<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "archivearticle.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="systematic-review" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Oncol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Oncology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Oncol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2234-943X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fonc.2022.847510</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Oncology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Systematic Review</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Using in Conduit Reconstruction for Patients With Esophageal Cancer to Improve Short-Term Clinical Outcome: A Meta-Analysis</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hong</surname>
<given-names>Zhi-Nuan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1687638"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>Liqin</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Weiguang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Kang</surname>
<given-names>Mingqiang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital</institution>, <addr-line>Fuzhou</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Key Laboratory of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (Fujian Medical University), Fujian Province University</institution>, <addr-line>Fuzhou</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University</institution>, <addr-line>Fuzhou</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
<institution>Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University</institution>, <addr-line>Fuzhou</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
<institution>Department of Equipment, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital</institution>, <addr-line>Fuzhou</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Francesco Ferrara, Santi Paolo e Carlo Hospital, Italy</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Katsuya Yamada, Hirosaki University, Japan; Flavio Roberto Takeda, University of S&#xe3;o Paulo, Brazil</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Mingqiang Kang, <email xlink:href="mailto:kangmingqiang0799@163.com">kangmingqiang0799@163.com</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn003">
<p>&#x2020;These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002">
<p>This article was submitted to Surgical Oncology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>01</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<elocation-id>847510</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>02</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>27</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2022 Hong, Huang, Zhang and Kang</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Hong, Huang, Zhang and Kang</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Objectives</title>
<p>This meta-analysis evaluated the short-term safety and efficacy of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence in gastric reconstruction to determine a suitable anastomotic position during esophagectomy.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes 2020 (PRISMA) were followed for this analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>A total of 9 publications including 1,162 patients were included. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss were comparable in the ICG and control groups. There was also no significant difference in overall postoperative mortality, reoperation, arrhythmia, vocal cord paralysis, pneumonia, and surgical wound infection. The ICG group had a 2.66-day reduction in postoperative stay. The overall anastomotic leak (AL) was 17.6% (n = 131) in the control group and 4.5% (n = 19) in the ICG group with a relative risk (RR) of 0.29 (95% CI 0.18&#x2013;0.47). A subgroup analysis showed that the application of ICG in cervical anastomosis significantly reduced the incidence of AL (RR of 0.31, 95% CI 0.18&#x2013;0.52), but for intrathoracic anastomosis, the RR 0.35 was not significant (95% CI 0.09&#x2013;1.43). Compared to an RR of 0.35 in publications with a sample size of &lt;50, a sample size of &gt;50 had a lower RR of 0.24 (95% CI 0.12&#x2013;0.48). Regarding intervention time of ICG, the application of ICG both before and after gastric construction had a better RR of 0.25 (95% CI 0.07&#x2013;0.89).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>The application of ICG fluorescence could effectively reduce the incidence of AL and shorten the postoperative hospital stay for patients undergoing cervical anastomosis but was not effective for patients undergoing intrathoracic anastomosis. The application of ICG fluorescence before and after gastric management can better prevent AL.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Systematic Review Registration</title>
<p>PROSPERO, CRD:42021244819.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>esophagectomy</kwd>
<kwd>indocyanine green</kwd>
<kwd>anastomotic leak</kwd>
<kwd>meta-analysis</kwd>
<kwd>short-term outcome</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="6"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="35"/>
<page-count count="9"/>
<word-count count="3561"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Esophagectomy is an important means of radical/curative treatment of esophageal cancer. Among the postoperative complications, anastomotic leakage (AL) after esophagectomy remains a risk of considerable morbidity and mortality. In high-volume centers, AL rates range from 5 to 40%, even up to 50% in some medical centers, despite surgical advances and preoperative optimizations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>). Among the risk factors affecting anastomotic integrity, poor perfusion is a factor that can be intervened upon surgically. Gastric tube blood supply is currently monitored clinically by monitoring blood vessel color, temperature, and arterial pulse to predict poor perfusion. However, these parameters cannot reliably and objectively reflect the level of perfusion, therefore they have limited predictive value (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>).</p>
<p>Thus, it would be useful to find valid parameters to evaluate the perfusion status. Indocyanine green (ICG) is a water-soluble three-carbon anthocyanin dye with a plasma half-life span of 3&#x2013;5 min. ICG absorbs light at an excitation wavelength of between 750 and 800 nm while emitting light at longer emission wavelengths of 830 nm or more. Only a few patients developed anaphylactic shock after an intravenous injection of ICG. Regarding its safety concerns, ICG has been added to the rapid food and drug administration approval for clinical use (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>). Nowadays, the application of ICG fluorescence angiography in the resection of esophageal carcinoma and conduit reconstruction is being widely developed.</p>
<p>At present, ICG fluorescence has been widely used in liver surgery, sentinel lymph node biopsy of breast cancer, and gastric cancer. In the field of thoracic surgery, it is mainly used in the location of pulmonary nodules, determination of pulmonary segment boundaries during pulmonary segmentectomy, sentinel lymph node location in the thoracic cavity of lung cancer, intraoperative chest guide display, and gastric perfusion assessment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>). Previous meta-analysis has confirmed that ICG fluorescence is an objective and useful parameter for evaluating gastric microcirculation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>). This study aimed to systematically review the existing literature to determine the value of ICG fluorescence for short-term efficacy, especially for preventing anastomotic leakage (AL), and to investigate whether there are differences in the efficacy of ICG among different anastomosis sites (intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis), the sample size in the intervention group (&lt;50 versus &gt;50), and the intervention time (only after tube construction versus both before and after tube construction).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<title>Method</title>
