Front. Nutr.Frontiers in NutritionFront. Nutr.2296-861XFrontiers Media S.A.10.3389/fnut.2022.741630NutritionOriginal ResearchEffect of Dietary Modification on Gastric Mucosa, Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Nutritional Status of Patients With Early Gastric Cancer After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort StudyZhangYebing1LiuChengxia2MaXingbin2XuLei3WangXiuhua2WangXin2CaoJingrun2MaAiguo1*GaoTao2*1Institute of Nutrition and Health, School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China2Binzhou Medical University Hospital, Binzhou, China3Huai’an Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Huai’an, China
Edited by: Rakesh Bhardwaj, National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources (ICAR), India
Reviewed by: Monica Trif, Centre for Innovative Process Engineering, Germany; Linda Maximiano, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil; Arti Bartwal, National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources (ICAR), India
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Food is an important factor affecting the treatment of patients with early gastric cancer (EGC). We have established a hospital cohort to guide dietary patterns and observe the health status of patients with EGC after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) after dietary modification. A total of 273 patients with EGC who underwent ESD were recruited to the cohort. They were given dietary instruction and education through a dietary manual and were followed up for 12 months. If the dietary pattern changed to the “traditional food” pattern (high consumption of vegetables, wheat products, and red meat) after the nutritional guidance, subjects were defined as the improvement diet group. Dietary patterns focused on “alcohol and fish” (drink a lot of wine and beer and eating freshwater and marine fish) or “coarse cereals” (mainly whole grains, beans and poultry) were the main ones in the unimproved diet group. The nutritional status, gastric mucosa, and gastrointestinal symptoms of the two groups of patients before and after the dietary instruction were compared. Compared with the unimproved diet group, the endoscopic performance score and the symptom score in the improved diet group were decreased by an average of 1.31 and 1.90, respectively. Except for lymphocyte count (P = 0.227), total protein (P < 0.000), albumin (P = 0.003), globulin (P = 0.014), red blood cell count (P < 0.000), and hemoglobin (P < 0.000) values were improved to varying degrees. After changing the diet, the intake of wheat products and vegetables in the improved diet group increased by 15.58 and 17.52%, respectively, while the intake of alcohol, fish, and pickled products was reduced by 43.36, 36.43, and 31.41%, respectively. After 1 year of dietary adjustment, the nutritional status, gastric mucosa, and gastrointestinal symptoms of patients with EGC after ESD eating the "traditional food" diet were all improved.
early gastric cancerendoscopic submucosal dissectiondietary patterndietary modificationcohort studyIntroduction
Gastric cancer ranks fifth among malignant tumors globally, accounting for approximately 5.6% of cancers, and it is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths (1). The occurrence of gastric cancer is a multi-step and multi-factor process, resulting from the complex interaction between genetic susceptibility and environmental factors. Early gastric cancer (EGC) refers to gastric cancer tissue confined to the mucosa and submucosa, regardless of its size or lymph node metastasis status (2), and it is mainly manifested as intestinal gastric cancer (Figure 1). The long-term prognosis of patients with EGC is good, and the 5-year survival rate can reach 90 to 95% (3). Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a surgical treatment commonly used in recent years in patients with EGC, and it can completely remove EGC at one time. However, after eradication of Helicobacter pylori in EGC patients after ESD, metachronous gastric cancer can still occur, with an incidence of 2.4% (4). Early studies have shown that gastric mucosal inflammation, atrophy, and intestinal metaplasia are independent risk factors (5) for metachronous cancer that can be controlled by diet (6–8). In addition to the damage of gastric mucosa, we can also observe the recovery of gastric environment in patients with EGC through gastrointestinal symptoms. Gastrointestinal symptoms are mostly caused by peptic ulcer and malignant lesions (9, 10). The relief of symptoms (such as vomiting, nausea, and acid regurgitation) is related to specific carbohydrates, proteins and fats or micronutrients (11). Early gastric cancer is in the precancerous stage of gastric cancer, and it is best to be treated during this period, whether through surgery, drugs, diet, or lifestyle changes (12), so we proposed to further study the dietary pattern suitable for gastric cancer patients after early ESD surgery.
Carcinogenesis pattern of intestinal type gastric cancer.
In 2018, we conducted a cross-sectional study on the dietary patterns of patients with atrophic gastritis (13) and obtained three typical dietary patterns through principal component analysis (PCA). The first is "alcohol and fish," including high consumption of wine, beer, and freshwater and marine fish. The second is "traditional food," which means eating a lot of vegetables, wheat products, and red meat. The third type is "coarse cereals," which means eating large amounts of whole grains, beans and poultry. In this study, "alcohol and fish" and "coarse cereals" were negatively correlated with atrophic gastritis, while "traditional food" was not correlated with atrophic gastritis. Gastric atrophy and intestinal metaplasia of the gastric mucosa are collectively referred to as chronic atrophic gastritis and are considered precancerous lesions (14). Based on this research, we decided to explore a dietary pattern suitable for EGC patients after ESD. In 2007, the World Cancer Research Foundation/American Cancer Institute (WCRF/AICR) noted, "Non-starchy vegetables, especially onion vegetables and fruits can prevent gastric cancer" (15). In this report, a daily intake of 50 grams of allium vegetables was associated with a 23% reduction in the risk of gastric cancer. A meta-analysis involving 11 case-control and cohort studies showed that the higher the salt intake, the risk of GC increased by 22% (16). However, people’s daily intake consists of a variety of foods. The resulting complex combination of dietary components is likely to produce interactive or synergistic effects (17, 18). In 2021, a case-control study (19) of 415 people in South Korea found that a diet including high amounts of vegetables and fruits is associated with a reduction in GC risk. In a retrospective cohort study in Ireland (20), a low FODMAP (fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols) diet was used by patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) for 1 year, which significantly improved the symptoms of IBS. Therefore, the dietary pattern formed by the combination of foods may have a greater impact on certain diseases than the individual foods.
