<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Oncol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Oncology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Oncol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2234-943X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fonc.2022.896593</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Oncology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Improved risk stratification by PET-based intratumor heterogeneity in children with high-risk neuroblastoma</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Chao</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1071114"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Shaoyan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Can</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname>
<given-names>Yafu</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1212166"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname>
<given-names>Fang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1269332"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fu</surname>
<given-names>Hongliang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Hui</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1132338"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Suyun</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1719674"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine</institution>, <addr-line>Shanghai</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Department of Pathology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine</institution>, <addr-line>Shanghai</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Kyung Hyun Sung, UCLA Health System, United States</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Guoqiang Shao, Nanjing Medical University, China; Jianhua Gong, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Hui Wang, <email xlink:href="mailto:wanghui@xinhuamed.com.cn">wanghui@xinhuamed.com.cn</email>; Suyun Chen, <email xlink:href="mailto:nuyus@outlook.com">nuyus@outlook.com</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn003">
<p>&#x2020;These authors share last authorship</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002">
<p>This article was submitted to Cancer Imaging and Image-directed Interventions, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>24</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<elocation-id>896593</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>15</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>20</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2022 Li, Wang, Li, Yin, Feng, Fu, Wang and Chen</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Li, Wang, Li, Yin, Feng, Fu, Wang and Chen</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Purpose</title>
<p>The substratification of high-risk neuroblastoma is challenging, and new predictive imaging biomarkers are warranted for better patient selection. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic role of PET-based intratumor heterogeneity and its potential ability to improve risk stratification in neuroblastoma.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>Pretreatment <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT scans from 112 consecutive children with newly diagnosed neuroblastoma were retrospectively analyzed. The primary tumor was segmented in the PET images. SUVs, volumetric parameters including metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and texture features were extracted. After the exclusion of imaging features with poor and moderate reproducibility, the relationships between the imaging indices and clinicopathological factors, as well as event-free survival (EFS), were assessed.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>The median follow-up duration was 33&#xa0;months. Multivariate analysis showed that PET-based intratumor heterogeneity outperformed clinicopathological features, including age, stage, and MYCN, and remained the most robust independent predictor for EFS [training set, hazard ratio (HR): 6.4, 95% CI: 3.1&#x2013;13.2, <italic>p</italic>&#xa0;&lt;&#xa0;0.001; test set, HR: 5.0, 95% CI: 1.8&#x2013;13.6, <italic>p</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.002]. Within the clinical high-risk group, patients with a high metabolic heterogeneity showed significantly poorer outcomes (HR: 3.3, 95% CI: 1.6&#x2013;6.8, <italic>p</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.002 in the training set; HR: 4.4, 95% CI: 1.5&#x2013;12.9, <italic>p</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.008 in the test set) compared to those with relatively homogeneous tumors. Furthermore, intratumor heterogeneity outran the volumetric indices (MTVs and TLGs) and yielded the best performance of distinguishing high-risk patients with different outcomes with a 3-year EFS of 6% vs. 47% (<italic>p</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.001) in the training set and 9% vs. 51% (<italic>p</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.004) in the test set.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>PET-based intratumor heterogeneity was a strong independent prognostic factor in neuroblastoma. In the clinical high-risk group, intratumor heterogeneity further stratified patients with distinct outcomes.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>pediatric</kwd>
<kwd>neuroblastoma</kwd>
<kwd>
<sup>18</sup>F-FDG</kwd>
<kwd>PET/CT</kwd>
<kwd>intratumor heterogeneity</kwd>
<kwd>radiomics</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn001">81801731 , 81901775</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">National Natural Science Foundation of China<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100001809</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="6"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="45"/>
<page-count count="13"/>
<word-count count="5550"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumor in children and is remarkable for its heterogeneity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>). Risk stratification using a combination of clinical and biological factors, such as age at diagnosis, stage, histology, and MYCN status, is of paramount importance to effectively inform therapeutic approaches. At the time of presentation, about 60% of children are classified as high risk (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>). The incorporation of intensive multimodality therapy has increased the 5-year survival for high-risk neuroblastoma from less than 20% to ~50% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>). However, a notable subset of patients do not respond to induction therapy and have a dismal outcome, with a long-term survival of less than 15% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>). The improved outcome for the survivors has come at a cost of significant early or long-term toxicity. The early identification of these different subsets of patients may facilitate a more precisely tailored treatment, which remains an important unmet need.</p>
<p>Intratumor heterogeneity, resulting from subclonal genetic diversity within a tumor, manifests in spatial variation in stromal architecture and consumption of oxygen and glucose (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>). It has been associated with poor prognosis and predisposes patients to inferior response to anticancer therapies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>). Medical images can depict the spatial heterogeneity in individual tumors andquantify the overall functional characteristics. Various approaches for the assessment of intratumor heterogeneity in PET images have been investigated, including simple visual analysis, histogram quantifying voxel distributions, and texture features quantifying spatial complexity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>). A growing body of evidence suggests that PET-based intratumor heterogeneity might have predictive or prognostic value in various malignancies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>).</p>
<p>
<sup>123</sup>I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) scan has been the main imaging modality for neuroblastoma. For high-risk diseases, however, the limited prognostic value of pretreatment mIBG score was reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>). On the other hand, <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT is increasingly used in neuroblastoma, particularly in tumors not taking up mIBG. SUVmax has been reported to correlate with MYCN amplification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>) and may serve as a prognostic biomarker in neuroblastoma (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>). Volumetric parameters derived from <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET, including metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), were previously reported as significant prognostic factors in neuroblastoma (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>). To date, there is limited evidence regarding the role of intratumor metabolic heterogeneity in neuroblastoma.</p>
<p>Our key objectives were to investigate the prognostic role of PET-based intratumor heterogeneity and whether it could be used to further risk-stratify neuroblastoma.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<title>Patients</title>
<p>This study included 129 consecutive pediatric patients with histologically proven neuroblastoma between October 2011 and September 2020. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) newly diagnosed neuroblastoma with no previous anticancer treatment, 2) underwent baseline <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT scan, 3) not accompanied by other malignancies, and 4) at least 6&#xa0;months of follow-up. Patients were excluded if they had primary intracranial neuroblastoma, ganglioneuroma, no predominant primary tumor site, refused treatment, or had received chemotherapy before the PET scan (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Clinicopathological prognostic indices, such as age, stage, risk stratification, MYCN, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and ferritin, were collected. This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and the requirement for informed consent was waived.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Flowchart shows study population selection, with exclusion criteria.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fonc-12-896593-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<title>PET/CT imaging</title>
<p>
<sup>18</sup>F-FDG was administered at a dose of 5.18&#xa0;MBq/kg after at least 4&#x2013;6&#xa0;h of fasting. PET/CT scans from the skull to the proximal thigh were acquired about 60&#xa0;min after injection using a Biograph mCT-64 scanner (Siemens). When metastasis was suspected to involve the extremities, imaging from the vertex to the toes including the arms was performed. Chloral hydrate sedation (50&#xa0;mg/kg) was used 30&#xa0;min before scanning for children unable to follow instructions. PET images were reconstructed using 3D ordered subset expectation maximization (3 iterations, 24 subsets). CT scans were acquired with 100-kV tube voltage, automated tube current modulation, 3-mm slice thickness, and a pitch of 1.5.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<title>Imaging segmentation and feature extraction</title>
