<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="review-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Oncol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Oncology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Oncol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2234-943X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fonc.2025.1539911</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Oncology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Review</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Dynamic FDG PET/CT imaging: quantitative assessment, advantages and application in the diagnosis of malignant solid tumors</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Yiling</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>Yuanshan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Jinxin</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname>
<given-names>Dezhou</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>Hai</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>Jinbai</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1758012/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Nuclear Medicine Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University</institution>, <addr-line>Jingzhou, Hubei</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Department of Medical Imaging, Health Science Center, Yangtze University</institution>, <addr-line>Jingzhou, Hubei</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Division of Endocrinology and Rheumatology, HuangPi People&#x2019;s Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Jianghan University</institution>, <addr-line>Wuhan</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Wen Shen, Tianjin First Central Hospital, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Sikandar Shaikh, Shadan Hospital and Institute of Medical Sciences, India</p>
<p>Kyeong Min Kim, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Republic of Korea</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Jinbai Huang, <email xlink:href="mailto:YZjinbaihuang@163.com">YZjinbaihuang@163.com</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn003">
<p>&#x2020;These authors have contributed equally to this work</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>14</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>15</volume>
<elocation-id>1539911</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>05</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>24</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2025 Wang, Yang, Li, Cheng, Xu and Huang</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Wang, Yang, Li, Cheng, Xu and Huang</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Dynamic imaging has obtained remarkable achievements among a variety of malignant tumors due to the development of multiple simplified scanning protocols and the emergence of whole-body PET/CT scanners, which promote wider application of dynamic PET/CT. In this paper, we mainly review the acquisition protocols of dynamic imaging, related kinetic parameters, advantages and the application of dynamic PET/CT imaging in malignant tumors, including lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, breast cancer, pancreatic carcinoma, prostate neoplasm, and cancer of head and neck. Dynamic PET/CT imaging is increasingly being applied the diagnosis, staging, efficacy monitoring, and prognosis evaluation of malignant tumors. Although standardized uptake value is the most frequently employed semi-quantitative assessment index for static imaging, it is susceptible to several factors, thus cannot be used to evaluate the tracer kinetic information of the lesion. Dynamic PET/CT imaging can be used to achieve continuous assessment of the metabolic activity of a lesion over a certain time frame through quantitative measurement of kinetic parameters, such as the net uptake rate constant. Compared with conventional static imaging, dynamic scanning can be used for the early estimation of minute metabolic changes in tumors. Besides, dynamic scanning can directly and effectively reflect tracer uptake. Nevertheless, the intricacy of parameter analysis and the lengthy scanning time related to dynamic scanning limits its clinical application. Dynamic imaging has obtained remarkable achievements among a variety of malignant tumors due to the development of multiple simplified scanning protocols and the emergence of whole-body PET/CT scanners, which promote wider application of dynamic PET/CT. In this paper, we mainly review the acquisition protocols of dynamic imaging, related kinetic parameters, advantages and the application of dynamic PET/CT imaging in malignant tumors, including lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, breast cancer, pancreatic carcinoma, prostate neoplasm, and cancer of head and neck.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>dynamic PET</kwd>
<kwd>dynamic acquisition</kwd>
<kwd>quantification</kwd>
<kwd>oncology</kwd>
<kwd>clinical application</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn001">Yz202308</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Yangtze University<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100007923</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="4"/>
<table-count count="1"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="91"/>
<page-count count="14"/>
<word-count count="7944"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Cancer Imaging and Image-directed Interventions</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is a molecular imaging technique widely used to identify and analyze physiological, pathological, biochemical, and metabolic alterations in human tissues through radiolabeled tracers. PET/CT can be used to diagnose and evaluate various diseases. Although standardized uptake value (SUV) is a widely used parameter to measure the amount of tracer uptake in both healthy and diseased tissues, it is influenced by several factors, such as physiological factors (body weight, blood glucose levels, and respiratory movement of the patient), procedural factors (injection dose, imaging time, and region of interest (ROI) outlining), and physical factors (partial volume effect, acquisition mode) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>). The degree of glucose metabolism in tumors correlates with factors such as histological type, tumor grade and size. For instance, the SUV<sub>max</sub> of squamous carcinoma, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, small cell carcinoma and large cell carcinoma was significantly increased, while the SUV<sub>max</sub> of well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, carcinoma <italic>in situ</italic> and minimally invasive carcinoma was only mildly increased or not significantly increased. Even for lung cancers of the same histologic type, SUV<sub>max</sub> was only mildly increased in low-grade and significantly increased in high-grade. In addition, due to the influence of spatial resolution, the increase in SUV of lung cancer &lt;1 cm is not obvious (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>). Furthermore, the problem of false positives is still widespread, and active infectious lesions such as pneumonia and tuberculosis can be characterized by a marked increase in SUV<sub>max</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>). This is due to the fact that <sup>18</sup>F-FDG is not a tumor-specific imaging agent, and the SUV value is the cumulative activity value of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>), therefore, SUV is unable to accurately distinguish between tumors, inflammation and normal physiological metabolism.</p>
<p>Dynamic PET (dPET) can reflect the physiological and metabolic information of the tumor from the time of the injection of the imaging agent. This is achieved by extracting kinetic parameters through kinetic modeling, including the uptake rate constant K<sub>i</sub>, the metabolic rate of FDG (MR<sub>FDG</sub>), the time activity curves (TACs), and other parameters. Quantitative assessment of the images can be achieved using dPET by avoiding the influence of various factors, such as body mass index and injection-imaging time. Nonetheless, some factors such as excessive noise, the requirement for arterial blood collection as an input function (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>), and long scanning times limit the clinical application of dPET. Conventional PET scanners have a limited axial of view (aFOV) (about 25 cm), restricting dPET imaging of a single organ away from the blood pool, such as the lower abdomen, pelvis, and extremities. The recently established long-axis field-of-view whole-body PET systems have enhanced signal-to-noise ratios by utilizing 3D acquisition modes, high-efficiency bismuth germanate detector crystals, and lengthening the length of the system in the axial direction to capture more detection counts. Additionally, the advanced PET systems enhance spatial resolution by transitioning from large conventional photomultiplier tubes to compact solid-state silicon photomultipliers. The optimization of time-of-flight techniques and image reconstruction techniques, such as point diffusion, enhances the precise positioning of the annihilation point on the line of response, further improving the temporal resolution and reducing the image noise. These developments may facilitate pharmacokinetic studies and provide a foundation for the application of novel imaging agents to improve the acceptance of dynamic imaging in the clinical setting. This review aimed to describe the acquisition modalities of dPET and the relevant kinetic parameters, discuss the advantages of dynamic imaging, and provide an overview of the application of dynamic imaging in malignant tumors.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Quantitative assessment of dynamic PET</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>dPET data acquisition</title>
<p>dPET acquisition captures the spatial distribution of the captured radiotracer changes over time. The dynamic scanning in the aFOV of conventional PET/CT 15 to 25 cm is mainly performed in two ways: step-and-shoot scan mode (SS) and continuous bed motion (CBM). In SS, the number of beds is fixed, and scans must be selected to fit within these beds, with adjacent beds having overlapping sections that can cause partial volume effects. In contrast, CBM does not have fixed beds, allowing for customizable scanning ranges. The absence of bed overlap reduces artifacts and enhances patient comfort, leading to shorter acquisition times and improved efficiency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>).</p>
<p>Conventional PET scanners cannot concurrently capture dynamic data at the far end of the body because of the limits of the short-axis field of view. Therefore, increased axial coverage in a whole-body PET scanner may achieve kinetic analysis on lesions outside of the traditional aFOV. This eliminates time gaps and improves sensitivity, thus eliminating the need for arterial blood collection, which can lead to smaller doses of medication. A new generation of PET scanners entered the market in late 2018, leveraging the most recent advancements in electronics and materials research to attain scanning fields of 1 to 2 meters. These scanners can complete a whole-body acquisition in less than 60 seconds, providing real-time insight into pathophysiologic processes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Comparison of conventional short-axis PET/CT and total-body PET/CT.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fonc-15-1539911-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Relevant kinetic parameters of dPET</title>
<p>SUV is the most commonly used quantitative indicator of radiopharmaceutical uptake. SUV is a simple semi-quantitative analytical technique obtained by sketching the concentration of activity in a lesion after a period of rest from injected radiopharmaceuticals. K<sub>i</sub> images and DV images that have been kinetically modeled have better contrast compared to SUV images. Compartmental models are frequently used in the clinic for the evaluation of kinetic models, and the most commonly used compartmental models in PET are the two-tissue compartment model and the three-tissue compartment model, which describes the exchange of radiopharmaceuticals between the blood and tissue compartments, where the four transport rates are represented by the meanings of K<sub>1</sub> related to the inflow of tracer from the blood compartment into the tissue compartments, K<sub>2</sub> related to the efflux, K<sub>3</sub> reflecting the rate of phosphorylation, and K<sub>4</sub> reflects the rate of dephosphorylation. Whereas the parameter that allows the estimation of partial blood volume, also known as vascular density (V<sub>b</sub>). V<sub>b</sub> and K<sub>1</sub> are correlated and are usually higher than the rate of phosphorylation(K<sub>3</sub>).This model differs from the model that does not consider K<sub>4</sub> and V<sub>b</sub>, as proposed by Sokoloff et&#xa0;al. The absence of K<sub>4</sub> and V<sub>b</sub> results in different values of K<sub>1</sub> and K<sub>3</sub>, as K<sub>1</sub> is dependent on V<sub>b</sub>, whereas K<sub>3</sub> is dependent on K<sub>4</sub>. In addition, the dephosphorylation rate (K<sub>4</sub>) of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG may be low but cannot be ignored. Compartmental models have the advantage of directly visualizing different kinetic parameters, but it is computationally intensive and sensitive to noise. As an alternative to compartmental modeling, the Patlak model is a linear graphical method that can approximate K<sub>i</sub> using the slope of the graphical curves of the blood input function and the tissue time-activity curve (TAC), and obtains intercepted images related to the volume fraction and the volume of distribution. For parametric imaging, the Patlak model has the advantages of computational efficiency and noise robustness. The associated PET kinetic modeling and parametric imaging flow is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>.</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Flowchart of PET kinetic modeling and parametric imaging. PET images are acquired over a period of time (generally 0-60 min), and the 60th min data are reconstructed to obtain SUV images. Further all the data are reconstructed to get the dynamic image. For each image voxel or region of interest, the TAC is extracted from the dynamic sequence, and kinetic parameters (K<sub>i</sub>, V<sub>b</sub>, and MR<sub>FDG</sub>, etc.) are estimated using kinetic models and input functions. The input function can be measured invasively by arterial blood sampling, derived non-invasively from the dynamic images (Image-derived input function, IDIF) or a population-based input function (PBIF). Evaluation of kinetic modeling can be based on a two-tissue compartment model or a three-tissue compartment model. C<sub>p</sub> is the plasma compartment; C<sub>1</sub> and C<sub>2</sub> are tissue compartments.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fonc-15-1539911-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<sec id="s2_2_1">
<label>2.2.1</label>
<title>Ki</title>
<p>K<sub>i</sub> represents the uptake rate of radiopharmaceuticals into tissues and is a quantitative measure of metabolism from the Patlak slope. K<sub>i</sub> can be determined using dynamic imaging to acquire the TAC and artery input function (AIF). Although SUV and K<sub>i</sub> are not similar, they exhibit a correlation. SUV measures total activity (both metabolic and nonmetabolic) in a lesion, whereas Patlak analysis separates metabolic and non-metabolic activity and determines only metabolic uptake. Therefore, K<sub>i</sub> is considered to be a more accurate indicator of glucose metabolic rate than SUV. Besides, K<sub>i</sub> has a greater level of sensitivity than SUV images and thus has better sensitivity (from 92.5% to 95%) and accuracy (from 90.24% to 95.12%) in diagnosing malignant tumors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>) and potentially enhanced specificity. Fotis Kotasidis et&#xa0;al. conducted multichannel whole-body <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET parametric imaging in 8 patients with staged lung and liver lesions. They found that three malignant liver lesions, confirmed by contrast-enhanced CT, and one biopsy-confirmed hepatic malignant lesion, were not visible on static SUV or Patlak images. However, these lesions were clearly identified on K<sub>1</sub> and K<sub>2</sub> images, and the K<sub>i</sub> images enhanced lesion detectability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>). Oncology Patlak K<sub>i</sub> imaging complements standard SUV imaging to achieve equal or higher lesion detection rates, especially in tissue organs with a rich blood supply (e.g., liver), where K<sub>i</sub> images significantly reduce background uptake, resulting in an increased tumor-to- background ratio(TBR), which makes it easier to detect lesions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>). Moreover, due to the higher TBR, K<sub>i</sub> images are more accurate in outlining the radiotherapy target area and volume of interest. K<sub>i</sub> images have similar (or lower) quality compared to SUV images. Also, significant motion artifacts may be apparent in K<sub>i</sub> images during prolonged dynamic scanning.</p>
