<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Neurosci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Neuroscience</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Neurosci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1662-453X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fnins.2022.861511</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Neuroscience</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Optical Coherence Tomography Evaluation of Carotid Artery Stenosis and Stenting in Patients With Previous Cervical Radiotherapy</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Xiaohui</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1575453/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Feihong</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1766343/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>Xuan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/809398/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Rui</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/904288/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Yunfei</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1640707/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Min</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1766370/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Fang</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/896214/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Qingwen</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1408298/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Wusheng</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1163727/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>Ruidong</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/98582/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Xinfeng</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c002"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/882121/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Department of Neurology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University</institution>, <addr-line>Nanjing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Department of Neurology, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Southern Medical University</institution>, <addr-line>Nanjing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Department of Neurology, Guilin People&#x2019;s Hospital</institution>, <addr-line>Guilin</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Department of Neurology, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine</institution>, <addr-line>Nanjing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff5"><sup>5</sup><institution>Department of Neurology, Jinling Hospital, Southeast University School of Medicine</institution>, <addr-line>Nanjing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff6"><sup>6</sup><institution>Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, Stroke Center &#x0026; Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), University of Science and Technology of China</institution>, <addr-line>Hefei</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Sung-Liang Chen, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Zhen Qiu, Michigan State University, United States; Hsiang-Chieh Lee, National Taiwan University, Taiwan</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Ruidong Ye, <email>yeruid@gmail.com</email></corresp>
<corresp id="c002">Xinfeng Liu, <email>xfliu2@vip.163.com</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn002"><p><sup>&#x2020;</sup>These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn004"><p>This article was submitted to Brain Imaging Methods, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>27</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>861511</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>24</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>29</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2022 Xu, Huang, Shi, Liu, Han, Li, Wang, Yang, Zhu, Ye and Liu.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Xu, Huang, Shi, Liu, Han, Li, Wang, Yang, Zhu, Ye and Liu</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Objectives</title>
<p>Cervical radiotherapy can lead to accelerated carotid artery stenosis, increased incidence of stroke, and a higher rate of in-stent restenosis in irradiated patients. Our objective was to reveal the morphological characteristics of radiation-induced carotid stenosis (RICS) and the stent&#x2013;vessel interactions in patients with previous cervical radiotherapy by optical coherence tomography (OCT).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<p>Between November 2017 and March 2019, five patients with a history of cervical radiotherapy were diagnosed with severe carotid artery stenosis and underwent carotid artery stenting (CAS). OCT was conducted before and immediately after the carotid stent implantation. Two patients received OCT evaluation of carotid stenting at 6- or 13-month follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>The tumor types indicating cervical radiotherapy were nasopharyngeal carcinoma (<italic>n</italic> = 3), cervical esophageal carcinoma (<italic>n</italic> = 1), and cervical lymphoma (<italic>n</italic> = 1). The median interval from the radiotherapy to the diagnosis of RICS was 8 years (range 4&#x2013;36 years). Lesion characteristics of RICS were detected with heterogeneous signal-rich tissue, dissection, and advanced atherosclerosis upon OCT evaluation. Post-interventional OCT revealed 18.2&#x2013;57.1% tissue protrusion and 3.3&#x2013;13.8% stent strut malapposition. Follow-up OCT detected homogeneous signal-rich neointima and signal-poor regions around stent struts. In the patient with high rates of tissue protrusion and stent strut malapposition, the 6-month neointima burden reached 48.9% and microvessels were detected.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The morphological features of RICS were heterogeneous, including heterogeneous signal-rich tissue, dissection, and advanced atherosclerosis. Stenting was successful in all 5 patients with severe RICS. One patient, with high rates of tissue protrusion and stent strut malapposition immediately after stenting, received in-stent neointimal hyperplasia at a 6-month follow-up.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>carotid artery stenosis</kwd>
<kwd>radiotherapy</kwd>
<kwd>stenting</kwd>
<kwd>optical coherence tomography</kwd>
<kwd>morphological characteristics</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn001">81530038</contract-num>
<contract-num rid="cn001">81870946</contract-num>
<contract-num rid="cn001">81901218</contract-num>
<contract-num rid="cn002">2017YFC1307900</contract-num>
<contract-num rid="cn003">BK20201234</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">National Natural Science Foundation of China<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100001809</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn002">National Key Research and Development Program of China<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100012166</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn003">Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100004608</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="42"/>
<page-count count="11"/>
<word-count count="7687"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="S1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Radiotherapy is an effective treatment for head and neck cancer and dramatically extends life expectancy. However, there is a major issue that radiation-induced cerebral vasculopathy may occur during the long-term follow-up, such as cerebrovascular stenosis or occlusion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Twitchell et al., 2018</xref>). It is reported that the cumulative incidence of moderate (&#x003E;50%) carotid stenosis in the first, second, and third years following head and neck radiotherapy is 4, 12, and 21%, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Texakalidis et al., 2020</xref>). The mechanism of radiation-induced carotid stenosis (RICS) has been undetermined in the literature. Relevant hypotheses include radiation insult to the intima-media (accelerated atherosclerosis) and injury to the vasa vasorum in the adventitia (a distinct disease entity) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Plummer et al., 2011</xref>). To date, the histopathological findings of RICS based on small cases are various, including ulcerating atherosclerosis with calcification, periarterial fibrosis, damage to the vasa vasorum, necrotizing vasculitis, thrombosis, and transmural fibrosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Levinson et al., 1973</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Atkinson et al., 1989</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Zidar et al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Tonomura et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>Furthermore, the incidence of stroke significantly increases after cervical radiation and the relative risk of stroke reaches 5.6 in irradiated patients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Gujral et al., 2014</xref>). To reduce the risk of stroke, carotid artery stenting (CAS) is performed in patients with severe RICS. Nevertheless, the long-term outcomes after CAS show a markedly higher rate of in-stent restenosis in patients with previous radiotherapy, reaching 25.7% in 2 years (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Yu et al., 2014</xref>). To the best of our knowledge, the stent&#x2013;vessel relationship immediately after stenting and the pattern of in-stent neointimal hyperplasia in patients with RICS have not been studied yet. Overall, the morphological features of RICS and the stent&#x2013;vessel interactions in patients with previous cervical radiotherapy remain to be examined. With the help of the intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT) technique, we may achieve that aim.</p>
<p>Optical coherence tomography is a vessel wall imaging technique with the highest resolution (10&#x2013;20 &#x03BC;m) and has been known as an optical biopsy technique (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Tearney et al., 2012</xref>). It has been applied to evaluate the carotid atherosclerotic plaque and the stent&#x2013;vessel interactions since 2010 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Yoshimura et al., 2010</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Jones et al., 2012</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Setacci et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Given et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Liu et al., 2015</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Funatsu et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Shi et al., 2020</xref>). The purpose of this preliminary study was to apply OCT to reveal the morphological characteristics of RICS and the stent&#x2013;vessel interactions in patients with previous cervical radiotherapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="S2.SS1">
<title>Study Design and Patient Selection</title>