<p>Segmentation and feature extraction were performed using the LIFEx software (Version 6.31, <uri xlink:href="http://www.lifexsoft.org">http://www.lifexsoft.org</uri>). To investigate the voxel relationships inside the entire tumor, volumes of interest (VOIs) covering the whole primary tumor were delineated manually in PET images by a nuclear medicine physician with more than 11&#xa0;years of PET/CT experience without knowledge of clinical information. In some cases, the primary tumor fused with the metastatic lesions and was delineated with reference to recent contrast-enhanced CT or MRI images. As PET has relatively large voxels compared with CT and MRI, each VOI must contain at least 64 contiguous voxels according to the LIFEx user guide. Two patients were excluded due to small voxels. Imaging indices were computed after a resampling step using 64 bins (size bin of 0.3) without spatial resampling. MTV and TLG with a threshold of 41% of SUVmax (MTV41%, TLG41%), which has been reported to correspond best with the actual dimensions of the tumor for tumor boundary delineation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>), were extracted from the same VOIs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<title>Clinical endpoints and risk stratification</title>
<p>Event-free survival (EFS) was calculated as the time from the start date of cancer treatment to the date of relapse, progression, or death from any cause. All the patients received risk-adapted treatment according to the Chinese Children Cancer Group-NB-2009/2014. The risk categorization schema was consistent with the Children&#x2019;s Oncology Group protocol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>). Briefly, patients were classified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories based on age, stage, and other histopathological factors. High-risk disease was defined as &#x2265;18&#xa0;months of age and either disseminated disease or localized disease with unfavorable markers, such as MYCN amplification.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>To determine robust features, half of the patients were selected randomly and segmented independently by another nuclear medicine physician with 6&#xa0;years of PET/CT experience. We evaluated the reproducibility of features using a two-way random, absolute agreement intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Using the lower bounds of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the ICC value (ICC<sub>lb95%</sub>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>), the reproducibility of each feature was categorized as follows: poor, ICC<sub>lb95%</sub> &lt;0.50; moderate, ICC<sub>lb95%</sub> of 0.50&#x2013;0.75; good, ICC<sub>lb95%</sub> of 0.75&#x2013;0.90; and excellent, ICC<sub>lb95%</sub> &#x2265;0.90. Robust features with good or excellent reproducibility were qualified for further analysis.</p>
<p>The Mann&#x2013;Whitney <italic>U</italic> test and chi-squared test were used for comparing variables between groups. The Benjamini&#x2013;Hochberg stepwise method was performed to control the false discovery rate and adjusted <italic>p</italic>-values were calculated. Correlations among the parameters were determined by the Pearson and Spearman rank correlation. To avoid redundancy, factors with poorer predictive validity in the pairs of indices that showed correlation coefficient (<italic>r</italic>) &#x2265;0.8 were omitted (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>). Logistic regression analyses with forward selection were performed to evaluate the relationship between imaging indices and MYCN amplification. Then, the entire cohort was randomly split into a training set (<italic>n</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;77) and a test set (<italic>n</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;35). Prognostic factors were identified by univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses in the training set and then validated in the test set. Receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses and the Youden index were used to determine the optimal cutoff values. Survival estimates were evaluated by the Kaplan&#x2013;Meier analysis and log-rank test. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 25.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA), except that the adjusted <italic>p</italic>-values were obtained on R software (Version 4.0.3, <uri xlink:href="http://www.r-project.org/">http://www.r-project.org/</uri>). A two-sided <italic>p</italic>-value &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<title>Patient characteristics</title>
<p>As a result, a total of 112 children were identified. The patient characteristics are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>. There were 39 girls (median age 34&#xa0;months, range 1&#x2013;153&#xa0;months) and 73 boys (median age 36&#xa0;months, range 2&#x2013;150&#xa0;months). Ninety patients had neuroblastoma and 22 had ganglioneuroblastoma (GNB). Most of them presented disseminated disease (2 with stage 4S, 79 with stage 4). With a median follow-up of 33&#xa0;months, 51 disease relapse/progression and 34 deaths occurred. The 3-year EFS rate was 47%.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Patient characteristics.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Characteristics</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Total (<italic>n</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;112)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Training set (<italic>n</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;77)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Test set (<italic>n</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;35)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">
<italic>p-</italic>value</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="center"/>
<th valign="top" align="center">No. (%)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">No. (%)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">No. (%)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Median age (months)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37&#xa0;&#xb1;&#xa0;26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37&#xa0;&#xb1;&#xa0;28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37&#xa0;&#xb1;&#xa0;22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.615</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;&#x2265;18&#xa0;months</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">84 (75%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58 (75%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26 (74%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.906</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sex</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.438</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Female</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">39 (35%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25 (32%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14 (40%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Male</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">73 (65%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52 (68%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21 (60%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pathology</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.081</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;GNB intermixed/well-differentiated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16 (14%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8 (10%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8 (23%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;GNB nodular, neuroblastoma</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96 (86%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">69 (90%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27 (77%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MYCN (<italic>n</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;90)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.320</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Non-amplified</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">70 (78%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48/64 (75%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22/26 (85%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Amplified</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20 (22%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16/64 (25%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4/26 (15%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Location</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.352</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Abdominal and pelvic</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">92 (82%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">65 (84%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27 (77%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Others</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20 (18%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12 (16%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8 (23%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Stage</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.889</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;1, 2, 3, 4S</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">33 (29%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23 (30%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10 (29%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">79 (71%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">54 (70%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25 (71%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Risk stratification</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.910</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Low</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7 (6%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5 (6%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2 (6%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Intermediate</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26 (23%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17 (22%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9 (26%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;High</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">79 (71%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">55 (71%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24 (69%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Laboratory tests</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Ferritin &#x2265;92&#xa0;ng/ml<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="fnT1_1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">63/96 (66%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45/64 (70%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18/32 (56%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.171</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;LDH &#x2265;587&#xa0;U/L<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="fnT1_1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51/100 (51%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36/66 (55%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15/34 (44%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.323</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Metabolic parameters</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;SUVmax</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.3&#xa0;&#xb1;&#xa0;3.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.1&#xa0;&#xb1;&#xa0;3.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.7&#xa0;&#xb1;&#xa0;4.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.488</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;SUVpeak</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.6&#xa0;&#xb1;&#xa0;2.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.5&#xa0;&#xb1;&#xa0;2.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.8&#xa0;&#xb1;&#xa0;3.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.713</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Endpoints</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Progression</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51 (46%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">33 (43%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18 (51%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.399</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Death</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34 (30%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21 (27%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13 (37%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.292</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; GNB, ganglioneuroblastoma.</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fnT1_1">