<p>In addition, the time it takes for tracers to reach different organs and lesions can vary significantly. Long axial field-of-view PET/CT, which does not require continuous bed movement, allows for precise capture of tracer pharmacokinetics in major organs and most lesions, offering high temporal resolution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>). Christos Sachpekidis et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>) used a two-tissue model for 38 cases of prostate cancer patients for whole-body dynamic imaging and found significantly higher parameter K<sub>3</sub> values in prostate lesions and parotid glands than in the liver and spleen, reflecting higher tracer binding and internalization rates in diseased tissues. Further, rapid temporal sampling provides the opportunity to capture blood volume or blood flow (perfusion), which are potential biomarkers for predicting treatment response or survival. Data indicates that the mid-term dynamic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT Patlak parameter K<sub>i</sub>max can predict the prognosis of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and that predictive modeling by K<sub>i</sub>max and mid-term response to treatment permits accurate stratification of prognostic risk in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2_2">
<label>2.2.2</label>
<title>MR<sub>FDG</sub> and DV<sub>FDG</sub>
</title>
<p>MR<sub>FDG</sub> and Distribution volume of free FDG(DV<sub>FDG</sub>) are quantitative metrics that describe parametric images. MR<sub>FDG</sub> and DV<sub>FDG</sub> are calculated by fitting a linear regression function to the time-activity data and each pixel based on dPET data. The slope of the image indicates the metabolic rate of FDG entering the tissue based on the contrasting effect on the surrounding tissue. This information can be utilized to identify malignant lesions and determine the placement of volumes of interests (VOIs). The intercept of the image represents DV<sub>FDG</sub>, which can be used for better anatomical localization of the lesion. Andr&#xe9; H Dias et&#xa0;al. performed dynamic whole-body PET/CT scans of 103 patients using long axial field-of-view PET/CT and compared static whole-body <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT with multiparametric Patlak images and found that MR<sub>FDG</sub> images can reduce false-positive rate, identify false-positive lesions misdiagnosed by the SUV images. They also showed that MR<sub>FDG</sub> images provide a higher TBR and contrast-to-noise ratio(CNR) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>). Similarly, Pedersen et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>) performed whole-body dynamic imaging of patients with locally advanced breast cancer and found that MR<sub>FDG</sub> images had better lesion visibility and 2.28 times higher TBR than SUV images, which effectively improved the detection rate of locally advanced breast cancer lesions. DV<sub>FDG</sub> images can identify small SUV artifact foci and improve the specificity of PET/CT. DV<sub>FDG</sub> images reflect free FDG, whereas MR<sub>FDG</sub> images reflect metabolic FDG. SUV images are equivalent to the &#x201c;sum&#x201d; of MR<sub>FDG</sub> and DV<sub>FDG</sub> images. Therefore, artifactual foci are usually not detected on MR<sub>FDG</sub> images but can be detected on DV<sub>FDG</sub> images and SUV images. In terms of benign and malignant differentiation, MR<sub>FDG</sub> and DV<sub>FDG</sub> may be robust indicators for identifying benign and malignant lung nodules. It has been demonstrated that most malignant lung nodules exhibit high uptake on MR<sub>FDG</sub> and SUV, while benign lesions exhibit low uptake on MR<sub>FDG</sub> but high uptake on DV<sub>FDG</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>). Moreover, factors such as different pathological types, lesion sizes and methods of lesion delineation can influence MR<sub>FDG</sub> results (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>). In a direct comparison of whole-body PET scans from 45 patients, Wu et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>) found that the improved image quality of MR<sub>FDG</sub> did not necessarily result in significant differences between benign and malignant lesions. This may be because MR<sub>FDG</sub> is particularly useful for lesions surrounded by high background activity, but it provides limited additional information for lesions with low uptake and low background activity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2_3">
<label>2.2.3</label>
<title>FD</title>
<p>Fractal dimension (FD) is used to measure the heterogeneity of the VOI in the non-compartmental model- FD can be determined by analyzing the time-activity data of each individual voxel within the VOI. The FD number ranges from 0 to 2, suggesting either a deterministic or chaotic distribution of tracer activity. A higher FD value indicates a more varied and uneven distribution of the tracer activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>). Therefore, the FD value reflects the degree of benignity or malignancy of the tumor(malignant lesions have higher FD values than benign lesions). However, parametric images do not offer substantial additional insights into tumor heterogeneity when compared to static images. Meijer et&#xa0;al. delineated lesion volumes on both static and parametric images in 35 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases for radiation treatment planning. They subsequently compared the volume measurements obtained from PET images with pathological volumes, as well as the volumes associated with different NSCLC tissue subtypes. The results showed that the pathological volume was larger than the PET volume, the glucose metabolism rate, <sup>18</sup>F-FDG phosphorylation rate and heterogeneity of VB were lower in the adenocarcinoma group than in the squamous carcinoma group, and there was no difference in the parametric images and static images of NSCLC (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>). Similarly, Tixier et&#xa0;al (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>) extracted heterogeneity parameters from static and parametric images of 20 NSCLC patients and showed that the differences between static and parametric images in quantitative measures of intra-tumor heterogeneity were mainly attributed to variations in image features and noise, rather than to substantial differences in the spatial distribution of uptake within the actual tumor.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<label>3</label>
<title>Advantages of dPET</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Use of non-invasive input functions</title>
<p>Kinetic modeling analysis of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG using PET/CT requires AIF based on TAC image-derived AIF. Although arterial blood collection is the gold standard for obtaining AIF (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>), it is not the clinically preferred method due to its invasive nature during the procedure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>). Image-derived input function (IDIF) is currently the most commonly used input function. IDIF allows the selection of a dynamic scan of the initial blood pool (heart or aorta) in place of arterial blood collection. The ascending aorta is widely chosen to obtain IDIF because of the strong correlation between the results of the ascending aorta and arterial sampling. Besides, a relatively large ROI can be determined when using an ascending aorta with better statistical properties and less interference from adjacent myocardial spillovers. However, the accuracy of using ascending aorta is affected by body motion and partial volume effects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>). Zhu et&#xa0;al. used IDIF from small vascular regions (carotid artery) as a merging kernel of <italic>a priori</italic> information, stabilizing the performance of the simultaneous estimation of the input function method and significantly enhancing the accuracy of evaluating early time points of the input function (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>). Besides IDIF, a template can be generated using a population-based input function (PBIF). PBIF can be obtained by averaging the arterial blood data collected from the subjects, predetermining the model parameters, and applying a scaling factor for normalization for each subject. Mika et&#xa0;al. compared PBIFs normalized by different scaling factors and found good accuracy and precision using a scaling factor consisting of the area under the curve of the time window and the initial volume of distribution of the developer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>). However, using a single model with a single input function from a single blood pool can lead to inaccurate kinetic parameter estimates for organs with dual blood supplies (liver and lungs) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>). Wang et&#xa0;al. proposed that dynamics can be modeled using an optimally derived dual-blood input function (DBIF). Compared with the traditional single-blood input function (SBIF) and PBIF, DBIF can significantly improve the fitting of liver time-activity curves without the need to invade the arteries for blood sampling or delineate additional regions of interest. Besides, the optimized model demonstrated that FDG blood-hepatic transit rate K<sub>i</sub> is significantly correlated with the histological grading of liver inflammation, making it suitable for individual patients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>). Similarly, Yiran Wang et&#xa0;al. used high-temporal resolution dynamic imaging and demonstrated that the DBIF model can be used to better quantify the kinetic parameters and improve the quality of the fit of the efficiency curves under the influence of dual blood supply to the lungs. They also showed that this effect is particularly pronounced in lung tumors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>). In addition, no input function is required in the non-compartmental model to reflect the changes in tumor heterogeneity. The temporal activity data of the tracer in a single voxel within the ROI can be evaluated to show the non-homogeneity of the distribution of the tracer activity over time within the ROI, which is closely correlated with the pathological findings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>). It is also possible to acquire image IDIFs from multiple blood pools (e.g., ventricles and arteries) simultaneously by expanding the axial scanning field of view, such as with long axial PET/CT, and selecting the most relevant vascular IDIFs for kinetic modeling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Short-term dynamic acquisition</title>
<p>Although dynamic scanning allows continuous tracking of changes in tracer activity, it is associated with long scanning times, poor patient tolerance, and limited clinical application. The ultra-high-sensitivity whole-body PET scanners can shorten the time for dynamic acquisition. Feng et&#xa0;al. demonstrated that ultra-high sensitivity whole-body PET scanner can achieve whole-body parametric image reconstruction at an early stage of scanning (within 2 minutes of injection) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>). Wu et&#xa0;al. also demonstrated that a nonlinear estimation method can reduce the acquisition time of FDG PET K<sub>i</sub> parametric imaging (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>). However, Wu et&#xa0;al. also indicated that the shorter imaging time (10 min) is associated with a significantly increased computational cost. Several researchers have used simplified dynamic scanning protocols to effectively shorten the dynamic acquisition time. Compared with the 0-75 min standard parametric images, Hui Wang et&#xa0;al. found that using two short-duration dynamic multiparametric images of 0-6 min (input function) and 60-75 min (equilibrium activity) generated from 0-75 min standard parametric images provide good image quality. Dual time-point imaging can effectively improve gastrointestinal motility artifacts in standard parametric images due to long scanning times by leaving the scanner in the middle of the scanning process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>). Meanwhile, this needs the use of regions of interest from both aortas in both scans to generate the full IDIF and two CT scans to attenuate the two PET images for correction, increasing the radiation dose. Alternatively, PBIF can be used to scale the IDIF extracted from the later time frames of the scan, and a scaling curve can be used to generate the Patlak K<sub>i</sub> values. However, the shape of the input curve must be assumed to be the same for each patient. Hasan Sari et&#xa0;al. explored the effect of different scanning cycles on the accuracy of sPBIF and found that sPBIF generated from 55-65 min of image data can accurately assess K<sub>i</sub> (deviation &lt;5%) and provide good image quality when it is used for K<sub>i</sub> images generated from 20 min (45-65 min post-injection) dynamic scanning (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>). Alternatively, a global scaling factor can be used to normalize the Patlak slopes obtained from the data in the later frames, thus eliminating the need for PBIF (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>). Although some potential inaccuracies may occur, images obtained using post-scanning give better target-to-background ratios than static images, effectively reducing scanning time (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Three different imaging schemes for shortened scanning protocols: standard 75 min dynamic scanning (protocol 1), dual time-point imaging (protocol 2), and 20 min dynamic scanning based on population input function (protocol 3).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fonc-15-1539911-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>High sensitivity</title>
<p>Whole-body dynamic scanning is mainly achieved by SS and CBM scanning modes in conventional PET scanners due to the limitations of the detector axial scanning field. The high sensitivity of the continuous bed motion listing mode is mainly reflected in the provision of continuous short-interval whole-body dynamic scanning. The whole-body dynamic images are acquired by multi-channel and multibed PET acquisition. Motoki Tomohito Kaji et&#xa0;al. found that the use of CBM scanning mode, which removes the frames with motion in the images, can improve the quality of image acquisition for patients who may move during the scanning process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>). In addition, it is sometimes difficult to identify lesions in the urinary tract and gastrointestinal tract using conventional static PET imaging. As a result, radiologic technicians are needed to distinguish whether the gastrointestinal tract is pathologically ingested or physiologically ingested through delayed imaging. Besides, Motoki Nishimura et&#xa0;al. found that continuous dynamic whole-body imaging can differentiate between pathologic and physiologic uptake based on changes in uptake shape, minimizing the need for such delayed imaging and reducing radiation dose (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>). Although multibed, multichannel approaches can provide dynamic imaging with extended AFOV, their temporal resolution is limited by bed motion and scanner sensitivity, which cannot rapidly capture tracer kinetics. In contrast, long-axis field-of-view PET/CT permits dynamic imaging of the entire body at high temporal resolution, acquisitions are no longer segmented by bed position. The long-axis field-of-view PET/CT eliminates the need for segmenting bed position during acquisitions. Besides, long-axis field-of-view PET/CT significantly improves sensitivity by increasing the number of detectors, allowing for dynamic whole-body acquisitions and improved image quality, increasing the detectability of microscopic lesions. Guillaume Fahrni et&#xa0;al. compared SUV and K<sub>i</sub> images for 18 different oncologic indications (lesion characterization and staging) and found that K<sub>i</sub> can improve sensitivity (from 92.5% to 95%) and accuracy (from 90.24% to 95.12%) compared with SUV imaging, especially for organs with high background uptake (liver). This is because K<sub>i</sub> images suppress the non-specific <sup>18</sup>F-FDG signal in the background, resulting in higher contrast in the region of abnormal uptake, improved lesion detectability, and reduced rate of false positives of lesions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>). In addition, the effect of respiratory motion in routine PET scans may lead to inaccurate description (tumor size, location, and morphology) and quantification of small lung nodules near the diaphragm. The use of breath-holding PET technology combined with the counting performance in the long aFOV can minimize motion artifacts and PET/CT image mismatches, especially for small nodules &#x2264;10 mm from the pleura, effectively reducing the false-negative rate of early lung adenocarcinoma (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4">