<p>Between November 2017 and March 2019, five patients (&#x2265;18 years old) with severe internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis (70&#x2013;90% diameter reduction) detected by digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and previous cervical radiotherapy were enrolled for pre-interventional OCT evaluation. Immediately after stenting, 4 patients underwent OCT evaluation. Since the patient experienced vasospasm and the blockage of the cerebral protection device, 1 patient did not receive post-interventional OCT evaluation. Only two patients underwent 6- or 13-month follow-up OCT evaluation since the other three patients refused another OCT evaluation due to the relatively expensive fee and the fear of invasive examination. Patients were from Jinling hospital in Nanjing, China. The study protocol was approved by the hospital&#x2019;s ethics committee. Written informed consents were obtained from all patients. The relevant clinical and radiologic data were reviewed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS2">
<title>Optical Coherence Tomography Image Acquisition and Analysis</title>
<p>The intravascular frequency-domain OCT imaging system (ILUMIEN OPTIS, St. Jude Medical, Massachusetts, United States) and 2.7F OCT imaging catheters (Dragonfly Duo, Abbott Medical, Massachusetts, United States) were used for OCT image acquisition. With an 8F guide catheter placed in the common carotid artery (CCA), a cerebral protection device [FilterWire (Boston Scientific, Massachusetts, United States), Emboshield NAV6 (Abbott Vascular, California, United States), or ANGIOGUARD (Cordis Corporation, Florida, United States)] was advanced through the guide catheter and positioned in the ICA C1 segment. An OCT imaging catheter was then carefully advanced over the guidewire of the cerebral protection device and navigated through the carotid artery lesion. During the blood clearance by the automatic injection of 20 ml of undiluted iodixanol 320 (GE Healthcare Ireland Limited, County Cork, Ireland) with a velocity of 10 ml/s through the 8F guide catheter, the light mirror of the OCT imaging catheter was helically pulled back (18 or 36 mm/s) to get a series of cross-sectional OCT images of the vessel wall (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Jones et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Liu et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Shi et al., 2020</xref>). OCT image acquisition was repeated immediately after stenting and during the follow-up DSA examination. The OCT imaging catheter was introduced into the ICA over a 0.014-inch microwire during the follow-up DSA examination.</p>
<p>Optical coherence tomography images were analyzed independently by two investigators (XX and FH) with extensive experience in reviewing OCT images. OCT images within 10 mm distal and proximal to the minimum lumen were assessed. The image was considered non-analyzable if the assessment of a continuous 270&#x00B0; arc was impaired by the intraluminal blood (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Jones et al., 2014</xref>). Before quantitative measurement, manual OCT calibration was performed along with the entire pullback. Cross-sectional OCT images were analyzed at 0.1- or 0.2-mm intervals. The rates of tissue protrusion and stent strut malapposition were analyzed at 1-mm intervals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">de Donato et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Liu et al., 2015</xref>). The rates of tissue protrusion were calculated in the slice-based analysis, and the rates of stent strut malapposition were in the strut-based analysis.</p>
<p>Qualitative and quantitative OCT evaluations were performed precisely based on previously published criteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Prati et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Tearney et al., 2012</xref>). Lipid-rich plaque was defined as plaque with lipid content occupying more than one quadrant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Tearney et al., 2012</xref>). The calcific nodule was defined as single or multiple regions of calcium that protruded into the lumen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Tearney et al., 2012</xref>). A thin fibrous cap was present if the fibrous cap thickness was less than 65 &#x03BC;m (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Tearney et al., 2012</xref>). Plaque rupture was defined as the discontinuity of the fibrous cap and the cavity formation, with or without a superimposed thrombus (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Prati et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Tearney et al., 2012</xref>). A thrombus was defined as a mass (&#x2265;250 &#x03BC;m) attached to the luminal surface or floating within the lumen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Jang et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Tearney et al., 2012</xref>). Microvessels or neovascularization was defined as signal-voiding tubular structures (50&#x2013;300 &#x03BC;m) present on at least three consecutive cross-sectional frames (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Takano et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Prati et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Li et al., 2020</xref>). Dissection was defined as the presence of an intimomedial flap producing a double-lumen or an intramural hematoma formation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Alfonso et al., 2012</xref>). Intramural hematoma can be defined as a relatively homogeneous signal-rich material with variable attenuation separating the intima from the outer vessel wall (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Alfonso et al., 2012</xref>). Tissue protrusion was defined as the prolapse of tissue into the lumen between adjacent stent struts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Tearney et al., 2012</xref>). It was divided into 3 groups, namely, smooth protrusion, irregular protrusion, and protrusion with attenuation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Funatsu et al., 2020</xref>). The distance from the surface of the stent strut to the lumen contour was measured. A stent strut was classified as &#x201C;malapposed&#x201D; (distance &#x003E; 200 &#x03BC;m), &#x201C;well apposed&#x201D; (distance 10&#x2013;200 &#x03BC;m), or &#x201C;embedded&#x201D; (distance &#x003C; 10 &#x03BC;m) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">de Donato et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Liu et al., 2015</xref>). Follow-up OCT image with the minimum lumen was selected to measure the neointima burden. It was calculated as (stent area &#x2013; lumen area)/stent area &#x00D7; 100% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Tearney et al., 2012</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS3">
<title>Carotid Artery Stenting Procedure and Quantitative Angiography Analysis</title>
<p>The CAS procedure was performed through the femoral approach through guide catheters. All patients underwent systemic anticoagulation with 4,000 IU unfractionated heparin after femoral artery puncture and an additional 2,000 IU/h. Pre-dilatation of the carotid lesion with a 4.0&#x2013;5.0-mm balloon catheter was performed after OCT image acquisition. Stenting was then performed with one of the following open-cell stents: Acculink (Abbott Vascular, California, United States), Precise (Cordis, Florida, United States), and Prot&#x00E9;g&#x00E9; (Medtronic, Minnesota, United States). The selection of the stent diameter and length was decided by our experienced interventional neurologists according to the lesion feature. Post-dilatation was performed with a 5.0&#x2013;6.0-mm balloon catheter when the remaining stenosis was &#x003E; 30%.</p>
<p>The degree of diameter stenosis, residual stenosis, and in-stent stenosis was calculated accurately according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Barnett et al., 1998</xref>). Technical success was defined as the residual stenosis &#x003C; 30% on DSA. In-stent restenosis was defined as &#x2265; 50% stenosis within or at the edge of the stent. Angiograms and OCT images used co-registration on the basis of the landmarks, such as the bifurcation of the CCA and the stent edge, to ensure that they were at identical sites.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S3" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="S3.SS1">
<title>Patient Characteristics</title>
<p>A total of 5 male patients [mean (standard deviation) age, 64.2 (8.5) years] with previous cervical radiotherapy underwent OCT evaluation of carotid artery stenosis successfully (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). The tumor types indicating cervical radiotherapy were nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) (<italic>n</italic> = 3, 60%), cervical esophageal carcinoma (<italic>n</italic> = 1, 20%), and cervical lymphoma (<italic>n</italic> = 1, 20%). The radiation dose was 70 Gy in three patients. The median interval from the radiotherapy to the diagnosis of RICS was 8 years (range 4&#x2013;36 years). Interestingly, all patients had not more than one risk factor for atherosclerosis but 60% of them had severe bilateral carotid disease (70&#x2013;100% diameter reduction). Except for one patient diagnosed with severe right coronary artery stenosis, all patients were free of coronary artery disease and peripheral artery disease.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption><p>Demographic, clinical, and radiological features of five patients with a history of cervical radiotherapy.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case No./Age (years)/Sex</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tumor type</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Treatment</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Radiation to diagnosis interval (years)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Risk factors for atherosclerosis</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Carotid artery stenosis</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CAD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PAD</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">1/61/male</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Nasopharyngeal carcinoma</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Radiation (70 Gy) and chemo</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">None</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">LICA 70%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RCA 95%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">None</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">2/53/male</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Nasopharyngeal carcinoma</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Radiation (70 Gy) and chemo</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypertension</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">LICA 80% LECA 100%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">None</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">None</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">3/75/male</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Nasopharyngeal carcinoma</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Radiation</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">36</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Smoking</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">LICA 90% LECA 100% RCCA 100%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">None</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">None</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">4/70/male</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cervical esophageal carcinoma</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Radiation (70 Gy) and chemo</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">None</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RICA 70% LICA 100%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">None</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">None</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">5/62/male</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cervical lymphoma</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Radiation and chemo</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">15</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypertension</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">LCCA 70% RCCA 100%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">None</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">None</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p><italic>Risk factors for atherosclerosis include smoking, obesity, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia.</italic></p></fn>