<label>a</label>
<p>Cutoff values for ferritin and LDH were set according to INRG (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>All the patients had an FDG-avid primary tumor with a median SUVmax of 5.8 (range 1.6&#x2013;26.5). Seven tumors had SUVmax lower than 2.5 (1.6&#x2013;2.4), all of which were higher than the liver background. High-risk neuroblastoma showed significantly higher FDG uptake (SUVmax and SUVpeak, <italic>p</italic>&#xa0;&lt;&#xa0;0.001) and volumetric values (MTV, TLG, and TLG41%, all <italic>p</italic>&#xa0;&lt;&#xa0;0.001; MTV41%, <italic>p</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.040) than those with non-high-risk disease (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<title>Imaging feature selection</title>
<p>Sixty-nine imaging features were obtained per VOI. The steps used to reduce feature dimension are summarized in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S1</bold>
</xref>. The ICC revealed that most of the imaging features could be reproduced well (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S2</bold>
</xref>). Fifty-one out of the 59 feature pairs had ICC<sub>lb95%</sub> &#x2265;0.75 (excellent reproducibility in 39 and good reproducibility in 12) and were qualified for subsequent analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<title>Imaging model for predicting MYCN amplification</title>
<p>MYCN status was available in 90 patients and was amplified in 20 patients. The majority of imaging features (44/51) were significantly different between the MYCN-amplified and the non-amplified groups (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S3</bold>
</xref>). After false discovery correction, 34 remained statistically significant. For example, FDG uptake was significantly higher in the MYCN-amplified tumor (SUVmax: 7.9, 95% CI: 6.7&#x2013;9.9 vs. 5.1, 95% CI: 4.9&#x2013;6.6, <italic>p</italic>&#xa0;&lt;&#xa0;0.001, adjusted <italic>p</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.005).</p>
<p>The ROC analysis showed that all of the above 34 features had AUCs higher than 0.7 to predict MYCN amplification. Histogram_Kurtosis, which reflects the shape of the histogram distribution relative to a normal distribution, yielded the highest AUC of 0.853 (<italic>p</italic>&#xa0;&lt;&#xa0;0.001). After multicollinearity reduction, nine features were entered into multivariate logistic regression analysis. A radiomic model composed of two features [Histogram_Kurtosis and gray-level non-uniformity from gray-level zone length matrix (GLZLM_GLNU), which reflects the non-uniformity of the gray levels of the homogeneous zones in 3D] was built subsequently, resulting in an AUC of 0.871 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>, <italic>p</italic>&#xa0;&lt;&#xa0;0.001) with the following equation:</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis for the prediction of MYCN amplification according to a model composed of two texture features.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fonc-12-896593-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Predicted probability = EXP (&#x2212;0.287 &#x2212; 0.228 &#xd7; Histogram_Kurtosis + 0.021 &#xd7; GLZLM_GLNU)/(1 + EXP (&#x2212;0.287 &#x2212; 0.228 &#xd7; Histogram_Kurtosis + 0.021 &#xd7; GLZLM_GLNU).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<title>Development of rad-risk to predict EFS</title>
<p>The distribution of key variables including age, stage, MYCN, and conventional metabolic parameters was similar between the training and test sets (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). In the training set, univariate Cox regression analysis revealed that 14 first-order and 8 second-order indices correlated with EFS (<italic>p</italic>&#xa0;&lt;&#xa0;0.05). After feature dimension reduction, two first-order indices, namely, SUVmax and Histogram_Entropy reflecting the randomness of the voxel distribution, were retained (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Three second-order indices retained were as follows: one from the gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM): GLCM_energy, which reflects the uniformity of gray-level voxel pairs; two from the gray-level run-length matrix (GLRLM), namely, the gray-level non-uniformity (GLRLM_GLNU), which measures the non-uniformity of the gray levels, and run-length non-uniformity (GLRLM_RLNU), which quantifies the non-uniformity of the length of the homogeneous runs. The AUCs for SUVmax, Histogram_Entropy, GLCM_energy, GLRLM_GLNU, and GLRLM_RLNU to predict progression were 0.611, 0.666, 0.645, 0.689, and 0.733, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that GLRLM_RLNU with a cutoff value of 1,828 and Histogram_Entropy with a cutoff value of 3.3 outperformed other imaging indices and were significant to predict events. In addition, imaging features extraction was performed in the high-risk group separately, and the results are presented in the <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Materials</bold>
</xref> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Data</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S2</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Univariate Cox regression analyses for event-free survival.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Variables</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="3" align="center">Training set (<italic>n</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;77)</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="3" align="center">Test set (<italic>n</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;35)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="center"/>
<th valign="top" align="center">HR</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">95% CI</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">
<italic>p</italic>-value</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">HR</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">95% CI</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">
<italic>p</italic>-value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" colspan="7" align="left">Clinicopathological factors</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Age &#x2265;18&#xa0;months</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.8&#x2013;96.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.011</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.6&#x2013;7.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.246</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Stage 4 vs. 1, 2, 3, 4S</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.6&#x2013;12.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.005</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.6&#x2013;10.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.224</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;MYCN amplification<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="fnT2_1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.2&#x2013;6.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.014</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1&#x2013;4.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.527</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;LDH &#x2265;587<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="fnT2_2">
<sup>b</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3&#x2013;6.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.008</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3&#x2013;8.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.015</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Ferritin &#x2265;92<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="fnT2_3">
<sup>c</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1&#x2013;7.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.026</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.7&#x2013;5.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.246</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" colspan="7" align="left">First-order imaging indices</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;SUVmax &#x2265;5.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5&#x2013;6.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.003</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.0&#x2013;8.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.049</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Histogram_Entropy &#x2265;3.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.8&#x2013;7.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1&#x2013;10.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.029</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" colspan="7" align="left">Second-order imaging indices</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;GLCM_Energy &#x2264;0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.7&#x2013;7.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.8&#x2013;5.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.146</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;GLRLM_RLNU &#x2265;1,828</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.3&#x2013;11.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.0&#x2013;16.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;GLRLM_GLNU &#x2265;575</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5&#x2013;5.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.002</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.6&#x2013;6.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.224</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; GLCM, gray level co-occurrence matrix; GLNU, gray-level non-uniformity; GLRLM, gray-level run-length matrix; rad-risk, radiomic risk; RLNU, run-length non-uniformity.</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fnT2_1">
<label>a</label>
<p>MYCN amplification status was available in 64 patients in the training set and 26 in the test set.</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fnT2_2">
<label>b</label>
<p>LDH was available in 66 patients in the training set and 34 in the test set.</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fnT2_3">
<label>c</label>
<p>Ferritin was available in 64 patients in the training set and 32 in the test set.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Then, patients in the training set and the test set were divided into three groups according to whether GLRLM_RLNU &#x2265;1,828 and Histogram_Entropy &#x2265;3.3: patients with neither of these two risk factors, those with either one of the factors, and those with both. Patients with neither or either one of these factors demonstrated similar survival curves both in the training set and test set (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold>
