Front. Ophthalmol.Frontiers in OphthalmologyFront. Ophthalmol.2674-0826Frontiers Media S.A.10.3389/fopht.2024.1382567OphthalmologyCorrectionCorrigendum: Pilot report: objective quantification of trabecular meshwork pigmentation using densitometry and the NIDEK GS-1 gonioscope in glaucoma patientsLarocheDaniel12*BrownAaron1SinonJose3MartinAlexander4NgChester2SakkariSohail21Department of Ophthalmology, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, Icahn School of Medicine of Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States2Department of Ophthalmology, Advanced Eyecare of New York, New York, NY, United States3Department of Ophthalmology, Downstate Medical Center, New York, NY, United States4Department of Ophthalmology, Northwell Health, New York, NY, United States
Edited and Reviewed by: Saif Aldeen AlRyalat, Houston Methodist Hospital, United States
*Correspondence: Daniel Laroche, dlarochemd@aol.com
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
A Corrigendum on Pilot report: objective quantification of trabecular meshwork pigmentation using densitometry and the NIDEK GS-1 gonioscope in glaucoma patients By Laroche D, Brown A, Sinon J, Martin A, Ng C and Sakkari S (2024). Front. Ophthalmol. 3:1322178. doi: 10.3389/fopht.2023.1322178pigmentary glaucomabiomarkersdensitometrytrabecular meshwork pigmentationpigment dispersion glaucomaNIDEK GS-1section-in-acceptanceGlaucoma
In the published article, there was an error in Figures 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 as published. The sequence of the images was incorrect. The corrected Figures 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and their captions appear below.
Case 3: Inferior angle (inverted by mirror).
Case 4: Superior angle (inverted by mirror).
Case 4: Inferior angle (inverted by mirror).
Case 5: Superior angle (inverted by mirror).
Case 5: Inferior angle (inverted by mirror).
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.