<fn><p><italic>CAD, coronary artery disease; LCCA, left common carotid artery; LECA, left external carotid artery; LICA, left internal carotid artery; PAD, peripheral artery disease; RCA, right coronary artery; RCCA, right common carotid artery; RICA, right internal carotid artery.</italic></p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS2">
<title>Digital Subtraction Angiography and Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis</title>
<p>As for the evaluated carotid artery lesion, the mean degree of diameter stenosis was 76% (range 70&#x2013;90%) on DSA and the mean minimum lumen area was 3.10 mm<sup>2</sup> (range 1.57&#x2013;5.23 mm<sup>2</sup>) on OCT (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). The morphological characteristics of RICS in three NPC patients were different (Cases 1&#x2013;3). In the NPC patient with a 4-year interval from radiotherapy, heterogeneous signal-rich tissue was observed in consecutive 30 frames (6 mm) and occupied almost three-quarters of the vessel at the minimum lumen (Case 1). Atypical lesion such as dissection in the ICA C1 segment was detected in the other two NPC patients with longer time intervals (Cases 2 and 3). In the NPC patient with an 8-year interval, multiple cavity formations were present besides the dissection (Case 2). In the NPC patient at a 36-year interval, advanced atherosclerosis such as ruptured lipid-rich plaque, ruptured calcific nodule, and thrombosis coexisted with the dissection (Case 3). The morphological characteristics of RICS in patients with esophageal carcinoma or lymphoma were similar to atherosclerosis (Cases 4 and 5). Lipid-rich plaque was present in both cases. Neovascularization and thrombosis were revealed in the patient with longer time intervals (Case 5).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption><p>DSA and OCT features of radiation-induced carotid stenosis and the stent-vessel interactions.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case no./age (years)/Sex</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Evaluated vessel site</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DS, %, DSA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">MLA, mm<sup>2</sup>, OCT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lesion features, OCT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Treatment</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RS, %, DSA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Stent-vessel relationship, OCT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tissue protrusion, %, OCT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Stent strut malapposition, %, OCT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Follow-up in-stent restenosis, DSA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Follow-up OCT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Neointima burden, %, OCT</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">1/61/male</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">LICA sinus</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">70%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.46</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Heterogeneous signal-rich tissue.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Angioplasty and Stenting</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">20%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Smooth tissue protrusion.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">35.7%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.4%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">None</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">NA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">2/53/male</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">LICA C1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">80%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dissection; multiple cavity formations.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Angioplasty and Stenting</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">20%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Smooth tissue protrusion; small dissection.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">28.6%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.3%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">NA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">3/75/male</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">LICA C1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">90%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dissection; ruptured lipid-rich plaque; ruptured calcific nodule; thrombosis.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Angioplasty and Stenting</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">20%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">None</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">13-month homogeneous neointima; signal-poor regions around struts.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">31.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">4/70/male</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RICA sinus and C1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">70%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lipid-rich plaque.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Angioplasty and Stenting</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">20%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Smooth and irregular tissue protrusion; small dissection.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">57.1%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">13.8%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">None</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6-month homogeneous neointima; neovascularization; signal-poor regions around struts.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">48.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">5/62/male</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bifurcation of LCCA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">70%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lipid-rich plaque; neovascularization; thrombosis.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Angioplasty and Stenting</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">20%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Smooth tissue protrusion.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">18.2%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.6%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">NA</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p><italic>DS, diameter stenosis; DSA, digital subtraction angiography; LCCA, left common carotid artery; LICA, left internal carotid artery; MLA, minimum lumen area; NA, not available; OCT, optical coherence tomography; RICA, right internal carotid artery; RS, residual stenosis.</italic></p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>All patients received balloon pre-dilatation and carotid stenting. The rate of technical success was 100% on DSA. Four patients underwent OCT examination immediately after stenting to evaluate the stent&#x2013;vessel relationship in RICS patients (Cases 1, 2, 4, and 5). A total of 67 cross-sectional OCT images [mean (standard deviation), 17 (5)] were analyzed to assess the rates of tissue protrusion and stent strut malapposition. The mean rates of tissue protrusion and stent strut malapposition were 34.9% (range 18.2&#x2013;57.1%) and 7.0% (range 3.3&#x2013;13.8%), respectively. Besides, there were the highest rates of tissue protrusion and stent strut malapposition in Case 4. Most of the tissue protrusion was smooth tissue protrusion. Small dissection may appear sometimes (Cases 2 and 4). Two patients underwent follow-up OCT examination to evaluate the pattern of neointimal hyperplasia in RICS patients (Cases 3 and 4). There were homogeneous signal-rich neointima and signal-poor regions around stent struts in both follow-up OCT images. The neointima burden of Cases 3 and 4 was 31.6 and 48.9%, respectively. Microvessels were observed in the thicker 6-month neointima of Case 4. Detailed data are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS3">
<title>Case 1</title>
<p>The patient presented with a history of NPC 4 years had been treated with cervical radiotherapy (70 Gy) and chemotherapy (cisplatin, docetaxel, and bevacizumab). The patient presented with dizziness for 2 months. DSA showed 70% of stenosis at the left ICA (LICA) sinus (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1A</xref>). The patient underwent balloon pre-dilatation (5 &#x00D7; 30 mm) and stent implantation (Acculink, 7&#x2013;10 &#x00D7; 40 mm). The residual stenosis was 20% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1B</xref>). The 4-month follow-up DSA detected that there was no in-stent restenosis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1C</xref>). Pre-interventional OCT examination of the distal lesion with mild stenosis revealed macrophage accumulations at 2 o&#x2019;clock, and there was no clear three-layered vessel structure (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1D</xref>). More proximally, nearly half of the vessel was occupied by a heterogeneous signal-rich tissue located close to the luminal surface (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1E</xref>). There was a clear demarcation between the tissue and the outer fibrous tissue. Moreover, there was a microvessel at 12 o&#x2019;clock (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1E</xref>). Nearly three-quarters of the vessel was occupied by the heterogeneous tissue at the minimum lumen, and there was irregular signal-poor tissue accumulating at 5&#x2013;7 o&#x2019;clock (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figures 1F,G</xref>). At the proximal site of the lesion, there were multiple layers of heterogeneous signal-rich tissue, forming the onion-like structure (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1H</xref>). The post-interventional OCT evaluation revealed excellent stent strut apposition and smooth tissue protrusion at the image with the minimum lumen (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1I</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>DSA and OCT findings of the LICA lesion. Case 1. <bold>(A)</bold> The angiogram before stenting showed severe stenosis at the LICA sinus. <bold>(B)</bold> The angiogram after stenting. <bold>(C)</bold> The angiogram at a 4-month follow-up revealed no in-stent restenosis. <bold>(D)</bold> The macrophage accumulations (arrow) at 2 o&#x2019;clock. <bold>(E)</bold> The microvessel (dashed arrow) at 12 o&#x2019;clock and the heterogeneous signal-rich tissue (arrow) at 12&#x2013;6 o&#x2019;clock. <bold>(F,G)</bold> Adjacent OCT images. <bold>(G)</bold> The image with the minimum lumen. The heterogeneous tissue occupied 3/4 of the vessel and the irregular signal-poor tissue (dashed curve with arrows) accumulated at 5&#x2013;7 o&#x2019;clock. <bold>(H)</bold> The onion-like structure (double arrow). <bold>(I)</bold> Post-interventional OCT image with the minimum lumen. Stent struts were well apposed and there was smooth tissue protrusion (arrowhead) between stent struts. Scale bars represent 1 mm. Asterisks denote guide-wire artifact. DSA, digital subtraction angiography; LICA, left internal carotid artery; OCT, optical coherence tomography.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fnins-16-861511-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS4">
