<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Oncol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Oncology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Oncol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2234-943X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fonc.2024.1267625</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Oncology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Surgical, oncologic, and obstetric outcomes of radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: results from a retrospective cohort study at Brazil National Cancer Institute</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name>
<surname>Bellotti</surname>
<given-names>Jos&#xe9; Augusto</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2355877"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Gutierres</surname>
<given-names>Isabella Gon&#xe7;alves</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2383672"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Furtado</surname>
<given-names>Yara L&#xfa;cia</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/889441"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Patury</surname>
<given-names>Patricia</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Figueiredo</surname>
<given-names>Juliana de Almeida</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guitmann</surname>
<given-names>Gustavo</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1709646"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fiorelli</surname>
<given-names>Rossano Keppler Alvin</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2203119"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>da Silva</surname>
<given-names>Fernanda Campos</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Institute</institution>, <addr-line>Rio de Janeiro, RJ</addr-line>, <country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Rio de Janeiro State Federal University</institution>, <addr-line>Rio de Janeiro, RJ</addr-line>, <country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Department of Internal Medicine, University of Bras&#xed;lia</institution>, <addr-line>Bras&#xed;lia, DF</addr-line>, <country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
<institution>Department of Gynecology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro</institution>, <addr-line>Rio de Janeiro, RJ</addr-line>, <country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Berna Dilbaz, University of Health Sciences, T&#xfc;rkiye</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Marta Caretto, University of Pisa, Italy</p>
<p>Fulya Kayikcioglu, Health Institutes of Turkey (TUSEB), T&#xfc;rkiye</p>
<p>Patrice Mathevet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Switzerland</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Isabella Gon&#xe7;alves Gutierres, <email xlink:href="mailto:isabella.gutierres@ebserh.gov.br">isabella.gutierres@ebserh.gov.br</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn003">
<p>&#x2020;These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>08</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1267625</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>26</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>16</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2024 Bellotti, Gutierres, Furtado, Patury, Figueiredo, Guitmann, Fiorelli and da Silva</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Bellotti, Gutierres, Furtado, Patury, Figueiredo, Guitmann, Fiorelli and da Silva</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Objective</title>
<p>to analyze oncological, obstetrical, and surgical results of young early-stage cervical cancer patients who underwent radical trachelectomy (RT) surgery and wished to maintain their fertility.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methodology</title>
<p>a retrospective cohort study was carried out concerning cases attended at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute Gynecology Oncology Service. Patients who underwent RT between January 2005 and January 2021 were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>A total of 32 patients with median age of 32 years old, 62.5% of whom were nulliparous, were assessed. Concerning cancer type, 65.6% squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cases, 31.2% adenocarcinoma cases and 3.1% adenosquamous carcinoma cases were verified. Stage IA2 was evidenced in 12.5% of the patients and stage IB &lt; 4&#xa0;cm in 87.5%. Regarding surgical approaches, 68.25% of the patients underwent vaginal RT (VRT), 18.75%, abdominal RT (ART), 9.3%, the robotic radical trachelectomy (RORT) and 3.1%, video laparoscopy radical trachelectomy (VLRT). The median number of removed lymph nodes was 14, with only two detected as positive. Two cases of positive surgical margins were noted. A total of 3.1% intraoperative and 31.25% postoperative complications were observed, with cervical stenosis being the most common. The recurrence rate of the study was 3.1%, with a median follow-up time of 87 months, where 3.1% deaths occurred. The pregnancy rate of the study was 17.85% (5/28), with 54.5% evolving to live births and 45.5% evolving to abortion.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Radical trachelectomy is a feasible procedure presenting good oncological results and acceptable pregnancy rates.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>cervical cancer</kwd>
<kwd>trachelectomy</kwd>
<kwd>fertility preservation</kwd>
<kwd>gynecologic surgical oncology</kwd>
<kwd>pregnancy</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="0"/>
<table-count count="6"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="46"/>
<page-count count="8"/>
<word-count count="4839"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Gynecological Oncology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The diagnosis of early cervical cancer is still a major challenge. This type of cancer ranks fourth among the most common cancers and is the fourth cause of death from cancer in women worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>). In Brazil, this type of neoplasm ranks third among women, excluding cases of non-melanoma skin cancer. A total of 16,710 new cases were estimated to be diagnosed in 2022 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>).</p>
<p>In the United States, about 38.3% of new cervical cancer cases are diagnosed in women younger than 45 every year (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>). Many of these young patients are nulliparous or have incomplete families and wish to preserve their fertility. The management of this type of patient is a challenge for oncological gynecologists and should always be approached in a multidisciplinary manner. Surgeries in this regard comprise a therapeutic option for fertility preservation, including radical trachelectomy (RT) and conization/simple trachelectomy and, more recently, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by cervical resection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>). Embryo and unfertilized oocyte cryopreservation can also be carried out (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>). The indicated treatment varies according to disease staging, following International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) guidelines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>).</p>
<p>In this scenario, RT has been gaining ground as a safe alternative for cervical cancer treatment in women who wish to maintain their reproductive potential, with similar oncological results to hysterectomies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>). Therefore, RT, regardless of the access route, is currently considered the surgical treatment of choice for young early-stage cervical tumor patients who wish to preserve their fertility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>).</p>
<p>Radical trachelectomy surgery involves the removal of cervix, upper third of the vagina, and parametrium lymph nodes. The uterine body is preserved and the proximal vaginal stump is then sutured to the uterine body (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>). The performance of the cerclage is recommended. The term &#x201c;radical&#x201d; refers to parametrial resection. The amount of resected parametrial tissue is still a matter of controversy and a trend towards smaller resections is noted (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>).</p>
<p>The first RT was performed in 1987 by Daniel Dargent, through the vagina employing video laparoscopic lymphadenectomy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>). From this point onwards, trachelectomies began being performed through the abdominal (1993), total laparoscopic (2003) and robotic (2008) routes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>).</p>
<p>The criteria for RT are the presence histological type squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma, the desire to preserve the ability to conceive, age below 40, disease staging up to stage IA1 with lymphovascular invasion, IA2 or IB &lt; 4&#xa0;cm, negative lymph nodes and tumors preferably smaller than 2&#xa0;cm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>).</p>
<p>A low recurrence rate of about 3% is expected following RT (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>), with an estimated pregnancy rate of about 20%, according to Smith et&#xa0;al. in a systematic review (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>). Theses pregnancies are, however, associated with an increased risk of obstetric complications, including preterm delivery, premature membrane rupture and abnormal varicose vein bleeding at the uterovaginal anastomosis site (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>).</p>