<label>4</label>
<title>Application of dPET in the diagnosis of malignant solid tumors</title>
<p>Dynamic imaging has had a significant impact on the diagnosis and management of tumor patients and has gained initial use worldwide. This article focuses on malignant solid tumors for which dynamic imaging has been more commonly used in clinical practice and summarizes the characteristics of the relevant studies (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref> summarizes the clinical applications of dPET in partial solid tumor studies.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Summary of the selected PET/CT oncological studies applying dynamic imaging.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Tracer</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Tumor Type</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">No.of patients</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Acquisition Program </th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Software Used</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Goal</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">References</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<sup>18</sup>F-FDG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">benign and malignant pulmonary lesions</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">147</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">dPET/CT (65 min, chest)&#x2009;+&#x2009;sPET/CT (10-20 min, whole body)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Matlab in house software</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Impact of parametric Patlak imaging on distinguishing benign and malignant lung lesions and predicting EGFR mutation status</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<sup>18</sup>F-FDG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">metastatic and non-metastatic LNs in lung cancer</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">108</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">dPET/CT (65 min, chest)&#x2009;+&#x2009;sPET/CT (10-20 min, whole body)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Matlab in house software</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Impact of parametric Patlack imaging on the differentiation of metastatic and non-metastatic LNs in lung cancer</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<sup>18</sup>F-FDG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NSCLC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">dPET/CT (60min, chest)&#x2009;+&#x2009;sPET/CT (10-20 min, whole body)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">in house software</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Comparison of quantitative and semiquantitative parameters in predicting OS in NSCLC patients scheduled to receive platinum-based chemotherapy</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<sup>18</sup>F-FDG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">locally advanced NSCLC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">dPET/CT (60min, whole body)&#x2009;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">in house software</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Impact of parametric Patrak imaging on metabolic profiles after induction immunochemotherapy in patients with locally advanced NSCLC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<sup>18</sup>F-FDG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">locally advanced NSCLC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">dPET/CT (four timepoints, whole body)&#x2009;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">in house software</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Evaluation of parametric imaging for different radiation treatment plans</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<sup>18</sup>F-FDG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">HCC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">dPET/CT (60 frames of 10s, 50 frames of 60s, liver)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">in house software</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Comparison of four kinetic models with different dual blood input functions</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">46</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<sup>18</sup>F-FDG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">HCC,ICC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">dPET/CT (60min, liver)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">in MIM software Inc</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Evaluation of a two-tissue compartment model with dual blood input function</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">48</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<sup>18</sup>F-FDG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">HCC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">early dPET/CT (5min, liver) +&#x2009;sPET/CT (10-20 min, whole body)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">in house software</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Evaluating the feasibility of a dual-input dual-compartment uptake model for the diagnosis of HCC by perfusion and early uptake</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">50</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<sup>18</sup>F-FDG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">HCC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">early dPET/CT (2min, liver) +&#x2009;sPET/CT (10-20 min, whole body)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">in house software</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Evaluating the diagnostic value of early dynamic combined conventional imaging for HCC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">49</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<sup>18</sup>F-FDG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">BC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">dPET/CT (60min, chest)&#x2009;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PMOD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Evaluate the correlation between the pathologic features of BC and kinetic parameters</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">60</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<sup>18</sup>F-FDG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">locally advanced BC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">dPET/CT (60min, chest)&#x2009; +&#x2009;sPET/CT (10-20 min, whole body)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PMOD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Evaluation of metabolism/perfusion mismatch in breast tumors by dynamic parameters combined with MRI parameters</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">61</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<sup>18</sup>F-FDG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">locally advanced BC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">dPET/CT (6min, chest) + dPET/CT (64min, whole body)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PMOD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Comparison of detection rates of locally advanced BC on conventional SUV images and parametric images</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<sup>18</sup>F-FDG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">BC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">217</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dynamic first-pass(2min, chest)&#x2009; +&#x2009;sPET/CT (two-step, chest)&#x2009;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">in house software</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Comparison of parametric and SUV images in tumor perfusion and metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">67</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">IPMN</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">sPET/CT (10-20 min, whole body) +&#x2009; dPET/CT(45min, whole body)&#x2009;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PMOD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Comparison of the efficacy of static and dynamic imaging in identifying IPMN subtypes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">70</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">PDAC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">sPET/CT (10-20 min, whole body) +&#x2009; dPET/CT(60min,pancreas)&#x2009;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">in MIM software Inc</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Comparison of <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG in disease staging and prognostic value</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">71</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<sup>68</sup>Ga- PSMA-11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">prostate cancer</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">dPET/CT (60min, whole body)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PMOD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Evaluation of kinetic and metabolic heterogeneity of tracers in diseased and normal organs</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">79</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<sup>68</sup>Ga- PSMA-11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">prostate cancer</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">dPET/CT (60min, whole body)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PMOD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Comparison of parametric and SUV imaging in tumor detectability</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">81</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<sup>68</sup>Ga- PSMA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">prostate cancer</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">dPET/CT (60min, whole body)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">in house software</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Determining the optimal imaging time for tracers</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">91</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">68Ga- PSMA-11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">prostate cancer</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">dPET/CT (75min, skull vertex to mid-thigh)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PMOD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Evaluation of the possibility of shortening time intervals by investigating dynamic changes in image quality metrics</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">82</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<sup>18</sup>F-DCFPyL, <sup>18</sup>F-FCH PET</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">prostate cancer</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19,23</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">dPET/CT (22min, prostate and common iliac arteries)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Matlab in house software</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Comparison of different kinetic behaviors of two tracers used to interpret different SUV images</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">84</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<sup>18</sup>F-FMISO</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">head and neck cancer</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">120</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">dPET/CT (30min, head and neck) +&#x2009;sPET/CT (10 min, head and neck) +&#x2009;sPET/CT (10 min, head and neck)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">in house software</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Impact of multiparametric imaging on tumor hypoxia, perfusion, and heterogeneity</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">87</xref>)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; dPET/CT, dynamic PET/CT; sPET/CT, static PET/CT; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; OS, overall survival; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; ICC, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; BC, breast cancer; IPMN, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia; PDAC, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Clinical application of dPET in partial solid tumor studies. <bold>(A)</bold> MR<sub>FDG</sub> images improve the recognition of suspicious primary lesions. Primary suspicious lesions of hepatocellular carcinoma, mediastinal lesions, and lung cancer cannot be accurately identified in conventional static images, but they can be clearly distinguished in MR<sub>FDG</sub> images (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>). Image taken from Yaping Wu et al. CC BY 4.0 License: <uri xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</uri>. <bold>(B)</bold> K<sub>1</sub> images were used to show positive lesions masked by physiologic background uptake. A case of hepatocellular carcinoma, the lesion was not metabolized in SUV images but was detected on K<sub>i</sub> images (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>). Image taken from Christos Sachpekidis et al. CC BY 4.0License: <uri xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</uri>. <bold>(C)</bold> Dynamic PET was applied to study the systemic pharmacokinetics of <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 in a group of prostate cancer patients. The figure shows dynamic PET acquisitions of a patient with PC biochemical recurrence at various time points. The patient had multiple iliac, retroperitoneal and supraclavicular manifestations of high uptake lymph node metastases. Of note, some retroperitoneal lymph node metastases were visualized within 10 minutes of tracer injection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>).  Image taken from Christos Sachpekidis et al. CC BY 4.0License: <uri xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</uri>. <bold>(D)</bold> Dynamic imaging was applied to estimate organ distribution and dosimetry data for a new contrast agent (<sup>68</sup>Ga-Trivehexin). In addition to the kidneys and bladder, there was a significant uptake in the stomach, which disappeared 1.5 hours after injection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">74</xref>). Image taken from Neil Gerard Quigley et al. CC BY 4.0 License:  <uri xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</uri>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fonc-15-1539911-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Lung cancer</title>
<p>Lung cancer is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, according to data released by CA in 2024 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>). Therefore, early detection, accurate diagnosis, and development of individualized treatment plans can improve the survival of lung cancer patients. The dynamic metabolic parameter K<sub>i</sub> can be used to improve specificity when differentiating benign and malignant lung nodules. Studies have shown that the K<sub>i</sub> parameter is lower in benignancies than in malignancies. Besides, the diagnostic specificity of K<sub>i</sub> can be further improved (about 0.830) when the critical value of K<sub>i</sub> is 0.0250 ml/g/min, compared with that of SUV<sub>max</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>), effectively reducing unnecessary invasive treatment. The K<sub>i</sub> value is more sensitive than conventional SUV in identifying early lymph node metastasis. Besides, the use of the K<sub>i</sub> and K<sub>i</sub>/K<sub>1</sub> values has higher diagnostic specificity in cases where conventional static PET may not accurately identify suspicious lymph nodes (lymph nodes located in the hilar and mediastinal regions), complementing the lower specificity of SUV<sub>max</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>).</p>
