<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Nutr.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Nutrition</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Nutr.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-861X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fnut.2023.1127970</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Nutrition</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Impact of organic and integrated production systems on yield and seed quality of rainfed crops and on soil properties</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name>
<surname>Gopinath</surname>
<given-names>Kodigal A.</given-names>
</name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref rid="c001" ref-type="corresp"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2017604/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name>
<surname>Venkatesh</surname>
<given-names>Govindarajan</given-names>
</name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name>
<surname>Manjunath</surname>
<given-names>Mallappa</given-names>
</name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name>
<surname>Jayalakshmi</surname>
<given-names>Mitnala</given-names>
</name><xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1174808/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name>
<surname>Prasad</surname>
<given-names>Telaprolu Venkata</given-names>
</name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name>
<surname>Rajkumar</surname>
<given-names>Bollam</given-names>
</name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name>
<surname>Venugopalan</surname>
<given-names>Visha Kumari</given-names>
</name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref rid="c001" ref-type="corresp"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1329957/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name>
<surname>Raju</surname>
<given-names>Bellapukonda Murali Krishna</given-names>
</name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name>
<surname>Prabhakar</surname>
<given-names>Mathyam</given-names>
</name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name>
<surname>Chary</surname>
<given-names>Gajjala Ravindra</given-names>
</name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>Vinod Kumar</given-names>
</name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref rid="c001" ref-type="corresp"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1068931/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA)</institution>, <addr-line>Hyderabad</addr-line>, <country>India</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Regional Agricultural Research Station (RARS), Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Nandyal</addr-line>, <country>India</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn id="fn0001" fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Jayanta Layek, The ICAR Research Complex for North Eastern Hill Region (ICAR RC NEH), India</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fn0002" fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Kulasekaran Ramesh, Indian Institute of Oilseeds Research (ICAR), India; Hanuman S. Jat, Central Soil Salinity Research Institute (ICAR), India</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Kodigal A. Gopinath, <email>ka.gopinath@icar.gov.in</email>; Vinod Kumar Singh, <email>vkumarsingh_01@yahoo.com</email>; Visha
Kumari Venugopalan, <email>v.visha@icar.gov.in</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>10</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>1127970</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>20</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>20</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2023 Gopinath, Venkatesh, Manjunath, Jayalakshmi, Prasad, Rajkumar, Venugopalan, Raju, Prabhakar, Chary and Singh.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Gopinath, Venkatesh, Manjunath, Jayalakshmi, Prasad, Rajkumar, Venugopalan, Raju, Prabhakar, Chary and Singh</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Mineral and vitamin deficiencies together affect a greater number of human populations in the world than does protein malnutrition. Organic farming is reported to improve nutritional quality of food grains while also improving soil health. However, sufficient scientific information on several aspects of organic farming based on long-term studies is lacking particularly under rainfed conditions of India. The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term impact of organic and integrated production systems on crops yield and quality, economic returns and soil properties. The study was conducted with three crops, sunflower (<italic>Helianthus annuus</italic> L.), pigeonpea (<italic>Cajanus cajan</italic> L.), and greengram [<italic>Vigna radiata</italic> (L.) Wilczek] under three different production systems, control (use of chemical inputs alone), organic and integrated. The results of the 10-year study revealed that, the average production of integrated system was on par with organic management and recorded significantly higher pigeonpea equivalent yield (PEY) (827&#x2009;kg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) compared to control (chemical inputs) (748&#x2009;kg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>). In general, the yield gap between organic and integrated production systems declined from fourth year for greengram and eighth year for sunflower, during the 10-year experimental period whereas the pigeonpea yield was similar under both production systems from first year. Plots under organic management had significantly lower bulk density (1.18&#x2009;mg&#x2009;m<sup>&#x2212;3</sup>), higher water holding capacity (38.72%) and porosity (53.79%) compared to integrated production system and control (chemical inputs). The soil organic C (SOC) content in the plots under organic production system was 32.6% more than the initial organic carbon of the soil (0.43%), with higher soil N (205.2&#x2009;kg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>). Plots under integrated production system, however, had higher soil P (26.5&#x2009;kg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) compared with other treatments. The dehydrogenase activity (5.86&#x2009;&#x03BC;g TPF g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil h<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) and microbial biomass carbon (317.3&#x2009;&#x03BC;g&#x2009;g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil) content was higher in the plots under organic production system than under other systems. Organically produced pigeonpea and greengram seeds had similar protein content with that of integrated system, and higher K and micronutrient (Fe, Zn, Cu, and Mn) contents than other treatments. The results show the potential of organic production system in improving crop yields, soil properties and produce quality in semiarid rainfed areas.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>organic production system</kwd>
<kwd>pigeonpea</kwd>
<kwd>greengram</kwd>
<kwd>sunflower</kwd>
<kwd>soil health</kwd>
<kwd>rainfed areas</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="10"/>
<table-count count="6"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="82"/>
<page-count count="13"/>
<word-count count="7736"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Nutrition and Sustainable Diets</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="sec1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Several countries have started promoting organic farming as an alternative to high-input agriculture (conventional farming). Organic farming is one of the fastest growing sectors of agricultural production. As per the latest FiBL survey, 74.9 million ha were under organic agricultural management worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>). Organic farming is not new to India as this nature friendly farming practice is done in the country from ancient times (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>). Recently, promotion of organic farming is one of the priority areas of Government of India to improve agricultural productivity while reducing the use of external inputs; The Government is promoting adoption of organic farming in India through various schemes such as Paramparagat Krishi Vikas Yojana (PKVY) and Mission Organic Value Chain Development for North East Region (MOVCDNER). Last decade witnessed a huge jump under the area of certified organic farming in India. Presently, India has about 2.7 million ha under certified organic farming with the highest number of organic producers (1.6 million) in the world (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>).</p>
<p>The productivity of rainfed agriculture which constitutes about 51% of the cultivated area in India is constrained by the aberrant monsoon, low and unstable yield, small farm size, degraded soil and resource poor farmers. Smallholders in rainfed regions may have the chance to increase their output through organic farming without relying on outside resources like capital or inputs, and they may also be able to sell their food for higher prices. Numerous studies have compared the output, impact on the environment, and financial returns of organic and conventional farming. In general, some loss in crop yields is observed after discarding synthetic inputs and converting the operations from the conventional systems to organic production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>), while others have reported that organic systems can be as productive as conventional ones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>). By adding organic manures, the soil&#x2019;s available nutrients usually benefit in the form of increased yields (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>). However, literature on performance of rainfed organic production systems is scanty. Though organic farming systems are low-impact and low-yielding than conventional or integrated management systems, they are reported to be more resilient and offer nutrient-dense quality food (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>). Further, the reduction in crop yields from organic systems can very well be compensated by the higher economic returns fetching from the price premium (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>).</p>
<p>On the other hand, organic amendments like farmyard manure (FYM), vermicompost and green manures lowers bulk density, improves porosity and infiltration rates, reduces surface runoff, increase water-holding capacity thus improving soil physical properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13 ref14 ref15 ref16">13&#x2013;16</xref>). Furthermore, numerous studies demonstrate that soil fertility is increased over time by organic farming (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17 ref18 ref19">17&#x2013;19</xref>). In comparison to conventionally maintained systems, these organic systems also result in superior soil quality and greater soil biological activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>). Unlike chemical fertilizers, organic amendments are characterized with their slower nutrient release pattern coupled with higher residual effect on the subsequent crops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>). Judicious application of organic amendments improve the crop productivity in addition to maintaining the sustainability of the system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">23</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">24</xref>) because of the organic manure being the basic source of organic matter in soil. In fact, one of the greatest challenges in the present world is to feed the ever-increasing population, still maintaining soil health along with environmental quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>).</p>
<p>Legume and oilseed crops are the most relevant crop type in global food security, and as such, the move toward resilient and more sustainable cropping systems by reducing the chemical input is a major challenge. Sunflower (<italic>Helianthus annuus</italic> L.), greengram [<italic>Vigna radiata</italic> (L.) Wilczek] and pigeonpea [<italic>Cajanus cajan</italic> (L.) Millsp.] are well suited for the rainfed regions of semi-arid tropics and are widely grown in this region. Further, no attempts were made so far to assess the impact of different production systems on performance of these crops and on different soil properties. Hence, we carried out a study to assess the impact of organic and conventional production systems on performance of sunflower, greengram and pigeonpea, crop quality and soil properties in semiarid rainfed conditions. Here, the first hypothesis we tested was that organic production system would improve crops yield and quality compared to that of conventional production systems due to improvement of soil properties. The second hypothesis tested was that crops respond differently to different production systems.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec3">
<title>Study area</title>
<p>The study location is situated in India&#x2019;s 7.2 agro-ecological subregion, and the growing season lasts between 120 and 150&#x2009;days. The region has a semi-arid (dry) climate with three distinct seasons: the summer (March to May), the rainy season (<italic>kharif</italic>), which lasts from June to September, and the winter (<italic>rabi</italic>) (October to February). At the Gungal Research farm of the ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (17&#x00B0;40&#x2032; 40.4&#x2033; N latitude and 78&#x00B0;39&#x2032;, 55.7&#x2033; E longitude and at a mean sea level of 626&#x2009;m), Hyderabad, Telangana, India, the field experiment was carried out for 10&#x2009;years between 2012 and 2021.The farm represents a semi-arid tropical region with a mean annual temperature of 25.7&#x00B0;C and rainfall of 746&#x2009;mm. The monthly rainfall during the crop season (July&#x2013;December) during the study period (2012&#x2013;2021) and the monthly maximum and minimum temperature prevailed during the period are given in <xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figures 1</xref>, <xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">2</xref>. Soil of the experimental site is sandy loam; slightly acidic in reaction (pH 6.51), EC was in normal range (0.05&#x2013;0.07 dS m<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), low in organic carbon (0.43%), available N (229.1&#x2009;kg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), high in available P (24.7&#x2009;kg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), and medium in available K (218.1&#x2009;kg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1"><label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Monthly total rainfall (mm) during the cropping period (July&#x2013;December) during 2012&#x2013;2021.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fnut-10-1127970-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig position="float" id="fig2"><label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Mean monthly maximum and minimum temperature during the crop period (July&#x2013;December) during 2012&#x2013;2021.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fnut-10-1127970-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<title>Treatments</title>