<p>In this context, the initial hypothesis of this study is that RT presents similar oncological results to standard surgery, resulting in reasonable obstetric result.</p>
<p>The general objective of this study was to analyze oncological (overall survival and disease-free survival) and obstetric (pregnancy rate and live birth rate) outcomes in women undergoing surgical cervical cancer treatment. Secondary objectives included the analysis of factors associated to the surgical technique, such as surgical time, intra- and postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, number of removed lymph nodes and surgical margins.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Methodology</title>
<p>A retrospective cohort study was carried out concerning women undergoing surgical cervical cancer treatment at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute&#x2019;s (Instituto Nacional de C&#xe2;ncer, INCA) Gynecology Oncology Service from January 2005 to January 2021.</p>
<p>Patient diagnosis was based on uterine cervix biopsies or on conization specimens, and all cases were reviewed by the INCA&#x2019;s pathological anatomy service. The INCA&#x2019;s Gynecology Oncology Service Radical Trachelectomy criteria are depicted in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Brazilian National Cancer Institute Gynecology Oncology Service Radical Trachelectomy eligibility criteria.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Item</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Criterion</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Desire to preserve fertility</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Histological confirmation of an invasive tumor</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Histological types: squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Staging according to FIGO 2009: IA1 (with lympho-vascular involvement), IA2 or IB &lt; 4 cm</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tumor smaller than 20&#xa0;mm and located on the outer surface of the cervix</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Absence of lymph node or distant metastasis</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Data were obtained from INCA&#x2019;s electronic and physical medical records. The assessed variables were age, pregnancies, births and previous abortion, histological tumor type, tumor grade. FIGO stage system used was 2009 version.</p>
<p>because most of the patients were include before 2018 (84%). Surgical/oncological variables comprised surgery date, type of surgical approach, size of the residual tumor, number of removed lymph nodes, number of positive lymph nodes, surgical limits, the presence of lymphovascular invasion, intra- and postoperative complications, length of the patient&#x2019;s hospital stay, the need for adjuvant treatment, recurrence, and date of last consultation. Obstetric data on pregnancies, abortions and live births after surgery were also analyzed.</p>
<p>This project was approved by the Ethics and Research Committee and included in the Brasil Plataform under no. 49953415.1.0000.5258.</p>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Data analysis</title>
<p>A descriptive data assessment was carried out using central tendency measures for continuous variables and relative and absolute frequencies for categorical variables. Surgical time was presented as mean and standard deviation (SD). Other measures were demonstrated as median and range.</p>
<p>The R v. 3.4.4 and Jamovi v. 2.2.5 softwares were used for all statistical analyses. Fisher&#x2019;s exact test was applied for a comparative analysis between surgical techniques and categorical variables (<italic>i.e</italic>., pregnancy, complications, and recurrence). The Shapiro-Wilk test was applied to assess the distribution of continuous variables, such as duration of surgery and length of hospital stay. When normally distributed, the ANOVA test was used to compare variances between group means for each surgical approach. The Kaplan-Meier analysis could not be performed to assess survival, due to the small sample size. p values &lt; 0.05 were considered statistically significant in all analyses.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<p>A total of 32 patients who underwent RT were identified at INCA between January 2005 and January 2021. Patient and case characteristics are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Cancer patient and case characteristics.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="center">Characteristics</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="left">Age (years)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Means</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31 (19&#x2013;44)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Nulliparous</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20 (62.5%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="left">Tumor staging</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;IA2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4 (12.5%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;IB &lt; 4 cm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28 (87.5%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="left">Histological type</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Squamous cell carcinoma</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21 (65.6%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Adenocarcinoma</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10 (31.2%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Adenosquamous carcinoma</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1 (3/1%)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Surgical results</title>
<p>The median number of removed lymph nodes was 14. No compromised lymph nodes were identified in frozen sections during surgery, as per INCA&#x2019;s institutional routine. Although two cases (6.2%) presented positive lymph nodes in the final anatomopathological exam (paraffin), with indication of adjuvant radiotherapy, chemotherapy and brachytherapy. Lymphovascular invasion was identified in only three (9.3%) cases (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Relation of surgical findings and intra and postoperative complications.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="center">Result</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Number</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="left">Removed lymph nodes</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Median</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15 (5-30)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Positive</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 cases</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="left">Residual tumor size</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Median</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11 (2-25)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;&#x2264; 20 mm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19 (59.4%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;&gt; 20 mm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4 (12.5%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Not identified</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9 (28.3%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="left">Lymphovascular invasion</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Present</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3 (9.3%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Absent</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="left">Surgical margins</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Compromised</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2 (6.2%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Non-compromised</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Intraoperative complications</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (3.1%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="left">Post-surgical complications</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Cervical canal stenosis</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7 (21.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Ureterovaginal fistula</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1 (3.1%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Vesico-vaginal fistula</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1 (3.1%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Lower limb lymphedema</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2 (6.2%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Chronic pain</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1 (3.1%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Lymphocele</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1 (3.1%)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>A 3.1% (1/32) intraoperative complication rate and 40.62% (13/32) postoperative complication rate were noted, albeit with no statistical significance by Fisher&#x2019;s exact test when analyzing surgical approach effects (p=0.307).</p>