Existing research mainly focuses on the relationship between certain single nutrients or foods and the incidence of gastric cancer (21–23). Research on dietary patterns and EGC is still lacking. Therefore, through this cohort study, we hope to explore the dietary patterns suitable for EGC patients after ESD that will relieve postoperative symptoms and promote the recovery of the gastric environment, as well as add more research evidence for future dietary guidelines.
Materials and MethodsEthics Approval
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University and was complied with the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants have obtained informed consent (Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2100045405; Ethical certification number: KYLL-2021-01).
Subjects
From January 2019 to December 2020, a total of 273 patients with EGC who underwent ESD were recruited to the hospital-based cohort study in the Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical College located in Binzhou City, China. The hospital is the Yellow River Delta Regional Medical Center. It is the only tertiary A hospital in the region that independently conducts ESD. In February 2018, it was rated as a demonstration base for early gastrointestinal tumor screening in Shandong Province.
The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Between 18 and 66 years old, gender not limited; (2) Endoscopic diagnosis of EGC, surrounding mucosal background shows gastric mucosal atrophy; (3) ESD complete resection of the lesion, the pathology high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or highly or moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, no residual horizontal margin, vertical invasion depth of 500 μm, no vascular metastasis, no distant metastasis; (4) Except for the dietary pattern, there was no significant change in lifestyle; and (5) Voluntary participation and signed informed consent. The exclusion criteria were (1) History of gastrointestinal surgery, malignant tumor, or severe neurological disease; (2) Positive for H. pylori before ESD treatment; (3) Pregnancy or lactation; and (4) Long-term (>3 months) use of omeprazole or another gastric mucosa protector.
Design
According to the results of a cross-sectional study in 2018 (24), a dietary guidebook for patients who had ESD after EGC was designed by a clinical registered dietitian certified by the Chinese Dietitian Association. The dietary guidelines included: (1) The dietary pattern after EGC surgery, giving priority to eating "traditional food" and reducing "alcohol and fish" and "coarse grains;" (2) Introduction of the intake of energy, protein, carbohydrates, and micronutrients and the type of food intake; and (3) A reminder to record food intake and existing problems regularly so that the follow-up calls can proceed smoothly. We conducted a telephone return visit every 4 months to monitor the patient’s dietary improvement and digestive symptoms and make detailed records. The patient was notified to come to the hospital for review on the 12th month after surgery. According to the follow-up situation, the included population was divided into two groups. If the 4, 8, and 12th month follow-ups after nutritional guidance all answered “traditional food” mode, they were defined as the improved diet group, and patients who adopted the "traditional food" mode before dietary guidance were excluded. At the 4, 8, and 12th months of follow-up, those who adopted the “alcohol and fish” or “coarse grain” model were defined as the unimproved diet group. In addition, the basic data, biochemical data, and endoscopy reports of patients before and 12 months after the instruction were collected, and the diet survey and clinical symptom survey were carried out.
Survey
The questionnaire survey included general information (such as age, gender, income, education level, etc.), history of chronic diseases, family history of gastric cancer and history of HP infection. The dietary survey was conducted with a food frequency table and a 3-day 24-hour diet review table. The food frequency table was used to understand the nutritional intake of patients, and the 3-day 24-hour diet review table was used to check the patient’s eating pattern. The food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) consists of 74 foods, including grains (rice, wheat foods, and whole grains), potatoes, beans, vegetables, fruits, dairy products, eggs, meats (pork, beef, and lamb) poultry, fish, preserved products, alcohol, and tea (25). The frequency items included g/daily, g/weekly, g/monthly, g/yearly, and finally converted into the daily intake (3). Physical examination included height and weight, all measured with an electronic scale. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated and according to the classification criteria of the Chinese population, was categorized as thin (BMI <18.5 kg/m2), normal (BMI 18.5∼23.9 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 24.0∼27.9 kg/m2), and obese (BMI >28 kg/m2).
Indicators
(1) Endoscopic performance score: according to the Kyoto gastritis standard classification (26), we scored the gastroscopic performance before and at 12 months after the dietary instruction (see Table 1.1 for the scoring criteria).
Endoscopic performance scoring criteria for gastric cancer risk.