</xref>, <italic>p</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.697; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold>
</xref>, <italic>p</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.383) and, thus, were combined and categorized as low rad-risk. Patients with both factors had a significantly worse prognosis (training set, HR: 6.4, 95% CI: 3.1&#x2013;13.2, <italic>p</italic>&#xa0;&lt;&#xa0;0.001; test set, HR: 5.0, 95% CI: 1.8&#x2013;13.6, <italic>p</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.002) and were categorized as high rad-risk. The 3-year EFS of low vs. high rad-risk was 71% vs. 6% in the training set and 69% vs. 17% in the test set, respectively (both <italic>p</italic>&#xa0;&lt;&#xa0;0.001).</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Kaplan&#x2013;Meier event-free survival (EFS) curves in children with neuroblastoma having neither, one, or both imaging risk factors&#x2014;GLRLM_RLNU &#x2265;1,828 and Histogram_Entropy &#x2265;3.3&#x2014;in the training set <bold>(A)</bold> and the test set <bold>(B)</bold>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fonc-12-896593-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<title>Multivariate analysis</title>
<p>Clinicopathological factors including age, stage, MYCN, LDH, and ferritin significantly correlated with EFS in the training set (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). As MYCN status, LDH, and ferritin were unavailable in several patients, we firstly integrated rad-risk with age and stage into the multivariate analysis. After adjustment for clinical covariates (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>), rad-risk obtained independent significance with HR of 4.3 (95% CI: 2.0&#x2013;9.1, <italic>p</italic>&#xa0;&lt;&#xa0;0.001), while age showed marginal significance (HR: 6.8, 95% CI: 0.9&#x2013;52.5, <italic>p</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.066). After incorporating MYCN into the model, only rad-risk remained significant (HR: 8.8, 95% CI: 3.7&#x2013;21.0, <italic>p</italic>&#xa0;&lt;&#xa0;0.001). Furthermore, we integrated LDH and ferritin into the multivariate analyses separately or together, and rad-risk was the only factor that retained significance.</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Multivariate Cox regression analyses for event-free survival.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Models</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="3" align="center">Training set</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="3" align="center">Test set</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="center"/>
<th valign="top" align="center">HR</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">95% CI</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">
<italic>p-</italic>value</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">HR</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">95% CI</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">
<italic>p-</italic>value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Multivariate model 1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="fnT3_1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td valign="top" colspan="3" align="left">
<italic>n</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;77</td>
<td valign="top" colspan="3" align="left">
<italic>n</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;35</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Age &#x2265;18&#xa0;months</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9&#x2013;52.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.066</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">/</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">/</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">/</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">High rad-risk</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.0&#x2013;9.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.8&#x2013;13.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Multivariate model 2<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="fnT3_2">
<sup>b</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td valign="top" colspan="3" align="left">
<italic>n</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;64</td>
<td valign="top" colspan="3" align="left">
<italic>n</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">High rad-risk</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.7&#x2013;21.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.7&#x2013;26.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.007</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Multivariate model 3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="fnT3_3">
<sup>c</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td valign="top" colspan="3" align="left">
<italic>n</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;66</td>
<td valign="top" colspan="3" align="left">
<italic>n</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;34</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Age &#x2265;18&#xa0;months</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.8&#x2013;49.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.074</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">/</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">/</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">/</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">LDH &#x2265;587&#xa0;U/L</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">/</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">/</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">/</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1&#x2013;8.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">High rad-risk</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.0&#x2013;9.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.7&#x2013;13.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Multivariate model 4<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="fnT3_4">
<sup>d</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td valign="top" colspan="3" align="left">
<italic>n</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;64</td>
<td valign="top" colspan="3" align="left">
<italic>n</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Age &#x2265;18&#xa0;months</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9&#x2013;54.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.062</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">/</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">/</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">/</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">High rad-risk</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.8&#x2013;8.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.6&#x2013;12.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.004</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Multivariate model 5<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="fnT3_5">
<sup>e</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td valign="top" colspan="3" align="left">
<italic>n</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;51</td>
<td valign="top" colspan="3" align="left">
<italic>n</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">High rad-risk</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.2&#x2013;21.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.6&#x2013;63.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.002</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="fnT3_1">
<label>a</label>
<p>Multivariate model 1 includes age, stage, and rad-risk (n&#xa0;=&#xa0;112).</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fnT3_2">
<label>b</label>
<p>Multivariate model 2 includes age, stage, MYCN, and rad-risk (n&#xa0;=&#xa0;90).</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fnT3_3">
<label>c</label>
<p>Multivariate model 3 includes age, stage, LDH, and rad-risk (n&#xa0;=&#xa0;100).</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fnT3_4">
<label>d</label>
<p>Multivariate model 4 includes age, stage, ferritin, and rad-risk (n&#xa0;=&#xa0;96).</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fnT3_5">
<label>e</label>
<p>Multivariate model 5 includes age, stage, MYCH, LDH, ferritin, and rad-risk (n&#xa0;=&#xa0;76).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Similarly, after adjusting for clinicopathological variables separately or together in the multivariate analysis, high rad-risk was confirmed to be the most significant factor to predict EFS in the test set (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_6">
<title>Refinement of risk stratification in neuroblastoma</title>
<p>None of the seven patients with clinical low-risk diseases had a high rad-risk, and only 2 of the 26 patients with clinical intermediate-risk diseases had a high rad-risk, indicating that the majority of patients with clinical non-high-risk had a relatively homogeneous tumor. Due to limited cases with a high rad-risk in the clinical non-high-risk group, the significance of rad-risk in the risk substratification in this group could not be statistically analyzed.</p>
<p>Seventy-nine patients had high-risk neuroblastoma: 55 patients in the training set and 24 in the test set. We further evaluated whether adding rad-risk could refine risk stratification and compared it with volumetric indices, including MTV, MTV41%, TLG, and TLG41%. In the training set, ROC analyses were performed (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S3</bold>
</xref>) and optimal cutoff values were determined to be 120&#xa0;ml for MTV, 65&#xa0;ml for MTV41%, 426&#xa0;g for TLG, and 141&#xa0;g for TLG41%, respectively.</p>
<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>, all of the five imaging indices significantly correlated with EFS in the training set. The 3-year EFS for patients with high vs. low MTV, MTV41%, TLG, and TLG41% were 17% vs. 61% (<italic>p</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.013), 14% vs. 53% (<italic>p</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.015), 18% vs. 40% (<italic>p</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.014), and 16% vs. 61% (<italic>p</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.025), respectively. However, the volumetric features failed to retain significance in the test set, except TLG (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). Rad-risk yielded the best performance to distinguish high-risk patients with different outcomes, with a 3-year EFS of 6% vs. 47% (<italic>p</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.001, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4E</bold>
</xref>) in the training set and 9% vs. 51% (<italic>p</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.004, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5E</bold>
