AUTHOR=Berman Daniel E. , Cowansage Kiriana P. , Bellanti Dawn M. , Nair Reshmi , Boyd Courtney C. , Beech Erin H. , Reddy Madhavi K. , Recker Robyn S. , Belsher Bradley E. , Kelber Marija S. 

TITLE=Systematic review and meta-analysis of neurofeedback training efficacy and neural mechanisms in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Neuroscience

VOLUME=Volume 19 - 2025

YEAR=2025

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2025.1658652

DOI=10.3389/fnins.2025.1658652

ISSN=1662-453X

ABSTRACT=IntroductionNeurofeedback in the treatment of psychological disorders has gained increasingly widespread interest in recent years. As the use of neurofeedback training expands, it is important to elucidate its treatment efficacy, especially for prevalent and debilitating psychopathologies such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Likewise, furthering our understanding of the underlying neural mechanisms by which neurofeedback acts is also necessary.MethodsHere, we present the results of a PROSPERO registered (protocol number: CRD42020184659) meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of neurofeedback training for treatment of PTSD in adults. We evaluate the efficacy of different neurofeedback modalities used to treat PTSD, including functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback (fMRI-NF) and electroencephalogram neurofeedback (EEG-NF). We also differentiate active control (sham or yoked sham) studies from passive control (waitlist, treatment as usual, no treatment, and any non-neurofeedback based intervention) studies.ResultsOur results show that EEG-NF has a moderate to large effect in reducing PTSD symptoms pre- to post-treatment compared to passive controls (k = 5). Two fMRI-NF RCTs, both using sham controls, showed no improvement in PTSD symptoms, pre- to post-treatment. However, our confidence in these findings is very low to low due to concerns regarding risk of bias, imprecision, and conflicts of interest. Neurofeedback in passive control studies outperformed neurofeedback in active control studies relative to their respective control treatment arms. We also synthesized the neural results from these studies and found that between-group neural effects were generally inconclusive.DiscussionThese findings highlight the need for improved controls in studies examining neurofeedback for PTSD to reliably determine whether neurofeedback training, or other factors, are the basis for improvements in PTSD symptoms. We elaborate on some of the underlying neural mechanisms by which neurofeedback training shows potential in improving PTSD symptoms to guide future developments and provide recommendations for future neurofeedback interventions in treating PTSD.