Feature
Scoring criteria
Shrinking
0 points (no C-0∼C-1); 1 point (mild C-2∼C-3); 2 points (severe O-1∼O-P)
0 points (no); 1 point (mild, RAC+ in some areas); 2 points (severe)
(2) Digestive tract symptom score: Any uncomfortable reaction (including abdominal pain, hiccups, bloating, burning sensation, acid reflux, and eating less) was defined as an uncomfortable reaction. The daily stomach discomfort reaction was recorded through the questionnaire, and the stomach discomfort reaction was scored before and after the dietary instruction (see Table 1.2 for the digestive tract symptom score).
Gastrointestinal symptom score table.
Clinical symptoms
Score
0
1
2
3
Stomach ache
No
Mild, short duration, no medication required
Moderate, pain for a long time, more than 4 h a day, still tolerable
Severe, severe pain, continuous, need medication to relieve
Belching
No
Seizures
Mild attack, causing discomfort in both ribs
Frequent attacks, causing pain in ribs
Bloating
No
Abdominal distension is worse in a short time
Abdominal bloating is severe and does not subside for a long time
Bloating all day long
Burning sensation
No
Occasionally and short-lived
Appear frequently
Persistent discomfort
Acid reflux
No
Occasionally and short-lived (Occasionally spit acid)
1 to 2 times a day (Eat discomfort or vomit acid)
Acid reflux several times in a day (Frequent spitting of acid)
Eat less
No
Poor appetite, less than 1/3 of appetite reduction
Poor appetite, reduced appetite by 1/3-1/2
There is no appetite, and the appetite is reduced by more than 2/3
(3) Biochemical data: we collected the total protein (TP), albumin (Alb), hemoglobin (Hb), red blood cell count (RBC) and other data of patients with EGC to reflect the changes in the nutritional status of the patients before and after dietary guidance. At the same time, we also determined the incidence of hypoalbuminemia and low hemoglobin in the two groups after 1 year of follow-up. The reference values of each index are: TP 60∼80 g/L, Alb-40∼55 g/L, Hb-120∼160 g/L (male),110∼150 g/L (female). An Alb content less than 35 g/L was considered hypoalbuminemia. Low Hb in males was considered to be less than 120 g/L and less than 110 g/L in females (27).
Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed using SPSS 24.0 software. We compared the pre-instruction and 12-month data of the improved diet group and the unimproved diet group. Quantitative data such as age conforming to a normal distribution or an approximately normal distribution were statistically analyzed by an independent sample t-test. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to analyze non-normal data such as dietary intake, endoscopic performance score, symptom score, and biochemical indicators. The qualitative data such as gender, hypertension, family history, etc., of the two groups were all tested by the χ2 test. Fisher’s accurate probability method was used to compare qualitative data such as education level, income, diabetes, and BMI. The above analysis is a two-sided test, and the test result shows a statistical difference when P < 0.05.
ResultsBasic Situation
The flowchart of the study population is shown in Figure 2. A total of 273 patients joined the study, and 98 potential participants were excluded for the following reasons: (1) Refusal to review (n = 21); (2) Met the exclusion criteria (n = 32); (3) Incomplete or unreliable data in the diet history questionnaire (n = 45). The study finally included 175 participants.
Flow chart of the study population.
We paired the baseline data and related indicators before the intervention, including age (P = 0.629), gender (P = 0.921), educational level (P = 0.636), income (P = 0.286), hypertension (P = 0.422), diabetes (P = 1.00), family history (P = 0.099), history of HP infection (P = 0.575), body mass index (P = 0.350), etc., and these were not found to be statistically different (Table 2).
Demographic data of research subjects.
Basic Information
Grouping
Improved diet group (n = 140)
Unimproved diet group (n = 35)
P
Age
61.66 ± 9.11
60.80 ± 10.75
0.629
Gender
Male
115 (82.1)
29 (82.9)
0.921
Female
25 (17.9)
6 (17.1)
Education level
Elementary school and below
44 (31.4)
15 (42.9)
0.636
Junior high school
55 (39.3)
11 (31.4)
High school and technical Secondary school
33 (23.6)
7 (20.0)
Junior college
6 (4.3)
1 (2.9)
Bachelor degree and above
2 (1.4)
1 (2.9)
Income
<2000
50(35.7)
17 (48.6)
0.286
2000–5000
49 (35.0)
8 (22.9)
5000–8000
32 (22.9)
6 (17.1)
>8000
9 (6.4)
4 (11.4)
Hypertension
Yes
31 (22.1)
10 (28.6)
0.422
No
109(77.9)
25 (71.4)
Diabetes
Yes
13 (9.3)
3 (8.6)
1.00
No
127 (90.7)
32 (91.4)
Family history
Yes
93 (66.4)
18 (51.4)
0.099
No
47 (33.6)
17 (48.6)
History of HP infection
Yes
72 (51.4)
16 (54.3)
0.575
No
68 (48.6)
19 (45.7)
BMI
<18.5 kg/m2
3 (1.1)
2 (5.7)
0.350
18.5–23.9 kg/m2
65 (23.2)
12 (34.3)
24.0–27.9 kg/m2
54 (19.3)
15 (42.9)
>28 kg/m2
18 (6.4)
6 (17.1)
Endoscopic Manifestations and Stomach Symptoms
According to the endoscopic performance scoring standard of the risk of gastric cancer in the Kyoto global consensus report on Helicobacter pylori gastritis (26), the average score of the diet improvement group before instruction was 4.82, and the average score after 12 months of instruction was 3.50 (P < 0.000); The average score of the unimproved diet group before instruction was 5.25, and the average score after 12 months of instruction was 4.80 (P = 0.008). The difference in endoscopic performance scores between the two groups before and after dietary guidance was statistically significant (Table 3). The score difference between the two groups was analyzed by the Mann–Whitney U test. The endoscopic performance score of the diet improvement group was reduced by an average of 1.31, and the score for diet unimproved group was reduced by an average of 0.45. The difference in scores was statistically significant (P < 0.000) (Table 4). At the same time, we also provided the gastric endoscopic images of patients with EGC before dietary guidance, half a year and 1 year, which showed a significant improvement in the gastric environment (Figure 3).
