AR, also known as nuclear receptor subfamily 3, group C, gene 4 (NR3C4), located at Xq12, has been extensively studied as a TF that is dependent on ligand binding and is classified as a member of the NR superfamily (187–189). AR expression can be found in the regions of the body like the breast, cervix, endometrium, epididymis, fallopian tube, kidney, seminal vesicle, and testis (190).

Accumulating studies have revealed that AR expression has been upregulated, and androgen/AR signaling stimulated tumor growth and metastasis in OVC (86, 88, 191, 192). For instance, several studies in the past few decades have shown the effects of dihydrotestosterone (DHT), a synthetic androgen, in promoting AR translocation into the nucleus and increasing its expression in both OVC cells and in vivo models (76, 78–81). DHT acts as an agonist for AR, thereby inducing the proliferation and invasiveness of various OVC cells (78, 81). However, an intriguing study by Gogoi and colleagues showed that DHT and medroxyprogesterone acetate, an androgenic ligand, act by upregulating the inflammatory cytokines, IL-6 and IL-8 and downregulating the matrix metalloproteinases, MMP-2 and MMP-9 in OVC cells (79). Similarly, in another study, DHT increased cell proliferation in SKOV3 cells by elevating the IL-6 and IL-8 levels, which was reversed by treatment with an AR antagonist, flutamide (78). Further, the addition of R1881 (a synthetic anabolic androgenic steroid) caused cell growth and invasiveness by increasing the AR expression (82). It was observed that treatment with strong antagonists of AR, such as flutamide, OH-flutamide, anandron, and 3-β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase inhibitor, epostane reduced the survival and proliferation of OV166, OVC NOVA, and OV1225 cells adapted to DHT (75). Besides, OVCAR-3 and OSE2 cells, when treated with Casodex (bicalutamide), a potent anti-androgenic drug, inhibited cell proliferation and related genes by reducing AR level in the nucleus and resulted in cleavage of poly (ADP)-ribose polymerase (PARP) (80).

Taxol/paclitaxel, a mitotoxin, is well known for its growth-inhibitory properties of many cancers, including OVC. Yet, in patients, the effectiveness of this treatment is constrained by the acquisition of taxol resistance (txr). Kohli et al. reported that txr in OVC results from the upregulation of the linker histone H1.0 and the ABCB1 and ABCG2 drug transporters, followed by the recruitment of GCN5 and AR (88). Besides, Sun et al. demonstrated that FK506-binding protein 5 (FKBP5) was significantly upregulated in txr SKOV3 cells and knockdown of this protein resulted in increased sensitivity to taxol by downregulating several txr-related genes, including ABCB1, BMP5, FAT3, FGFR2, H1F0, SRCRB4D, STAG3, and TMPRSS15. Moreover, this study showed that FKBP5 forms a protein complex with AR which modulated the sensitivity of OVC cells towards taxol (82). Furthermore, the same group demonstrated that silencing of AR in txr OVC cells, resulted in increased apoptotic rate and decreased expression of AR mRNA and several multidrug resistance genes (83). In addition, they also found that suppression of ABCB1 gene helps in sensitizing txr OVC cells to paclitaxel or bicalutamide treatment (84). Another study demonstrated that AR expression and its nuclear translocation are influenced by the suppression of an AR molecular chaperone called small glutamine-rich tetratricopeptide repeat-containing protein alpha (SGTA) (81). Chung and colleagues demonstrated that overexpression of AR enhanced the cell growth, survival, and expression of the ABCG2 gene. This study also confirmed that the combinatorial treatment of paclitaxel with ASC-J9, an AR-degradation enhancer markedly reduced colony formation and survival of OVC cells (85).

Another study revealed the role of AR in promoting the growth of ovarian teratocarcinoma cells. AR overexpression improved the self-renewal capacity of cancer stem/progenitor cells (CSPCs). It was worth noting that the addition of DHT did not significantly affect cell growth or morphology, suggesting that these activities were carried out in a ligand-independent manner (57). Another study revealed the crosstalk between two NR signaling pathways where OVCAR-3 cells were treated with DHT and 1, 25-dihydroxy vitamin D3 [1,25(OH)2D3], which is an agonist of VDR. Notably, AR expression was enhanced by 1,25(OH)2D3 treatment but led to a reduction of growth in these cells (77). Another study demonstrated the treatment of txr OVC cells with androgen activated toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) thereby and AR, thereby leading to AR-based txr. Hence, targeting TLR4 pathway can be used as an efficient strategy in overcoming txr in these cells (87). Collectively, the above studies illustrated that AR is upregulated in OVC, and therapeutic approaches targeting AR could be utilized for the prevention and management of this disease.

