Front. Nutr. Frontiers in Nutrition Front. Nutr. 2296-861X Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fnut.2022.1079618 Nutrition Correction Corrigendum: Approaching to biogenic amines as quality markers in packaged chicken meat Esposito Luigi Mastrocola Dino Martuscelli Maria * Faculty of Bioscience and Technology for Food, Agriculture and Environment, University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy

Approved by: Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

 *Correspondence: Maria Martuscelli mmartuscelli@unite.it

This article was submitted to Nutrition and Food Science Technology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Nutrition

 09 11 2022 2022 9 1079618 25 10 2022 27 10 2022 Copyright © 2022 Esposito, Mastrocola and Martuscelli. 2022 Esposito, Mastrocola and Martuscelli

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 A corrigendum on Approaching to biogenic amines as quality markers in packaged chicken meat by Esposito, L., Mastrocola, D., and Martuscelli, M. (2022). Front. Nutr. 9:966790. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.966790 biogenic amines chicken meat quality safety BAI index TBARS packaged meat refrigerated meat

In the published article, there was an error. The ratio of gases composition in MAP packaging was reported inverted.

A correction has been made to Materials and methods, Origin of the samples and sampling, 2 This sentence previously stated:

“The cuts were packaged using three types of packaging and conditions: under modified atmosphere or MAP (CO2:O2 - 70%:30%); …”

The corrected sentence appears below:

“The cuts were packaged using three types of packaging and conditions: under modified atmosphere or MAP (CO2:O2-30%:70%);…”

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.