<p>Three production systems <italic>viz.</italic> organic, integrated and control (chemical inputs), and three field crops <italic>viz.</italic> sunflower (<italic>Helianthus annuus</italic> L.), pigeonpea [<italic>Cajanus cajan</italic> (L.) Millsp.], and greengram [<italic>Vigna radiata</italic> (L) Wilczek] were studied in this experiment every year. The experiment was laid out in strip plot design. All the treatments were replicated thrice in a plot size of 12&#x2009;m&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;4&#x2009;m. The package of practices in each crop are presented in <xref rid="tab1" ref-type="table">Table 1</xref>. The FYM was sourced from the same place every year and the average composition of 0.5% N, 0.25% P, 0.4% K, 27.9&#x2009;ppm Cu, 228.7&#x2009;ppm Mn, 452&#x2009;ppm Fe, and 143.1&#x2009;ppm Zn (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1"><label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Variety, seed rate and planting geometry used for each crop.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Crop</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Variety</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Seed rate (kg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Planting geometry (cm)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Sunflower</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">DRSH-1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">60&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Greengram</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">WGG-37</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Pigeonpea</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">PRG-158</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">90&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;20</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The FYM was treated with <italic>Trichoderma viridae</italic> at 2.5&#x2009;kg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, as a prophylactic measure against soil borne diseases as explained by Gopinath et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">26</xref>). The details of application of nutrients in different treatments are given in <xref rid="tab2" ref-type="table">Tables 2</xref>, <xref rid="tab3" ref-type="table">3</xref>. Under integrated method, one fourth of the N was applied through FYM. The remaining N and total P and K was applied through mineral fertilizers. In sunflower crop, N was applied in basal and two other splits (30 and 60 DAS). However, in pigeonpea and greengram the nutrients were applied basal.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2"><label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Application rates of farmyard manure and mineral fertilizers in different treatments.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="3">Treatment</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="5">Sunflower</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="5">Pigeonpea</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="5">Greengram</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">FYM (Mg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">Mineral fertilizers (kg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">Rock phosphate (kg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">FYM (Mg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">Mineral fertilizers (kg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">Rock phosphate (kg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">FYM (Mg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">Mineral fertilizers (kg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">Rock phosphate (kg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">N</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></th>
<th align="center" valign="top">K<sub>2</sub>O</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">N</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></th>
<th align="center" valign="top">K<sub>2</sub>O</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">N</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></th>
<th align="center" valign="top">K<sub>2</sub>O</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Organic</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">167</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">167</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Integrated</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">45</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">60</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">50</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">50</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Control&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">60</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">60</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">20</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">50</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">20</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">50</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>&#x002A;Use of chemical inputs alone.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab3"><label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Amount of nutrients applied each year through farmyard manure and rock phosphate in different crops under organic management.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Crop</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">FYM (Mg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">Rock phosphate (kg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">Nutrients applied through FYM (kg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> applied through rock phosphate (kg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">Total major nutrients applied (kg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="4">Total micronutrients applied (kg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">N</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></th>
<th align="center" valign="top">K<sub>2</sub>O</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">N</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></th>
<th align="center" valign="top">K<sub>2</sub>O</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Fe</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Cu</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Mn</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Zn</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Sunflower</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">60</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">68.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">57.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">60</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">68.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">57.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.42</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.33</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.75</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.71</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Pigeonpea</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">165</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">20</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">22.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">19.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">27.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">50.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">19.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.81</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.11</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.91</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Greengram</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">165</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">20</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">22.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">19.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">27.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">20</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">50.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">19.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.81</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.11</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.91</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.57</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Every year, the crops were sown after the receipt of monsoon rainfall in the month of June. The organic plots were maintained chemical free throughout the years. Manual weeding and manually operated wheel-hoe were used to keep the plots wee free. The prophylactic measure used are described by the authors in their earlier paper (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>). Crops were harvested and the yields were converted to pigeonpea equivalent yield (PEY) as per De Wit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">27</xref>):</p>
<p><inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="thickmathspace"/>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="thickmathspace"/>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> =&#x2009;[Yield of sunflower or greengram (kg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) &#x00D7; price of sunflower or greengram seed (Rs kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)/price of pigeonpea (Rs kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)].</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<title>Soil sampling and analysis</title>
<p>A core sampler was used to collect the soil samples before the application of various nutrients and after the crop harvest in 2021 from various soil depts (0&#x2013;20, 20&#x2013;40, and 40&#x2013;60&#x2009;cm). The soil samples for various microbial activity were kept at 4&#x00B0;C and analyzed within 2&#x2009;weeks. Bulk density of the soil was determined using metallic cores of known volume. The detailed procedures are explained by the author in their earlier paper (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>).</p>
<p>Keen Rackzowski box method was used to determine the WHC and total porosity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">28</xref>). Potentiometric method as described by Jackson (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">29</xref>) was used for determining soil pH. Available N, P, and K were determined using Kjeldahl method, Olsen&#x2019;s method and flame photometer method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29 ref30 ref31">29&#x2013;31</xref>). Micronutrients were determined using the atomic absorption spectrometry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">32</xref>). Soil organic carbon was multiplied with BD to arrive at soil carbon stock (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">33</xref>).</p>
<p>Various microbial activities like dehydrogenase (DHA), soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC), urease and acid phosphatase was analyzed/measured using methods of Casida et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">34</xref>), Vance et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">35</xref>), Tabatabai and Bremner (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">36</xref>), and Tabatabai and Bremner (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">37</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<title>Crop quality analysis</title>
<p>The dried seeds were stored at room temperature prior to analysis for various parameters. The samples of greengram and pigeonpea were analyzed for chemical parameters after tri-acid digestion. Nitrogen content was determined by Kjeldahl method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">38</xref>). Protein content was determined by using the formula: N &#x00D7; 5.4 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">39</xref>). Phosphorus content was analyzed photometrically (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">40</xref>). Potassium content was determined by using flame photometer and micronutrients (Fe, Cu, Mn, and Zn) by using atomic absorption spectroscopy. Sunflower oil was extracted using hexane on Soxhlet apparatus using the methodology of Anjani and Yadav (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">41</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Using the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) Star and ANOVA, data were statistically evaluated. Tukey&#x2019;s HSD <italic>post hoc</italic> comparisons were used to clarify significant differences in means (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C;&#x2009;0.05).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec9">
<title>Crop quality</title>