<p>Regarding intraoperative complications, a bladder injury was noted in one case, identified, and treated during surgery. The most frequent postoperative complication was cervical canal stenosis, observed in seven (21.88%) cases, followed by fistulas in two (6.25%) cases, comprising a ureterovaginal fistula and a vesicovaginal fistula. Furthermore, two persistent lower-limb lymphedema cases, one chronic pelvic pain case and one lymphocele case were observed, the latter two the same patient (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>No compromised surgical margins were identified in frozen section samples during surgery. Subsequent anatomopathological analyses however, identified compromised surgical margins in two (6.2%) cases, with hysterectomy complementation indicated.</p>
<p>Residual tumors in surgical specimens were identified in 24 cases (75%), with six (25%) presenting <italic>in situ</italic> neoplasia.</p>
<p>The following surgical approaches were employed: radical trachelectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy via abdominal approach (ART), vaginal approach with videolaparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy (VRT), robotic approach (TRRO) and radical trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy totally via videolaparoscopic approach (VLRT) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Radical Trachelectomy Route, number of cases (N) and surgical time.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="center">Surgery type</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">N</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Mean time (SD)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">Total</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">32 (100%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">248 (59)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Abdominal trachelectomy (ART)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6 (18.75%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">278 (68,09)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Robotic trachelectomy (RORT)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (9.38%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">260 (38,83)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Laparoscopic radical trachelectomy (VLRT)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (3.13%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">300 (-)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Vaginal trachelectomy and laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">22 (68.75%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">255 (57,16)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The mean surgical time was 248 minutes, detailed for each surgical route in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>. The surgical time data distribution was normal (P=0.154 by the Shapiro-Wilk test), so an ANOVA test was applied, indicating a non-statistically significant (p=0.286) difference between the mean times for the different surgical approaches. This indicates that the type of surgery (independent variable) does not significantly influence surgical time (dependent variable).</p>
<p>The median hospital stay for surgery was 4 days and the median post-surgery hospital stay was 3 days. The median hospital stays for each approach were as follows: for ART, 7 days, for VRT, 5 days, TRRO, 4 days and for the single VLRT case, 5 days. The hospitalization distribution data was non-normally distributed (P=0.05 by the Shapiro-Wilk normality test), so these values could not be compared.</p>
<p>The median of follow-up time was 87 months, with data collected up to May 2022. Three patients (9.3%) were lost during follow-up. Concerning the remaining 29 (90.62%) cases, one (3.4%) death and three (10.3%) completions with total hysterectomy were noted, as well as 10 (34.48%) institutional discharges after 5 years without evidence of recurrence, while 15 (51.72%) cases are still in follow-up (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">
<bold>Table&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T5" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Relation of oncological outcomes.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="center">Oncological outcomes</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">N = 29</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">Recurrence</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (3.4%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">Deaths</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (3.4%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">Adjuvant treatment</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (6.9%)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Oncological results</title>
<p>Only one recurrence and death case were observed after surgery in the present study. This case evolved with local recurrence and nodal and lung metastasis about 84 months after surgery. This case, without any adverse prognostic factors, was a grade II squamous cell carcinoma (CEC), with clear margins, 10 negative excised lymph nodes and no lymphovascular invasion. The patient was treated with six chemotherapy sessions with the administration of Carboplatin and Taxol, evolving to death 6 months after the beginning of palliative treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Obstetrics results</title>
<p>Of the 32 patients, four were excluded from the obstetric results, two due to hysterectomies and two for having undergone radiotherapy, brachytherapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy due to positive lymph nodes. A final fertility rate of 17.85% was observed, with five pregnant patients, two of whom were pregnant more than once, totaling nine pregnancies. Of these, four (45.5%) evolved to abortion and five (54.5%), to live birth. Of the five patients who became pregnant, three underwent VRT and two, ART. The pregnancy rate following VRT was 15.7% (three of 19 patients able to conceive) and following ART, 33.33% (three of six patients able to conceive), with zero for the other routes (P= 0.763, with a 95% confidence interval by Fisher&#x2019;s exact test). <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">
<bold>Table&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref> depicts the obstetric outcome data.</p>
<table-wrap id="T6" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Relation of obstetric outcomes.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Number of patients included</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">32</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Number of patients with fertility sparing who remained under follow-up</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28 (87.5%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Number of patients who became pregnant</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5 (17.85%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Obstetric outcomes</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Pregnancy rate</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">N = 9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;&#x2003;Abortion</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4/9 (45.5%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;&#x2003;Live birth</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5/9 (54.5%)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Fertility preservation in young early-stage cervical cancer patients is a challenge. Our study suggests that RT is an adequate approach from an oncological and obstetric point of view, corroborating American (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>), European (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>) and in Brazilian Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FEBRASGO) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>) guidelines as a therapeutic possibility for this type of patient.</p>
<p>Younger early-stage cervical cancer patients that wish to preserve their fertility have been reported previously in the literature. For example, Smith et&#xa0;al. in a 2020 systematic review, reported a median age of 31 for these patients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>), as did Kiss et&#xa0;al., Guo et&#xa0;al., Wethington et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>), similar to the age as reported herein. The fact that most patients are nulliparous seems to be common and is related to the desire to maintain pregnancy potential. Smith et&#xa0;al. and Kiss et&#xa0;al. reported 64.1%, 66.67% of nulliparous cases, respectively, similar to the 62.5% frequency reported herein (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>).</p>
<p>Regarding the FIGO 2009 staging classification, most cases in the present study were categorized as FIGO stage IB1 (87.5%), in line with Wethington et&#xa0;al., who reported 87% of patients in this stage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>), and Yoshino et&#xa0;al., who indicated 83.3% in their ART assessment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>). Bentivegna et&#xa0;al. reported 78% and 85% of VRT and ART patients in stage IB1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>) in a 2016 systematic review, while Smith et&#xa0;al, including VRT, ART and laparoscopic RT, reported 74.8% of patients in stage IB1 in a 2020 systematic review (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>).</p>