Comparison of endoscopic performance scores and symptom scores between the diet improvement group and the diet non-improvement group before and after dietary guidance.
Improved diet group (n = 140)
P
Unimproved diet group (n = 35)
P
Before dietary guidance
1 year after guidance
Before dietary guidance
1 year after guidance
Endoscopic performance
4.82 ± 1.54
3.50 ± 1.29
<0.000
5.25 ± 1.31
4.80 ± 1.15
0.008
Digestive symptoms
2.27 ± 1.31
0.36 ± 0.64
<0.000
2.51 ± 1.50
1.17 ± 0.82
<0.000
Comparison of the difference between the endoscopic performance score and the symptom score of the diet improvement group and the diet non-improvement group at 1 year after dietary guidance.
Improved diet group (n = 140)
Unimproved diet group (n = 35)
P
Endoscopic score
−1.31 ± 1.09
−0.45 ± 0.88
<0.000
Digestive symptom score
−1.90 ± 1.32
−1.34 ± 1.18
0.022
Changes of gastric mucosa in patients with early gastric cancer before and after dietary guidance.
Scores are assigned according to the research subjects’ digestive tract symptoms and severity, and the scoring criteria are shown in the Methods section. The results showed that there was a statistical difference in symptom scores between the improved diet group (P < 0.000) and the unimproved diet group (P < 0.000) before and after dietary guidance (Table 3). After 12 months of dietary guidance, the symptom score of the improved diet group dropped by an average of 1.90 and in the unimproved group dropped by an average of 1.34. The score difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P = 0.022) (Table 4).
Nutritional Status
The 175 subjects were divided into two groups, 140 people in the improved diet group and 35 people in the unimproved diet group. We compared the TP, Alb, Hb, and RBC of the two groups to determine whether the nutritional status of the patients improved after 1 year of dietary guidance. The results showed that the related indicators of the patients in the improved diet group improved before and after the instruction: TP (P = 0.001), Alb (P < 0.000), Hb (P = 0.019), and RBC (P < 0.000). We compared the differences between the improvement group and the unimproved group’s nutritional indicators before and after changes, and TP (P < 0.000), Alb (P = 0.003), Hb (P < 0.000), and RBC (P < 0.000) were statistically different. After adopting the “traditional food” diet, the nutritional status of patients improved, but nutritional status of patients who adhered to the "alcohol and fish" or "coarse cereals" did not (Tables 5, 6). In addition, we also found that after 1 year of follow up, there were differences in the incidence of hypoalbuminemia (P = 0.001) and low hemoglobin (P = 0.017), and the incidence in the improved diet group was significantly lower than that in the non-improved diet group (Figure 4).
Comparison of nutritional status before and after guidance between the diet improvement group and the diet non-improvement group.
Measure
Improved diet group (n = 140)
P
Unimproved diet group (n = 35)
P
Before dietary guidance
1 year after guidance
Before dietary guidance
1 year after guidance
TP
68.74 ± 5.30
70.89 ± 4.91
0.001
69.43 ± 4.91
67.56 ± 5.12
0.069
Alb
41.49 ± 4.95
43.39 ± 3.20
<0.000
42.57 ± 3.85
41.77 ± 3.52
0.264
RBC
4.55 ± 0.56
4.77 ± 0.45
<0.000
4.79 ± 0.43
4.51 ± 0.47
0.002
Hb
137.97 ± 15.02
146.14 ± 13.81
<0.000
147.11 ± 12.69
139.91 ± 17.84
0.007
TP, total protein; Alb, albumin; RBC, red blood count; Hb, hemoglobin.
Comparison of nutritional status difference between the two groups after 1 year.
Species
Improved diet group (n = 140)
Unimproved diet group (n = 35)
P
TP
2.38 ± 4.60
−1.86 ± 5.35
<0.000
Alb
2.00 ± 4.99
−0.80 ± 4.18
0.003
RBC
0.21 ± 0.47
−0.27 ± 0.48
<0.000
Hb
8.17 ± 11.72
−7.20 ± 14.79
<0.000
TP, total protein; Alb, albumin; RBC, red blood count; Hb, hemoglobin.
