Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide according to the latest data from the World Health Organization (WHO). In 2020, there were an estimated 9.9 million cancer-related deaths globally (1). The solid tumor environment, also known as the tumor microenvironment, refers to the surrounding cellular and non-cellular components that interact with and influence the behavior of solid tumors. It is a complex ecosystem that plays a crucial role in tumor growth, progression, and response to therapy. The solid tumor environment consists of various components, including cancer cells, stromal cells, immune cells, blood vessels, the extracellular matrix (ECM), and signaling molecules.

Solid tumors are composed of cancer cells that have undergone genetic alterations, enabling them to divide and grow uncontrollably. These cancer cells interact with other cells and components within the tumor environment. Additionally, stromal cells are also non-cancerous cells present in the tumor environment. This subset includes cancer-associated fibroblasts, which provide structural support to the tumor, produce extracellular matrix proteins, and secrete growth factors that can promote tumor growth (2). Other stromal cells, such as adipocytes and pericytes, may also be found in the tumor environment. The involvement of endothelial cells in cancer is primarily related to tumor angiogenesis, which is the formation of new blood vessels to supply nutrients and oxygen to the growing tumor.

The immune system plays a critical role in recognizing and eliminating cancer cells, thereby exerting a significant influence on the composition of the tumor environment. The involvement of endothelial cells in cancer is primarily related to tumor angiogenesis, whichis the formaAon of new blood vessels to supply nutrients and oxygen to the growing tumor. In response to the presence of cancer cells, immune cells, such as T cells, B cells, natural killer (NK) cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages, infiltrate the tumor microenvironment. This infiltration can be influenced by the chemotactic signals and interactions between cancer cells, stromal cells, and immune cells (3). Despite immune cell infiltration, tumors can create an immunosuppressive microenvironment. Tumor cells and stromal cells release factors, such as cytokines and chemokines, that inhibit immune cell activity and promote the recruitment of immunosuppressive cells. Regulatory T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and tumor-associated macrophages are examples of immune cells with suppressive functions that can be found in the tumor microenvironment.

The solid tumor microenvironment is also intrinsically shaped by the presence of vascularization, which is essential in providing the blood supply that is needed for the growth and survival of solid tumors. Blood vessels within the solid tumor environment deliver oxygen, nutrients, and growth factors to the tumor cells. The formation of new blood vessels, known as angiogenesis, is a crucial process in solid tumor development (4). However, the tumor vasculature can be abnormal, leading to inadequate blood flow and oxygenation in some regions of the tumor.

Additionally, the ECM significantly influences the solid tumor microenvironment. As a regulated mechanism comprising of network of proteins, carbohydrates, and other structural and support molecules, ECM remodeling in solid tumors has been demonstrated to exert profound effects on tumor behavior (5). The modified ECM can promote tumor cell migration, enhance tumor cell invasion into surrounding tissues, and facilitate metastasis. Furthermore, the tumor microenvironment contains various signaling molecules, including growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines, which further enhance tumor cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and angiogenesis.

Within the heterogenous tumor environment, a subset of cells, known as cancer stem cells (CSCs), are believed to play a key role in tumor growth, recurrence, and resistance to therapy. Studies have shown that the percentage of CSCs in a tumor can range from less than 1% to more than 50%, depending on the cancer type and stage (6). Based on decade-long studies, CSCs are thought to be especially important for the development and treatment of cancer clinically. However, it is unclear on the how, when, and where CSCs originate, and this remains a continuous research subject. One hypothesis is that the CSCs developed from cellular reprogramming, a process by which cells lose their original identity and acquire a different cell fate (7). In some cases, CSCs can also be differentiated into other cell types, which can contribute to tumor heterogeneity and tumor progression (7). Yamanaka factors can also induce the formation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), which have some similarities to CSCs and can be used to reprogram CSCs (8). Several studies have shown that the overexpression of Yamanaka factors in cancer cells can induce a stem-like state, which is associated with increased tumorigenicity and drug resistance (8–10). This suggests that there may be a link between the reprogramming of cells to a pluripotent state and the acquisition of stem-like properties in cancer cells that increase their metastatic behavior.