<p>Different production systems significantly influenced the protein content of pigeonpea seed (<xref rid="tab4" ref-type="table">Table 4</xref>). Pigeonpea grown under integrated production system being on par with organic system recorded significantly higher protein content (20.0%) than that of Control (chemical inputs). However, different production systems had no significant influence on protein content of greengram seed. Organic production system being on par with integrated production system recorded significantly greater P content in both pigeonpea and greengram seeds compared to Control (chemical inputs). Significantly greater K content of both pigeonpea and greengram was recorded with organic production system than other treatments. The micronutrient (Fe, Zn, Cu, and Mn) contents of both pigeonpea and greengram seeds varied significantly with different production systems (<xref rid="tab4" ref-type="table">Table 4</xref>). Organic production system being on par with integrated production system registered significantly higher Fe and Zn contents in seeds of both crops compared to Control (chemical inputs). The Zn and Cu contents of organically grown pigeonpea and greengram seed was greater than that of other production systems.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab4"><label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Seed protein, P, K and micronutrient contents mas influenced by different production systems.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Production system</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Protein (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">P (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">K (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Fe (ppm)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Zn (ppm)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Cu (ppm)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Mn (ppm)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="8">Pigeonpea</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Organic</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19.6&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.1a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.19&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.02a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.39&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.01a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">35.6&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;1.5a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">25.0&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.2.1a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.4&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;1.8a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.3&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2.3a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Integrated</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20.0&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.2a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.18&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.01ab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.33&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.03a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">31.7&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2.1ab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">22.7&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;3.1b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.7&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2.2b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.8&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2.0ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Control</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">17.9&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.1b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.17&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.03b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.20&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.03b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">36.7&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;1.4b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">21.8&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2.8b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.9&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;1.2c</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.2&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2.1b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="8">Greengram</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Organic</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">21.8&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.2a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.19&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.02a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.85&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.01a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">37.0&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;1.2a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">29.6&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2.1a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.8&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;1.2a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12.7&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2.1a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Integrated</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">21.4&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.1a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.19&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.01a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.61&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.02b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">35.4&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;1.8ab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">29.1&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;1.7b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.0&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;1.8b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12.2&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;1.8ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Control&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">21.2&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.1a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.17&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.02b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.59&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.01b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">30.9&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;1.6b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">28.8&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;1.8b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.2&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.9c</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.7&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;1.4b</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>&#x002A;Use of chemical inputs alone. Means in the same columns with different letters are significantly (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) different.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Different production systems had significant effect on sunflower oil content (<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figure 3</xref>). Integrated production system being on par with Control (chemical inputs) had greater oil content than that of organic production system. Regarding fatty acid composition of oil, organically produced sunflower oil being on par with that of integrated production system had a higher content of oleic acid than Control (chemical inputs). However, no statistical differences were evident among different production systems in terms of palmitic acid, stearic acid and linoleic acid contents.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig3"><label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of different production systems on oil content and fatty acid composition of sunflower seed. Bars with different letters within each parameter are significantly (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) different.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fnut-10-1127970-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<title>Crop yield</title>
<p>Yield of all the different crops and cropping system was significantly different in terms of pigeonpea equivalent yield (PEY) in all the years (<xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">Figure 4</xref>). Rainfall distribution and amount has a greater impact on the yield. Sufficient and well distributed rainfall during 2012 and 2013 resulted in higher yield due to less crop stress. Intermittent dry spells and less rainfall during the others years resulted in PEY less than 1,000&#x2009;kg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig4"><label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Pigeonpea equivalent yield (PEY) of crops during 2012&#x2013;2021 (averaged across three production systems). Bars with different letters within each year are significantly (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) different.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fnut-10-1127970-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In the first year, the integrated production system greatly outperformed the organic and control (chemical inputs) treatments in terms of PEY production (2012). In the second year, both integrated and organic production systems were comparable (<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figure 5</xref>) implying the narrowing of gap. However, no significant changes in PEY was observed during the 2014&#x2013;2017, presumably as a result of extremely low yields in all treatment groups. When compared to the control (chemical inputs), integrated production system produced more PEY in 2017 and 2018 than an organic production system did (<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figure 5</xref>). During 2019&#x2013;2021, both organic and integrated production systems recorded similar but significantly higher PEY than Control (chemical inputs).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig5"><label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of different production systems on pigeonpea equivalent yield (PEY) of crops during 2012&#x2013;2021 (averaged across three crops). Bars with different letters within each year are significantly (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) different.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fnut-10-1127970-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<title>Soil parameters</title>
<sec id="sec12">
<title>Physical properties</title>
<p>Among the crops, plots under pigeonpea had considerably lower bulk density compared to other crops after 10&#x2009;years. Plots under organic production system and integrated production system had significantly lower bulk density of soil than that under control (chemical inputs) (<xref rid="tab5" ref-type="table">Table 5</xref>). Cultivation of pigeonpea crop resulted in significantly higher soil porosity (54.40%) compared to other crops. Plots managed organically had significantly higher porosity (53.79%) than control (chemical inputs) across the production systems. The soil&#x2019;s ability to retain water was also noticeably higher in the plots grown with pigeonpea crops. When comparing the various production systems, organically managed soils had much more water retention capacity than the control (chemical inputs) (<xref rid="tab5" ref-type="table">Table 5</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab5"><label>Table 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of crops and production systems on soil physical parameters.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Treatment</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Bulk density (Mg&#x2009;m<sup>&#x2212;3</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Porosity (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Water holding capacity (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Crop</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Sunflower</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.25&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.1a</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">51.31&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.2b</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">37.13&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.2b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Pigeonpea</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.20&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.2b</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">54.40&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.1a</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">38.94&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.2a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Greengram</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.21&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.1ab</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">51.09&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.3b</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">37.45&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.2b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Production system</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Control&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.26&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.0a</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">51.00&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.1b</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">37.21&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.1b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Organic</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.18&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.2b</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">53.79&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.2a</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">38.72&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.2a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Integrated</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.21&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.2b</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">52.41&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.1a</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">37.84&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.1b</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>&#x002A;Use of chemical inputs alone; initial bulk density was 1.21&#x2009;Mg&#x2009;m<sup>&#x2212;3</sup>; means in the same columns with different letters are significantly (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) different.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<title>Chemical properties</title>
<p>The 10-year long experiment had no significant effect on soil pH, although pH was marginally higher in the plots under organic management (<xref rid="tab6" ref-type="table">Table 6</xref>). The soil organic C (SOC) content in the plots under organic production system was 32.6% more than the initial organic carbon of the soil, with higher soil N. The SOC was significantly higher in FYM amended plots compared with mineral fertilizer and integrated production treatments. Plots under integrated production system had higher soil P compared with other treatments (<xref rid="tab6" ref-type="table">Table 6</xref>). However, plots under organic production system being on par with integrated system had significantly higher K content than under control (chemical inputs) plots (<xref rid="tab6" ref-type="table">Table 6</xref>). In our study, DTPA-extractable micronutrient (Cu, Mn, Fe, and Zn) contents were significantly higher in the plots under organic production system than under other treatments.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab6"><label>Table 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of different production systems on soil properties.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Production system</th>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">pH</th>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Organic C (%)</th>
