The microbiota that colonizes various parts of the human body, such as skin, genitals and gastrointestinal tract, lives in a symbiotic relationship with the host (1). Each part of the gastrointestinal tract, e.g., oral cavity, pharynx, esophagus, stomach, small and large intestine, has its own site-specific core microbiome, which is regulated by the physiological and other environmental factors that characterize every ecological unit (habitat). Collectively, these microbial habitats and their genomes constitute the human microbiome, with characteristic compositions for each niche in which the microorganisms live in a symbiotic and homeostatic condition with the host, and together constitute the symbiont. The main benefits of this host-microbiome symbiosis are, among others, resistance to colonization by exogenous pathogens, support in host defense functions and anti-inflammatory properties, antioxidant activity, support in the regulation of the cardiovascular system, additional metabolic potential, and support to maintain a healthy digestive tract (2). The tissue response to the colonizers along the entire gastrointestinal tract is a normal and valuable reaction to the microbial load in each habitat. The degree of mucosal lymphoid tissue manifestation beneath the epithelial barrier of the mucosal membranes is balanced against the metabolic activity and growth of the microorganisms in each habitat (3).

The ecology of the dental biofilm (dental plaque) is developed by an establishment of a highly diversified microbiota, ecologically termed as a climax community (4). This ecology, in the gingival crevice, develops around all teeth, in all humans and even animals (with a similar anatomy and physiology) and the microbiota is typical for this niche. It is true that in populations/individuals that practice dental cleaning the bacterial load and diversity is lower, however, the number of individuals with a gingiva fulfilling the criteria for being “healthy”, with a bleeding on probing < 10%, is a minority (5). Classical experimental gingivitis studies also confirm that the establishment of a climax community within the gingival crevice in adults takes less than 14 days, although there is no time limit for the continuous and life-long maturation process, with further adaptation and reorganization of a dynamic subgingival plaque community (6–9). The response of the host, seen clinically as an inflammatory response (gingivitis), should be regarded as a natural protecting response (a normal condition) rather than pathologic, and is balanced (homeostasis) against the microbial activity and release of metabolic products from the dental biofilm in the gingival crevice.

Numerous studies have been carried out in the past in search for specific species/genera or combinations/communities that are associated with destructive periodontal disease (10–12). Unfortunately, most studies are cross-sectional using advanced molecular methods with a limited number of subjects. Further, the specific details of the sampling strategy and the clinical status of the patients can be elusive to obtain. Several species (putative periodontal pathogens, key stone periodontal pathogens) have been associated with deep (>6 mm) periodontal pockets, however, their roles in the disease process are still far from established. Morphological studies report on bacterial masses in the periodontal pockets, with an adherent part against the root surface and a non-adherent part, including a high number of motile bacteria, densely packed in the most apical part of the pocket (13, 14). Studies on the composition of the periodontal pocket microbiome/microbiota generally show a predominance of Gram-negative strictly anaerobic species using protein fermentation as their main nutritional pathway in a slightly alkaline environment (2, 15). The periodontitis microbiota is associated with an overgrowth of some microorganisms such as Porphyromonas spp. and Treponema spp. (spirochetes), resulting in an increased microbial diversity in periodontitis compared to periodontal health (16). It is possible that these bacteria constitute a higher relative risk for further periodontal breakdown, but they are commonly present in high numbers also in shallow pockets and in gingivitis cases as well, and their impact on the periodontal disease progression is therefore not well established. The term “dysbiosis” is sometimes used to refer to the changes in the composition of the microbiota in particular niches (for example, those found in deep periodontal pockets). It should, however, be borne in mind that such proportional changes, although often considered pathologic, are more likely an adaptation of oral commensals to a modified microenvironment. Dysbiosis is mainly a term that normally refers to microbial imbalance or maladaptation within the microbiome (16, 17).

In recent years the function e.g., metabolic activities of the dental biofilm community rather than its composition have gained an increasing interest in both caries and periodontitis research (18–22). The dental biofilm metabolism is extremely complex and contrasting findings from in vitro and cell culture studies are common. The metabolism of the subgingival dental biofilm and the interaction of bacterial metabolites with the host tissues is still poorly understood (23).

This paper reviews the metabolic processes in the subgingival dental biofilm and its complex interaction with the gingival tissues and inflammatory cells of the host, supporting the view of an alternative perspective on destructive periodontal disease.

