Front. Oncol. Frontiers in Oncology Front. Oncol. 2234-943X Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fonc.2024.1507589 Oncology Correction Corrigendum: A comparative study of two in vivo PET verification methods in clinical cases Zhang Junyu 1 2 3 4 5 † Lu Yan 2 3 6 † Sheng Yinxiangzi 2 3 6 Wang Weiwei 2 3 6 Hong Zhengshan 2 3 7 Sun Yun 1 2 3 Zhou Rong 4 5 Cheng Jingyi 1 2 3 * 1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China 2 Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China 3 Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China 4 College of Physics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China 5 Key Laboratory of Radiation Physics and Technology, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China 6 Department of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China 7 Department of Radiotherapy, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China

Approved by: Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

*Correspondence: Jingyi Cheng, jcheng13@fudan.edu.cn

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

 12 11 2024 2024 14 1507589 08 10 2024 31 10 2024 Copyright © 2024 Zhang, Lu, Sheng, Wang, Hong, Sun, Zhou and Cheng 2024 Zhang, Lu, Sheng, Wang, Hong, Sun, Zhou and Cheng

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 A Corrigendum on A comparative study of two in vivo PET verification methods in clinical cases By Zhang J, Lu Y, Sheng Y, Wang W, Hong Z, Sun Y, Zhou R and Cheng J (2021) Front. Oncol. 11:617787. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.617787 proton therapy breast cancer positron emission tomography depth verification methods comparison section-in-acceptance Radiation Oncology

In the published article, there was an error in the Funding statement. The funding statement for the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai was displayed as “21ZR460300”. The correct statement is “Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (21ZR1460300)’’.

The correct Funding statement appears below.

“This project was supported by the Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (Grant No. 202040279), the Pudong New Area Science and Technology Development Foundation (No. PKJ 2020-Y56), and the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (21ZR1460300).’’

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.