<th align="left" valign="top" colspan="3">Av. macronutrients (kg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">DTPA-extractable micronutrients (ppm)</th>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">DHA (&#x03BC;g TPF g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil h<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">MBC (&#x03BC;g&#x2009;g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">N</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">P</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">K</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Cu</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Mn</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Fe</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Zn</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Control&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6.45&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.15a</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.42&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.02c</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">188.1&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;38c</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">24.3&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;22b</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">217.2&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;8b</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.64&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.2b</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">19.0&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.2c</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6.8&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.6c</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.43&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.2c</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.61&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.2c</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">252.8&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;38b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Organic</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6.63&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.18a</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.57&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.03a</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">205.2&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;16ab</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">25.2&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;11a</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">244.8&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;12a</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.08&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.7a</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">29.9&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.6a</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13.8&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.1a</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.68&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.4a</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.86&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.6a</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">317.3&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;26a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Integrated</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6.55&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.14a</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.49&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.03b</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">191.5&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;25bc</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">26.5&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;23a</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">231.4&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;16a</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.83&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.3a</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">26.7&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.4b</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11.5&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.4b</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.55&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.1b</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.99&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.2b</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">298.5&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;31a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Initial values</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6.51</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.43</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">179.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">24.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">218.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.69</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">20.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.47</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.56</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">262.4</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>&#x002A;Use of chemical inputs alone; means in the same columns with different letters are significantly (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) different.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<title>Biological properties</title>
<p>Under this experiment, we observed higher DHA and MBC in plots under organic production system than under other systems for all the three crops (<xref rid="tab6" ref-type="table">Table 6</xref>). Improved DHA, in our study, in plots under organic production system is a result of diversified nutritional amendments which led to the improvement of soil biological health. Similarly, higher activity of acid phosphatase with organic production system (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6</xref>) might be attributed to the accelerated microbial activity due to improved organic carbon content of the soil. However, increased level of urease enzyme under organic management (<xref rid="fig7" ref-type="fig">Figure 7</xref>) suggested persistent availability of substrates with C-N bonds for the enzyme to work.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig6"><label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of different production systems and crops on soil acid phosphatase activity. Bars with different letters within each crop are significantly (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) different.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fnut-10-1127970-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig position="float" id="fig7"><label>Figure 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of different production systems and crops on soil urease activity. Bars with different letters within each crop are significantly (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) different.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fnut-10-1127970-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15" sec-type="discussions">
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="sec16">
<title>Crop yield and quality</title>
<p>In our study, the performance of crops varied under different production systems. When the yield data was adjusted for year effect, pigeonpea performed better under organic production system than under other treatments across all the years except 2018 (<xref rid="fig8" ref-type="fig">Figure 8</xref>). Averaged across the years, pigeonpea seed yield (721&#x2013;737&#x2009;kg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) was similar under both organic and integrated production systems compared to Control (chemical inputs) (672&#x2009;kg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>). In greengram, the seed yields were higher under integrated production system during initial 5&#x2009;years, whereas organic system recorded marginally higher yields during the latter 5&#x2009;years compared to other treatments (<xref rid="fig9" ref-type="fig">Figure 9</xref>). On average, greengram seed yield (699&#x2013;706&#x2009;kg&#x2009;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) was similar under both organic and integrated production systems. Results here are compared with past studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42 ref43 ref44 ref45">42&#x2013;45</xref>), where organic crop yields were lower than conventional crop yields during initial years. As the nutrient cycling processes in organic systems change from inorganic N fertilization to organic amendments, lower crop yields in the plots under organic production systems may have been related to the less readily available nutrients in the early years of transition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46 ref47 ref48 ref49">46&#x2013;49</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig8"><label>Figure 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Performance of pigeonpea under different production systems during 2012&#x2013;2021.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fnut-10-1127970-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig position="float" id="fig9"><label>Figure 9</label>
<caption>
<p>Performance of greengram under different production systems during 2012&#x2013;2021.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fnut-10-1127970-g009.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>However, integrated production system recorded higher seed yield of sunflower in all the years except during last 2&#x2009;years where seed yield was marginally higher under organic production system than other treatments (<xref rid="fig10" ref-type="fig">Figure 10</xref>). A gradual improvement in seed yield of sunflower was observed under organic production system whereas, the seed yield showed a declining trend in the plots under Control (chemical inputs), over the years. The yield gap between organic and integrated production systems narrowed down after 8&#x2009;years of study. Integrated production system, averaged across the years, recorded 9.2&#x2013;10.0% higher seed yield than that of organic and Control (chemical inputs) treatments. Many comparisons between organic and conventional production systems are mostly from relatively short-term experiments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">50</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">51</xref>). However, there are few well documented long-term (more than 10&#x2009;years) comparisons between organic and conventional production systems. Similarly to our study, Schrama et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">45</xref>) reported that the yield gap between organic and conventional production systems declined during a 13-year experimental period, suggesting that the yield gap between organic and conventional production systems may decline over time.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig10"><label>Figure 10</label>
<caption>
<p>Performance of sunflower under different production systems during 2012&#x2013;2021.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fnut-10-1127970-g010.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>A large number of studies have been reported that attempt to investigate if there is a difference in the nutritional value of organically and conventionally grown food (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">52</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">53</xref>). In general, our results showed marginally lower protein, and higher K and micronutrient (Fe, Zn, Cu, and Mn) contents of both pigeonpea and greengram seeds under organic management than other treatments. Gopinath et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">54</xref>) and Saha et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">55</xref>) also reported similar results. According to Worthington (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">56</xref>), organic produce from various crops had 21% more iron, 29% more magnesium, and 13.6% more phosphorus. According to a study by Lairon (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">53</xref>), organic food has 21 and 29% more iron and magnesium than non-organic food. In sunflower, integrated production system being on par with Control (chemical inputs) had greater oil content than that of organic production system. However, different production systems had no significant effect on fatty acid composition except that organic sunflower oil had higher content of oleic acid.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17">
<title>Soil properties</title>
<p>Numerous desirable soil characteristics, such as a reduction in bulk density, increased porosity, and increased water-holding capacity, have been linked to the use of organic amendments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">26</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">45</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">57</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">58</xref>). According to earlier studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">59</xref>), organic production systems had higher pH levels in mildly acidic soils than their conventional counterparts. Our findings on the impact of organic systems on various chemical properties of soil are similar to those of those earlier studies.</p>
<p>One of the important environmental benefits due to a shift from conventional to organic production systems is an improvement in soil carbon content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">60</xref>). The SOC was significantly higher in the plots under organic management compared with mineral fertilizer and integrated production treatments. This increment in SOC might be attributed to the direct addition of organic source of plant nutrients which in turn led to lesser mineralization owing to its wider C: N ratio (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">61</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">62</xref>). Previously, some long-term experiments reported notable improvements in SOC content through incorporation of organic manures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref63">63</xref>). In a similar line, Aoyama et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref64">64</xref>) observed increased level of organic matter in soil after 18&#x2009;years of experimentation with the addition of organic manure. Hati et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref65">65</xref>), Ramesh et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref66">66</xref>), and Gopinath et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>) also reported higher SOC with organic nutrients application on long term basis.</p>