</xref>) in the test set. High rad-risk was associated with a 2.3&#x2013;3.4 times higher risk of progression (HR: 3.3, 95% CI: 1.6&#x2013;6.8, <italic>p</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.002 in the training set; HR: 4.4, 95% CI: 1.5&#x2013;12.9, <italic>p</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.008 in the test set). Two patients with high-risk neuroblastoma and a high or low rad-risk are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>.</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Kaplan&#x2013;Meier curves for EFS in children with high-risk neuroblastoma in the training set according to <bold>(A)</bold> metabolic tumor volume (MTV) with a cutoff value of 120&#xa0;ml; <bold>(B)</bold> MTV41% with a cutoff value of 65&#xa0;ml; <bold>(C)</bold> total lesion glycolysis (TLG) with a cutoff value of 426&#xa0;g; <bold>(D)</bold> TLG41% with a cutoff value of 141&#xa0;g; <bold>(E)</bold> rad-risk.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fonc-12-896593-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Kaplan&#x2013;Meier curves for EFS in children with high-risk neuroblastoma in the test set according to <bold>(A)</bold> MTV with a cutoff value of 120&#xa0;ml; <bold>(B)</bold> MTV41% with a cutoff value of 65&#xa0;ml; <bold>(C)</bold> TLG with a cutoff value of 426&#xa0;g; <bold>(D)</bold> TLG41% with a cutoff value of 141&#xa0;g; <bold>(E)</bold> rad-risk.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fonc-12-896593-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Two patients with a high-risk neuroblastoma and high or low intratumor heterogeneity. Both patients had amplified MYCN and stage 4 diseases. <bold>(A&#x2013;D)</bold> A 20-month-old girl with a highly heterogeneous FDG uptake in the primary tumor (high rad-risk). She progressed 21&#xa0;months after diagnosis. <bold>(E&#x2013;H)</bold> A 5-year-old boy with a relatively homogeneous FDG uptake (low rad-risk). The patient remained recurrence free within 5&#xa0;years of follow-up.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fonc-12-896593-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The substratification of high-risk neuroblastoma is challenging, and new predictive biomarkers are warranted for better patient selection. In this study, we confirmed that PET-based intratumor heterogeneity independently correlated with EFS in neuroblastoma both in the training set and the test set. It further improved the risk stratification in high-risk neuroblastoma, with a 3-year EFS of 6%&#x2013;9% for the highly heterogeneous tumors compared to 47%&#x2013;51% for the relatively homogeneous ones.</p>
<p>Radiomics, extracting quantitative features from medical images, has rapidly evolved throughout these years. Compared to histological biopsy only capturing a small proportion of tumor tissue that could underestimate the mutational burden (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>), a great advantage of radiomics is its ability to visualize the characteristics of the whole tumor non-invasively. It fully depicts spatial intratumor heterogeneity, which has been associated with poor prognosis. Studies showed that radiomic features in PET images correlated with heterogeneity at the cellular and genomic levels and had significant prognostic value in various malignancies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>). On the other hand, tumor necrosis results from increased tumor size, intratumor hypoxia, and nutrient deprivation. Both the presence and the extent of necrosis correlated with poor prognosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>). A necrotic core appears as non-FDG-avid area within the tumor. To investigate the spatial voxel relationships inside the entire tumor, the current study examined the VOI covering the whole mass (including the necrotic region) instead of putting a threshold of SUVmax on VOI segmentation. Our results partly confirmed previous studies that texture features significantly correlated with tumor size or volume (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>). We found four second-order indices reflecting tumor heterogeneity, including GLRLM_RLNU, highly correlated with volumetric indices. The latter is usually considered a reflection of tumor burden, while texture features correlate with tumor heterogeneity. A larger tumor results in a higher level of intratumor hypoxia and necrosis and leads to higher spatial complexity and heterogeneity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>). Hatt et&#xa0;al. found that radiomic heterogeneity quantification provided valuable complementary information for large tumors (&gt;10&#xa0;cm<sup>3</sup>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>). In our study, only one patient had a tumor volume less than 10&#xa0;ml. The median volume for our whole cohort was 160&#xa0;ml.</p>
<p>MYCN amplification is the most common genomic alteration in neuroblastoma, occurring in approximately 20% of the patients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>). It is highly associated with advanced stage and poor prognosis; thus, it has been incorporated into the mostly used neuroblastoma protocol. Radiomic models derived from contrast-enhanced CT have been shown to accurately predict MYCN amplification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>). Wu et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>) suggested that three-phase CT had a higher value than non-contrast CT scan, which could be explained by tumor angiogenesis promoted by MYCN amplification. Different from the density heterogeneous and vascular structure complexity depicted by CT scans, PET imaging semi-quantifies the glucose consumption of tumor parenchyma and reflects the uneven spatial distribution of cellular metabolism, hypoxia, necrosis, and proliferation. In our study, MYCN amplification occurred in 22% of the patients. Two patients had divergent MYCN results, potentially resulting from the heterogeneity of the tumor or underestimation of the mutational burden by biopsy bias. In line with a prior study by Sung et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>), we found that SUVmax and TLG had the potential to predict MYCN with AUCs of 0.771 and 0.776, respectively. However, histogram metrics and several second-order indices showed superior performance. Consequently, a radiomic model containing two PET features, namely, Histogram_Kurtosis and GLZLM_GLNU, was built and showed the strongest predictive power with an AUC of 0.871. Histogram_Kurtosis reflects the shape of the histogram distribution relative to a normal distribution. GLZLM_GLNU reflects the non-uniformity of the gray levels of the homogeneous zones in 3D. These two features have been proven to be promising parameters as biomarkers of tumor heterogeneity in various malignancies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>). A higher GLZLM_GLNU and a lower Histogram_Kurtosis, which indicate higher spatial heterogeneity, correlated with a higher possibility of MYCN amplification. Recently, Qian et&#xa0;al. reported that the radiomic signature containing both PET and CT features had a good ability to predict MYCN amplification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>). However, the majority of the features were obtained from wavelet transformed images, which decompose an image by using spatially oriented frequency filters but require intensive computation and may suffer from low reproducibility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>). Despite the methodology differences, we both showed that a high intratumor heterogeneity was associated with MYCN amplification. Since neuroblastoma is remarkably heterogeneous, which might require at least two solid tumor areas to provide a more accurate genomic diagnosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>), texture features fully portraying the entire tumor might provide important complementary information about molecular profiling.</p>
<p>Our second step was to evaluate whether intratumor heterogeneity could provide prognostic information in pretreatment neuroblastoma. A recent study reported that high intratumor metabolic heterogeneity on <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT was a strong prognostic factor in 38 children with newly diagnosed neuroblastoma (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>), and it was the first report identifying metabolic heterogeneity as a prognostic biomarker of neuroblastoma. The authors used the area under the curve of the cumulative SUV-volume histograms (AUC-CSHs), which is a histogram-based first-order feature that describes the percentage of total tumor volume above the percent threshold of SUVmax, as an intratumor heterogeneity index. Lower AUC-CSH indicated higher heterogeneity of the tumor and poorer outcomes. Although the histogram analysis appears promising and simple, the major pitfalls of the histogram analysis are the lack of information on the spatial organization of tumors and that it is not straightforward which might lead to errors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>). In another recently published study of 18 children with high-risk neuroblastoma, Fiz et&#xa0;al. demonstrated that intratumor heterogeneity on 18fluorine-dihydroxyphenylalanine (18F-DOPA) PET/CT was closely associated with metastatic burden and had certain prognostic value (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>). In the current study, we further expanded that intratumor heterogeneity was a prognostic biomarker in neuroblastoma, with a much larger cohort and a higher order of texture analysis, which further improves quantitative histogram approaches by introducing the spatial dimension. Multivariate analysis identified GLRLM_RLNU and Histogram_Entropy as the independently significant predictors for EFS. GLRLM_RLNU gives the size of homogeneous runs for each gray level. A similar run length results in low values of GLRLM_RLNU. On the contrary, a high value is indicative of heterogeneity. Studies have reported that GLRLM_RLNU extracted from PET had the potential for predicting treatment response and prognosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>). On the other hand, Histogram_Entropy measures the randomness of voxel distribution and has been established as an important biomarker reflecting heterogeneity in various MRI and PET studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>). In accordance with previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>), we found that high rad-risk, defined as patients with both a high GLRLM_RLNU and a high Histogram_Entropy, indicating a high intratumor heterogeneity, was the most significant independent factor for EFS after adjusting for clinicopathological factors.</p>
<p>To further evaluate the ability of rad-risk in the refinement of risk stratification, we incorporated rad-risk into the existing risk stratification schema and compared it to volumetric indices. The results showed that the majority of patients with clinical non-high risk had a low rad-risk, indicating a relatively homogeneous tumor. Among high-risk neuroblastoma, rad-risk effectively distinguished patients with distinct outcomes both in the training and test sets. In addition, despite that intratumor heterogeneity highly correlated with MTV and TLG, rad-risk outperformed the volumetric indices and showed the highest ability to predict the outcome. These findings indicate that PET-based intratumor heterogeneity might have independent prognostic information, which may help substratify neuroblastoma patients for more refined risk-adapted treatment approaches in the future.</p>