<p>A meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement (PRISMA) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>). IRB approval and written consent were not required for this further analysis.</p>
<sec id="s2_1">
<title>Literature Search Method</title>
<p>A search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP Database, China Biology Medicine Disc, and Wan-fang database was conducted on 10 April 2021 by two independent researchers. The retrieval terms included ICG and esophagectomy. Both database subject heading fields (Emtree in EMBASE, MeSH in MEDLINE) and text word fields were searched. References of retrieved articles and reviews were also manually screened to obtain additional relevant studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<title>Study Selection</title>
<p>The inclusion criteria included: (1) esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction; (2) comparative study design: control group using color, temperature, and pulsation of vessels; experimental group using ICG to assess perfusion; (3) age &#x2265;18 years; (4) sufficient clinical outcome data for further analysis; and (5) sample size &#x2265;10. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) abstract or review; (2) data insufficient; (3) repeated publications; and (4) included in a multicenter study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<title>Quality Assessment</title>
<p>We used the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies tool (MINORS) (score from 0 to 24). MINORS is a 12-point validated tool designed specifically to evaluate the methodological quality of non-randomized surgical trials. For the comparative studies, the ideal score was 24. A MINORS score below 12 indicates poor quality. A MINORS score above 18 indicates good quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>). Disagreements in the quality assessment were resolved through discussion.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<title>Data Extraction</title>
<p>Data were extracted by two independent researchers (Z-NH and LH) and entered into an EXCEL file including author, published time, country, study design, BMI, sample size, gender, history of smoking, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, histological type, preoperative albumin, preoperative comorbidity (including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obstructive lung disease), neoadjuvant therapy, tumor location, pathological tumor category, TNM stage, anastomotic method (stapler/hand sewn), route of gastric conduit, operation type, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, AL number, other complications, postoperative hospital stay, and hospital cost.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<title>Statistical Analysis</title>
<p>We used the inconsistency statistic (I<sup>2</sup>) to evaluate the extent of heterogeneity. Relative risk was used to evaluate the binary variable and the weighted mean difference for the continuous variable. An I<sup>2</sup> value greater than 50% was considered to indicate substantial heterogeneity. A fixed model was used when I<sup>2</sup> &lt;50%, and a random model was used when I<sup>2</sup> &#x2267;50%. A 2-sided test at the 5% level was defined as indicating statistical significance. We only calculated the existing data and did not fill in the missing data. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to find the heterogeneity source. Publication bias would be assessed by funnel plots, Begg&#x2019;s test, and Egger&#x2019;s tests. Statistical analysis was conducted with Stata version 15 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA), and Revman 5.4.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<title>Study Selection</title>
<p>Electronic database search results are available in the PRISMA flow diagram (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). From an initial total of 501 studies, 42 underwent full-text review, with 9 studies being included in our analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>). Many related publications focus on the flow dynamics of ICG perfusion.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p> PRISMA flow diagram. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fonc-12-847510-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<title>Study Characteristics</title>
<p>A total of 1,162 patients from 4 countries were included in our analysis, of whom 419 patients underwent ICG. Although most of the publications were retrospective, there was only 1 prospective study. The sample size ranged from 40 to 285. There was some heterogeneity regarding the ICG dose, near-infrared system, operation type, and ICG intervention time. The ICG and near-infrared system were varied, which makes it difficult for further analysis. Detailed information about the included studies can be found in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Baseline characteristics of included studies.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"/>
<th valign="top" rowspan="2" align="center">Included studies</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Heterogeneity</th>
<th valign="top" rowspan="2" align="center">Model</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Pooled effect</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"/>
<th valign="top" align="center">
<italic>p</italic>
</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">I2%</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">95% CI</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">
<italic>p</italic>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Male</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.49</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fixed</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.93 (0.67-1.29)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.49</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Age</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Random</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07 (-0.08-0.22)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.35</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BMI</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fixed</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.12 (-0.08-0.31)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">History of smoking</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.92</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fixed</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.12 (0.70-1381)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.63</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ASA I-II</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Random</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.63 (0.4-0.99)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SSC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fixed</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.98 (0.56-1.71)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.94</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Diabetes