<p>Higher soil P was found in integrated system as reported by Chen et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">67</xref>). Slower release of organic materials, particularly during initial years under organic production results in lower availability of plant nutrients in organic plots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">47</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">48</xref>). Patel et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref68">68</xref>) also reported an increase in available P with integrated application of NPK and FYM in a long-term experiment with soybean-wheat cropping system. On the other hand, available K was found higher in organic system. Greater available K with organic nutrition has been documented by Bulluck et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">57</xref>) and Panwar et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref69">69</xref>). This beneficial effect with organic manure application might be attributed to organic source induced release of organic colloids with more cation exchange sites which adds up more amount of available K by attracting them from the non-exchangeable pool (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">70</xref>). The improved agricultural practices such as soil organic amendments play vital role in soil micronutrient availability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>). Higher DTPA-extractable micronutrient (Cu, Mn, Fe, and Zn) contents under organic production system may be attributed to FYM addition and enhanced soil microbial properties might have improved the micronutrient status of the soil.</p>
<p>Soil organic carbon (SOC) is consisted of a vital fraction termed as microbial biomass carbon (MBC) of soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref71">71</xref>). Microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and dehydrogenase activity (DHA) are crucial indicators for soil quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref72">72</xref>). These indicators also provide clear reflection of soil microbial activity, specifically representing the metabolically active fraction of soil microbial population (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref73">73</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref74">74</xref>). Improved MBC might be attributed to the property of organic manure to be a more soluble source of substrate for better microbial proliferation in soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref75">75</xref>). Accordingly, implementation of organic management might have accelerated the availability of substrates and stimulated the metabolic activity of soil microbes, which leads to enhanced dehydrogenase activity as confirmed by the outcomes of Basak et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref76">76</xref>). The reason behind this stimulation of soil dehydrogenase may be due to addition of substrates containing several intra- and extra-cellular enzymes through the incorporation of organic manures. Similar result was also reported by Saviozzi et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref77">77</xref>) and Smitha et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref78">78</xref>). Similarly, phosphatase activity in soil is likely to get amplified in response to organic nutrient management compared to chemical inputs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref79">79</xref>). In our study, higher activity of acid phosphatase with organic production system might be attributed to the accelerated microbial activity due to improved organic carbon content of the soil. However, increased level of urease enzyme under organic management may be because of persistent availability of substrates with C-N bonds for the enzyme to work. Few other researchers have also reported similar type of improvement in urease activity with the application of organic manures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref80 ref81 ref82">80&#x2013;82</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec18" sec-type="conclusions">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Long-term research based recommendations must be developed for suitable production system that provide higher crop yields, seed quality and improve soil fertility in rainfed areas of India&#x2019;s semiarid tropics. The results of 10-year experiment revealed that the crop yields were lower under organic production system than that of other production systems, particularly during initial years. The yield gap of both the legumes (pigeonpea and greengram) between organic and integrated production systems was less even during initial years, indicating that they may be better suited for organic production under rainfed areas. In general, yield gap of all the three crops between organic and conventional production systems declined over the years. Organic production also improved most of the quality parameters of pigeonpea, greengram, and sunflower relative to integrated production system. Consumption of organic produce, therefore, is one of the approaches to address nutritional security particularly the micronutrient malnutrition of the people. Organic management improved soil properties such as bulk density, porosity, water holding capacity, organic carbon, micronutrient contents and soil microbial activities. In general, the soil fertility parameters were the poorest under Control (use of chemical inputs alone). We conclude that, in the long-run, organic farming has the potential to improve crop yields and soil properties in rainfed semiarid tropics of India.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec20">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>KG: conceptualization. KG and GV: methodology. MM, MJ, KG, and BMR: formal analysis. KG, GV, and TP: investigation. MP: resources. KG and VK: data curation, writing, review, and editing. GC: supervision. VS: project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec21" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work was financially supported by grants from the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi in the form of the National Innovations in Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) Project (Grant No. 2&#x2013;2(201)/17&#x2013;18/NICRA).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="conf1" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec100" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><label>1.</label> <citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Willer</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jan</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Claudia</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bernhard</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group> eds. <source>The world of organic agriculture. Statistics and emerging trends 2022</source>. <publisher-loc>Bonn</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL, Frick, and IFOAM &#x2013; Organics International</publisher-name> (<year>2022</year>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><label>2.</label> <citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Randhawa</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names></name></person-group>. <source>A history of agriculture in India 1980&#x2013;1986</source>, vol. <volume>I-IV</volume>. <publisher-loc>New Delhi</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Indian Council of Agricultural Research</publisher-name> (<year>1986</year>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><label>3.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gopinath</surname> <given-names>KA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rajanna</surname> <given-names>GA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Venkatesh</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jayalakshmi</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumari</surname> <given-names>VV</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prabhakar</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Influence of crops and different production systems on soil carbon fractions and carbon sequestration in rainfed areas of semiarid tropics in India</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>4207</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su14074207</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><label>4.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Malik</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Productivity of barnyard millet (<italic>Echinochloa frumentacea</italic>) in relation to organic nutrition under rainfed conditions of Western Himalaya region</article-title>. <source>Indian J. Agron.</source> (<year>2010</year>) <volume>55</volume>:<fpage>105</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><label>5.</label> <citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pimentel</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). Impacts of organic farming on the efficiency of energy use in agriculture. The Organic Centre, Cornell University An organic center state of science review. The Organic Centre, Cornell University. <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>40</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><label>6.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Posner</surname> <given-names>JL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baldock</surname> <given-names>JO</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hedtcke</surname> <given-names>JL</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Organic and conventional production systems in the Wisconsin integrated cropping systems trials: I. productivity 1990&#x2013;2002</article-title>. <source>Agron J</source>. (<year>2008</year>) <volume>100</volume>:<fpage>253</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>60</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronj2007.0058</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><label>7.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Selim</surname> <given-names>MM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Al-Owied</surname> <given-names>A-JA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Understanding the basic concepts of recycling agricultural wastes using different activators to produce good quality compost</article-title>. <source>Biosci Res</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>178</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>92</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><label>8.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Siavoshi</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nasiri</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Laware</surname> <given-names>SL</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Effect of organic fertilizer on growth and yield components in rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>J Agric Sci</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>3</volume>:<fpage>217</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5539/jas.v3n3p217</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><label>9.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dragicevic</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stoiljkovic</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brankov</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tolimir</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tabakovi&#x0107;</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dodevska</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Status of essential elements in soil and grain of organically produced maize, spelt, and soybean</article-title>. <source>Agriculture</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>702</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agriculture12050702</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><label>10.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Montgomery</surname> <given-names>DR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bikl&#x00E9;</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Soil health and nutrient density: beyond organic vs. conventional farming</article-title>. <source>Front Sust Food Syst</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>699147</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fsufs.2021.699147</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><label>11.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Babu</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Avasthe</surname> <given-names>RK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>GS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Das</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>VK</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Impact of land configuration and organic nutrient management on productivity, quality and soil properties under baby corn in eastern Himalayas</article-title>. <source>Sci Rep</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-020-73072-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><label>12.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Selim</surname> <given-names>MM</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Introduction to the integrated nutrient management strategies and their contribution to yield and soil properties</article-title>. <source>Int J Agron</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>2020</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2020/2821678</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><label>13.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fisher</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Organic farming&#x2019;s impact on soil physical properties</article-title>. <source>Crop Soil</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>50</volume>:<fpage>22</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/cs2017.50.0404</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><label>14.</label> <citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Petersen</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Drinkwater</surname> <given-names>LE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wagoner</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group>. <source>The Rodale Institute farming systems trial: the first fifteen years</source>. <publisher-loc>Kutztown, PA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>The Rodale Institute</publisher-name> (<year>1999</year>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><label>15.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tester</surname> <given-names>CF</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Organic amendment effects on physical and chemical properties of a sandy soil</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci Soc Am J</source>. (<year>1990</year>) <volume>54</volume>:<fpage>827</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>31</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400030035x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><label>16.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Werner</surname> <given-names>MR</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Soil quality characteristics during conversion to organic orchard management</article-title>. <source>Appl Soil Ecol</source>. (<year>1997</year>) <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>151</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>67</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0929-1393(96)00139-4</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><label>17.