<p>Historically, more SCC cases are noted compared to other histological cervical cancer types, as was the case herein. Smith et&#xa0;al. indicated that most cases were diagnosed as SCC, at 68.5% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>), similar to Yoshino et&#xa0;al. in a retrospective cohort study, at 88.1% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>), the former similar to the SCC frequency of the present study, of 65.6%. Despite this, an apparent upward trend concerning adenocarcinoma cases is noted (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>), possibly due to the fact that cytology screenings are more effective in tracking precursor SCC lesions compared to adenocarcinoma (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>), and the fact that cytopathologists are now more experienced in detecting adenocarcinomas, which in the past were mistakenly diagnosed as SCC (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>).</p>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Surgical outcomes</title>
<p>The presence of lymphovascular invasion, despite not being a contraindication to RT, is considered a risk factor for nodal involvement and, therefore, a reserved prognostic factor (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>). Prevalence rates ranged from 8.2% to 55% in studies concerning the presence of lymphovascular invasion in trachelectomy specimens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>). In a meta-analysis, Feng et&#xa0;al. reported a 40.4% invasion rate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>), while a 6.6% lymphovascular space invasion rate was noted herein.</p>
<p>Small tumors are often excised completely during diagnostic conization. Thus, it is not uncommon for no tumor to be observed in surgical specimens following RT. The absence of residual tumors, similar to radical hysterectomy cases, seems to be associated with better prognoses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>). Plante et&#xa0;al., in a study of 72 VRT cases, indicated a 60% frequency of cases with no residual disease observed in surgical specimens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>). In the present study, eight (25%) cases with no residual surgical specimen tumors were detected. Among the patients that did present residual tumors in surgical specimens, the lesions ranged from 2 to 25&#xa0;mm, averaging 14&#xa0;mm. Feng et&#xa0;al., reported that 82.9% of all analyzed tumors in a meta-analysis were smaller than 2&#xa0;cm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>).</p>
<p>Assessing nodal status and surgical margins during surgery is paramount towards preserving fertility. The presence of disease-affected pelvic lymph nodes identified during surgery is a contraindication to RT (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>). In this regard, Plante et&#xa0;al. reported 10% nodal metastasis cases, with 36% of these identified only in paraffin, with subsequent radiochemotherapy indication (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>). Feng et&#xa0;al. reported 5.1% of positive lymph nodes following RT in a meta-analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>), while Kiss et&#xa0;al. indicated a median of 38 removed lymph nodes, ranging from 13 to 58 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>) an Malmstem et&#xa0;al, when assessing 28&#xa0;V RT cases, indicated a mean of 22 resected lymph nodes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>). In the present study, a median of 14 resected pelvic lymph nodes was noted, with a minimum of five and a maximum of 30. Two (6.2%) nodal metastasis cases were identified in the final anatomopathological examination. Adjuvant therapy with radiotherapy, chemotherapy and brachytherapy were then indicated.</p>
<p>When the surgical specimen displays compromised margins following the final anatomopathological analysis, a hysterectomy is indicated. Patients must, therefore, be informed of these possibilities before the surgery, through informed consent forms. Kiss et&#xa0;al. reported one case out of 18 that had to undergo a hysterectomy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>), and Wethington et&#xa0;al. reported 10 patients out of 101 who required hysterectomies due to compromised margins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>). In the present study, two hysterectomy complementation cases were observed, due to compromised endocervical margins.</p>
<p>Regarding route and surgical approaches, RT can be performed vaginally, abdominally, laparoscopically, or robotically. Smith et&#xa0;al. concluded in a 2020 systematic review that, although the literature is limited to case series and reports, oncological outcomes, such as recurrence, recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates, are favorable, with no significant differences observed between surgical approaches (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>). In a more recent systematic review conducted in 2022, Morice, Maulard, Scherier et&#xa0;al. reported a similar recurrence rate between the three approaches in FIGO 2018 stage IB1 patients, namely 4.7% vaginally, 2.4% abdominally and 5.2% laparoscopically (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>).</p>
<p>Abdominal RT presents several advantages, as it is performed by professionals in units that do not have laparoscopic technology, allows a wider parametrial resection and is the most indicated in cases with tumors between 2 and 4&#xa0;cm when compared to VRT, while disadvantages include lower fertility rates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>). It is possible that the wider paracervical tissue resection employed in this approach may impair patient fertility.</p>
<p>Minimally invasive approaches, <italic>i.e.</italic>, laparoscopic RT and robotic RT, have the advantages of avoiding abdominal incisions, with less postoperative pain, lower adhesion rates and intraoperative bleeding (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>). However, after the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer study (LACC <italic>trial</italic>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>), a prospective multicenter study that compared minimally invasive hysterectomies with abdominal hysterectomies in stage I cervical cancer patients, concerns were raised regarding the possibility of worse oncological outcomes.</p>
<p>Herein, only four minimally invasive surgery cases were observed, three RORT and one VLRT. One (33.33%) of the RORT cases required hysterectomy complementation, due to compromised surgical margins, while the other three cases do not present any sign of recurrence so far. As this is a very small sample size, no literature comparisons were possible.</p>
<p>Some advantages regarding the vaginal route are noted compared to other approaches, such as higher pregnancy rates and obstetric results associated with shorter surgery times (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>). As noted in the present study, the vaginal route is generally the most employed for RT (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>).</p>
<p>Regarding surgery time, the median surgery time reported by Smith et&#xa0;al. in a systematic review was 226 minutes, with the lowest duration noted for VRT, of 180 minutes. ART was conducted in 240 minutes and VLRT, in 272 minutes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>). These are similar to the median operating time observed in the present study.</p>
<p>Intra- and postoperative RT complication rates are relatively low and consistent with radical hysterectomy results. Feng et&#xa0;al. demonstrated no differences between RT and hysterectomy outcomes, reporting 15% vs 10% of intraoperative complications and 12.3% vs 14.7% of postoperative complications, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>).</p>
<p>Vieira et&#xa0;al. reported three intraoperative complications (3%): one bladder injury and one fallopian tube injury requiring unilateral salpingectomies in the minimally invasive group and one vascular injury in the ART group. These authors also reported postoperative complications such as urinary tract infections (11%), voiding dysfunction (5.4%), lymphocyst formation (4%), cerclage erosion (17.5%) and cervical stenosis (9%). Kiss et&#xa0;al. indicated one intraoperative complication, also a bladder injury, as well as 33% voiding dysfunction, 11% lymphoceles, 5% pelvic peritonitis, 5% wound infection, 5% cervical stenosis, 11% amenorrhea and 5% pelvic abscess. Guo et&#xa0;al. reported 3.5% of intraoperative complications, with one bladder and one intestinal injury and three vascular injuries. Regarding post-ART complications, a 35.7% rate was observed, with 9.8% voiding dysfunction, 3.5% cervical stenosis, 7.7% lower limb edema, 10.5% lymphocyst and 4.2% menstrual abnormalities. In the present study, 3.1% of intraoperative complications and 34.37% postoperative complication rates were noted.</p>
<p>One of the most common complications following RT is cervical canal stenosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>). In a systematic review on the incidence of cervical stenosis after trachelectomy, Li et&#xa0;al. reported a median incidence of 10.5%, ranging from 0 to 73.3%. The authors also indicated that the occurrence of stenosis varied according to the approach, cerclage and use of anti-stenosis devices. The highest cervical stenosis rate was observed following the ART route, at 11%. An 8.6% incidence was observed in cases where cerclage was performed, versus 3% in cases without cerclage (P&gt;0.005). This incidence decreased to 4.6% when employing an anti-stenosis device versus 12.7% (P&lt;0.001). Herein, seven out of 32 (21.9%) patients presented this complication. All were treated satisfactorily with cervical dilation. As a prevention for this complication, it is part of the INCA&#x2019;s service routine to introduce an anti-stenosis device immediately after surgery and leave it in place for about seven days.</p>