<p>In addition, dynamic imaging is a valuable non-invasive screening method that can be used to assess treatment effectiveness and predict prognosis. Furthermore, SUV and K<sub>i</sub> values are significantly higher in squamous carcinomas than in adenocarcinomas, possibly due to the differentiation of tumor cells combined with GULT-1 and GULT-3 overexpression (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>). K<sub>i</sub> values are lower in EGFR-expressing adenocarcinoma patients than in patients not expressing EGFR. Also, K<sub>i</sub> can improve the differentiation in some NSCLC patients who did not undergo EGFR testing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>). Besides K<sub>i</sub>, the tumor load parameters MTV and TLG are reliable overall survival prognostic markers for NSCLC patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>). Notably, the efficacy of a treatment in adjuvant trials is not determined until several years after determining disease-free survival and overall survival. Neoadjuvant trials allow for efficacy endpoints, such as clinical and pathologic response, to be determined in months. Studies have shown that neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy can improve long-term survival and increase the chances of cure in patients with unresectable NSCLC. However, there are no suitable predictive imaging markers that can be used to comprehensively characterize the response to neoadjuvant treatment. DaQuan Wang et&#xa0;al. recently demonstrated that the uEXPLORER system can be used for whole-body <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT dynamic imaging of patients with locally-advanced NSCLC. The results found that Patlak-K<sub>i</sub> values were associated with response to induction immunochemotherapy in unresectable locally-advanced NSCLC. Furthermore, they showed that higher FDG K<sub>i</sub> values have a better response to induction therapy and a higher level of immune cell infiltration in the primary tumor (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>). DaQuan Wang et&#xa0;al. further performed repetitive dynamic scanning of patients during combined immuno-radiotherapy and found that the metabolic profile of the high FDG K<sub>i</sub> group after induction immunochemotherapy was significantly reduced during the treatment period. They also showed that the K<sub>i</sub> value of the primary foci was significantly correlated with the efficacy and survival of combined immuno-radiotherapy in locally advanced NSCLC patients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>). In summary, dynamic imaging provides non-invasive biomarkers that can predict treatment response in patients with unresectable locally advanced NSCLC.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Hepatocellular carcinoma</title>
<p>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths worldwide. Dynamic imaging, dynamic perfusion imaging, and novel imaging agents have emerged as complementary techniques for HCC diagnosis. The blood input function is crucial for precise analysis in dPET kinetic modeling. Early studies used SBIF from the hepatic artery or portal vein for hepatic kinetic modeling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">46</xref>). However, recent studies have shown that using DBIF is reasonable because of the dual blood supply to liver tissue from the hepatic artery and portal vein (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">47</xref>). Notably, only a few studies have reported the use of DBIF, and no perfect kinetic modeling has been developed yet. Studies have shown that a reversible dual-tissue compartment model for kinetic modeling using DBIF and optimally derived blood-supply fraction hepatic artery can effectively differentiate malignant lesions from healthy liver tissues. Moreover, the model can be used to further distinguish between lesions of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and HCC (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">48</xref>). Dynamic perfusion imaging focuses on the liver and reveals information about the spatial distribution and temporal dynamics of the tumor through dynamic blood flow parameters, such as time to peak (TTP), blood flow, and hepatic perfusion index starting from the injection of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG. Therefore, dynamic perfusion imaging enables quantitative interpretation of PET data (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">49</xref>). Studies have shown that TTP and perfusion index can be used to distinguish HCC from background liver tissue, significantly improving the detection rate of poorly differentiated and moderately differentiated HCC (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">49</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">50</xref>).</p>
<p>Contrast-enhanced CT or magnetic resonance imaging can also be utilized for HCC screening. The two imaging are associated with many advantages, including multiphase enhancement characteristics and straightforward data gathering. However, the accuracy of these methods may be compromised when the lesion size is less than 2 cm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">51</xref>). Also, the sensitivity of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG in detecting HCC is limited to about 36%-68% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">52</xref>). This is mainly because increased glucose transporter protein expression and hexokinase activity are found in highly differentiated HCC, reducing FDG accumulation in the lesions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">53</xref>). Some scholars also found that <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-04 has a higher sensitivity in detecting intrahepatic HCC lesions than <sup>18</sup>F-FDG, especially for tumors with a diameter of less than 2 cm(diagnostic efficiency: about 68.8%) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">54</xref>). In addition, <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-04 showed high sensitivity in identifying liver malignant tumors and metastatic lymph nodes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">55</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">56</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Breast cancer</title>
<p>Breast cancer (BC) has become the most common cancer in women, surpassing lung cancer, with an estimated 2.3 million new cases reported worldwide each year, and is the leading cause of cancer deaths in women (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">57</xref>). It is classified into four subtypes, including Luminal A, Luminal B, HER-2 overexpression, and triple-negative, based on the expression of cell proliferation markers (K<sub>i</sub>-67), the estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR), and the HER-2 receptor (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">58</xref>). Lack of ER and PR expression in BC correlates with poor overall prognosis, whereas positivity for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2c-erbB2 and K<sub>i</sub>-67 are considered good indicators of the invasiveness and metastastic potential of tumors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">59</xref>). Korn&#xe9;lia Kaj&#xe1;ry et&#xa0;al. conducted dynamic PET/CT imaging on 35 primary breast cancers. Their findings revealed that highly aggressive tumors, characterized by high differentiation, hormone receptor negativity (ER and/or PR), and rapid proliferation (high K<sub>i</sub>-67), exhibited increased cellular uptake and phosphorylation of FDG (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">60</xref>), and these kinetic parameters can be used to characterize residual lesions following neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced BC because they less dependent on pre-treatment FDG uptake as static parameters. Mid-treatment evaluation of changes in glucose delivery (K<sub>1</sub>) and metabolic rate (MR<sub>FDG</sub>) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy can predict recurrence-free survival (RFS). Specifically, a greater reduction in metabolism-to-perfusion ratios (MR<sub>FDG</sub>/peak PE and MR<sub>FDG</sub>/peak SER) compared to pretreatment levels is associated with longer RFS (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">61</xref>), suggesting a potential new biomarker for therapeutic response in breast cancer. Axillary lymph node metastasis is a critical prognostic factor in locally advanced breast cancer. Traditionally, lymph node status has been assessed invasively through sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary lymph node dissection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">62</xref>). These procedures often lead to edema, numbness, pain, and long-term complications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">63</xref>). The study demonstrated that the TBR and CNR of MR parametric images generated using 6 min single bed dynamic scan and 64 min dynamic whole body PET scan were superior to SUV images, which significantly improved lesion detectability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>).</p>
<p>Microvessel density and tumor angiogenesis can influence the tumor growth and metastasis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">64</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">65</xref>). In contrast, patients with locally advanced breast cancer often exhibit a mismatch between blood supply and metabolic rate within the tumor. This imbalance, potentially caused by inadequate blood flow and/or elevated tumor metabolism, can create a hypoxic microenvironment linked to treatment resistance. This phenomenon is particularly prevalent in triple-negative breast cancer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">65</xref>). Methods based on a 2-minute half-life <sup>15</sup>O are effective for perfusion assessment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">66</xref>), however the use of cyclotrons limits its clinical application. Neree Payan et&#xa0;al. used a first-pass scanning approach with a 2-minute dynamic acquisition centered on the chest immediately after injection of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG, followed by a static acquisition 90 min later, which correlated well with <sup>15</sup>O-water measurements of tumor perfusion. In patients with lymph node involvement, primary tumors exhibited high perfusion and K<sub>1</sub> values (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">67</xref>), which may explain the extensive angiogenesis that may promote cancer metastasis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_4">
<label>4.4</label>
<title>Pancreatic carcinoma</title>
<p>Pancreatic cancer is a malignant tumor the primarily originates from pancreatic ductal epithelial and follicular cells, with high degree of malignancy and insidious onset. Among its various subtypes, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cancer (PDAC) is the most common type, accounting for about 90% of the cases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">68</xref>). Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is the precursor of malignant transformation of PDAC (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">69</xref>). Although many IPMNs are benign, differentiating between these and those with malignant potential is crucial. Matthias Lang et&#xa0;al. demonstrated that dPET parameters (TTP, K<sub>1</sub>, K<sub>2</sub>, K<sub>3</sub>, K<sub>4</sub>) can effectively distinguish between high-grade and low-grade IPMNs. With 80% sensitivity and specificity, this approach offers a promising tool for predicting IPMN subtypes and potentially avoiding unnecessary surgery for non-malignant lesions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">70</xref>). In terms of staging and prognosis of PDCA, the dual imaging with <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG allowed precise stratification of postoperative patients, with 18.4% and 10.2% of patients experiencing a change in staging, respectively, but <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI had a lower specificity in identifying primary lesions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">71</xref>) that was mainly attributed to the overlapping uptake intensity of primary pancreatic tumors and tumor-induced obstructive pancreatitis of the pancreatic parenchyma. Unfortunately, dynamic <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT did not effectively differentiate between PDAC and distal obstructive pancreatitis based on K<sub>i</sub> values (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">72</xref>). However, dual time-point imaging with a 3-hour delay successfully distinguished between tumor and inflammation-induced fibrosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">72</xref>).</p>
<p>Currently, there are limited studies on the dynamics of PET/CT in pancreatic cancer, especially with the low sensitivity or specificity of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">73</xref>), the development of new imaging agents is imperative, and the use of <sup>68</sup>Ga-labeled trimerized &#x3b1;v&#x3b2;6 integrin-selective nonpeptide <sup>68</sup>Ga-Trivehexin has been shown to be superior in PDAC metastases, especially in cancers with low metabolic conversion and/or high stromal ratios, such as liver (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">74</xref>), brain tissue and retroperitoneum (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">75</xref>). In addition, researchers are actively seeking innovative strategies to enhance pancreatic cancer treatment outcomes. A primary focus of targeted therapy involves identifying new targets through the administration of short-lived, highly radioactive radionuclides. In the study by Tadashi Watabe et&#xa0;al., dPET was employed to evaluate <sup>64</sup>Cu and <sup>225</sup>Ac to label mice with human pancreatic cancer xenografts using a FAP inhibitor (FAPI) and found that it significantly inhibited tumor growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">76</xref>), while Yuwei Liu et&#xa0;al. discovered that administration of <sup>177</sup>Lu-FAPI-46 and <sup>225</sup>Ac-FAPI-46 to PANC-1 xenograft mice decreased the tumor growth. However, <sup>177</sup>Lu-FAPI-46 exhibited a less intense but more prolonged therapeutic effect compared with <sup>225</sup>Ac-FAPI-46 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">77</xref>). These studies suggest that &#x3b2;-therapy and &#x3b1;-therapy targeting FAP may offer effective treatment of pancreatic cancer, but it is currently in the clinical translational phase and further investigations using dPET are needed to determine the best mix of rapid FAP kinetics and physical radionuclide decay. There is a compelling need to develop combinatorial treatment strategies focused on tumor cell elimination.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_5">
<label>4.5</label>
<title>Prostate neoplasm</title>
<p>Current statistics indicate that prostate neoplasm has surpassed lung cancer as the most common tumor in men worldwide and is the leading cause of cancer deaths in men (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">57</xref>). Since 2020, when <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 was approved by the FDA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">78</xref>), prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET imaging of prostate cancer employing <sup>68</sup>Ga-labelled complexes is increasingly being adopted in routine clinical treatment worldwide. Studies have shown that the kinetic behavior of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 varies across different organs and lesions. The irreversible two-tissue compartmental (2T4k) model is more suitable for describing the kinetics in pathological lesions, while the reversible two-tissue compartmental (2T4k) model better fits normal tissue kinetics. In terms of kinetic metrics, the K<sub>3</sub> value effectively distinguished between abnormal lesions and healthy organs with increased absorption of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11, and is expected to gain broader clinical application as an imaging biomarker for differentiating pathological and non-specific <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 uptake in prostate cancer patients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">79</xref>). Currently, delayed imaging with <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA PET/CT can improve the identification of non-specific PSMA ingestion in patients with prostate cancer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">80</xref>). In addition, K<sub>i</sub> images collected using whole-body PET/CT scanning for 60 min are less noisy and have sharper lesions than SUV images, making them ideal for early detection of small lesions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">81</xref>). The lengthy 60-min scan time can lead to significant bladder activity, hindering the detection of small lesions like local recurrences or lymph node metastases near the bladder. A combination of a 6-min early dynamic imaging and static imaging protocol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">91</xref>), as proposed by Jun Wen et&#xa0;al., effectively reduces bladder interference and shortens the PET/CT acquisition time to 45 min. While the improvement in image quality is modest, it enhances patient comfort (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">82</xref>).</p>
