Front. Neurosci. Frontiers in Neuroscience Front. Neurosci. 1662-453X Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fnins.2018.01024 Neuroscience Correction Corrigendum: Similar Neural Correlates of Planning and Execution to Inhibit Continuing Actions Omata Kei 1 Ito Shigeru 2 Takata Youhei 3 Ouchi Yasuomi 1 * 1Department of Biofunctional Imaging, Medical Photonics Research Center, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan 2Hamamatsu Medical Photonics Foundation, Hamamatsu PET Imaging Center, Hamamatsu, Japan 3Hamamatsu Photonics KK, Global Strategic Challenge Center, Hamamatsu, Japan

Approved by: Frontiers in Neuroscience Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

 *Correspondence: Yasuomi Ouchi ouchi@hama-med.ac.jp

This article was submitted to Decision Neuroscience, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience

 11 01 2019 2018 12 1024 16 12 2018 18 12 2018 Copyright © 2019 Omata, Ito, Takata and Ouchi. 2019 Omata, Ito, Takata and Ouchi

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 A Corrigendum on Similar Neural Correlates of Planning and Execution to Inhibit Continuing Actions by Omata, K., Ito, S., Takata, Y., and Ouchi, Y. (2018). Front. Neurosci. 12:951. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00951 behavioral inhibition simple finger tapping voluntary decision cued judgment neural substrates functional magnetic resonance imaging

In the original article, there was a mistake in the legend for Figure 2 as published. The term “waiting” in Figure 2 (A) was swapped with the term “tapping” in Figure 2 (B). The correct legend appears below.

“Activations in the planning phase of an ongoing action task while tapping (A) and while waiting (B) are shown.”

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.