AUTHOR=Lange Falko , Gade Richard , Einsle Anne , Porath Katrin , Reichart Gesine , Maletzki Claudia , Schneider Björn , Henker Christian , Dubinski Daniel , Linnebacher Michael , Köhling Rüdiger , Freiman Thomas M. , Kirschstein Timo TITLE=A glutamatergic biomarker panel enables differentiating Grade 4 gliomas/astrocytomas from brain metastases JOURNAL=Frontiers in Oncology VOLUME=Volume 14 - 2024 YEAR=2024 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/oncology/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1335401 DOI=10.3389/fonc.2024.1335401 ISSN=2234-943X ABSTRACT=The differentiation of high-grade glioma and brain tumours of an extracranial origin is eminent for the decision on subsequent treatment regimens. While in high-grade glioma, a surgical resection of the tumour mass is a fundamental part of current standard regimens, in brain metastasis, the burden of the primary tumour must be considered. However, without a cancer history, the differentiation remains challenging in the imaging. Hence, biopsies are common that may help to identify the tumour origin. An additional tool to support the differentiation may be of great help. For this purpose, we aimed to identify a biomarker panel based on the expression analysis of a small sample of tissue to support the pathological analysis of surgery resection specimens. Given that an aberrant glutamate signalling was identified to drive glioblastoma progression, we focused on glutamate receptors and key players of glutamate homeostasis.Based on surgically resected samples from 55 brain tumours, the expression of ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors and key players of glutamate homeostasis were analysed by RT-PCR. Subsequently, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify genes whose expression levels may be associated with either glioblastoma or brain metastasis. Out of a total of 29 glutamatergic genes analysed, nine genes presented a significantly different expression level between high-grade gliomas and brain metastases. Of those, seven were identified as potential biomarker candidates including genes encoding for AMPA receptors GRIA1, GRIA2, kainate receptors GRIK1 and GRIK4, metabotropic receptor GRM3, transaminase BCAT1 and the glutamine synthetase (encoded by GLUL). Overall, the biomarker panel achieved an accuracy of 88% (95% CI: 87.1, 90.8) in predicting the tumour entity. Gene expression data, however, could not discriminate between patients with seizures from those without.In conclusion, we have identified a panel of seven genes whose expression may serve as a biomarker panel to discriminate glioblastomas and brain metastases at the molecular level. After further validation, our biomarker signatures could be of great use in the decision making on subsequent treatment regimens after diagnosis.