<title>Case 2</title>
<p>The patient presented with a history of NPC 8 years had been treated with cervical radiotherapy (70 Gy) and chemotherapy. The patient presented with paroxysmal vertigo for 3 days. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed acute cerebral infarction in the right frontal lobe, occipital lobe, and semi-oval center. DSA showed 80% stenosis with an irregular surface at the LICA C1 segment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>) and occlusion at the left external carotid artery origin. The patient underwent balloon pre-dilatation (4 &#x00D7; 30 mm) and stent implantation (Precise, 8 &#x00D7; 40 mm) at the LICA lesion. The residual stenosis was 20% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>). Pre-interventional OCT examination of the distal lesion revealed that the crescent-shaped material separated the intima from the outer vessel wall at 5&#x2013;9 o&#x2019;clock (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2C</xref>). More proximally, nearly half of the vessel was occupied by the relatively homogeneous signal-rich material with variable attenuation that separated the intima from the outer vessel wall, indicating intramural hematoma (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2D</xref>). The intramural hematoma expanded to almost three-quarters of the vessel at the minimum lumen (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2E</xref>). In addition, the intimal tear at 5 o&#x2019;clock, intimomedial flap floating, and double-lumen formation were well visualized by OCT (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures 2F,G</xref>), demonstrating dissection. Multiple cavity formations and macrophage accumulations were detected at the proximal normal-appearing vessel (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2H</xref>). The post-interventional OCT evaluation disclosed excellent stent strut apposition, smooth tissue protrusion, and a residual small dissection (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures 2I&#x2013;K</xref>). The dissection corresponded to the intimal tear mentioned above (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2J</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p>DSA and OCT findings of the LICA lesion. Case 2. <bold>(A)</bold> The angiogram before stenting showed severe stenosis at the LICA C1 segment. <bold>(B)</bold> The angiogram after stenting. <bold>(C)</bold> The intramural hematoma (arrow) at 5&#x2013;9 o&#x2019;clock. <bold>(D)</bold> The intramural hematoma (arrow) occupied half of the vessel. <bold>(E)</bold> The intramural hematoma (dashed curve with arrows) expanded to nearly three-quarters of the vessel at the minimum lumen. <bold>(F)</bold> The intimal tear (dashed arrow) at 5 o&#x2019;clock. <bold>(G)</bold> The double-lumen (the true lumen and the false lumen [FL]) and the floating intimomedial flap (dashed arrow) were identified. <bold>(H)</bold> The cavity formations (red arrows) and the macrophage accumulations (arrow). <bold>(I&#x2013;K)</bold> Post-interventional OCT images. <bold>(I)</bold> The smooth tissue protrusion (arrow). <bold>(J)</bold> The residual small dissection (red dashed arrow). Image <bold>(J)</bold> corresponds to image <bold>(F)</bold>. Image <bold>(K)</bold> represents the image with the minimum lumen. Stent struts were well apposed. Scale bars represent 1 mm. Asterisks denote guide-wire artifact. DSA, digital subtraction angiography; LICA, left internal carotid artery; OCT, optical coherence tomography.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fnins-16-861511-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS5">
<title>Case 3</title>
<p>The patient presented with a history of NPC of 36 years had been treated with cervical radiotherapy. The patient presented with recurrent weakness and numbness of the right limb, and slurred speech for 1 month. MRI revealed acute cerebral infarction in the bilateral frontal and parietal lobes. DSA showed 90% of stenosis with an irregular surface at the LICA C1 segment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref>) and occlusion at both the left external carotid artery and the right CCA (RCCA) origin. Balloon pre-dilatation (4 &#x00D7; 30 mm), stent implantation (Acculink, 9 &#x00D7; 40 mm), and balloon post-dilatation (5 &#x00D7; 20 mm) were performed at the LICA lesion. The residual stenosis was 20% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref>). The 13-month follow-up DSA showed no in-stent restenosis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3C</xref>). Pre-interventional OCT examination of the lesion revealed that the crescent-shaped material separated the intima and the outer vessel wall at 9&#x2013;1 o&#x2019;clock, indicating intramural hematoma (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3D</xref>). In addition, intraluminal thrombus was observed and shadowed the underlying vessel wall (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3D</xref>). At the minimum lumen, there was a ruptured lipid-rich plaque and a ruptured calcific nodule with an overlying thrombus next to the intramural hematoma (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3E,F</xref>). More proximally, the double-lumen with the fenestration communicating the true lumen and the false lumen was identified as the sign of dissection (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3G,H</xref>). In addition, the calcification with overlying thrombus (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3G,H</xref>) and the ruptured calcific nodule mentioned above were consecutive. The length of the calcification reached 6.8 mm. Cholesterol crystals and cavity formations due to intimal disruption were frequently detected at the proximal site of the lesion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3I</xref>). The 13-month follow-up OCT examination revealed mild in-stent neointimal hyperplasia (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3J&#x2013;L</xref>). The neointima was homogeneous signal-rich, and there were signal-poor regions near the stent struts (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3J,K</xref>). Some struts in the cavity mentioned above were not covered by the neointima (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3L</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption><p>DSA and OCT findings of the LICA lesion. Case 3. <bold>(A)</bold> The angiogram before stenting showed severe stenosis with an irregular surface at the LICA C1 segment. <bold>(B)</bold> The angiogram after stenting. <bold>(C)</bold> The angiogram at a 13-month follow-up revealed no in-stent restenosis. <bold>(D)</bold> The crescent-shaped intramural hematoma (arrow) and the intraluminal thrombus (double arrow). <bold>(E,F)</bold> Adjacent OCT images. Image <bold>(E)</bold> represents the image with the minimum lumen. The lipid-rich plaque (dashed curve with arrows) with plaque rupture (arrowheads) and adjacent ruptured calcific nodule (dashed arrows) with overlying thrombus were detected. <bold>(G,H)</bold> The double-lumen and the fenestration (arrowhead) between the true lumen and the false lumen (FL). The calcification (dashed curve with arrows) with overlying thrombus. <bold>(I)</bold> The cavity formation (red arrow), cholesterol crystals (arrowheads), and calcification (dashed curve with arrows) were observed. <bold>(J&#x2013;L)</bold> Thirteen-month follow-up OCT images. Image <bold>(J)</bold> represents the image with the minimum lumen. Homogeneous neointima and signal-poor regions around stent struts (dashed curve with arrows) were detected. There were uncovered stent struts (arrowheads) in the cavity. Image <bold>(L)</bold> corresponds to image <bold>(I)</bold>. Scale bars represent 1 mm. Asterisks denote guide-wire artifact. DSA, digital subtraction angiography; LICA, left internal carotid artery; OCT, optical coherence tomography.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fnins-16-861511-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS6">
<title>Case 4</title>
<p>The patient presented with a history of cervical esophageal carcinoma 4 years had been treated with cervical radiotherapy (70 Gy) and chemotherapy (nedaplatin, docetaxel, and raltitrexed). The patient presented with slurred speech and paroxysmal unconsciousness for 3 days. MRI revealed acute cerebral infarction in the left frontal and temporal lobes. DSA showed a long lesion with 70% stenosis at both the right ICA (RICA) sinus and C1 segment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4A</xref>) and occlusion at the LICA sinus. The patient underwent balloon pre-dilatation (5 &#x00D7; 30 mm) and stent implantation (Prot&#x00E9;g&#x00E9;, 8 &#x00D7; 60 mm) at the RICA lesion. The residual stenosis was 20% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4B</xref>). The 6-month follow-up DSA showed no in-stent restenosis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4C</xref>). Pre-interventional OCT examination of the lesion disclosed focal signal-poor tissue in the fibrous tissue (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4D</xref>). More proximally, there was a lipid-rich plaque with a thick fibrous cap at 6&#x2013;10 o&#x2019;clock (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4E</xref>). At the minimum lumen, the intima thickened with mainly fibrous tissue and linear signal-rich cholesterol crystals were detected at 6 o&#x2019;clock (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4F</xref>). The cholesterol crystals were detected at 10 adjacent cross sections. The post-interventional OCT evaluation disclosed the small dissection, smooth tissue protrusion, and irregular tissue protrusion at the stented segment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figures 4G&#x2013;I</xref>). Besides, its rates of tissue protrusion