ER, otherwise known as nuclear receptor subfamily 3 group A genes 1 (ERα) and 2 (ERβ) are positioned at 6q25.1 and 14q23.2, respectively (189, 193). ERα is predominantly present in reproductive tissues like the uterus and ovary and in the breast, kidney, bone, white adipose tissue, and liver. On the other hand, ERβ is expressed in various tissues such as the ovary, central nervous system, cardiovascular system, immune system, lung, male reproductive organs, prostate, colon, and kidney (193). The specific targeting of ERα and ERβ isoforms could be a valuable strategy for treating diseases, considering their overlapping and distinct nonoverlapping functions, as well as the tissue-specific differences in their relative abundance (187).

A plethora of research has illustrated the vital role of ER in cancer therapeutics. For instance, a number of studies have depicted that 17-β-estradiol or E2, a natural female steroid hormone, resulted in increased cell proliferation, growth, viability, and migration of various OVC cells and caused an increase in tumor growth and size in vivo through ER signaling pathway (7, 76, 89–93, 95, 97, 98, 102, 104, 108, 111). Moreover, many studies have clearly illustrated that ERα is often highly expressed in OVC and its natural ligand E2 has tumorigenic effects (55, 97, 104). Hung et al. reported that non-genomic ERα signaling increased the proliferation, invasion, and migration of immature ovarian teratoma cells by elevating the expression of microRNA-21 (125). Further, Parker et al. demonstrated that 24 genes specifically involved with ERs showed differential expression in various OVC cell lines, when treated with either E2 or genistein, a phytochemical with estrogenic potentials. This includes genes that regulate survival, invasion, migration, and other aspects critical to the development and progression of OVC (100). In addition, bisphenol A (BPA), a potent endocrine disrupting chemical (EDC) and an environmental estrogen mimic, was also shown to contribute significantly towards OVC progression via ER pathway by enhancing cell proliferation, adhesion, invasion, angiogenesis, and migration, as well as elevating cell growth-related genes (99, 110, 111, 117, 127). Further, di-n-butyl phthalate and hexabromocyclododecane, two EDCs were shown to induce estrogenic effects in OVC cells by inducing their proliferation (103). Therefore, a large number of synthetic ligands collectively known as selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are being employed for the therapeutic targeting of ER (187). For example, several studies suggested that treatment with tamoxifen and its derivatives profoundly reduced cell proliferation, and tumor growth, and induced apoptosis in preclinical OVC models (89, 90, 94, 98, 101, 122, 129, 194). Interestingly, a few studies explicitly conducted on ERβ indicated that E2 treatment alone or combined with ERβ overexpression resulted in reduced cell proliferation and motility by inducing the expression of p21 and fibulin-1c and downregulating the expression of MMP-2 and cyclin A2 (131, 132). Verardi et al. reported that an indole derivative interacted with ERβ and resulted in the suppression of growth of OVC cells (136). Further, another study showed that overexpression of ERβ5 promotes migration, invasion, and proliferation of OVC cells through FAK/c-Src activation establishing it as potential target for OVC treatment (134).

In addition, another study demonstrated that genistein and daidzein, two isoflavones from soy foods also exhibited anti-estrogenic effects in numerous OVC cells by inducing apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, and reducing cancer cell viability, sphere formation, invasion, and migration (96, 113). Besides, another study utilized two ERβ agonists, liquiritigenin, and S-equol, which is isolated from soy isoflavone daidzein, where both the agonists suppressed invasion and migration and induced apoptosis in preclinical models of OVC (133). Further, these compounds were reported to downregulate PI3K/Akt/Wnt signaling pathways in OVC cell lines such as SKOV3, NIH: OVCAR-3, CAOV3, and A2780 (96). Another study demonstrated that aconitine, a toxin from Aconitum plant inhibited the proliferation, motility, and colony formation along with inducing apoptosis and DNA damage of OVC cells (135). A few studies demonstrated that leptin promoted cell growth and invasion of SKOV3 cells by inducing estrogen and ERα expression. Nevertheless, treatment with selective ERα antagonist methyl-piperidine-pyrazole (MPP) substantially suppressed the growth of these cells (121, 128). Likewise, a couple of studies have reported the anti-carcinogenic effects of MPP in ERα-expressing OVC cells (106, 117). Moreover, another study showed that 3-butoxy-1,8,9-trihydroxy-6H-benzofuro [3,2-c]benzopyran-6-one (BTB), derived from wedelolactone, selectively blocked the E2-induced transactivation of ERs and hindered the growth of ER-positive OVC cells (107).