The oral cavity and its microbiota should be seen as the portal entry and the functional starting point of the gastrointestinal tract. A major beneficial activity of the gastrointestinal microbiota is the fermentation of food. The processes of degradation of the polymeric components (polysaccharides, proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids) into smaller molecules (oligomers and monomers), together with inorganic ions, provide the nutrients for host cells (Figure 1). They also provide the nutrients and cell materials (polymers) for the bacteria that colonize the entire gastrointestinal tract. This is a major function also for the oral microbiota. Although there are substantial differences between the gastrointestinal microbiota and the microbiota on the teeth and tongue, there are also some similarities, e.g., complex compositions, strong microbial interactions, and the degradation of nutrients (24). Firmicutes (mainly streptococci), which are biochemically the most active species in the oral cavity due to their potent ability to ferment both carbohydrates and peptides, represents the predominant phylum in the oral resident microbiota.

The fermentation process in the oral microbiota follows two main pathways, one for carbohydrate (sugars and sugar alcohols) and one for proteins (peptides and amino acids), both described in detail by Takahashi (18). Nutrients from ingested food, especially mono- and di-saccharides, are readily available and efficiently fermented by streptococci, also under anaerobic conditions (19). The oral microbiota is momentarily activated through the carbohydrate-rich diet, especially through intake of sugars (mono and disaccharides). This can easily be followed by measurement of acid formation (mainly lactic acid) and the subsequent pH drop (Stephan curve) (25). For the resting microbiota on mucosal membranes and dental plaque (e.g., at night during sleep), under starvation conditions, the nutrients comprise salivary glycoproteins that are degraded into oligomeric molecules through the fermentation of both carbohydrates and proteins. It is important to emphasize that even during resting and starving conditions the microbiota of various oral niches are still metabolizing and growing and continuously fluctuating in activity (26, 27).

A major metabolic activity that takes place is the oxidation processes that results in the production of hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂). This process is mainly occurring in the presence of oxygen in the dental biofilm (Figure 1) (18). The main producers of H₂O₂ are Streptococcus spp. and it is suggested that that their production of H₂O₂ has an important regulatory function against anaerobes to become established on exposed surfaces such as the mucosal membranes and teeth surfaces. Thus, H₂O₂ is regulating the dental plaque since certain bacteria lack protection from peroxides and oxygen radicals. There are, however, many both facultative and anaerobic bacteria, that are protected from oxygen-free radicals by enzymatic antioxidants such as superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase and catalase (28). Since peroxides also have toxic effects on host epithelial and other cells, saliva contains lacto-peroxidase, which convert thiocyanate (SCN⁻) to hypothiocyanite (OSCN⁻), which is strongly antibacterial. The source of cyanate is through the diet, but cyanate is present in significant concentrations also in blood. It is therefore likely that this conversion of SCN⁻ to OSCN⁻ also takes place in the gingival pocket by myeloperoxidase from neutrophils. Increasing inflammation may thus efficiently degrade the peroxides and thus work as antioxidants and keep the anaerobiosis in the periodontal pocket. Interestingly, smokers seem to have higher concentration of cyanate in serum and may therefore contribute to more anaerobic conditions, favoring anaerobic bacteria (29). However, little is known about the importance of myeloperoxidase in anaerobic conditions of the periodontal pocket and whether the conversion of SCN⁻ to OSCN⁻ have any role in the periodontal pocket ecology or if this reaction is mainly occurring in supragingival areas.

Interestingly, oral rinsing with urea, momentarily leads to degradation of the urea to ammonia (NH₃) and a pH raise followed by a neutralization back to initial status within 30 min (30, 31). The degradation of urea is due to urease which is strongly produced by some Gram-negative bacteria such as Campylobacter ureolyticus, Helicobacter pylori and Haemophilus parainfluenzae and moderately by some Gram-positive bacteria such as Streptococcus spp. and Actinomyces spp (32).