mellitus</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.86</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fixed</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.14 (0.78-1.66)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cardiovascular disease</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fixed</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.08 (0.60-1.94)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.79</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Obstructive lung disease</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.63</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fixed</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.37 (0.13-1.03)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.06</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Neoadjuvant therapy</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">65</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Random</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.59 (0.41-0.85)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.004</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tumor in upper thoracic</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Random</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.86 (0.51-1.47)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.59</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pathological Tumor Category T1-2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Random</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.87 (0.57-1.32)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.51</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TNM stage I-II</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.006</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Random</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.86 (0.60-1.23)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Thoracoscopy</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fixed</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.73 (1.40-5.37)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Laparoscopy</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fixed</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.17 (1.18-3.96)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Anastomotic procedure using Stapler</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.49</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fixed</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.99 (0.57-1.70)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.97</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Gastric conduit Through posterior mediastinal</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fixed</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.97 (0.44-2.17)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.95</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Preoperative albumin (mg/dl)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fixed</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.14 (-0.28--0.002)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.047</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Five studies were assessed to be of good quality based on the MINORS, with scores of 19 or more. The other four studies were assessed to be of moderate quality, with scores of 13 or more (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Quality assessment by methodological index for non-randomized studies tool.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Author</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Stated aim</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Inclusion of consecutive patients</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Prospective data collection</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Endpoint appropriate for study</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Unbiased assessment of study endpoint</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">F/U period approriate for study</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Loss to follow-up &lt;5%</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Prospective calculation of study size</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Adequate control group</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Contemporary groups</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Baseline aquivalence of groups</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Adequate statistical analysis</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Total score</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Campbell et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dalton et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Karampinis et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Kitagawa et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Noma et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ohi et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Guo Jin-cheng et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Song Xuantong et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Rao-Jun Luo et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<title>Baseline Characteristics</title>
<p>The age, body mean index, history of smoking, pathological type, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, obstructive lung disease, tumor location, pathological tumor category (T1&#x2013;2/T3&#x2013;4), TNM stage (I&#x2013;II/III&#x2013;IV), anastomotic procedure using a stapler, and gastric conduit through the posterior mediastinal were comparable in the ICG and control groups. However, the ICG group was lower in ASA I&#x2013;II status (RR of 0.63, 95% CI 0.4&#x2013;0.99), neoadjuvant therapy (RR of 0.59, 95% CI 0.41&#x2013;0.85), and preoperative albumin (WMD &#x2212;0.14 g/L, 95% CI &#x2212;0.28&#x2013;0.002). The ICG group underwent more thoracoscopy (RR of 2.73, 95% CI 1.40&#x2013;5.37) and laparoscopy (RR of 2.17, 95% CI 1.18&#x2013;3.96) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<title>Short-Term Clinical Outcomes</title>
<p>The short-term clinical outcomes are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss were comparable in the ICG and control groups. There was no significant difference regarding overall postoperative mortality, reoperation rate, arrhythmia rate, vocal cord paralysis rate, pneumonia rate, or surgical wound infection. However, the ICG group had a shorter postoperative stay, with a 2.66-day reduction (WMD, 95% CI &#x2212;3.77&#x2013;1.55, p = 0.000).</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Summary of short-term clinical outcomes.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"/>
<th valign="top" rowspan="2" align="center">Included studies</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center"> Heterogeneity</th>
<th valign="top" rowspan="2" align="center">Model</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Pooled effect</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"/>
<th valign="top" align="center">
<italic>p</italic>
</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">I2%</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">95% CI</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">