<p>The median hospital stay length following ART was 7 days, VRT, 5 days, RORT, 4 days and the single VLRT case, 5 days. These findings are in line with another series of ART cases, with a median hospital stay length of 8 days, ranging from 7 to 14 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>), and also with a VRT series, with 3.7 days, ranging from 1 to 9 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Oncological outcomes</title>
<p>Low recurrence rates are reported in the literature. Smith et&#xa0;al. reported rates from 0 to 9.9% in a systematic review (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>), while Feng et&#xa0;al. indicated a 4.8% recurrence rate, a 5-year disease-free survival of 94.9% and a 5-year overall survival of 95.7% in a meta-analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>). Maulard and Scherier et&#xa0;al. reported recurrence rates of 5.1%, 4%, 7.5% and 5.3% for VRT, ART, VLRT, RORT respectively, in a 2022 meta-analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>) and Salvo et&#xa0;al. reported a 4.8% of recurrence following ART and 6.3% following minimally invasive approaches (P=0.40) in a retrospective multicenter study concerning 646 cases, with disease-free survival rates at 4.5 years of 94.3% and 91.5% for ART and minimally invasive approaches, respectively. These authors also reported disease-free survival rates at 4.5 years of 99.2% for ART and 99% for minimally invasive approaches (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>). In the present study, only one recurrence case (3.1%) was observed. Survival analyses could not be performed due to the low number of cases. Simultaneous local and distant recurrence (vagina and cervical lymph node) were noted 84 months after surgery. This case was treated with six Carboplatin cycles alongside Taxol, but the patient died after 6 months. The patient was categorized as stage IB &lt; 4&#xa0;cm, with no lymphovascular invasion, compromised surgical limits or positive lymph nodes in the final anatomopathological examination. A 4&#xa0;mm residual SCC grade 2 tumor was detected.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Obstetrics outcomes</title>
<p>When it comes to obstetrics, pregnancy rates are reported as highly variable in the literature, probably due to different calculation methods, as this is influenced by the number of women trying to conceive among all patients undergoing conservative fertility treatment, or because of different variability rates between different approaches. In addition, the VRT approach is associated with higher pregnancy rates among the aforementioned routes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>).</p>
<p>Regarding pregnancies after abdominal radical trachelectomy, Kiss et&#xa0;al., Guo et&#xa0;al., Yoshino et&#xa0;al. and Li et&#xa0;al. reported pregnancy rates of 42.8%. 31.7%, 36.8%, 17.4% respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>). Wang et&#xa0;al. and Malmsten et&#xa0;al. revealed a rate of 78.9% and 58.6% of pregnancies, respectively, after the vaginal route approach (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>), while, Smith, in turn, indicated a median of 23.9% of postoperative pregnancies, with pregnancy rates of 37.8%, 10% and 9.2% following the vaginal, abdominal and laparoscopic routes respectively, in addition to 75.1% live births in a systematic review (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>). Zhang et&#xa0;al., on the other hand, in a meta-analysis, reported a 20.5% frequency (16.8%-24.5%) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>).</p>
<p>In the present study, a pregnancy rate of 17.85% was reported, comprising five out of 28 patients. Of the five patients who became pregnant, three (60%) had been submitted to VRT and two (40%) to ART. The pregnancy rate of each route was, thus, 15.7% for VRT (three of 19 patients able to conceive) and 33.33% for ART (two of six patients able to conceive), albeit with no statistical significance. Four patients were excluded, two who underwent hysterectomies and two, adjuvant treatment. Data regarding the real desire for pregnancy after treatment, however, could not be determined. Consequently, fertility rates were calculated for the total number of patients with preserved fertility, which may explain the lower rate observed herein compared to the literature.</p>
<p>Some factors may interfere with a patient&#x2019;s ability to conceive, such as adhesions following the abdominal approach, fallopian tube abnormalities, greater paracervical tissue resection and cervical canal stenosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>). Some reports also indicate Asherman&#x2019;s syndrome and ovarian failure after ART (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>). Furthermore, social, family and physical factors, as well as mental health issues, also significantly influence pregnancy rates and may be prevalent in patients undergoing RT (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>). As noted previously, a 21.9% cervical stenosis rate was reported herein and, although the patients were satisfactorily treated, this may have interfered with the pregnancy rate outcome.</p>
<p>Moreover, access to infertility and assisted reproduction specialists is scarce in Brazil, especially in the Unified Health System (<italic>Sistema &#xda;nico de</italic> Sa&#xfa;de, SUS) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>). In this study, as expected in this scenario, all patients who became pregnant became so spontaneously, which may explain the lower pregnancy rate compared to the literature. Furthermore, due to the urgency in beginning cancer treatment, no previous investigation about the reproductive potential of these patients was conducted.</p>
<p>It should also be noted that two of the five patients (40%) evaluated herein with abortion, a higher rate than reported in the literature. Both patients had undergone ART. One of them had three abortions and the other, one, totaling four (44.44% of nine pregnancies). Zhang et&#xa0;al. reported 24.0% (18.8%-29.6%) abortions after RT in a 2017 meta-analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>), Li, et&#xa0;al., 36.7% after ART (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>), Yoshino et&#xa0;al., 14.2% after ART (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>) and Smith et&#xa0;al., found a median rate of 23.9% and 24.3%, 24.4% and 42.9% for the vaginal, abdominal and laparoscopic routes respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>).</p>
<p>It is also important to note that deliveries should be performed via cesarean section in these cases, to avoid removing the prophylactic cerclage and circumvent cervical lacerations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>).</p>
<p>Abortions are relatively common, as well as premature labor and premature oval membrane rupture in RT patients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>). An early theory postulated that this was due to a lack of adequate blood flow to the uterus following uterine artery transection. Studies employing 3D computed tomography (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>) and magnetic resonance imaging (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">46</xref>) with contrast have demonstrated that artery ligation actually induces new arterial vascularization and does not affect fetal growth or placental function, suggesting preserved fertility. On the other hand, the amount of remaining cervical tissue may influence premature rupture, while the loss of the mucus plug is associated with loss of a protective barrier and a potential increase in pathogens.</p>
<p>Therefore, radical trachelectomy is a feasible option for young early-stage tumor patients who wish to maintain their fertility, with good oncological outcomes comparable to the gold standard treatment and reasonable obstetric results.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="ethics-statement">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The studies involving humans were approved by Comit&#xea; de &#xc9;tica em Pesquisa (CEP/HUGG) do Hospital Universit&#xe1;rio Gaffr&#xe9;e e Guinle. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants&#x2019; legal guardians/next of kin because we only use retrospective data, no harm to participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>IG: Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. JB: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; original draft. YdM: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. PP: Funding acquisition,&#xa0;Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. JF: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. GG: Funding&#xa0;acquisition, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. RF: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. FdS:&#xa0;Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bray</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ferlay</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Soerjomataram</surname> <given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Siegel</surname> <given-names>RL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Torre</surname> <given-names>LA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jemal</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries</article-title>. <source>CA Cancer J Clin</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>68</volume>:<fpage>394</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>424</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3322/caac.21492</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label>