Nitrite (NO⁻), is another metabolite formed in the oral cavity through the reduction of nitrate (NO₃⁻) by the bacterial enzyme nitrate reductase (33). Numerous oral bacterial species such as Veillonella spp., Rothia spp., Neisseria spp, and Corynebacterium spp. share this ability to reduce nitrate. In acidic environment (stomach acid) nitrite is further reduced to nitric oxide (NO), which is strongly linked to the cardiovascular system and regulation of blood pressure (34–38). Thus, a diet rich in vegetables (that have high nitrate content), in combination with nitrate reducing oral bacteria have indirectly linked the oral nitrate-nitrite-nitric oxide pathway to systemic NO dependent effects and cardiovascular health in previous studies (39–45). Whether the reduction of nitrite to NO takes place also locally in the acidic conditions (at sugar intake) at the surface of teeth is unknown but likely (46, 47). This potential trait of the dental biofilm has been claimed to counteract the caries process (48–50). Significant amounts of nitrite, suggested to have a local antimicrobial effect, is formed after intake of nitrate rich foods. Intragastric NO production has been measured in humans in expelled air but will also contain NO produced locally in the oral cavity (51, 52). It is likely that the formation of nitrite and NO mainly occurs at the tongue, but its potential antibacterial effect here is controversial (34). Also, anti-inflammatory effects of a nitrate-rich diet have been reported for periodontal health (53). It has been reported that periodontitis recall patients presented a decrease in gingival inflammation after regular consumption of juice high in nitrate compared to a control group consuming juice without nitrate (54, 55).

Bacterial fermentation of proteins is complex (Figure 1). In the gingival area, there is absence of sugars but access to proteins/peptides from gingival crevicular fluid (GCF). In particular, under inflammatory conditions, the flow of GCF leaking out through the very thin (4–5 cells) epithelial barrier, is increased (56). The junctional pocket epithelium is non-keratinized, which allows migration of cells such as neutrophils and macrophages by chemotaxis. Thus, GCF, inflammatory cells and desquamated epithelial cells are the main sources of nutrients for the subgingival plaque bacteria. GCF is a serum exudate that contains components found in serum such as proteins, peptides, amino acids, hormones, and vitamins (57). The levels of sugars are negligible in the serum (except in glycemic diabetic patients) and the level of fermentation of carbohydrates/sugars in the subgingival environment is thus low. The fermentation of proteins is, therefore, the predominant metabolic pathway and this favors the proteolytic species in the oral microbiota (secondary fermenters, Figure 1). Nitrogenous compounds can be degraded into short chain fatty acids (SCFAs), NH₃, sulfur compounds, and amines by the bacteria of the subgingival biofilm. It should also be noted that urea originates from serum via GCF (58). Therefore, the production of NH₃ from urea is mainly occurring in the dental plaque, and the subgingival plaque in particular.

The nutrients present in the oral cavity are further used by secondary fermenters, predominately anaerobic and asaccharolytic bacteria, which collectively produce numerous metabolites, such as SCFAs, amines and gases (Table 1). While most of the metabolites, produced are further used by the microbial community, others are excreted as waste products. This cascade of metabolites increases when the activities and growth rates of the bacteria are increased. The gingival crevice is inaccessible and partly sequestered from the influence of saliva and the conditions prevailing above the gingival margin.

The homofermentative bacteria of the phylum Firmicutes (Streptococcus, Gemella, Granulicatella), are characterized as producing mainly lactic acid from carbohydrates and as being the most abundant bacteria in the human oral cavity. Other primary fermenters, such as lactobacilli, bifidobacteria and clostridia, are prominent fermenters in the proximal part of the intestine but normally constitute only a small fraction of the oral microbiota. Instead, other heterofermentative species with adhesion properties, such as Actinomyces, Corynebacteria, Rothia, Haemophilus, Neisseria, Prevotella and Fusobacterium spp., are better suited to the conditions found in the oral cavity.

Secondary fermenters are predominantly anaerobic bacteria (Figure 1) that require a low redox potential for growth, but these are sensitive to oxidizing substances (oxygen, peroxides, oxygen radicals, isothiocyanate, NO) and can survive and grow only in “hidden areas”, such as the dorsum of the tongue and the interproximal areas between teeth and in and around the gingival crevice. Although many of these anaerobic bacteria can degrade both carbohydrates and proteins, they primarily metabolize monosaccharides and peptides/amino acids and are, therefore, dependent upon the co-operation activities and food chains in a polymicrobial community. There are numerous examples from the oral microbiota of microbial growth only in co-culture with other microorganisms, as well as examples of bacteria providing growth factors to their neighbors (132). Among the secondary fermenters, asaccharolytic bacteria are also found. Veillonella spp. use lactate as a nutrient and have been attributed an important role in producing weaker acids and contributing to neutralizing the pH in dental biofilms (37).