<italic>p</italic>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Intraoperative blood loss (ml)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Fixed</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-9.18 (-21.34-2.99)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Operation time (min)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">33.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Fixed</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.69 (-6.86-10.23)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Postoperative Hospital stay (d)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Fixed</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-2.66 (-3.77--1.55)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AL</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.46</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Fixed</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.29 (0.18-0.47)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Surgical Wound infection</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Fixed</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.66 (0.29-1.49)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.31</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pneumonia</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Fixed</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.85 (0.59-1.23)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Vocalcord paralysis</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Fixed</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.07 (0.98-1.16)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.13</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Arrhythmia</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">77.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Random</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.73 (0.47-1.12)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Reoperation</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.70</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Fixed</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.67 (0.20-2.22)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Overall mortality</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Fixed</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.23 (0.45-3.39)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.69</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Al, anastomotic leak.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The overall AL rate was 17.6% (n = 131) in the control group and 4.5% (n = 19) in the ICG group. The overall RR for AL was 0.29 (95% CI 0.18&#x2013;0.47, p = 0.000), suggesting that ICG was associated with a statistically significant decrease in rates of AL (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). The sensitivity analysis results did not indicate any publications with obvious heterogeneity (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary 1</bold>
</xref>). Subgroup analysis was conducted by anastomosis site, ICG group sample size, and intervention time. The application of ICG in cervical anastomosis significantly reduced the incidence of AL (RR of 0.31, 95% CI 0.18&#x2013;0.52), but the application of ICG fluorescence in intrathoracic anastomosis did not significantly reduce the incidence of AL rate (RR of 0.35, 95% CI 0.09&#x2013;1.43) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Regarding the sample size in the ICG group, publications with a sample size of &gt;50 had a lower RR of 0.24 (95% CI 0.12&#x2013;0.48). However, publications with a sample size of &lt;50 still had a statistical RR of 0.35 (95% CI 0.18&#x2013;0.68) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). Regarding the intervention time of ICG, the application of ICG both before and after gastric construction showed a better RR of 0.25 (95% CI 0.07&#x2013;0.89) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Forest plot for anastomotic leak.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fonc-12-847510-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Forest plot for subgroup analysis of anastomotic leak based on anastomosis site.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fonc-12-847510-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Forest plot for subgroup analysis of anastomotic leak based on experimental group sample size.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fonc-12-847510-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Forest plot for subgroup analysis of anastomotic leak based on indocyanine green fluorescence intervention time.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fonc-12-847510-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<title>Publication Bias</title>
<p>A funnel plot analysis based on AL was performed. The funnel plot was asymmetrical (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6A</bold>
</xref>), which suggested that smaller studies favoring control had been omitted. Thus, we further conducted the Egger&#x2019;s test (p = 0.65) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6B</bold>
</xref>) and Begg&#x2019;s test (p = 0.47) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6C</bold>
</xref>), which both indicated no potential publication bias. The trim and fill test was stable without any trim or fill (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6D</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Publication bias assessment. <bold>(A)</bold> Funnel plot; <bold>(B)</bold> Egger&#x2019;s test funnel plot; <bold>(C)</bold> Begg&#x2019;s test funnel plot; <bold>(D)</bold> Trim and fill funnel plot. Above four pictures were draw based on anastomotic leak rate.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fonc-12-847510-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>This is the first meta-analysis focused on the short-term outcome of ICG fluorescence. No ICG-related adverse events were reported in the included publications. Preliminary study results suggested ICG fluorescence did not increase the operation time or intraoperative blood loss. Overall postoperative mortality, reoperation rate, arrhythmia rate, vocal cord paralysis rate, pneumonia rate, and surgical wound infection were comparable between the ICG and control groups. There was an absolute risk reduction of 69% in the ICG group, which means the prevention of 55 patients in the ICG group from AL. ICG can effectively identify the sufficiency of gastric perfusion so that the surgeon can make an early decision if any adjustment of the gastric tube should be made. This is a promising finding and could explain the reduction in postoperative hospital stays.</p>
<p>The application of ICG could only prevent patients from undergoing cervical anastomosis but not intrathoracic anastomosis from AL (RR of 0.31, 95% CI 0.18&#x2013;0.52). This contributed to the difference in AL rates between cervical anastomosis and intrathoracic anastomosis. Cervical anastomosis is associated with a significantly increased risk of AL. Biere et&#xa0;al. reported that cervical anastomosis could be associated with a higher leak rate (OR: 3.43; 95% CI: 1.09&#x2013;10.78; p = 0.03) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>).</p>
<p>There is a consensus that cervical anastomosis requires the formation of a longer gastric tube, which must travel over a longer distance in the mediastinum with a higher tension. This in turn can impair the integrity of the blood vessels around the gastric tube, leading to a greater rate of rupture and leakage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>). For most intrathoracic anastomosis, the blood supply and tension are more likely enough. Thus, using ICG fluorescence to assess blood supply would not be helpful. Another explanation is that the low incidence of AL in intrathoracic anastomosis requires a larger sample size to confirm the validity of ICG.</p>