A plethora of preclinical studies provided evidence that anti-estrogen ICI 182, 780 or fulvestrant caused a significant decrease in OVC growth and metastasis by degrading ER and inducing apoptosis and cell cycle arrest (7, 94, 97, 99, 105, 108, 110, 114, 121, 122, 128). Many studies revealed that benzophenone-1 or 4-tert-octylphenol mimicked estrogenic effects by enhancing cell migration and the expression of proteins like N-cadherin, Snail, and Slug along with downregulating E-cadherin via ER-dependent manner (112, 124, 130). An interesting study reported that cadmium has strong estrogenic effects and it activated ER, which was reversed by the addition of ICI 182, 780 wherein it inhibited cell growth and both ERα and ERβ expression (115). Another study showed that suramin, an anticancer agent resulted in an unexpected increase in the growth of ER-positive OVC cells, thereby providing insights into the complex pathways through which ER modulates OVC progression (120). A number of studies have exploited the ERα specific agonistic action of 1, 3, 5-Tris (4-hydroxyphenyl)-4-propyl-1H-pyrazole (PPT) in upregulating the ERα expression, cell growth and migration in many OVC cell lines. Nonetheless, these effects could be potentially reversed by a strong antagonist of this receptor (99, 106, 123).

Another study portrayed the effects of pesticides, which are found in trace amounts in harvested fruits and vegetables on the development of OVC. This study showed that fenhexamid and cyprodinil, two potential fungicides, apparently increased cell proliferation and metastasis in BG-1 OVC cell line and increased tumor volume in mice models. However, treatment with the anti-estrogen, ICI 182, 780 suppressed cell proliferation by downregulating cathepsin D, PCNA, cyclin D, and E (109). In another study, the synergistic effect of trametinib and tamoxifen was explored in OVCAR-3 and SKOV3 cell lines previously treated with estrogen. It was found that treatment led to no significant impact on the growth of these cells. However, the treatment with trametinib or erlotinib alone showed a substantial reduction in cell growth (116). In addition, another study reported that micro RNA-26b suppressed the proliferation, invasion and migration of OVC cells by inhibiting ERα (118). Moreover, few studies have demonstrated that siRNA-mediated repression of ERα caused reduction in cell growth of various OVC cell lines and subsequent treatments with a potent ERα antagonist had enhanced anticancer effects (99, 127, 128). Interestingly, overexpression of ERβ in numerous lines of OVC cells, potentially reduced cell growth and migration and increased apoptosis (99, 131). Another study showed that the ERβ agonist, LY500307, inhibited growth, sphere formation, and self-renewal of ovarian cancer stem cells, while also inducing apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in these cells (137). Besides, another study revealed that OSU-ERb-12, an ERβ agonist suppressed OVC progression and inhibited cancer stem cell (CSC) subpopulation by preventing non-CSC to CSC conversion (119). Similarly, the treatment of OVC cell lines with the ERβ-specific antagonist 2,3-bis (4-hydroxy-phenyl)-propionitrile or DPN, also resulted in decreased growth and enhanced apoptosis (99, 106). Another study demonstrated semaphorin 4D expression, positively correlated with OVC progression, where it was upregulated by ERα which accelerated the proliferation of OVC cells, and was downregulated by ERβ which inhibited cell multiplication (126). In essence, these studies have uncovered the distinct roles of both the isoforms of ER and their agonists and antagonists that might pave the way for the therapeutic interventions of OVC.