In the subgingival microflora, several proteolytic species (Porphyromonas spp. and Campylobacter spp.), are asaccharolytic, using peptides/amino acids for their energy supply. Most of the amino acids that can be utilized are also essential for growth of the anaerobes. The fermentation process performed by the anaerobes is complex in that it involves extensive degradation of proteins, peptides, and amino acids. The subgingival microbiota constitutes an efficient fermenter (Figure 1), generating plentiful well-known and less-known bioactive metabolites with wide-ranging effects on the gingival tissues (18, 133, 134). These metabolites include an extensive collection of SCFAs, amines, and various gases (Table 1). The impact of these molecules are often crucial for the host, being beneficial at low and detrimental at high concentrations.

SCFAs, which include formic acid, acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid and valeric acid, are produced from carbohydrate fermentation. They are also produced during the proteolytic degradation carried out by anaerobic gut bacteria, as well as oral bacteria (62, 135). SCFAs play important roles in both the maintenance of health and the development of inflammatory diseases (18, 136). They exhibit antimicrobial activities against specific bacteria in the microbial community (69). SCFAs (primarily acetate), are extensively produced by F. nucleatum and P. gingivalis (63, 64, 66). Butyric acid is produced during the fermentation of glutamate and has an unpleasant odor (18). A mean concentration of 2.6 mM of butyric acid has been reported in subgingival plaque of periodontitis patients, and 9.5 mM propionic acid, while these SCFAs were below the detection limit at healthy sites (68). In GCF high mean values have been reported, 3.11 mM for butyric and 11.68 mM for propionic acid respectively (67). Furthermore, it has been shown that the concentrations of butyric acid, propionic acid, acetic acid, and isovaleric acid in GCF are significantly reduced two weeks after treatment of periodontitis affected sites (67, 137). Thus, it appears that the concentrations of SCFAs correlate with gingival inflammation (138).

The amines indole and skatole are converted from the amino acid tryptophan during fermentation by several anaerobic oral bacteria, e.g., Fusobacterium, Prevotella, and Porphyromonas, present within the subgingival microbiota (64, 74–76, 78). However, few studies have examined the presence and amounts of indole and skatole in the oral cavity. Other bioactive amines, the polyamines putrescine, spermine and spermidine, have not only been detected in GCF of periodontitis-affected sites but also shown to decrease after treatment (80, 139). Concentrations of 2.76 mM of putrescine have been measured (80). Cadaverine has been investigated in saliva and been shown to increase in the absence of oral hygiene measures (140).

Gases, including carbon monoxide (CO), hydrogen gas (H₂), NO, NH₃, and hydrogen sulfide (H₂S), are critical end-products of the fermentation processes. CO and carbon dioxide (CO₂) are main sources for carbon, and even essential for some bacteria, e.g., Capnocytophaga spp (98). H₂ is important for many microorganisms (e.g., Campylobacter spp. and Archaea) for their survival and growth. H₂S is produced by bacterial fermentation of the sulfur-containing amino acid cysteine by mainly anaerobic species associated with periodontal diseases, including Porphyromonas spp., Fusobacterium spp., Alloprevotella tannerae, Parvimonas micra, T. denticola, V. parvula, and S. anginosus (101, 102, 141, 142). It can also be produced through the reduction of sulfate by the sulfate-reducing bacteria Desulfovibrio spp., Desulfobacter spp., and Desulfomicrobium orale, which may also be present in periodontal pockets (103, 104). Its smell resembles that of rotten eggs, and it is detectable from a concentration of 0.01 ppm in air. H₂S, together with methyl mercaptan (CH₃SH) and dimethyl disulfide (CH₃SSCH₃), are important contributors to oral malodor and are usually referred to as volatile sulfur compounds (143, 144). The highest concentrations of H₂S reported from diseased periodontal pockets are in the range of 1.5–1.9 mM (109, 110). It has been shown that the subgingival levels of H₂S are higher at diseased sites than at healthy sites, as are the capacities of subgingival microbial samples to produce H₂S from cysteine (120, 145–147). Thus, the direct measurements of H₂S and indirect measurements of the capacity of the microbiota to produce H₂S are consistent with each other, in that the more dysbiotic the microflora, the higher is its production of H₂S. In addition, accessibility to cysteine is expected to be greater at diseased sites due to the increased secretion of GCF, which contains cysteine. The concentration of cysteine in the serum of healthy blood donors has been reported as 0.26 mM, and it is likely that its level in the GCF is of a similar magnitude (148). Based on these observations, H₂S has been suggested to participate in the pathogenesis of periodontal disease (Figure 2A) (110, 120, 121, 147, 149).