Comparison of low hemoglobin and hypoalbuminemia between the diet-improved group and the diet-unimproved group (*P < 0.05).
Diet
We collected the dietary questionnaires before the patient’s dietary guidelines and the 12th month of dietary guidance. After analysis, we found that the diet improvement group that adopted the "traditional food" model increased intake of wheat products by 15.58% and vegetables by 17.52%. Alcohol, fish, and pickled food intake decreased by 43.36, 36.43, and 31.41%, respectively. Changing the dietary intake shows that adopting the “traditional food” model can help improve the nutritional status, gastric mucosa, and gastrointestinal symptoms of patients with EGC after ESD (Table 7).
Dietary changes in the diet improvement group and the diet non-improvement group.
Species
Improved diet group (n = 140)
P
Unimproved diet group (n = 35)
P
Before dietary intervention
1 year after intervention
Before dietary intervention
1 year after intervention
Rice (g/d)
88.95 ± 35.14
99.68 ± 35.02
0.009
107.14 ± 45.60
88.57 ± 38.03
0.075
Coarse grains (g/d)
31.08 ± 41.96
40.53 ± 53.34
0.104
45.00 ± 46.88
65.72 ± 59.13
0.150
Pasta (g/d)
99.86 ± 47.64
120.9 ± 42.05
0.000
100.71 ± 26.06
97.90 ± 14.11
0.578
Tubers (g/d)
89.37 ± 54.21
103.47 ± 49.87
0.012
94.51 ± 51.20
116.15 ± 68.68
0.211
Beans (g/d)
79.02 ± 61.37
86.19 ± 58.97
0.343
83.05 ± 56.88
128.58 ± 59.74
0.002
Red meat (g/d)
58.03 ± 39.99
40.19 ± 34.76
0.000
54.28 ± 31.20
48.14 ± 48.26
0.533
Poultry (g/d)
99.10 ± 77.06
67.10 ± 66.96
0.000
115.71 ± 94.53
105.71 ± 71.25
0.611
Fish (g/d)
60.25 ± 91.90
38.30 ± 52.54
0.013
117.14 ± 98.47
93.57 ± 96.12
0.261
Vegetables (g/d)
120.25 ± 49.70
145.46 ± 43.98
0.000
137.85 ± 51.58
123.05 ± 54.43
0.358
Fruit (g/d)
117.14 ± 96.29
106.78 ± 76.50
0.332
105.00 ± 69.08
99.28 ± 78.70
0.672
Pickled products (g/d)
48.73 ± 43.67
33.42 ± 46.48
0.004
41.48 ± 40.77
56.74 ± 34.40
0.066
Milk and eggs (g/d)
145.96 ± 132.99
180.98 ± 187.68
0.056
146.17 ± 142.93
153.14 ± 157.44
0.836
Alcohol (g/d)
65.89 ± 133.58
37.32 ± 94.28
0.049
60.71 ± 94.18
67.85 ± 121.20
0.796
Tea (g/d)
45.57 ± 63.74
27.96 ± 48.60
0.007
17.42 ± 25.87
49.85 ± 59.11
0.005
Discussion
The results of this study showed that 1 year after the diet was adjusted to “traditional food,” intake of the vegetable and wheat foods in the diet-improved group increased by 17.52 and 15.58%, respectively. It was observed that the patient healing was significantly improved. The nutritional status, gastric mucosa, and gastrointestinal symptoms of the improved diet group were statistically different from those of the unimproved diet group. The Alb (43.39 ± 3.20), TP (70.89 ± 4.91), Hb (146.14 ± 13.81), and RBC (4.77 ± 0.45) in patients with EGC were significantly higher than those in the unimproved diet group. The endoscopic performance score decreased by an average of 1.31, and the symptom score decreased by an average of 1.90.
The gastric mucosa plays an important role in maintaining the physiological functions of the stomach. As the barrier in the stomach, the gastric mucosa can protect deep tissues from gastric juice components and exogenous gastric mucosal irritants (28). A retrospective cohort study (29) consisting of 10,185 subjects found that drinking alcohol is an independent risk factor for mucosal atrophy. Alcohol can regulate the release of inflammatory factors, activate granulocytes, cause protease secretion, produce reactive oxygen species, and contract blood vessels, and enhanced vascular permeability can change gastric acid secretions and induce acute gastric mucosal damage (30, 31). In addition, pickled products and salted fish are sources of sodium nitrate and nitrite, which can react with amino acids in the stomach to form N-nitro compounds, which are called chemical gastric carcinogens (32). Nitrite causes epithelial cell damage, and high concentrations of sodium chloride cause mucosal damage, which in turn increases the sensitivity to mutagenesis or cancer (33–35). However, proper food intake can repair the gastric mucosa and reduce gastrointestinal symptoms. In two studies in South Korea (36) and Italy (37), it was found that eating high levels of vegetables and fruits is associated with lowering the risk of gastric cancer, possibly because fruits and vegetables are rich in antioxidants, which can protect the gastric mucosa. Avoiding inflammation and inhibiting endogenous nitrosation reduces the damage of H. pylori in the body (38, 39). In 2020, an animal experiment (40) showed that wheat peptides protect the gastric mucosa from the lesions caused by ethanol in rats by improving gastric microcirculation and inhibiting inflammation mediated by the nuclear factor (NF)-κB signal transduction pathway. Wheat peptides are extracted from natural food wheat flour, and then the small molecule peptide material is obtained by directed enzyme digestion and specific oligopeptide separation technology, it is abundant in wheat foods. In addition to the repair of the gastric mucosa, digestive symptoms were also reduced in the diet improvement group. It may be that the vitamins in fruits and vegetables promote gastrointestinal motility, reduce reflux, and appropriately increase high dietary fiber. The intake of foods such as fungi and oats can strengthen nutrition and increase esophageal sphincter pressure. Wheat-based foods are fine grains that can reduce the burden of gastrointestinal peristalsis in patients with EGC and relieve symptoms such as abdominal pain. To some extent, this explains that traditional food patterns will have a positive impact on patients with EGC.