ERR, also known as nuclear receptor 3 group B (NR3B), has three isoforms ERRα (NR3B1), ERRβ (NR3B2), and ERRγ (NR3B3), and are located at the 11q13.1, 14q24.3, and 1q41 position respectively (https://www.genenames.org/data/gene-symbol-report/#!/hgnc_id/3471, https://www.genenames.org/data/gene-symbol-report/#!/hgnc_id/3473, https://www.genenames.org/data/gene-symbol-report/#!/hgnc_id/3474) (187). ERRα is present throughout the body except in regions like the oral mucosa, ovary, smooth muscle, spleen, and vagina. ERRβ is expressed in regions like amygdala, basal ganglia, breast, cerebellum, cerebral cortex, choroid plexus, epididymis, fallopian tube, heart muscle, hippocampal formation, hypothalamus, kidney, medulla oblongata, midbrain, pons, prostate, retina, skeletal muscle, spinal cord, spleen, and stomach, testis, thalamus, thymus, tongue, and white matter. ERRγ is found in regions like the stomach, kidney, cerebral cortex, cerebellum, nasopharynx, bronchus, lung, esophagus, colon, rectum, testis, prostate, breast, heart muscle, smooth muscle, and skeletal muscle (190). ERRs exhibit a relatively similar sequence to that of ERs, particularly in the DBD regions, with a sequence identity of over 60% between ERRα and ERα (195). ERRs have been found to exert differential effects on estrogen signaling, and studies examining ERR expression in ovarian tumors have identified ERRα and ERRγ as potential prognostic markers for these cancers (196, 197). Moreover, studies have also reported that ERRα, ERRβ, and ERRγ are upregulated in OVC tissues compared to normal ovarian tissues (63, 64). An interesting study revealed that the overexpression of ERRα elevated the levels of Snail and promoted EMT whereas specific inhibition of ERRα led to the suppression of Snail, upregulation of E-cadherin expression, and reduction in stem cell properties. It was found that the miR-200 family has a role in the post-transcriptional control of Snail mediated by ERRα. Inhibition of miR-200a/b was found to counteract the downregulation of Snail caused by ERRα depletion in vitro. Further, the silencing of ERRα in vivo led to a substantial decrease in tumor burden, ascites formation, and metastatic peritoneal nodules (138). In addition, Wang et al. reported that cordycepin, an antitumor compound inhibited ERRα (a co-TF associated with mitochondrial fusion), EMT, metastasis and migration of OVC cells by repressing their mitochondrial activity (139). However, more studies in the future could lead to a better understanding of ERR action in OVC.

GR is a glucocorticoid-activated receptor protein that belongs to the superfamily 3 of the NRs. It is encoded by a single gene, NR3C1 and is positioned at 5q31–32, and contains a highly conserved sequence (187). GRs are expressed throughout the human body and can regulate the transcription of various genes involved in development, metabolism, and inflammation by binding to various glucocorticoid response elements (GRE). Their effects on cancer cells vary depending on the cell type, making their use in cancer therapy context-dependent (198). However, in OVC, this receptor shows upregulated expression and has tumorigenic potentials (58, 144).

Several lines of evidence implicated that a synthetic glucocorticoid, dexamethasone (DEX) plays a vital role in regulating cell proliferation and survival in different OVC cell lines. For instance, Yin and colleagues revealed that DEX upregulated fibronectin and MUC1 resulting in enhanced cell adhesion and survival by upregulating PI3K/Akt pathway and survival genes in SKOV3 and HO-8910 cell lines (144). Another study reported that the treatment of OVC cell lines with DEX resulted in suppression of paclitaxel-mediated apoptosis. DEX upregulated two important pro-survival genes, serum and glucocorticoid-regulated kinase 1 (SGK1), and map kinase phosphatase 1 (MKP1)/dual specificity phosphatase 1 (DUSP1) (142). Further, these effects were evident in human trials, where pharmacological doses of DEX were administered to patients undergoing chemotherapy (142). In essence, these results suggest that activation of the GR may lead to an increase in anti-apoptotic gene expression in cancer patients, thus hindering chemotherapy-induced apoptosis (142). Accordingly, similar results were observed when OVC cells were treated with DEX in combination with carboplatin and gemcitabine. Here, DEX upregulated SGK1 and MKP1/DUSP1 and significantly suppressed carboplatin or gemcitabine-induced cell death. However, the treatment with GR antagonists, mifepristone, or CORT125134 partially abrogated this effect. Further, a significant decrease in tumor volume was observed when OVC xenografts were treated with carboplatin or gemcitabine along with mifepristone (143). These results suggested that antagonists of GR enhanced the sensitivity of GR-positive OVC cells to chemotherapy-induced cell death by impeding the GR-mediated cellular survival pathways (143). Furthermore, preclinical and clinical studies revealed that the selective GR modulation via relacorilant (a selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator), when used in combination with nab-paclitaxel, may result in enhanced efficacy of chemotherapy (146). Another study demonstrated that DEX inhibited the proliferation of 3AO cells in both time and concentration-dependent manner. Additionally, treatment with DEX resulted in an increase in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and a decrease in the expression of the CA125 tumor marker in 3AO cells. These findings suggested that glucocorticoids are critical regulators of 3AO cell proliferation and differentiation (140). Moreover, an in vitro study demonstrated that 3AO cells express functional GR that can be downregulated by DEX at both protein and mRNA levels (141). ORIC-101 (structure-based modified mifepristone), is a highly potent steroidal GR antagonist with reduced AR agonistic activity, making it suitable for use in AR-positive tumors. It has also shown an improved inhibition profile for CYP2C8 and CYP2C9, reducing the potential for drug-drug interactions. Unlike mifepristone, ORIC-101 can be co-administered with chemotherapeutic agents metabolized by CYP2C8, such as paclitaxel. Furthermore, ORIC-101 exhibited antitumor activity in vivo by enhancing the chemotherapy response in the GR-positive OVCAR-5 OVC xenograft model. Moreover, the safety and therapeutic potential of ORIC-101 is currently being evaluated in clinical studies (145). Taken together, these findings suggest a crucial role of GR in ovarian tumorigenesis, and effective interventions of GR at clinical levels could be a valuable therapeutic option targeting OVC.

Nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group D member 1 (NR1D1), also known as REV-ERBα, is a member of the nuclear hormone receptor family that plays a critical role in the regulation of various physiological processes, including metabolism, inflammation, and circadian rhythm (199, 200). Several studies over the years have uncovered the role of NR1D1 in the pathophysiology of cancer (201, 202). Wang et al. demonstrated that overexpression of NR1D1 suppressed proliferation and induced apoptosis of OVCAR-3 cells. Further, overexpression of NR1D1 remarkably downregulated JAK/STAT3 pathway by upregulating suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) 3 in both OVC cell lines and xenografts (147). However, more studies are warranted to validate the tumor suppressor function of this receptor in OVC.

Nur77, also known as NR4A1, NGFI-B, or TR3, is a member of the NR superfamily that has a role in the regulation of both the survival and death of cancerous cells (187, 203, 204). It is located at the 12q13.13 position of the chromosome (189). Nur77 is expressed throughout the body except in regions like the adipose tissue, bone marrow, liver, parathyroid gland, prostate, and spleen (190). It has been found that Nur77 signaling is dysregulated in numerous types of cancer and serves as a crucial target for cancer therapy (205). For instance, vitamin K2 treatment of PA-1 OVC cell line resulted in increased Nur77 expression in both the mitochondria and nuclei potentially implicating the induction of apoptosis mediated by vitamin K2, suggesting that this vitamin may possess therapeutic potential for the treatment of OVC (148). Another in vitro study showed that Nur77 is a crucial regulator of apoptosis and a key mediator of the response to cytotoxic chemotherapy, such as cisplatin, in OVC. Nevertheless, this study also suggested that upregulating Nur77 expression and promoting its nuclear export could represent a rational therapeutic strategy for counteracting cisplatin resistance in OVC (149). Another study reported that the expression of Nur77 is higher in ovarian tissue samples than in other tissues and the overexpression of this orphan NR is correlated with worse PFS. Besides, Nur77 expression showed heterogeneity among different high grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) cell lines and samples and showed localization in cytoplasm and nucleus (206). However, further research is crucial to understand the functional role of Nur77 in modulating ovarian tumorigenesis.

The PR or NR3C2 is a hormone-regulated TF located on chromosome 11 at q22 position and employs two different promoters to give rise to isoforms, PR-A and PR-B. The well-documented ligand of PR is progesterone (4-pregnene-3,20-dione) or P4 and both the ligand and its receptor play an inevitable role in the regulation of reproductive genes. Upon binding of ligand, PR dimerizes and enters the nucleus where it binds to progesterone receptor DNA-response element (PRE) and regulates the transcription of numerous genes (187, 198). Importantly, both the isoforms of PR are shown to be highly expressed in OVC issues than in normal ovaries and hence ligands/agents that target PR could act as potential therapeutic agents against this cancer (68).