<p>The limitations of this study are as follows: first, this is a retrospective study with a relatively small sample size in a single center. Second, <sup>123</sup>I-mIBG scans were not performed in our cohort, since <sup>123</sup>I-MIBG is not yet available in our country. The disadvantages of the <sup>123</sup>I-mIBG scan, including limited spatial resolution and lower sensitivity in soft tissue lesions or small lesions, limit its value in radiomic analysis in neuroblastoma. Future efforts in PET-based texture features using novel radiopharmaceuticals such as <sup>18</sup>F-fluorometaguanidine and <sup>124</sup>I-mIBG might yield important predictive or prognostic information. Third, this study evaluated the features of primary tumor and captured less information outside the primary site, such as metastatic lesions or metastatic burden, which could be of important prognostic value. An additional limitation is that no separate cohort was used for validation regarding the prediction of MYCN amplification due to the limited number of patients with amplified MYCN. A large cohort with external validation should be warranted in the future.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>In summary, PET-based intratumor heterogeneity could serve as a powerful and non-invasive approach to predict MYCN amplification and survival outcome in newly diagnosed neuroblastoma, providing a potential approach to refine the risk stratification in children with high-risk diseases. Further validation with a larger cohort is required.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref>. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="ethics-statement">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>This retrospective study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine and the requirement for informed consent was waived.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>ChL, HW, and SC contributed to the conception and design of the study. ChL and SC organized the database. ChL and SC performed the statistical analysis. CaL, SW, YY, FF, and HF performed the data analysis and interpretation. ChL and SC wrote the first draft of the manuscript. CaL, SW, YY, FF, and HF wrote sections of the manuscript. ChL, HW, and SC edited the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This study has been supported by the National Natural Science Funds (81801731 and 81901775).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s12" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.896593/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.896593/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>van Groningen</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koster</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Valentijn</surname> <given-names>LJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zwijnenburg</surname> <given-names>DA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Akogul</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hasselt</surname> <given-names>NE</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Neuroblastoma is composed of two super-enhancer-associated differentiation states</article-title>. <source>Nat Genet</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>49</volume>(<issue>8</issue>):<page-range>1261&#x2013;6</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ng.3899</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cohn</surname> <given-names>SL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pearson</surname> <given-names>AD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>London</surname> <given-names>WB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Monclair</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ambros</surname> <given-names>PF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brodeur</surname> <given-names>GM</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>The international neuroblastoma risk group (INRG) classification system: An INRG task force report</article-title>. <source>J Clin Oncol</source> (<year>2009</year>) <volume>27</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<page-range>289&#x2013;97</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6785</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Siegel</surname> <given-names>RL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>KD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fuchs</surname> <given-names>HE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jemal</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Cancer statistics, 2021</article-title>. <source>CA Cancer J Clin</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>71</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>7</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3322/caac.21654</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tadeo</surname> <given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berbegall</surname> <given-names>AP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Castel</surname> <given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garcia-Miguel</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Callaghan</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pahlman</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Extracellular matrix composition defines an ultra-high-risk group of neuroblastoma within the high-risk patient cohort</article-title>. <source>Br J Cancer</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>115</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<page-range>480&#x2013;9</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/bjc.2016.210</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Junttila</surname> <given-names>MR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Sauvage</surname> <given-names>FJ</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Influence of tumour micro-environment heterogeneity on therapeutic response</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> (<year>2013</year>) <volume>501</volume>(<issue>7467</issue>):<page-range>346&#x2013;54</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature12626</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Meacham</surname> <given-names>CE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morrison</surname> <given-names>SJ</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Tumour heterogeneity and cancer cell plasticity</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> (<year>2013</year>) <volume>501</volume>(<issue>7467</issue>):<page-range>328&#x2013;37</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature12624</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chicklore</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Goh</surname> <given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Siddique</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roy</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marsden</surname> <given-names>PK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cook</surname> <given-names>GJ</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Quantifying tumour heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging by texture analysis</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source> (<year>2013</year>) <volume>40</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<page-range>133&#x2013;40</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-012-2247-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>van Velden</surname> <given-names>FH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheebsumon</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yaqub</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smit</surname> <given-names>EF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hoekstra</surname> <given-names>OS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lammertsma</surname> <given-names>AA</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Evaluation of a cumulative SUV-volume histogram method for parameterizing heterogeneous intratumoural FDG uptake in non-small cell lung cancer PET studies</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source> (<year>2011</year>) <volume>38</volume>(<issue>9</issue>):<page-range>1636&#x2013;47</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-011-1845-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yoo</surname> <given-names>SH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>SY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheon</surname> <given-names>GJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oh</surname> <given-names>DY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bang</surname> <given-names>YJ</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Predictive role of temporal changes in intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity during palliative chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: A prospective cohort study</article-title>. <source>J Nucl Med</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>61</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<page-range>33&#x2013;9</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2967/jnumed.119.226407</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pinho</surname> <given-names>DF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>King</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xi</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Albuquerque</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lea</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Subramaniam</surname> <given-names>RM</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Value of intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity and quantitative (18)F-FDG PET/CT parameters in predicting prognosis for patients with cervical cancer</article-title>. <source>AJR Am J roentgenol</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>214</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<page-range>908&#x2013;16</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2214/AJR.19.21604</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yanik</surname> <given-names>GA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parisi</surname> <given-names>MT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shulkin</surname> <given-names>BL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Naranjo</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kreissman</surname> <given-names>SG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>London</surname> <given-names>WB</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Semiquantitative mIBG scoring as a prognostic indicator in patients with stage 4 neuroblastoma: A report from the children's oncology group</article-title>. <source>J Nucl Med</source> (<year>2013</year>) <volume>54</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<page-range>541&#x2013;8</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2967/jnumed.112.112334</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Katzenstein</surname> <given-names>HM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cohn</surname> <given-names>SL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shore</surname> <given-names>RM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bardo</surname> <given-names>DM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haut</surname> <given-names>PR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Olszewski</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Scintigraphic response by 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scan correlates with event-free survival in high-risk neuroblastoma</article-title>. <source>J Clin Oncol</source> (<year>2004</year>) <volume>22</volume>(<issue>19</issue>):<page-range>3909&#x2013;15</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1200/JCO.2004.07.144</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>CJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>MY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>YL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ko</surname> <given-names>CL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ko</surname> <given-names>KY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tzen</surname> <given-names>KY</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Risk stratification of pediatric patients