Serum TP levels mainly reflect liver synthesis function and protein loss caused by kidney disease (41). Alb plays an important role in maintaining body fluid osmotic pressure, removing oxygen free radicals related to inflammatory diseases, and maintaining pH as a plasma buffer (42). The half-life of Alb is 21 days, which can reflect the condition of the body’s protein over a few weeks to several months (41). Low Hb (anemia) is a common nutritional problem in EGC (42). Protein malnutrition can inhibit the proliferation and differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells (43), inhibit immune responses, and cause chronic inflammation, leading to changes in iron metabolism (44) that result in decreased hemoglobin. These indicators can be used to evaluate the nutritional status of patients (45). Nutritional status is one of the important factors affecting the treatment of patients with EGC (46). Characteristics of EGC patients include weight loss, nutritional deficiencies, impaired immunity, and disordered inflammation levels (47). Malnutrition decreases cellular immunity, increases susceptibility to inflammation and infection, and weakens the body’s ability to repair itself, leading to aggravation of the disease (17). Postoperative patients with EGC may also have gastric mucosal damage caused by inflammation (48, 49) and gastrointestinal symptoms that affect appetite (50). Some patients do not understand how to choose suitable foods after surgery because of their limited education. These reasons can cause malnutrition in patients with EGC. Through dietary guidance to adjust the type of food intake, repair the gastric mucosa, and alleviate gastrointestinal symptoms, the nutritional status of patients can be improved.
The strengths of this study include the following: (1) According to the literature, this is the first study on EGC and diet patterns in China. (2) It provides specific dietary combinations and intake sources of carbohydrates, fats, proteins and vitamins, and is not limited to a single food; (3) It uses the authoritative International Kyoto Gastritis Standard Scale to evaluate the gastric mucosal state, and the results obtained thereby are more accurate. (4) It eliminates the interference of H. pylori and adjust factors such as age, gender, economic status, family genetic history and others; (5) The Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical College is a regional medical center in the Yellow River Delta. It is the only hospital that independently conducts ESD. Most patients will choose to come to this hospital for review, which reduces the rate of loss to follow up during the research process. This study also has several limitations: (1) Because patients with positive H. pylori were excluded, the number of people included in this study was limited; (2) the FFQ used to conduct dietary surveys relies on the patient’s memory to answer, and there will be a certain information bias in this process, but at the same time we used a 3-day 24-hour diet review to reduce this bias.
Conclusion
In this cohort study, 1 year after the diet model was changed from the "alcohol and fish" or "coarse grains" model to the "traditional food" model, nutritional status, gastric mucosa, and gastrointestinal symptoms of patients with EGC after ESD were improved. Improvement of diet is a major factor in optimizing the quality of life of these patients after surgery. However, whether changes in dietary patterns can reduce the incidence of metachronous cancer in EGC patients remains to be confirmed by further studies.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics Statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University; Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical College. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
Author Contributions
AM and TG designed research and had primary responsibility for final content. YZ, XM, XUW, and JC conducted the research. YZ, LX, and XNW analyzed data. YZ and CL wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 81673160).
Thanking all the staff of the Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical College, for their support and help in this study, and the relevant authors for their efforts.
