The prevalence of dental caries in children remains high worldwide affecting both primary and permanent dentition (1). According to the World Health Organization, 45% of children aged 1–9 in Yemen suffered from untreated tooth decay, reflecting the country's underdeveloped healthcare conditions (2). Selecting the most appropriate treatment option for primary teeth is one of the dentistry challenges. Caries management approaches differ according to the patient's caries risk level, which plays a key role in guiding the clinician's treatment decisions (3). Clinicians' decisions are influenced by several factors as patient's age, motivation, caries risk, tooth status, caries stage, and the dentist's expertise (4, 5).

Preformed metal crowns (PMCs) are one of the most common treatment options for restoring decayed and badly destroyed teeth (6). They were introduced into pediatric dentistry in 1947, described by Engel, and then disseminated by Humphrey in 1950 (7, 8). Stainless steel crowns (SSCs) have properties that make them widely used and selected in pediatric dentistry, as they give superior clinical performance with better longevity and low cost (6).

Hall Technique (HT) can be defined as the placement of PMCs without carious removal, tooth preparation, or local anesthesia. PMCs are cemented using glass-ionomer (luting) cement over carious primary molars (6). Since its inception, the technique has gained considerable attention due to its simplicity, effectiveness, and acceptability among both practitioners and patients. Among all carious management techniques, the overall success rate of HT was 49%. Moreover, its success rate was 80% in comparison with other restorations. On the other hand, HT had a similar success rate when compared to conventional PMCs (6). General dental practitioner (GDPs) have expressed positive views on the use of the Hall Technique and stainless steel crowns for restoring primary molars. The technique simplicity and effectiveness, along with the reduced need for advanced behavior management techniques, contribute to its favorable reception within the dental community (6).

In Yemen pediatric dentistry is underserved specialty, with only seven consultants and six experts in the capital city according to Yemen Dental Association. Many pediatric dentists trained abroad did not return due to the country's unstable situation. As a result, GDPs are under heavy demand to perform such treatments. SSCs have been used in Yemeni dental schools and clinics for 11 years. This study hypothesizes that GDPs exhibit variable levels of knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding the use of SSCs and HT, potentially influenced by differences in educational background, clinical training, and professional experience. Given the established efficacy of SSCs and HT in pediatric dentistry, evaluating these factors among GDPs is essential to identify existing knowledge gaps and inform the development of targeted educational strategies to enhance clinical practice and patient outcomes.

This study aimed to assess practice, knowledge and challenges of GDPs in Yemen regarding the use of SSCs and HT among dentists in Yemen, as well as their demographic features and training requirements. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the usage of both SSCs and HT among Yemeni GDPs.

Interestingly, most of the respondents were female (54.7%), showing a significant gender imbalance in Yemen's dental profession. This result suggests that dental profession in Yemen may have a higher proportion of females compared to males. This observation is consistent with comparable patterns reported in other studies. For instance, a survey conducted among Norwegian and Finnish dentists indicated a higher proportion of females than males, indicating the persistent gender imbalance within the dental sector (9). Furthermore, 61.5% of participants were under 30 year-olds, indicating a young and potentially dynamic workforce. Geographically, most respondents (62.9%) resided in the North area, which correlates with concentrated dental infrastructure in Northern Yemen, more specifically in Sana'a. This may explain the relatively higher use of SSCs and HT in this region, given better access to materials and clinical facilities (11). In contrast, the southern regions continue to be affected by active conflict zones, which have significantly limited access to crown materials and dental laboratories, potentially restricting the use of these treatment options (12). Moreover, a significant number of dentists (68.5%) graduated from public universities demonstrating the dominance of public institutions in dental education. Yemen's reliance on public dental education aligns with low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Egypt and Pakistan, where 70%–80% of dentists were trained in public schools due to centralized healthcare policies (13, 14).

