Front. Pediatr.Frontiers in PediatricsFront. Pediatr.2296-2360Frontiers Media S.A.10.3389/fped.2024.1484562PediatricsCorrectionCorrigendum: Outcomes of olecranon fractures in adolescents: comparison of tension band wiring and Herbert screw fixationsYangWeiweiZhangXintaoSunDongJinShaobinChenJunfeiLiYang*Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
Edited and Reviewed by: Andrew S. Day, University of Otago, New Zealand
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
childrenolecranon fractureHerbert screw fixationepiphyseal growth platetension band wiringsection-at-acceptancePediatric SurgeryA Corrigendum on Outcomes of olecranon fractures in adolescents: comparison of tension band wiring and Herbert screw fixations By Yang W, Zhang X, Sun D, Jin S, Chen J and Li Y (2024). Front. Pediatr. 11:1269628. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1269628
In the published article, there was an error in the legend for Figure 1 as published. The part labels (B) “Postoperative images from the 1-day follow-up and AP and lateral radiographs in the same patient treated with closed reduction and Herbert screw fixation” and (D) “Functional outcomes in the same patient at 6 months after surgery. Before removing the cannulated screw, we recorded the patient's elbow range of motion in flexion, extension, pronation, and supination, forearm length, and QuickDASH score”, were incorrect. The corrected legend appears below.
Figure 1 (A) preoperative images; anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs in a 12-year-old boy with an olecranon fracture. (B) Postoperative images from the 1-day follow-up and AP and lateral radiographs in the same patient treated with open reduction and TBW fixation. (C) Follow-up images obtained at 6 months after surgery in the same patient. (D) Functional outcomes in the same patient at 6 months after surgery. Before removing the TBW screw, we recorded the patient's elbow range of motion in flexion, extension, pronation, and supination, forearm length, and QuickDASH score.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.