2 ± 0.1) × 10−7 100/(1 ± 0.3) × 10−5 31 ± 4 43 ± 6 37 ± 6 51 ± 9
Cotinine 100/(2 ± 0.2) × 10−3 100/(1 ± 0.2) × 10−3 2 ± 0.1 4 ± 0.1 3 ± 0.1 4 ± 0.1

*I/IC50, percentage maximum inhibition/concentration of drug that inhibits 50% radioligand binding (in M). Values of IC50, mean ± SD. LD, lethal dose with nicotine attributed 100% toxicity (Riah et al., 1999).

It has been suggested that α7 nAChRs is not the main target of cotinine (Riah et al., 1999) and other type of receptors for cotinine have been suggested (Riah et al., 2000). Also, using [3H]dopamine release assays and ligand-binding autoradiography in monkey striatum, it was concluded that cotinine functionally interacts with both α4β2 and α3α6β2 nAChR subtypes in the caudate with a IC50 for the inhibition of specific agonists in the micromolar range (O’Leary et al., 2008). In recent years, we and others have proposed that cotinine functions as a positive allosteric modulator of α7 nAChRs (Buccafusco et al., 2009; Zeitlin et al., 2012). Positive allosteric modulators, are compounds that facilitate endogenous neurotransmission without directly stimulating the target receptors (Bertrand and Gopalakrishnan, 2007; Faghih et al., 2007). For example the compound PNU-120596, acts as a positive allosteric modulator of nAChRs both in vitro and in vivo (see Young et al., 2008). PNU-120596 inhibited the ability of amphetamine to suppress auditory gating in rats, suggesting its potential for use in schizophrenia, characterized by auditory gating deficits. The effects of PNU-120596 in vitro were shown to be mediated by α7 nAChRs. As a positive allosteric modulator, PNU-120596 positively modulates nicotinic cholinergic neurotransmission mostly by preventing receptor desensitization. Because, cotinine has been shown to be a memory enhancer (Echeverria et al., 2011), and also inhibit sensory gating disruption it has been speculated that can have similar beneficial effects on memory in AD or schizophrenia (Hajos and Rogers, 2010). However this is highly speculative at this point and needs to be demonstrated.

Another hypothesis proposed to explain the beneficial effects of cotinine on cognition is the theory of desensitization of specific population of the α7nAChRs. This hypothesis speculates that cotinine desensitization of the α7 nAChRs expressed on inhibitory GABAergic neurons of the hippocampus, may result in the activation of excitatory glutamate receptors mediating the synaptic plasticity changes required for memory (Buccafusco et al., 2007, 2009). Functional assays of human α7 nAChR expressed in Xenopus leavis oocytes showed that cotinine acted as weak agonists at the human α7 nAChR (1% response at 1 mM) and inhibited the response to ACh with IC50 value of 175 μM (Briggs and McKenna, 1998). Although this hypothesis is intriguing, the doses required for inducing the receptor desensitization are higher than those showing pharmacological effects and direct evidence that cotinine may have this effect in the brain is still missing. The idea of a desensitization of the α7nAChR induced by cotinine is contradictory with the fact that in mice, the chronic treatment with cotinine induced the activation of the Akt/GSK3β signaling pathway, which is activated by the α7 nAChR, in both the hippocampus and cortex (Echeverria et al., 2011). In fact, cotinine prevented apomorphine-induced deficits in PPI of acoustic startle in rats (Buccafusco and Terry, 2003), a behavioral task that greatly depends on the activity of the α7 nAChR. The effects of cotinine can be better explained by cotinine functioning as a positive allosteric modulator of the human α7 nAChR.

As a positive modulator, cotinine may improve learning and memory performance and reverse the apomorphine-induced deficits of PPI, in addition to stimulating the protein kinase B (Akt)/GSK3β pathway. Furthermore, stimulation of α7 nAChR signaling may explain the neuroprotective effects of cotinine because Akt can promote neuronal survival via several mechanisms including stimulation of the expression of anti-apoptotic factors such as CREB and Bcl-2 while inactivating pro-apoptotic enzyme such as Ask1 (Kim et al., 2001). Evidence of an allosteric effect of cotinine on the α7 nAChR or other receptors.

 Conclusion

Altogether the evidence suggests that cotinine is less toxic and has different mechanism(s) of action than nicotine. Cotinine’s properties and the preclinical evidence of its nootropic effects in animal models of psychiatric conditions, suggests that cotinine as a pure agent, in absence of nicotine, represents a new therapeutic agent to reduce anxiety, facilitate the extinction of fear memories, and improve attention and working memory in individuals with psychiatric conditions such as AD.