Several lines of evidence have unequivocally proved that P4 binding to PR and the subsequent upregulation of this receptor have protective effects on cancer development (68, 91). Various studies have revealed that estrogen and its analogs greatly induce the expression of PR and increase the growth and proliferation of OVC cells (68, 91, 165). Besides, this hormone also induces tumor growth and volume in xenograft models. However, when OVC cells were treated with estrogen alone or combined with P4, cell proliferation, survival, and tumor growth were reduced significantly (68, 91). Another study demonstrated that tamoxifen and megestrol acetate (a progestin medication) substantially reduced tumor volume in PE04 cell xenografts (93). Another study reported that primary cell cultures derived from patients with EOC revealed that the isolated cells expressed ER and PR, with the ER positive/PR positive combination being the most prevalent. After a 72 hour culture period, both ER and PR expression levels declined. The survival rates of cells cultured in P4 appeared inversely correlated with PR expression, while reductions in 17-β-estradiol and testosterone levels in the cultures were associated with decreased cell survival. These findings suggest a significant impact of sex steroids on PR expression and the survival of ovarian epithelial tumor cells (162). Takahashi et al. demonstrated that treatment with cAMP activated the PR-B, leading to cellular senescence and suppression of tumorigenicity in SKOV (p16 and p53 null) OVC cells (163). Another study revealed that P4 safeguards OVC cells from cisplatin -induced apoptosis by activating the PI3K/Akt survival pathway and modulating the expression profiles of PGR and 1/2. Consequently, combining PI3K/Akt signaling inhibitors or a PGRMC antagonist with platinum-based chemotherapy could improve treatment outcomes and prognosis in OVC patients (164). Lima et al. showed that P4 enhanced the expression levels of a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs (ADAMTS) in lysates from ES2 cells, and in lysates and conditioned media from NIH-OVCAR-3 cells, suggesting P4 acts via the PR to regulate ADAMTS levels (1 and 4) in OVC cells (166). Another study reported that progestins and vitamin D exhibit a synergistic effect in reducing cell viability and inducing apoptosis in OVC cells. Progestins also inhibit calcitriol (CAL)-induced CYP24A1 expression through PR-dependent mechanisms, thereby prolonging CAL activity. This combination therapy of progestins and vitamin D warrants further investigation as a potential strategy to inhibit ovarian carcinogenesis (167). Additionally, another study highlighted the critical role of P4 and the presence of PRs in reducing disease progression in endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (168). Further, HGSOC tumors exhibiting weak PR-B expression were linked to increased platinum resistance and poor survival outcomes. In preclinical settings, P4 and PR-B expression enhanced the sensitivity of HGSC cells to cisplatin by promoting cisplatin-induced apoptosis. Furthermore, preclinical evaluations demonstrated that P4 treatment could re-sensitize platinum-resistant HGSC cells to cisplatin, suggesting this approach could be clinically valuable in enhancing the effectiveness of cisplatin therapy in the treatment and management of OVC (50). Although the role of PR in OVC has been elucidated, further research is required to identify agents that could modulate the PR expression as a viable strategy in the treatment of OVC.

PPAR, also known as nuclear receptor 1, group 3 has three isoforms PPAR α (NR1C1), PPAR β (NR1C2), and PPARγ (NR1C3), and regulates energy metabolism (187, 207). These isoforms are located at 22q13.31, 6p21.31, and 3p25.2 positions (https://www.genenames.org/data/gene-symbol-report/#!/hgnc_id/9232; https://www.genenames.org/data/gene-symbol-report/#!/hgnc_id/9235; https://www.genenames.org/data/gene-symbol-report/#!/hgnc_id/9236). PPARα is expressed throughout the body. PPARβ expression is found in regions like the liver, prostate, heart, and skeletal muscles. PPARγ is present in the regions like appendix, cervix, colon, epididymis, esophagus, oral mucosa, placenta, rectum, stomach, tonsil, urinary bladder, adrenal gland, duodenum, gallbladder, hippocampus, lung, salivary gland, skin, small intestine, thyroid gland, vagina, adipose tissue, bone marrow, breast, bronchus, caudate, cerebellum cerebral cortex, kidney, skeletal muscle, spleen, and testis (190). In addition, PPARs are significantly expressed in the immune cells, which displayed their crucial involvement in immune cell differentiation and fate determination (207). PPARα and PPARδ play a pivotal role in regulating genes associated with substrate delivery, oxidative phosphorylation, and the maintenance of energy homeostasis (207). On the other hand, PPARγ primarily governs lipogenesis and lipid synthesis, with the highest expression levels observed in white adipose tissue (207). PPARs also differ in ligand specificity, and response to agonists and antagonists (208). PPARs have emerged as promising therapeutic targets for a wide range of diseases, such as metabolic, autoimmune, and cancers, including OVC (208–213).