<p>Although most publications only applied ICG after gastric tube creation, our results showed that the application of ICG both before and after gastric creation showed a better RR of 0.25 (95% CI 0.07&#x2013;0.89). Kitagawa et&#xa0;al. changed the intervention time from ICG after gastric tube creation to both before and after gastric creation to detect the border of the blood supply (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>). Application of ICG before gastric tube creation could help surgeons detect the border of arterial supply and determine the cutting line. In terms of the practical use of ICG in clinical sites, there is no consensus on the dose of ICG. Doses ranged from 1.25 to 25 mg per bolus. The minimum dose can be measured clearly and reliably, but in some cases, it is too low. Higher doses may interfere with the second measurement because the background signal is still high. Slooter et&#xa0;al. recommended a 0.05 mg/kg/bolus dose, and after 15 min, new measurements could be taken (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>). However, if we choose to assess gastric perfusion both before and after gastric construction, the total dose of ICG is 25 mg for a patient weighing 50 kg, which is the dose limit of ICG (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>). Thus, we recommend 12.5 mg/bolus both before and after gastric construction.</p>
<p>Low volume of the institution and surgeon could be a risk factor of Al (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>). Regarding the sample size in ICG group, publications with sample size &lt;50 had a statistical RR 0.35(95% 0.18-0.68), and publications with sample size &gt;50 had a lower RR 0.24(95% 0.12-0.48). This result indicated that application of ICG in gastric blood supply requires a learning curve. Hardy NP et al. conducted a questionnaire about the interpretation of near infrared perfusion imaging using ICG in colorectal surgery in 40 participants, and 70% felt &gt; 10 cases were needed for competency in use with the majority of experts advocating &gt; 50 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>). The learning curve of application of ICG in gastric perfusion is still unclear. Based on this subgroup analysis, application of ICG may have a short learning curve. It seems that, even in learning curve station, ICG application still could prevent patients from AL. Despite the expensive equipment, ICG fluorescence has potential popularization and application value.</p>
<sec id="s4_1">
<title>Limitations</title>
<p>Despite the evidence-based findings, there still exist some limitations in our study, Methodological limitations include: (1) Only one study was prospective, and no randomized control trial (RCT) studies were included in meta-analysis. Based on the GRADE scales, the evidence is low. Thus, a well-designed RCT is necessary for further confirm the effect of ICG fluorescence. We would like to update this meta-analysis when there are more reliable studies, especially RCTs. (2) There were some minor differences in baseline data between the ICG group and control group, which may cause potential influence on the incidence of AL. (3) Most studies have not reported AL grading based on the Clavien-Dindo classification. Whether ICG fluorescence could prevent patients from severe AL is unclear. (4) The number of included publications on Ivor-Lewis (conducting intrathoracic anastomosis) is limited, more high-quality publications are necessary to confirm the usefulness of ICG fluorescence in intrathoracic anastomosis. (5) Few studies used ICG quantification to measure the blood flow speed, and most studies ignored the importance of venous congestion. How to reduce the AL rate in patients with poor perfusion is really a question (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>). Recently, Takeda FR et.al reported the supercharged cervical anastomosis for esophagectomy procedure may reduce the occurrence of anastomotic leakage and improve perfusion in the anastomotic area via vein and arterial micro-anastomoses based on the ICG quantification technique (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>). </p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The application of ICG fluorescence could effectively reduce the incidence of anastomotic leak and shorten postoperative hospital stay for patients undergoing cervical anastomosis, but not for patients undergoing intrathoracic anastomosis. The application of ICG fluorescence before and after gastric management can better prevent patients from AL. This prevention works both in large (&gt;50 cases) and small (&lt;50 cases) medical centers.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref>. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This study was sponsored by Key Laboratory of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (Fujian Medical University), Fujian Province University, National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82070499), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81773129), Joint Funds for the Innovation of Science and Technology, Fujian Province (Grant No. 2020Y9073), Natural Science Foundation, Fujian Province (Grant No. 2020J011036), and Program for Innovative Research Team in Science and technology in Fujian Province University (Grant No. 2018B053).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>We appreciate the meta tutorial from STATRAY. This manuscript has also been edited by native English&#x2010;speaking experts of To Edit.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary Material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.847510/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.847510/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tabatabai</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hashemi</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mohajeri</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ahmadinejad</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>IA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haghdani</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Incidence and Risk Factors Predisposing Anastomotic Leak After Transhiatal Esophagectomy</article-title>. <source>Ann Thorac Med</source> (<year>2009</year>) <volume>4</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>197</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>200</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4103/1817-1737.56012</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Markar</surname> <given-names>SR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arya</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karthikesalingam</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hanna</surname> <given-names>GB</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Technical Factors That Affect Anastomotic Integrity Following Esophagectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</article-title>. <source>Ann Surg Oncol</source> (<year>2013</year>) <volume>20</volume>(<issue>13</issue>):<page-range>4274&#x2013;81</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1245/s10434-013-3189-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>van der Sluis</surname> <given-names>PC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van der Horst</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>May</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schippers</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brosens</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Joore</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Thoracolaparoscopic Esophagectomy Versus Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial</article-title>. <source>Ann