Another important environmental factor, hypoxia, which refers to a deficiency in the amount of oxygen reaching the tissues, has been found to be related to the regulation of Yamanaka factors (11). Studies have shown that hypoxia can induce the expression of Yamanaka factors in cells, which can lead to the reprogramming of cells into a pluripotent state (11, 12). Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) is a transcription factor that is activated under conditions of hypoxia, and it has been found to regulate the expression of Yamanaka factors in response to low oxygen levels (13). Furthermore, the activation of HIF-1 has been shown to be important for the survival and self-renewal of CSCs, which are thought to be responsible for tumor initiation, progression, and resistance to therapy (13). It has been suggested that the upregulation of Yamanaka factors in response to hypoxia may contribute to the maintenance of CSCs and the development of tumors.

Here, we first review different theories that illuminate the heterogeneity of how CSCs can arise and how a hypoxic environment can be involved in promoting CSCs. Secondly, we will review the commitment of Yamanaka factors as inducers of stem-cell like qualities seen in CSCs. Additionally, the unique interaction between CSCs and the extracellular matrix will be discussed in the context of CSC’s ability to significantly increase metastatic behavior. Lastly, we discuss how reprogramming can be used as a possible therapeutic strategy in CSC treatment.

“Omnis ellula e cellular (every cell stems from another cells).” This aphorism originated from Rudolf Virchow, a German physician whose publication made a major contribution to the cell theory in 1855. Virchow proposed that some tumors arise from embryonic-like cells with properties that are similar to stem cells (14). Over a century later, the existence of CSCs was identified in human acute myeloid leukemia (15). This was followed by the discovery of CSCs within a solid breast tumor environment (16). In 2006, Shinya Yamanaka, a stem cell researcher, discovered that adult somatic cells can undergo cellular reprogramming into an embryonic-like pluripotent state through transcription factors known collectively as Yamanaka factors (OCT3/4, SOX2, KLF4, and c-MYC) (17). Multiple studies have implicated that CSCs share critical properties with embryonic cells through the elevated expression of Yamanaka factors, which supports the impact of these pluripotency factors in tumorigenesis (18, 19). Considering these recent discoveries however, it is still not clear how CSCs arise in the tumor environment. It is important to note that the CSC population can change over time, as cells undergo genetic mutations or epigenetic changes that alter their properties. Additionally, the tumor microenvironment, which includes cells and molecules surrounding the tumor, can influence the behavior of CSCs and their ability to proliferate and differentiate.

The stem cell theory of cancer ( Figure 1A ) includes two major concepts: 1) cancer arises from stem cells that are present in the tissues of both children and adults; and 2) cancer cells originate from the cells of normal tissues, including stem cells, proliferating cells, and terminally differentiated cells (20). In each of the hypothesis on the origin of cancer, including field theory, chemical carcinogenesis, infection, mutation, and genetic change, stem cells are considered to be the core generator of cancer. According to the stem cell theory, cancer originates from the arrest in the maturation of stem cells. Additionally, CSCs and/or cancer cells can give rise and/or be composed of cells found in normal tissues including stem cells, transit amplifying cells, and terminally differentiated cells. Observations on the origins of teratocarcinomas and hepatocellular carcinomas led to another hypothesis where cancers arise due to arrest in stem cell maturation (21). Within the same decade, tumor transplantation studies supported the theory that cancer was maintained by a small population of stem-like cells (22, 23).

More currently, the somatic stem cell hypothesis ( Figure 1B ) suggests that mutation or chromosomal rearrangements in dormant stem cells could lead to CSC formation (24). Somatic stem cells have three stable features: 1) they generate identical cells and have long term self-renewal; 2) their progeny differentiates to functional, specialized cells; and 3) they faithfully respond to homeostatic controls within their environment (24). In contrast, CSCs undergo aberrant differentiation and do not respond to homeostatic controls as they undergo self-renewal (25).

With respect to carcinogenesis, the Cell Reversal Theory ( Figure 1C ) refers to a carcinogenic event on the cell and/or its environment that causes the cell to transition to a different epigenetic state, leading to abnormal proliferation in the absence of homeostatic controls (26). As a result, the cell enters into a deviant epigenetic program and becomes a CSC according to environmental influences and its stage of development (26). Given that there is a plethora of epigenetic states, it is more probable that a small fraction of these transitioning cells survives and selects an evolutionary advantageous route, the stem cell or pluripotent route, rather than waiting on the correct and successive environmental inputs that lead to enhanced proliferation, therapy resistance, and invasion (26).