 Conflict of Interest Statement

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

This material is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the Bay Pines VA Healthcare System and the James A. Haley Veterans’ Hospital. The contents do not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government. This work was also supported by the Bay Pines Foundation, Inc., and a grant obtained from the James and Esther King Biomedical Research Program 1KG03-33968 (to Valentina Echeverria Moran). Also, I am especially grateful to Dr. Hugo Fernandez, who has recently departed, for his friendship, guidance, and generous support to cotinine research. The scientific community will be forever indebted to you.

 References Ago Y. (2010). Beneficial effect of galantamine on sensory information-processing deficits. Yakugaku Zasshi 130, 1305–1310.10.1248/yakushi.130.130520930482 Ago Y. Koda K. Takuma K. Matsuda T. (2011). Pharmacological aspects of the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor galantamine. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 116, 6–17.10.1254/jphs.11R01CR21498956 AhnAllen C. G. (2012). The role of the alpha7 nicotinic receptor in cognitive processing of persons with schizophrenia. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 25, 103–108.10.1097/YCO.0b013e328350363722262029 Araki H. Suemaru K. Gomita Y. (2002). Neuronal nicotinic receptor and psychiatric disorders: functional and behavioral effects of nicotine. Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 88, 133–138.10.1254/jjp.88.29311928712 Aubin H. J. Rollema H. Svensson T. H. Winterer G. (2012). Smoking, quitting, and psychiatric disease: a review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36, 271–284.10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.06.00721723317 Balls E. K. (1962). Early Uses of California Plants. University of California Press. Baune B. T. Miller R. McAfoose J. Johnson M. Quirk F. Mitchell D. (2010). The role of cognitive impairment in general functioning in major depression. Psychiatry Res. 176, 183–189.10.1016/j.psychres.2008.12.00120138370 Benowitz N. L. Kuyt F. Jacob P. III Jones R. T. Osman A. L. (1983). Cotinine disposition and effects. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 34, 604–611.10.1038/clpt.1983.2226627820 Benowitz N. L. Sharp D. S. (1989). Inverse relation between serum cotinine concentration and blood pressure in cigarette smokers. Circulation 80, 1309–1312.10.1161/01.CIR.80.5.13092805267 Bertrand D. Gopalakrishnan M. (2007). Allosteric modulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Biochem. Pharmacol. 74, 1155–1163.10.1016/j.bcp.2007.07.01117707779 Biedermann F. Fleischhacker W. W. (2011). Emerging drugs for schizophrenia. Expert Opin. Emerg. Drugs 16, 271–282.10.1517/14728214.2011.55611221563991 Borzelleca J. F. Bowman E. R. Mc K. H. Jr. (1962). Studies on the respiratory and cardiovascular effects of (-)-cotinine. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 137, 313–318.13871520 Bouton M. E. Westbrook R. F. Corcoran K. A. Maren S. (2006). Contextual and temporal modulation of extinction: behavioral and biological mechanisms. Biol. Psychiatry 60, 352–360.10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.12.01516616731 Bowie C. R. Harvey P. D. (2005). Cognition in schizophrenia: impairments, determinants, and functional importance. Psychiatr. Clin. North Am. 28, 613–633, 626.10.1016/j.psc.2005.05.00416122570 Bowman E. R. Mc K. H. Jr. (1962). Studies on the metabolism of (-)-cotinine in the human. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 135, 306–311.13872096 Brady K. Pearlstein T. Asnis G. M. Baker D. Rothbaum B. Sikes C. R. (2000). Efficacy and safety of sertraline treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 283, 1837–1844.10.1001/jama.283.14.183710770145 Brady K. T. Clary C. M. (2003). Affective and anxiety comorbidity in post-traumatic stress disorder treatment trials of sertraline. Compr. Psychiatry 44, 360–369.10.1016/S0010-440X(03)00111-114505296 Braff D. L. Grillon C. Geyer M. A. (1992). Gating and habituation of the startle reflex in schizophrenic patients. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 49, 206–215.10.1001/archpsyc.1992.018200300380051567275 Bramer S. L. Kallungal B. A. (2003). Clinical considerations in study designs that use cotinine as a biomarker. Biomarkers 8, 187–203.10.1080/1354750031001254512944172 Breese C. R. Lee M. J. Adams C. E. Sullivan B. Logel J. Gillen K. M. (2000). Abnormal regulation of high affinity nicotinic receptors in subjects with schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 23, 351–364.10.1016/S0893-133X(00)00121-410989262 Briggs C. A. McKenna D. G. (1998). Activation and inhibition of the human alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor by agonists. Neuropharmacology 37, 1095–1102.10.1016/S0028-3908(98)00110-59833639 Buccafusco J. J. Beach J. W. Terry A. V. Jr. (2009). Desensitization of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors as a strategy for drug development. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 328, 364–370.10.1124/jpet.108.14529219023041 Buccafusco J. J. Shuster L. C. Terry A. V. Jr. (2007). Disconnection between activation and desensitization of autonomic nicotinic receptors by nicotine and cotinine. Neurosci. Lett. 413, 68–71.10.1016/j.neulet.2006.11.02817157984 Buccafusco J. J. Terry A. V. Jr. (2003). The potential role of cotinine in the cognitive and neuroprotective actions of nicotine. Life Sci. 72, 2931–2942.10.1016/S0024-3205(03)00226-112706481 Buckley T. C. Holohan D. R. Mozley S. L. Walsh K. Kassel J. (2007). The effect of nicotine and attention allocation on physiological and self-report measures of induced anxiety in PTSD: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 15, 154–164.10.1037/1064-1297.15.2.15417469939 Buggia-Prevot V. Sevalle J. Rossner S. Checler F. (2008). NFkappaB-dependent control of BACE1 promoter transactivation by Abeta42. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 10037–10047.10.1074/jbc.M70657920018263584 Buhot M. C. Martin S. Segu L. (2000). Role of serotonin in memory impairment. Ann. Med. 32, 210–221.10.3109/0785389000899882810821328 Burriss L. Ayers E. Ginsberg J. Powell D. A. (2008). Learning and memory impairment in PTSD: relationship to depression. Depress. Anxiety 25, 149–157.10.1002/da.2029117352380 Caldwell W. S. Greene J. M. Byrd G. D. Chang K. M. Uhrig M. S. deBethizy J. D. (1992). Characterization of the glucuronide conjugate of cotinine: a previously unidentified major metabolite of nicotine in smokers’ urine. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 5, 280–285.10.1021/tx00026a0211643259 Chen X. Garelick M. G. Wang H. Lil V. Athos J. Storm D. R. (2005). PI3 kinase signaling is required for retrieval and extinction of contextual memory. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 925–931.10.1038/nn144315937483 Ciamei A. Aversano M. Cestari V. Castellano C. (2001). Effects of MK-801 and nicotine combinations on memory consolidation in CD1 mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 154, 126–130.10.1007/s00213000058411314674 Cohen H. Kotler M. Matar M. Kaplan Z. (2000). Normalization of heart rate variability in post-traumatic stress disorder patients following fluoxetine treatment: preliminary results. Isr. Med. Assoc. J. 2, 296–301.10804906 Corchs F. Nutt D. J. Hood S. Bernik M. (2009). Serotonin and sensitivity to trauma-related exposure in selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors-recovered posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 66, 17–24.10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.01.03119268914 Corrigall W. A. Coen K. M. (1991). Selective dopamine antagonists reduce nicotine self-administration. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 104, 171–176.10.1007/BF022441731876661 Dalack G. W. Meador-Woodruff J. H. (1996). Smoking, smoking withdrawal and schizophrenia: case reports and a review of the literature. Schizophr. Res. 22, 133–141.10.1016/S0920-9964(96)80441-58958597 Dalack G. W. Meador-Woodruff J. H. (1999). Acute feasibility and safety of a smoking reduction strategy for smokers with schizophrenia. Nicotine Tob. Res. 1, 53–57.10.1080/1462229905001115111072388 Davidson J. Pearlstein T. Londborg P. Brady K. T. Rothbaum B. Bell J. (2001). Efficacy of sertraline in preventing relapse of posttraumatic stress disorder: results of a 28-week double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Am. J. Psychiatry 158, 1974–1981.10.1176/appi.ajp.158.12.197411729012 De Schepper P. J. Van Hecken A. Daenens P. Van Rossum J. M. (1987). Kinetics of cotinine after oral and intravenous administration to man. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 31, 583–588.10.1007/BF006066353830243 Dodd S. Brnabic A. J. Berk L. Fitzgerald P. B. de Castella A. R. Filia S. (2010). A prospective study of the impact of smoking on outcomes in bipolar and schizoaffective disorder. Compr. Psychiatry 51, 504–509.10.1016/j.comppsych.2009.12.00120728008 Donato M. T. Viitala P. Rodriguez-Antona C. Lindfors A. Castell J. V. Raunio H. (2000). CYP2A5/CYP2A6 expression in mouse and human hepatocytes treated with various in vivo inducers. Drug Metab. Dispos. 28, 1321–1326.11038160 Echeverria V. Zeitlin R. (2012). Cotinine: a potential new therapeutic agent against Alzheimer’s disease. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 18, 517–523.10.1111/j.1755-5949.2012.00317.x22530628 Echeverria V. Zeitlin R. Burgess S. Patel S. Barman A. Thakur G. (2011). Cotinine Reduces Amyloid-β aggregation and improves memory in Alzheimer’s disease mice. J. Alzheimers Dis. 24, 817–835.21321389 Elzinga B. M. Bremner J. D. (2002). Are the neural substrates of memory the final common pathway in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)? J. Affect. Disord. 70, 1–17.10.1016/S0165-0327(01)00351-212113915 Faghih R. Gfesser G. A. Gopalakrishnan M. (2007). Advances in the discovery of novel positive allosteric modulators of the alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Recent Pat. CNS Drug Discov. 2, 99–106.10.2174/15748890778083275118221220 Fischer A. Radulovic M. Schrick C. Sananbenesi F. Godovac-Zimmermann J. Radulovic J. (2007). Hippocampal Mek/Erk signaling mediates extinction of contextual freezing behavior. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 87, 149–158.10.1016/j.nlm.2006.08.00316979915 Freedman R. Adler L. E. Bickford P. Byerley W. Coon H. Cullum C. M. (1994). Schizophrenia and nicotinic receptors. Harv. Rev. Psychiatry 2, 179–192.10.3109/106732294090171369384901 Freedman R. Olincy A. Buchanan R. W. Harris J. G. Gold J. M. Johnson L. (2008). Initial phase 2 trial of a nicotinic agonist in schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 165, 1040–1047.10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.0801014718381905 Freedman R. Wetmore C. Stromberg I. Leonard S. Olson L. (1993). Alpha-bungarotoxin binding to hippocampal interneurons: immunocytochemical characterization and effects on growth factor expression. J. Neurosci. 13, 1965–1975.8478687 Fuxe K. Everitt B. J. Hokfelt T. (1979). On the action of nicotine and cotinine on central 5-hydroxytryptamine neurons. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 10, 671–677.10.1016/0091-3057(79)90319-8493284 Gately I. (2003). Tobacco: A Cultural History of How an Exotic Plant Seduced Civilization. Diane. Geyer M. A. (2006). Are cross-species measures of sensorimotor gating useful for the discovery of procognitive cotreatments for schizophrenia? Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 8, 9–16.16640109 Ghosheh O. Hawes E. M. (2002). N-glucuronidation of nicotine and cotinine in human: formation of cotinine glucuronide in liver microsomes and lack of catalysis by 10 examined UDP-glucuronosyltransferases. Drug Metab. Dispos. 30, 991–996.10.1124/dmd.30.12.147812167564 Glynn S. M. Sussman S. (1990). Why patients smoke. Hosp. Community Psychiatry 41, 1027–1028.2210702 Gray J. A. Roth B. L. (2007). Molecular targets for treating cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 33, 1100–1119.10.1093/schbul/sbm07417617664 Hajos M. Rogers B. N. (2010). Targeting alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the treatment of schizophrenia. Curr. Pharm. Des. 16, 538–554.10.2174/13816121079036143419909231 Hapke U. Schumann A. Rumpf H. J. John U. Konerding U. Meyer C. (2005). Association of smoking and nicotine dependence with trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in a general population sample. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 193, 843–846.10.1097/01.nmd.0000188964.83476.e016319709 Hatsukami D. Pentel P. R. Jensen J. Nelson D. Allen S. S. Goldman A. (1998). Cotinine: effects with and without nicotine. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 135, 141–150.10.1007/s0021300504959497019 Hatsukami D. K. Grillo M. Pentel P. R. Oncken C. Bliss R. (1997). Safety of cotinine in humans: physiologic, subjective, and cognitive effects. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 57, 643–650.10.1016/S0091-3057(97)80001-99258989 Hatsukami D. K. Jensen J. Brauer L. H. Mooney M. Schulte S. Sofuoglu M. (2003). Lack of effect of 5HT3 antagonist in mediating subjective and behavioral responses to cotinine. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 75, 1–7.10.1016/S0091-3057(03)00035-212759107 Hinkelmann K. Moritz S. Botzenhardt J. Riedesel K. Wiedemann K. Kellner M. (2009). Cognitive impairment in major depression: association with salivary cortisol. Biol. Psychiatry 66, 879–885.10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.06.02319709646 Holt D. J. Lebron-Milad K. Milad M. R. Rauch S. L. Pitman R. K. Orr S. P. (2009). Extinction memory is impaired in schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry 65, 455–463.10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.09.01718986648 Horner M. D. Hamner M. B. (2002). Neurocognitive functioning in posttraumatic stress disorder. Neuropsychol. Rev. 12, 15–30.10.1023/A:101543910623112090717 Hukkanen J. Jacob P. III Benowitz N. L. (2006). Effect of grapefruit juice on cytochrome P450 2A6 and nicotine renal clearance. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 80, 522–530.10.1016/j.clpt.2006.08.00617112808 Izquierdo I. Cammarota M. Vianna M. M. Bevilaqua L. R. (2004). The inhibition of acquired fear. Neurotox. Res. 6, 175–188.10.1007/BF0303322015325957 Johnsen G. E. Asbjornsen A. E. (2009). Verbal learning and memory impairments in posttraumatic stress disorder: the role of encoding strategies. Psychiatry Res. 165, 68–77.10.1016/j.psychres.2008.01.00119058857 Karaconji I. B. (2005). Facts about nicotine toxicity. Arh. Hig. Rada Toksikol. 56, 363–371.16370520 Karam C. S. Ballon J. S. Bivens N. M. Freyberg Z. Girgis R. R. Lizardi-Ortiz J. E. (2012). Signaling pathways in schizophrenia: emerging targets and therapeutic strategies. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 31, 381–390.10.1016/j.tips.2010.05.004 Kelly D. L. McMahon R. P. Wehring H. J. Liu F. Mackowick K. M. Boggs D. L. (2011). Cigarette smoking and mortality risk in people with schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 37, 832–838.10.1093/schbul/sbp15220019128 Kim A. H. Khursigara G. Sun X. Franke T. F. Chao M. V. (2001). Akt phosphorylates and negatively regulates apoptosis signal-regulating kina(se 1). Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 893–901.10.1128/MCB.21.10.3503-3513.200111154276 Kuehl G. E. Murphy S. E. (2003). N-glucuronidation of trans-3’-hydroxycotinine by human liver microsomes. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 16, 1502–1506.10.1021/tx034173o14680362 Lang U. E. Puls I. Muller D. J. Strutz-Seebohm N. Gallinat J. (2007). Molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 20, 687–702.10.1159/00011043017982252 Leiser S. C. Bowlby M. R. Comery T. A. Dunlop J. (2009). A cog in cognition: how the alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor is geared towards improving cognitive deficits. Pharmacol. Ther. 122, 302–311.10.1016/j.pharmthera.2009.03.00919351547 Leonard S. Adler L. E. Benhammou K. Berger R. Breese C. R. Drebing C. (2001). Smoking and mental illness. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 70, 561–570.10.1016/S0091-3057(01)00677-311796154 Leonard S. Breese C. Adams C. Benhammou K. Gault J. Stevens K. (2000). Smoking and schizophrenia: abnormal nicotinic receptor expression. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 393, 237–242.10.1016/S0014-2999(00)00035-210771019 Leonard S. Gault J. Adams C. Breese C. R. Rollins Y. Adler L. E. (1998). Nicotinic receptors, smoking and schizophrenia. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 12, 195–201.12671315 Levin E. D. (2002). Nicotinic receptor subtypes and cognitive function. J. Neurobiol. 53, 633–640.10.1002/neu.1015112436426 Levin E. D. Bettegowda C. Weaver T. Christopher N. C. (1998). Nicotine-dizocilpine interactions and working and reference memory performance of rats in the radial-arm maze. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 61, 335–340.10.1016/S0091-3057(98)00109-99768569 Lewis D. F. Dickins M. Lake B. G. Eddershaw P. J. Tarbit M. H. Goldfarb P. S. (1999). Molecular modelling of the human cytochrome P450 isoform CYP2A6 and investigations of CYP2A substrate selectivity. Toxicology 133, 1–33.10.1016/S0300-483X(98)00149-810413191 Luck S. J. Gold J. M. (2008). The construct of attention in schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry 64, 34–39.10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.02.01418374901 Lyon E. R. (1999). A review of the effects of nicotine on schizophrenia and antipsychotic medications. Psychiatr. Serv. 50, 1346–1350.10506305 Malaiyandi V. Goodz S. D. Sellers E. M. Tyndale R. F. (2006). CYP2A6 genotype, phenotype, and the use of nicotine metabolites as biomarkers during ad libitum smoking. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 15, 1812–1819.10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-072317035386 Martenyi F. Brown E. B. Caldwell C. D. (2007). Failed efficacy of fluoxetine in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder: results of a fixed-dose, placebo-controlled study. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 27, 166–170.10.1097/JCP.0b013e31803308ce17414240 Matthews A. M. Wilson V. B. Mitchell S. H. (2011). The role of antipsychotics in smoking and smoking cessation. CNS Drugs 25, 299–315.10.2165/11588170-000000000-0000021425883 McEvoy J. P. Freudenreich O. Wilson W. H. (1999). Smoking and therapeutic response to clozapine in patients with schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry 46, 125–129.10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00377-110394482 McGehee D. S. Role L. W. (1995). Physiological diversity of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors expressed by vertebrate neurons. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 57, 521–546.10.1146/annurev.ph.57.030195.0025137778876 Mexal S. Berger R. Logel J. Ross R. G. Freedman R. Leonard S. (2010). Differential regulation of alpha7 nicotinic receptor gene (CHRNA7) expression in schizophrenic smokers. J. Mol. Neurosci. 40, 185–195.10.1007/s12031-009-9303-719680823 Money T. T. Scarr E. Udawela M. Gibbons A. S. Jeon W. J. Seo M. S. (2012). Treating schizophrenia: novel targets for the cholinergic system. CNS Neurol Disord. Drug Targets 9, 241–256. Nakajima M. Fukami T. Yamanaka H. Higashi E. Sakai H. Yoshida R. (2006). Comprehensive evaluation of variability in nicotine metabolism and CYP2A6 polymorphic alleles in four ethnic populations. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 80, 282–297.10.1016/j.clpt.2006.05.01216952495 Nutt D. J. (2000). The psychobiology of posttraumatic stress disorder. J. Clin. Psychiatry 61(Suppl. 5), 24–29; discussion 30–22.10761676 Ohno M. Chang L. Tseng W. Oakley H. Citron M. Klein W. L. (2006). Temporal memory deficits in Alzheimer’s mouse models: rescue by genetic deletion of B(ACE1). Eur. J. Neurosci. 23, 251–260.10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04746.x16420434 O’Leary K. Parameswaran N. McIntosh J. M. Quik M. (2008). Cotinine selectively activates a subpopulation of alpha3/alpha6beta2 nicotinic receptors in monkey striatum. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 325, 646–654.10.1124/jpet.108.13683818305015 Olincy A. Stevens K. E. (2007). Treating schizophrenia symptoms with an alpha7 nicotinic agonist, from mice to men. Biochem. Pharmacol. 74, 1192–1201.10.1016/j.bcp.2007.07.01517714692 Peto R. Lopez A. D. Boreham J. Thun M. Heath C. Jr. Doll R. (1996). Mortality from smoking worldwide. Br. Med. Bull. 52, 12–21.10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a0115198746293 Quirk G. J. Mueller D. (2008). Neural mechanisms of extinction learning and retrieval. Neuropsychopharmacology 33, 56–72.10.1038/sj.npp.130155517882236 Rabin R. A. Sacco K. A. George T. P. (2009). Correlation of prepulse inhibition and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in schizophrenia and controls: effects of smoking status. Schizophr. Res. 114, 91–97.10.1016/j.schres.2009.07.00619656658 Riah O. Courriere P. Dousset J. C. Todeschi N. Labat C. (1998). Nicotine is more efficient than cotinine at passing the blood-brain barrier in rats. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 18, 311–318.10.1023/A:10225011317099590561 Riah O. Dousset J. C. Bofill-Cardona E. Courriere P. (2000). Isolation and microsequencing of a novel cotinine receptor. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 20, 653–664.10.1023/A:100709462377511100974 Riah O. Dousset J. C. Courriere P. Stigliani J. L. Baziard-Mouysset G. Belahsen Y. (1999). Evidence that nicotine acetylcholine receptors are not the main targets of cotinine toxicity. Toxicol. Lett. 109, 21–29.10.1016/S0378-4274(99)00070-310514027 Risner M. E. Goldberg S. R. Prada J. A. Cone E. J. (1985). Effects of nicotine, cocaine and some of their metabolites on schedule-controlled responding by beagle dogs and squirrel monkeys. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 234, 113–119.4009496 Robbins T. W. (2002). The 5-choice serial reaction time task: behavioural pharmacology and functional neurochemistry. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 163, 362–380.10.1007/s00213-002-1154-712373437 Robinson E. S. Eagle D. M. Economidou D. Theobald D. E. Mar A. C. Murphy E. R. (2009). Behavioural characterisation of high impulsivity on the 5-choice serial reaction time task: specific deficits in “waiting” versus “stopping.” Behav. Brain Res. 196, 310–316.10.1016/j.bbr.2008.09.02118940201 Rubboli F. Court J. A. Sala C. Morris C. Chini B. Perry E. (1994a). Distribution of nicotinic receptors in the human hippocampus and thalamus. Eur. J. Neurosci. 6, 1596–1604.10.1111/j.1460-9568.1994.tb00550.x Rubboli F. Court J. A. Sala C. Morris C. Perry E. Clementi F. (1994b). Distribution of neuronal nicotinic receptor subunits in human brain. Neurochem. Int. 25, 69–71.10.1016/0197-0186(94)90055-8 Sagud M. Mihaljevic-Peles A. Muck-Seler D. Pivac N. Vuksan-Cusa B. Brataljenovic T. (2009). Smoking and schizophrenia. Psychiatr. Danub. 21, 371–375.19794359 Seillier A. Giuffrida A. (2009). Evaluation of NMDA receptor models of schizophrenia: divergences in the behavioral effects of sub-chronic PCP and MK(-801). Behav. Brain Res. 204, 410–415.10.1016/j.bbr.2009.02.00719716985 Smith R. C. Singh A. Infante M. Khandat A. Kloos A. (2002). Effects of cigarette smoking and nicotine nasal spray on psychiatric symptoms and cognition in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 27, 479–497.10.1016/S0893-133X(02)00324-X12225705 Smith R. C. Warner-Cohen J. Matute M. Butler E. Kelly E. Vaidhyanathaswamy S. (2006). Effects of nicotine nasal spray on cognitive function in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 31, 637–643.10.1038/sj.npp.130088116160711 Steckler T. Risbrough V. (2012). Pharmacological treatment of PTSD – Established and new approaches. Neuropharmacology 62, 617–627.10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.06.01221736888 Stein D. J. Ipser J. McAnda N. (2009). Pharmacotherapy of posttraumatic stress disorder: a review of meta-analyses and treatment guidelines. CNS Spectr. 14, 25–31.19169191 Strasser A. A. Malaiyandi V. Hoffmann E. Tyndale R. F. Lerman C. (2007). An association of CYP2A6 genotype and smoking topography. Nicotine Tob. Res. 9, 511–518.10.1080/1462220070123960517454707 Suemaru K. Yasuda K. Umeda K. Araki H. Shibata K. Choshi T. (2004). Nicotine blocks apomorphine-induced disruption of prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle in rats: possible involvement of central nicotinic alpha7 receptors. Br. J. Pharmacol. 142, 843–850.10.1038/sj.bjp.070585515197106 Sugaya K. Giacobini E. Chiappinelli V. A. (1990). Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes in human frontal cortex: changes in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurosci. Res. 27, 349–359.10.1002/jnr.4902703142097379 Swerdlow N. R. Light G. A. Cadenhead K. S. Sprock J. Hsieh M. H. Braff D. L. (2006). Startle gating deficits in a large cohort of patients with schizophrenia: relationship to medications, symptoms, neurocognition, and level of function. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 63, 1325–1335.10.1001/archpsyc.63.12.132517146007 Taly A. Corringer P. J. Guedin D. Lestage P. Changeux J. P. (2009). Nicotinic receptors: allosteric transitions and therapeutic targets in the nervous system. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 8, 733–750.10.1038/nrd292719721446 Tapia G. Clarys D. El Hage W. Belzung C. Isingrini M. (2007). PTSD psychiatric patients exhibit a deficit in remembering. Memory 15, 145–153.10.1080/0965821060114596517534108 Tassaneeyakul W. Guo L. Q. Fukuda K. Ohta T. Yamazoe Y. (2000). Inhibition selectivity of grapefruit juice components on human cytochromes (P450). Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 378, 356–363.10.1006/abbi.2000.183510860553 Terry A. V. Jr. Buccafusco J. J. Schade R. F. Vandenhuerk L. Callahan P. M. Beck W. D. (2012). The nicotine metabolite, cotinine, attenuates glutamate (NMDA) antagonist-related effects on the performance of the five choice serial reaction time task (5C-SRTT) in rats. Biochem. Pharmacol. 83, 941–951.10.1016/j.bcp.2011.12.04322244928 Terry A. V. Jr. Buccafusco J. J. Wilson C. (2008). Cognitive dysfunction in neuropsychiatric disorders: selected serotonin receptor subtypes as therapeutic targets. Behav. Brain Res. 195, 30–38.10.1016/j.bbr.2007.12.00618241938 Terry A. V. Jr. Hernandez C. M. Hohnadel E. J. Bouchard K. P. Buccafusco J. J. (2005). Cotinine, a neuroactive metabolite of nicotine: potential for treating disorders of impaired cognition. CNS Drug Rev. 11, 229–252.10.1111/j.1527-3458.2005.tb00045.x16389292 Thorndike F. P. Wernicke R. Pearlman M. Y. Haaga D. A. (2006). Nicotine dependence, PTSD symptoms, and depression proneness among male and female smokers. Addict. Behav. 31, 223–231.10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.04.02315919158 Toyohara J. Hashimoto K. (2010). alpha7 nicotinic receptor agonists: potential therapeutic drugs for treatment of cognitive impairments in schizophrenia and Alzheimer’s disease. Open Med. Chem. J. 4, 37–56.10.2174/187410450100402003721249164 van Os J. Kapur S. (2009). Schizophrenia. Lancet 374, 635–645.10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60995-819700006 Van Snellenberg J. X. (2009). Working memory and long-term memory deficits in schizophrenia: is there a common substrate? Psychiatry Res. 174, 89–96.10.1016/j.pscychresns.2009.04.00119837568 Veltmeyer M. D. Clark C. R. McFarlane A. C. Moores K. A. Bryant R. A. Gordon E. (2009). Working memory function in post-traumatic stress disorder: an event-related potential study. Clin. Neurophysiol. 120, 1096–1106.10.1016/j.clinph.2009.03.02419442579 Visoni S. Meireles N. Monteiro L. Rossini A. Pinto L. F. (2008). Different modes of inhibition of mouse Cyp2a5 and rat CYP2A3 by the food-derived 8-methoxypsoralen. Food Chem. Toxicol. 46, 1190–1195.10.1016/j.fct.2007.12.00118215451 von Hausswolff-Juhlin Y. Bjartveit M. Lindstrom E. Jones P. (2009). Schizophrenia and physical health problems. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. Suppl. 15–21.10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01309.x18764840 Weaver T. L. Etzel J. C. (2003). Smoking patterns, symptoms of PTSD and depression: preliminary findings from a sample of severely battered women. Addict. Behav. 28, 1665–1679.10.1016/j.addbeh.2003.08.04114656552 Woodruff-Pak D. S. Gould T. J. (2002). Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: involvement in Alzheimer’s disease and schizophrenia. Behav. Cogn. Neurosci. Rev. 1, 5–20.10.1177/153458230200100100217715584 Yakel J. L. (2012). Nicotinic ACh receptors in the hippocampus: role in excitability and plasticity. Nicotine Tob. Res. [Epub ahead of print].22472168 Yamanaka H. Nakajima M. Nishimura K. Yoshida R. Fukami T. Katoh M. (2004). Metabolic profile of nicotine in subjects whose CYP2A6 gene is deleted. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 22, 419–425.10.1016/j.ejps.2004.04.01215265511 Yehuda R. Giller E. L. Southwick S. M. Lowy M. T. Mason J. W. (1991). Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal dysfunction in posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 30, 1031–1048.10.1016/0006-3223(91)90123-41661614 Young G. T. Zwart R. Walker A. S. Sher E. Millar N. S. (2008). Potentiation of alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors via an allosteric transmembrane site. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 14686–14691.10.1073/pnas.080437210518791069 Zeitlin R. Patel S. Solomon R. Tran J. Weeber E. J. Echeverria V. (2012). Cotinine enhances the extinction of contextual fear memory and reduces anxiety after fear conditioning. Behav. Brain Res. 228, 284–293.10.1016/j.bbr.2011.11.02322137886