Studies have reported the upregulation of PPAR in OVC compared to adjacent normal tissues (66, 67). An intriguing study reported that the treatment of oroxylin A (OA), a phytochemical, upregulated the expression of PPARγ and inhibited both the migratory capacity and viability of SKOV3 cells. Further, OA induced apoptotic cell death and restored the expression of the PGRMC1/2 family in OVC cells (159). Leng and colleagues demonstrated that low-level exposure to mono(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (MEHP), a major toxicant from plastics activated the PI3K/Akt/NF-κB pathway in a PPARα-dependent manner, promoting OVC progression in both in vitro and in vivo (160). Several studies have reported that the treatment of PPAR modulators, such as ciglitazone, pioglitazone, troglitazone, clofibric acid, GW9662, GW6471 and rosiglitazone alone or in combination with other compounds like BPA, clioquinol, and DHA, resulted in multiple anticancer activities such as induction of apoptosis, necrosis and suppression of cell growth, viability, colony formation and glucose intake. These studies also showed that treatment of OVC cells with these compounds reduced tumor growth, inhibition of MMP-9, and COX-2 expression in pre-clinical settings in a PPAR-dependent manner (51, 67, 151–156). In addition, Hoffmann and team reported that BPA promoted the expression of apelin, which is an endogenous adipokine involved in the proliferation and migration of many cancers, in a PPARγ-dependent manner (158). However, a different study conducted by this team reported that BPA and its derivatives suppressed the expression of chemerin, another adipokine, thereby inducing the proliferation of OVC cells (51). Further, another study reported that the treatment of telmisartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker, resulted in the induction of apoptosis, activation of caspase-3, upregulation of PPARγ expression, and inhibition of cell growth and MMP-9 expression in HEY cells (157). Collectively, these studies suggest that targeting PPAR could result in several antitumorigenic effects leading to better management and treatment of OVC.

RAR belongs to the nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group B of the NR superfamily, which binds to ligands such as RA and its isomers. RAR has three isoforms RARα, RARβ, and RARγ located on chromosomes, 17q21.2, 3p24.2, and 12q13.13, respectively (189, 214). RARs and RXRs are both regulated by their natural ligand retinoids, which upon binding regulate the transcription of several important genes. The dysregulation of the RA signaling pathway is suggested to be the underlying cause of a broad range of malignancies, including OVC, leukemia, skin cancer, head and neck cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, renal cell carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, liver cancer, glioblastoma, and neuroblastoma (214). RARα and RARγ are expressed throughout the body, but the expression of RARβ is constricted to regions except parathyroid gland, duodenum, liver, kidney, prostate, ovary, heart muscle, adipose tissue, lymph node, tonsil, and bone marrow (190). Treatment of OVC cell lines either alone or in combination with retinoids, and their derivatives, forskolin, 8-Cl-cAMP, 6-[-(1-Admantyl)-4-hydroxyphenyl]-2-naphthalene carboxylic acid (AHPN/CD437), N-(4-hydroxyphenyl) retinamide (4HPR or fenretinide), N-(4-methoxyphenyl) retinamide (4MPR), PD153035, and 2-(6-carboxy-2-naphthalenyl)-2-(5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-5,5,8,8-tetramethyl-2-naphthalenyl)-1,3-dithione (MM11253) inhibited different hallmarks of cancer such as growth, proliferation, colony formation, and apoptosis (56, 169–173). For instance, OVC cells when treated with the combination of RA and 8-Cl-cAMP resulted in increased RARβ expression followed by a reduction in colony formation ability by initiating fragmentation of nucleosomes resulting in apoptosis, as evidenced by an increase in the expression of cleaved caspase-3 and PARP (170). Another study demonstrated that overexpression of RARα and RXRα resulted in significant growth inhibition in both SKOV3 and CAOV3 cells when treated with RA. This study suggests that RAR/RXR profiles could be valuable in determining the potential therapeutic benefits of RA or receptor-specific retinoid derivatives in treating OVC (56). Another study showed that the treatment of OVCAR-3 cells with EGFR inhibitor PD153035 resulted in cellular inhibition and the induction of RARβ expression through the demethylation of its promoter sequences (174). In addition, siRNA-mediated knockdown of RARγ led to decreased cell proliferation and colony number in OVC cells. Further, the knockdown of RARγ in A2780 xenografts resulted in decreased tumor weight and volume along with reduced expression of RARγ, Ki-67, and PCNA (49). Another study showed that RARβ is involved in reducing the proliferation of OVC cells and increasing the sensitivity of these cells to a synthetic retinoid derivative, N-(4-hydroxyphenyl) retinamide (4HPR or fenretinide), suggesting RARs might have a tumor-suppressing effect in ovarian tumorigenesis (172). Taken together, these results suggest that further research is needed to better understand the role of RARs in OVC, which could provide a more holistic picture of the mechanistic action of this receptor in ovarian tumor biology.