Another hypothesis relating to breast cancer pathology is the stem cell misplacement theory ( Figure 1D ), which states that misplaced epithelial stem cells arrive in the wrong connective tissue stroma which leads to invasive cancer, known as an in situ carcinoma (27). Thus, the seed of the cancer, which is a misplaced, normal epithelial stem cell, can migrate to basement membrane due to leakage or trauma. This epithelial stem cell could be identified as a foreign invader by the immune system or it could escape the immune system, ensuring its survival without triggering an immune response. Environmental factors within the basement membrane, including inflammation, trauma, aging, and degeneration, create favorable conditions for the mislocalization of normal epithelial stem, thereby increasing the probability of stem cell arrest and development of invasive cancer. This hypothesis is based on evidence that ductal carcinoma in situ has a higher frequency of HER2 gene amplification/overexpression (50-60%) compared to invasive breast cancer (20-30%) (27). However, it was noted that when the invasive breast cancer was mixed with ductal carcinoma in situ, the invasive cancer cells were HER2-negative while the ductal carcinoma in situ was HER2-positive. This indicated that HER2 amplification/overexpression had no advantage compared to HER2-negative in developing into an invasive cancer type (27). Overall, most theories agree that CSCs emerge as a result of accumulated epigenetic and/or genetic alterations arising from normal stem cells or cancer cells while fewer evidence suggest a “wrong place, wrong time” idiom scenario in in situ carcinoma.

Which arose first, the cancer cell or the CSC? To illuminate this question, tumor cells can arise either from transformed differentiated cells or transformed resident stem cells (28, 29). Transformation is likely to arise from environmental inputs such as tissue regeneration (30), infections (31), toxins (32), as well as intrinsic and non-intrinsic factors that lead to DNA mutations (33). As the transformation process progresses in differentiated cells, oncogenes are overexpressed while tumor suppresser genes are deactivated leading to the de-differentiation of cells, uncontrolled proliferation, and the acquisition of stem-like characteristics (26).

Tumors that originate from CSCs are thought to follow a unidirectional hierarchy, meaning that the CSC population initiates tumor growth (29). Thus, CSCs divide asymmetrically to maintain a subpopulation CSCs while also generating transient cells that undergo symmetric divisions with highly proliferative capabilities (34). Current data on solid and hematological cancers has suggested three models that are not mutually elusive to CSCs: 1) the hierarchical model in which cell of the stem/progenitor hierarchy are susceptible to transformation (15); 2) the CSC model in which a small subpopulation of cells promotes tumor initiation and growth (35); 3) the clonal evolution model which states that genetic instability from genetic alteration worsen over time leading to increased tumor aggressiveness, resistance, and heterogeneity (36). The validity of all three models in explaining the origin of CSCs attributes to the cellular plasticity seen with different cancer types (37).

The stem cell theory of cancer, somatic stem cell theory, cell reversal theory, and stem cell misplacement theory are all concepts based on the microenvironment of solid tumors. In contrast, leukemias, liquid tumors of the blood, represent a unique and contrasting environment for the origin or development of CSCs. Up until 1997, little was known of the origin of the target cell in the hematopoietic stem cell hierarchy for leukemic transformation (15). Two landmark studies involving immune-deficient mice models showed that leukemic cells expressing the same markers seen in adult human hematopoietic stem cells (CD34+CD38−) initiated hematopoietic malignancy (15, 38). These leukemia-initiating cells were termed leukemia stem cells or CSCs. To date, leukemia stem cells have been identified in both acute myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (39). These cells share characteristics with normal hematopoietic stem cells, including the ability to self-renew and generate differentiated progeny. CSCs in leukemias are believed to be responsible for the uncontrolled proliferation of leukemic cells and the ability of the disease to recur after treatment. Additionally, CSCs in leukemias are often characterized by the expression of specific cell surface markers, such as CD34, CD38, and CD123, among others, which can be isolated to study CSC populations in leukemia samples.

The exact origins of leukemia stem cells remain a subject of ongoing research and investigation. Leukemia is a complex disease that arises from genetic mutations and abnormalities in blood-forming stem cells. While the specific mechanisms underlying the development of LSCs are not fully understood, a couple of theories have been proposed based on scientific evidence and observations. One prevailing theory suggests that leukemia stem cells originate from hematopoietic stem cells or progenitor cells that acquire somatic mutations in critical genes responsible for regulating normal cell growth and differentiation (40). These mutations can lead to uncontrolled proliferation and the development of leukemia. Another theory suggests that leukemia stem cells arise from clonal evolution (41). Leukemia is characterized by genetic heterogeneity, indicating that leukemia stem cells and their progeny undergo clonal evolution over time. This means that as the disease progresses, subclones with distinct genetic mutations may emerge, leading to treatment resistance and disease relapse.