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Agegnehu</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nelson</surname> <given-names>PN</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bird</surname> <given-names>MI</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Crop yield, plant nutrient uptake and soil physicochemical properties under organic soil amendments and nitrogen fertilization on nitisols</article-title>. <source>Soil Till Res</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>160</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2016.02.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><label>18.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Clark</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Horwath</surname> <given-names>WR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shennan</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scow</surname> <given-names>KM</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Changes in soil chemical properties resulting from organic and low-input farming practices</article-title>. <source>Agron J</source>. (<year>1998</year>) <volume>90</volume>:<fpage>662</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>71</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronj1998.00021962009000050016x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><label>19.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Drinkwater</surname> <given-names>LE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Letourneau</surname> <given-names>DK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Workneh</surname> <given-names>FA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Bruggen</surname> <given-names>AH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shennan</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Fundamental differences between conventional and organic tomato agroecosystems in California</article-title>. <source>Ecol Appl</source>. (<year>1995</year>) <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>1098</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>112</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/2269357</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><label>20.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Castillo</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Joergensen</surname> <given-names>RG</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Impact of ecological and conventional arable management systems on chemical and biological soil quality indices in Nicaragua</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem</source>. (<year>2001</year>) <volume>33</volume>:<fpage>1591</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00089-X</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><label>21.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brar</surname> <given-names>AS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buttar</surname> <given-names>GS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jhanji</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vashist</surname> <given-names>KK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mahal</surname> <given-names>SS</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Water productivity, energy and economic analysis of transplanting methods with different irrigation regimes in basmati rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> L.) under North-Western India</article-title>. <source>Agric Water Manag</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>158</volume>:<fpage>189</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>95</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2015.04.018</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><label>22.</label> <citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dhaliwal</surname> <given-names>SS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mandal</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Naresh</surname> <given-names>RK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Verma</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Improving soil micronutrient availability under organic farming</article-title> In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Meena</surname> <given-names>VS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meena</surname> <given-names>SK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rakshit</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stanley</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Srinivasarao</surname> <given-names>CH</given-names></name></person-group>, editors. <source>Advances in organic farming</source>, vol. <volume>1</volume>: <publisher-name>Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK</publisher-name> (<year>2021</year>). <fpage>93</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>114</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><label>23.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prakash</surname> <given-names>O</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Chapter-5 the impact of chemical fertilizers on our environment and ecosystem</article-title>. <source>Chief Ed</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>35</volume>:<fpage>69</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><label>24.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sushila</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gajendra</surname> <given-names>GI</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Influence of farmyard manure, nitrogen and biofertilizers on growth, yield attributes and yield of wheat (<italic>Triticum aestivum</italic>) under limited water supply</article-title>. <source>Indian J Agron</source>. (<year>2000</year>) <volume>45</volume>:<fpage>590</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><label>25.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aher</surname> <given-names>SB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lakaria</surname> <given-names>BL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaleshananda</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>AB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramana</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramesh</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Effect of organic farming practices on soil and performance of soybean (<italic>Glycine max</italic>) under semi-arid tropical conditions in Central India</article-title>. <source>J Appl Nat Sci</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>67</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>71</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31018/jans.v7i1.564</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><label>26.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gopinath</surname> <given-names>KA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saha</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mina</surname> <given-names>BL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pande</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Srivastva</surname> <given-names>AK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>HS</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Bell pepper yield and soil properties during conversion from conventional to organic production in Indian Himalayas</article-title>. <source>Sci Hortic</source>. (<year>2009</year>) <volume>122</volume>:<fpage>339</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>45</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2009.05.016</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><label>27.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>de Wit</surname> <given-names>CT</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>On competition</article-title>. <source>Versl Landbouwkd Onderz</source>. (<year>1960</year>) <volume>66</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>82</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><label>28.</label> <citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baruah</surname> <given-names>TC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barthakur</surname> <given-names>HP</given-names></name></person-group>. <source>A textbook of soil analysis</source>. <publisher-loc>New Delhi</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Vikas Publishing House</publisher-name> (<year>1997</year>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><label>29.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jackson</surname> <given-names>ML</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Interlayering of expansible layer silicates in soils by chemical weathering</article-title>. <source>Clay Clay Miner</source>. (<year>1962</year>) <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>29</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>46</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1346/CCMN.1962.0110104</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><label>30.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Subbiah</surname> <given-names>BV</given-names></name> <name><surname>Asija</surname> <given-names>GL</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils</article-title>. <source>Curr Sci</source>. (<year>1956</year>) <volume>25</volume>:<fpage>259</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>60</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><label>31.</label> <citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Olsen</surname> <given-names>SR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cole</surname> <given-names>CV</given-names></name> <name><surname>Watanabe</surname> <given-names>FS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dean</surname> <given-names>LA</given-names></name></person-group>. <source>Estimation of available phosphorous in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate</source>. <publisher-loc>Washington, DC</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>US Department of Agriculture</publisher-name> (<year>1954</year>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><label>32.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lindsay</surname> <given-names>WL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Norvell</surname> <given-names>WA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci Soc Am J</source>. (<year>1978</year>) <volume>42</volume>:<fpage>421</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><label>33.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Batjes</surname> <given-names>NH</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world</article-title>. <source>Eur J Soil Sci</source>. (<year>1996</year>) <volume>47</volume>:<fpage>151</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>63</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01386.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><label>34.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Casida</surname> <given-names>LE</given-names> <suffix>Jr</suffix></name> <name><surname>Klein</surname> <given-names>DA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Santaro</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Soil dehydrogenase activity</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci</source>. (<year>1964</year>) <volume>98</volume>:<fpage>371</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00010694-196412000-00004</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><label>35.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vance</surname> <given-names>ED</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brookes</surname> <given-names>PC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jenkinson</surname> <given-names>DS</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem</source>. (<year>1987</year>) <volume>19</volume>:<fpage>703</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><label>36.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tabatabai</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bremner</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Assay of urease activity in soils</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem</source>. (<year>1972</year>) <volume>4</volume>:<fpage>479</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>87</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0038-0717(72)90064-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><label>37.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tabatabai</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bremner</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem</source>. (<year>1969</year>) <volume>1</volume>:<fpage>301</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0038-0717(69)90012-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><label>38.</label> <citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bremner</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mulvaney</surname> <given-names>CS</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Nitrogen-total</article-title> In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Page</surname> <given-names>AL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>RH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Keeney</surname> <given-names>DR</given-names></name></person-group>, editors. <source>Methods of soil analysis: part 2 chemical and microbiological properties</source>. <publisher-loc>Madison</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>American Society of Agronomy</publisher-name> (<year>1982</year>). <fpage>595</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>624</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><label>39.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mariotti</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tom&#x00E9;</surname> <given-names>DD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mirand</surname> <given-names>PP</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Converting nitrogen into protein &#x2013; beyond 6.25 and Jones&#x2019; factors</article-title>. <source>Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr</source>. (<year>2008</year>) <volume>48</volume>:<fpage>177</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>84</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10408390701279749</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18274971</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><label>40.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Taussky</surname> <given-names>HH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shorr</surname> <given-names>EE</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A microcolorimetric method for the determination of inorganic phosphorus</article-title>. <source>J Biol Chem</source>. (<year>1953</year>) <volume>202</volume>:<fpage>675</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>85</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0021-9258(18)66180-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">13061491</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><label>41.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anjani</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Enhancing oleic acid and oil content in low oil and oleic type Indian safflower (<italic>Carthamus tinctorius</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>Ind Crop Prod</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>175</volume>:<fpage>114254</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.114254</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><label>42.