Surg</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>269</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<page-range>621&#x2013;30</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/SLA.0000000000003031</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Straatman</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van der Wielen</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cuesta</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Daams</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roig Garcia</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bonavina</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophageal Resection: Three-Year Follow-Up of the Previously Reported Randomized Controlled Trial: The TIME Trial</article-title>. <source>Ann Surg</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>266</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<page-range>232&#x2013;6</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/SLA.0000000000002171</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Van Daele</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Van Nieuwenhove</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ceelen</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vanhove</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Braeckman</surname> <given-names>BP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hoorens</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Near-Infrared Fluorescence Guided Esophageal Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review</article-title>. <source>World J Gastrointest Oncol</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>11</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<page-range>250&#x2013;63</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4251/wjgo.v11.i3.250</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Karliczek</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Harlaar</surname> <given-names>NJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zeebregts</surname> <given-names>CJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wiggers</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baas</surname> <given-names>PC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van Dam</surname> <given-names>GM</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Surgeons Lack Predictive Accuracy for Anastomotic Leakage in Gastrointestinal Surgery</article-title>. <source>Int J Colorect Dis</source> (<year>2009</year>) <volume>24</volume>(<issue>5</issue>):<page-range>569&#x2013;76</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00384-009-0658-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Escobedo</surname> <given-names>JO</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rusin</surname> <given-names>O</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lim</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Strongin</surname> <given-names>RM</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>NIR Dyes for Bioimaging Applications</article-title>. <source>Curr Opin Chem Biol</source> (<year>2010</year>) <volume>14</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>64</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>70</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.10.022</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Alander</surname> <given-names>JT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaartinen</surname> <given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Laakso</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>P&#xe4;til&#xe4;</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Spillmann</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tuchin</surname> <given-names>VV</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>A Review of Indocyanine Green Fluorescent Imaging in Surgery</article-title>. <source>Int J Biomed Imaging</source> (<year>2012</year>) <volume>2012</volume>:<fpage>940585</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2012/940585</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Griffiths</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chae</surname> <given-names>MP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rozen</surname> <given-names>WM</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Indocyanine Green-Based Fluorescent Angiography in Breast Reconstruction</article-title>. <source>Gland Surg</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>5</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<page-range>133&#x2013;49</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2016.02.01</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bailey</surname> <given-names>ST</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hwang</surname> <given-names>TS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McClintic</surname> <given-names>SM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>SS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pennesi</surname> <given-names>ME</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Quantitative Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography of Vascular Abnormalities in the Living Human Eye</article-title>. <source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>112</volume>(<issue>18</issue>):<page-range>E2395&#x2013;402</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1500185112</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kaibori</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kosaka</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matsui</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ishizaki</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matsushima</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tsuda</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging and Photodynamic Therapy for Liver Tumors</article-title>. <source>Front Oncol</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>11</volume>:<elocation-id>638327</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fonc.2021.638327</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sucher</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brunotte</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Seehofer</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Indocyaningr&#xfc;nfluoreszenzf&#xe4;rbung in Der Leberchirurgie [Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Staining in Liver Surgery]</article-title>. <source>Der Chirurg; Z Fur Alle Gebiete Der Operativen Medizen</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>91</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<page-range>466&#x2013;73</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00104-020-01203-w</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ladak</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dang</surname> <given-names>JT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Switzer</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mocanu</surname> <given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Birch</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Indocyanine Green for the Prevention of Anastomotic Leaks Following Esophagectomy: A Meta-Analysis</article-title>. <source>Surg Endoscopy</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>33</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<page-range>384&#x2013;94</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00464-018-6503-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Slooter</surname> <given-names>MD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eshuis</surname> <given-names>WJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cuesta</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gisbertz</surname> <given-names>SS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van