Worldwide, solid tumors account for the highest levels of morbidity and mortality and are the most common form of cancer (42). A hallmark of the tumor environment is hypoxia, especially in rapidly growing solid tumors where the oxygen levels can range from 0% to 2% compared to normal physiological levels of 4% to 9% oxygen (43). These low oxygen levels have been noted in prostate (44), cervix (45), breast (46), head and neck cancers (47), with levels depending on the size, stage, initial oxygenation level, and the method applied to measure the oxygen within the solid tumor (48).

A core mechanism of stemness generation and maintenance induced by hypoxia are hypoxia inducible factors (HIFs) ( Figure 2 ) (49, 50). HIFs are a helix-loop-helix-Per-ARNT-Sim (bHLH-PAS) containing transcription factor (51). HIF-1 is a heterodimer made up of α and β subunits. These heterodimers translocate in the nucleus and interact with specific DNA sequences, called HIF-responsive elements, leading to activation or repression of gene expression. So far, three different genes are known to encode a subunit of HIF: HIF1α, HIF2α, and HIF3α. All three heterodimerize with the HIF-1β subunit and are subject to posttranslational regulation that is dependent on oxygen levels in the environment (52). In most cases, HIF3α is thought to be a negative regulator of HIF1α and HIF2α. However, a study using zebrafish showed that HIF3α is degraded under normoxia (21% O₂) and when overexpressed under hypoxia binds to target gene promoters to upregulate expression (53). HIF1α and HIF2α expression is specific to tissue type and the time course of induction by hypoxia (54). For example, HIF-1α expression levels peak early under hypoxia while HIF-2α expression slowly rises and is more sustained (54). With respect to CSCs, a study investigating glioblastoma stem cells demonstrated differential expression of HIF-1α and HIF-2α in stem and non-stem cancer cell populations. HIF-2α was found to be present within the CSC population, while HIF-1α was present in both stem and non-stem cancer populations. In the same study, knockdown of both HIF-1α and HIF-2α attenuated stem cell and non-stem cell survival and proliferation. HIF-2α knockdown led to growth restriction for stem cells, while HIF-1α knockdown resulted in reduced growth in stem and non-stem cells. HIF-1α and HIF-2α were also shown to be required for VEGF expression in stem cells, but only HIF-1α expression was required for VEGF expression in non-stem populations (55). While HIF-1α has been shown to mediate angiogenesis (56), metabolic reprogramming (57), invasion (58), metastasis (58), and epithelial-mesenchymal transitioning (59), this study suggests HIF-2α serves a unique role in CSC development and maintenance. It is important for promoting the CSC phenotype (49), prompting de-differentiation of cancer cells to CSCs (60), as well as inducing the expression of pluripotent stem cell markers, OCT4, NANOG, SOX2, KLF4, c-MYC ( Figure 2 ) (61).

CSCs are classified by expression of stemness-related markers. Several markers have been reported to be expressed in CSCs including the Yamanaka transcription factors OCT4, NANOG, SOX2, KLF4, and c-MYC (62, 63). Discovered by Dr. Shinya Yamanaka in 2006, these transcription factors can collectively reprogram adult cells into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and are considered CSCs biomarkers. Studies have also suggested that expression levels of Yamanaka factors are associated with the prognosis of several cancer types, and subsequently can be useful in assessing patient diagnosis and treatment decisions (17, 63). As previously discussed, hypoxia and Yamanaka factors have been found to be related in the sense that hypoxia can induce the expression of Yamanaka factors, which may contribute to the reprogramming and maintenance of cells into a pluripotent state (64) ( Figure 3 ).

Metastatic disease remains the primary cause of cancer mortality. Despite recent advancements in cancer therapies, survival in metastatic setting is still poor. 90% of cancer-related deaths are due to metastatic disease rather than primary tumors. Historically, cancer progression has been firmly established in mutational processes and clonal expansion (107). However, recent studies have implicated CSCs in the resistance (108) and recurrence of tumors (109). Studies have also linked direct reprogramming of somatic cells to cancer metastasis (110). Similarities between somatic cells and CSCs suggest an association between reprogramming in CSCs and progression of disease (111).This relationship could be the basis for metastatic disease, driving tumor initiation and growth. However, the underlying mechanisms of CSC reprogramming and tumor progression remain unclear.