and stent strut malapposition were the biggest among the four patients. The 6-month follow-up OCT examination revealed evident in-stent neointimal hyperplasia, signal-poor regions around stent struts, and neovascularization (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figures 4J&#x2013;L</xref>). Stent struts were all covered by the neointima, and the small dissection was healed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4J</xref>). There were some microvessels near the signal-poor regions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4K</xref>). The neointima with the minimum lumen was fibrotic and homogeneous signal-rich (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4L</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption><p>DSA and OCT findings of the RICA lesion. Case 4. <bold>(A)</bold> The angiogram before stenting showed a long lesion with severe stenosis at the RICA sinus and C1 segment. <bold>(B)</bold> The angiogram after stenting. <bold>(C)</bold> The angiogram at a 6-month follow-up revealed no in-stent restenosis. <bold>(D)</bold> The focal signal-poor tissue (arrow). <bold>(E)</bold> The lipid-rich plaque (dashed curve with arrows). <bold>(F)</bold> The image with the minimum lumen. The cholesterol crystals (dashed arrow) at 6 o&#x2019;clock. <bold>(G&#x2013;I)</bold> Post-interventional OCT images. <bold>(G)</bold> The small dissection (red arrow) at the cross section with the focal signal-poor tissue (arrow). Image <bold>(G)</bold> corresponds to image <bold>(D)</bold>. Image <bold>(H)</bold> represents the image with the minimum lumen. The smooth tissue protrusion (red dashed arrow) between stent struts was detected. <bold>(I)</bold> The irregular tissue protrusion (red dashed arrow) at the cross section with the cholesterol crystals (dashed arrow) was observed. Image <bold>(I)</bold> corresponds to image <bold>(F)</bold>. <bold>(J&#x2013;L)</bold> Six-month follow-up OCT images. Image <bold>(J)</bold> corresponds to image <bold>(G)</bold>. Image <bold>(L)</bold> represents the image with the minimum lumen. The homogeneous signal-rich neointima, signal-poor regions around stent struts (dashed curve with arrows), and microvessels (red arrow) were visualized. Scale bars represent 1 mm. Asterisks denote guide-wire artifact. DSA, digital subtraction angiography; OCT, optical coherence tomography; RICA, right internal carotid artery.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fnins-16-861511-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS7">
<title>Case 5</title>
<p>The patient presented with a history of cervical lymphoma for 15 years had been treated with cervical radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The patient presented with recurrent vision loss in the right eye for more than 1 year and paroxysmal vertigo for 2 months. DSA showed 70% stenosis at the bifurcation of the left CCA (LCCA) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5A</xref>) and occlusion at the RCCA origin. Balloon pre-dilatation (4 &#x00D7; 30 mm), stent implantation (Precise, 8 &#x00D7; 40 mm), and balloon post-dilatation (6 &#x00D7; 30 mm) were performed at the LCCA lesion. The residual stenosis was 20% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5B</xref>). Pre-interventional OCT examination of the lesion revealed the intraluminal thrombus floating at 12&#x2013;3 o&#x2019;clock (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5C</xref>). There was a fibrous plaque with the intraluminal thrombus at the minimum lumen (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5D</xref>). A lipid-rich plaque with macrophage accumulations was visualized at the proximal site of the lesion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figures 5E,F</xref>). In addition, there was a microvessel connecting with the edge of the lipid plaque. More proximally, the lipid plaque with the neovascularization still existed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5G</xref>). The length of the lipid plaque reached 5.5 mm. The post-interventional OCT evaluation disclosed fine stent strut apposition, and some of the vessel walls were out of the imaging range (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5H</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption><p>DSA and OCT findings of the LCCA lesion. Case 5. <bold>(A)</bold> The angiogram before stenting showed severe stenosis at the bifurcation of the LCCA. <bold>(B)</bold> The angiogram after stenting. <bold>(C)</bold> The intraluminal thrombus (arrow). <bold>(D)</bold> The fibrous plaque with the intraluminal thrombus (arrow) at the minimum lumen. <bold>(E&#x2013;G)</bold> Images <bold>(E,F)</bold> are adjacent OCT images. The lipid-rich plaque (dashed curve with arrows) with macrophage accumulations (red arrows) and adjacent microvessels (dashed arrows) were detected. <bold>(H)</bold> Post-interventional OCT image. Most stent struts were well apposed, and some of the vessel walls were out of the imaging range. Scale bars represent 1 mm. Asterisks denote guide-wire artifact. DSA, digital subtraction angiography; LCCA, left common carotid artery; OCT, optical coherence tomography.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fnins-16-861511-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The goal of this study was to utilize OCT to reveal the morphological characteristics of RICS and the stent&#x2013;vessel interactions in patients with previous cervical radiotherapy. In this pilot study, several morphological characteristics of RICS were exhibited by OCT, such as heterogeneous signal-rich tissue, dissection, and advanced atherosclerosis. Based on the post-interventional OCT findings, the mean rates of tissue protrusion and stent strut malapposition were 34.9% (range 18.2&#x2013;57.1%) and 7.0% (range 3.3&#x2013;13.8%), respectively. Follow-up OCT examinations of the two patients revealed homogeneous signal-rich neointima and signal-poor regions around stent struts. Microvessels were observed in the thicker 6-month neointima where the neointima burden reached 48.9%.</p>
<p>Although the lesion characteristics of RICS were studied through various imaging tools, the mechanism of RICS has been undetermined. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Zou et al. (2013)</xref> applied DSA and discovered that there was more bilateral severe stenosis at the CCA/ICA (18% vs. 6%) and dissections (20% vs. 3%) in patients with symptomatic occlusive radiation vasculopathy than in patients with severe symptomatic carotid stenosis. In line with the research by Zou, bilateral severe stenosis at the CCA/ICA and dissection were frequently present in this study. As for the plaque composition, multidetector row computed tomography showed a significant increase in the carotid artery plaque volume and the percentage of fatty plaque component at 2 years after radiotherapy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Anzidei et al., 2016</xref>). Moreover, the carotid ultrasound scanning revealed more hypoechoic plaque (9% vs. 0%) in irradiated NPC patients (4&#x2013;11 years after radiotherapy) than in non-irradiated patients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Lam et al., 2002</xref>). Hypoechoic plaque may indicate lipid plaque or intraplaque hemorrhage and represent vulnerable plaque. However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Fokkema et al. (2012b)</xref> compared the histopathological features of RICS (1.8&#x2013;24 years after radiotherapy) with atherosclerotic-induced carotid stenosis and discovered that RICS had less infiltration of macrophages and a smaller lipid core size, indicating a more stable plaque in RICS. The tumor type, the radiation dose, the time interval from radiotherapy, concomitant chemotherapy (cisplatin), and the existing cardiovascular risk factors were associated with RICS (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Cheng et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Dorth et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Twitchell et al., 2018</xref>). We supposed that the heterogeneity of tumor types and time intervals from radiotherapy in these two research works may explain the opposite results.</p>
<p>The heterogeneous lesion characteristics of RICS were also observed by OCT in our study. As for the NPC patients (Cases 1&#x2013;3) with increasing time intervals from radiotherapy, heterogeneous signal-rich tissue, dissection, and advanced atherosclerosis were identified in sequence. As far as we know, OCT has been applied to reveal the features of carotid atherosclerotic stenosis and the stent&#x2013;vessel relationship after stenting. As for the features of carotid stenosis, advanced atherosclerosis such as ruptured lipid-rich plaque, ruptured calcific nodule, neovascularization, and thrombosis were both observed in carotid atherosclerotic stenosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Yoshimura et al., 2011</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Jones et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Yang et al., 2021</xref>) and RICS. Interestingly, heterogeneous signal-rich tissue and onion-like structure were observed in our study. Heterogeneous signal-rich tissue may represent layers of distinct collagen types or organized thrombi and be explained by prior rupture and healing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Shimokado et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Vergallo and Crea, 2020</xref>). As we know, radiation can damage the vascular endothelial cell and promote thrombosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Zheng et al., 2020</xref>). Furthermore, radiation damage to the vasa vasorum may cause loss of the elastic fibers and smooth muscle fibers and lead to dissection. With the application of OCT, we can clearly identify the various lesion features of RICS and may guide individualized treatment in the future.</p>
<p>Carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy were both effective treatments for reducing the risk of stroke in patients with severe carotid stenosis. On account of the fact that previous cervical radiotherapy could cause absent tissue planes in the carotid artery wall and poor tissue healing, CAS has been assumed as a less invasive alternative to reduce the risk of complications with surgery (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Kernan et al., 2014</xref>). A meta-analysis compared the outcome of CAS with carotid endarterectomy in patients with RICS and discovered that CAS had higher rates of restenosis and late cerebrovascular adverse event (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Fokkema et al., 2012a</xref>). In addition, Yu et al. reported that the rates of in-stent restenosis in patients with RICS were significantly higher than in patients with carotid atherosclerotic stenosis (26% vs. 4%) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Yu et al., 2014</xref>). The stent&#x2013;vessel interactions in RICS have not yet been studied. In this study, the mean rates of tissue protrusion and stent strut malapposition were 34.9 and 7.0%, respectively. With the high rates of tissue protrusion and stent strut malapposition in Case 4, its 6-month neointima burden reached 48.9% and neovascularization was observed. The stent strut malapposition may increase the risk of stent thrombosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Ng et al., 2017</xref>), and irregular tissue protrusion may be associated with target lesion revascularization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Soeda et al., 2015</xref>). Whether the rates of tissue protrusion and stent strut malapposition affect the stent restenosis in irradiated patients needs further exploration.</p>