Berge Henegouwen</surname> <given-names>MI</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Fluorescent Imaging Using Indocyanine Green During Esophagectomy to Prevent Surgical Morbidity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</article-title>. <source>J Thorac Dis</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>11</volume>(<supplement>Suppl 5</supplement>):<page-range>S755&#x2013;65</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21037/jtd.2019.01.30</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Page</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McKenzie</surname> <given-names>JE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bossuyt</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boutron</surname> <given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hoffmann</surname> <given-names>TC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mulrow</surname> <given-names>CD</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews</article-title>. <source>BMJ (Clin Res Ed)</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>372</volume>:<fpage>n71</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/bmj.n71</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Slim</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nini</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Forestier</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kwiatkowski</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Panis</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chipponi</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Methodological Index for non-Randomized Studies (Minors): Development and Validation of a New Instrument</article-title>. <source>ANZ J Surg</source> (<year>2003</year>) <volume>73</volume>(<issue>9</issue>):<page-range>712&#x2013;6</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dent</surname> <given-names>O</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Methodological Index for non-Randomized Studies</article-title>. <source>ANZ J Surg</source> (<year>2003</year>) <volume>73</volume>(<issue>9</issue>):<page-range>675&#x2013;6</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02762.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>RJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>ZY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>ZF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>YZ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Efficacy of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography in Preventing Anastomotic Leakage After McKeown Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy</article-title>. <source>Front Oncol</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>10</volume>:<elocation-id>619822</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fonc.2020.619822</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>XT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>JC</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Application of Indocyanine Green Fluorescent Imaging Labeling in Production of Gastric Conduits in Thoracoscopic and Laparoscopic Esophagectomy</article-title>. <source>J Laparoscopic Surg</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>25</volume>(<issue>12</issue>):<page-range>915&#x2013;8</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13499/j.cnki.fqjwkzz.2020.12.915</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>JC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>JB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qiao</surname> <given-names>CR</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Application of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Esophageal Carcinoma</article-title>. <source>Chin J Thorac Surg (Electron Ed)</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>6</volume>(<issue>04</issue>):<page-range>234&#x2013;8</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8773.2019.04.06</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dalton</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ali</surname> <given-names>AA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Crandall</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Awad</surname> <given-names>ZT</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Near Infrared Perfusion Assessment of Gastric Conduit During Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy</article-title>. <source>Am J Surg</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>216</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<page-range>524&#x2013;7</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.11.026</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Karampinis</surname> <given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ronellenfitsch</surname> <given-names>U</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mertens</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gerken</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hetjens</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Post</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Indocyanine Green Tissue Angiography Affects Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy. A Retrospective, Case-Control Study</article-title>. <source>Int J Surg (Lond Engl)</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>48</volume>:<page-range>210&#x2013;4</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.11.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Noma</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shirakawa</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kanaya</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Okada</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maeda</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ninomiya</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Visualized Evaluation of Blood Flow to the Gastric Conduit and Complications in Esophageal Reconstruction</article-title>. <source>J Am Coll Surg</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>226</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<page-range>241&#x2013;51</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.11.007</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ohi</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Toiyama</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mohri</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saigusa</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ichikawa</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shimura</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Prevalence of Anastomotic Leak and the Impact of Indocyanine Green Fluorescein Imaging for Evaluating Blood Flow in the Gastric Conduit Following Esophageal Cancer Surgery</article-title>. <source>Esophagus</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>14</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<page-range>351&#x2013;9</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10388-017-0585-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kitagawa</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Namikawa</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Iwabu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fujisawa</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Uemura</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tsuda</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Assessment of the Blood Supply Using the Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Method and Postoperative Endoscopic Evaluation of Anastomosis of the