The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a developmental process that leads to the transformation of epithelial cells into mesenchymal cells. While EMT is accepted to occur during embryogenesis, it has also been recognized in CSCs (112). In 2005, the “migratory cancer stem (MCS) cell” theory established the association between CSCs and EMT, which describes a ‘mobile CSC’ as a stationary CSC with partial EMT that disseminates and retains stem cell features, forming metastatic colonies (113). The acquisition of migratory qualities through EMT could then be a critical feature of CSCs in the growth, invasion, and dissemination of tumors, leading to the poor prognosis seen in metastasis. However, it is unclear whether only CSCs are responsible for the initiation of metastatic growth, or if there are other factors driving CSCs for pre-metastatic development.

Another concept that implicates CSCs in the progression of metastatic disease is their influence on the microenvironment. It is well known that hypoxia promotes tumor changes, such as EMT and dysfunctional vascularization, leading to cell migration and metastatic disease (114). Hypoxia has also been shown to stimulate CSCs. The increase in reactive oxygen species due to hypoxia promotes EMT in CSCs, resulting in the production of VEGF (115). While VEGF is fully established as an angiogenic factor, it has also been shown to drive malignancy through other mechanisms. For example, VEGF promotes breast and lung CSC renewal via VEGF receptor-2/STAT3-mediated upregulation of c-MYC and SOX2 (116). However, variable VEGF expression among cancer subtypes suggests involvement of other potential factors in the microenvironment.

For decades, tumor vascularization via angiogenesis was considered the primary method of blood supply for tumor growth (117). In 1999, Maniotis et al. reported highly invasive and metastatic human melanoma cells with tumor growth independent of angiogenesis, suggesting the generation of vascular channels by cancer cells without the involvement of endothelial cells (118). This process was termed vascular mimicry (VM) ( Figure 4 ). Tumors with VM lead to a worse prognosis, and evidence has indicated that VM may be used as an independent prognostic factor for survival (119). However, the underlying mechanisms of the initiation of VM are still not well understood. Recently, evidence has suggested an association between VM and CSCs. CSCs were found to be positively correlated to triple negative breast cancer subtype and VM in human invasive breast cancer (120). Another study found that a hypoxic tumor microenvironment increased the population of CSCs, thereby accelerating VM channel formation in triple negative breast cancer (121). These findings could explain the invasive nature of treatment-resistant tumors.

Many strategies have been implemented for cancer treatment including surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapies. These strategies have been essential in reducing cancer death rate by 1.5% from 2019 to 2020 (122). Furthermore, an overall cancer death reduction of 33% has been reported since 1991 with mortality declines seen in leukemia, melanoma, kidney, and lung cancers (122). However, traditional cancer treatments are not always effective, especially with malignant tumors (123). A few reasons for unsuccessful treatment outcomes are metastasis, recurrence, cancer heterogeneity, resistance to the treatment, and immunological escape [L. Yang et al., (79)]. All of these factors can be attributed to the characteristics seen in CSCs present in the tumor environment. Therefore, CSCs are considered promising targets for cancer treatment.

Tumor hypoxia is considered one of the most inimical factors that leads to treatment resistance (124). Radiotherapy generates reactive oxygen species, causing irreversible cellular DNA damage and apoptosis (125). Currently, radiotherapy is most often used to treat head, neck, breast, cervix, prostate, and eye cancers. However, cancer cells experiencing hypoxia are likely to be three-times more resistant to radiation (126). On the other hand, CSCs are considered to be the “seeds” of cancer and are believed to be “awakened” with radiation, leading to recurrence and metastasis post-radiation (88). As for chemotherapy, oxygenated cells are essential for successful drug delivery (127). Thus, hypoxic cells, including CSCs, escape chemotherapy due to alterations in apoptotic pathways and DNA damage repair systems (128). Additionally, the restricted/abnormal vasculature of the hypoxic tumor environment contributes to inadequate transport of anti-tumor drugs into the tumor tissue (129). Immunotherapy is one of the more recent developments in cancer therapies (130). However, there is strong evidence that hypoxia suppresses T cells and support tumor associated macrophage polarization (131).