with neuroblastoma using volumetric parameters of 18F-FDG and 18F-DOPA PET/CT</article-title>. <source>Clin Nucl Med</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>42</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<page-range>e142&#x2013;e8</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/RLU.0000000000001529</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>JW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cho</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yun</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>JD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lyu</surname> <given-names>CJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>WJ</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Prognostic value of pretreatment FDG PET in pediatric neuroblastoma</article-title>. <source>Eur J Radiol</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>84</volume>(<issue>12</issue>):<page-range>2633&#x2013;9</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.09.027</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Papathanasiou</surname> <given-names>ND</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gaze</surname> <given-names>MN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sullivan</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aldridge</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Waddington</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Almuhaideb</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>18F-FDG PET/CT and 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging in high-risk neuroblastoma: Diagnostic comparison and survival analysis</article-title>. <source>J Nucl Med</source> (<year>2011</year>) <volume>52</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<page-range>519&#x2013;25</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2967/jnumed.110.083303</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Prognostic value of metabolic indices and bone marrow uptake pattern on preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT in pediatric patients with neuroblastoma</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>45</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<page-range>306&#x2013;15</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-017-3851-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Boellaard</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Delgado-Bolton</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oyen</surname> <given-names>WJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Giammarile</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tatsch</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eschner</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>42</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<page-range>328&#x2013;54</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-014-2961-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Peerawaranun</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Landier</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nosten</surname> <given-names>FH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>TN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hien</surname> <given-names>TT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tripura</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Intracluster correlation coefficients in the greater Mekong subregion for sample size calculations of cluster randomized malaria trials</article-title>. <source>Malar J</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>18</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>428</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12936-019-3062-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dissaux</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Visvikis</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Da-Ano</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pradier</surname> <given-names>O</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chajon</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barillot</surname> <given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT radiomics predict local recurrence in patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: A multicentric study</article-title>. <source>J Nucl Med</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>61</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<page-range>814&#x2013;20</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2967/jnumed.119.228106</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mukaka</surname> <given-names>MM</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research</article-title>. <source>Malawi Med J</source> (<year>2012</year>) <volume>24</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>69</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>71</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gerlinger</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rowan</surname> <given-names>AJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Horswell</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Math</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Larkin</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Endesfelder</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing</article-title>. <source>N Engl J Med</source> (<year>2012</year>) <volume>366</volume>(<issue>10</issue>):<page-range>883&#x2013;92</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1056/NEJMoa1113205</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Basler</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gabrys</surname> <given-names>HS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hogan</surname> <given-names>SA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pavic</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bogowicz</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vuong</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Radiomics, tumor volume, and blood biomarkers for early prediction of pseudoprogression in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibition</article-title>. <source>Clin Cancer Res</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>26</volume>(<issue>16</issue>):<page-range>4414&#x2013;25</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0020</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Limkin</surname> <given-names>EJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vakalopoulou</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dercle</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Champiat</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>SR</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>A radiomics approach to assess tumour-infiltrating CD8 cells and response to anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy: An imaging biomarker, retrospective multicohort study</article-title>. <source>Lancet Oncol</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>19</volume>(<issue>9</issue>):<page-range>1180&#x2013;91</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30413-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Moon</surname> <given-names>SH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Joung</surname> <given-names>JG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cha</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Park</surname> <given-names>WY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ahn</surname> <given-names>JS</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Correlations between metabolic texture features, genetic heterogeneity, and mutation burden in patients with lung cancer</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>46</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<page-range>446&#x2013;54</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-018-4138-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Minervini</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Di Cristofano</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gacci</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Serni</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Menicagli</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lanciotti</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Prognostic role of histological necrosis for nonmetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Correlation with pathological features and molecular markers</article-title>. <source>J Urol</source> (<year>2008</year>) <volume>180</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<page-range>1284&#x2013;9</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.juro.2008.06.036</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rakheja</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Makis</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tulbah</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Skamene</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Holcroft</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nahal</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Necrosis on FDG PET/CT correlates with prognosis and mortality in sarcomas</article-title>. <source>AJR Am J Roentgenol</source> (<year>2013</year>) <volume>201</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<page-range>170&#x2013;7</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2214/AJR.12.9795</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hatt</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Majdoub</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Valli&#xe8;res</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tixier</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Le Rest</surname> <given-names>CC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Groheux</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>18F-FDG PET uptake characterization through texture analysis: investigating the complementary nature of heterogeneity and functional tumor volume in a multi-cancer site patient cohort</article-title>. <source>J Nucl Med</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>56</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>38</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>44</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2967/jnumed.114.144055</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pfaehler</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mesotten</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhovannik</surname> <given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pieplenbosch</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thomeer</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vanhove</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Plausibility and redundancy analysis to select FDG-PET textural features in non-small cell lung cancer</article-title>. <source>Med Phys</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>48</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<page-range>1226&#x2013;38</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/mp.14684</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Matthay</surname> <given-names>KK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maris</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schleiermacher</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nakagawara</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mackall</surname> <given-names>CL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Diller</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Neuroblastoma</article-title>. <source>Nat Rev Dis