Cervical cancer is a significant worldwide health issue, with over half a million women diagnosed each year. In high-income countries, the frequency has significantly reduced due to the widespread introduction of cervical screening programs (1). However, many women still die from cervical cancer, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, making it the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in women worldwide (2). For locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) plus brachytherapy is the standard treatment (3, 4). Compared to 2D (two-dimensional) brachytherapy, 3D (three-dimensional) brachytherapy has resulted in an improved tumor control rate and a reduction of radiotherapy’s adverse effects (5, 6). Approximately 4%–7% of females are born with malformations in their reproductive tract, and malformations combined with cervical cancer are rarer. There is no agreed-upon clinical treatment guideline or consensus due to differences in anatomical structure, making brachytherapy challenging. Our patient with a complete bicorporeal uterus and cervical cancer received radical concurrent chemoradiation followed by CT-guided 3D brachytherapy.

The 53-year-old female patient experienced a natural birth of twins in 1994 and underwent ovarian cyst removal in 2002, during which she was found to have a complete bicorporeal uterus. Menopause occurred at age 51 years and, in April 2022, she developed contact bleeding. In September 2022, she tested positive for human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 infection and was confirmed by pathological biopsy to have invasive squamous cell carcinoma. Probably because the tumor was small, her squamous cell carcinoma-associated antigen (SCC) test results were normal.

The total treatment time was 49 days. The total therapeutic dose for the patient’s brachytherapy target area and organs at risk (OARs) is detailed in Table 1 . After dose conversion and superposition of the patient’s external irradiation dose, the patient’s final HRCTV D90 EQD2₁₀ was 84.9 Gy, and IRCTV D90 EQD2₁₀ was 63.5 Gy. Rectum D2cc EQD2₃ was 66.03 Gy, bladder D2cc EQD2₃ was 75.57 Gy, sigmoid D2cc EQD2₃ was 63.93 Gy, and intestine D2cc EQD2₃ was 65.86 Gy. One year following the conclusion of the patient’s treatment, their MRI review showed complete remission ( Figure 1 ), with no observable adverse reactions.

CCRT combined with brachytherapy is the standard treatment for LACC. Intracavitary brachytherapy has less impact on OARs due to its high-dose gradient and is therefore essential for cervical cancer treatment. The key to successful brachytherapy is selecting a suitable applicator to achieve satisfactory dose distribution. Conventional applicators are designed for normal anatomical structures, and there are no individualized applicators for patients with reproductive tract malformations.

Female reproductive tract malformation refers to a variety of structural abnormalities in the fallopian tubes, uterine body, cervix, and vagina caused by abnormalities in different nodes during the development, fusion, and absorption of Mullerian canal. These abnormalities may consist of a solitary local anomaly, such as the mediastinum of the uterus, or a combination of abnormalities across multiple sites. The main categories of female reproductive tract malformations include the American Fertility Society Classification of Mullerian Tube Abnormalities (1988), the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology and European Society of Gynecological Endoscopy (ESHRE/ESGE) Classification of Congenital Abnormalities of the female reproductive tract (2013), the Vagino-Cervico-Uterine-Adnex-Associated Malformations Classification (2005), and the Embryological and Clinical Classification of Female genito-urinary system Malformations (2011 update). In this case, the ESHRE/ESGE classification was used, and the patient was identified as having a U3/b complete double uterus (8).

There is no standard radiotherapy protocol for cervical cancer patients with genital tract malformations. The target area of external irradiation includes all uterine bodies and the cervix, with other target areas and prescription doses remaining the same as those for conventional patients. Due to anatomical abnormalities, brachytherapy is challenging, resulting in variations in treatment plans. We reviewed relevant literature and found several similar case reports. H W LOO et al., aiming at a patient with double uterus and double cervix, adopted a brachytherapy program of bilateral alternating uterine cavity (9). Guler Yavas et al. applied a special vaginal mold to a patient with stage IIIA cervical adenocarcinoma with a double uterus and double cervix and performed pulsed brachytherapy with intertissue insertion (10). Platta et al. treated a case of stage IIB cervical adenocarcinoma of the mediastinal uterus with a Rotte-Y tandem and two domes (11). ChengzhiLei et al. used a vaginal mold for a patient with double uterine cervical clear cell carcinoma of stage IIB and administered two separate doses of 7 Gy on the left and right sides using a uterine tube plus insertion needle (12). C D LEE et al. performed 2D brachytherapy with bilateral uterine ducts on a patient with cervical squamous cell carcinoma with a double cervix and double uterus (13). Denise Fabian et al. treated a patient with a bicornis uterus using a ring applicator combined with an insertion needle (14). Abel Cordoba et al. applied a 3D-printed vaginal model to a cervical cancer patient with HWW (Herlin-Werner-Wunderlich) syndrome for intertissue implantation brachytherapy (15).