<p>The longer half-life of <sup>18</sup>F compared to <sup>68</sup>Ga offers great convenience in terms of transportation and can be used in delayed imaging protocols. Evidence indicates that <sup>18</sup>F-DCFPyL and <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 exhibit similar biodistribution patterns including the bladder uptake, and that <sup>18</sup>F-DCFPyL has a higher overall detection rate although it did not show a higher detection rate in terms of localized foci (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">83</xref>), this may be due to the better spatial resolution of the images provided by <sup>18</sup>F. A 22-min dynamic <sup>18</sup>F-DCFPyL PET scan effectively detected dominant intraprostatic lesions. Kinetic parameters K<sub>i</sub> and K<sub>4</sub> derived from this scan accurately differentiated between tumor and benign tissue (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">84</xref>). These investigations suggest that <sup>18</sup>F-DCFPyL is the most favorable substitute for <sup>68</sup>Ga-labeled drugs. Moreover, the transition from <sup>68</sup>Ga-labeled PSMA-targeted compounds to <sup>18</sup>F-labeled PSMA-targeted compounds is expected to gain broader clinical acceptance.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_6">
<label>4.6</label>
<title>Head and neck tumors</title>
<p>Hypoxia is a common feature of head and neck cancer and a predictor of poor prognosis following radiotherapy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">85</xref>). <sup>18</sup>F-Fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) has been extensively investigated as a radiotracer for hypoxic PET with good performance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">86</xref>). Tumor-to-Blood Ratio and Tumor-to-Muscle Ratios are measurements obtained from static FMISO scans and are frequently employed as substitute biomarkers for tumor hypoxia, depending on the specific moment of image capture. Furthermore, tumor-to-blood ratio and tumor-to-muscle ratios values are influenced by the distribution of FMISO within and among tumors. Consequently, this method may inaccurately assess the presence and severity of hypoxia. Milan Grkovski et&#xa0;al. performed a 30-min single-bed dynamic imaging of 120 patients with head and neck cancer, and found that <sup>18</sup>F-FMISO dPET provided data required for parametric mapping of tumor hypoxia, perfusion, and radiotracer distribution volumes, and K<sub>3</sub> was identified as a direct biomarker of hypoxia-mediated <sup>18</sup>F-FMISO accumulation, and K<sub>3</sub> was not dependent on the volume of distribution and time of acquisition with FMISO (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">87</xref>).</p>
<p>Tumor perfusion is a critical factor influencing drug delivery. Changes in perfusion can serve as a prognostic indicator for the effectiveness of both conventional and targeted therapies, such as anti-angiogenic treatments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">88</xref>). Studies have reported that tumor perfusion and hypoxia can help to predict response to treatment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">89</xref>). The 20-min truncated <sup>18</sup>F-FMISO dPET scans, i.e., by the kinetic parameters K<sub>1</sub> and K<sub>3</sub> reacting to tumor hypoxia and perfusion can identify alternative markers of hypoxia and perfusion. Currently, two hypotheses have been proposed for the relationship between K<sub>1</sub> and K<sub>3</sub>, one is a negative correlation, whereby hypoxia occurs in a hypoperfused tumor volume with a disorganized and dysfunctional microvascular structure. It is hypothesized that the increased separation between tumor cells and functional blood vessels results in diminished oxygen delivery to distal cells, causing diffusion-limited hypoxia. The other is a positive correlation, which implies that areas with good perfusion may experience hypoxia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">89</xref>). This may reflect the various forms of hypoxia (patchy, banded, and mixed) described in head and neck tumors by Ljungkvist et&#xa0;al, who reported that hypoxia and perfusion can simultaneously occur in very close proximity under the microscope (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90">90</xref>). Notably, hypoxia may promote angiogenesis, hyperperfusion and perfusion heterogeneity.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>Radiotracer-based kinetic modeling and dynamic imaging provide data that cannot be obtained by conventional static PET/CT, and have been successfully applied in various malignant tumors. They provide kinetic scanning parameters are of superior value for diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and assessment of treatment response and prognosis in these diseases than the visual and semiquantitative analysis of conventional static imaging. The practical application of kinetic imaging is hindered by issues related to data volume, scan duration, and the sophistication required for data analysis. With the advent of state-of-the-art PET/CT scanners, these problems can be ameliorated with the optimization of existing clinical applications of whole-body PET/CT, such as sequential dPET imaging of all relevant organ structures to map the pharmacokinetic behavior of (new) tracers. Moreover, exploring the potential of artificial intelligence in image analysis could lead to advanced multiparametric methods and uncover new avenues for research.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>YW: Funding acquisition, Writing &#x2013; original draft. YY: Funding acquisition, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. JL: Data curation, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. DC: Formal Analysis, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. HX: Investigation, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. JH: Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Grant (No. 2023fzyx025), Jingzhou Healthcare Science and Technology Program(2023HC07 to YY), and the College Students Innovative Entrepreneurial Training Program in Yangtze University (Yz202308 to YW).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="ai-statement">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<fn-group>
<title>Abbreviations</title>
<fn fn-type="abbr" id="abbrev1">
<p>SUV, Standardized uptake value; PET/CT, Positron emission tomography/computed tomography; ROI, Region of interest; DPET, Dynamic PET; MR<sub>FDG,</sub> Metabolic rate of FDG; TACs, Time activity curves; AFOV, Axial of view; SS, Step-and-shoot scan mode; CBM, Continuous bed motion; AIF, Artery input function; DV<sub>FDG,</sub> Distribution volume of free FDG; VOIs, Volumes of interests; TBR, Tumor-to- background ratio; CNR, Contrast-to-noise ratio; MTV, Metabolic tumor volume; TLG, Total lesion glycolysis; FD, Fractal dimension; IDIF, Image-derived input function; PBIF, Population-based input function; DBIF, Dual-blood input function; SBIF, Single-blood input function; NSCLC, Non-small cell lung cancer; HCC, Hepatocellular carcinoma; TTP, Time to peak; BC, Breast cancer; PDAC, Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cancer; IPMN, Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm.</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sarikaya</surname> <given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sarikaya</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Assessing pet parameters in oncologic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG studies</article-title>. <source>J Nucl Med Technol</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>483</volume>:<page-range>278&#x2013;82</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2967/jnmt.119.236109</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Influx rate constant of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG increases in metastatic lymph nodes of non-small cell lung cancer patients</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>475</volume>:<page-range>1198&#x2013;208</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-020-04682-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The value of 4D fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the diagnosis of lung lesions</article-title>. <source>Nucl Med Commun</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>4112</volume>:<page-range>1306&#x2013;12</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/mnm.0000000000001289</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dias</surname> <given-names>AH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pedersen</surname> <given-names>MF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Danielsen</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Munk</surname> <given-names>OL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gormsen</surname> <given-names>LC</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Clinical feasibility and impact of fully automated multiparametric PET imaging using direct Patlak reconstruction: evaluation of 103 dynamic whole-body <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT scans</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>483</volume>:<page-range>837&#x2013;50</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-020-05007-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sachpekidis</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Kinetic modeling and parametric imaging with dynamic PET for oncological applications: General considerations, current clinical applications, and future perspectives</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>481</volume>:<fpage>21</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>39</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-020-04843-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schatka</surname> <given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weiberg</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reichelt</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Owsianski-Hille</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Derlin</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berding</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>A randomized, double-blind, crossover comparison of novel continuous bed motion versus traditional bed position whole-body PET/CT imaging</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>434</volume>:<page-range>711&#x2013;7</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-015-3226-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fahrni</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karakatsanis</surname> <given-names>NA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Di Domenicantonio</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garibotto</surname> <given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zaidi</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Does whole-body patlak <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET imaging improve lesion detectability in clinical oncology</article-title>? <source>Eur Radiol</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>299</volume>:<page-range>4812&#x2013;21</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00330-018-5966-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zaker</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kotasidis</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garibotto</surname> <given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zaidi</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Assessment of lesion detectability in dynamic whole-body PET imaging using compartmental and patlak parametric mapping</article-title>. <source>Clin Nucl Med</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>455</volume>:<page-range>e221&#x2013;e31</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/rlu.0000000000002954</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Comparative benefits of Ki and SUV images in lesion detection during PET/CT imaging</article-title>. <source>EJNMMI Res</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>141</volume>:<fpage>98</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13550-024-01162-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Leung</surname> <given-names>EK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berg</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Omidvari</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Spencer</surname> <given-names>BA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abdelhafez</surname> <given-names>YG</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Quantitative accuracy in total-body imaging using the uEXPLORER PET/CT scanner</article-title>. <source>Phys Med Biol</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>66</volume>:<elocation-id>205008</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1361-6560/ac287c</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sachpekidis</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Groezinger</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Strauss</surname> <given-names>DS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Combined whole-body dynamic and static PET/CT with low-dose <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 in prostate cancer patients</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>517</volume>:<page-range>2137&#x2013;50</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-024-06620-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>MI</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Prognostic value of whole-body dynamic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT Patlak in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma</article-title>. <source>Heliyon</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>99</volume>:<elocation-id>e19749</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19749</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dias</surname> <given-names>AH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pedersen</surname> <given-names>MF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Danielsen</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Munk</surname> <given-names>OL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gormsen</surname> <given-names>LC</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Correction to: Clinical feasibility and impact of fully automated multiparametric pet imaging using direct patlak reconstruction: Evaluation of 103 dynamic whole-body <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT scans</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>483</volume>:<fpage>954</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-021-05225-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pedersen</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dias</surname> <given-names>AH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hjorthaug</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gormsen</surname> <given-names>LC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fledelius</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johnsson</surname> <given-names>AL</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Increased lesion detectability in patients with locally advanced breast cancer-A pilot study using dynamic whole-body [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT</article-title>. <source>EJNMMI Res</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>141</volume>:<fpage>31</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13550-024-01096-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Application