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mader</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Flie&#x00DF;ach</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dubois</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gunst</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fried</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Niggli</surname> <given-names>U</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming</article-title>. <source>Science</source>. (<year>2002</year>) <volume>296</volume>:<fpage>1694</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1071148</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><label>43.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ponisio</surname> <given-names>LC</given-names></name> <name><surname>M'Gonigle</surname> <given-names>LK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mace</surname> <given-names>KC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Palomino</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Valpine</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kremen</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Diversification practices reduce organic to conventional yield gap</article-title>. <source>Proc R Soc B</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>282</volume>:<fpage>20141396</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rspb.2014.1396</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25621333</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><label>44.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ryan</surname> <given-names>MH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Derrick</surname> <given-names>JW</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dann</surname> <given-names>PR</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Grain mineral concentrations and yield of wheat grown under organic and conventional management</article-title>. <source>J Sci Food Agric</source>. (<year>2004</year>) <volume>84</volume>:<fpage>207</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jsfa.1634</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><label>45.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schrama</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Haan</surname> <given-names>JJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kroonen</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Verstegen</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van der Putten</surname> <given-names>WH</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Crop yield gap and stability in organic and conventional farming systems</article-title>. <source>Agric Ecosyst Environ</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>256</volume>:<fpage>123</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>30</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2017.12.023</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46"><label>46.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Harris</surname> <given-names>GH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hesterman</surname> <given-names>OB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paul</surname> <given-names>EA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peters</surname> <given-names>SE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Janke</surname> <given-names>RR</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Fate of legume and fertilizer nitrogen-15 in a long-term cropping experiment</article-title>. <source>Agron J</source>. (<year>1994</year>) <volume>86</volume>:<fpage>910</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronj1994.00021962008600050028x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref47"><label>47.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liebhardt</surname> <given-names>WC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andrews</surname> <given-names>RW</given-names></name> <name><surname>Culik</surname> <given-names>MN</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Crop production during conversion from conventional to low-input methods</article-title>. <source>Agron J</source>. (<year>1989</year>) <volume>81</volume>:<fpage>150</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronj1989.00021962008100020003x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref48"><label>48.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>MacRae</surname> <given-names>RJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hill</surname> <given-names>SB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mehuys</surname> <given-names>GR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Henning</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Farm-scale agronomic and economic conversion from conventional to sustainable agriculture</article-title>. <source>Adv Agron</source>. (<year>1993</year>) <volume>43</volume>:<fpage>155</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>98</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60478-2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref49"><label>49.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Reider</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Herdman</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Drinkwater</surname> <given-names>LE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Janke</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Yields and nutrient budgets under composts, raw dairy manure and mineral fertilizer</article-title>. <source>Compost Sci Util</source>. (<year>2000</year>) <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>328</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>39</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/1065657X.2000.10702006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref50"><label>50.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>De Ponti</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rijk</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Ittersum</surname> <given-names>MK</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The crop yield gap between organic and conventional agriculture</article-title>. <source>Agric Syst</source>. (<year>2012</year>) <volume>108</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agsy.2011.12.004</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref51"><label>51.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Seufert</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramankutty</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Foley</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture</article-title>. <source>Nature</source>. (<year>2012</year>) <volume>485</volume>:<fpage>229</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>32</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature11069</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref52"><label>52.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bourn</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prescott</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A comparison of the nutritional value, sensory qualities and food safety of organically and conventionally produced foods</article-title>. <source>Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr</source>. (<year>2002</year>) <volume>42</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>34</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10408690290825439</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11833635</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref53"><label>53.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lairon</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Nutritional quality and safety of organic food. A review</article-title>. <source>Agron Sust Dev</source>. (<year>2009</year>) <volume>30</volume>:<fpage>33</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>41</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1051/agro/2009019</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref54"><label>54.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gopinath</surname> <given-names>KA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saha</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mina</surname> <given-names>BL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kundu</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pande</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>HS</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Influence of organic amendments on growth, yield and quality of wheat and on soil properties during transition to organic production</article-title>. <source>Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst</source>. (<year>2008</year>) <volume>82</volume>:<fpage>51</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>60</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10705-008-9168-0</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref55"><label>55.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Saha</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gopinath</surname> <given-names>KA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mina</surname> <given-names>BL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kundu</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bhattacharaya</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>HS</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Expression of soil chemical and biological behavior on nutritional quality of aromatic rice as influenced by organic and mineral fertilization</article-title>. <source>Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal</source>. (<year>2010</year>) <volume>41</volume>:<fpage>1816</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>31</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00103624.2010.492439</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref56"><label>56.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Worthington</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Nutritional quality of organic versus conventional fruits, vegetables and grains</article-title>. <source>J Altern Complement Med</source>. (<year>2001</year>) <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>161</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>73</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/107555301750164244</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11327522</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref57"><label>57.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bulluck</surname> <given-names>LR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brosius</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Evanylo</surname> <given-names>GK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ristaino</surname> <given-names>JB</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Organic and synthetic fertility amendments influence soil microbial, physical and chemical properties on organic and conventional farms</article-title>. <source>Appl Soil Ecol</source>. (<year>2002</year>) <volume>19</volume>:<fpage>147</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>60</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0929-1393(01)00187-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref58"><label>58.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cima</surname> <given-names>DS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luik</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reintam</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Organic farming and cover crops as an alternative to mineral fertilizers to improve soil physical properties</article-title>. <source>Int Agrophys</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>29</volume>:<fpage>405</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1515/intag-2015-0056</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref59"><label>59.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kamau</surname> <given-names>JW</given-names></name> <name><surname>Biber-Freudenberger</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lamers</surname> <given-names>JPA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stellmacher</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Borgemeister</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Soil fertility and biodiversity on organic and conventional smallholder farms in Kenya</article-title>. <source>Appl Soil Ecol</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>134</volume>:<fpage>85</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>97</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.10.020</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref60"><label>60.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Novara</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gristina</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sala</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Galati</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crescimanno</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cerd&#x00E0;</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Agricultural land abandonment in Mediterranean environment provides ecosystem services via soil carbon sequestration</article-title>. <source>Sci Total Environ</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>576</volume>:<fpage>420</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.123</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27792957</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref61"><label>61.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chakraborty</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chakrabarti</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chakraborty</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ghosh</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Effect of long-term fertilizers and manure application on microbial biomass and microbial activity of a tropical agricultural soil</article-title>. <source>Biol Fertil Soil</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>47</volume>:<fpage>227</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00374-010-0509-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref62"><label>62.</label> <citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rahman</surname> <given-names>GK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rahman</surname> <given-names>MM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alam</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kamal</surname> <given-names>MZ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mashuk</surname> <given-names>HA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Datta</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meena</surname> <given-names>RS</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Biochar and organic amendments for sustainable soil carbon and soil health</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source>Carbon and nitrogen cycling in soil</source>. eds. R Datta,, R Meena, S Pathan, and M Ceccherini (Singapore: Springer) (<year>2020</year>). <fpage>45</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>85</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref63"><label>63.