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>Incid&#xea;ncia</collab>
</person-group>. Available at: <uri xlink:href="https://www.inca.gov.br/controle-do-cancer-do-colo-do-utero/dados-e-numeros/incidencia">https://www.inca.gov.br/controle-do-cancer-do-colo-do-utero/dados-e-numeros/incidencia</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>National Cancer Institute</collab>
</person-group>. <source>Cervical Cancer - Cancer Stat Facts</source>. <publisher-name>SEER Cancer Stat Facts: Cervical Cancer</publisher-name>. <publisher-loc>United States of America</publisher-loc>. (<year>2017</year>). Available at: <uri xlink:href="https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/cervix.html">https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/cervix.html</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Morice</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maulard</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scherier</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sanson</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zarokian</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zaccarini</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Oncologic results of fertility sparing surgery of cervical cancer: An updated systematic review</article-title>. <source>Gynecol Oncol</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>165</volume>:<page-range>169&#x2013;83</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.01.023</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Somigliana</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mangili</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martinelli</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Noli</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Filippi</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bergamini</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Fertility preservation in women with cervical cancer</article-title>. <source>Crit Rev Oncol Hematol</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>154</volume>:<fpage>1&#x2013;13</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103092</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bhatla</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aoki</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>DN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sankaranarayanan</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Cancer of the cervix uteri</article-title>. <source>Int J Gynecol Obstet</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>143</volume>:<fpage>22</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>36</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ijgo.12611</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Prodromidou</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Iavazzo</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fotiou</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Psomiadou</surname> <given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Douligeris</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vorgias</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Short- and long term outcomes after abdominal radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Arch Gynecol Obstet</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>300</volume>:<fpage>25</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>31</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00404-019-05176-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cibula</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>P&#xf6;tter</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Planchamp</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Avall-Lundqvist</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fischerova</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haie Meder</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>The european society of gynaecological oncology/european society for radiotherapy and oncology/european society of pathology guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer</article-title>. <source>Int J Gynecol Cancer</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>28</volume>:<page-range>641&#x2013;55</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/IGC.0000000000001216</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>RR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tergas</surname> <given-names>AI</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>JY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Clair</surname> <given-names>CMS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Neugut</surname> <given-names>AI</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Trends in use and survival associated with fertility-sparing trachelectomy for young women with early-stage cervical cancer</article-title>. <source>Vol. 131 Obstetrics Gynecology</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>p</volume>:<page-range>1085&#x2013;94</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/AOG.0000000000002613</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Berek</surname> <given-names>JS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kraus</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Professor</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berek</surname> <given-names>DL</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <source>Berek &amp; Novak&#x2019;s Gynecology (Berek and Novak&#x2019;s Gynecology)</source>. <edition>16th ed</edition>. <publisher-loc>Philadephia</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Wolters Kluwer Health</publisher-name> (<year>2020</year>) p. <page-range>1557&#x2013;89</page-range>. Available at: <uri xlink:href="https://lccn.loc.gov/2018052861">https://lccn.loc.gov/2018052861</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>XL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>XX</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>GS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ju</surname> <given-names>DD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Narrowing resection of parametrial tissues is feasible in low-risk cases of stage IA2-IB1 cervical cancer</article-title>. <source>J Cancer</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>1481</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7150/jca.15466</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dargent</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sacchetoni</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mathevet</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Laparoscopic vaginal radical trachelectomy: a treatment to preserve the fertility of cervical carcinoma patients</article-title>. <source>Cancer</source>. (<year>2000</year>) <volume>88</volume>:<page-range>1877&#x2013;82</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000415)88:8&lt;1877::AID-CNCR17&gt;3.0.CO;2-W</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Persson</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kannisto</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bossmar</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Robot-assisted abdominal laparoscopic radical trachelectomy</article-title>. <source>Gynecol Oncol</source>. (<year>2008</year>) <volume>111</volume>:<page-range>564&#x2013;7</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.05.034</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pecorelli</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium</article-title>. <source>Int J gynaecology obstetrics</source>. (<year>2009</year>) <volume>105</volume>:<page-range>103&#x2013;4</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.012</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>ES</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moon</surname> <given-names>AS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>O&#x2019;Hanlon</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leitao</surname> <given-names>MM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sonoda</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abu-Rustum</surname> <given-names>NR</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Radical trachelectomy for the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review</article-title>. <source>Obstet Gynecol</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>136</volume>:<page-range>533&#x2013;42</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/AOG.0000000000003952</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lou</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The security of radical trachelectomy in the treatment of IA&#x2013;IIA cervical carcinoma requires further evaluation: updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis</article-title>. <source>Arch Gynecol Obstet</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>299</volume>:<page-range>1525&#x2013;36</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00404-019-05141-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kasuga</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ikenoue</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tanaka</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ochiai</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Management of pregnancy after radical trachelectomy</article-title>. <source>Gynecol Oncol</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>162</volume>:<page-range>220&#x2013;5</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.04.023</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label>