of dynamic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT multiparametric imaging leads to an improved differentiation of benign and Malignant lung lesions</article-title>. <source>Mol Imaging Biol</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>265</volume>:<fpage>790</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>801</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11307-024-01942-w</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miao</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Su</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Characteristics of whole-body dynamic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT Patlak multi-parametric imaging in lung cancer and the influence of different delineation methods on quantitative parameters</article-title>. <source>Quant Imaging Med Surg</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>141</volume>:<fpage>291</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>304</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21037/qims-23-862</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>The role of dynamic, static, and delayed total-body PET imaging in the detection and differential diagnosis of oncological lesions</article-title>. <source>Cancer Imaging</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>241</volume>:<elocation-id>2</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40644-023-00649-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Strauss</surname> <given-names>LG</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Quantitative approaches of dynamic FDG-PET and pet/ct studies (dPET/CT) for the evaluation of oncological patients</article-title>. <source>Cancer Imaging</source>. (<year>2012</year>) <volume>121</volume>:<page-range>283&#x2013;9</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1102/1470-7330.2012.0033</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Meijer</surname> <given-names>TWH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Geus-Oei</surname> <given-names>LF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Visser</surname> <given-names>EP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oyen</surname> <given-names>WJG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Looijen-Salamon</surname> <given-names>MG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Visvikis</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Tumor delineation and quantitative assessment of glucose metabolic rate within histologic subtypes of non-small cell lung cancer by using dynamic <sup>18</sup>F fluorodeoxyglucose pet</article-title>. <source>Radiology</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>2832</volume>:<page-range>547&#x2013;59</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1148/radiol.2016160329</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tixier</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vriens</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheze-Le Rest</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hatt</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Disselhorst</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oyen</surname> <given-names>WJ</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Comparison of tumor uptake heterogeneity characterization between static and parametric <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET images in non-small cell lung cancer</article-title>. <source>J Nucl Med</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>577</volume>:<page-range>1033&#x2013;9</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2967/jnumed.115.166918</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Kinetic metrics of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG in normal human organs identified by systematic dynamic total-body positron emission tomography</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>488</volume>:<page-range>2363&#x2013;72</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-020-05124-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Naganawa</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gallezot</surname> <given-names>JD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shah</surname> <given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mulnix</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Young</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dias</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Assessment of population-based input functions for patlak imaging of whole body dynamic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET</article-title>. <source>EJNMMI Phys</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>71</volume>:<fpage>67</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40658-020-00330-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sarikaya</surname> <given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Albatineh</surname> <given-names>AN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sarikaya</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Revisiting weight-normalized suv and lean-body-mass-normalized suv in pet studies</article-title>. <source>J Nucl Med Technol</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>482</volume>:<page-range>163&#x2013;7</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2967/jnmt.119.233353</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tran</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Badawi</surname> <given-names>RD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cherry</surname> <given-names>SR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Optimization-derived blood input function using a kernel method and its evaluation with total-body PET for brain parametric imaging</article-title>. <source>Neuroimage</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>293</volume>:<elocation-id>120611</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120611</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Short-time total-body dynamic pet imaging performance in quantifying the kinetic metrics of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG in healthy volunteers</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>498</volume>:<page-range>2493&#x2013;503</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-021-05500-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Corwin</surname> <given-names>MT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Olson</surname> <given-names>KA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Badawi</surname> <given-names>RD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sarkar</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Dynamic PET of human liver inflammation: Impact of kinetic modeling with optimization-derived dual-blood input function</article-title>. <source>Phys Med Biol</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>6315</volume>:<fpage>155004</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1361-6560/aac8cb</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abdelhafez</surname> <given-names>YG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Spencer</surname> <given-names>BA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Verma</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parikh</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stollenwerk</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>High-temporal-resolution kinetic modeling of lung tumors with dual-blood input function using total-body dynamic PET</article-title>. <source>J Nucl Med</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>655</volume>:<page-range>714&#x2013;21</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2967/jnumed.123.267036</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Strauss</surname> <given-names>LG</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Parametric imaging: A promising approach for the evaluation of dynamic PET-<sup>18</sup>F-FDG studies - the dkfz experience</article-title>. <source>Hell J Nucl Med</source>. (<year>2010</year>) <volume>131</volume>:<fpage>18</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>22</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sachpekidis</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hillengass</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Goldschmidt</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wagner</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haberkorn</surname> <given-names>U</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kopka</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Treatment response evaluation with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and <sup>18</sup>F-NAF PET/CT in multiple myeloma patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>441</volume>:<fpage>50</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>62</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-016-3502-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berg</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Judenhofer</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Total-body dynamic reconstruction and parametric imaging on the uEXPLORER</article-title>. <source>J Nucl Med</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>612</volume>:<page-range>285&#x2013;91</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2967/jnumed.119.230565</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Total-body quantitative parametric imaging of early kinetics of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG</article-title>. <source>J Nucl Med</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>625</volume>:<page-range>738&#x2013;44</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2967/jnumed.119.238113</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<label>32</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Whole-body parametric imaging of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET using uEXPLORER with reduced scanning time</article-title>. <source>J Nucl Med</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>634</volume>:<page-range>622&#x2013;8</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2967/jnumed.120.261651</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<label>33</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miao</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Improved clinical workflow for whole-body patlak parametric imaging using two short dynamic acquisitions</article-title>. <source>Front Oncol</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>12</volume>:<elocation-id>822708</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fonc.2022.822708</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<label>34</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sari</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eriksson</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mingels</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alberts</surname> <given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Casey</surname> <given-names>ME</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Afshar-Oromieh</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Feasibility of using abbreviated scan protocols with population-based input functions for accurate kinetic modeling of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG datasets from a long axial FOV PET scanner</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>502</volume>:<page-range>257&#x2013;65</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-022-05983-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<label>35</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zuo</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Relative patlak plot for dynamic pet parametric imaging without the need for early-time input function</article-title>. <source>Phys Med Biol</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>6316</volume>:<fpage>165004</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1361-6560/aad444</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<label>36</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kaji</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Osanai</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nakata</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tamaki</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Dynamic whole-body <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET for minimizing patient motion artifact</article-title>. <source>Clin Nucl Med</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>4511</volume>:<page-range>880&#x2013;2</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/rlu.0000000000003253</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<label>37</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nishimura</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tamaki</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matsushima</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kiba</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kotani</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bamba</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Dynamic whole-body <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET for differentiating abnormal lesions from physiological uptake</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>4710</volume>:<page-range>2293&#x2013;300</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-020-04726-w</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<label>38</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zan</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Role of breath-hold lung PET in stage ia pulmonary adenocarcinoma</article-title>. <source>Insights Imaging</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>141</volume>:<fpage>100</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13244-023-01446-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<label>39</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bray</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Laversanne</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sung</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ferlay</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Siegel</surname> <given-names>RL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Soerjomataram</surname> <given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Global cancer statistics 2022: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries</article-title>. <source>CA Cancer J Clin</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>743</volume>:<page-range>229&#x2013;63</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3322/caac.21834</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<label>40</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wumener</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zang</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Du</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>The value of dynamic FDG PET/CT in the differential diagnosis of lung cancer and predicting EGFR mutations</article-title>. <source>BMC Pulm Med</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>241</volume>:<fpage>227</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12890-024-02997-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<label>41</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wumener</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zang</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Dynamic FDG-PET imaging for differentiating metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes of lung cancer</article-title>. <source>Front Oncol</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>12</volume>:<elocation-id>1005924</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fonc.2022.1005924</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<label>42</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>De Geus-Oei</surname> <given-names>LF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Van Krieken</surname> <given-names>JH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aliredjo</surname> <given-names>RP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Krabbe</surname> <given-names>PF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frielink</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Verhagen</surname> <given-names>AF</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Biological correlates of fdg uptake in non-small cell lung cancer</article-title>. <source>Lung