For this patient, the disease was at stage IIB, and the residual lesion was found in the cervix after external irradiation treatment. For regular patients, single tandems and double ovoids are viable options. Single tandem and Rotte-Y tandem cannot provide sufficient dose coverage due to the considerable spacing between bilateral uterine cavities. After a thorough discussion, we employed a novel treatment approach using common applicators, two CT-compatible tandems, and two CT-compatible ovoids for this patient. Given the large bilateral uterine distance, 30° tandems were selected. During treatment, one tandem was attached to the ovoids using connecting components, while the other was secured with tape and additional components. After filling the vagina with gauze, each applicator was securely fixed. The prescription dose line fully covered the target area and bilateral lower uterine segments, achieving satisfactory dose coverage with reliable consistency between sessions. After five sessions, the cumulative dose met the requirements for HRCTV D90 and IRCTV D90, and the OARs remained within acceptable limits. It should be noted that our therapy machine, the Flexitron-HDR, has a total of 10 channels. Only the fifth channel can connect to the tandem. Thus, our treatment plan had to be divided into two parts: in the first part, we plan to use channels 1, 3, and 5 to connect two ovoids and one tandem, and use channel 5 to connect another tandem after completing the first part of the treatment.

According to the ESHRE/ESGE classification method, the Rotte-Y tandem is suitable for cases of mediastinal uterus, conventional treatments are applicable for cases of uniangular uterus, and our method is recommended for patients with a double uterus. If the remaining lesion is too extensive or there is an abnormality in the uterus, interstitial treatment may be combined ( Table 2 ). Additionally, the utilization of 3D-printing technology can be considered to enhance the distribution of the emitter and improve dose coverage. This treatment offers several benefits: first, conventional applicators were selected, ensuring replicable evaluation and measurement, which can be carried out at treatment institutions of all tiers. Second, it does not increase patient injury compared to intertissue implantation. Finally, it provides a more flexible angle compared to the Rotte-Y tandem, allowing for satisfactory coverage of the uterine body with different tandem combinations. This method of treatment has some limitations. Patients with cervical stenosis or adhesion need dilation, as the double uterine duct diameter is larger and requires a certain cervical duct width to be treated. Additionally, the treatment plan needs to be divided into two parts due to the uniqueness of the uterine tandem connection tube. This theoretically will not cause a deviation in the therapeutic dose, but it increases the difficulty of treatment.

For people with endometrial cancer that cannot be operated on, radiation treatment increases the chance of survival (16). For the brachytherapy of endometrial cancer, the special Rotte-Y tandem is often selected (17). The technique we employed is suitable for administering brachytherapy to patients with endometrial cancer, particularly in institutions that do not provide the Rotte-Y tandem. We treated a case of inoperable endometrial cancer, and the combination of two 15° tandems and double ovoids achieved very satisfactory dose coverage without increasing the patient’s risk of injury or treatment difficulty.

The implementation of 3D brachytherapy technology and the availability of various applicator types provide more treatment options for patients with reproductive tract malformations. However, due to the diversity of deformities, the range of applicators currently in use is limited. Therefore, treating such patients often necessitates the use of multiple applicators in combination to achieve satisfactory therapeutic outcomes.

For cervical cancer patients with a complete bicorporeal uterus, the use of double tandems combined with double ovoids is a feasible treatment alternative that achieves adequate dose coverage without causing additional harm. This therapeutic approach may also be applicable to individuals diagnosed with endometrial cancer.

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

LD: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. ZZ: Writing – original draft. YC: Data curation, Writing – original draft. ZW: Data curation, Writing – original draft. BZ: Data curation, Writing – original draft. GM: Data curation, Writing – original draft. WY: Writing – review & editing.