ReferencesGulloIGrilloFMastracciLVanoliACarneiroFSaragoniLPrecancerous lesions of the stomach, gastric cancer and hereditary gastric cancer syndromes.Pathologica. (2020) 112:166–85. 10.32074/1591-951X-16633179620SmythECNilssonMGrabschHIvan GriekenNCLordickF. Gastric cancer.Lancet. (2020) 396:635–48. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31288-534003294PrinzFEbigboAProbstAMessmannH. Gastric cancer- endoscopic treatment of early lesions, the West learns from the East.Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. (2021) 5:101739. 10.1016/j.bpg.2021.10173933975685KinamiSAizawaMYamashitaHKumagaiKKamiyaSTodaMThe incidences of metachronous multiple gastric cancer after various types of gastrectomy: analysis of data from a nationwide Japanese survey.Gastric Cancer. (2021) 24:2–30. 10.1007/s10120-020-01104-132780194ChoiKSJungHYChoiKDLeeGHSongHJKimDHEMR versus gastrectomy for intramucosal gastric cancer: comparison of long-term outcomes.Gastrointest Endosc. (2011) 73:942–8. 10.1016/j.gie.2010.12.03221392757XiaoFCrisseyMALynchJPKaestnerKHSilbergDGSuhE. Intestinal metaplasia with a high salt diet induces epithelial proliferation and alters cell composition in the gastric mucosa of mice.Cancer Biol Ther. (2005) 4:669–75. 10.4161/cbt.4.6.173415970710NomuraAYamakawaHIshidateTKamiyamaSMasudaHStemmermannGNIntestinal metaplasia in Japan: association with diet.J Natl Cancer Inst. (1982) 68:401–5.AritaSOgawaTMurakamiYKinoshitaYOkazakiMInagaki-OharaK. Dietary fat-accelerating leptin signaling promotes protumorigenic gastric environment in mice.Nutrients. (2019) 11:2127. 10.3390/nu1109212731489936LeeSYLeeKJKimSJChoSW. Prevalence and risk factors for overlaps between gastroesophageal reflux disease, dyspepsia, and irritable bowel syndrome: a population-based study.Digestion. (2009) 79:196–201. 10.1159/00021171519342860TackJTalleyNCamilleriMHoltmannGHuPMalageladaJRFunctional gastroduodenal disorders.Gastroenterology. (2006) 130:1466–79. 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.05916678560DuncansonKBurnsGPryorJKeelySTalleyNJ. Mechanisms of Food-Induced Symptom Induction and Dietary Management in Functional Dyspepsia.Nutrients. (2021) 13:1109. 10.3390/nu1304110933800668CorreaP. Human gastric carcinogenesis: a multistep and multifactorial process–First American Cancer Society Award Lecture on Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention.Cancer Res. (1992) 52:6735–40.WangJYuJCKangWMMaZQ. Treatment strategy for early gastric cancer.Surg Oncol. (2012) 21:119–23. 10.1016/j.suronc.2010.12.00421256735De MarcoMOTustumiFBrunaldiVOResendeRHMatsubayashiCOBabaERPrognostic factors for ESD of early gastric cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Endosc Int Open. (2020) 8:E1144–55. 10.1055/a-1201-308932904802KondoAde MouraEGBernardoWMYagiOKde MouraDTde MouraETEndoscopy vs surgery in the treatment of early gastric cancer: systematic review.World J Gastroenterol. (2015) 21:13177–87. 10.3748/wjg.v21.i46.1317726675093CamargoMCKimWHChiaravalliAMKimKMCorvalanAHMatsuoKImproved survival of gastric cancer with tumour Epstein-Barr virus positivity: an international pooled analysis.Gut. (2014) 63:236–43. 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-30453123580779KarimiPIslamiFAnandasabapathySFreedmanNDKamangarF. Gastric cancer: descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, screening, and prevention.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. (2014) 23:700–13. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-105724618998WisemanM. The second world cancer research fund/american institute for cancer research expert report. Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective.Proc Nutr Soc. (2008) 67:253–6. 10.1017/S002966510800712X18452640ZhouYZhuangWHuWLiuGJWuTXWuXT. Consumption of large amounts of Allium vegetables reduces risk for gastric cancer in a meta-analysis.Gastroenterology. (2011) 141:80–9. 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.03.05721473867DungalN. The special problem of stomach cancer in Iceland, with particular reference to dietary factors.JAMA. (1961) 178:789–98. 10.1001/jama.1961.0304047000500213888467GeSFengXShenLWeiZZhuQSunJ. Association between habitual dietary salt intake and risk of gastric cancer: a systematic review of observational studies.Gastroenterol Res Pract. (2012) 2012:808120. 10.1155/2012/80812023125851RazaMBhattH.Atrophic gastritis. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing (2021).KimSRKimKLeeSAKwonSOLeeJKKeumNEffect of red, processed, and white meat consumption on the risk of gastric cancer: an overall and dose-response meta-analysis.Nutrients. (2019) 11:826. 10.3390/nu1104082630979076LinSGaoTSunCJiaMLiuCMaXAssociation of dietary patterns and endoscopic gastric mucosal atrophy in an adult Chinese population.Sci Rep. (2019) 9:916567. 10.1038/s41598-019-52951-731719557MertensEKuijstenAGeleijnseJMBoshuizenHCFeskensEJMVan’t VeerP. FFQ versus repeated 24-h recalls for estimating diet-related environmental impact.Nutr J. (2019) 18:2. 