Primers</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>2</volume>:<fpage>16078</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrdp.2016.78</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>CT-based radiomics signature with machine learning predicts MYCN amplification in pediatric abdominal neuroblastoma</article-title>. <source>Front Oncol</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>11</volume>:<elocation-id>687884</elocation-id>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fonc.2021.687884</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duan</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Radiogenomics of neuroblastoma in pediatric patients: CT-based radiomics signature in predicting MYCN amplification</article-title>. <source>Eur Radiol</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>31</volume>(<issue>5</issue>):<page-range>3080&#x2013;9</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00330-020-07246-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<label>32</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Di Giannatale</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Di Paolo</surname> <given-names>PL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Curione</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lenkowicz</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Napolitano</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Secinaro</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Radiogenomics prediction for MYCN amplification in neuroblastoma: A hypothesis generating study</article-title>. <source>Pediatr Blood Cancer</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>68</volume>(<issue>9</issue>):<elocation-id>e29110</elocation-id>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22541/au.161144128.80677267/v1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<label>33</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sung</surname> <given-names>AJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weiss</surname> <given-names>BD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharp</surname> <given-names>SE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trout</surname> <given-names>AT</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Prognostic significance of pretreatment (18)F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography in pediatric neuroblastoma</article-title>. <source>Pediatr Radiol</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>51</volume>(<issue>8</issue>):<page-range>1400&#x2013;5</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00247-021-05005-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<label>34</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Just</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Improving tumour heterogeneity MRI assessment with histograms</article-title>. <source>Br J Cancer</source> (<year>2014</year>) <volume>111</volume>(<issue>12</issue>):<page-range>2205&#x2013;13</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/bjc.2014.512</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<label>35</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Acar</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Turgut</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yigit</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaya</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Comparison of the volumetric and radiomics findings of 18F-FDG PET/CT images with immunohistochemical prognostic factors in local/locally advanced breast cancer</article-title>. <source>Nucl Med Commun</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>40</volume>(<issue>7</issue>):<page-range>764&#x2013;72</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/MNM.0000000000001019</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<label>36</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Toyama</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hotta</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Motoi</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Takanami</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Minamimoto</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Takase</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Prognostic value of FDG-PET radiomics with machine learning in pancreatic cancer</article-title>. <source>Sci Rep</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>10</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>17024</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-020-73237-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<label>37</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Qian</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kan</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Prediction of MYCN amplification, 1p and 11q aberrations in pediatric neuroblastoma <italic>via</italic> pre-therapy 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics</article-title>. <source>Front Med (Lausanne)</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>9</volume>:<elocation-id>840777</elocation-id>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmed.2022.840777</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<label>38</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>van Griethuysen</surname> <given-names>JJM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fedorov</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parmar</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hosny</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aucoin</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Narayan</surname> <given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype</article-title>. <source>Cancer Res</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>77</volume>(<issue>21</issue>):<page-range>e104&#x2013;e7</page-range>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<label>39</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>L&#xf3;pez-Carrasco</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berbegall</surname> <given-names>AP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mart&#xed;n-Va&#xf1;&#xf3;</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blanquer-Maceiras</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Castel</surname> <given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Navarro</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Intra-tumour genetic heterogeneity and prognosis in high-risk neuroblastoma</article-title>. <source>Cancers (Basel)</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>13</volume>(<issue>20</issue>)<fpage>:5173</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/cancers13205173</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<label>40</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Si</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qian</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>The prognostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT intra-tumoural metabolic heterogeneity in pretreatment neuroblastoma patients</article-title>. <source>Cancer Imaging</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>22</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>32</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40644-022-00472-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<label>41</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rose</surname> <given-names>CJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>O'Connor</surname> <given-names>JP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cootes</surname> <given-names>TF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>CJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jayson</surname> <given-names>GC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parker</surname> <given-names>GJ</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Indexed distribution analysis for improved significance testing of spatially heterogeneous parameter maps: Application to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI biomarkers</article-title>. <source>Magn Reson Med</source> (<year>2014</year>) <volume>71</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<page-range>1299&#x2013;311</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/mrm.24755</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<label>42</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fiz</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bottoni</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bini</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cerroni</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marinozzi</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Conte</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Prognostic value of texture analysis of the primary tumour in high-risk neuroblastoma: An (18) f-DOPA PET study</article-title>. <source>Pediatr Blood Cancer</source> (<year>2022</year>): <elocation-id>e29910</elocation-id>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/pbc.29910</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<label>43</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Aerts</surname> <given-names>HJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Velazquez</surname> <given-names>ER</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leijenaar</surname> <given-names>RT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parmar</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grossmann</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carvalho</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach</article-title>. <source>Nat Commun</source> (<year>2014</year>) <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>4006</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms5006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<label>44</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>SW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>WC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>YC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>RY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hsieh</surname> <given-names>TC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yen</surname> <given-names>KY</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Correlation of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET tumor textural features with gene expression in pharyngeal cancer and implications for radiotherapy-based treatment outcomes</article-title>. <source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>44</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<page-range>567&#x2013;80</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-016-3580-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<label>45</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Atkinson</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ganeshan</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Endozo</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wan</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aldridge</surname> <given-names>MD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Groves</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Radiomics-based texture analysis of (68)Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography and computed tomography images as a prognostic biomarker in adults with neuroendocrine cancers treated with (177)Lu-DOTATATE</article-title>. <source>Front Oncol</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>11</volume>:<elocation-id>686235</elocation-id>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fonc.2021.686235</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>