In 1990, Mangelsdorf et al. discovered RXRs as orphan receptors, initially identified without any known ligands (215). However, the high sequence similarity between RXRs and RARs, along with their capacity to activate various genes in the presence of all-trans RA, highlighted their close association with RARs (216). Subsequently, 9-cis-RA was identified as their natural ligand (22, 215). RXRs exist in three distinct isoforms in mammals: RXRα, RXRβ, and RXRγ, also known as NR2B1, NR2B2, and NR2B3. These isoforms are encoded by separate genes located on human chromosomes 9q34.2, 6p21.32, and 1q23.3, respectively (215). Several studies have demonstrated the role of RXRs in OVC development. For instance, Holmes et al. reported that there is a higher apoptotic index in OVC cells overexpressing RXRα than in parental cells (171). In addition, another study showed that resveratrol induced apoptosis in carboplatin-resistant OVC cells by elevating the levels of RXRα and downregulating sirtunin 1 expression (175). Further, another study revealed the responsiveness of OVC cells to all-trans RA treatment depends significantly on the expression levels and activity of RARs and RXRs, particularly RARα and RXRα. This study found that modulating the expression of these receptors in resistant cell lines can restore sensitivity to RA, leading to effective therapeutic strategies for this cancer (56).

VDR belongs to the NR subfamily 1 group I of the nuclear receptor superfamily located on 12q13.11 (189). Upon activation with endogenous ligands, VDR modulates the expression of its target genes by heterodimerizing with RXR isoforms that translocate to the nucleus and bind to the vitamin D response elements (217).

VDR regulates different cellular processes such as cell cycle progression, proliferation, growth, survival, apoptosis, etc., upon activation with its ligands alone or in combination, especially with 1α,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3, MT19c, calcitriol, progesterone, cisplatin, paclitaxel, carboplatin, and synthetic vitamin D analogs (48, 183, 185). For instance, treatment with 1, 25VD suppressed the growth of OVCAR-3 cells and induced cell cycle arrest by inhibiting Cdc2 kinase and cyclin B1 levels. In addition, GADD45 was identified as an immediate early response gene that mediated the inhibitory effects of 1, 25VD on cell growth and cell cycle progression (176). In addition, it has been reported that vitamin D3 inhibits the growth and migration of the A2780 cells by phosphorylating MAPK and Akt proteins. Besides, it also inhibited metastatic potential and induced apoptosis in murine teratocarcinoma cells. However, this study also showed that vitamin D3 stimulated the growth of normal embryonic stem cells. Therefore, this study suggests that vitamin D3 may inhibit the proliferation of malignant cells while potentially protecting normal stem cells crucial for development and tissue regeneration (180). Another study reported that the treatment of ES2 OVC cells with a combination of calcitriol and progesterone, induced VDR expression and suppressed cell proliferation along with abating the expression of TGF-β, SMAD signaling proteins, and CYP24A1 (48). An intriguing study showed that treatment of OVC cells with a combination of vitamin D and TGF-β1 to OVC cells resulted in the reversal of TGF-β1 induced EMT by restoring the E-cadherin coupled with decreasing α-SMA, N-cadherin, slug, MMP-2, and MMP-9 expression (186). Another study showed that the treatment of SKOV3 cells with VDR antagonist, MT19c exhibited decreased cell proliferation, increased cell cycle arrest, and induced caspase-dependent apoptosis. Further, it reduced the IRS-1/2 pathway and its downstream target genes by MAPK/JNK activation (177). In addition, another study showed that MT19c specifically targets the metabolic pathways of cancer cells, particularly by inhibiting fatty acid synthase (FASN) functions and disrupting de novo lipogenesis, which is a characteristic feature of cancer cell metabolism in both in vitro and in vivo (179). Another study demonstrated that treatment with progesterone and calcitriol led to the inhibition of IκBα phosphorylation, suppression of NF-κB activation, and reduced expression of NF-κB-regulated genes that promote metastasis. These findings suggest that progesterone and calcitriol could be effective in managing ovarian tumors (178). Ji et al. demonstrated that 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1α,25(OH)2D3) restricts the stem cell-like properties of OVC cells by upregulating the expression of VDR, promoting the cytoplasmic β-catenin expression, and suppressing the CD44 expression (181). Another study demonstrated that 1α,25(OH)2D3 enhances radiosensitivity in a VDR-dependent manner and activates the NADPH oxidase- ROS-apoptosis pathway. This suggests that combining 1α,25(OH)2D3 with radiation therapy could enhance radiosensitivity in ovarian cells, potentially offering a novel therapeutic strategy for this disease (182). Further, it was reported that the combined treatment of calcitriol and cisplatin in SKOV3 OVC cells resulted in enhanced antiproliferative, apoptotic, and anti-angiogenic effects compared to cisplatin alone (184). Collectively, these studies indicate that targeting the VDR with its modulators induces various anticancer effects, including apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, inhibition of cell growth, and reduction of tumor growth, suggesting it might positively impact the treatment and management of OVC.