<p>This study has some limitations. First, it is a single-center study with small sample size. Future work should increase the sample size to compare RICS with carotid atherosclerotic stenosis by OCT. Second, although various morphological characteristics of RICS were detected in this study, consistent features of RICS need future exploration. Third, more post-interventional OCT and follow-up OCT evaluations are required to investigate the mechanism of stent restenosis in irradiated patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S5" sec-type="conclusion">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The morphological features of RICS were heterogeneous, including heterogeneous signal-rich tissue, dissection, and advanced atherosclerosis. Stenting was successful in all 5 patients with severe radiation-induced carotid stenosis. One patient, with high rates of tissue protrusion and stent strut malapposition immediately after stenting, received in-stent neointimal hyperplasia at a 6-month follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S7">
<title>Ethics Statement</title>
<p>The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Jinling hospital&#x2019;s Ethics Committee. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S8">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>XX and FH participated in the study design, collection, interpretation, analysis of data, and writing of the manuscript. XS and RL participated in the collection, interpretation, and analysis of data. YH, ML, FW, QY, and WZ participated in the analysis of data and revising of the manuscript. XL and RY participated in the study design, collection, interpretation, analysis of data, and revising of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="conf1" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="pudiscl1" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="S9" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81530038, 81870946, and 81901218), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC1307900), and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Provincial, China (BK20201234).</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alfonso</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paulo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gonzalo</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dutary</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jimenez-Quevedo</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lennie</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Diagnosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection by optical coherence tomography.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.</italic></source> <volume>59</volume> <fpage>1073</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1079</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anzidei</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suri</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saba</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sanfilippo</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Laddeo</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Montisci</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Longitudinal assessment of carotid atherosclerosis after Radiation Therapy using Computed Tomography: a case control Study.</article-title> <source><italic>Eur. Radiol.</italic></source> <volume>26</volume> <fpage>72</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>78</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00330-015-3753-9</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26408306</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Atkinson</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sundt</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names> <suffix>Jr.</suffix></name> <name><surname>Dale</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cascino</surname> <given-names>T. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nichols</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>Radiation-associated atheromatous disease of the cervical carotid artery: report of seven cases and review of the literature.</article-title> <source><italic>Neurosurgery</italic></source> <volume>24</volume> <fpage>171</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>178</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1227/00006123-198902000-00004</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2645540</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barnett</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eliasziw</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fox</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferguson</surname> <given-names>G. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haynes</surname> <given-names>R. B.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators.</article-title> <source><italic>N. Engl. J. Med.</italic></source> <volume>339</volume> <fpage>1415</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1425</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1056/NEJM199811123392002</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9811916</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ting</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lau</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lam</surname> <given-names>L. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>W. I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Irradiation-induced extracranial carotid stenosis in patients with head and neck malignancies.</article-title> <source><italic>Am. J. Surg.</italic></source> <volume>178</volume> <fpage>323</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>328</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0002-9610(99)00184-1</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10587192</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>de Donato</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Setacci</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sirignano</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Galzerano</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cappelli</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Setacci</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Optical coherence tomography after carotid stenting: rate of stent malapposition, plaque prolapse and fibrous cap rupture according to stent design.</article-title> <source><italic>Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg.</italic></source> <volume>45</volume> <fpage>579</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>587</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.03.005</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23582886</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dorth</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Patel</surname> <given-names>P. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Broadwater</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brizel</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Incidence and risk factors of significant carotid artery stenosis in asymptomatic survivors of head and neck cancer after radiotherapy.</article-title> <source><italic>Head Neck</italic></source> <volume>36</volume> <fpage>215</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>219</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/hed.23280</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23554082</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fokkema</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>den Hartog</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Lammeren</surname> <given-names>G. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bots</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pasterkamp</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vink</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2012b</year>). <article-title>Radiation-induced carotid stenotic lesions have a more stable phenotype than de novo atherosclerotic plaques.</article-title> <source><italic>Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg.</italic></source> <volume>43</volume> <fpage>643</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>648</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.02.023</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22436263</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fokkema</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>den Hartog</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bots</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van der Tweel</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moll</surname> <given-names>F. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Borst</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012a</year>). <article-title>Stenting versus surgery in patients with carotid stenosis after previous cervical radiation therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.</article-title> <source><italic>Stroke</italic></source> <volume>43</volume> <fpage>793</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>801</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/strokeaha.111.633743</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22207504</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Funatsu</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Enomoto</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Egashira</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yamauchi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nakayama</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kawasaki</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Tissue protrusion with attenuation is associated with ischemic brain lesions after carotid artery stenting.</article-title> <source><italic>Stroke</italic></source> <volume>51</volume> <fpage>327</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>330</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026332</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31795897</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Given</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names> <suffix>II</suffix></name> <name><surname>Attizzani</surname> <given-names>G. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramsey</surname> <given-names>C. N.</given-names> <suffix>III</suffix></name> <name><surname>Brooks</surname> <given-names>W. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Costa</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of human carotid atherosclerosis using saline flush for blood clearance without balloon occlusion.</article-title> <source><italic>AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol.</italic></source> <volume>34</volume> <fpage>1414</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1418</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3174/ajnr.A3411</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23391841</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gujral</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chahal</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Senior</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harrington</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nutting</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Radiation-induced carotid artery atherosclerosis.</article-title> <source><italic>Radiother. Oncol.</italic></source> <volume>110</volume> <fpage>31</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>38</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.radonc.2013.08.009</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24044796</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jang</surname> <given-names>I. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tearney</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>MacNeill</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Takano</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moselewski</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Iftima</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title><italic>In vivo</italic> characterization of coronary atherosclerotic plaque by use of optical coherence tomography.</article-title> <source><italic>Circulation</italic></source> <volume>111</volume> <fpage>1551</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1555</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/01.cir.0000159354.43778.69</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Attizzani</surname> <given-names>G. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Given</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names> <suffix>II</suffix></name> <name><surname>Brooks</surname> <given-names>W. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Costa</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bezerra</surname> <given-names>H. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Intravascular frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of atherosclerosis and stent-vessel interactions in human carotid arteries.</article-title> <source><italic>AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol.</italic></source> <volume>33</volume> <fpage>1494</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1501</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3174/ajnr.A3016</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22422179</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Attizzani</surname> <given-names>G. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Given</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names> <suffix>II</suffix></name> <name><surname>Brooks</surname> <given-names>W. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ganocy</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramsey</surname> <given-names>C. N.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Intravascular frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of carotid artery disease in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.</article-title> <source><italic>JACC Cardiovasc. Interv.</italic></source> <volume>7</volume> <fpage>674</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>684</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jcin.2014.01.163</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24947723</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kernan</surname> <given-names>W. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ovbiagele</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Black</surname> <given-names>H. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bravata</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chimowitz</surname> <given-names>M. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ezekowitz</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.</article-title> <source><italic>Stroke</italic></source> <volume>45</volume> <fpage>2160</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2236</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lam</surname> <given-names>W. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>K. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leung</surname> <given-names>S. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wong</surname> <given-names>K. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>So</surname> <given-names>N. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuen</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Sonographic characterisation of radiation-induced carotid artery stenosis.</article-title> <source><italic>Cerebrovasc. Dis.</italic></source> <volume>13</volume> <fpage>168</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>173</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1159/000047771</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11914533</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Levinson</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Close</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ehrenfeld</surname> <given-names>W. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stoney</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1973</year>). <article-title>Carotid artery occlusive disease following external cervical irradiation.</article-title> <source><italic>Arch. Surg.</italic></source> <volume>107</volume> <fpage>395</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>397</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1001/archsurg.1973.01350210031010</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">4783032</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dmytriw</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Krings</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiao</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Visualization of the human intracranial vasa vasorum <italic>in vivo</italic> using optical coherence tomography.</article-title> <source><italic>JAMA Neurol.</italic></source> <volume>77</volume> <fpage>903</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>905</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.0546</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32282013</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>An Optical Coherence Tomography Assessment of Stent Strut Apposition Based on the Presence of Lipid-Rich Plaque in the Carotid Artery.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Endovasc. Ther.</italic></source> <volume>22</volume> <fpage>942</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>949</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/1526602815610116</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26464412</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Diagnosis and treatment evaluation of in-stent restenosis of carotid artery stenting using optical coherence tomography.</article-title> <source><italic>Neurology</italic></source> <volume>92</volume> <fpage>99</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>100</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1212/WNL.0000000000006743</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30617167</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bourantas</surname> <given-names>C. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Torii</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ang</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tenekecioglu</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Serruys</surname> <given-names>P. W.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Local hemodynamic forces after stenting: implications on restenosis and thrombosis.</article-title> <source><italic>Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>37</volume> <fpage>2231</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2242</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/ATVBAHA.117.309728</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29122816</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Plummer</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Henderson</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>O&#x2019;Sullivan</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Read</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack after head and neck radiotherapy: a review.</article-title> <source><italic>Stroke</italic></source> <volume>42</volume> <fpage>2410</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2418</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.615203</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21817150</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Prati</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Regar</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mintz</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arbustini</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Di Mario</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jang</surname> <given-names>I. K.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Expert review document on methodology, terminology, and clinical applications of optical coherence tomography: physical principles, methodology of image acquisition, and clinical application for assessment of coronary arteries and atherosclerosis.</article-title> <source><italic>Eur. Heart J.</italic></source> <volume>31</volume> <fpage>401</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>415</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/eurheartj/ehp433</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19892716</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Setacci</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Donato</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Setacci</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Galzerano</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sirignano</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cappelli</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Safety and feasibility of intravascular optical coherence tomography using a nonocclusive technique to evaluate carotid plaques before and after stent deployment.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Endovasc. Ther.</italic></source> <volume>19</volume> <fpage>303</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>311</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1583/12-3871R.1</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22788878</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Superficial calcification with rotund shape is associated with carotid plaque rupture: an optical coherence tomography study.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Neurol.</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>:<issue>563334</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fneur.2020.563334</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33071946</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shimokado</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matsuo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kubo</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nishiguchi</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taruya</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Teraguchi</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title><italic>In vivo</italic> optical coherence tomography imaging and histopathology of healed coronary plaques.