Our findings indicated that while most surveyed dentists in Yemen treated pediatric patients, only 51.3% of respondents reported using SSCs in their daily practice. This rate exceeded the 26.3% SSCs adoption reported by Al-Arwali et al., which was based exclusively on data from Sana'a only (11). In contrast, our study encompassed northern, middle and southern of Yemen, thereby reflecting a wider spectrum of dental practice environments and regional differences in the utilization of SSCs. Comparatively, a study in Germany found that 66% of the respondents did not use SSCs (4). Similarly, in India a study by Bedre and Gurunathan showed only 46.4% of participants used SSCs in their daily practice (15). However, the context in Yemen is distinct.

The limited use of SSCs may be shaped by several local factors, including insufficient training in pediatric restorative techniques, economic constraints, and the lack of clear national guidelines or policies supporting the routine use of SSCs. Furthermore, ongoing conflict and regional disparities in dental infrastructure, especially between the more equipped northern regions and the conflict-affected south, may further hinder accessibility to crown materials and limit clinical capacity. These variables likely play significant roles in shaping dentists' decisions regarding the incorporation of SSCs into their clinical practice. Addressing these factors could help in bridging the gap and promote more consistent adoption of SSCs, which are beneficial for pediatric dental care.

Our findings revealed no significant association between gender and SSCs use (p = 0.6), aligning with a 2024 study from Yemen which similarly reported no gender-based difference in SSCs adoption (p = 0.201) (11).

In contrast, age demonstrated a significant influence (p = 0.01), Younger dentists, particularly those under 30s, were more likely to utilize SSCs than their older counterparts. This finding may suggest that younger dentists were more receptive to adopting knowledge and training in many fields like SSCs and HT, potentially due to recent advancements in dental education or evolving treatment protocols. Moreover, SSCs use was more common in the northern and middle areas compared to the southern region (p < 0.001). This regional variation in SSCs utilization may reflect differences in patient demographics, socioeconomic factors, or the availability of dental healthcare resources.

Notably, years of experience also influenced the frequency of SSCs use, with less experienced dentists using SSCs more frequently (p < 0.001). This finding could be explained by the fact that newer graduates may have received more recent training on SSCs placement and may be more inclined to incorporate them into their practice. A study showed that dentists with ≤5 years of experience have been shown to prescribe SSCs 2.5 times more often than those with over 15 years of experience (p <  0.001) (16). Furthermore, those who completed programs that included SSC-focused clinical rotations reported using them three times more frequently, underscored the impact of targeted training on clinical practice (17).

It was notable that a substantial portion of respondents learned about HT through informal channels such as YouTube (26.5%), suggesting a potential gap in formal educational curricula. This finding was consistent with a study conducted in China, where dentists typically learned about this technique through continuing education training courses and conferences (18). Contrast to this with the UK study, where 96% HT adoption followed undergraduate curriculum integration (19). Specifically, a survey of UK dental therapy schools found that the majority taught both conventional and alternative caries management techniques, including HT within their undergraduate programs (20). In Yemen, however, dental schools generally lack structured HT modules, leaving many practitioners to depend on peer learning or non-verified online resources, such as YouTube, to acquire the technique.

The expressed need for additional training on SSCs and HT (82.6% of the total sample) underscores a potential gap in current dental education programs in Yemen. Dentists preferred practical learning methods such as video demonstrations (51.3%) and hands-on courses (44.1%), suggesting a preference for experiential learning over theoretical instruction.

The significant impact of the university of graduation on the adequacy of theoretical and practical instructions regarding SSCs and HT (p ≦ 0.001) highlights potential discrepancies in dental education quality between public and private institutions. Specifically, graduates from private universities received more comprehensive instruction than public university graduates. This finding underscores the importance of curriculum standardization and continuous professional development programs to ensure that all dentists receive comprehensive training in evidence-based techniques.

Despite the high awareness of SSCs benefits, concerns such as patient cooperation (44.9%) and economic factors (35.7%) appear to influence their utilization. In a study by Uhlen et al., the primary barrier frequently reported for not using SSCs was a lack of practical training (9).