In the past few years, multiple efforts have been made to directly target CSC including biomarker-mediated targeting (79), targeting of mitochondria (132), targeting of CSC related genes (133), and targeting of epigenetics associated with CSCs (134). For example, OCT4 and LIN28, pluripotency factors are highly expressed in embryonic stem cells, were also found to be co-expressed in a sub-population of epithelial ovarian cancer cells (135). It was demonstrated that targeting these two pluripotent factors with RNA interference significantly reduced cell growth and survival of epithelial ovarian cancer cells suggesting that OCT4 and LIN28 were beneficial targets for in epithelial ovarian cancer patients. Further relating to OCT4 targeting, an oncolytic adenovirus was developed to retain its antitumor activity in a hypoxic environment (136). This OCT4-dependent oncolytic adenovirus was driven by nine copies of OCT4 response element as were a hypoxia response element to target bladder cancer cells that overexpressed HIF-2α and OCT4, which include bladder CSCs.

While it is recognized that benign cells can become CSCs, the real question is whether CSCs can be genetically and epigenetically reversed back to a benign phenotype. Thus, rather than targeting overexpressed pluripotent factors as seen before, a pioneer strategy would involve transcription factor-mediated cancer cell reprogramming (17). Currently, cancer reprogramming has been met with some success. For example, epigenetic modifications in melanoma cells were induced by reprogramming them into induced pluripotent cancer cells that were able to differentiate into non-tumorigenic lineages (65). In the direction of immunotherapy, cellular reprogramming has been used to generate T-cells and natural killer cells with enhanced anti-tumor properties (137). Thus, patient-tailored immune cell types, including macrophages and dendritic cells, can also be generated via reprogramming of lineage-specific master regulators that can induce unique cell identities, in vivo. The involvement of cancer reprogramming has been taken a step further in the direction of therapeutic cancer vaccination. In a recent study by Majeti et al. (2023), myeloid lineage reprogramming was used to convert murine leukemia cancer cells into tumor reprogrammed-antigen presenting cells (138). These reprogrammed tumor cells demonstrated a myeloid phenotype and function as well as the ability to process and present endogenous tumor associated antigens that could be used to elicit cancer specific responses. With regards to human cancer cell lines, that is brain, uterine cervix, lung, colon, bladder, and synovium derived cell lines, double-network hydrogel has been utilized to create spheroids with elevated levels of stemness-related genes SOX2, OCT3/4, and NANOG in vitro within 24h of seeding (139). The results seen in the cells lines were compared to a highly malignant human brain cancer glioblastoma to confirm that the findings of elevated CSCs markers were not cell-line specific. Thus, spheroid formation highly mimics the CSC niche in the tumor environment and offers a method of in vitro reprogramming to identify reagents that can be used to specifically investigate CSCs.

On the flip side to successful reprogramming efforts, some cancer types resist or have limited reprogramming abilities. For example, human benign and malignant MCF10A and MCF7 breast cancer cell lines showed resistance to an induced reprogramming using retroviral reprogramming method (140). This study found that there were 29 candidate barrier genes with RNA-sequencing that could explain the roadblock seen in cancer cell reprogramming in these breast cancer cell lines. It has been noted that cancer cell reprogramming is more difficult and not well understood compared to somatic cells (141). One reason is that features that are observed in pluripotency, including morphology, specific gene expression, clonal expansion, immunocytochemistry, and teratoma formation are not well characterized, especially in cancer stem characterization (140). Another reason is that the differences between malignant and benign cancer cells have still not been fully characterized and require much more exploration.