</article-title> <source><italic>Atherosclerosis</italic></source> <volume>275</volume> <fpage>35</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>42</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.05.025</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29859471</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Soeda</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Uemura</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cho</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Incidence and clinical significance of poststent optical coherence tomography findings: one-year follow-up study from a multicenter registry.</article-title> <source><italic>Circulation</italic></source> <volume>132</volume> <fpage>1020</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1029</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014704</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26162917</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Takano</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yamamoto</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Inami</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Murakami</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ohba</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Seino</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Appearance of lipid-laden intima and neovascularization after implantation of bare-metal stents extended late-phase observation by intracoronary optical coherence tomography.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.</italic></source> <volume>55</volume> <fpage>26</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>32</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jacc.2009.08.032</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20117359</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tearney</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Regar</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Akasaka</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adriaenssens</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barlis</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bezerra</surname> <given-names>H. G.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Consensus standards for acquisition, measurement, and reporting of intravascular optical coherence tomography studies: a report from the International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Standardization and Validation.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.</italic></source> <volume>59</volume> <fpage>1058</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1072</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.079</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22421299</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Texakalidis</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Giannopoulos</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tsouknidas</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rivet</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reiter</surname> <given-names>E. R.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Prevalence of carotid stenosis following radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.</article-title> <source><italic>Head Neck</italic></source> <volume>42</volume> <fpage>1077</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1088</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/hed.26102</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32048781</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tonomura</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shimada</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Funatsu</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kakehi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shimizu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Takahashi</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Pathologic findings of symptomatic carotid artery stenosis several decades after radiation therapy: a case report.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis.</italic></source> <volume>27</volume> <fpage>e39</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e41</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.08.039</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29337048</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Twitchell</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karsy</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Couldwell</surname> <given-names>W. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taussky</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Sequelae and management of radiation vasculopathy in neurosurgical patients.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Neurosurg.</italic></source> <volume>130</volume>, <fpage>1889</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1897</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3171/2017.12.JNS172635</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29999447</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vergallo</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crea</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Atherosclerotic plaque healing.</article-title> <source><italic>N. Engl. J. Med.</italic></source> <volume>383</volume> <fpage>846</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>857</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1056/nejmra2000317</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32846063</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zha</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Identification of symptomatic carotid artery plaque: a three-item scale combined angiography with optical coherence tomography.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Neurosci.</italic></source> <volume>15</volume>:<issue>792437</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fnins.2021.792437</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34955737</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yoshimura</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kawasaki</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hattori</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nishigaki</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Minatoguchi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Iwama</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Demonstration of intraluminal thrombus in the carotid artery by optical coherence tomography: technical case report.</article-title> <source><italic>Neurosurgery</italic></source> <volume>67</volume>(<issue>3 Suppl Operative</issue>) <comment>onsE305.onsE305; discussion onsE305</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1227/01.NEU.0000383749.76915.3C</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20679918</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yoshimura</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kawasaki</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yamada</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Enomoto</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Egashira</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hattori</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Visualization of internal carotid artery atherosclerotic plaques in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients: a comparison of optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound.</article-title> <source><italic>AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol.</italic></source> <volume>33</volume> <fpage>308</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>313</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3174/ajnr.A2740</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22051806</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yoshimura</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kawasaki</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yamada</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hattori</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nishigaki</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Minatoguchi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>OCT of human carotid arterial plaques.</article-title> <source><italic>JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging</italic></source> <volume>4</volume> <fpage>432</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>436</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.01.013</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21492820</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>W. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soo</surname> <given-names>Y. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hui</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chan</surname> <given-names>A. Y.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of carotid angioplasty and stenting for radiation-induced carotid stenosis.</article-title> <source><italic>Stroke</italic></source> <volume>45</volume> <fpage>1402</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1407</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003995</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24699055</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Medical prevention and treatment of radiation-induced carotid injury.</article-title> <source><italic>Biomed. Pharmacother.</italic></source> <volume>131</volume>:<issue>110664</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110664</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32861067</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zidar</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferluga</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hvala</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Popovic</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soba</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Contribution to the pathogenesis of radiation-induced injury to large arteries.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Laryngol. Otol.</italic></source> <volume>111</volume> <fpage>988</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>990</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/s0022215100139167</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9425496</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>W. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leung</surname> <given-names>T. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wong</surname> <given-names>E. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leung</surname> <given-names>S. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soo</surname> <given-names>Y. O.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Angiographic features, collaterals, and infarct topography of symptomatic occlusive radiation vasculopathy: a case-referent study.</article-title> <source><italic>Stroke</italic></source> <volume>44</volume> <fpage>401</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>406</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.674036</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23306321</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>