</label> <citation citation-type="confproc"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Swarup</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Emerging soil fertility management issues for sustainable crop productivity in irrigated systems</article-title>. In <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Swarup</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reddy</surname> <given-names>D. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prasad</surname> <given-names>R. N.</given-names></name></person-group> (Eds.), <conf-name>Proceedings of the National Workshop on Long-Term Soil Fertility Management Through Integrated Plant Nutrient Supply</conf-name>. <publisher-name>Indian Institute of Soil Science</publisher-name>, <conf-loc>Bhopal</conf-loc>, <fpage>54</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>68</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref64"><label>64.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aoyama</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Angers</surname> <given-names>DA</given-names></name> <name><surname>N'dayegamiye</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Particulate and mineral-associated organic matter in water-stable aggregates as affected by mineral fertilizer and manure applications</article-title>. <source>Canadian J Soil Sci</source>. (<year>1999</year>) <volume>79</volume>:<fpage>295</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>302</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4141/S98-049</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref65"><label>65.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hati</surname> <given-names>KM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Swarup</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mishra</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manna</surname> <given-names>MC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wanjari</surname> <given-names>RH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mandal</surname> <given-names>KG</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Impact of long-term application of fertilizer, manure and lime under intensive cropping on physical properties and organic carbon content of an Alfisol</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source>. (<year>2008</year>) <volume>148</volume>:<fpage>173</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.09.015</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref66"><label>66.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ramesh</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Panwar</surname> <given-names>NR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>AB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramana</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Effect of organic nutrient management practices on the production potential, nutrient uptake, soil quality, input-use efficiency and economics of mustard (<italic>Brassica juncea</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Indian J Agric Sci</source>. (<year>2009</year>) <volume>79</volume>:<fpage>40</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref67"><label>67.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cade-Menun</surname> <given-names>BJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bainard</surname> <given-names>LD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luce</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The influence of long-term N and P fertilization on soil P forms and cycling in a wheat/fallow cropping system</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>404</volume>:<fpage>115274</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115274</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref68"><label>68.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Patel</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dwivedi</surname> <given-names>BS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dwivedi</surname> <given-names>AK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thakur</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Long-term effect of nutrient management on soil biochemical properties in a vertisol under soybean-wheat cropping sequence</article-title>. <source>J Indian Soc Soil Sci</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>66</volume>:<fpage>215</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>21</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5958/0974-0228.2018.00027.0</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref69"><label>69.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Panwar</surname> <given-names>NR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramesh</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>AB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramana</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Influence of organic, chemical, and integrated management practices on soil organic carbon and soil nutrient status under semi-arid tropical conditions in Central India</article-title>. <source>Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal</source>. (<year>2010</year>) <volume>41</volume>:<fpage>1073</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>83</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00103621003687166</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref70"><label>70.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mazumdar</surname> <given-names>SP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kundu</surname> <given-names>DK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ghosh</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saha</surname> <given-names>AR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Majumdar</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ghorai</surname> <given-names>AK</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Effect of long-term application of inorganic fertilizers and organic manure on yield, potassium uptake and distribution of potassium fractions in the new Gangetic alluvial soil under jute-rice-wheat cropping system</article-title>. <source>Int J Agric Food Sci Technol</source>. (<year>2014</year>) <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>297</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>306</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref71"><label>71.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lal</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Effects of 15 years of manure and inorganic fertilizers on soil organic carbon fractions in a wheat-maize system in the North China plain</article-title>. <source>Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst</source>. (<year>2012</year>) <volume>92</volume>:<fpage>21</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10705-011-9469-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref72"><label>72.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sodhi</surname> <given-names>GP</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Soil organic carbon and biological indicators of uncultivated Vis-&#x00E0;-Vis intensively cultivated soils under rice&#x2013;wheat and cotton&#x2013;wheat cropping systems in South-Western Punjab</article-title>. <source>Carbon Manage</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>681</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>95</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/17583004.2020.1840891</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref73"><label>73.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bhattacharjya</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bhaduri</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chauhan</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chandra</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raverkar</surname> <given-names>KP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pareek</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Comparative evaluation of three contrasting land use systems for soil carbon, microbial and biochemical indicators in North-Western Himalaya</article-title>. <source>Ecol Engin</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>103</volume>:<fpage>21</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>30</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.03.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref74"><label>74.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chavarr&#x00ED;a</surname> <given-names>DN</given-names></name> <name><surname>Verdenelli</surname> <given-names>RA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Serri</surname> <given-names>DL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Restovich</surname> <given-names>SB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andriulo</surname> <given-names>AE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meriles</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Effect of cover crops on microbial community structure and related enzyme activities and macronutrient availability</article-title>. <source>European J Soil Biol</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>76</volume>:<fpage>74</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>82</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejsobi.2016.07.002</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref75"><label>75.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Malarkodi</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karthikeyan</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Balachandar</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Correlation between carbon dioxide evolution and biological quality index of long-term nutrient management adopted soils</article-title>. <source>Madras Agric J</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>107</volume>:<fpage>182</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>90</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.29321/MAJ.2020.000363</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref76"><label>76.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Basak</surname> <given-names>BB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saha</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gajbhiye</surname> <given-names>NA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manivel</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Potential of organic nutrient sources for improving yield and bioactive principle of ashwagandha (<italic>Withania somnifera</italic>) through enhanced soil fertility and biological functions</article-title>. <source>Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>51</volume>:<fpage>779</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>93</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00103624.2020.1729368</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref77"><label>77.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Saviozzi</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bufalino</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Levi-Minzi</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Riffaldi</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Biochemical activities in a degraded soil restored by two amendments: a laboratory study</article-title>. <source>Biol Fert Soil</source>. (<year>2002</year>) <volume>35</volume>:<fpage>96</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>101</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00374-002-0445-9</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref78"><label>78.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Smitha</surname> <given-names>GR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Basak</surname> <given-names>BB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thondaiman</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saha</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Nutrient management through organics, bio-fertilizers and crop residues improves growth, yield and quality of sacred basil (<italic>Ocimum sanctum</italic> Linn)</article-title>. <source>Indust Crop Product</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>128</volume>:<fpage>599</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>606</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.11.058</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref79"><label>79.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chinnadurai</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gopalaswamy</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Balachandar</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Impact of long-term organic and inorganic nutrient managements on the biological properties and eubacterial community diversity of the Indian semi-arid Alfisol</article-title>. <source>Arch Agron Soil Sci</source>. (<year>2014</year>) <volume>60</volume>:<fpage>531</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>48</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/03650340.2013.803072</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref80"><label>80.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Soil enzymatic activity and growth of rice and barley as influenced by organic manure in an anthropogenic soil</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source>. (<year>2003</year>) <volume>115</volume>:<fpage>149</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>60</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00084-3</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref81"><label>81.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lian</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A practical soil management to improve soil quality by applying mineral organic fertilizer</article-title>. <source>Acta Geochim</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>36</volume>:<fpage>198</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>204</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11631-017-0139-5</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref82"><label>82.</label> <citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yi-Ren</surname> <given-names>LI</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiang</surname> <given-names>LI</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qi-Rong</surname> <given-names>SH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang-Chun</surname> <given-names>XU</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Enzyme activity in water-stable soil aggregates as affected by long-term application of organic manure and chemical fertiliser</article-title>. <source>Pedosphere</source>. (<year>2013</year>) <volume>23</volume>:<fpage>111</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1002-0160(12)60086-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>