The origin of CSCs is complex and multifactorial, involving a combination of genetic and epigenetic changes, as well as changes in the cellular microenvironment. Hypoxia is a critical factor in the development and maintenance of CSCs. Hypoxia induces the activation of various signaling pathways that promote the survival and self-renewal of CSCs, leading to increased tumor growth and resistance to therapy. The adaptation of cancer cells to a hypoxic environment involves the upregulation of HIFs, which play a crucial role in the maintenance of CSCs. HIFs induce the expression of genes involved in cell survival, angiogenesis, and metabolism, providing a selective advantage to CSCs in hypoxic tumors. In addition, hypoxia also induces epigenetic changes that alter gene expression and contribute to the maintenance of CSCs. Yamanaka factors have been suggested as potential CSC markers since Yamanaka factors can induce a stem-like state in cancer cells, leading to the acquisition of cancer stem cell properties. The connection between Yamanaka factors and cancer stem cells lies in the similarities observed between induced pluripotent stem cells and cancer stem cells. Induced pluripotent stem cells generated by the expression of Yamanaka factors share certain characteristics with CSCs, such as self-renewal ability and the potential to differentiate into different cell types. This suggests that there may be overlapping mechanisms or molecular pathways involved in the generation and maintenance of both induced pluripotent stem cells and CSCs. Moreover, studies have indicated that the overexpression of Yamanaka factors can induce a stem-like state in cancer cells, leading to the acquisition of CSC-like properties. This includes enhanced self-renewal capacity, increased tumorigenicity, resistance to therapy, and the ability to initiate new tumors when transplanted into animal models. Additionally, emerging evidence suggests that hypoxia may influence the expression and activity of Yamanaka factors in cancer cells. Hypoxia has been shown to upregulate the expression of Oct4, Sox2, and c-Myc, among other pluripotency-related genes, potentially inducing a stem-like state. This connection raises the possibility that hypoxia could contribute to the acquisition or maintenance of CSC properties through the modulation of Yamanaka factors. By targeting and studying these markers, scientists can gain insights into the mechanisms underlying cancer initiation, progression, and treatment resistance. Understanding the mechanisms by which hypoxia regulates CSCs is crucial for developing effective therapies that target these cells and to prevent cancer recurrence. Further research is needed to fully elucidate the complex interplay between hypoxia, CSCs, and Yamanaka factor expression to identify new therapeutic targets that can be exploited for the treatment of cancer.

Advancements in CSC research have highlighted their critical role in tumor initiation, progression, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance. As we look ahead, several promising directions emerge that offer potential breakthroughs in understanding and targeting CSCs, particularly in the context of hypoxia and Yamanaka factors.

Firstly, investigating the interplay between CSCs and the hypoxic tumor microenvironment presents a compelling avenue for research. Hypoxia, or low oxygen levels, is a common feature of solid tumors and has been shown to promote CSC maintenance and metastasis. Future studies could focus on unraveling the molecular mechanisms underlying CSC adaptation to hypoxia, which may involve the activation of specific signaling pathways and epigenetic modifications. Understanding how hypoxia influences CSC properties, such as self-renewal and differentiation, will be crucial in developing novel therapeutic strategies to target these resilient cells within the tumor niche.

Secondly, exploring the role of Yamanaka factors in cancer stemness offers exciting prospects. The Yamanaka factors, initially identified for their ability to induce pluripotency in somatic cells, have been found to reprogram differentiated cancer cells back into a stem-like state. Investigating the precise mechanisms by which Yamanaka factors modulate CSC properties could pave the way for innovative approaches in cancer therapy. Utilizing these factors to induce differentiation in CSCs or, conversely, to reprogram them into less aggressive cell types could hold great therapeutic potential, potentially disrupting tumor growth and reducing resistance to conventional treatments.

Moreover, combinatorial approaches that integrate hypoxia-targeting strategies with Yamanaka factor-based therapies may yield synergistic effects in eradicating CSC populations. By targeting CSCs both within the hypoxic tumor microenvironment and at the molecular level through Yamanaka factors, researchers may enhance treatment efficacy and limit disease recurrence.

Lastly, translating these research findings into clinical applications remains a priority for future investigations. Developing therapeutics that specifically target CSCs, while sparing normal stem cells, poses a significant challenge. Nevertheless, progress in identifying unique CSC markers and understanding the signaling pathways that regulate CSC self-renewal provides promising opportunities for developing targeted therapies. Moreover, exploring innovative drug delivery systems that can effectively penetrate the hypoxic tumor regions may improve treatment outcomes.

In conclusion, the study of cancer stem cells, hypoxia, and Yamanaka factors represents a cutting-edge frontier in cancer research. Advancing our understanding of the molecular mechanisms governing CSC behavior within the hypoxic microenvironment and harnessing the potential of Yamanaka factors to reprogram these cells hold great promise for revolutionizing cancer treatment strategies. As interdisciplinary collaborations continue to thrive, we can envision a future where novel therapies specifically designed to target CSCs contribute to more effective and personalized cancer treatments, ultimately improving patient outcomes and advancing the fight against cancer.

GA, ML, and JK contributed to the conception, writing, and design of the review. All three performed literature review and drafted separate sections of the manuscript. YL structure, read, revised, and approved the submitted manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.