Cancer</source>. (<year>2007</year>) <volume>551</volume>:<fpage>79</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>87</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.08.018</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<label>43</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mohan</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bhalla</surname> <given-names>AS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>MC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vishnubhatla</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Das</surname> <given-names>CJ</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Role of various metabolic parameters derived from baseline <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT as prognostic markers in non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing platinum-based chemotherapy</article-title>. <source>Clin Nucl Med</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>431</volume>:<fpage>e8</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e17</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/rlu.0000000000001886</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<label>44</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Patlak-Ki derived from ultra-high sensitivity dynamic total body <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT correlates with the response to induction immuno-chemotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>5011</volume>:<page-range>3400&#x2013;13</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-023-06298-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<label>45</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mo</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Repeated dynamic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT imaging using a high-sensitivity PET/CT scanner for assessing non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing induction immuno-chemotherapy followed by hypo-fractionated chemoradiotherapy and consolidative immunotherapy: Report from a prospective observational study (GASTO-1067)</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>51</volume>(<issue>13</issue>):<fpage>4083</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>98</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-024-06819-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<label>46</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Geist</surname> <given-names>BK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Comparison of different kinetic models for dynamic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma with various, also dual-blood input function</article-title>. <source>Phys Med Biol</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>654</volume>:<fpage>045001</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1361-6560/ab66e3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<label>47</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Munk</surname> <given-names>OL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bass</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roelsgaard</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bender</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hansen</surname> <given-names>SB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Keiding</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Liver kinetics of glucose analogs measured in pigs by pet: Importance of dual-input blood sampling</article-title>. <source>J Nucl Med</source>. (<year>2001</year>) <volume>425</volume>:<fpage>795</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>801</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<label>48</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Geist</surname> <given-names>BK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Dynamic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET imaging of liver lesions: Evaluation of a two-tissue compartment model with dual blood input function</article-title>. <source>BMC Med Imaging</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>211</volume>:<fpage>90</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12880-021-00623-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<label>49</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Combined early dynamic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and conventional whole-body <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in hepatocellular carcinoma</article-title>. <source>Abdom Radiol (NY)</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>4810</volume>:<page-range>3127&#x2013;34</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00261-023-03986-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<label>50</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Feasibility of perfusion and early-uptake <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in primary hepatocellular carcinoma: A dual-input dual-compartment uptake model</article-title>. <source>Jpn J Radiol</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>3911</volume>:<page-range>1086&#x2013;96</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11604-021-01140-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<label>51</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Osho</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rich</surname> <given-names>NE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singal</surname> <given-names>AG</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Role of imaging in management of hepatocellular carcinoma: Surveillance, diagnosis, and treatment response</article-title>. <source>Hepatoma Res</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>55</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.20517/2394-5079.2020.42</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<label>52</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>SM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>HS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>JW</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Emerging role of <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for guiding management of hepatocellular carcinoma</article-title>. <source>World J Gastroenterol</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>2511</volume>:<page-range>1289&#x2013;306</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3748/wjg.v25.i11.1289</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<label>53</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>HB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>QS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>BY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>HS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>WL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>QY</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>F-18 FDG in conjunction with 11C-choline pet/ct in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma</article-title>. <source>Clin Nucl Med</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>3612</volume>:<page-range>1092&#x2013;7</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/RLU.0b013e3182335df4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<label>54</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kong</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>
<sup>68</sup>GA-FAPI-04 versus <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma</article-title>. <source>Front Oncol</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>11</volume>:<elocation-id>693640</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fonc.2021.693640</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<label>55</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ke</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Imaging fibroblast activation protein in liver cancer: A single-center post hoc retrospective analysis to compare <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT versus mri and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>485</volume>:<page-range>1604&#x2013;17</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-020-05095-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<label>56</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhong</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Head-to-head comparison of <sup>18</sup>F-FAPI and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in staging and therapeutic management of hepatocellular carcinoma</article-title>. <source>Cancer Imaging</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>231</volume>:<fpage>106</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40644-023-00626-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<label>57</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Siegel</surname> <given-names>RL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Giaquinto</surname> <given-names>AN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jemal</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Cancer statistics, 2024</article-title>. <source>CA Cancer J Clin</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>741</volume>:<fpage>12</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>49</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3322/caac.21820</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<label>58</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vaz</surname> <given-names>SC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Woll</surname> <given-names>JPP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cardoso</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Groheux</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cook</surname> <given-names>GJR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ulaner</surname> <given-names>GA</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Joint EANM-SNMMI guideline on the role of 2-<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in no special type breast cancer: (endorsed by the ACR, ESSO, ESTRO, EUSOBI/ESR, and EUSOMA)</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>51</volume>(<issue>9</issue>):<page-range>2706&#x2013;32</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-024-06696-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<label>59</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yaghan</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stanton</surname> <given-names>PD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Robertson</surname> <given-names>KW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Going</surname> <given-names>JJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Murray</surname> <given-names>GD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McArdle</surname> <given-names>CS</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Oestrogen receptor status predicts local recurrence following breast conservation surgery for early breast cancer</article-title>. <source>Eur J Surg Oncol</source>. (<year>1998</year>) <volume>245</volume>:<page-range>424&#x2013;6</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0748-7983(98)92341-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<label>60</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kaj&#xe1;ry</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lengyel</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>T&#x151;k&#xe9;s</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kulka</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dank</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>T&#x151;k&#xe9;s</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Dynamic FDG-PET/CT in the initial staging of primary breast cancer: Clinicopathological correlations</article-title>. <source>Pathol Oncol Res</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>262</volume>:<fpage>997</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1006</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12253-019-00641-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<label>61</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kazerouni</surname> <given-names>AS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peterson</surname> <given-names>LM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jenkins</surname> <given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Novakova-Jiresova</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Linden</surname> <given-names>HM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gralow</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Multimodal prediction of neoadjuvant treatment outcome by serial FDG PET and MRI in women with locally advanced breast cancer</article-title>. <source>Breast Cancer Res</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>251</volume>:<fpage>138</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13058-023-01722-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<label>62</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Brackstone</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baldassarre</surname> <given-names>FG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Perera</surname> <given-names>FE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cil</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chavez Mac Gregor</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dayes</surname> <given-names>IS</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Management of the axilla in early-stage breast cancer: Ontario health (cancer care ontario) and asco guideline</article-title>. <source>J Clin Oncol</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>3927</volume>:<page-range>3056&#x2013;82</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1200/jco.21.00934</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<label>63</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Verbelen</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tjalma</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meirte</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gebruers</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Long-term morbidity after a negative sentinel node in breast cancer patients</article-title>. <source>Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>285</volume>:<elocation-id>e13077</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ecc.13077</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<label>64</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Weidner</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Current pathologic methods for measuring intratumoral microvessel density within breast carcinoma and other solid tumors</article-title>. <source>Breast Cancer Res Treat</source>. (<year>1995</year>) <volume>362</volume>:<page-range>169&#x2013;80</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/bf00666038</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<label>65</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mankoff</surname> <given-names>DA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dunnwald</surname> <given-names>LK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Partridge</surname> <given-names>SC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Specht</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Blood flow-metabolism mismatch: Good for the tumor, bad for the patient</article-title>. <source>Clin Cancer Res</source>. (<year>2009</year>) <volume>1517</volume>:<page-range>5294&#x2013;6</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-09-1448</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<label>66</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Laking</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Price</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Radionuclide imaging of perfusion and hypoxia</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source>. (<year>2010</year>) <volume>37</volume>:<page-range>20&#x2013;9</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-010-1453-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<label>67</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Payan</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Presles</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brunotte</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coutant</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Desmoulins</surname> <given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vrigneaud</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Biological correlates of tumor perfusion and its heterogeneity in newly diagnosed breast cancer using dynamic first-pass <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>475</volume>:<page-range>1103&#x2013;15</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-019-04422-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<label>68</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The role of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and autophagy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma invasion</article-title>. <source>Cell Death Dis</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>148</volume>:<fpage>506</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41419-023-06032-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B69">