Gastric Tube During Esophagectomy</article-title>. <source>Surg Endoscopy</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>32</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<page-range>1749&#x2013;54</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00464-017-5857-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Campbell</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reames</surname> <given-names>MK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Robinson</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Symanowski</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Salo</surname> <given-names>JC</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Conduit Vascular Evaluation is Associated With Reduction in Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy</article-title>. <source>J Gastrointest Surg</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>19</volume>(<issue>5</issue>):<page-range>806&#x2013;12</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11605-015-2794-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Biere</surname> <given-names>SS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maas</surname> <given-names>KW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cuesta</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van der Peet</surname> <given-names>DL</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Cervical or Thoracic Anastomosis After Esophagectomy for Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</article-title>. <source>Digest Surg</source> (<year>2011</year>) <volume>28</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>29</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>35</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1159/000322014</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Walther</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johansson</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johnsson</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Von Holstein</surname> <given-names>CS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zilling</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Cervical or Thoracic Anastomosis After Esophageal Resection and Gastric Tube Reconstruction: A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Sutured Neck Anastomosis With Stapled Intrathoracic Anastomosis</article-title>. <source>Ann Surg</source> (<year>2003</year>) <volume>238</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<page-range>803&#x2013;14</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/01.sla.0000098624.04100.b1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Egberts</surname> <given-names>JH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schniewind</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bestmann</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schafmayer</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Egberts</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Faendrich</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Impact of the Site of Anastomosis After Oncologic Esophagectomy on Quality of Life&#x2013;a Prospective, Longitudinal Outcome Study</article-title>. <source>Ann Surg Oncol</source> (<year>2008</year>) <volume>15</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<page-range>566&#x2013;75</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1245/s10434-007-9615-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>Indocyanine Green</collab>
</person-group>. <source>Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed)</source>. <publisher-name>Bethesda, MD: National Library of Medicine (US)</publisher-name> (<year>2021</year>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Whooley</surname> <given-names>BP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Law</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alexandrou</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Murthy</surname> <given-names>SC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wong</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Critical Appraisal of the Significance of Intrathoracic Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy for Cancer</article-title>. <source>Am J Surg</source> (<year>2001</year>) <volume>181</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>198</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>203</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00559-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<label>32</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Junemann-Ramirez</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Awan</surname> <given-names>MY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>ZM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rahamim</surname> <given-names>JS</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Anastomotic Leakage Post-Esophagogastrectomy for Esophageal Carcinoma: Retrospective Analysis of Predictive Factors, Management and Influence on Longterm Survival in a High Volume Centre</article-title>. <source>Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg</source> (<year>2005</year>) <volume>27</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>3</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.09.018</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<label>33</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hardy</surname> <given-names>NP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dalli</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>MF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Andrejevic</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Neary</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cahill</surname> <given-names>RA</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Inter-User Variation in the Interpretation of Near Infrared Perfusion Imaging Using Indocyanine Green in Colorectal Surgery</article-title>. <source>Surg Endoscopy</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>35</volume>(<issue>12</issue>):<page-range>7074&#x2013;81</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00464-020-08223-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<label>34</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Takeda</surname> <given-names>FRDr</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cecconello</surname> <given-names>IP</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The Complex Assessment of Anastomosis' Perfusion Following Esophagectomy: Set in Stone</article-title>? <source>Eur J Surg Oncol</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>47</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<page-range>1491&#x2013;2</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejso.2020.11.010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<label>35</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Takeda</surname> <given-names>FR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tutihashi</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tustumi</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sallum</surname> <given-names>RAA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Freitas Busnardo</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ribeiro</surname> <given-names>U</given-names> <suffix>Jr</suffix>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Supercharged Cervical Anastomosis for Esophagectomy and Gastric Pull-Up</article-title>. <source>J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>20)</volume>:<fpage>S0022e5223</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.06.021.31737-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>