10.1186/s12937-018-0425-z30621736SuganoKTackJKuipersEJGrahamDYEl-OmarEMMiuraSKyoto global consensus report on Helicobacter pylori gastritis.Gut. (2015) 64:1353–67. 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-30925226187502LinLHuKCaiSDengXShaoXLiangYHypoproteinemia is an independent risk factor for the prognosis of severe COVID-19 patients.J Clin Biochem Nutrit. (2020) 67:126–30. 10.3164/jcbn.20-7533041508KwiecienSJasnosKMagierowskiMSliwowskiZPajdoRBrzozowskiBLipid peroxidation, reactive oxygen species and antioxidative factors in the pathogenesis of gastric mucosal lesions and mechanism of protection against oxidative stress-induced gastric injury.J Physiol Pharmacol. (2014) 65:613–22.SongJHKimSGJinEHLimJHYangSY. Risk factors for gastric tumorigenesis in underlying gastric mucosal atrophy.Gut Liver. (2017) 11:612–9. 10.5009/gnl1648828531911TeyssenSSingerMV. Alcohol-related diseases of the oesophagus and stomach.Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. (2003) 17:557–73. 10.1016/s1521-6918(03)00049-0BodeCBodeJC. Alcohol’s role in gastrointestinal tract disorders.Alcohol Health Res World. (1997) 21:76–83.YooJYChoHJMoonSChoiJLeeSAhnCPickled vegetable and salted fish intake and the risk of gastric cancer: two prospective cohort studies and a meta-analysis.Cancers (Basel). (2020) 12:996. 10.3390/cancers1204099632316595FurihataCOhtaHKatsuyamaT. Cause and effect between concentration-dependent tissue damage and temporary cell proliferation in rat stomach mucosa by NaCl, a stomach tumor promoter.Carcinogenesis. (1996) 17:401–6. 10.1093/carcin/17.3.4018631123CharnleyGTannenbaumSR. Flow Cytometric analysis of the effect of sodium chloride on gastric cancer risk in the rat.Cancer Res. (1985) 45:5608.FangXWeiJHeXAnPWangHJiangLLandscape of dietary factors associated with risk of gastric cancer: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.Eur J Cancer. (2015) 51:2820–32. 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.09.01026589974KimJHLeeJChoiIJKimYIKimJ. Dietary patterns and gastric cancer risk in a Korean population: a case-control study.Eur J Nutr. (2021) 60:389–97. 10.1007/s00394-020-02253-w32350654BertuccioPEdefontiVBraviFFerraroniMPelucchiCNegriENutrient dietary patterns and gastric cancer risk in Italy.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. (2009) 18:2882–6. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-078219861520BradburyKEApplebyPNKeyTJ. Fruit, vegetable, and fiber intake in relation to cancer risk: findings from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC).Am J Clin Nutr. (2014) 100(Suppl. 1):394S–8S. 10.3945/ajcn.113.07135724920034KimJHLeeJChoiIJKimYIKwonOKimHDietary carotenoids intake and the risk of gastric cancer: a case-control study in Korea.Nutrients. (2018) 10:1031. 10.3390/nu1008103130087311YuLLiRLiuWZhouYLiYQinYProtective effects of wheat peptides against ethanol-induced gastric mucosal lesions in rats: vasodilation and anti-inflammation.Nutrients. (2020) 12:2355. 10.3390/nu1208235532784583PencharzPB. Assessment of protein nutritional status in children.Pediatr Blood Cancer. (2008) 50(Suppl. 2):445–6. 10.1002/pbc.2141518064637GattaAVerardoABolognesiM. Hypoalbuminemia.Intern Emerg Med. (2012) 7(Suppl. 3):S193–9. 10.1007/s11739-012-0802-023073857SantosEWOliveiraDCSilvaGBTsujitaMBeltranJOHastreiterAHematological alterations in protein malnutrition.Nutrit Rev. (2017) 75:909–19. 10.1093/nutrit/nux04129025154MupfumiLMoyoSMolebatsiKThamiPKAndersonMMogashoaTImmunological non-response and low hemoglobin levels are predictors of incident tuberculosis among HIV-infected individuals on Truvada-based therapy in Botswana.PLoS One. (2018) 13:e0192030. 10.1371/journal.pone.019203029385208ItoMKGonçalvesVSSFariaSLCMMoizéVPorporattiALGuerraENSEffect of protein intake on the protein status and lean mass of post-bariatric surgery patients: a systematic review.Obesity Surg. (2017) 27:502–12. 10.1007/s11695-016-2453-027844254EusebiLHTeleseAMarascoGBazzoliFZagariRM. Gastric cancer prevention strategies: a global perspective.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2020) 35:1495–502. 10.1111/jgh.1503732181516RoukosDH. Current status and future perspectives in gastric cancer management.Cancer Treat Rev. (2000) 26:243–55. 10.1053/ctrv.2000.016410913380MoriGNakajimaTAsadaKShimazuTYamamichiNMaekitaTIncidence of and risk factors for metachronous gastric cancer after endoscopic resection and successful Helicobacter pylori eradication: results of a large-scale, multicenter cohort study in Japan.Gastric Cancer. (2016) 19:911–8. 10.1007/s10120-015-0544-626420267ShiotaniAHarumaKGrahamDY. Metachronous gastric cancer after successful Helicobacter pylori eradication.World J Gastroenterol. (2014) 20:11552–9. 10.3748/wjg.v20.i33.1155225206262BoshierPRKlevebroFSavvaKVWallerAHageLHannaGBAssessment of health related quality of life and digestive symptoms in long-term, disease free survivors after esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 275:e140–7. (2022). 10.1097/SLA.000000000000382932068555