Front. Oncol. Frontiers in Oncology Front. Oncol. 2234-943X Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fonc.2023.1192726 Oncology Correction Corrigendum: Time interval from diagnosis to treatment of brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery is not associated with radionecrosis or local failure Leu Justin 1 Akerman Meredith 2 Mendez Christopher 3 Lischalk Jonathan W. 3 4 Carpenter Todd 3 Ebling David 3 Haas Jonathan A. 3 4 Witten Matthew 5 Barbaro Marissa 6 Duic Paul 6 Tessler Lee 7 Repka Michael C. 8 * 1 Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States 2 Division of Health Services Research, New York University (NYU) Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY, United States 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University (NYU) Long Island, Mineola, NY, United States 4 NYCyberKnife at Perlmutter Cancer Center – Manhattan, New York, NY, United States 5 Department of Medical Physics, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University (NYU) Long Island, Mineola, NY, United States 6 Department of Neurology, New York University (NYU) Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY, United States 7 Department of Neurosurgery, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University (NYU) Long Island, Mineola, NY, United States 8 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States

Edited and Reviewed by: John Varlotto, Edwards Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States

*Correspondence: Michael C. Repka, michael_repka@med.unc.edu

This article was submitted to Radiation Oncology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology

 05 04 2023 2023 13 1192726 23 03 2023 29 03 2023 Copyright © 2023 Leu, Akerman, Mendez, Lischalk, Carpenter, Ebling, Haas, Witten, Barbaro, Duic, Tessler and Repka 2023 Leu, Akerman, Mendez, Lischalk, Carpenter, Ebling, Haas, Witten, Barbaro, Duic, Tessler and Repka

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 A corrigendum on Time interval from diagnosis to treatment of brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery is not associated with radionecrosis or local failure by Leu J, Akerman M, Mendez C, Lischalk JW, Carpenter T, Ebling D, Haas JA, Witten M, Barbaro M, Duic P, Tessler L and Repka MC (2023). Front. Oncol. 13:1132777. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1132777 stereotactic radiosurgery brain metastases immunotherapy radionecrosis treatment delays cancer radiation therapy radiation necrosis

Text Correction

In the published article, there was an error. One of the citations of Table 3 was incorrect and should have referred to Table 4 instead.

A correction has been made to the Results section, Association between regional failure (distant brain failure) and other variables, paragraph 1. This sentence previously stated:

“After univariate analyses, age at diagnosis, histology, MRI maximum axial dimension, time interval between diagnostic MRI and first treatment, time interval between CT simulation and first treatment, fractionated versus single fraction SRS, total dose, GTV, PTV, max GTV dose, presence of normal brain constraint, and a history of prior WBRT were not associated with regional failure (Table 3).”

The corrected sentence appears below:

“After univariate analyses, age at diagnosis, histology, MRI maximum axial dimension, time interval between diagnostic MRI and first treatment, time interval between CT simulation and first treatment, fractionated versus single fraction SRS, total dose, GTV, PTV, max GTV dose, presence of normal brain constraint, and a history of prior WBRT were not associated with regional failure (Table 4).”

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.