<label>69</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pollini</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Adsay</surname> <given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Capurso</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dal Molin</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Esposito</surname> <given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hruban</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>The tumour immune microenvironment and microbiome of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms</article-title>. <source>Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>712</volume>:<page-range>1141&#x2013;50</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00235-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<label>70</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lang</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Spektor</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hielscher</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hoppner</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Glatting</surname> <given-names>FM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bicu</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Static and dynamic <sup>68</sup>GA-FAPI PET/CT for the detection of Malignant transformation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia of the pancreas</article-title>. <source>J Nucl Med</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>642</volume>:<page-range>244&#x2013;51</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2967/jnumed.122.264361</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B71">
<label>71</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Comparing the clinical value of baseline <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: additional prognostic value of the distal pancreatitis</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>5013</volume>:<page-range>4036&#x2013;50</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-023-06297-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B72">
<label>72</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shang</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Positron emission tomography and computed tomography with [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitors improves tumor detection and staging in patients with pancreatic cancer</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>494</volume>:<page-range>1322&#x2013;37</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-021-05576-w</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B73">
<label>73</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rijkers</surname> <given-names>AP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Valkema</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duivenvoorden</surname> <given-names>HJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van Eijck</surname> <given-names>CH</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Usefulness of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to confirm suspected pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Eur J Surg Oncol</source>. (<year>2014</year>) <volume>407</volume>:<fpage>794</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>804</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejso.2014.03.016</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B74">
<label>74</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Quigley</surname> <given-names>NG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Steiger</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hober&#xfc;ck</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Czech</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zierke</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kossatz</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>PET/CT imaging of head-and-neck and pancreatic cancer in humans by targeting the &#x201c;Cancer Integrin&#x201d; &#x3b1;v&#x3b2;6 with Ga-68-Trivehexin</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>494</volume>:<page-range>1136&#x2013;47</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-021-05559-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B75">
<label>75</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rehm</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Winzer</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Notni</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hempel</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Distler</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Folprecht</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Concomitant metastatic head-and-neck cancer and pancreatic cancer assessed by &#x3b1;v&#x3b2;6-integrin PET/CT using <sup>68</sup>Ga-Trivehexin: Incidental detection of a brain metastasis</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>51</volume>(<issue>11</issue>):<fpage>3469</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>71</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-024-06750-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B76">
<label>76</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Watabe</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaneda-Nakashima</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shirakami</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lindner</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ooe</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Theranostics targeting fibroblast activation protein in the tumor stroma: <sup>64</sup>Cu- and <sup>225</sup>Ac-labeled FAPI-04 in pancreatic cancer xenograft mouse models</article-title>. <source>J Nucl Med</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>614</volume>:<page-range>563&#x2013;9</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2967/jnumed.119.233122</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B77">
<label>77</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Watabe</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaneda-Nakashima</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shirakami</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Naka</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ooe</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Fibroblast activation protein targeted therapy using <sup>177</sup>Lu-FAPI-46 compared with <sup>225</sup>Ac-FAPI-46 in a pancreatic cancer model</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>493</volume>:<page-range>871&#x2013;80</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-021-05554-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B78">
<label>78</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ke</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>First-in-human study of PSMA-targeting agent, [<sup>18</sup>F]AlF-P16-093: Dosimetry and initial evaluation in prostate cancer patients</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>516</volume>:<page-range>1753&#x2013;62</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-024-06596-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B79">
<label>79</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ng</surname> <given-names>YL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Assessing dynamic metabolic heterogeneity in prostate cancer patients via total-body <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging: quantitative analysis of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 uptake in pathological lesions and normal organs</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>513</volume>:<fpage>896</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>906</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-023-06475-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B80">
<label>80</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Su</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Diagnostic value of dual-time point <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA PET/CT image for benign and Malignant lesions in patients with prostate cancer</article-title>. <source>Abdom Radiol (NY)</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>49</volume>(<issue>9</issue>):<fpage>3214</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>19</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00261-024-04269-w</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B81">
<label>81</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ng</surname> <given-names>YL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Comparison of parametric imaging and SUV imaging with <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 using dynamic total-body PET/CT in prostate cancer</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>512</volume>:<page-range>568&#x2013;80</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-023-06456-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B82">
<label>82</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>van der Sar</surname> <given-names>ECA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Viol</surname> <given-names>SLM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Braat</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van Rooij</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lam</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Jong</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Impact of uptake time on image quality of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT</article-title>. <source>Med Phys</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>5012</volume>:<page-range>7619&#x2013;28</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/mp.16429</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B83">
<label>83</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ferreira</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Iravani</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hofman</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hicks</surname> <given-names>RJ</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Intra-individual comparison of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 and <sup>18</sup>F-dcfpyl normal-organ biodistribution</article-title>. <source>Cancer Imaging</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>191</volume>:<fpage>23</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40644-019-0211-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B84">
<label>84</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>DM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bauman</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chin</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pautler</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moussa</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Kinetic analysis of dominant intraprostatic lesion of prostate cancer using quantitative dynamic <sup>18</sup>F-dcfpyl-pet: Comparison to <sup>18</sup>F-fluorocholine-PET</article-title>. <source>EJNMMI Res</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>111</volume>:<elocation-id>2</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13550-020-00735-w</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B85">
<label>85</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bigos</surname> <given-names>KJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Quiles</surname> <given-names>CG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lunj</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Krause</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Troost</surname> <given-names>EG</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Tumour response to hypoxia: Understanding the hypoxic tumour microenvironment to improve treatment outcome in solid tumours</article-title>. <source>Front Oncol</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>14</volume>:<elocation-id>1331355</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fonc.2024.1331355</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B86">
<label>86</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sommat</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tong</surname> <given-names>AKT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ong</surname> <given-names>ALK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sin</surname> <given-names>SY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lam</surname> <given-names>WWC</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>
<sup>18</sup>F-FMISO PET-guided dose escalation with multifield optimization intensity-modulated proton therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma</article-title>. <source>Asia Pac J Clin Oncol</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>20</volume>(<issue>5</issue>):<fpage>611</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ajco.13953</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B87">
<label>87</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Grkovski</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sch&#xf6;der</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>NY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carlin</surname> <given-names>SD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beattie</surname> <given-names>BJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Riaz</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Multiparametric imaging of tumor hypoxia and perfusion with <sup>18</sup>F-fluoromisonidazole dynamic pet in head and neck cancer</article-title>. <source>J Nucl Med</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>587</volume>:<page-range>1072&#x2013;80</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2967/jnumed.116.188649</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B88">
<label>88</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>GB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Harms</surname> <given-names>HJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>DR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jacobson</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>PET imaging of tumor perfusion: A potential cancer biomarker</article-title>? <source>Semin Nucl Med</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>506</volume>:<page-range>549&#x2013;61</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2020.07.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B89">
<label>89</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rickard</surname> <given-names>AG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Palmer</surname> <given-names>GM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dewhirst</surname> <given-names>MW</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Clinical and pre-clinical methods for quantifying tumor hypoxia</article-title>. <source>Adv Exp Med Biol</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>1136</volume>:<fpage>19</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>41</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-030-12734-3_2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B90">
<label>90</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ljungkvist</surname> <given-names>AS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bussink</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rijken</surname> <given-names>PF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaanders</surname> <given-names>JH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van der Kogel</surname> <given-names>AJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Denekamp</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Vascular architecture, hypoxia, and proliferation in first-generation xenografts of human head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomas</article-title>. <source>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</source>. (<year>2002</year>) <volume>541</volume>:<page-range>215&#x2013;28</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02938-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B91">
<label>91</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Determination of optimal <sup>68</sup>GA-PSMA PET/CT imaging time in prostate cancers by total-body dynamic PET/CT</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>496</volume>:<page-range>2086&#x2013;95</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-021-05659-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>