Findings related to HT utilization reveal noteworthy insights into the current practices and attitudes among dentists surveyed. A considerable proportion of respondents (66.7%) reported not using the HT, while a small percentage (3.2%) admitted to being unfamiliar with the technique altogether. This corresponded with findings from other studies conducted in China (18) and the USA (10), where the use of the HT was reported at 40.2% and 39%, respectively. This disparity in HT utilization across different countries could be attributed to variations in introducing and integrating the technique into dental education curricula. Notably, in the UK, where HT usage appeared to be higher (96%), it is likely because the technique was introduced into the undergraduate pediatric dentistry curriculum before 2010 (21). When comparing Yemen to other Arab contexts, such as Qatar, where 58% of pediatric dentists reported using HT, the difference becomes notable. This higher adoption in Qatar likely reflects the presence of a well-structured primary oral healthcare system, supported by stable infrastructure, continuous training, and clear clinical guidelines (22).

Gender and age were found not significantly influence HT use among dentists in Yemen. A lower percentage of males (33%) and females (27%) reported using HT. This aligns with a study conducted by Ding et al. reported that the use of HT showed no association with gender (18). In contrast to Gonzalez et al.'s findings, which showed a significant association between gender and HT use (10). This suggested potential regional differences in dental practices or training programs. Further investigation is necessary to elucidate these discrepancies comprehensively.

One of the primary concerns expressed regarding the HT was the difficulty in insertion due to a lack of preparation (43.5%). Multiple studies have reported that practitioners, especially those new to the HT, find crown insertion challenging because no tooth reduction is performed (23). In a clinical trial by Innes et al., 15% of crowns were deemed “incompletely seated,” largely because of these insertion difficulties, and tight contacts often necessitated the use of orthodontic separators to facilitate crown placement (24).

This finding highlights the importance of ensuring dentists receives adequate training and support to effectively implement HT in their clinical practice. Other studies, including those by Gonzalez et al. (10) and Ding et al. (18), have highlighted further concerns regarding HT. Specifically, dentists who had not utilized the HT expressed apprehensions regarding potential complications such as pulp inflammation or necrosis following its application (10, 18). These disparities may stem from differences in education systems, clinical guidelines, and cultural factors. Addressing these challenges requires enhanced training and ongoing professional development opportunities for dentists.

Despite these challenges, it is encouraging to note that pain, typically associated with traditional anesthesia, was not a significant concern among respondents utilizing HT (17.4%) in our study. This can be attributed to the minimally invasive nature of HT, which eliminates the need for local anesthesia, caries excavation, and tooth preparation (23). These characteristics reduce procedural discomfort and psychological distress, particularly in pediatric patients, thereby supporting HT suitability as a child-friendly, atraumatic restorative approach.

Lastly, our study observed that most of those who employed HT (30.1%) gained knowledge of the technique during their university education, emphasizing the importance of formal training for undergraduates. However, it is noteworthy that most dental students in Germany have yet to learn about nor use the HT (4), indicating potential variations in educational practices. This suggests a need to incorporate training on HT into dental education curricula to ensure that dentists are adequately equipped with the necessary skills to utilize this approach effectively in clinical practice.

This study revealed a significant gaps related to practice and knowledge of SSCs use and HT among GDPs in Yemen. This could be attributed to training deficiencies, cultural perceptions, and resource limitations. To address these challenges and improve pediatric dental care, it is recommended to implement comprehensive training programs for dental professionals, integrating SSCs and HT into educational curricula, establishing ongoing education initiatives, launching targeted awareness campaigns, and ensuring effective resource management. Not only this Yemen Dental Association should develop a policy regarding SSCs and HT. These steps are essential for enhancing the adoption of SSCs and HT, thereby advancing oral health care for Yemeni children.

While the research offers insights into how Yemeni GDPs use SSCs and HT, it is essential to acknowledge some limitations; 1.

Sampling Bias: The data collection from dentists registered with the Yemen Dental Association does not represent the entire dental practitioner population of Yemen. The study results cannot be considered representative for all dental practitioners operating in Yemen.