As for bacterial production of H₂S, the enzymes involved also catalyze the production of other by-products, such as pyruvate, NH₃, and serine (92, 95, 150). NH₃ is produced by several bacteria associated with periodontitis, such as Prevotella spp., and Fusobacterium spp. and asserted to contribute to the slightly alkali subgingival environment (65). NH₃ can, apart from proteolysis, also be produced from nitrate, as has been shown in saliva and tongue scrapings (139). There are however, to our knowledge no reports to date of measurements of NH₃ in periodontal pockets.

Methanogenesis is the process in which methane is produced and usually the final step in the fermentation of organic materials. Methanogenesis takes place only under anaerobic conditions by Archaea. Archaea is regularly missed in culture studies but archaeal DNA can be detected by PCR amplification and by sequencing of subgingival plaque from most adults (151). Especially methane-producing Archaea, e.g., Methanobrevibacter spp., have gained interest in the ecology of the oral microbiota because of their requirement for H₂ produced from fermentation by the oral microbiota, e.g., Campylobacter spp. (Figure 1) (152).

The host response to the microbial challenge in periodontal disease is complex and numerous factors are at play (23). It should be noted that the connection between the gingival epithelium and the tooth surface is vulnerable for an exposition of microorganisms of the dental biofilm and their metabolites. The epithelial barrier is extremely thin, non-keratinized and without a mucin layer and is easily penetrable for small molecules such as many of the bacterial metabolites. The host defense in the gingival pocket is supported by the gingival exudate containing serum defense factors such as immunoglobulins and complement factors as well as phagocyting cells such as neutrophils and macrophages. At prolonged exposition of the gingiva for the dental biofilm, an immune-response phase involving lymphocytes and plasma cells, is activated. In contrast to neutrophils and macrophages, which are rapidly and constantly recruited by chemotaxis through the pocket epithelium, lymphocytes and plasma cells are recruited at a later point into the connective tissue beneath the pocket epithelium (inflammatory connective tissue). When activated, these cells produce and release a cascade of cytokines characteristic for a more chronic type of inflammation occurring in long-standing gingivitis. The host response to the dental biofilm is balanced (homeostasis) against the bacterial challenge and the activity in the dental biofilm, characterized by the chronic inflammatory phase, and due to continuous fluctuation of the bacterial activity within the dental biofilm the response includes various degrees of acute phases. In addition, the host is under constant and challenging influence from external and internal host-related factors often referred to as host susceptibility for the tissue breakdown (153). The factors included are systemic diseases (e.g., diabetes), medications (cytostatic drugs), smoking and psychological factors (stress, allostatic load), which results in a highly unpredictable outcome of the inflammatory response at the individual level, after many years of bacterial challenge (23, 154–159).

The many and diverse bacterial waste products in the periodontal pocket are assumed to be abundant due to the lack of salivary cleansing that is seen above the gingival margin. Thus, subgingivally the high concentrations of the waste products of bacterial proteolysis results in a vulnerable oral niche. Apart from potential toxic properties of the waste products at high concentrations, many of them are also present in the human host and may have various functions and contribute to diverse effects on the cells of the host. Several metabolites function as signaling molecules and can trigger or dampen the inflammatory response of the host. It should, however, be highlighted that details and mechanisms known to date are almost exclusively based on in vitro studies and thus, the importance and relevance of these metabolites in vivo are still mostly undetermined. Therefore, more studies are warranted to delineate their relevance in the pathogenesis of periodontal diseases.