<citation citation-type="web">
<article-title>Treatment by cancer type</article-title>. Available at: <uri xlink:href="https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1">https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fernandes</surname> <given-names>CE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de S&#xe1;</surname> <given-names>MFS</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <source>Tratado de Ginecologia FEBRASGO</source>. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>de Janeiro</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, editor. <publisher-loc>Rio de Janeiro</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Elsevier Editora Ltda</publisher-name> (<year>2019</year>) p. <page-range>2312&#x2013;46</page-range>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kiss</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fandi</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cozlea</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gheorghe</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stanca</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bacalba&#x15f;a</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Abdominal radical trachelectomy as fertility-sparing management for early stages of cervical cancer: Our experience in 18 cases</article-title>. <source>Exp Ther Med</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>22</volume>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/etm.2021.10106</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sheng</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Surgical and oncologic outcomes of radical abdominal trachelectomy versus hysterectomy for stage IA2-IB1 cervical cancer</article-title>. <source>J Minim Invasive Gynecol</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>26</volume>:<page-range>484&#x2013;91</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmig.2018.06.006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wethington</surname> <given-names>SL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cibula</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duska</surname> <given-names>LR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garrett</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>CH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chi</surname> <given-names>DS</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>An international series on abdominal radical trachelectomy 101 patients and 28 pregnancies</article-title>. <source>Int J Gynecol Cancer</source>. (<year>2012</year>) <volume>22</volume>:<page-range>1251&#x2013;7</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/IGC.0b013e318263eee2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yoshino</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kobayashi</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kodama</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hashimoto</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ueda</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sawada</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Oncological and reproductive outcomes of abdominal radical trachelectomy</article-title>. <source>Anticancer Res</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>40</volume>:<page-range>5939&#x2013;47</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21873/anticanres.14615</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bentivegna</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gouy</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maulard</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chargari</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leary</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morice</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Oncological outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for cervical cancer: a systematic review</article-title>. <source>Lancet Oncol [Internet]</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>17</volume>:<page-range>e240&#x2013;53</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30032-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Adegoke</surname> <given-names>O</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kulasingam</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Virnig</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Cervical cancer trends in the United States: A 35-year population-based analysis</article-title>. <source>J Women&#x2019;s Heal</source>. (<year>2012</year>) <volume>21</volume>:<page-range>1031&#x2013;7</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/jwh.2011.3385</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Castanon</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Landy</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sasieni</surname> <given-names>PD</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Is cervical screening preventing adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix</article-title>. <source>Int J Cancer</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>139</volume>:<page-range>1040&#x2013;5</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ijc.30152</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>HO</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tiffany</surname> <given-names>MF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qualls</surname> <given-names>CR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Key</surname> <given-names>CR</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The rising incidence of adenocarcinoma relative to squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix in the United States - A 24-year population-based study</article-title>. <source>Gynecol Oncol</source>. (<year>2000</year>) <volume>78</volume>:<fpage>97</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>105</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/gyno.2000.5826</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pol</surname> <given-names>FJM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zusterzeel</surname> <given-names>PLM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Van Ham</surname> <given-names>MAPC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuijpers</surname> <given-names>DAT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bulten</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Massuger</surname> <given-names>LFAG</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Satellite lymphovascular space invasion: An independent risk factor in early stage cervical cancer</article-title>. <source>Gynecol Oncol</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>138</volume>:<page-range>579&#x2013;84</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.06.035</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Weyl</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Illac</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lusque</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leray</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vaysse</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martinez</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Prognostic value of lymphovascular space invasion in early-stage cervical cancer</article-title>. <source>Int J Gynecol Cancer</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>30</volume>:<page-range>1493&#x2013;9</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/ijgc-2020-001274</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stolnicu</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boros</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hoang</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Almadani</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>De Brot</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baiocchi</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>FIGO 2018 stage IB endocervical adenocarcinomas: an international study of outcomes informed by prognostic biomarkers</article-title>. <source>Int J Gynecol Cancer</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>31</volume>:<page-range>177&#x2013;84</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/ijgc-2020-001893</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gil-Iba&#xf1;ez</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gil-Moreno</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Torn&#xe9;</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jimenez</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gorostidi</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zapardiel</surname> <given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Tumor size and oncological outcomes in patients with early cervical cancer treated by fertility preservation surgery: A multicenter retrospective cohort study</article-title>. <source>Cancers (Basel)</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>1&#x2013;10</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/cancers14092108</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<label>32</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Casarin</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buda</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bogani</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fanfani</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Papadia</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ceccaroni</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Predictors of recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A multi-institutional study</article-title>. <source>Gynecol Oncol</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>159</volume>:<page-range>164&#x2013;70</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.06.508</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<label>33</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Plante</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Renaud</surname> <given-names>MC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fran&#xe7;ois</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roy</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Vaginal radical trachelectomy: an oncologically safe fertility-preserving surgery. An updated series of 72 cases and review of the literature</article-title>. <source>Gynecol Oncol</source>. (<year>2004</year>) <volume>94</volume>:<page-range>614&#x2013;23</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.05.032</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<label>34</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Malmsten</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hellberg</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bergmark</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dahm-K&#xe4;hler</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Long-term fertility, oncological, and quality-of-life outcomes after trachelectomy in early stage cervical cancer</article-title>. <source>Arch Gynecol Obstet</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>299</volume>:<page-range>1033&#x2013;41</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00404-018-4972-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<label>35</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vieira</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rend&#xf3;n</surname> <given-names>GJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Munsell</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Echeverri</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frumovitz</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schmeler</surname> <given-names>KM</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A comparison of laparotomy and minimally invasive surgery</article-title>. <source>Gynecol Oncol</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>138</volume>:<page-range>585&#x2013;9</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.06.023</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<label>36</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ramirez</surname> <given-names>PT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frumovitz</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pareja</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lopez</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vieira</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ribeiro</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer</article-title>. <source>N Engl J Med</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>379</volume>:<page-range>1895&#x2013;904</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1056/NEJMoa1806395</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<label>37</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ju</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Reproductive and obstetric outcomes after abdominal radical trachelectomy (ART) for patients with early-stage cervical cancers in Fudan, China</article-title>. <source>Gynecol Oncol</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>157</volume>:<page-range>418&#x2013;22</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.02.016</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<label>38</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Incidence, risk factors and treatment of cervical stenosis after radical trachelectomy: A systematic review</article-title>. <source>Eur J Cancer</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>51</volume>:<page-range>1751&#x2013;9</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejca.2015.05.012</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<label>39</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Salvo</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ramirez</surname> <given-names>PT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leitao</surname> <given-names>MM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cibula</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Falconer</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Open vs minimally invasive radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: International Radical Trachelectomy Assessment Study</article-title>. <source>Am J Obstet Gynecol</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>226</volume>:<fpage>97.e1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>97.e16</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.029</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<label>40</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Multicenter research on tumor and pregnancy outcomes in patients with early-stage cervical cancer after fertility-sparing surgery</article-title>. <source>J Int Med Res</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>47</volume>:<page-range>2881&#x2013;9</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0300060519845974</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<label>41</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kanis</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Oncologic and obstetrical outcomes with fertility-sparing</article-title>. <source>Oncotarget</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>8</volume>:<page-range>46580&#x2013;92</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18632/oncotarget.16233</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<label>42</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Egashira</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hiasa</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yokota</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kawamura</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matsushita</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Okugawa</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Infertility after abdominal trachelectomy</article-title>. <source>Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>97</volume>:<page-range>1358&#x2013;64</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/aogs.13429</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<label>43</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zang</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ju</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Radical abdominal trachelectomy for cervical Malignancies: Surgical, oncological and fertility outcomes in 62 patients</article-title>. <source>Gynecol Oncol</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>121</volume>:<page-range>565&#x2013;70</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.01.032</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<label>44</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>de Souza M do</surname> <given-names>CB</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Latin America and access to assisted reproductive techniques: A Brazilian perspective</article-title>. <source>J Bras Reprod Assist</source>. (<year>2014</year>) <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>47</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>51</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5935/1518-0557.20140004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<label>45</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Umemura</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ishioka</surname> <given-names>SI</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Endo</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baba</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ezaka</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Naga-Sawa</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Changes of uterine blood flow after vaginal radical trachelectomy (VRT) in patients with early-stage uterine invasive cervical cancer</article-title>. <source>Int J Med Sci</source>. (<year>2010</year>) <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>260</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7150/ijms.7.260</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<label>46</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Makino</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kato</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Furui</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hayasaki</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morishige</surname> <given-names>Ki</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kanematsu</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Assessment of uterine enhancement rate after abdominal radical trachelectomy using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging</article-title>. <source>Arch Gynecol Obstet</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>293</volume>:<page-range>625&#x2013;32</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00404-015-3842-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>