Microbial metabolites are the main contributors to evoke an inflammatory response in the gingival tissues. The metabolic pathways in the biofilm are generally shared between different microbial species representing diverse genera. The metabolism of the biofilm is characterized by fluctuations between burst of activities and resting (dormant) microbial cells. The release of metabolites is constantly fluctuating, which normally and in a seemingly homeostatic condition is balanced by the host response inducing and maintaining an inflammatory process seen clinically as gingivitis. This inflammatory response should be regarded as a natural, protective response to a subgingival microbiota that is adapted and thrive in the inflamed and deepened gingival pocket which offers a perfect ecological niche (161). Simply, this is a normal condition occurring in everybody in absence of careful oral hygiene measures. Like the dripping water that cavitates the stone, loss of clinical attachment at long-standing inflammation is a slow process that becomes clinically visible after years of exposition as the host response and colonizing microorganisms increase in complexity as the disease progresses. The transition from gingivitis to destructive periodontitis has been a matter of various hypotheses over the years, involving both biofilm and host factors, and there are advocates for it primarily being a natural aging phenomenon (15, 23, 204, 205). The likelihood of progression or regression can be influenced by various determinants, (e.g., specific bacteria), but these processes will nevertheless occur in the absence of such factors (17). From this it follows that destructive periodontitis can occur in everybody with time, but the probability of disease to occur can be reduced and controlled by measures that reduce the risk, such as for instance daily tooth cleaning procedures that regularly disrupt the dental biofilm formed and decrease the bacterial load and the levels of released metabolic waste products. It is the way the host and the tissues respond, which could be delayed or disproportionate of various reasons, that is responsible in the long-term for the disease progression, based on intrinsic (genetics, age) or acquired factors (smoking, systemic diseases) making the host and tissues susceptible to a variable degree (153, 159, 205, 206). The central role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of destructive periodontitis is generally accepted (204).

In addition to the metabolites, other factors of the bacteria connected to their characteristics, such as endotoxins, capsule formation, fimbriae but also their production of leukotoxin, outer membrane vesicles, bacteriocins and other antimicrobial peptides, are also to be considered in these interactions with the host, as we have reviewed elsewhere (23, 161). These “virulence” factors are of importance for the survival and growth of the bacteria, but their importance in the pathogenesis is undetermined (161).

The net outcome of the very complex interactions between numerous microorganisms in the dental biofilm, where it is impossible to perceive who is doing what, may be estimated by longitudinal and continuous measurement of these waste products, possibly by the use of cheap and simple chair-side methods. But if this is clinically relevant is still mostly unexplored territory.

The role of specific bacterial species may intermittently play a decisive part. So far, predictive studies, using specific risk marker bacteria, have only reached weak sensitivity and/or specificity to prospectively predict future progression on site/individual level, and these markers have not become widely used in current risk evaluation of periodontal diseases (207). However, the Jp2 clone of A. actinomycetemcomitans in populations of African origin is an exception from this by the finding that those individuals with this particular bacterial genotype have a 14 times higher risk for progression of periodontitis within 2 years (208, 209). The reason for the limits to use bacteria as risk markers is probably due to that the prevalence and abundance of bacteria are inadequate indirect measurements for their activity at a given time point (e.g., time of sampling) (138). To evaluate the metabolic activity by measuring the level of metabolites and the capacity of biofilms to produce these in the subgingival niche would thus be a more appropriate approach for identifying risk determinants, such as various metabolites, for the probability of disease progression, but this research area is still in its infancy. GCF has been used as a sampling source for biomarkers of periodontitis using bacterial metabolomics for diagnostics of the microbial and host interaction (210). In a systematic review on four metabolomic studies on biomarkers of GCF, it was shown among 40 significantly discriminant metabolites, predominantly related to amino acid and lipid degradation, that the diagnostic accuracy was low (211). New and more sophisticated molecular methods, such as the use of proteomics and metabolomics, will add knowledge in this area but due to often small sample sizes, also approaches fitting more prospective large-scale studies are needed. Here, initial controlled in vitro investigations of host cells to prolonged exposure to clinically relevant concentrations of various metabolites in an appropriate environment regarding temperature, pH, and oxygen level, may be followed by more advanced clinical studies using sophisticated molecular approaches.

Thus, studies on the major metabolites produced under bacterial activities (burst of activities) are suggested for future research on metabolic biomarkers. Simple and easily performed methods for the measurement of the metabolic load and the capacity to produce various metabolites (at rest and at challenge) experimentally in vivo or ex vivo are needed. Longitudinal follow-up studies using chair-side evaluations at many sampling sites, mapping the metabolic landscape in each individual, would disclose metabolic determinants in identifying individuals with a greater risk for disease progression.

The metabolites are the net outcome of the very complex interplay between numerous and different microorganisms in the dental biofilm. Much research has focused on the composition of the biofilms and the presence of certain periodontopathogens. This review focuses on the functions and dynamics of the biofilm, the metabolites, and their interplay with the host to better understand the impact of the biofilm in destructive periodontal disease. Here, simple chairside methods can complement molecular approaches and be applied longitudinally in clinical studies for determination of major metabolites and their clinical relevance on subjects with various periodontal conditions.